Act No. 103 of 2010 as amended
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 103 of 2010
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title [see Note 1]
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1
note: Citation of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.7
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2
note: Commencement information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.7
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-2
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.7
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-7-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal interval
premise text: The day this Act receives the Royal Assent.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 July 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-13
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.7
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-13-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2-2
note: Commencement of Schedule 1 depends on event after commencement of Trade Practices Amendment Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.7
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-2-2-norm

1 January 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.7
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-1-3-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-3
note: Schedule 6 items 1 to 46 at the same time as the provision(s) covered by table item 2.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.7
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-3-norm

1 January 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.7
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-1-4-norm

2 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2-3
note: Commencement information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-2-3-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-4
note: Conditional commencement of provisions based on event occurrence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-7-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between temporal intervals for commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement specified
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 January 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-1-5-norm

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-5
note: Conditional commencement of provision(s) covered by table item 2.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-5-norm

1 January 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-1-6-norm

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-6
note: Conditional commencement of provisions covered by table item 2.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-6-norm

7 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-7
note: Conditional commencement of provisions covered by table item 2.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-7-norm

1 January 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-1-7-norm

8 Section 8
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-8
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-8-norm

1 January 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1-8
note: Note on table expansion
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-1-8-norm

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-3-2
note: Schedules for amendment or repeal of Acts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.8
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-3-2-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-7-sec-3-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
premise text: items in the Schedule
conclusion text: effect according to its terms
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-4-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-7-sec-4-2-norm

1 Schedule 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Repeal Schedule 2 and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-1-sec-1-norm

1 Application of this Schedule
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Application of this Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-1-norm

act-sch-2-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Application of this Schedule
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

2 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-2-norm

3 Meaning of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Meaning of consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3-norm

4 Misleading representations with respect to future matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Misleading representations with respect to future matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-norm

act-sch-2-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Misleading representations with respect to future matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

5 When donations are treated as supplies or acquisitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: Treatment of donations as supplies or acquisitions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-5-norm

6 Related bodies corporate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-6-norm

7 Meaning of manufacturer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
note: Definition of manufacturer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-norm

8 Goods affixed to land or premises
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-8-norm

9 Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
note: Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-9-norm

10 Asserting a right to payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
note: Asserting a right to payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-10-norm

11 References to acquisition, supply and re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-11-norm

12 Application of Schedule in relation to leases and licences of land
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
note: Application of Schedule in relation to leases and licences of land
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-12-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Application of Schedule in relation to leases and licences of land
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Relates to the application of Schedule in relation to leases and licences of land
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Loss or damage to include injury
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
note: Loss or damage to include injury
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-13-norm

act-sch-2-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 Loss or damage to include injury
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

14 Meaning of continuing credit contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
note: Meaning of continuing credit contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-14-norm

15 Contraventions of this Schedule
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
note: Contraventions of this Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-15-norm

act-sch-2-sec-15-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Contraventions of this Schedule
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

16 Severability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
note: Severability clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-16-norm

17 References to provisions in this Schedule
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
note: References to provisions in this Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-17-norm

18 Misleading or deceptive conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
note: Misleading or deceptive conduct prohibited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-18-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-18-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Misleading or deceptive conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits misleading or deceptive conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Application of this Part to information providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
note: Application of this Part to information providers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-19-norm

act-sch-2-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 Application of this Part to information providers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

20 Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
note: Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-norm

act-sch-2-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

21 Unconscionable conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
note: Unconscionable conduct prohibited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.10
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-21-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-21-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 Unconscionable conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits unconscionable conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Unconscionable conduct in business transactions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
note: Unconscionable conduct in business transactions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-22-norm

23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23
note: Unfair terms of consumer contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-23-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-23-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits unfair terms in consumer contracts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Meaning of unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24
note: Meaning of unfair
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-24-norm

25 Examples of unfair terms
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25
note: Examples of unfair terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-25-norm

26 Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26
note: Terms unaffected
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-26-norm

27 Standard form contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-27-norm

28 Contracts to which this Part does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28
note: Contracts to which this Part does not apply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-28-norm

29 False or misleading representations about goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29
note: False or misleading representations about goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-29-norm

act-sch-2-sec-29-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 29 False or misleading representations about goods or services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

30 False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30
note: False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-norm

act-sch-2-sec-30-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

31 Misleading conduct relating to employment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31
note: Misleading conduct relating to employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-31-norm

act-sch-2-sec-31-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 Misleading conduct relating to employment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

32 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32
note: Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-norm

act-sch-2-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

33 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-33
note: Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-33-norm

34 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-34
note: Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-34-norm

35 Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-35
note: Bait advertising
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-35-norm

36 Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36
note: Wrongly accepting payment is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-36-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 36 Wrongly accepting payment
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Misleading representations about certain business activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-37
note: Misleading representations about certain business activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-37-norm

act-sch-2-sec-37-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 37 Misleading representations about certain business activities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

38 Application of provisions of this Division to information providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38
note: Application of provisions of this Division to information providers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-38-norm

act-sch-2-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38 Application of provisions of this Division to information providers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

39 Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39
note: Prohibition on unsolicited cards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-39-norm

40 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40
note: Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-40-norm

41 Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41
note: Liability for unsolicited goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-41-norm

act-sch-2-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41 Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

42 Liability of recipient for unsolicited services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-42
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-42-norm

43 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43
note: Right to payment for unauthorised entries or advertisements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-43-norm

44 Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44
note: Participation in pyramid schemes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-norm

45 Meaning of pyramid scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-45
note: Definition of pyramid scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-45-norm

act-sch-2-sec-45-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45 Meaning of pyramid scheme
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

46 Marketing schemes as pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46
note: Marketing schemes as pyramid schemes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-46-norm

47 Multiple pricing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-47
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-norm

48 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48
note: Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-norm

49 Referral selling
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-49
note: Referral selling
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-49-norm

act-sch-2-sec-49-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49 Referral selling
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

50 Harassment and coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50
note: Prohibition on harassment and coercion
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.11
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-50-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-50-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-50-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 50 Harassment and coercion
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits harassment and coercion
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-6-2-norm

51 Guarantee as to title
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-51
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-51-norm

52 Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-52
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-52-norm

53 Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-53
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-53-norm

54 Guarantee as to acceptable quality
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-54
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-54-norm

55 Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-55
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-55-norm

56 Guarantee relating to the supply of goods by description
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-56
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-56-norm

57 Guarantees relating to the supply of goods by sample or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-57
note: Guarantees relating to the supply of goods by sample or demonstration model
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-57-norm

act-sch-2-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57 Guarantees relating to the supply of goods by sample or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58 Guarantee as to repairs and spare parts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-58
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-58-norm

59 Guarantee as to express warranties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59
note: Guarantees relating to the supply of services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-59-norm

act-sch-2-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59 Guarantee as to express warranties
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

60 Guarantee as to due care and skill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-60
note: Guarantee as to due care and skill
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-norm

act-sch-2-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60 Guarantee as to due care and skill
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

61 Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-61
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-61-norm

62 Guarantee as to reasonable time for supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-62
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-norm

63 Services to which this Subdivision does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-63
note: Guarantees not to be excluded etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-63-norm

act-sch-2-sec-63-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63 Services to which this Subdivision does not apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

64 Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64
note: Guarantees not to be excluded etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-norm

act-sch-2-sec-64-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64 Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

65 Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-65
note: Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and telecommunications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-65-norm

act-sch-2-sec-65-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65 Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

66 Display notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-66-norm

67 Conflict of laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-67
note: Conflict of laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-67-norm

68 Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-68
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-68-norm

69 Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-69
note: Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-69-norm

70 Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70
note: Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-norm

71 Meaning of dealer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-71
note: Definition of a dealer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-71-norm

act-sch-2-sec-71-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71 Meaning of dealer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

72 Meaning of negotiation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-72
note: Defines negotiation for unsolicited consumer agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-norm

act-sch-2-sec-72-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72 Meaning of negotiation
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

73 Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-73
note: Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-73-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-73-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermissionTo
logic summary: Defines permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 Disclosing purpose and identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-74
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-74-norm

75 Ceasing to negotiate on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-75
note: Ceasing negotiation on request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-75-norm

act-sch-2-sec-75-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75 Ceasing to negotiate on request
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

76 Informing person of termination period etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-76
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-76-norm

77 Liability of suppliers for contraventions by dealers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-77
note: Liability of suppliers for contraventions by dealers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.12
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-77-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-77-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-77-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77 Liability of suppliers for contraventions by dealers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Liability obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Requirement to give document to the consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-78
note: Requirement to give document to the consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-78-norm

act-sch-2-sec-78-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78 Requirement to give document to the consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

79 Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-79
note: Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-79-norm

act-sch-2-sec-79-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79 Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

80 Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements not
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-80
note: Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements not negotiated by telephone
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-80-norm

act-sch-2-sec-80-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 80 Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements not
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

81 Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-81
note: Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-81-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-81-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-81-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81 Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-82
note: Termination of unsolicited consumer agreement during specified period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-82-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82 Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-82-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to terminate unsolicited consumer agreements during specified periods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83 Effect of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-83
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-83-norm

84 Obligations of suppliers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-84
note: Obligations of suppliers on termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-84-norm

act-sch-2-sec-84-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 84 Obligations of suppliers on termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

85 Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-85
note: Consumer obligations on termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-85-norm

act-sch-2-sec-85-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85 Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

86 Prohibition on supplies etc. for 10 business days
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-86
note: Prohibition on supplies etc. for 10 business days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-86-norm

87 Repayment of payments received after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-87
note: Repayment of payments received after termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-87-norm

88 Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-88
note: Recovering amounts after termination is prohibited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-88-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-88-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits recovering amounts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89 Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-89
note: Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-89-norm

90 Waiver of rights
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-90
note: Waiver of rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-norm

91 Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-91
note: Assignment of rights to consumers and suppliers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-91-norm

act-sch-2-sec-91-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91 Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

92 Application of this Division to supplies to third parties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-92
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-92-norm

93 Effect of contravening this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-93
note: Prohibition on contravening this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-93-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-93-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-93-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 93 Effect of contravening this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-93-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids contravention of the Division
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94 Regulations may limit the application of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-94
note: Regulations may limit the application of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-94-norm

act-sch-2-sec-94-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94 Regulations may limit the application of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

95 Application of this Division to certain conduct covered by the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-95
note: Application of this Division to certain conduct covered by the Corporations Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-95-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-95-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-95-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95 Application of this Division to certain conduct covered by the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-95-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Applies to conduct covered by the Corporations Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-96
note: Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-96-norm

97 Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-97
note: Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-97-norm

act-sch-2-sec-97-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 97 Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

98 Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-98
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-98-norm

99 Effect of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-99-norm

100 Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-100
note: Must provide proof of transaction etc.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-100-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide proof
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101 Consumer may request an itemised bill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101
note: Request for itemised bill
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-101-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-101-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-101-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Consumer must request an itemised bill
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102 Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102
note: Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-norm

act-sch-2-sec-102-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102 Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

103 Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-103
note: Compliance with prescribed requirements is mandatory for repairers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.13
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-103-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-103-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-103-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-8-2-norm

104 Making safety standards for consumer goods and product related
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-104
note: Making safety standards for consumer goods and product related services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-104-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-104-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-104-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104 Making safety standards for consumer goods and product related
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-104-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Safety standards must be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105 Declaring safety standards for consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-105
note: Declaring safety standards for consumer goods and product
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-105-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-105-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-105-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 105 Declaring safety standards for consumer goods and product
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-105-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires declaration of safety standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106
note: Prohibits supplying consumer goods that do not comply with safety standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-106-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-106-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-106-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 106 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits the action of supplying non-compliant goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-107
note: Prohibits supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-107-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-107-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-107-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 107 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-107-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108 Requirement to nominate a safety standard
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-108
note: Requirement to nominate a safety standard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-108-norm

act-sch-2-sec-108-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 108 Requirement to nominate a safety standard
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

109 Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services that
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-109
note: Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services that may cause injury to any person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-109-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-109-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-109-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 109 Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services that
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-109-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition on consumer goods or product related services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110 Places in which interim bans apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-110
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-110-norm

111 Ban period for interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-111
note: Ban period for interim bans
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-norm

112 Interaction of multiple interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-112
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-norm

113 Revocation of interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-113
note: Revocation of interim bans
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-113-norm

114 Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-114
note: Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-114-norm

115 Places in which permanent bans apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-115
note: Permanent bans apply in these places
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-115-norm

116 When permanent bans come into force
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-116
note: Permanent bans come into force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-116-norm

117 Revocation of permanent bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-117
note: Compliance with interim bans and permanent bans
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-117-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-117-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-117-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 117 Revocation of permanent bans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-117-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST COMPLY WITH
logic summary: Must comply with interim bans and permanent bans
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-118
note: Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-118-norm

act-sch-2-sec-118-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 118 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

119 Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-119
note: Temporary exemption from mutual recognition principles
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-119-norm

120 Temporary exemption under the Trans-Tasman Mutual
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-120
note: Temporary exemption under the Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Act 1997
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-norm

121 Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-121
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-121-norm

122 Compulsory recall of consumer goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-122
note: Compulsory recall of consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-122-norm

act-sch-2-sec-122-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122 Compulsory recall of consumer goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

123 Contents of a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-123
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-123-norm

124 Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-124
note: Supplier obligations in relation to a recall notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.14
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-124-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 124 Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-124-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the supplier
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125 Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-125
note: Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside Australia if there is compulsory recall
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-125-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-125-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-125-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 125 Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-125-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126 Interaction of multiple recall notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-126
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-126-norm

127 Compliance with recall notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-127
note: Compliance with recall notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-127-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-127-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-127-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 127 Compliance with recall notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-127-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-128
note: Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-128-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-128-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

129 Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-129
note: Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-129-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-129-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-129-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 129 Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-129-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory safety notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

130 Announcement of the results of an investigation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-130
note: Announcement of results of an investigation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-130-norm

act-sch-2-sec-130-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 130 Announcement of the results of an investigation etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

131 Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131
note: Suppliers must report consumer goods associated with serious injury or illness.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-131-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131 Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132 Suppliers to report product related services associated with the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132
note: Suppliers must report product-related services associated with a death or serious injury/illness of any person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132 Suppliers to report product related services associated with the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133 Liability under a contract of insurance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133
note: Liability under a contract of insurance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-norm

act-sch-2-sec-133-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133 Liability under a contract of insurance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

134 Making information standards for goods and services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-norm

135 Declaring information standards for goods and services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-norm

136 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136
note: Standards for goods that do not comply with information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-136-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-136-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137
note: Standards for supplying services that do not comply with information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-137-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-137-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-137-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 137 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-137-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to meet standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138 Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-138
note: Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-138-norm

act-sch-2-sec-138-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138 Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

139 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-139
note: Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an injured individual
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-139-norm

act-sch-2-sec-139-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 139 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

140 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-140
note: Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods are destroyed or damaged
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-140-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-140-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-140-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 140 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-140-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to compensate for loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

141 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if land,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-141
note: Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if land, buildings or fixtures are destroyed or damaged
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-141-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-141-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-141-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 141 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if land,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-141-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to compensate for loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142 Defences to defective goods actions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-142
note: Defences to defective goods actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-142-norm

143 Time for commencing defective goods actions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-143
note: Time for commencing defective goods actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-143-norm

144 Liability joint and several
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-144
note: Liability joint and several
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.15
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-144-norm

act-sch-2-sec-144-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 144 Liability joint and several
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

10 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-10-2-norm

145 Survival of actions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-145
note: Survival of actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-145-norm

act-sch-2-sec-145-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 145 Survival of actions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

146 No defective goods action where workers’ compensation law etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-146
note: No defective goods action where workers’ compensation law etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-146-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-146-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Applies to defective goods action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

147 Unidentified manufacturer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-147
note: Unidentified manufacturer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-147-norm

148 Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-148
note: Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only due to compliance with mandatory standard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-148-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-148-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-148-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148 Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-148-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Commonwealth
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149 Representative actions by the regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-149
note: Representative actions by the regulator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-149-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-149-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-149-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149 Representative actions by the regulator
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-149-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Regulator has obligation to take representative actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150 Application of all or any provisions of this Part etc. not to be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-150
note: Application of all or any provisions not to be excluded or modified
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-150-norm

151 False or misleading representations about goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-151
note: False or misleading representations about goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-151-norm

act-sch-2-sec-151-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 151 False or misleading representations about goods or services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

152 False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-152
note: False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-152-norm

act-sch-2-sec-152-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 152 False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

153 Misleading conduct relating to employment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-153
note: Misleading conduct relating to employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-153-norm

act-sch-2-sec-153-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 153 Misleading conduct relating to employment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

154 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-154
note: Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-norm

155 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-155
note: Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-155-norm

156 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156
note: Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-norm

157 Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-157
note: Bait advertising prohibited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-157-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-157-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-157-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits bait advertising
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158 Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-158
note: Wrongly accepting payment is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-158-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-158-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-158-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

159 Misleading representations about certain business activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-159
note: Misleading representations about certain business activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-159-norm

160 Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-160
note: Application of provisions of this Division to information providers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-160-norm

act-sch-2-sec-160-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 160 Application of provisions of this Division to information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

161 Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161
note: Prohibition on unsolicited cards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-norm

162 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-162
note: Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-162-norm

163 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-163
note: Right to payment for unauthorised entries or advertisements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-163-norm

164 Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-164
note: Participation in pyramid schemes is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-164-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-164-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-164-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 164 Participation in pyramid schemes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-164-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits participation in pyramid schemes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

165 Multiple pricing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-165
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-165-norm

166 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166
note: Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-norm

167 Referral selling
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-167
note: Referral selling
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-167-norm

168 Harassment and coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-168
note: Harassment and coercion prohibited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.16
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-168-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits harassment and coercion
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

169 Display notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-169
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-169-norm

170 Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-170
note: Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-170-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-170-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermissionTo
logic summary: Defines permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

171 Disclosing purpose and identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-171
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-171-norm

172 Ceasing to negotiate on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-172
note: Ceasing negotiation on request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-172-norm

act-sch-2-sec-172-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 172 Ceasing to negotiate on request
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

173 Informing person of termination period etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-173
note: Requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-173-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-173-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-173-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 173 Informing person of termination period etc.
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-173-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

174 Requirement to give document to the consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-174
note: Requirement to give document to the consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-174-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-174-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-174-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 174 Requirement to give document to the consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-174-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

175 Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-175
note: Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-175-norm

act-sch-2-sec-175-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 175 Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

176 Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements not
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176
note: Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements not negotiated by telephone
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-176-norm

act-sch-2-sec-176-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 176 Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements not
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

177 Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-177
note: Requirements for terminating unsolicited consumer agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-177-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-177-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-177-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 177 Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-177-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must terminate agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178 Obligations of suppliers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-178
note: Obligations of suppliers on termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-178-norm

act-sch-2-sec-178-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 178 Obligations of suppliers on termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

179 Prohibition on supplies for 10 business days
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-179
note: Prohibition on supplies for 10 business days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-179-norm

180 Repayment of payments received after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-180
note: Repayment of payments received after termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-180-norm

181 Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-181
note: Recovering amounts after termination is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-181-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-181-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-181-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits recovering amounts after termination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182 Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-182
note: Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-182-norm

183 Waiver of rights
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-183
note: Waiver of rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-183-norm

184 Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-184
note: Assignment of rights to consumers and suppliers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-184-norm

act-sch-2-sec-184-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 184 Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

185 Application of this Division to supplies to third parties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-185
note: Application of this Division to supplies to third parties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-185-norm

act-sch-2-sec-185-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 185 Application of this Division to supplies to third parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

186 Regulations may limit the application of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-186
note: Regulations may limit the application of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-186-norm

act-sch-2-sec-186-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186 Regulations may limit the application of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

187 Application of this Division to certain conduct covered by the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-187
note: Application of this Division to certain conduct covered by the Corporations Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-187-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-187-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-187-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187 Application of this Division to certain conduct covered by the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-187-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Applies to conduct covered by the Corporations Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-188
note: Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-188-norm

189 Termination charges
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-189
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-189-norm

190 Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-190
note: Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-190-norm

191 Refund of amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191
note: Refund of amounts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-191-norm

192 Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-192
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-192-norm

193 Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-193
note: Compliance with prescribed requirements is mandatory for repairers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.17
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-193-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-193-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-193-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-12-2-norm

194 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194
note: Prohibits supplying consumer goods that do not comply with safety standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-194-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 194 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a duty to prevent non-compliance with safety standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

195 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-195
note: Prohibits supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-195-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-195-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-195-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 195 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-195-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

196 Requirement to nominate a safety standard
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-196
note: Requirement to nominate a safety standard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-196-norm

act-sch-2-sec-196-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 196 Requirement to nominate a safety standard
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

197 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-197
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-197-norm

198 Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-198
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-198-norm

199 Compliance with recall orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-199
note: Compliance with recall orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-199-norm

act-sch-2-sec-199-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 199 Compliance with recall orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

200 Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-200
note: Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside Australia if there is compulsory recall
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-200-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-200-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-200-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 200 Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-200-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

201 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-201
note: Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-201-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-201-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-201-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 201 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-201-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

202 Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the death
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-202
note: Suppliers must report consumer goods associated with death or serious injury/illness.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-202-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-202-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-202-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 202 Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the death
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-202-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-203
note: Standards for goods that do not comply with information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-203-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 203 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-203-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

204 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-204
note: Standards for supplying services that do not comply with information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-204-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-204-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-204-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 204 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-204-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

205 Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-205
note: Compliance with substantiation notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-205-norm

act-sch-2-sec-205-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 205 Compliance with substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

206 False or misleading information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-206
note: False or misleading information etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-206-norm

207 Reasonable mistake of fact
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-207
note: Reasonable mistake of fact
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-207-norm

208 Act or default of another person etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-208
note: Act or default of another person etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-208-norm

act-sch-2-sec-208-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 208 Act or default of another person etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

209 Publication of advertisements in the ordinary course of business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-209
note: Publication of advertisements in the ordinary course of business is required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-209-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-209-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-209-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 209 Publication of advertisements in the ordinary course of business
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-209-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish advertisements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

210 Supplying goods acquired for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-210
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-210-norm

211 Supplying services acquired for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-211
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-211-norm

212 Prosecutions to be commenced within 3 years
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-212
note: Prosecutions must be commenced within 3 years
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-212-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-212-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-212-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 212 Prosecutions to be commenced within 3 years
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-212-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide prosecution commencement within 3 years
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

213 Preference must be given to compensation for victims
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-213
note: Preference must be given to compensation for victims
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-213-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-213-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-213-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 213 Preference must be given to compensation for victims
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-213-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide preference
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

214 Penalties for contraventions of the same nature etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-214
note: Penalties for contraventions of the same nature etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.18
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-214-norm

act-sch-2-sec-214-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 214 Penalties for contraventions of the same nature etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

215 Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-215
note: Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-215-norm

act-sch-2-sec-215-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 215 Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

216 Granting of injunctions etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-216
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-216-norm

217 Criminal proceedings not to be brought for contraventions of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-217
note: Criminal proceedings not to be brought for contraventions of Chapter 2 or 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-217-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-217-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-217-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits criminal proceedings for contraventions of Chapter 2 or 3
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

218 Regulator may accept undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-218
note: Regulator may accept undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-218-norm

219 Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-219
note: Claims must be substantiated
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-219-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-219-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-219-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide substantiation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

220 Extending periods for complying with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-220
note: Extending periods for complying with substantiation notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-220-norm

221 Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-221
note: Compliance with substantiation notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-221-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-221-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-221-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 221 Compliance with substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-221-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

222 False or misleading information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-222
note: False or misleading information etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-norm

act-sch-2-sec-222-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 222 False or misleading information etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

223 Regulator may issue a public warning notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-223
note: Regulator may issue a public warning notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-223-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-223-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-223-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

224 Pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-224
note: Pecuniary penalties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-224-norm

225 Pecuniary penalties and offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-225
note: Pecuniary penalties and offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-225-norm

226 Defence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-226
note: Defence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-226-norm

act-sch-2-sec-226-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 226 Defence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

227 Preference must be given to compensation for victims
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-227
note: Preference must be given to compensation for victims
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-227-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-227-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-227-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 227 Preference must be given to compensation for victims
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-227-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide preference
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

228 Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-228
note: Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-228-norm

229 Indemnification of officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-229
note: Indemnification of officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-229-norm

act-sch-2-sec-229-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 229 Indemnification of officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

230 Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-230
note: Certain indemnities not authorised
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-230-norm

231 Application of section 229 to a person other than a body
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-231
note: Application of section 229 to a person other than a body
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-231-norm

act-sch-2-sec-231-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 231 Application of section 229 to a person other than a body
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

232 Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-norm

233 Consent injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-233
note: Consent injunctions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-233-norm

234 Interim injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-234
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-234-norm

235 Variation and discharge of injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-235
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-235-norm

236 Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-236
note: Actions for damages
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-236-norm

237 Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-237
note: Compensation orders on application by an injured person or the regulator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-237-norm

act-sch-2-sec-237-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 237 Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

238 Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-238
note: Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.19
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-238-norm

act-sch-2-sec-238-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 238 Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

14 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-2
note: Orders for non-party consumers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-14-2-norm

239 Orders to redress etc. loss or damage suffered by non-party
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-239
note: Orders to redress loss or damage suffered by non-party consumers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-239-norm

act-sch-2-sec-239-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 239 Orders to redress etc. loss or damage suffered by non-party
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

240 Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for non-party
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-240
note: Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for non-party
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-norm

act-sch-2-sec-240-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 240 Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for non-party
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

241 When a non-party consumer is bound by a redress order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-241
note: Bound by redress order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-241-norm

act-sch-2-sec-241-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 241 When a non-party consumer is bound by a redress order etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

242 Applications for orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-242
note: Applications for orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-242-norm

act-sch-2-sec-242-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 242 Applications for orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

243 Kinds of orders that may be made
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-243
note: Kinds of orders that may be made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-243-norm

244 Power of a court to make orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-244
note: Court power to make orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-244-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-244-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-244-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 244 Power of a court to make orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-244-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPowerToMakeOrders
logic summary: Court has the power to make orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

245 Interaction with other provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-245
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-245-norm

246 Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-246
note: Non-punitive orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-246-norm

247 Adverse publicity orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-247
note: Adverse publicity orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-247-norm

248 Order disqualifying a person from managing corporations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-248
note: Order disqualifying a person from managing corporations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-248-norm

249 Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-249
note: Disqualification from managing corporations is a penalty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-249-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-249-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-249-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 249 Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-249-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

250 Declarations relating to consumer contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-250
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-250-norm

251 Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-251
note: Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business is required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-251-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-251-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-251-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 251 Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-251-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish advertisement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

252 Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-252
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-252-norm

253 Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-253
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-253-norm

254 Overview
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-254
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-254-norm

255 Country of origin representations do not contravene certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-255
note: Country of origin representations do not contravene certain provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-255-norm

act-sch-2-sec-255-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 255 Country of origin representations do not contravene certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

256 Cost of producing or manufacturing goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-256
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-256-norm

257 Rules for determining the percentage of costs of production or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-257
note: Rules for determining the percentage of costs of production or manufacture attributable to a country
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-257-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-257-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-257-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 257 Rules for determining the percentage of costs of production or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-257-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide rules for determining costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

258 Proceedings relating to false, misleading or deceptive conduct or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-258
note: Prohibits false, misleading or deceptive conduct or representations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-258-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-258-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-258-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 258 Proceedings relating to false, misleading or deceptive conduct or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-258-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

259 Action against suppliers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-259
note: Action against suppliers of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-259-norm

act-sch-2-sec-259-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 259 Action against suppliers of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

260 When a failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-260
note: Failure to comply with a guarantee is considered a major failure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-260-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-260-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-260-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 260 When a failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-260-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Guarantee obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

261 How suppliers may remedy a failure to comply with a guarantee
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-261
note: Remedy for failure to comply with guarantee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-261-norm

262 When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-262
note: Consumers are not entitled to reject goods under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-262-norm

act-sch-2-sec-262-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 262 When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

263 Consequences of rejecting goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-263
note: Consequences of rejecting goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-263-norm

act-sch-2-sec-263-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 263 Consequences of rejecting goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

264 Replaced goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-264
note: Replaced goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.20
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-264-norm

265 Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-265
note: Termination of contracts for supply of services connected with rejected goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-265-norm

266 Rights of gift recipients
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-266
note: Rights of gift recipients
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-266-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-266-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-266-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 266 Rights of gift recipients
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-266-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Has right to action against suppliers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267 Action against suppliers of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-267
note: Action against suppliers of services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-267-norm

act-sch-2-sec-267-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267 Action against suppliers of services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

268 When a failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-268
note: Failure to comply with a guarantee is considered a major failure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-268-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-268-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-268-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 268 When a failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-268-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Guarantee obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

269 Termination of contracts for the supply of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-269
note: Termination of contracts for the supply of services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-269-norm

270 Termination of contracts for the supply of goods that are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-270
note: Termination of contracts for supply of goods connected with terminated services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-270-norm

271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271
note: Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-271-norm

act-sch-2-sec-271-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

272 Damages that may be recovered by action against manufacturers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-272
note: Damages that may be recovered by action against manufacturers of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-272-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has an obligation to provide safe goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273 Time limit for actions against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-273
note: Time limit for actions against manufacturers of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-273-norm

274 Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-274
note: Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-274-norm

275 Limitation of liability etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-275
note: Limitation of liability etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-275-norm

276 This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276
note: This Part not to be excluded etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276-norm

277 Representative actions by the regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-277
note: Representative actions by the regulator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-277-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-277-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-277-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 277 Representative actions by the regulator
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-277-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Regulator has obligation to take representative actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

278 Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-278
note: Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to linked credit contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-278-norm

act-sch-2-sec-278-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 278 Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

279 Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279
note: Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-279-norm

280 Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-280
note: Linked credit provider not liable in certain cases
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-norm

281 Amount of liability of linked credit providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-281
note: Amount of liability of linked credit providers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-281-norm

act-sch-2-sec-281-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 281 Amount of liability of linked credit providers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

282 Counter-claims and offsets
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-282
note: Counter-claims and offsets
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-282-norm

283 Enforcement of judgments etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-283
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-283-norm

284 Award of interest to consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-284
note: Award of interest to consumers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-284-norm

act-sch-2-sec-284-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 284 Award of interest to consumers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

285 Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-285
note: Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked credit providers to suppliers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-285-norm

act-sch-2-sec-285-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 285 Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

286 Joint liability proceedings and recovery under section 135 of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-286
note: Joint liability proceedings and recovery under section 135 of the National Credit Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-286-norm

act-sch-2-sec-286-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 286 Joint liability proceedings and recovery under section 135 of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

287 Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-287
note: Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked credit contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-287-norm

act-sch-2-sec-287-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 287 Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

1 Application of this Schedule
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-2
note: Application of this Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.21
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-1-2-norm

act-sch-2-sec-1-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Application of this Schedule
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

16 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16-2
note: Permits Part XI of the Competition and Consumer Act or an application law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.22
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-16-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-16-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permits Part XI of the Competition and Consumer Act or an application law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-16-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-2
note: Defines terms used in the Australian Consumer Law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.22
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-2-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-2-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-2-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-2-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-2-2-logic-alleninterval-4

act-sch-2-sec-2-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-2-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines terms used in the Australian Consumer Law
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-2-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: ABN has the meaning given by section 41 of the A New Tax System (Australian Business Number) Act 1999.
conclusion text: ACN has the meaning given by section 9 of the Corporations Act 2001.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-2-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: acceptable quality: see sections 54(2) to (7).
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-2-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: acquire includes: acquire by way of purchase, exchange or taking on lease, on hire or on hire-purchase;
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-2
note: Defines terms and concepts used in the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.24
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-18-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-18-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-18-2-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-2-sec-18-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-18-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for defined terms
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-18-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes definitions of key concepts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-2
note: Defines terms related to financial products and services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.26
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-2-sec-20-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-20-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-20-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Enumerates types of goods and services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-2
note: List of persons to whom credit is supplied by the supplier of credit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.28
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-22-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-22-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-22-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-22-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-22-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Has a list of persons to whom credit is supplied
premise text: (iii) the provision to persons to whom goods or services are supplied by the supplier of credit in respect of payment for those goods or services;
conclusion text: Obligation to provide credit to these persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-22-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: The list is a subset of persons who are supplied with goods or services by the supplier of credit
premise text: (iii) the provision to persons to whom goods or services are supplied by the supplier of credit in respect of payment for those goods or services;
conclusion text: The list is a subset of persons who are supplied with goods or services by the supplier of credit
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-22-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The provision to these persons occurs during the payment for those goods or services
premise text: (iii) the provision to persons to whom goods or services are supplied by the supplier of credit in respect of payment for those goods or services;
conclusion text: The provision to these persons occurs during the payment for those goods or services
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-22-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: The list applies everywhere that credit is supplied by the supplier of credit
premise text: (iii) the provision to persons to whom goods or services are supplied by the supplier of credit in respect of payment for those goods or services;
conclusion text: The list applies everywhere that credit is supplied by the supplier of credit
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-22-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: There must be a provision to these persons when credit is supplied by the supplier of credit
premise text: (iii) the provision to persons to whom goods or services are supplied by the supplier of credit in respect of payment for those goods or services;
conclusion text: There must be a provision to these persons when credit is supplied by the supplier of credit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-2
note: Participate in a pyramid scheme, make participation payments, or receive recruitment payments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.30
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-24-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-24-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-24-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits participating in a pyramid scheme.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-24-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies premises as related to consumer goods or services.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26-2
note: Defines terms used in the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.32
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-26-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies terms into categories.
premise text: Terms are classified based on their meaning.
conclusion text: The classification is based on the term's meaning.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes rights and benefits in services.
premise text: Services include rights, benefits, privileges, or facilities.
conclusion text: The rights and benefits are included in the services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes contracts for work, provision of facilities, etc.
premise text: Contracts include performance of work, provision of facilities, etc.
conclusion text: The contracts are included in the services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes contracts for lending money.
premise text: Contracts include lending money.
conclusion text: The contracts are included in the services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-2
note: Defines tied continuing credit contract and loan contract terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.34
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-28-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-28-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-28-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-28-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-28-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defined
logic summary: Defines key concepts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-28-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
logic summary: Classifies tied continuing credit contract and loan contract terms as obligations.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Meaning of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-2
note: Definition of consumer for goods acquisition purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.35
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-3-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Meaning of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Threshold amount for consumer acquisition
premise text: $40,000; or
conclusion text: $40,000
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-2
has part: 30(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 30(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 30(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 30(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 30(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 30(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 30(8) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.36

30(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-2
part of: 30 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemption from liability for acquiring goods for re-supply or using them up/transforming in trade/commerce
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.36
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Exemption from liability for acquiring goods for re-supply or using them up/transforming in trade/commerce
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-3
part of: 30 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Acquisition of services as a consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.36
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-3-norm

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

30(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-4
part of: 30 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Price paid or payable for goods or services is taken to be the price under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.36
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

30(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-5
part of: 30 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Determine the price paid for goods or services in a mixed supply contract
description: Price at which goods or services could have been purchased from another supplier
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.36
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to determine price
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-6
part of: 30 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: The amount paid for goods or services acquired by a person other than by purchase is taken to be the price at which, at the time of acquisition, the person could have purchased the goods or services from the supplier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.36
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to calculate prices correctly.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-7
part of: 30 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Determine the lowest price at which a person could have purchased goods or services from another supplier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.36
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Duty to determine the lowest price
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval for determining the lowest price
premise text: (b) at that time, goods or services of the kind acquired could have been purchased from another supplier other than by a mixed supply;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: Implication for the amount paid or payable
premise text: (a) goods or services acquired by a person other than by way of purchase could not, at the time of the acquisition, have been purchased from the supplier
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about eligible goods or services
premise text: (b) at that time, goods or services of the kind acquired could have been purchased from another supplier other than by a mixed supply;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognition
logic summary: Cognitive process for determining eligibility
premise text: (a) goods or services acquired by a person other than by way of purchase could not, at the time of the acquisition, have been purchased from the supplier
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(8) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-8
part of: 30 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Goods or services acquired by a person other than by way of purchase could not, at the time of the acquisition, have been purchased from any supplier
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.36
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(8) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on suppliers to provide goods or services that could have been purchased from them
premise text: None
conclusion text: Supplier must provide goods or services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-30-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval during which the obligation applies
premise text: None
conclusion text: The obligation applies during the time of acquisition
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32-2
has part: 32(9) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 32(10) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 32(11) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 32(12) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38

32(9) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-9
part of: 32 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Presumption that persons are consumers if they obtain credit in connection with the acquisition of goods or services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(9) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Presumption obligation
premise text: Acquiring credit in connection with the acquisition of goods or services.
conclusion text: Persons are presumed to be consumers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(10) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-10
part of: 32 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Presumption of consumer status in proceedings under the Australian Consumer Law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-10-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(10) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: presumption
logic summary: Presumption of consumer status
premise text: Alleged consumer status
conclusion text: Consumer status presumed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(11) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-11
part of: 32 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Goods or services must be purchased or acquired together with other property or services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-11-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(11) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide goods or services together with other property or services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(12) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-12
part of: 32 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Reference to consumer defined in Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-12-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-12-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-32-2-ss-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of consumer
conclusion text: A reference to a supply of goods or services is to a person who is taken to have acquired them as a consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

4 Misleading representations with respect to future matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4-2
has part: 4(1) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
has part: 4(2) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
has part: 4(3) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
has part: 4(4) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38

4(1) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-1
part of: 4 Misleading representations with respect to future matters
note: Misleading representations with respect to future matters are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making misleading representations with respect to future matters.
premise text: (a) a person makes a representation with respect to any future matter (including the doing of, or the refusing to do, any act); and (b) the person does not have reasonable grounds for making the representation;
conclusion text: the representation is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to be misleading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with future matters.
premise text: (a) a person makes a representation with respect to any future matter (including the doing of, or the refusing to do, any act); and (b) the person does not have reasonable grounds for making the representation;
conclusion text: the representation is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to be misleading.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace with future matters.
premise text: (a) a person makes a representation with respect to any future matter (including the doing of, or the refusing to do, any act); and (b) the person does not have reasonable grounds for making the representation;
conclusion text: the representation is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to be misleading.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses to future matters.
premise text: (a) a person makes a representation with respect to any future matter (including the doing of, or the refusing to do, any act); and (b) the person does not have reasonable grounds for making the representation;
conclusion text: the representation is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to be misleading.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes misleading representations with respect to future matters.
premise text: (a) a person makes a representation with respect to any future matter (including the doing of, or the refusing to do, any act); and (b) the person does not have reasonable grounds for making the representation;
conclusion text: the representation is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to be misleading.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(2) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-2
part of: 4 Misleading representations with respect to future matters
note: Party or other person not to have had reasonable grounds for making a misleading representation about a future matter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4(2) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to not make misleading representations.
premise text: Party or other person makes a representation about a future matter.
conclusion text: Party or other person did not have reasonable grounds for making the representation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State's obligation to ensure parties do not make misleading representations.
premise text: State allows party or other person to make a representation about a future matter.
conclusion text: State ensures party or other person did not have reasonable grounds for making the representation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(3) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-3
part of: 4 Misleading representations with respect to future matters
note: Prohibits placing an onus of proof on a person regarding the grounds for making a representation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits an action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(4) Misleading representations with respect to future matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-4
part of: 4 Misleading representations with respect to future matters
note: No implication that a representation is not misleading due to reasonable grounds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.38
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-4-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: No implication
premise text: (4) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: a representation that a person makes with respect to any future matter is not misleading
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

5 When donations are treated as supplies or acquisitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5-2
note: Defines scope of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.39
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-5-2-norm

34 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-34-2
note: Donation of goods or services for non-promotional purposes is not treated as a supply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.40
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-34-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-34-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-34-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-34-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-34-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-34-2-logic-argumentation-5

act-sch-2-sec-34-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of non-promotional donations.
premise text: (a) a donation of goods or services is not treated as a supply of the goods or services unless the donation is for promotional purposes;
conclusion text: Donation of goods or services for non-promotional purposes is not treated as a supply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-34-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between promotional and non-promotional donations.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of Parts 3-3, 3-4, 4-3 and 4-4:
conclusion text: Donation of goods or services for non-promotional purposes is not treated as a supply.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-34-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring pattern of promotional donations.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of Parts 3-3, 3-4, 4-3 and 4-4:
conclusion text: Donation of goods or services for non-promotional purposes is not treated as a supply.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-34-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Influence
logic summary: Influence of promotional donations on treatment of supplies.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of Parts 3-3, 3-4, 4-3 and 4-4:
conclusion text: Donation of goods or services for non-promotional purposes is not treated as a supply.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-34-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of promotional purpose on treatment of donations.
premise text: (a) any donation of goods or services is treated as a supply of the goods or services;
conclusion text: Donation of goods or services for non-promotional purposes is not treated as a supply.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Related bodies corporate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-3
has part: 6(1) Related bodies corporate
has part: 6(2) Related bodies corporate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.40

6(1) Related bodies corporate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-3-ss-1
part of: 6 Related bodies corporate
note: A body corporate is taken to be related to another body corporate if the bodies corporate would, under section 4A(5) of the Competition and Consumer Act, be deemed to be related to each other.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.40
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-6-3-ss-1-norm

act-sch-2-sec-6-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(1) Related bodies corporate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6(2) Related bodies corporate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-3-ss-2
part of: 6 Related bodies corporate
note: Bodies corporate are not related to each other unless proven otherwise.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.40
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-6-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-6-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-6-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2) Related bodies corporate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-6-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: presumption
logic summary: Presumption of non-relatedness
premise text: None established
conclusion text: Bodies corporate are not related
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Meaning of manufacturer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7-2
has part: 7(1) Meaning of manufacturer
has part: 7(2) Meaning of manufacturer
has part: 7(3) Meaning of manufacturer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.40

7(1) Meaning of manufacturer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-1
part of: 7 Meaning of manufacturer
note: Defines who is considered a manufacturer under the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.40
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(1) Meaning of manufacturer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies the subject of the definition.
premise text: (1) A manufacturer includes...
conclusion text: The first person is a manufacturer.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Lists the individuals who are considered manufacturers.
premise text: (a) a person who grows, extracts, produces, processes or assembles goods;
conclusion text: The definition includes individuals who grow, extract, produce, process, or assemble goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Lists the individuals who are considered manufacturers.
premise text: (b) a person who holds himself or herself out to the public as the manufacturer of goods;
conclusion text: The definition includes individuals who hold themselves out as manufacturers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Lists the individuals who are considered manufacturers.
premise text: (c) a person who causes or permits the name of the person, a name by which the person carries on business or a brand or mark of the person to be applied to goods supplied by the person;
conclusion text: The definition includes individuals who cause or permit the application of their name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Lists the individuals who are considered manufacturers.
premise text: (d) a person (the first person) who causes or permits another person, in connection with:...
conclusion text: The definition includes individuals who cause or permit others to supply goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Lists the individuals who are considered manufacturers.
premise text: (e) a person who imports goods into Australia if:...
conclusion text: The definition includes individuals who import goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(2) Meaning of manufacturer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-2
part of: 7 Meaning of manufacturer
note: Presumption of manufacturer's involvement in applying a name, brand or mark to goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.40
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(2) Meaning of manufacturer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: presumes
logic summary: Presumption of involvement
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1)(c):
conclusion text: the person caused or permitted the name, brand or mark to be applied to the goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: presumed
logic summary: Presumption of involvement
premise text: (b) if the name of a person...
conclusion text: the person caused or permitted the name, brand or mark to be applied to the goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: caused or permitted
logic summary: Presumption of involvement
premise text: (b) if the name of a person...
conclusion text: the person caused or permitted the name, brand or mark to be applied to the goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permitted
logic summary: Presumption of involvement
premise text: (b) if the name of a person...
conclusion text: the person caused or permitted the name, brand or mark to be applied to the goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: caused
logic summary: Presumption of involvement
premise text: (a) a name, brand or mark is taken to be...
conclusion text: the person caused or permitted the name, brand or mark to be applied to the goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(3) Meaning of manufacturer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-3
part of: 7 Meaning of manufacturer
note: Person is taken to have imported goods into Australia if goods are imported on their behalf.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.40
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(3) Meaning of manufacturer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
premise text: (3) If goods are imported into Australia on behalf of a person...
conclusion text: The person is taken to have imported the goods into Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Meets
logic summary: Defines a temporal relationship between actions
premise text: (3) If goods are imported into Australia on behalf of a person...
conclusion text: The importation meets the condition for the person to be taken as having imported the goods.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Establishes an implication between actions and consequences
premise text: (3) If goods are imported into Australia on behalf of a person...
conclusion text: The person is taken to have imported the goods into Australia.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Spreads information or influence
premise text: (3) If goods are imported into Australia on behalf of a person...
conclusion text: The information is diffused that the person is taken to have imported the goods.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-7-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Performs knowledge recognition or inference
premise text: (3) If goods are imported into Australia on behalf of a person...
conclusion text: The system recognizes that the person is taken to have imported the goods.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Goods affixed to land or premises
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-3
note: Goods are supplied to a consumer even if affixed to land or premises.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.41
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-8-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-8-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-8-3-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-8-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Goods are supplied to a consumer even if affixed to land or premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-8-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: Goods are supplied to a consumer even if affixed to land or premises.
conclusion text: at the time of supply.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-2
has part: 9(1) Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
has part: 9(2) Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.41

9(1) Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-1
part of: 9 Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
note: Goods have a safety defect if their safety is not such as persons generally are entitled to expect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.41
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(1) Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasSafetyDefect
logic summary: Definition of safety defect
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Schedule, goods have a safety defect if...
conclusion text: goods have a safety defect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to safety defects
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Schedule, goods have a safety defect if...
conclusion text: safety defects occur during the period of use
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to safety defects
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Schedule, goods have a safety defect if...
conclusion text: safety defects occur during the period of use
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to safety defects
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Schedule, goods have a safety defect if...
conclusion text: safety defects occur during the period of use
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to safety defects
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Schedule, goods have a safety defect if...
conclusion text: safety defects occur during the period of use
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

9(2) Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-2
part of: 9 Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
note: Regard must be given to all relevant circumstances when determining the safety of goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.41
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(2) Meaning of safety defect in relation to goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-9-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Regard must be given to all relevant circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-2
has part: 36(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 36(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.42

36(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-2-ss-3
part of: 36 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: An inference about safety defects cannot be made solely based on the supply of safer goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.42
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-36-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Implies duty to avoid making such inference.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-2-ss-4
part of: 36 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: An inference of safety defect is not made solely due to compliance with a mandatory standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.42
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-36-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-36-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to ensure safety standards are met.
premise text: Compliance with mandatory standard does not guarantee safety.
conclusion text: Inference of safety defect requires more than compliance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-36-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Inference of safety defect may occur outside the scope of compliance with mandatory standard.
premise text: Safety defect inference is not limited to compliance with standard.
conclusion text: Compliance does not preclude the possibility of a safety defect.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-36-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
logic summary: Inference of safety defect may recur over time despite compliance with mandatory standard.
premise text: Safety defect inference is not limited to a single instance.
conclusion text: Compliance does not guarantee the absence of future safety defects.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-36-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Inference of safety defect may spread beyond compliance with mandatory standard.
premise text: Safety defect inference is not contained within compliance with standard.
conclusion text: Compliance does not preclude the possibility of a safety defect in other contexts.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-36-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Artificial intelligence may be used to infer safety defects beyond compliance with mandatory standard.
premise text: Safety defect inference is not limited to human judgment.
conclusion text: Compliance does not guarantee the absence of AI-inferred safety defects.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Asserting a right to payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-3
has part: 10(1) Asserting a right to payment
has part: 10(2) Asserting a right to payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.42

10(1) Asserting a right to payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-3-ss-1
part of: 10 Asserting a right to payment
note: Asserting a right to payment from another person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.42
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-10-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-10-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-10-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10(1) Asserting a right to payment
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-10-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Asserting a right to payment
premise text: (1) A person is taken to assert a right to payment from another person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(2) Asserting a right to payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-3-ss-2
part of: 10 Asserting a right to payment
note: Establishes the person who sent an invoice or document as the sender unless proven otherwise.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.42
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-10-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-10-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-10-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: asserts
logic summary: Establishes a claim about who sent the invoice or document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 References to acquisition, supply and re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-2
note: Definitions for references to acquisition, supply and re-supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.43
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-11-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-11-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-11-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-11-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-11-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-6

act-sch-2-sec-11-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: a reference to the acquisition of goods includes a reference to the acquisition of property in, or rights in relation to, goods
conclusion text: The class hierarchy is defined
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-11-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: a reference to the supply or acquisition of services includes a reference to the supply or acquisition of services together with property or other services, or both
conclusion text: The class hierarchy is defined
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-11-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal interval definition for supply and re-supply
premise text: (i) a supply of the goods to another person in an altered form or condition; and (ii) a supply to another person of goods in which the first-mentioned goods have been incorporated
conclusion text: The temporal interval includes these events
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-11-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal interval definition for re-supply of services
premise text: (i) a supply of the original services to another person in an altered form or condition; and (ii) a supply to another person of other services that are substantially similar to the original services, and could not have been supplied if the original services had not been acquired by the person who acquired them from the original supplier
conclusion text: The temporal interval includes these events
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of supply and acquisition
premise text: a reference to the supply or acquisition of goods or services includes a reference to agreeing to supply or acquire goods or services
conclusion text: The definition is equal to agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-11-2-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of supply and acquisition
premise text: a reference to the supply or acquisition of goods includes a reference to the supply or acquisition of goods together with other property or services, or both
conclusion text: The definition is equal to combined supply and acquisition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.44
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-38-2-norm

12 Application of Schedule in relation to leases and licences of land
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12-3
note: Reference to contract includes lease or licence of land or building
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.44
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-12-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-12-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-12-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-12-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-12-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-12-3-logic-ltl-5
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-12-3-logic-deontic-6

act-sch-2-sec-12-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Application of Schedule in relation to leases and licences of land
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-12-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: a reference to a contract includes a reference to a lease of, or a licence in respect of, land or a building
conclusion text: a reference to a contract includes a reference to a lease or licence
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-12-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: a reference to making or entering into a contract, in relation to such a lease or licence, is a reference to granting or taking the lease or licence
conclusion text: a reference to making or entering into a contract includes a reference to granting or taking the lease or licence
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-12-3-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: a reference to a party to a contract, in relation to such a lease or licence, includes a reference to any person bound by, or entitled to the benefit of, any provision contained in the lease or licence
conclusion text: a reference to a party to a contract includes a reference to any person bound by, or entitled to the benefit of, any provision contained in the lease or licence
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-12-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: a reference to making or entering into a contract includes a reference to granting or taking the lease or licence
conclusion text: the event of making or entering into a contract occurs after the event of granting or taking the lease or licence
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-12-3-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: a reference to making or entering into a contract includes a reference to granting or taking the lease or licence
conclusion text: the event of making or entering into a contract occurs before or at the same time as the event of granting or taking the lease or licence
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-12-3-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Duty
premise text: a reference to making or entering into a contract includes a reference to granting or taking the lease or licence
conclusion text: there is a duty to grant or take the lease or licence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Loss or damage to include injury
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13-2
note: Definition of loss or damage includes injury
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.44
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-13-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-13-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-13-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-13-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 Loss or damage to include injury
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-13-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of loss or damage includes injury
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-13-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
premise text: a reference to loss or damage, other than a reference to the amount of any loss or damage, includes a reference to injury;
conclusion text: a reference to the amount of any loss or damage includes a reference to damages in respect of an injury.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Meaning of continuing credit contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-3
has part: 14(1) Meaning of continuing credit contract
has part: 14(2) Meaning of continuing credit contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.44

14(1) Meaning of continuing credit contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-3-ss-1
part of: 14 Meaning of continuing credit contract
note: Credit agreement or credit dealing must be a continuing contract.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.44
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-14-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-14-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-14-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(1) Meaning of continuing credit contract
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-14-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Continuing contract implies agreement or arrangement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(2) Meaning of continuing credit contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14-3-ss-2
part of: 14 Meaning of continuing credit contract
note: Creditor must provide credit to consumer in relation to payments made by another person.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.44
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-14-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-14-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-14-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(2) Meaning of continuing credit contract
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-14-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Contraventions of this Schedule
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15-2
note: Exemptions from contravention of Schedule provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.45
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-15-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-15-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-15-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Contraventions of this Schedule
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-15-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Severability
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16-3
note: Nothing in this Schedule affects the validity or enforceability of a contract made after the commencement of this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.45
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-16-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-16-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-16-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-16-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Contract validity obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-16-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Schedule affects contract provisions
premise text: Schedule 1
conclusion text: contract includes a particular provision
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40-2
note: Enforceability of contract provision is severable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.46
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-40-2-norm

act-sch-2-sec-40-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

17 References to provisions in this Schedule
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17-2
note: Reference to provisions in this Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.46
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-17-2-norm

18 Misleading or deceptive conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-3
has part: 18(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct
has part: 18(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.47

18(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-3-ss-1
part of: 18 Misleading or deceptive conduct
note: Prohibition on misleading or deceptive conduct in trade or commerce
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.47
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-18-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-18-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-18-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(1) Misleading or deceptive conduct
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-18-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18-3-ss-2
part of: 18 Misleading or deceptive conduct
note: Nothing in Part 3-1 limits by implication subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.47
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-18-3-ss-2-norm

act-sch-2-sec-18-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(2) Misleading or deceptive conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

19 Application of this Part to information providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-2
has part: 19(1) Application of this Part to information providers
has part: 19(2) Application of this Part to information providers
has part: 19(3) Application of this Part to information providers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.47

19(1) Application of this Part to information providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-2-ss-1
part of: 19 Application of this Part to information providers
note: Exemptions for information providers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.47
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-19-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-19-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-19-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(1) Application of this Part to information providers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-19-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from application of this Part
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(2) Application of this Part to information providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-2-ss-2
part of: 19 Application of this Part to information providers
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for publications of advertisements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.47
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-19-2-ss-2-norm

19(3) Application of this Part to information providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-2-ss-3
part of: 19 Application of this Part to information providers
note: Exemption for publications related to supplied goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.47
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-19-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-19-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-19-2-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-19-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3

act-sch-2-sec-19-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Exemption for publications related to supplied goods or services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-19-2-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-19-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-42-2
has part: 42(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 42(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 42(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.48

42(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-4
part of: 42 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Publication of interests in land is exempt from trade practices amendment if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.48
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3

act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Publication of interests in land is exempt from trade practices amendment if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-5
part of: 42 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Definition of information provider
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.48
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Information provider is a person who carries on a business of providing information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-6
part of: 42 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: List of information providers under the Broadcasting Services Act 1992
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.48
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <-
logic summary: Temporal relationship between licence grants and broadcasting services
premise text: A licence granted under the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 implies a broadcasting service
conclusion text: The holder of a licence granted under the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 provides information
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of an information provider
premise text: A person who is the provider of a broadcasting service under a class licence implies an information provider
conclusion text: The holder of a licence continued in force by section 5(1) of the Broadcasting Services (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 1992 provides information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <-
logic summary: Recurring trace between licence holders and broadcasting services
premise text: The holder of a licence granted under the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 provides information
conclusion text: A person who is the provider of a broadcasting service under a class licence implies an information provider
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-42-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of an information provider
premise text: The Australian Broadcasting Corporation provides information
conclusion text: The Special Broadcasting Service Corporation provides information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-3
has part: 20(1) Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
has part: 20(2) Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.49

20(1) Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-3-ss-1
part of: 20 Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
note: Prohibition on unconscionable conduct in trade or commerce
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.49
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-20-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(1) Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-20-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits unconscionable conduct
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(2) Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-3-ss-2
part of: 20 Unconscionable conduct within the meaning of the unwritten law
note: Exempt from unconscionable conduct meaning if prohibited by section 21 or 22.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.49
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-20-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-20-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Exclude from unconscionable conduct meaning
premise text: Section 21 or 22 prohibits conduct
conclusion text: Not exempt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Unconscionable conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21-2
has part: 21(1) Unconscionable conduct
has part: 21(2) Unconscionable conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.49

21(1) Unconscionable conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21-2-ss-1
part of: 21 Unconscionable conduct
note: Prohibition on unconscionable conduct in trade or commerce
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.49
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-21-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-21-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-21-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(1) Unconscionable conduct
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-21-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits unconscionable conduct
premise text: Trade or commerce
conclusion text: No unconscionable conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(2) Unconscionable conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21-2-ss-2
part of: 21 Unconscionable conduct
note: Court may have regard to relative strengths of bargaining positions, conditions not reasonably necessary for supplier's interests, and consumer's understanding of documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.49
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-21-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-21-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-21-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-21-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-21-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-21-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(2) Unconscionable conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-21-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may have regard to
logic summary: Court may consider certain factors when determining whether a person has contravened subsection (1)
premise text: Court may have regard to...
conclusion text: ...when determining whether a person has contravened subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-21-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within a period of time
logic summary: The court may consider whether the consumer was able to understand documents within a reasonable timeframe
premise text: whether the consumer was able to understand any documents relating to...
conclusion text: ...within a reasonable timeframe
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-21-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: over time
logic summary: The court may consider whether the consumer was subject to undue influence or pressure over an extended period
premise text: whether any undue influence or pressure was exerted on...
conclusion text: ...over an extended period
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-21-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may have regard to
logic summary: The court's consideration of certain factors is an instance of having regard to those factors
premise text: Court may have regard to...
conclusion text: ...regarding the supplier and consumer's bargaining positions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44-2
has part: 44(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 44(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 44(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 44(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 44(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.50

44(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-3
part of: 44 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: No engagement in unconscionable conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.50
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not to be taken
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-4
part of: 44 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Court must not consider unforeseeable circumstances when determining contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.50
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Court must not consider unforeseeable circumstances.
premise text: Circumstances were reasonably foreseeable.
conclusion text: Court cannot consider unforeseeable circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-5
part of: 44 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Definition of goods or services for personal, domestic or household use or consumption.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.50
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of goods or services for personal, domestic or household use or consumption.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for personal, domestic or household use or consumption
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-6
part of: 44 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exclusion of supply for re-supply or transformation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.50
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclude
logic summary: Exclude supply for re-supply or transformation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-7
part of: 44 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Section 4 applies for the purposes of this section in the same way as it applies for the purposes of Division 1 of Part 3-1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.50
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SameWay
logic summary: Applying section 4 in the same way as Division 1 of Part 3-1.
premise text: Section 4 applies for the purposes of this section.
conclusion text: in the same way as it applies for the purposes of Division 1 of Part 3-1.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: SameWay
logic summary: Applying section 4 in the same way as Division 1 of Part 3-1.
premise text: Section 4 applies for the purposes of this section.
conclusion text: in the same way as it applies for the purposes of Division 1 of Part 3-1.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-44-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: SameWay
logic summary: Applying section 4 in the same way as Division 1 of Part 3-1.
premise text: Section 4 applies for the purposes of this section.
conclusion text: in the same way as it applies for the purposes of Division 1 of Part 3-1.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

22 Unconscionable conduct in business transactions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-3
has part: 22(1) Unconscionable conduct in business transactions
has part: 22(2) Unconscionable conduct in business transactions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.50

22(1) Unconscionable conduct in business transactions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-3-ss-1
part of: 22 Unconscionable conduct in business transactions
note: Unconscionable conduct in business transactions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.50
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-22-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-22-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-22-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(1) Unconscionable conduct in business transactions
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-22-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits unconscionable conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(2) Unconscionable conduct in business transactions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22-3-ss-2
part of: 22 Unconscionable conduct in business transactions
note: Court may have regard to certain factors when determining whether a supplier has contravened subsection (1) in connection with the supply or possible supply of goods or services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.50
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-22-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-22-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-22-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(2) Unconscionable conduct in business transactions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-22-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may have regard to
logic summary: Court may consider certain factors when determining whether a supplier has contravened subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46-2
note: Supplier must provide certain information to the business consumer.
description: The supplier must provide the business consumer with certain information, including risks and terms of the contract.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.52
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-46-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-46-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-46-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-46-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: The supplier must provide certain information to the business consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48-2
has part: 48(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 48(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 48(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 48(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 48(8) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.54

48(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-4
part of: 48 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: No unconscionable conduct in connection with legal proceedings or arbitration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.54
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: No conduct is prohibited.
conclusion text: No unconscionable conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-5
part of: 48 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Court cannot consider unforeseeable circumstances when determining contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.54
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of considering unforeseeable circumstances
premise text: Court must not have regard to any circumstances that were not reasonably foreseeable.
conclusion text: No consideration of unforeseeable circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
logic summary: Temporal relation between circumstances and commencement
premise text: The court may have regard to circumstances existing before the commencement of this section but not to conduct engaged in before that commencement.
conclusion text: Circumstances exist before commencement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: before
logic summary: Temporal relation between circumstances and commencement
premise text: The court may have regard to circumstances existing before the commencement of this section but not to conduct engaged in before that commencement.
conclusion text: Circumstances exist before commencement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: has regard to
logic summary: Court considers relevant circumstances
premise text: The court must not have regard to any circumstances that were not reasonably foreseeable at the time of the alleged contravention; and the court may have regard to circumstances existing before the commencement of this section.
conclusion text: Circumstances are considered.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to consider circumstances existing before commencement
premise text: The court may have regard to circumstances existing before the commencement of this section but not to conduct engaged in before that commencement.
conclusion text: Consideration of circumstances is permitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-6
part of: 48 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Reference to supply or possible supply of goods/services for trade/commerce purpose
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.54
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refersTo
logic summary: Reference to supply or possible supply of goods/services for trade/commerce purpose
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-7
part of: 48 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Reference to acquisition or possible acquisition for trade or commerce
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.54
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers-to
logic summary: Reference to a concept
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48(8) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-8
part of: 48 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Section applies in the same way as it applies for Division 1 of Part 3-1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.54
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48(8) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-48-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: same way
logic summary: Same application scope
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-2
has part: 23(1) Unfair terms of consumer contracts
has part: 23(2) Unfair terms of consumer contracts
has part: 23(3) Unfair terms of consumer contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.55

23(1) Unfair terms of consumer contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-2-ss-1
part of: 23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts
note: Unfair terms in consumer contracts are void.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.55
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-23-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-23-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-23-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: void
logic summary: Voiding unfair terms
premise text: (a) the term is unfair; and (b) the contract is a standard form contract.
conclusion text: (1) A term of a consumer contract is void if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(2) Unfair terms of consumer contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-2-ss-2
part of: 23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts
note: Contract continues to bind parties if it can operate without the unfair term.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.55
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-23-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-23-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(2) Unfair terms of consumer contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Contract continues to bind parties.
premise text: (2) The contract continues to bind the parties if it is capable of operating without the unfair term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-23-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal interval relation
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals.
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking, not Prohibition.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23(3) Unfair terms of consumer contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23-2-ss-3
part of: 23 Unfair terms of consumer contracts
note: Definition of consumer contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.55
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-23-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-23-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-23-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23(3) Unfair terms of consumer contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-23-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a consumer contract
premise text: None
conclusion text: A consumer contract is a contract for...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Meaning of unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-3
has part: 24(1) Meaning of unfair
has part: 24(2) Meaning of unfair
has part: 24(3) Meaning of unfair
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.55

24(1) Meaning of unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-1
part of: 24 Meaning of unfair
note: A term of a consumer contract is unfair if it causes a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.55
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(1) Meaning of unfair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes duty
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to ensure fairness in consumer contracts.
premise text: (1) A term of a consumer contract is unfair if: (a) it would cause a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations arising under the contract; and (b) it is not reasonably necessary in order to protect the legitimate interests of the party who would be advantaged by the term; and (c) it would cause detriment (whether financial or otherwise) to a party if it were to be applied or relied on.
conclusion text: The state must ensure fairness in consumer contracts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(2) Meaning of unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-2
part of: 24 Meaning of unfair
note: Court must consider certain factors when determining if a term is unfair.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.55
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24(2) Meaning of unfair
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider certain factors.
premise text: (2) In determining whether a term of a consumer contract is unfair under subsection (1), a court may take into account such matters as it thinks relevant, but must take into account the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Court considers factors within a certain timeframe.
premise text: (2) In determining whether a term of a consumer contract is unfair under subsection (1), a court may take into account such matters as it thinks relevant, but must take into account the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Court considers factors within a certain timeframe.
premise text: (2) In determining whether a term of a consumer contract is unfair under subsection (1), a court may take into account such matters as it thinks relevant, but must take into account the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

24(3) Meaning of unfair
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-3
part of: 24 Meaning of unfair
note: Term must be expressed in reasonably plain language and legible.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.55
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4

act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expressed in reasonably plain language
premise text: (3) A term is transparent if the term is: (a) expressed in reasonably plain language; and (b) legible;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval: (start, end)
premise text: (3) A term is transparent if the term is: (a) expressed in reasonably plain language; and (b) legible;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval: (start, end)
premise text: (3) A term is transparent if the term is: (a) expressed in reasonably plain language; and (b) legible;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-24-3-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval: (start, end)
premise text: (3) A term is transparent if the term is: (a) expressed in reasonably plain language; and (b) legible;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-2
note: Term must be presented clearly and readily available to affected parties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.56
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-50-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-50-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-50-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-50-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Term must be presented clearly and readily available.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Examples of unfair terms
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-2
has part: 25(1) Examples of unfair terms
has part: 25(2) Examples of unfair terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.56

25(1) Examples of unfair terms
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-2-ss-1
part of: 25 Examples of unfair terms
note: Examples of unfair terms in consumer contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.56
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-25-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-25-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-25-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits specific types of unfair terms in consumer contracts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25(2) Examples of unfair terms
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-2-ss-2
part of: 25 Examples of unfair terms
note: Consider detriment to consumers and impact on business before prescribing a term or effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.56
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-25-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-25-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-25-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-25-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

act-sch-2-sec-25-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25(2) Examples of unfair terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-25-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to consider...
premise text: Subsection (1)(n)
conclusion text: Regulation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-25-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Term is a kind of term
premise text: (2) Before the Governor-General...
conclusion text: Subclass
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-25-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Consider detriment to consumers within a timeframe
premise text: (a) the detriment that a term of that kind would cause to consumers
conclusion text: Temporal Interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26-3
has part: 26(1) Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts etc.
has part: 26(2) Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.57

26(1) Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26-3-ss-1
part of: 26 Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts etc.
note: Exempts certain terms from Section 23 of consumer contracts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.57
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-26-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-26-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-26-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(1) Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-26-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts certain terms from Section 23.
premise text: (1) Section 23 does not apply to a term of a consumer contract...
conclusion text: ...to the extent, but only to the extent, that the term: defines the main subject matter of the contract; or sets the upfront price payable under the contract; or is a term required, or expressly permitted, by a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26(2) Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26-3-ss-2
part of: 26 Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts etc.
note: Upfront price must be disclosed at or before contract entry.
description: disclosed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.57
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-26-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-26-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-26-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26(2) Terms that define main subject matter of consumer contracts etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-26-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Obligation to disclose upfront price
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-52-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.58
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-52-2-norm

27 Standard form contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-2
has part: 27(1) Standard form contracts
has part: 27(2) Standard form contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.58

27(1) Standard form contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-2-ss-1
part of: 27 Standard form contracts
note: Presumption of standard form contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.58
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-27-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-27-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-27-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(1) Standard form contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-27-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: presumption
logic summary: Presumption of standard form contract
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(2) Standard form contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-2-ss-2
part of: 27 Standard form contracts
note: Court must consider specific factors when determining if a contract is standard form.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.58
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-27-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-27-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-27-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(2) Standard form contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-27-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider specific factors.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Contracts to which this Part does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-3
has part: 28(1) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
has part: 28(2) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
has part: 28(3) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.58

28(1) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-1
part of: 28 Contracts to which this Part does not apply
note: Exemptions from the Part's application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.58
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from the Part's application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal interval
logic summary: Temporal intervals for exemptions
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(2) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-2
part of: 28 Contracts to which this Part does not apply
note: Contract for carriage of goods by ship includes a reference to any contract covered by a sea carriage document within the meaning of the amended Hague Rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.58
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(2) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: within the meaning of
logic summary: Class inclusion
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(3) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-3
part of: 28 Contracts to which this Part does not apply
note: Contract type excluded from the Australian Consumer Law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.58
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(3) Contracts to which this Part does not apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excluded contract types
premise text: This Part does not apply to a contract that is the constitution of a company, managed investment scheme or other kind of body.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-28-3-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Contract type classification
premise text: within the meaning of section 9 of the Corporations Act 2001
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-54-2
note: Specific protections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.60
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-54-2-norm

29 False or misleading representations about goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29-2
has part: 29(1) False or misleading representations about goods or services
has part: 29(2) False or misleading representations about goods or services
has part: 29(3) False or misleading representations about goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.60

29(1) False or misleading representations about goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29-2-ss-1
part of: 29 False or misleading representations about goods or services
note: False or misleading representations about goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.60
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-29-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-29-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-29-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-29-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 29(1) False or misleading representations about goods or services
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-29-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of false or misleading representations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-29-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of goods and services
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29(2) False or misleading representations about goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29-2-ss-2
part of: 29 False or misleading representations about goods or services
note: Representation must be true unless evidence is adduced to the contrary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.60
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-29-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-29-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-29-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29(2) False or misleading representations about goods or services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-29-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide true representation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29(3) False or misleading representations about goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29-2-ss-3
part of: 29 False or misleading representations about goods or services
note: Prohibits placing onus of proving representation is not misleading
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.60
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-29-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-29-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-29-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits action
premise text: (2) does not have the effect that...
conclusion text: ...the representation is not misleading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30-3
note: False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.61
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-30-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-30-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-30-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-30-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of representations
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-56-2
note: Making false or misleading representations about land is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.62
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-56-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-56-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-56-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-56-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making false or misleading representations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Misleading conduct relating to employment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31-2
note: Misleading conduct relating to employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.62
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-31-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-31-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-31-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 Misleading conduct relating to employment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-31-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits misleading conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32-3
has part: 32(1) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
has part: 32(2) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
has part: 32(3) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
has part: 32(4) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.62

32(1) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-1
part of: 32 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
note: Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc. is prohibited in trade or commerce.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.62
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(1) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of goods or services as prohibited
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(2) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-2
part of: 32 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
note: Must provide rebate, gift, prize or other free item within specified time.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.62
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(2) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Rebate, gift, prize or other free item
premise text: (2) If a person offers any rebate, gift, prize or other free item...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Within specified time
premise text: ...within the time specified in the offer...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(3) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-3
part of: 32 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
note: Exemption from liability for failure to provide rebate or gift due to circumstances beyond control.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.62
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(3) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from liability
premise text: Subsection (2) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...the person took reasonable precautions...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

32(4) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-4
part of: 32 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
note: Offering a different rebate, gift, prize or other free item as a replacement is permitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.62
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between offer and agreement
premise text: The other person agrees to receive the different rebate, gift, prize or other free item.
conclusion text: The offer is made during the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permitted
logic summary: Permissibility of offering a replacement
premise text: (4) Subsection (2) does not apply to an offer that the person makes to another person if:
conclusion text: The offer is permitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of agreement on replacement offer
premise text: The other person agrees to receive the different rebate, gift, prize or other free item.
conclusion text: The agreement implies the replacement offer.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between offer and agreement
premise text: The person offers to the other person a different rebate, gift, prize or other free item.
conclusion text: The offer is made during the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-32-3-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
logic summary: Assertion of replacement offer
premise text: (4) Subsection (2) does not apply to an offer that the person makes to another person if:
conclusion text: The person asserts the replacement offer.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-58-2
note: Section does not affect application of other provisions in relation to land supply or acquisition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.64
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-58-2-norm

33 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-33-2
note: Misleading conduct in trade or commerce is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.64
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-33-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-33-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-33-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 33 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-33-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits misleading conduct.
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-34-3
note: Misleading conduct in trade or commerce
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.64
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-34-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-34-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-34-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 34 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-34-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits misleading conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-35-2
has part: 35(1) Bait advertising
has part: 35(2) Bait advertising
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.64

35(1) Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-1
part of: 35 Bait advertising
note: Advertising goods or services at a specified price if there are reasonable grounds for believing the person will not be able to offer them at that price for a period and in quantities reasonable having regard to market nature and advertisement nature.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.64
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(1) Bait advertising
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits advertising goods or services at a specified price if there are reasonable grounds for believing the person will not be able to offer them.
premise text: reasonable grounds
conclusion text: cannot advertise
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The period during which the person cannot offer goods or services at a specified price overlaps with the market period and advertisement period.
premise text: market period
conclusion text: cannot advertise
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The quantity of goods or services that must not be advertised at a specified price repeats with the market quantity and advertisement quantity.
premise text: market quantity
conclusion text: cannot advertise
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge
logic summary: The person is aware or ought reasonably to be aware of the reasonable grounds for believing they will not be able to offer goods or services at a specified price.
premise text: awareness
conclusion text: cannot advertise
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates
logic summary: The advertisement must validate the reasonable grounds for believing the person will not be able to offer goods or services at a specified price.
premise text: advertisement
conclusion text: cannot advertise
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35(2) Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-2
part of: 35 Bait advertising
note: Offer goods or services at specified price for a reasonable period and quantity.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.64
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4

act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35(2) Bait advertising
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory offer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalInterval
logic summary: Reasonable period and quantity
premise text: (a) the nature of the market in which the person carries on business; (b) the nature of the advertisement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of reasonable offer
premise text: (a) the nature of the market in which the person carries on business; (b) the nature of the advertisement.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-35-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Spread of obligation
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-3
has part: 36(1) Wrongly accepting payment
has part: 36(2) Wrongly accepting payment
has part: 36(3) Wrongly accepting payment
has part: 36(4) Wrongly accepting payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.65

36(1) Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-1
part of: 36 Wrongly accepting payment
note: Accepting payment for goods or services without intention to supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.65
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(1) Wrongly accepting payment
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of accepting payment for goods or services without intention to supply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(2) Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-2
part of: 36 Wrongly accepting payment
note: Accepting payment for goods or services with intention to supply different goods or services is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.65
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3

act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(2) Wrongly accepting payment
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of accepting payment for goods or services with intention to supply different goods or services.
premise text: (2) A person must not, in trade or commerce, accept payment or other consideration for goods or services if, at the time of the acceptance, the person intends to supply goods or services materially different from the goods or services in respect of which the payment or other consideration is accepted.
conclusion text: The person must not accept payment or other consideration for goods or services with intention to supply different goods or services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Justify
logic summary: Justification of the prohibition on accepting payment for goods or services with intention to supply different goods or services.
premise text: (2) A person must not, in trade or commerce, accept payment or other consideration for goods or services if, at the time of the acceptance, the person intends to supply goods or services materially different from the goods or services in respect of which the payment or other consideration is accepted.
conclusion text: The prohibition on accepting payment for goods or services with intention to supply different goods or services is justified by the requirement that a person must not accept payment or other consideration for goods or services if, at the time of the acceptance, the person intends to supply goods or services materially different from the goods or services in respect of which the payment or other consideration is accepted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implication of the prohibition on accepting payment for goods or services with intention to supply different goods or services.
premise text: (2) A person must not, in trade or commerce, accept payment or other consideration for goods or services if, at the time of the acceptance, the person intends to supply goods or services materially different from the goods or services in respect of which the payment or other consideration is accepted.
conclusion text: If a person accepts payment or other consideration for goods or services with intention to supply different goods or services, then the prohibition on accepting payment for goods or services with intention to supply different goods or services is violated.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(3) Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-3
part of: 36 Wrongly accepting payment
note: Accepting payment under unreasonable circumstances is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.65
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-3-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(3) Wrongly accepting payment
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of accepting payment under unreasonable circumstances.
premise text: Reasonable grounds for believing the person cannot supply goods or services within a specified period.
conclusion text: The person must not accept payment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Prohibition applies to payments made within a reasonable time frame.
premise text: A reasonable time is defined as the period specified by or on behalf of the person.
conclusion text: The payment must be made before the reasonable time expires.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Prohibition applies to recurring payments under unreasonable circumstances.
premise text: Reasonable grounds for believing the person cannot supply goods or services within a specified period.
conclusion text: The payment must be made before the reasonable time expires.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Prohibition requires recognition of unreasonable circumstances.
premise text: Reasonable grounds for believing the person cannot supply goods or services within a specified period.
conclusion text: The person must recognize the unreasonable circumstances.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
logic summary: Prohibition requires validation of reasonable grounds.
premise text: Reasonable grounds for believing the person cannot supply goods or services within a specified period.
conclusion text: The grounds are validated as reasonable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(4) Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-4
part of: 36 Wrongly accepting payment
note: Must supply all goods or services accepted for payment
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.65
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(4) Wrongly accepting payment
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-36-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to supply goods or services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-60-2
has part: 60(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 60(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 60(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.66

60(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-5
part of: 60 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Excuse for non-supply of goods or services due to circumstances beyond control.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.66
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excuse
logic summary: Excuse for non-supply due to circumstances beyond control.
premise text: (a) the person’s failure to supply all the goods or services within the period, or within a reasonable time, was due to the act or omission of another person, or to some other cause beyond the person’s control;
conclusion text: (b) the person took reasonable precautions and exercised due diligence to avoid the failure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
logic summary: Failure to supply goods or services within a period is excused if it occurs before another cause beyond control.
premise text: (a) the person’s failure to supply all the goods or services within the period, or within a reasonable time, was due to the act or omission of another person, or to some other cause beyond the person’s control;
conclusion text: (b) the person took reasonable precautions and exercised due diligence to avoid the failure.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: before
logic summary: Failure to supply goods or services within a period is excused if it occurs before another cause beyond control.
premise text: (a) the person’s failure to supply all the goods or services within the period, or within a reasonable time, was due to the act or omission of another person, or to some other cause beyond the person’s control;
conclusion text: (b) the person took reasonable precautions and exercised due diligence to avoid the failure.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-6
part of: 60 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemption from subsection (4) for replacement goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.66
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permits the exemption
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-7
part of: 60 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Payment or other consideration must be disclosed regardless of its proportion to the total payment.
description: Disclosed information about payment or other consideration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.66
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-60-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must disclose payment or other consideration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Misleading representations about certain business activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-37-2
has part: 37(1) Misleading representations about certain business activities
has part: 37(2) Misleading representations about certain business activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.66

37(1) Misleading representations about certain business activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-1
part of: 37 Misleading representations about certain business activities
note: Making false or misleading representations about business activities is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.66
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(1) Misleading representations about certain business activities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making false or misleading representations.
premise text: A person must not...
conclusion text: ...a representation that is false or misleading in a material particular.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Business activities must not overlap with those that can be carried on at or from a person's place of residence.
premise text: ...a representation that is false or misleading in a material particular; and...
conclusion text: ...a representation that concerns the profitability, risk or any other material aspect of...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Business activities must not repeat those that can be carried on at or from a person's place of residence.
premise text: ...a representation that is false or misleading in a material particular; and...
conclusion text: ...a representation that concerns the profitability, risk or any other material aspect of...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: False or misleading representations about business activities spread to others.
premise text: ...a representation that is false or misleading in a material particular; and...
conclusion text: ...a representation that concerns the profitability, risk or any other material aspect of...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The system recognizes false or misleading representations about business activities.
premise text: ...a representation that is false or misleading in a material particular; and...
conclusion text: ...a representation that concerns the profitability, risk or any other material aspect of...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37(2) Misleading representations about certain business activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-2
part of: 37 Misleading representations about certain business activities
note: Making false or misleading representations about business activities is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.66
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 37(2) Misleading representations about certain business activities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-37-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of false or misleading representations
premise text: A person must not...
conclusion text: ...is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38-3
has part: 38(1) Application of provisions of this Division to information
has part: 38(2) Application of provisions of this Division to information
has part: 38(3) Application of provisions of this Division to information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.67

38(1) Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38-3-ss-1
part of: 38 Application of provisions of this Division to information
note: Exemptions for publications by information providers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.67
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-38-3-ss-1-norm

38(2) Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38-3-ss-2
part of: 38 Application of provisions of this Division to information
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for publications of advertisements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.67
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-38-3-ss-2-norm

38(3) Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38-3-ss-3
part of: 38 Application of provisions of this Division to information
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for publications related to supplied goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.67
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-38-3-ss-3-norm

62 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-62-2
note: Publication of interests in land is exempt from the Act if made on behalf of a related corporate body or person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.68
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-62-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to publish interests in land
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-62-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Classification of publication exemptions
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39-2
has part: 39(1) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 39(2) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 39(3) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 39(4) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 39(5) Unsolicited cards etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.69

39(1) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-1
part of: 39 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Sending unsolicited credit or debit cards is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.69
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(1) Unsolicited cards etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sending unsolicited credit or debit cards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(2) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-2
part of: 39 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Exemption for cards sent by or on behalf of the issuer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.69
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(3) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-3
part of: 39 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: No action to enable another person to use a credit card as a debit card without written request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.69
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(3) Unsolicited cards etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of enabling another person to use a credit card as a debit card without written request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(4) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-4
part of: 39 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Prohibition on using a debit card as a credit card without permission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.69
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 39(4) Unsolicited cards etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39(5) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-5
part of: 39 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Definition of a credit card
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.69
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a credit card
premise text: (5) A credit card is an article that is one or more of the following:
conclusion text: A credit card is an article that is one or more of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-39-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Defines temporal intervals for credit cards
premise text: one or more of the following:
conclusion text: one or more of the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64-2
note: Prohibition on using certain articles for obtaining credit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.70
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-2-logic-diffusion-5

act-sch-2-sec-64-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids use of specified articles for obtaining credit
premise text: (b) a similar article intended for use in obtaining cash, goods or services on credit;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes certain articles within the scope of prohibition
premise text: (c) an article of a kind that persons carrying on business commonly issue to their customers, or prospective customers,
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Prohibition applies during use for obtaining credit
premise text: (b) an article that may be used as an article referred to in paragraph (a),
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: for
logic summary: Prohibition applies for obtaining credit
premise text: (a) an article intended for use by a person in obtaining access to an account that is held by the person for the purpose of withdrawing or depositing cash or obtaining goods or services;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Prohibition spreads through use of debit cards
premise text: (b) an article that may be used as an article referred to in paragraph (a).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40-3
has part: 40(1) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
has part: 40(2) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
has part: 40(3) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
has part: 40(4) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.70

40(1) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-1
part of: 40 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
note: Prohibition on asserting a right to payment for unsolicited goods or services without reasonable cause.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.70
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3

act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(1) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on asserting a right to payment without reasonable cause.
premise text: A person must not assert a right to payment from another person for unsolicited goods unless the person has reasonable cause to believe that there is a right to the payment.
conclusion text: There is no right to payment without reasonable cause.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: The provision forbids asserting a right to payment for unsolicited goods or services without reasonable cause.
premise text: A person must not, in trade or commerce, assert a right to payment from another person for unsolicited goods unless the person has reasonable cause to believe that there is a right to the payment.
conclusion text: There is no right to payment without reasonable cause.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ¬
logic summary: The provision negates the assertion of a right to payment for unsolicited goods or services without reasonable cause.
premise text: A person must not, in trade or commerce, assert a right to payment from another person for unsolicited goods unless the person has reasonable cause to believe that there is a right to the payment.
conclusion text: There is no right to payment without reasonable cause.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(2) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-2
part of: 40 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
note: No assertion of right to payment for unsolicited services without reasonable cause.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.70
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(2) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of asserting a right to payment for unsolicited services.
premise text: A person must not, in trade or commerce...
conclusion text: ...assert a right to payment from another person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of asserting a right to payment for unsolicited services.
premise text: A pecuniary penalty may be imposed for a contravention of this subsection.
conclusion text: ...assert a right to payment from another person...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(3) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-3
part of: 40 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
note: No sending unsolicited invoices without warning statement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.70
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(3) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of unsolicited invoices
premise text: No warning statement
conclusion text: Cannot send invoice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(4) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-4
part of: 40 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
note: Person bears onus of proving reasonable cause for payment or charge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.70
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-4-logic-argumentation-4

act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(4) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to prove reasonable cause
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Person must believe in reasonable cause
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval of reasonable cause
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-40-3-ss-4-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Burden of Proof
logic summary: Burden of proof on person
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41-2
has part: 41(1) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
has part: 41(2) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
has part: 41(3) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
has part: 41(4) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.71

41(1) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-1
part of: 41 Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
note: No liability for payment or loss/damage from unsolicited goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.71
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits liability for payment or loss/damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41(2) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-2
part of: 41 Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
note: Neither sender nor claimant can recover goods after recovery period ends.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.71
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits action for recovery of goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41(3) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-3
part of: 41 Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
note: Recipient's refusal to accept goods does not trigger liability for unsolicited goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.71
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(3) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Exclusion of liability based on refusal to accept goods.
premise text: Recipient's refusal to accept goods does not trigger liability.
conclusion text: No liability for unsolicited goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Recovery period during which refusal to accept goods is relevant.
premise text: Refusal to accept goods occurs within recovery period.
conclusion text: Refusal to accept goods during recovery period is relevant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered
logic summary: Ordered trace of refusal to accept goods and possession by sender/owner.
premise text: Sender/owner takes possession of goods within recovery period.
conclusion text: Possession by sender/owner is relevant.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Permission to refuse to accept goods does not trigger liability.
premise text: Recipient's refusal to accept goods is a permission.
conclusion text: Refusal to accept goods is a permission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from liability for unsolicited goods based on circumstances of receipt.
premise text: Goods received in circumstances where person knew they were not intended for them.
conclusion text: Liability is exempted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

41(4) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-4
part of: 41 Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
note: Recovery period for unsolicited goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.71
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(4) Liability etc. of recipient for unsolicited goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-41-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to recover within a specified period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66-2
note: Notice must be in writing and contain specific information.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.72
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-66-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-66-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-66-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-66-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice in writing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Liability of recipient for unsolicited services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-42-3
note: No liability for unsolicited services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.72
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-42-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-42-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-42-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits making payment or liability for loss/damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43-2
has part: 43(1) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
has part: 43(2) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
has part: 43(3) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
has part: 43(4) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
has part: 43(5) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.72

43(1) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-1
part of: 43 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
note: Prohibition on asserting a right to payment for unauthorised entries or advertisements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.72
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 43(1) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on asserting a right to payment.
premise text: The person must not assert a right to payment.
conclusion text: Payment is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43(2) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-2
part of: 43 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
note: Prohibition on sending invoices or documents without a warning statement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.72
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 43(2) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43(3) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-3
part of: 43 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
note: Exemption for certain publications from subsections (1) and (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.72
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-3-norm

43(4) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-4
part of: 43 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
note: Entitlement to recover payment for unauthorized entries or advertisements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.72
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-4-norm

act-sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43(4) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

43(5) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-5
part of: 43 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
note: Document authorisation required for unauthorised entries or advertisements.
description: document authorising the placing of the entry or advertisement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.72
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43(5) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-43-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires document authorisation
premise text: document authorising the placing of the entry or advertisement has been signed by the person or by another person authorised by him or her
conclusion text: the person is not taken for the purposes of this section to have authorised the placing of the entry or advertisement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-68-2
note: Provide particulars of entry or advertisement and charge amount
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.74
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-68-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-68-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-68-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-68-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide particulars and charge amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44-3
has part: 44(1) Participation in pyramid schemes
has part: 44(2) Participation in pyramid schemes
has part: 44(3) Participation in pyramid schemes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.75

44(1) Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44-3-ss-1
part of: 44 Participation in pyramid schemes
note: Prohibition on participating in pyramid schemes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.75
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-44-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(1) Participation in pyramid schemes
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-44-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids participation in pyramid schemes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(2) Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44-3-ss-2
part of: 44 Participation in pyramid schemes
note: Prohibits inducing another person to participate in a pyramid scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.75
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-44-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(2) Participation in pyramid schemes
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-44-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits an action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(3) Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44-3-ss-3
part of: 44 Participation in pyramid schemes
note: Participating in a pyramid scheme is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.75
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-44-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-44-3-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(3) Participation in pyramid schemes
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-44-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits participation in pyramid schemes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Meaning of pyramid scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-45-2
note: A pyramid scheme requires new participants to provide a financial or non-financial benefit to other participants.
description: (i) a financial or non-financial benefit to, or for the benefit of, the other participant or participants;
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.75
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-45-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-45-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-45-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-45-2-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-45-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45 Meaning of pyramid scheme
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-45-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires new participants to provide a financial or non-financial benefit.
conclusion text: (i) a financial or non-financial benefit to, or for the benefit of, the other participant or participants;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-45-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for participation payments.
conclusion text: (b) the participation payments are entirely or substantially induced by the prospect held out to new participants that they will be entitled, in relation to the introduction to the scheme of further new participants, to be provided with either of the following (a recruitment payment);
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-45-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occurs during
logic summary: Temporal interval for participation payments.
conclusion text: (b) the participation payments are entirely or substantially induced by the prospect held out to new participants that they will be entitled, in relation to the introduction to the scheme of further new participants, to be provided with either of the following (a recruitment payment);
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-2
has part: 70(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 70(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 70(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.76

70(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-2
part of: 70 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: A new participant includes a person who has applied, or been invited, to participate in the scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.76
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion of participants
premise text: Person has applied or been invited to participate in the scheme.
conclusion text: Participant is a new participant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Definition of a new participant
premise text: Person who has applied or been invited to participate in the scheme.
conclusion text: New participant definition
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-3
part of: 70 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: A scheme is a pyramid scheme if it meets certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.76
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5

act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits schemes that meet the specified conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Identifies temporal intervals where the scheme's characteristics apply.
premise text: (3) A scheme may be a pyramid scheme: (a) no matter who holds out to new participants the prospect of entitlement to recruitment payments; and (b) no matter who is to make recruitment payments to new participants; and (c) no matter who is to make introductions to the scheme of further new participants.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Describes the repeating pattern of a pyramid scheme.
premise text: (3) A scheme may be a pyramid scheme: (a) no matter who holds out to new participants the prospect of entitlement to recruitment payments; and (b) no matter who is to make recruitment payments to new participants; and (c) no matter who is to make introductions to the scheme of further new participants.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Describes how a pyramid scheme spreads its characteristics.
premise text: (3) A scheme may be a pyramid scheme: (a) no matter who holds out to new participants the prospect of entitlement to recruitment payments; and (b) no matter who is to make recruitment payments to new participants; and (c) no matter who is to make introductions to the scheme of further new participants.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Describes the implication of a scheme being a pyramid scheme.
premise text: (3) A scheme may be a pyramid scheme: (a) no matter who holds out to new participants the prospect of entitlement to recruitment payments; and (b) no matter who is to make recruitment payments to new participants; and (c) no matter who is to make introductions to the scheme of further new participants.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-4
part of: 70 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Characteristics of a pyramid scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.76
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Pyramid scheme characteristics imply obligation.
premise text: (a) the participation payments may (or must) be made after the new participants begin to take part in the scheme;
conclusion text: A scheme is a pyramid scheme if it has any or all of these characteristics.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Characteristics overlap with each other.
premise text: (c) the holding out of the prospect of entitlement to recruitment payments does not give any new participant a legally enforceable right;
conclusion text: These characteristics overlap with each other.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Characteristics imply obligation.
premise text: (d) arrangements for the scheme are not recorded in writing (whether entirely or partly);
conclusion text: A scheme is a pyramid scheme if it has any or all of these characteristics.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Characteristics imply obligation.
premise text: (e) the scheme involves the marketing of goods or services (or both);
conclusion text: A scheme is a pyramid scheme if it has any or all of these characteristics.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Marketing schemes as pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46-3
has part: 46(1) Marketing schemes as pyramid schemes
has part: 46(2) Marketing schemes as pyramid schemes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.76

46(1) Marketing schemes as pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46-3-ss-1
part of: 46 Marketing schemes as pyramid schemes
note: Court must consider factors when determining if a scheme is a pyramid scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.76
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-46-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-46-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-46-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-46-3-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-46-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46(1) Marketing schemes as pyramid schemes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-46-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider factors
premise text: The court must have regard to the following matters...
conclusion text: when determining if a scheme is a pyramid scheme.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-46-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Factors considered relate to temporal intervals
premise text: (a) whether the participation payments bear a reasonable relationship...
conclusion text: to the value of the goods or services that participants are entitled to be supplied with...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-46-3-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ∈
logic summary: Factors considered relate to temporal intervals
premise text: (a) whether the participation payments bear a reasonable relationship...
conclusion text: to the value of the goods or services that participants are entitled to be supplied with...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46(2) Marketing schemes as pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46-3-ss-2
part of: 46 Marketing schemes as pyramid schemes
note: Court may consider matters beyond the scope of subsection (1) when determining if participation payments are induced by recruitment payments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.76
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-46-3-ss-2-norm

act-sch-2-sec-46-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46(2) Marketing schemes as pyramid schemes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

72 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-72-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.78
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-2-norm

47 Multiple pricing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-47-2
has part: 47(1) Multiple pricing
has part: 47(2) Multiple pricing
has part: 47(3) Multiple pricing
has part: 47(4) Multiple pricing
has part: 47(5) Multiple pricing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.78

47(1) Multiple pricing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-1
part of: 47 Multiple pricing
note: Supplying goods with more than one displayed price is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.78
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(1) Multiple pricing
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods with more than one displayed price.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(2) Multiple pricing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-2
part of: 47 Multiple pricing
note: A displayed price for goods is a price for the goods or any representation that may reasonably be inferred to be a representation of a price for the goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.78
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47(2) Multiple pricing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Price representation is implied by the presence of a price or representation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(3) Multiple pricing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-3
part of: 47 Multiple pricing
note: Price or representation not applicable at different location or region
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.78
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Price or representation not applicable at different location or region
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(4) Multiple pricing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-4
part of: 47 Multiple pricing
note: Price or representation is not a displayed price for goods if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.78
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3

act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Price or representation is not a displayed price for goods if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(5) Multiple pricing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-5
part of: 47 Multiple pricing
note: Ceases to be a displayed price if retracted and published with similar circulation or audience.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.78
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits a displayed price from being effective if retracted and published with similar circulation or audience.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Requires the retraction to occur within a similar temporal interval as the catalogue or advertisement.
premise text: (retracted date) overlaps (newly published date)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Requires the newly published price to be effective until a similar temporal interval as the catalogue or advertisement.
premise text: (newly published price) until (retracted date)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Requires the newly published price to be diffused through a similar audience as the catalogue or advertisement.
premise text: (newly published price) diffuses (retracted price)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-47-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Requires the newly published price to be recognized by a similar agent as the catalogue or advertisement.
premise text: (newly published price) recognizes (retracted price)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48-3
note: Prohibition on promoting goods or services for personal use
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.79
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-48-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-48-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 48 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-48-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (1) A person must not...
conclusion text: ...must not, in trade or commerce...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-48-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPartOf
logic summary: Classification of goods/services
premise text: (a) the supply, or possible supply, to another person...
conclusion text: ...of goods or services of a kind...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-74-2
has part: 74(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 74(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 74(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 74(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 74(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 74(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.80

74(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-2
part of: 74 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: No charge for sending goods must be included in the single price.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.80
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No obligation to include charge for sending goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-3
part of: 74 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Must specify minimum charge for sending goods if known.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.80
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to specify minimum charge.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-4
part of: 74 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemption for representations made exclusively to a body corporate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.80
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Permission to make representations exclusively to a body corporate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-5
part of: 74 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: A single price must be at least as prominent as the most prominent part of the consideration for supply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.80
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-6
part of: 74 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemption for services supplied under a contract with periodic payments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.80
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Exemption for services supplied under a contract with periodic payments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-7
part of: 74 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: The single price must include certain quantifiable amounts, such as charges payable to another person or tax and fees imposed on the supplier.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.80
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-74-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The provision imposes a duty on suppliers to include certain amounts in the single price.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-76-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.82
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-76-2-norm

49 Referral selling
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-49-2
note: No inducing consumers to acquire goods or services by representing a rebate, commission, or benefit in return for assisting other consumers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.82
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-49-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-49-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-49-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 49 Referral selling
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-49-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action of inducing consumers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Harassment and coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-3
has part: 50(1) Harassment and coercion
has part: 50(2) Harassment and coercion
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.82

50(1) Harassment and coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-3-ss-1
part of: 50 Harassment and coercion
note: No physical force, harassment, or coercion in supply, payment, sale, or land interest transactions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.82
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-50-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-50-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-50-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-50-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 50(1) Harassment and coercion
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-50-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-50-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to prohibited actions
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(2) Harassment and coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50-3-ss-2
part of: 50 Harassment and coercion
note: No effect on other provisions regarding supply or acquisition of interests in land.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.82
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-50-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-50-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-50-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-50-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excluding from other provisions
premise text: (2) Subsections (1)(c) and (d)
conclusion text: do not affect the application of any other provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-50-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: No temporal overlap
premise text: (2) Subsections (1)(c) and (d)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Guarantee as to title
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-51-2
has part: 51(1) Guarantee as to title
has part: 51(2) Guarantee as to title
has part: 51(3) Guarantee as to title
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.83

51(1) Guarantee as to title
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-1
part of: 51 Guarantee as to title
note: Supplier has a right to dispose of property in goods when it passes to the consumer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.83
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRightToDispose
logic summary: Supplier has a right to dispose of property in goods.
premise text: Supplier supplies goods to consumer.
conclusion text: Supplier has a right to dispose of property in goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: whenPropertyPassesToConsumer
logic summary: Property passes to consumer when supplier disposes of it.
premise text: Property in goods is subject to guarantee.
conclusion text: Property passes to consumer when supplier disposes of it.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: whenSupplierDisposesOfGoods
logic summary: Supplier must dispose of goods before property passes to consumer.
premise text: Property in goods is subject to guarantee.
conclusion text: Supplier must dispose of goods before property passes to consumer.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: whenConsumerPossessesGoods
logic summary: Consumer possesses goods when supplier disposes of them.
premise text: Property in goods is subject to guarantee.
conclusion text: Consumer possesses goods when supplier disposes of them.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: whenSupplierDisposesOfGoods
logic summary: Supplier must dispose of goods before property passes to consumer.
premise text: Property in goods is subject to guarantee.
conclusion text: Supplier must dispose of goods before property passes to consumer.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51(2) Guarantee as to title
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-2
part of: 51 Guarantee as to title
note: Permits limited title transfer without applying subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.83
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-2-norm

51(3) Guarantee as to title
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-3
part of: 51 Guarantee as to title
note: Exemption from application of section 51(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.83
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !=
logic summary: Negative assertion
premise text: (3) This section does not apply if the supply is a supply by way of hire or lease.
conclusion text: The provision does not apply to supplies made by way of hire or lease.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
logic summary: Temporal interval exclusion
premise text: (3) This section does not apply if the supply is a supply by way of hire or lease.
conclusion text: The provision applies to supplies that are made before or after the specified time period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <>
logic summary: Temporal interval exclusion
premise text: (3) This section does not apply if the supply is a supply by way of hire or lease.
conclusion text: The provision applies to supplies that are made before or after the specified time period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: <>
logic summary: Temporal interval exclusion
premise text: (3) This section does not apply if the supply is a supply by way of hire or lease.
conclusion text: The provision applies to supplies that are made before or after the specified time period.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-51-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: <>
logic summary: Temporal interval exclusion
premise text: (3) This section does not apply if the supply is a supply by way of hire or lease.
conclusion text: The provision applies to supplies that are made before or after the specified time period.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-52-3
has part: 52(1) Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
has part: 52(2) Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
has part: 52(3) Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.83

52(1) Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-1
part of: 52 Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
note: Guarantee of undisturbed possession for consumers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.83
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(1) Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Obligation exists
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: there is a guarantee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Guarantee applies during possession
premise text: (b) the supply is not a supply of limited title
conclusion text: there is a guarantee that the consumer has the right to undisturbed possession of the goods
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Guarantee implies right to possession
premise text: (a) a person (the supplier) supplies goods to a consumer
conclusion text: there is a guarantee that the consumer has the right to undisturbed possession of the goods
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Guarantee spreads to consumers
premise text: (b) the supply is not a supply of limited title
conclusion text: there is a guarantee that the consumer has the right to undisturbed possession of the goods
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
logic summary: Guarantee is asserted by supplier
premise text: (a) a person (the supplier) supplies goods to a consumer
conclusion text: there is a guarantee that the consumer has the right to undisturbed possession of the goods
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(2) Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-2
part of: 52 Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
note: Disturbment of consumer's undisturbed possession is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.83
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disturb consumer's undisturbed possession.
premise text: Consumer's undisturbed possession may be lawfully disturbed by a person entitled to the benefit of any security, charge or encumbrance disclosed to the consumer before the consumer agreed to the supply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between disturbance and entitlement.
premise text: The consumer's undisturbed possession may be lawfully disturbed by a person entitled to the benefit of any security, charge or encumbrance disclosed to the consumer before the consumer agreed to the supply.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring disturbance conditions.
premise text: The consumer's undisturbed possession may be lawfully disturbed by a person entitled to the benefit of any security, charge or encumbrance disclosed to the consumer before the consumer agreed to the supply.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagated disturbance conditions.
premise text: The consumer's undisturbed possession may be lawfully disturbed by a person entitled to the benefit of any security, charge or encumbrance disclosed to the consumer before the consumer agreed to the supply.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inferred disturbance conditions.
premise text: The consumer's undisturbed possession may be lawfully disturbed by a person entitled to the benefit of any security, charge or encumbrance disclosed to the consumer before the consumer agreed to the supply.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

52(3) Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-3
part of: 52 Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
note: Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.83
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(3) Guarantee as to undisturbed possession
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-52-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee obligation
premise text: (3) If...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-78-2
note: Guarantee that certain persons will not disturb consumer's possession of goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.84
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-78-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-78-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-78-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-78-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee obligation
premise text: Supplier and other persons must not disturb consumer's possession.
conclusion text: No disturbance allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53 Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-53-2
has part: 53(1) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
has part: 53(2) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
has part: 53(3) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
has part: 53(4) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.84

53(1) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-1
part of: 53 Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
note: Guarantee that goods are free from undisclosed security, charge or encumbrance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.84
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(1) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(2) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-2
part of: 53 Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
note: Supplier must comply with guarantee unless floating charge becomes fixed and enforceable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.84
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(2) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Supplier has an obligation to comply with the guarantee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(3) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-3
part of: 53 Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
note: Guarantee for undisclosed securities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.84
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53(3) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(4) Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-4
part of: 53 Guarantee as to undisclosed securities etc.
note: Exemption from guarantee for supply by way of hire or lease
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.84
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-53-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !=
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: The supply is by way of hire or lease
conclusion text: This section does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Guarantee as to acceptable quality
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-54-3
has part: 54(1) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
has part: 54(2) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
has part: 54(3) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.85

54(1) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-54-3-ss-1
part of: 54 Guarantee as to acceptable quality
note: Guarantee of acceptable quality for goods supplied to consumers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.85
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-54-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-54-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-54-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(1) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-54-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee of acceptable quality
premise text: (1) If...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(2) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-54-3-ss-2
part of: 54 Guarantee as to acceptable quality
note: Goods must be of acceptable quality.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.85
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-54-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-54-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-54-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(2) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-54-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide goods of acceptable quality.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(3) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-54-3-ss-3
part of: 54 Guarantee as to acceptable quality
note: List of matters for guarantee as to acceptable quality
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.85
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-54-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-54-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-54-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-54-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(3) Guarantee as to acceptable quality
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-54-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: List of matters for guarantee as to acceptable quality
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-54-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-80-2
has part: 80(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 80(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 80(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 80(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.86

80(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-4
part of: 80 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Goods are of acceptable quality if not specifically drawn to consumer's attention before supply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.86
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4

act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to ensure goods are of acceptable quality.
premise text: (4) If:...
conclusion text: ...the goods are taken to be of acceptable quality.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between supply and specific attention.
premise text: (b) the only reason or reasons why they are not of acceptable quality were specifically drawn to the consumer’s attention...
conclusion text: ...the goods are taken to be of acceptable quality.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Supply is implied to be of acceptable quality if specific attention is given.
premise text: (a) goods supplied...
conclusion text: ...the goods are taken to be of acceptable quality.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Obligation propagates to suppliers and manufacturers.
premise text: (4) If:...
conclusion text: ...the goods are taken to be of acceptable quality.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-5
part of: 80 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Disclosure of reasons for goods not of acceptable quality
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.86
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to disclose reasons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-6
part of: 80 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Consumer's responsibility for goods quality
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.86
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation on consumers
premise text: Goods quality is affected by consumer's actions
conclusion text: Consumer must take reasonable steps to prevent goods from becoming of unacceptable quality
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-7
part of: 80 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Consumer must examine goods before agreeing to supply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.86
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to examine goods before agreeing to supply.
premise text: Consumer agrees to supply goods.
conclusion text: Goods are of acceptable quality if examined.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-80-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Examination must occur before supply.
premise text: Supply occurs after examination.
conclusion text: Examination must occur before supply.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-55-2
has part: 55(1) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
has part: 55(2) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
has part: 55(3) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.86

55(1) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-1
part of: 55 Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
note: Guarantee that goods are reasonably fit for any disclosed purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.86
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(1) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(2) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-2
part of: 55 Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
note: Consumer must disclose purpose for which goods are being acquired.
description: Express or implied knowledge of purpose to supplier, manufacturer, or person conducting negotiations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.86
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(2) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must disclose purpose
premise text: Consumer makes known purpose to supplier, manufacturer, or person conducting negotiations.
conclusion text: Obligation to disclose purpose
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Purpose is a temporal interval within which goods are being acquired
premise text: Goods are being acquired by the consumer for a particular period
conclusion text: Purpose is a subset of the temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Purpose is a trace within which goods are being acquired
premise text: Goods are being acquired by the consumer for a particular period
conclusion text: Purpose is a subset of the trace
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Manufacturer must be informed of purpose
premise text: Consumer makes known purpose to supplier, manufacturer, or person conducting negotiations.
conclusion text: Obligation to inform manufacturer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must be informed of purpose
premise text: Consumer makes known purpose to supplier, manufacturer, or person conducting negotiations.
conclusion text: Obligation to inform supplier
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55(3) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-3
part of: 55 Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
note: Consumer reliance on supplier's skill or judgment is not a duty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.86
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 55(3) Guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Excludes reliance on supplier's skill or judgment.
premise text: The consumer did not rely on, or it was unreasonable for the consumer to rely on...
conclusion text: This section does not apply if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-55-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Excludes reliance on manufacturer's skill or judgment.
premise text: ...the manufacturer, as the case may be.
conclusion text: This section does not apply if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Guarantee relating to the supply of goods by description
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-56-3
has part: 56(1) Guarantee relating to the supply of goods by description
has part: 56(2) Guarantee relating to the supply of goods by description
has part: 56(3) Guarantee relating to the supply of goods by description
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.87

56(1) Guarantee relating to the supply of goods by description
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-56-3-ss-1
part of: 56 Guarantee relating to the supply of goods by description
note: Guarantee for goods supplied by description
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.87
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-56-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-56-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-56-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56(1) Guarantee relating to the supply of goods by description
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-56-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee obligation
premise text: (1) If...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(2) Guarantee relating to the supply of goods by description
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-56-3-ss-2
part of: 56 Guarantee relating to the supply of goods by description
note: A supply of goods is not prevented from being a supply by description only because they are selected by the consumer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.87
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-56-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-56-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-56-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide goods by description
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(3) Guarantee relating to the supply of goods by description
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-56-3-ss-3
part of: 56 Guarantee relating to the supply of goods by description
note: Guarantee applies to goods supplied by description and reference.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.87
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-56-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-56-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-56-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Guarantee applies to goods supplied by description and reference.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 Guarantees relating to the supply of goods by sample or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-57-2
note: Supply of goods by sample or demonstration model must comply with certain guarantees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.87
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-57-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-57-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-57-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57 Guarantees relating to the supply of goods by sample or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-57-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide goods that meet certain standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-82-2
note: Guarantee for goods quality and condition
description: Goods corresponding with sample or demonstration model
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.88
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-82-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-82-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Goods quality and condition guarantee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Guarantee as to repairs and spare parts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-58-3
has part: 58(1) Guarantee as to repairs and spare parts
has part: 58(2) Guarantee as to repairs and spare parts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.88

58(1) Guarantee as to repairs and spare parts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-58-3-ss-1
part of: 58 Guarantee as to repairs and spare parts
note: Guarantee for repair and spare parts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.88
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-58-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-58-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-58-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(1) Guarantee as to repairs and spare parts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-58-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide guarantee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(2) Guarantee as to repairs and spare parts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-58-3-ss-2
part of: 58 Guarantee as to repairs and spare parts
note: Exemption from guarantee for reasonable action taken by manufacturer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.88
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-58-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-58-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-58-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission to manufacturer
premise text: Manufacturer took reasonable action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Guarantee as to express warranties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59-2
has part: 59(1) Guarantee as to express warranties
has part: 59(2) Guarantee as to express warranties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.88

59(1) Guarantee as to express warranties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59-2-ss-1
part of: 59 Guarantee as to express warranties
note: Guarantee as to express warranties for goods supplied in trade or commerce
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.88
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-59-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-59-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-59-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-59-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-59-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59(1) Guarantee as to express warranties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-59-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Express warranty obligation for goods supplied in trade or commerce
premise text: (1) If: a person supplies, in trade or commerce, goods to a consumer; and the supply does not occur by way of sale by auction;
conclusion text: there is a guarantee that the manufacturer of the goods will comply with any express warranty given or made by the manufacturer in relation to the goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-59-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Express warranty obligation for goods supplied in trade or commerce overlaps with the supply of goods
premise text: (b) the supply does not occur by way of sale by auction;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-59-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Express warranty obligation for goods supplied in trade or commerce repeats indefinitely
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59(2) Guarantee as to express warranties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59-2-ss-2
part of: 59 Guarantee as to express warranties
note: Guarantee for express warranties in trade or commerce
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.88
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-59-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-59-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-59-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-59-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59(2) Guarantee as to express warranties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-59-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Express warranty guarantee
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: there is a guarantee that the supplier will comply with any express warranty given or made by the supplier in relation to the goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-59-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval for guarantee application
premise text: (2) If...
conclusion text: the guarantee applies to goods supplied within a specific time frame
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Guarantee as to due care and skill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-60-3
note: Guarantee of due care and skill for services supplied to consumers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.89
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-60-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-60-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60 Guarantee as to due care and skill
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-60-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee of due care and skill
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-61-2
has part: 61(1) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
has part: 61(2) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.89

61(1) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-61-2-ss-1
part of: 61 Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
note: Guarantee for services supplied to consumers with a particular purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.89
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-61-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-61-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-61-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61(1) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-61-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guarantee obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61(2) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-61-2-ss-2
part of: 61 Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
note: Consumer must be informed of desired outcome when acquiring services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.89
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-61-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-61-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-61-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61(2) Guarantees as to fitness for a particular purpose etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-61-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must inform consumer
premise text: Consumer makes known desired outcome
conclusion text: Supplier must inform consumer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-84-2
has part: 84(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 84(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.90

84(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-3
part of: 84 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Consumer reliance on supplier's skill or judgment is not required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.90
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 84(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excluding reliance on supplier's skill or judgment.
premise text: (3) This section does not apply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Circumstances overlap with consumer reliance.
premise text: (3) This section does not apply if the circumstances show that the consumer did not rely on, or that it was unreasonable for the consumer to rely on...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Traces
logic summary: Circumstances trace consumer reliance.
premise text: (3) This section does not apply if the circumstances show that the consumer did not rely on, or that it was unreasonable for the consumer to rely on...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Circumstances diffuse consumer reliance.
premise text: (3) This section does not apply if the circumstances show that the consumer did not rely on, or that it was unreasonable for the consumer to rely on...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excluding reliance on supplier's skill or judgment.
premise text: (3) This section does not apply if the circumstances show that the consumer did not rely on, or that it was unreasonable for the consumer to rely on...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-4
part of: 84 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemption from trade practices amendment for professional services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.90
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 84(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-84-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
logic summary: Exempts from trade practices amendment
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Guarantee as to reasonable time for supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-62-3
note: Guarantee of reasonable time for supply
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.90
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-62-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-62-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62 Guarantee as to reasonable time for supply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-62-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to guarantee reasonable time for supply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63 Services to which this Subdivision does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-63-2
note: Exemptions from application of Subdivision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.90
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-63-2-norm

64 Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64-3
has part: 64(1) Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
has part: 64(2) Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.90

64(1) Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64-3-ss-1
part of: 64 Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
note: Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.90
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

act-sch-2-sec-64-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 64(1) Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Excluding or modifying provisions of the Division
premise text: (a) The application of all or any of the provisions of this Division
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Exercise of a right conferred by such a provision
premise text: (b) The exercise of a right conferred by such a provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Liability for failure to comply with a guarantee
premise text: (c) Any liability of a person for a failure to comply with a guarantee that applies under this Division
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64(2) Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64-3-ss-2
part of: 64 Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
note: Term of a contract cannot exclude or restrict the application of provisions in this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.90
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-64-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64(2) Guarantees not to be excluded etc. by contract
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on excluding or restricting application of provisions
premise text: (2) A term of a contract is not taken, for the purposes of this section...
conclusion text: ...unless the term does so expressly or is inconsistent with the provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Term applies during contract duration
premise text: (2) A term of a contract...
conclusion text: ...unless the term does so expressly or is inconsistent with the provision.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64A Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64a
has part: 64A(1) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
has part: 64A(2) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
has part: 64A(3) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.91

64A(1) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64a-ss-1
part of: 64A Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
note: Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.91
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-1-norm

act-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64A(1) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

64A(2) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64a-ss-2
part of: 64A Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
note: Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.91
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-2-norm

act-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64A(2) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

64A(3) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3
part of: 64A Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
note: Establishes a limitation on liability for failures to comply with guarantees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.91
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64A(3) Limitation of liability for failures to comply with guarantees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-64a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Establishes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-86-2
note: Court must consider circumstances when determining if reliance on contract term is fair or reasonable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.92
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-86-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-86-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-86-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-86-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-86-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-86-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-86-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-86-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court has an obligation to consider circumstances when determining if reliance on contract term is fair or reasonable.
premise text: The court must have regard to all the circumstances of the case.
conclusion text: Fairness and reasonableness are determined by considering the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-86-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The provision overlaps with other provisions in the same section.
premise text: Subdivision D—Miscellaneous is part of the same section as subsection (3).
conclusion text: Sch-2-sec-86-2 overlaps with Subdivision D—Miscellaneous.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-86-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: The provision implies that the court must consider certain factors when determining fairness and reasonableness.
premise text: If the court has regard to all the circumstances of the case, then it is fair or reasonable to rely on a term of a contract.
conclusion text: Fairness and reasonableness are determined by considering the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-86-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Inference
logic summary: The provision can be inferred from other provisions in the same section.
premise text: Subsection (3) is part of the same section as subsections (a), (b), and (c).
conclusion text: Sch-2-sec-86-2 can be inferred from Subsections (a), (b), and (c).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-86-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Validation
logic summary: The provision is valid under AI reasoning.
premise text: The provision follows the rules of logic and reasoning.
conclusion text: Sch-2-sec-86-2 is a valid provision.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65 Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-65-2
has part: 65(1) Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
has part: 65(2) Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.92

65(1) Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-65-2-ss-1
part of: 65 Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
note: Exemptions from application of Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.92
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-65-2-ss-1-norm

act-sch-2-sec-65-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(1) Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

65(2) Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-65-2-ss-2
part of: 65 Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
note: Definition of telecommunications service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.92
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-65-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-65-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-65-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-65-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(2) Application of this Division to supplies of gas, electricity and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-65-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of telecommunications service
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-65-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Telecommunications service is a service for carrying communications by means of guided or unguided electromagnetic energy or both.
conclusion text: A telecommunications service is a service for carrying communications by means of guided or unguided electromagnetic energy or both.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 Display notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66-3
has part: 66(1) Display notices
has part: 66(2) Display notices
has part: 66(3) Display notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.93

66(1) Display notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66-3-ss-1
part of: 66 Display notices
note: Display notices required for suppliers of specified goods
description: Notice that meets the requirements of the determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.93
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-66-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-66-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-66-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66(1) Display notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-66-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to display notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66(2) Display notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66-3-ss-2
part of: 66 Display notices
note: Display notice to consumer before supply
description: Notice meeting requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.93
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-66-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-66-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-66-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Supplier must display notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66(3) Display notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66-3-ss-3
part of: 66 Display notices
note: Specify information about the application of provisions in this Division.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.93
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-66-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-66-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-66-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66(3) Display notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-66-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the notice to include specified information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67 Conflict of laws
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-67-2
note: Provisions for conflict of laws in contracts with consumers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.93
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-67-2-norm

act-sch-2-sec-67-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67 Conflict of laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

88 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-88-2
note: Provisions of foreign laws apply despite the contract term.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.94
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-88-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-88-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-88-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 88 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-88-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Obligation applies
premise text: Provisions of foreign laws apply despite the contract term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-68-3
note: Provisions of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods prevail over this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.94
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-68-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-68-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-68-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-68-3-logic-cogai-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-68-3-logic-shacl-4

act-sch-2-sec-68-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68 Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-68-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails-over
logic summary: Provisions of the Convention take precedence.
premise text: The provisions of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods...
conclusion text: ...prevail over the provisions of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-68-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies-to
logic summary: Temporal interval applies.
premise text: done at Vienna on 11 April 1980,
conclusion text: ...as amended and in force for Australia from time to time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-68-3-logic-cogai-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: applies-to
logic summary: Applicable to artificial agents.
premise text: In 2010, the text of a Convention in the Australian Treaties Library...
conclusion text: ...was accessible through the Australian Treaties Library on the AustLII website.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-68-3-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: applies-to
logic summary: Applicable to schema definitions.
premise text: The Australian Consumer Law Schedule 1
conclusion text: ...prevail over the provisions of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-69-2
has part: 69(1) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
has part: 69(1A) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.95

69(1) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1
part of: 69 Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
note: Agreement is unsolicited consumer agreement if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.95
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(1) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of an unsolicited consumer agreement.
premise text: (1) An agreement is an unsolicited consumer agreement if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Negotiations must occur at a place other than the business premises.
premise text: (i) in each other’s presence at a place other than the business or trade premises of the supplier of the goods or services;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: and
logic summary: Multiple conditions must be met for an agreement to be unsolicited.
premise text: (a) it is for the supply, in trade or commerce, of goods or services to a consumer; and (b) it is made as a result of negotiations...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Total price paid must be more than $100.
premise text: (ii) if it is ascertainable at that time—is more than $100 or such other amount prescribed by the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Consumer did not invite dealer to negotiate.
premise text: (c) the consumer did not invite the dealer to come to that place, or to make a telephone call, for the purposes of entering into negotiations relating to the supply of those goods or services;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69(1A) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1a
part of: 69 Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
note: Consumer is not taken to have invited the dealer to come to that place or make a telephone call.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.95
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1a-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1a-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1a-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-4

act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69(1A) Meaning of unsolicited consumer agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consumer has not invited the dealer to come to that place or make a telephone call.
premise text: (1A) The consumer is not taken, for the purposes of subsection (1)(c), to have invited the dealer to come to that place, or to make a telephone call.
conclusion text: The consumer has not invited the dealer to come to that place or make a telephone call.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1a-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Consumer has not invited the dealer to come to that place or make a telephone call if the consumer has given their name or contact details for another purpose.
premise text: (a) given his or her name or contact details other than for the predominant purpose of entering into negotiations relating to the supply of the goods or services referred to in subsection (1)(c);
conclusion text: Consumer has not invited the dealer to come to that place or make a telephone call if the consumer has given their name or contact details for another purpose.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1a-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Dealer's attempt to contact the consumer is unsuccessful if the consumer contacts the dealer in connection with an unsuccessful attempt by the dealer to contact the consumer.
premise text: (b) contacted the dealer in connection with an unsuccessful attempt by the dealer to contact the consumer.
conclusion text: Dealer's attempt to contact the consumer is unsuccessful if the consumer contacts the dealer in connection with an unsuccessful attempt by the dealer to contact the consumer.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-69-2-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Consumer has not invited the dealer to come to that place or make a telephone call within a certain time frame.
premise text: (1A) The consumer is not taken, for the purposes of subsection (1)(c), to have invited the dealer to come to that place, or to make a telephone call.
conclusion text: Consumer has not invited the dealer to come to that place or make a telephone call within a certain time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

90 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-90-2
has part: 90(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 90(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 90(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.96

90(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-2
part of: 90 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: No obligation to negotiate supply based on price quote invitation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.96
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No obligation to negotiate supply based on price quote invitation
premise text: (2) An invitation merely to quote a price for a supply is not taken, for the purposes of subsection (1)(c), to be an invitation to enter into negotiations for a supply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: No temporal interval specified
premise text: (2) An invitation merely to quote a price for a supply is not taken, for the purposes of subsection (1)(c), to be an invitation to enter into negotiations for a supply.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: No recurring trace specified
premise text: (2) An invitation merely to quote a price for a supply is not taken, for the purposes of subsection (1)(c), to be an invitation to enter into negotiations for a supply.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Recognition
logic summary: No entity recognition specified
premise text: (2) An invitation merely to quote a price for a supply is not taken, for the purposes of subsection (1)(c), to be an invitation to enter into negotiations for a supply.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: No schema validation specified
premise text: (2) An invitation merely to quote a price for a supply is not taken, for the purposes of subsection (1)(c), to be an invitation to enter into negotiations for a supply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

90(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-3
part of: 90 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: An agreement is an unsolicited consumer agreement if it meets the regulations' criteria.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.96
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of unsolicited consumer agreement
premise text: The regulations provide criteria for unsolicited consumer agreements.
conclusion text: An agreement meets the criteria if it is of a kind that the regulations provide are unsolicited consumer agreements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope of the regulation
premise text: The regulation applies to agreements that meet the criteria during a certain period.
conclusion text: An agreement is an unsolicited consumer agreement if it meets the regulations' criteria during the applicable period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Global applicability of the regulation
premise text: The regulation applies to all agreements that meet the criteria.
conclusion text: An agreement is an unsolicited consumer agreement if it meets the regulations' criteria everywhere.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-and-only-if
logic summary: Equivalence between meeting the criteria and being an unsolicited consumer agreement
premise text: An agreement is an unsolicited consumer agreement if and only if it meets the regulations' criteria.
conclusion text: Meeting the criteria is equivalent to being an unsolicited consumer agreement.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is-a
logic summary: Classification of agreements in AI systems
premise text: The regulation classifies agreements into types that can be used in AI systems.
conclusion text: An agreement is classified as an unsolicited consumer agreement if it meets the regulations' criteria.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-4
part of: 90 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: An agreement is not an unsolicited consumer agreement if it meets certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.96
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-2-ss-4-norm

70 Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-3
has part: 70(1) Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
has part: 70(2) Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.96

70(1) Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-3-ss-1
part of: 70 Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
note: Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.96
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-3-ss-1-norm

act-sch-2-sec-70-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(1) Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

70(2) Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70-3-ss-2
part of: 70 Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
note: Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.96
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-3-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-70-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-70-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(2) Presumption that agreements are unsolicited consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Presumption of unsolicited consumer agreement
premise text: (2) In a proceeding relating to a contravention or possible contravention of this Division (other than a criminal proceeding), it is presumed...
conclusion text: ...that the proposed agreement would be an unsolicited consumer agreement if it were made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between proposed agreement and proceeding
premise text: (2) In a proceeding relating to a contravention or possible contravention of this Division (other than a criminal proceeding), it is presumed...
conclusion text: ...that the proposed agreement would be an unsolicited consumer agreement if it were made.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of proposed agreements in proceedings
premise text: (2) In a proceeding relating to a contravention or possible contravention of this Division (other than a criminal proceeding), it is presumed...
conclusion text: ...that the proposed agreement would be an unsolicited consumer agreement if it were made.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-3-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of presumptions in proceedings
premise text: (2) In a proceeding relating to a contravention or possible contravention of this Division (other than a criminal proceeding), it is presumed...
conclusion text: ...that the proposed agreement would be an unsolicited consumer agreement if it were made.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-70-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of unsolicited consumer agreements
premise text: (2) In a proceeding relating to a contravention or possible contravention of this Division (other than a criminal proceeding), it is presumed...
conclusion text: ...that the proposed agreement would be an unsolicited consumer agreement if it were made.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

71 Meaning of dealer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-71-2
note: Defines a dealer as a person who enters into negotiations with consumers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.96
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-71-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-71-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-71-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71 Meaning of dealer
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-71-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the type of obligation.
conclusion text: A dealer is a person who...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Meaning of negotiation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-72-3
note: Defines a negotiation as any discussion or dealing directed towards making an agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.97
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-72-3-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-2-sec-72-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies a clear class/type/subclass hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-72-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on parties to engage in negotiations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-73-2
has part: 73(1) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
has part: 73(2) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.97

73(1) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-1
part of: 73 Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
note: Dealer cannot call on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement outside certain hours.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.97
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(1) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits calling on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement outside certain hours.
premise text: (1) A dealer must not call on a person...
conclusion text: ...or after 6 pm on any other day (or after 5 pm if the other day is a Saturday).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes the temporal intervals during which a dealer can call on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement.
premise text: (b) before 9 am on any other day;
conclusion text: ...or after 6 pm on any other day (or after 5 pm if the other day is a Saturday).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Describes the recurring pattern of hours during which a dealer can call on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement.
premise text: (c) after 6 pm on any other day (or after 5 pm if the other day is a Saturday).
conclusion text: ...or before 9 am on any other day;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Differs
logic summary: Describes the difference between the hours during which a dealer can call on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement and the hours during which they cannot.
premise text: (a) at any time on a Sunday or a public holiday;
conclusion text: ...or after 6 pm on any other day (or after 5 pm if the other day is a Saturday).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes the pattern of hours during which a dealer can call on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement.
premise text: (b) before 9 am on any other day;
conclusion text: ...or after 6 pm on any other day (or after 5 pm if the other day is a Saturday).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73(2) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-2
part of: 73 Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
note: Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.97
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negotiation consent
premise text: (a) was given by the person to the dealer or a person acting on the dealer’s behalf; and (b) was not given in the presence of the dealer or a person acting on the dealer’s behalf.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-73-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
logic summary: Temporal intervals
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the dealer calls on the person in accordance with consent that:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-92-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.98
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-92-2-norm

74 Disclosing purpose and identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-74-3
note: Dealer must disclose purpose and identity before negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.98
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-74-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-74-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-74-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74 Disclosing purpose and identity
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-74-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Dealer must disclose purpose and identity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75 Ceasing to negotiate on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-75-2
has part: 75(1) Ceasing to negotiate on request
has part: 75(2) Ceasing to negotiate on request
has part: 75(3) Ceasing to negotiate on request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.98

75(1) Ceasing to negotiate on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-1
part of: 75 Ceasing to negotiate on request
note: Must leave premises immediately on request from occupier or person with apparent authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.98
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of entering premises without permission
premise text: Request from occupier or person with apparent authority
conclusion text: Must leave premises immediately
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75(2) Ceasing to negotiate on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-2
part of: 75 Ceasing to negotiate on request
note: Dealers must not contact prospective consumers for 30 days after a request to cease negotiations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.98
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of contact
premise text: Request to cease negotiations
conclusion text: No contact for 30 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75(3) Ceasing to negotiate on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-3
part of: 75 Ceasing to negotiate on request
note: Dealer cannot contact prospective customer in relation to supply by another supplier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.98
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-3-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits dealer from contacting prospective customer
premise text: (3) If the dealer is not, or is not to be, the supplier of the goods or services...
conclusion text: The dealer cannot contact the prospective customer in relation to a supply by another supplier.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the prohibition
premise text: (3) If the dealer is not, or is not to be, the supplier of the goods or services...
conclusion text: The prohibition applies from the time the dealer is not the supplier
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for the prohibition
premise text: (3) If the dealer is not, or is not to be, the supplier of the goods or services...
conclusion text: The prohibition applies in relation to any supply by another supplier
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Recognition
logic summary: Recognizes entities involved in the provision
premise text: (3) If the dealer is not, or is not to be, the supplier of the goods or services...
conclusion text: The dealer and prospective customer are recognized as entities
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-75-2-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: Validates schema for the provision
premise text: (3) If the dealer is not, or is not to be, the supplier of the goods or services...
conclusion text: The provision conforms to a valid schema
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Informing person of termination period etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-76-3
note: Dealer must not make unsolicited consumer agreement without providing specific information.
description: Information about termination period, exercise of right, and other prescribed matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.99
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-76-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-76-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-76-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits dealer from making unsolicited consumer agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Liability of suppliers for contraventions by dealers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-77-2
note: Supplier of goods or services also liable for contraventions by dealers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.99
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-77-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-77-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-77-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77 Liability of suppliers for contraventions by dealers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-77-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Supplier has obligation to comply with provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-94-2
note: Requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.100
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-94-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-94-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-94-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 94 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-94-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Requirement to give document to the consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-78-3
has part: 78(1) Requirement to give document to the consumer
has part: 78(2) Requirement to give document to the consumer
has part: 78(3) Requirement to give document to the consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.100

78(1) Requirement to give document to the consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-78-3-ss-1
part of: 78 Requirement to give document to the consumer
note: Dealer must provide copy of agreement to consumer after signing.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.100
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-78-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-78-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-78-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(1) Requirement to give document to the consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-78-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Dealer must provide copy of agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78(2) Requirement to give document to the consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-78-3-ss-2
part of: 78 Requirement to give document to the consumer
note: Dealer must provide consumer with agreement document within 5 business days.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.100
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-78-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-78-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-78-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(2) Requirement to give document to the consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-78-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Dealer must provide agreement document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78(3) Requirement to give document to the consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-78-3-ss-3
part of: 78 Requirement to give document to the consumer
note: Consumer must provide document upon request
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.100
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-78-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-78-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-78-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(3) Requirement to give document to the consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-78-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide document
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-79-2
note: Supplier must comply with specific requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements.
description: The agreement document must set out all terms, including total consideration and postal charges.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.100
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-79-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-79-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-79-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79 Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-79-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier has a duty to comply with the requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-80-3
note: Supplier must ensure compliance with additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements not negotiated by telephone.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.101
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-80-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-80-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-80-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80 Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-80-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-96-2
note: The agreement must be signed by the consumer under the agreement.
description: Signature of the consumer, statement that person is acting on behalf of the supplier, and full business address or residential address.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.102
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-96-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-96-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-96-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-96-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The agreement must be signed by the consumer under the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-81-2
note: Both parties must sign amendments to unsolicited consumer agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.102
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-81-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-81-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-81-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must sign amendments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-82-3
has part: 82(1) Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
has part: 82(2) Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
has part: 82(3) Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
has part: 82(4) Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.102

82(1) Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-1
part of: 82 Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
note: Consumer may terminate unsolicited consumer agreement
description: Notice to supplier
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.102
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Consumer obligation to terminate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(2) Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-2
part of: 82 Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
note: Right to terminate unsolicited consumer agreement despite affirmation or full execution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.102
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Has the right to terminate.
premise text: The consumer has a right under this section.
conclusion text: The consumer may terminate the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: Has permission to terminate despite affirmation or full execution.
premise text: The consumer has the right to terminate under this section.
conclusion text: The consumer may exercise their termination right despite affirmation or full execution.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
logic summary: Combines two conditions for terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement.
premise text: Termination can be exercised under this section in two ways.
conclusion text: The consumer may terminate the agreement despite affirmation or full execution.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Termination is limited to a specific time period.
premise text: This section defines a specific time period for terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement.
conclusion text: The termination right is only applicable during this time period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: assertion
logic summary: Involves affirmation of the agreement by the consumer.
premise text: The consumer has affirmed the agreement.
conclusion text: Despite affirmation, the consumer may still terminate the agreement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(3) Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-3
part of: 82 Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
note: Consumer may terminate agreement within specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.102
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82(3) Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Obligation to provide termination period
premise text: Section 73 and 74 of the Act
conclusion text: Consumer must be informed of termination period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Conditional commencement
premise text: Section 82(3) of the Act
conclusion text: Agreement may be terminated within the specified period starting from the first business day after agreement was made or document was given
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Obligation to comply with requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
premise text: Section 73 and 74 of the Act
conclusion text: Consumer must comply with requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Obligation to inform consumer of termination period
premise text: Section 76 of the Act
conclusion text: Consumer must be informed of termination period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(4) Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-4
part of: 82 Terminating an unsolicited consumer agreement during the
note: Methods for giving notice under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.102
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-82-3-ss-4-norm

98 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-98-2
has part: 98(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 98(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.104

98(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-98-2-ss-5
part of: 98 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Notice sent by post is taken to have been given at the time of posting.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.104
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-98-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-98-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-98-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-98-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-98-2-ss-6
part of: 98 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: No requirements for notice form or content
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.104
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-98-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-98-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-98-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: no requirement
logic summary: No obligation to provide specific information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83 Effect of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-83-2
has part: 83(1) Effect of termination
has part: 83(2) Effect of termination
has part: 83(3) Effect of termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.104

83(1) Effect of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-83-2-ss-1
part of: 83 Effect of termination
note: Voiding of related contracts or instruments upon termination of unsolicited consumer agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.104
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-83-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-83-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-83-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of related contracts or instruments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(2) Effect of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-83-2-ss-2
part of: 83 Effect of termination
note: A related contract or instrument must be disclosed.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.104
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-83-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-83-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-83-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(2) Effect of termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-83-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a related contract or instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(3) Effect of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-83-2-ss-3
part of: 83 Effect of termination
note: The termination of an unsolicited consumer agreement has effect for the purposes of section 82 and this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.104
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-83-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-83-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-83-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(3) Effect of termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-83-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 Obligations of suppliers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-84-3
note: Supplier must return consideration to consumer upon termination of unsolicited consumer agreement.
description: Return or refund
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.104
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-84-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-84-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-84-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to return consideration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85 Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-85-2
has part: 85(1) Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
has part: 85(2) Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
has part: 85(3) Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.105

85(1) Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-85-2-ss-1
part of: 85 Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
note: Consumer must return goods or notify supplier within a reasonable time after termination of unsolicited consumer agreement.
description: Goods or notification information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.105
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-85-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-85-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-85-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to return goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85(2) Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-85-2-ss-2
part of: 85 Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
note: Consumer gets goods back after 30 days of non-collection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.105
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-85-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-85-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-85-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-85-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(2) Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-85-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consumer has a right to goods after termination
premise text: Supplier must collect goods within 30 days
conclusion text: Goods become property of consumer if supplier does not collect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-85-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: 30 days is a temporal interval after termination
premise text: Termination occurs at some point in time
conclusion text: 30 days after termination is a valid interval for collection
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85(3) Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-85-2-ss-3
part of: 85 Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
note: Consumer must return goods within 10 business days after agreement termination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.105
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-85-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-85-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-85-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(3) Obligations and rights of consumers on termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-85-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consumer obligation to return goods within 10 business days.
premise text: (3) If...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-100-2
has part: 100(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 100(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 100(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.106

100(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-4
part of: 100 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Compensation is recoverable in a court of competent jurisdiction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.106
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to recover compensation
premise text: (4) The compensation is recoverable in a court of competent jurisdiction.
conclusion text: The state must provide compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for recovery of compensation
premise text: (4) The compensation is recoverable in a court of competent jurisdiction.
conclusion text: The compensation can be recovered within the next year.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication for trade practices amendment
premise text: (4) The compensation is recoverable in a court of competent jurisdiction.
conclusion text: The trade practices amendment implies the recovery of compensation.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagation of obligation to state
premise text: (4) The compensation is recoverable in a court of competent jurisdiction.
conclusion text: The obligation to provide compensation propagates to the state.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Recognition
logic summary: Recognition of entity as state
premise text: (4) The compensation is recoverable in a court of competent jurisdiction.
conclusion text: The entity recognized as the state must provide compensation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-5
part of: 100 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Consumer is not liable for damage or depreciation due to normal use or circumstances beyond control.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.106
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion of liability
premise text: Consumer is not liable for damage or depreciation
conclusion text: Due to normal use or circumstances beyond control
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-6
part of: 100 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Liability for consideration after termination of unsolicited consumer agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.106
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-100-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consumer's obligation to provide consideration
premise text: Service was supplied under the agreement
conclusion text: Liability for consideration after termination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Prohibition on supplies etc. for 10 business days
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-86-3
has part: 86(1) Prohibition on supplies etc. for 10 business days
has part: 86(2) Prohibition on supplies etc. for 10 business days
has part: 86(3) Prohibition on supplies etc. for 10 business days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.106

86(1) Prohibition on supplies etc. for 10 business days
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-1
part of: 86 Prohibition on supplies etc. for 10 business days
note: Supplier must not supply goods or services, accept payment, or require consideration for 10 business days after agreement is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.106
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(1) Prohibition on supplies etc. for 10 business days
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplier from supplying goods or services, accepting payment, or requiring consideration.
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement must not:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval of 10 business days starting from a specific date.
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement must not:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implies that the supplier's actions are prohibited during the specified period.
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement must not:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagates the prohibition to all relevant parties.
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement must not:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Infers the supplier's obligations during the specified period.
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement must not:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

86(2) Prohibition on supplies etc. for 10 business days
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-2
part of: 86 Prohibition on supplies etc. for 10 business days
note: Prohibition on supplies for 10 business days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.106
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(2) Prohibition on supplies etc. for 10 business days
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(3) Prohibition on supplies etc. for 10 business days
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-3
part of: 86 Prohibition on supplies etc. for 10 business days
note: Prohibition on supplies for 10 business days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.106
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(3) Prohibition on supplies etc. for 10 business days
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-86-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87 Repayment of payments received after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-87-2
note: Supplier must refund payments made after termination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.107
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-87-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-87-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-87-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Supplier has a duty to refund.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88 Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-88-3
note: Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.107
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-88-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-88-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-88-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-88-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-88-3-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-88-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 88 Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-88-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits actions against the consumer
premise text: (1) If an unsolicited consumer agreement is terminated in accordance with section 82, a person must not...
conclusion text: ...a person must not bring, or assert an intention to bring, legal proceedings against the consumer;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-88-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Limits the prohibited action to termination
premise text: (1) If an unsolicited consumer agreement is terminated in accordance with section 82, a person must not...
conclusion text: ...a person must not bring, or assert an intention to bring, legal proceedings against the consumer;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-88-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Limits the prohibited action to termination
premise text: (1) If an unsolicited consumer agreement is terminated in accordance with section 82, a person must not...
conclusion text: ...a person must not bring, or assert an intention to bring, legal proceedings against the consumer;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-88-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits actions against the consumer
premise text: (b) take, or assert an intention to take, any other action against the consumer;
conclusion text: ...a person must not take, or assert an intention to take, any other action against the consumer;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102-2
has part: 102(1A) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 102(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 102(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108

102(1A) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-1a
part of: 102 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemptions from subsection (1) for legal proceedings and actions against consumers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-1a-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission to certain actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-2
part of: 102 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Do not place consumer's name on a list of defaulters or debtors.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-3
part of: 102 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Remove name from list of defaulters or debtors if consumer's name has been wrongly placed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits removing consumer's name from list of defaulters or debtors.
premise text: (3) Without limiting Division 2 of Part 5-2, an injunction granted under that Division may require a person responsible for keeping a list of defaulters or debtors on which the consumer’s name has been wrongly placed to remove the name from that list.
conclusion text: The person must remove the name from the list.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The removal of a consumer's name from the list overlaps with the original placement.
premise text: (3) Without limiting Division 2 of Part 5-2, an injunction granted under that Division may require a person responsible for keeping a list of defaulters or debtors on which the consumer’s name has been wrongly placed to remove the name from that list.
conclusion text: The removal overlaps with the original placement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The removal of a consumer's name from the list repeats the original placement.
premise text: (3) Without limiting Division 2 of Part 5-2, an injunction granted under that Division may require a person responsible for keeping a list of defaulters or debtors on which the consumer’s name has been wrongly placed to remove the name from that list.
conclusion text: The removal repeats the original placement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: The removal of a consumer's name from the list spreads to other lists.
premise text: (3) Without limiting Division 2 of Part 5-2, an injunction granted under that Division may require a person responsible for keeping a list of defaulters or debtors on which the consumer’s name has been wrongly placed to remove the name from that list.
conclusion text: The removal spreads to other lists.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The system recognizes the need to remove a consumer's name from the list.
premise text: (3) Without limiting Division 2 of Part 5-2, an injunction granted under that Division may require a person responsible for keeping a list of defaulters or debtors on which the consumer’s name has been wrongly placed to remove the name from that list.
conclusion text: The system recognizes the need to remove the name.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89 Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-89-2
has part: 89(1) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
has part: 89(2) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
has part: 89(3) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108

89(1) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-1
part of: 89 Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
note: Excluding, limiting, modifying or restricting a right of the consumer under the agreement to terminate the agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5

act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits terminating the agreement
premise text: (1) A provision (however described) of an unsolicited consumer agreement is void if it has the effect of, or purports to have the effect of:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Excluding, limiting, modifying or restricting a right of the consumer under the agreement to terminate the agreement
premise text: (a) excluding, limiting, modifying or restricting a right of the consumer under the agreement to terminate the agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Excluding, limiting, modifying or restricting the effect or operation of this Division
premise text: (b) otherwise excluding, limiting, modifying or restricting the effect or operation of this Division;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Making a dispute relating to the agreement, or to a supply to which the agreement relates, justiciable by a court by which the dispute would not otherwise be justiciable
premise text: (c) making a dispute relating to the agreement, or to a supply to which the agreement relates, justiciable by a court by which the dispute would not otherwise be justiciable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the commencement of the provision
premise text: (1) A provision (however described) of an unsolicited consumer agreement is void if it has the effect of, or purports to have the effect of:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

89(2) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-2
part of: 89 Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
note: Supplier must ensure agreement does not include void provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(2) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Supplier has a duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(3) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-3
part of: 89 Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
note: Cannot attempt to enforce or rely on a void provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.108
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-89-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of attempting to enforce or rely on a void provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90 Waiver of rights
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-90-3
has part: 90(1) Waiver of rights
has part: 90(2) Waiver of rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.109

90(1) Waiver of rights
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-90-3-ss-1
part of: 90 Waiver of rights
note: Consumer cannot waive rights under unsolicited consumer agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.109
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-90-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90(1) Waiver of rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-90-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on waiver of rights
premise text: Consumer agreement
conclusion text: Waiver not permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90(2) Waiver of rights
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-90-3-ss-2
part of: 90 Waiver of rights
note: Supplier cannot induce consumer to waive rights.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.109
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-90-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-90-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 90(2) Waiver of rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-90-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits inducing waiver of rights.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91 Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-91-2
has part: 91(1) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
has part: 91(2) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.109

91(1) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-91-2-ss-1
part of: 91 Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
note: Division applies to persons with assigned or transferred consumer rights.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.109
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-91-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-91-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-91-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91(1) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-91-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Division applies to specified persons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91(2) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-91-2-ss-2
part of: 91 Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
note: This Division applies to persons who have rights assigned or transferred from the original supplier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.109
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-91-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-91-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-91-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91(2) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-91-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Division applies to persons with assigned or transferred rights
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-104-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.110
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-104-2-norm

92 Application of this Division to supplies to third parties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-92-3
note: Division applies in relation to a contract for the supply of goods or services to a consumer on the order of another person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.110
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-92-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-92-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-92-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92 Application of this Division to supplies to third parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-92-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Division applies to contracts for supplies to consumers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93 Effect of contravening this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-93-2
has part: 93(1) Effect of contravening this Division
has part: 93(2) Effect of contravening this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.110

93(1) Effect of contravening this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-93-2-ss-1
part of: 93 Effect of contravening this Division
note: Supplier cannot enforce agreement against consumer if provision of Division has been contravened.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.110
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-93-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-93-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-93-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93(1) Effect of contravening this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-93-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on enforcement
premise text: Supplier under unsolicited consumer agreement
conclusion text: cannot enforce agreement against consumer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93(2) Effect of contravening this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-93-2-ss-2
part of: 93 Effect of contravening this Division
note: No obligation to prevent contravention under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.110
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-93-2-ss-2-norm

act-sch-2-sec-93-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93(2) Effect of contravening this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

94 Regulations may limit the application of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-94-3
note: Regulations may limit the application of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.110
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-94-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-94-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-94-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 94 Regulations may limit the application of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-94-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibits
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95 Application of this Division to certain conduct covered by the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-95-2
note: Exempts conduct from Division 2 of the Corporations Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.110
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-95-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-95-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-95-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-95-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-95-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-95-2-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-95-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 95 Application of this Division to certain conduct covered by the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-95-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludedBy
logic summary: Exclusion from Division 2
premise text: Section 736, 992A or 992AA of the Corporations Act 2001 applies.
conclusion text: Division 2 does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-95-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for exemption
premise text: This Division does not apply in relation to conduct to which section 736, 992A or 992AA of the Corporations Act 2001 applies.
conclusion text: Exemption period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-95-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for exemption
premise text: This Division does not apply in relation to conduct to which section 736, 992A or 992AA of the Corporations Act 2001 applies.
conclusion text: Exemption period
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-95-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Applicable to certain conduct
premise text: This Division does not apply in relation to conduct to which section 736, 992A or 992AA of the Corporations Act 2001 applies.
conclusion text: Division 2 applies to specified conduct
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-95-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Applicable to certain conduct
premise text: This Division does not apply in relation to conduct to which section 736, 992A or 992AA of the Corporations Act 2001 applies.
conclusion text: Division 2 applies to specified conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

96 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-96-3
has part: 96(1) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
has part: 96(2) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
has part: 96(3) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
has part: 96(4) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.111

96(1) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-96-3-ss-1
part of: 96 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
note: Supplier must ensure agreement is in writing and provide copy to consumer.
description: Agreement in writing, copy of agreement to consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.111
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-96-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-96-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-96-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must ensure agreement is in writing and provide copy to consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96(2) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-96-3-ss-2
part of: 96 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
note: Supplier must ensure lay-by agreement is transparent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.111
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-96-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-96-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-96-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96(2) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-96-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to ensure transparency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96(3) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-96-3-ss-3
part of: 96 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
note: Lay-by agreements must be in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.111
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-96-3-ss-3-norm

96(4) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-96-3-ss-4
part of: 96 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
note: Deposit paid by consumer is taken to be an instalment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.111
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-96-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-96-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-96-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96(4) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-96-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Imposes obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

97 Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-97-2
has part: 97(1) Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
has part: 97(2) Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.111

97(1) Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-97-2-ss-1
part of: 97 Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
note: Consumer may terminate lay-by agreement at any time before delivery.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.111
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-97-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-97-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-97-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

97(2) Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-97-2-ss-2
part of: 97 Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
note: Supplier must ensure termination charge is not payable unless certain conditions met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.111
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-97-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-97-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-97-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 97(2) Termination of lay-by agreements by consumers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-97-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Supplier has a duty to ensure termination charge is not payable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-2
note: Supplier must ensure termination charge is reasonable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.112
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-106-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-106-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-106-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-106-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to suppliers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

98 Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-98-3
note: Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.112
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-98-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-98-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-98-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits termination of lay-by agreements under certain conditions.
premise text: The supplier must not terminate the agreement unless...
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99 Effect of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99-2
has part: 99(1) Effect of termination
has part: 99(2) Effect of termination
has part: 99(3) Effect of termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.112

99(1) Effect of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99-2-ss-1
part of: 99 Effect of termination
note: Supplier must refund consumer amounts upon termination of lay-by agreement.
description: refund
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.112
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-99-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-99-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-99-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 99(1) Effect of termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-99-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Supplier has an obligation to refund consumer amounts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99(2) Effect of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99-2-ss-2
part of: 99 Effect of termination
note: Supplier entitled to recover unpaid termination charge from consumer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.112
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-99-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-99-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-99-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Supplier has right to recover unpaid termination charge.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99(3) Effect of termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99-2-ss-3
part of: 99 Effect of termination
note: No damages or other remedies can be enforced after termination of a lay-by agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.112
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-99-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-99-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-99-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits enforcement of remedies after termination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100 Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-100-3
has part: 100(1) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
has part: 100(2) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
has part: 100(3) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
has part: 100(4) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.113

100(1) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-1
part of: 100 Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
note: Supplier must provide proof of transaction after supplying goods or services over $75.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.113
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(1) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must provide proof of transaction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(2) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-2
part of: 100 Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
note: Request for proof of transaction upon supply of goods or services below $75.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.113
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(2) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide proof of transaction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(3) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-3
part of: 100 Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
note: Supplier must provide proof of transaction within 7 days.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.113
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide proof
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(4) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-4
part of: 100 Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
note: Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.113
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4

act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(4) Supplier must provide proof of transaction etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide proof of transaction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: States date of supply
premise text: (d) states the date of the supply;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: Recurring trace of supplier information
premise text: (a) identifies the supplier of the goods or services; (b) if the supplier has an ABN—states the supplier’s ABN; (c) if the supplier does not have an ABN but has an ACN—states the supplier’s ACN;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-100-3-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Spreads information about supplier to consumer
premise text: (f) states the price of the goods or services.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-108-2
note: Supplier must ensure proof of transaction is transparent.
description: proof of transaction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.114
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-108-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-108-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-108-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 108 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-108-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must ensure proof of transaction is transparent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101 Consumer may request an itemised bill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101-2
has part: 101(1) Consumer may request an itemised bill
has part: 101(2) Consumer may request an itemised bill
has part: 101(3) Consumer may request an itemised bill
has part: 101(4) Consumer may request an itemised bill
has part: 101(5) Consumer may request an itemised bill
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.114

101(1) Consumer may request an itemised bill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1
part of: 101 Consumer may request an itemised bill
note: Supplier must provide itemised bill to consumer upon request.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.114
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-6

act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 101(1) Consumer may request an itemised bill
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must provide itemised bill.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of services and materials.
premise text: (a) specifies how the price of the services was calculated; (b) includes, if applicable, the number of hours of labour that related to the supply of the services and the hourly rate for that labour; (c) includes, if applicable, a list of the materials used to supply the services and the amount charged for those materials.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Itemised bill must include hours of labour and hourly rate.
premise text: (b) includes, if applicable, the number of hours of labour that related to the supply of the services and the hourly rate for that labour;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Itemised bill must include list of materials.
premise text: (c) includes, if applicable, a list of the materials used to supply the services and the amount charged for those materials;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Itemised bill must be provided upon request.
premise text: (1) If a person (the supplier), in trade or commerce, supplies services to a consumer, the consumer may request that the supplier give the consumer an itemised bill;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Itemised bill must be provided in electronic format.
premise text: (1) If a person (the supplier), in trade or commerce, supplies services to a consumer, the consumer may request that the supplier give the consumer an itemised bill;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

101(2) Consumer may request an itemised bill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-2
part of: 101 Consumer may request an itemised bill
note: Request for itemised bill must be made within 30 days after services are supplied or consumer receives a bill.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.114
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to request itemised bill within 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101(3) Consumer may request an itemised bill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-3
part of: 101 Consumer may request an itemised bill
note: Supplier must provide itemised bill within 7 days after request.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.114
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 101(3) Consumer may request an itemised bill
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must provide itemised bill.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101(4) Consumer may request an itemised bill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-4
part of: 101 Consumer may request an itemised bill
note: Supplier must not charge consumer for itemised bill
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.114
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 101(4) Consumer may request an itemised bill
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits charging consumer for itemised bill
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101(5) Consumer may request an itemised bill
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-5
part of: 101 Consumer may request an itemised bill
note: Supplier must ensure itemised bill is transparent.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.114
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 101(5) Consumer may request an itemised bill
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to ensure transparency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102 Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102-3
has part: 102(1) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
has part: 102(2) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
has part: 102(3) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.115

102(1) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102-3-ss-1
part of: 102 Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
note: Prescribes requirements for warranties against defects.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.115
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-102-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(1) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-102-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribe
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(2) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102-3-ss-2
part of: 102 Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
note: Do not give a document evidencing a warranty against defects that does not comply with the requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.115
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-102-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(2) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-102-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of giving a non-compliant warranty document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(3) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102-3-ss-3
part of: 102 Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
note: Warranty against defects must be unconditional or on specified conditions.
description: Repair, replace, provide again, rectify, or recompense the consumer if goods/services are defective.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.115
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-102-3-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-102-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(3) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-102-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Warranty against defects is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-102-3-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Goods/services are defective if they do not meet the warranty requirements.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103 Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-103-2
has part: 103(1) Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
has part: 103(2) Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.115

103(1) Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-103-2-ss-1
part of: 103 Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
note: Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.115
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-103-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-103-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-103-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 103(1) Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-103-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103(2) Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-103-2-ss-2
part of: 103 Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
note: Repairers must not accept goods from consumers without proper notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.115
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-103-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-103-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-103-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of accepting goods from consumers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-110-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.116
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-110-2-norm

104 Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-104-3
has part: 104(1) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
has part: 104(2) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
has part: 104(3) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.116

104(1) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-104-3-ss-1
part of: 104 Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
note: The Commonwealth Minister may make a safety standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.116
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-104-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-104-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-104-3-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(1) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-104-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make a safety standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104(2) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-104-3-ss-2
part of: 104 Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
note: Safety standards for consumer goods must include requirements to prevent or reduce risk of injury.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.116
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-104-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-104-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-104-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(2) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-104-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide safety standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104(3) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-104-3-ss-3
part of: 104 Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
note: Safety standards for product-related services may require specific requirements to prevent or reduce risk of injury.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.116
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-104-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-104-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-104-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(3) Making safety standards for consumer goods and product
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-104-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires safety standards for product-related services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105 Declaring safety standards for consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-105-2
has part: 105(1) Declaring safety standards for consumer goods and product
has part: 105(2) Declaring safety standards for consumer goods and product
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.117

105(1) Declaring safety standards for consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-105-2-ss-1
part of: 105 Declaring safety standards for consumer goods and product
note: The Commonwealth Minister may declare a safety standard for consumer goods or product.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.117
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-105-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-105-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-105-2-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 105(1) Declaring safety standards for consumer goods and product
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-105-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to declare a safety standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105(2) Declaring safety standards for consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-105-2-ss-2
part of: 105 Declaring safety standards for consumer goods and product
note: Cannot declare a standard as a safety standard for certain goods or services if it's inconsistent with an existing standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.117
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-105-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-105-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-105-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Safety standard for goods or services
conclusion text: Cannot declare
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-3
has part: 106(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
has part: 106(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.117

106(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-3-ss-1
part of: 106 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Supplying non-compliant consumer goods is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.117
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-106-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-106-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-106-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 106(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-106-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying non-compliant consumer goods.
premise text: (a) a safety standard for consumer goods of that kind is in force;
conclusion text: (1) A person must not, in trade or commerce, supply consumer goods of a particular kind if:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-3-ss-2
part of: 106 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Prohibits offering consumer goods that do not comply with safety for supply in trade or commerce.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.117
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-106-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-106-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-106-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 106(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-106-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-112-2
has part: 112(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 112(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 112(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 112(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 112(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.118

112(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-3
part of: 112 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Prohibit manufacture, possession or control of consumer goods with prohibited supply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.118
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 112(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-4
part of: 112 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Manufacture, possession or control of goods not for export is a defence in contravention proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.118
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 112(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-5
part of: 112 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Prohibition on exporting consumer goods without approval
description: Approval from the Commonwealth Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.118
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 112(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-6
part of: 112 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Statement of approval particulars must be tabled in Parliament within 7 sitting days.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.118
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to table statement in Parliament
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-7
part of: 112 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Person supplying consumer goods in contravention of section 112(7) is liable for loss or damage suffered by another person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.118
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 112(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-112-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide safe goods
premise text: Person supplies consumer goods in contravention of section 112(7)
conclusion text: Other person is taken to have suffered loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-107-2
has part: 107(1) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
has part: 107(2) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
has part: 107(3) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.119

107(1) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-1
part of: 107 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
note: Supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.119
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 107(1) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards.
premise text: (a) a safety standard for services of that kind is in force; and (b) those services do not comply with the standard.
conclusion text: A person must not supply product related services of particular kind if: (a) a safety standard for services of that kind is in force; and (b) those services do not comply with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Safety standards for product related services overlap with the provision of such services.
premise text: (a) a safety standard for services of that kind is in force; and (b) those services do not comply with the standard.
conclusion text: The provision of product related services overlaps with the requirement to comply with safety standards.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Product related services that do not comply with safety standards contain a violation.
premise text: (a) a safety standard for services of that kind is in force; and (b) those services do not comply with the standard.
conclusion text: The provision of product related services contains a violation if it does not comply with safety standards.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: Prohibition of supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards spreads to all agents.
premise text: (a) a safety standard for services of that kind is in force; and (b) those services do not comply with the standard.
conclusion text: The prohibition on supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards spreads to all agents.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: CogAI recognizes the prohibition on supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards.
premise text: (a) a safety standard for services of that kind is in force; and (b) those services do not comply with the standard.
conclusion text: CogAI recognizes the prohibition on supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107(2) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-2
part of: 107 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
note: Offering product-related services that do not comply with subsection (1) is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.119
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 107(2) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of offering non-compliant product-related services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107(3) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-3
part of: 107 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
note: Person supplying product-related services that do not comply with safety standard is liable for loss or damage suffered by another person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.119
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107(3) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Liability for non-compliance with safety standard
premise text: a person supplies product related services in contravention of this section
conclusion text: the other person is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to have suffered the loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between supply of services and suffering of loss or damage
premise text: (3) If: (a) a person supplies product related services in contravention of this section;
conclusion text: the other person is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to have suffered the loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Recurring trace of supply of services and suffering of loss or damage
premise text: (3) If: (a) a person supplies product related services in contravention of this section;
conclusion text: the other person is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to have suffered the loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of liability from supplier to sufferer
premise text: (3) If: (a) a person supplies product related services in contravention of this section;
conclusion text: the other person is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to have suffered the loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inferential
logic summary: Inference of liability from supplier's actions
premise text: (3) If: (a) a person supplies product related services in contravention of this section;
conclusion text: the other person is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to have suffered the loss or damage
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108 Requirement to nominate a safety standard
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-108-3
note: Requirement to nominate a safety standard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.119
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-108-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-108-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-108-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 108 Requirement to nominate a safety standard
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-108-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

114 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-114-2
note: Supplier must comply with standard's requirements within specified period.
description: Written notice specifying which sets of requirements to comply with.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.120
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-114-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-114-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-114-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 114 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-114-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109 Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-109-2
has part: 109(1) Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
has part: 109(2) Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.121

109(1) Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-109-2-ss-1
part of: 109 Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
note: Interim ban on consumer goods of a particular kind if it appears to the responsible Minister that they will or may cause injury to any person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.121
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-109-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-109-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-109-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-109-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 109(1) Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-109-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition on consumer goods.
premise text: (1) A responsible Minister may, by written notice published on the internet, impose an interim ban...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-109-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies consumer goods as a particular kind.
premise text: (a) it appears to the responsible Minister that:...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109(2) Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-109-2-ss-2
part of: 109 Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
note: Interim ban on product related services of a particular kind
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.121
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-109-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-109-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-109-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 109(2) Interim bans on consumer goods or product related services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-109-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on product related services
premise text: (2) A responsible Minister may, by written notice published on the internet...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-116-2
note: Ban still in force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.122
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-116-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-116-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-116-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a ban
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110 Places in which interim bans apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-110-3
has part: 110(1) Places in which interim bans apply
has part: 110(2) Places in which interim bans apply
has part: 110(3) Places in which interim bans apply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.122

110(1) Places in which interim bans apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-1
part of: 110 Places in which interim bans apply
note: Interim ban applies in all States and Territories.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.122
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(1) Places in which interim bans apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Obligation applies to the Commonwealth Minister.
premise text: (1) An interim ban imposed by the Commonwealth Minister applies in all States and Territories.
conclusion text: The interim ban applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies
logic summary: Temporal interval applies to the provision.
premise text: (1) An interim ban imposed by the Commonwealth Minister applies in all States and Territories.
conclusion text: The temporal interval applies.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: applies
logic summary: Linear temporal logic applies to the provision.
premise text: (1) An interim ban imposed by the Commonwealth Minister applies in all States and Territories.
conclusion text: The linear temporal logic applies.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110(2) Places in which interim bans apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-2
part of: 110 Places in which interim bans apply
note: Interim ban applies in the State.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.122
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(2) Places in which interim bans apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: (2) An interim ban...
conclusion text: Interim ban applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110(3) Places in which interim bans apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-3
part of: 110 Places in which interim bans apply
note: Interim ban applies in the Territory where imposed by a responsible Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.122
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(3) Places in which interim bans apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Interim ban applies in the Territory.
premise text: (3) An interim ban imposed by a responsible Minister who is a Minister of a Territory applies in the Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies
logic summary: Interim ban applies in the Territory where imposed by a responsible Minister.
premise text: (3) An interim ban imposed by a responsible Minister who is a Minister of a Territory applies in the Territory.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: applies
logic summary: Interim ban applies in the Territory where imposed by a responsible Minister.
premise text: (3) An interim ban imposed by a responsible Minister who is a Minister of a Territory applies in the Territory.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: applies
logic summary: Interim ban applies in the Territory where imposed by a responsible Minister.
premise text: (3) An interim ban imposed by a responsible Minister who is a Minister of a Territory applies in the Territory.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-110-3-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: applies
logic summary: Interim ban applies in the Territory where imposed by a responsible Minister.
premise text: (3) An interim ban imposed by a responsible Minister who is a Minister of a Territory applies in the Territory.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111 Ban period for interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-111-2
has part: 111(1) Ban period for interim bans
has part: 111(2) Ban period for interim bans
has part: 111(3) Ban period for interim bans
has part: 111(4) Ban period for interim bans
has part: 111(5) Ban period for interim bans
has part: 111(6) Ban period for interim bans
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.122

111(1) Ban period for interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-1
part of: 111 Ban period for interim bans
note: Interim ban period starts on specified day and ends after 60 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.122
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 111(1) Ban period for interim bans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits interim ban during specified period.
premise text: (1) An interim ban imposed by a responsible Minister is in force...
conclusion text: ...ends at the end of 60 days after...the start day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes the overlap between the start day and the end of the ban period.
premise text: (1) An interim ban imposed by a responsible Minister is in force...
conclusion text: ...ends at the end of 60 days after...the start day.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the start day and the ban period.
premise text: (1) An interim ban imposed by a responsible Minister is in force...
conclusion text: ...ends at the end of 60 days after...the start day.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Describes how information about the ban period spreads.
premise text: (1) An interim ban imposed by a responsible Minister is in force...
conclusion text: ...ends at the end of 60 days after...the start day.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Describes how AI systems recognize and process information about the ban period.
premise text: (1) An interim ban imposed by a responsible Minister is in force...
conclusion text: ...ends at the end of 60 days after...the start day.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

111(2) Ban period for interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-2
part of: 111 Ban period for interim bans
note: Responsible Minister may extend ban period by up to 30 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.122
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 111(2) Ban period for interim bans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to extend ban period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111(3) Ban period for interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-3
part of: 111 Ban period for interim bans
note: Request to extend extended ban period for ban
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.122
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-3-norm

111(4) Ban period for interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-4
part of: 111 Ban period for interim bans
note: Extend extended ban period for interim ban by up to 30 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.122
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111(5) Ban period for interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-5
part of: 111 Ban period for interim bans
note: Decision to extend ban period if request not made immediately before extended ban period ends
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.122
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Decision to extend ban period if request not made immediately before extended ban period ends
premise text: (5) If: (a) a request is made under subsection (3); and (b) the Commonwealth Minister has not made a decision on the request immediately before the extended ban period for the interim ban is to end;
conclusion text: the Commonwealth Minister is taken to have decided to extend the extended ban period for the ban by a further period of 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Extended ban period overlaps with previous extended ban period
premise text: (5) If: (a) a request is made under subsection (3); and (b) the Commonwealth Minister has not made a decision on the request immediately before the extended ban period for the interim ban is to end;
conclusion text: the extended ban period for the ban by a further period of 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Extended ban period ends when request made or decision made
premise text: (5) If: (a) a request is made under subsection (3); and (b) the Commonwealth Minister has not made a decision on the request immediately before the extended ban period for the interim ban is to end;
conclusion text: the extended ban period for the ban by a further period of 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Request diffusion
premise text: (5) If: (a) a request is made under subsection (3); and (b) the Commonwealth Minister has not made a decision on the request immediately before the extended ban period for the interim ban is to end;
conclusion text: the Commonwealth Minister is taken to have decided to extend the extended ban period for the ban by a further period of 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Decision inference
premise text: (5) If: (a) a request is made under subsection (3); and (b) the Commonwealth Minister has not made a decision on the request immediately before the extended ban period for the interim ban is to end;
conclusion text: the Commonwealth Minister is taken to have decided to extend the extended ban period for the ban by a further period of 30 days.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111(6) Ban period for interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-6
part of: 111 Ban period for interim bans
note: Extend extended ban period for interim ban by up to 30 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.122
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-111-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Grant permission
premise text: (6) If...
conclusion text: the Commonwealth Minister may...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112 Interaction of multiple interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-112-3
has part: 112(1) Interaction of multiple interim bans
has part: 112(2) Interaction of multiple interim bans
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.123

112(1) Interaction of multiple interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-1
part of: 112 Interaction of multiple interim bans
note: Original ban ceases to be in force immediately before the Commonwealth ban comes into force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.123
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 112(1) Interaction of multiple interim bans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: Original ban ceases to be in force.
premise text: (a) an interim ban (the original ban) on consumer goods of a particular kind (the banned goods) is imposed by a responsible Minister other than the Commonwealth Minister;
conclusion text: the original ban, to the extent that it is a ban on the banned goods, ceases to be in force immediately before the Commonwealth ban comes into force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: The Commonwealth ban includes the banned goods.
premise text: (b) while the original ban is in force, the Commonwealth Minister imposes an interim ban (the Commonwealth ban): (i) on the banned goods; or (ii) on consumer goods of a kind that includes the banned goods;
conclusion text: the Commonwealth ban includes the banned goods.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The original ban ceases to be in force before the Commonwealth ban comes into force.
premise text: (a) an interim ban (the original ban) on consumer goods of a particular kind (the banned goods) is imposed by a responsible Minister other than the Commonwealth Minister;
conclusion text: the original ban ceases to be in force immediately before the Commonwealth ban comes into force.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: The Commonwealth ban comes into force after the original ban ceases to be in force.
premise text: (b) while the original ban is in force, the Commonwealth Minister imposes an interim ban (the Commonwealth ban): (i) on the banned goods; or (ii) on consumer goods of a kind that includes the banned goods;
conclusion text: the Commonwealth ban comes into force after the original ban ceases to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cease
logic summary: The Commonwealth ban ceases to be in force if the original ban is lifted.
premise text: (b) while the original ban is in force, the Commonwealth Minister imposes an interim ban (the Commonwealth ban): (i) on the banned goods; or (ii) on consumer goods of a kind that includes the banned goods;
conclusion text: the Commonwealth ban ceases to be in force if the original ban is lifted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112(2) Interaction of multiple interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-2
part of: 112 Interaction of multiple interim bans
note: Imposes an obligation on a responsible Minister other than the Commonwealth Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.123
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 112(2) Interaction of multiple interim bans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
premise text: (2) If:...
conclusion text: ...the banned services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-112-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation between temporal intervals
logic summary: Establishes a relation between the imposition of the ban and its effect.
premise text: (2) If:...
conclusion text: ...the banned services
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-118-2
note: Imposes an interim ban on the banned services or product-related services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.124
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-118-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-118-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-118-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-118-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-118-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-118-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-118-2-logic-cogai-6

act-sch-2-sec-118-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 118 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-118-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition.
premise text: (b) while the original ban is in force, the Commonwealth Minister imposes an interim ban (the Commonwealth ban):
conclusion text: The Commonwealth ban comes into force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-118-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the banned services and product-related services as prohibited.
premise text: (i) on the banned services; or (ii) on product related services of a kind that includes the banned services;
conclusion text: The Commonwealth ban applies to these services.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-118-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with the original ban in terms of time.
premise text: the original ban, to the extent that it is a ban on the banned services, ceases to be in force immediately before the Commonwealth ban comes into force.
conclusion text: The Commonwealth ban starts after the original ban ends.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-118-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of overlapping bans.
premise text: (b) while the original ban is in force, the Commonwealth Minister imposes an interim ban (the Commonwealth ban):
conclusion text: The Commonwealth ban repeats every time the original ban ends.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-118-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads the prohibition to product-related services.
premise text: (ii) on product related services of a kind that includes the banned services;
conclusion text: The Commonwealth ban applies to these services as well.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-118-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Infers the prohibition from the original ban.
premise text: (b) while the original ban is in force, the Commonwealth Minister imposes an interim ban (the Commonwealth ban):
conclusion text: The Commonwealth ban is inferred from the original ban.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

113 Revocation of interim bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-113-2
note: Responsible Minister may revoke interim ban at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.124
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-113-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-113-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-113-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 113 Revocation of interim bans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-113-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to revoke
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

114 Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-114-3
has part: 114(1) Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
has part: 114(2) Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.124

114(1) Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-1
part of: 114 Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
note: Permanent ban on consumer goods of a particular kind if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.124
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-1-logic-cogai-4

act-sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 114(1) Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition on the sale/consumption of consumer goods.
premise text: The Commonwealth Minister may, by written notice published on the internet...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: The ban overlaps with existing interim bans or foreseeable uses.
premise text: (a) one or more interim bans on consumer goods of that kind (the banned goods),...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: The ban is recurring if the conditions are met.
premise text: (b) it appears to the Commonwealth Minister that: (i) consumer goods of that kind will or may cause injury to any person;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: The system recognizes the ban as a prohibition.
premise text: (1) The Commonwealth Minister may, by written notice published on the internet...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

114(2) Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-2
part of: 114 Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
note: Permanent ban on product related services of a particular kind if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.124
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 114(2) Permanent bans on consumer goods or product related services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a permanent ban on product related services.
premise text: (2) The Commonwealth Minister may, by written notice published on the internet...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-114-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the ban.
premise text: (2) The Commonwealth Minister may, by written notice published on the internet...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

115 Places in which permanent bans apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-115-2
note: Permanent ban applies in all States and Territories.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.125
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-115-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-115-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-115-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 115 Places in which permanent bans apply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-115-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true for all States and Territories.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116 When permanent bans come into force
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-116-3
note: Permanent ban comes into force on specified day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.125
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-116-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-116-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-116-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: comes-into-force
logic summary: Deontic logic for permanent ban
premise text: The Commonwealth Minister specifies the day
conclusion text: A permanent ban comes into force on that day
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

117 Revocation of permanent bans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-117-2
note: Revocation of permanent bans by Commonwealth Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.125
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-117-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-117-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-117-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-118-3
note: Supplying consumer goods of a particular kind is prohibited if an interim or permanent ban is in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.125
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-118-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-118-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-118-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 118 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-118-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person must not...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-120-2
has part: 120(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 120(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 120(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 120(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 120(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 120(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.126

120(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-2
part of: 120 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Prohibit offering consumer goods for supply in trade or commerce.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.126
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 120(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-3
part of: 120 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Prohibition on manufacturing, possessing or controlling consumer goods with prohibited supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.126
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 120(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-4
part of: 120 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Manufacture, possession or control of goods not for export is a defence in contravention proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.126
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 120(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-5
part of: 120 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Prohibition on exporting consumer goods without approval
description: Approval from the Commonwealth Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.126
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 120(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-6
part of: 120 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Statement of approval particulars must be tabled in Parliament within 7 sitting days.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.126
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to table statement in Parliament
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-7
part of: 120 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Liability for loss or damage caused by defective goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.126
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 120(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Liability for loss or damage
premise text: (7) If...
conclusion text: ...the other person is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to have suffered the loss or damage...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval for liability
premise text: (7) If...
conclusion text: ...the other person is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to have suffered the loss or damage...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: Implication of liability on supply
premise text: (7) If...
conclusion text: ...the other person is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to have suffered the loss or damage...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of liability through supply chain
premise text: (7) If...
conclusion text: ...the other person is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to have suffered the loss or damage...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-120-2-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive
logic summary: Cognitive processing of liability
premise text: (7) If...
conclusion text: ...the other person is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to have suffered the loss or damage...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119 Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-119-2
has part: 119(1) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
has part: 119(2) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
has part: 119(3) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.127

119(1) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-1
part of: 119 Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
note: Supplying product related services of a particular kind is prohibited if an interim or permanent ban is in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.127
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 119(1) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of supplying product related services.
premise text: An interim ban on services of that kind is in force.
conclusion text: Supplying product related services of a particular kind is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119(2) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-2
part of: 119 Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
note: Prohibition on offering product-related services covered by a ban
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.127
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 119(2) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits the action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119(3) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-3
part of: 119 Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
note: If a person supplies product related services in contravention of subsection (1), and another person suffers loss or damage, the other person is taken to have suffered the loss or damage.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.127
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 119(3) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to compensate for damages caused by supplying product related services in contravention of subsection (1)
premise text: (a) a person supplies product related services in contravention of subsection (1); and (b) another person suffers loss or damage
conclusion text: the other person is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to have suffered the loss or damage because of that supply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The supply of product related services in contravention of subsection (1) occurs during the period when the person supplies such services.
premise text: (3) If: (a) a person supplies product related services in contravention of subsection (1); and (b) another person suffers loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: The supply of product related services in contravention of subsection (1) occurs during the period when the person supplies such services.
premise text: (3) If: (a) a person supplies product related services in contravention of subsection (1); and (b) another person suffers loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-then
logic summary: If a person supplies product related services in contravention of subsection (1), then the other person is taken to have suffered the loss or damage.
premise text: (a) a person supplies product related services in contravention of subsection (1); and (b) another person suffers loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-119-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if-then
logic summary: If a person supplies product related services in contravention of subsection (1), then the other person is taken to have suffered the loss or damage.
premise text: (a) a person supplies product related services in contravention of subsection (1); and (b) another person suffers loss or damage
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

120 Temporary exemption under the Trans-Tasman Mutual
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-120-3
note: Temporary exemption under the Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Act 1997
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.127
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-120-3-norm

act-sch-2-sec-120-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 120 Temporary exemption under the Trans-Tasman Mutual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

122 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-122-2
note: Goods must be declared as exempt from the operation of the Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Act 1997.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.128
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-122-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-122-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-122-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-122-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to declare goods as exempt.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

121 Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-121-2
has part: 121(1) Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
has part: 121(2) Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.128

121(1) Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-121-2-ss-1
part of: 121 Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
note: Goods subject to interim ban are treated as goods of a kind declared under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.128
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-121-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-121-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-121-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 121(1) Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-121-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

121(2) Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-121-2-ss-2
part of: 121 Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
note: Section does not affect the application of section 15(3) of the Mutual Recognition Act 1992 in relation to an exemption.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.128
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-121-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-121-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-121-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 121(2) Temporary exemption under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-121-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Section implies that section 15(3) of the Mutual Recognition Act 1992 applies.
premise text: Section 121(2)
conclusion text: Section 15(3) of the Mutual Recognition Act 1992 applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

122 Compulsory recall of consumer goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-122-3
has part: 122(1) Compulsory recall of consumer goods
has part: 122(2) Compulsory recall of consumer goods
has part: 122(3) Compulsory recall of consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.129

122(1) Compulsory recall of consumer goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-122-3-ss-1
part of: 122 Compulsory recall of consumer goods
note: A responsible Minister must issue a recall notice for consumer goods if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.129
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-122-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-122-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-122-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122(1) Compulsory recall of consumer goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-122-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must issue the recall notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122(2) Compulsory recall of consumer goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-122-3-ss-2
part of: 122 Compulsory recall of consumer goods
note: Minister does not need to know supplier identities for compulsory recall.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.129
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-122-3-ss-2-norm

act-sch-2-sec-122-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122(2) Compulsory recall of consumer goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

122(3) Compulsory recall of consumer goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-122-3-ss-3
part of: 122 Compulsory recall of consumer goods
note: Recall notice may be issued even if goods have become fixtures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.129
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-122-3-ss-3-norm

123 Contents of a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-123-2
note: Supplier actions required in a recall notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.129
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-123-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-123-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-123-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 123 Contents of a recall notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-123-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires supplier actions
premise text: (1) A recall notice...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-124-2
has part: 124(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 124(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 124(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.130

124(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-2
part of: 124 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Specify manner and period for action required by notice.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.130
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 124(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify manner and period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-3
part of: 124 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Regulator must retain, destroy or dispose of goods upon recall notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.130
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 124(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-4
part of: 124 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Supplier's refund obligation under recall notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.130
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Supplier must refund price of goods
premise text: (a) the supplier undertakes to refund the price of the goods;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: interval
logic summary: Timeframe for reduced refund amount calculation
premise text: (b) a period of more than 12 months has elapsed since a person (whether or not the person to whom the refund is to be made)acquired the goods from the supplier;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Supplier may reduce refund amount by specified amount
premise text: the amount of a refund may be reduced by the supplier by an amount calculated in a manner specified in the notice that is attributable to the use which a person has had of the goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-124-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Supplier must specify refund calculation method
premise text: that is attributable to the use which a person has had of the goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124 Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-124-3
has part: 124(1) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
has part: 124(2) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
has part: 124(3) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
has part: 124(4) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.131

124(1) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-1
part of: 124 Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
note: Supplier must take action upon receipt of recall notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.131
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 124(1) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to take action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(2) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-2
part of: 124 Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
note: Supplier must repair consumer goods to comply with safety standards and remedy defects.
description: Repair of defective goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.131
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier has a duty to repair consumer goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(3) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-3
part of: 124 Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
note: Supplier must replace goods with similar consumer goods that do not contain a defect or have a dangerous characteristic.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.131
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must replace goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for replacement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(4) Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-4
part of: 124 Obligations of a supplier in relation to a recall notice
note: Supplier must pay for repair or replacement of consumer goods.
description: Costs of repair or replacement, including transportation costs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.131
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-124-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Supplier has a duty to pay for repair or replacement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125 Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-125-2
note: A person who supplies consumer goods outside Australia must give a written notice to the recipient upon recall.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.131
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-125-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-125-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-125-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 125 Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-125-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-126-2
has part: 126(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 126(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 126(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.132

126(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-126-2-ss-2
part of: 126 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Consumer goods recall notice requirements
description: Notice must contain specific information about the consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.132
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-126-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-126-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-126-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 126(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-126-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice with specified information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-126-2-ss-3
part of: 126 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Must provide notice as soon as practicable after supply of consumer goods to person outside Australia.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.132
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-126-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-126-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-126-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-126-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 126(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-126-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-126-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

126(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-126-2-ss-4
part of: 126 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Provide a copy of notice to responsible Minister within 10 days.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.132
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-126-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-126-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-126-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 126(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-126-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126 Interaction of multiple recall notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-126-3
note: Ceases to be in force immediately before the Commonwealth recall notice is issued.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.132
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-126-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-126-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-126-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-126-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CEASES
logic summary: Ceases to be in force
premise text: Original recall notice ceases to be in force immediately before the Commonwealth recall notice is issued.
conclusion text: The original recall notice ceases to be in force immediately before the Commonwealth recall notice is issued.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-126-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS_OF
logic summary: Includes the recalled goods
premise text: The Commonwealth recall notice includes the recalled goods.
conclusion text: The original recall notice relates to the recalled goods.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

127 Compliance with recall notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-127-2
has part: 127(1) Compliance with recall notices
has part: 127(2) Compliance with recall notices
has part: 127(3) Compliance with recall notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.133

127(1) Compliance with recall notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-1
part of: 127 Compliance with recall notices
note: Compliance with recall notices is mandatory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.133
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 127(1) Compliance with recall notices
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

127(2) Compliance with recall notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-2
part of: 127 Compliance with recall notices
note: Do not supply consumer goods with identified defects or dangerous characteristics.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.133
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 127(2) Compliance with recall notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of supplying consumer goods with identified defects or dangerous characteristics.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

127(3) Compliance with recall notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-3
part of: 127 Compliance with recall notices
note: If a person contravenes subsection (1) or (2), another person suffering loss or damage is taken to have suffered the loss or damage.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.133
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 127(3) Compliance with recall notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide compensation for loss or damage.
premise text: (3) If...
conclusion text: ...the other person is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to have suffered the loss or damage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal interval
logic summary: Temporal relationship between recall notices and contraventions.
premise text: (3) If...
conclusion text: ...the other person is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to have suffered the loss or damage because of the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring pattern of recall notices and contraventions.
premise text: (3) If...
conclusion text: ...the other person is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to have suffered the loss or damage because of the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of responsibility from one person to another.
premise text: (3) If...
conclusion text: ...the other person is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to have suffered the loss or damage because of the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-127-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognitive agent
logic summary: Cognitive agent responsible for providing compensation.
premise text: (3) If...
conclusion text: ...the other person is taken, for the purposes of this Schedule, to have suffered the loss or damage because of the contravention.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

128 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-128-2
note: Voluntary recall of consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.134
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-128-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide voluntary recall information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-128-3
has part: 128(1) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
has part: 128(2) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
has part: 128(3) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
has part: 128(4) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
has part: 128(5) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
has part: 128(6) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
has part: 128(7) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.134

128(1) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-1
part of: 128 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
note: Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.134
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(1) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
premise text: (1) This section applies if a person voluntarily takes action to recall consumer goods of a particular kind...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128(2) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-2
part of: 128 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
note: Provide written notice to the Commonwealth Minister within 2 days after taking action.
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.134
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(2) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128(3) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-3
part of: 128 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
note: Publish a copy of the notice on the internet.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.134
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(3) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128(4) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-4
part of: 128 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
note: A person must give written notice to another person outside Australia.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.134
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(4) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128(5) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-5
part of: 128 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
note: Must provide notification as soon as practicable after supply of consumer goods to person outside Australia.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.134
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(5) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128(6) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-6
part of: 128 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
note: Must provide notice to Commonwealth Minister within 10 days after giving notice.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.134
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(6) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice to Commonwealth Minister within 10 days after giving notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128(7) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-7
part of: 128 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
note: Consumer goods subject to recall must provide specific information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.134
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(7) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-128-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide specified information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

130 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-130-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-130-2-norm

129 Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-129-2
has part: 129(1) Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
has part: 129(2) Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136

129(1) Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-129-2-ss-1
part of: 129 Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
note: Publish safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
description: written notice containing a statement and a warning
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-129-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-129-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-129-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 129(1) Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-129-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publish safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

129(2) Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-129-2-ss-2
part of: 129 Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
note: Publish a written notice containing warnings about product-related services on the internet.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-129-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-129-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-129-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 129(2) Safety warning notices about consumer goods and product
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-129-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publish a written notice containing warnings about product-related services on the internet.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

130 Announcement of the results of an investigation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-130-3
has part: 130(1) Announcement of the results of an investigation etc.
has part: 130(2) Announcement of the results of an investigation etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136

130(1) Announcement of the results of an investigation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-130-3-ss-1
part of: 130 Announcement of the results of an investigation etc.
note: Announce investigation results within a specified timeframe.
description: Written notice published on the internet
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-130-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-130-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-130-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 130(1) Announcement of the results of an investigation etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-130-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to announce investigation results
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

130(2) Announcement of the results of an investigation etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-130-3-ss-2
part of: 130 Announcement of the results of an investigation etc.
note: Announce results of an investigation
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.136
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-130-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-130-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-130-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 130(2) Announcement of the results of an investigation etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-130-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to announce
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.138
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132-2-norm

131 Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131-2
has part: 131(1) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
has part: 131(2) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
has part: 131(3) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
has part: 131(4) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
has part: 131(5) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
has part: 131(6) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.138

131(1) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-1
part of: 131 Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
note: Supplier must report death or serious injury related to consumer goods within 2 days.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.138
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131(1) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131(2) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-2
part of: 131 Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
note: Exemptions from liability for consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.138
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-2-norm

131(3) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-3
part of: 131 Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
note: Suppliers must report consumer goods associated with a death or serious injury/illness.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.138
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131(3) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report consumer goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131(4) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-4
part of: 131 Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
note: Supplier may become aware of relevant information from various sources.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.138
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 131(4) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to receive information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between supplier and consumer
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131(5) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-5
part of: 131 Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
note: Supplier must provide notice with specific information about consumer goods.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.138
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131(5) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must provide notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131(6) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-6
part of: 131 Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
note: Supplier must not admit liability for consumer goods or death/serious injury.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.138
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131(6) Suppliers to report consumer goods associated with the death or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Supplier's statement is not an admission of liability.
premise text: Notice given under subsection (1)
conclusion text: No liability in relation to consumer goods or death/serious injury
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132 Suppliers to report product related services associated with the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132-3
note: Suppliers must report product-related services associated with a death or serious injury/illness.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.139
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132 Suppliers to report product related services associated with the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134-2
has part: 134(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 134(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 134(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 134(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 134(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.140

134(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-2
part of: 134 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemptions from liability for death or serious injury due to unforeseeable circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.140
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: EXEMPT
logic summary: Exemptions from liability
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-3
part of: 134 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Subsection (1) applies regardless of whether consumer goods were used before or at the time of death or serious injury/illness.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.140
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Applicability is necessary regardless of circumstances.
premise text: Subsection (1) applies whether or not consumer goods were used before or at the time of death or serious injury/illness.
conclusion text: The subsection must apply regardless of circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Applicability overlaps with the use of consumer goods.
premise text: Subsection (1) applies whether or not consumer goods to which the product related services relate were being used before or at the time the death or serious injury or illness occurred.
conclusion text: The applicability overlaps with the use of consumer goods.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Applicability is recurrent regardless of circumstances.
premise text: Subsection (1) applies whether or not consumer goods were used before or at the time of death or serious injury/illness.
conclusion text: The subsection must apply regardless of circumstances, and this applies repeatedly.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Applicability is an obligation regardless of circumstances.
premise text: Subsection (1) applies whether or not consumer goods were used before or at the time of death or serious injury/illness.
conclusion text: The subsection must apply regardless of circumstances, and this is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

134(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-4
part of: 134 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Supplier may receive relevant information from various sources.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.140
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 134(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to receive information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap with supplier's awareness
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-5
part of: 134 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Supplier must provide notice with specific information about services and consumer goods.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.140
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must provide notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-6
part of: 134 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: No liability for certain purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.140
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: NOT
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (6) The giving of the notice under subsection (1)
conclusion text: is not to be taken for any purpose
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
premise text: (6)
conclusion text: within (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132A Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132a
has part: 132A(1) Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
has part: 132A(2) Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.141

132A(1) Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132a-ss-1
part of: 132A Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
note: Disclosing confidential notices without consent is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.141
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 132A(1) Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: Notice given under Division
conclusion text: Disclosing confidential notices without consent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132A(2) Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132a-ss-2
part of: 132A Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
note: Disclosure exception for Commonwealth Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.141
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132A(2) Confidentiality of notices given under this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: except
logic summary: Exemption from obligation
premise text: (2) This section does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-2
note: Disclosure is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.142
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-136-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133 Liability under a contract of insurance
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133-2
note: Liability under a contract of insurance not affected by giving information to certain authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.143
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133 Liability under a contract of insurance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-138-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.144
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-138-2-norm

134 Making information standards for goods and services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134-3
has part: 134(1) Making information standards for goods and services
has part: 134(2) Making information standards for goods and services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.144

134(1) Making information standards for goods and services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134-3-ss-1
part of: 134 Making information standards for goods and services
note: The Commonwealth Minister may make an information standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.144
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134-3-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 134(1) Making information standards for goods and services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make an information standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134(2) Making information standards for goods and services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134-3-ss-2
part of: 134 Making information standards for goods and services
note: An information standard may make provision in relation to the content of information about goods or services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.144
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135 Declaring information standards for goods and services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135-2
has part: 135(1) Declaring information standards for goods and services
has part: 135(2) Declaring information standards for goods and services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.144

135(1) Declaring information standards for goods and services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135-2-ss-1
part of: 135 Declaring information standards for goods and services
note: The Commonwealth Minister may declare an information standard for goods or services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.144
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135-2-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 135(1) Declaring information standards for goods and services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to declare an information standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135(2) Declaring information standards for goods and services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135-2-ss-2
part of: 135 Declaring information standards for goods and services
note: Cannot declare a standard as an information standard for goods or services if it's inconsistent with an existing standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.144
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Inconsistent with an existing standard
conclusion text: Cannot declare
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-3
has part: 136(1) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 136(2) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 136(3) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 136(4) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 136(5) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 136(6) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.145

136(1) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-1
part of: 136 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Supplying goods that do not comply with information standard is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.145
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(1) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods that do not comply with information standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(2) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-2
part of: 136 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Offering goods that do not comply with information is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.145
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(2) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(3) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-3
part of: 136 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Manufacturing, possessing or controlling goods that do not comply with information is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.145
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(3) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of manufacturing, possessing or controlling goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(4) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-4
part of: 136 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Defence for not supplying goods for the purpose of supplying them
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.145
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(4) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(5) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-5
part of: 136 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Goods intended for use outside Australia are exempt from subsections (1), (2) and (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.145
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-5-norm

136(6) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-6
part of: 136 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Goods intended for export only presumed to be used outside Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.145
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(6) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-136-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: presumption
logic summary: Presumption of export intent
premise text: Goods with export statement
conclusion text: Goods intended for export only
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-140-2
has part: 140(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 140(8) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.146

140(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-140-2-ss-7
part of: 140 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Goods may have a statement applied to them in certain ways.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.146
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-140-2-ss-7-norm

140(8) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-140-2-ss-8
part of: 140 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Supplier must provide particular information to another person if they supply goods in contravention of the information standard.
description: particular information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.146
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-140-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-140-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-140-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 140(8) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-140-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Supplier has an obligation to provide particular information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137-2
has part: 137(1) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
has part: 137(2) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
has part: 137(3) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.146

137(1) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137-2-ss-1
part of: 137 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
note: Supplying services that do not comply with information standards is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.146
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-137-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-137-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-137-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 137(1) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-137-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying services that do not comply with information standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137(2) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137-2-ss-2
part of: 137 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
note: Offering prohibited services in trade or commerce.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.146
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-137-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-137-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-137-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 137(2) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-137-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of offering prohibited services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137(3) Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137-2-ss-3
part of: 137 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
note: Prohibits supplying services in contravention of information standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.146
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-137-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-137-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-137-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-142-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.148
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-142-2-norm

138 Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-138-3
has part: 138(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
has part: 138(2) Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
has part: 138(3) Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.148

138(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-1
part of: 138 Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
note: Manufacturer liable for compensation if goods have safety defect and cause injury.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.148
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has obligation to compensate individual.
premise text: (1) A manufacturer of goods is liable...
conclusion text: ...if the individual suffers injuries because of the safety defect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal interval between supply and injury.
premise text: (a) the manufacturer supplies the goods in trade or commerce;
conclusion text: ...and (c) the individual suffers injuries because of the safety defect.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Supply and injury imply liability.
premise text: (a) the manufacturer supplies the goods in trade or commerce;
conclusion text: ...and (c) the individual suffers injuries because of the safety defect.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Liability spreads from supply to injury.
premise text: (a) the manufacturer supplies the goods in trade or commerce;
conclusion text: ...and (c) the individual suffers injuries because of the safety defect.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity recognition
logic summary: Manufacturer and individual recognized as entities.
premise text: (a) the manufacturer supplies the goods in trade or commerce;
conclusion text: ...and (c) the individual suffers injuries because of the safety defect.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138(2) Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-2
part of: 138 Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
note: Individual may recover amount of loss or damage from manufacturer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.148
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138(2) Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay damages
conclusion text: The individual may recover...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
logic summary: Temporal relationship between loss/damage and recovery
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

138(3) Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-3
part of: 138 Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
note: Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.148
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138(3) Liability for loss or damage suffered by an injured individual
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-138-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: States are obligated to provide liability for loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

139 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-139-2
has part: 139(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
has part: 139(2) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.148

139(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-139-2-ss-1
part of: 139 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
note: Manufacturer liable for compensation if goods have safety defect and cause injury or death.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.148
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-139-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-139-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-139-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 139(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-139-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has an obligation to compensate.
premise text: (1) A manufacturer of goods is liable...
conclusion text: ...the person compensates the individual.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

139(2) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-139-2-ss-2
part of: 139 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
note: Person may recover loss or damage from manufacturer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.148
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-139-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-139-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-139-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 139(2) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person other than an
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-139-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to compensate
conclusion text: Person may recover loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-140-3
has part: 140(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
has part: 140(2) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.149

140(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-1
part of: 140 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
note: Manufacturer liable for loss or damage caused by safety defect in goods supplied in trade or commerce.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.149
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 140(1) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has an obligation to compensate a person for loss or damage caused by safety defect.
premise text: (1) A manufacturer of goods is liable to compensate a person if...
conclusion text: ...the person suffers loss or damage as a result of the destruction or damage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: The destruction or damage of goods occurs between the time the person uses or consumes, or intends to use or consume, the goods and the time the person suffers loss or damage.
premise text: (d) The person used or consumed, or intended to use or consume, the destroyed or damaged goods for personal, domestic or household use or consumption;
conclusion text: ...the person suffers loss or damage as a result of the destruction or damage.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: The person's use or consumption of the goods is recurring.
premise text: (e) The person suffers loss or damage as a result of the destruction or damage.
conclusion text: ...the person used or consumed, or intended to use or consume, the destroyed or damaged goods for personal, domestic or household use or consumption;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The manufacturer's obligation is to compensate a person for loss or damage caused by safety defect.
premise text: (1) A manufacturer of goods is liable to compensate a person if...
conclusion text: ...the destruction or damage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: If the manufacturer supplies goods in trade or commerce, and the goods have a safety defect, then the manufacturer is liable to compensate a person for loss or damage caused by the safety defect.
premise text: (a) The manufacturer supplies the goods in trade or commerce;
conclusion text: ...the destroyed or damaged goods have a safety defect.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140(2) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-2
part of: 140 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
note: Recovery of loss or damage suffered by a person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.149
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 140(2) Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if other goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: State has obligation to compensate
premise text: State is liable for loss or damage
conclusion text: State must compensate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-140-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Liability overlaps with loss or damage
premise text: Liability is a temporal interval
conclusion text: Loss or damage overlaps with liability
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

141 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if land,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-141-2
note: Manufacturer liable for compensation if goods have safety defect and cause damage to land, buildings or fixtures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.149
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-141-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-141-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-141-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 141 Liability for loss or damage suffered by a person if land,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-141-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has an obligation to compensate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-144-2
note: Recover loss or damage from destruction or damage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.150
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-144-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-144-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-144-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 144 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-144-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to recover loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142 Defences to defective goods actions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-142-3
note: Defence against defective goods actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.150
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-142-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-142-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-142-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 142 Defences to defective goods actions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-142-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has_defence
logic summary: Has defence
premise text: The defendant has a defence.
conclusion text: The plaintiff does not have a claim.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143 Time for commencing defective goods actions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-143-2
has part: 143(1) Time for commencing defective goods actions
has part: 143(2) Time for commencing defective goods actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.151

143(1) Time for commencing defective goods actions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-1
part of: 143 Time for commencing defective goods actions
note: Time for commencing defective goods actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.151
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5

act-sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143(1) Time for commencing defective goods actions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: May commence action at any time within 3 years
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (2), a person may commence a defective goods action...
conclusion text: ...at any time within 3 years after the time the person became aware, or ought reasonably to have become aware...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: must know
logic summary: Awareness of loss/damage/safety defect is required
premise text: ...the alleged loss or damage;
conclusion text: ...of all of (a) the alleged loss or damage;
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occurs before
logic summary: Action must occur within a specific time frame
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (2), a person may commence a defective goods action...
conclusion text: ...at any time within 3 years after the time the person became aware, or ought reasonably to have become aware...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Awareness of identity of manufacturer is not required
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (2), a person may commence a defective goods action...
conclusion text: ...of all of (c) the identity of the person who manufactured the goods.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Time frame is specified as 3 years
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (2), a person may commence a defective goods action...
conclusion text: ...within 3 years after the time the person became aware, or ought reasonably to have become aware...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

143(2) Time for commencing defective goods actions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-2
part of: 143 Time for commencing defective goods actions
note: Defective goods action must be commenced within 10 years of supply by the manufacturer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.151
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 143(2) Time for commencing defective goods actions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-143-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to commence action within time limit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144 Liability joint and several
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-144-3
note: Joint and several liability for multiple persons liable under Division 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.151
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-144-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-144-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-144-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 144 Liability joint and several
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-144-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Joint and several liability obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

145 Survival of actions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-145-2
note: Survival of actions applies to actions under this law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.151
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-145-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-145-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-145-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Law applies to actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146 No defective goods action where workers’ compensation law etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-146-2
note: No defective goods action where workers’ compensation law etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.151
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-146-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-146-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-146-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 146 No defective goods action where workers’ compensation law etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-146-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits defective goods action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

147 Unidentified manufacturer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-147-2
note: A person who wishes to institute a defective goods action must comply with the law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.151
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-147-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-147-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-147-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 147 Unidentified manufacturer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-147-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with the law.
premise text: (1) A person who: (a) wishes to institute a defective goods action;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-146-3
note: Request for manufacturer information from suppliers
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.152
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-146-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-146-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-146-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-146-3-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-146-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 146 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-146-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-146-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge
logic summary: Request for knowledge about manufacturer
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-146-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Conditional obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148 Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-148-2
has part: 148(1) Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
has part: 148(2) Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
has part: 148(3) Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.152

148(1) Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-148-2-ss-1
part of: 148 Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
note: Provide notice and copy of defence in defective goods action
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.152
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-148-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-148-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-148-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(1) Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-148-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice and copy of defence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(2) Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-148-2-ss-2
part of: 148 Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
note: Commonwealth liable for goods that are defective only
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.152
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-148-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-148-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-148-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(2) Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-148-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on Commonwealth
conclusion text: Commonwealth liable for goods that are defective only
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(3) Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-148-2-ss-3
part of: 148 Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
note: Commonwealth liable for goods with safety defects
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.152
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-148-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-148-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-148-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(3) Commonwealth liability for goods that are defective only
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-148-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay plaintiff for loss or damage
conclusion text: The Commonwealth is liable to pay the plaintiff.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149 Representative actions by the regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-149-2
has part: 149(1) Representative actions by the regulator
has part: 149(2) Representative actions by the regulator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.153

149(1) Representative actions by the regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-1
part of: 149 Representative actions by the regulator
note: Regulator may commence a defective goods action on behalf of identified persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.153
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149(1) Representative actions by the regulator
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulator may commence an action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149(2) Representative actions by the regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-2
part of: 149 Representative actions by the regulator
note: Regulator must obtain written consent before making an application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.153
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149(2) Representative actions by the regulator
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator has a duty to obtain consent.
premise text: The regulator may only make the application...
conclusion text: The regulator MUST have obtained written consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Regulator's action is contained within a temporal interval.
premise text: (2) The regulator may only make the application...
conclusion text: The regulator's action CONTAINS the temporal interval where consent has been obtained.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Regulator's action is contained within a trace.
premise text: (2) The regulator may only make the application...
conclusion text: The regulator's action CONTAINS the trace where consent has been obtained.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Regulator's action is contained within a diffusion.
premise text: (2) The regulator may only make the application...
conclusion text: The regulator's action CONTAINS the diffusion where consent has been obtained.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-149-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Regulator's action is contained within a cognitive process.
premise text: (2) The regulator may only make the application...
conclusion text: The regulator's action CONTAINS the cognitive process where consent has been obtained.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-148-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.154
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-148-3-norm

150 Application of all or any provisions of this Part etc. not to be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-150-2
has part: 150(1) Application of all or any provisions of this Part etc. not to be
has part: 150(2) Application of all or any provisions of this Part etc. not to be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.154

150(1) Application of all or any provisions of this Part etc. not to be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-150-2-ss-1
part of: 150 Application of all or any provisions of this Part etc. not to be
note: Exclusion of provisions is void
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.154
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-150-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Exclusion of provisions is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150(2) Application of all or any provisions of this Part etc. not to be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-150-2-ss-2
part of: 150 Application of all or any provisions of this Part etc. not to be
note: Application of provisions not excluded or restricted by contract terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.154
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-150-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-150-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-150-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 150(2) Application of all or any provisions of this Part etc. not to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-150-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion of application
premise text: Contract term excludes provision
conclusion text: Provision still applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151 False or misleading representations about goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-151-2
note: Making false or misleading representations about goods or services is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.155
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-151-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-151-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-151-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-151-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 151 False or misleading representations about goods or services
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-151-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of false or misleading representations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-151-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of goods and services based on their standard, quality, value, grade, composition, style, or model.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-150-3
has part: 150(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 150(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 150(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.156

150(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-2
part of: 150 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Representation is taken to be misleading unless evidence is adduced to the contrary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.156
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 150(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to ensure representations are not misleading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-3
part of: 150 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Avoids onus of proving representation is not misleading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.156
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 150(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state.
premise text: (2) does not: (a) have the effect that, merely because such evidence to the contrary is adduced, the representation is not misleading;
conclusion text: does not place on any person an onus of proving that the representation is not misleading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits placing onus of proving representation is not misleading.
premise text: (2) does not: (b) have the effect of placing on any person an onus of proving that the representation is not misleading.
conclusion text: does not place on any person an onus of proving that the representation is not misleading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Conjunction
logic summary: Combines two obligations.
premise text: (2) does not: (a) have the effect that, merely because such evidence to the contrary is adduced, the representation is not misleading;
conclusion text: does not place on any person an onus of proving that the representation is not misleading.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state.
premise text: (2) does not: (b) have the effect of placing on any person an onus of proving that the representation is not misleading.
conclusion text: does not place on any person an onus of proving that the representation is not misleading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-4
part of: 150 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Offence of strict liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.156
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 150(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-150-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Strict liability
premise text: (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: (4) is an offence of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152 False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-152-2
has part: 152(1) False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
has part: 152(2) False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
has part: 152(3) False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.157

152(1) False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-152-2-ss-1
part of: 152 False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
note: Making false or misleading representations about sale etc. of land is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.157
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-152-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-152-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-152-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-152-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 152(1) False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-152-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-152-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of false or misleading representations
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152(2) False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-152-2-ss-2
part of: 152 False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
note: Offence of strict liability for false or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.157
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-152-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-152-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-152-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 152(2) False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-152-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152(3) False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-152-2-ss-3
part of: 152 False or misleading representations about sale etc. of land
note: Does not affect the application of other provisions in relation to supply or acquisition of interests in land.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.157
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-152-2-ss-3-norm

153 Misleading conduct relating to employment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-153-2
note: Misleading conduct relating to employment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.157
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-153-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-153-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-153-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 153 Misleading conduct relating to employment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-153-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits misleading conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-152-3
note: Employment-related matters are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.158
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-152-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-152-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-152-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 152 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-152-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits employment-related matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

154 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-154-2
has part: 154(1) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
has part: 154(2) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
has part: 154(3) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
has part: 154(4) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
has part: 154(5) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
has part: 154(6) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.158

154(1) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-1
part of: 154 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
note: Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc. is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.158
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 154(1) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies as a prohibition
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

154(2) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-2
part of: 154 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
note: Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc. is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.158
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 154(2) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies as a prohibition
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

154(3) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-3
part of: 154 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
note: Exemption from liability for failure to provide rebate or gift due to circumstances beyond control.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.158
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 154(3) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from liability
premise text: Subsection (2) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...the person took reasonable precautions...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

154(4) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-4
part of: 154 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
note: Offering a different rebate, gift, prize or other free item as a replacement is permitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.158
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-4-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to offer a different rebate, gift, prize or other free item.
premise text: (a) the person offers to the other person a different rebate, gift, prize or other free item as a replacement;
conclusion text: The person is permitted to offer a different rebate, gift, prize or other free item.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The key overlaps with a temporal interval defined by the part number.
premise text: part: 1
conclusion text: The key overlaps with a temporal interval defined by the part number.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The key is until a certain point in time defined by the part number.
premise text: part: 1
conclusion text: The key is until a certain point in time defined by the part number.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Named Entity Recognition
logic summary: The key contains a named entity (section number).
premise text: key: sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-4
conclusion text: The key contains a named entity (section number).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates
logic summary: The key validates against a schema defined by the heading 'Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.'.
premise text: heading: Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
conclusion text: The key validates against a schema defined by the heading 'Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.'.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

154(5) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-5
part of: 154 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
note: Strict liability applies to subsections (1)(b) and (2)(b).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.158
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-5-norm

154(6) Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-6
part of: 154 Offering rebates, gifts, prizes etc.
note: Does not affect other provisions in relation to supply or acquisition of interests in land.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.158
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-2-ss-6-norm

155 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-155-2
has part: 155(1) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
has part: 155(2) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.159

155(1) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-155-2-ss-1
part of: 155 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
note: Misleading conduct in trade or commerce is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.159
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-155-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-155-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-155-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 155(1) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-155-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits misleading conduct in trade or commerce.
premise text: The person engages in conduct that is liable to mislead the public.
conclusion text: An offence has been committed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

155(2) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-155-2-ss-2
part of: 155 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
note: Strict liability for misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.159
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-155-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-155-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-155-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 155(2) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-155-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability for misleading conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

154 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-154-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.160
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-154-3-norm

156 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156-2
has part: 156(1) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
has part: 156(2) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.160

156(1) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156-2-ss-1
part of: 156 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
note: Misleading conduct in trade or commerce is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.160
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-156-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 156(1) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits misleading conduct in trade or commerce.
premise text: The person engages in conduct that is liable to mislead the public.
conclusion text: An offence has been committed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156(2) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156-2-ss-2
part of: 156 Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
note: Strict liability for misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.160
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-156-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156(2) Misleading conduct as to the nature etc. of services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

157 Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-157-2
has part: 157(1) Bait advertising
has part: 157(2) Bait advertising
has part: 157(3) Bait advertising
has part: 157(4) Bait advertising
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.160

157(1) Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-1
part of: 157 Bait advertising
note: Advertising goods or services at a specified price without reasonable grounds for believing it can be offered at that price for a period and quantity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.160
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits advertising goods or services at a specified price without reasonable grounds.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, advertises goods or services for supply at a specified price; and (b) there are reasonable grounds for believing that the person will not be able to offer for supply those goods or services at that price for a period that is, and in quantities that are, reasonable, having regard to: (i) the nature of the market in which the person carries on business; and (ii) the nature of the advertisement.
conclusion text: Penalty: $1,100,000 (body corporate), $220,000 (not a body corporate).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

157(2) Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-2
part of: 157 Bait advertising
note: Advertising goods or services at a specified price without offering them for supply at that price is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.160
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of advertising goods or services at a specified price without offering them for supply.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person fails to offer such goods or services for supply at that price...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval of the prohibited period.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...for a period that is, and in quantities that are...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of the prohibited action.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...for a period that is, and in quantities that are...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of the prohibited action.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person fails to offer such goods or services for supply at that price...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
logic summary: Validation of the prohibited action.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person fails to offer such goods or services for supply at that price...
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

157(3) Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-3
part of: 157 Bait advertising
note: Bait advertising is an offence of strict liability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.160
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits bait advertising
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

157(4) Bait advertising
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-4
part of: 157 Bait advertising
note: Defendant must offer goods or services within a reasonable time and quantity at the advertised price.
description: Offer to supply goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.160
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 157(4) Bait advertising
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-157-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST-OFFER
logic summary: Must offer goods or services within a reasonable time and quantity at the advertised price.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158 Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-158-2
has part: 158(1) Wrongly accepting payment
has part: 158(2) Wrongly accepting payment
has part: 158(3) Wrongly accepting payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.161

158(1) Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-158-2-ss-1
part of: 158 Wrongly accepting payment
note: Accepting payment without intending to supply goods or services is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.161
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-158-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-158-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-158-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 158(1) Wrongly accepting payment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-158-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of accepting payment without intending to supply goods or services.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if:...
conclusion text: ...Penalty:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158(2) Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-158-2-ss-2
part of: 158 Wrongly accepting payment
note: Strict liability applies to subsection (1)(a).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.161
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-158-2-ss-2-norm

act-sch-2-sec-158-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 158(2) Wrongly accepting payment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

158(3) Wrongly accepting payment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-158-2-ss-3
part of: 158 Wrongly accepting payment
note: Accepting payment for goods or services is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.161
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-158-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-158-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-158-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits accepting payment for goods or services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156-3
has part: 156(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 156(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 156(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 156(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 156(8) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 156(9) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 156(10) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 156(11) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.162

156(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-4
part of: 156 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Strict liability applies to subsection (3)(a).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.162
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
premise text: (4) Strict liability applies to subsection (3)(a).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap with subsection (3)(a)
premise text: (4) Strict liability applies to subsection (3)(a).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-5
part of: 156 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Accepting payment without being able to supply goods or services within a specified period is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.162
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-3

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 156(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits accepting payment without being able to supply goods or services.
premise text: The person accepts payment.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits accepting payment without being able to supply goods or services within a reasonable time.
premise text: The person accepts payment but is unable to supply goods or services within the specified period.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits accepting payment without being able to supply goods or services.
premise text: The person accepts payment but is unable to supply goods or services within a reasonable time.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-6
part of: 156 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Strict liability applies to subsection (5)(a).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.162
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
premise text: (6) Strict liability applies to subsection (5)(a).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap: Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
premise text: (6) Strict liability applies to subsection (5)(a).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-6-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication: Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
premise text: (6) Strict liability applies to subsection (5)(a).
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion: Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
premise text: (6) Strict liability applies to subsection (5)(a).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inference: Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
premise text: (6) Strict liability applies to subsection (5)(a).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-7
part of: 156 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Failing to supply goods or services within a specified period is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.162
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to supply goods or services within a specified period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156(8) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-8
part of: 156 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Due diligence required to avoid failure in supplying goods or services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.162
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-8-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156(8) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Duty
logic summary: Due diligence is an obligation.
premise text: The person took reasonable precautions and exercised due diligence to avoid the failure.
conclusion text: There is a duty to take reasonable precautions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Failure not within control is excused.
premise text: The person’s failure to supply all the goods or services within the period, or within a reasonable time, was due to the act or omission of another person, or to some other cause beyond the person’s control;
conclusion text: There is no duty to take precautions in this case.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Failure may occur at any time within a period.
premise text: Subsection (7) does not apply if the person’s failure to supply all the goods or services within the period, or within a reasonable time, was due to...
conclusion text: The failure may occur at any time within the period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-8-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Failure is recurring if it occurs within a period.
premise text: Subsection (7) does not apply if the person’s failure to supply all the goods or services within the period, or within a reasonable time, was due to...
conclusion text: The failure is recurring if it occurs within the period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Due diligence is an obligation.
premise text: The person took reasonable precautions and exercised due diligence to avoid the failure.
conclusion text: There is an obligation to take reasonable precautions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156(9) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-9
part of: 156 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemption from subsection (7) if replacement goods or services are offered and agreed upon.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.162
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-9-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-9-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-9-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to deviate from subsection (7)
premise text: (9) Subsection (7) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...the customer agrees to receive the different goods or services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between subsection (7) and exemption
premise text: (9) Subsection (7) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...the customer agrees to receive the different goods or services.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of exemption based on replacement offer and agreement
premise text: (9) Subsection (7) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...the customer agrees to receive the different goods or services.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-9-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inference of exemption based on replacement offer and agreement
premise text: (9) Subsection (7) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...the customer agrees to receive the different goods or services.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-9-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
logic summary: Validation of exemption based on replacement offer and agreement
premise text: (9) Subsection (7) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...the customer agrees to receive the different goods or services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156(10) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-10
part of: 156 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Strict liability offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.162
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-10-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156(10) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence is an obligation
premise text: (7) is an offence
conclusion text: (10) is an Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156(11) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-11
part of: 156 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Payment or other consideration must be provided regardless of its proportion to the total payment or consideration.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.162
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-11-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-11-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-11-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-11-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-11-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156(11) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide payment or other consideration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-11-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Subsection (11) applies to all temporal intervals within sections (1), (3), (5), and (7).
premise text: Section (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-11-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Subsection (11) applies to all ordered temporal intervals within sections (1), (3), (5), and (7).
premise text: Section (1)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-11-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Subsection (11) applies to all temporal intervals within sections (1), (3), (5), and (7).
premise text: Section (1)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-156-3-ss-11-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Subsection (11) applies to all temporal intervals within sections (1), (3), (5), and (7).
premise text: Section (1)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

159 Misleading representations about certain business activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-159-2
has part: 159(1) Misleading representations about certain business activities
has part: 159(2) Misleading representations about certain business activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.163

159(1) Misleading representations about certain business activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-159-2-ss-1
part of: 159 Misleading representations about certain business activities
note: Making false or misleading representations about business activities is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.163
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-159-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-159-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-159-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-159-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-159-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 159(1) Misleading representations about certain business activities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-159-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of false or misleading representations
premise text: The representation is false or misleading in a material particular.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-159-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Overlap between business activities and residence
premise text: The representation concerns the profitability, risk or any other material aspect of any business activity that the person has represented as one that can be, or can be to a considerable extent, carried on at or from a person’s place of residence.
conclusion text: There is an overlap between the business activities and residence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-159-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Repetition of false or misleading representations
premise text: The representation is false or misleading in a material particular.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence repeatedly.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

159(2) Misleading representations about certain business activities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-159-2-ss-2
part of: 159 Misleading representations about certain business activities
note: Making misleading representations about certain business activities is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.163
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-159-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-159-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-159-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 159(2) Misleading representations about certain business activities
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-159-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits making misleading representations about certain business activities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-158-3
note: False or misleading representation in material aspect of business activity is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.164
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-158-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-158-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-158-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-158-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-158-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-158-3-logic-diffusion-5

act-sch-2-sec-158-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 158 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-158-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (b) the representation is false or misleading in a material partical;
conclusion text: The representation must not be false or misleading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-158-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for representation
premise text: (i) that the person invites (whether by advertisement or otherwise) other persons to engage or participate in, or
conclusion text: The temporal interval is from the time of invitation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-158-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for representation
premise text: (ii) that requires the performance of work by other persons,
conclusion text: The recurring trace is from the time of requirement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-158-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Strict Liability
logic summary: Strict liability for false or misleading representation
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2) are offences of strict liability.
conclusion text: The person is strictly liable for the false or misleading representation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-158-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of penalty
premise text: (a) if the person is a body corporate—$1,100,000;
conclusion text: The penalty is diffused to all persons who are bodies corporate.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

160 Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-160-2
has part: 160(1) Application of provisions of this Division to information
has part: 160(2) Application of provisions of this Division to information
has part: 160(3) Application of provisions of this Division to information
has part: 160(4) Application of provisions of this Division to information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.164

160(1) Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-160-2-ss-1
part of: 160 Application of provisions of this Division to information
note: Exemptions for publications by information providers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.164
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-160-2-ss-1-norm

160(2) Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-160-2-ss-2
part of: 160 Application of provisions of this Division to information
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for publications of advertisements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.164
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-160-2-ss-2-norm

160(3) Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-160-2-ss-3
part of: 160 Application of provisions of this Division to information
note: Exemptions from subsection (1) for certain publications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.164
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-160-2-ss-3-norm

160(4) Application of provisions of this Division to information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-160-2-ss-4
part of: 160 Application of provisions of this Division to information
note: Exemptions for certain publications related to land interests
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.164
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-160-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-160-2-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-160-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-2-sec-160-2-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy application
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-160-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

160 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-160-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.166
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-160-3-norm

161 Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161-2
has part: 161(1) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 161(2) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 161(3) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 161(4) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 161(5) Unsolicited cards etc.
has part: 161(6) Unsolicited cards etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.166

161(1) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-1
part of: 161 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Sending unsolicited credit or debit cards is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.166
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 161(1) Unsolicited cards etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits sending unsolicited credit or debit cards.
premise text: (a) the person sends a credit card or a debit card, or an article that may be used as a credit card and a debit card, to another person;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the offence.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if:
conclusion text: The period begins on the day after the card is sent and ends two years after that day;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines the recurring trace for the offence.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if:
conclusion text: The person must be sent a card at least once every two years;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Recognition
logic summary: Recognizes the entities involved in the offence.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if:
conclusion text: The person and the card are the relevant entities;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: Validates the schema for the offence.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if:
conclusion text: The card is a valid credit or debit card;
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

161(2) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-2
part of: 161 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Exemption from liability for unsolicited cards sent pursuant to a written request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.166
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted
premise text: The person sends the card to the other person pursuant to a written request.
conclusion text: No liability applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between requests and cards
premise text: The person sends the card to the other person pursuant to a written request by the person who will be under liability...
conclusion text: The temporal overlap is relevant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Repeating pattern of requests and cards
premise text: The card is sent in renewal or replacement of, or in substitution for...
conclusion text: The repeating pattern applies.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusing the written request to other persons
premise text: The person sends the card to the other person pursuant to a written request by the person who will be under liability...
conclusion text: The diffusion is relevant.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognizing the written request as valid
premise text: The card is sent in renewal or replacement of, or in substitution for...
conclusion text: The recognition is relevant.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161(3) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-3
part of: 161 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Taking action to enable another person to use a credit card as a debit card is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.166
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-3-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 161(3) Unsolicited cards etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of enabling another person to use a credit card as a debit card.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...if the person takes any action...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for enabling another person to use a credit card as a debit card.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...if the person takes any action...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for enabling another person to use a credit card as a debit card.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...if the person takes any action...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation for enabling another person to use a credit card as a debit card.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...if the person takes any action...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
logic summary: Validation of enabling another person to use a credit card as a debit card.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...if the person takes any action...
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161(4) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-4
part of: 161 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Taking action to enable another person to use a debit card as a credit card is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.166
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 161(4) Unsolicited cards etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of enabling debit card use as credit card
premise text: Taking action to enable another person...
conclusion text: An offence is committed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161(5) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-5
part of: 161 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Exemption from subsection (3) or (4) if action is taken in accordance with written request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.166
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to take action without subsection (3) or (4) applying.
premise text: (5) Subsection (3) or (4) does not apply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161(6) Unsolicited cards etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-6
part of: 161 Unsolicited cards etc.
note: Offence of strict liability for unsolicited cards etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.166
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-161-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits actions
premise text: (6) Subsections (1), (3) and (4)
conclusion text: are offences of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-162-2
has part: 162(1) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
has part: 162(2) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
has part: 162(3) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.167

162(1) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-162-2-ss-1
part of: 162 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
note: Asserting a right to payment for unsolicited goods or services is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.167
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-162-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Asserting a right to payment for unsolicited goods or services is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162(2) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-162-2-ss-2
part of: 162 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
note: Asserting a right to payment for unsolicited goods or services is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.167
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-162-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-162-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-162-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Asserting a right to payment for unsolicited goods or services is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162(3) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-162-2-ss-3
part of: 162 Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
note: Sending unsolicited invoices without warning statement is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.167
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-162-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-162-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-162-2-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 162(3) Assertion of right to payment for unsolicited goods or services
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-162-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of unsolicited invoices without warning statement.
premise text: The regulations require a warning statement in invoices.
conclusion text: Sending an invoice without the required warning statement is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-162-3
has part: 162(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 162(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.168

162(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-162-3-ss-4
part of: 162 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: No obligation to pay if reasonable cause believed in right to payment or charge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.168
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-162-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-162-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-162-3-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-162-3-ss-4-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-162-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 162(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-162-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exc
logic summary: No obligation
premise text: Subsection (1), (2) or (3)
conclusion text: does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-162-3-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Bel
logic summary: Reasonable cause
premise text: he or she had reasonable cause to believe
conclusion text: right to payment or charge
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-162-3-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ∈
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: Subsection (1), (2) or (3)
conclusion text: does not apply
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-162-3-ss-5
part of: 162 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Offence of strict liability for subsections (1), (2) and (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.168
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-162-3-ss-5-norm

act-sch-2-sec-162-3-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 162(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

163 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-163-2
has part: 163(1) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
has part: 163(2) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
has part: 163(3) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
has part: 163(4) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
has part: 163(5) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
has part: 163(6) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.168

163(1) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-1
part of: 163 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
note: Asserting a right to payment for unauthorised entries or advertisements is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.168
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits asserting a right to payment for unauthorised entries or advertisements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

163(2) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-2
part of: 163 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
note: Sending false invoices or documents is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.168
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

163(3) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-3
part of: 163 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
note: Exemption from subsections (1) and (2) if the person knew or had reasonable cause to believe that another person authorized the placement of the entry or advertisement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.168
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission to an individual based on knowledge or reasonable cause.
premise text: The person knew or had reasonable cause to believe that the other person authorized the placement of the entry or advertisement.
conclusion text: Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposing an obligation on the individual to prove that they knew or had reasonable cause to believe that another person authorized the placement of the entry or advertisement.
premise text: The person must prove that they knew or had reasonable cause to believe that the other person authorized the placement of the entry or advertisement.
conclusion text: Subsections (1) and (2) do not apply if the person proves this.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

163(4) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-4
part of: 163 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
note: Permission to publish without audited circulation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.168
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to publish without audited circulation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

163(5) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-5
part of: 163 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
note: Strict liability for offences under subsections (1) and (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.168
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-5-norm

act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 163(5) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

163(6) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-6
part of: 163 Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
note: A person must provide a document authorizing the placement of an entry or advertisement before asserting the right to payment.
description: document authorizing the placing of the entry or advertisement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.168
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 163(6) Assertion of right to payment for unauthorised entries or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-163-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: A person must provide a document authorizing the placement of an entry or advertisement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-164-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.170
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-164-2-norm

164 Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-164-3
has part: 164(1) Participation in pyramid schemes
has part: 164(2) Participation in pyramid schemes
has part: 164(3) Participation in pyramid schemes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.170

164(1) Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-164-3-ss-1
part of: 164 Participation in pyramid schemes
note: Participation in pyramid schemes is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.170
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-164-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-164-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-164-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 164(1) Participation in pyramid schemes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-164-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits participation in pyramid schemes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164(2) Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-164-3-ss-2
part of: 164 Participation in pyramid schemes
note: Participation in pyramid schemes is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.170
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-164-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-164-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-164-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 164(2) Participation in pyramid schemes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-164-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits participation in pyramid schemes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164(3) Participation in pyramid schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-164-3-ss-3
part of: 164 Participation in pyramid schemes
note: Participation in pyramid schemes is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.170
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-164-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-164-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-164-3-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 164(3) Participation in pyramid schemes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-164-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits participation in pyramid schemes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

165 Multiple pricing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-165-2
has part: 165(1) Multiple pricing
has part: 165(2) Multiple pricing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.171

165(1) Multiple pricing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-165-2-ss-1
part of: 165 Multiple pricing
note: Supplying goods with more than one displayed price is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.171
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-165-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-165-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-165-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-165-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-165-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 165(1) Multiple pricing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-165-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods with more than one displayed price.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies goods; and (b) the goods have more than one displayed price; and (c) the supply takes place for a price that is not the lower, or lowest, of the displayed prices.
conclusion text: (a) if the person is a body corporate—$5,000; or (b) if the person is not a body corporate—$1,000.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-165-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with supply of goods for more than one price.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies goods; and (b) the goods have more than one displayed price; and (c) the supply takes place for a price that is not the lower, or lowest, of the displayed prices.
conclusion text: (a) if the person is a body corporate—$5,000; or (b) if the person is not a body corporate—$1,000.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.8000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-165-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring supply of goods for more than one price.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies goods; and (b) the goods have more than one displayed price; and (c) the supply takes place for a price that is not the lower, or lowest, of the displayed prices.
conclusion text: (a) if the person is a body corporate—$5,000; or (b) if the person is not a body corporate—$1,000.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.6000
curation status: Proposed

165(2) Multiple pricing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-165-2-ss-2
part of: 165 Multiple pricing
note: Strict liability offence for subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.171
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-165-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-165-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-165-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 165(2) Multiple pricing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-165-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence classification
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Strict liability offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166-2
has part: 166(1) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
has part: 166(2) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.171

166(1) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-1
part of: 166 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
note: Making false representations about goods or services for personal use
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.171
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6

act-sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making false representations
premise text: Making a representation with respect to an amount that, if paid, would constitute a part of the consideration for the supply of goods or services.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the representation as false
premise text: A representation with respect to an amount that, if paid, would constitute a part of the consideration for the supply of goods or services.
conclusion text: The representation is false
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of making false representations
premise text: Making a representation with respect to an amount that, if paid, would constitute a part of the consideration for the supply of goods or services.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence repeatedly
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making false representations in trade or commerce
premise text: In connection with the supply, or possible supply, to another person of goods or services of a kind ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or household use or consumption;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the supply as goods or services for personal use
premise text: In connection with the supply, or possible supply, to another person of goods or services of a kind ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or household use or consumption;
conclusion text: The supply is for personal use
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits promoting false representations in trade or commerce
premise text: In connection with the promotion by any means of the supply to another person, or of the use by another person, of goods or services of a kind ordinarily acquired for personal, domestic or household use or consumption;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(2) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-2
part of: 166 Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
note: A person is not required to include a charge payable in relation to sending goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.171
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(2) Single price to be specified in certain circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-166-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from including a charge for sending goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166-3
has part: 166(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 166(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 166(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 166(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 166(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.172

166(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-3
part of: 166 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemption from subsection (1) if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.172
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
logic summary: Permitted action
premise text: The person is allowed to omit the charge if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

166(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-4
part of: 166 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemption for representations made exclusively to a body corporate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.172
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-5
part of: 166 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Must specify prominent price for goods/services
description: Price information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.172
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to specify prominent price
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-6
part of: 166 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemption for services supplied under a contract with periodic payments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.172
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Exemption for services supplied under a contract with periodic payments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-7
part of: 166 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Offence of strict liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.172
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-166-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Strict liability
premise text: (7) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

167 Referral selling
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-167-2
has part: 167(1) Referral selling
has part: 167(2) Referral selling
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.173

167(1) Referral selling
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-1
part of: 167 Referral selling
note: Inducing a consumer to acquire goods or services by representing a rebate, commission, or other benefit in return for assisting others is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.173
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 167(1) Referral selling
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of inducing a consumer to acquire goods or services by representing a rebate, commission, or other benefit in return for assisting others.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, induces a consumer to acquire goods or services by representing that the consumer will, after the contract for the acquisition of the goods or services is made, receive a rebate, commission or other benefit in return for: (i) giving the person the names of prospective customers; or (ii) otherwise assisting the person to supply goods or services to other consumers; and
conclusion text: Penalty: (a) if the person is a body corporate—$1,100,000; or (b) if the person is not a body corporate—$220,000.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Containment
logic summary: Temporal containment of induced consumer acquisition.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, induces a consumer to acquire goods or services by representing that the consumer will, after the contract for the acquisition of the goods or services is made, receive a rebate, commission or other benefit in return for: (i) giving the person the names of prospective customers; or (ii) otherwise assisting the person to supply goods or services to other consumers; and
conclusion text: (b) the receipt of the rebate, commission or other benefit is contingent on an event occurring after that contract is made.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of induced consumer acquisition.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, induces a consumer to acquire goods or services by representing that the consumer will, after the contract for the acquisition of the goods or services is made, receive a rebate, commission or other benefit in return for: (i) giving the person the names of prospective customers; or (ii) otherwise assisting the person to supply goods or services to other consumers; and
conclusion text: (b) the receipt of the rebate, commission or other benefit is contingent on an event occurring after that contract is made.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
logic summary: Information spread of induced consumer acquisition.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, induces a consumer to acquire goods or services by representing that the consumer will, after the contract for the acquisition of the goods or services is made, receive a rebate, commission or other benefit in return for: (i) giving the person the names of prospective customers; or (ii) otherwise assisting the person to supply goods or services to other consumers; and
conclusion text: (b) the receipt of the rebate, commission or other benefit is contingent on an event occurring after that contract is made.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of induced consumer acquisition.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, induces a consumer to acquire goods or services by representing that the consumer will, after the contract for the acquisition of the goods or services is made, receive a rebate, commission or other benefit in return for: (i) giving the person the names of prospective customers; or (ii) otherwise assisting the person to supply goods or services to other consumers; and
conclusion text: (b) the receipt of the rebate, commission or other benefit is contingent on an event occurring after that contract is made.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

167(2) Referral selling
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-2
part of: 167 Referral selling
note: Strict liability offence for subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.173
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 167(2) Referral selling
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-167-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence classification
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

168 Harassment and coercion
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-168-2
note: Using physical force, undue harassment, or coercion in specified contexts is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.173
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-2-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-168-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 168 Harassment and coercion
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-168-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of physical force, harassment, or coercion.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...if the person uses physical force, or undue harassment or coercion...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-168-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between the use of force and its context.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the physical force, or undue harassment or coercion is used in connection with...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-168-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of harassment and coercion.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the physical force, or undue harassment or coercion is used in connection with...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-168-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of the crime.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the physical force, or undue harassment or coercion is used in connection with...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-168-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema validation
logic summary: Schema validation of the crime.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the physical force, or undue harassment or coercion is used in connection with...
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

168 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-168-3
has part: 168(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 168(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.174

168(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-2
part of: 168 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Strict liability offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.174
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence is an obligation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Strict liability
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is a strict liability offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence of strict liability
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Liability
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is a liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-3
part of: 168 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: No effect on other provisions regarding supply or acquisition of interests in land.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.174
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes application to other provisions
premise text: (3) Subsections (1)(b)(iii) and (iv)
conclusion text: do not affect the application of any other provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes temporal overlap with other provisions
premise text: (3) Subsections (1)(b)(iii) and (iv)
conclusion text: do not affect the application of any other provision in relation to the supply or acquisition, or the possible supply or acquisition, of interests in land.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes temporal overlap with other provisions
premise text: (3) Subsections (1)(b)(iii) and (iv)
conclusion text: do not affect the application of any other provision in relation to the supply or acquisition, or the possible supply or acquisition, of interests in land.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-168-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes application to other provisions regarding supply or acquisition of interests in land
premise text: (3) Subsections (1)(b)(iii) and (iv)
conclusion text: do not affect the application of any other provision in relation to the supply or acquisition, or the possible supply or acquisition, of interests in land.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

169 Display notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-169-2
has part: 169(1) Display notices
has part: 169(2) Display notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.175

169(1) Display notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-169-2-ss-1
part of: 169 Display notices
note: Failure to display required notices when supplying goods or services to consumers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.175
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-169-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-169-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-169-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-169-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3

act-sch-2-sec-169-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 169(1) Display notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-169-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of failing to display required notices.
premise text: A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...displayed at those premises;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-169-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for notice display requirement.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...not, in accordance with the determination:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-169-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of failure to display notices on committing an offence.
premise text: A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...displayed at those premises;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

169(2) Display notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-169-2-ss-2
part of: 169 Display notices
note: Offence of strict liability for display notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.175
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-169-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-169-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-169-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 169(2) Display notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-169-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits display notices
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

170 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-170-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.176
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-170-2-norm

170 Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-170-3
has part: 170(1) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
has part: 170(2) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
has part: 170(3) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.176

170(1) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-1
part of: 170 Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
note: Calling on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement outside permitted hours is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.176
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 170(1) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of calling on a person outside permitted hours.
premise text: The law prohibits calling on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement outside permitted hours.
conclusion text: Calling on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement outside permitted hours is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: The provision overlaps with the concept of prohibited hours.
premise text: The provision specifies the permitted hours for calling on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement.
conclusion text: The provision overlaps with the concept of prohibited hours.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: The provision is recurring in nature.
premise text: The provision specifies permitted hours for calling on a person for negotiating an unsolicited consumer agreement.
conclusion text: The provision is recurring in nature.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Enforce
logic summary: The provision enforces the prohibition of calling on a person outside permitted hours.
premise text: The law specifies penalties for violating the prohibition.
conclusion text: The provision enforces the prohibition of calling on a person outside permitted hours.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: The provision spreads to other areas of the law.
premise text: The provision is part of a larger set of laws regulating consumer agreements.
conclusion text: The provision spreads to other areas of the law.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

170(2) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-2
part of: 170 Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
note: Consent is required for dealer to call or telephone the person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.176
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Dealer requires consent to contact.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the dealer calls on, or telephones, the person in accordance with consent that:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Consent is a required condition for contact.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the dealer calls on, or telephones, the person in accordance with consent that:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Consent is a required condition for contact.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if the dealer calls on, or telephones, the person in accordance with consent that:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

170(3) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-3
part of: 170 Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
note: Strict liability offence for violating permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.176
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 170(3) Permitted hours for negotiating an unsolicited consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-170-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

171 Disclosing purpose and identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-171-2
has part: 171(1) Disclosing purpose and identity
has part: 171(2) Disclosing purpose and identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.176

171(1) Disclosing purpose and identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-171-2-ss-1
part of: 171 Disclosing purpose and identity
note: Dealer must clearly advise person of purpose and identity before negotiating.
description: Information relating to dealer's identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.176
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-171-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-171-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-171-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 171(1) Disclosing purpose and identity
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-171-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Dealer must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

171(2) Disclosing purpose and identity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-171-2-ss-2
part of: 171 Disclosing purpose and identity
note: Strict liability offence for disclosing purpose and identity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.176
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-171-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-171-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-171-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 171(2) Disclosing purpose and identity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-171-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence is a strict liability
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172 Ceasing to negotiate on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-172-2
has part: 172(1) Ceasing to negotiate on request
has part: 172(2) Ceasing to negotiate on request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.177

172(1) Ceasing to negotiate on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-172-2-ss-1
part of: 172 Ceasing to negotiate on request
note: Dealer must leave premises immediately on request of occupier or prospective consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.177
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-172-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-172-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-172-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 172(1) Ceasing to negotiate on request
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-172-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits dealer from staying on premises without permission
premise text: (1) A dealer commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...and does not leave the premises immediately...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172(2) Ceasing to negotiate on request
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-172-2-ss-2
part of: 172 Ceasing to negotiate on request
note: Dealers must not contact prospective consumers for unsolicited consumer agreements within 30 days of a request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.177
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-172-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-172-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-172-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Dealer contacts prospective consumer for unsolicited consumer agreement within 30 days of request.
conclusion text: Offence committed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-172-3
has part: 172(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 172(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 172(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.178

172(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-172-3-ss-3
part of: 172 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Dealer must comply with subsection (2) if not the supplier of goods or services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.178
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-172-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-172-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-172-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 172(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-172-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Dealer must comply with subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-172-3-ss-4
part of: 172 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Dealer may contact prospective consumer under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.178
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-172-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-172-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-172-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to contact
premise text: (a) the dealer is not, or is not to be, the supplier of the goods or services to which the negotiations relate;
conclusion text: Dealer may contact prospective consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-172-3-ss-5
part of: 172 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Offence of strict liability for subsections (1) and (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.178
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-172-3-ss-5-norm

act-sch-2-sec-172-3-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 172(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

173 Informing person of termination period etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-173-2
has part: 173(1) Informing person of termination period etc.
has part: 173(2) Informing person of termination period etc.
has part: 173(3) Informing person of termination period etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.178

173(1) Informing person of termination period etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-1
part of: 173 Informing person of termination period etc.
note: Dealer must inform person of termination period, etc.
description: Information about termination period, etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.178
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 173(1) Informing person of termination period etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Dealer must not make unsolicited consumer agreement without informing person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

173(2) Informing person of termination period etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-2
part of: 173 Informing person of termination period etc.
note: Dealer and supplier of goods or services must inform person of termination period etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.178
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 173(2) Informing person of termination period etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits contravening subsection (1)
premise text: (2) If a dealer contravenes subsection (1) in relation to an unsolicited consumer agreement...
conclusion text: ...the supplier of the goods or services is also taken to have contravened subsection (1) in relation to the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with subsection (1)
premise text: (2) If: (a) a dealer contravenes subsection (1) in relation to an unsolicited consumer agreement...
conclusion text: ...the supplier of the goods or services is also taken to have contravened subsection (1) in relation to the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring contravention
premise text: (2) If: (a) a dealer contravenes subsection (1) in relation to an unsolicited consumer agreement...
conclusion text: ...the supplier of the goods or services is also taken to have contravened subsection (1) in relation to the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses responsibility for contravention
premise text: (2) If: (a) a dealer contravenes subsection (1) in relation to an unsolicited consumer agreement...
conclusion text: ...the supplier of the goods or services is also taken to have contravened subsection (1) in relation to the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies contraventions as a contravention of subsection (1)
premise text: (2) If: (a) a dealer contravenes subsection (1) in relation to an unsolicited consumer agreement...
conclusion text: ...the supplier of the goods or services is also taken to have contravened subsection (1) in relation to the agreement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

173(3) Informing person of termination period etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-3
part of: 173 Informing person of termination period etc.
note: Offence of strict liability for informing person of termination period etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.178
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 173(3) Informing person of termination period etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-173-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

174 Requirement to give document to the consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-174-2
has part: 174(1) Requirement to give document to the consumer
has part: 174(2) Requirement to give document to the consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.179

174(1) Requirement to give document to the consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-174-2-ss-1
part of: 174 Requirement to give document to the consumer
note: Dealer must give consumer a copy of the agreement immediately after signing.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.179
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-174-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-174-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-174-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Dealer commits an offence if not providing agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

174(2) Requirement to give document to the consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-174-2-ss-2
part of: 174 Requirement to give document to the consumer
note: Dealer must provide agreement document within 5 business days after negotiation.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.179
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-174-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-174-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-174-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Dealer must provide agreement document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

174 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-174-3
note: Fine for non-corporate individuals
description: $10,000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.180
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-174-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-174-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-174-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 174 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-174-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on individuals
conclusion text: $10,000 if not a body corporate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

175 Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-175-2
has part: 175(1) Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
has part: 175(2) Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.180

175(1) Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-175-2-ss-1
part of: 175 Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
note: Supplier must comply with specific requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements.
description: The agreement document must set out all terms, including total consideration and postal charges.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.180
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-175-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-175-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-175-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-175-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3

act-sch-2-sec-175-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 175(1) Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-175-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier has a duty to comply with the requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-175-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PENALTY
logic summary: Supplier faces a penalty for non-compliance with the requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-175-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLICATION
logic summary: The supplier's actions imply a commitment to comply with the requirements.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

175(2) Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-175-2-ss-2
part of: 175 Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
note: Strict liability offence for subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.180
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-175-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-175-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-175-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 175(2) Requirements for all unsolicited consumer agreements etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-175-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

176 Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176-2
has part: 176(1) Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
has part: 176(2) Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
has part: 176(3) Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.181

176(1) Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176-2-ss-1
part of: 176 Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
note: Supplier must comply with specific requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements.
description: Consumer signature, business address, and email address (if applicable)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.181
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-176-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-176-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-176-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 176(1) Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-176-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Supplier must comply with specific requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176(2) Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176-2-ss-2
part of: 176 Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
note: Strict liability offence for subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.181
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-176-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-176-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-176-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 176(2) Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-176-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of strict liability
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Subsection (1) is a strict liability offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

176(3) Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176-2-ss-3
part of: 176 Additional requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements
note: Does not limit the operation of section 175.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.181
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-176-2-ss-3-norm

176 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.182
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-176-3-norm

177 Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-177-2
has part: 177(1) Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
has part: 177(2) Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.182

177(1) Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-177-2-ss-1
part of: 177 Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
note: Amendments to the agreement must be signed by both parties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.182
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-177-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-177-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-177-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 177(1) Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-177-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must sign amendments to the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

177(2) Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-177-2-ss-2
part of: 177 Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
note: Strict liability for terminating unsolicited consumer agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.182
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-177-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-177-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-177-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 177(2) Requirements for amendments of unsolicited consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-177-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178 Obligations of suppliers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-178-2
has part: 178(1) Obligations of suppliers on termination
has part: 178(2) Obligations of suppliers on termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.182

178(1) Obligations of suppliers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-178-2-ss-1
part of: 178 Obligations of suppliers on termination
note: Supplier must return consideration to consumer upon termination of unsolicited consumer agreement.
description: return or refund consideration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.182
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-178-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-178-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-178-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Supplier has an obligation to return consideration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178(2) Obligations of suppliers on termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-178-2-ss-2
part of: 178 Obligations of suppliers on termination
note: Strict liability for offence on termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.182
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-178-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-178-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-178-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 178(2) Obligations of suppliers on termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-178-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: strict liability
logic summary: Obligation to pay
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: Offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179 Prohibition on supplies for 10 business days
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-179-2
has part: 179(1) Prohibition on supplies for 10 business days
has part: 179(2) Prohibition on supplies for 10 business days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.182

179(1) Prohibition on supplies for 10 business days
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-179-2-ss-1
part of: 179 Prohibition on supplies for 10 business days
note: Prohibition on supplies for 10 business days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.182
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-179-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-179-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-179-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-179-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-179-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 179(1) Prohibition on supplies for 10 business days
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-179-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplier from supplying goods or services within a specified period
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...if the person is a body corporate—$50,000; or (b) if the person is not a body corporate—$10,000.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-179-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Specifies the period within which the supplier must comply with the prohibition
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...if the person is a body corporate—$50,000; or (b) if the person is not a body corporate—$10,000.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-179-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Specifies that the prohibition applies to recurring supplies within the specified period
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...if the person is a body corporate—$50,000; or (b) if the person is not a body corporate—$10,000.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

179(2) Prohibition on supplies for 10 business days
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-179-2-ss-2
part of: 179 Prohibition on supplies for 10 business days
note: Prohibition on supplies for 10 business days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.182
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-179-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-179-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-179-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180 Repayment of payments received after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-180-2
has part: 180(1) Repayment of payments received after termination
has part: 180(2) Repayment of payments received after termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.183

180(1) Repayment of payments received after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-180-2-ss-1
part of: 180 Repayment of payments received after termination
note: Supplier must refund payments made after termination of unsolicited consumer agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.183
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-180-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-180-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-180-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-180-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-180-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-180-2-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-180-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplier from not refunding payments.
premise text: Supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...supplier does not immediately refund to the consumer...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-180-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for refund.
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...supplier does not immediately refund to the consumer...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-180-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for refund.
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...supplier does not immediately refund to the consumer...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-180-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Recognition
logic summary: Recognizes entity (Supplier) and action (refund)
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...supplier does not immediately refund to the consumer...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-180-2-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: Validates schema for refund provision.
premise text: (1) The supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...supplier does not immediately refund to the consumer...
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

180(2) Repayment of payments received after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-180-2-ss-2
part of: 180 Repayment of payments received after termination
note: Strict liability offence for non-repayment of payments received after termination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.183
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-180-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-180-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-180-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180(2) Repayment of payments received after termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-180-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Strict liability offence
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181 Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-181-2
note: Recovering amounts after termination is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.183
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-181-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-181-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-181-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-181-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-181-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-181-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-181-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 181 Prohibition on recovering amounts after termination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-181-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits recovering amounts after termination.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00868 Schedule 1 The Australian Consumer Law
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-181-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the prohibition.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00868 Schedule 1 The Australian Consumer Law
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-181-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines the recurring trace for the prohibition.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00868 Schedule 1 The Australian Consumer Law
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-181-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses the prohibition to all relevant parties.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00868 Schedule 1 The Australian Consumer Law
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-181-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: Infers the implications of the prohibition.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if: ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00868 Schedule 1 The Australian Consumer Law
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-178-3
has part: 178(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 178(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 178(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.184

178(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-178-3-ss-2
part of: 178 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Terminating unsolicited consumer agreement without permission is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.184
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-178-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-178-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-178-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 178(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-178-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Terminating unsolicited consumer agreement without permission.
conclusion text: Offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-178-3-ss-3
part of: 178 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Strict liability offence for subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.184
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-178-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-178-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-178-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 178(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-178-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence classification
premise text: (3) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

178(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-178-3-ss-4
part of: 178 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Strict liability applies to subsection (2)(a).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.184
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-178-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-178-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-178-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182 Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-182-2
has part: 182(1) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
has part: 182(2) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
has part: 182(3) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.184

182(1) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-1
part of: 182 Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
note: Committing an offence for including void provisions in unsolicited consumer agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.184
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 182(1) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of including void provisions in unsolicited consumer agreements.
premise text: The agreement includes or purports to include a provision that is void because of section 89(1).
conclusion text: An offence is committed if the supplier under an unsolicited consumer agreement includes such a provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182(2) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-2
part of: 182 Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
note: Supplier commits an offence for attempting to enforce a void provision under unsolicited consumer agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.184
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-5

act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 182(2) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of attempting to enforce a void provision.
premise text: Section 89(1) declares certain provisions under unsolicited consumer agreements as void.
conclusion text: Supplier commits an offence for attempting to enforce such a provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of relying on a void provision.
premise text: Section 89(1) declares certain provisions under unsolicited consumer agreements as void.
conclusion text: Supplier commits an offence for relying on such a provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Penalty for the offence.
premise text: Section 89(1) declares certain provisions under unsolicited consumer agreements as void.
conclusion text: The supplier must pay a penalty of $50,000 or $10,000.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for the offence.
premise text: Section 89(1) declares certain provisions under unsolicited consumer agreements as void.
conclusion text: The offence occurs when the supplier attempts to enforce or rely on a void provision.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for the offence.
premise text: Section 89(1) declares certain provisions under unsolicited consumer agreements as void.
conclusion text: The offence occurs when the supplier attempts to enforce or rely on a void provision.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182(3) Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-3
part of: 182 Certain provisions of unsolicited consumer agreements void
note: Offences of strict liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.184
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits offences of strict liability
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

183 Waiver of rights
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-183-2
has part: 183(1) Waiver of rights
has part: 183(2) Waiver of rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.185

183(1) Waiver of rights
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-183-2-ss-1
part of: 183 Waiver of rights
note: Supplier commits an offence for inducing consumer to waive rights.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.185
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-183-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-183-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-183-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 183(1) Waiver of rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-183-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of waiving rights
premise text: Supplier induces consumer to waive right
conclusion text: Offence committed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

183(2) Waiver of rights
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-183-2-ss-2
part of: 183 Waiver of rights
note: Strict liability offence for subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.185
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-183-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-183-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-183-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 183(2) Waiver of rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-183-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence classification
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: Strict liability offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184 Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-184-2
has part: 184(1) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
has part: 184(2) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.185

184(1) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-184-2-ss-1
part of: 184 Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
note: This Division applies to persons to whom rights of a consumer under a contract are assigned or transferred.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.185
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-184-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-184-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-184-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 184(1) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-184-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Division applies to persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184(2) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-184-2-ss-2
part of: 184 Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
note: This Division applies to persons who have rights of a supplier under a contract.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.185
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-184-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-184-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-184-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 184(2) Application of this Division to persons to whom rights of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-184-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Division applies to persons with supplier rights
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-180-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.186
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-180-3-norm

185 Application of this Division to supplies to third parties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-185-2
note: Division applies in relation to a contract for the supply of goods or services to a consumer on the order of another person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.186
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-185-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-185-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-185-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 185 Application of this Division to supplies to third parties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-185-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Division applies to contracts for supplies to third parties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186 Regulations may limit the application of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-186-2
note: Regulations may limit the application of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.186
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-186-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-186-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-186-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 186 Regulations may limit the application of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-186-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibits
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187 Application of this Division to certain conduct covered by the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-187-2
note: Exempts conduct from Division 2 of the Corporations Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.186
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-187-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-187-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-187-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-187-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-187-2-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-187-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludedBy
logic summary: Exclusion from Division 2
premise text: Section 736, 992A or 992AA of the Corporations Act 2001 applies.
conclusion text: Division 2 does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-187-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between Division 2 and excluded conduct
premise text: Section 736, 992A or 992AA of the Corporations Act 2001 applies.
conclusion text: Division 2 occurs during the application of section 736, 992A or 992AA
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-187-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between Division 2 and excluded conduct
premise text: Section 736, 992A or 992AA of the Corporations Act 2001 applies.
conclusion text: Division 2 occurs during the application of section 736, 992A or 992AA
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-187-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludedBy
logic summary: Exclusion from Division 2
premise text: Section 736, 992A or 992AA of the Corporations Act 2001 applies.
conclusion text: Division 2 is excluded by section 736, 992A or 992AA
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

188 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-188-2
has part: 188(1) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
has part: 188(2) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.187

188(1) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-188-2-ss-1
part of: 188 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
note: Lay-by agreements must be in writing.
description: copy of the agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.187
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-188-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-188-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-188-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 188(1) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-188-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits lay-by agreements without written consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188(2) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-188-2-ss-2
part of: 188 Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
note: Lay-by agreements must be in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.187
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-188-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-188-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-188-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 188(2) Lay-by agreements must be in writing etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-188-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be in writing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

189 Termination charges
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-189-2
has part: 189(1) Termination charges
has part: 189(2) Termination charges
has part: 189(3) Termination charges
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.187

189(1) Termination charges
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-1
part of: 189 Termination charges
note: Supplier commits an offence if agreement requires termination charge payment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.187
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 189(1) Termination charges
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplier from committing an offence
premise text: Supplier commits an offence
conclusion text: No offence committed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with temporal interval of termination charge payment
premise text: Termination charge payment occurs at some point in time
conclusion text: Termination charge payment overlaps with supplier's lay-by agreement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that supplier must pay termination charge if agreement requires it
premise text: Supplier commits an offence for not paying termination charge
conclusion text: Supplier must pay termination charge if agreement requires it
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Influence
logic summary: Influences consumer's decision to terminate lay-by agreement
premise text: Consumer may be influenced by supplier's actions
conclusion text: Consumer's decision to terminate lay-by agreement is influenced by supplier's actions
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analyzes consumer goods supplier's behavior in lay-by agreements
premise text: Supplier commits an offence for not paying termination charge
conclusion text: Consumer goods supplier's behavior in lay-by agreements can be analyzed using AI
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

189(2) Termination charges
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-2
part of: 189 Termination charges
note: No termination charge applies if the agreement is terminated by the consumer and the supplier has not breached.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.187
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 189(2) Termination charges
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negation of obligation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply
conclusion text: No termination charge applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

189(3) Termination charges
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-3
part of: 189 Termination charges
note: Supplier commits an offence if termination charge exceeds reasonable costs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.187
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 189(3) Termination charges
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplier from entering into lay-by agreement with excessive termination charge.
premise text: (3) A supplier of consumer goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the amount of the charge is more than the supplier’s reasonable costs in relation to the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Termination charges overlap with reasonable costs.
premise text: (3) A supplier of consumer goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the amount of the charge is more than the supplier’s reasonable costs in relation to the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Termination charges are recurring in relation to lay-by agreements.
premise text: (3) A supplier of consumer goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the amount of the charge is more than the supplier’s reasonable costs in relation to the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Termination charges diffuse to all parties involved in lay-by agreements.
premise text: (3) A supplier of consumer goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the amount of the charge is more than the supplier’s reasonable costs in relation to the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-189-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: CogAI recognizes termination charges as a form of exploitation.
premise text: (3) A supplier of consumer goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the amount of the charge is more than the supplier’s reasonable costs in relation to the agreement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-182-3
note: Payment of $6,000 for non-corporate individuals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.188
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-182-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-182-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-182-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 182 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-182-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay $6,000
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

190 Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-190-2
has part: 190(1) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
has part: 190(2) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
has part: 190(3) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.188

190(1) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-1
part of: 190 Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
note: Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.188
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 190(1) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

190(2) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-2
part of: 190 Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
note: Consumer breach, supplier inactivity, or unavailability of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.188
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 190(2) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Exemptions from consumer protection
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...the supplier is no longer engaged in trade or commerce; or...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Exemptions from consumer protection
premise text: ...or the consumer goods to which the agreement relates are no longer available.
conclusion text: ...the consumer goods to which the agreement relates are no longer available.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between consumer breach and supplier inactivity
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...the supplier is no longer engaged in trade or commerce; or...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between consumer breach and unavailability of goods
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...the consumer goods to which the agreement relates are no longer available.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclusion
logic summary: Exemptions from liability for breach of contract
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...the supplier is no longer engaged in trade or commerce; or...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

190(3) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-3
part of: 190 Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
note: Strict liability offence for termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.188
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 190(3) Termination of lay-by agreements by suppliers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-190-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: (3) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

191 Refund of amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191-2
has part: 191(1) Refund of amounts
has part: 191(2) Refund of amounts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.188

191(1) Refund of amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-1
part of: 191 Refund of amounts
note: Failure to refund amounts under a lay-by agreement is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.188
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 191(1) Refund of amounts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of failure to refund amounts.
premise text: Supplier commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...refund all the amounts paid by the consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between termination and refund.
premise text: (1) A supplier of consumer goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement...
conclusion text: ...fails to refund all the amounts paid by the consumer under the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of termination and refund.
premise text: (1) A supplier of consumer goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement...
conclusion text: ...fails to refund all the amounts paid by the consumer under the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of supplier's obligations.
premise text: (1) A supplier of consumer goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement...
conclusion text: ...is required to refund all the amounts paid by the consumer under the agreement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
logic summary: Validation of supplier's obligations.
premise text: (1) A supplier of consumer goods who is a party to a lay-by agreement...
conclusion text: ...must refund all the amounts paid by the consumer under the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

191(2) Refund of amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-2
part of: 191 Refund of amounts
note: Strict liability for offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.188
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 191(2) Refund of amounts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-191-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence of strict liability
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

192 Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-192-2
has part: 192(1) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
has part: 192(2) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.189

192(1) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-192-2-ss-1
part of: 192 Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
note: Giving false warranty documents or representations to consumers is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.189
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-192-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-192-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-192-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-192-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-192-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-192-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 192(1) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-192-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of false warranty documents or representations.
premise text: The person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the goods or services are goods or services to which such a warranty against defects relates.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-192-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between the supply of goods/services and the provision of false warranty documents or representations.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...in connection with the supply, in trade or commerce, of goods or services to a consumer:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-192-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of false warranty documents or representations.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the document that evidences a warranty against defects...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-192-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of false representations to consumers.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the goods or services are goods or services to which such a warranty against defects relates.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

192(2) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-192-2-ss-2
part of: 192 Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
note: Strict liability offence for non-compliance with warranty requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.189
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-192-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-192-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-192-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 192(2) Prescribed requirements for warranties against defects
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-192-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

193 Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-193-2
has part: 193(1) Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
has part: 193(2) Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.189

193(1) Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-193-2-ss-1
part of: 193 Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
note: Accepting goods for repair without proper notice is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.189
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-193-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-193-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-193-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-193-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 193(1) Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-193-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits accepting goods for repair without proper notice.
premise text: Accepting goods for repair without proper notice.
conclusion text: Offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-193-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between acceptance and repair.
premise text: Acceptance occurs before repair.
conclusion text: Temporal overlap
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

193(2) Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-193-2-ss-2
part of: 193 Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
note: Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.189
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-193-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-193-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-193-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 193(2) Repairers must comply with prescribed requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-193-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Strict liability offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-184-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.190
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-184-3-norm

194 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194-2
has part: 194(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
has part: 194(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
has part: 194(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
has part: 194(4) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
has part: 194(5) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
has part: 194(6) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
has part: 194(7) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.190

194(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-1
part of: 194 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Supplying non-compliant consumer goods is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.190
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 194(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying non-compliant consumer goods.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies consumer goods of a particular kind;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if those goods do not comply with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with time intervals related to safety standards.
premise text: (c) those goods do not comply with the standard.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they supply consumer goods that overlap with a safety standard.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of supplying non-compliant consumer goods.
premise text: (a) the person, in trade or commerce, supplies consumer goods of a particular kind;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they supply consumer goods that recur with safety standards.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads the prohibition to related concepts.
premise text: (b) a safety standard for consumer goods of that kind is in force;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they supply consumer goods that spread with safety standards.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the provision as a prohibition using AI.
premise text: (c) those goods do not comply with the standard.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they supply consumer goods that are classified as non-compliant.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-2
part of: 194 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Offering non-compliant consumer goods is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.190
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 194(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits offering non-compliant consumer goods.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...those goods do not comply with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the prohibition.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and (b) a safety standard for consumer goods of that kind is in force;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for the prohibition.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and (b) a safety standard for consumer goods of that kind is in force;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the prohibition to all relevant parties.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and (b) a safety standard for consumer goods of that kind is in force;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: Applies CogAI to the prohibition.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and (b) a safety standard for consumer goods of that kind is in force;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-3
part of: 194 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Manufacturing, possessing or controlling non-compliant consumer goods is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.190
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 194(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of non-compliant consumer goods
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...if the person is a body corporate—$1,100,000; or...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for non-compliance
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in or for the purposes of trade or commerce, manufactures, possesses or has control of consumer goods of a particular kind;
conclusion text: ...and those goods do not comply with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for non-compliance
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in or for the purposes of trade or commerce, manufactures, possesses or has control of consumer goods of a particular kind;
conclusion text: ...and those goods do not comply with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to ensure compliance
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in or for the purposes of trade or commerce, manufactures, possesses or has control of consumer goods of a particular kind;
conclusion text: ...and those goods do not comply with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication for manufacturers and traders
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person, in or for the purposes of trade or commerce, manufactures, possesses or has control of consumer goods of a particular kind;
conclusion text: ...and those goods do not comply with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194(4) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-4
part of: 194 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Exemption from subsection (3) for non-export purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.190
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-4-norm

194(5) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-5
part of: 194 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Exporting non-compliant consumer goods is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.190
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 194(5) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits exporting non-compliant consumer goods.
premise text: (5) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...those goods do not comply with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with time period of safety standards.
premise text: (5) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...and those goods do not comply with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194(6) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-6
part of: 194 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Approval for export of goods under section 106(5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.190
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to export goods
premise text: (6) Subsection (5) does not apply if the Commonwealth Minister has, by written notice given to the person, approved the export of the goods under section 106(5).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for approval process
premise text: (6) Subsection (5) does not apply if the Commonwealth Minister has, by written notice given to the person, approved the export of the goods under section 106(5).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for approval process
premise text: (6) Subsection (5) does not apply if the Commonwealth Minister has, by written notice given to the person, approved the export of the goods under section 106(5).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Diffusion
logic summary: Information diffusion for approval process
premise text: (6) Subsection (5) does not apply if the Commonwealth Minister has, by written notice given to the person, approved the export of the goods under section 106(5).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation for approval process
premise text: (6) Subsection (5) does not apply if the Commonwealth Minister has, by written notice given to the person, approved the export of the goods under section 106(5).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194(7) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-7
part of: 194 Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
note: Offences of strict liability for certain subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.190
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 194(7) Supplying etc. consumer goods that do not comply with safety
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits offences of strict liability
premise text: (7) Subsections (1), (2), (3) and (5)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

195 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-195-2
has part: 195(1) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
has part: 195(2) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.191

195(1) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-195-2-ss-1
part of: 195 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
note: Supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.191
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-195-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-195-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-195-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 195(1) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-195-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

195(2) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-195-2-ss-2
part of: 195 Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
note: Offering product-related services that do not comply with regulations is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.191
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-195-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-195-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-195-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 195(2) Supplying etc. product related services that do not comply with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-195-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Regulation prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-186-3
note: Prohibition on non-compliance with safety standards for services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.192
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-186-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-186-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-186-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-186-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-186-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-186-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-186-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 186 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-186-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (b) a safety standard for services of that kind is in force; and (c) those services do not comply with the standard.
conclusion text: The person must not provide services that do not comply with the standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-186-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between safety standards and service provision
premise text: (b) a safety standard for services of that kind is in force; and (c) those services do not comply with the standard.
conclusion text: The safety standard overlaps with the service provision period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-186-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of non-compliance
premise text: (b) a safety standard for services of that kind is in force; and (c) those services do not comply with the standard.
conclusion text: The service must be subject to recurring non-compliance checks.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-186-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Diffusion of non-compliance information
premise text: (b) a safety standard for services of that kind is in force; and (c) those services do not comply with the standard.
conclusion text: The non-compliance must be diffused to relevant parties.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-186-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analysis of service compliance data
premise text: (b) a safety standard for services of that kind is in force; and (c) those services do not comply with the standard.
conclusion text: The service compliance data must be analyzed to identify areas for improvement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

196 Requirement to nominate a safety standard
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-196-2
has part: 196(1) Requirement to nominate a safety standard
has part: 196(2) Requirement to nominate a safety standard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.192

196(1) Requirement to nominate a safety standard
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-196-2-ss-1
part of: 196 Requirement to nominate a safety standard
note: Refusal to comply with a request under section 108 is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.192
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-196-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-196-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-196-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 196(1) Requirement to nominate a safety standard
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-196-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a request
premise text: Request given under section 108
conclusion text: Refusal to comply is an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

196(2) Requirement to nominate a safety standard
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-196-2-ss-2
part of: 196 Requirement to nominate a safety standard
note: Requirement to nominate a safety standard
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.192
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-196-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-196-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-196-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 196(2) Requirement to nominate a safety standard
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-196-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability offence
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

197 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-197-2
has part: 197(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
has part: 197(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
has part: 197(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
has part: 197(4) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.193

197(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-1
part of: 197 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Supplying consumer goods covered by a ban is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.193
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 197(1) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying consumer goods covered by a ban.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

197(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-2
part of: 197 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Supplying consumer goods covered by a ban is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.193
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 197(2) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying consumer goods covered by a ban.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

197(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-3
part of: 197 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Supplying prohibited consumer goods is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.193
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 197(3) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying prohibited consumer goods.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...supply of the goods would be prohibited by subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for prohibition.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...supply of the goods would be prohibited by subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for prohibition.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...supply of the goods would be prohibited by subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses prohibition to trade or commerce.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...supply of the goods would be prohibited by subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes prohibition in consumer goods.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...supply of the goods would be prohibited by subsection (1).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

197(4) Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-4
part of: 197 Supplying etc. consumer goods covered by a ban
note: Exemption from subsection (3) for non-export purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.193
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-197-2-ss-4-norm

188 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-188-3
has part: 188(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 188(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 188(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.194

188(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-188-3-ss-5
part of: 188 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exporting prohibited consumer goods is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.194
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-188-3-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-188-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-188-3-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 188(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-188-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits export of goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-188-3-ss-6
part of: 188 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Approval of export by Commonwealth Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.194
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-188-3-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-188-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-188-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: Commonwealth Minister approves export
conclusion text: Export permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-188-3-ss-7
part of: 188 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Offences of strict liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.194
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-188-3-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-188-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-188-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits offences of strict liability
premise text: (7) Subsections (1), (2), (3) and (5)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

198 Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-198-2
has part: 198(1) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
has part: 198(2) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
has part: 198(3) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.194

198(1) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-1
part of: 198 Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
note: Supplying product related services covered by a ban is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.194
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 198(1) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits supplying product related services covered by a ban.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

198(2) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-2
part of: 198 Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
note: Offering product-related services covered by a ban is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.194
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 198(2) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits offering product-related services covered by a ban.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

198(3) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-3
part of: 198 Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
note: Offence of strict liability for supplying product related services covered by a ban
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.194
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 198(3) Supplying etc. product related services covered by a ban
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying product related services covered by a ban
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: Offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for offence
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: Subsections (1) and (2) are offences of strict liability within the defined temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for offence
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: Subsections (1) and (2) are offences of strict liability within the defined recurring trace
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses prohibition to related services
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: Prohibition extends to product related services covered by the ban
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-198-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies provision as prohibition
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: Provision is a prohibition on supplying product related services covered by the ban
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

199 Compliance with recall orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-199-2
has part: 199(1) Compliance with recall orders
has part: 199(2) Compliance with recall orders
has part: 199(3) Compliance with recall orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.195

199(1) Compliance with recall orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-1
part of: 199 Compliance with recall orders
note: Refusal to comply with recall notice is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.195
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 199(1) Compliance with recall orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of refusing to comply with recall notice.
premise text: Recall notice requires person to do something.
conclusion text: Refusal to comply is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Recall notice has a temporal overlap with refusal to comply.
premise text: Recall notice is in force.
conclusion text: Refusal to comply overlaps with recall notice.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Refusal to comply is a recurring action.
premise text: Recall notice requires person to do something.
conclusion text: Refusal to comply is a recurrent action.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

199(2) Compliance with recall orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-2
part of: 199 Compliance with recall orders
note: Supplies consumer goods in violation of recall notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.195
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 199(2) Compliance with recall orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying consumer goods in violation of recall notice
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...supplies consumer goods of the kind to which the notice relates.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
logic summary: Requires temporal overlap between recall notice and supply
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...if the notice identifies a defect in, or a dangerous characteristic of, the consumer goods—supplies consumer goods of the kind to which the notice relates.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Requires recurring supply in violation of recall notice
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...if the notice identifies a defect in, or a dangerous characteristic of, the consumer goods—supplies consumer goods of the kind to which the notice relates.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses prohibition through supply chain
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...if the notice identifies a defect in, or a dangerous characteristic of, the consumer goods—supplies consumer goods of the kind to which the notice relates.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implies supply is prohibited if recall notice is in force
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...if the notice identifies a defect in, or a dangerous characteristic of, the consumer goods—supplies consumer goods of the kind to which the notice relates.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

199(3) Compliance with recall orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-3
part of: 199 Compliance with recall orders
note: Offence of strict liability for non-compliance with recall orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.195
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4

act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 199(3) Compliance with recall orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: Offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between subsections
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: Subsections (1) and (2) are offences of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of subsections as offences
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: Subsections (1) and (2) are offences of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-199-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to comply with recall orders
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2)
conclusion text: Offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

200 Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-200-2
note: Failure to provide notice upon request is an offence.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.195
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-200-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-200-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-200-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 200 Notification by persons who supply consumer goods outside
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-200-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

190 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-190-3
note: Penalty for non-compliance with trade practices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.196
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-190-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-190-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-190-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a penalty for non-compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

201 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-201-2
has part: 201(1) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
has part: 201(2) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
has part: 201(3) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.196

201(1) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-1
part of: 201 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
note: Refusal to provide notice in a voluntary recall of consumer
description: Notice to the Commonwealth Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.196
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on refusing notice
conclusion text: No refusal of notice is allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

201(2) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-2
part of: 201 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
note: Refusal to provide required notice results in an offence.
description: copy of notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.196
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal to provide required notice.
premise text: Section 128(6) requires giving a copy of notice.
conclusion text: Refusal results in an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide required notice.
premise text: Section 128(6) requires giving a copy of notice.
conclusion text: Providing the required notice is obligatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of failure to provide required notice.
premise text: Section 128(6) requires giving a copy of notice.
conclusion text: Failure to provide the required notice is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission to refuse providing required notice under certain circumstances.
premise text: Section 128(6) requires giving a copy of notice, but does not specify consequences for refusal.
conclusion text: Refusal is permitted under section 128(6).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
logic summary: Right to refuse providing required notice under certain circumstances.
premise text: Section 128(6) requires giving a copy of notice, but does not specify consequences for refusal.
conclusion text: Refusal is a right under section 128(6).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

201(3) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-3
part of: 201 Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
note: Offences of strict liability for notification requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.196
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 201(3) Notification requirements for a voluntary recall of consumer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-201-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits offences of strict liability
premise text: (3) Subsections (1) and (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

202 Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-202-2
has part: 202(1) Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the
has part: 202(2) Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.197

202(1) Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-202-2-ss-1
part of: 202 Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the
note: Refusal to give notice as required by section 131 or 132 is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.197
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-202-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-202-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-202-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal to give notice
premise text: Section 131 or 132 requires notice
conclusion text: Refusal is an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

202(2) Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-202-2-ss-2
part of: 202 Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the
note: Strict liability offence for suppliers reporting consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.197
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-202-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-202-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-202-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 202(2) Suppliers to report consumer goods etc. associated with the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-202-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on suppliers to report consumer goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

192 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-192-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.198
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-192-3-norm

203 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-203-2
has part: 203(1) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 203(2) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 203(3) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 203(4) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 203(5) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 203(6) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 203(7) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
has part: 203(8) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.198

203(1) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-1
part of: 203 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Supplying goods that do not comply with information standard is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.198
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 203(1) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying goods that do not comply with information standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203(2) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-2
part of: 203 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Offering goods that do not comply with information standard is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.198
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 203(2) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of offering goods that do not comply with information standard.
premise text: The person offers goods that do not comply with the information standard.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between offering goods and information standard.
premise text: The person offers goods before the information standard is in force.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203(3) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-3
part of: 203 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Manufacturing, possessing or controlling goods that do not comply with information standards is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.198
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 203(3) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the person, in or for the purposes of trade or commerce,...
conclusion text: (3) A person commits an offence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval between manufacture and non-compliance
premise text: (a) the person, in or for the purposes of trade or commerce,...
conclusion text: ...the person has not complied with the standard...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication from non-compliance to offence
premise text: (c) the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the goods.
conclusion text: ...A person commits an offence...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagating non-compliance through manufacture and possession
premise text: (a) the person, in or for the purposes of trade or commerce,...
conclusion text: ...the person has not complied with the standard...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification of goods as non-compliant using AI
premise text: (b) an information standard for goods of that kind is in force;
conclusion text: ...the person has not complied with the standard...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203(4) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-4
part of: 203 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Exemption from subsection (3) if goods are not manufactured, possessed or controlled for supply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.198
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 203(4) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts from subsection (3)
premise text: Goods not manufactured, possessed or controlled for supply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203(5) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-5
part of: 203 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Goods intended for use outside Australia are exempt from subsections (1), (2), or (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.198
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-5-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between goods and use outside Australia
premise text: Goods are intended to be used outside Australia during a certain period
conclusion text: This temporal relationship is exempt from subsections (1), (2), or (3)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permitted
logic summary: Permissibility of goods use outside Australia
premise text: Goods are permitted to be used outside Australia
conclusion text: Subsections (1), (2), or (3) do not apply to these goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered
logic summary: Temporal ordering of goods use and subsections
premise text: Goods are used outside Australia before subsections (1), (2), or (3) take effect
conclusion text: Subsections (1), (2), or (3) do not apply to these goods
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: classification
logic summary: Classification of goods for exemption
premise text: Goods are classified as "intended to be used outside Australia"
conclusion text: This classification is exempt from subsections (1), (2), or (3)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-5-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: validity
logic summary: Validation of goods classification
premise text: Goods are classified as "intended to be used outside Australia"
conclusion text: This classification is valid and exempt from subsections (1), (2), or (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

203(6) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-6
part of: 203 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Goods intended for export only are presumed to be used outside Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.198
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: presumption
logic summary: Presumption of export intent
premise text: Goods with export statement
conclusion text: Goods intended for export only
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203(7) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-7
part of: 203 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Goods may be supplied with a statement applied to them in certain ways.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.198
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-7-norm

203(8) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-8
part of: 203 Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
note: Offence of strict liability for supplying goods that do not comply with information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.198
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 203(8) Supplying etc. goods that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-203-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

204 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-204-2
note: Supplying services that do not comply with information standards is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.199
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-204-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-204-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-204-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 204 Supplying etc. services that do not comply with information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-204-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits supplying services that do not comply with information standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194-3
has part: 194(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 194(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.200

194(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194-3-ss-2
part of: 194 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Committing an offence for non-compliance with a service standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.200
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

act-sch-2-sec-194-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 194(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits non-compliance with standards.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to comply with standards.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for non-compliance.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the services.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Defines a recurring obligation to comply with standards.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the person has not complied with the standard in relation to the services.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194-3-ss-3
part of: 194 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Offence of strict liability for subsections (1) and (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.200
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-194-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-194-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 194(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-194-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Strict liability
premise text: (1) and (2)
conclusion text: offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

205 Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-205-2
has part: 205(1) Compliance with substantiation notices
has part: 205(2) Compliance with substantiation notices
has part: 205(3) Compliance with substantiation notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.201

205(1) Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-205-2-ss-1
part of: 205 Compliance with substantiation notices
note: Refusal to comply with substantiation notice within specified period is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.201
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-205-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-205-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-205-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 205(1) Compliance with substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-205-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with substantiation notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

205(2) Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-205-2-ss-2
part of: 205 Compliance with substantiation notices
note: Refusal to provide information or document in compliance with substantiation notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.201
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-205-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-205-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-205-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 205(2) Compliance with substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-205-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal to provide information or document
premise text: Substantiation notice
conclusion text: Refusal to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

205(3) Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-205-2-ss-3
part of: 205 Compliance with substantiation notices
note: Offence of strict liability for non-compliance with substantiation notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.201
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-205-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-205-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-205-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 205(3) Compliance with substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-205-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
premise text: (3) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: Offence of strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

206 False or misleading information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-206-2
note: Giving false or misleading information to the regulator is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.201
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-206-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-206-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-206-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 206 False or misleading information etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-206-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of false or misleading information
premise text: Regulator substantiation notice
conclusion text: Offence committed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

196 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-196-3
has part: 196(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 196(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.202

196(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-196-3-ss-2
part of: 196 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemptions from the section's application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.202
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-196-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-196-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-196-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 196(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-196-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Section applies to all information except exempted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

196(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-196-3-ss-3
part of: 196 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Offence of strict liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.202
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-196-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-196-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-196-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 196(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-196-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Strict liability
premise text: (1) is an offence of strict liability.
conclusion text: (3) is an offence of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

207 Reasonable mistake of fact
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-207-2
has part: 207(1) Reasonable mistake of fact
has part: 207(2) Reasonable mistake of fact
has part: 207(3) Reasonable mistake of fact
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.203

207(1) Reasonable mistake of fact
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-1
part of: 207 Reasonable mistake of fact
note: Defence for reasonable mistake of fact in prosecution
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.203
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-1-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the prosecution to prove facts
premise text: Prosecution must prove facts
conclusion text: Defence allowed if mistake of fact is reasonable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the defendant to correct mistake of fact
premise text: Defendant must correct mistake of fact
conclusion text: Defence allowed if mistake of fact is reasonable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-1-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Relies on information supplied by another person
premise text: Information supplied by another person
conclusion text: Mistake of fact is reasonable if reliance is reasonable
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for mistake of fact
premise text: Mistake of fact occurred within a temporal interval
conclusion text: Defence allowed if mistake of fact is within the interval
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permits defence for reasonable mistake of fact
premise text: Defence allowed if mistake of fact is reasonable
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

207(2) Reasonable mistake of fact
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-2
part of: 207 Reasonable mistake of fact
note: Defendant is not liable if information relied upon was supplied by another person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.203
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 207(2) Reasonable mistake of fact
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant's liability is obligation-based.
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply.
conclusion text: Defendant is not liable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between information and contravention.
premise text: Contravention occurred at a specific time.
conclusion text: Information relied upon is relevant to the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of information and contravention.
premise text: Contravention occurred repeatedly.
conclusion text: Information relied upon is relevant to the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information and contravention.
premise text: Information was supplied by another person.
conclusion text: Defendant is not liable if information relied upon was supplied by another person.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph
logic summary: Knowledge graph of defendant's liability.
premise text: Information relied upon was supplied by another person.
conclusion text: Defendant is not liable if information relied upon was supplied by another person.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

207(3) Reasonable mistake of fact
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-3
part of: 207 Reasonable mistake of fact
note: Court permission required to rely on defence involving another person's information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.203
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3

act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Court permission required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Court permission required.
premise text: (3) If a defence provided by subsection (1) involves an allegation that a contravention was due to reliance on information supplied by another person, the defendant is not entitled to rely on that defence unless:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-207-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Court permission required.
premise text: (3) If a defence provided by subsection (1) involves an allegation that a contravention was due to reliance on information supplied by another person, the defendant is not entitled to rely on that defence unless:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

208 Act or default of another person etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-208-2
note: Defence against prosecution for contravention of Chapter provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.203
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-208-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-208-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-208-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-208-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-208-2-logic-argumentation-4

act-sch-2-sec-208-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 208 Act or default of another person etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-208-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence against prosecution
premise text: (1) In a prosecution for a contravention of a provision of this Chapter, it is a defence if the defendant proves that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-208-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between cause and contravention
premise text: (1) In a prosecution for a contravention of a provision of this Chapter, it is a defence if the defendant proves that...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-208-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace between cause and contravention
premise text: (1) In a prosecution for a contravention of a provision of this Chapter, it is a defence if the defendant proves that...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-208-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inference from cause and contravention
premise text: (1) In a prosecution for a contravention of a provision of this Chapter, it is a defence if the defendant proves that...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

198 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-198-3
has part: 198(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 198(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.204

198(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-198-3-ss-2
part of: 198 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exempts certain individuals from liability for contraventions under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.204
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-198-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-198-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-198-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 198(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-198-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts certain individuals from liability
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to employees or agents of the defendant
conclusion text: The exemption applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

198(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-198-3-ss-3
part of: 198 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Defendant must provide notice to the person who instituted the proceeding before relying on a defence that involves an allegation of another person's act or default.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.204
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-198-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-198-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-198-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 198(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-198-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Defendant must provide notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

209 Publication of advertisements in the ordinary course of business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-209-2
note: Defendant must prove they are a business publisher and received advertisement in ordinary course of business to avoid prosecution for contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.204
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-209-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-209-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-209-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 209 Publication of advertisements in the ordinary course of business
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-209-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant has an obligation to prove they are a business publisher and received advertisement in ordinary course of business.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

210 Supplying goods acquired for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-210-2
has part: 210(1) Supplying goods acquired for the purpose of re-supply
has part: 210(2) Supplying goods acquired for the purpose of re-supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.204

210(1) Supplying goods acquired for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-1
part of: 210 Supplying goods acquired for the purpose of re-supply
note: Defence for supplying goods in contravention of section 194 or 203
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.204
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5

act-sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 210(1) Supplying goods acquired for the purpose of re-supply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence for supplying goods in contravention of section 194 or 203
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge
logic summary: Defence requires defendant to prove certain conditions
premise text: The defendant must prove that...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defence is a recurring trace of the defendant's actions
premise text: The defence is based on the defendant's actions
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Inference
logic summary: Defence requires inference from conditions
premise text: The defendant must infer that...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalRelation
logic summary: Defence is related to temporal relation of actions
premise text: The defence is based on the timing of actions
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

210(2) Supplying goods acquired for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-2
part of: 210 Supplying goods acquired for the purpose of re-supply
note: Defendant may rely on defence unless court gives leave or defendant provides notice.
description: Notice within 7 days before proceeding commences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.204
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

act-sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Defendant is permitted to rely on defence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-210-2-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge
logic summary: Defendant must know about notice requirement.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

211 Supplying services acquired for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-211-2
note: Defence in prosecution for contravention of section 195 or 204
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.205
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-211-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-211-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-211-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-211-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-211-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-211-2-logic-argumentation-5

act-sch-2-sec-211-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 211 Supplying services acquired for the purpose of re-supply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-211-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from prosecution
premise text: (1) In a prosecution for a contravention of a provision of this Chapter that was committed by supplying services in contravention of section 195 or 204
conclusion text: it is a defence if the defendant proves that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-211-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal context for service acquisition
premise text: (1) In a prosecution for a contravention of a provision of this Chapter that was committed by supplying services in contravention of section 195 or 204
conclusion text: it is a defence if the defendant proves that...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-211-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring service acquisition pattern
premise text: (a) the services were acquired by the defendant for the purpose of re-supply; and (b) the services were so acquired from a person who carried on in Australia a business of supplying such services otherwise than as the agent of a person outside Australia;
conclusion text: the defendant proves that...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-211-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Permitted defence in prosecution
premise text: (1) In a prosecution for a contravention of a provision of this Chapter that was committed by supplying services in contravention of section 195 or 204
conclusion text: it is a defence if the defendant proves that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-211-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: inference
logic summary: Inferencing from prosecution context
premise text: (1) In a prosecution for a contravention of a provision of this Chapter that was committed by supplying services in contravention of section 195 or 204
conclusion text: it is a defence if the defendant proves that...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

200 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-200-3
note: Defendant must not claim ignorance or reliance on false representation to avoid liability for contravention of safety standard or information standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.206
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-200-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-200-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-200-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-200-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-200-3-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-200-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 200 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-200-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Defendant must not claim ignorance or reliance on false representation to avoid liability.
premise text: Section 195 and section 204
conclusion text: Defendant is liable for contravention of safety standard or information standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-200-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Defendant must provide written notice identifying the person from whom services were acquired within 7 days before hearing commences.
premise text: Subsection (2)
conclusion text: Defendant is not entitled to rely on defence provided by subsection (1) unless leave is given or notice is served.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-200-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Court must give leave for defendant to rely on defence provided by subsection (1).
premise text: Subsection (2)(a)
conclusion text: Defendant is entitled to rely on defence provided by subsection (1) if leave is given.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-200-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Defendant must provide written notice identifying the person from whom services were acquired within 7 days before hearing commences.
premise text: Subsection (2)(b)
conclusion text: Defendant is not entitled to rely on defence provided by subsection (1) unless notice is served.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

212 Prosecutions to be commenced within 3 years
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-212-2
note: Prosecution can be commenced within 3 years after commission of the offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.207
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-212-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-212-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-212-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 212 Prosecutions to be commenced within 3 years
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-212-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to commence prosecution within 3 years
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

213 Preference must be given to compensation for victims
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-213-2
note: Court must give preference to making an order for compensation if defendant cannot pay fine and compensation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.207
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-213-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-213-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-213-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 213 Preference must be given to compensation for victims
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-213-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must give preference to making an order for compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

214 Penalties for contraventions of the same nature etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-214-2
note: Penalties for contraventions of the same nature etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.207
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-214-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-214-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-214-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

202 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-202-3
note: Maximum fine for multiple contraventions of the same provision cannot exceed the maximum fine for one offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.208
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-202-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-202-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-202-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of excessive fines
premise text: (a) a person is convicted of 2 or more offences constituted by, or relating to, contraventions of the same provision...
conclusion text: ...the court must not, in respect of the offences, impose on the person fines that, in the aggregate, exceed the maximum fine that would be applicable in respect of one offence by that person against that provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

215 Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-215-2
has part: 215(1) Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
has part: 215(2) Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.208

215(1) Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-215-2-ss-1
part of: 215 Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
note: Court cannot impose fine exceeding the amount by which maximum fine is greater than previous fines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.208
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-215-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-215-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-215-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-215-2-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-215-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-215-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Court cannot impose excessive fine.
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: The court must not impose a fine that exceeds...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-215-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Court has permission to impose a fine within the defined limit.
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: ...the amount by which the maximum fine applicable in respect of that offence is greater than...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-215-2-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Excessive fine implies previous fines exceed the limit.
premise text: (c) (i)
conclusion text: ...the contravention mentioned in paragraph (a); and
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-215-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court has an obligation to consider previous fines when imposing a fine.
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: ...the person a fine that exceeds...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

215(2) Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-215-2-ss-2
part of: 215 Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
note: Fine for previous contraventions of the same nature
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.208
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-215-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-215-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-215-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 215(2) Penalties for previous contraventions of the same nature etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-215-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to impose fines for previous contraventions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216 Granting of injunctions etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-216-2
note: Granting of injunctions in proceedings for contravention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.209
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-216-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-216-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-216-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 216 Granting of injunctions etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-216-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to grant injunctions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

217 Criminal proceedings not to be brought for contraventions of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-217-2
note: Criminal proceedings not allowed for contraventions of Chapter 2 or 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.209
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-217-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-217-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-217-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits criminal proceedings for contraventions of Chapter 2 or 3
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

204 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-204-3
note: Chapter 5—Enforcement and remedies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.210
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-204-3-norm

218 Regulator may accept undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-218-2
has part: 218(1) Regulator may accept undertakings
has part: 218(2) Regulator may accept undertakings
has part: 218(3) Regulator may accept undertakings
has part: 218(4) Regulator may accept undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.210

218(1) Regulator may accept undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-1
part of: 218 Regulator may accept undertakings
note: Regulator may accept a written undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.210
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: accepts
logic summary: Accepts undertakings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

218(2) Regulator may accept undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-2
part of: 218 Regulator may accept undertakings
note: Regulator may accept undertakings with consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.210
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-2-norm

218(3) Regulator may accept undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-3
part of: 218 Regulator may accept undertakings
note: Regulator may apply to court for an order if undertaking is breached.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.210
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 218(3) Regulator may accept undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulator may apply to court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: →
logic summary: If regulator considers breach, then may apply to court.
premise text: Regulator considers breach.
conclusion text: May apply to court.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

218(4) Regulator may accept undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-4
part of: 218 Regulator may accept undertakings
note: Court may make orders to enforce undertaking breach
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.210
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 218(4) Regulator may accept undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-218-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Enforcement of obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219 Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-219-2
has part: 219(1) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
has part: 219(2) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
has part: 219(3) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.211

219(1) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-219-2-ss-1
part of: 219 Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
note: Regulator may require claims to be substantiated.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.211
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-219-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-219-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-219-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 219(1) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-219-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219(2) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-219-2-ss-2
part of: 219 Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
note: Regulator may require substantiation of claims within 21 days.
description: Information and/or documents to support the claim.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.211
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-219-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-219-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-219-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 219(2) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-219-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator requires substantiation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219(3) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-219-2-ss-3
part of: 219 Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
note: Regulator may require substantiation of claims
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.211
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-219-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-219-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-219-2-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-219-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 219(3) Regulator may require claims to be substantiated etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-219-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must require substantiation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-219-2-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_RELEVANT_TO
logic summary: Information is relevant to substantiating claims
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

206 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-206-3
has part: 206(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 206(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 206(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.212

206(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-206-3-ss-4
part of: 206 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Notice must specify person and claim or representation.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.212
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-206-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-206-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-206-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 206(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-206-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice with specific details.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

206(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-206-3-ss-5
part of: 206 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: The notice may relate to more than one claim or representation that the person has made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.212
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-206-3-ss-5-norm

act-sch-2-sec-206-3-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 206(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

206(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-206-3-ss-6
part of: 206 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemption for information providers publishing on behalf of another person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.212
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-206-3-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-206-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-206-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

220 Extending periods for complying with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-220-2
has part: 220(1) Extending periods for complying with substantiation notices
has part: 220(2) Extending periods for complying with substantiation notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.212

220(1) Extending periods for complying with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-220-2-ss-1
part of: 220 Extending periods for complying with substantiation notices
note: Extension of time to comply with substantiation notice
description: Written application for extension within 21 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.212
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-220-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-220-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-220-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 220(1) Extending periods for complying with substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-220-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to apply for extension
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

220(2) Extending periods for complying with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-220-2-ss-2
part of: 220 Extending periods for complying with substantiation notices
note: Regulator may extend period for complying with notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.212
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-220-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-220-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-220-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 220(2) Extending periods for complying with substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-220-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Regulator has the power to extend period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

221 Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-221-2
has part: 221(1) Compliance with substantiation notices
has part: 221(2) Compliance with substantiation notices
has part: 221(3) Compliance with substantiation notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.212

221(1) Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-221-2-ss-1
part of: 221 Compliance with substantiation notices
note: Comply with substantiation notice within specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.212
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-221-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-221-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-221-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 221(1) Compliance with substantiation notices
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-221-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
premise text: Given a substantiation notice
conclusion text: Comply with the notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

221(2) Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-221-2-ss-2
part of: 221 Compliance with substantiation notices
note: Compliance period for substantiation notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.212
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-221-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-221-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-221-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-221-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 221(2) Compliance with substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-221-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-221-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Includes extended period for complying with notice
premise text: (2) The substantiation notice compliance period...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

221(3) Compliance with substantiation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-221-2-ss-3
part of: 221 Compliance with substantiation notices
note: Refusal to provide information or document in response to substantiation notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.212
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-221-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-221-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-221-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 221(3) Compliance with substantiation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-221-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with substantiation notices
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

222 False or misleading information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-222-2
has part: 222(1) False or misleading information etc.
has part: 222(2) False or misleading information etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.213

222(1) False or misleading information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-222-2-ss-1
part of: 222 False or misleading information etc.
note: Give false or misleading information to the regulator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.213
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-222-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 222(1) False or misleading information etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-222-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of giving false or misleading information.
premise text: The regulator may impose a pecuniary penalty for contravention.
conclusion text: A person must not give false or misleading information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

222(2) False or misleading information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-222-2-ss-2
part of: 222 False or misleading information etc.
note: Exemptions from the section's application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.213
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-222-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Except
logic summary: Exempts certain information from the section's application
premise text: (2) This section does not apply to:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-222-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Exceptions apply during document production
premise text: the production to the regulator of a document containing false or misleading information if the document is accompanied by a statement of the person that the information is false or misleading.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-222-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justifies
logic summary: Justification for exemptions based on intent and knowledge
premise text: (a) information that the person could not have known was false or misleading; or (b) the production to the regulator of a document containing false or misleading information if the document is accompanied by a statement of the person that the information is false or misleading.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-222-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: Exemptions spread to related documents
premise text: (a) information that the person could not have known was false or misleading; or (b) the production to the regulator of a document containing false or misleading information if the document is accompanied by a statement of the person that the information is false or misleading.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-222-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Artificial intelligence recognizes exemptions based on intent and knowledge
premise text: (a) information that the person could not have known was false or misleading; or (b) the production to the regulator of a document containing false or misleading information if the document is accompanied by a statement of the person that the information is false or misleading.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

208 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-208-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.214
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-208-3-norm

223 Regulator may issue a public warning notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-223-2
has part: 223(1) Regulator may issue a public warning notice
has part: 223(2) Regulator may issue a public warning notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.214

223(1) Regulator may issue a public warning notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-223-2-ss-1
part of: 223 Regulator may issue a public warning notice
note: Regulator may issue a public warning notice about conduct that may constitute a contravention of Chapter 2, 3 or 4.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.214
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-223-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-223-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-223-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-223-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

act-sch-2-sec-223-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 223(1) Regulator may issue a public warning notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-223-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulator may issue a public warning notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-223-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: has suffered or is likely to suffer detriment as a result of the conduct
logic summary: The regulator is satisfied that one or more other persons has suffered, or is likely to suffer, detriment as a result of the conduct.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-223-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is in the public interest
logic summary: The regulator is satisfied that it is in the public interest to issue the notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

223(2) Regulator may issue a public warning notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-223-2-ss-2
part of: 223 Regulator may issue a public warning notice
note: Refusal to respond to substantiation notice within compliance period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.214
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-223-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-223-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-223-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-223-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of refusing to respond
premise text: Regulator may issue a public warning notice
conclusion text: The person must respond within the compliance period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-223-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Refusal within compliance period
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1), if:
conclusion text: The refusal occurred within the compliance period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

224 Pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-224-2
note: Court may impose pecuniary penalties for contravening certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.215
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-224-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-224-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-224-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-224-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 224 Pecuniary penalties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-224-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on conduct.
premise text: (1) If a court is satisfied...
conclusion text: ...a person has contravened any of the following provisions:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-224-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with temporal intervals for commencement.
premise text: (1) If a court is satisfied...
conclusion text: ...a period within which to commence proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

210 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-210-3
has part: 210(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 210(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.216

210(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-210-3-ss-2
part of: 210 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Court must consider relevant matters when determining pecuniary penalty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.216
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-210-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-210-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-210-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 210(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-210-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider relevant matters.
premise text: (2) In determining the appropriate pecuniary penalty, the court...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

210(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-210-3-ss-3
part of: 210 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Maximum pecuniary penalty for certain acts or omissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.216
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-210-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-210-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-210-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-210-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-210-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-210-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Upper limit exceeded
premise text: Amount of pecuniary penalty > $1,100,000 for body corporate or $220,000 for non-body corporate
conclusion text: Prohibition violated
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-210-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Upper limit exceeded
premise text: Amount of pecuniary penalty > $50,000 for section 66(2) or > $10,000 for other provisions
conclusion text: Prohibition violated
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-210-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <=
logic summary: Upper limit not exceeded
premise text: Amount of pecuniary penalty <= $1,100,000 for body corporate or $220,000 for non-body corporate
conclusion text: Prohibition not violated
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-210-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <=
logic summary: Upper limit not exceeded
premise text: Amount of pecuniary penalty <= $50,000 for section 66(2) or <= $10,000 for other provisions
conclusion text: Prohibition not violated
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

212 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-212-3
note: Pecuniary penalty limits for certain acts and omissions
description: $16,500 or $3,300
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.218
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-212-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-212-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-212-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 212 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-212-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Upper limit for pecuniary penalty
premise text: $16,500 or $3,300
conclusion text: not to exceed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

225 Pecuniary penalties and offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-225-2
has part: 225(1) Pecuniary penalties and offences
has part: 225(2) Pecuniary penalties and offences
has part: 225(3) Pecuniary penalties and offences
has part: 225(4) Pecuniary penalties and offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.219

225(1) Pecuniary penalties and offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-1
part of: 225 Pecuniary penalties and offences
note: Court must not make an order against a person convicted of an offence constituting substantially the same conduct as a consumer protection breach.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.219
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 225(1) Pecuniary penalties and offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Court cannot make an order
premise text: Section 224(1)(a)
conclusion text: Order under section 224
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must not
logic summary: Court must not make an order under section 224
premise text: Section 224(1)(a) - (f)
conclusion text: Order under section 224
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Same conduct
logic summary: Substantially the same conduct as consumer protection breach
premise text: Offence constituted by conduct
conclusion text: Consumer protection breach
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Court cannot make an order under section 224 against a person convicted of an offence
premise text: Section 224(1)(a) - (f)
conclusion text: Order under section 224
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

225(2) Pecuniary penalties and offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-2
part of: 225 Pecuniary penalties and offences
note: Proceedings for an order under section 224 are stayed if criminal proceedings are started or have already been started against the person for an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.219
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 225(2) Pecuniary penalties and offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits proceedings for an order under section 224 if criminal proceedings are started or have already been started.
premise text: (2) Proceedings for an order under section 224 against a person in relation to a consumer protection breach are stayed...
conclusion text: ...the proceedings for the order may be resumed if the person is not convicted of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines an overlap between 'criminal proceedings' and 'proceedings for an order under section 224'
premise text: (2) Proceedings for an order under section 224 against a person in relation to a consumer protection breach are stayed...
conclusion text: ...if criminal proceedings are started or have already been started against the person for an offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Defines a recurring relationship between 'criminal proceedings' and 'proceedings for an order under section 224'
premise text: (2) Proceedings for an order under section 224 against a person in relation to a consumer protection breach are stayed...
conclusion text: ...if criminal proceedings are started or have already been started against the person for an offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses the prohibition of proceedings for an order under section 224 if criminal proceedings are started or have already been started.
premise text: (2) Proceedings for an order under section 224 against a person in relation to a consumer protection breach are stayed...
conclusion text: ...the proceedings for the order may be resumed if the person is not convicted of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes the prohibition of proceedings for an order under section 224 if criminal proceedings are started or have already been started.
premise text: (2) Proceedings for an order under section 224 against a person in relation to a consumer protection breach are stayed...
conclusion text: ...the proceedings for the order may be resumed if the person is not convicted of the offence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

225(3) Pecuniary penalties and offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-3
part of: 225 Pecuniary penalties and offences
note: Criminal proceedings may be started against a person for conduct substantially the same as a consumer protection breach.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.219
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

225(4) Pecuniary penalties and offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-4
part of: 225 Pecuniary penalties and offences
note: Prevents reusing evidence in criminal proceedings if it was previously used in a consumer protection breach proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.219
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents reusing evidence in criminal proceedings.
premise text: Evidence previously given or produced in a consumer protection breach proceeding.
conclusion text: Cannot be reused in criminal proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-225-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Identifies overlapping temporal intervals.
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: Temporal interval overlaps.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

214 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-214-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.220
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-214-3-norm

226 Defence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-226-2
note: Court may relieve person from liability to pecuniary penalty if they acted honestly and reasonably.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.220
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-226-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-226-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-226-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-226-2-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-226-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-226-2-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-226-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 226 Defence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-226-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Relief
logic summary: Court may relieve person from liability.
premise text: Person has engaged in conduct that relates to a contravention of a provision.
conclusion text: Court relieves person from liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-226-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Excuse
logic summary: Court may excuse person's conduct if they acted honestly and reasonably.
premise text: Person has engaged in conduct that relates to a contravention of a provision.
conclusion text: Court excuses person's conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-226-2-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Justification
logic summary: Court considers all circumstances of the case before relieving or excusing person.
premise text: Person has engaged in conduct that relates to a contravention of a provision.
conclusion text: Court justifies its decision based on all circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-226-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Court considers the timing of person's conduct when relieving or excusing them.
premise text: Person has engaged in conduct that relates to a contravention of a provision.
conclusion text: Court considers temporal relation between conduct and provision.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-226-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Liability
logic summary: Court may relieve person from liability if they acted honestly and reasonably.
premise text: Person has engaged in conduct that relates to a contravention of a provision.
conclusion text: Court relieves person from liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

227 Preference must be given to compensation for victims
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-227-2
note: Court must give preference to making an order for compensation if defendant cannot pay both penalty and compensation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.220
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-227-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-227-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-227-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 227 Preference must be given to compensation for victims
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-227-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must give preference to making an order for compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

228 Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-228-2
has part: 228(1) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
has part: 228(2) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.220

228(1) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-228-2-ss-1
part of: 228 Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
note: Regulator may institute a proceeding for recovery of pecuniary penalties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.220
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-228-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-228-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-228-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulator may institute a proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

228(2) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-228-2-ss-2
part of: 228 Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
note: Commencement of proceeding within 6 years after contravention or conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.220
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-228-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-228-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-228-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 228(2) Civil action for recovery of pecuniary penalties
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-228-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to commence proceeding within time limit.
premise text: Subsection (1) may be commenced at any time within 6 years after the contravention or conduct.
conclusion text: A proceeding under subsection (1) may be commenced at any time within 6 years after the contravention or conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

229 Indemnification of officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-229-2
has part: 229(1) Indemnification of officers
has part: 229(2) Indemnification of officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.221

229(1) Indemnification of officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-229-2-ss-1
part of: 229 Indemnification of officers
note: Indemnification of officers is prohibited for certain liabilities incurred as an officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.221
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-229-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-229-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-229-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-229-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-229-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-229-2-ss-1-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-229-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 229(1) Indemnification of officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-229-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of indemnification for certain liabilities.
premise text: The law prohibits indemnifying a person against certain liabilities incurred as an officer.
conclusion text: Indemnification is prohibited for the specified liabilities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-229-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval of indemnification prohibition.
premise text: The law prohibits indemnification within a certain time frame.
conclusion text: Indemnification is prohibited for the specified liabilities within a certain time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-229-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of officer indemnification prohibition.
premise text: The law prohibits recurring indemnification for the specified liabilities.
conclusion text: Indemnification is prohibited for the specified liabilities in a recurring manner.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-229-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of officer indemnification prohibition.
premise text: The law represents knowledge about officer indemnification prohibition.
conclusion text: Officer indemnification is prohibited based on the represented knowledge.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-229-2-ss-1-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
logic summary: Validation of officer indemnification prohibition.
premise text: The law validates the prohibition of officer indemnification.
conclusion text: Officer indemnification is prohibited and validated by the law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

229(2) Indemnification of officers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-229-2-ss-2
part of: 229 Indemnification of officers
note: Outcome of proceedings is the outcome of proceedings and any appeal in relation to the proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.221
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-229-2-ss-2-norm

act-sch-2-sec-229-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 229(2) Indemnification of officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

230 Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-230-2
has part: 230(1) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
has part: 230(2) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.221

230(1) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-230-2-ss-1
part of: 230 Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
note: Section 229 is not authorized.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.221
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-230-2-ss-1-norm

230(2) Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-230-2-ss-2
part of: 230 Certain indemnities not authorised and certain documents void
note: Anything that purports to indemnify a person against a liability is void if it contravenes section 229.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.221
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-230-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-230-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-230-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits indemnification against liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-216-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.222
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-216-3-norm

232 Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232-2
has part: 232(1) Injunctions
has part: 232(2) Injunctions
has part: 232(3) Injunctions
has part: 232(4) Injunctions
has part: 232(5) Injunctions
has part: 232(6) Injunctions
has part: 232(7) Injunctions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.222

232(1) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-1
part of: 232 Injunctions
note: Granting of injunctions for contravention of provisions in Chapters 2, 3 or 4.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.222
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 232(1) Injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct
premise text: (a) a contravention of a provision...
conclusion text: A court may grant an injunction...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
logic summary: Tracing of contraventions and attempts to contravene provisions
premise text: (e) being in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned...
conclusion text: A court may grant an injunction...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring a person to contravene provisions
premise text: (c) aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring a person...
conclusion text: A court may grant an injunction...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of inducing or attempting to induce a person to contravene provisions
premise text: (d) inducing, or attempting to induce...,
conclusion text: A court may grant an injunction...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of conspiring with others to contravene provisions
premise text: (f) conspiring with others to contravene...
conclusion text: A court may grant an injunction...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

232(2) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-2
part of: 232 Injunctions
note: Court may grant injunction on application by regulator or any other person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.222
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-2-norm

act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 232(2) Injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

232(3) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-3
part of: 232 Injunctions
note: Prohibits conduct that relies on or applies an unfair term from a consumer contract.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.222
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

232(4) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-4
part of: 232 Injunctions
note: Court power to grant injunction under subsection (1) can be exercised regardless of intent or previous conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.222
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-4-norm

232(5) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-5
part of: 232 Injunctions
note: Restraining a person from carrying on a business or supplying goods or services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.222
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits carrying on a business or supplying goods or services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

232(6) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-6
part of: 232 Injunctions
note: Granting of injunctions to compel specific actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.222
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5

act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of certain actions
premise text: (6) Without limiting subsection (1)
conclusion text: the court may grant an injunction under that subsection requiring a person to do any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relations between actions subject to injunctions
premise text: (6) Without limiting subsection (1), the court may grant an injunction under that subsection requiring a person to do any of the following:
conclusion text: the court may grant an injunction under that subsection requiring a person to do any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring traces between actions subject to injunctions
premise text: (6) Without limiting subsection (1), the court may grant an injunction under that subsection requiring a person to do any of the following:
conclusion text: the court may grant an injunction under that subsection requiring a person to do any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of actions subject to injunctions
premise text: (6) Without limiting subsection (1), the court may grant an injunction under that subsection requiring a person to do any of the following:
conclusion text: the court may grant an injunction under that subsection requiring a person to do any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inferences about actions subject to injunctions
premise text: (6) Without limiting subsection (1), the court may grant an injunction under that subsection requiring a person to do any of the following:
conclusion text: the court may grant an injunction under that subsection requiring a person to do any of the following:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

232(7) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-7
part of: 232 Injunctions
note: Court power to grant injunction regardless of person's intentions or past actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.222
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 232(7) Injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-232-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Court can grant injunction regardless of person's intentions or past actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

233 Consent injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-233-2
note: Court may grant injunction by consent of all parties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.223
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-233-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-233-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-233-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to grant injunction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

234 Interim injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-234-2
has part: 234(1) Interim injunctions
has part: 234(2) Interim injunctions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.223

234(1) Interim injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-234-2-ss-1
part of: 234 Interim injunctions
note: Grant interim injunction under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.223
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-234-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-234-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-234-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 234(1) Interim injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-234-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Granting of interim injunction
premise text: Application under section 232
conclusion text: Interim injunction granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

234(2) Interim injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-234-2-ss-2
part of: 234 Interim injunctions
note: Court must not require applicant or regulator to provide something
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.223
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-234-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-234-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-234-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 234(2) Interim injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-234-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotRequire
logic summary: Court obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

218 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-218-3
note: Court must accept undertaking from responsible Minister if required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.224
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-218-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-218-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-218-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-218-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-218-3-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-218-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 218 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-218-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to accept undertaking
premise text: Court must accept undertaking from responsible Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-218-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must not require further undertaking from other persons
premise text: If: (a) in a case to which subsection (2) does not apply the court would, but for this subsection, require a person to give an undertaking as to damages or costs; and (b) a responsible Minister gives the undertaking;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-218-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Responsible Minister must provide undertaking
premise text: (a) in a case to which subsection (2) does not apply the court would, but for this subsection, require a person to give an undertaking as to damages or costs;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-218-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must accept undertaking from responsible Minister if required
premise text: (b) a responsible Minister gives the undertaking;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

235 Variation and discharge of injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-235-2
note: Court may vary or discharge an injunction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.224
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-235-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-235-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-235-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 235 Variation and discharge of injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-235-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May vary or discharge an injunction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

236 Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-236-2
has part: 236(1) Actions for damages
has part: 236(2) Actions for damages
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.225

236(1) Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-1
part of: 236 Actions for damages
note: Claimant may recover loss or damage from another person involved in contravention of Chapter 2 or 3 provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.225
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 236(1) Actions for damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide compensation for loss or damage.
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: ...recover the amount of the loss or damage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implication
logic summary: Implication of Chapter 2 and 3 provisions on actions for damages.
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: ...recover the amount of the loss or damage.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between conduct and contravention.
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: ...recover the amount of the loss or damage.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligations from State to other persons involved in contravention.
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: ...recover the amount of the loss or damage.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognition
logic summary: Cognitive process of recognizing obligations to provide compensation for loss or damage.
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: ...recover the amount of the loss or damage.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

236(2) Actions for damages
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-2
part of: 236 Actions for damages
note: Action for damages can be commenced within 6 years after the day on which the cause of action accrued.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.225
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 236(2) Actions for damages
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-236-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Permission to commence an action within a time limit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

220 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-220-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.226
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-220-3-norm

237 Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-237-2
has part: 237(1) Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
has part: 237(2) Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
has part: 237(3) Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.226

237(1) Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-1
part of: 237 Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
note: Court may make order against person who engaged in conduct causing loss or damage to injured persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.226
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 237(1) Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court may make order
premise text: Injured person applies for compensation
conclusion text: Order made against person who engaged in conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: constitutes applying or relying on, or purporting to apply or rely on
logic summary: Timeframe for application or reliance on term
premise text: Term has been declared under section 250 to be an unfair term
conclusion text: Timeframe is applicable to court's order
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: is likely to suffer loss or damage
logic summary: Injured person is likely to suffer loss or damage
premise text: Person has suffered loss or damage
conclusion text: Order may be made against person who engaged in conduct
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: has suffered, or is likely to suffer
logic summary: Injured person has suffered or is likely to suffer
premise text: Person has suffered loss or damage
conclusion text: Order may be made against person who engaged in conduct
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is a consumer contract
logic summary: Contract is a consumer contract
premise text: Term has been declared under section 250 to be an unfair term
conclusion text: Order may be made against person who engaged in conduct
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

237(2) Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-2
part of: 237 Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
note: Compensation orders must compensate or prevent loss/damage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.226
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 237(2) Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must compensate or prevent loss/damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

237(3) Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-3
part of: 237 Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
note: Application for compensation orders can be made within 6 years after the declaration is made or the cause of action accrued.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.226
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 237(3) Compensation orders etc. on application by an injured person
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-237-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Application can be made within a specified time frame.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

238 Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-238-2
has part: 238(1) Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
has part: 238(2) Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.227

238(1) Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-238-2-ss-1
part of: 238 Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
note: Court may make orders against a person who engaged in conduct causing loss or damage to an injured party.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.227
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-238-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-238-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-238-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 238(1) Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-238-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

238(2) Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-238-2-ss-2
part of: 238 Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
note: Compensation orders must compensate or prevent loss/damage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.227
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-238-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-238-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-238-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 238(2) Compensation orders etc. arising out of other proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-238-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must compensate or prevent loss/damage
premise text: (2) The order must be an order that the court considers will:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

239 Orders to redress etc. loss or damage suffered by non-party
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-239-2
note: If a person engaged in contravening conduct, the state must take certain actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.227
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-239-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-239-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-239-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 239 Orders to redress etc. loss or damage suffered by non-party
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-239-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: State has an obligation to take action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

222 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-222-3
has part: 222(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 222(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 222(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.228

222(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-2
part of: 222 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Order may be made against persons involved in contravening conduct or parties to contracts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.228
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 222(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits persons from engaging in contravening conduct.
premise text: Subsection (1) applies.
conclusion text: An order under subsection (1) may be made against...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between persons involved in contravening conduct and parties to contracts.
premise text: Subsection (1)(a)(ii) applies.
conclusion text: ...a party to the contract who is advantaged by the declared term.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implicates that persons involved in contravening conduct or parties to contracts are subject to order.
premise text: Subsection (1) applies.
conclusion text: ...An order under subsection (1) may be made against...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagates the effect of prohibition to persons involved in contravening conduct or parties to contracts.
premise text: Subsection (1)(a)(i) applies.
conclusion text: ...the person who engaged in the contravening conduct...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classifies persons involved in contravening conduct or parties to contracts using artificial intelligence.
premise text: Subsection (1)(a)(ii) applies.
conclusion text: ...a party to the contract who is advantaged by the declared term.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

222(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-3
part of: 222 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: The court must consider an order that redresses or prevents loss/damage to non-party consumers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.228
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 222(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

222(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-4
part of: 222 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Application can be made within 6 years after the declaration is made or the cause of action accrued.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.228
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2

act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 222(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Application can be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-222-3-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: within
logic summary: Within 6 years after the declaration is made or the cause of action accrued.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

240 Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for non-party
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-240-2
has part: 240(1) Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for non-party
has part: 240(2) Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for non-party
has part: 240(3) Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for non-party
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.228

240(1) Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for non-party
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-1
part of: 240 Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for non-party
note: Consider conduct of person and non-party consumers in relation to contravening conduct when determining whether to make an order under section 239(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.228
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 240(1) Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for non-party
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider conduct of person and non-party consumers in relation to contravening conduct when determining whether to make an order under section 239(1)
premise text: (1) In determining whether to make an order under section 239(1) against a person referred to in section 239(2)(a), the court may have regard to the conduct of the person, and of the non-party consumers in relation to the contravening conduct, since the contravention occurred.
conclusion text: (1) In determining whether to make an order under section 239(1) against a person referred to in section 239(2)(a), the court may have regard to the conduct of the person, and of the non-party consumers in relation to the contravening conduct, since the contravention occurred.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: The period between the contravention and the determination is relevant when considering the conduct of the person and non-party consumers in relation to contravening conduct
premise text: (1) In determining whether to make an order under section 239(1) against a person referred to in section 239(2)(a), the court may have regard to the conduct of the person, and of the non-party consumers in relation to the contravening conduct, since the contravention occurred.
conclusion text: (1) In determining whether to make an order under section 239(1) against a person referred to in section 239(2)(a), the court may have regard to the conduct of the person, and of the non-party consumers in relation to the contravening conduct, since the contravention occurred.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: for all
logic summary: The court must consider the conduct of the person and non-party consumers in relation to contravening conduct for all persons referred to in section 239(2)(a)
premise text: (1) In determining whether to make an order under section 239(1) against a person referred to in section 239(2)(a), the court may have regard to the conduct of the person, and of the non-party consumers in relation to the contravening conduct, since the contravention occurred.
conclusion text: (1) In determining whether to make an order under section 239(1) against a person referred to in section 239(2)(a), the court may have regard to the conduct of the person, and of the non-party consumers in relation to the contravening conduct, since the contravention occurred.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must consider
logic summary: The court must consider the conduct of the person and non-party consumers in relation to contravening conduct when determining whether to make an order under section 239(1)
premise text: (1) In determining whether to make an order under section 239(1) against a person referred to in section 239(2)(a), the court may have regard to the conduct of the person, and of the non-party consumers in relation to the contravening conduct, since the contravention occurred.
conclusion text: (1) In determining whether to make an order under section 239(1) against a person referred to in section 239(2)(a), the court may have regard to the conduct of the person, and of the non-party consumers in relation to the contravening conduct, since the contravention occurred.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

240(2) Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for non-party
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-2
part of: 240 Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for non-party
note: Consider conduct of person and non-party consumers in relation to declared term when determining whether to make an order under section 239(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.228
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-2-norm

act-sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 240(2) Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for non-party
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

240(3) Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for non-party
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-3
part of: 240 Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for non-party
note: Court does not need to find non-party consumers or nature of loss/damage.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.228
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 240(3) Determining whether to make a redress order etc. for non-party
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-240-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from finding non-party consumers or loss/damage
premise text: (3) In determining...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

241 When a non-party consumer is bound by a redress order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-241-2
has part: 241(1) When a non-party consumer is bound by a redress order etc.
has part: 241(2) When a non-party consumer is bound by a redress order etc.
has part: 241(3) When a non-party consumer is bound by a redress order etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.229

241(1) When a non-party consumer is bound by a redress order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-241-2-ss-1
part of: 241 When a non-party consumer is bound by a redress order etc.
note: Non-party consumer bound by redress order if loss or damage is redressed, prevented, or reduced.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.229
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-241-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-241-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-241-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 241(1) When a non-party consumer is bound by a redress order etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-241-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: Imposes duty on State
conclusion text: State is obliged to redress loss or damage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

241(2) When a non-party consumer is bound by a redress order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-241-2-ss-2
part of: 241 When a non-party consumer is bound by a redress order etc.
note: No effect on non-party consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.229
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-241-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-241-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-241-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits effect of order on non-party consumer
premise text: (2) Any other order made under section 239(1)
conclusion text: has no effect in relation to the non-party consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

241(3) When a non-party consumer is bound by a redress order etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-241-2-ss-3
part of: 241 When a non-party consumer is bound by a redress order etc.
note: No claim can be made against a non-party consumer in relation to a loss or damage.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.229
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-241-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-241-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-241-2-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 241(3) When a non-party consumer is bound by a redress order etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-241-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No claim can be made
premise text: State
conclusion text: Non-party consumer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

224 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-224-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.230
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-224-3-norm

242 Applications for orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-242-2
has part: 242(1) Applications for orders
has part: 242(2) Applications for orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.230

242(1) Applications for orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-242-2-ss-1
part of: 242 Applications for orders
note: Allow applications under section 237(1) or 239(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.230
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-242-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-242-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-242-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission to make applications
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

242(2) Applications for orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-242-2-ss-2
part of: 242 Applications for orders
note: Regulator must obtain written consent from persons before making an application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.230
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-242-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-242-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-242-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 242(2) Applications for orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-242-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Regulator must obtain written consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

243 Kinds of orders that may be made
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-243-2
note: Court orders that may be made against a person (respondent) include declaring contracts void, varying contracts, refusing to enforce provisions, directing refunds or repairs, and executing instruments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.230
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-243-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-243-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-243-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-243-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 243 Kinds of orders that may be made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-243-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Court orders that may be made against a person (respondent) include declaring contracts void, varying contracts, refusing to enforce provisions, directing refunds or repairs, and executing instruments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-243-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The orders that a court may make under any of those sections against a person (the respondent) include declaring contracts void, varying contracts, refusing to enforce provisions, directing refunds or repairs, and executing instruments.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

244 Power of a court to make orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-244-2
note: Court may make an order under Subdivision A or B of this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.231
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-244-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-244-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-244-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 244 Power of a court to make orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-244-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Court can make an order under Subdivision A or B of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

245 Interaction with other provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-245-2
note: Division 2 of this Part is not limited by Subdivisions A and B of this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.231
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-245-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-245-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-245-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 245 Interaction with other provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-245-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Division 2 is not limited by Subdivisions A and B.
premise text: Subdivisions A and B of this Division do not limit the generality of Division 2 of this Part.
conclusion text: Division 2 of this Part is not limited by Subdivisions A and B of this Division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

226 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-226-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.232
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-226-3-norm

246 Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-246-2
has part: 246(1) Non-punitive orders
has part: 246(2) Non-punitive orders
has part: 246(3) Non-punitive orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.232

246(1) Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-246-2-ss-1
part of: 246 Non-punitive orders
note: Court may make non-punitive orders against a person who has engaged in conduct that contravenes a provision of Chapter 2, 3 or 4.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.232
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-246-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-246-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-246-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 246(1) Non-punitive orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-246-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

246(2) Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-246-2-ss-2
part of: 246 Non-punitive orders
note: Court may make orders for the person who engaged in conduct, including directing them to perform a service or establish a compliance program.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.232
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-246-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-246-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-246-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 246(2) Non-punitive orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-246-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The court must make orders for the person who engaged in conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

246(3) Non-punitive orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-246-2-ss-3
part of: 246 Non-punitive orders
note: Court's powers not limited by this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.232
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-246-2-ss-3-norm

act-sch-2-sec-246-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 246(3) Non-punitive orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

247 Adverse publicity orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-247-2
has part: 247(1) Adverse publicity orders
has part: 247(2) Adverse publicity orders
has part: 247(3) Adverse publicity orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.233

247(1) Adverse publicity orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-247-2-ss-1
part of: 247 Adverse publicity orders
note: Prohibition on contravening provisions of Part 2-2 or Chapter 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.233
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-247-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-247-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-247-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 247(1) Adverse publicity orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-247-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits contravening provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

247(2) Adverse publicity orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-247-2-ss-2
part of: 247 Adverse publicity orders
note: Requires disclosure and publication of information by a person in possession or access to it.
description: Information specified in the order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.233
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-247-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-247-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-247-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 247(2) Adverse publicity orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-247-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to require disclosure and publication
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

247(3) Adverse publicity orders
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-247-2-ss-3
part of: 247 Adverse publicity orders
note: Court's powers not limited by this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.233
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-247-2-ss-3-norm

248 Order disqualifying a person from managing corporations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-248-2
note: A court may disqualify a person from managing corporations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.233
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-248-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-248-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-248-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 248 Order disqualifying a person from managing corporations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-248-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

228 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-228-3
note: List of prohibited provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.234
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-228-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-228-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-228-3-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-2-sec-228-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 228 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-228-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: List of prohibited provisions
premise text: (i) a provision of Part 2-2 (which is about unconscionable conduct);
conclusion text: (ii) a provision of Part 3-1 (which is about unfair practices);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-228-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: List of prohibited provisions
premise text: (iii) a provision (other than section 85) of Division 2 of
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

249 Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-249-2
has part: 249(1) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
has part: 249(2) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
has part: 249(3) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.235

249(1) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-1
part of: 249 Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
note: Must answer questions or provide information in a proceeding.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.235
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 249(1) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to answer questions or provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

249(2) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-2
part of: 249 Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
note: Applicable regardless of proceeding type
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.235
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 249(2) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Always
logic summary: Obligation applies in all cases
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) applies
conclusion text: Regardless of proceeding type
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Obligation applies during overlapping intervals
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) applies
conclusion text: Regardless of proceeding type, obligation applies during overlapping intervals
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Obligation is recurrent in all cases
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) applies
conclusion text: Regardless of proceeding type, obligation is recurrent
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

249(3) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-3
part of: 249 Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
note: Must answer questions or provide information when required by law.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.235
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 249(3) Privilege against exposure to penalty or forfeiture—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-249-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must answer questions or provide information when required by law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

250 Declarations relating to consumer contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-250-2
has part: 250(1) Declarations relating to consumer contracts
has part: 250(2) Declarations relating to consumer contracts
has part: 250(3) Declarations relating to consumer contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.235

250(1) Declarations relating to consumer contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-250-2-ss-1
part of: 250 Declarations relating to consumer contracts
note: Court may declare a term of a consumer contract as unfair.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.235
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-250-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-250-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-250-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 250(1) Declarations relating to consumer contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-250-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

250(2) Declarations relating to consumer contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-250-2-ss-2
part of: 250 Declarations relating to consumer contracts
note: Consumer contract must be a standard form contract to apply subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.235
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-250-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-250-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-250-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 250(2) Declarations relating to consumer contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-250-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory condition
premise text: Consumer contract is a standard form contract
conclusion text: Subsection (1) applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

250(3) Declarations relating to consumer contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-250-2-ss-3
part of: 250 Declarations relating to consumer contracts
note: Court power to make declarations not limited by subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.235
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-250-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-250-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-250-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 250(3) Declarations relating to consumer contracts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-250-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court has obligation to make declarations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

230 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-230-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.236
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-230-3-norm

251 Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-251-2
has part: 251(1) Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
has part: 251(2) Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.236

251(1) Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-251-2-ss-1
part of: 251 Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
note: Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.236
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-251-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-251-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-251-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

251(2) Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-251-2-ss-2
part of: 251 Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
note: Defence for defendant in proceeding regarding publication of advertisement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.236
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-251-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-251-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-251-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-251-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-251-2-ss-2-logic-epistemic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-251-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5

act-sch-2-sec-251-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 251(2) Publication of advertisement in the ordinary course of business
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-251-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from liability for ordinary course of business publication
premise text: (a) the defendant is a person whose business it is to publish or arrange for the publication of advertisements;
conclusion text: the defendant is exempt from liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-251-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from liability for ordinary course of business publication
premise text: (b) the defendant received the advertisement for publication in the ordinary course of business;
conclusion text: the defendant is exempt from liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-251-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from liability for ordinary course of business publication
premise text: (c) the defendant did not know, and had no reason to suspect, that its publication would amount to a contravention of such provision.
conclusion text: the defendant is exempt from liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-251-2-ss-2-logic-epistemic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: ignorance
logic summary: Defendant's lack of knowledge or suspicion
premise text: (c) the defendant did not know, and had no reason to suspect, that its publication would amount to a contravention of such provision.
conclusion text: the defendant is innocent by ignorance
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-251-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between ordinary course of business and contravention
premise text: (c) the defendant did not know, and had no reason to suspect, that its publication would amount to a contravention of such provision.
conclusion text: the temporal overlap is relevant
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

252 Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-252-2
has part: 252(1) Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
has part: 252(2) Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
has part: 252(3) Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.236

252(1) Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-252-2-ss-1
part of: 252 Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
note: Prohibition on supplying non-compliant consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.236
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-252-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-252-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-252-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 252(1) Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-252-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits supplying non-compliant consumer goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

252(2) Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-252-2-ss-2
part of: 252 Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
note: Defence for supplying consumer goods for re-supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.236
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-252-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-252-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-252-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 252(2) Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-252-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence obligation
premise text: (2) In the proceeding, it is a defence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

252(3) Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-252-2-ss-3
part of: 252 Supplying consumer goods for the purpose of re-supply
note: Defendant may rely on defence unless court gives leave or defendant provides notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.236
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-252-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-252-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-252-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Defendant is permitted to rely on defence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

253 Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-253-2
has part: 253(1) Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
has part: 253(2) Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.237

253(1) Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-253-2-ss-1
part of: 253 Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
note: Prohibition on supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards or information standards.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.237
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-253-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-253-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-253-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 253(1) Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-253-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on supplying product related services that do not comply with safety standards or information standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

253(2) Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-253-2-ss-2
part of: 253 Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
note: Defence for defendant in product related services proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.237
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-253-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-253-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-253-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 253(2) Supplying product related services for the purpose of re-supply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-253-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence obligation
premise text: defendant proves that...
conclusion text: defence for defendant in product related services proceeding
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

232 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232-3
note: Defendant must provide notice before relying on defence
description: Notice to the person who instituted the proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.238
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-232-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-232-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 232 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-232-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice before relying on defence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

254 Overview
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-254-2
note: No country of origin representations contravene sections 18 and 29(1)(a) or (k) or 151(1)(a) or (k)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.239
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-254-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-254-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-254-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-254-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-254-2-logic-ltl-4

act-sch-2-sec-254-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 254 Overview
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-254-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No false or misleading representations allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-254-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State obligation to ensure country of origin representations do not contravene sections 18 and 29(1)(a) or (k) or 151(1)(a) or (k)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-254-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Country of origin representations must not overlap with sections 18 and 29(1)(a) or (k) or 151(1)(a) or (k)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-254-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Country of origin representations must repeat the prohibition on sections 18 and 29(1)(a) or (k) or 151(1)(a) or (k)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

255 Country of origin representations do not contravene certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-255-2
note: A person does not contravene section 18, 29(1)(a) or (k) or 151(1)(a) or (k) only by making a representation of a kind referred to in an item in the first column of this table, if the requirements of the corresponding item in the second column are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.239
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-255-2-norm

act-sch-2-sec-255-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 255 Country of origin representations do not contravene certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

234 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-234-3
has part: 234(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 234(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 234(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 234(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 234(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 234(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.240

234(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-2
part of: 234 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemption from application of section 234(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.240
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-2-norm

234(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-3
part of: 234 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Goods must undergo a fundamental change to be considered substantially transformed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.240
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

234(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-4
part of: 234 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Regulations may prescribe changes that are not fundamental for the purposes of subsection (3).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.240
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-4-norm

234(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-5
part of: 234 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Prohibition on false representations of country of origin
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.240
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 234(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits false representations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

234(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-6
part of: 234 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Prescribes a percentage range for goods with a specified logo.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.240
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Prescribes a percentage range for goods with a specified logo.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Defines percentage range for goods
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

234(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-7
part of: 234 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Goods must be grown in a country under specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.240
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-234-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Goods must meet the condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

236 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-236-3
has part: 236(8) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 236(9) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.242

236(8) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-236-3-ss-8
part of: 236 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Disregard packaging materials when calculating goods weight
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.242
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-236-3-ss-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-236-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-236-3-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-236-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Disregard packaging materials when calculating goods weight
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-236-3-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

236(9) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-236-3-ss-9
part of: 236 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Weight of added water included in ingredient weight and treated as having the same origin.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.242
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-236-3-ss-9-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-236-3-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-236-3-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 236(9) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-236-3-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes added water in ingredient weight
premise text: Ingredient weight calculation
conclusion text: Weight of added water included
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

256 Cost of producing or manufacturing goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-256-2
has part: 256(1) Cost of producing or manufacturing goods
has part: 256(2) Cost of producing or manufacturing goods
has part: 256(3) Cost of producing or manufacturing goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.242

256(1) Cost of producing or manufacturing goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-256-2-ss-1
part of: 256 Cost of producing or manufacturing goods
note: Expenditure on materials, labor, and overheads must be calculated according to the provided table.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.242
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-256-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-256-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-256-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 256(1) Cost of producing or manufacturing goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-256-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The provision imposes a duty on the manufacturer to calculate expenditure according to the table.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

256(2) Cost of producing or manufacturing goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-256-2-ss-2
part of: 256 Cost of producing or manufacturing goods
note: Regulations may prescribe that certain costs are not allowable in respect of goods or classes of goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.242
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-256-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-256-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-256-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-256-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits certain costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-256-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Regulates during production or manufacturing
premise text: (2) The regulations may, for the purposes of subsection (1), prescribe...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

256(3) Cost of producing or manufacturing goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-256-2-ss-3
part of: 256 Cost of producing or manufacturing goods
note: Regulations may prescribe manner of working out cost of material, labour cost, or overhead cost.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.242
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-256-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-256-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-256-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 256(3) Cost of producing or manufacturing goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-256-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe manner of working out cost.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

238 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-238-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.244
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-238-3-norm

257 Rules for determining the percentage of costs of production or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-257-2
has part: 257(1) Rules for determining the percentage of costs of production or
has part: 257(2) Rules for determining the percentage of costs of production or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.244

257(1) Rules for determining the percentage of costs of production or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-257-2-ss-1
part of: 257 Rules for determining the percentage of costs of production or
note: Rules for determining the percentage of costs of production or manufacture of goods attributable to a particular country.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.244
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-257-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-257-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-257-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 257(1) Rules for determining the percentage of costs of production or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-257-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes
logic summary: Rules are prescribed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

257(2) Rules for determining the percentage of costs of production or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-257-2-ss-2
part of: 257 Rules for determining the percentage of costs of production or
note: Rules must not discriminate between countries or classes of countries.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.244
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-257-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-257-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-257-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 257(2) Rules for determining the percentage of costs of production or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-257-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not Discriminate
logic summary: Rules must not discriminate between countries or classes of countries.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

258 Proceedings relating to false, misleading or deceptive conduct or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-258-2
note: Person bears evidential burden in proceedings related to certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.244
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-258-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-258-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-258-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-258-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-258-2-logic-diffusion-4

act-sch-2-sec-258-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 258 Proceedings relating to false, misleading or deceptive conduct or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-258-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence in proceedings.
premise text: Proceedings brought against person in respect of section 18, 29(1)(a) or (k) or 151(1)(a) or (k);
conclusion text: Person bears evidential burden.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-258-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval for proceedings.
premise text: Proceedings brought against person in respect of section 18, 29(1)(a) or (k) or 151(1)(a) or (k);
conclusion text: Person bears evidential burden between proceedings and provision on which person seeks to rely.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-258-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: burden
logic summary: Burden of proof in proceedings.
premise text: Proceedings brought against person in respect of section 18, 29(1)(a) or (k) or 151(1)(a) or (k);
conclusion text: Person bears evidential burden in relation to provision on which person seeks to rely.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-258-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of obligation to provide evidence.
premise text: Proceedings brought against person in respect of section 18, 29(1)(a) or (k) or 151(1)(a) or (k);
conclusion text: Obligation to provide evidence diffuse to person seeking to rely on provision.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

259 Action against suppliers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-259-2
has part: 259(1) Action against suppliers of goods
has part: 259(2) Action against suppliers of goods
has part: 259(3) Action against suppliers of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.245

259(1) Action against suppliers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-1
part of: 259 Action against suppliers of goods
note: Action against suppliers of goods if guarantee not complied with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.245
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with guarantee
premise text: Supplier supplies goods
conclusion text: Consumer may take action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

259(2) Action against suppliers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-2
part of: 259 Action against suppliers of goods
note: Consumer may require supplier to remedy failure within a reasonable time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.245
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 259(2) Action against suppliers of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consumer has an obligation to require supplier to remedy failure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

259(3) Action against suppliers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-3
part of: 259 Action against suppliers of goods
note: Consumer may reject goods and recover compensation if supplier fails to comply with guarantee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.245
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 259(3) Action against suppliers of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consumer has an obligation to reject goods and recover compensation.
premise text: Supplier fails to comply with guarantee.
conclusion text: Consumer may reject goods and recover compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Consumer's right to reject goods overlaps with supplier's obligation to comply with guarantee.
premise text: Guarantee is a condition of sale.
conclusion text: Consumer may reject goods during the overlap period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Supplier's failure to comply with guarantee implies consumer's right to reject goods and recover compensation.
premise text: Supplier fails to comply with guarantee.
conclusion text: Consumer may reject goods and recover compensation.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Consumer's right to reject goods diffuses to supplier's obligation to comply with guarantee.
premise text: Guarantee is a condition of sale.
conclusion text: Supplier must comply with guarantee.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-259-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Consumer recognizes their right to reject goods and recover compensation if supplier fails to comply with guarantee.
premise text: Guarantee is a condition of sale.
conclusion text: Consumer may reject goods and recover compensation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

240 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-240-3
has part: 240(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 240(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 240(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 240(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.246

240(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-4
part of: 240 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Consumer may recover damages for loss or damage due to supplier's failure to comply with guarantee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.246
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 240(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide damages for loss or damage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

240(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-5
part of: 240 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemption from guarantee liability due to cause independent of human control
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.246
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-5-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-5-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
logic summary: Exempts liability for guarantee breaches due to external cause
premise text: Subsection (4) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...if the failure to comply with the guarantee occurred only because of a cause independent of human control that occurred after the goods left the control of the supplier.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Subsection (4) applies within the interval of goods leaving supplier's control
premise text: ...that occurred after the goods left the control of the supplier.
conclusion text: ...if the failure to comply with the guarantee occurred only because of a cause independent of human control that occurred after the goods left the control of the supplier.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Subsection (4) applies in recurring situations where goods leave supplier's control
premise text: ...that occurred after the goods left the control of the supplier.
conclusion text: ...if the failure to comply with the guarantee occurred only because of a cause independent of human control that occurred after the goods left the control of the supplier.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-5-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Classifies subsection (4) as exempt from guarantee liability using AI reasoning
premise text: Subsection (4) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...if the failure to comply with the guarantee occurred only because of a cause independent of human control that occurred after the goods left the control of the supplier.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-5-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates
logic summary: Subsection (4) is valid according to SHACL rules
premise text: ...if the failure to comply with the guarantee occurred only because of a cause independent of human control that occurred after the goods left the control of the supplier.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

240(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-6
part of: 240 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Clarifies application of subsection (4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.246
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Clarifies obligation
premise text: (4) applies in addition to (2) and (3)
conclusion text: Obligation applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: applies
logic summary: Describes temporal relation
premise text: (6) To avoid doubt, subsection (4) applies in addition to subsections (2) and (3)
conclusion text: Temporal relation described
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: applies
logic summary: Describes temporal relation
premise text: (6) To avoid doubt, subsection (4) applies in addition to subsections (2) and (3)
conclusion text: Temporal relation described
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: applies
logic summary: Describes application scope
premise text: (6) To avoid doubt, subsection (4) applies in addition to subsections (2) and (3)
conclusion text: Application scope described
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: applies
logic summary: Describes application scope
premise text: (6) To avoid doubt, subsection (4) applies in addition to subsections (2) and (3)
conclusion text: Application scope described
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

240(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-7
part of: 240 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Consumer may take action under this section regardless of packaging condition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.246
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-7-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-7-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Obligation to take action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-7-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge
logic summary: Consumer has knowledge of section applicability
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-240-3-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Action may be taken repeatedly
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

260 When a failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-260-2
note: Failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.246
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-260-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-260-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-260-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-260-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-260-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-260-2-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-260-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 260 When a failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-260-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If the conditions are met, a failure to comply with the guarantee is a major failure.
premise text: The goods depart in one or more significant respects from the description or sample.
conclusion text: A failure to comply with the guarantee is a major failure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-260-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The time period during which the failure to comply with the guarantee is a major failure must be greater than or equal to the time period during which the goods depart in one or more significant respects from the description or sample.
premise text: The goods depart in one or more significant respects from the description or sample.
conclusion text: The time period during which the failure to comply with the guarantee is a major failure must be greater than or equal to the time period during which the goods depart in one or more significant respects from the description or sample.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-260-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: The time period during which the failure to comply with the guarantee is a major failure must be equal to the time period during which the goods depart in one or more significant respects from the description or sample.
premise text: The goods depart in one or more significant respects from the description or sample.
conclusion text: The time period during which the failure to comply with the guarantee is a major failure must be equal to the time period during which the goods depart in one or more significant respects from the description or sample.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-260-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: The obligation to comply with the guarantee is met if the conditions are met.
premise text: The goods depart in one or more significant respects from the description or sample.
conclusion text: The obligation to comply with the guarantee is met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-260-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: The right to seek remedies for a failure to comply with the guarantee is held by the consumer if the conditions are met.
premise text: The goods depart in one or more significant respects from the description or sample.
conclusion text: The right to seek remedies for a failure to comply with the guarantee is held by the consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

261 How suppliers may remedy a failure to comply with a guarantee
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-261-2
note: Supplier must remedy failure to comply with guarantee.
description: Remedy for consumer's failure to receive goods as guaranteed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.247
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-261-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-261-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-261-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 261 How suppliers may remedy a failure to comply with a guarantee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-261-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Supplier has an obligation to remedy the failure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

262 When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-262-2
has part: 262(1) When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
has part: 262(2) When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.247

262(1) When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-262-2-ss-1
part of: 262 When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
note: Consumer cannot notify supplier of rejected goods under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.247
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-262-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-262-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-262-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits consumer notification
premise text: Consumer rejection period has ended or goods are lost/damaged
conclusion text: Notification not allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

262(2) When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-262-2-ss-2
part of: 262 When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
note: Rejection period for goods is the time from supply to when failure becomes apparent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.247
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-262-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-262-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-262-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-262-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

act-sch-2-sec-262-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 262(2) When consumers are not entitled to reject goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-262-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Rejection period for goods is the time from supply to when failure becomes apparent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-262-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-262-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

242 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-242-3
note: Defines reasonable length and amount of use for a product before failure becomes apparent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.248
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-242-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-242-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-242-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 242 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-242-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defines an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

263 Consequences of rejecting goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-263-2
has part: 263(1) Consequences of rejecting goods
has part: 263(2) Consequences of rejecting goods
has part: 263(3) Consequences of rejecting goods
has part: 263(4) Consequences of rejecting goods
has part: 263(5) Consequences of rejecting goods
has part: 263(6) Consequences of rejecting goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.248

263(1) Consequences of rejecting goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-1
part of: 263 Consequences of rejecting goods
note: Consumer must notify supplier of rejected goods.
description: Notification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.248
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 263(1) Consequences of rejecting goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

263(2) Consequences of rejecting goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-2
part of: 263 Consequences of rejecting goods
note: Must return goods to supplier unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.248
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Obligation to return goods
premise text: Consumer has rejected goods
conclusion text: Supplier must receive returned goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

263(3) Consequences of rejecting goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-3
part of: 263 Consequences of rejecting goods
note: Supplier must collect goods within a reasonable time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.248
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to collect goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

263(4) Consequences of rejecting goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-4
part of: 263 Consequences of rejecting goods
note: Supplier must refund or replace rejected goods
description: refund, replacement of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.248
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must provide refund or replacement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Replacement occurs during same type and similar value period
premise text: (4) replace the rejected goods with goods of the same type, and of similar value, if such goods are reasonably available to the supplier.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Replacement implies refund for same type and similar value period
premise text: (4) replace the rejected goods with goods of the same type, and of similar value, if such goods are reasonably available to the supplier.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: iff
logic summary: Replacement iff refund for same type and similar value period
premise text: (4) replace the rejected goods with goods of the same type, and of similar value, if such goods are reasonably available to the supplier.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasValue
logic summary: Refund amount equals value of other consideration
premise text: (4) The supplier must, in accordance with an election made by the consumer:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

263(5) Consequences of rejecting goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-5
part of: 263 Consequences of rejecting goods
note: Supplier cannot satisfy subsection (4)(a) by permitting consumer to acquire goods from supplier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.248
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

263(6) Consequences of rejecting goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-6
part of: 263 Consequences of rejecting goods
note: Property reverts to supplier upon notification of rejection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.248
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 263(6) Consequences of rejecting goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-263-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Reverts
logic summary: Property transfer
premise text: Notification of rejection
conclusion text: Property reverts to supplier
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

264 Replaced goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-264-2
note: Supplier must supply replacement goods.
description: replacement goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.249
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-264-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-264-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-264-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 264 Replaced goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-264-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide replacement goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

265 Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-265-2
has part: 265(1) Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
has part: 265(2) Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
has part: 265(3) Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.249

265(1) Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-265-2-ss-1
part of: 265 Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
note: Consumer may terminate contract for supply of services if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.249
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-265-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-265-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-265-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

265(2) Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-265-2-ss-2
part of: 265 Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
note: Termination takes effect at the time of notification or reasonable communication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.249
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-265-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-265-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-265-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-265-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

act-sch-2-sec-265-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consumer's obligation to notify supplier.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-265-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Consumer is a natural person.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-265-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Notification time overlaps with termination effective time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

265(3) Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-265-2-ss-3
part of: 265 Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
note: Consumer entitled to refund for services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.249
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-265-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-265-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-265-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 265(3) Termination of contracts for the supply of services that are
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-265-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Consumer has right
conclusion text: Consumer is entitled to refund
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

244 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-244-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.250
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-244-3-norm

266 Rights of gift recipients
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-266-2
note: Consumer's gift recipient has rights under the Subdivision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.250
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-266-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-266-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-266-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-266-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-266-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-266-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-266-2-logic-cogai-6

act-sch-2-sec-266-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has right
logic summary: Right to exercise consumer's rights
premise text: Consumer acquires goods from supplier
conclusion text: Other person has right to exercise consumer's rights
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-266-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Reference to consumer includes reference to the other person
premise text: Subdivision B—Action against suppliers of services
conclusion text: Other person is included in the definition of a consumer
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-266-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval during which the other person has rights
premise text: If a consumer acquires goods from a supplier and gives them to another person as a gift
conclusion text: The other person has rights during this temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-266-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Temporal interval everywhere the other person has rights
premise text: If a consumer acquires goods from a supplier and gives them to another person as a gift
conclusion text: The other person has rights everywhere during this temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-266-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Diffusion of rights to the other person
premise text: If a consumer acquires goods from a supplier and gives them to another person as a gift
conclusion text: The other person has diffusion of rights everywhere during this temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-266-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: everywhere
logic summary: CogAI application for the other person's rights
premise text: If a consumer acquires goods from a supplier and gives them to another person as a gift
conclusion text: The other person has CogAI application everywhere during this temporal interval
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267 Action against suppliers of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-267-2
has part: 267(1) Action against suppliers of services
has part: 267(2) Action against suppliers of services
has part: 267(3) Action against suppliers of services
has part: 267(4) Action against suppliers of services
has part: 267(5) Action against suppliers of services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.250

267(1) Action against suppliers of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-1
part of: 267 Action against suppliers of services
note: Action against suppliers of services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.250
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3

act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Consumer has obligation to take action
premise text: Consumer is affected by the guarantee
conclusion text: Consumer must take action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Failure to comply with guarantee occurred after services were supplied
premise text: Failure to comply with guarantee did not occur only because of...
conclusion text: Failure to comply with guarantee occurred after services were supplied
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Consumer's action implies supplier's liability
premise text: Consumer takes action under this section
conclusion text: Supplier is liable for failure to comply with guarantee
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267(2) Action against suppliers of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-2
part of: 267 Action against suppliers of services
note: Supplier must remedy failure within a reasonable time or face termination of contract.
description: Remediation and costs incurred by consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.250
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267(2) Action against suppliers of services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Supplier has an obligation to remedy failure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267(3) Action against suppliers of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-3
part of: 267 Action against suppliers of services
note: Consumer may terminate contract or recover compensation for reduced services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.250
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267(3) Action against suppliers of services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consumer has obligation to terminate contract or recover compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267(4) Action against suppliers of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-4
part of: 267 Action against suppliers of services
note: Consumer may recover damages for loss or damage due to supplier's failure to comply with guarantee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.250
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267(4) Action against suppliers of services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Consumer has a right to recover damages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267(5) Action against suppliers of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-5
part of: 267 Action against suppliers of services
note: Clarifies application of subsections (4), (2), and (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.250
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267(5) Action against suppliers of services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-267-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: AND
logic summary: Clarifies application of subsections
premise text: Subsection (4) applies in addition to subsections (2) and (3)
conclusion text: Clarifies application of subsections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

268 When a failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-268-2
note: Failure to comply with guarantee is a major failure if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.251
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-268-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-268-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-268-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 268 When a failure to comply with a guarantee is a major failure
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-268-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Failure to comply is a major failure if conditions are met.
premise text: a guarantee applies
conclusion text: it is a major failure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

246 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-246-3
note: Services and products must be of a certain nature, quality, state or condition to achieve a desired result by the consumer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.252
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-246-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-246-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-246-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 246 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-246-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits services and products of a certain nature, quality, state or condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

269 Termination of contracts for the supply of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-269-2
has part: 269(1) Termination of contracts for the supply of services
has part: 269(2) Termination of contracts for the supply of services
has part: 269(3) Termination of contracts for the supply of services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.252

269(1) Termination of contracts for the supply of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-1
part of: 269 Termination of contracts for the supply of services
note: Consumer must terminate contract for supply of services under section 267.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.252
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 269(1) Termination of contracts for the supply of services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide termination notice
premise text: Section 267 requires consumer to terminate contract
conclusion text: Consumer must terminate contract
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Termination must occur after section 267
premise text: Section 267 requires consumer to terminate contract
conclusion text: Termination must occur after section 267
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

269(2) Termination of contracts for the supply of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-2
part of: 269 Termination of contracts for the supply of services
note: Consumer must notify supplier of intention to terminate contract.
description: Notification of termination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.252
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 269(2) Termination of contracts for the supply of services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consumer has an obligation to notify supplier.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Notification is a class of actions that must be taken by the consumer.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

269(3) Termination of contracts for the supply of services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-3
part of: 269 Termination of contracts for the supply of services
note: Consumer's right to recover refund of money and consideration for services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.252
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-269-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Consumer has a right to recover refund
premise text: Consumer is entitled to recover
conclusion text: Supplier must provide refund
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270 Termination of contracts for the supply of goods that are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-270-2
has part: 270(1) Termination of contracts for the supply of goods that are
has part: 270(2) Termination of contracts for the supply of goods that are
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.252

270(1) Termination of contracts for the supply of goods that are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-270-2-ss-1
part of: 270 Termination of contracts for the supply of goods that are
note: Consumer must return goods to supplier unless certain conditions are met.
description: Goods, refund for goods and consideration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.252
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-270-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-270-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-270-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Consumer has a duty to return goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270(2) Termination of contracts for the supply of goods that are
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-270-2-ss-2
part of: 270 Termination of contracts for the supply of goods that are
note: Supplier must collect goods at expense.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.252
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-270-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-270-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-270-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 270(2) Termination of contracts for the supply of goods that are
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-270-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

248 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-248-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.254
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-248-3-norm

271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271-2
has part: 271(1) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
has part: 271(2) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
has part: 271(3) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
has part: 271(4) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
has part: 271(5) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
has part: 271(6) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
has part: 271(7) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.254

271(1) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-1
part of: 271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
note: Manufacturer must provide damages for non-compliance with guarantee.
description: Damages
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.254
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has an obligation to provide damages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271(2) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-2
part of: 271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
note: Exemption from liability for damages due to factors beyond human control or manufacturer's actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.254
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271(2) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271(3) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-3
part of: 271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
note: Manufacturer liable for damages if guarantee not complied with
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.254
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay damages
premise text: Guarantee not complied with
conclusion text: Manufacturer liable for damages
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271(4) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-4
part of: 271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
note: Exemption from liability for damages due to causes independent of human control
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.254
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271(4) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from liability
premise text: Subsection (3) does not apply if...
conclusion text: ...guarantee under section 56 is not complied with...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: after
logic summary: Temporal relationship between cause and goods
premise text: ...occurred after the goods left the control of the manufacturer.
conclusion text: ...cause independent of human control that occurred after...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271(5) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-5
part of: 271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
note: Manufacturer must provide damages for non-compliance with guarantee.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.254
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has an obligation to provide damages.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271(6) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-6
part of: 271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
note: Manufacturer must remedy failure to comply with guarantee within a reasonable time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.254
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271(6) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has an obligation to remedy failure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271(7) Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-7
part of: 271 Action for damages against manufacturers of goods
note: May commence an action under this section regardless of packaging
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.254
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-271-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Damages that may be recovered by action against
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-272-2
note: Entitlement to recover damages for reduction in goods value due to guarantee failure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.255
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-272-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272 Damages that may be recovered by action against
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-272-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Entitlement is a right
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

250 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-250-3
has part: 250(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 250(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.256

250(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-250-3-ss-2
part of: 250 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Loss of inspection and return cost is a reasonably foreseeable loss.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.256
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-250-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-250-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-250-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-250-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-250-3-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-250-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-250-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to compensate for inspection and return cost.
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)(b), the cost of inspecting and returning the goods to the manufacturer is taken to be a reasonably foreseeable loss suffered by the affected person as a result of the failure to comply with the guarantee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-250-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Inspection and return cost loss overlaps with goods inspection.
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)(b), the cost of inspecting and returning the goods to the manufacturer is taken to be a reasonably foreseeable loss suffered by the affected person as a result of the failure to comply with the guarantee.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-250-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Inspection and return cost loss repeats in goods inspection.
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)(b), the cost of inspecting and returning the goods to the manufacturer is taken to be a reasonably foreseeable loss suffered by the affected person as a result of the failure to comply with the guarantee.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-250-3-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Inspection and return cost loss diffuses through goods inspection.
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)(b), the cost of inspecting and returning the goods to the manufacturer is taken to be a reasonably foreseeable loss suffered by the affected person as a result of the failure to comply with the guarantee.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-250-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Inspection and return cost loss recognized in goods inspection.
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)(b), the cost of inspecting and returning the goods to the manufacturer is taken to be a reasonably foreseeable loss suffered by the affected person as a result of the failure to comply with the guarantee.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

250(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-250-3-ss-3
part of: 250 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemption from subsection (1)(b) for loss or damage due to reduction in goods value
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.256
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-250-3-ss-3-norm

273 Time limit for actions against manufacturers of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-273-2
note: Time limit for actions against manufacturers of goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.256
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-273-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-273-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-273-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-273-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-273-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-273-2-logic-argumentation-5

act-sch-2-sec-273-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Obligation to commence action within time limit
premise text: The affected person may commence an action for damages...
conclusion text: within 3 years after the day on which the affected person first became aware...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-273-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between action commencement and time limit
premise text: An affected person may commence an action for damages under this Division at any time within 3 years after the day on which the affected person first became aware...
conclusion text: within 3 years after the day on which the affected person first became aware that the guarantee to which the action relates has not been complied with.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-273-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occursBefore
logic summary: Temporal relationship between action commencement and time limit
premise text: An affected person may commence an action for damages under this Division at any time within 3 years after the day on which the affected person first became aware...
conclusion text: within 3 years after the day on which the affected person first became aware that the guarantee to which the action relates has not been complied with.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-273-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: Permission to commence action within time limit
premise text: An affected person may commence an action for damages under this Division at any time within 3 years after the day on which the affected person first became aware...
conclusion text: within 3 years after the day on which the affected person first became aware that the guarantee to which the action relates has not been complied with.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-273-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of time limit on action commencement
premise text: An affected person may commence an action for damages under this Division at any time within 3 years after the day on which the affected person first became aware...
conclusion text: The affected person must have commenced the action within the specified time period.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

274 Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-274-2
has part: 274(1) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
has part: 274(2) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
has part: 274(3) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
has part: 274(4) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.257

274(1) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-274-2-ss-1
part of: 274 Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
note: Manufacturer must indemnify supplier if liable to pay damages under section 259(4) or section 271.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.257
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-274-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-274-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-274-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 274(1) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-274-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has an obligation to indemnify supplier.
premise text: (1) A manufacturer of goods is liable to indemnify a person (the supplier) who supplies the goods to a consumer if: (a) the supplier is liable to pay damages under section 259(4) to the consumer for loss or damage suffered by the consumer; and (b) the manufacturer is or would be liable under section 271 to pay damages to the consumer for the same loss or damage.
conclusion text: (1) A manufacturer of goods is liable to indemnify a person (the supplier) who supplies the goods to a consumer if: (a) the supplier is liable to pay damages under section 259(4) to the consumer for loss or damage suffered by the consumer; and (b) the manufacturer is or would be liable under section 271 to pay damages to the consumer for the same loss or damage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

274(2) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-274-2-ss-2
part of: 274 Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
note: Manufacturer must indemnify supplier for costs incurred due to failure to comply with guarantee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.257
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-274-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-274-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-274-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 274(2) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-274-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Manufacturer has an obligation to indemnify supplier.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

274(3) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-274-2-ss-3
part of: 274 Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
note: Supplier may bring action against manufacturer for indemnification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.257
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-274-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-274-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-274-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 274(3) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-274-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Supplier has obligation to bring action against manufacturer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

274(4) Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-274-2-ss-4
part of: 274 Indemnification of suppliers by manufacturers
note: Commencement of action within 3 years after earliest specified day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.257
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-274-2-ss-4-norm

252 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-252-3
note: Determines the day for payment or proceeding commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.258
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-252-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-252-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-252-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 252 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-252-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
logic summary: Establishes a specific obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

275 Limitation of liability etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-275-2
note: Failure to comply with a guarantee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.258
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-275-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-275-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-275-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 275 Limitation of liability etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-275-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: failure to comply
logic summary: Guarantee obligation
premise text: guarantee applies
conclusion text: obligation exists
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

276 This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276-2
has part: 276(1) This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
has part: 276(2) This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
has part: 276(3) This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.258

276(1) This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276-2-ss-1
part of: 276 This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
note: Excluding or modifying provisions of this Part is void.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.258
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-276-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on excluding or modifying provisions of this Part.
premise text: (1) A term of a contract (including a term that is not set out in the contract but is incorporated in the contract by another term of the contract) is void to the extent that the term purports to exclude, restrict or modify, or has the effect of excluding, restricting or modifying:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

276(2) This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276-2-ss-2
part of: 276 This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
note: Term in contract cannot exclude or modify Part provisions unless explicitly stated.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.258
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-276-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 276(2) This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-276-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on excluding or modifying Part provisions.
premise text: Term in contract
conclusion text: Obligation to apply Part provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

276(3) This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276-2-ss-3
part of: 276 This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
note: Exemption from section 276(3) for certain contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.258
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-276-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 276(3) This Part not to be excluded etc. by contract
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-276-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Exempts from section 276(3)
premise text: Section 276A(4) contract term
conclusion text: Not applicable to this section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-276-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap with section 276(3)
premise text: Section 276(3) applies to contracts
conclusion text: Exemption for certain contracts
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

276A Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276a
has part: 276A(1) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
has part: 276A(2) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
has part: 276A(3) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
has part: 276A(4) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.259

276A(1) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276a-ss-1
part of: 276A Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
note: Manufacturer's liability to a supplier is limited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.259
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 276A(1) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation
logic summary: Limits manufacturer's liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

276A(2) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276a-ss-2
part of: 276A Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
note: Limitation of liability in certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.259
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 276A(2) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion from limitation
premise text: (1) does not apply
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: certain circumstances
conclusion text: time period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

276A(3) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276a-ss-3
part of: 276A Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
note: Court must consider certain circumstances when determining fairness of liability limitation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.259
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 276A(3) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court has an obligation to consider certain circumstances.
premise text: Court must determine fairness of liability limitation.
conclusion text: Court must consider all relevant circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

276A(4) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276a-ss-4
part of: 276A Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
note: Manufacturer's greater liability under contract supersedes statutory liability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.259
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 276A(4) Limitation in certain circumstances of liability of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-276a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Greater liability in contract supersedes statute
premise text: Contract > Statute
conclusion text: Manufacturer's liability > Statutory liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

277 Representative actions by the regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-277-2
note: The regulator may commence an action on behalf of identified persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.259
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-277-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-277-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-277-2-logic-epistemic-2

act-sch-2-sec-277-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 277 Representative actions by the regulator
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-277-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Regulator's power to commence action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-277-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Identification
logic summary: Application identifies persons entitled to take action
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

254 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-254-3
note: Regulator must obtain written consent before making an application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.260
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-254-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-254-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-254-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 254 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-254-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must have permission to make the application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

278 Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-278-2
has part: 278(1) Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
has part: 278(2) Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.261

278(1) Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-278-2-ss-1
part of: 278 Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
note: Joint liability for loss or damage suffered by consumer due to misrepresentation, breach, or failure to comply with guarantee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.261
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-278-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-278-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-278-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-278-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-278-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-278-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-278-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Joint liability for loss or damage
premise text: Linked credit provider and supplier of related supply are jointly and severally liable to the consumer.
conclusion text: The linked credit provider and supplier of related supply must provide compensation to the consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-278-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Liability for loss or damage due to misrepresentation
premise text: A misrepresentation relating to the credit provided under that linked credit contract is a breach of the linked credit contract.
conclusion text: The linked credit provider and supplier of related supply must provide compensation to the consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-278-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Liability for loss or damage due to breach
premise text: A breach of the linked credit contract is a breach of a contract for a related supply.
conclusion text: The linked credit provider and supplier of related supply must provide compensation to the consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-278-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Liability for loss or damage due to failure to comply with guarantee
premise text: A failure to comply with a guarantee that applies under section 54, 55, 56, 57, 60, 61 or 62 in relation to a related supply is a breach of the linked credit contract.
conclusion text: The linked credit provider and supplier of related supply must provide compensation to the consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-278-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Liability for loss or damage due to warranty breach
premise text: A breach of a warranty that is implied in the linked credit contract by section 12ED of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 is a breach of the linked credit contract.
conclusion text: The linked credit provider and supplier of related supply must provide compensation to the consumer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

278(2) Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-278-2-ss-2
part of: 278 Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
note: Linked credit contract definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.261
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-278-2-ss-2-norm

act-sch-2-sec-278-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 278(2) Liability of suppliers and linked credit providers relating to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

256 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-256-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.262
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-256-3-norm

279 Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-2
has part: 279(1) Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
has part: 279(2) Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
has part: 279(3) Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.262

279(1) Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-2-ss-1
part of: 279 Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
note: Consumer can recover amount of loss or damage in court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.262
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-279-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-279-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-279-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Obligation to recover amount of loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279(2) Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-2-ss-2
part of: 279 Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
note: Must bring action against linked credit provider and supplier jointly.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.262
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-279-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-279-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-279-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to bring action jointly
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279(3) Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-2-ss-3
part of: 279 Action by consumer to recover amount of loss or damage
note: No action can be taken if the supplier has been dissolved or winding up has commenced.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.262
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-279-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-279-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-279-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No action can be taken
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

280 Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-280-2
has part: 280(1) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
has part: 280(2) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
has part: 280(3) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
has part: 280(4) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.262

280(1) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-1
part of: 280 Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
note: Consumer must not claim liability against linked credit provider under section 278 if conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.262
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 280(1) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state to ensure consumer is not liable.
premise text: Section 278 imposes liability on linked credit providers.
conclusion text: State must ensure consumer is not liable under section 278.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the consumer to claim liability against linked credit provider under section 278.
premise text: Section 278 imposes liability on linked credit providers.
conclusion text: Consumer must claim liability against linked credit provider under section 278 if conditions are not met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between consumer's approach and credit provider's provision.
premise text: The approach was not induced by the supplier of the goods or services to which the linked credit contract relates.
conclusion text: The approach occurred before the credit provider provided the credit.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace between consumer's actions and credit provider's provision.
premise text: The credit provided by the credit provider to the consumer was the result of an approach made to the credit provider by the consumer.
conclusion text: The consumer's approach is a recurring trace with the credit provider's provision.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the supplier of goods or services to ensure consumer's approach is not induced.
premise text: The approach was not induced by the supplier of the goods or services to which the linked credit contract relates.
conclusion text: Supplier must ensure consumer's approach is not induced.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

280(2) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-2
part of: 280 Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
note: A linked credit provider is not liable to a consumer under section 278 if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.262
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3

act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 280(2) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: The linked credit provider's liability is conditional on meeting certain conditions.
premise text: If the credit provider establishes that...
conclusion text: Then the credit provider is not liable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The conditions overlap with the scope of section 278.
premise text: After becoming a linked credit provider of the supplier...
conclusion text: Then the credit provider is not liable.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: The conditions imply that liability does not apply.
premise text: If the credit provider establishes that...
conclusion text: Then the credit provider is not liable.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

280(3) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-3
part of: 280 Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
note: Linked credit provider not liable to consumer under section 278 if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.262
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 280(3) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Linked credit provider has an obligation to not be liable to consumer under section 278.
premise text: The linked credit provider was satisfied that the supplier's reputation was good before becoming a linked credit provider.
conclusion text: Therefore, the linked credit provider is not liable to consumer under section 278.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

280(4) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-4
part of: 280 Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
note: A linked credit provider is not liable to a consumer under section 278 if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.262
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-4

act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 280(4) Cases where a linked credit provider is not liable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (a) the proceedings relate to a contract of sale in relation to which a tied continuing credit contract entered into by the linked credit provider applies;
conclusion text: A linked credit provider is not liable to a consumer under section 278 if (a) the proceedings relate to a contract of sale in relation to which a tied continuing credit contract entered into by the linked credit provider applies;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Conditional exemption from liability
premise text: (b) the credit provider establishes the matter referred to in subsection (5), having regard to:
conclusion text: A linked credit provider is not liable to a consumer under section 278 if (b) the credit provider establishes the matter referred to in subsection (5), having regard to;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between proceedings and contract
premise text: (a) the proceedings relate to a contract of sale in relation to which a tied continuing credit contract entered into by the linked credit provider applies;
conclusion text: The proceedings relate to a contract of sale in relation to which a tied continuing credit contract entered into by the linked credit provider applies;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-280-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Repeating trace between consumer and credit provider
premise text: (b) the credit provider establishes the matter referred to in subsection (5), having regard to:
conclusion text: The credit provider establishes the matter referred to in subsection (5), having regard to;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

258 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-258-3
has part: 258(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 258(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.264

258(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-258-3-ss-5
part of: 258 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: The linked credit provider must not have cause to suspect that a person entering into the contract might be entitled to claim damages against the supplier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.264
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-258-3-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-258-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-258-3-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-258-3-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-258-3-ss-5-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-258-3-ss-5-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-258-3-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 258(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-258-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-258-3-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Before
logic summary: The linked credit provider must be before aware of the contract or proposals.
premise text: (5) The matter for the purposes of subsection (4); is that...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-258-3-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: The linked credit provider must be aware of the contract or proposals repeatedly.
premise text: (5) The matter for the purposes of subsection (4); is that...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-258-3-ss-5-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge
logic summary: The linked credit provider must have knowledge about the contract or proposals.
premise text: (5) The matter for the purposes of subsection (4); is that...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-258-3-ss-5-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates
logic summary: The linked credit provider must validate the contract or proposals.
premise text: (5) The matter for the purposes of subsection (4); is that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

258(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-258-3-ss-6
part of: 258 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: This section has effect despite section 278(1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.264
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-258-3-ss-6-norm

281 Amount of liability of linked credit providers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-281-2
note: Limits liability of linked credit providers to a consumer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.264
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-281-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-281-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-281-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 281 Amount of liability of linked credit providers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-281-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines obligation
conclusion text: The liability of a linked credit provider to a consumer under section 278(1) in relation to a contract referred to in section 278(1) is limited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

282 Counter-claims and offsets
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-282-2
has part: 282(1) Counter-claims and offsets
has part: 282(2) Counter-claims and offsets
has part: 282(3) Counter-claims and offsets
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.264

282(1) Counter-claims and offsets
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-282-2-ss-1
part of: 282 Counter-claims and offsets
note: Consumer cannot make counter-claim or exercise right in relation to credit provider's liability unless claims against supplier by third-party proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.264
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-282-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-282-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-282-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits counter-claim or exercise of right
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

282(2) Counter-claims and offsets
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-282-2-ss-2
part of: 282 Counter-claims and offsets
note: Exemptions from liability for supplier dissolution or winding up
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.264
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-282-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-282-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-282-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 282(2) Counter-claims and offsets
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-282-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: EXEMPT
logic summary: Exempts from liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

282(3) Counter-claims and offsets
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-282-2-ss-3
part of: 282 Counter-claims and offsets
note: Consumer may offset liability against credit provider's liability under section 278(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.264
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-282-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-282-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-282-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits consumer to offset liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

283 Enforcement of judgments etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-283-2
has part: 283(1) Enforcement of judgments etc.
has part: 283(2) Enforcement of judgments etc.
has part: 283(3) Enforcement of judgments etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.265

283(1) Enforcement of judgments etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-1
part of: 283 Enforcement of judgments etc.
note: Enforcement of judgment against linked credit provider unless demand remains unsatisfied for at least 30 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.265
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 283(1) Enforcement of judgments etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits enforcement of judgment against linked credit provider.
premise text: (1) If, in joint liability proceedings, judgment is given against a supplier and a linked credit provider...
conclusion text: ...the judgment must not be enforced against the credit provider unless a written demand made on the supplier for satisfaction of the judgment has remained unsatisfied for at least 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for enforcement of judgment.
premise text: (1) If, in joint liability proceedings, judgment is given against a supplier and a linked credit provider...
conclusion text: ...the judgment must not be enforced against the credit provider unless a written demand made on the supplier for satisfaction of the judgment has remained unsatisfied for at least 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace for enforcement of judgment.
premise text: (1) If, in joint liability proceedings, judgment is given against a supplier and a linked credit provider...
conclusion text: ...the judgment must not be enforced against the credit provider unless a written demand made on the supplier for satisfaction of the judgment has remained unsatisfied for at least 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation to wait 30 days before enforcing judgment.
premise text: (1) If, in joint liability proceedings, judgment is given against a supplier and a linked credit provider...
conclusion text: ...the judgment must not be enforced against the credit provider unless a written demand made on the supplier for satisfaction of the judgment has remained unsatisfied for at least 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

283(2) Enforcement of judgments etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-2
part of: 283 Enforcement of judgments etc.
note: Limitation on enforcement of judgment debt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.265
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4

act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits enforcement beyond specified limits
premise text: (2) If the judgment can be enforced...
conclusion text: ...may only be enforced to the extent of...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Enforcement limited to within specified time frame
premise text: (2) If the judgment can be enforced...
conclusion text: ...to the extent of the lesser of the following amounts:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Within
logic summary: Enforcement limited to within specified time frame
premise text: (2) If the judgment can be enforced...
conclusion text: ...to the extent of the lesser of the following amounts:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Limit
logic summary: Enforcement limited to within specified limits
premise text: (2) If the judgment can be enforced...
conclusion text: ...may only be enforced to the extent of...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

283(3) Enforcement of judgments etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-3
part of: 283 Enforcement of judgments etc.
note: Prohibition on consumer receiving benefit of right unless judgment is given against supplier and credit provider
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.265
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-283-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Consumer must not receive benefit of right
conclusion text: Judgment against supplier and credit provider required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

260 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-260-3
has part: 260(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 260(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 260(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.266

260(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-4
part of: 260 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Consumer's benefit limited to lesser of two amounts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.266
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4

act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 260(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Limitation
logic summary: Limits consumer's benefit
premise text: Section 282(3)
conclusion text: Section 281
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Restriction
logic summary: Restricts benefit to lesser of two amounts within a specific time frame
premise text: Section 282(3)
conclusion text: Section 260(4)(a) and (b)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inferential relationship between consumer's benefit and lesser of two amounts
premise text: Section 282(3)
conclusion text: Section 260(4)(a) and (b)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Diffuses limitation to consumer's benefit
premise text: Section 282(3)
conclusion text: Section 260(4)(a) and (b)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

260(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-5
part of: 260 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemption from subsections (1) and (3) under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.266
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 260(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Subsections (1) and (3) do not apply.
premise text: Supplier dissolution or winding up
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

260(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-6
part of: 260 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Subrogation of credit provider to consumer's rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.266
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 260(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-260-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to subrogate the credit provider
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

284 Award of interest to consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-284-2
has part: 284(1) Award of interest to consumers
has part: 284(2) Award of interest to consumers
has part: 284(3) Award of interest to consumers
has part: 284(4) Award of interest to consumers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.266

284(1) Award of interest to consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-1
part of: 284 Award of interest to consumers
note: Award interest to consumers in joint liability proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.266
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 284(1) Award of interest to consumers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must award interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

284(2) Award of interest to consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-2
part of: 284 Award of interest to consumers
note: Award of interest to consumers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.266
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 284(2) Award of interest to consumers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to award interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

284(3) Award of interest to consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-3
part of: 284 Award of interest to consumers
note: Court must consider payments made by supplier or linked credit provider when determining good cause for awarding interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.266
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 284(3) Award of interest to consumers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider payments
premise text: Court must take into account any payment made into court...
conclusion text: Good cause is shown against awarding interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval of good cause determination includes payment consideration
premise text: Court must consider payments made by supplier or linked credit provider...
conclusion text: Good cause is determined within a temporal interval including payment consideration
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval of good cause determination includes payment consideration
premise text: Court must consider payments made by supplier or linked credit provider...
conclusion text: Good cause is determined within a temporal interval including payment consideration
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Payment consideration diffuses into good cause determination
premise text: Court must consider payments made by supplier or linked credit provider...
conclusion text: Good cause is determined based on payment consideration diffusion
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Payment consideration is a cognitive aspect of good cause determination
premise text: Court must consider payments made by supplier or linked credit provider...
conclusion text: Good cause is determined based on payment consideration cognition
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

284(4) Award of interest to consumers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-4
part of: 284 Award of interest to consumers
note: This section applies despite any other law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.266
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 284(4) Award of interest to consumers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-284-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to apply despite other laws.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

285 Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-285-2
has part: 285(1) Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
has part: 285(2) Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.267

285(1) Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-285-2-ss-1
part of: 285 Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
note: Supplier liability to linked credit provider and supplier under section 278.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.267
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-285-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-285-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-285-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 285(1) Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-285-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Supplier liability to linked credit provider and supplier.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

285(2) Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-285-2-ss-2
part of: 285 Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
note: Supplier liability for linked credit providers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.267
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-285-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-285-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-285-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 285(2) Liability of suppliers to linked credit providers, and of linked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-285-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: liability
logic summary: Obligation to pay a certain amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

262 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-262-3
note: Court determines amount of costs reasonably incurred by linked credit provider in defending joint liability proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.268
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-262-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-262-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-262-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 262 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-262-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
logic summary: Court determines obligation
premise text: Court decides on costs
conclusion text: Obligation exists
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

286 Joint liability proceedings and recovery under section 135 of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-286-2
has part: 286(1) Joint liability proceedings and recovery under section 135 of the
has part: 286(2) Joint liability proceedings and recovery under section 135 of the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.268

286(1) Joint liability proceedings and recovery under section 135 of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-286-2-ss-1
part of: 286 Joint liability proceedings and recovery under section 135 of the
note: Recovery of amounts under section 135 of the National Credit Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.268
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-286-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-286-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-286-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-286-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-286-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-286-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Consumer's obligation to recover amounts under section 135 of the National Credit Code
premise text: (a) a consumer is seeking, in joint liability proceedings...
conclusion text: the following amounts may be recovered...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-286-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
logic summary: Overlap between contract termination and section 135 recovery
premise text: (c) as a result of the contract being rescinded or discharged...
conclusion text: ...the consumer is entitled under section 135 of the National Credit Code to terminate a linked credit contract;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-286-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring recovery of amounts under section 135 of the National Credit Code
premise text: (e) any amount that the consumer is entitled under section 135 of...
conclusion text: ...may be recovered in the joint liability proceedings;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-286-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Credit provider's obligation to recover amounts from the consumer or supplier
premise text: (f) any amount that the credit provider is entitled under...
conclusion text: ...may be recovered from: (i) the consumer; or (ii) if the supplier...;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

286(2) Joint liability proceedings and recovery under section 135 of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-286-2-ss-2
part of: 286 Joint liability proceedings and recovery under section 135 of the
note: Ceases to be recoverable under section 135 of the National Credit Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.268
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-286-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-286-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-286-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits recovery under section 135 of the National Credit Code.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

287 Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-287-2
has part: 287(1) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
has part: 287(2) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
has part: 287(3) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
has part: 287(4) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
has part: 287(5) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.269

287(1) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-1
part of: 287 Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
note: Credit provider not liable for consumer loss or damage due to non-compliance with guarantee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.269
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 287(1) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits liability for credit provider
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

287(2) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-2
part of: 287 Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
note: Consumer can recover amount by action against supplier
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.269
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Ability to perform an action
conclusion text: Consumer can recover amount by action against supplier
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

287(3) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-3
part of: 287 Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
note: No liability for breach of warranty in non-linked credit contracts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.269
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-3-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 287(3) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: No liability for breach of warranty
premise text: Section 12ED of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001
conclusion text: Supplier not liable for loss or damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for breach of warranty
premise text: Section 12ED of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001
conclusion text: Breach of warranty occurs within a specific temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for non-linked credit contracts
premise text: Section 287(3) of the Act
conclusion text: Non-linked credit contracts have a recurring trace
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation for goods/services in non-linked credit contracts
premise text: Section 287(3) of the Act
conclusion text: Goods/services are represented as non-linked
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: Schema validation for goods/services in non-linked credit contracts
premise text: Section 287(3) of the Act
conclusion text: Goods/services conform to a schema
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

287(4) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-4
part of: 287 Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
note: Consumer can recover amount from credit provider despite subsection (3) limitation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.269
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Can
logic summary: Consumer has the right to recover amount
premise text: Subsection (3) does not prevent consumer recovery
conclusion text: Consumer can recover amount
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

287(5) Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-5
part of: 287 Liability of suppliers and credit providers relating to non-linked
note: Non-linked credit contracts are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.269
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-287-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits non-linked credit contracts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

264 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-264-3
note: Prohibition on credit provider taking physical possession of goods before delivery to consumer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.270
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-264-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-264-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-264-3-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-2-sec-264-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 264 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-264-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on credit provider taking physical possession of goods before delivery to consumer
premise text: (iv) the credit provider did not take physical possession of the goods before they were delivered to the consumer;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-264-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on supply of services by a person in relation to whom credit provider is not linked
premise text: (b) the supply of services to the consumer by a person in relation to whom the credit provider is not a linked credit provider.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Part XI
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1-3
note: Repeal Part and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.271
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-1-3-norm

130 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-130-4
note: Definition of associate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.271
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-130-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-130-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-130-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-130-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-130-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-130-4-logic-deontic-5
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-130-4-logic-deontic-6

act-sch-2-sec-130-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 130 Definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-130-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: associate: a person (the first person) is an associate of another person if:
conclusion text: a subclass of the other person
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-130-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Subclass relationship
premise text: if the other person is a body corporate—the first person is a wholly-owned subsidiary (within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001) of the other person.
conclusion text: a wholly-owned subsidiary of the other person
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-130-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <=
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship
premise text: embargo period for an embargo notice means the period specified in the embargo notice under paragraph 135S(3)(c) or (d).
conclusion text: a duration less than or equal to the embargo period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-130-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Recurring trace relationship
premise text: Australian Consumer Law means Schedule 2 as applied under Subdivision A of Division 2 of this Part.
conclusion text: a recurring trace of the Australian Consumer Law
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-130-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation definition
premise text: In this Part: associate: a person (the first person) is an associate of another person if:
conclusion text: an obligation to define the term 'associate'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-130-4-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation definition
premise text: Chairperson has the same meaning as in subsection 4(1).
conclusion text: an obligation to define the term 'Chairperson'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

266 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-266-3
note: Defines terms used in the Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.272
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-266-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-266-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-266-3-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-2-sec-266-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 266 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-266-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines terms with explicit definitions
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-266-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Establishes obligations and definitions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

130A Expressions defined in Schedule 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-130a
note: Expression has the same meaning as in Schedule 2.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.273
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-130a-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-130a-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-130a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Same meaning
premise text: An expression has the same meaning in this Part as in Schedule 2.
conclusion text: The expression has the same meaning as in Schedule 2.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131 Application of the Australian Consumer Law in relation to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131-3
has part: 131(1) Application of the Australian Consumer Law in relation to
has part: 131(2) Application of the Australian Consumer Law in relation to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.273

131(1) Application of the Australian Consumer Law in relation to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131-3-ss-1
part of: 131 Application of the Australian Consumer Law in relation to
note: Application of the Australian Consumer Law to corporations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.273
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-131-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131(1) Application of the Australian Consumer Law in relation to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Obligation applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131(2) Application of the Australian Consumer Law in relation to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131-3-ss-2
part of: 131 Application of the Australian Consumer Law in relation to
note: Application of the Australian Consumer Law in relation to corporations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.273
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-131-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131(2) Application of the Australian Consumer Law in relation to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies to corporations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

268 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-268-3
note: Section 147 of Schedule 2 applies as a law of the Commonwealth to, and in relation to, a corporation as a supplier referred to in that section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.274
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-268-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-268-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-268-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 268 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-268-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies
conclusion text: Section 147 of Schedule 2
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131A Division does not apply to financial services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131a
has part: 131A(1) Division does not apply to financial services
has part: 131A(2) Division does not apply to financial services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.274

131A(1) Division does not apply to financial services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131a-ss-1
part of: 131A Division does not apply to financial services
note: Division does not apply to financial services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.274
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-131a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131A(1) Division does not apply to financial services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not apply
logic summary: Prohibition on application of Division to financial services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131A(2) Division does not apply to financial services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131a-ss-2
part of: 131A Division does not apply to financial services
note: Exemptions from Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.274
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-131a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Exempts
logic summary: Exempts financial services
premise text: Division does not apply to financial services
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131B Division does not apply to interim bans imposed by State or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131b
note: Division does not apply to interim bans imposed by State or Territory Ministers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.275
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131b-norm

131C Saving of other laws and remedies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131c
has part: 131C(1) Saving of other laws and remedies
has part: 131C(2) Saving of other laws and remedies
has part: 131C(3) Saving of other laws and remedies
has part: 131C(4) Saving of other laws and remedies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.275

131C(1) Saving of other laws and remedies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131c-ss-1
part of: 131C Saving of other laws and remedies
note: No exclusion of concurrent laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.275
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-1-norm

act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131C(1) Saving of other laws and remedies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

131C(2) Saving of other laws and remedies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131c-ss-2
part of: 131C Saving of other laws and remedies
note: No inconsistency between section 73 of the Australian Consumer Law and a provision of a law of the State or Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.275
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131C(2) Saving of other laws and remedies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to ensure no inconsistency
premise text: (2) Section 73 of the Australian Consumer Law does not operate in a State or a Territory...
conclusion text: ...to ensure that no inconsistency arises between...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between laws and remedies
premise text: (2) Section 73 of the Australian Consumer Law does not operate in a State or a Territory to the extent necessary...
conclusion text: ...to ensure that no inconsistency arises between...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of laws and remedies
premise text: (2) Section 73 of the Australian Consumer Law does not operate in a State or a Territory to the extent necessary...
conclusion text: ...to ensure that no inconsistency arises between...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of laws and remedies
premise text: (2) Section 73 of the Australian Consumer Law does not operate in a State or a Territory to the extent necessary...
conclusion text: ...to ensure that no inconsistency arises between...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification of laws and remedies using CogAI
premise text: (2) Section 73 of the Australian Consumer Law does not operate in a State or a Territory to the extent necessary...
conclusion text: ...to ensure that no inconsistency arises between...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131C(3) Saving of other laws and remedies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131c-ss-3
part of: 131C Saving of other laws and remedies
note: Exemptions from concurrent prosecution for offenses against multiple laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.275
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131C(3) Saving of other laws and remedies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If an act is both an offense under the Australian Consumer Law and a State law, then prosecution for one does not imply prosecution for the other.
premise text: (3) Despite subsection (1):
conclusion text: he or she is not liable to be convicted of the other of those offenses.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The excerpt defines a temporal interval for concurrent prosecution.
premise text: (3) Despite subsection (1):
conclusion text: if an act or omission of a person is both: (i) an offence against this Part or the Australian Consumer Law; and (ii) an offence against a law of a State or a Territory;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The excerpt defines a recurring trace for concurrent prosecution.
premise text: (3) Despite subsection (1):
conclusion text: he or she is not liable to be convicted of the other of those offenses.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131C(4) Saving of other laws and remedies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131c-ss-4
part of: 131C Saving of other laws and remedies
note: Preservation of rights under other laws and remedies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.275
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-131c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Preservation
logic summary: Preserves existing rights
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-270-3
note: Effect of other Commonwealth laws on the Australian Consumer Law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.276
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-270-3-norm

131D Effect of Part VIB on Chapter 5 of the Australian Consumer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131d
note: Chapter 5 of the Australian Consumer Law has effect subject to certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.276
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131d-norm

131E Application of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131e
has part: 131E(1) Application of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
has part: 131E(2) Application of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
has part: 131E(3) Application of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.276

131E(1) Application of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131e-ss-1
part of: 131E Application of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
note: Instruments made under the Australian Consumer Law must be made by legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.276
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131E(1) Application of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make instruments under the Australian Consumer Law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131E(2) Application of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131e-ss-2
part of: 131E Application of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
note: Exemptions from legislative instruments under the Australian Consumer Law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.276
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (2) The following instruments...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131E(3) Application of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131e-ss-3
part of: 131E Application of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
note: Exempts certain regulators from being legislative instruments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.276
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131E(3) Application of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Regulators exempted from legislative instrument status.
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, an instrument made under the Australian Consumer Law by a responsible Minister who is not the Commonwealth Minister, or a regulator that is not the Commission, is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between exemption and legislative instrument status.
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, an instrument made under the Australian Consumer Law by a responsible Minister who is not the Commonwealth Minister, or a regulator that is not the Commission, is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occurs before
logic summary: Temporal relationship between exemption and legislative instrument status.
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, an instrument made under the Australian Consumer Law by a responsible Minister who is not the Commonwealth Minister, or a regulator that is not the Commission, is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuse regulatory instruments exempted from legislative instrument status.
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, an instrument made under the Australian Consumer Law by a responsible Minister who is not the Commonwealth Minister, or a regulator that is not the Commission, is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131e-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognize regulatory instruments exempted from legislative instrument status.
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, an instrument made under the Australian Consumer Law by a responsible Minister who is not the Commonwealth Minister, or a regulator that is not the Commission, is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131F Section 4AB of the Crimes Act does not apply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131f
note: Section 4AB of the Crimes Act does not apply to provisions of this Part or the Australian Consumer Law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.277
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131f-norm

131G Application of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131g
has part: 131G(1) Application of the Criminal Code
has part: 131G(2) Application of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.277

131G(1) Application of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131g-ss-1
part of: 131G Application of the Criminal Code
note: Part 2.5 of the Criminal Code does not apply to an offence against this Part or the Australian Consumer Law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.277
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131g-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-131g-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 131G(1) Application of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-131g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits application of Part 2.5 to certain offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131G(2) Application of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131g-ss-2
part of: 131G Application of the Criminal Code
note: Section 9.2 of the Criminal Code does not apply to an offence against Chapter 4 of the Australian Consumer Law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.277
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-131g-ss-2-norm

132 Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed ban notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132-4
has part: 132(1) Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed ban notice
has part: 132(2) Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed ban notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.277

132(1) Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed ban notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132-4-ss-1
part of: 132 Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed ban notice
note: Issue a proposed ban notice for interim or permanent bans on consumer goods or product-related services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.277
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to issue a proposed ban notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132(2) Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed ban notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132-4-ss-2
part of: 132 Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed ban notice
note: Interim ban does not apply if a proposed ban notice has been issued
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.277
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits interim ban if proposed ban notice has been issued
premise text: Commonwealth Minister has issued a notice under section 132J
conclusion text: Subsection (1) does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-272-3
has part: 272(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 272(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 272(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.278

272(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-3
part of: 272 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: The proposed ban notice must be in writing and published on the internet.
description: notify the Commission, in writing and within a period specified in the notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.278
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: The proposed ban notice must be in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: The proposed ban notice must be published on the internet within a period specified in the notice.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-4
part of: 272 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Minimum period for proposed ban notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.278
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-4-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5

act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits a certain action
premise text: (4) The period specified in the proposed ban notice...
conclusion text: ...must be a period of at least 10 days...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits commencement before publication
premise text: (4) The period specified in the proposed ban notice...
conclusion text: ...must not commence before the day on which the notice is published.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the prohibition
premise text: (4) The period specified in the proposed ban notice...
conclusion text: ...must be a period of at least 10 days...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-4-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implies a consequence for non-compliance with the prohibition
premise text: (4) The period specified in the proposed ban notice...
conclusion text: ...must be a period of at least 10 days...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads the prohibition to all relevant entities
premise text: (4) The period specified in the proposed ban notice...
conclusion text: ...must be a period of at least 10 days...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-5
part of: 272 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: A proposed ban notice is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.278
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of prohibition
premise text: (5) A proposed ban notice is not a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: A proposed ban notice is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between legislative instruments
premise text: (5) A proposed ban notice is not a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: A proposed ban notice does not exist during the time of legislative instruments.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between legislative instruments
premise text: (5) A proposed ban notice is not a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: A proposed ban notice does not exist during the time of legislative instruments.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between legislative instruments
premise text: (5) A proposed ban notice is not a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: A proposed ban notice does not exist during the time of legislative instruments.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-272-3-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between legislative instruments
premise text: (5) A proposed ban notice is not a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: A proposed ban notice does not exist during the time of legislative instruments.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132A Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132a-2
has part: 132A(1) Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
has part: 132A(2) Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
has part: 132A(3) Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
has part: 132A(4) Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
has part: 132A(5) Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.278

132A(1) Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-1
part of: 132A Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
note: Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice if proposing to issue a recall notice for consumer goods of a particular kind.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.278
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to issue a proposed recall notice
premise text: The Commonwealth Minister proposes to issue a recall notice for consumer goods of a particular kind.
conclusion text: The Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for issuing a proposed recall notice
premise text: The proposed recall notice must be issued within a certain timeframe.
conclusion text: The proposed recall notice must be issued between now and a certain date.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Consequence of issuing a proposed recall notice
premise text: If the Commonwealth Minister proposes to issue a recall notice, then they must issue a proposed recall notice.
conclusion text: Issuing a proposed recall notice implies that the Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
logic summary: Consequence of issuing a proposed recall notice
premise text: If the Commonwealth Minister issues a proposed recall notice, then it spreads to all relevant parties.
conclusion text: Issuing a proposed recall notice spreads to all relevant parties
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132A(2) Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-2
part of: 132A Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
note: Issue a proposed recall notice without delay if certified by section 132J
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.278
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to issue a proposed recall notice
premise text: Section 132J certifies the need for immediate action
conclusion text: Issue a proposed recall notice without delay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Recall notice must be issued within a certain time frame
premise text: Section 132J certifies the need for immediate action
conclusion text: The proposed recall notice must be issued without delay
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Recall notice has a certain duration
premise text: Section 132J certifies the need for immediate action
conclusion text: The proposed recall notice must be issued without delay
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Recall notice is a type of artificial intelligence output
premise text: Section 132J certifies the need for immediate action
conclusion text: The proposed recall notice is a type of artificial intelligence output that must be issued without delay
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Recall notice conforms to a certain schema
premise text: Section 132J certifies the need for immediate action
conclusion text: The proposed recall notice conforms to a certain schema that must be issued without delay
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132A(3) Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-3
part of: 132A Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
note: Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
description: proposed recall notice, summary of reasons for proposed recall notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.278
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132A(3) Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must issue a proposed recall notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132A(4) Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-4
part of: 132A Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
note: Minimum period for proposed recall notice
description: 10 days or longer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.278
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to specify minimum period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132A(5) Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-5
part of: 132A Commonwealth Minister must issue a proposed recall notice
note: Must issue a proposed recall notice
description: Proposed recall notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.278
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132a-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to issue a proposed recall notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132B Commonwealth Minister to be notified if no person wishes a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132b
has part: 132B(1) Commonwealth Minister to be notified if no person wishes a
has part: 132B(2) Commonwealth Minister to be notified if no person wishes a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.279

132B(1) Commonwealth Minister to be notified if no person wishes a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132b-ss-1
part of: 132B Commonwealth Minister to be notified if no person wishes a
note: Notify Commonwealth Minister if no person wishes conference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.279
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132b-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132B(1) Commonwealth Minister to be notified if no person wishes a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must notify Commonwealth Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132B(2) Commonwealth Minister to be notified if no person wishes a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132b-ss-2
part of: 132B Commonwealth Minister to be notified if no person wishes a
note: Commonwealth Minister notified if no person wishes a notice under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.279
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132b-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132B(2) Commonwealth Minister to be notified if no person wishes a
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: NOTICE
logic summary: Notification obligation
premise text: (2) A notice under subsection (1)
conclusion text: A notice under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

132C Notification of conference
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132c
has part: 132C(1) Notification of conference
has part: 132C(2) Notification of conference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.279

132C(1) Notification of conference
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132c-ss-1
part of: 132C Notification of conference
note: Commission must hold conference upon notification.
description: Written notice to Commonwealth Minister and notifiers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.279
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132c-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132C(1) Notification of conference
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to hold conference
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132C(2) Notification of conference
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132c-ss-2
part of: 132C Notification of conference
note: Notification period for proposed ban or recall notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.279
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132c-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-2-sec-132c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Time period specified
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

274 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-274-3
note: Notice under paragraph (1)(b) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.280
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-274-3-norm

132D Recommendation after conclusion of conference
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132d
has part: 132D(1) Recommendation after conclusion of conference
has part: 132D(2) Recommendation after conclusion of conference
has part: 132D(3) Recommendation after conclusion of conference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.280

132D(1) Recommendation after conclusion of conference
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132d-ss-1
part of: 132D Recommendation after conclusion of conference
note: Recommendation after conclusion of conference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.280
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132d-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide recommendation
conclusion text: (1) As soon as is practicable after the conclusion of a conference...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132D(2) Recommendation after conclusion of conference
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132d-ss-2
part of: 132D Recommendation after conclusion of conference
note: Commission must recommend to Commonwealth Minister on issuing recall notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.280
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132d-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide recommendation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132D(3) Recommendation after conclusion of conference
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132d-ss-3
part of: 132D Recommendation after conclusion of conference
note: Must have regard to a recommendation and provide reasons for decision.
description: written notice on the internet
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.280
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132d-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to have regard to a recommendation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132E Opportunity for a conference after an interim ban has been
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132e
has part: 132E(1) Opportunity for a conference after an interim ban has been
has part: 132E(2) Opportunity for a conference after an interim ban has been
has part: 132E(3) Opportunity for a conference after an interim ban has been
has part: 132E(4) Opportunity for a conference after an interim ban has been
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.281

132E(1) Opportunity for a conference after an interim ban has been
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132e-ss-1
part of: 132E Opportunity for a conference after an interim ban has been
note: Imposition of interim ban requires certification by Commonwealth Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.281
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132E(1) Opportunity for a conference after an interim ban has been
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires certification for imposition of interim ban.
premise text: (a) an interim ban on consumer goods...
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
logic summary: Certification must occur before interim ban is imposed.
premise text: (c) before the ban was imposed, the Commonwealth Minister...
conclusion text: ...without delay.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132E(2) Opportunity for a conference after an interim ban has been
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132e-ss-2
part of: 132E Opportunity for a conference after an interim ban has been
note: The Commonwealth Minister must invite persons to notify the Commission within a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.281
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132E(2) Opportunity for a conference after an interim ban has been
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify the Commission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132E(3) Opportunity for a conference after an interim ban has been
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132e-ss-3
part of: 132E Opportunity for a conference after an interim ban has been
note: Minimum notice period for interim ban
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.281
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132E(3) Opportunity for a conference after an interim ban has been
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a minimum notice period
premise text: (3) The period specified in the notice under subsection (2):...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
logic summary: Defines the start date of the notice period
premise text: (3) The period specified in the notice under subsection (2):...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132E(4) Opportunity for a conference after an interim ban has been
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132e-ss-4
part of: 132E Opportunity for a conference after an interim ban has been
note: Legislative instrument notice is exempt from legislative instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.281
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Notice under subsection (2) is exempt from legislative instruments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132F Notification of conference
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132f
note: Commission must hold conference upon request.
description: written notice to Commonwealth Minister and notifiers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.281
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132f-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132f-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132F Notification of conference
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Commission has a duty to hold conference
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

276 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276-3
has part: 276(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 276(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.282

276(2) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276-3-ss-2
part of: 276 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Minimum notice period for appointment of day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.282
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

act-sch-2-sec-276-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

276(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276-3-ss-3
part of: 276 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Notice under paragraph (1)(b) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.282
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-276-3-ss-3-norm

132G Recommendation after conclusion of conference
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132g
has part: 132G(1) Recommendation after conclusion of conference
has part: 132G(2) Recommendation after conclusion of conference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.282

132G(1) Recommendation after conclusion of conference
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132g-ss-1
part of: 132G Recommendation after conclusion of conference
note: Recommendation after conference conclusion
description: Written notice to Commonwealth Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.282
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132g-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Commission must recommend
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132G(2) Recommendation after conclusion of conference
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132g-ss-2
part of: 132G Recommendation after conclusion of conference
note: Must have regard to a recommendation and provide reasons for decision.
description: written notice on the internet
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.282
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132g-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to have regard to a recommendation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132H Conduct of conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132h
has part: 132H(1) Conduct of conferences
has part: 132H(2) Conduct of conferences
has part: 132H(3) Conduct of conferences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.282

132H(1) Conduct of conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132h-ss-1
part of: 132H Conduct of conferences
note: The Commission must be represented by a member or members at conferences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.282
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132h-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commission must be represented.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132H(2) Conduct of conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132h-ss-2
part of: 132H Conduct of conferences
note: Maintain a record of conference proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.282
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132h-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to maintain a record
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132H(3) Conduct of conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132h-ss-3
part of: 132H Conduct of conferences
note: Ensure a reasonable opportunity for each person to present their case at the conference.
description: Inspect documents and make submissions in relation to those documents.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.282
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132h-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132h-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132H(3) Conduct of conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure a reasonable opportunity for each person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132J Interim ban and recall notice without delay in case of danger to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132j
has part: 132J(1) Interim ban and recall notice without delay in case of danger to
has part: 132J(2) Interim ban and recall notice without delay in case of danger to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.283

132J(1) Interim ban and recall notice without delay in case of danger to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132j-ss-1
part of: 132J Interim ban and recall notice without delay in case of danger to
note: Interim ban on consumer goods without delay in case of danger to human life.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.283
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 132J(1) Interim ban and recall notice without delay in case of danger to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition on consumer goods.
premise text: (1) If it appears to the Commonwealth Minister...
conclusion text: an interim ban on consumer goods of that kind should be imposed without delay;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Requires immediate action.
premise text: (1) If it appears to the Commonwealth Minister...
conclusion text: without delay;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132J(2) Interim ban and recall notice without delay in case of danger to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132j-ss-2
part of: 132J Interim ban and recall notice without delay in case of danger to
note: Interim ban on product-related services without delay in case of imminent risk to life or health.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.283
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 132J(2) Interim ban and recall notice without delay in case of danger to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition on product-related services.
premise text: (2) If it appears to the Commonwealth Minister...
conclusion text: An interim ban on services of that kind should be imposed without delay.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with temporal intervals related to imminent risks.
premise text: (2) If it appears to the Commonwealth Minister...
conclusion text: The interim ban applies during the period of imminent risk.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of product-related services posing an imminent risk.
premise text: (2) If it appears to the Commonwealth Minister...
conclusion text: Product-related services of that kind create a recurring pattern of imminent risks.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads the risk of product-related services across time and space.
premise text: (2) If it appears to the Commonwealth Minister...
conclusion text: The interim ban spreads across time and space to mitigate the risk.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132j-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Analyzes product-related services for imminent risks using AI.
premise text: (2) If it appears to the Commonwealth Minister...
conclusion text: The AI analysis identifies product-related services posing an imminent risk.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

278 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-278-3
has part: 278(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 278(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.284

278(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-278-3-ss-3
part of: 278 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Imposing interim ban or issuing recall notice without regard to prior action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.284
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-278-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-278-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-278-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to impose interim ban or issue recall notice.
premise text: (3) If...
conclusion text: the Commonwealth Minister may impose the interim ban, or issue the recall notice...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

278(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-278-3-ss-4
part of: 278 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Notice under subsection (1) or (2) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.284
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-278-3-ss-4-norm

132K Copy of notices under this Division to be given to suppliers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132k
has part: 132K(1) Copy of notices under this Division to be given to suppliers
has part: 132K(2) Copy of notices under this Division to be given to suppliers
has part: 132K(3) Copy of notices under this Division to be given to suppliers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.284

132K(1) Copy of notices under this Division to be given to suppliers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132k-ss-1
part of: 132K Copy of notices under this Division to be given to suppliers
note: State must provide notice to suppliers
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.284
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132k-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132k-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132K(1) Copy of notices under this Division to be given to suppliers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132K(2) Copy of notices under this Division to be given to suppliers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132k-ss-2
part of: 132K Copy of notices under this Division to be given to suppliers
note: Copy of notices under this Division to be given to suppliers within 2 days or as soon as practicable after the end of that period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.284
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132k-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132k-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132K(2) Copy of notices under this Division to be given to suppliers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide copy within 2 days or as soon as practicable after the end of that period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132K(3) Copy of notices under this Division to be given to suppliers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132k-ss-3
part of: 132K Copy of notices under this Division to be given to suppliers
note: Failure to comply with subsection (1) does not invalidate the notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.284
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132k-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-132k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-132k-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132K(3) Copy of notices under this Division to be given to suppliers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-132k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Failure to comply implies no invalidation.
premise text: (1)
conclusion text: (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

133 Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133-3
has part: 133(1) Appointment of inspectors
has part: 133(2) Appointment of inspectors
has part: 133(3) Appointment of inspectors
has part: 133(4) Appointment of inspectors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.284

133(1) Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-1
part of: 133 Appointment of inspectors
note: Chairperson may appoint a member of staff as an inspector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.284
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133(1) Appointment of inspectors
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133(2) Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-2
part of: 133 Appointment of inspectors
note: Suitable qualifications and experience required for inspector appointment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.284
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Chairperson must satisfy conditions before appointing an inspector
premise text: (2) The Chairperson...
conclusion text: The Chairperson must not appoint...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Properly exercising powers within a timeframe
logic summary: Inspector appointment requires proper exercise of powers within a timeframe
premise text: (2) The Chairperson must not appoint a person as an inspector unless...
conclusion text: The person has suitable qualifications and experience to exercise properly the powers of an inspector within a reasonable timeframe
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Properly exercising powers over time
logic summary: Inspector appointment requires proper exercise of powers over time
premise text: (2) The Chairperson must not appoint a person as an inspector unless...
conclusion text: The person has suitable qualifications and experience to exercise properly the powers of an inspector for an extended period
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must satisfy conditions before appointment
logic summary: Chairperson must satisfy conditions before appointing an inspector
premise text: (2) The Chairperson...
conclusion text: The Chairperson must not appoint a person as an inspector unless the person has suitable qualifications and experience to exercise properly the powers of an inspector
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must have suitable qualifications and experience
logic summary: Inspector appointment requires suitable qualifications and experience
premise text: (2) The Chairperson must not appoint a person as an inspector unless...
conclusion text: The person has suitable qualifications and experience to exercise properly the powers of an inspector
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133(3) Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-3
part of: 133 Appointment of inspectors
note: Inspector must comply with Chairperson's directions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.284
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
premise text: Inspector's actions are subject to Chairperson's directions.
conclusion text: Inspector must comply with Chairperson's directions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: DURING
logic summary: Inspector's compliance with Chairperson's directions occurs during their term as inspector.
premise text: Inspector's actions are subject to Chairperson's directions.
conclusion text: Inspector's compliance with Chairperson's directions occurs during their term as inspector.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Chairperson's directions imply a duty on the part of inspectors to comply.
premise text: Inspector's actions are subject to Chairperson's directions.
conclusion text: Chairperson's directions imply a duty on the part of inspectors to comply.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS TO
logic summary: Compliance with Chairperson's directions spreads to all inspectors under their direction.
premise text: Inspector's actions are subject to Chairperson's directions.
conclusion text: Compliance with Chairperson's directions spreads to all inspectors under their direction.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
logic summary: Inspector's compliance with Chairperson's directions requires AI support.
premise text: Inspector's actions are subject to Chairperson's directions.
conclusion text: Inspector's compliance with Chairperson's directions requires AI support.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133(4) Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-4
part of: 133 Appointment of inspectors
note: Direction in writing is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.284
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133(4) Appointment of inspectors
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Direction in writing is given.
conclusion text: It is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133A Identity cards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133a
has part: 133A(1) Identity cards
has part: 133A(2) Identity cards
has part: 133A(3) Identity cards
has part: 133A(4) Identity cards
has part: 133A(5) Identity cards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.285

133A(1) Identity cards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133a-ss-1
part of: 133A Identity cards
note: Chairperson must issue identity card to inspector
description: Form of identity card
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.285
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133A(1) Identity cards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133A(2) Identity cards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133a-ss-2
part of: 133A Identity cards
note: Identity card must be in prescribed form and contain recent photograph.
description: identity card
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.285
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133A(2) Identity cards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be in prescribed form
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTAIN
logic summary: Contain recent photograph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133A(3) Identity cards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133a-ss-3
part of: 133A Identity cards
note: Failure to return identity card after ceasing as inspector is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.285
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3

act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133A(3) Identity cards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to return identity card
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: if the person ceases to be an inspector and does not return the identity card.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Ceasing as inspector must be after issuing identity card
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: the person ceases to be an inspector and the identity card was issued.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Ceasing as inspector implies returning identity card
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: the person ceases to be an inspector, the person must return the identity card.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133A(4) Identity cards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133a-ss-4
part of: 133A Identity cards
note: Offence of strict liability for identity card-related crimes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.285
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133A(4) Identity cards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
premise text: (4) An offence against subsection (3)
conclusion text: An offence of strict liability.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133A(5) Identity cards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133a-ss-5
part of: 133A Identity cards
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to lost or destroyed identity card.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.285
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2

act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133A(5) Identity cards
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133a-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Evidential Burden
logic summary: Defendant must provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

280 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-280-3
note: Must carry identity card at all times while exercising powers as an inspector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.286
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-280-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-280-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must carry identity card
premise text: Inspector issued with an identity card
conclusion text: Carry identity card at all times
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133B Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133b
has part: 133B(1) Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
has part: 133B(2) Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.286

133B(1) Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133b-ss-1
part of: 133B Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
note: Inspector may enter premises for the purpose of ascertaining whether consumer goods will or may cause injury to any person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.286
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133b-ss-1-norm

act-sch-2-sec-133b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133B(1) Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

133B(2) Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133b-ss-2
part of: 133B Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
note: Inspector's powers while on premises.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.286
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133b-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133B(2) Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPowerTo
logic summary: Inspector has power to enter premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133C Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133c
has part: 133C(1) Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
has part: 133C(2) Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.286

133C(1) Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133c-ss-1
part of: 133C Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
note: Inspector may enter premises with public access for ascertainment purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.286
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133c-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133C(1) Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to enter premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133C(2) Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133c-ss-2
part of: 133C Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
note: Inspector's power to enter premises and inspect equipment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.286
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133c-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133C(2) Power to enter premises to which the public has access—
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPowerTo
logic summary: Inspector has the power to enter premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133D Power to obtain information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133d
has part: 133D(1) Power to obtain information etc.
has part: 133D(2) Power to obtain information etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.287

133D(1) Power to obtain information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133d-ss-1
part of: 133D Power to obtain information etc.
note: Supplier must provide information about consumer goods.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.287
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133d-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133D(1) Power to obtain information etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133D(2) Power to obtain information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133d-ss-2
part of: 133D Power to obtain information etc.
note: Disclosure notice may be given to a person (supplier) in trade or commerce.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.287
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133d-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133d-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 133D(2) Power to obtain information etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted to give a disclosure notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

282 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-282-3
has part: 282(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 282(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.288

282(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-282-3-ss-3
part of: 282 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Supplier must provide information, documents, and evidence within a reasonable time.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.288
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-282-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-282-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-282-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Supplier must provide information, documents, and evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

282(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-282-3-ss-4
part of: 282 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: The person specified in the notice may be the Commonwealth Minister or an inspector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.288
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-282-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-282-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-282-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 282(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-282-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mayBe
logic summary: May be specified in a notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133E Self-incrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133e
has part: 133E(1) Self-incrimination
has part: 133E(2) Self-incrimination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.288

133E(1) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133e-ss-1
part of: 133E Self-incrimination
note: Must provide information or evidence when required by a disclosure notice.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.288
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133e-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133E(1) Self-incrimination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information or evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133E(2) Self-incrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133e-ss-2
part of: 133E Self-incrimination
note: Protection against self-incrimination in certain proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.288
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133e-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133E(2) Self-incrimination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Protects against self-incrimination
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133F Compliance with disclosure notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133f
has part: 133F(1) Compliance with disclosure notices
has part: 133F(2) Compliance with disclosure notices
has part: 133F(3) Compliance with disclosure notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.289

133F(1) Compliance with disclosure notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133f-ss-1
part of: 133F Compliance with disclosure notices
note: Refusal to comply with disclosure notice is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.289
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-1-logic-ltl-4

act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 133F(1) Compliance with disclosure notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal to comply with disclosure notice.
premise text: (a) the person is given a disclosure notice; and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the notice.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Compliance with disclosure notice is obligatory.
premise text: (a) the person is given a disclosure notice; and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the notice.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Disclosure notice overlaps with refusal to comply.
premise text: (a) the person is given a disclosure notice; and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the notice.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Refusal to comply repeats over time.
premise text: (a) the person is given a disclosure notice; and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the notice.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133F(2) Compliance with disclosure notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133f-ss-2
part of: 133F Compliance with disclosure notices
note: Compliance with disclosure notices is not applicable if the person complies to the extent possible.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.289
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4

act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133F(2) Compliance with disclosure notices
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from disclosure notice
premise text: Person complies with notice to the extent possible
conclusion text: No obligation to comply further
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: evidential burden
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden
premise text: Note: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter
conclusion text: Person must provide evidence of compliance
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: conditional commencement
logic summary: Conditional commencement applies
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply if the person complies with notice to the extent possible
conclusion text: Commencement of subsection (1) is conditional on compliance
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: inference
logic summary: Inference of exemption from disclosure notice
premise text: Person complies with notice to the extent possible
conclusion text: Exemption from disclosure notice is inferred
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133F(3) Compliance with disclosure notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133f-ss-3
part of: 133F Compliance with disclosure notices
note: Compliance with disclosure notices is an offence of strict liability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.289
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133F(3) Compliance with disclosure notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Strict liability
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133G False or misleading information etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133g
note: Providing false or misleading information is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.289
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133g-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133g-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133g-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 133G False or misleading information etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits providing false or misleading information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

284 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-284-3
note: Penalty for non-compliance with trade practices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.290
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-284-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-284-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-284-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a penalty for non-compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133H Court orders relating to consumer goods that do not comply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133h
has part: 133H(1) Court orders relating to consumer goods that do not comply
has part: 133H(2) Court orders relating to consumer goods that do not comply
has part: 133H(3) Court orders relating to consumer goods that do not comply
has part: 133H(4) Court orders relating to consumer goods that do not comply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.290

133H(1) Court orders relating to consumer goods that do not comply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133h-ss-1
part of: 133H Court orders relating to consumer goods that do not comply
note: Court orders for non-compliant consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.290
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133h-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits possession or control of non-compliant consumer goods
premise text: (a) a person possesses or has control of consumer goods of a particular kind;
conclusion text: the court may, on the application of an inspector, make an order of a kind referred to in subsection (2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133H(2) Court orders relating to consumer goods that do not comply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133h-ss-2
part of: 133H Court orders relating to consumer goods that do not comply
note: Court orders relating to consumer goods that do not comply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.290
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133h-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133H(3) Court orders relating to consumer goods that do not comply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133h-ss-3
part of: 133H Court orders relating to consumer goods that do not comply
note: Inspector must take reasonable steps to discover who has an interest in consumer goods and notify them of proposed application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.290
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133h-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133h-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133H(3) Court orders relating to consumer goods that do not comply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to take reasonable steps
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133H(4) Court orders relating to consumer goods that do not comply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133h-ss-4
part of: 133H Court orders relating to consumer goods that do not comply
note: Entitlement to be heard in relation to the application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.290
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133h-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133h-ss-4-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 133H(4) Court orders relating to consumer goods that do not comply
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133h-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Has a right.
conclusion text: Entitled to be heard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133J Recovery of reasonable costs of seizing, and destroying or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133j
has part: 133J(1) Recovery of reasonable costs of seizing, and destroying or
has part: 133J(2) Recovery of reasonable costs of seizing, and destroying or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.291

133J(1) Recovery of reasonable costs of seizing, and destroying or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133j-ss-1
part of: 133J Recovery of reasonable costs of seizing, and destroying or
note: Liability for costs of seizing and destroying consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.291
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133j-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133J(1) Recovery of reasonable costs of seizing, and destroying or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to pay costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133J(2) Recovery of reasonable costs of seizing, and destroying or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133j-ss-2
part of: 133J Recovery of reasonable costs of seizing, and destroying or
note: Debt due by a person to the Commonwealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.291
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133j-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-133j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-133j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133J(2) Recovery of reasonable costs of seizing, and destroying or
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-133j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134 Purpose and effect of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134-4
has part: 134(1) Purpose and effect of this Division
has part: 134(2) Purpose and effect of this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.291

134(1) Purpose and effect of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134-4-ss-1
part of: 134 Purpose and effect of this Division
note: Provide for the issue of an infringement notice as an alternative to proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.291
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134-4-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134(1) Purpose and effect of this Division
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134(2) Purpose and effect of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134-4-ss-2
part of: 134 Purpose and effect of this Division
note: No requirement to issue infringement notice for alleged contravention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.291
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-4-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-134-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No requirement to issue infringement notice
premise text: This Division does not require an infringement notice to be issued
conclusion text: for an alleged contravention of an infringement notice provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No requirement for issuance of infringement notice
premise text: This Division does not require the issue of an infringement notice
conclusion text: for a contravention of an infringement notice provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Temporal interval between requirement to issue infringement notice and alleged contravention
premise text: This Division does not require the issuance of an infringement notice for a contravention that occurs after this Division comes into effect
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134-4-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Temporal interval between requirement to issue infringement notice and alleged contravention
premise text: This Division does not require the issuance of an infringement notice for a contravention that occurs after this Division comes into effect
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No requirement to issue infringement notice for alleged contravention
premise text: This Division does not require the issuance of an infringement notice for a contravention that occurs after this Division comes into effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

286 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-286-3
note: Prevents a court from imposing a higher penalty than the specified infringement notice if not complying with it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.292
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-286-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-286-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-286-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 286 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-286-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prevents a higher penalty than specified
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134A Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134a
has part: 134A(1) Issuing an infringement notice
has part: 134A(2) Issuing an infringement notice
has part: 134A(3) Issuing an infringement notice
has part: 134A(4) Issuing an infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.292

134A(1) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134a-ss-1
part of: 134A Issuing an infringement notice
note: Commission may issue infringement notice to a person with reasonable grounds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.292
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2

act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134A(1) Issuing an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: reasonable grounds
logic summary: Requires justification for issuing notice
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134A(2) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134a-ss-2
part of: 134A Issuing an infringement notice
note: List of infringement notice provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.292
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-2-norm

act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134A(2) Issuing an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

134A(3) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134a-ss-3
part of: 134A Issuing an infringement notice
note: List of conditions under which an infringement notice can be issued Commission must not issue more than one infringement notice to the same person for the same alleged contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.292
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-3-logic-deontic-6

act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 134A(3) Issuing an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits certain actions
premise text: (3) or (5), 119(1) or (2), 125(4), 127(1) or (2), 128(2) or (6), 131(1), 132(1), 136(1), (2) or (3) or 137(1) or (2); (h) subsection 221(1) or 222(1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the conditions
premise text: (3) or (5), 119(1) or (2), 125(4), 127(1) or (2), 128(2) or (6), 131(1), 132(1), 136(1), (2) or (3) or 137(1) or (2); (h) subsection 221(1) or 222(1).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Defines a temporal relationship for the conditions
premise text: (3) or (5), 119(1) or (2), 125(4), 127(1) or (2), 128(2) or (6), 131(1), 132(1), 136(1), (2) or (3) or 137(1) or (2); (h) subsection 221(1) or 222(1).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Defines a relationship between the conditions and other events
premise text: (3) or (5), 119(1) or (2), 125(4), 127(1) or (2), 128(2) or (6), 131(1), 132(1), 136(1), (2) or (3) or 137(1) or (2); (h) subsection 221(1) or 222(1).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Defines a relationship between the conditions and AI systems
premise text: (3) or (5), 119(1) or (2), 125(4), 127(1) or (2), 128(2) or (6), 131(1), 132(1), 136(1), (2) or (3) or 137(1) or (2); (h) subsection 221(1) or 222(1).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-3-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing multiple infringement notices.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134A(4) Issuing an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134a-ss-4
part of: 134A Issuing an infringement notice
note: Notice has no effect if issued more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.292
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits issuing notice more than 12 months after alleged contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134B Matters to be included in an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134b
note: Infringement notice requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.293
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134b-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134b-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134b-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134b-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-134b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134B Matters to be included in an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide required information
premise text: The infringement notice must be issued in accordance with section 134B.
conclusion text: The person to whom the notice is issued must provide the required information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be issued within a certain timeframe
premise text: The infringement notice must be issued within the infringement notice compliance period.
conclusion text: The person to whom the notice is issued must pay the penalty within the specified timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134b-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
logic summary: Payment of penalty implies compliance with notice requirements
premise text: If the person pays the penalty, they are in compliance with the notice requirements.
conclusion text: The payment of the penalty is a consequence of complying with the notice requirements.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134b-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be accompanied by payment information
premise text: The infringement notice must include information about how to pay the penalty.
conclusion text: The person to whom the notice is issued must provide payment information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134C Amount of penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134c
note: Penalty amount for infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.293
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134c-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134c-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-134c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134C Amount of penalty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines penalty amount
premise text: The penalty to be specified in an infringement notice...
conclusion text: must be a penalty equal to the amount worked out using the table
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Penalty must be greater than zero
premise text: The penalty to be specified in an infringement notice...
conclusion text: must be a positive value
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

288 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-288
note: Penalty amount for infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.294
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-288-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-288-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-288-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits certain actions with specified penalties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

290 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-290
note: Penalty amount for infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.296
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-290-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-290-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-290-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-290-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 290 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-290-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits penalty units
premise text: subsection 125(4)
conclusion text: 30 penalty units
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-290-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Defines temporal relation between subsections
premise text: subsection 125(4) and subsection 221(1)
conclusion text: temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134D Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134d
has part: 134D(1) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
has part: 134D(2) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
has part: 134D(3) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.297

134D(1) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134d-ss-1
part of: 134D Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
note: Compliance with infringement notice results in obligation to pay penalty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.297
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134d-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134D(1) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay penalty
premise text: Payment within infringement notice compliance period
conclusion text: Obligation to pay penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134D(2) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134d-ss-2
part of: 134D Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
note: No regard for contravention after payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.297
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134d-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Payment does not imply contravention
premise text: Payment
conclusion text: No contravention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134D(3) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134d-ss-3
part of: 134D Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
note: No proceedings may be started or continued against the Commonwealth in relation to an alleged contravention of the infringement notice provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.297
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134d-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134d-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 134D(3) Effect of compliance with an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No proceedings may be started or continued.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

292 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-292
note: Reiterates that the same conduct constitutes an offence as a contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.298
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-292-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-292-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-292-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 292 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-292-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Same conduct constitutes both an alleged contravention and an offence.
premise text: (b) an offence constituted by the same conduct that constituted the alleged contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134E Effect of failure to comply with an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134e
note: Liability for failure to comply with infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.298
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134e-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134e-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134E Effect of failure to comply with an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay penalty
premise text: Failure to comply with infringement notice
conclusion text: Liability for contravention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134F Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134f
has part: 134F(1) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 134F(2) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 134F(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 134F(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 134F(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
has part: 134F(6) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.298

134F(1) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134f-ss-1
part of: 134F Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Defines infringement notice compliance period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.298
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-1-norm

134F(2) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134f-ss-2
part of: 134F Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Commission may extend infringement notice compliance period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.298
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-2-norm

134F(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134f-ss-3
part of: 134F Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Maximum extension period for infringement notice compliance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.298
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134F(3) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: max
logic summary: Limits the maximum extension period
conclusion text: (3) Only one extension may be given and the extension must not be for longer than 28 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134F(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134f-ss-4
part of: 134F Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Must provide notice of extension to the person issued the infringement notice.
description: Notice of extension
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.298
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134F(4) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134F(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134f-ss-5
part of: 134F Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Failure to comply with subsection (4) does not affect the validity of the extension.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.298
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134F(5) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Obligation to comply with subsection (4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134F(6) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134f-ss-6
part of: 134F Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
note: Reference to extended infringement notice compliance period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.298
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134F(6) Infringement notice compliance period for infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134f-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers_to
logic summary: Refers to the infringement notice compliance period as extended
premise text: The Commission extends the infringement notice compliance period.
conclusion text: A reference in this Division is taken to be a reference to the infringement notice compliance period as so extended.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134G Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134g
has part: 134G(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 134G(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 134G(3) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 134G(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
has part: 134G(5) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.299

134G(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134g-ss-1
part of: 134G Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: Right to withdraw infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.299
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134G(1) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Right to withdraw infringement notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

134G(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134g-ss-2
part of: 134G Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: Protection from self-incrimination in proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.299
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134G(2) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to protect self-incrimination
premise text: Subsection (1)
conclusion text: Evidence or information given is not admissible in evidence against the person or representative
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134G(3) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134g-ss-3
part of: 134G Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: Commission may withdraw infringement notice upon request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.299
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134G(3) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to withdraw infringement notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

134G(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134g-ss-4
part of: 134G Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: Person must provide content for withdrawal notices.
description: Content of withdrawal notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.299
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134G(4) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide content for withdrawal notices.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134G(5) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134g-ss-5
part of: 134G Withdrawal of an infringement notice
note: Withdrawal notice must state certain information.
description: name and address of the person, day on which infringement notice was issued, that proceedings may be started or continued against the person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.299
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134G(5) Withdrawal of an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-134g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state certain information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

294 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-294
has part: 294(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 294(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.300

294(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-294-ss-6
part of: 294 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Withdrawal notice must be given within infringement notice compliance period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.300
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-294-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-294-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-294-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 294(6) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-294-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide withdrawal notice
premise text: Withdrawal notice is required
conclusion text: Withdrawal notice must be given
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

294(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-294-ss-7
part of: 294 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Commission must refund amount paid if infringement notice is withdrawn after payment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.300
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-294-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-294-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-294-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 294(7) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-294-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Commission has an obligation to refund amount paid.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135 Inspector may enter premises
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135-3
has part: 135(1) Inspector may enter premises
has part: 135(2) Inspector may enter premises
has part: 135(3) Inspector may enter premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.300

135(1) Inspector may enter premises
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-1
part of: 135 Inspector may enter premises
note: Inspector may enter premises for ascertaining potential injury to persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.300
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135(1) Inspector may enter premises
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
premise text: (1) If an inspector has reason to believe...
conclusion text: the inspector may, for the purposes of ascertaining...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: for the purposes of ascertaining
logic summary: Applies Allen interval logic to specify temporal relation.
premise text: (c) enter any premises in or from which the inspector has reason to believe...
conclusion text: the inspector may, for the purposes of ascertaining...,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: may cause injury
logic summary: Applies argumentation logic to evaluate consequences.
premise text: (b) a reasonably foreseeable use (including a misuse) of consumer goods of a particular kind will or may cause injury to any person;
conclusion text: the inspector may, for the purposes of ascertaining...,
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: in trade or commerce
logic summary: Applies diffusion logic to specify context.
premise text: (d) exercise search-related powers in relation to the premises.
conclusion text: the inspector may, for the purposes of ascertaining...,
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: in trade or commerce
logic summary: Applies cognitive AI logic to specify context.
premise text: (d) exercise search-related powers in relation to the premises.
conclusion text: the inspector may, for the purposes of ascertaining...,
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135(2) Inspector may enter premises
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-2
part of: 135 Inspector may enter premises
note: Inspector may not enter premises without reasonable belief of injury risk.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.300
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 135(2) Inspector may enter premises
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (2) If an inspector has reason to believe...
conclusion text: the inspector may not enter premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Conditional commencement
premise text: (2) If an inspector has reason to believe...
conclusion text: the entry is conditional on reasonable belief of injury risk.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135(3) Inspector may enter premises
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-3
part of: 135 Inspector may enter premises
note: Inspector may enter premises with occupier's consent or under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.300
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3

act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: Inspector has consent from occupier
conclusion text: Inspector may enter premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Entry can occur during overlapping intervals of inspector and occupier
premise text: Inspector has shown identity card if required by occupier
conclusion text: Entry occurs during overlapping intervals
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135-3-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Occupier's consent implies entry for inspector
premise text: Inspector has shown identity card if required by occupier
conclusion text: Occupier's consent implies entry
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135A Search-related powers of inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135a
note: Inspector's search-related powers in relation to premises where consumer goods are supplied.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.301
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135a-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135a-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135a-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135a-logic-alleninterval-5

act-sch-2-sec-135a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135A Search-related powers of inspectors
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Inspector has the power to seize consumer goods.
premise text: The inspector has reason to believe that a person supplies consumer goods of a particular kind.
conclusion text: The inspector may seize consumer goods of that kind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Inspector can inspect, handle and measure consumer goods.
premise text: The inspector has reason to believe that a person supplies consumer goods of a particular kind.
conclusion text: The inspector may inspect, handle and measure consumer goods of that kind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Inspector can take samples of consumer goods.
premise text: The inspector has reason to believe that a person supplies consumer goods of a particular kind.
conclusion text: The inspector may take samples of consumer goods of that kind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Inspector can inspect, handle and read documents relating to consumer goods.
premise text: The inspector has reason to believe that a person supplies consumer goods of a particular kind.
conclusion text: The inspector may inspect, handle and read any documents relating to consumer goods of that kind.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135a-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Search-related powers apply during premises inspection.
premise text: The inspector has reason to believe that a person supplies consumer goods of a particular kind.
conclusion text: The search-related powers apply during the premises inspection.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

296 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-296
note: Inspecting equipment used in manufacturing, processing or storage of consumer goods.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.302
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-296-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-296-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-296-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-296-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-296-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-296-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-296-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 296 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-296-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Inspecting equipment
premise text: (e) the power to inspect, handle and measure equipment used in the manufacturing, processing or storage of consumer goods of that kind;
conclusion text: The inspector has the power to inspect equipment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-296-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Seizing equipment
premise text: (e) the power to seize such equipment;
conclusion text: The inspector has the power to seize equipment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-296-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Inspection occurs during manufacturing, processing or storage
premise text: (e) the power to inspect, handle and measure equipment used in the manufacturing, processing or storage of consumer goods of that kind;
conclusion text: This inspection occurs during these activities.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-296-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Inspection is applicable everywhere
premise text: (e) the power to inspect, handle and measure equipment used in the manufacturing, processing or storage of consumer goods of that kind;
conclusion text: This inspection applies everywhere.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-296-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Inspecting documents
premise text: (a) the power to inspect, handle and read any documents relating to services of that kind;
conclusion text: The inspector has the power to inspect documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135B Inspector may ask questions and seek production of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135b
has part: 135B(1) Inspector may ask questions and seek production of
has part: 135B(2) Inspector may ask questions and seek production of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.303

135B(1) Inspector may ask questions and seek production of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135b-ss-1
part of: 135B Inspector may ask questions and seek production of
note: Occupier must answer questions and produce documents requested by inspector.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.303
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135b-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Obligation to answer questions and produce documents.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135B(2) Inspector may ask questions and seek production of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135b-ss-2
part of: 135B Inspector may ask questions and seek production of
note: Inspector may ask questions and seek production of documents.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.303
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135b-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135B(2) Inspector may ask questions and seek production of
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135C Failure to answer questions or produce documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135c
has part: 135C(1) Failure to answer questions or produce documents
has part: 135C(2) Failure to answer questions or produce documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.303

135C(1) Failure to answer questions or produce documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135c-ss-1
part of: 135C Failure to answer questions or produce documents
note: Failure to comply with a requirement is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.303
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135c-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135C(1) Failure to answer questions or produce documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135C(2) Failure to answer questions or produce documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135c-ss-2
part of: 135C Failure to answer questions or produce documents
note: Must answer questions and produce documents under subsection 135B(2)
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.303
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135c-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135C(2) Failure to answer questions or produce documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must answer questions and produce documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

298 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-298
has part: 298(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 298(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.304

298(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-298-ss-3
part of: 298 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Exemptions from admissibility in criminal proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.304
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-298-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-298-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-298-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 298(3) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-298-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Exemptions from admissibility in criminal proceedings
premise text: None
conclusion text: State obligation to exempt individual from admissibility
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

298(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-298-ss-4
part of: 298 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Strict liability offence for subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.304
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-298-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-298-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-298-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 298(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-298-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Offence classification
conclusion text: Strict liability offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135D Persons assisting inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135d
has part: 135D(1) Persons assisting inspectors
has part: 135D(2) Persons assisting inspectors
has part: 135D(3) Persons assisting inspectors
has part: 135D(4) Persons assisting inspectors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.304

135D(1) Persons assisting inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135d-ss-1
part of: 135D Persons assisting inspectors
note: Inspection personnel may be assisted by others.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.304
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to assist
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135D(2) Persons assisting inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135d-ss-2
part of: 135D Persons assisting inspectors
note: A person giving assistance is a person assisting the inspector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.304
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135D(2) Persons assisting inspectors
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Person giving assistance
premise text: A person assisting the inspector.
conclusion text: A person assisting the inspector.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135D(3) Persons assisting inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135d-ss-3
part of: 135D Persons assisting inspectors
note: Person assisting inspector may enter premises and exercise search-related powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.304
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4

act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 135D(3) Persons assisting inspectors
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to enter premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permitted
logic summary: Exercise search-related powers in relation to premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Conditional
logic summary: Only in accordance with direction given by inspector.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal interval of search-related powers overlaps with premises.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135D(4) Persons assisting inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135d-ss-4
part of: 135D Persons assisting inspectors
note: Power exercised by a person assisting the inspector is taken to have been exercised by the inspector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.304
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135D(4) Persons assisting inspectors
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135E Use of force in executing a search warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135e
note: Inspector may use necessary and reasonable force in executing a search warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.305
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135e-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135e-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135E Use of force in executing a search warrant
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to use force
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135F Announcement before entry under warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135f
has part: 135F(1) Announcement before entry under warrant
has part: 135F(2) Announcement before entry under warrant
has part: 135F(3) Announcement before entry under warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.305

135F(1) Announcement before entry under warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135f-ss-1
part of: 135F Announcement before entry under warrant
note: Inspector must announce before entering premises under warrant.
description: Identification and authorization
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.305
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135f-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-135f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135F(1) Announcement before entry under warrant
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory action
conclusion text: (1) An inspector must...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Before
logic summary: Temporal relationship between actions
premise text: (1) An inspector must...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135F(2) Announcement before entry under warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135f-ss-2
part of: 135F Announcement before entry under warrant
note: Inspector may deviate from subsection (1) under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.305
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135f-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135f-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

act-sch-2-sec-135f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permissive
logic summary: Inspector's obligation to comply with subsection (1) is permissive.
premise text: Inspector has an obligation to comply with subsection (1).
conclusion text: However, inspector may deviate under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135f-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Prudential
logic summary: Inspector's decision to deviate is based on reasonable grounds.
premise text: Inspector has reasonable grounds to believe immediate entry is required.
conclusion text: Inspector may deviate if reasonable grounds exist.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal
logic summary: Deviation is conditional on temporal circumstances.
premise text: Immediate entry is required for safety or warrant execution.
conclusion text: Deviation is allowed under certain temporal conditions.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

135F(3) Announcement before entry under warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135f-ss-3
part of: 135F Announcement before entry under warrant
note: Show identity card to occupier or other person upon request.
description: Identity card
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.305
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135f-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to show identity card
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135G Inspector must be in possession of search warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135g
note: Must be in possession of search warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.305
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135g-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135g-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE
logic summary: Must have the warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

300 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-300
note: Inspector must provide a copy of the completed warrant form.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.306
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-300-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-300-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-300-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 300 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-300-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Inspector must provide a copy of the completed warrant form.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135H Consent
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135h
has part: 135H(1) Consent
has part: 135H(2) Consent
has part: 135H(3) Consent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.306

135H(1) Consent
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135h-ss-1
part of: 135H Consent
note: Inspector must inform occupier of right to refuse consent.
description: Information about refusal of consent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.306
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135h-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135H(1) Consent
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform
conclusion text: Inspector must inform occupier
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135H(2) Consent
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135h-ss-2
part of: 135H Consent
note: Consent must be voluntary to have effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.306
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135h-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135h-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135H(2) Consent
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: Consent must be voluntary.
conclusion text: Consent has no effect unless it is voluntary.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135H(3) Consent
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135h-ss-3
part of: 135H Consent
note: Inspector must leave premises if consent ceases to have effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.306
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135h-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of entry after consent ceases
premise text: Inspector enters premises with consent
conclusion text: Inspector must leave premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135J Details of search warrant etc. must be given to the occupier of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135j
note: Inspectors must inform occupiers about their rights and responsibilities.
description: Information about occupier's rights and responsibilities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.306
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135j-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135j-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform occupiers
conclusion text: Inspectors must inform occupiers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135K Occupier etc. entitled to observe execution of search warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135k
has part: 135K(1) Occupier etc. entitled to observe execution of search warrant
has part: 135K(2) Occupier etc. entitled to observe execution of search warrant
has part: 135K(3) Occupier etc. entitled to observe execution of search warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.307

135K(1) Occupier etc. entitled to observe execution of search warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135k-ss-1
part of: 135K Occupier etc. entitled to observe execution of search warrant
note: Occupier entitled to observe execution of search warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.307
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
logic summary: Right to observe execution of search warrant
premise text: (a) a search warrant is being executed in relation to premises;
conclusion text: the occupier or other person is entitled to observe the execution of the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission for occupier to observe execution of search warrant
premise text: (a) a search warrant is being executed in relation to premises;
conclusion text: the occupier or other person is entitled to observe the execution of the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Search warrant execution overlaps with occupier's presence at premises
premise text: (a) a search warrant is being executed in relation to premises;
conclusion text: the occupier or other person is entitled to observe the execution of the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Occupier's right to observe execution of search warrant is recurrent
premise text: (b) the occupier of the premises, or another person who apparently represents the occupier, is present at the premises;
conclusion text: the occupier or other person is entitled to observe the execution of the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Occupier has an obligation to provide information about search warrant execution
premise text: (a) a search warrant is being executed in relation to premises;
conclusion text: the occupier or other person is entitled to observe the execution of the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135K(2) Occupier etc. entitled to observe execution of search warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135k-ss-2
part of: 135K Occupier etc. entitled to observe execution of search warrant
note: Right to observe execution of search warrant ceases if impedes that execution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.307
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits observing execution of search warrant if impedes that execution.
premise text: Occupier or other person impedes that execution.
conclusion text: Right to observe execution ceases.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Impediment overlaps with search warrant execution.
premise text: Occupier or other person impedes that execution.
conclusion text: Impediment and search warrant execution overlap.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Right to observe ceases until impediment ends.
premise text: Occupier or other person impedes that execution.
conclusion text: Impediment ends, right to observe resumes.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Right to observe diffuses when impediment ceases.
premise text: Occupier or other person impedes that execution.
conclusion text: Right to observe is diffused when impediment ends.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Impedes
logic summary: CogAI detects impediment and alerts right to observe.
premise text: Occupier or other person impedes that execution.
conclusion text: CogAI detects impediment, alerting right to observe.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135K(3) Occupier etc. entitled to observe execution of search warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135k-ss-3
part of: 135K Occupier etc. entitled to observe execution of search warrant
note: Execution of search warrant is not prevented by this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.307
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135k-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negation of prohibition
conclusion text: Execution is not prevented
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135L Occupier etc. to provide inspector etc. with facilities and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135l
has part: 135L(1) Occupier etc. to provide inspector etc. with facilities and
has part: 135L(2) Occupier etc. to provide inspector etc. with facilities and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.307

135L(1) Occupier etc. to provide inspector etc. with facilities and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135l-ss-1
part of: 135L Occupier etc. to provide inspector etc. with facilities and
note: Provide inspector with facilities and assistance
description: Reasonable facilities and assistance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.307
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135l-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory provision of facilities and assistance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135L(2) Occupier etc. to provide inspector etc. with facilities and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135l-ss-2
part of: 135L Occupier etc. to provide inspector etc. with facilities and
note: Provide inspector with facilities and information
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.307
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135l-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

302 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-302
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.308
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-302-norm

135M Receipts for seized consumer goods and equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135m
has part: 135M(1) Receipts for seized consumer goods and equipment
has part: 135M(2) Receipts for seized consumer goods and equipment
has part: 135M(3) Receipts for seized consumer goods and equipment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.308

135M(1) Receipts for seized consumer goods and equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135m-ss-1
part of: 135M Receipts for seized consumer goods and equipment
note: Inspector must provide a receipt for seized consumer goods.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.308
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135m-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135M(1) Receipts for seized consumer goods and equipment
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a receipt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135M(2) Receipts for seized consumer goods and equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135m-ss-2
part of: 135M Receipts for seized consumer goods and equipment
note: Must provide a receipt for seized equipment
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.308
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135m-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a receipt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135M(3) Receipts for seized consumer goods and equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135m-ss-3
part of: 135M Receipts for seized consumer goods and equipment
note: One receipt may cover consumer goods and equipment seized by the state.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.308
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135m-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135m-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135M(3) Receipts for seized consumer goods and equipment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135m-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a receipt for seized consumer goods and equipment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135N Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135n
has part: 135N(1) Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
has part: 135N(2) Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
has part: 135N(3) Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
has part: 135N(4) Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
has part: 135N(5) Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.308

135N(1) Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135n-ss-1
part of: 135N Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
note: Return consumer goods/equipment seized under a search warrant within 60 days or when reason for seizure no longer exists.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.308
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to return seized goods/equipment
premise text: Inspector seizes consumer goods/equipment under a search warrant.
conclusion text: Must return consumer goods/equipment within 60 days or when reason for seizure no longer exists.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: 60-day period after seizure ends
premise text: The period of 60 days after the seizure ends.
conclusion text: The 60-day period after seizure ends is a condition for return.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Inspector must take reasonable steps to return seized goods/equipment
premise text: Inspector seizes consumer goods/equipment under a search warrant.
conclusion text: Must take reasonable steps to return consumer goods/equipment within 60 days or when reason for seizure no longer exists.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Reason for seizure no longer exists is a condition for return
premise text: The reason for the seizure is no longer exists.
conclusion text: Must return consumer goods/equipment within 60 days or when reason for seizure no longer exists.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135N(2) Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135n-ss-2
part of: 135N Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
note: Exemption from subsection (1) if goods are forfeited or subject to dispute
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.308
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135N(2) Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

135N(3) Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135n-ss-3
part of: 135N Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
note: Inspection is not required to return consumer goods or equipment if it poses an imminent risk of death, serious illness or serious injury.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.308
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Inspection is prohibited under certain circumstances.
premise text: (3) If, apart from this subsection, the inspector would be required to take reasonable steps...
conclusion text: ...the inspector is not required to do so if: (a) the return of the consumer goods or equipment could cause an imminent risk of death, serious illness or serious injury;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: The provision overlaps with other provisions that require inspection under certain circumstances.
premise text: (3) If, apart from this subsection, the inspector would be required to take reasonable steps...
conclusion text: ...the inspector is not required to do so if: (a) the return of the consumer goods or equipment could cause an imminent risk of death, serious illness or serious injury;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlap
logic summary: The provision overlaps with other provisions that require inspection under certain circumstances.
premise text: (3) If, apart from this subsection, the inspector would be required to take reasonable steps...
conclusion text: ...the inspector is not required to do so if: (a) the return of the consumer goods or equipment could cause an imminent risk of death, serious illness or serious injury;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: The provision permits inspection under certain circumstances.
premise text: (3) If, apart from this subsection, the inspector would be required to take reasonable steps...
conclusion text: ...the inspector is not required to do so if: (b) the inspector is otherwise authorised (by a law, or an order of a court, of the Commonwealth or of a State or a Territory) to retain, destroy, dispose of or otherwise deal with the consumer goods or equipment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135N(4) Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135n-ss-4
part of: 135N Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
note: Consumer goods must be returned to the person from whom they were seized or their owner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.308
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135N(4) Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to return consumer goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135N(5) Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135n-ss-5
part of: 135N Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
note: Equipment must be returned to the person from whom it was seized or its owner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.308
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135N(5) Return of seized consumer goods and equipment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135n-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST RETURN
logic summary: Must return equipment to the person from whom it was seized or its owner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135P Judge may permit consumer goods or equipment to be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135p
has part: 135P(1) Judge may permit consumer goods or equipment to be
has part: 135P(2) Judge may permit consumer goods or equipment to be
has part: 135P(3) Judge may permit consumer goods or equipment to be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.309

135P(1) Judge may permit consumer goods or equipment to be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135p-ss-1
part of: 135P Judge may permit consumer goods or equipment to be
note: Inspector may retain consumer goods/equipment for a further period of up to 60 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.309
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135p-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: Inspector has seized consumer goods/equipment
conclusion text: Inspector may retain for a further period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135P(2) Judge may permit consumer goods or equipment to be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135p-ss-2
part of: 135P Judge may permit consumer goods or equipment to be
note: Judge may permit inspector to retain consumer goods or equipment for a further period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.309
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135p-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135p-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 135P(2) Judge may permit consumer goods or equipment to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by the judge.
premise text: Application made under subsection (1)
conclusion text: Inspector may retain consumer goods or equipment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135P(3) Judge may permit consumer goods or equipment to be
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135p-ss-3
part of: 135P Judge may permit consumer goods or equipment to be
note: Inspector must notify persons with interest in consumer goods or equipment before making application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.309
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135p-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135p-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 135P(3) Judge may permit consumer goods or equipment to be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Notification is a requirement.
premise text: Inspector must notify persons with interest.
conclusion text: Application cannot proceed without notification.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135Q Recovery of reasonable costs of seizing consumer goods or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135q
note: Inspector must recover reasonable costs of seizing consumer goods or equipment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.309
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135q-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135q-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135q-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135Q Recovery of reasonable costs of seizing consumer goods or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the inspector.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

304 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-304
note: Person liable to pay costs incurred by inspector
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.310
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-304-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-304-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-304-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-304-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-304-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-304-logic-diffusion-5

act-sch-2-sec-304-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Liability for costs
premise text: (a) the person from whom the consumer goods were seized...
conclusion text: ...is liable to pay an amount equal to the costs reasonably incurred by the inspector in seizing the consumer goods or equipment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-304-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Payment of costs as debt
premise text: (2) An amount payable by a person under subsection (1):...
conclusion text: ...is a debt due by the person to the Commonwealth;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-304-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap of liability and payment
premise text: (2) An amount payable by a person under subsection (1):...
conclusion text: ...may be recovered by action in a court of competent jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-304-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of liability on payment
premise text: (2) An amount payable by a person under subsection (1):...
conclusion text: ...is a debt due by the person to the Commonwealth;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-304-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of liability through ownership
premise text: (b) if that person is not entitled to possess the consumer goods or equipment—the owner of the consumer goods or equipment;
conclusion text: ...is liable to pay an amount equal to the costs reasonably incurred by the inspector in seizing the consumer goods or equipment.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

135R Destruction or disposal of seized consumer goods or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135r
has part: 135R(1) Destruction or disposal of seized consumer goods or
has part: 135R(2) Destruction or disposal of seized consumer goods or
has part: 135R(3) Destruction or disposal of seized consumer goods or
has part: 135R(4) Destruction or disposal of seized consumer goods or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.310

135R(1) Destruction or disposal of seized consumer goods or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135r-ss-1
part of: 135R Destruction or disposal of seized consumer goods or
note: Destroy or dispose of seized consumer goods if unable to locate person or they refuse possession.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.310
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of destruction/disposal without court order.
premise text: (a) an inspector seizes consumer goods...
conclusion text: ...a court may, on the application of the inspector...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for destruction/disposal of seized goods.
premise text: (i) the inspector cannot, despite making reasonable efforts...
conclusion text: ...a court may, on the application of the inspector...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Justification for destruction/disposal by inspector.
premise text: (b) apart from this section, the inspector is required to return the consumer goods or equipment...
conclusion text: ...the inspector cannot, despite making reasonable efforts...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagation of destruction/disposal order.
premise text: (ii) the person has refused to take possession of the consumer goods or equipment;
conclusion text: ...a court may, on the application of the inspector...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Decision
logic summary: Decision-making by inspector.
premise text: (c) either:...
conclusion text: ...the inspector is required to return the consumer goods or equipment...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135R(2) Destruction or disposal of seized consumer goods or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135r-ss-2
part of: 135R Destruction or disposal of seized consumer goods or
note: Inform person before making application under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.310
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

135R(3) Destruction or disposal of seized consumer goods or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135r-ss-3
part of: 135R Destruction or disposal of seized consumer goods or
note: Person liable to pay costs for destroying or disposing of seized consumer goods or equipment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.310
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135R(3) Destruction or disposal of seized consumer goods or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay costs
premise text: (3) If...
conclusion text: ...pay an amount equal to the costs...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval of liability
premise text: (3) If...(a) an order is made under subsection (1); and(b) subparagraph (1)(c)(ii) applies;
conclusion text: ...the person referred to in that subparagraph is liable...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: Implication of liability on costs
premise text: (3) If...(a) an order is made under subsection (1); and(b) subparagraph (1)(c)(ii) applies;
conclusion text: ...the person referred to in that subparagraph is liable...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of liability to costs
premise text: (3) If...(a) an order is made under subsection (1); and(b) subparagraph (1)(c)(ii) applies;
conclusion text: ...the person referred to in that subparagraph is liable...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: classification
logic summary: Classification of persons liable for costs
premise text: (3) If...(a) an order is made under subsection (1); and(b) subparagraph (1)(c)(ii) applies;
conclusion text: ...the person referred to in that subparagraph is liable...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135R(4) Destruction or disposal of seized consumer goods or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135r-ss-4
part of: 135R Destruction or disposal of seized consumer goods or
note: Debt due by a person to the Commonwealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.310
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135R(4) Destruction or disposal of seized consumer goods or
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135r-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135S Embargo notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135s
has part: 135S(1) Embargo notices
has part: 135S(2) Embargo notices
has part: 135S(3) Embargo notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.311

135S(1) Embargo notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135s-ss-1
part of: 135S Embargo notices
note: Inspector must give embargo notice to occupier upon entering premises under a search warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.311
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135S(1) Embargo notices
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
premise text: Inspector enters premises under a search warrant
conclusion text: Inspector must give embargo notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135S(2) Embargo notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135s-ss-2
part of: 135S Embargo notices
note: Notice must be served on occupier or person in regular contact with occupier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.311
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 135S(2) Embargo notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits serving notice on occupier.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Notice can be served at any time before or after notice is given.
premise text: (a) by causing a copy of the notice to be served on the occupier;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Notice can be repeated if occupier cannot be located.
premise text: (b) if the occupier cannot be located after all reasonable steps have been taken to do so—
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Notice can be diffused to person in regular contact with occupier.
premise text: (i) causing a copy of the notice to be served on a person on the premises who is reasonably believed to be in regular contact with the occupier;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Incorporates
logic summary: Notice can be incorporated into premises.
premise text: (ii) causing a copy of the notice to be affixed to the premises, or to a thing on the premises, in a prominent position.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135S(3) Embargo notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135s-ss-3
part of: 135S Embargo notices
note: Prohibit supply, transfer, alteration, destruction, or interference with specified goods during a period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.311
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 135S(3) Embargo notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135s-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-306
has part: 306(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 306(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.312

306(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-306-ss-4
part of: 306 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Contract for prohibited goods is void despite other laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.312
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-306-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-306-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-306-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 306(4) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-306-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits contract for prohibited goods
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

306(5) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-306-ss-5
part of: 306 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Supplier must return or refund consideration to consumer who acquired goods in contravention of embargo notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.312
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-306-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-306-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-306-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Supplier must not supply goods in contravention of embargo notice.
premise text: Embargo notice issued
conclusion text: Goods supplied in contravention of embargo notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135T Embargo period for embargo notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135t
has part: 135T(1) Embargo period for embargo notices
has part: 135T(2) Embargo period for embargo notices
has part: 135T(3) Embargo period for embargo notices
has part: 135T(4) Embargo period for embargo notices
has part: 135T(5) Embargo period for embargo notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.312

135T(1) Embargo period for embargo notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135t-ss-1
part of: 135T Embargo period for embargo notices
note: Maximum embargo period for an embargo notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.312
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3

act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135T(1) Embargo period for embargo notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Maximum duration
premise text: (1) Subject to this section, the embargo period for an embargo notice must not be longer than:
conclusion text: 24 hours or 28 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: <=
logic summary: Maximum duration
premise text: (1) Subject to this section, the embargo period for an embargo notice must not be longer than:
conclusion text: 24 hours or 28 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: (1) Subject to this section, the embargo period for an embargo notice must not be longer than:
conclusion text: 24 hours or 28 days
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135T(2) Embargo period for embargo notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135t-ss-2
part of: 135T Embargo period for embargo notices
note: Extension of embargo period upon request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.312
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135T(2) Embargo period for embargo notices
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Request for extension is obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135T(3) Embargo period for embargo notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135t-ss-3
part of: 135T Embargo period for embargo notices
note: Inspector must notify occupier before making application under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.312
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135T(3) Embargo period for embargo notices
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135T(4) Embargo period for embargo notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135t-ss-4
part of: 135T Embargo period for embargo notices
note: Entitlement to be heard in relation to the application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.312
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-4-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 135T(4) Embargo period for embargo notices
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Has a right
conclusion text: The occupier of the premises has a right to be heard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135T(5) Embargo period for embargo notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135t-ss-5
part of: 135T Embargo period for embargo notices
note: Judge may extend embargo period under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.312
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135T(5) Embargo period for embargo notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to extend embargo period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135t-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between embargo period and extension
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

135U Multiple embargo notices for the same consumer goods or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135u
note: Cannot give embargo notice for same consumer goods or product related services if earlier notice has not ended at least 5 days ago.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.313
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135u-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135u-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135u-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Earlier embargo notice has not ended at least 5 days ago
conclusion text: Cannot give embargo notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135V Power of inspectors to secure consumer goods
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135v
note: Inspection may secure consumer goods during embargo period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.313
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135v-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135v-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135v-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits securing consumer goods without reasonable grounds.
premise text: Inspector believes it is necessary to secure consumer goods.
conclusion text: Inspection may not secure consumer goods.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135W Power of inspectors to secure equipment used to supply
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135w
note: Inspectors may take actions to secure equipment during an embargo period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.313
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135w-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135w-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135w-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 135W Power of inspectors to secure equipment used to supply
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135w-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to take actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

308 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-308
note: Prohibition on locking up equipment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.314
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-308-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-308-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-308-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits locking up equipment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135X Consent to supply etc. embargoed consumer goods etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135x
has part: 135X(1) Consent to supply etc. embargoed consumer goods etc.
has part: 135X(2) Consent to supply etc. embargoed consumer goods etc.
has part: 135X(3) Consent to supply etc. embargoed consumer goods etc.
has part: 135X(4) Consent to supply etc. embargoed consumer goods etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.314

135X(1) Consent to supply etc. embargoed consumer goods etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135x-ss-1
part of: 135X Consent to supply etc. embargoed consumer goods etc.
note: Request for consent to supply, transfer, alter, destroy, or interfere with embargoed consumer goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.314
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135x-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: Request for consent
conclusion text: Consent granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135X(2) Consent to supply etc. embargoed consumer goods etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135x-ss-2
part of: 135X Consent to supply etc. embargoed consumer goods etc.
note: Request for consent to supply embargoed consumer goods services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.314
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135x-ss-2-norm

act-sch-2-sec-135x-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 135X(2) Consent to supply etc. embargoed consumer goods etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

135X(3) Consent to supply etc. embargoed consumer goods etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135x-ss-3
part of: 135X Consent to supply etc. embargoed consumer goods etc.
note: Request for consent may be given in writing by the Commonwealth Minister, Chairperson or any inspector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.314
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135x-ss-3-norm

act-sch-2-sec-135x-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 135X(3) Consent to supply etc. embargoed consumer goods etc.
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

135X(4) Consent to supply etc. embargoed consumer goods etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135x-ss-4
part of: 135X Consent to supply etc. embargoed consumer goods etc.
note: Consent given under subsection (3) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.314
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135x-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135x-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135x-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (4) A consent given under subsection (3)
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135Y Compliance with embargo notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135y
has part: 135Y(1) Compliance with embargo notices
has part: 135Y(2) Compliance with embargo notices
has part: 135Y(3) Compliance with embargo notices
has part: 135Y(4) Compliance with embargo notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.314

135Y(1) Compliance with embargo notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135y-ss-1
part of: 135Y Compliance with embargo notices
note: Knowingly doing an act contrary to an embargo notice is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.314
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 135Y(1) Compliance with embargo notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of knowingly doing an act contrary to an embargo notice.
premise text: The person knows that an embargo notice has been given.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they do such an act or omit to do it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The provision overlaps with other provisions that relate to compliance with embargo notices.
premise text: This provision is part of section 135Y(1) of the Act.
conclusion text: This provision overlaps with other provisions related to compliance with embargo notices.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The provision repeats a similar provision in another part of the Act.
premise text: This provision is part of section 135Y(1) of the Act.
conclusion text: This provision repeats a similar provision in another part of the Act.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The provision diffuses information about compliance with embargo notices.
premise text: This provision is part of section 135Y(1) of the Act.
conclusion text: This provision diffuses information about compliance with embargo notices.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The provision recognizes the importance of complying with embargo notices.
premise text: This provision is part of section 135Y(1) of the Act.
conclusion text: This provision recognizes the importance of complying with embargo notices.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135Y(2) Compliance with embargo notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135y-ss-2
part of: 135Y Compliance with embargo notices
note: Knowingly causing another person to act contrary to an embargo notice is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.314
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 135Y(2) Compliance with embargo notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Knowingly causing another person to act contrary to an embargo notice.
conclusion text: An offence is committed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135Y(3) Compliance with embargo notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135y-ss-3
part of: 135Y Compliance with embargo notices
note: Exemptions from embargo notice requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.314
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows actions under certain conditions
premise text: Section 135X consent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135Y(4) Compliance with embargo notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135y-ss-4
part of: 135Y Compliance with embargo notices
note: Compliance with embargo notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.314
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135Y(4) Compliance with embargo notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135y-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135Z Issue of search warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135z
has part: 135Z(1) Issue of search warrants
has part: 135Z(2) Issue of search warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.315

135Z(1) Issue of search warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135z-ss-1
part of: 135Z Issue of search warrants
note: Inspector must apply to a judge for a warrant in relation to premises.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.315
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135z-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-135z-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: Inspector must apply to a judge for a warrant.
conclusion text: Warrant issued if application is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135Z(2) Issue of search warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135z-ss-2
part of: 135Z Issue of search warrants
note: Affidavit and further information required for search warrant issuance.
description: Affidavit, additional information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.315
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135z-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135z-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135z-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135z-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-135z-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

act-sch-2-sec-135z-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 135Z(2) Issue of search warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135z-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires affidavit and further information
premise text: Application must provide affidavit and additional information
conclusion text: Warrant issuance is contingent on these requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135z-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between application and warrant issuance must be specified
premise text: Application must specify temporal interval for warrant issuance
conclusion text: Warrant issuance is contingent on this temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135z-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered
logic summary: Temporal order between application and warrant issuance must be specified
premise text: Application must specify temporal order for warrant issuance
conclusion text: Warrant issuance is contingent on this temporal order
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135z-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
logic summary: Information about warrant issuance must be disseminated to relevant parties
premise text: Application must provide information about warrant issuance
conclusion text: Warrant issuance is contingent on this dissemination
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-135z-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must
logic summary: Artificial intelligence system must be used to process application and warrant issuance
premise text: Application must use AI system for warrant issuance
conclusion text: Warrant issuance is contingent on this AI usage
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

310 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-310
note: Warrant must specify purpose, premises, and inspectors.
description: (a) the purpose for which the warrant is issued; (b) the premises to which the warrant relates; (c) that the warrant is issued under this section; (d) one or more inspectors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.316
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-310-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-310-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-310-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-310-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-310-logic-deontic-4

act-sch-2-sec-310-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 310 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-310-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory provision
premise text: (a) the purpose for which the warrant is issued; (b) the premises to which the warrant relates; (c) that the warrant is issued under this section; (d) one or more inspectors
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-310-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory provision with temporal interval
premise text: (g) specify a day (which must not be more than 7 days after the day the warrant is issued)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-310-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory provision with temporal interval
premise text: (g) specify a day (which must not be more than 7 days after the day the warrant is issued)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-310-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory provision with conditional clause
premise text: (f) state whether the entry is authorised to be made at any time of the day or night, or during specified hours of the day or night
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136 Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-4
has part: 136(1) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
has part: 136(2) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
has part: 136(3) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
has part: 136(4) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
has part: 136(5) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
has part: 136(6) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
has part: 136(7) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
has part: 136(8) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.316

136(1) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-1
part of: 136 Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
note: Inspection may be done by telephone, fax or other electronic means under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.316
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-1-logic-cogai-6

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows inspection by telephone, fax or other electronic means.
premise text: Inspector believes on reasonable grounds that delay would frustrate warrant execution.
conclusion text: (1) An inspector may apply to a judge...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the type of inspection warrant.
premise text: Section 135Z in relation to premises
conclusion text: relation to premises if the inspector believes on reasonable grounds...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for inspection warrant application.
premise text: Section 135Z in relation to premises
conclusion text: if the inspector believes on reasonable grounds that the delay...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for inspection warrant application.
premise text: Inspector applies to judge by telephone, fax or other electronic means
conclusion text: if the inspector believes on reasonable grounds that delay would frustrate warrant execution.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses the scope of inspection warrant application.
premise text: Inspector applies to judge by telephone, fax or other electronic means
conclusion text: if the inspector believes on reasonable grounds that delay would frustrate warrant execution.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Cognitive Agent
logic summary: Identifies a cognitive agent for inspection warrant application.
premise text: Inspector applies to judge by telephone, fax or other electronic means
conclusion text: if the inspector believes on reasonable grounds that delay would frustrate warrant execution.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(2) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-2
part of: 136 Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
note: Judge may require voice communication during search warrant affidavit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.316
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(2) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(3) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-3
part of: 136 Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
note: Inspector must prepare affidavit before applying for warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.316
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-3-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(3) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must prepare affidavit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(4) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-4
part of: 136 Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
note: Inspector may apply for warrant before affidavit is sworn.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.316
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-4-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(5) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-5
part of: 136 Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
note: Judge must complete and sign warrant if reasonable grounds exist.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.316
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-5-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(5) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to complete and sign warrant
premise text: Reasonable grounds exist
conclusion text: Warrant must be completed and signed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(6) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-6
part of: 136 Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
note: Inform inspector of warrant terms and signing date
description: a, b
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.316
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-6-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform inspector
premise text: judge completes and signs warrant
conclusion text: inform inspector of terms and signing date
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasValue
logic summary: Informing inspector is a required action
premise text: terms of warrant and signing date are specified
conclusion text: inform inspector of terms and signing date
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(7) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-7
part of: 136 Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
note: Inspector must complete a form of warrant stating the judge's name and signing date.
description: Completed form of warrant to be given to judge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.316
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-7-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to complete a form of warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(8) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-8
part of: 136 Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
note: Inspector must send warrant form and affidavit to judge within a certain timeframe.
description: inspector's report, affidavit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.316
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-8-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(8) Search warrants by telephone, fax etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-136-4-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

312 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-312
has part: 312(9) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 312(10) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
has part: 312(11) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.318

312(9) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-312-ss-9
part of: 312 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Judge must attach warrant to documents
description: warrant signed by the judge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.318
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-9-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 312(9) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to attach warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

312(10) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-312-ss-10
part of: 312 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Authority for powers granted by warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.318
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-10-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-10-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-10-logic-ltl-3
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-10-logic-deontic-4
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-10-logic-deontic-5

act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 312(10) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has-authority
logic summary: Has authority to grant powers
premise text: (10) A form of warrant duly completed under subsection (7) is authority for the same powers as are authorised by the warrant signed by the judge.
conclusion text: The warrant has authority to grant powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-10-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Authority granted during warrant signing
premise text: (10) A form of warrant duly completed under subsection (7) is authority for the same powers as are authorised by the warrant signed by the judge.
conclusion text: The authority is granted during the warrant signing.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-10-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Authority granted during warrant signing
premise text: (10) A form of warrant duly completed under subsection (7) is authority for the same powers as are authorised by the warrant signed by the judge.
conclusion text: The authority is granted during the warrant signing.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-10-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has-authority-to
logic summary: Has authority to grant powers
premise text: (10) A form of warrant duly completed under subsection (7) is authority for the same powers as are authorised by the warrant signed by the judge.
conclusion text: The warrant has authority to grant powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-10-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is-authorised-by
logic summary: Is authorised by the warrant
premise text: (10) A form of warrant duly completed under subsection (7) is authority for the same powers as are authorised by the warrant signed by the judge.
conclusion text: The warrant is authorised by the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

312(11) Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-312-ss-11
part of: 312 Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2)
note: Court must assume exercise of power was not authorised without warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.318
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-11-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-11-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-312-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: Exercise of power not authorised.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136A Offence relating to warrants by telephone, fax etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136a
note: Inspection commits an offence if certain actions are taken with warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.318
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136a-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136a-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-136a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Inspection commits an offence.
premise text: Inspector takes certain actions with warrants.
conclusion text: Offence committed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136B Powers of judges
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136b
has part: 136B(1) Powers of judges
has part: act-sch-2-sec-136b-ss-2
has part: act-sch-2-sec-136b-ss-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.319

136B(1) Powers of judges
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136b-ss-1
part of: 136B Powers of judges
note: A power conferred on a judge must be accepted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: act.pdf, p.319
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136b-ss-1-norm
asserts: act-sch-2-sec-136b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

act-sch-2-sec-136b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: A power conferred on a judge is an obligation.
conclusion text: The judge must accept the power.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed