1 Short title [see Note 1]
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Starts on the day the Act receives Royal Assent
modality: Deontic
operator: begins

1 After subsection 58(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.9
note: Conditional commencement
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-3
schema version: 2

1 April, 1 July or 1 October.
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.64
note: Definitions for regulated service, retail business unit, and wholesale/network business unit.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-4
schema version: 2

10 Section 10
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.7
note: Schedule 1 section
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Section 7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Defines final migration plan
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-2
schema version: 2

10 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-3
schema version: 2

100 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.104
curation status: Proposed
has part: 100(2A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 100(2B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-100
schema version: 2

100 After subclause 33(4) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: Amendments to Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-100-2
schema version: 2

100(2A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.104
note: No obligation imposed under certain conditions
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-100-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 100 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

100(2B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.104
note: Right to request contingent provisions come into force if condition precedent is satisfied.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 100 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the condition precedent is satisfied, the contingent provisions come into force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the request and the fulfillment of the contingent provisions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: The request is made at a time when the condition precedent has not been satisfied.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the condition precedent is satisfied, the contingent provisions come into force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Describes the logical connection between the request and the fulfillment of the contingent provisions.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Inference
premise text: The person requests that the contingent provisions come into force if the condition precedent is satisfied.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the condition precedent is satisfied, the contingent provisions come into force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The state has a contractual obligation to fulfill contingent provisions.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the condition precedent is satisfied, the contingent provisions come into force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the spread of information about the request and its implications.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: The person requests that the contingent provisions come into force if the condition precedent is satisfied.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the condition precedent is satisfied, the contingent provisions come into force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Describes the implication of the request on the contract.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: The person requests that the contingent provisions come into force if the condition precedent is satisfied.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 100(2B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

101 Subclause 33(5) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: Omit ACMA and substitute ACCC.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-101-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-101-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-101
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-101-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of ACMA
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

102 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: Consultation with ACMA before issuing a certificate
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-102
schema version: 2

102 At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.106
curation status: Proposed
has part: 102(6) At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
has part: 102(7) At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
has part: 102(8) At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-102-2
schema version: 2

102(6) At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: Exemption from obligation under certain conditions
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 102 At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption applies during certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between exemptions and obligations
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subclause (1) is classified as an exemption from obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of exemptions as obligations
modality: CogAI
operator: classification
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation under certain conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption applies if certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional relationship between exemptions and obligations
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-then
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption applies until certain conditions are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between exemptions and obligations
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...

102(7) At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: If a condition precedent has not been satisfied, the person may have a right under the contingent provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 102 At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Right under contingent provisions
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Possibility of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Condition precedent not satisfied

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 102(7) At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1

102(8) At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.106
note: NBN corporation is not the operator of a telecommunications transmission tower under an agreement with Telstra.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 102 At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the NBN corporation is taken not to be the operator of the telecommunications transmission tower.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The agreement with Telstra overlaps with the NBN corporation's access to a telecommunications transmission tower.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (8) For the purposes of subclause (1), if: (a) there is an agreement in force between Telstra and an NBN corporation; and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the NBN corporation is taken not to be the operator of the telecommunications transmission tower.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The CogAI system recognizes that the agreement with Telstra affects the operation of a telecommunications transmission tower.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (8) For the purposes of subclause (1), if: (a) there is an agreement in force between Telstra and an NBN corporation; and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the NBN corporation is taken not to be the operator of the telecommunications transmission tower.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to not be the operator of a telecommunications transmission tower.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (8) For the purposes of subclause (1), if: (a) there is an agreement in force between Telstra and an NBN corporation; and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the NBN corporation is taken not to be the operator of the telecommunications transmission tower.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The agreement with Telstra diffuses responsibility for the operation of a telecommunications transmission tower.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (8) For the purposes of subclause (1), if: (a) there is an agreement in force between Telstra and an NBN corporation; and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the NBN corporation is taken not to be the operator of the telecommunications transmission tower.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The agreement with Telstra recurrently affects the NBN corporation's access to a telecommunications transmission tower.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (8) For the purposes of subclause (1), if: (a) there is an agreement in force between Telstra and an NBN corporation; and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for the consultation is between the issuance of the certificate and the consultation itself.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The consultation with ACMA must occur before issuing a certificate.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consultation with ACMA implies a higher likelihood of certification.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of consultation on certification process
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: If the ACCC consults with ACMA, then it is more likely that a certificate will be issued.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consultation with ACMA is necessary for the ACCC to fulfill its duty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Requiring consultation as a condition for certification
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
premise text: The consultation with ACMA is required as a condition for the ACCC to issue a certificate.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The consultation with ACMA is obligatory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult ACMA
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The ACCC must consult the ACMA before issuing a certificate.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Other parties must also consult with ACMA before issuing a certificate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of obligation to other parties
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
premise text: The obligation to consult ACMA spreads to other parties involved in the certification process.

103 Subclause 34(3) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.107
note: Omit specific phrase from Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-103-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-103-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-103
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-103-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the ACMA stating a certain phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

104 Subclause 34(4) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.107
note: Omit ACMA and substitute ACCC.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-104
schema version: 2

104 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.108
curation status: Proposed
has part: 104(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 104(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-104-2
schema version: 2

104(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.108
note: Right to request contract provision to come into force if condition precedent is satisfied.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 104 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the possibility that the condition precedent could become satisfied;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between request and condition precedent.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (7) If, at the time the request was made:...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person would have a right under the contingent provisions;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Request to modify contract provision implies right to do so.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (7) If, at the time the request was made:...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person would have a right under the contingent provisions;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to request contract provision to come into force if condition precedent is satisfied.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (7) If, at the time the request was made:...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person had the right under the contingent provisions;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Request to modify contract provision is permitted.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (7) If, at the time the request was made:...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the contingent provisions would come into force;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between request and condition precedent.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (7) If, at the time the request was made:...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 104(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

104(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.108
note: NBN corporation is prohibited from being the occupier or controller of the site.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 104 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: NBN corporation's access to the site overlaps with Telstra's right to use the site.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: NBN corporation's access to the site overlaps with Telstra's right to use the site.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Telstra has a right to use the site.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: NBN corporation's access to the site is classified as prohibited by CogAI.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies NBN corporation's access to the site as prohibited by CogAI.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
premise text: Telstra has a right to use the site.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: NBN corporation is prohibited from occupying or controlling the site.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits NBN corporation from occupying or controlling the site.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: NBN corporation has a right to use the site.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: NBN corporation's access to the site is diffused through Telstra's right to use the site.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses NBN corporation's access to the site through Telstra's right to use the site.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Telstra has a right to use the site.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: NBN corporation's access to the site is recurring and overlaps with Telstra's right to use the site.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: NBN corporation's access to the site is recurring and overlaps with Telstra's right to use the site.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: Telstra has a right to use the site.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of ACMA
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

105 After subclause 34(4) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.107
note: Consult ACMA before issuing a certificate
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-105
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult ACMA
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

105B Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
curation status: Proposed
has part: 105B(1) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
has part: 105B(2) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
has part: 105B(3) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-105b
schema version: 2

105B(1) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
note: Telstra must monitor and report compliance with a final functional separation undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-105b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 105B Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to monitor and report compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105B(1) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional

105B(2) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
note: The ACCC must give a report to the Minister after the end of the financial year.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-105b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 105B Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105B(2) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional

105B(3) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
note: Minister must table a report in each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-105b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 105B Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must perform action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105B(3) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional

105C Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
curation status: Proposed
has part: 105C(1) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
has part: 105C(2) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
has part: 105C(3) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-105c
schema version: 2

105C(1) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
type: Concept
description: Report on breaches
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
note: Telstra must report breaches of an undertaking to the Minister.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-105c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 105C Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must report breaches
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105C(1) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about

105C(2) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
note: The ACCC must give a report to the Minister after the end of the financial year.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-105c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 105C Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105C(2) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about

105C(3) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
note: Minister must table a report in each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-105c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 105C Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to table a report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 105C(3) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about

106 Subclause 34(5) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.107
note: Omit ACMA and substitute ACCC.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-106-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-106
schema version: 2

106 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.110
note: The NBN corporation is taken to not be the operator of an eligible underground facility under certain agreements.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-106-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-106-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of ACMA
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

107 At the end of clause 34 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.107
note: Exemption from obligation under certain conditions
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-107
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if a final migration plan is in force—requiring Telstra to engage in conduct in connection with matters covered by the final migration plan.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for exemptions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if a final migration plan is in force—requiring Telstra to engage in conduct in connection with matters covered by the final migration plan.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for exemptions
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...(a) depriving any person of a right under a contract that was in force at the time the request was made;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts Telstra from obligations under specific conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if a final migration plan is in force—requiring Telstra to engage in conduct in connection with matters covered by the final migration plan.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for exemptions
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if a final migration plan is in force—requiring Telstra to engage in conduct in connection with matters covered by the final migration plan.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for exemptions
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...

108 Subclause 35(3) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.108
note: Omit specific phrase from ACMA statement.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-108-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-108
schema version: 2

108 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-108-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-108-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specific phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

109 Subclause 35(4) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.109
note: Substitute ACCC for ACMA
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-109-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-109-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-109
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-109-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to substitute ACCC for ACMA
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.7
note: Schedule 1 section
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
schema version: 2

11 Section 7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Defines hybrid fibre-coaxial network
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-11-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: coaxial cable connections from nodes to premises of end-users supplement optical fibre connections
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between optical fibre and coaxial cable connections
modality: AllenInterval
operator: supplements
premise text: optical fibre connects nodes

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a class of telecommunications networks
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: hybrid fibre-coaxial network is a telecommunications network

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Section 7

110 After subclause 35(4) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.109
note: Consult ACMA before issuing a certificate
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-110
schema version: 2

110 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: The Commission must consider a relevant matter when determining the expiry date of a declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-110-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commission must consider a relevant matter.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must be consulted before issuing a certificate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consultation is a prerequisite for issuing a certificate
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
premise text: Issuing a certificate requires consultation with ACMA

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must be consulted before issuing a certificate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Consultation is a necessary condition for issuing a certificate
modality: Argumentation
operator: MUST
premise text: Issuing a certificate requires consultation with ACMA

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must be consulted before issuing a certificate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Consultation is a necessary condition for issuing a certificate
modality: CogAI
operator: MUST
premise text: Issuing a certificate requires consultation with ACMA

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must be consulted before issuing a certificate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult ACMA
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ACCC must issue a certificate

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACMA must be consulted before issuing a certificate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Consultation is a necessary condition for issuing a certificate
modality: Diffusion
operator: MUST
premise text: Issuing a certificate requires consultation with ACMA

111 Subclause 35(5) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.109
note: Omit ACMA and substitute ACCC.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-111-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-111
schema version: 2

112 At the end of clause 35 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.109
curation status: Proposed
has part: 112(6) At the end of clause 35 of Schedule 1
has part: 112(7) At the end of clause 35 of Schedule 1
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-112
schema version: 2

112 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-112-2
schema version: 2

112(6) At the end of clause 35 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.109
note: Exemption from obligation under certain conditions
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-112-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 112 At the end of clause 35 of Schedule 1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...

112(7) At the end of clause 35 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.109
note: Right to claim contingent provisions if condition precedent is satisfied
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-112-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 112 At the end of clause 35 of Schedule 1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person would have a right under the contingent provisions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Condition precedent must be satisfied before contingent provisions take effect
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: If the condition precedent had been satisfied

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person would have a right under the contingent provisions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Condition precedent implies contingent provisions taking effect
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
premise text: Assuming that the condition precedent had been satisfied

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person would have a right under the contingent provisions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Right to claim contingent provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: right
premise text: Assuming the condition precedent had been satisfied

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person would have a right under the contingent provisions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Condition precedent is necessary and sufficient for contingent provisions to take effect
modality: Diffusion
operator: iff
premise text: If the condition precedent had been satisfied

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person would have a right under the contingent provisions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Condition precedent must be met for contingent provisions to take effect
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: Assuming that the condition precedent had been satisfied

113 At the end of clause 36 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.110
curation status: Proposed
has part: 113(7) At the end of clause 36 of Schedule 1
has part: 113(8) At the end of clause 36 of Schedule 1
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-113
schema version: 2

113(7) At the end of clause 36 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.110
note: Prevent arbitrators from making determinations that would prevent Telstra from complying with certain undertakings.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-113-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 113 At the end of clause 36 of Schedule 1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identifies the temporal interval during which arbitrators must not make determinations that would prevent Telstra from complying with undertakings.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (7) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Identifies the argument that prohibits making determinations that would prevent Telstra from complying with undertakings.
modality: Argumentation
operator: not
premise text: (7) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making determinations that would prevent Telstra from complying with undertakings.
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (7) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Identifies the temporal interval during which arbitrators must not make determinations that would prevent Telstra from complying with undertakings.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (7) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Identifies the temporal interval during which arbitrators must not make determinations that would prevent Telstra from complying with undertakings.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (7) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...

113(8) At the end of clause 36 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.110
note: No effect on agreement in writing
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-113-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 113 At the end of clause 36 of Schedule 1

114 Section 152AA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.110
note: Carrier must not prevent or hinder standard access obligation.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-114
schema version: 2

114 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-114-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision overlaps with the Allen interval of 'If agreement cannot be reached, but no access undertaking is in operation'.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Section 152AA

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Preventing or hindering a standard access obligation is prohibited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commission may conduct an arbitration of a dispute about access to declared services.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: A carrier must not prevent or hinder the fulfilment of a standard access obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 114 Section 152AA

114A Wholesale carriage service and wholesale customer
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.193
note: Carriage service provider must supply carriage service to another provider
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-114a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 114A Wholesale carriage service and wholesale customer

115 Section 152AC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Definition of access agreement
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-115-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-115-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-115
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-115-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: access agreement has the meaning given by section 152BE.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

116 Section 152AC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Definition of access determination
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-116-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-116
schema version: 2

116 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Commission may make binding rules of conduct if urgent need exists.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-116-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-116-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-116-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-116-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Binding rules of conduct may be made
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Commission considers urgent need

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-116-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 116 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

117 Section 152AC (definition of access undertaking)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Omit “an ordinary access undertaking or”.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117
schema version: 2

117B Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.194
curation status: Proposed
has part: 117B(1) Performance benchmarks
has part: 117B(2) Performance benchmarks
has part: 117B(3) Performance benchmarks
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117b
schema version: 2

117B(1) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.194
note: The Minister may set minimum benchmarks for carriage service providers.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 117B Performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to set benchmarks
modality: Deontic
operator: May

117B(2) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.194
note: Instrument may be of general application or limited as provided in the instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117b-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 117B Performance benchmarks

117B(3) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.194
note: Does not limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 by implication.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 117B Performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: DoesNotImply
premise text: Subsection (2)

117C Compliance with performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.195
curation status: Proposed
has part: 117C(1) Compliance with performance benchmarks
has part: 117C(2) Compliance with performance benchmarks
has part: 117C(3) Compliance with performance benchmarks
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117c
schema version: 2

117C(1) Compliance with performance benchmarks
type: Concept
description: Performance
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.195
note: Must meet or exceed minimum benchmark
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 117C Compliance with performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to meet performance benchmarks
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

117C(2) Compliance with performance benchmarks
type: Concept
description: Performance
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.195
note: Must meet or exceed a minimum benchmark set by the instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 117C Compliance with performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must meet or exceed a minimum benchmark.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 117C(2) Compliance with performance benchmarks

117C(3) Compliance with performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.195
note: Exempts first provider from contravening a standard if another carriage service provider is responsible for the contravention.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 117C Compliance with performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The benchmark period overlaps with the standard enforcement period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Indicates overlap between two temporal intervals: the benchmark period and the standard enforcement period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) For the purposes of determining whether the first provider has met or exceeded a minimum benchmark set by the instrument...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first provider's act is a contravention if it meets the definition of 'standard'
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Indicates inference from the definition of 'standard' to the meaning of 'contravention'
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (a) the first provider has contravened a standard in force under section 115;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first provider is taken not to have contravened the standard.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts first provider from obligation to comply with standard.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: (3) For the purposes of determining whether the first provider has met or exceeded a minimum benchmark set by the instrument...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The first provider's responsibility is diffused to another provider.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Indicates diffusion of responsibility from one provider to another.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (b) the contravention is wholly or partly attributable to one or more acts or omissions of another carriage service provider;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The contravention and exemption are part of a recurring pattern.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Indicates recurring trace between two events: the contravention and the exemption.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (3) For the purposes of determining whether the first provider has met or exceeded a minimum benchmark set by the instrument...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 117C(3) Compliance with performance benchmarks

117D Performance standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.195
curation status: Proposed
has part: 117D(1) Performance standards
has part: 117D(2) Performance standards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117d
schema version: 2

117D(1) Performance standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.195
note: Minister may make standards for wholesale carriage services
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 117D Performance standards

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with standards
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 117D(1) Performance standards

117D(2) Performance standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.195
note: A standard under this section may be of general application or may be limited as provided in the standard.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 117D Performance standards

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 117D(2) Performance standards

117E Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
curation status: Proposed
has part: 117E(1) Performance benchmarks
has part: 117E(2) Performance benchmarks
has part: 117E(3) Performance benchmarks
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117e
schema version: 2

117E(1) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
note: Minister may set minimum benchmarks for carriage service providers
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 117E Performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to set benchmarks
modality: Deontic
operator: May

117E(2) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
note: Instrument may be of general application or limited as provided in the instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117e-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 117E Performance benchmarks

117E(3) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
note: Does not limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117e-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 117E Performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3A)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative implication
modality: Deontic
operator: DoesNotImply
premise text: (2)

117F Compliance with performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
curation status: Proposed
has part: 117F(1) Compliance with performance benchmarks
has part: 117F(2) Compliance with performance benchmarks
has part: 117F(3) Compliance with performance benchmarks
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117f
schema version: 2

117F(1) Compliance with performance benchmarks
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
note: Provider must meet or exceed minimum benchmark
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 117F Compliance with performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 117F(1) Compliance with performance benchmarks

117F(2) Compliance with performance benchmarks
type: Concept
description: Performance
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
note: Must meet or exceed a minimum benchmark set by the instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 117F Compliance with performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must meet or exceed a minimum benchmark.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 117F(2) Compliance with performance benchmarks

117F(3) Compliance with performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
note: Exempts first provider from contravening standard if another provider is partly responsible.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-117f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 117F Compliance with performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: First provider is not considered to have contravened the standard.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts first provider from contravening standard.
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: First provider has contravened a standard.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 117F(3) Compliance with performance benchmarks

118 Section 152AC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Defines binding rules of conduct
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-118
schema version: 2

118 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.122
curation status: Proposed
has part: 118(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 118(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 118(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 118(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 118(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 118(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 118(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-2
schema version: 2

118(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Commission must consider various factors when making an access determination. Prevents Commission from making access determinations with certain effects.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 118 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would have any of the following effects:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for access seeker's request.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) The Commission must not make an access determination that...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would have any of the following effects:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes Commission's authority.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (1) The Commission must not make an access determination that...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission has a duty to consider various factors.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would have any of the following effects:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents Commission from making access determinations with certain effects.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) The Commission must not make an access determination that...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...obtaining a sufficient amount of the service to be able to meet the service provider’s reasonably anticipated requirements,
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses access seeker's request for access.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (a) preventing a service provider who already has access to...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...obtaining a sufficient amount of the service to be able to meet the carrier’s or provider’s reasonably anticipated requirements,
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for carrier's or provider's requirements.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (b) preventing a carrier or carriage service provider from...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 118(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

118(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Commission may take into account characteristics, costs, revenues, and demand of other eligible services when making access determination.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 118 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission may take into account...
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 118(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

118(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Commission may consider other relevant matters
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 118 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 118(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

118(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Section does not apply to interim access determination.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 118 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

118(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Restrictions on access determinations
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 118 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

118(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Terms and conditions must include price or method of ascertaining price
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 118 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to include price or method of ascertaining price
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 118(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

118(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.122
note: Matters that the Commission must take into account when making access determinations.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 118 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...when making access determinations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission's obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Commission must take into account...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 118(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a concept
modality: Deontic
operator: defined

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Establishes a subclass relationship
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 118 Section 152AC

119 Section 152AC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Defines final access determination
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-119-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-119
schema version: 2

12 Section 12
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.7
note: Schedule 1 section
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
schema version: 2

12 Section 7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: Definition of internet carriage service
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: internet carriage service means a carriage service that enables end-users to access the internet.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the term
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(7A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(12) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3
schema version: 2

12(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Designated day for the purposes of this section
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

12(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Cannot be varied or revoked without a fresh instrument specifying a later day.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-11-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-11
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot be varied or revoked.
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

12(12) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Condition for ACCC to accept Telstra's undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-12
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

12(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Monitoring of compliance is required.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide monitoring of compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

12(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Monitoring and compliance systems
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: ACCQ cannot accept undertaking without monitoring and compliance systems
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Monitoring and compliance systems must be implemented at the same time as the undertaking
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (5) The ACCC must not accept an undertaking under this section unless the ACCC is satisfied that: (a) the undertaking provides for: (i) the ACCC to monitor Telstra’s compliance with the undertaking; and (ii) Telstra to have systems, procedures and processes that promote and facilitate the ACCC’s monitoring of Telstra’s compliance with the undertaking; and (b) the undertaking does so in an appropriate and effective manner.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot accept undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACCQ must monitor Telstra's compliance with the undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (5) The ACCC must not accept an undertaking under this section unless the ACCC is satisfied that: (a) the undertaking provides for: (i) the ACCC to monitor Telstra’s compliance with the undertaking; and (ii) Telstra to have systems, procedures and processes that promote and facilitate the ACCC’s monitoring of Telstra’s compliance with the undertaking; and (b) the undertaking does so in an appropriate and effective manner.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Monitoring and compliance systems must be implemented before the undertaking takes effect
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (5) The ACCC must not accept an undertaking under this section unless the ACCC is satisfied that: (a) the undertaking provides for: (i) the ACCC to monitor Telstra’s compliance with the undertaking; and (ii) Telstra to have systems, procedures and processes that promote and facilitate the ACCC’s monitoring of Telstra’s compliance with the undertaking; and (b) the undertaking does so in an appropriate and effective manner.

12(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: ACCC must consider certain matters when deciding to accept an undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An undertaking may be accepted only if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: National interest in structural reform is relevant
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The ACCC must have regard to the national interest...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An undertaking may be accepted only if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider matters
modality: Deontic
operator: ought
premise text: The ACCC must have regard to...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An undertaking may be accepted only if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACCC must consider matters relevant to an undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: The ACCC considers such other matters (if any) as the ACCC considers relevant

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An undertaking may be accepted only if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACCC discretion to consider additional matters
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: The ACCC must have regard to the matters set out in an instrument in force under subsection (7)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An undertaking may be accepted only if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Impact of structural reform on consumers and competition is relevant
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: The ACCC must have regard to the impact of that structural reform...

12(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: The Minister may set out matters for the purposes of paragraph (6)(a)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to set out matters
modality: Deontic
operator: May

12(7A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Notice and submissions
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Publish notice and invite submissions before making or varying an instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-7a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-7a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-7a
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-7a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

12(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Minister must take reasonable steps to ensure instrument comes into force as soon as practicable after section commencement.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to take reasonable steps.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

12(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
note: Prohibition on giving undertaking without instrument in force under subsection (7)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless an instrument is in force under subsection (7)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on giving undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: not entitled to
premise text: (9) Telstra is not entitled to give an undertaking under this section

120 Section 152AC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Defines fixed principles provision
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-120
schema version: 2

120 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.124
curation status: Proposed
has part: 120(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 120(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 120(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 120(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 120(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 120(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 120(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-2
schema version: 2

120(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: An access determination may include a provision that is specified to be a fixed principles provision.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 120 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion of a provision in an access determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

120(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Determination must provide a nominal termination date for fixed principles provision. Grounds for believing access seeker is not creditworthy or has repeated failures to comply with terms and conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 120 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with repeated failures by the access seeker to comply with terms and conditions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (2) Examples of grounds for believing as mentioned in subparagraph (1)(g)(i)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a nominal termination date.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits grounds for believing access seeker is not creditworthy or has repeated failures to comply with terms and conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) Examples of grounds for believing as mentioned in subparagraph (1)(g)(i)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Overlaps with repeated failures by the access seeker to comply with terms and conditions.
modality: LTL
operator: Overlap
premise text: (2) Examples of grounds for believing as mentioned in subparagraph (1)(g)(i)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 120(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

120(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Must not make an access determination inconsistent with standard access obligations.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 120 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making an access determination inconsistent with standard access obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

120(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Commission cannot make access determination that would require Telstra to engage in conduct covered by final migration plan.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 120 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of Commission's action
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

120(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Compensation for deprivation of pre-determination right
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 120 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Compensation obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 120(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

120(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: An access determination is of no effect to the extent it contravenes subsections (1), (3), or (3A).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 120 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

120(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.124
note: Definition of pre-determination right and protected contractual right.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 120 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of pre-determination right implies a duty to comply with access determination
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 120(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

120A Carriage service may be supplied on condition that the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
note: Customer waives protection and rights under this Part in relation to the carriage service.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-120a
schema version: 2

121 Section 152AC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Defines term for fixed principles
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-121-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-121
schema version: 2

122 Section 152AC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
note: Definition of interim access determination
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-122
schema version: 2

122 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.126
curation status: Proposed
has part: 122(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 122(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 122(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 122(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 122(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-122-2
schema version: 2

122(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.126
note: Access determination comes into force on specified day and ceases to be in force on expiry date.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies a future event
modality: Deontic
operator: comes-into-force

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies a past event
modality: Deontic
operator: ceases-to-be-in-force

122(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.126
note: Conditional commencement of determination
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

122(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.126
note: Replacement access determination must include fixed principles provision with same terms as previous access determination.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide fixed principles provision
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 122(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

122(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.126
note: Fixed principles provision ceases to be in force when access determination ceases.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

122(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: fixed principles provision
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.126
note: Access determination must not be varied to alter or remove fixed principles provision.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 122 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot be varied
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 122(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

122A Failure to meet or exceed a minimum benchmark is not an
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.198
note: Failure to meet or exceed a minimum benchmark is not an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-122a
schema version: 2

123 Section 152AC (definition of ordinary access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.113
note: Repeal definition of ordinary access
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-123-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-123
schema version: 2

124 Section 152AC (definition of telecommunications access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.113
note: Repeal definition of telecommunications access code
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-124
schema version: 2

124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
curation status: Proposed
has part: 124(2A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(4A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(9A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2
schema version: 2

124(2A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: Condition for commencement of section
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

124(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: Must not be earlier than the day on which the declaration came into force.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 124(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

124(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: Cannot be earlier than the day the service became a declared service
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specified day before the day the service became a declared service
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
premise text: (3A) If the declared service is covered by subsection 152AL(7), the specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the service became a declared service under that subsection.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: No CogAI logic applied
modality: CogAI
operator: none
premise text: (3A) If the declared service is covered by subsection 152AL(7), the specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the service became a declared service under that subsection.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot be earlier than the specified day
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (3A) If the declared service is covered by subsection 152AL(7), the specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the service became a declared service under that subsection.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: No diffusion logic applied
modality: Diffusion
operator: none
premise text: (3A) If the declared service is covered by subsection 152AL(7), the specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the service became a declared service under that subsection.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specified day before the day the service became a declared service
modality: LTL
operator: before
premise text: (3A) If the declared service is covered by subsection 152AL(7), the specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the service became a declared service under that subsection.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 124(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

124(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: If a previous access determination expires, the specified day must be the first day after its expiry.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with the condition
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The specified day must be the first day after the expiry of the previous access determination.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 124(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

124(4A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: Conditional commencement of access determination
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-4a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

124(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: Expiry date for access determination must be specified.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify expiry date
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

124(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: The Commission must have regard to certain matters when specifying an expiry date for an access determination.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commission must have regard to certain matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

124(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: Commission can make a fresh access determination under section 152BC in the same terms as the expired access determination.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

124(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: Access determination revoked upon declaration cessation
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the Commission does not make a fresh declaration...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Revocation occurs at declaration cessation time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) the declared service is covered by a declaration under section 152AL,

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the access determination is taken to be revoked...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Commission inaction implies revocation
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (c) the Commission does not make a fresh declaration under section 152AL that replaces the declaration referred to in paragraph (b) of this subsection;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the Commission does not make a fresh declaration...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Revocation inference from declaration cessation
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (b) the declared service is covered by a declaration under section 152AL,

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the access determination is taken to be revoked...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of access determination
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
premise text: (8) If...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the declaration ceases to be in force;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Revocation spreads through declaration cessation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (a) an access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force;

124(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: Access determination revoked upon declaration revocation
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the access determination is taken to be revoked at the time of the revocation of the declaration
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between declarations and access determinations
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (9) If an access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and the declared service is covered by a declaration under section 152AL, and the declaration is revoked;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the access determination is taken to be revoked at the time of the revocation of the declaration
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes a relationship between declarations and access determinations
modality: CogAI
operator: Asserts
premise text: (9) If an access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and the declared service is covered by a declaration under section 152AL, and the declaration is revoked;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the access determination is taken to be revoked at the time of the revocation of the declaration
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access determination revocation upon declaration revocation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (9) If an access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and the declared service is covered by a declaration under section 152AL, and the declaration is revoked; and the Commission does not make a fresh declaration under section 152AL that replaces the declaration referred to in paragraph (b) of this subsection;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the access determination is taken to be revoked at the time of the revocation of the declaration
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes a relationship between declarations and access determinations
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (9) If an access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and the declared service is covered by a declaration under section 152AL, and the declaration is revoked;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the access determination is taken to be revoked at the time of the revocation of the declaration
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between declarations and access determinations
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (9) If an access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and the declared service is covered by a declaration under section 152AL, and the declaration is revoked;

124(9A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
note: Prohibition on access to declared service while interim access determination is in force
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a
schema version: 2
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval for prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (9A) If: an interim access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval for prohibition using CogAI
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (9A) If: an interim access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access to declared service
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (9A) If: an interim access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval for prohibition using diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (9A) If: an interim access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval for prohibition using LTL
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (9A) If: an interim access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and

125 Section 152AC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.113
note: Definition of variation agreement
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-125
schema version: 2

125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214
curation status: Proposed
has part: 125AA(1) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
has part: 125AA(2) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
has part: 125AA(3) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
has part: 125AA(4) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
has part: 125AA(5) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-125aa
schema version: 2

125AA(1) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214
note: ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

125AA(2) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214
note: Industry standard must be known by a specific name
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a standard with a specific name
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

125AA(3) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214
note: ACMA must consult a body or association before determining an industry standard.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

125AA(4) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214
note: The Minister may direct ACMA to determine a standard under subsection (1) that applies to participants in a specified section of the telecommunications industry.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between the standard and the telecommunications activities.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relating to
premise text: (b) deals with one or more specified matters relating to the telecommunications activities of those participants;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Requires consideration of specific matters when determining the standard.
modality: Argumentation
operator: must consider
premise text: (b) deals with one or more specified matters relating to the telecommunications activities of those participants;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Requires utilizing specific knowledge when determining the standard.
modality: CogAI
operator: must utilize
premise text: (b) deals with one or more specified matters relating to the telecommunications activities of those participants;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or authorization.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Requires informing participants about the specific matters when determining the standard.
modality: Diffusion
operator: must inform
premise text: (b) deals with one or more specified matters relating to the telecommunications activities of those participants;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 125AA(4) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by

125AA(5) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214
note: ACMA must not determine a standard under subsection (1) unless it does so in accordance with a direction under subsection (4).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by

126 At the end of section 152AF
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.113
note: Anything done by a carrier or provider in fulfillment of the requirement is taken to be an aspect of access to a declared service.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-126
schema version: 2

126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
curation status: Proposed
has part: 126(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(12) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(13) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(14) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(15) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(16) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2
schema version: 2

126(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Commission must make interim access determination if certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The public inquiry has started before the declaration was made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Commission has commenced to hold a public inquiry under Part 25 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 about a proposal to make an access determination in relation to access to the declared service.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The Commission has commenced to hold a public inquiry under Part 25 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 about a proposal to make an access determination in relation to access to the declared service;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commission must make an interim access determination in relation to access to the service.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make interim access determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Commission makes a declaration under section 152AL after the commencement of this section.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The interim access determination must be made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission considers it is unlikely that a final access determination in relation to access to the service will be made within 6 months after the commencement of the public inquiry.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (d) either: (i) the Commission considers that it is unlikely that a final access determination in relation to access to the service will be made within 6 months after the commencement of the public inquiry; or (ii) the Commission considers that there is an urgent need to make an access determination in relation to access to the service before the completion of the public inquiry;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The public inquiry must end before the interim access determination can be made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Commission considers there is an urgent need to make an access determination in relation to access to the service before the completion of the public inquiry;
modality: LTL
operator: <=
premise text: (d) either: (i) the Commission considers that it is unlikely that a final access determination in relation to access to the service will be made within 6 months after the commencement of the public inquiry; or (ii) the Commission considers that there is an urgent need to make an access determination in relation to access to the service before the completion of the public inquiry;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 126(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

126(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Commission may declare new expiry date for original access determination.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to modify expiry date.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

126(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Publish a declaration on the Commission's website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-11-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-11
schema version: 2
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish a declaration
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

126(12) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Commission may extend expiry date for access determination by same period
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-12-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-12
schema version: 2
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to extend expiry date
modality: Deontic
operator: May

126(13) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Commission must publish instrument on website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-13
schema version: 2
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission must publish an instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-13-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 126(13) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

126(14) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: No procedural fairness requirements for Commission decisions under subsections (10) or (12)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-14-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-14
schema version: 2
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits procedural fairness requirements for Commission decisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

126(15) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: A declaration under subsection (10) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-15-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-15
schema version: 2
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaring something as not an instrument is a prohibition.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

126(16) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: An instrument under subsection (12) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-16
schema version: 2
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

126(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Commission may make interim access determination if declaration is in force and no previous access determination has been made.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

126(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
note: Conditional commencement of interim access determination
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 126 At the end of section 152AF

127 After section 152AH
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.113
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-127-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-127
schema version: 2

128 Subsection 152ALA(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.113
note: Repeal subsection, substitute with new provision
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-128
schema version: 2

128 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.132
curation status: Proposed
has part: 128(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 128(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 128(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 128(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 128(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-128-2
schema version: 2

128(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Commission must not make access determination without public inquiry and report Commission must hold a public inquiry within 30 days after declaration. Exempts Commission decisions from certain judicial review provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 128 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission must not make an access determination
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Report must be published within 180 days of determination
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (c) the report was published during the 180-day period...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission must not make an access determination
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making access determination
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (a) the Commission has held a public inquiry...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission must not make an access determination
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission's action is conditional on meeting requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (a) the Commission has held a public inquiry...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission must not make an access determination
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission's action is conditional on meeting requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (b) the Commission has prepared a report...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to hold a public inquiry
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits application of certain provisions to Commission decisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission must not make an access determination
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Commission can only make access determination if conditions are met
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (a) the Commission has held a public inquiry...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 128(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

128(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Exempts interim access determination from subsection (1) Commission must hold a public inquiry about access to declared service. Court must not make orders staying or otherwise affecting the operation or implementation of the decision pending finalisation of the application.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 128 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision overlaps with other provisions related to access determinations and public inquiries
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Subsection 39B(1) of the Judiciary Act 1903

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The provision recognizes the importance of access determinations and public inquiries in the legislation
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: Subsection 39B(1) of the Judiciary Act 1903

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No orders can be made.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court cannot make orders staying or otherwise affecting the operation or implementation of the decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Subsection 39B(1) of the Judiciary Act 1903

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The provision diffuses information about access determinations and public inquiries
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Subsection 39B(1) of the Judiciary Act 1903

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The provision repeats a similar provision in another part of the legislation
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: Subsection 39B(1) of the Judiciary Act 1903

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 128(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

128(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Conditional commencement Commission must hold a public inquiry about access to declared service.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 128 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

128(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: Commission not required to observe procedural fairness in making interim access determination Conditional effect of subsection (3)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 128 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of procedural fairness requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

128(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.132
note: If a declaration is in force under section 152AL and an access determination has previously been made, the entity must comply with the access determination. Commission must not make an interim access determination without following this section.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 128 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access determination has previously been made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entity must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Declaration is in force under section 152AL

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making interim access determinations without following this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 128(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

129 After subsection 152ALA(6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: Fresh declaration replaces expired declaration if it comes into force immediately after expiry.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-129-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-129
schema version: 2

12EB Performance standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12EB(1) Performance standards
has part: 12EB(2) Performance standards
has part: 12EB(3) Performance standards
has part: 12EB(4) Performance standards
has part: 12EB(5) Performance standards
has part: 12EB(6) Performance standards
has part: 12EB(7) Performance standards
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eb
schema version: 2

12EB(1) Performance standards
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182
note: The Minister may make a written determination setting out standards to be complied with by a primary universal service provider.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12EB Performance standards

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister may make a written determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EB(1) Performance standards

12EB(2) Performance standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182
note: A determination may be of general application or limited as provided.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12EB Performance standards

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EB(2) Performance standards

12EB(3) Performance standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182
note: Compliance with subsection (2) does not limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 12EB Performance standards

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with subsection (2) overlaps with subsection 33(3A)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlap between compliance and subsection 33(3A)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not, by implication, limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with subsection (2) does not limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implication of compliance with subsection (2)
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not, by implication, limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with subsection (2) is excluded from other obligations
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion of compliance from other obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: Excludes
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not, by implication, limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with subsection (2) is included in obligations
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion of compliance in obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: Includes
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not, by implication, limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with subsection (2) implies that subsection 33(3A) is not limited
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of compliance with subsection (2)
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not, by implication, limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EB(3) Performance standards

12EB(4) Performance standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182
note: Primary universal service provider must comply with a standard in force under subsection (1).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 12EB Performance standards

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Primary universal service provider must comply with a standard.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EB(4) Performance standards

12EB(5) Performance standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182
note: Service supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 12EB Performance standards

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Universal service obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EB(5) Performance standards

12EB(6) Performance standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182
note: Exempts standard telephone service from this section if supplied in fulfilment of universal service obligation.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 12EB Performance standards

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section does not apply to such services.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The exemption overlaps with the standard telephone service provision.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The service is supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies to such services.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The exemption recognizes standard telephone services supplied in fulfilment of universal service obligation.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: The service is supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section does not apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts from the obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: The service is supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section does not apply to such services.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The exemption diffuses to other standard telephone services.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: The service is supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section does not apply to such services.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The exemption repeats with each standard telephone service provision.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: The service is supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EB(6) Performance standards

12EB(7) Performance standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182
note: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 12EB Performance standards

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship of a legislative instrument
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (7) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of a legislative instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (7) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.

12EC Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.183
note: Minister may make written determination setting standards for primary universal service providers.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ec-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ec
schema version: 2

12ED Performance standards
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.185
note: Minister may make written determination setting standards for payphone carriage service providers.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ed-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ed-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ed
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ed-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister may make determination
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ed-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12ED Performance standards

12EE Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12EE(1) Performance benchmarks
has part: 12EE(2) Performance benchmarks
has part: 12EE(3) Performance benchmarks
has part: 12EE(4) Performance benchmarks
has part: 12EE(5) Performance benchmarks
has part: 12EE(6) Performance benchmarks
has part: 12EE(7) Performance benchmarks
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ee
schema version: 2

12EE(1) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: The Minister must set standards for primary universal service providers.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12EE Performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must set standards.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EE(1) Performance benchmarks

12EE(2) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: A determination may be of general application or limited as provided.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12EE Performance benchmarks

12EE(3) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: Determination prevails over inconsistent instruments
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 12EE Performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
premise text: (2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EE(3) Performance benchmarks

12EE(4) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: Instruments inconsistent with a determination have no effect.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 12EE Performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent to which the instrument is inconsistent with a determination in force under subsection (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Instrument inconsistency has no temporal relation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (4) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent to which the instrument is inconsistent with a determination in force under subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Instrument inconsistency is prohibited.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (4) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent to which the instrument is inconsistent with a determination in force under subsection (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Instrument inconsistency is not permitted.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: (4) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent to which the instrument is inconsistent with a determination in force under subsection (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Instrument inconsistency has no diffusion impact.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
premise text: (4) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent to which the instrument is inconsistent with a determination in force under subsection (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Instrument inconsistency has no temporal impact.
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: (4) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EE(4) Performance benchmarks

12EE(5) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: Performance benchmarks must be determined
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 12EE Performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide performance benchmarks
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EE(5) Performance benchmarks

12EE(6) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: Minister may set minimum benchmarks for compliance with a standard.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 12EE Performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to set benchmarks
modality: Deontic
operator: May

12EE(7) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: Instrument may be of general application or limited as provided in the instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 12EE Performance benchmarks

12EF Rules about the location of payphones
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12EF(1) Rules about the location of payphones
has part: 12EF(2) Rules about the location of payphones
has part: 12EF(3) Rules about the location of payphones
has part: 12EF(4) Rules about the location of payphones
has part: 12EF(5) Rules about the location of payphones
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ef
schema version: 2

12EF(1) Rules about the location of payphones
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
note: Minister must make rules for payphone locations.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12EF Rules about the location of payphones

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with rules.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EF(1) Rules about the location of payphones

12EF(2) Rules about the location of payphones
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
note: Primary universal service provider must comply with a determination under subsection (1).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12EF Rules about the location of payphones

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Primary universal service provider must comply.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EF(2) Rules about the location of payphones

12EF(3) Rules about the location of payphones
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
note: Compliance with determination implies compliance with obligation to locate payphones.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 12EF Rules about the location of payphones

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the provider is taken to have complied with an obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Compliance during determination implies obligation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) If a primary universal service provider complies with a determination under subsection (1), the provider is taken to have complied with an obligation under paragraph 9(1)(b) or subsection 9(2A),

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the provider is taken to have complied with an obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation implies compliance.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (3) If a primary universal service provider complies with a determination under subsection (1), the provider is taken to have complied with an obligation under paragraph 9(1)(b) or subsection 9(2A),

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the provider is taken to have complied with an obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Compliance during determination implies obligation.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (3) If a primary universal service provider complies with a determination under subsection (1), the provider is taken to have complied with an obligation under paragraph 9(1)(b) or subsection 9(2A),

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EF(3) Rules about the location of payphones

12EF(4) Rules about the location of payphones
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
note: Instruments inconsistent with a determination have no effect.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 12EF Rules about the location of payphones

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) or (b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation violation
modality: Deontic
operator: inconsistentWith
premise text: (4)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EF(4) Rules about the location of payphones

12EF(5) Rules about the location of payphones
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
note: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 12EF Rules about the location of payphones

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EF(5) Rules about the location of payphones

12EG Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.189
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12EG(1) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
has part: 12EG(2) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
has part: 12EG(3) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
has part: 12EG(4) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eg
schema version: 2

12EG(1) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.189
note: Minister must make rules for public consultation on payphone location
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12EG Rules about the process for public consultation on the location

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must make rules
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EG(1) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location

12EG(2) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
type: Concept
description: Notification of process outcome
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.189
note: Minister must ensure public consultation on payphone removal
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12EG Rules about the process for public consultation on the location

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to ensure public consultation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EG(2) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location

12EG(3) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.189
note: Primary universal service provider must comply with a determination under subsection (1).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 12EG Rules about the process for public consultation on the location

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Primary universal service provider must comply with a determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EG(3) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location

12EG(4) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.189
note: Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 12EG Rules about the process for public consultation on the location

12EH Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.190
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12EH(1) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
has part: 12EH(2) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
has part: 12EH(3) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
has part: 12EH(4) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eh
schema version: 2

12EH(1) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.190
note: Minister may make rules for resolution of complaints about payphones.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12EH Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EH(1) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the

12EH(2) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.190
note: Primary universal service provider must comply with a determination.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12EH Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EH(2) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the

12EH(3) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.190
note: Instruments inconsistent with a determination have no effect.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 12EH Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Instruments may overlap with determinations.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Instruments infer determinations.
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
premise text: (3) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent to which the instrument is inconsistent with a determination in force under subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits instruments inconsistent with a determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Instruments diffuse to determinations.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Instruments may contain determinations.
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
premise text: (3) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;

12EH(4) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.190
note: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 12EH Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EH(4) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the

12EI Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.191
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12EI(1) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
has part: 12EI(2) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
has part: 12EI(3) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
has part: 12EI(4) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
has part: 12EI(5) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
has part: 12EI(6) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
has part: 12EI(7) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ei
schema version: 2

12EI(1) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.191
note: ACMA must direct removal of payphone if objections are notified and breach determination is found.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12EI Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Removal of payphone must occur after breach determination found.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Removal of payphone must be after breach determination found.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Breach determination found.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Direction given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must direct removal of payphone.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Notification of objections and breach determination found.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EI(1) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones

12EI(2) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.191
note: ACMA may direct provider not to remove payphone from location.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12EI Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directive obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

12EI(3) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.191
note: ACMA may direct provider to supply and install payphone within specified period.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 12EI Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directive obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EI(3) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones

12EI(4) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.191
note: Minimum notice period for removal of payphones
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 12EI Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between notice periods and removal of payphones
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4) A period specified under paragraph (3)(b) must not be shorter than 30 days after the notice is given.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal overlap between notice periods and removal of payphones
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4) A period specified under paragraph (3)(b) must not be shorter than 30 days after the notice is given.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on short notice periods
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (4) A period specified under paragraph (3)(b) must not be shorter than 30 days after the notice is given.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal overlap between notice periods and removal of payphones
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4) A period specified under paragraph (3)(b) must not be shorter than 30 days after the notice is given.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal overlap between notice periods and removal of payphones
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4) A period specified under paragraph (3)(b) must not be shorter than 30 days after the notice is given.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EI(4) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones

12EI(5) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.191
note: Must comply with a determination under subsection 12EF(1)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 12EI Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 12EF(1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on inconsistent directions
modality: Deontic
operator: must not
premise text: (2) or (3)

12EI(6) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.191
note: Primary universal service providers must comply with ACMA directions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 12EI Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12EI(6) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones

12EI(7) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.191
note: Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones are not legislative instruments.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 12EI Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of directions by the ACMA
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

13 Section 7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: Definition of radiocommunications device
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Radiocommunications device has the same meaning as in the Radiocommunications Act 1992.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: =

130 Paragraph 152ALA(7)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: Substitute 18-month for 12-month in subsection heading.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-130
schema version: 2

130 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.134
curation status: Proposed
has part: 130(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 130(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 130(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 130(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 130(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-130-2
schema version: 2

130(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Commission may decide to combine public inquiries.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 130 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

130(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Commission must ensure reports for combined inquiries.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 130 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for report preparation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide reports
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 130(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

130(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Commission may defer public inquiry about access determination until declaration expiry date is extended or further extended.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 130 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

130(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Commission not required to hold public inquiry about access determination.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 130 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission decides to allow the declaration to expire...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between declarations and inquiries
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (7) If a declaration is in force under section 152AL;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inquiry implication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (7) If a declaration is in force under section 152AL;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (7) If...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission decides to allow the declaration to expire...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Declaration propagation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (7) If a declaration is in force under section 152AL;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 130(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

130(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.134
note: Commission must hold a public inquiry within 30 days after making binding rules of conduct.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 130 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to hold a public inquiry
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 130(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

131 After subparagraph 152ALA(7)(a)(v)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: Duty to extend or expire declaration
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-131-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-131-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-131
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-131-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-131-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 131 After subparagraph 152ALA(7)(a)(v)

132 Subsection 152AM(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: Commission does not have a duty to consider public inquiry upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-132
schema version: 2

132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
curation status: Proposed
has part: 132(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 132(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 132(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 132(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 132(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 132(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 132(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 132(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 132(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2
schema version: 2

132(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Applying a modified version of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 to a power conferred on the Commission by section 152BC. Commission must hold a public inquiry under Part 25 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 about a proposal to make an access determination.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must hold a public inquiry
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 132(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

132(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Commission must make final access determination within 6 months after commencement. Commission not required to hold public inquiry under Part 25 if proposal is of minor nature and affected parties consent in writing.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the variation is of a minor nature; or (b) each carrier or carriage service provider and access seeker whose interests are likely to be affected by the variation has consented in writing to the variation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Minor variation defined as one that occurs between the time of proposal and the time of consent.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (2) The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the variation is of a minor nature; or (b) each carrier or carriage service provider and access seeker whose interests are likely to be affected by the variation has consented in writing to the variation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Commission's decision to hold public inquiry implies that minor variation is not acceptable.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
premise text: (2) The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make final access determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the variation is of a minor nature and affected parties consent in writing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission exempt from holding public inquiry under Part 25.
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (2) The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the variation is of a minor nature; or (b) each carrier or carriage service provider and access seeker whose interests are likely to be affected by the variation has consented in writing to the variation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission permitted to vary access determination without holding public inquiry.
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: (2) The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the variation is of a minor nature; or (b) each carrier or carriage service provider and access seeker whose interests are likely to be affected by the variation has consented in writing to the variation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Minor variation defined as one that recurs over time.
modality: LTL
operator: recurring
premise text: (2) The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 132(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

132(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Commission may extend 6-month period for making final access determination Consent required for revocation of access determination
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-7
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry under Part 25 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 about a proposal to revoke an access determination if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for which consent is required
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) carrier or service provider; and (b) access seeker; whose interests are likely to be affected by the revocation has consented in writing to the revocation.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-7
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry under Part 25 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 about a proposal to revoke an access determination if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference from consent requirement
modality: Argumentation
operator: Inference
premise text: (a) carrier or service provider; and (b) access seeker; whose interests are likely to be affected by the revocation has consented in writing to the revocation.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to extend period
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry under Part 25 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 about a proposal to revoke an access determination if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State must obtain consent before revoking access determination
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) carrier or service provider; and (b) access seeker; whose interests are likely to be affected by the revocation has consented in writing to the revocation.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Extension of time frame
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: HasPart

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry under Part 25 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 about a proposal to revoke an access determination if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Consent diffusion through revocation of access determination
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (a) carrier or service provider; and (b) access seeker; whose interests are likely to be affected by the revocation has consented in writing to the revocation.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry under Part 25 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 about a proposal to revoke an access determination if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for which consent is required
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (a) carrier or service provider; and (b) access seeker; whose interests are likely to be affected by the revocation has consented in writing to the revocation.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 132(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

132(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Prohibition on varying certain provisions in access determinations.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits variation of certain provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 132(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

132(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Commission does not have a duty to consider exercising power.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 132(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

132(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Commission may alter proposed variation if public inquiry has commenced
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: May

132(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Notice of alteration must be published in a certain way.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish notice of alteration
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 132(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

132(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Consent required for alteration of minor nature
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Alteration of minor nature with consent

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-8-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 132(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

132(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
note: Prohibition on making binding rules of conduct that relate to access to a declared service
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on making binding rules of conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (9) Despite anything else in this section

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 132 Subsection 152AM(3)

133 Subsection 152AQ(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.114
note: Substitution of words in a law
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-133-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-133
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-133-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 133 Subsection 152AQ(3)

134 Subsections 152AQ(4), (5) and (6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
curation status: Proposed
has part: 134(4) Subsections 152AQ(4), (5) and (6)
has part: 134(5) Subsections 152AQ(4), (5) and (6)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-134
schema version: 2

134 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.138
curation status: Proposed
has part: 134(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 134(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 134(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 134(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-134-2
schema version: 2

134(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.138
note: Prohibition on engaging in conduct that constitutes a contravention of an access determination. Service provider rule for the purposes of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 134 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 134(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

134(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.138
note: Remedy for contravention of access determination Carriage service provider must comply with access determinations.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 134 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide remedy for contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 134(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

134(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.138
note: Court may make other orders against involved persons
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 134 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 134(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

134(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.138
note: Defines who is considered involved in a contravention.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 134 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is obligated to prevent further involvement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Involvement in a contravention is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: involvement
premise text: A person who has aided, abetted, counselled or procured the contravention is involved.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is obligated to prevent further involvement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Involvement in a contravention is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: involvement
premise text: A person who has induced the contravention, whether through threats or promises or otherwise, is involved.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is obligated to prevent further involvement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Involvement in a contravention is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: involvement
premise text: A person who has been in any way (directly or indirectly) knowingly concerned in or a party to the contravention is involved.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person is obligated to prevent further involvement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Involvement in a contravention is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: involvement
premise text: A person who has conspired with others to effect the contravention is involved.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 134(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

134(4) Subsections 152AQ(4), (5) and (6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
note: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-134-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 134 Subsections 152AQ(4), (5) and (6)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 134(4) Subsections 152AQ(4), (5) and (6)

134(5) Subsections 152AQ(4), (5) and (6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
note: The Register is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-134-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 134 Subsections 152AQ(4), (5) and (6)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Register is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

135 Sections 152AQA and 152AQB
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
note: Repeal sections
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-135-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-135
schema version: 2

136 Subsection 152AR(12) (definition of pre-request right)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
note: Omit specified phrase.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-136
schema version: 2

136 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.140
curation status: Proposed
has part: 136(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 136(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 136(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 136(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 136(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 136(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-2
schema version: 2

136(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.140
note: The Commission must maintain a register of access determinations.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 136 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to maintain a register
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of access determinations
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 136(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

136(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.140
note: The Register is to be maintained by electronic means.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 136 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

136(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.140
note: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 136 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make available
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 136(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

136(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.140
note: The Register is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 136 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the Register from being a legislative instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

136(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.140
note: Commission may remove a provision from the Register if it prejudices substantially the commercial interests of a person and outweighs the public interest in publication.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 136 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the access determination that is included in the Register.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for removal of a provision.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (b) the prejudice outweighs the public interest in the publication of the provision;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the access determination that is included in the Register.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes how artificial intelligence is applied to removal of a provision.
modality: CogAI
operator: Artificial Intelligence Application
premise text: (b) the prejudice outweighs the public interest in the publication of the provision;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the access determination that is included in the Register.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits publication of a provision if it prejudices substantially the commercial interests of a person.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) publication of a particular provision of an access determination could reasonably be expected to prejudice substantially the commercial interests of a person;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the access determination that is included in the Register.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes how information spreads about removal of a provision.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
premise text: (b) the prejudice outweighs the public interest in the publication of the provision;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the access determination that is included in the Register.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a temporal trace for removal of a provision.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (b) the prejudice outweighs the public interest in the publication of the provision;

136(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.140
note: Commission must include annotation in Register if required.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 136 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to include annotation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Omit specified phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

137 Section 152AS
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
note: Repeal a section
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-137-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-137
schema version: 2

138 After subsection 152ASA(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
note: Service or proposed service cannot be specified in a determination if it is declared.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-138
schema version: 2

138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
curation status: Proposed
has part: 138(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 138(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 138(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 138(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 138(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 138(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 138(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 138(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 138(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2
schema version: 2

138(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Prevents the Commission from making rules that would prevent a service provider from obtaining sufficient access to a declared service. Commission must consider various factors when making binding rules of conduct.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents the Commission from making rules that would prevent a service provider from obtaining sufficient access to a declared service.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider certain factors.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Consideration of specific factors is a necessary condition for making binding rules.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 138(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

138(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Commission may take into account characteristics, costs, revenues, and demand of other eligible services when making binding rules.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Commission's consideration of costs and revenues is between the supply of declared service and the demand for other eligible services.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission's obligation to consider characteristics, costs, revenues, and demand of other eligible services.
modality: Deontic
operator: may take into account

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 138(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

138(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Commission may consider other relevant matters.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 138(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

138(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Commission not required to take a matter into account if it is not reasonably practicable.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between Commission's decision-making and its obligations.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: interval relation
premise text: Urgent need to make binding rules of conduct

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission exempt from taking a matter into account if it is not reasonably practicable.
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Subsection (1) or (2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the spread of information about Commission's decision-making.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion relation
premise text: Urgent need to make binding rules of conduct

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between Commission's decision-making and its obligations.
modality: LTL
operator: trace relation
premise text: Urgent need to make binding rules of conduct

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 138(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

138(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Commission is not required to obtain information if it is not reasonably practicable. Exempts subsection (4) from limitation by subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if it is not reasonably practicable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap: Commission's obligation and urgent need
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Commission is not required to obtain information if it is not reasonably practicable.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if it is not reasonably practicable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI inference: Commission's obligation and urgent need
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: Commission is not required to obtain information if it is not reasonably practicable.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if it is not reasonably practicable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission's obligation to obtain information
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Commission is not required...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to exempt
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
premise text: Subsection (4) does not limit subsection 33(3A)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if it is not reasonably practicable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion: Commission's obligation and urgent need
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Commission is not required to obtain information if it is not reasonably practicable.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if it is not reasonably practicable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal until: Commission's obligation and urgent need
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: Commission is not required to obtain information if it is not reasonably practicable.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 138(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

138(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Restrictions on binding rules of conduct Commission not required to observe procedural fairness in making binding rules.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts binding rules of conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of procedural fairness requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 138(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

138(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Commission does not have a duty to consider making binding rules of conduct.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commission does not have a duty to consider making binding rules of conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
premise text: Commission has a duty to consider making binding rules of conduct.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 138(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

138(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Commission may exercise powers under rules
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 138(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

138(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
note: Instrument under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (9) An instrument under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
modality: Deontic
operator: not

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of service specification
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 138 After subsection 152ASA(1)

139 After subsection 152ASA(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
curation status: Proposed
has part: 139(2A) After subsection 152ASA(2)
has part: 139(2B) After subsection 152ASA(2)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-139
schema version: 2

139(2A) After subsection 152ASA(2)
type: Concept
description: Variation of determination
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
note: Determination must not be varied except in specified circumstances.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-139-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 139 After subsection 152ASA(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139(2A) After subsection 152ASA(2)

139(2B) After subsection 152ASA(2)
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
note: Determination must not be revoked under certain circumstances.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 139 After subsection 152ASA(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for revocation of a determination.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2B) A determination under this section may provide that the determination must not be revoked;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determination must not be revoked.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotRevocable
premise text: (2B) A determination under this section may provide that the determination must not be revoked;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determination can be revoked under certain circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: MustBeRevocable
premise text: (2B) A determination under this section may provide that the determination must be revoked except in such circumstances as are specified in the determination;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines temporal trace for revocation of a determination.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (2B) A determination under this section may provide that the determination must not be revoked;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 139(2B) After subsection 152ASA(2)

14 Section 7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: Defines spectrum as same as in Radiocommunications Act 1992.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
schema version: 2

14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14(13) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(14) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(15) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(16) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(17) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(18) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(19) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(20) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(21) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(22) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(23) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(24) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2
schema version: 2

14(13) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Telstra may request the Minister to make or revoke an instrument under paragraph (10)(b) specifying a particular day.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-13-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-13
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-13-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Particular day specified
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Designated day

14(14) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Minister must consider Telstra's request.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-14-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-14
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister must consider request.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider request.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Telstra requests consideration.

14(15) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Request not considered if frivolous or made in bad faith
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-15-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-15-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-15
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-15-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request is within the applicable time period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal inclusion
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
premise text: The request was made before the commencement of this Act.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister is not required to consider the request.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
premise text: Request not considered if frivolous or made in bad faith.

14(16) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: An undertaking under this section must be expressed to be an undertaking under this section.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-16-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-16
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must be expressed to be an undertaking under this section
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expressed as an undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Expressed
premise text: An undertaking under this section

14(17) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Cannot withdraw undertaking after acceptance by ACCC
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-17-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-17-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-17
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Withdrawal not allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on withdrawing undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Undertaking accepted by ACCC

14(18) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: ACCC may perform functions and exercise powers in relation to the undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-18-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-18
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACCC may perform functions and exercise powers.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

14(19) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: No implication that matters cannot be included in an undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-19-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-19-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-19
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No implication that matters cannot be included in an undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-19-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(19) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

14(20) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: The Minister may exempt a specified fixed-line carriage service from the scope of subsection (1) and the associated provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-20-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-20-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-20
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to exempt a service
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-20-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(20) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

14(21) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Minister may exempt telecommunications network from scope of subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-21-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-21
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to exempt
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-21-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(21) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

14(22) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-22-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-22-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-22
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-22-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(22) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

14(23) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Instrument under subsection (7) or paragraph (10)(b) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-23-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-23-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-23
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of legislative instruments
modality: Deontic
operator: not

14(24) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
note: Defines associated provision and fixed-line carriage service.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-24
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

140 Subsection 152ASA(8)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Omit all words from and including 'Commission'
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-140
schema version: 2

140 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.144
curation status: Proposed
has part: 140(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 140(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 140(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 140(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 140(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 140(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-140-2
schema version: 2

140(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.144
note: Grounds for denying access based on creditworthiness or repeated non-compliance
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 140 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Access denied for recurring non-compliance within a specific time frame
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (b) repeated failures by the access seeker to comply with the terms and conditions on which the same or similar access has been provided

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits access based on creditworthiness or repeated non-compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) Examples of grounds for believing as mentioned in subparagraph (1)(g)(i)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Access denied for recurring non-compliance
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (b) repeated failures by the access seeker to comply with the terms and conditions on which the same or similar access has been provided

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 140(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

140(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.144
note: Commission cannot make binding rules of conduct inconsistent with standard access obligations.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 140 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on making rules of conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

140(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.144
note: Commission cannot make binding rules that would require Telstra to engage in conduct covered by the final migration plan.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 140 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of Commission's action
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

140(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Fair compensation and reimbursement
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.144
note: Compensation for deprivation of access right
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 140 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Compensation obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 140(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

140(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.144
note: Exemptions from binding rules of conduct
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 140 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from binding rules of conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (5) Binding rules of conduct are of no effect to the extent to which they contravene subsection (1), (3) or (3A).

140(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.144
note: Access agreements prevail over inconsistent binding rules of conduct.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 140 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (binding rules of conduct came into force before the binding rules of conduct came into force)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Binding rules came into force before the binding rules of conduct came into force.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (binding rules of conduct) came into force after (binding rules of conduct came into force)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (binding rules of conduct have no effect to the extent they are inconsistent with an access agreement)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Binding rules have no effect to the extent they are inconsistent with an access agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
premise text: (binding rules of conduct are applicable to those parties) and (access agreement is applicable to those parties)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (access agreement prevails over binding rules of conduct)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Access agreements prevail over binding rules of conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
premise text: (access agreement) is applicable to (those parties) and (binding rules of conduct) are applicable to (those parties)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (binding rules of conduct have no effect to the extent they are inconsistent with an access agreement)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Binding rules have no effect to the extent they are inconsistent with an access agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
premise text: (binding rules of conduct) are applicable to (those parties) and (access agreement) is applicable to (those parties)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (binding rules of conduct are applicable to those parties)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Binding rules apply to carriers or carriage service providers and access seekers.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is applicable to
premise text: (binding rules of conduct) are applicable to (a carrier or carriage service provider) and (an access seeker)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (binding rules of conduct are applicable to those parties for all time)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Binding rules apply to carriers or carriage service providers and access seekers.
modality: LTL
operator: for all
premise text: (binding rules of conduct) are applicable to (a carrier or carriage service provider) and (an access seeker)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 140(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making a fresh determination under this section
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

141 After subsection 152ASA(11)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
curation status: Proposed
has part: 141(11A) After subsection 152ASA(11)
has part: 141(11B) After subsection 152ASA(11)
has part: 141(11C) After subsection 152ASA(11)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-141
schema version: 2

141(11A) After subsection 152ASA(11)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Applicability of Acts Interpretation Act 1901 to Commission's power
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-141-ss-11a
schema version: 2
part of: 141 After subsection 152ASA(11)

141(11B) After subsection 152ASA(11)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Cannot be varied or removed
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b
schema version: 2
part of: 141 After subsection 152ASA(11)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: between the provisions referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between provisions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (11B) A provision referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: asserts the prohibition on variation or removal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Assertion of prohibition
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
premise text: (11B) A provision referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: cannot be varied or removed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of variation or removal
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (11B) A provision referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: diffuses the prohibition on variation or removal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (11B) A provision referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: until the provisions referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b) are varied or removed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval until variation or removal
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (11B) A provision referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b)

141(11C) After subsection 152ASA(11)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: No variation or revocation of a determination is allowed unless consistent with certain provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11c-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-141-ss-11c
schema version: 2
part of: 141 After subsection 152ASA(11)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No variation or revocation is allowed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (11C) A determination under this section must not be varied or revoked in a manner that is inconsistent with a provision referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b).

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11c-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: No variation or revocation is allowed.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (11C) A determination under this section must not be varied or revoked in a manner that is inconsistent with a provision referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b).

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 141(11C) After subsection 152ASA(11)

142 Subsection 152ASA(12)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Repeal of a legislative instrument determination
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-142
schema version: 2

142 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.146
curation status: Proposed
has part: 142(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 142(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 142(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 142(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-142-2
schema version: 2

142(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.146
note: Commencement of binding rules of conduct Prohibition on conduct that constitutes a contravention of binding rules of conduct Service provider rule for the purposes of the Telecommunications Act 1997 Exempts Commission decisions from certain judicial review provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-8
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 142 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rules take effect during a specified period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Rules take effect during specified period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) Binding rules of conduct come into force on the day specified in the rules as the day on which the rules are to come into force.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rules imply a commencement date through argumentation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Rules imply commencement date through argumentation
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (1) Binding rules of conduct come into force on the day specified in the rules as the day on which the rules are to come into force.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) Binding rules of conduct come into force on the day specified in the rules as the day on which the rules are to come into force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Binding rules come into force on specified day
modality: Deontic
operator: on
premise text: (1) Binding rules of conduct come into force on the day specified in the rules as the day on which the rules are to come into force.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-8
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits application of certain judicial review provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rules diffuse through a commencement date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Rules diffuse through commencement date
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
premise text: (1) Binding rules of conduct come into force on the day specified in the rules as the day on which the rules are to come into force.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The rules imply a commencement date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Rules imply commencement date
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
premise text: (1) Binding rules of conduct come into force on the day specified in the rules as the day on which the rules are to come into force.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 142(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

142(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.146
note: Carriage service provider must comply with binding rules of conduct. Rules of conduct must specify an expiry date. Court must comply with binding rules of conduct
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 142 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 142(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

142(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.146
note: Expiry date must occur within 12 months of rules making
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 142 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

142(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.146
note: Binding rules of conduct cease to be in force on expiry date.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 142 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Binding rules of conduct cease to be in force.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of legislative instrument determinations
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

143 Subsection 152ASA(13) (note)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Repeal a note
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-143-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-143
schema version: 2

144 Section 152AT
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Repeal section
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-144
schema version: 2

144 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.148
curation status: Proposed
has part: 144(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 144(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 144(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 144(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-144-2
schema version: 2

144(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: The Commission must maintain a register of binding rules of conduct.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commission must maintain a register.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The register is a list of binding rules.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS A

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 144(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

144(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: Remedy for contravention of rules despite revocation or expiry The Register is to be maintained by electronic means.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide remedy for contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 144(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

144(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: Court may make orders against other persons involved in contravention. The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 144(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

144(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.148
note: A person involved in the contravention is a reference to a person who has aided, abetted, counselled or procured the contravention.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 144 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The text refers to a person involved in the contravention.
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 144(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

145 After subsection 152ATA(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
note: Service or proposed service cannot be specified in an order if it is a declared service.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-145-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-145-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-145
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-145-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot be specified in an order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: Service or proposed service is a declared service.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-145-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 145 After subsection 152ATA(3)

146 After subsection 152ATA(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.117
curation status: Proposed
has part: 146(4A) After subsection 152ATA(4)
has part: 146(4B) After subsection 152ATA(4)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-146
schema version: 2

146 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.150
curation status: Proposed
has part: 146(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 146(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 146(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-146-2
schema version: 2

146(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: The Register is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 146 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

146(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: Commission may remove provision from rules if it prejudices substantially the commercial interests of a person and outweighs public interest in publication.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 146 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the rules that is included in the Register.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for removal of provisions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (5) If the Commission is satisfied...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the rules that is included in the Register.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of provisions based on commercial interests and public interest.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: (5) If the Commission is satisfied...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the rules that is included in the Register.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulation of rules by Commission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) If the Commission is satisfied...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the rules that is included in the Register.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about removal of provisions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (5) If the Commission is satisfied...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the rules that is included in the Register.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for removal of provisions.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (5) If the Commission is satisfied...

146(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: Commission must include annotation in Register if required.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 146 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide annotation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

146(4A) After subsection 152ATA(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.117
note: Order must not be varied except in specified circumstances.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 146 After subsection 152ATA(4)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may: (a) provide that the order must not be varied; or (b) provide that the order must not be varied except in such circumstances as are specified in the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal overlap of variation prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4A) An order under paragraph (3)(a)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may: (a) provide that the order must not be varied; or (b) provide that the order must not be varied except in such circumstances as are specified in the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes recognition of variation prohibition
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (4A) An order under paragraph (3)(a)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may: (a) provide that the order must not be varied; or (b) provide that the order must not be varied except in such circumstances as are specified in the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits variation of order
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (4A) An order under paragraph (3)(a)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may: (a) provide that the order must not be varied; or (b) provide that the order must not be varied except in such circumstances as are specified in the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes diffusion of variation prohibition
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (4A) An order under paragraph (3)(a)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: may: (a) provide that the order must not be varied; or (b) provide that the order must not be varied except in such circumstances as are specified in the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship of variation prohibition
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (4A) An order under paragraph (3)(a)

146(4B) After subsection 152ATA(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.117
note: Order must not be revoked except in specified circumstances.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-logic-dialectical-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b
schema version: 2
part of: 146 After subsection 152ATA(4)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: except in such circumstances as are specified in the order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between revocation and order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4B) An order under paragraph (3)(a)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not be revoked except in such circumstances as are specified in the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of order
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (4B) An order under paragraph (3)(a)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-logic-dialectical-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not be revoked
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dialectical
logic summary: Describes negation of revocation
modality: Dialectical
operator: Negation
premise text: (4B) An order under paragraph (3)(a)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not be revoked except in such circumstances as are specified in the order.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between revocation and order
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (4B) An order under paragraph (3)(a)

147 After subsection 152ATA(6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.117
note: Commission may refuse to consider subsequent application if grounds are materially similar.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-147-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-147-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-147
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-147-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission may refuse to consider subsequent application if grounds are materially similar.
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

148 Subsection 152ATA(10)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.117
note: Omit all words from and including 'Commission'
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-148
schema version: 2

148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
curation status: Proposed
has part: 148(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2
schema version: 2

148(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Carrier must provide access agreement and written statement to Commission within 28 days.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must provide access agreement and written statement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 148(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

148(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Legislative instruments under certain subsections are not legislative instruments.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
modality: Deontic
operator: not

148(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Carrier must provide agreement and statement within 28 days
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

148(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Carrier must provide variation agreement and written statement within 28 days. Reference to access agreement is updated upon variation agreement.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide variation agreement and written statement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Reference to access agreement is updated
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Update reference to access agreement
modality: Deontic
operator: update
premise text: Variation agreement is legally enforceable

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 148(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

148(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Commission may specify information by writing. Commencement of section is unaffected by timing of access agreements
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

148(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Access agreements are not legislative instruments. Commission may specify information for paragraph (2)(d) purposes
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An access agreement is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
modality: Deontic
operator: not

148(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Commission may specify information for paragraph (3)(b) purposes Variation agreements are not legislative instruments.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (6) A variation agreement is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
modality: Deontic
operator: not

148(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Commission may require information to be verified by statutory declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

148(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Commission must publish instrument on website
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 148(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

148(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
note: Commission may extend deadline for certain actions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making a fresh order under paragraph (3)(a)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

149 After subsection 152ATA(16)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
curation status: Proposed
has part: 149(16A) After subsection 152ATA(16)
has part: 149(16B) After subsection 152ATA(16)
has part: 149(16C) After subsection 152ATA(16)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-149
schema version: 2

149(16A) After subsection 152ATA(16)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Applying Acts Interpretation Act 1901 to Commission's power
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-149-ss-16a
schema version: 2
part of: 149 After subsection 152ATA(16)

149(16B) After subsection 152ATA(16)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Cannot be varied or removed after certain subsections
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16b-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-149-ss-16b
schema version: 2
part of: 149 After subsection 152ATA(16)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on variation or removal
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (16B) A provision referred to in paragraph (4A)(a) or (b) or (4B)(a) or (b)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16b-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implication of subsections on provisions
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: (16B) A provision referred to in paragraph (4A)(a) or (b) or (4B)(a) or (b)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 149(16B) After subsection 152ATA(16)

149(16C) After subsection 152ATA(16)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Order variation or revocation must be consistent with certain provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16c-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-149-ss-16c
schema version: 2
part of: 149 After subsection 152ATA(16)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not be varied or revoked in a manner that is inconsistent with...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of order variation or revocation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (16C) An order under paragraph (3)(a)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16c-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not be varied or revoked in a manner that is inconsistent with...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of order variation or revocation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (16C) An order under paragraph (3)(a)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16c-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 149(16C) After subsection 152ATA(16)

15 December
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
schema version: 2

15 March 2011
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15-2
schema version: 2

15 June 2011
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15-3
schema version: 2

15 March 2011
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement information
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15-4
schema version: 2

15 Section 7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: Defines spectrum licence meaning
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15-5
schema version: 2

15 September 2009; and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.170
note: The undertaking continues to apply despite repeals and amendments.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15-6
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking's duration is tied to the access determination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The undertaking ceases to have effect when the first access determination comes into force.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal interval
premise text: There is a temporal relationship between the undertaking and the access determination.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking continues to apply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The undertaking persists in spite of changes.
modality: Deontic
operator: Continues
premise text: Repeals and amendments do not affect the undertaking.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking's duration is fixed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The undertaking cannot be varied to extend its duration.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: There is a prohibition on modifying the undertaking.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking's effect is sustained by the model terms.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: If the undertaking adopts model terms and conditions, those sections continue to apply despite repeals.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: There is a recurring relationship between the undertaking and the model terms.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15 September 2009; and

15 Dec 2010
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.217
note: See s. 2(1)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15-7
schema version: 2

150 Subsection 152ATA(18) (note)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Repeal a note.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-150
schema version: 2

150 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.154
curation status: Proposed
has part: 150(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 150(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 150(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-150-2
schema version: 2

150(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Service provider rule for the purposes of the Telecommunications Act 1997. Duty to notify Commission of terminated access agreement
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 150 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and (b) the agreement is terminated, rescinded or cancelled before the expiry of the agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies a temporal interval for which this section applies
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a copy of an access agreement has been given to the Commission under section 152BEA;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and (b) the agreement is terminated, rescinded or cancelled before the expiry of the agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Specifies the conditions under which this section applies
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (a) a copy of an access agreement has been given to the Commission under section 152BEA;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Service provider rule
modality: Deontic
operator: is

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a copy of an access agreement has been given to the Commission under section 152BEA;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to notify the Commission of terminated access agreements
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES
premise text: (a) a copy of an access agreement has been given to the Commission under section 152BEA

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a copy of an access agreement has been given to the Commission under section 152BEA;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to notify the Commission of terminated access agreements
modality: Deontic
operator: IMPOSES
premise text: (a) a copy of an access agreement has been given to the Commission under section 152BEA;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and (b) the agreement is terminated, rescinded or cancelled before the expiry of the agreement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies a recursive relation for which this section applies
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a copy of an access agreement has been given to the Commission under section 152BEA;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 150(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

150(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Notification of termination of access agreement is required.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-11-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-11
schema version: 2
part of: 150 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

150(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Notification in writing
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Notify the Commission of termination, rescission, or cancellation within 28 days. Carriage service provider must comply with sections 152BEA and 152BEB.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 150 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 150(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

151 Subsection 152AU(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Omit “152AT(1) or”.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-151
schema version: 2

151CP Functional separation for Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
curation status: Proposed
has part: 151CP(1) Functional separation for Telstra
has part: 151CP(2) Functional separation for Telstra
has part: 151CP(3) Functional separation for Telstra
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-151cp
schema version: 2

151CP(1) Functional separation for Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Commission must have regard to Telstra's conduct if a final functional separation undertaking is in force.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 151CP Functional separation for Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for Commission's obligation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: This section applies if a final functional separation undertaking is in force under Part 9 of Schedule 1 to the Telecommunications Act 1997.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Commission's obligation implies Telstra's conduct
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: Commission must have regard to Telstra's conduct if a final functional separation undertaking is in force.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of Commission's obligation as a cognitive action
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: Commission must have regard to Telstra's conduct if a final functional separation undertaking is in force.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to have regard
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Commission must have regard to Telstra's conduct

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Obligation spreads to related parties
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
premise text: Commission must have regard to Telstra's conduct if a final functional separation undertaking is in force.

151CP(2) Functional separation for Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Commission must have regard to conduct relevant to Telstra's undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 151CP Functional separation for Telstra

151CP(3) Functional separation for Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Commission must not prevent Telstra from complying with its undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 151CP Functional separation for Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Commission's action prevents Telstra from complying.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Prevents
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Commission's action must not prevent Telstra's compliance.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Must Not Prevent
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Telstra's undertaking is classified by Commission.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission cannot prevent Telstra from complying.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Commission's action differs from Telstra's compliance.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Differs
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151CP(3) Functional separation for Telstra

151CQ Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.85
note: Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cq-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-151cq
schema version: 2

152 Sections 152AV to 152AX
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Repeal sections
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152
schema version: 2

152 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.156
curation status: Proposed
has part: 152(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 152(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152-2
schema version: 2

152(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.156
note: Fixed principles term or condition ceases to be in operation when the undertaking ceases.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 152 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the fixed principles term or condition is specified in a special access undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Fixed principles term or condition is specified in a special access undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (a) a fixed principles term or condition is specified in a special access undertaking;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the undertaking ceases to be in operation when the fixed principles term or condition ceases.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Undertaking ceases to be in operation when the fixed principles term or condition ceases.
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (b) the undertaking ceases to be in operation before the end of the notional fixed period for the fixed principles term or condition;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a fresh undertaking can include an identical fixed principles term or condition.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Fixed principles term or condition can be included in a fresh undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (a) a fixed principles term or condition is specified in a special access undertaking;

152(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.156
note: Commission must not reject other undertaking for specified reasons
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 152 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notional fixed periods for original and corresponding fixed principles terms overlap
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Notional fixed periods overlap
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Original and corresponding fixed principles terms have notional fixed periods that end at or before the same time

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commission must not reject other undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotReject
premise text: Original undertaking accepted by Commission

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commission must consider submissions related to corresponding fixed principles term or condition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission must consider submissions related to specified circumstances
modality: Deontic
operator: MustConsider
premise text: Other undertaking contains qualifying circumstances

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Paragraphs 152CBD(2)(d) and (ii) do not apply to corresponding fixed principles term or condition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Paragraphs do not apply to specified conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotApply
premise text: Corresponding fixed principles term or condition is the only term or condition contained in other undertaking

152AI When public inquiry commences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.113
note: Public inquiry commences when notice is published.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ai-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152ai
schema version: 2

152AY Compliance with standard access obligations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.119
curation status: Proposed
has part: 152AY(1) Compliance with standard access obligations
has part: 152AY(2) Compliance with standard access obligations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152ay
schema version: 2

152AY(1) Compliance with standard access obligations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.119
note: Carrier or carriage service provider must comply with standard access obligations.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 152AY Compliance with standard access obligations

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier or carriage service provider must comply with standard access obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 152AY(1) Compliance with standard access obligations

152AY(2) Compliance with standard access obligations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.119
note: Carrier or carriage service provider must comply with obligations regarding access agreements, undertakings, and binding rules of conduct.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 152AY Compliance with standard access obligations

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier or carriage service provider must comply with obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 152AY(2) Compliance with standard access obligations

152BC Access determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
curation status: Proposed
has part: 152BC(1) Access determinations
has part: 152BC(2) Access determinations
has part: 152BC(3) Access determinations
has part: 152BC(4) Access determinations
has part: 152BC(5) Access determinations
has part: 152BC(6) Access determinations
has part: 152BC(7) Access determinations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bc
schema version: 2

152BC(1) Access determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Commission may make a written determination relating to access to a declared service.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 152BC Access determinations

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 152BC(1) Access determinations

152BC(2) Access determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: A determination under subsection (1) must be known as an access determination.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 152BC Access determinations

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a name for the access determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 152BC(2) Access determinations

152BC(3) Access determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Specify terms and conditions for carrier or provider compliance with standard access obligations.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 152BC Access determinations

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a carrier or provider to extend or enhance capability within a specified timeframe.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: (d) require a carrier or carriage service provider to extend or enhance the capability of a facility by means of which the declared service is supplied;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires a carrier or provider to comply with specified terms and conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (3) An access determination may:

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires a carrier or provider to pay for access to the declared service.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (g) require access seekers to accept, and pay for, access to the declared service;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires a carrier or provider to comply with specified obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (i) unconditionally; or (ii) subject to such conditions or limitations as are specified in the determination;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Specifies terms and conditions for carrier or provider compliance.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: specifies
premise text: (3) An access determination may: (a) specify any or all of the terms and conditions on which a carrier or carriage service provider is to comply with any or all of the standard access obligations applicable to the carrier or provider;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Applies to all carriers and providers.
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: (3) An access determination may: (a) specify any or all of the terms and conditions on which a carrier or carriage service provider is to comply with any or all of the standard access obligations applicable to the carrier or provider;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 152BC(3) Access determinations

152BC(4) Access determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Subsection (3) does not limit subsection (1).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 152BC Access determinations

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Subsection (3) implies no limit on subsection (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (3)

152BC(5) Access determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: May make different provision with respect to carriers or carriage service providers.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 152BC Access determinations

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 152BC(5) Access determinations

152BC(6) Access determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Does not limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 152BC Access determinations

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3A)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative implication
modality: Deontic
operator: DoesNotImply
premise text: (5)

152BC(7) Access determinations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Commission may perform functions and exercise powers under an access determination.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 152BC Access determinations

152BD Binding rules of conduct
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.141
curation status: Proposed
has part: 152BD(1) Binding rules of conduct
has part: 152BD(2) Binding rules of conduct
has part: 152BD(3) Binding rules of conduct
has part: 152BD(4) Binding rules of conduct
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bd
schema version: 2

152BD(1) Binding rules of conduct
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.141
note: Commission may make written rules specifying terms and conditions for carriers or carriage service providers.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 152BD Binding rules of conduct

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission may make rules
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 152BD(1) Binding rules of conduct

152BD(2) Binding rules of conduct
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.141
note: Rules under subsection (1) are to be known as binding rules of conduct.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 152BD Binding rules of conduct

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 152BD(2) Binding rules of conduct

152BD(3) Binding rules of conduct
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.141
note: Rules of conduct may be of general application or limited as provided in the rules.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 152BD Binding rules of conduct

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Rules of conduct are binding.
modality: Deontic
operator: binding obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 152BD(3) Binding rules of conduct

152BD(4) Binding rules of conduct
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.141
note: Limitation on binding rules of conduct
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 152BD Binding rules of conduct

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal limitation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: SUBSETOF
premise text: (b) particular classes of carriers or carriage service providers

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: binding rules of conduct may be limited to
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative limitation
modality: Deontic
operator: NOT
premise text: (4)

152BE Access agreements
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.150
curation status: Proposed
has part: 152BE(1) Access agreements
has part: 152BE(1A) Access agreements
has part: 152BE(2) Access agreements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152be
schema version: 2

152BE(1) Access agreements
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: Access agreement definition
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 152BE Access agreements

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The declaration of the service is prior to the agreement.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The agreement relates to access to a declared service.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Access agreement definition
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The agreement is an access agreement.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: An access seeker and a carrier or carriage service provider are parties to the agreement.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 152BE(1) Access agreements

152BE(1A) Access agreements
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: Exempts agreement from paragraph (1)(b) to the extent it is covered by subparagraph (1)(e)(ix) or (x)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 152BE Access agreements

152BE(2) Access agreements
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.150
note: Agreement to access eligible service must be declared after its declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 152BE Access agreements

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the eligible service becomes a declared service; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Eligible service declaration time overlaps with agreement entry time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (2) If an agreement relates to access to an eligible service (within the meaning of section 152AL); and...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the eligible service becomes a declared service; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Eligible service declaration is inferentially related to agreement entry.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inferential
premise text: (2) If an agreement relates to access to an eligible service (within the meaning of section 152AL); and...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the eligible service becomes a declared service; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to declare eligible service after its declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) If an agreement relates to access to an eligible service (within the meaning of section 152AL); and...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the eligible service becomes a declared service; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Eligible service declaration diffuses to agreement entry.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (2) If an agreement relates to access to an eligible service (within the meaning of section 152AL); and...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the eligible service becomes a declared service; and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Eligible service declaration is recurrently related to agreement entry.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (2) If an agreement relates to access to an eligible service (within the meaning of section 152AL); and...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 152BE(2) Access agreements

152EQ Functional separation for Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.91
curation status: Proposed
has part: 152EQ(1) Functional separation for Telstra
has part: 152EQ(2) Functional separation for Telstra
has part: 152EQ(3) Functional separation for Telstra
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152eq
schema version: 2

152EQ Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
curation status: Proposed
has part: 152EQ(1) Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator
has part: 152EQ(2) Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152eq-2
schema version: 2

152EQ(1) Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
note: The independent telecommunications adjudicator must be a company that meets certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 152EQ Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The independent telecommunications adjudicator must be a company that meets certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 152EQ(1) Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator

152EQ(2) Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
note: Commission may assist independent telecommunications adjudicator
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 152EQ Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to assist
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 152EQ(2) Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator

152EQ(1) Functional separation for Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.91
note: Commission must have regard to Telstra's conduct if a final functional separation undertaking is in force.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 152EQ Functional separation for Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to have regard
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

152EQ(2) Functional separation for Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.91
note: Commission must have regard to conduct relevant to Telstra's undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 152EQ Functional separation for Telstra

152EQ(3) Functional separation for Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.91
note: Must not prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 152EQ Functional separation for Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on Commission's action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

152ER Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.86
curation status: Proposed
has part: 152ER(1) Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
has part: 152ER(2) Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
has part: 152ER(3) Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152er
schema version: 2

152ER(1) Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra under specific sections of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152er-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 152ER Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on Telstra.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

152ER(2) Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Commission must have regard to conduct relevant to Telstra's undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152er-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 152ER Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Telstra must comply with its undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

152ER(3) Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Prevents Commission from preventing Telstra's compliance with the undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 152ER Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for undertaking
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function, or exercise a power, under this Part so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prevent interference
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function, or exercise a power, under this Part so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on Commission's interference
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function, or exercise a power, under this Part so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal condition for undertaking
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function, or exercise a power, under this Part so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.

153 Subsection 152AXA(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Omit ‘(1)’ from section heading.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-153-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-153-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-153
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-153-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

154 Paragraph 152AXA(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Omit “152AT or”.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-154-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-154
schema version: 2

154 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.158
note: Commission must not reject variation of undertaking under certain circumstances.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-154-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-154-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-154-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-154-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commission must not reject
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must not reject variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Qualifying circumstances exist

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-154-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 154 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

155 Subsection 152AXA(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-155-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-155
schema version: 2

156 Section 152AY
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
note: Repeal section and substitute with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-156-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-156
schema version: 2

156 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.160
note: Commission may refuse to consider another special access undertaking if it is materially similar to a previous one.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-156-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-156-2
schema version: 2

157 Paragraph 152BBAA(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Omit “152AS or”.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-157-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-157
schema version: 2

158 Paragraph 152BBAA(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Omit “152AT or”.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-158-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-158
schema version: 2

158 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.162
curation status: Proposed
has part: 158(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 158(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-158-2
schema version: 2

158(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.162
note: Commission must consider varied undertaking under section 152CBC.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 158 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider varied undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

158(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.162
note: Commission does not have a duty to consider giving a notice under subsection (2).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 158 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 158(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

159 Subsection 152BBC(5)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-159-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-159
schema version: 2

16 December
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
schema version: 2

16 December
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2
schema version: 2

16 December
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-3
schema version: 2

16 December
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.7
note: Note on table limitations
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-4
schema version: 2

16 Section 7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: Defines subscription television broadcasting licence
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-5
schema version: 2

16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(6A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6
schema version: 2

16(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Instrument under subsection (3) or (5) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of an instrument being a legislative instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: not

16(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Cannot specify event timing in nomination
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot specify event timing
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

16(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Minister may specify events by writing.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

16(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: A period specified by the ACCC must be 6 months or as specified in an instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be a period of 6 months or as specified in an instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

16(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: The Minister may specify a period by writing.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

16(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Notification in writing
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Notify ACCC of event occurrence within specified period.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Event occurrence within specified period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (b) such an event occurs within that period;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must notify ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expressed obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

16(6A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Exempts a specific event from subsection (6) of section 16(6A)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6a-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6a
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

16(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Repeals acceptance of undertaking if event does not occur within specified period.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the event
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act (other than subclause 76(4) of Schedule 1) has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Defines a rebuttal for the event
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act (other than subclause 76(4) of Schedule 1) has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals acceptance of undertaking if event does not occur within specified period.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act (other than subclause 76(4) of Schedule 1) has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines a diffusion for the event
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act (other than subclause 76(4) of Schedule 1) has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a trace for the event
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act (other than subclause 76(4) of Schedule 1) has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

16(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: If specified events do not occur within a period, the undertaking is not accepted.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for the occurrence of events.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for the undertaking.
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of accepting an undertaking if events do not occur within a period.
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about the undertaking.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal logic for the occurrence of events.
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

16(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

16 Simplified outline
type: Concept
description: Information about priority assistance
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.201
note: Must inform prospective customer of non-priority assistance and alternative providers.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-7
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of non-compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

160 Division 4 of Part XIC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
note: Repeal Division and substitute with new content.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-160-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-160
schema version: 2

160 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
note: Inconsistent provision has no effect to the extent of inconsistency.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-160-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-160-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-160-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-160-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of inconsistent provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

161 Subdivision A of Division 5 of Part XIC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Repeal Subdivision A of Division 5 of Part XIC
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-161-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-161
schema version: 2

162 Subsection 152CBA(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: Substitute 'a' for 'an active'
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-162
schema version: 2

162 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.166
curation status: Proposed
has part: 162(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 162(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 162(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 162(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-162-2
schema version: 2

162(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.166
note: Minister must conduct a review of the operation of certain provisions before June 30, 2014.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 162 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the time period for the review
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) Before 30 June 2014, the Minister must cause to be conducted a review of the operation of: (a) this Part; and (b) the remaining provisions of this Act so far as they relate to this Part.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) Before 30 June 2014, the Minister must cause to be conducted a review of the operation of: (a) this Part; and (b) the remaining provisions of this Act so far as they relate to this Part.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies the time period for the review
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) Before 30 June 2014, the Minister must cause to be conducted a review of the operation of: (a) this Part; and (b) the remaining provisions of this Act so far as they relate to this Part.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 162(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

162(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.166
note: Public consultation must be made during a review under subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 162 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide public consultation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 162(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

162(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.166
note: Minister must prepare report after review
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 162 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prepare report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 162(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

162(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.166
note: Minister must table report in each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 162 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to table report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 162(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

163 Before subsection 152CBA(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.154
note: States conduct in relation to access to a service and terms and conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-163-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-163-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-163
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-163-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the undertaking as a deontic provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: =

164 Subsection 152CBA(10)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.155
note: Permits giving a fresh special access undertaking if the previous one expires.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-164-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-164
schema version: 2

164 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.168
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-164-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-164-2
schema version: 2

165 Before subsection 152CBA(11)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.155
note: Commission may perform functions or exercise powers in relation to the undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-165-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-165
schema version: 2

166 After section 152CBA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.155
curation status: Proposed
has part: 166(1) After section 152CBA
has part: 166(2) After section 152CBA
has part: 166(3) After section 152CBA
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-166
schema version: 2

166 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.170
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-166-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-166-2
schema version: 2

166(1) After section 152CBA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.155
note: Defines a fixed principles term or condition with a notional period.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-166-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-166-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 166 After section 152CBA

166(2) After section 152CBA
type: Concept
description: one or more specified circumstances
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.155
note: Qualifying circumstances for fixed principles term or condition
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-166-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-166-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 166 After section 152CBA

166(3) After section 152CBA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.155
note: Defines notional fixed period for a fixed principles term or condition
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-166-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-166-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 166 After section 152CBA

167 Before paragraph 152CBC(6)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.158
note: Compliance with notice under section 152CBDA is required.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-167-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-167-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-167
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-167-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-167-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 167 Before paragraph 152CBC(6)(a)

168 Paragraph 152CBC(6)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.159
note: Insertion of phrase after 'if'
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-168-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-168-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-168
schema version: 2

168 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.172
note: No access dispute notification allowed under section 152CM of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-168-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-168-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-168-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-168-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No access dispute notification allowed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 152CM of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-168-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 168 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-168-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
premise text: Paragraph (ac) does not apply

169 After section 152CBC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.159
note: Amendments to Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-169-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-169
schema version: 2

17 After subsection 69(5)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.11
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
schema version: 2

17 Priority assistance industry code
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.202
note: Defines priority assistance industry code
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-17-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-17-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17 After subsection 69(5)

170 After paragraph 152CBD(2)(c)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.160
note: Commission must be satisfied that conduct promotes long-term interests of end-users and terms and conditions are reasonable.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-170
schema version: 2

170 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.174
note: Determination has no effect if inconsistent with binding rules of conduct or access agreement.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-170-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits inconsistent determinations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to satisfy Commission's conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies conduct as promoting long-term interests of end-users.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 170 After paragraph 152CBD(2)(c)

171 At the end of section 152CBD
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.160
curation status: Proposed
has part: 171(3) At the end of section 152CBD
has part: 171(4) At the end of section 152CBD
has part: 171(5) At the end of section 152CBD
has part: 171(6) At the end of section 152CBD
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-171
schema version: 2

171(3) At the end of section 152CBD
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.160
note: Subsection (2) has effect subject to subsection 152CBAA(5)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-171-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 171 At the end of section 152CBD

171(4) At the end of section 152CBD
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.160
note: Commission must refuse to accept undertaking if certain conditions not met.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-171-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 171 At the end of section 152CBD

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission prohibits acceptance of undertaking if conditions not met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

171(5) At the end of section 152CBD
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.160
note: Subsection (4) has effect subject to subsection 152CBAA(5)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-171-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 171 At the end of section 152CBD

171(6) At the end of section 152CBD
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.160
note: Commission must publish special access undertaking under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-171-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 171 At the end of section 152CBD

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 171(6) At the end of section 152CBD

172 After section 152CBD
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.161
curation status: Proposed
has part: 172(1) After section 152CBD
has part: 172(2) After section 152CBD
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-172
schema version: 2

172 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.176
note: Terms and conditions about a particular matter must comply with the access determination.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-172-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 172 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

172(1) After section 152CBD
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.161
note: Special access undertaking to the Commission.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-172-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 172 After section 152CBD

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a special access undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

172(2) After section 152CBD
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.161
note: Commission may give written notice stating variations to original undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-172-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 172 After section 152CBD

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commission has an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 172(2) After section 152CBD

173 After subsection 152CBG(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.162
note: Subsection (4) has effect subject to subsection 152CBAA(6)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-173-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-173
schema version: 2

174 After section 152CBI
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.162
note: Special access undertakings prevail over inconsistent access determinations and binding rules of conduct.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-174-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-174-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-174-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-174
schema version: 2

174 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.178
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-174-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-174-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-174-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inconsistent with special access undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Special access undertakings take precedence over inconsistent determinations and rules.
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
premise text: Access determination

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-174-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Inconsistent with special access undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Special access undertakings override inconsistent binding rules of conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
premise text: Binding rules of conduct

175 Subsection 152CC(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
note: Omit “may”, substitute “is to”.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-175-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-175-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-175
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-175-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘is to’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits using 'may'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Omit ‘may’

176 Subsections 152CC(3), (4) and (5)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
curation status: Proposed
has part: 176(3) Subsections 152CC(3), (4) and (5)
has part: 176(4) Subsections 152CC(3), (4) and (5)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-176
schema version: 2

176 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
note: Customer acknowledges that the relevant service is not supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-176-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notice and supply occur within a temporal interval
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between notice and supply
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: The customer has, by written notice given to the provider, acknowledged that the relevant service is not supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation; and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Provider recognises notice from customer
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Provider recognises notice from customer
modality: CogAI
operator: recognises
premise text: The customer has, by written notice given to the provider, acknowledged that the relevant service is not supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation; and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation fulfilled
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Acknowledgement of non-supply
modality: Deontic
operator: acknowledges
premise text: Customer acknowledges that the relevant service is not supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notice diffuses to provider
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of notice to provider
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: The customer has, by written notice given to the provider, acknowledged that the relevant service is not supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation; and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notice and supply occur in an ordered temporal interval
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ordered trace of notice and supply
modality: LTL
operator: ordered
premise text: The customer has, by written notice given to the provider, acknowledged that the relevant service is not supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation; and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 176 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

176(3) Subsections 152CC(3), (4) and (5)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
note: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-176-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 176 Subsections 152CC(3), (4) and (5)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 176(3) Subsections 152CC(3), (4) and (5)

176(4) Subsections 152CC(3), (4) and (5)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
note: The Register is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-176-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 176 Subsections 152CC(3), (4) and (5)

177 Sections 152CE, 152CF, 152CG and 152CGA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
note: Repeal sections
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-177-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-177
schema version: 2

178 Section 152CGB
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
note: Repeal a section
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-178-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-178
schema version: 2

178 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182
note: Standard telephone service requirements
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-178-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-178-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-178-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-178-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide standard telephone service
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-178-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 178 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

179 Subsection 152CH(1) (notes 1A, 1B, 2 and 3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
note: Repeal notes
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-179
schema version: 2

18 Before subsection 69(7)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Exempts subsection (1) from clause 84 of Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
schema version: 2

18 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.22
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2
schema version: 2

18 Compliance with the priority assistance industry code
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.202
note: Compliance with priority assistance industry code is mandatory.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal applicability
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18 Compliance with the priority assistance industry code

180 Subsection 152CH(1) (note 5)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
note: Repeal note and substitute with new text
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180
schema version: 2

180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2
schema version: 2

180(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
note: Clause 1 of Schedule 1 to the Telecommunications Act 1997 does not apply to a contravention of a standard in force under subsection (1).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-10-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

180(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
note: Clause 1 of Schedule 2 to the Telecommunications Act 1997 does not apply to a contravention of a standard in force under subsection (1).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-11-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-11
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: !

180(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
note: Determination may be of general application or limited as provided in the instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

180(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
note: Determination prevails over inconsistent instruments
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: over inconsistent instruments
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
premise text: Determination

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

180(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
note: Instruments inconsistent with a determination have no effect.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits instruments inconsistent with a determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

180(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
note: Performance benchmarks are a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Performance benchmarks occur during the determination of a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation to performance benchmarks
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (5) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument. Performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Performance benchmarks are defined as a type of AI output.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Definition of performance benchmark
modality: CogAI
operator: is-a
premise text: (5) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument. Performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Performance benchmarks are a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legislative instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Performance benchmarks are defined as a type of determination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Definition of performance benchmark
modality: Diffusion
operator: is-a
premise text: (5) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument. Performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Performance benchmarks occur during the determination of a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation to performance benchmarks
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (5) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument. Performance benchmarks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

180(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
note: Minister may set minimum benchmarks for compliance with a standard.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

180(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
note: Instrument may be of general application or limited as provided in the instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

180(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
note: Must meet or exceed minimum benchmarks
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to meet minimum benchmarks
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

180(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
note: Primary universal service provider must meet or exceed a minimum benchmark set by an instrument under subsection (6).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Primary universal service provider must meet or exceed a minimum benchmark.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

181 Subsection 152CH(1) (note 6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
note: Repeal a note
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-181-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-181
schema version: 2

182 Subsection 152CI(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
note: Repeal subsection, substitute with provision having no effect to the extent of inconsistency.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-182
schema version: 2

182 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
curation status: Proposed
has part: 182(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 182(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 182(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 182(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 182(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-182-2
schema version: 2

182(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: A determination under subsection (1) may be of general application or may be limited as provided in the determination.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 182 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 182(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

182(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: Compliance with subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 is not limited by subsection (2)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 182 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No implication on compliance
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between subsections
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Subsection (2) and subsection 33(3A) have overlapping temporal scopes

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance is not limited
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of compliance as a concept
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: Compliance is recognized as a concept in the legislation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance is not limited
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implication of limitation on subsection 33(3A)
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Subsection (2) does not limit subsection 33(3A)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance is not limited
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of implications
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Implication of limitation on subsection 33(3A) is diffused to subsection (2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No implication on compliance
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Repeating pattern of subsections
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: Subsection (2) and subsection 33(3A) have repeating patterns

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 182(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

182(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: Primary universal service provider must comply with a determination under subsection (1).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 182 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 182(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

182(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: Instruments inconsistent with a determination have no effect.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 182 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Determination is a legislative instrument.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (5) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent to which the instrument is inconsistent with a determination in force under subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits instruments inconsistent with a determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (5) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determination is a legislative instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (5) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Instruments inconsistent with a determination have no effect.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implication
premise text: (5) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Determination is a legislative instrument.
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
premise text: (5) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 182(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

182(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
note: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 182 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It is an obligation on the State to make such a determination.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of legislative instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 182(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits provision with inconsistent Ministerial pricing determination.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

183 Subsection 152CJ(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
note: Omit “may”, substitute “is to”.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-183-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-183-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-183
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-183-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘is to’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits using 'may'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Omit ‘may’

184 Subsections 152CJ(3), (4) and (5)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
curation status: Proposed
has part: 184(3) Subsections 152CJ(3), (4) and (5)
has part: 184(4) Subsections 152CJ(3), (4) and (5)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-184
schema version: 2

184 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
curation status: Proposed
has part: 184(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 184(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 184(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 184(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-184-2
schema version: 2

184(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
note: Clause 1 of Schedule 1 to the Telecommunications Act 1997 does not apply to a contravention of a standard in force under subsection (1).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 184 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-10-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 184(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

184(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
note: Clause 1 of Schedule 2 to the Telecommunications Act 1997 does not apply to a contravention of a standard in force under subsection (1).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-11
schema version: 2
part of: 184 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-11-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 184(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

184(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: minimum benchmarks
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
note: Must meet or exceed minimum benchmarks
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 184 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to meet or exceed minimum benchmarks
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

184(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
note: Primary universal service provider must meet or exceed a minimum benchmark.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 184 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to meet or exceed a minimum benchmark.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 184(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

184(3) Subsections 152CJ(3), (4) and (5)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
note: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-184-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 184 Subsections 152CJ(3), (4) and (5)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 184(3) Subsections 152CJ(3), (4) and (5)

184(4) Subsections 152CJ(3), (4) and (5)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
note: The Register is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-184-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 184 Subsections 152CJ(3), (4) and (5)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Register is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

185 Division 8 of Part XIC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
note: Repeal Division
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-185-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-185
schema version: 2

186 Division 9 of Part XIC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
note: Repeal Division
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-186-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-186
schema version: 2

186 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.190
note: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-186-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-186-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-186-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

187 Paragraph 152EF(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new requirements.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-187-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-187-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-187-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the specified paragraph.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

188 Subparagraph 152ELA(3)(a)(i)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
note: Omit '152AT(1) or'
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-188-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-188
schema version: 2

188 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.192
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-188-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-188-2
schema version: 2

189 Subparagraph 152ELA(3)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
note: Omit “or” (last occurring)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-189-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-189
schema version: 2

19 After subsection 70(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
schema version: 2

19 Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.202
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19(1) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
has part: 19(2) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
has part: 19(3) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-19-2
schema version: 2

19(1) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
type: Concept
description: Priority assistance in connection with standard telephone service supply
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.202
note: Carriage service provider must offer priority assistance if requested by prospective residential customer.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to provide priority assistance
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide priority assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Request for priority assistance

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(1) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage

19(2) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.202
note: Provider must inform prospective residential customer of priority assistance options.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provider must inform prospective residential customer.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(2) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage

19(3) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.202
note: Priority assistance has the same meaning as in the priority assistance industry code.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of priority assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: =

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(3) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage

190 Subparagraph 152ELA(3)(a)(iii)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
note: Repeal a subparagraph
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-190-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-190
schema version: 2

190 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.194
note: Second provider must be a wholesale customer of the first provider.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-190-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-190-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-190-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-190-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-190-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 190 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

191 Paragraph 152ELA(3)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
note: Repeal paragraph
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-191-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-191
schema version: 2

192 Paragraph 152ELA(3)(c)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.165
note: Omit “this Part;”, substitute “this Part.”.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-192-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-192
schema version: 2

192 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
note: Does not limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-192-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-192-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-192-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-192-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (3A)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: DoesNotImply
premise text: Subsection (2)

193 Paragraph 152ELA(3)(d)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.165
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-193-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-193
schema version: 2

194 Subsections 152ELA(6) and (7)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.165
note: Repeal subsections and substitute with new provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-194-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-194
schema version: 2

194 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.198
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-194-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-194-2
schema version: 2

195 Before section 152EM
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.165
curation status: Proposed
has part: 195(1) Before section 152EM
has part: 195(2) Before section 152EM
has part: 195(3) Before section 152EM
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-195
schema version: 2

195(1) Before section 152EM
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.165
note: Compensation for acquisition of property on just terms
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-195-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 195 Before section 152EM

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to pay compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

195(2) Before section 152EM
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.165
note: Person may institute proceedings for recovery of compensation if Commonwealth and person do not agree on amount.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-195-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 195 Before section 152EM

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide compensation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 195(2) Before section 152EM

195(3) Before section 152EM
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.165
note: Definitions and scope of Part 2 of Schedule 1 to the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Act 2010.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-195-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 195 Before section 152EM

195A After section 152EO
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.165
note: Amendments to Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-195a
schema version: 2

196 Subsection 155AAA(21) (subparagraph (c)(i) of the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.166
note: Omit specific references from definition of protected information
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-196-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-196
schema version: 2

196 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.200
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-196-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-196-2
schema version: 2

197 Subsection 171B(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.166
note: Omit certain words from section headings.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-197-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-197-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-197
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-197-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting words.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

198 Definitions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.166
note: Definitions for access agreement, access determination, and binding rules of conduct.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-198-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-198
schema version: 2

198 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.202
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-198-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-198-2
schema version: 2

199 Transitional—certificates under subclause 33(3) of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.167
note: Certificate effect after commencement
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-199-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-199
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-199-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 199 Transitional—certificates under subclause 33(3) of

1A Section 1A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1a
schema version: 2

1A At the end of subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Enhance the welfare of Australians with accessible and affordable carriage services.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1a-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1a-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1a-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1a-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Enhance welfare
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to enhance welfare
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Availability of carriage services

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1a-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1A At the end of subsection 3(1)

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement rules
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement information for the Act
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-3
schema version: 2

2 At the end of section 60
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.9
note: Section 60 has effect subject to section 577J of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-4
schema version: 2

20 After paragraph 70(5)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Inserts condition from Part 1 of Schedule 1 related to sections 577AD, 577CD or 577ED.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
schema version: 2

20 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 20(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 20(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 20(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2
schema version: 2

20(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Variation takes effect when accepted by the ACCC.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

20(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Variation details
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Publish variation on website after effect of variation
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publish variation on website
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

20(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

20(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: An instrument under subsection (5) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of an instrument being a legislative instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (9) An instrument under subsection (5)

20 Requirements for Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.203
note: No requirement imposed on Telstra if clause 19 of Carrier Licence Conditions Declaration 1997 is in force.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Part does not impose a requirement on Telstra if clause 19 is in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between clause 19 and the Part
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Clause 19 of Carrier Licence Conditions Declaration 1997 is during the force of the Part.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No requirement imposed on Telstra.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Clause 19 of Carrier Licence Conditions Declaration 1997 is in force.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No requirement imposed on Telstra if clause 19 is in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to exempt from requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: The Part permits exemption from the requirement if clause 19 of Carrier Licence Conditions Declaration 1997 is in force.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No requirement imposed on Telstra.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: The Part does not impose a requirement on Telstra if clause 19 of Carrier Licence Conditions Declaration 1997 is in force.

200 Transitional—certificates under subclause 34(3) of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.167
note: Certificate effect after commencement
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-200-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-200
schema version: 2

200 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.204
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-200-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-200-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-200-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 200 Transitional—certificates under subclause 34(3) of

201 Transitional—certificates under subclause 35(3) of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.167
note: Certificate effect after commencement
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-201-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-201
schema version: 2

202 Transitional—ordinary class exemptions from standard
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.168
note: Continues application of section 152AS despite repeal and amendment.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-202
schema version: 2

202 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.206
curation status: Proposed
has part: 202(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 202(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 202(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-202-2
schema version: 2

202(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.206
note: No infringement notice can be given if the provision is a listed infringement notice provision and has been so for at least 3 months.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 202 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No infringement notice can be given.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The provision is a listed infringement notice provision and has been so for at least 3 months.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 202(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

202(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.206
note: No infringement notice can be given unless the other provision has been a listed infringement notice provision for at least 3 months before the contravention is alleged to have taken place.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 202 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No infringement notice can be given.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 202(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

202(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.206
note: Declaration of listed infringement notice provision
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 202 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a specified provision of this Act; or ... is a listed infringement notice provision for the purposes of this section.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Declares a temporal interval during which a provision applies
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (7) The ACMA may, by legislative instrument...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a specified provision of this Act; or ... is a listed infringement notice provision for the purposes of this section.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Declares a provision that can be applied through a determination
modality: CogAI
operator: through
premise text: (7) The ACMA may, by legislative instrument...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a specified provision of this Act; or ... is a listed infringement notice provision for the purposes of this section.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declares a provision as permitted
modality: Deontic
operator: permits
premise text: (7) The ACMA may, by legislative instrument...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a specified provision of this Act; or ... is a listed infringement notice provision for the purposes of this section.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Declares a provision that can be applied through a declaration
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: (7) The ACMA may, by legislative instrument...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a specified provision of this Act; or ... is a listed infringement notice provision for the purposes of this section.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Declares a temporal interval during which a provision applies
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (7) The ACMA may, by legislative instrument...

203 Transitional—ordinary individual exemptions from
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.168
note: Continues application of section 152AT despite repeal and amendment.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-203-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-203
schema version: 2

204 Transitional—ordinary access undertakings given to the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.169
note: Transitional provisions for ordinary access undertakings given to the Commission before 15 September 2009.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-204
schema version: 2

204 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.208
curation status: Proposed
has part: 204(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 204(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-204-2
schema version: 2

204(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Submissions to the ACMA within 14 days after publication of the notice.
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.208
note: Publish notice and consider submissions before making or varying a declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 204 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish and consider submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

204(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.208
note: Includes specified Acts and regulations
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 204 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes specified Acts and regulations
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: specified Acts and regulations

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The undertaking was in operation immediately before the commencement of this item.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (1)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking cannot be varied so as to extend its duration.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The undertaking must be in operation immediately before the commencement of this item.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: This subitem has effect subject to the following subitems.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the undertaking adopts a set of model terms and conditions set out in the telecommunications access code, then, despite the repeal of sections 152BJ and 152BK of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010,
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The undertaking must adopt a set of model terms and conditions set out in the telecommunications access code.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (4)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the undertaking is inconsistent with an access agreement, the undertaking has no effect to the extent of the inconsistency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The undertaking must not be inconsistent with an access agreement.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (5)

205 Transitional—ordinary access undertakings given to the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.170
note: Ordinary access undertaking given to Commission on or after 15 September 2009
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-205-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-205
schema version: 2

206 Transitional—continuity of special access undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.171
note: Continuity of special access undertakings
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-206
schema version: 2

206 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210
curation status: Proposed
has part: 206(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 206(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 206(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-206-2
schema version: 2

206(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210
note: Withdrawal of infringement notice
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 206 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorized officer can withdraw notice
modality: Deontic
operator: can

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 206(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

206(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210
note: Withdrawal notice must be given within 28 days after infringement notice.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 206 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide withdrawal notice within 28 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 206(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

206(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210
note: Commonwealth liable to refund penalty if infringement notice withdrawn after payment.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 206 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Commonwealth is liable to refund the penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for liability.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4) If: (a) the penalty specified in the infringement notice is paid; and (b) the infringement notice is withdrawn after the penalty is paid;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Commonwealth is liable to refund the penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines inferential relationship between Commonwealth and refund.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inferential
premise text: (4) If: (a) the penalty specified in the infringement notice is paid; and (b) the infringement notice is withdrawn after the penalty is paid;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Commonwealth is liable to refund the penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on Commonwealth to refund penalty.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (4) If the penalty specified in the infringement notice is paid; and (b) the infringement notice is withdrawn after the penalty is paid;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Commonwealth is liable to refund the penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines diffusion of liability.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (4) If: (a) the penalty specified in the infringement notice is paid; and (b) the infringement notice is withdrawn after the penalty is paid;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Commonwealth is liable to refund the penalty.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring liability for refund.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (4) If: (a) the penalty specified in the infringement notice is paid; and (b) the infringement notice is withdrawn after the penalty is paid;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 206(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking continues to exist
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the effect on the undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The amendment does not affect the undertaking

207 Transitional—arbitration of access disputes
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.171
note: Continuation of Division, definition, and sections despite repeals and amendments.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-207-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-207-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-207
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-207-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-207-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 207 Transitional—arbitration of access disputes

208 Transitional—compliance with standard access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.174
note: Carrier or carriage service provider must comply with standard access obligations under specified conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-208-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-208-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-208
schema version: 2

208 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.212
note: No infringement notice can be given without guidelines in force.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-208-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-208-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-208-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-208-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No infringement notice can be given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing infringement notices without guidelines.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Guidelines must be in force under subsection (2).

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-208-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 208 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-208-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier or carriage service provider must comply with standard access obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-208-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 208 Transitional—compliance with standard access

209 Transitional—hindering the fulfilment of an obligation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.176
note: Hindering the fulfilment of an obligation imposed by arbitration determination
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-209-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-209
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-209-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 209 Transitional—hindering the fulfilment of an obligation

21 Before subsection 70(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in clause 84 of Schedule 1.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21 Before subsection 70(4)

210 Transitional—regulations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.176
note: Governor-General may make regulations in relation to transitional matters.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-210-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-210-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-210
schema version: 2

210 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-210-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-210-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-210-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

211 At the end of section 151AF (before the note)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.177
note: Add content services
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-211-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-211-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-211
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-211-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adds content services
modality: Deontic
operator: add

212 Subsections 151AKA(9) and (10)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.177
note: Commission is not required to observe procedural fairness in relation to Part A competition notices.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-212-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-212-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-212
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-212-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of procedural fairness observation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-212-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 212 Subsections 151AKA(9) and (10)

213 Application—competition notices
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.177
note: Amendment of section 151AKA applies to Part A competition notices issued after commencement.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-213-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-213
schema version: 2

214 Subsection 5(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.178
note: Definition of payphone carriage service
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-214
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: payphone operation is a temporal interval during which payphone carriage service is supplied
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: payphone carriage service is supplied by means of a payphone during its operation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: means of a payphone are sufficient to supply payphone carriage service
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Inference
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: payphone carriage service is supplied by means of a payphone

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: means of a payphone are sufficient to supply payphone carriage service
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
premise text: payphone carriage service is supplied by means of a payphone

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: means of a payphone must supply payphone carriage service
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: payphone carriage service must be supplied by means of a payphone

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: carriage service is a subclass of payphone carriage service
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: payphone carriage service is a type of carriage service

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: means of a payphone are sufficient to supply payphone carriage service
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
premise text: payphone carriage service is supplied by means of a payphone

215 Subsection 5(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.178
note: Defines price-related terms and conditions
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-215-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-215
schema version: 2

216 Subsection 5(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.178
note: Defines VOIP service
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-216
schema version: 2

216A Subparagraph 6(1)(b)(i)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.178
note: Omit specific term from text.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-216a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of a specific term.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

216B Subparagraph 6(1)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.178
note: Omit 'teletypewriter' and substitute with a device that enables text-based communication.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-216b
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute with a device that enables text-based communication.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Replaces 'teletypewriter' at the specified point in time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Replacement
premise text: Omit 'teletypewriter'

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute with a device that enables text-based communication.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Replaces 'teletypewriter' at the specified point in time.
modality: CogAI
operator: Temporal Replacement
premise text: Omit 'teletypewriter'

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute with a device that enables text-based communication.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'teletypewriter'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit 'teletypewriter'

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute with a device that enables text-based communication.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Replaces 'teletypewriter' at the specified point in time.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal Replacement
premise text: Omit 'teletypewriter'

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute with a device that enables text-based communication.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Replaces 'teletypewriter' at the specified point in time.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Replacement
premise text: Omit 'teletypewriter'

217 After section 6
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.178
note: Insert: ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 Amendments Schedule 1 Universal service regime Part 4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-217-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-217
schema version: 2

218 After section 8B
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-218-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-218
schema version: 2

219 Subsections 9(2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
curation status: Proposed
has part: 219(2) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
has part: 219(2A) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
has part: 219(2B) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
has part: 219(2C) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
has part: 219(2D) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
has part: 219(2E) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
has part: 219(3) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-219
schema version: 2

219(2) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
type: Concept
description: True
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
note: Obligation to supply standard telephone services on request.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-219-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 219 Subsections 9(2) and (3)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to supply standard telephone services on request.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass of obligation to provide standard telephone services.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 219(2) Subsections 9(2) and (3)

219(2A) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
type: Concept
description: payphones
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
note: Obligation to supply, install and maintain payphones in Australia.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-219-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 219 Subsections 9(2) and (3)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to supply, install and maintain payphones in Australia.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies payphones as a required service.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 219(2A) Subsections 9(2) and (3)

219(2B) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
type: Concept
description: True
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
note: Obligation to supply prescribed carriage services on request.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-219-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 219 Subsections 9(2) and (3)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to supply prescribed carriage services on request.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass of obligation to supply prescribed carriage services.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 219(2B) Subsections 9(2) and (3)

219(2C) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
note: Request for standard telephone service must comply with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c
schema version: 2
part of: 219 Subsections 9(2) and (3)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During the supply of a standard telephone service, compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements is required.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Supply of a standard telephone service.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: During the supply of a standard telephone service, compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements is required.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: Supply of a standard telephone service.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Request for standard telephone service.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: During the supply of a standard telephone service, compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements is required.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: Supply of a standard telephone service.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: During the supply of a standard telephone service, compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements is required.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Supply of a standard telephone service.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 219(2C) Subsections 9(2) and (3)

219(2D) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
note: Minister may determine requirements by legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-219-ss-2d
schema version: 2
part of: 219 Subsections 9(2) and (3)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to determine requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: may

219(2E) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
note: No obligation arises for standard telephone service supply under specified circumstances.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2e-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-219-ss-2e
schema version: 2
part of: 219 Subsections 9(2) and (3)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No obligation arises.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negation of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
premise text: (2E) An obligation does not arise...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 219(2E) Subsections 9(2) and (3)

219(3) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
note: Minister may determine circumstances for subsection (2E) purposes
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-219-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 219 Subsections 9(2) and (3)

22 After paragraph 564(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Inserts carrier licence condition related to section 577AD, 577CD or 577ED
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
schema version: 2

22 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.26
curation status: Proposed
has part: 22(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 22(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 22(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 22(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 22(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2
schema version: 2

22(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Authorises entry into contract with NBN corporation under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...then:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval within which authorisation applies
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (c) when the contract, arrangement or understanding is entered into...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is authorised for the purposes of subsection 51(1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Support for Telstra's action
modality: Argumentation
operator: Supports
premise text: (a) Telstra enters into a contract...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...then:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation to enter into contract
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (4) If...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...then:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of authorisation to NBN corporation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (b) the contract, arrangement or understanding contains a migration provision...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is authorised for the purposes of subsection 51(1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Justification for Telstra's action
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Justifies
premise text: (a) Telstra enters into a contract...

22(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Telstra's conduct is prohibited unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conduct is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Telstra's conduct is engaged in

22(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Authorisation for conduct under section 577A
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection 51(1) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During section 577A undertaking
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Section 577A undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection 51(1) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: During section 577A undertaking
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: Section 577A undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection 51(1) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorises conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: authorises
premise text: Section 577A undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection 51(1) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: During section 577A undertaking
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: Section 577A undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection 51(1) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: During section 577A undertaking
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: Section 577A undertaking

22(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: Acquisition of asset from Telstra authorized under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the disposal of the asset overlaps with the compliance requirement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between conditions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) the disposal of the asset by Telstra is required for the compliance by Telstra with an undertaking in force under section 577A

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the acquisition of the asset is authorised
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (7) If...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the acquisition of the asset is authorized
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Asset acquisition authorization
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorization
premise text: (7) If...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is recurrently involved in the asset acquisition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of asset acquisition
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (c) the person is identified in the undertaking as the person by whom the asset is to be directly or indirectly acquired

22(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.26
note: If Telstra enters into a contract with an NBN corporation to comply with an undertaking in force under section 577A, then both parties must enter into the contract.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 22 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Both parties must enter into the contract.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: Telstra enters into a contract with an NBN corporation.

22 Sept 2012
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.217
note: Royal Assent
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-3
schema version: 2

220 Subsection 9(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181
note: Substitute clause in subsection (2)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-220-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-220
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-220-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 220 Subsection 9(4)

221 Subsection 9(5)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181
note: Substitute subsection (2B) for (1)(c)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-221-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-221
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-221-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 221 Subsection 9(5)

222 Subsection 9(6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181
note: Substitute clause in subsection (2)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-222-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-222
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-222-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 222 Subsection 9(6)

223 Section 9A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-223-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-223
schema version: 2

224 Subsection 12C(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181
note: Omit 'take all reasonable steps to'
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-224-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-224
schema version: 2

225 After Subdivision B of Division 5 of Part 2
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181
note: Amendments to Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-225-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-225
schema version: 2

226 Subsection 150(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.192
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-226-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-226-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-226
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-226-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal subsection
modality: Deontic
operator: REPEAL

227 Before section 113
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.193
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-227-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-227
schema version: 2

228 Section 113
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.193
note: Minister may make performance standards and set minimum benchmarks.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-228-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-228-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-228
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-228-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-228-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 228 Section 113

229 After section 114
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.193
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-229-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-229
schema version: 2

23 Subsection 564(3) (after note 1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Notes sections dealing with undertakings given by Telstra
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
schema version: 2

230 After subsection 115(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.194
note: No standard applies to wholesale carriage services.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-230-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-230-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-230
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-230-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on standard application
modality: Deontic
operator: !

231 Subsections 115(5) and (6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.194
note: Repeal subsections and substitute with new definitions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-231-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-231
schema version: 2

232 After section 117A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.194
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-232-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-232
schema version: 2

233 At the end of subsection 118(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
note: Add “or 117D”.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-233-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-233-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-233
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-233-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adding to a list.
modality: Deontic
operator: addition

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-233-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 233 At the end of subsection 118(1)

234 At the end of paragraph 118(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
note: Add 'or 117D'
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-234-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-234-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-234
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-234-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Add 'or 117D'
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adding to a list
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
premise text: The list must be updated.

235 Subsection 120(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
curation status: Proposed
has part: 235(4) Subsection 120(4)
has part: 235(5) Subsection 120(4)
has part: 235(6) Subsection 120(4)
has part: 235(7) Subsection 120(4)
has part: 235(8) Subsection 120(4)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-235
schema version: 2

235(4) Subsection 120(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
note: Waiver must be in the specified form.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-235-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 235 Subsection 120(4)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to specify waiver form.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) A waiver must be in the form specified in the instrument.

235(5) Subsection 120(4)
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
note: The form must include a statement that summarises the consequences of the waiver.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-235-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 235 Subsection 120(4)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The form must include a statement that summarises the consequences of the waiver.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a statement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 235(5) Subsection 120(4)

235(6) Subsection 120(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
note: Waiver cannot be set out in a standard form of agreement
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-235-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 235 Subsection 120(4)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on waiver
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (6) A waiver must not be set out in a standard form of agreement

235(7) Subsection 120(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
note: Customer cannot waive protection and rights under Part in relation to a particular standard telephone service.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-235-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 235 Subsection 120(4)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Customer's protection and rights under Part
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on waiving protection and rights
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Universal service obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 235(7) Subsection 120(4)

235(8) Subsection 120(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
note: An instrument under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-235-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 235 Subsection 120(4)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An instrument under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of a legislative instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (8) An instrument under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 235(8) Subsection 120(4)

236 After section 120
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-236-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-236
schema version: 2

237 Section 122
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
note: Insert 'or 117D' after '115'
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-237-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-237-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-237
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-237-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

238 After section 122
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.198
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-238-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-238
schema version: 2

239 At the end of section 123 (before the note)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.198
note: Add 'or 117D'
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-239-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-239-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-239
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-239-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The list now contains 'or 117D'
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adding to a list
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
premise text: The list contains 'or 117C'

24 After paragraph 564(3)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.13
note: Inserts carrier licence condition set out in clause 84 of Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
schema version: 2

24 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 24(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 24(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 24(12) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2
schema version: 2

24(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Conduct for determining timetable is authorised under subsection 51(1) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-10-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-10-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (b) the final migration plan sets out a method for determining a timetable...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for determining timetable.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (10) If...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the conduct is authorised for the purposes of subsection 51(1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to engage in conduct for determining timetable.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (10) If...

24(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Telstra must not enter into a contract with an NBN corporation containing certain provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-11-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-11
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of contract with NBN corporation
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

24(12) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Imposes a duty to amend Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-12-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-12
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the amendment of Schedule 1
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

24(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.28
note: Minister may determine that subsection (8) applies as if Telstra had entered into the contract to comply with the undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 24 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

240 Application—waiver
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.198
note: Amendments apply in relation to a waiver given after commencement.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-240-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-240-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-240
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-240-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: Deontic
operator: >

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-240-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 240 Application—waiver

241 After subsection 529(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.199
curation status: Proposed
has part: 241(2A) After subsection 529(2)
has part: 241(2B) After subsection 529(2)
has part: 241(2C) After subsection 529(2)
has part: 241(2D) After subsection 529(2)
has part: 241(2E) After subsection 529(2)
has part: 241(2F) After subsection 529(2)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-241
schema version: 2

241(2A) After subsection 529(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.199
note: Carriers or carriage service providers must prepare reports.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-241-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 241 After subsection 529(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide reports
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 241(2A) After subsection 529(2)

241(2B) After subsection 529(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.199
note: Carriers or carriage service providers must give reports to ACMA.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-241-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 241 After subsection 529(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 241(2B) After subsection 529(2)

241(2C) After subsection 529(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.199
note: Rules for report preparation manner and form
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-241-ss-2c
schema version: 2
part of: 241 After subsection 529(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to specify rules for report preparation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2C) The rules may specify the manner and form in which reports are to be prepared.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 241(2C) After subsection 529(2)

241(2D) After subsection 529(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.199
note: Rules may require preparation of reports as and when required by ACMA or at specified intervals.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2d-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-241-ss-2d
schema version: 2
part of: 241 After subsection 529(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2d-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...at regular intervals as are specified in the rules.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Reports must be prepared at regular intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: REGULAR
premise text: or at specified intervals.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the preparation of reports as and when required by the ACMA;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prepare reports
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: Rules may provide for...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 241(2D) After subsection 529(2)

241(2E) After subsection 529(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.199
note: Report prepared in accordance with rules may be given to ACMA
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2e-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-241-ss-2e
schema version: 2
part of: 241 After subsection 529(2)

241(2F) After subsection 529(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.199
note: No limitation on subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2f-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-241-ss-2f
schema version: 2
part of: 241 After subsection 529(2)

242 Paragraphs 529(4)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.199
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with ACMA's telecommunications functions or powers.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-242-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-242-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-242
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-242-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace existing paragraphs with new obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-242-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 242 Paragraphs 529(4)(a) and (b)

243 At the end of section 529
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.200
note: Section 529 does not limit ACMA's general information-gathering powers.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-243-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-243
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-243-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 243 At the end of section 529

244 Transitional—record-keeping rules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.200
note: Amendments do not affect record-keeping rules continuity
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-244-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-244
schema version: 2

245 At the end of Schedule 2
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.201
note: Add at the end of Schedule 2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-245-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-245
schema version: 2

246 Section 7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.204
note: Definition of authorised infringement notice officer
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-246-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-246-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-246-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-246
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-246-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-246-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

247 Section 7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.204
note: Definition of infringement notice
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-247-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-247-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-247-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-247
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-247-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a key term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-247-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

248 Section 7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.204
note: Definition of penalty unit
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-248-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-248-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-248
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-248-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: penalty unit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-248-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 248 Section 7

249 After Part 31A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.204
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-249-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-249
schema version: 2

25 Subsection 564(3) (after note 2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.13
note: Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
schema version: 2

250 Application—infringement notices
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.212
note: Section applies in relation to alleged contravention of civil penalty provision after commencement.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-250-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-250-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-250
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-250-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to alleged contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-250-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 250 Application—infringement notices

251 Section 7 (definition of civil penalty provision)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.213
note: Defines civil penalty provision
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-251-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-251
schema version: 2

252 Subsection 112(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214
note: Insertion of section 125AA after sections 124 and 125.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-252-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-252
schema version: 2

253 After section 125
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-253-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-253
schema version: 2

26 After paragraph 571(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.13
note: Inserts carrier licence condition related to section 577AD, 577CD or 577ED
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
schema version: 2

26 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.30
note: Definition of asset and related terms
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-7
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of asset and related terms
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: N/A
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: asset means: (a) any legal or equitable estate or interest in real or personal property, including a contingent or prospective one; and (b) any right, privilege or immunity, including a contingent or prospective one.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: N/A
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: fixed-line carriage service means: (a) a carriage service that is supplied using a line to premises occupied or used by an end-user; or (b) a service that facilitates the supply of a carriage service covered by paragraph (a).

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: N/A
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: give effect to, in relation to a provision of a contract, arrangement or understanding, has the same meaning as in the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: N/A
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: migration provision has the meaning given by subsection (11).

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: N/A
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: national broadband network means a telecommunications network for the high-speed carriage of communications, where an NBN corporation has been, is, or is to be, involved in the creation or development of the network.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-7
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: N/A
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: NBN Co means NBN Co Limited (ACN 136 533 741), as the company exists from time to time (even if its name is later changed).

27 Subsection 571(3) (after note 1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.13
note: References sections dealing with undertakings given by Telstra.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
schema version: 2

28 After paragraph 571(3)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.13
note: Inserts carrier licence condition set out in clause 84 of Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
schema version: 2

28 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 28(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 28(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 28(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 28(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 28(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 28(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2
schema version: 2

28(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Minister may specify additional matters in a written instrument
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

28(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: No provisions dealing with specified matters in a migration plan
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No provisions dealing with specified matters in a migration plan
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: A draft or final migration plan must not contain provisions dealing with such matters (if any) as are specified in a written instrument made by the Minister.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

28(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Draft migration plan cannot be given to ACCC without determination in force under subsection 577BB(1).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

28(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

28(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: An instrument under subsection (3) or (4) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits instruments under subsection (3) or (4)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

28(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.32
note: Defines fixed-line carriage service and national broadband network.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 28 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: NBN corporation means NBN Co; or NBN Tasmania; or a company that is a related body corporate of NBN Co.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies NBN Co and related body corporate.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: NBN Co means NBN Co Limited (ACN 136 533 741)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: NBN corporation means NBN Co; or NBN Tasmania; or a company that is a related body corporate of NBN Co.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines NBN Tasmania and related body corporate.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: NBN Tasmania means NBN Tasmania Limited (ACN 138 338 271)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies related body corporate.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: related body corporate has the same meaning as in the Corporations Act 2001

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

29 Subsection 571(3) (after note 2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.13
note: Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
schema version: 2

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule 1 section
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.7
note: Amendments to Acts specified in a Schedule
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to amend Acts
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Schedule(s)

3 At the end of section 62
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.9
note: Section 62 has effect subject to section 577J of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 At the end of section 62

30 After Part 32
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.13
note: Amendments to Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
schema version: 2

30 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 30(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 30(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 30(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 30(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 30(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 30(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2
schema version: 2

30(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Telstra gives ACCC an undertaking under section 577A.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Telstra has an obligation to nominate the event.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The nomination meets the requirements of paragraph 577AA(1)(b) and subsection 577AA(2).
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

30(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Replacement draft migration plan
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Request for Telstra to provide a replacement draft migration plan within 30 days.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal interval for providing the replacement draft migration plan is >= 30 days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for providing the replacement draft migration plan
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: Telstra MUST provide a replacement draft migration plan within 30 days after receiving the notice.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra's failure to provide a replacement draft migration plan implies that the ACCC will refuse to approve the original plan.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of Telstra's failure to provide a replacement draft migration plan
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: If Telstra fails to provide a replacement draft migration plan within 30 days, the ACCC will refuse to approve the original plan.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra MUST provide a replacement draft migration plan within 30 days.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a replacement draft migration plan
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The ACCC requests Telstra to provide a replacement draft migration plan within 30 days.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra and the ACCC are related by IS_A.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Relationship between Telstra and the ACCC
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: The ACCC is an agent that requests Telstra to provide a replacement draft migration plan.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The replacement draft migration plan IS A document that complies with the migration plan principles.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation of the replacement draft migration plan
modality: SHACL
operator: IS_A
premise text: The replacement draft migration plan must comply with the migration plan principles.

30(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Submissions to the ACCC within 28 days
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: The ACCC must accept an undertaking before making a decision under subsection (2) The ACCC must publish a notice and consider submissions before making a decision.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to accept an undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish notice and consider submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

30(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Comply with a direction under subparagraph (2)(b)(ii) Consultation after undertaking comes into force
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between the direction and the compliance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (4) Telstra must comply with a direction under subparagraph (2)(b)(ii)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a direction
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (4) Telstra must comply with a direction under subparagraph (2)(b)(ii)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section has effect as if the original plan had been given to the ACCC in accordance with the undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The ACCC must be consulted

30(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: ACCC must consider certain factors before making a decision. Draft migration plan given by Telstra is taken to be in accordance with the undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to consider
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Decision-making process

30(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Notification in writing
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.34
note: Notify Telstra of decision within a certain timeframe.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 30 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify Telstra
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

31 At the end of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.63
note: Addition of new content at the end of Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
schema version: 2

32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 32(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 32(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 32(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 32(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 32(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 32(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
schema version: 2

32 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.85
note: Defines Telstra as the same meaning as in the Telstra Corporation Act 1991.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra means the entity defined by this subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with an obligation to provide its meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: Definition
premise text: Telstra has the same meaning as in the Telstra Corporation Act 1991.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra means the entity defined by this subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with an obligation to provide its meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: Definition
premise text: The definition of Telstra is provided in this subsection.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra means the entity defined by this subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with an obligation to provide its meaning.
modality: Deontic
operator: Definition
premise text: The definition of Telstra is provided in section 32(1).

32(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: Telstra must provide a draft migration plan to the ACCC under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Telstra has given an undertaking to the ACCC.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

32(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Replacement draft migration plan
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: Direct Telstra to provide a replacement draft migration plan within 30 days.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Direct Telstra to provide a replacement draft migration plan within 30 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

32(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Submissions to the ACCC within 28 days
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: The ACCC must publish a notice and consider submissions before making a decision.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish notice and consider submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

32(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: Comply with a direction under subparagraph (2)(b)(ii)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (4) Telstra must comply with a direction under subparagraph (2)(b)(ii)

32(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: Draft migration plan must be given in accordance with the undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with the undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

32(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: Draft migration plan must be given in accordance with the undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a draft migration plan in accordance with the undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

32(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Decision notification to Telstra
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.36
note: Notify Telstra of decision within a timeframe
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision notification
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

33 At the end of section 151AJ
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.85
note: Exemption from anti-competitive conduct under specific circumstances.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection 51(1) purposes
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conduct permitted during specific period or circumstances.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: Section 577BA

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No anti-competitive conduct
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to engage in anti-competitive conduct under specific circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Section 577BA of the Telecommunications Act 1997

34 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.38
curation status: Proposed
has part: 34(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 34(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 34(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 34(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 34(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 34(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
schema version: 2

34 Subsection 151BTA(13) (definition of Telstra)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.85
note: Repeal definition of Telstra
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-2
schema version: 2

34(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Telstra gives ACCC an undertaking under section 577A.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Telstra gives ACCC an undertaking under section 577A.

34(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Replacement draft migration plan
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Request for Telstra to provide a replacement draft migration plan within 30 days.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a replacement draft migration plan
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

34(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Submissions to the ACCC within 28 days
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: The ACCC must publish a notice and consider submissions before making a decision.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The ACCC must take action before making a decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

34(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Draft migration plan must be given in accordance with the undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a draft migration plan in accordance with the undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

34(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Decision notification to Telstra
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Notify Telstra of decision within a reasonable timeframe.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision notification
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

34(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Decision notification to Telstra
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.38
note: Notify Telstra of decision within a timeframe
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 34 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision notification
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

35 Section 151BUAAA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.85
note: Repeal a section
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-35-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
schema version: 2

36 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 36(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 36(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 36(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 36(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 36(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
schema version: 2

36 At the end of Part XIB
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.85
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2
schema version: 2

36(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Cannot withdraw a final migration plan
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A final migration plan cannot be withdrawn.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of withdrawing a final migration plan
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (4) A final migration plan may not be withdrawn.

36(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Integration of migration plan provisions into the undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

36(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Publish ACCC's final migration plan on website after its force.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between plan publication and ACCC's functions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

36(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: ACCC may perform functions and exercise powers in relation to a final migration plan.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

36(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: A final migration plan is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 36 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

37 Section 152AC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Defines final migration plan as same meaning as in Telecommunications Act 1997.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
schema version: 2

38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
curation status: Proposed
has part: 38(1C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 38(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 38(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 38(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 38(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 38(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 38(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
schema version: 2

38 At the end of subsection 152AR(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Preventing Telstra from complying with undertakings under specified sections.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition applies during specified periods.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Prohibition applies during specified periods.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: Section 38(2) of the Telecommunications Act 1997

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must not comply with undertakings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits Telstra from complying with undertakings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 577A, 577C or 577E of the Telecommunications Act 1997

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must not comply with undertakings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents Telstra from complying with undertakings under specified sections.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 38(2) of the Telecommunications Act 1997

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition is enforced through specified sections.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Prohibition is enforced through specified sections.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
premise text: Section 38(2) of the Telecommunications Act 1997

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibition continues until Telstra complies with undertakings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Prohibition continues until Telstra complies with undertakings.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: Section 38(2) of the Telecommunications Act 1997

38(1C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Notice and submissions
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Publish notice and invite submissions before making or varying an instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-1c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-1c
schema version: 2
part of: 38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

38(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: The period specified in the undertaking must not be longer than 12 months.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

38(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: The undertaking must be expressed to be an undertaking under this section.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expressing the undertaking clearly
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST Express
premise text: The undertaking must be expressed to be an undertaking under this section.

38(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: The undertaking may not be withdrawn after it has been accepted by the ACCC.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking has a specific temporal scope.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The undertaking overlaps with other provisions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The provision is part of the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The withdrawal of the undertaking implies a breach of the provision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The withdrawal of the undertaking implies a breach of the provision.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: If the undertaking is withdrawn, then the ACCC has breached the provision.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision acknowledges the ACCC's role.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The provision recognizes the ACCC's authority.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: The provision is part of the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking may not be withdrawn.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The undertaking cannot be withdrawn.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: The ACCC has accepted the undertaking.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision has a broader scope.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The provision diffuses to other related provisions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: The provision is part of the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

38(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: ACCC may perform functions and exercise powers in accordance with the undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

38(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

38(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: An instrument under subsection (1B) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

39 At the end of Part XIC
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Add at the end of Part XIC
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-39-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
schema version: 2

4 Section 4
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule 1 section
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
schema version: 2

4 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.8
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2
schema version: 2

4 At the end of section 68
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.9
note: Section 68 has effect subject to section 577K of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-3
schema version: 2

40 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 40(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 40(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 40(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 40(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
schema version: 2

40 Transitional—continuity of special Telstra directions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.87
note: Continuity of special Telstra directions unaffected by repeal
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2
schema version: 2

40(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: An instrument under subsection (3) or (5) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: An instrument under subsection (3) or (5)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

40(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Repeals undertaking if event does not occur within specified period
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for event
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Defines rebuttal of undertaking
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals undertaking if event does not occur within specified period
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines diffusion of undertaking
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines eventual occurrence of event
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.

40(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: If events do not occur within the specified period, the undertaking is not accepted.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines an Allen interval for the key 'sch-1-sec-40-ss-8'
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Defines an argumentation property for the key 'sch-1-sec-40-ss-8'
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits acceptance of an undertaking if events do not occur within the specified period.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines a diffusion property for the key 'sch-1-sec-40-ss-8'
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines an LTL property for the key 'sch-1-sec-40-ss-8'
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;

40(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 40 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

41 Subsection 61(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.87
note: Omit “(1)”
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
schema version: 2

42 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-42-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
schema version: 2

42 Subsections 61(2), (3) and (4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.87
note: Repeal subsections
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-42-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-2
schema version: 2

43 Section 61A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.87
note: Repeal section
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-43-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
schema version: 2

44 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
curation status: Proposed
has part: 44(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 44(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 44(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 44(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 44(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 44(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
schema version: 2

44 After subsection 69(6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.87
note: Amendments to Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2
schema version: 2

44(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Expressing an undertaking under this section is mandatory.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expressing an undertaking is a requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

44(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: The undertaking may not be withdrawn after it has been accepted by the ACCC.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on withdrawing an undertaking after acceptance.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

44(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: ACCC may perform functions and exercise powers in accordance with the undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

44(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Determines control of subscription television broadcasting licence under Schedule 1 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

44(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 44(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

44(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: An instrument under subsection (1B) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 44 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

45 Subsection 69A(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.88
note: Omit 'Part 8', substitute 'Part 9'
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
schema version: 2

46 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.50
curation status: Proposed
has part: 46(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 46(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 46(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
schema version: 2

46 Section 69B
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.88
note: Repeal section
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-2
schema version: 2

46(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: An instrument under subsection (3) or (5) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 46 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of legislative instruments
modality: Deontic
operator: not

46(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: If events do not occur within the specified period, the undertaking is not accepted.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 46 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the events.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits acceptance of an undertaking if events do not occur within the specified period.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577E is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the decision-maker to consider the events.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577E is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission to consider alternative courses of action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the repetition of the temporal interval.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;

46(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 46 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

47 After subsection 70(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.88
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for conditions in Part 9 of Schedule 1.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47 After subsection 70(3)

48 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
schema version: 2

48 Paragraph 70(5)(ba)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.88
note: Omit 'Part 8', substitute 'Part 9'
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-48-2
schema version: 2

49 Subsection 70(6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.88
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-49-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
schema version: 2

5 Section 5
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 1, Parts 2 and 3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
schema version: 2

5 Subsection 85(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.9
note: Substitution of section references
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-5-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5-2
schema version: 2

50 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
curation status: Proposed
has part: 50(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 50(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
schema version: 2

50 Section 104
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.88
note: The ACMA may be directed to monitor and report on specified matters.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-50-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directive obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

50(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Notice of application must be given to certain persons or published in a certain manner.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-50-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

50(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Federal Court may rescind, vary or discharge an order made by it under this section.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-50-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 50 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the Federal Court from making an order under this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

505A ACCC may use material presented to a previous public
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
curation status: Proposed
has part: 505A(1) ACCC may use material presented to a previous public
has part: 505A(2) ACCC may use material presented to a previous public
has part: 505A(3) ACCC may use material presented to a previous public
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-505a
schema version: 2

505A(1) ACCC may use material presented to a previous public
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: The ACCC may use material presented to a previous public inquiry.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-505a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 505A ACCC may use material presented to a previous public

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The ACCC may use material.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

505A(2) ACCC may use material presented to a previous public
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Treat evidence/material as if presented to another public inquiry
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-505a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 505A ACCC may use material presented to a previous public

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACCC must treat evidence/material as if presented to another public inquiry
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

505A(3) ACCC may use material presented to a previous public
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: No implication that limits information use for public inquiries
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505a-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-505a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 505A ACCC may use material presented to a previous public

505B ACCC may adopt a finding from a previous public inquiry
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.101
note: ACCC may adopt a finding from a previous public inquiry
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-505b
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May adopt a finding
modality: Deontic
operator: may

51 At the end of Part 5
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
note: Addition of a new section
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
schema version: 2

52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 52(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(4A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(4B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(6A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(6B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(6C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
schema version: 2

52 After paragraph 564(3)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
note: Carrier licence condition set out in Part 9 of Schedule 1.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52 After paragraph 564(3)(b)

52(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: The Minister must make a declaration only if the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must make a declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

52(4A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Conditional commencement of a declaration under subsection (3)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

52(4B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Reverses the effect of a declaration if the undertaking has not been accepted by the ACCC.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4b-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-4b
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reverses the effect of a declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: Reversal
premise text: (4B) If: ... this Act has effect as if the declaration had never been made by the Minister.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: this Act has effect as if the declaration had never been made by the Minister.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reverses the effect of a declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: Reversal
premise text: (4B) If: ... this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC;

52(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Minister may declare Telstra exempt from undertaking requirement
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

52(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: The Minister must make a declaration only if the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must make a declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

52(6A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Conditional commencement of a declaration under subsection (5)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-6a
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

52(6B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Reverses the effect of a declaration if the undertaking has not been accepted by the ACCC.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-6b
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: this Act has effect as if the declaration had never been made by the Minister.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reverses the effect of a declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: Reversal
premise text: (6B) If: (a) paragraph (6)(b) applies to a declaration; and (b) as a result of subsection 577AA(7) or (8), this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC;

52(6C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Cannot be revoked
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-6c
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration cannot be revoked
modality: Deontic
operator: CannotBeRevoked

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52(6C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

52(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: A declaration made under subsection (3) or (5) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits declarations from being considered legislative instruments.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

52(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
note: Defines telecommunications market for this section.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-8-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section is part of Part XIB
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between terms
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Part XIB of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 applies to this section

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-8-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telecommunications market applies to this section
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Establishes a logical implication between terms
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: This section defines telecommunications market

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section references Part XIB
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes a relationship between terms
modality: Deontic
operator: has the same meaning as
premise text: Part XIB of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 defines telecommunications market

53 Subsection 564(3) (after note 2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
note: Inserts note 2A regarding functional separation of Telstra in Part 9 of Schedule 1.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-53-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
schema version: 2

54 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.58
curation status: Proposed
has part: 54(2A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 54(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 54(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
schema version: 2

54 After paragraph 571(3)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
note: Carrier licence condition set out in Part 9 of Schedule 1.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inserts a carrier licence condition.
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54 After paragraph 571(3)(b)

54(2A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Section 54(2A) covers a section 577A undertaking if certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must give the ACCC a draft migration plan
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Section requires a draft migration plan to be given by Telstra
modality: AllenInterval
operator: requires
premise text: Draft migration plan is required for this undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 54(2A) covers this undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section covers certain undertakings
modality: Deontic
operator: covers
premise text: Undertaking defined in section 577A

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must give the ACCC a draft migration plan
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section requires Telstra to give the ACCC a draft migration plan
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Draft migration plan is required for this undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The ACCC must approve the draft migration plan
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section requires the ACCC to approve the draft migration plan
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Draft migration plan is required for this undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The ACCC must have approved the draft migration plan under these sections
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section requires the ACCC to have approved the draft migration plan under specified sections
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Draft migration plan is required for this undertaking

54(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Prohibits aiding, abetting, counseling, or procuring a contravention of subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between prohibited actions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
premise text: (a) aid, abet, counsel or procure a contravention of subsection (1); and (b) induce, whether by threats or promises or otherwise, a contravention of subsection (1);

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Direct prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A person must not:

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inducing contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) induce, whether by threats or promises or otherwise, a contravention of subsection (1);

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Being knowingly concerned in contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) be in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, nor party to, a contravention of subsection (1);

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conspiring to effect contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (d) conspire with others to effect a contravention of subsection (1);

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

54(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Civil penalty provisions
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 54 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: civil penalty provisions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits breaches of civil penalty provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (4) Subsections (1) and (3)

55 Subsection 571(3) (after note 2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
note: Inserts note 2A regarding functional separation of Telstra in Part 9 of Schedule 1.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-55-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
schema version: 2

56 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.60
curation status: Proposed
has part: 56(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 56(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
schema version: 2

56 Part 8 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
note: Repeal Part of Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-56-2
schema version: 2

56(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Prohibits aiding, abetting, counseling, or procuring a contravention of subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-56-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits an action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

56(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Civil penalty provisions
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-56-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 56 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits civil penalty provisions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

57 Division 14 of Part XIB
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Repeal Division and substitute with new content.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-57-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
schema version: 2

572D Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.204
note: Infringement notices for contraventions of civil penalty provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572d
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes an obligation to issue infringement notices.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 572D Simplified outline

572E When an infringement notice can be given
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.205
curation status: Proposed
has part: 572E(1) When an infringement notice can be given
has part: 572E(2) When an infringement notice can be given
has part: 572E(3) When an infringement notice can be given
has part: 572E(4) When an infringement notice can be given
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572e
schema version: 2

572E(1) When an infringement notice can be given
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.205
note: Authorized infringement notice officer may give an infringement notice to a person who has contravened a civil penalty provision.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 572E When an infringement notice can be given

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorized infringement notice officer may give an infringement notice to the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May give an infringement notice
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: Authorized infringement notice officer has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened a civil penalty provision.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorized infringement notice officer must give an infringement notice to the person if he or she has reasonable grounds to believe that a person has contravened a civil penalty provision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must give an infringement notice if reasonable grounds exist
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: If an authorized infringement notice officer has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened a civil penalty provision, the authorized infringement notice officer may give to the person an infringement notice.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorized infringement notice officer can give an infringement notice to the person if he or she has reasonable grounds to believe that a person has contravened a civil penalty provision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorized infringement notice officer can give an infringement notice
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: If an authorized infringement notice officer has reasonable grounds to believe that a person has contravened a civil penalty provision, the authorized infringement notice officer may give to the person an infringement notice.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorized infringement notice officer can issue an infringement notice to the person based on his or her reasonable grounds.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Can issue an infringement notice based on reasonable grounds
modality: Epistemic
operator: can
premise text: The authorized infringement notice officer may give to the person an infringement notice relating to the contravention if he or she has reasonable grounds.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorized infringement notice officer must give an infringement notice to the person within a time limit if he or she has reasonable grounds to believe that a person has contravened a civil penalty provision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Must give an infringement notice within a time limit
modality: LTL
operator: must
premise text: If an authorized infringement notice officer has reasonable grounds to believe that a person has contravened a civil penalty provision, the authorized infringement notice officer may give to the person an infringement notice relating to the contravention.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 572E(1) When an infringement notice can be given

572E(2) When an infringement notice can be given
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.205
note: Infringement notice must be given within 12 months after the day on which the contravention is alleged to have taken place.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 572E When an infringement notice can be given

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 572E(2) When an infringement notice can be given

572E(3) When an infringement notice can be given
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.205
note: No infringement notice can be given for contravention of section 68 or 101.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 572E When an infringement notice can be given

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: No infringement notice can be given

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 572E(3) When an infringement notice can be given

572E(4) When an infringement notice can be given
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.205
note: Infringement notice can be given for certain contraventions of carrier licence conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572e-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 572E When an infringement notice can be given

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between infringement notice and contraventions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (4) If...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits certain conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (4) If...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 572E(4) When an infringement notice can be given

572F Matters to be included in an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.208
curation status: Proposed
has part: 572F(1) Matters to be included in an infringement notice
has part: 572F(2) Matters to be included in an infringement notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572f
schema version: 2

572F(1) Matters to be included in an infringement notice
type: Concept
description: (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f)
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.208
note: Infringement notice must contain specific details and information.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 572F Matters to be included in an infringement notice

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide specific information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) set out the name of the person to whom the notice is given;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide explanation for payment.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (e) give an explanation of how payment of the penalty is to be made;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Multiple obligations in a single provision.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND
premise text: (a), (b), (c), (d), (e)

572F(2) Matters to be included in an infringement notice
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.208
note: Must provide specific information in an infringement notice
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 572F Matters to be included in an infringement notice

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the date of the alleged contravention;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Contains temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(c), the brief details must include...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide specific information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following information in relation to the alleged contravention:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Contains information about infringement notice
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(c), the brief details must include...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the civil penalty provision that was allegedly contravened.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Contains trace
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(c), the brief details must include...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 572F(2) Matters to be included in an infringement notice

572G Amount of penalty
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.209
curation status: Proposed
has part: 572G(1) Amount of penalty
has part: 572G(2) Amount of penalty
has part: 572G(3) Amount of penalty
has part: 572G(4) Amount of penalty
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572g
schema version: 2

572G(1) Amount of penalty
type: Concept
description: Number of penalty units
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.209
note: Specify pecuniary penalty for infringement notice
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 572G Amount of penalty

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify pecuniary penalty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Relation to determination
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class
premise text: Determination under subsection (2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 572G(1) Amount of penalty

572G(2) Amount of penalty
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.209
note: Determination of contraventions and penalty units
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 572G Amount of penalty

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defining contraventions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: sets out

572G(3) Amount of penalty
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.209
note: Maximum penalty units per contravention
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 572G Amount of penalty

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 18,000 penalty units
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Penalty units must not exceed
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
premise text: Determination for a particular kind of contravention

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: 18,000
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Specifics the maximum penalty units
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Section 3 of subsection 572G

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 572G(3) Amount of penalty

572G(4) Amount of penalty
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.209
note: Penalty amount must be a pecuniary penalty equal to 12 penalty units.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572g-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 572G Amount of penalty

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4) The penalty to be specified in an infringement notice given to a person other than a body corporate must be a pecuniary penalty equal to 12 penalty units.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Equality of penalty amount
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (4) The penalty to be specified in an infringement notice given to a person other than a body corporate must be a pecuniary penalty equal to 12 penalty units.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4) The penalty to be specified in an infringement notice given to a person other than a body corporate must be a pecuniary penalty equal to 12 penalty units.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Equality of penalty amount
modality: LinearLogic
operator: =
premise text: (4) The penalty to be specified in an infringement notice given to a person other than a body corporate must be a pecuniary penalty equal to 12 penalty units.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 572G(4) Amount of penalty

572H Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.209
note: Scope of withdrawal of an infringement notice
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572h-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572h
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572h-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 572H Withdrawal of an infringement notice

572J What happens if the penalty is paid
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210
curation status: Proposed
has part: 572J(1) What happens if the penalty is paid
has part: 572J(2) What happens if the penalty is paid
has part: 572J(3) What happens if the penalty is paid
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572j
schema version: 2

572J(1) What happens if the penalty is paid
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210
note: Payment of penalty triggers obligation to comply with infringement notice.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 572J What happens if the penalty is paid

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (c) the infringement notice is not withdrawn.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Payment of penalty occurs during infringement notice period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) This section applies if:...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the infringement notice is not withdrawn.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation triggered by payment of penalty.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (1) This section applies if:...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 572J(1) What happens if the penalty is paid

572J(2) What happens if the penalty is paid
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210
note: Liability is discharged upon payment of the penalty.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 572J What happens if the penalty is paid

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation discharge
modality: Deontic
operator: discharge
premise text: (2) Any liability of the person for the alleged contravention is discharged.

572J(3) What happens if the penalty is paid
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210
note: Prevents bringing proceedings under Part 31 against the person for alleged contravention.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 572J What happens if the penalty is paid

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval during which proceedings are prohibited
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) Proceedings under Part 31 may not be brought against the person for the alleged contravention.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Identifies the prohibition as a rule of conduct
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (3) Proceedings under Part 31 may not be brought against the person for the alleged contravention.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents bringing proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) Proceedings under Part 31 may not be brought against the person for the alleged contravention.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads the prohibition to all persons within a certain scope
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) Proceedings under Part 31 may not be brought against the person for the alleged contravention.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a recurring prohibition on bringing proceedings
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (3) Proceedings under Part 31 may not be brought against the person for the alleged contravention.

572K Effect of this Part on civil proceedings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210
note: Does not require an infringement notice to be given in relation to an alleged contravention.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572k-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572k-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572k
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negation of a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572k-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 572K Effect of this Part on civil proceedings

572L Appointment of authorised infringement notice officer
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.211
curation status: Proposed
has part: 572L(1) Appointment of authorised infringement notice officer
has part: 572L(2) Appointment of authorised infringement notice officer
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572l
schema version: 2

572L(1) Appointment of authorised infringement notice officer
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.211
note: Appointment of authorised infringement notice officer
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572l-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 572L Appointment of authorised infringement notice officer

572L(2) Appointment of authorised infringement notice officer
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.211
note: ACMA must not appoint a person under subsection (1) unless the person meets certain qualifications.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572l-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 572L Appointment of authorised infringement notice officer

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The ACMA may not appoint a person unless the person meets certain qualifications.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of appointment without qualifications.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: ACMA must appoint a person under subsection (1)

572M Guidelines relating to infringement notices
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.211
curation status: Proposed
has part: 572M(1) Guidelines relating to infringement notices
has part: 572M(2) Guidelines relating to infringement notices
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572m
schema version: 2

572M(1) Guidelines relating to infringement notices
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.211
note: Must regard relevant guidelines in exercising power.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572m-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 572M Guidelines relating to infringement notices

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regard relevant guidelines
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider guidelines
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Exercising power

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 572M(1) Guidelines relating to infringement notices

572M(2) Guidelines relating to infringement notices
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.211
note: ACMA may formulate guidelines for infringement notices
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572m-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 572M Guidelines relating to infringement notices

572N Regulations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.212
note: Regulations may make further provision in relation to infringement notices.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572n-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-572n
schema version: 2

577 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.14
note: Telstra undertakes about structural separation, hybrid fibre-coaxial networks, and subscription television broadcasting licences.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Telstra has an obligation to provide undertakings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

577A Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.15
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577A(1) Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
has part: 577A(2) Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
has part: 577A(3) Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577a
schema version: 2

577A(1) Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.15
note: Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577A Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation

577A(2) Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.15
note: Matters related to transparency and equivalence in supply of regulated services are considered in connection with paragraph (1)(a)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577A Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: during the period beginning when the undertaking comes into force, ending at the start of the designated day
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval: beginning when the undertaking comes into force, ending at the start of the designated day
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (c) beginning when the undertaking comes into force; and (d) ending at the start of the designated day;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: during the period beginning when the undertaking comes into force, ending at the start of the designated day
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal interval: beginning when the undertaking comes into force, ending at the start of the designated day
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (c) beginning when the undertaking comes into force; and (d) ending at the start of the designated day;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) Telstra’s wholesale customers; and (b) Telstra’s retail business units;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Matters are in connection with paragraph (1)(a)
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: during the period beginning when the undertaking comes into force, ending at the start of the designated day
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal interval: beginning when the undertaking comes into force, ending at the start of the designated day
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (c) beginning when the undertaking comes into force; and (d) ending at the start of the designated day;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: during the period beginning when the undertaking comes into force, ending at the start of the designated day
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval: beginning when the undertaking comes into force, ending at the start of the designated day
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (c) beginning when the undertaking comes into force; and (d) ending at the start of the designated day;

577A(3) Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
description: transparency and equivalence
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.15
note: The ACCC must not accept an undertaking under this section unless satisfied that the undertaking provides for transparency and equivalence.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 577A Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The ACCC is prohibited from accepting an undertaking under this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

577AA Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation may
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.19
note: Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation may be subject to the occurrence of events
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577aa-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577aa
schema version: 2

577AB When undertaking about structural separation comes into
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.22
note: Conditions under which an undertaking comes into force
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ab
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The event must occur within the specified period for the undertaking to come into force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the temporal relationship between the event and the commencement of the undertaking
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (i) the decision to accept the undertaking is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (ii) the event occurs within that period;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking comes into force when the event occurs.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the conditions under which the undertaking comes into force
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (a) if: (i) the decision to accept the undertaking is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (ii) the event occurs within that period;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking comes into force when all the events occur.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the conditions under which the undertaking comes into force for multiple events
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (c) if: (i) the decision to accept the undertaking is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (ii) each of those events occur at different times;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking comes into force when it is accepted by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the conditions under which the undertaking comes into force for multiple events
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (d) if the decision to accept the undertaking is not expressed to be subject to the occurrence of one or more specified events within a specified period—when the undertaking is accepted by the ACCC.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking comes into force when all the events occur simultaneously.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies the temporal relationship between the events and the commencement of the undertaking
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: (b) if: (i) the decision to accept the undertaking is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (ii) each of those events occur at the same time;

577AC Publication requirements for undertaking about structural
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.22
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577AC(1) Publication requirements for undertaking about structural
has part: 577AC(2) Publication requirements for undertaking about structural
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ac
schema version: 2

577AC(1) Publication requirements for undertaking about structural
type: Concept
description: Notice announcing the undertaking has come into force
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.22
note: Publish undertaking and decision terms on website within a specified period.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577AC Publication requirements for undertaking about structural

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publishing is a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577AC(1) Publication requirements for undertaking about structural

577AC(2) Publication requirements for undertaking about structural
type: Concept
description: specified events and period
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.22
note: Publish undertaking on website within a specified period
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577AC Publication requirements for undertaking about structural

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577AD Compliance with undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Compliance with undertaking about structural separation
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ad-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ad-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ad
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ad-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577B Variation of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.23
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577B(1) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
has part: 577B(2) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
has part: 577B(3) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
has part: 577B(4) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
has part: 577B(5) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
has part: 577B(5A) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577b
schema version: 2

577B(1) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Applicability of section 577B(1) to Telstra's undertaking under section 577A.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577B Variation of undertaking about structural separation

577B(2) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Variation of undertaking about structural separation
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577B Variation of undertaking about structural separation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between Telstra's action and ACCC's receipt
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) Telstra may give the ACCC a variation of the undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of Telstra's action on ACCC's rights
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) Telstra may give the ACCC a variation of the undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to ACCC
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) Telstra may give the ACCC a variation of the undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of permission to ACCC
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (2) Telstra may give the ACCC a variation of the undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Classification of structural separation provisions as subclasses
modality: N3Logic
operator: Subclass
premise text: (a) is covered by paragraph 577A(1)(b); and (b) does not consist of provisions of a final migration plan

577B(3) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Decision to accept or reject variation of undertaking about structural separation
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 577B Variation of undertaking about structural separation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Decision to accept or reject variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577B(4) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Consideration of relevant matters when deciding to accept a variation
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 577B Variation of undertaking about structural separation

577B(5) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: The Minister may set out matters for the purposes of paragraph (4)(a)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 577B Variation of undertaking about structural separation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to set out matters
modality: Deontic
operator: May

577B(5A) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.23
note: Notice must be published on the Department's website before making or varying an instrument under subsection (5)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-5a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577b-ss-5a
schema version: 2
part of: 577B Variation of undertaking about structural separation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to publish notice on the Department's website
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577BA Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577BA(1) Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
has part: 577BA(2) Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
has part: 577BA(3) Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ba
schema version: 2

577BA(1) Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Authorises conduct of Telstra and NBN corporations.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577BA Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation of conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577BA(1) Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and

577BA(2) Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Giving by Telstra of certain undertakings is authorised.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577BA Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is authorised for the purposes of subsection 51(1)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to give undertakings
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) The giving by Telstra of...

577BA(3) Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24
note: Authorisation for contract arrangements under subsection 51(1) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 577BA Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...before the undertaking was accepted by the ACCC, Telstra or the NBN corporation gave the ACCC a copy of the contract...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for contract arrangements
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (i) the undertaking under section 577A comes into force;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (d) the entering into of the contract, arrangement or understanding by Telstra is authorised...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation for contract arrangements
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (3) If...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (f) conduct engaged in by Telstra or the NBN corporation after the undertaking comes into force...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation for NBN corporation arrangements
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (e) the entering into of the contract, arrangement or understanding by the NBN corporation is authorised...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...conduct engaged in by Telstra or the NBN corporation after the undertaking comes into force...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional authorisation for contract arrangements
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (f) if...(ii)...then...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...before the undertaking was accepted by the ACCC, Telstra or the NBN corporation gave the ACCC a copy of the contract...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for contract arrangements
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (ii) if the contract, arrangement or understanding was in writing;

577BB Migration plan principles
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.31
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577BB(1) Migration plan principles
has part: 577BB(2) Migration plan principles
has part: 577BB(3) Migration plan principles
has part: 577BB(4) Migration plan principles
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bb
schema version: 2

577BB(1) Migration plan principles
type: Concept
references: 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.31
note: Minister may determine migration plan principles
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577BB Migration plan principles

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to determine principles
modality: Deontic
operator: may

577BB(2) Migration plan principles
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.31
note: Publish notice on website and consider submissions within 14 days.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577BB Migration plan principles

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publish notice on website and consider submissions within 14 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577BB(3) Migration plan principles
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.31
note: Publish determination on Department's website
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 577BB Migration plan principles

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577BB(4) Migration plan principles
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.31
note: A determination under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 577BB Migration plan principles

577BC Migration plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.31
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577BC(1) Migration plan
has part: 577BC(2) Migration plan
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bc
schema version: 2

577BC(1) Migration plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.31
note: Draft migration plan may be given to ACCC after undertaking comes into force
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bc-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577BC Migration plan

577BC(2) Migration plan
type: Concept
description: Migration plan
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.31
note: Must specify action to cease supplying fixed-line carriage services
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bc-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577BC Migration plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify action to cease supplying fixed-line carriage services
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577BD Approval of draft migration plan by the ACCC—plan given
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577BD(1) Approval of draft migration plan by the ACCC—plan given
has part: 577BD(2) Approval of draft migration plan by the ACCC—plan given
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bd
schema version: 2

577BD(1) Approval of draft migration plan by the ACCC—plan given
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.33
note: Telstra must give the ACCC a draft migration plan in accordance with an undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bd-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bd-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577BD Approval of draft migration plan by the ACCC—plan given

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577BD(2) Approval of draft migration plan by the ACCC—plan given
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.33
note: The ACCC must approve the original plan if it complies with migration plan principles.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bd-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bd-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577BD Approval of draft migration plan by the ACCC—plan given

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The ACCC must approve the original plan.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577BE Effect of approval of draft migration plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.39
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577BE(1) Effect of approval of draft migration plan
has part: 577BE(2) Effect of approval of draft migration plan
has part: 577BE(3) Effect of approval of draft migration plan
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577be
schema version: 2

577BE(1) Effect of approval of draft migration plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Plan becomes final upon approval
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577be-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577BE Effect of approval of draft migration plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The plan becomes a final migration plan.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to follow plan
modality: Deontic
operator: becomes
premise text: (1) If the ACCC approves a draft migration plan...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577BE(1) Effect of approval of draft migration plan

577BE(2) Effect of approval of draft migration plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Plan comes into force after notice of approval is given to Telstra
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577BE Effect of approval of draft migration plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Plan starts on a specific date
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Plan starts on the day after notice of approval is given
modality: AllenInterval
operator: StartsAfter
premise text: Notice of approval is given to Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Plan incorporates ACCC's decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Plan incorporates ACCC's decision-making process
modality: CogAI
operator: Incorporates
premise text: ACCC approves draft migration plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Plan comes into force
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to implement plan
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: ACCC approves draft migration plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Plan diffuses to Telstra
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Plan diffuses to Telstra after notice of approval is given
modality: Diffusion
operator: DiffusesTo
premise text: Notice of approval is given to Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Plan starts on a specific date
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Plan starts on the day after notice of approval is given
modality: LTL
operator: StartsAfter
premise text: Notice of approval is given to Telstra

577BE(3) Effect of approval of draft migration plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.39
note: Plan comes into force at the later of two conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577be-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 577BE Effect of approval of draft migration plan

577BF Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577BF(1) Variation of final migration plan
has part: 577BF(2) Variation of final migration plan
has part: 577BF(3) Variation of final migration plan
has part: 577BF(4) Variation of final migration plan
has part: 577BF(5) Variation of final migration plan
has part: 577BF(6) Variation of final migration plan
has part: 577BF(7) Variation of final migration plan
has part: 577BF(8) Variation of final migration plan
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf
schema version: 2

577BF(1) Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: This section applies if a final migration plan is in force.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577BF Variation of final migration plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section applies.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: (final migration plan is in force)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577BF(1) Variation of final migration plan

577BF(2) Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Telstra may give the ACCC a variation of the final migration plan.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577BF Variation of final migration plan

577BF(3) Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Must approve or refuse variation of final migration plan
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 577BF Variation of final migration plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve or refuse variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577BF(4) Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Publish notice and consider submissions on variation of final migration plan
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 577BF Variation of final migration plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publish notice and consider submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577BF(5) Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Variation of minor nature does not trigger subsection (4)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 577BF Variation of final migration plan

577BF(6) Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Variation of final migration plan takes effect upon approval by ACCC.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 577BF Variation of final migration plan

577BF(7) Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Variation of final migration plan takes effect as if provisions were part of the undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 577BF Variation of final migration plan

577BF(8) Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
description: Copy of variation
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
note: Publish variation on website after it takes effect
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 577BF Variation of final migration plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publish variation on website after it takes effect
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577C Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.41
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577C(1) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
has part: 577C(1A) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
has part: 577C(1B) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577c
schema version: 2

577C(1) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.41
note: Telstra undertakes not to exercise control of a hybrid fibre-coaxial network in Australia.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577C Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: not exercising control
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to not exercise control
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Telstra undertakes

577C(1A) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.41
note: ACCC must consider relevant matters when deciding to accept an undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 577C Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Relevant matters must be considered.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consideration of relevant matters is a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
premise text: ACCC has discretion to decide on undertakings.

577C(1B) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.41
note: The Minister may set out matters for the purposes of paragraph (1A)(a)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 577C Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial

577CA Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577CA(1) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
has part: 577CA(2) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
has part: 577CA(3) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
has part: 577CA(4) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
has part: 577CA(5) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
has part: 577CA(6) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ca
schema version: 2

577CA(1) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Decision to accept undertaking must be expressed to occur within specified period after acceptance.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577CA Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Decision to accept undertaking is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

577CA(2) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Must not specify event timing in nomination
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577CA Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits specifying event timing
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A nomination under subsection (1) must not specify an event by reference to the timing of the event.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577CA(2) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial

577CA(3) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Minister may specify events for the purposes of subsection (1)(c)(vii)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 577CA Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial

577CA(4) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: A period specified by the ACCC must be 6 months or as specified in an instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 577CA Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be a period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577CA(4) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial

577CA(5) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Minister may specify a period for notification requirement
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 577CA Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has the power to specify a period
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577CA(5) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial

577CA(6) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
note: Notify ACCC of event occurrence within specified period after decision to accept undertaking is expressed to be subject to such event.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 577CA Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notify ACCC of event occurrence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expressed obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

577CB When undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.44
note: Conditions under which an undertaking comes into force
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cb-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577cb
schema version: 2

577CC Publication requirements for undertaking about hybrid
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577CC(1) Publication requirements for undertaking about hybrid
has part: 577CC(2) Publication requirements for undertaking about hybrid
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577cc
schema version: 2

577CC(1) Publication requirements for undertaking about hybrid
type: Concept
description: undertaking, terms of decision
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Publish undertaking and terms on website upon decision
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cc-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577cc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577CC Publication requirements for undertaking about hybrid

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publishing undertaking and terms upon decision
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

577CC(2) Publication requirements for undertaking about hybrid
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.45
note: Publish undertaking on website within a specified period
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cc-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577cc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577CC Publication requirements for undertaking about hybrid

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577CD Compliance with undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Must comply with undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cd-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cd-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577cd
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cd-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577D(1) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(2) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(3) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(3A) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(3B) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(3C) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(4) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(5) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(6) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(7) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d
schema version: 2

577D(1) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Applicability of section 577D(1) to Telstra's undertaking under section 577C
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the deontic type of the provision
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo

577D(2) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks

577D(3) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Decision to accept or reject variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to decide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577D(3A) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Consider relevant matters when deciding to accept a variation in hybrid fibre-coaxial networks.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consider relevant matters
modality: Deontic
operator: consider

577D(3B) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3b
schema version: 2
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks

577D(3C) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
description: Notice and submissions
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Publish notice and invite submissions before making or varying an instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3c
schema version: 2
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577D(4) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks takes effect upon acceptance by the ACCC.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks

577D(5) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Must publish variation on website after it takes effect.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577D(6) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577D(6) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks

577D(7) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
note: An instrument under subsection (3B) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (7) An instrument under subsection (3B)

577E Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.47
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577E(1) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577E(1A) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577E(1B) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577E(1C) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577E(2) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577e
schema version: 2

577E(1) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.47
note: Telstra must not exercise control of a subscription television broadcasting licence.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577E Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Telstra must not exercise control.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

577E(1A) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.47
note: ACCC must consider relevant matters when deciding to accept an undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 577E Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Matters are relevant
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Matters must be considered
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
premise text: ACCC has regard to matters

577E(1B) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.47
note: Minister may set out matters for the purposes of paragraph (1A)(a) by writing.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 577E Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television

577E(1C) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
description: Submissions to the Minister within 14 days after publication of the notice.
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.47
note: Publish notice on website and consider submissions before making or varying an instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1c
schema version: 2
part of: 577E Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice and consider submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577E(2) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.47
note: The period specified in the undertaking must not be longer than 12 months.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577E Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not be longer than 12 months.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (2) The period specified in the undertaking as mentioned in paragraph (1)(a)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not be longer than 12 months.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on exceeding the specified period
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: (2) The period specified in the undertaking as mentioned in paragraph (1)(a)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not be longer than 12 months.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
modality: Deontic
operator: MustBeLessThanOrEqual
premise text: (2) The period specified in the undertaking as mentioned in paragraph (1)(a)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577E(2) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television

577EA Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577EA(1) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577EA(2) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577EA(3) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577EA(4) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577EA(5) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577EA(6) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577EA(7) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ea
schema version: 2

577EA(1) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Decision to accept undertaking must be expressed to occur within specified period after acceptance.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577EA Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Decision to accept undertaking is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

577EA(2) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Cannot specify event timing in nomination
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577EA Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must not specify
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cannot be specified
modality: Deontic
operator: !=
premise text: Timing of event

577EA(3) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Minister may specify events for the purposes of subsection (1)(c)(vii)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 577EA Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television

577EA(4) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: A period specified by the ACCC must be 6 months or as specified in an instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 577EA Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) 6 months; or (b) if another period is specified in an instrument under subsection (5)—that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The period must contain the specified duration.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) A period specified by the ACCC under subsection (1)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) 6 months; or (b) if another period is specified in an instrument under subsection (5)—that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: If the ACCC specifies a period, then that period must be 6 months or as specified in an instrument.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (4) A period specified by the ACCC under subsection (1)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) 6 months; or (b) if another period is specified in an instrument under subsection (5)—that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be a period of 6 months or as specified in an instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (4) A period specified by the ACCC under subsection (1)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) 6 months; or (b) if another period is specified in an instrument under subsection (5)—that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The period must contain the specified duration.
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) A period specified by the ACCC under subsection (1)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) 6 months; or (b) if another period is specified in an instrument under subsection (5)—that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The period must contain the specified duration.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (4) A period specified by the ACCC under subsection (1)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577EA(4) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television

577EA(5) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Specify a period for notification requirement
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 577EA Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to specify a period
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577EA(6) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
description: Notification in writing
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Notify ACCC of event occurrence within specified period if condition is met.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 577EA Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must notify ACCC
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expressed obligation to notify ACCC
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

577EA(7) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
note: Conditional acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 577EA Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the event does not occur within that period;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: (7) If: a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577E is expressed...

577EB When undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.50
note: Conditions under which an undertaking comes into force
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577eb
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The event must occur within that period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The decision to accept the undertaking is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking comes into force if the event occurs within that period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: The decision to accept the undertaking is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking comes into force if all events occur at the same time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation with multiple events
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: The decision to accept the undertaking is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period, and each of those events occur at the same time.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking comes into force if all events occur at the last time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation with different events
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: The decision to accept the undertaking is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period, and each of those events occur at different times.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The undertaking comes into force when it is accepted by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Default obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: The decision to accept the undertaking is not expressed to be subject to the occurrence of one or more specified events within a specified period.

577EC Publication requirements for undertaking about
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.51
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577EC(1) Publication requirements for undertaking about
has part: 577EC(2) Publication requirements for undertaking about
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ec
schema version: 2

577EC(1) Publication requirements for undertaking about
type: Concept
description: ACCC must publish notice when undertaking comes into force.
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Publish undertaking and decision terms on website upon acceptance.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ec-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ec-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ec-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577EC Publication requirements for undertaking about

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ec-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Publishing obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

577EC(2) Publication requirements for undertaking about
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: ACCC must publish undertaking on its website within a specified period after accepting it.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ec-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ec-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ec-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577EC Publication requirements for undertaking about

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ec-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577ED Compliance with undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.51
note: Compliance with undertaking about subscription television
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ed-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ed-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ed
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ed-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577F(1) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(2) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(3) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(3A) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(3B) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(3C) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(4) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(5) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(6) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(7) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f
schema version: 2

577F(1) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Applicability of section to Telstra's undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television

577F(2) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Variation of undertaking about subscription television
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television

577F(3) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Decision to accept or reject variation in subscription television undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must decide to accept or reject variation
modality: Deontic
operator: Decide

577F(3A) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: ACCC must consider relevant matters when deciding to accept a variation in subscription television.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Relevant matters must be considered during the decision-making process
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Relevant matters must be considered during the decision-making process
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Decision to accept variation is made at some point

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACCC must consider all relevant matters
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: ACCC must consider all relevant matters when deciding to accept a variation
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
premise text: Decision to accept variation is made at some point

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACCC's decision-making process must be transparent and explainable
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: ACCC's decision-making process must be transparent and explainable
modality: CogAI
operator: must
premise text: Decision to accept variation is made at some point

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACCC must consider relevant matters
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider relevant matters
modality: Deontic
operator: ought
premise text: ACCC must decide whether to accept the variation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Relevant matters must be disseminated to those who need them
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Relevant matters must be disseminated to those who need them
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
premise text: Decision to accept variation is made at some point

577F(3B) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: The Minister may set out matters for the purposes of paragraph (3A)(a) by writing.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3b
schema version: 2
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television

577F(3C) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
description: Submissions to the Minister within 14 days after publication of the notice.
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Minister must publish notice and consider submissions before making or varying an instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3c
schema version: 2
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish and consider submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577F(4) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Variation of undertaking about subscription television takes effect upon acceptance by the ACCC.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation takes effect at the time of acceptance by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for variation acceptance
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal interval
premise text: (4) The variation takes effect when it is accepted by the ACCC.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation is justified upon acceptance by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Argument for variation acceptance
modality: Argumentation
operator: argumentation
premise text: (4) The variation takes effect when it is accepted by the ACCC.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation takes effect upon acceptance by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Effect of variation on subscription television
modality: Deontic
operator: takes effect
premise text: (4) The variation takes effect when it is accepted by the ACCC.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation spreads to all parties upon acceptance by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion for variation acceptance
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
premise text: (4) The variation takes effect when it is accepted by the ACCC.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The variation takes effect at each time of acceptance by the ACCC.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for variation acceptance
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace
premise text: (4) The variation takes effect when it is accepted by the ACCC.

577F(5) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
description: Variation details
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Publish variation on website after variation takes effect
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577F(6) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must cause a copy of an instrument...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

577F(7) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
note: An instrument under subsection (3B) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (7) An instrument under subsection (3B)

577G Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.53
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577G(1) Enforcement of undertakings
has part: 577G(2) Enforcement of undertakings
has part: 577G(3) Enforcement of undertakings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577g
schema version: 2

577G(1) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.53
note: ACCC may apply for order if Telstra breaches undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577G Enforcement of undertakings

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order may be applied
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide order
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: ACCC considers breach

577G(2) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.53
note: Order prohibiting or deferring payment of sums due to a person in respect of shares held by Telstra
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577G Enforcement of undertakings

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (d) an order prohibiting or deferring the payment of any sums due to a person in respect of shares held by Telstra;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits payment of sums due to a person in respect of shares held by Telstra
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) If the Federal Court is satisfied that Telstra has breached the undertaking...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (c) an order restraining the exercise of any rights attached to shares;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restrains exercise of rights attached to shares
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) an order restraining the exercise of any rights attached to shares;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) an order directing the disposal of network units, shares or other assets;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directs disposal of network units, shares or other assets
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) an order directing the disposal of network units, shares or other assets;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (f) an order directing Telstra to pay to the Commonwealth an amount up to the amount of any financial benefit that Telstra has obtained directly or indirectly and that is reasonably attributable to the breach;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directs payment to Commonwealth
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (f) an order directing Telstra to pay to the Commonwealth an amount up to the amount of any financial benefit that Telstra has obtained directly or indirectly and that is reasonably attributable to the breach;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (g) any order that the Court considers appropriate directing Telstra to compensate any other person who has suffered loss or damage as a result of the breach;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directs compensation to other persons
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (g) any order that the Court considers appropriate directing Telstra to compensate any other person who has suffered loss or damage as a result of the breach;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) an order directing Telstra to comply with the undertaking;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directs compliance with undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) an order directing Telstra to comply with the undertaking;

577G(3) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.53
note: Power to make orders directing persons to do or refrain from specified acts.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 577G Enforcement of undertakings

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Power to make orders
modality: Deontic
operator: has power
premise text: (2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577G(3) Enforcement of undertakings

577GA Excluded spectrum regime
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577GA(1) Excluded spectrum regime
has part: 577GA(2) Excluded spectrum regime
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ga
schema version: 2

577GA(1) Excluded spectrum regime
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: The Minister may determine that the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ga-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ga-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577GA Excluded spectrum regime

577GA(2) Excluded spectrum regime
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Determinations under subsection (1) have effect for the purposes of this Division and Part 10 of Schedule 1.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ga-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ga-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577GA Excluded spectrum regime

577H Designated part of the spectrum
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577H(1) Designated part of the spectrum
has part: 577H(2) Designated part of the spectrum
has part: 577H(3) Designated part of the spectrum
has part: 577H(4) Designated part of the spectrum
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577h
schema version: 2

577H(1) Designated part of the spectrum
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Designates specific frequency ranges as part of the spectrum.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577H Designated part of the spectrum

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a designated part of the spectrum
modality: Deontic
operator: =

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577H(1) Designated part of the spectrum

577H(2) Designated part of the spectrum
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Conditional effect of subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577H Designated part of the spectrum

577H(3) Designated part of the spectrum
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: Minister may determine part of spectrum not designated
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577h-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 577H Designated part of the spectrum

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to determine
modality: Deontic
operator: may

577H(4) Designated part of the spectrum
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
note: The Minister may determine a part of the spectrum is designated.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577h-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 577H Designated part of the spectrum

577J Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.55
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577J(1) Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
has part: 577J(2) Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
has part: 577J(2A) Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
has part: 577J(3) Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577j
schema version: 2

577J(1) Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.55
note: ACMA must not allocate a spectrum licence to Telstra if the licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577J Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

577J(2) Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.55
note: Exemptions from spectrum licence allocation limits for Telstra undertakings
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577J Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An exemption under section 577A applies before the commencement of subsection (2A).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for exemptions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
premise text: The rule in subsection (1) does not apply if an undertaking given by Telstra is in force under section 577A and the undertaking is covered by subsection (2A).

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Either an exemption under section 577C or a declaration under subsection (3) applies to exempt spectrum licence allocation limits.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Disjunction of exemptions
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ∨
premise text: The rule in subsection (1) does not apply if either an undertaking given by Telstra is in force under section 577C or a declaration is in force under subsection (3).

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Either an exemption under section 577E or a declaration under subsection (5) applies to exempt spectrum licence allocation limits.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Disjunction of exemptions
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ∨
premise text: The rule in subsection (1) does not apply if either an undertaking given by Telstra is in force under section 577E or a declaration is in force under subsection (5).

577J(2A) Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.55
note: Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 577J Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Telstra must give the ACCC a draft migration plan
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

577J(3) Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.55
note: Telstra exempt from undertaking under section 577C
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577j-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 577J Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declare exemption
modality: Deontic
operator: Declare

577K Limits on use of certain spectrum licences by Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.57
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577K(1) Limits on use of certain spectrum licences by Telstra
has part: 577K(2) Limits on use of certain spectrum licences by Telstra
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577k
schema version: 2

577K(1) Limits on use of certain spectrum licences by Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Telstra cannot authorise radiocommunications devices under the licence.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577K Limits on use of certain spectrum licences by Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Radiocommunications devices are not allowed during this period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Spectrum licence and radiocommunications devices overlap in time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra's actions are constrained by the excluded spectrum regime.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Telstra's actions are inferred from the excluded spectrum regime.
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: The excluded spectrum regime provides context for Telstra's actions.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra cannot authorise radiocommunications devices under the licence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of Telstra's actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Telstra is a licensee of the spectrum licence.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Excluded spectrum regime is affected by Telstra's actions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spectrum licence holder's actions affect the excluded spectrum regime.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implication
premise text: The spectrum licence holder has authority over the spectrum licence.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Radiocommunications devices are not allowed after this period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Spectrum licence is valid until it expires.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: The spectrum licence has a designated end date.

577K(2) Limits on use of certain spectrum licences by Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.57
note: Exemption from rule for Telstra undertakings
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577K Limits on use of certain spectrum licences by Telstra

577L Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.58
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577L(1) Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
has part: 577L(2) Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
has part: 577L(2A) Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577l
schema version: 2

577L(1) Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Cannot assign whole or part of spectrum licence to Telstra
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577L Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not assign...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on assignment
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: (1) If...

577L(2) Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Exemptions from assignment limits for Telstra undertakings
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577L Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and the undertaking is covered by subsection (2A);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The undertaking is covered by subsection (2A)

577L(2A) Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.58
note: Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2a-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 577L Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must give the ACCC a draft migration plan
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a draft migration plan
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The undertaking requires Telstra to give the ACCC a draft migration plan

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra is not required to give the ACCC a draft migration plan
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must not require Telstra to give the ACCC a draft migration plan
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
premise text: The undertaking does not require Telstra to give the ACCC a draft migration plan

577M Associate
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.60
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577M(1) Associate
has part: 577M(2) Associate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577m
schema version: 2

577M(1) Associate
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Associate definition for control purposes
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577m-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577M Associate

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must be defined as an associate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of associate
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Telstra is an associate if it controls a company or network

577M(2) Associate
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.60
note: Persons are not associates if they do not act together in relevant dealings.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577M Associate

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the conditions in (a) and (b) are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal disjointness
modality: AllenInterval
operator: disjoint
premise text: (a) they do not act together in any relevant dealings relating to the network or company;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: they are not associates.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (a) they do not act together in any relevant dealings relating to the network or company;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: they are not associates.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (b) neither of them is in a position to exert influence over the business dealings of the other in relation to the network or company.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the conditions in (a) and (b) are met.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Conjunction of conditions
modality: LTL
operator: and
premise text: (a) they do not act together in any relevant dealings relating to the network or company; and (b) neither of them is in a position to exert influence over...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577M(2) Associate

577N Control
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Control includes control as a result of, or by means of, trusts, agreements, arrangements, understandings and practices.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577n-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577n-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577n-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577n
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion relation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577n-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass relation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577n-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577N Control

577P Control of a company
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.61
curation status: Proposed
has part: 577P(1) Control of a company
has part: 577P(2) Control of a company
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577p
schema version: 2

577P(1) Control of a company
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Determines the question of control of a company under Schedule 1 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577p-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 577P Control of a company

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determines control of a company
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
premise text: Schedule 1 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577P(1) Control of a company

577P(2) Control of a company
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Definition of associate in section 577M applies instead.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577p-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 577P Control of a company

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of associate in subsection 6(1) does not apply
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: Subsection 6(1) definition does not apply

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577P(2) Control of a company

577Q When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a network
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.61
note: Telstra exercises control of a network if certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577q-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577q-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-577q
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra exercises control of a network.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: if
premise text: Certain conditions are met.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577q-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 577Q When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a network

58 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.62
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 58(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
schema version: 2

58 After section 152EP
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
curation status: Proposed
has part: 58(1) After section 152EP
has part: 58(2) After section 152EP
has part: 58(3) After section 152EP
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58-2
schema version: 2

58(1) After section 152EP
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Defines independent telecommunications adjudicator as a company limited by guarantee and identified in a final functional separation undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 58 After section 152EP

58(2) After section 152EP
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: The Commission may assist the independent telecommunications adjudicator.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58 After section 152EP

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58(2) After section 152EP

58(3) After section 152EP
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Provision of information, advice, and resources
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58 After section 152EP

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State has obligation to provide information, advice, and resources
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58(3) After section 152EP

58(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: An employee is not regarded as exercising control of a network solely because of being an employee.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Employee's employment period does not imply control over the network
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Employee's employment period

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An employee is not regarded as being in a position to exercise control
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: Employee is not regarded as exercising control

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

58(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.62
note: More than one person may exercise control of a network.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 58 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 58(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

59 Section 152EQ
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.91
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-59-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-59
schema version: 2

6 March 2012
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: References an external document
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
schema version: 2

6 Section 6
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2
schema version: 2

6 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-3
schema version: 2

6 Section 7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Defines a term for a designated part of the spectrum.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-4
schema version: 2

60 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.64
note: Defines equivalence and functional separation principles for telecommunications services.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-60
schema version: 2

60 Subsection 61(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.92
note: Omit ‘(1)’.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-60-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: a = b
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies terms and conditions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: equivalence means:

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: determination under clause 75
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines functional separation requirements
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: functional separation principles means the principles set out in clause 74

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

61 Subsections 61(2), (3) and (4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.92
note: Repeal subsections
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-61-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-61
schema version: 2

62 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.66
curation status: Proposed
has part: 62(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 62(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-62
schema version: 2

62 Sections 61A, 69A and 69B
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.92
note: Repeal sections
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-62-2
schema version: 2

62(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: If a final functional separation undertaking is in force throughout a part, but not the whole, of a particular quarter, that part is taken to be a quarter in its own right.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-62-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to treat a part as a quarter in its own right
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

62(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: ACCC may perform functions or exercise powers in relation to the undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-62-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 62 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: may

62A Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BCO of the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.95
note: Carrier licence subject to condition set out in section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-62a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier licence is subject to a condition.
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62A Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BCO of the

62B Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BDF of the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96
note: Carrier licence subject to condition set out in section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-62b
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier licence is subject to a condition.
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62B Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BDF of the

62C Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BEC of the
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96
note: Carrier licence subject to condition set out in section 152BEC.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-62c
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier licence is subject to a condition.
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62C Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BEC of the

63 Paragraph 70(5)(ba)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.92
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-63-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-63
schema version: 2

64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68
curation status: Proposed
has part: 64(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 64(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 64(4A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 64(4B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 64(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 64(5A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 64(5B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 64(5C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
schema version: 2

64 Subsection 70(6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.92
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-2
schema version: 2

64(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: A functional separation requirements determination must deal with the manner in which a requirement is to be met.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

64(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: No limitation on subclause (1)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

64(4A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: Minister must publish notice and consider submissions before making or varying functional separation requirements determination.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must perform actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64(4A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

64(4B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: Minister may ask ACCC for additional advice on a matter arising under this clause.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-ss-4b
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64(4B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

64(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: Functional separation requirements determination must be implemented within 90 days after clause commencement.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to implement within 90 days
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

64(5A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: Exemption from subclause (5) for Telstra's undertaking on structural separation
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-ss-5a
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts Telstra from subclause (5)
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Telstra has given the ACCC a draft migration plan under section 577A

64(5B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: Extension of 90-day period for telecommunications legislation amendment
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-ss-5b
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to extend the 90-day period
modality: Deontic
operator: May

64(5C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68
note: Minister must not make an instrument under subclause (5B) without specified conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5c-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5c-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-ss-5c
schema version: 2
part of: 64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5c-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Timeframe for undertaking to take effect
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: that period has not ended;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister cannot make an instrument under subclause (5B)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Telstra has given the ACCC an undertaking under section 577A;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5c-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Minister's action is contingent on specified conditions
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
premise text: that decision is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of one or more specified events within a specified period;

64A Section 104
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.92
note: The ACCC must monitor and report on breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about structural separation.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The breach >= commencement date.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Breach must occur after the commencement date
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The ACCC must report on breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about structural separation that occurred after the commencement date.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The ACCC MUST report on breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about structural separation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report breaches
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The ACCC is required to monitor and report on breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about structural separation.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister MUST direct the ACCC to monitor and report on specified matters.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister's direction is required to monitor and report on specified matters
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister MUST direct the ACCC to monitor and report on specified matters relating to the performance of carriers and carriage service providers.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister MUST direct the ACCC to report on specified matters.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister's direction is required to report on specified matters
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister MUST direct the ACCC to report on specified matters relating to the performance of carriers and carriage service providers.

64B At the end of Part 5
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.92
note: Additions and amendments
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64b
schema version: 2

65 Part 8 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
note: Repeal Part of Competition and Consumer Act 2010
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-65-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-65
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals Part of Competition and Consumer Act 2010
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

66 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.70
curation status: Proposed
has part: 66(5D) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 66(5E) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-66
schema version: 2

66 Division 14 of Part XIB
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
note: Repeal Division
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-66-2
schema version: 2

66(5D) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: Minister must table a copy of an instrument within 15 sitting days.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-66-ss-5d
schema version: 2
part of: 66 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to table an instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66(5D) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

66(5E) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.70
note: If the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra under section 577A, and certain conditions are met, subclause (5) does not apply.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e
schema version: 2
part of: 66 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (f) the Minister must ensure that a functional separation requirements determination comes into force within 90 days after the end of the post-acceptance period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must ensure that a functional separation requirements determination comes into force within 90 days after the end of the post-acceptance period.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (5E) If: (a) before the end of the period applicable under subclause (5), the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra under section 577A; and ... (f) the Minister must ensure that a functional separation requirements determination comes into force within 90 days after the end of the post-acceptance period.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: subclause (5) does not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra under section 577A, and certain conditions are met, subclause (5) does not apply.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (5EA) If: (a) before the end of the period applicable under subclause (5), the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra under section 577A; and... (g) subclause (5) does not apply;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: subclause (5) does not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra under section 577A, and certain conditions are met, subclause (5) does not apply.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (5EB) Subclause (5) does not apply if: (a) before the end of the period applicable under subclause (5), the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra under section 577A; and... (e) the undertaking does not require Telstra to give the ACCC a draft migration plan.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (h) the Minister must ensure that a functional separation requirements determination comes into force within 90 days after the end of the post-acceptance period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must ensure that a functional separation requirements determination comes into force within 90 days after the end of the post-acceptance period.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (5EC) Subclause (5) does not apply if: (a) before the end of the period applicable under subclause (5), the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra under section 577A; and... (h) the Minister must ensure that a functional separation requirements determination comes into force within 90 days after the end of the post-acceptance period.

67 Section 152EQ
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-67-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-67
schema version: 2

68 Simplified outline
type: Concept
description: draft functional separation undertaking
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.63
note: Telstra must prepare a draft functional separation undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
schema version: 2

68 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
curation status: Proposed
has part: 68(5F) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 68(5G) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 68(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 68(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2
schema version: 2

68(5F) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: No procedural fairness requirements for instrument making
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5f
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (5F)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister exempt from procedural fairness
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: (5B)

68(5G) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Minister does not have a duty to consider making an instrument under subclause (5B)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5g-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5g-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5g
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister's obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: does not have a duty to

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5g-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68(5G) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

68(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: A determination under subclause (1) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under subclause (1) occurs during the existence of a legislative instrument.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation to legislative instruments
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (6) A determination under subclause (1) is not a legislative instrument.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under subclause (1) occurs during the existence of a legislative instrument.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal relation to legislative instruments
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (6) A determination under subclause (1) is not a legislative instrument.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under subclause (1) is an obligation that does not impose a duty.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (6) A determination under subclause (1) is not a legislative instrument.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under subclause (1) diffuses during the existence of a legislative instrument.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal relation to legislative instruments
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (6) A determination under subclause (1) is not a legislative instrument.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A determination under subclause (1) occurs during the existence of a legislative instrument.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation to legislative instruments
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (6) A determination under subclause (1) is not a legislative instrument.

68(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: An instrument under subclause (5B) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 68 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of an instrument being a legislative instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (7) An instrument under subclause (5B)

68 Section 3 (paragraphs (a) and (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.95
note: Insert a definition from another Act
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Telstra must prepare a draft functional separation undertaking.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

69 Definitions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.63
note: Definitions for Telstra business unit and declared network service
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
schema version: 2

69 At the end of section 16
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.95
note: Reference to Competition and Consumer Act is to the Act as in force before Division 1 commencement
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69-2
schema version: 2

69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.97
curation status: Proposed
has part: 69AA(1) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
has part: 69AA(2) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
has part: 69AA(3) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
has part: 69AA(4) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
has part: 69AA(5) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
has part: 69AA(6) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69aa
schema version: 2

69AA(1) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.97
note: Carrier must comply with conditions of licence if contravening them.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Carrier has a duty to comply with conditions of licence.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69AA(1) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

69AA(2) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.97
note: The ACCC may give a written direction requiring the carrier to take specified action.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69AA(2) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

69AA(3) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.97
note: Examples of direction that may be given to a carrier under subsection (2)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Direction that may be given to a carrier
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69AA(3) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

69AA(4) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.97
note: Preventing ACCC from giving a direction that would prevent Telstra from complying with an undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: direction would prevent Telstra from complying with an undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of ACCC giving a direction
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: ACCC must not give a direction

69AA(5) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.97
note: Carrier must not contravene a direction under subsection (2).
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of action
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (5) A carrier must not contravene a direction under subsection (2).

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69AA(5) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

69AA(6) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.97
note: A direction under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (6) A direction under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69AA(6) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access

6A When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.179
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6A(1) When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
has part: 6A(2) When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
has part: 6A(3) When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6a
schema version: 2

6A(1) When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.179
note: Service not taken to be supplied in fulfilment of universal service obligation unless notice given
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6A When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, if: ...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Service not taken to be supplied in fulfilment of universal service obligation unless notice given
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) a standard telephone service is supplied, or proposed to be supplied, to a customer by a primary universal service provider; and (b) the service is: ...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, if: ...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Service not taken to be supplied in fulfilment of universal service obligation unless notice given
modality: Argumentation
operator: IF-THEN
premise text: (a) a standard telephone service is supplied, or proposed to be supplied, to a customer by a primary universal service provider; and (b) the service is: ...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, if: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Service not taken to be supplied in fulfilment of universal service obligation unless notice given
modality: Deontic
operator: NOT
premise text: (a) a standard telephone service is supplied, or proposed to be supplied, to a customer by a primary universal service provider; and (b) the service is: ...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, if: ...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Service not taken to be supplied in fulfilment of universal service obligation unless notice given
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (a) a standard telephone service is supplied, or proposed to be supplied, to a customer by a primary universal service provider; and (b) the service is: ...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, if: ...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Service not taken to be supplied in fulfilment of universal service obligation unless notice given
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (a) a standard telephone service is supplied, or proposed to be supplied, to a customer by a primary universal service provider; and (b) the service is: ...

6A(2) When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.179
note: Determine requirements for standard telephone service
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6A When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to determine requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: may

6A(3) When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.179
note: Customer must be given option to choose another standard telephone service before entering agreement.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6A When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the customer was given the option of being supplied with another standard telephone service by the provider...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Customer must enter agreement before option expires
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: if, before the customer entered into an agreement with the primary universal service provider for the supply of the relevant service:

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The relevant service is taken not to be supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide option to customer
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Customer was given the option of being supplied with another standard telephone service.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the relevant service is taken not to be supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provider must give option to customer
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The primary universal service provider must supply another standard telephone service if the customer was given the option.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the relevant service is taken not to be supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Customer must choose another standard telephone service
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: If the customer was given the option, they must choose another standard telephone service.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the customer was given the option of being supplied with another standard telephone service by the provider...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Option must be provided before agreement is entered
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: if, before the customer entered into an agreement with the primary universal service provider for the supply of the relevant service:

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6A(3) When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of

7 Section 7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule 1 section
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
schema version: 2

7 Section 7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Definition of draft functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-7-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7-2
schema version: 2

70 Declared network services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.64
note: Declared network service definition
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
schema version: 2

70 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
curation status: Proposed
has part: 70(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 70(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 70(6A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 70(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 70(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 70(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-70-2
schema version: 2

70(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: Minister cannot revoke a subclause (3) instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of revocation
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Subclause (3) instrument

70(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: A period specified in a subclause (3) instrument may be a period ascertained wholly or partly by reference to the occurrence of a specified event.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

70(6A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: No procedural fairness requirements for subclause instrument making
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to the making of a subclause (3) instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal overlap for 'subclause (3) instrument' creation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (6A) The Minister is not required to observe any requirements of procedural fairness...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to the making of a subclause (3) instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Defines recognition for 'subclause (3) instrument' creation
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (6A) The Minister is not required to observe any requirements of procedural fairness...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to the making of a subclause (3) instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits procedural fairness requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (6A) The Minister is not required to observe any requirements of procedural fairness...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to the making of a subclause (3) instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines diffusion for 'subclause (3) instrument' creation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (6A) The Minister is not required to observe any requirements of procedural fairness...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to the making of a subclause (3) instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines repeated application for 'subclause (3) instrument' creation
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (6A) The Minister is not required to observe any requirements of procedural fairness...

70(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: Minister has a duty to consider exercising power to make subclause instrument
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister must consider exercising power
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Duty
premise text: Minister is requested to do so

70(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

70(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: An instrument under subclause (3) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 70 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (9) An instrument under subclause (3) is not a legislative instrument.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
modality: Deontic
operator: not

70 After section 62
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.95
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-70-3
schema version: 2

71 Regulated services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.65
curation status: Proposed
has part: 71(1) Regulated services
has part: 71(2) Regulated services
has part: 71(3) Regulated services
has part: 71(4) Regulated services
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
schema version: 2

71 Subsection 69(6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96
note: Omit ‘or 4’, substitute ‘, 4 or 5’.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-71-2
schema version: 2

71(1) Regulated services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Defines regulated service for the purposes of Part XIC.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-71-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 71 Regulated services

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regulated service is within the meaning of Part XIC at some point in time
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between declared service and Part XIC
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within the meaning of
premise text: Part XIC declares a declared service

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regulated service is a declared service within the meaning of Part XIC
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justifies definition of regulated service
modality: Argumentation
operator: is defined as
premise text: Part XIC declares a declared service

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regulated service is a declared service within the meaning of Part XIC
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes regulated service using AI
modality: CogAI
operator: is defined as
premise text: Part XIC declares a declared service

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regulated service is a declared service within the meaning of Part XIC
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines regulated service
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
premise text: Part XIC declares a declared service

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Regulated service is within the meaning of Part XIC at some point in time
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes relationship between declared service and Part XIC
modality: Diffusion
operator: within the meaning of
premise text: Part XIC declares a declared service

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 71(1) Regulated services

71(2) Regulated services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Regulated services subject to subclause (3)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-71-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 71 Regulated services

71(3) Regulated services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Minister may determine service is not regulated
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-71-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 71 Regulated services

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to determine
modality: Deontic
operator: may

71(4) Regulated services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Minister may determine regulated services
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-71-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 71 Regulated services

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to regulate service
modality: Deontic
operator: may

72 Notional contracts
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Treat notional contracts as actual contracts for Telstra's business units.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
schema version: 2

72 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.76
curation status: Proposed
has part: 72(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 72(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 72(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 72(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-72-2
schema version: 2

72(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Minister must consider Telstra's submissions before making a decision to approve the replacement undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The submission period must be at least 14 days after the notice is given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Submission period must be at least 14 days after notice is given.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: A submission period is required.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must consider Telstra's submissions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must consider Telstra's submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister is required to make a decision.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must give Telstra notice and invite submissions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must give Telstra notice and invite submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister is required to make a decision.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must consider submissions received from Telstra.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must consider submissions received from Telstra.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister is required to make a decision.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must give notice and invite submissions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must give notice and invite submissions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Minister is required to make a decision.

72(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: The Minister may ask the ACCC for additional advice on a matter arising under this clause.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or possibility
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

72(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Decision notification to Telstra
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Notify Telstra of decision within a timeframe
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision notification
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

72(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: An instrument made under subclause (2) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 72 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making an instrument under subclause (2)
modality: Deontic
operator: not

72 Subsection 69(6) (note)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96
note: Repeal a note and substitute with new text
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-72-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determine the deontic type
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text states 'Repeal the note, substitute'

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on Telstra's business units.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

73 Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.65
note: Telstra must establish and maintain a committee to comply with the functional separation principles.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
schema version: 2

73 After subsection 69(7)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96
curation status: Proposed
has part: 73(7A) After subsection 69(7)
has part: 73(7B) After subsection 69(7)
has part: 73(7C) After subsection 69(7)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-73-2
schema version: 2

73(7A) After subsection 69(7)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96
note: Exemption from subsection 69(7) for section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a
schema version: 2
part of: 73 After subsection 69(7)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for exemption from subsection 69(7).
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes the exemption from subsection 69(7) for section 152BCO.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection 69(7) does not apply to this exemption.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts subsection 69(7) for section 152BCO.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with access determinations.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the exemption from subsection 69(7) for section 152BCO.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace for exemption from subsection 69(7).
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73(7A) After subsection 69(7)

73(7B) After subsection 69(7)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96
note: Exemption from subsection 69(7) for section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b
schema version: 2
part of: 73 After subsection 69(7)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This exemption applies within this temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for subsection 69(7) that excludes section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: Subsection 69(7) does not apply to this condition.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This exemption applies to this classification.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 as a binding rule of conduct.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
premise text: Section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with binding rules of conduct.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection 69(7) does not apply to this condition.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts subsection 69(7) for section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with binding rules of conduct.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This exemption diffuses the effect of subsection 69(7).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the effect of subsection 69(7) for section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Subsection 69(7) does not apply to this condition.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This exemption applies within this recurring trace.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for subsection 69(7) that excludes section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: Subsection 69(7) does not apply to this condition.

73(7C) After subsection 69(7)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96
note: Does not apply to access agreements
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7c
schema version: 2
part of: 73 After subsection 69(7)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Does not apply to access agreements
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

74 Functional separation principles
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.66
curation status: Proposed
has part: 74(1) Functional separation principles
has part: 74(2) Functional separation principles
has part: 74(3) Functional separation principles
has part: 74(4) Functional separation principles
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74
schema version: 2

74 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.78
curation status: Proposed
has part: 74(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 74(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 74(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 74(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 74(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 74(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-2
schema version: 2

74(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Variation of a final functional separation undertaking is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits variation of final functional separation undertaking as legislative instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

74(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: No minor nature variation is exempt from the general rule.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal intervals involved in definition of minor nature overlap with current variation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The concept of 'minor nature' is defined in terms of temporal intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Definition of minor nature involves temporal intervals

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (Minor nature) -> (Variation involves that time)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The concept of 'minor nature' is defined in terms of a temporal interval.
modality: CogAI
operator: Involves
premise text: Definition of minor nature involves a temporal interval that the variation must involve

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (Not exempt)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If a variation is minor, then it does not exempt from the general rule.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (Minor variation) -> (Not exempt)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (Minor nature) -> (Variation is affected by that time)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The concept of 'minor nature' is defined in terms of a temporal interval.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Definition of minor nature involves a temporal interval that diffuses into the current variation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (Minor nature) -> (Variation occurs before or at that time)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The concept of 'minor nature' is defined in terms of a temporal interval.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: Definition of minor nature involves a temporal interval until which the variation must occur

74(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Submissions from Telstra within 14 days
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Minister must give Telstra notice and consider submissions before making proposed variation.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must take action
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

74(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Minister may ask ACCC for additional advice on a matter arising under the clause.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to ask ACCC for additional advice.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

74(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Notification to Telstra
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Notify Telstra of variation in final functional separation undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notification required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

74(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.78
note: Variation of a final functional separation undertaking comes into force on the day after notice is given to Telstra.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

74 After section 69
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.97
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-3
schema version: 2

74(1) Functional separation principles
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Maintain functional separation principles
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Functional separation principles

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must maintain functional separation principles
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) The functional separation principles are as follows:

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Maintain arm's length functional separation between wholesale/network business unit and retail business units
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (c) the principle that Telstra should maintain arm’s length functional separation between: (i) its wholesale/network business unit; and (ii) its retail business units;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Comply with final functional separation undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (d) the principle that Telstra should have systems, procedures and practices that relate to: (i) compliance with a final functional separation undertaking;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Monitor and report on compliance with final functional separation undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (d) the principle that Telstra should have systems, procedures and practices that relate to: (ii) monitoring of, and reporting on, compliance with a final functional separation undertaking;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Develop performance measures relating to compliance with final functional separation undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (d) the principle that Telstra should have systems, procedures and practices that relate to: (iii) the development of performance measures relating to compliance with a final functional separation undertaking;

74(2) Functional separation principles
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Must consider favourable terms and conditions when determining equivalence principle.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Functional separation principles

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider favourable terms and conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74(2) Functional separation principles

74(3) Functional separation principles
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Regard may be had to matters not limited by subclause (2)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Functional separation principles

74(4) Functional separation principles
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.66
note: Clarifies that this clause does not affect the meaning of anything in Part 33.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 74 Functional separation principles

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The commencement of this clause is clarified to mean that it does not affect the meaning of Part 33.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Clarifies temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: clarifies
premise text: This clause clarifies that its commencement does not affect the meaning of anything in Part 33.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applications of this clause are clarified to mean that they do not affect the meaning of Part 33.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Clarifies cognitive AI
modality: CogAI
operator: clarifies
premise text: This clause clarifies that its applications do not affect the meaning of anything in Part 33.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is no obligation to consider this clause when determining the meaning of Part 33.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Clarifies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: clarifies
premise text: This clause does not affect the meaning of anything in Part 33.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The effects of this clause are clarified to mean that they do not affect the meaning of Part 33.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Clarifies diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: clarifies
premise text: This clause clarifies that its effects do not affect the meaning of anything in Part 33.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conditions of this clause are clarified to mean that they do not affect the meaning of Part 33.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Clarifies temporal logic
modality: LTL
operator: clarifies
premise text: This clause clarifies that its conditions do not affect the meaning of anything in Part 33.

75 Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.67
curation status: Proposed
has part: 75(1) Functional separation requirements determination
has part: 75(2) Functional separation requirements determination
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-75
schema version: 2

75 Subsection 70(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Omit “or 4”, substitute ‘, 4 or 5’.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-75-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-75-2
schema version: 2

75(1) Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.67
note: Minister may make written determination specifying functional separation requirements.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-75-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-75-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Functional separation requirements determination

75(2) Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.67
note: Determines manner of implementation of functional separation principles
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-75-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-75-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Functional separation requirements determination

76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
curation status: Proposed
has part: 76(1) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
has part: 76(2) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
has part: 76(3) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
has part: 76(4) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76
schema version: 2

76 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: True
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.80
note: Telstra must provide undertakings about structural separation, hybrid fibre-coaxial networks, and subscription television broadcasting licences.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide undertakings
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

76 Subsection 70(3) (note)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Repeal a note and substitute it with a new one.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The repeal note had a specific temporal interval.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identify the temporal interval of the repeal note.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The note was repealed at some point.

76(1) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister within 90 days
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Telstra must provide the undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

76(2) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Exemption from draft migration plan requirement under section 577A
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on requiring draft migration plan
modality: Deontic
operator: !

76(3) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Minister may specify a period for purposes of paragraph (1)(b)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...specify a period for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specification of temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal specification
premise text: (3) The Minister may, by writing...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...specify a period for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justification for Minister's discretion
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
premise text: (3) The Minister may, by writing...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...specify a period for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of Minister's discretion
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
premise text: (3) The Minister may, by writing...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to specify a period
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...specify a period for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of Minister's discretion
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (3) The Minister may, by writing...

76(4) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
note: Minister must specify period under subclause (3) unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The period specified by the Minister overlaps with the period during which Telstra is preparing a draft migration plan.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (iii) that decision is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of one or more specified events within a specified period;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to specify period under subclause (3) unless certain conditions are met.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must provide a draft functional separation undertaking to the Minister upon request.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (i) Telstra has given the ACCC an undertaking under section 577A;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The Minister's obligation to specify period under subclause (3) repeats every time Telstra gives an undertaking under section 577A.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: Telstra has given the ACCC an undertaking under section 577A;

77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
curation status: Proposed
has part: 77(1) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
has part: 77(2) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
has part: 77(3) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
has part: 77(4) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77
schema version: 2

77 After subsection 70(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
curation status: Proposed
has part: 77(4A) After subsection 70(4)
has part: 77(4B) After subsection 70(4)
has part: 77(4C) After subsection 70(4)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-2
schema version: 2

77(4A) After subsection 70(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Exemption from subsection 70(4) for section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 77 After subsection 70(4)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The temporal relation between subsection 70(4) and section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 is one of exemption.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between subsection 70(4) and section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 is a regulatory provision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 as a regulatory provision.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
premise text: Section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with access determinations.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection 70(4) does not apply to section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts subsection 70(4) from section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with access determinations.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The applicability of subsection 70(4) is diffused to section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the applicability of subsection 70(4) to section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The recurring trace between subsection 70(4) and section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 is one of exemption.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace between subsection 70(4) and section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.

77(4B) After subsection 70(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Exemption from subsection 70(4) for section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b
schema version: 2
part of: 77 After subsection 70(4)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption applies within this temporal interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the exemption from subsection 70(4).
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This exemption is represented by this rule.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Represents knowledge about the exemption from subsection 70(4).
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: Section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with binding rules of conduct.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection 70(4) does not apply to this condition.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts subsection 70(4) from section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with binding rules of conduct.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption applies within this recurring trace.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for the exemption from subsection 70(4).
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This exemption conforms to this schema.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Defines a schema for the exemption from subsection 70(4).
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Definition
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.

77(4C) After subsection 70(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Exemption from subsection 70(4) for access agreements under section 152BEC.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4c
schema version: 2
part of: 77 After subsection 70(4)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Access agreements under section 152BEC are exempt from subsection 70(4)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 152BEC provides an exemption from subsection 70(4)
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: Subsection 70(4) does not apply to access agreements under section 152BEC

77(1) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister

77(2) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: The Minister must approve the original undertaking by writing.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The original undertaking is approved.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must take action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

77(3) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: Minister must consult with ACCC before making a decision on the original undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must take action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

77(4) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
description: Notice and submissions from Telstra
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
note: Minister must give Telstra notice and invite submissions before approving varied undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a duty to give notice and invite submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

78 Time limit for making an approval decision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.76
curation status: Proposed
has part: 78(1) Time limit for making an approval decision
has part: 78(2) Time limit for making an approval decision
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78
schema version: 2

78 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.82
curation status: Proposed
has part: 78(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 78(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-2
schema version: 2

78(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.82
note: Exemption from rule for Telstra undertakings
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Under force of section 577A
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
premise text: Section 577A

78(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Draft migration plan
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.82
note: Telstra must provide a draft migration plan to the ACCC under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must provide a draft migration plan.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

78 Paragraph 70(5)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Omit ‘or 4’, substitute ‘, 4 or 5’.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-3
schema version: 2

78(1) Time limit for making an approval decision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Defines time limit for making an approval decision
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Time limit for making an approval decision

78(2) Time limit for making an approval decision
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.76
note: Must make a decision within 6 months after original undertaking was given to the Minister.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Time limit for making an approval decision

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The original undertaking was given to the Minister within 6 months of the specified deadline.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between the original undertaking and the deadline for making a decision.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (2) The Minister must use his or her best endeavours to make a decision under subclause 77(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the Minister does not meet the deadline, then they have failed to fulfill their obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of not meeting the deadline for making a decision.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (2) The Minister must use his or her best endeavours to make a decision under subclause 77(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision is represented as an obligation in the knowledge base.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of the provision as an obligation.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
premise text: (2) The Minister must use his or her best endeavours to make a decision under subclause 77(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: within 6 months after the original undertaking was given to the Minister.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must make a decision within a specified time frame.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) The Minister must use his or her best endeavours to make a decision under subclause 77(2)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation to make a decision within 6 months is propagated to other parties affected by the original undertaking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of the obligation from the Minister to other parties.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (2) The Minister must use his or her best endeavours to make a decision under subclause 77(2)

79 Effect of approval
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
curation status: Proposed
has part: 79(1) Effect of approval
has part: 79(2) Effect of approval
has part: 79(3) Effect of approval
has part: 79(4) Effect of approval
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-79
schema version: 2

79 At the end of subsection 70(5)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Adds conditions from sections 152BCO, 152BDF, and 152BEC of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Describes the nature of added conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable

79(1) Effect of approval
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
note: Minister must approve draft functional separation undertaking for it to become final.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Effect of approval

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister's approval is required.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79(1) Effect of approval

79(2) Effect of approval
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
note: Final functional separation undertaking comes into force on a specific day.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Effect of approval

79(3) Effect of approval
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
note: Cannot withdraw a final functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Effect of approval

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of withdrawal
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot

79(4) Effect of approval
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
note: Final functional separation is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 79 Effect of approval

8 Section 8
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule 1 section
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
schema version: 2

8 Section 7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Definition of draft migration plan
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: draft migration plan means...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition

8 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.12
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-3
schema version: 2

80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
curation status: Proposed
has part: 80(1) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(2) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(3) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(4) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80
schema version: 2

80 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.84
curation status: Proposed
has part: 80(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 80(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-2
schema version: 2

80(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.84
note: Employee cannot exercise control of spectrum licence solely because of employment.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Cannot exercise control solely because of employment
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on exercising control due to employment
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
premise text: Employee is not in a position to exercise control

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

80(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.84
note: Multiple persons may exercise control of a spectrum licence.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Multiple persons can exercise control.
modality: Deontic
operator: multiple

80 At the end of section 98
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
curation status: Proposed
has part: 80(3) At the end of section 98
has part: 80(4) At the end of section 98
has part: 80(5) At the end of section 98
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-3
schema version: 2

80(3) At the end of section 98
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Compliance with access determinations is required for carriage service providers.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 80 At the end of section 98

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with access determinations.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80(3) At the end of section 98

80(4) At the end of section 98
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Compliance with binding rules of conduct is required.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 80 At the end of section 98

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with rules of conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80(4) At the end of section 98

80(5) At the end of section 98
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Mention of a rule from another Act as a service provider rule for this Act.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 80 At the end of section 98

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It is an obligation to follow this rule.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mention of a rule from another Act as an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Mention
premise text: The rule is mentioned in the text.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 80(5) At the end of section 98

80(1) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
note: Variation of final functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking

80(2) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
note: Variation of final functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to vary the final functional separation undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: may

80(3) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
note: Duty to consider variation of final functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider variation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Obligation to consider
modality: Epistemic
operator: OBLIGATION

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Continuous consideration required
modality: LTL
operator: CONTINUOUSLY

80(4) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
note: Notice must be published and submissions invited before varying a final functional separation undertaking.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice and invite submissions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

81 Publication of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.79
curation status: Proposed
has part: 81(1) Publication of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 81(2) Publication of final functional separation undertaking
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-81
schema version: 2

81 After subsection 102(6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.99
curation status: Proposed
has part: 81(6A) After subsection 102(6)
has part: 81(6B) After subsection 102(6)
has part: 81(6C) After subsection 102(6)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-81-2
schema version: 2

81(6A) After subsection 102(6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.99
note: Exempts subsection (1) from applying to the rule set out in subsection 152BCP(2)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6a
schema version: 2
part of: 81 After subsection 102(6)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6a-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 81(6A) After subsection 102(6)

81(6B) After subsection 102(6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.99
note: Exempts subsection 152BDG(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 from a rule.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6b-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6b
schema version: 2
part of: 81 After subsection 102(6)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provides an exemption.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on carriage service providers.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Carriage service providers must comply with binding rules of conduct.

81(6C) After subsection 102(6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.99
note: Exempts subsection 152BED(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 from subsection 102(6)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c
schema version: 2
part of: 81 After subsection 102(6)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption applies to a specific temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the exemption
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Subsection 152BED(2) is exempted from subsection 102(6)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption can be analyzed as a rule
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Analyzes the exemption as a rule
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
premise text: Subsection 152BED(2) is exempted from subsection 102(6)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption prohibits applying subsection 102(6)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the exemption as a prohibition on applying subsection 102(6)
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Subsection 152BED(2) is exempted from subsection 102(6)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption applies to a specific temporal interval
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the exemption
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: Subsection 152BED(2) is exempted from subsection 102(6)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The exemption conforms to a schema
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates the exemption against a schema
modality: SHACL
operator: Applicable
premise text: Subsection 152BED(2) is exempted from subsection 102(6)

81(1) Publication of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
description: Copy of the final functional separation undertaking
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.79
note: Make a copy of the final functional separation undertaking available on Telstra’s website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-81-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Publication of final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must make a copy of the undertaking available.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a copy available
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

81(2) Publication of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.79
note: Make a copy of the varied final functional separation undertaking available on Telstra’s website.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-81-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 81 Publication of final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

82 Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.79
curation status: Proposed
has part: 82(1) Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
has part: 82(2) Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-82
schema version: 2

82 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.86
note: Commission must consider Telstra's conduct when performing functions or exercising powers under this Part.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-82-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commission must consider conduct
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Commission must have regard to Telstra's conduct

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 82 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

82 After subsection 103(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.99
note: Amendments to Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-82-3
schema version: 2

82(1) Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.79
note: Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-82-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Compliance with final functional separation undertaking

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

82(2) Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.79
note: Exemption from compliance with final functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-82-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 82 Compliance with final functional separation undertaking

83 Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.79
note: Simplified outline of this Part
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-83
schema version: 2

83 After subsection 103(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
curation status: Proposed
has part: 83(4A) After subsection 103(4)
has part: 83(4B) After subsection 103(4)
has part: 83(4C) After subsection 103(4)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-83-2
schema version: 2

83(4A) After subsection 103(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Issuing a formal warning for contravening the service provider rule set.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 83 After subsection 103(4)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits issuing a formal warning.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83(4A) After subsection 103(4)

83(4B) After subsection 103(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Issuing a formal warning for contravening the service provider rule set.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4b
schema version: 2
part of: 83 After subsection 103(4)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits issuing a formal warning.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4b-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83(4B) After subsection 103(4)

83(4C) After subsection 103(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Formal warning for contravening service provider rule set
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c
schema version: 2
part of: 83 After subsection 103(4)

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if a person contravenes the service provider rule set out in subsection 152BED(2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for issuing formal warnings
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (4C) The ACCC may issue a formal warning...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if a person contravenes the service provider rule set out in subsection 152BED(2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implies consequences for issuing formal warnings for service provider rule set violations
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
premise text: (4C) The ACCC may issue a formal warning...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...contravenes the service provider rule set out in subsection 152BED(2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits issuing formal warnings for contravening service provider rule set
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4C) The ACCC may issue a formal warning...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if a person contravenes the service provider rule set out in subsection 152BED(2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about formal warnings for service provider rule set violations
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (4C) The ACCC may issue a formal warning...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if a person contravenes the service provider rule set out in subsection 152BED(2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace for issuing formal warnings
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (4C) The ACCC may issue a formal warning...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 83(4C) After subsection 103(4)

84 Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.80
curation status: Proposed
has part: 84(1) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
has part: 84(2) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
has part: 84(3) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-84
schema version: 2

84 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.88
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for conditions in Part 9 of Schedule 1.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-84-2
schema version: 2

84 After section 505
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-84-3
schema version: 2

84(1) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.80
note: Telstra must not exercise control of the licence.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-84-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Prevents Telstra from exercising control over the licence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Prevents
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Prevents Telstra from exercising control over the licence for all time
modality: CogAI
operator: Prevents
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Prevents Telstra from exercising control over the licence for all time
modality: Diffusion
operator: Prevents
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Prevents Telstra from exercising control over the licence for all time
modality: LTL
operator: Prevents
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;

84(2) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.80
note: Exemption from control by Telstra for certain spectrum licences
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-84-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences

84(3) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
description: Draft migration plan
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.80
note: Telstra must provide a draft migration plan to the ACCC under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-84-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 84 Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must provide a draft migration plan.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

85 Use by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.81
note: Telstra must not supply a carriage service using a radiocommunications device.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-n3logic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-85
schema version: 2

85 Paragraph 564(3)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.101
note: Omit or substitute specific words in a provision.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-85-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must not supply a carriage service using a radiocommunications device.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must not supply a carriage service using a radiocommunications device.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for classification
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must not supply a carriage service using a radiocommunications device.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must not supply a carriage service using a radiocommunications device.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Implication from excluded spectrum regime
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implication
premise text: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra;

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Telstra must not supply a carriage service using a radiocommunications device.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Implication from excluded spectrum regime
modality: N3Logic
operator: Implication
premise text: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra;

86 Associate
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.82
curation status: Proposed
has part: 86(1) Associate
has part: 86(2) Associate
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-86
schema version: 2

86 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-86-2
schema version: 2

86 At the end of subsection 564(3) (before the notes)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: List of conditions for carrier licence
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-86-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the carrier licence is valid, then all conditions in the list must be met during that time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The conditions listed must be met during the validity period of the carrier licence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: The carrier licence has a validity period

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a condition in the list has a specific value, then it is a requirement for carrier licence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The conditions listed have a specific value or meaning
modality: CogAI
operator: hasValue
premise text: The conditions listed are requirements for carrier licence

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If a condition is in the list, then the carrier licence is required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Membership in the list is a necessary condition for carrier licence
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
premise text: The conditions listed are requirements for carrier licence

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If all conditions in the list are met, then the carrier licence is granted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: All conditions listed must be met simultaneously for carrier licence to be granted
modality: LTL
operator: and
premise text: The conditions listed are requirements for carrier licence

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the conditions in the list have a validity period, then they must be met within that time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: The conditions listed have a validity period or scope
modality: SHACL
operator: validity
premise text: The conditions listed are requirements for carrier licence

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86 At the end of subsection 564(3) (before the notes)

86(1) Associate
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.82
note: An associate of Telstra in relation to control of a spectrum licence is defined.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-86-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Associate

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: another person who is an associate of Telstra under another paragraph
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Control relationship
modality: Deontic
operator: is an associate of
premise text: Telstra

86(2) Associate
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.82
note: Persons are not associates if they do not act together in relevant dealings and one cannot exert influence over the other's business dealings.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-86-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 86 Associate

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: they are not associates
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (a) they do not act together in any relevant dealings relating to the spectrum licence

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: they are not associates
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative influence
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (b) neither of them is in a position to exert influence over the business dealings of the other in relation to the spectrum licence

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86(2) Associate

87 Control
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.83
note: Control includes control as a result of, or by means of, trusts, agreements, arrangements, understandings and practices.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-87-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-87-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-87
schema version: 2

87 Subsection 564(3) (note 2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Repeal note and substitute with new text
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-87-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-87-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion relation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-87-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass relation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-87-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87 Control

88 When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.83
note: Telstra cannot exercise control of a spectrum licence.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-88-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-88
schema version: 2

88 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.92
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-88-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-88-2
schema version: 2

88 At the end of subsection 564(3) (after the notes)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Notes on access determinations, binding rules of conduct, and access agreements under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-88-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-88-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot

89 Paragraph 571(3)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Omit 'or 4', substitute ', 4 or 5'
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-89-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-89-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-89
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-89-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'or 4'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

8BA Special meaning of standard telephone service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8BA(1) Special meaning of standard telephone service
has part: 8BA(2) Special meaning of standard telephone service
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8ba
schema version: 2

8BA(1) Special meaning of standard telephone service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
note: Defines standard telephone service as a reference to a specific service with specified characteristics.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8ba-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8ba-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8BA Special meaning of standard telephone service

8BA(2) Special meaning of standard telephone service
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
note: Minister may determine characteristics for standard telephone service
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8ba-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8BA Special meaning of standard telephone service

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to determine characteristics
modality: Deontic
operator: may

9 Section 9
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule 1 section
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
schema version: 2

9 Section 7
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.10
note: Defines final functional separation undertaking
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-9-2
schema version: 2

90 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.94
note: The provision of information, advice, and resources.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-90
schema version: 2

90 At the end of subsection 571(3) (before the notes)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.103
note: List of conditions for carrier licence
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-90-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between conditions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: List of conditions for carrier licence
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: provide

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

91 Subsection 571(3) (note 2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.103
note: Repeal note and substitute with new text
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-91-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-91
schema version: 2

92 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-92-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-92
schema version: 2

92 At the end of subsection 571(3) (after the notes)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.103
note: Notes on access determinations, binding rules of conduct, and access agreements under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-92-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-92-2
schema version: 2

93 After subclause 17(2) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.103
note: Amendments to Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-93-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-93
schema version: 2

94 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-94-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-94
schema version: 2

94 After subclause 17(4) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.104
note: NBN corporation is not the operator of facilities if agreement with Telstra would result in that.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-94-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-94-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-94-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-94-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: NBN corporation is taken not to be the operator of facilities.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Asserts that NBN corporation is not the operator of facilities under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: Agreement with Telstra would result in NBN corporation being the operator of facilities.

95 At the end of clause 17 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: Defines NBN corporation as having the same meaning as in section 577BA.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-95-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-95-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-95
schema version: 2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-95-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: NBN corporation has the same meaning as in section 577BA.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

96 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
curation status: Proposed
has part: 96(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 96(3B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 96(3C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-96
schema version: 2

96 At the end of clause 18 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.105
curation status: Proposed
has part: 96(6) At the end of clause 18 of Schedule 1
has part: 96(7) At the end of clause 18 of Schedule 1
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-96-2
schema version: 2

96(6) At the end of clause 18 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: Prevent arbitrators from making determinations that would prevent Telstra from complying with certain undertakings.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 96 At the end of clause 18 of Schedule 1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: (a) preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The determination must overlap with Telstra's compliance with undertakings.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (6) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: (a) preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: The determination implies that Telstra's compliance with undertakings is necessary.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (6) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: (a) preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of making determinations that would prevent Telstra from complying with undertakings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (6) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: (a) preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The determination must diffuse to Telstra's compliance with undertakings.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (6) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: (a) preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The determination must be recurrently related to Telstra's compliance with undertakings.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (6) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...

96(7) At the end of clause 18 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: No effect on agreement in writing
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 96 At the end of clause 18 of Schedule 1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: determination under this clause has no effect to the extent to which it is inconsistent with the agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Agreement and clause determination overlap in time
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: determination under this clause has no effect to the extent to which it is inconsistent with the agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Agreement incorporates into clause determination
modality: CogAI
operator: Incorporates
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (determination under this clause has no effect to the extent to which it is inconsistent with the agreement)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agreement overrides clause determination
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (a) agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: determination under this clause has no effect to the extent to which it is inconsistent with the agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Agreement diffuses into clause determination
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: determination under this clause has no effect to the extent to which it is inconsistent with the agreement
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Agreement and clause determination have recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force

96(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Access determinations
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Must comply with access determinations
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-96-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with access determinations
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

96(3B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
description: Compliance with applicable rules
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Must comply with binding rules of conduct
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-96-ss-3b
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

96(3C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
note: Exempts access agreements from subsection (1)
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-96-ss-3c
schema version: 2
part of: 96 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts access agreements
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

97 Clause 31 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: Defines NBN corporation term
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-97-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-97
schema version: 2

98 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.102
note: Consumer Safeguards
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-98-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-98
schema version: 2

98 Subclause 33(3) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: Omit specific phrase from Schedule 1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-98-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-98-2
schema version: 2

99 Subclause 33(4) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.105
note: Omit 'ACMA' and substitute 'ACCC'
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-99-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-99
schema version: 2

9A Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181
curation status: Proposed
has part: 9A(1) Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services
has part: 9A(2) Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-9a
schema version: 2

9A(1) Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181
note: Minister must determine what is necessary to ensure prescribed carriage services are reasonably accessible.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-9a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 9A Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to determine what is necessary.
modality: Deontic
operator: Determine

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9A(1) Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services

9A(2) Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181
note: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-9a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 9A Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It is a legislative instrument.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of a legislative instrument
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9A(2) Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services

Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Act 2010
type: Document
description: An Act to amend legislation relating to telecommunications, and for other purposes
identifier: No. 140 of 2010
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU