Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Act 2010
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 140 of 2010
description: An Act to amend legislation relating to telecommunications, and for other purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title [see Note 1]
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Commencement rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-2
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Starts on the day the Act receives Royal Assent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 December
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-norm

1A Section 1A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1a
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1a-norm

16 December
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-2-norm

2 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-3
note: Commencement information for the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-3-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Schedule 1 section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Schedule 1 section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-norm

6 March 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
note: References an external document
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-norm

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 1, Parts 2 and 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-5-norm

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-2-norm

15 March 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-2-norm

7 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
note: Schedule 1 section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-7-norm

15 June 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-3-norm

8 Section 8
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
note: Schedule 1 section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-norm

16 December
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-2-norm

9 Section 9
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
note: Schedule 1 section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-norm

15 March 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15-4
note: Commencement information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-4-norm

10 Section 10
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
note: Schedule 1 section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-norm

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
note: Schedule 1 section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-norm

16 December
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-3-norm

12 Section 12
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
note: Schedule 1 section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-norm

16 December
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-4
note: Note on table limitations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-4-norm

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3-2
note: Amendments to Acts specified in a Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Schedule(s)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to amend Acts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-2-norm

1A At the end of subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1a-2
note: Enhance the welfare of Australians with accessible and affordable carriage services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.8
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1a-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1a-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1a-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1A At the end of subsection 3(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1a-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to enhance welfare
premise text: Availability of carriage services
conclusion text: Enhance welfare
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 After subsection 58(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-3
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.9
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-3-norm

2 At the end of section 60
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-4
note: Section 60 has effect subject to section 577J of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.9
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-2-4-norm

3 At the end of section 62
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3-3
note: Section 62 has effect subject to section 577J of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.9
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-3-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-3-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 At the end of section 62
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

4 At the end of section 68
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-3
note: Section 68 has effect subject to section 577K of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.9
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-4-3-norm

5 Subsection 85(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5-2
note: Substitution of section references
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.9
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-5-2-norm

6 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-3
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-3-norm

6 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-4
note: Defines a term for a designated part of the spectrum.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6-4-norm

7 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7-2
note: Definition of draft functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-7-2-norm

8 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-2
note: Definition of draft migration plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: draft migration plan means...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9-2
note: Defines final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9-2-norm

10 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-2
note: Defines final migration plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-2-norm

11 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11-2
note: Defines hybrid fibre-coaxial network
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.10
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Section 7
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: hybrid fibre-coaxial network is a telecommunications network
conclusion text: is a class of telecommunications networks
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-11-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: supplements
logic summary: Temporal relation between optical fibre and coaxial cable connections
premise text: optical fibre connects nodes
conclusion text: coaxial cable connections from nodes to premises of end-users supplement optical fibre connections
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2
note: Definition of internet carriage service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines the term
conclusion text: internet carriage service means a carriage service that enables end-users to access the internet.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
note: Definition of radiocommunications device
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines term
conclusion text: Radiocommunications device has the same meaning as in the Radiocommunications Act 1992.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
note: Defines spectrum as same as in Radiocommunications Act 1992.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-norm

15 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15-5
note: Defines spectrum licence meaning
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-5-norm

16 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-5
note: Defines subscription television broadcasting licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-5-norm

17 After subsection 69(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.11
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-17-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 After subsection 69(5)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

8 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-3
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8-3-norm

18 Before subsection 69(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
note: Exempts subsection (1) from clause 84 of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-norm

19 After subsection 70(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
note: Exempts certain conditions from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-norm

20 After paragraph 70(5)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
note: Inserts condition from Part 1 of Schedule 1 related to sections 577AD, 577CD or 577ED.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-norm

21 Before subsection 70(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
note: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in clause 84 of Schedule 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-21-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 Before subsection 70(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

22 After paragraph 564(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
note: Inserts carrier licence condition related to section 577AD, 577CD or 577ED
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-norm

23 Subsection 564(3) (after note 1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
note: Notes sections dealing with undertakings given by Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.12
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-23-norm

24 After paragraph 564(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
note: Inserts carrier licence condition set out in clause 84 of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.13
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-norm

25 Subsection 564(3) (after note 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
note: Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.13
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-25-norm

26 After paragraph 571(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
note: Inserts carrier licence condition related to section 577AD, 577CD or 577ED
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.13
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-norm

27 Subsection 571(3) (after note 1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
note: References sections dealing with undertakings given by Telstra.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.13
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-27-norm

28 After paragraph 571(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
note: Inserts carrier licence condition set out in clause 84 of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.13
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-norm

29 Subsection 571(3) (after note 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
note: Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.13
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-29-norm

30 After Part 32
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
note: Amendments to Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.13
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-norm

10 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-3
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-10-3-norm

577 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577
note: Telstra undertakes about structural separation, hybrid fibre-coaxial networks, and subscription television broadcasting licences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Telstra has an obligation to provide undertakings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577A Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577a
has part: 577A(1) Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
has part: 577A(2) Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
has part: 577A(3) Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.15

577A(1) Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577a-ss-1
part of: 577A Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
note: Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.15
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-1-norm

577A(2) Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2
part of: 577A Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
note: Matters related to transparency and equivalence in supply of regulated services are considered in connection with paragraph (1)(a)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.15
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Matters are in connection with paragraph (1)(a)
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(b)
conclusion text: (a) Telstra’s wholesale customers; and (b) Telstra’s retail business units;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval: beginning when the undertaking comes into force, ending at the start of the designated day
premise text: (c) beginning when the undertaking comes into force; and (d) ending at the start of the designated day;
conclusion text: during the period beginning when the undertaking comes into force, ending at the start of the designated day
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval: beginning when the undertaking comes into force, ending at the start of the designated day
premise text: (c) beginning when the undertaking comes into force; and (d) ending at the start of the designated day;
conclusion text: during the period beginning when the undertaking comes into force, ending at the start of the designated day
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval: beginning when the undertaking comes into force, ending at the start of the designated day
premise text: (c) beginning when the undertaking comes into force; and (d) ending at the start of the designated day;
conclusion text: during the period beginning when the undertaking comes into force, ending at the start of the designated day
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval: beginning when the undertaking comes into force, ending at the start of the designated day
premise text: (c) beginning when the undertaking comes into force; and (d) ending at the start of the designated day;
conclusion text: during the period beginning when the undertaking comes into force, ending at the start of the designated day
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

577A(3) Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577a-ss-3
part of: 577A Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation
note: The ACCC must not accept an undertaking under this section unless satisfied that the undertaking provides for transparency and equivalence.
description: transparency and equivalence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.15
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: The ACCC is prohibited from accepting an undertaking under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3
has part: 12(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(7A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 12(12) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16

12(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-4
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Monitoring of compliance is required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide monitoring of compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: ACCQ cannot accept undertaking without monitoring and compliance systems
description: Monitoring and compliance systems
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Cannot accept undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Monitoring and compliance systems must be implemented at the same time as the undertaking
premise text: (5) The ACCC must not accept an undertaking under this section unless the ACCC is satisfied that: (a) the undertaking provides for: (i) the ACCC to monitor Telstra’s compliance with the undertaking; and (ii) Telstra to have systems, procedures and processes that promote and facilitate the ACCC’s monitoring of Telstra’s compliance with the undertaking; and (b) the undertaking does so in an appropriate and effective manner.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Monitoring and compliance systems must be implemented before the undertaking takes effect
premise text: (5) The ACCC must not accept an undertaking under this section unless the ACCC is satisfied that: (a) the undertaking provides for: (i) the ACCC to monitor Telstra’s compliance with the undertaking; and (ii) Telstra to have systems, procedures and processes that promote and facilitate the ACCC’s monitoring of Telstra’s compliance with the undertaking; and (b) the undertaking does so in an appropriate and effective manner.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: ACCQ must monitor Telstra's compliance with the undertaking
premise text: (5) The ACCC must not accept an undertaking under this section unless the ACCC is satisfied that: (a) the undertaking provides for: (i) the ACCC to monitor Telstra’s compliance with the undertaking; and (ii) Telstra to have systems, procedures and processes that promote and facilitate the ACCC’s monitoring of Telstra’s compliance with the undertaking; and (b) the undertaking does so in an appropriate and effective manner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: ACCC must consider certain matters when deciding to accept an undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ought
logic summary: Obligation to consider matters
premise text: The ACCC must have regard to...
conclusion text: An undertaking may be accepted only if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: National interest in structural reform is relevant
premise text: The ACCC must have regard to the national interest...
conclusion text: An undertaking may be accepted only if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Impact of structural reform on consumers and competition is relevant
premise text: The ACCC must have regard to the impact of that structural reform...
conclusion text: An undertaking may be accepted only if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: ACCC must consider matters relevant to an undertaking
premise text: The ACCC considers such other matters (if any) as the ACCC considers relevant
conclusion text: An undertaking may be accepted only if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: ACCC discretion to consider additional matters
premise text: The ACCC must have regard to the matters set out in an instrument in force under subsection (7)
conclusion text: An undertaking may be accepted only if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-7
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The Minister may set out matters for the purposes of paragraph (6)(a)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to set out matters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(7A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-7a
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Publish notice and invite submissions before making or varying an instrument.
description: Notice and submissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-7a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-7a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-7a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-8
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister must take reasonable steps to ensure instrument comes into force as soon as practicable after section commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to take reasonable steps.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-9
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Prohibition on giving undertaking without instrument in force under subsection (7)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not entitled to
logic summary: Prohibition on giving undertaking
premise text: (9) Telstra is not entitled to give an undertaking under this section
conclusion text: unless an instrument is in force under subsection (7)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-10
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Designated day for the purposes of this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-10-norm

12(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-11
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Cannot be varied or revoked without a fresh instrument specifying a later day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-11-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-11-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot be varied or revoked.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(12) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-12
part of: 12 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Condition for ACCC to accept Telstra's undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12-3-ss-12-norm

14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2
has part: 14(13) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(14) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(15) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(16) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(17) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(18) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(19) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(20) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(21) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(22) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(23) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 14(24) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18

14(13) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-13
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Telstra may request the Minister to make or revoke an instrument under paragraph (10)(b) specifying a particular day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-13-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-13-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Designated day
conclusion text: Particular day specified
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

14(14) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-14
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister must consider Telstra's request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-14-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-14-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider request.
premise text: Telstra requests consideration.
conclusion text: Minister must consider request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(15) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-15
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Request not considered if frivolous or made in bad faith
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-15-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-15-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Request not considered if frivolous or made in bad faith.
conclusion text: Minister is not required to consider the request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-15-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Temporal inclusion
premise text: The request was made before the commencement of this Act.
conclusion text: Request is within the applicable time period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(16) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-16
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: An undertaking under this section must be expressed to be an undertaking under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-16-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-16-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Expressed
logic summary: Expressed as an undertaking
premise text: An undertaking under this section
conclusion text: Must be expressed to be an undertaking under this section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(17) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-17
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Cannot withdraw undertaking after acceptance by ACCC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-17-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-17-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on withdrawing undertaking
premise text: Undertaking accepted by ACCC
conclusion text: Withdrawal not allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(18) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-18
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: ACCC may perform functions and exercise powers in relation to the undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-18-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-18-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: ACCC may perform functions and exercise powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(19) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-19
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: No implication that matters cannot be included in an undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-19-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-19-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-19-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(19) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: No implication that matters cannot be included in an undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(20) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-20
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The Minister may exempt a specified fixed-line carriage service from the scope of subsection (1) and the associated provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-20-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-20-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-20-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(20) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to exempt a service
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(21) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-21
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister may exempt telecommunications network from scope of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-21-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-21-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-21-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(21) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to exempt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

14(22) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-22
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-22-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-22-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-22-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(22) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(23) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-23
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Instrument under subsection (7) or paragraph (10)(b) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-23-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-23-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition of legislative instruments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(24) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-24
part of: 14 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Defines associated provision and fixed-line carriage service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-14-2-ss-24-norm

577AA Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation may
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577aa
note: Acceptance of undertaking about structural separation may be subject to the occurrence of events
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.19
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577aa-norm

16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6
has part: 16(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(6A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 16(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20

16(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-2
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Cannot specify event timing in nomination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot specify event timing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-3
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister may specify events by writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-3-norm

16(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-4
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: A period specified by the ACCC must be 6 months or as specified in an instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be a period of 6 months or as specified in an instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-5
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The Minister may specify a period by writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-5-norm

16(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Notify ACCC of event occurrence within specified period.
description: Notification in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expressed obligation
conclusion text: Telstra must notify ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Event occurrence within specified period
premise text: (b) such an event occurs within that period;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(6A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6a
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Exempts a specific event from subsection (6) of section 16(6A)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6a-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-6a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Repeals acceptance of undertaking if event does not occur within specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Repeals acceptance of undertaking if event does not occur within specified period.
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act (other than subclause 76(4) of Schedule 1) has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the event
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act (other than subclause 76(4) of Schedule 1) has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
logic summary: Defines a trace for the event
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act (other than subclause 76(4) of Schedule 1) has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Defines a diffusion for the event
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act (other than subclause 76(4) of Schedule 1) has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
logic summary: Defines a rebuttal for the event
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act (other than subclause 76(4) of Schedule 1) has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

16(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: If specified events do not occur within a period, the undertaking is not accepted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of accepting an undertaking if events do not occur within a period.
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;
conclusion text: This Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval for the occurrence of events.
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal logic for the occurrence of events.
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Diffusion of information about the undertaking.
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for the undertaking.
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577A is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

16(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-9
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-10
part of: 16 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Instrument under subsection (3) or (5) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-6-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition of an instrument being a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-2-norm

577AB When undertaking about structural separation comes into
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ab
note: Conditions under which an undertaking comes into force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Specifies the temporal relationship between the event and the commencement of the undertaking
premise text: (i) the decision to accept the undertaking is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (ii) the event occurs within that period;
conclusion text: The event must occur within the specified period for the undertaking to come into force.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Describes the conditions under which the undertaking comes into force
premise text: (a) if: (i) the decision to accept the undertaking is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (ii) the event occurs within that period;
conclusion text: The undertaking comes into force when the event occurs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Specifies the temporal relationship between the events and the commencement of the undertaking
premise text: (b) if: (i) the decision to accept the undertaking is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (ii) each of those events occur at the same time;
conclusion text: The undertaking comes into force when all the events occur simultaneously.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Describes the conditions under which the undertaking comes into force for multiple events
premise text: (c) if: (i) the decision to accept the undertaking is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (ii) each of those events occur at different times;
conclusion text: The undertaking comes into force when all the events occur.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ab-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Describes the conditions under which the undertaking comes into force for multiple events
premise text: (d) if the decision to accept the undertaking is not expressed to be subject to the occurrence of one or more specified events within a specified period—when the undertaking is accepted by the ACCC.
conclusion text: The undertaking comes into force when it is accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577AC Publication requirements for undertaking about structural
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ac
has part: 577AC(1) Publication requirements for undertaking about structural
has part: 577AC(2) Publication requirements for undertaking about structural
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.22

577AC(1) Publication requirements for undertaking about structural
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-1
part of: 577AC Publication requirements for undertaking about structural
note: Publish undertaking and decision terms on website within a specified period.
description: Notice announcing the undertaking has come into force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 577AC(1) Publication requirements for undertaking about structural
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publishing is a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577AC(2) Publication requirements for undertaking about structural
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-2
part of: 577AC Publication requirements for undertaking about structural
note: Publish undertaking on website within a specified period
description: specified events and period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.22
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577AD Compliance with undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ad
note: Compliance with undertaking about structural separation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ad-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ad-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ad-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577B Variation of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577b
has part: 577B(1) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
has part: 577B(2) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
has part: 577B(3) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
has part: 577B(4) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
has part: 577B(5) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
has part: 577B(5A) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.23

577B(1) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577b-ss-1
part of: 577B Variation of undertaking about structural separation
note: Applicability of section 577B(1) to Telstra's undertaking under section 577A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-1-norm

577B(2) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2
part of: 577B Variation of undertaking about structural separation
note: Variation of undertaking about structural separation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to ACCC
premise text: (2) Telstra may give the ACCC a variation of the undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between Telstra's action and ACCC's receipt
premise text: (2) Telstra may give the ACCC a variation of the undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of Telstra's action on ACCC's rights
premise text: (2) Telstra may give the ACCC a variation of the undertaking
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagation of permission to ACCC
premise text: (2) Telstra may give the ACCC a variation of the undertaking
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: Subclass
logic summary: Classification of structural separation provisions as subclasses
premise text: (a) is covered by paragraph 577A(1)(b); and (b) does not consist of provisions of a final migration plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

577B(3) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577b-ss-3
part of: 577B Variation of undertaking about structural separation
note: Decision to accept or reject variation of undertaking about structural separation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Decision to accept or reject variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577B(4) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577b-ss-4
part of: 577B Variation of undertaking about structural separation
note: Consideration of relevant matters when deciding to accept a variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-4-norm

577B(5) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577b-ss-5
part of: 577B Variation of undertaking about structural separation
note: The Minister may set out matters for the purposes of paragraph (4)(a)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to set out matters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577B(5A) Variation of undertaking about structural separation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577b-ss-5a
part of: 577B Variation of undertaking about structural separation
note: Notice must be published on the Department's website before making or varying an instrument under subsection (5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.23
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-5a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577b-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to publish notice on the Department's website
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2
has part: 20(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 20(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 20(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 20(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24

20(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-6
part of: 20 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Variation takes effect when accepted by the ACCC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-6-norm

20(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-7
part of: 20 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Publish variation on website after effect of variation
description: Variation details
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publish variation on website
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-8
part of: 20 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-9
part of: 20 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: An instrument under subsection (5) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition of an instrument being a legislative instrument
premise text: (9) An instrument under subsection (5)
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577BA Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ba
has part: 577BA(1) Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
has part: 577BA(2) Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
has part: 577BA(3) Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24

577BA(1) Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-1
part of: 577BA Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
note: Authorises conduct of Telstra and NBN corporations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 577BA(1) Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Authorisation of conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577BA(2) Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-2
part of: 577BA Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
note: Giving by Telstra of certain undertakings is authorised.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to give undertakings
premise text: (2) The giving by Telstra of...
conclusion text: ...is authorised for the purposes of subsection 51(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577BA(3) Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3
part of: 577BA Authorised conduct—subsection 51(1) of the Competition and
note: Authorisation for contract arrangements under subsection 51(1) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorisation for contract arrangements
premise text: (3) If...
conclusion text: (d) the entering into of the contract, arrangement or understanding by Telstra is authorised...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorisation for NBN corporation arrangements
premise text: (e) the entering into of the contract, arrangement or understanding by the NBN corporation is authorised...
conclusion text: (f) conduct engaged in by Telstra or the NBN corporation after the undertaking comes into force...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval for contract arrangements
premise text: (i) the undertaking under section 577A comes into force;
conclusion text: ...before the undertaking was accepted by the ACCC, Telstra or the NBN corporation gave the ACCC a copy of the contract...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace for contract arrangements
premise text: (ii) if the contract, arrangement or understanding was in writing;
conclusion text: ...before the undertaking was accepted by the ACCC, Telstra or the NBN corporation gave the ACCC a copy of the contract...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Conditional authorisation for contract arrangements
premise text: (f) if...(ii)...then...
conclusion text: ...conduct engaged in by Telstra or the NBN corporation after the undertaking comes into force...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2
has part: 22(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 22(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 22(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 22(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 22(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.26

22(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4
part of: 22 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Authorises entry into contract with NBN corporation under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Authorisation to enter into contract
premise text: (4) If...
conclusion text: ...then:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Justifies
logic summary: Justification for Telstra's action
premise text: (a) Telstra enters into a contract...
conclusion text: ...is authorised for the purposes of subsection 51(1)
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval within which authorisation applies
premise text: (c) when the contract, arrangement or understanding is entered into...
conclusion text: ...then:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Supports
logic summary: Support for Telstra's action
premise text: (a) Telstra enters into a contract...
conclusion text: ...is authorised for the purposes of subsection 51(1)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of authorisation to NBN corporation
premise text: (b) the contract, arrangement or understanding contains a migration provision...
conclusion text: ...then:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-5
part of: 22 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Telstra's conduct is prohibited unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of conduct
premise text: Telstra's conduct is engaged in
conclusion text: Conduct is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6
part of: 22 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Authorisation for conduct under section 577A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorises
logic summary: Authorises conduct
premise text: Section 577A undertaking
conclusion text: Subsection 51(1) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During section 577A undertaking
premise text: Section 577A undertaking
conclusion text: Subsection 51(1) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: During section 577A undertaking
premise text: Section 577A undertaking
conclusion text: Subsection 51(1) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: During section 577A undertaking
premise text: Section 577A undertaking
conclusion text: Subsection 51(1) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: During section 577A undertaking
premise text: Section 577A undertaking
conclusion text: Subsection 51(1) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7
part of: 22 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Acquisition of asset from Telstra authorized under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (7) If...
conclusion text: the acquisition of the asset is authorised
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between conditions
premise text: (b) the disposal of the asset by Telstra is required for the compliance by Telstra with an undertaking in force under section 577A
conclusion text: the disposal of the asset overlaps with the compliance requirement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Recurring trace of asset acquisition
premise text: (c) the person is identified in the undertaking as the person by whom the asset is to be directly or indirectly acquired
conclusion text: the person is recurrently involved in the asset acquisition
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorization
logic summary: Asset acquisition authorization
premise text: (7) If...
conclusion text: the acquisition of the asset is authorized
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-8
part of: 22 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: If Telstra enters into a contract with an NBN corporation to comply with an undertaking in force under section 577A, then both parties must enter into the contract.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Telstra enters into a contract with an NBN corporation.
conclusion text: Both parties must enter into the contract.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

24 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2
has part: 24(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 24(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 24(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 24(12) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.28

24(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-9
part of: 24 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister may determine that subsection (8) applies as if Telstra had entered into the contract to comply with the undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-10
part of: 24 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Conduct for determining timetable is authorised under subsection 51(1) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-10-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to engage in conduct for determining timetable.
premise text: (10) If...
conclusion text: ...the conduct is authorised for the purposes of subsection 51(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-10-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for determining timetable.
premise text: (10) If...
conclusion text: ...and (b) the final migration plan sets out a method for determining a timetable...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-11
part of: 24 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Telstra must not enter into a contract with an NBN corporation containing certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-11-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of contract with NBN corporation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(12) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-12
part of: 24 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Imposes a duty to amend Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-12-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-12-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-24-2-ss-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the amendment of Schedule 1
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

26 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2
note: Definition of asset and related terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-7

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of asset and related terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: asset means: (a) any legal or equitable estate or interest in real or personal property, including a contingent or prospective one; and (b) any right, privilege or immunity, including a contingent or prospective one.
conclusion text: N/A
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: fixed-line carriage service means: (a) a carriage service that is supplied using a line to premises occupied or used by an end-user; or (b) a service that facilitates the supply of a carriage service covered by paragraph (a).
conclusion text: N/A
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: give effect to, in relation to a provision of a contract, arrangement or understanding, has the same meaning as in the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
conclusion text: N/A
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: migration provision has the meaning given by subsection (11).
conclusion text: N/A
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: national broadband network means a telecommunications network for the high-speed carriage of communications, where an NBN corporation has been, is, or is to be, involved in the creation or development of the network.
conclusion text: N/A
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-26-2-logic-descriptionlogic-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: NBN Co means NBN Co Limited (ACN 136 533 741), as the company exists from time to time (even if its name is later changed).
conclusion text: N/A
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577BB Migration plan principles
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bb
has part: 577BB(1) Migration plan principles
has part: 577BB(2) Migration plan principles
has part: 577BB(3) Migration plan principles
has part: 577BB(4) Migration plan principles
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.31

577BB(1) Migration plan principles
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-1
part of: 577BB Migration plan principles
note: Minister may determine migration plan principles
references: 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to determine principles
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

577BB(2) Migration plan principles
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-2
part of: 577BB Migration plan principles
note: Publish notice on website and consider submissions within 14 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publish notice on website and consider submissions within 14 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577BB(3) Migration plan principles
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-3
part of: 577BB Migration plan principles
note: Publish determination on Department's website
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577BB(4) Migration plan principles
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-4
part of: 577BB Migration plan principles
note: A determination under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bb-ss-4-norm

577BC Migration plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bc
has part: 577BC(1) Migration plan
has part: 577BC(2) Migration plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.31

577BC(1) Migration plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bc-ss-1
part of: 577BC Migration plan
note: Draft migration plan may be given to ACCC after undertaking comes into force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bc-ss-1-norm

577BC(2) Migration plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bc-ss-2
part of: 577BC Migration plan
note: Must specify action to cease supplying fixed-line carriage services
description: Migration plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.31
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bc-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify action to cease supplying fixed-line carriage services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2
has part: 28(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 28(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 28(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 28(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 28(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 28(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.32

28(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-3
part of: 28 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister may specify additional matters in a written instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-3-norm

28(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-4
part of: 28 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: No provisions dealing with specified matters in a migration plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: A draft or final migration plan must not contain provisions dealing with such matters (if any) as are specified in a written instrument made by the Minister.
conclusion text: No provisions dealing with specified matters in a migration plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-5
part of: 28 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Draft migration plan cannot be given to ACCC without determination in force under subsection 577BB(1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-5-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

28(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-6
part of: 28 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-7
part of: 28 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: An instrument under subsection (3) or (4) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits instruments under subsection (3) or (4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8
part of: 28 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Defines fixed-line carriage service and national broadband network.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies NBN Co and related body corporate.
premise text: NBN Co means NBN Co Limited (ACN 136 533 741)
conclusion text: NBN corporation means NBN Co; or NBN Tasmania; or a company that is a related body corporate of NBN Co.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines NBN Tasmania and related body corporate.
premise text: NBN Tasmania means NBN Tasmania Limited (ACN 138 338 271)
conclusion text: NBN corporation means NBN Co; or NBN Tasmania; or a company that is a related body corporate of NBN Co.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-28-2-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies related body corporate.
premise text: related body corporate has the same meaning as in the Corporations Act 2001
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

577BD Approval of draft migration plan by the ACCC—plan given
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bd
has part: 577BD(1) Approval of draft migration plan by the ACCC—plan given
has part: 577BD(2) Approval of draft migration plan by the ACCC—plan given
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.33

577BD(1) Approval of draft migration plan by the ACCC—plan given
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bd-ss-1
part of: 577BD Approval of draft migration plan by the ACCC—plan given
note: Telstra must give the ACCC a draft migration plan in accordance with an undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.33
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bd-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577BD(2) Approval of draft migration plan by the ACCC—plan given
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bd-ss-2
part of: 577BD Approval of draft migration plan by the ACCC—plan given
note: The ACCC must approve the original plan if it complies with migration plan principles.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.33
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bd-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bd-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The ACCC must approve the original plan.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2
has part: 30(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 30(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 30(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 30(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 30(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 30(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.34

30(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-3
part of: 30 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The ACCC must accept an undertaking before making a decision under subsection (2) The ACCC must publish a notice and consider submissions before making a decision.
description: Submissions to the ACCC within 28 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to accept an undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish notice and consider submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-4
part of: 30 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Comply with a direction under subparagraph (2)(b)(ii) Consultation after undertaking comes into force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Obligation to comply with a direction
premise text: (4) Telstra must comply with a direction under subparagraph (2)(b)(ii)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between the direction and the compliance
premise text: (4) Telstra must comply with a direction under subparagraph (2)(b)(ii)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to consult
premise text: The ACCC must be consulted
conclusion text: This section has effect as if the original plan had been given to the ACCC in accordance with the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-5
part of: 30 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: ACCC must consider certain factors before making a decision. Draft migration plan given by Telstra is taken to be in accordance with the undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consider
premise text: Decision-making process
conclusion text: Obligation to consider
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-6
part of: 30 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Notify Telstra of decision within a certain timeframe.
description: Notification in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify Telstra
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1
part of: 30 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Telstra gives ACCC an undertaking under section 577A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Telstra has an obligation to nominate the event.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: The nomination meets the requirements of paragraph 577AA(1)(b) and subsection 577AA(2).
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2
part of: 30 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Request for Telstra to provide a replacement draft migration plan within 30 days.
description: Replacement draft migration plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.34
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a replacement draft migration plan
premise text: The ACCC requests Telstra to provide a replacement draft migration plan within 30 days.
conclusion text: Telstra MUST provide a replacement draft migration plan within 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for providing the replacement draft migration plan
premise text: Telstra MUST provide a replacement draft migration plan within 30 days after receiving the notice.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for providing the replacement draft migration plan is >= 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Implication of Telstra's failure to provide a replacement draft migration plan
premise text: If Telstra fails to provide a replacement draft migration plan within 30 days, the ACCC will refuse to approve the original plan.
conclusion text: Telstra's failure to provide a replacement draft migration plan implies that the ACCC will refuse to approve the original plan.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Relationship between Telstra and the ACCC
premise text: The ACCC is an agent that requests Telstra to provide a replacement draft migration plan.
conclusion text: Telstra and the ACCC are related by IS_A.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-30-2-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Validation of the replacement draft migration plan
premise text: The replacement draft migration plan must comply with the migration plan principles.
conclusion text: The replacement draft migration plan IS A document that complies with the migration plan principles.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
has part: 32(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 32(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 32(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 32(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 32(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 32(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 32(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.36

32(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-6
part of: 32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Draft migration plan must be given in accordance with the undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide a draft migration plan in accordance with the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-7
part of: 32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Notify Telstra of decision within a timeframe
description: Decision notification to Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
conclusion text: Decision notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-1
part of: 32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Telstra must provide a draft migration plan to the ACCC under certain conditions.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Telstra has given an undertaking to the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-2
part of: 32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Direct Telstra to provide a replacement draft migration plan within 30 days.
description: Replacement draft migration plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Direct Telstra to provide a replacement draft migration plan within 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-3
part of: 32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The ACCC must publish a notice and consider submissions before making a decision.
description: Submissions to the ACCC within 28 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish notice and consider submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-4
part of: 32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Comply with a direction under subparagraph (2)(b)(ii)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Obligation to comply
premise text: (4) Telstra must comply with a direction under subparagraph (2)(b)(ii)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-5
part of: 32 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Draft migration plan must be given in accordance with the undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
has part: 34(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 34(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 34(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 34(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 34(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 34(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.38

34(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-6
part of: 34 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Notify Telstra of decision within a timeframe
description: Decision notification to Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
conclusion text: Decision notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-1
part of: 34 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Telstra gives ACCC an undertaking under section 577A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide undertaking
premise text: Telstra gives ACCC an undertaking under section 577A.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-2
part of: 34 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Request for Telstra to provide a replacement draft migration plan within 30 days.
description: Replacement draft migration plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a replacement draft migration plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-3
part of: 34 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The ACCC must publish a notice and consider submissions before making a decision.
description: Submissions to the ACCC within 28 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The ACCC must take action before making a decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-4
part of: 34 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Draft migration plan must be given in accordance with the undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide a draft migration plan in accordance with the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-ss-5
part of: 34 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Notify Telstra of decision within a reasonable timeframe.
description: Decision notification to Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
conclusion text: Decision notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577BE Effect of approval of draft migration plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577be
has part: 577BE(1) Effect of approval of draft migration plan
has part: 577BE(2) Effect of approval of draft migration plan
has part: 577BE(3) Effect of approval of draft migration plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.39

577BE(1) Effect of approval of draft migration plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577be-ss-1
part of: 577BE Effect of approval of draft migration plan
note: Plan becomes final upon approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 577BE(1) Effect of approval of draft migration plan
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: becomes
logic summary: Obligation to follow plan
premise text: (1) If the ACCC approves a draft migration plan...
conclusion text: The plan becomes a final migration plan.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

577BE(2) Effect of approval of draft migration plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2
part of: 577BE Effect of approval of draft migration plan
note: Plan comes into force after notice of approval is given to Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to implement plan
premise text: ACCC approves draft migration plan
conclusion text: Plan comes into force
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: StartsAfter
logic summary: Plan starts on the day after notice of approval is given
premise text: Notice of approval is given to Telstra
conclusion text: Plan starts on a specific date
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: StartsAfter
logic summary: Plan starts on the day after notice of approval is given
premise text: Notice of approval is given to Telstra
conclusion text: Plan starts on a specific date
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: DiffusesTo
logic summary: Plan diffuses to Telstra after notice of approval is given
premise text: Notice of approval is given to Telstra
conclusion text: Plan diffuses to Telstra
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Incorporates
logic summary: Plan incorporates ACCC's decision-making process
premise text: ACCC approves draft migration plan
conclusion text: Plan incorporates ACCC's decision
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577BE(3) Effect of approval of draft migration plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577be-ss-3
part of: 577BE Effect of approval of draft migration plan
note: Plan comes into force at the later of two conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.39
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577be-ss-3-norm

36 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
has part: 36(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 36(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 36(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 36(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 36(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40

36(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-4
part of: 36 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Cannot withdraw a final migration plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of withdrawing a final migration plan
premise text: (4) A final migration plan may not be withdrawn.
conclusion text: A final migration plan cannot be withdrawn.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-5
part of: 36 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Integration of migration plan provisions into the undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-5-norm

36(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-6
part of: 36 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Publish ACCC's final migration plan on website after its force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between plan publication and ACCC's functions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-7
part of: 36 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: ACCC may perform functions and exercise powers in relation to a final migration plan.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-7-norm

36(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-ss-8
part of: 36 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: A final migration plan is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-ss-8-norm

577BF Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf
has part: 577BF(1) Variation of final migration plan
has part: 577BF(2) Variation of final migration plan
has part: 577BF(3) Variation of final migration plan
has part: 577BF(4) Variation of final migration plan
has part: 577BF(5) Variation of final migration plan
has part: 577BF(6) Variation of final migration plan
has part: 577BF(7) Variation of final migration plan
has part: 577BF(8) Variation of final migration plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40

577BF(1) Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-1
part of: 577BF Variation of final migration plan
note: This section applies if a final migration plan is in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 577BF(1) Variation of final migration plan
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (final migration plan is in force)
conclusion text: This section applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577BF(2) Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-2
part of: 577BF Variation of final migration plan
note: Telstra may give the ACCC a variation of the final migration plan.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-2-norm

577BF(3) Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-3
part of: 577BF Variation of final migration plan
note: Must approve or refuse variation of final migration plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve or refuse variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577BF(4) Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-4
part of: 577BF Variation of final migration plan
note: Publish notice and consider submissions on variation of final migration plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publish notice and consider submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577BF(5) Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-5
part of: 577BF Variation of final migration plan
note: Variation of minor nature does not trigger subsection (4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-5-norm

577BF(6) Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-6
part of: 577BF Variation of final migration plan
note: Variation of final migration plan takes effect upon approval by ACCC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-6-norm

577BF(7) Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-7
part of: 577BF Variation of final migration plan
note: Variation of final migration plan takes effect as if provisions were part of the undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-7-norm

577BF(8) Variation of final migration plan
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-8
part of: 577BF Variation of final migration plan
note: Publish variation on website after it takes effect
description: Copy of variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577bf-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Publish variation on website after it takes effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577C Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577c
has part: 577C(1) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
has part: 577C(1A) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
has part: 577C(1B) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.41

577C(1) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1
part of: 577C Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
note: Telstra undertakes not to exercise control of a hybrid fibre-coaxial network in Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to not exercise control
premise text: Telstra undertakes
conclusion text: not exercising control
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577C(1A) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1a
part of: 577C Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
note: ACCC must consider relevant matters when deciding to accept an undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Consideration of relevant matters is a duty.
premise text: ACCC has discretion to decide on undertakings.
conclusion text: Relevant matters must be considered.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

577C(1B) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1b
part of: 577C Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
note: The Minister may set out matters for the purposes of paragraph (1A)(a)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.41
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577c-ss-1b-norm

38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
has part: 38(1C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 38(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 38(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 38(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 38(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 38(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 38(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42

38(1C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-1c
part of: 38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Publish notice and invite submissions before making or varying an instrument.
description: Notice and submissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-1c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-2
part of: 38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The period specified in the undertaking must not be longer than 12 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-3
part of: 38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The undertaking must be expressed to be an undertaking under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST Express
logic summary: Expressing the undertaking clearly
premise text: The undertaking must be expressed to be an undertaking under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-4
part of: 38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The undertaking may not be withdrawn after it has been accepted by the ACCC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: The undertaking cannot be withdrawn.
premise text: The ACCC has accepted the undertaking.
conclusion text: The undertaking may not be withdrawn.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The undertaking overlaps with other provisions.
premise text: The provision is part of the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
conclusion text: The undertaking has a specific temporal scope.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: The withdrawal of the undertaking implies a breach of the provision.
premise text: If the undertaking is withdrawn, then the ACCC has breached the provision.
conclusion text: The withdrawal of the undertaking implies a breach of the provision.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The provision diffuses to other related provisions.
premise text: The provision is part of the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
conclusion text: The provision has a broader scope.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The provision recognizes the ACCC's authority.
premise text: The provision is part of the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
conclusion text: The provision acknowledges the ACCC's role.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-5
part of: 38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: ACCC may perform functions and exercise powers in accordance with the undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-5-norm

38(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-6
part of: 38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-ss-7
part of: 38 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: An instrument under subsection (1B) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-ss-7-norm

577CA Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ca
has part: 577CA(1) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
has part: 577CA(2) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
has part: 577CA(3) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
has part: 577CA(4) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
has part: 577CA(5) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
has part: 577CA(6) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42

577CA(1) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-1
part of: 577CA Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
note: Decision to accept undertaking must be expressed to occur within specified period after acceptance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Decision to accept undertaking is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577CA(2) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-2
part of: 577CA Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
note: Must not specify event timing in nomination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 577CA(2) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits specifying event timing
premise text: (2) A nomination under subsection (1) must not specify an event by reference to the timing of the event.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577CA(3) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-3
part of: 577CA Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
note: Minister may specify events for the purposes of subsection (1)(c)(vii)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-3-norm

577CA(4) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-4
part of: 577CA Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
note: A period specified by the ACCC must be 6 months or as specified in an instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 577CA(4) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be a period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577CA(5) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-5
part of: 577CA Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
note: Minister may specify a period for notification requirement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 577CA(5) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Minister has the power to specify a period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577CA(6) Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-6
part of: 577CA Acceptance of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
note: Notify ACCC of event occurrence within specified period after decision to accept undertaking is expressed to be subject to such event.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.42
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ca-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Expressed obligation
conclusion text: Notify ACCC of event occurrence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
has part: 40(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 40(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 40(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 40(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.44

40(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-ss-7
part of: 40 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Repeals undertaking if event does not occur within specified period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Repeals undertaking if event does not occur within specified period
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for event
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
logic summary: Defines eventual occurrence of event
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Defines diffusion of undertaking
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
logic summary: Defines rebuttal of undertaking
premise text: (7) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period; and (b) the event does not occur within that period; this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-ss-8
part of: 40 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: If events do not occur within the specified period, the undertaking is not accepted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits acceptance of an undertaking if events do not occur within the specified period.
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;
conclusion text: This Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines an Allen interval for the key 'sch-1-sec-40-ss-8'
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;
conclusion text: This Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
logic summary: Defines an LTL property for the key 'sch-1-sec-40-ss-8'
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;
conclusion text: This Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Defines a diffusion property for the key 'sch-1-sec-40-ss-8'
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;
conclusion text: This Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-8-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Defines an argumentation property for the key 'sch-1-sec-40-ss-8'
premise text: (8) If: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577C is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period; and (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;
conclusion text: This Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-ss-9
part of: 40 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-ss-10
part of: 40 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: An instrument under subsection (3) or (5) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: An instrument under subsection (3) or (5)
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577CB When undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577cb
note: Conditions under which an undertaking comes into force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cb-norm

577CC Publication requirements for undertaking about hybrid
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577cc
has part: 577CC(1) Publication requirements for undertaking about hybrid
has part: 577CC(2) Publication requirements for undertaking about hybrid
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.45

577CC(1) Publication requirements for undertaking about hybrid
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577cc-ss-1
part of: 577CC Publication requirements for undertaking about hybrid
note: Publish undertaking and terms on website upon decision
description: undertaking, terms of decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cc-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Publishing undertaking and terms upon decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577CC(2) Publication requirements for undertaking about hybrid
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577cc-ss-2
part of: 577CC Publication requirements for undertaking about hybrid
note: Publish undertaking on website within a specified period
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.45
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cc-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-42-norm

577CD Compliance with undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577cd
note: Must comply with undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cd-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cd-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577cd-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d
has part: 577D(1) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(2) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(3) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(3A) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(3B) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(3C) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(4) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(5) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(6) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
has part: 577D(7) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46

577D(1) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-1
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
note: Applicability of section 577D(1) to Telstra's undertaking under section 577C
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Identifies the deontic type of the provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577D(2) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-2
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
note: Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-2-norm

577D(3) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
note: Decision to accept or reject variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to decide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577D(3A) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3a
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
note: Consider relevant matters when deciding to accept a variation in hybrid fibre-coaxial networks.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider relevant matters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577D(3B) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3b
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
note: Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3b-norm

577D(3C) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3c
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
note: Publish notice and invite submissions before making or varying an instrument.
description: Notice and submissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577D(4) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-4
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
note: Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks takes effect upon acceptance by the ACCC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-4-norm

577D(5) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-5
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
note: Must publish variation on website after it takes effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577D(6) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-6
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 577D(6) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577D(7) Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577d-ss-7
part of: 577D Variation of undertaking about hybrid fibre-coaxial networks
note: An instrument under subsection (3B) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577d-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (7) An instrument under subsection (3B)
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577E Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577e
has part: 577E(1) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577E(1A) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577E(1B) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577E(1C) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577E(2) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.47

577E(1) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1
part of: 577E Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
note: Telstra must not exercise control of a subscription television broadcasting licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Telstra must not exercise control.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577E(1A) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1a
part of: 577E Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
note: ACCC must consider relevant matters when deciding to accept an undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Matters must be considered
premise text: ACCC has regard to matters
conclusion text: Matters are relevant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

577E(1B) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1b
part of: 577E Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
note: Minister may set out matters for the purposes of paragraph (1A)(a) by writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1b-norm

577E(1C) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1c
part of: 577E Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
note: Publish notice on website and consider submissions before making or varying an instrument.
description: Submissions to the Minister within 14 days after publication of the notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice and consider submissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577E(2) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2
part of: 577E Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
note: The period specified in the undertaking must not be longer than 12 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 577E(2) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on exceeding the specified period
premise text: (2) The period specified in the undertaking as mentioned in paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: must not be longer than 12 months.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
premise text: (2) The period specified in the undertaking as mentioned in paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: must not be longer than 12 months.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577e-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustBeLessThanOrEqual
logic summary: Temporal interval restriction
premise text: (2) The period specified in the undertaking as mentioned in paragraph (1)(a)
conclusion text: must not be longer than 12 months.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
has part: 44(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 44(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 44(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 44(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 44(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 44(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48

44(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-3
part of: 44 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Expressing an undertaking under this section is mandatory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expressing an undertaking is a requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-4
part of: 44 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The undertaking may not be withdrawn after it has been accepted by the ACCC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on withdrawing an undertaking after acceptance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-5
part of: 44 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: ACCC may perform functions and exercise powers in accordance with the undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-5-norm

44(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-6
part of: 44 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Determines control of subscription television broadcasting licence under Schedule 1 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-6-norm

44(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-7
part of: 44 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-ss-8
part of: 44 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: An instrument under subsection (1B) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-ss-8-norm

577EA Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ea
has part: 577EA(1) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577EA(2) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577EA(3) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577EA(4) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577EA(5) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577EA(6) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577EA(7) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48

577EA(1) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-1
part of: 577EA Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
note: Decision to accept undertaking must be expressed to occur within specified period after acceptance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Decision to accept undertaking is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577EA(2) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-2
part of: 577EA Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
note: Cannot specify event timing in nomination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !=
logic summary: Cannot be specified
premise text: Timing of event
conclusion text: Must not specify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577EA(3) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-3
part of: 577EA Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
note: Minister may specify events for the purposes of subsection (1)(c)(vii)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-3-norm

577EA(4) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4
part of: 577EA Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
note: A period specified by the ACCC must be 6 months or as specified in an instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 577EA(4) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be a period of 6 months or as specified in an instrument.
premise text: (4) A period specified by the ACCC under subsection (1)
conclusion text: (a) 6 months; or (b) if another period is specified in an instrument under subsection (5)—that period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: The period must contain the specified duration.
premise text: (4) A period specified by the ACCC under subsection (1)
conclusion text: (a) 6 months; or (b) if another period is specified in an instrument under subsection (5)—that period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: The period must contain the specified duration.
premise text: (4) A period specified by the ACCC under subsection (1)
conclusion text: (a) 6 months; or (b) if another period is specified in an instrument under subsection (5)—that period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: The period must contain the specified duration.
premise text: (4) A period specified by the ACCC under subsection (1)
conclusion text: (a) 6 months; or (b) if another period is specified in an instrument under subsection (5)—that period.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: If the ACCC specifies a period, then that period must be 6 months or as specified in an instrument.
premise text: (4) A period specified by the ACCC under subsection (1)
conclusion text: (a) 6 months; or (b) if another period is specified in an instrument under subsection (5)—that period.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577EA(5) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-5
part of: 577EA Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
note: Specify a period for notification requirement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to specify a period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577EA(6) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-6
part of: 577EA Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
note: Notify ACCC of event occurrence within specified period if condition is met.
description: Notification in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Expressed obligation to notify ACCC
conclusion text: Telstra must notify ACCC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577EA(7) Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-7
part of: 577EA Acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
note: Conditional acceptance of undertaking about subscription television
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ea-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: (7) If: a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577E is expressed...
conclusion text: ...the event does not occur within that period;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

46 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
has part: 46(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 46(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 46(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.50

46(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-ss-8
part of: 46 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: If events do not occur within the specified period, the undertaking is not accepted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits acceptance of an undertaking if events do not occur within the specified period.
premise text: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577E is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period;
conclusion text: this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the events.
premise text: (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;
conclusion text: this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Defines the repetition of the temporal interval.
premise text: (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;
conclusion text: this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the decision-maker to consider the events.
premise text: (a) a decision to accept an undertaking under section 577E is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period;
conclusion text: this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-8-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Grants permission to consider alternative courses of action.
premise text: (b) one or more of those events do not occur within that period;
conclusion text: this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-ss-9
part of: 46 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-ss-10
part of: 46 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: An instrument under subsection (3) or (5) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition of legislative instruments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577EB When undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577eb
note: Conditions under which an undertaking comes into force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-alleninterval-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: The decision to accept the undertaking is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period.
conclusion text: The undertaking comes into force if the event occurs within that period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation with multiple events
premise text: The decision to accept the undertaking is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period, and each of those events occur at the same time.
conclusion text: The undertaking comes into force if all events occur at the same time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation with different events
premise text: The decision to accept the undertaking is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of 2 or more specified events within a specified period, and each of those events occur at different times.
conclusion text: The undertaking comes into force if all events occur at the last time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Default obligation
premise text: The decision to accept the undertaking is not expressed to be subject to the occurrence of one or more specified events within a specified period.
conclusion text: The undertaking comes into force when it is accepted by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577eb-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: The decision to accept the undertaking is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of a single specified event within a specified period.
conclusion text: The event must occur within that period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

577EC Publication requirements for undertaking about
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ec
has part: 577EC(1) Publication requirements for undertaking about
has part: 577EC(2) Publication requirements for undertaking about
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.51

577EC(1) Publication requirements for undertaking about
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ec-ss-1
part of: 577EC Publication requirements for undertaking about
note: Publish undertaking and decision terms on website upon acceptance.
description: ACCC must publish notice when undertaking comes into force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ec-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ec-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ec-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Publishing obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577EC(2) Publication requirements for undertaking about
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ec-ss-2
part of: 577EC Publication requirements for undertaking about
note: ACCC must publish undertaking on its website within a specified period after accepting it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ec-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ec-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ec-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577ED Compliance with undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ed
note: Compliance with undertaking about subscription television
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.51
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ed-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ed-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ed-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-norm

577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f
has part: 577F(1) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(2) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(3) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(3A) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(3B) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(3C) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(4) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(5) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(6) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
has part: 577F(7) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52

577F(1) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-1
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television
note: Applicability of section to Telstra's undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-1-norm

577F(2) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-2
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television
note: Variation of undertaking about subscription television
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-2-norm

577F(3) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television
note: Decision to accept or reject variation in subscription television undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Decide
logic summary: Must decide to accept or reject variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577F(3A) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television
note: ACCC must consider relevant matters when deciding to accept a variation in subscription television.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ought
logic summary: Obligation to consider relevant matters
premise text: ACCC must decide whether to accept the variation
conclusion text: ACCC must consider relevant matters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Relevant matters must be considered during the decision-making process
premise text: Decision to accept variation is made at some point
conclusion text: Relevant matters must be considered during the decision-making process
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: must
logic summary: ACCC must consider all relevant matters when deciding to accept a variation
premise text: Decision to accept variation is made at some point
conclusion text: ACCC must consider all relevant matters
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
logic summary: Relevant matters must be disseminated to those who need them
premise text: Decision to accept variation is made at some point
conclusion text: Relevant matters must be disseminated to those who need them
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must
logic summary: ACCC's decision-making process must be transparent and explainable
premise text: Decision to accept variation is made at some point
conclusion text: ACCC's decision-making process must be transparent and explainable
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577F(3B) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3b
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television
note: The Minister may set out matters for the purposes of paragraph (3A)(a) by writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3b-norm

577F(3C) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3c
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television
note: Minister must publish notice and consider submissions before making or varying an instrument.
description: Submissions to the Minister within 14 days after publication of the notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish and consider submissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577F(4) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television
note: Variation of undertaking about subscription television takes effect upon acceptance by the ACCC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes effect
logic summary: Effect of variation on subscription television
premise text: (4) The variation takes effect when it is accepted by the ACCC.
conclusion text: The variation takes effect upon acceptance by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for variation acceptance
premise text: (4) The variation takes effect when it is accepted by the ACCC.
conclusion text: The variation takes effect at the time of acceptance by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for variation acceptance
premise text: (4) The variation takes effect when it is accepted by the ACCC.
conclusion text: The variation takes effect at each time of acceptance by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion for variation acceptance
premise text: (4) The variation takes effect when it is accepted by the ACCC.
conclusion text: The variation spreads to all parties upon acceptance by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: argumentation
logic summary: Argument for variation acceptance
premise text: (4) The variation takes effect when it is accepted by the ACCC.
conclusion text: The variation is justified upon acceptance by the ACCC.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577F(5) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-5
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television
note: Publish variation on website after variation takes effect
description: Variation details
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577F(6) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-6
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to publish
conclusion text: The Minister must cause a copy of an instrument...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577F(7) Variation of undertaking about subscription television
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577f-ss-7
part of: 577F Variation of undertaking about subscription television
note: An instrument under subsection (3B) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577f-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of prohibition
premise text: (7) An instrument under subsection (3B)
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577G Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577g
has part: 577G(1) Enforcement of undertakings
has part: 577G(2) Enforcement of undertakings
has part: 577G(3) Enforcement of undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.53

577G(1) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577g-ss-1
part of: 577G Enforcement of undertakings
note: ACCC may apply for order if Telstra breaches undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.53
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to provide order
premise text: ACCC considers breach
conclusion text: Order may be applied
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577G(2) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2
part of: 577G Enforcement of undertakings
note: Order prohibiting or deferring payment of sums due to a person in respect of shares held by Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.53
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-6

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits payment of sums due to a person in respect of shares held by Telstra
premise text: (2) If the Federal Court is satisfied that Telstra has breached the undertaking...
conclusion text: (d) an order prohibiting or deferring the payment of any sums due to a person in respect of shares held by Telstra;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Restrains exercise of rights attached to shares
premise text: (c) an order restraining the exercise of any rights attached to shares;
conclusion text: (c) an order restraining the exercise of any rights attached to shares;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Directs disposal of network units, shares or other assets
premise text: (b) an order directing the disposal of network units, shares or other assets;
conclusion text: (b) an order directing the disposal of network units, shares or other assets;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Directs payment to Commonwealth
premise text: (f) an order directing Telstra to pay to the Commonwealth an amount up to the amount of any financial benefit that Telstra has obtained directly or indirectly and that is reasonably attributable to the breach;
conclusion text: (f) an order directing Telstra to pay to the Commonwealth an amount up to the amount of any financial benefit that Telstra has obtained directly or indirectly and that is reasonably attributable to the breach;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Directs compensation to other persons
premise text: (g) any order that the Court considers appropriate directing Telstra to compensate any other person who has suffered loss or damage as a result of the breach;
conclusion text: (g) any order that the Court considers appropriate directing Telstra to compensate any other person who has suffered loss or damage as a result of the breach;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-2-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Directs compliance with undertaking
premise text: (a) an order directing Telstra to comply with the undertaking;
conclusion text: (a) an order directing Telstra to comply with the undertaking;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577G(3) Enforcement of undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577g-ss-3
part of: 577G Enforcement of undertakings
note: Power to make orders directing persons to do or refrain from specified acts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.53
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 577G(3) Enforcement of undertakings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has power
logic summary: Power to make orders
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
has part: 50(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 50(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54

50(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50-ss-4
part of: 50 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Notice of application must be given to certain persons or published in a certain manner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50-ss-5
part of: 50 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Federal Court may rescind, vary or discharge an order made by it under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the Federal Court from making an order under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577GA Excluded spectrum regime
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ga
has part: 577GA(1) Excluded spectrum regime
has part: 577GA(2) Excluded spectrum regime
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54

577GA(1) Excluded spectrum regime
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ga-ss-1
part of: 577GA Excluded spectrum regime
note: The Minister may determine that the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ga-ss-1-norm

577GA(2) Excluded spectrum regime
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577ga-ss-2
part of: 577GA Excluded spectrum regime
note: Determinations under subsection (1) have effect for the purposes of this Division and Part 10 of Schedule 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577ga-ss-2-norm

577H Designated part of the spectrum
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577h
has part: 577H(1) Designated part of the spectrum
has part: 577H(2) Designated part of the spectrum
has part: 577H(3) Designated part of the spectrum
has part: 577H(4) Designated part of the spectrum
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54

577H(1) Designated part of the spectrum
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577h-ss-1
part of: 577H Designated part of the spectrum
note: Designates specific frequency ranges as part of the spectrum.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 577H(1) Designated part of the spectrum
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a designated part of the spectrum
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577H(2) Designated part of the spectrum
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577h-ss-2
part of: 577H Designated part of the spectrum
note: Conditional effect of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-2-norm

577H(3) Designated part of the spectrum
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577h-ss-3
part of: 577H Designated part of the spectrum
note: Minister may determine part of spectrum not designated
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to determine
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577H(4) Designated part of the spectrum
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577h-ss-4
part of: 577H Designated part of the spectrum
note: The Minister may determine a part of the spectrum is designated.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.54
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577h-ss-4-norm

577J Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577j
has part: 577J(1) Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
has part: 577J(2) Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
has part: 577J(2A) Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
has part: 577J(3) Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.55

577J(1) Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577j-ss-1
part of: 577J Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
note: ACMA must not allocate a spectrum licence to Telstra if the licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.55
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577J(2) Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2
part of: 577J Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
note: Exemptions from spectrum licence allocation limits for Telstra undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.55
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ∨
logic summary: Disjunction of exemptions
premise text: The rule in subsection (1) does not apply if either an undertaking given by Telstra is in force under section 577C or a declaration is in force under subsection (3).
conclusion text: Either an exemption under section 577C or a declaration under subsection (3) applies to exempt spectrum licence allocation limits.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ∨
logic summary: Disjunction of exemptions
premise text: The rule in subsection (1) does not apply if either an undertaking given by Telstra is in force under section 577E or a declaration is in force under subsection (5).
conclusion text: Either an exemption under section 577E or a declaration under subsection (5) applies to exempt spectrum licence allocation limits.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
logic summary: Temporal interval for exemptions
premise text: The rule in subsection (1) does not apply if an undertaking given by Telstra is in force under section 577A and the undertaking is covered by subsection (2A).
conclusion text: An exemption under section 577A applies before the commencement of subsection (2A).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577J(2A) Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2a
part of: 577J Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
note: Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.55
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Telstra must give the ACCC a draft migration plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577J(3) Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577j-ss-3
part of: 577J Limits on allocation of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
note: Telstra exempt from undertaking under section 577C
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.55
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Declare
logic summary: Declare exemption
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
has part: 52(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(4A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(4B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(6A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(6B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(6C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 52(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56

52(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-4
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The Minister must make a declaration only if the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must make a declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(4A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-4a
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Conditional commencement of a declaration under subsection (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4a-norm

52(4B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-4b
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Reverses the effect of a declaration if the undertaking has not been accepted by the ACCC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4b-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Reversal
logic summary: Reverses the effect of a declaration.
premise text: (4B) If: ... this Act has effect as if the declaration had never been made by the Minister.
conclusion text: this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-4b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Reversal
logic summary: Reverses the effect of a declaration.
premise text: (4B) If: ... this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC;
conclusion text: this Act has effect as if the declaration had never been made by the Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-5
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister may declare Telstra exempt from undertaking requirement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration of exemption
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-6
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The Minister must make a declaration only if the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must make a declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(6A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-6a
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Conditional commencement of a declaration under subsection (5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6a-norm

52(6B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-6b
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Reverses the effect of a declaration if the undertaking has not been accepted by the ACCC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Reversal
logic summary: Reverses the effect of a declaration.
premise text: (6B) If: (a) paragraph (6)(b) applies to a declaration; and (b) as a result of subsection 577AA(7) or (8), this Act has effect as if the undertaking had never been accepted by the ACCC;
conclusion text: this Act has effect as if the declaration had never been made by the Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(6C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-6c
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Cannot be revoked
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(6C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-6c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CannotBeRevoked
logic summary: Declaration cannot be revoked
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-7
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: A declaration made under subsection (3) or (5) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits declarations from being considered legislative instruments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-ss-8
part of: 52 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Defines telecommunications market for this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-8-logic-argumentation-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has the same meaning as
logic summary: Establishes a relationship between terms
premise text: Part XIB of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 defines telecommunications market
conclusion text: This section references Part XIB
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between terms
premise text: Part XIB of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 applies to this section
conclusion text: This section is part of Part XIB
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-ss-8-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Establishes a logical implication between terms
premise text: This section defines telecommunications market
conclusion text: Telecommunications market applies to this section
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

577K Limits on use of certain spectrum licences by Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577k
has part: 577K(1) Limits on use of certain spectrum licences by Telstra
has part: 577K(2) Limits on use of certain spectrum licences by Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.57

577K(1) Limits on use of certain spectrum licences by Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1
part of: 577K Limits on use of certain spectrum licences by Telstra
note: Telstra cannot authorise radiocommunications devices under the licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of Telstra's actions.
premise text: Telstra is a licensee of the spectrum licence.
conclusion text: Telstra cannot authorise radiocommunications devices under the licence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Spectrum licence and radiocommunications devices overlap in time.
premise text: The spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum.
conclusion text: Radiocommunications devices are not allowed during this period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Spectrum licence is valid until it expires.
premise text: The spectrum licence has a designated end date.
conclusion text: Radiocommunications devices are not allowed after this period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implication
logic summary: Spectrum licence holder's actions affect the excluded spectrum regime.
premise text: The spectrum licence holder has authority over the spectrum licence.
conclusion text: Excluded spectrum regime is affected by Telstra's actions.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Telstra's actions are inferred from the excluded spectrum regime.
premise text: The excluded spectrum regime provides context for Telstra's actions.
conclusion text: Telstra's actions are constrained by the excluded spectrum regime.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577K(2) Limits on use of certain spectrum licences by Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577k-ss-2
part of: 577K Limits on use of certain spectrum licences by Telstra
note: Exemption from rule for Telstra undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.57
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577k-ss-2-norm

54 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
has part: 54(2A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 54(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 54(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.58

54(2A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a
part of: 54 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Section 54(2A) covers a section 577A undertaking if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: covers
logic summary: Section covers certain undertakings
premise text: Undertaking defined in section 577A
conclusion text: Section 54(2A) covers this undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: requires
logic summary: Section requires a draft migration plan to be given by Telstra
premise text: Draft migration plan is required for this undertaking
conclusion text: Telstra must give the ACCC a draft migration plan
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Section requires Telstra to give the ACCC a draft migration plan
premise text: Draft migration plan is required for this undertaking
conclusion text: Telstra must give the ACCC a draft migration plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Section requires the ACCC to approve the draft migration plan
premise text: Draft migration plan is required for this undertaking
conclusion text: The ACCC must approve the draft migration plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-2a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Section requires the ACCC to have approved the draft migration plan under specified sections
premise text: Draft migration plan is required for this undertaking
conclusion text: The ACCC must have approved the draft migration plan under these sections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54-ss-3
part of: 54 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Prohibits aiding, abetting, counseling, or procuring a contravention of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 54(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Direct prohibition
premise text: (3) A person must not:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Inducing contravention
premise text: (b) induce, whether by threats or promises or otherwise, a contravention of subsection (1);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Being knowingly concerned in contravention
premise text: (c) be in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, nor party to, a contravention of subsection (1);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Conspiring to effect contravention
premise text: (d) conspire with others to effect a contravention of subsection (1);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between prohibited actions
premise text: (a) aid, abet, counsel or procure a contravention of subsection (1); and (b) induce, whether by threats or promises or otherwise, a contravention of subsection (1);
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

54(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54-ss-4
part of: 54 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Civil penalty provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits breaches of civil penalty provisions
premise text: (4) Subsections (1) and (3)
conclusion text: civil penalty provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577L Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577l
has part: 577L(1) Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
has part: 577L(2) Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
has part: 577L(2A) Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.58

577L(1) Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577l-ss-1
part of: 577L Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
note: Cannot assign whole or part of spectrum licence to Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on assignment
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: ...must not assign...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577L(2) Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2
part of: 577L Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
note: Exemptions from assignment limits for Telstra undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal intervals
premise text: The undertaking is covered by subsection (2A)
conclusion text: ...and the undertaking is covered by subsection (2A);
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577L(2A) Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2a
part of: 577L Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
note: Limits on assignment of certain spectrum licences to Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.58
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2a-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a draft migration plan
premise text: The undertaking requires Telstra to give the ACCC a draft migration plan
conclusion text: Telstra must give the ACCC a draft migration plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577l-ss-2a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
logic summary: Must not require Telstra to give the ACCC a draft migration plan
premise text: The undertaking does not require Telstra to give the ACCC a draft migration plan
conclusion text: Telstra is not required to give the ACCC a draft migration plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
has part: 56(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 56(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.60

56(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-56-ss-3
part of: 56 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Prohibits aiding, abetting, counseling, or procuring a contravention of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 56(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits an action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-56-ss-4
part of: 56 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Civil penalty provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits civil penalty provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577M Associate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577m
has part: 577M(1) Associate
has part: 577M(2) Associate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.60

577M(1) Associate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577m-ss-1
part of: 577M Associate
note: Associate definition for control purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of associate
premise text: Telstra is an associate if it controls a company or network
conclusion text: Telstra must be defined as an associate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577M(2) Associate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2
part of: 577M Associate
note: Persons are not associates if they do not act together in relevant dealings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.60
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 577M(2) Associate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (a) they do not act together in any relevant dealings relating to the network or company;
conclusion text: they are not associates.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: disjoint
logic summary: Temporal disjointness
premise text: (a) they do not act together in any relevant dealings relating to the network or company;
conclusion text: the conditions in (a) and (b) are met.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: and
logic summary: Conjunction of conditions
premise text: (a) they do not act together in any relevant dealings relating to the network or company; and (b) neither of them is in a position to exert influence over...
conclusion text: the conditions in (a) and (b) are met.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577m-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (b) neither of them is in a position to exert influence over the business dealings of the other in relation to the network or company.
conclusion text: they are not associates.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577N Control
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577n
note: Control includes control as a result of, or by means of, trusts, agreements, arrangements, understandings and practices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577n-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577n-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577n-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577n-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 577N Control
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577n-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass relation
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577P Control of a company
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577p
has part: 577P(1) Control of a company
has part: 577P(2) Control of a company
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.61

577P(1) Control of a company
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577p-ss-1
part of: 577P Control of a company
note: Determines the question of control of a company under Schedule 1 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577p-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577p-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 577P(1) Control of a company
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
logic summary: Determines control of a company
premise text: Schedule 1 to the Broadcasting Services Act 1992
conclusion text: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

577P(2) Control of a company
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577p-ss-2
part of: 577P Control of a company
note: Definition of associate in section 577M applies instead.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577p-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 577P(2) Control of a company
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Definition of associate in subsection 6(1) does not apply
premise text: Subsection 6(1) definition does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

577Q When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a network
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-577q
note: Telstra exercises control of a network if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.61
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577q-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577q-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577q-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 577Q When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a network
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-577q-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Certain conditions are met.
conclusion text: Telstra exercises control of a network.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
has part: 58(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 58(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.62

58(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58-ss-2
part of: 58 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: An employee is not regarded as exercising control of a network solely because of being an employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Employee is not regarded as exercising control
conclusion text: An employee is not regarded as being in a position to exercise control
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
premise text: Employee's employment period
conclusion text: Employee's employment period does not imply control over the network
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58-ss-3
part of: 58 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: More than one person may exercise control of a network.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.62
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

31 At the end of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
note: Addition of new content at the end of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.63
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-31-norm

68 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
note: Telstra must prepare a draft functional separation undertaking.
description: draft functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.63
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Telstra must prepare a draft functional separation undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
note: Definitions for Telstra business unit and declared network service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.63
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69-norm

60 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-60
note: Defines equivalence and functional separation principles for telecommunications services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies terms and conditions
premise text: equivalence means:
conclusion text: a = b
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines functional separation requirements
premise text: functional separation principles means the principles set out in clause 74
conclusion text: determination under clause 75
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 April, 1 July or 1 October.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-4
note: Definitions for regulated service, retail business unit, and wholesale/network business unit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-1-4-norm

70 Declared network services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
note: Declared network service definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-norm

71 Regulated services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
has part: 71(1) Regulated services
has part: 71(2) Regulated services
has part: 71(3) Regulated services
has part: 71(4) Regulated services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.65

71(1) Regulated services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-71-ss-1
part of: 71 Regulated services
note: Defines regulated service for the purposes of Part XIC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71(1) Regulated services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines regulated service
premise text: Part XIC declares a declared service
conclusion text: Regulated service is a declared service within the meaning of Part XIC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within the meaning of
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between declared service and Part XIC
premise text: Part XIC declares a declared service
conclusion text: Regulated service is within the meaning of Part XIC at some point in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Justifies definition of regulated service
premise text: Part XIC declares a declared service
conclusion text: Regulated service is a declared service within the meaning of Part XIC
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: within the meaning of
logic summary: Describes relationship between declared service and Part XIC
premise text: Part XIC declares a declared service
conclusion text: Regulated service is within the meaning of Part XIC at some point in time
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Describes regulated service using AI
premise text: Part XIC declares a declared service
conclusion text: Regulated service is a declared service within the meaning of Part XIC
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

71(2) Regulated services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-71-ss-2
part of: 71 Regulated services
note: Regulated services subject to subclause (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-2-norm

71(3) Regulated services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-71-ss-3
part of: 71 Regulated services
note: Minister may determine service is not regulated
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to determine
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(4) Regulated services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-71-ss-4
part of: 71 Regulated services
note: Minister may determine regulated services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to regulate service
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Notional contracts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
note: Treat notional contracts as actual contracts for Telstra's business units.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on Telstra's business units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 Contents of draft or final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
note: Telstra must establish and maintain a committee to comply with the functional separation principles.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.65
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-norm

62 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-62
has part: 62(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 62(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.66

62(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-62-ss-2
part of: 62 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: If a final functional separation undertaking is in force throughout a part, but not the whole, of a particular quarter, that part is taken to be a quarter in its own right.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to treat a part as a quarter in its own right
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

62(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-62-ss-3
part of: 62 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: ACCC may perform functions or exercise powers in relation to the undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 Functional separation principles
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74
has part: 74(1) Functional separation principles
has part: 74(2) Functional separation principles
has part: 74(3) Functional separation principles
has part: 74(4) Functional separation principles
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.66

74(1) Functional separation principles
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-ss-1
part of: 74 Functional separation principles
note: Maintain functional separation principles
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must maintain functional separation principles
premise text: (1) The functional separation principles are as follows:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Maintain arm's length functional separation between wholesale/network business unit and retail business units
premise text: (c) the principle that Telstra should maintain arm’s length functional separation between: (i) its wholesale/network business unit; and (ii) its retail business units;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Comply with final functional separation undertaking
premise text: (d) the principle that Telstra should have systems, procedures and practices that relate to: (i) compliance with a final functional separation undertaking;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Monitor and report on compliance with final functional separation undertaking
premise text: (d) the principle that Telstra should have systems, procedures and practices that relate to: (ii) monitoring of, and reporting on, compliance with a final functional separation undertaking;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Develop performance measures relating to compliance with final functional separation undertaking
premise text: (d) the principle that Telstra should have systems, procedures and practices that relate to: (iii) the development of performance measures relating to compliance with a final functional separation undertaking;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(2) Functional separation principles
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-ss-2
part of: 74 Functional separation principles
note: Must consider favourable terms and conditions when determining equivalence principle.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(2) Functional separation principles
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider favourable terms and conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(3) Functional separation principles
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-ss-3
part of: 74 Functional separation principles
note: Regard may be had to matters not limited by subclause (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-3-norm

74(4) Functional separation principles
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-ss-4
part of: 74 Functional separation principles
note: Clarifies that this clause does not affect the meaning of anything in Part 33.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.66
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: clarifies
logic summary: Clarifies obligation
premise text: This clause does not affect the meaning of anything in Part 33.
conclusion text: There is no obligation to consider this clause when determining the meaning of Part 33.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: clarifies
logic summary: Clarifies temporal interval
premise text: This clause clarifies that its commencement does not affect the meaning of anything in Part 33.
conclusion text: The commencement of this clause is clarified to mean that it does not affect the meaning of Part 33.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: clarifies
logic summary: Clarifies temporal logic
premise text: This clause clarifies that its conditions do not affect the meaning of anything in Part 33.
conclusion text: The conditions of this clause are clarified to mean that they do not affect the meaning of Part 33.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: clarifies
logic summary: Clarifies diffusion
premise text: This clause clarifies that its effects do not affect the meaning of anything in Part 33.
conclusion text: The effects of this clause are clarified to mean that they do not affect the meaning of Part 33.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: clarifies
logic summary: Clarifies cognitive AI
premise text: This clause clarifies that its applications do not affect the meaning of anything in Part 33.
conclusion text: The applications of this clause are clarified to mean that they do not affect the meaning of Part 33.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

75 Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75
has part: 75(1) Functional separation requirements determination
has part: 75(2) Functional separation requirements determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.67

75(1) Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75-ss-1
part of: 75 Functional separation requirements determination
note: Minister may make written determination specifying functional separation requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.67
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-75-ss-1-norm

75(2) Functional separation requirements determination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75-ss-2
part of: 75 Functional separation requirements determination
note: Determines manner of implementation of functional separation principles
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.67
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-75-ss-2-norm

64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
has part: 64(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 64(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 64(4A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 64(4B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 64(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 64(5A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 64(5B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 64(5C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68

64(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-ss-3
part of: 64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: A functional separation requirements determination must deal with the manner in which a requirement is to be met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-ss-4
part of: 64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: No limitation on subclause (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4-norm

64(4A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-ss-4a
part of: 64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister must publish notice and consider submissions before making or varying functional separation requirements determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64(4A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must perform actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64(4B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-ss-4b
part of: 64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister may ask ACCC for additional advice on a matter arising under this clause.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64(4B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-ss-5
part of: 64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Functional separation requirements determination must be implemented within 90 days after clause commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to implement within 90 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64(5A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-ss-5a
part of: 64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Exemption from subclause (5) for Telstra's undertaking on structural separation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts Telstra from subclause (5)
premise text: Telstra has given the ACCC a draft migration plan under section 577A
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64(5B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-ss-5b
part of: 64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Extension of 90-day period for telecommunications legislation amendment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Granting permission to extend the 90-day period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64(5C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-ss-5c
part of: 64 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister must not make an instrument under subclause (5B) without specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.68
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5c-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5c-logic-alleninterval-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Minister cannot make an instrument under subclause (5B)
premise text: Telstra has given the ACCC an undertaking under section 577A;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5c-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Minister's action is contingent on specified conditions
premise text: that decision is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of one or more specified events within a specified period;
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-ss-5c-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Timeframe for undertaking to take effect
premise text: that period has not ended;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-66
has part: 66(5D) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 66(5E) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.70

66(5D) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-66-ss-5d
part of: 66 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister must table a copy of an instrument within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5d-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66(5D) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to table an instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66(5E) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e
part of: 66 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: If the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra under section 577A, and certain conditions are met, subclause (5) does not apply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Minister must ensure that a functional separation requirements determination comes into force within 90 days after the end of the post-acceptance period.
premise text: (5E) If: (a) before the end of the period applicable under subclause (5), the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra under section 577A; and ... (f) the Minister must ensure that a functional separation requirements determination comes into force within 90 days after the end of the post-acceptance period.
conclusion text: (f) the Minister must ensure that a functional separation requirements determination comes into force within 90 days after the end of the post-acceptance period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: If the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra under section 577A, and certain conditions are met, subclause (5) does not apply.
premise text: (5EA) If: (a) before the end of the period applicable under subclause (5), the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra under section 577A; and... (g) subclause (5) does not apply;
conclusion text: subclause (5) does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: If the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra under section 577A, and certain conditions are met, subclause (5) does not apply.
premise text: (5EB) Subclause (5) does not apply if: (a) before the end of the period applicable under subclause (5), the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra under section 577A; and... (e) the undertaking does not require Telstra to give the ACCC a draft migration plan.
conclusion text: subclause (5) does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-ss-5e-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Minister must ensure that a functional separation requirements determination comes into force within 90 days after the end of the post-acceptance period.
premise text: (5EC) Subclause (5) does not apply if: (a) before the end of the period applicable under subclause (5), the ACCC accepts an undertaking given by Telstra under section 577A; and... (h) the Minister must ensure that a functional separation requirements determination comes into force within 90 days after the end of the post-acceptance period.
conclusion text: (h) the Minister must ensure that a functional separation requirements determination comes into force within 90 days after the end of the post-acceptance period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2
has part: 68(5F) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 68(5G) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 68(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 68(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72

68(5F) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5f
part of: 68 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: No procedural fairness requirements for instrument making
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5f-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Minister exempt from procedural fairness
premise text: (5B)
conclusion text: (5F)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68(5G) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5g
part of: 68 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister does not have a duty to consider making an instrument under subclause (5B)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5g-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5g-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5g-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68(5G) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-5g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not have a duty to
logic summary: Minister's obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6
part of: 68 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: A determination under subclause (1) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (6) A determination under subclause (1) is not a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: A determination under subclause (1) is an obligation that does not impose a duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to legislative instruments
premise text: (6) A determination under subclause (1) is not a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: A determination under subclause (1) occurs during the existence of a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to legislative instruments
premise text: (6) A determination under subclause (1) is not a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: A determination under subclause (1) occurs during the existence of a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to legislative instruments
premise text: (6) A determination under subclause (1) is not a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: A determination under subclause (1) diffuses during the existence of a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to legislative instruments
premise text: (6) A determination under subclause (1) is not a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: A determination under subclause (1) occurs during the existence of a legislative instrument.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

68(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-7
part of: 68 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: An instrument under subclause (5B) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition of an instrument being a legislative instrument
premise text: (7) An instrument under subclause (5B)
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76
has part: 76(1) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
has part: 76(2) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
has part: 76(3) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
has part: 76(4) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72

76(1) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-ss-1
part of: 76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
note: Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister within 90 days
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Telstra must provide the undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(2) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-ss-2
part of: 76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
note: Exemption from draft migration plan requirement under section 577A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Prohibition on requiring draft migration plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(3) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-ss-3
part of: 76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
note: Minister may specify a period for purposes of paragraph (1)(b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to specify a period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal specification
logic summary: Specification of temporal interval
premise text: (3) The Minister may, by writing...
conclusion text: ...specify a period for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Justification for Minister's discretion
premise text: (3) The Minister may, by writing...
conclusion text: ...specify a period for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b).
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagation of Minister's discretion
premise text: (3) The Minister may, by writing...
conclusion text: ...specify a period for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of Minister's discretion
premise text: (3) The Minister may, by writing...
conclusion text: ...specify a period for the purposes of paragraph (1)(b).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

76(4) Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-ss-4
part of: 76 Draft functional separation undertaking to be given to Minister
note: Minister must specify period under subclause (3) unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to specify period under subclause (3) unless certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The period specified by the Minister overlaps with the period during which Telstra is preparing a draft migration plan.
premise text: (iii) that decision is expressed to be subject to the occurrence of one or more specified events within a specified period;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The Minister's obligation to specify period under subclause (3) repeats every time Telstra gives an undertaking under section 577A.
premise text: Telstra has given the ACCC an undertaking under section 577A;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister must provide a draft functional separation undertaking to the Minister upon request.
premise text: (i) Telstra has given the ACCC an undertaking under section 577A;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70-2
has part: 70(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 70(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 70(6A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 70(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 70(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 70(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74

70(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-5
part of: 70 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister cannot revoke a subclause (3) instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of revocation
premise text: Subclause (3) instrument
conclusion text: Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6
part of: 70 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: A period specified in a subclause (3) instrument may be a period ascertained wholly or partly by reference to the occurrence of a specified event.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6-norm

70(6A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a
part of: 70 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: No procedural fairness requirements for subclause instrument making
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits procedural fairness requirements
premise text: (6A) The Minister is not required to observe any requirements of procedural fairness...
conclusion text: ...in relation to the making of a subclause (3) instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal overlap for 'subclause (3) instrument' creation
premise text: (6A) The Minister is not required to observe any requirements of procedural fairness...
conclusion text: ...in relation to the making of a subclause (3) instrument.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Defines repeated application for 'subclause (3) instrument' creation
premise text: (6A) The Minister is not required to observe any requirements of procedural fairness...
conclusion text: ...in relation to the making of a subclause (3) instrument.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Defines diffusion for 'subclause (3) instrument' creation
premise text: (6A) The Minister is not required to observe any requirements of procedural fairness...
conclusion text: ...in relation to the making of a subclause (3) instrument.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-6a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Defines recognition for 'subclause (3) instrument' creation
premise text: (6A) The Minister is not required to observe any requirements of procedural fairness...
conclusion text: ...in relation to the making of a subclause (3) instrument.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-7
part of: 70 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister has a duty to consider exercising power to make subclause instrument
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Duty
logic summary: Minister has a duty
premise text: Minister is requested to do so
conclusion text: Minister must consider exercising power
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-8
part of: 70 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish a copy of an instrument on the Department's website.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-9
part of: 70 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: An instrument under subclause (3) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
conclusion text: (9) An instrument under subclause (3) is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77
has part: 77(1) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
has part: 77(2) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
has part: 77(3) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
has part: 77(4) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74

77(1) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-ss-1
part of: 77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
note: Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-1-norm

77(2) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-ss-2
part of: 77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
note: The Minister must approve the original undertaking by writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must take action.
conclusion text: The original undertaking is approved.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(3) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-ss-3
part of: 77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
note: Minister must consult with ACCC before making a decision on the original undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must take action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(4) Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-ss-4
part of: 77 Approval of draft functional separation undertaking by Minister
note: Minister must give Telstra notice and invite submissions before approving varied undertaking.
description: Notice and submissions from Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has a duty to give notice and invite submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-72-2
has part: 72(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 72(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 72(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 72(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.76

72(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5
part of: 72 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister must consider Telstra's submissions before making a decision to approve the replacement undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must consider Telstra's submissions.
premise text: The Minister is required to make a decision.
conclusion text: The Minister must consider Telstra's submissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must give Telstra notice and invite submissions.
premise text: The Minister is required to make a decision.
conclusion text: The Minister must give Telstra notice and invite submissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Submission period must be at least 14 days after notice is given.
premise text: A submission period is required.
conclusion text: The submission period must be at least 14 days after the notice is given.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must consider submissions received from Telstra.
premise text: The Minister is required to make a decision.
conclusion text: The Minister must consider submissions received from Telstra.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must give notice and invite submissions.
premise text: The Minister is required to make a decision.
conclusion text: The Minister must give notice and invite submissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-6
part of: 72 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The Minister may ask the ACCC for additional advice on a matter arising under this clause.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or possibility
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-7
part of: 72 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Notify Telstra of decision within a timeframe
description: Decision notification to Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
conclusion text: Decision notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-8
part of: 72 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: An instrument made under subclause (2) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition of making an instrument under subclause (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Time limit for making an approval decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78
has part: 78(1) Time limit for making an approval decision
has part: 78(2) Time limit for making an approval decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.76

78(1) Time limit for making an approval decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-ss-1
part of: 78 Time limit for making an approval decision
note: Defines time limit for making an approval decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-1-norm

78(2) Time limit for making an approval decision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-ss-2
part of: 78 Time limit for making an approval decision
note: Must make a decision within 6 months after original undertaking was given to the Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.76
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must make a decision within a specified time frame.
premise text: (2) The Minister must use his or her best endeavours to make a decision under subclause 77(2)
conclusion text: within 6 months after the original undertaking was given to the Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between the original undertaking and the deadline for making a decision.
premise text: (2) The Minister must use his or her best endeavours to make a decision under subclause 77(2)
conclusion text: The original undertaking was given to the Minister within 6 months of the specified deadline.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of not meeting the deadline for making a decision.
premise text: (2) The Minister must use his or her best endeavours to make a decision under subclause 77(2)
conclusion text: If the Minister does not meet the deadline, then they have failed to fulfill their obligation.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagation of the obligation from the Minister to other parties.
premise text: (2) The Minister must use his or her best endeavours to make a decision under subclause 77(2)
conclusion text: The obligation to make a decision within 6 months is propagated to other parties affected by the original undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of the provision as an obligation.
premise text: (2) The Minister must use his or her best endeavours to make a decision under subclause 77(2)
conclusion text: The provision is represented as an obligation in the knowledge base.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 Effect of approval
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79
has part: 79(1) Effect of approval
has part: 79(2) Effect of approval
has part: 79(3) Effect of approval
has part: 79(4) Effect of approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77

79(1) Effect of approval
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-ss-1
part of: 79 Effect of approval
note: Minister must approve draft functional separation undertaking for it to become final.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(1) Effect of approval
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister's approval is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(2) Effect of approval
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-ss-2
part of: 79 Effect of approval
note: Final functional separation undertaking comes into force on a specific day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-2-norm

79(3) Effect of approval
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-ss-3
part of: 79 Effect of approval
note: Cannot withdraw a final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of withdrawal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(4) Effect of approval
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-ss-4
part of: 79 Effect of approval
note: Final functional separation is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-ss-4-norm

80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80
has part: 80(1) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(2) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(3) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 80(4) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77

80(1) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-1
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
note: Variation of final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-1-norm

80(2) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-2
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
note: Variation of final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to vary the final functional separation undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(3) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-3
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
note: Duty to consider variation of final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consider variation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: OBLIGATION
logic summary: Obligation to consider
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTINUOUSLY
logic summary: Continuous consideration required
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(4) Variation of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-ss-4
part of: 80 Variation of final functional separation undertaking
note: Notice must be published and submissions invited before varying a final functional separation undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish notice and invite submissions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-2
has part: 74(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 74(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 74(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 74(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 74(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 74(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.78

74(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5
part of: 74 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: No minor nature variation is exempt from the general rule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If a variation is minor, then it does not exempt from the general rule.
premise text: (Minor variation) -> (Not exempt)
conclusion text: (Not exempt)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The concept of 'minor nature' is defined in terms of temporal intervals.
premise text: Definition of minor nature involves temporal intervals
conclusion text: Temporal intervals involved in definition of minor nature overlap with current variation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The concept of 'minor nature' is defined in terms of a temporal interval.
premise text: Definition of minor nature involves a temporal interval until which the variation must occur
conclusion text: (Minor nature) -> (Variation occurs before or at that time)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The concept of 'minor nature' is defined in terms of a temporal interval.
premise text: Definition of minor nature involves a temporal interval that diffuses into the current variation
conclusion text: (Minor nature) -> (Variation is affected by that time)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Involves
logic summary: The concept of 'minor nature' is defined in terms of a temporal interval.
premise text: Definition of minor nature involves a temporal interval that the variation must involve
conclusion text: (Minor nature) -> (Variation involves that time)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-6
part of: 74 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister must give Telstra notice and consider submissions before making proposed variation.
description: Submissions from Telstra within 14 days
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must take action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-7
part of: 74 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister may ask ACCC for additional advice on a matter arising under the clause.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to ask ACCC for additional advice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-8
part of: 74 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Notify Telstra of variation in final functional separation undertaking.
description: Notification to Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
conclusion text: Notification required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-9
part of: 74 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Variation of a final functional separation undertaking comes into force on the day after notice is given to Telstra.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-9-norm

74(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-10
part of: 74 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Variation of a final functional separation undertaking is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.78
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits variation of final functional separation undertaking as legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 Publication of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-81
has part: 81(1) Publication of final functional separation undertaking
has part: 81(2) Publication of final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.79

81(1) Publication of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-81-ss-1
part of: 81 Publication of final functional separation undertaking
note: Make a copy of the final functional separation undertaking available on Telstra’s website.
description: Copy of the final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.79
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make a copy available
conclusion text: Telstra must make a copy of the undertaking available.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81(2) Publication of final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-81-ss-2
part of: 81 Publication of final functional separation undertaking
note: Make a copy of the varied final functional separation undertaking available on Telstra’s website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.79
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-82
has part: 82(1) Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
has part: 82(2) Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.79

82(1) Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-82-ss-1
part of: 82 Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
note: Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.79
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82(2) Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-82-ss-2
part of: 82 Compliance with final functional separation undertaking
note: Exemption from compliance with final functional separation undertaking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.79
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-ss-2-norm

83 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-83
note: Simplified outline of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.79
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-norm

76 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-2
note: Telstra must provide undertakings about structural separation, hybrid fibre-coaxial networks, and subscription television broadcasting licences.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.80
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide undertakings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-84
has part: 84(1) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
has part: 84(2) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
has part: 84(3) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.80

84(1) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-84-ss-1
part of: 84 Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
note: Telstra must not exercise control of the licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.80
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Prevents
logic summary: Prevents Telstra from exercising control over the licence
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Prevents
logic summary: Prevents Telstra from exercising control over the licence for all time
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Prevents
logic summary: Prevents Telstra from exercising control over the licence for all time
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Prevents
logic summary: Prevents Telstra from exercising control over the licence for all time
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;
conclusion text: Telstra must not be in a position to exercise control of the licence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

84(2) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-84-ss-2
part of: 84 Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
note: Exemption from control by Telstra for certain spectrum licences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.80
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-2-norm

84(3) Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-84-ss-3
part of: 84 Control by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
note: Telstra must provide a draft migration plan to the ACCC under certain conditions.
description: Draft migration plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.80
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: Telstra must provide a draft migration plan.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
logic summary: Temporal relationship
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

85 Use by Telstra of certain spectrum licences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-85
note: Telstra must not supply a carriage service using a radiocommunications device.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.81
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-n3logic-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;
conclusion text: Telstra must not supply a carriage service using a radiocommunications device.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
premise text: (1) If: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra; and (b) a spectrum licence relates to a designated part of the spectrum;
conclusion text: Telstra must not supply a carriage service using a radiocommunications device.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication from excluded spectrum regime
premise text: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra;
conclusion text: Telstra must not supply a carriage service using a radiocommunications device.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for classification
premise text: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra;
conclusion text: Telstra must not supply a carriage service using a radiocommunications device.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication from excluded spectrum regime
premise text: (a) the excluded spectrum regime applies to Telstra;
conclusion text: Telstra must not supply a carriage service using a radiocommunications device.
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-2
has part: 78(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 78(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.82

78(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-2-ss-2
part of: 78 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Exemption from rule for Telstra undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: Section 577A
conclusion text: Under force of section 577A
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-2-ss-3
part of: 78 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Telstra must provide a draft migration plan to the ACCC under certain conditions.
description: Draft migration plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: Telstra must provide a draft migration plan.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Associate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-86
has part: 86(1) Associate
has part: 86(2) Associate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.82

86(1) Associate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-86-ss-1
part of: 86 Associate
note: An associate of Telstra in relation to control of a spectrum licence is defined.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is an associate of
logic summary: Control relationship
premise text: Telstra
conclusion text: another person who is an associate of Telstra under another paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86(2) Associate
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-86-ss-2
part of: 86 Associate
note: Persons are not associates if they do not act together in relevant dealings and one cannot exert influence over the other's business dealings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 86(2) Associate
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (a) they do not act together in any relevant dealings relating to the spectrum licence
conclusion text: they are not associates
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative influence
premise text: (b) neither of them is in a position to exert influence over the business dealings of the other in relation to the spectrum licence
conclusion text: they are not associates
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87 Control
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-87
note: Control includes control as a result of, or by means of, trusts, agreements, arrangements, understandings and practices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.83
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-87-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-87-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-87-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87 Control
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-87-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass relation
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88 When Telstra is in a position to exercise control of a spectrum
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-88
note: Telstra cannot exercise control of a spectrum licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.83
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-88-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-88-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-2
has part: 80(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 80(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.84

80(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-2
part of: 80 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Employee cannot exercise control of spectrum licence solely because of employment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on exercising control due to employment
premise text: Employee is not in a position to exercise control
conclusion text: Cannot exercise control solely because of employment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-3
part of: 80 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Multiple persons may exercise control of a spectrum licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.84
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: multiple
logic summary: Multiple persons can exercise control.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-2
note: Defines Telstra as the same meaning as in the Telstra Corporation Act 1991.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.85
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Definition
logic summary: Defines a term with an obligation to provide its meaning.
premise text: Telstra has the same meaning as in the Telstra Corporation Act 1991.
conclusion text: Telstra means the entity defined by this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Definition
logic summary: Defines a term with an obligation to provide its meaning.
premise text: The definition of Telstra is provided in this subsection.
conclusion text: Telstra means the entity defined by this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-32-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Definition
logic summary: Defines a term with an obligation to provide its meaning.
premise text: The definition of Telstra is provided in section 32(1).
conclusion text: Telstra means the entity defined by this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

33 At the end of section 151AJ
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
note: Exemption from anti-competitive conduct under specific circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.85
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to engage in anti-competitive conduct under specific circumstances.
premise text: Section 577BA of the Telecommunications Act 1997
conclusion text: No anti-competitive conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-33-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Conduct permitted during specific period or circumstances.
premise text: Section 577BA
conclusion text: Subsection 51(1) purposes
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Subsection 151BTA(13) (definition of Telstra)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34-2
note: Repeal definition of Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.85
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-34-2-norm

35 Section 151BUAAA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
note: Repeal a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.85
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-35-norm

36 At the end of Part XIB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.85
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-36-2-norm

151CQ Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-151cq
note: Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.85
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cq-norm

82 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-82-2
note: Commission must consider Telstra's conduct when performing functions or exercising powers under this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 82 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Obligation to consider conduct
premise text: Commission must have regard to Telstra's conduct
conclusion text: Commission must consider conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Section 152AC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
note: Defines final migration plan as same meaning as in Telecommunications Act 1997.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-37-norm

38 At the end of subsection 152AR(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38-2
note: Preventing Telstra from complying with undertakings under specified sections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-diffusion-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits Telstra from complying with undertakings.
premise text: Section 577A, 577C or 577E of the Telecommunications Act 1997
conclusion text: Telstra must not comply with undertakings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents Telstra from complying with undertakings under specified sections.
premise text: Section 38(2) of the Telecommunications Act 1997
conclusion text: Telstra must not comply with undertakings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Prohibition applies during specified periods.
premise text: Section 38(2) of the Telecommunications Act 1997
conclusion text: Prohibition applies during specified periods.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Prohibition continues until Telstra complies with undertakings.
premise text: Section 38(2) of the Telecommunications Act 1997
conclusion text: Prohibition continues until Telstra complies with undertakings.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-38-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Through
logic summary: Prohibition is enforced through specified sections.
premise text: Section 38(2) of the Telecommunications Act 1997
conclusion text: Prohibition is enforced through specified sections.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 At the end of Part XIC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
note: Add at the end of Part XIC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-39-norm

152ER Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152er
has part: 152ER(1) Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
has part: 152ER(2) Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
has part: 152ER(3) Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.86

152ER(1) Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152er-ss-1
part of: 152ER Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
note: Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra under specific sections of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on Telstra.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152ER(2) Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152er-ss-2
part of: 152ER Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
note: Commission must have regard to conduct relevant to Telstra's undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Telstra must comply with its undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152ER(3) Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3
part of: 152ER Voluntary undertakings given by Telstra
note: Prevents Commission from preventing Telstra's compliance with the undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-logic-ltl-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to prevent interference
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function, or exercise a power, under this Part so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on Commission's interference
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function, or exercise a power, under this Part so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Temporal interval for undertaking
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function, or exercise a power, under this Part so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152er-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal condition for undertaking
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function, or exercise a power, under this Part so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Transitional—continuity of special Telstra directions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40-2
note: Continuity of special Telstra directions unaffected by repeal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.87
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-40-2-norm

41 Subsection 61(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
note: Omit “(1)”
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.87
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-41-norm

42 Subsections 61(2), (3) and (4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42-2
note: Repeal subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.87
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-42-2-norm

43 Section 61A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
note: Repeal section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.87
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-43-norm

44 After subsection 69(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44-2
note: Amendments to Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.87
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-44-2-norm

84 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-84-2
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for conditions in Part 9 of Schedule 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-2-norm

45 Subsection 69A(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
note: Omit 'Part 8', substitute 'Part 9'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-45-norm

46 Section 69B
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46-2
note: Repeal section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-46-2-norm

47 After subsection 70(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for conditions in Part 9 of Schedule 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-47-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47 After subsection 70(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

48 Paragraph 70(5)(ba)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-48-2
note: Omit 'Part 8', substitute 'Part 9'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-48-2-norm

49 Subsection 70(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-49-norm

50 Section 104
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50-2
note: The ACMA may be directed to monitor and report on specified matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.88
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-50-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Directive obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

51 At the end of Part 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
note: Addition of a new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-51-norm

105B Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-105b
has part: 105B(1) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
has part: 105B(2) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
has part: 105B(3) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89

105B(1) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-105b-ss-1
part of: 105B Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
note: Telstra must monitor and report compliance with a final functional separation undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 105B(1) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to monitor and report compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105B(2) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-105b-ss-2
part of: 105B Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
note: The ACCC must give a report to the Minister after the end of the financial year.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 105B(2) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105B(3) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-105b-ss-3
part of: 105B Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
note: Minister must table a report in each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 105B(3) Monitoring of compliance by Telstra with a final functional
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must perform action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 After paragraph 564(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52-2
note: Carrier licence condition set out in Part 9 of Schedule 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-2-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-52-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52 After paragraph 564(3)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

53 Subsection 564(3) (after note 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
note: Inserts note 2A regarding functional separation of Telstra in Part 9 of Schedule 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-53-norm

54 After paragraph 571(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54-2
note: Carrier licence condition set out in Part 9 of Schedule 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54 After paragraph 571(3)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-54-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS
logic summary: Inserts a carrier licence condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Subsection 571(3) (after note 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
note: Inserts note 2A regarding functional separation of Telstra in Part 9 of Schedule 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-55-norm

56 Part 8 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-56-2
note: Repeal Part of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.89
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-56-2-norm

86 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-86-2
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-2-norm

57 Division 14 of Part XIB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
note: Repeal Division and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-57-norm

151CP Functional separation for Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-151cp
has part: 151CP(1) Functional separation for Telstra
has part: 151CP(2) Functional separation for Telstra
has part: 151CP(3) Functional separation for Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90

151CP(1) Functional separation for Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1
part of: 151CP Functional separation for Telstra
note: Commission must have regard to Telstra's conduct if a final functional separation undertaking is in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to have regard
premise text: Commission must have regard to Telstra's conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for Commission's obligation
premise text: This section applies if a final functional separation undertaking is in force under Part 9 of Schedule 1 to the Telecommunications Act 1997.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Commission's obligation implies Telstra's conduct
premise text: Commission must have regard to Telstra's conduct if a final functional separation undertaking is in force.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
logic summary: Obligation spreads to related parties
premise text: Commission must have regard to Telstra's conduct if a final functional separation undertaking is in force.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Classification of Commission's obligation as a cognitive action
premise text: Commission must have regard to Telstra's conduct if a final functional separation undertaking is in force.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

151CP(2) Functional separation for Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-2
part of: 151CP Functional separation for Telstra
note: Commission must have regard to conduct relevant to Telstra's undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-2-norm

151CP(3) Functional separation for Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3
part of: 151CP Functional separation for Telstra
note: Commission must not prevent Telstra from complying with its undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151CP(3) Functional separation for Telstra
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Commission cannot prevent Telstra from complying.
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function...
conclusion text: ...so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Prevents
logic summary: Commission's action prevents Telstra from complying.
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function...
conclusion text: ...so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Must Not Prevent
logic summary: Commission's action must not prevent Telstra's compliance.
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function...
conclusion text: ...so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Differs
logic summary: Commission's action differs from Telstra's compliance.
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function...
conclusion text: ...so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151cp-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Telstra's undertaking is classified by Commission.
premise text: (3) The Commission must not perform a function...
conclusion text: ...so as to prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 After section 152EP
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58-2
has part: 58(1) After section 152EP
has part: 58(2) After section 152EP
has part: 58(3) After section 152EP
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90

58(1) After section 152EP
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-1
part of: 58 After section 152EP
note: Defines independent telecommunications adjudicator as a company limited by guarantee and identified in a final functional separation undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-1-norm

58(2) After section 152EP
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-2
part of: 58 After section 152EP
note: The Commission may assist the independent telecommunications adjudicator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(2) After section 152EP
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58(3) After section 152EP
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-3
part of: 58 After section 152EP
note: Provision of information, advice, and resources
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.90
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(3) After section 152EP
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-58-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: State has obligation to provide information, advice, and resources
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Section 152EQ
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-59
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.91
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-59-norm

152EQ Functional separation for Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152eq
has part: 152EQ(1) Functional separation for Telstra
has part: 152EQ(2) Functional separation for Telstra
has part: 152EQ(3) Functional separation for Telstra
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.91

152EQ(1) Functional separation for Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-1
part of: 152EQ Functional separation for Telstra
note: Commission must have regard to Telstra's conduct if a final functional separation undertaking is in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.91
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to have regard
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152EQ(2) Functional separation for Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-2
part of: 152EQ Functional separation for Telstra
note: Commission must have regard to conduct relevant to Telstra's undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.91
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-2-norm

152EQ(3) Functional separation for Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-3
part of: 152EQ Functional separation for Telstra
note: Must not prevent Telstra from complying with the undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.91
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on Commission's action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-88-2
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.92
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-88-2-norm

60 Subsection 61(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-60-2
note: Omit ‘(1)’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.92
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-60-2-norm

61 Subsections 61(2), (3) and (4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-61
note: Repeal subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.92
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-61-norm

62 Sections 61A, 69A and 69B
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-62-2
note: Repeal sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.92
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62-2-norm

63 Paragraph 70(5)(ba)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-63
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.92
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-63-norm

64 Subsection 70(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64-2
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.92
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64-2-norm

64A Section 104
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64a
note: The ACCC must monitor and report on breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about structural separation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.92
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report breaches
premise text: The ACCC is required to monitor and report on breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about structural separation.
conclusion text: The ACCC MUST report on breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about structural separation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Breach must occur after the commencement date
premise text: The ACCC must report on breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about structural separation that occurred after the commencement date.
conclusion text: The breach >= commencement date.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister's direction is required to monitor and report on specified matters
premise text: The Minister MUST direct the ACCC to monitor and report on specified matters relating to the performance of carriers and carriage service providers.
conclusion text: The Minister MUST direct the ACCC to monitor and report on specified matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister's direction is required to report on specified matters
premise text: The Minister MUST direct the ACCC to report on specified matters relating to the performance of carriers and carriage service providers.
conclusion text: The Minister MUST direct the ACCC to report on specified matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64B At the end of Part 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64b
note: Additions and amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.92
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-64b-norm

105C Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-105c
has part: 105C(1) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
has part: 105C(2) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
has part: 105C(3) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93

105C(1) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-105c-ss-1
part of: 105C Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
note: Telstra must report breaches of an undertaking to the Minister.
description: Report on breaches
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 105C(1) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
conclusion text: Telstra must report breaches
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105C(2) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-105c-ss-2
part of: 105C Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
note: The ACCC must give a report to the Minister after the end of the financial year.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 105C(2) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105C(3) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-105c-ss-3
part of: 105C Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
note: Minister must table a report in each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 105C(3) Monitoring of breaches by Telstra of an undertaking about
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to table a report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65 Part 8 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-65
note: Repeal Part of Competition and Consumer Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-65-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-65-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals Part of Competition and Consumer Act 2010
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 Division 14 of Part XIB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-66-2
note: Repeal Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-66-2-norm

67 Section 152EQ
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-67
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-67-norm

152EQ Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152eq-2
has part: 152EQ(1) Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator
has part: 152EQ(2) Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93

152EQ(1) Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-1
part of: 152EQ Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator
note: The independent telecommunications adjudicator must be a company that meets certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 152EQ(1) Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The independent telecommunications adjudicator must be a company that meets certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152EQ(2) Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-2
part of: 152EQ Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator
note: Commission may assist independent telecommunications adjudicator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.93
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 152EQ(2) Assistance to independent telecommunications adjudicator
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152eq-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to assist
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-90
note: The provision of information, advice, and resources.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.94
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: provide
logic summary: Must provide assistance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Section 3 (paragraphs (a) and (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68-3
note: Insert a definition from another Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.95
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-68-3-norm

69 At the end of section 16
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69-2
note: Reference to Competition and Consumer Act is to the Act as in force before Division 1 commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.95
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69-2-norm

70 After section 62
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.95
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-70-3-norm

62A Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BCO of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-62a
note: Carrier licence subject to condition set out in section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.95
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62A Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BCO of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Carrier licence is subject to a condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-92
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-92-norm

62B Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BDF of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-62b
note: Carrier licence subject to condition set out in section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62B Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BDF of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Carrier licence is subject to a condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62C Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BEC of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-62c
note: Carrier licence subject to condition set out in section 152BEC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62C Condition of carrier licence set out in section 152BEC of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-62c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Carrier licence is subject to a condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71 Subsection 69(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-71-2
note: Omit ‘or 4’, substitute ‘, 4 or 5’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-71-2-norm

72 Subsection 69(6) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-72-3
note: Repeal a note and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-72-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Determine the deontic type
premise text: The text states 'Repeal the note, substitute'
conclusion text: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 After subsection 69(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-73-2
has part: 73(7A) After subsection 69(7)
has part: 73(7B) After subsection 69(7)
has part: 73(7C) After subsection 69(7)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96

73(7A) After subsection 69(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a
part of: 73 After subsection 69(7)
note: Exemption from subsection 69(7) for section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73(7A) After subsection 69(7)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts subsection 69(7) for section 152BCO.
premise text: Section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with access determinations.
conclusion text: Subsection 69(7) does not apply to this exemption.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for exemption from subsection 69(7).
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace for exemption from subsection 69(7).
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses the exemption from subsection 69(7) for section 152BCO.
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes the exemption from subsection 69(7) for section 152BCO.
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73(7B) After subsection 69(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b
part of: 73 After subsection 69(7)
note: Exemption from subsection 69(7) for section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts subsection 69(7) for section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
premise text: Section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with binding rules of conduct.
conclusion text: Subsection 69(7) does not apply to this condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for subsection 69(7) that excludes section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
premise text: Subsection 69(7) does not apply to this condition.
conclusion text: This exemption applies within this temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for subsection 69(7) that excludes section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
premise text: Subsection 69(7) does not apply to this condition.
conclusion text: This exemption applies within this recurring trace.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses the effect of subsection 69(7) for section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
premise text: Subsection 69(7) does not apply to this condition.
conclusion text: This exemption diffuses the effect of subsection 69(7).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Classifies section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 as a binding rule of conduct.
premise text: Section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with binding rules of conduct.
conclusion text: This exemption applies to this classification.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73(7C) After subsection 69(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7c
part of: 73 After subsection 69(7)
note: Does not apply to access agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.96
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-73-2-ss-7c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Does not apply to access agreements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 After section 69
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.97
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-74-3-norm

69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69aa
has part: 69AA(1) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
has part: 69AA(2) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
has part: 69AA(3) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
has part: 69AA(4) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
has part: 69AA(5) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
has part: 69AA(6) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.97

69AA(1) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-1
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
note: Carrier must comply with conditions of licence if contravening them.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.97
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69AA(1) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Carrier has a duty to comply with conditions of licence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69AA(2) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-2
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
note: The ACCC may give a written direction requiring the carrier to take specified action.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.97
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69AA(2) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69AA(3) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-3
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
note: Examples of direction that may be given to a carrier under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.97
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69AA(3) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Direction that may be given to a carrier
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69AA(4) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-4
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
note: Preventing ACCC from giving a direction that would prevent Telstra from complying with an undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.97
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of ACCC giving a direction
premise text: ACCC must not give a direction
conclusion text: direction would prevent Telstra from complying with an undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69AA(5) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-5
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
note: Carrier must not contravene a direction under subsection (2).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.97
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 69AA(5) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of action
premise text: (5) A carrier must not contravene a direction under subsection (2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69AA(6) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-6
part of: 69AA Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
note: A direction under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.97
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69AA(6) Remedial directions—breach of conditions relating to access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-69aa-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (6) A direction under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-94
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-94-norm

75 Subsection 70(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75-2
note: Omit “or 4”, substitute ‘, 4 or 5’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-75-2-norm

76 Subsection 70(3) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76-3
note: Repeal a note and substitute it with a new one.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-3-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-76-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Identify the temporal interval of the repeal note.
premise text: The note was repealed at some point.
conclusion text: The repeal note had a specific temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

77 After subsection 70(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-2
has part: 77(4A) After subsection 70(4)
has part: 77(4B) After subsection 70(4)
has part: 77(4C) After subsection 70(4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98

77(4A) After subsection 70(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a
part of: 77 After subsection 70(4)
note: Exemption from subsection 70(4) for section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts subsection 70(4) from section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
premise text: Section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with access determinations.
conclusion text: Subsection 70(4) does not apply to section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between subsection 70(4) and section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
conclusion text: The temporal relation between subsection 70(4) and section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 is one of exemption.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace between subsection 70(4) and section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
conclusion text: The recurring trace between subsection 70(4) and section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 is one of exemption.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses the applicability of subsection 70(4) to section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
conclusion text: The applicability of subsection 70(4) is diffused to section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Classifies section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 as a regulatory provision.
premise text: Section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with access determinations.
conclusion text: Section 152BCO of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 is a regulatory provision.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(4B) After subsection 70(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b
part of: 77 After subsection 70(4)
note: Exemption from subsection 70(4) for section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-shacl-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts subsection 70(4) from section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
premise text: Section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with binding rules of conduct.
conclusion text: Subsection 70(4) does not apply to this condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the exemption from subsection 70(4).
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
conclusion text: The exemption applies within this temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for the exemption from subsection 70(4).
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
conclusion text: The exemption applies within this recurring trace.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Represents knowledge about the exemption from subsection 70(4).
premise text: Section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 deals with binding rules of conduct.
conclusion text: This exemption is represented by this rule.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4b-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Definition
logic summary: Defines a schema for the exemption from subsection 70(4).
premise text: Subsection (1) does not apply to the condition set out in section 152BDF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
conclusion text: This exemption conforms to this schema.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77(4C) After subsection 70(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4c
part of: 77 After subsection 70(4)
note: Exemption from subsection 70(4) for access agreements under section 152BEC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-77-2-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Section 152BEC provides an exemption from subsection 70(4)
premise text: Subsection 70(4) does not apply to access agreements under section 152BEC
conclusion text: Access agreements under section 152BEC are exempt from subsection 70(4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Paragraph 70(5)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78-3
note: Omit ‘or 4’, substitute ‘, 4 or 5’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-78-3-norm

79 At the end of subsection 70(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79-2
note: Adds conditions from sections 152BCO, 152BDF, and 152BEC of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-79-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the nature of added conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 At the end of section 98
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-3
has part: 80(3) At the end of section 98
has part: 80(4) At the end of section 98
has part: 80(5) At the end of section 98
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98

80(3) At the end of section 98
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-3
part of: 80 At the end of section 98
note: Compliance with access determinations is required for carriage service providers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(3) At the end of section 98
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with access determinations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(4) At the end of section 98
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-4
part of: 80 At the end of section 98
note: Compliance with binding rules of conduct is required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(4) At the end of section 98
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with rules of conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(5) At the end of section 98
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-5
part of: 80 At the end of section 98
note: Mention of a rule from another Act as a service provider rule for this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.98
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(5) At the end of section 98
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Mention
logic summary: Mention of a rule from another Act as an obligation.
premise text: The rule is mentioned in the text.
conclusion text: It is an obligation to follow this rule.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

81 After subsection 102(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-81-2
has part: 81(6A) After subsection 102(6)
has part: 81(6B) After subsection 102(6)
has part: 81(6C) After subsection 102(6)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.99

81(6A) After subsection 102(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6a
part of: 81 After subsection 102(6)
note: Exempts subsection (1) from applying to the rule set out in subsection 152BCP(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.99
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6a-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6a-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 81(6A) After subsection 102(6)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

81(6B) After subsection 102(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6b
part of: 81 After subsection 102(6)
note: Exempts subsection 152BDG(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 from a rule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.99
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6b-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Provides an exemption.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on carriage service providers.
premise text: Carriage service providers must comply with binding rules of conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81(6C) After subsection 102(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c
part of: 81 After subsection 102(6)
note: Exempts subsection 152BED(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 from subsection 102(6)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.99
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-shacl-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the exemption
premise text: Subsection 152BED(2) is exempted from subsection 102(6)
conclusion text: The exemption applies to a specific temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the exemption as a prohibition on applying subsection 102(6)
premise text: Subsection 152BED(2) is exempted from subsection 102(6)
conclusion text: The exemption prohibits applying subsection 102(6)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the exemption
premise text: Subsection 152BED(2) is exempted from subsection 102(6)
conclusion text: The exemption applies to a specific temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Analyzes the exemption as a rule
premise text: Subsection 152BED(2) is exempted from subsection 102(6)
conclusion text: The exemption can be analyzed as a rule
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-81-2-ss-6c-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Validates the exemption against a schema
premise text: Subsection 152BED(2) is exempted from subsection 102(6)
conclusion text: The exemption conforms to a schema
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 After subsection 103(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-82-3
note: Amendments to Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.99
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-82-3-norm

96 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-96
has part: 96(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 96(3B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 96(3C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100

96(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-96-ss-3a
part of: 96 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Must comply with access determinations
description: Access determinations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with access determinations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96(3B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-96-ss-3b
part of: 96 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Must comply with binding rules of conduct
description: Compliance with applicable rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96(3C) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-96-ss-3c
part of: 96 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Exempts access agreements from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts access agreements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83 After subsection 103(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-83-2
has part: 83(4A) After subsection 103(4)
has part: 83(4B) After subsection 103(4)
has part: 83(4C) After subsection 103(4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100

83(4A) After subsection 103(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4a
part of: 83 After subsection 103(4)
note: Issuing a formal warning for contravening the service provider rule set.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(4A) After subsection 103(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits issuing a formal warning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(4B) After subsection 103(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4b
part of: 83 After subsection 103(4)
note: Issuing a formal warning for contravening the service provider rule set.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(4B) After subsection 103(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits issuing a formal warning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(4C) After subsection 103(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c
part of: 83 After subsection 103(4)
note: Formal warning for contravening service provider rule set
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(4C) After subsection 103(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits issuing formal warnings for contravening service provider rule set
premise text: (4C) The ACCC may issue a formal warning...
conclusion text: ...contravenes the service provider rule set out in subsection 152BED(2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for issuing formal warnings
premise text: (4C) The ACCC may issue a formal warning...
conclusion text: ...if a person contravenes the service provider rule set out in subsection 152BED(2)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace for issuing formal warnings
premise text: (4C) The ACCC may issue a formal warning...
conclusion text: ...if a person contravenes the service provider rule set out in subsection 152BED(2)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses information about formal warnings for service provider rule set violations
premise text: (4C) The ACCC may issue a formal warning...
conclusion text: ...if a person contravenes the service provider rule set out in subsection 152BED(2)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-83-2-ss-4c-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies consequences for issuing formal warnings for service provider rule set violations
premise text: (4C) The ACCC may issue a formal warning...
conclusion text: ...if a person contravenes the service provider rule set out in subsection 152BED(2)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 After section 505
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-84-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-84-3-norm

505A ACCC may use material presented to a previous public
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-505a
has part: 505A(1) ACCC may use material presented to a previous public
has part: 505A(2) ACCC may use material presented to a previous public
has part: 505A(3) ACCC may use material presented to a previous public
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100

505A(1) ACCC may use material presented to a previous public
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-505a-ss-1
part of: 505A ACCC may use material presented to a previous public
note: The ACCC may use material presented to a previous public inquiry.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The ACCC may use material.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

505A(2) ACCC may use material presented to a previous public
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-505a-ss-2
part of: 505A ACCC may use material presented to a previous public
note: Treat evidence/material as if presented to another public inquiry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: ACCC must treat evidence/material as if presented to another public inquiry
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

505A(3) ACCC may use material presented to a previous public
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-505a-ss-3
part of: 505A ACCC may use material presented to a previous public
note: No implication that limits information use for public inquiries
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.100
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505a-ss-3-norm

505B ACCC may adopt a finding from a previous public inquiry
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-505b
note: ACCC may adopt a finding from a previous public inquiry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.101
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-505b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May adopt a finding
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85 Paragraph 564(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-85-2
note: Omit or substitute specific words in a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.101
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-85-2-norm

98 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-98
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-98-norm

86 At the end of subsection 564(3) (before the notes)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-86-3
note: List of conditions for carrier licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-shacl-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86 At the end of subsection 564(3) (before the notes)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: Membership in the list is a necessary condition for carrier licence
premise text: The conditions listed are requirements for carrier licence
conclusion text: If a condition is in the list, then the carrier licence is required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The conditions listed must be met during the validity period of the carrier licence
premise text: The carrier licence has a validity period
conclusion text: If the carrier licence is valid, then all conditions in the list must be met during that time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: and
logic summary: All conditions listed must be met simultaneously for carrier licence to be granted
premise text: The conditions listed are requirements for carrier licence
conclusion text: If all conditions in the list are met, then the carrier licence is granted
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasValue
logic summary: The conditions listed have a specific value or meaning
premise text: The conditions listed are requirements for carrier licence
conclusion text: If a condition in the list has a specific value, then it is a requirement for carrier licence
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-86-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: validity
logic summary: The conditions listed have a validity period or scope
premise text: The conditions listed are requirements for carrier licence
conclusion text: If the conditions in the list have a validity period, then they must be met within that time
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87 Subsection 564(3) (note 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-87-2
note: Repeal note and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-87-2-norm

88 At the end of subsection 564(3) (after the notes)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-88-3
note: Notes on access determinations, binding rules of conduct, and access agreements under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-88-3-norm

89 Paragraph 571(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-89
note: Omit 'or 4', substitute ', 4 or 5'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.102
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-89-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-89-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-89-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'or 4'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90 At the end of subsection 571(3) (before the notes)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-90-2
note: List of conditions for carrier licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.103
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: List of conditions for carrier licence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-90-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between conditions
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91 Subsection 571(3) (note 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-91
note: Repeal note and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.103
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-91-norm

92 At the end of subsection 571(3) (after the notes)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-92-2
note: Notes on access determinations, binding rules of conduct, and access agreements under the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.103
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-92-2-norm

93 After subclause 17(2) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-93
note: Amendments to Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.103
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-93-norm

100 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-100
has part: 100(2A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 100(2B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.104

100(2A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-100-ss-2a
part of: 100 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: No obligation imposed under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.104
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2a-norm

100(2B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b
part of: 100 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Right to request contingent provisions come into force if condition precedent is satisfied.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.104
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(2B) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
premise text: The state has a contractual obligation to fulfill contingent provisions.
conclusion text: If the condition precedent is satisfied, the contingent provisions come into force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Describes the implication of the request on the contract.
premise text: The person requests that the contingent provisions come into force if the condition precedent is satisfied.
conclusion text: If the condition precedent is satisfied, the contingent provisions come into force.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the request and the fulfillment of the contingent provisions.
premise text: The request is made at a time when the condition precedent has not been satisfied.
conclusion text: If the condition precedent is satisfied, the contingent provisions come into force.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Inference
logic summary: Describes the logical connection between the request and the fulfillment of the contingent provisions.
premise text: The person requests that the contingent provisions come into force if the condition precedent is satisfied.
conclusion text: If the condition precedent is satisfied, the contingent provisions come into force.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Describes the spread of information about the request and its implications.
premise text: The person requests that the contingent provisions come into force if the condition precedent is satisfied.
conclusion text: If the condition precedent is satisfied, the contingent provisions come into force.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94 After subclause 17(4) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-94-2
note: NBN corporation is not the operator of facilities if agreement with Telstra would result in that.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.104
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-94-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-94-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-94-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Asserts that NBN corporation is not the operator of facilities under certain conditions.
premise text: Agreement with Telstra would result in NBN corporation being the operator of facilities.
conclusion text: NBN corporation is taken not to be the operator of facilities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95 At the end of clause 17 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-95
note: Defines NBN corporation as having the same meaning as in section 577BA.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-95-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-95-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-95-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: NBN corporation has the same meaning as in section 577BA.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96 At the end of clause 18 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-96-2
has part: 96(6) At the end of clause 18 of Schedule 1
has part: 96(7) At the end of clause 18 of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.105

96(6) At the end of clause 18 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6
part of: 96 At the end of clause 18 of Schedule 1
note: Prevent arbitrators from making determinations that would prevent Telstra from complying with certain undertakings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of making determinations that would prevent Telstra from complying with undertakings.
premise text: (6) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: (a) preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The determination must overlap with Telstra's compliance with undertakings.
premise text: (6) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: (a) preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: The determination must be recurrently related to Telstra's compliance with undertakings.
premise text: (6) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: (a) preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The determination must diffuse to Telstra's compliance with undertakings.
premise text: (6) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: (a) preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: The determination implies that Telstra's compliance with undertakings is necessary.
premise text: (6) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: (a) preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96(7) At the end of clause 18 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7
part of: 96 At the end of clause 18 of Schedule 1
note: No effect on agreement in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Agreement overrides clause determination
premise text: (a) agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force
conclusion text: (determination under this clause has no effect to the extent to which it is inconsistent with the agreement)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Agreement and clause determination overlap in time
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force
conclusion text: determination under this clause has no effect to the extent to which it is inconsistent with the agreement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Agreement and clause determination have recurring trace
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force
conclusion text: determination under this clause has no effect to the extent to which it is inconsistent with the agreement
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Agreement diffuses into clause determination
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force
conclusion text: determination under this clause has no effect to the extent to which it is inconsistent with the agreement
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-96-2-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Incorporates
logic summary: Agreement incorporates into clause determination
premise text: (a) an agreement mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) is in force
conclusion text: determination under this clause has no effect to the extent to which it is inconsistent with the agreement
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

97 Clause 31 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-97
note: Defines NBN corporation term
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-97-norm

98 Subclause 33(3) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-98-2
note: Omit specific phrase from Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-98-2-norm

99 Subclause 33(4) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-99
note: Omit 'ACMA' and substitute 'ACCC'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-99-norm

100 After subclause 33(4) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-100-2
note: Amendments to Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.105
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-100-2-norm

102 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-102
note: Consultation with ACMA before issuing a certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult ACMA
premise text: The ACCC must consult the ACMA before issuing a certificate.
conclusion text: The consultation with ACMA is obligatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation
premise text: The consultation with ACMA must occur before issuing a certificate.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for the consultation is between the issuance of the certificate and the consultation itself.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Implication of consultation on certification process
premise text: If the ACCC consults with ACMA, then it is more likely that a certificate will be issued.
conclusion text: The consultation with ACMA implies a higher likelihood of certification.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
logic summary: Spread of obligation to other parties
premise text: The obligation to consult ACMA spreads to other parties involved in the certification process.
conclusion text: Other parties must also consult with ACMA before issuing a certificate.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
logic summary: Requiring consultation as a condition for certification
premise text: The consultation with ACMA is required as a condition for the ACCC to issue a certificate.
conclusion text: The consultation with ACMA is necessary for the ACCC to fulfill its duty.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101 Subclause 33(5) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-101
note: Omit ACMA and substitute ACCC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-101-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-101-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-101-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of ACMA
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102 At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-102-2
has part: 102(6) At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
has part: 102(7) At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
has part: 102(8) At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.106

102(6) At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6
part of: 102 At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
note: Exemption from obligation under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from obligations
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...
conclusion text: Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between exemptions and obligations
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...
conclusion text: The exemption applies during certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between exemptions and obligations
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...
conclusion text: The exemption applies until certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional relationship between exemptions and obligations
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...
conclusion text: The exemption applies if certain conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: classification
logic summary: Classification of exemptions as obligations
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...
conclusion text: Subclause (1) is classified as an exemption from obligation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(7) At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-7
part of: 102 At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
note: If a condition precedent has not been satisfied, the person may have a right under the contingent provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(7) At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Possibility of obligation
premise text: Condition precedent not satisfied
conclusion text: Right under contingent provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

102(8) At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8
part of: 102 At the end of clause 33 of Schedule 1
note: NBN corporation is not the operator of a telecommunications transmission tower under an agreement with Telstra.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.106
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to not be the operator of a telecommunications transmission tower.
premise text: (8) For the purposes of subclause (1), if: (a) there is an agreement in force between Telstra and an NBN corporation; and
conclusion text: the NBN corporation is taken not to be the operator of the telecommunications transmission tower.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The agreement with Telstra overlaps with the NBN corporation's access to a telecommunications transmission tower.
premise text: (8) For the purposes of subclause (1), if: (a) there is an agreement in force between Telstra and an NBN corporation; and
conclusion text: the NBN corporation is taken not to be the operator of the telecommunications transmission tower.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: The agreement with Telstra recurrently affects the NBN corporation's access to a telecommunications transmission tower.
premise text: (8) For the purposes of subclause (1), if: (a) there is an agreement in force between Telstra and an NBN corporation; and
conclusion text: the NBN corporation is taken not to be the operator of the telecommunications transmission tower.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The agreement with Telstra diffuses responsibility for the operation of a telecommunications transmission tower.
premise text: (8) For the purposes of subclause (1), if: (a) there is an agreement in force between Telstra and an NBN corporation; and
conclusion text: the NBN corporation is taken not to be the operator of the telecommunications transmission tower.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-102-2-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The CogAI system recognizes that the agreement with Telstra affects the operation of a telecommunications transmission tower.
premise text: (8) For the purposes of subclause (1), if: (a) there is an agreement in force between Telstra and an NBN corporation; and
conclusion text: the NBN corporation is taken not to be the operator of the telecommunications transmission tower.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103 Subclause 34(3) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-103
note: Omit specific phrase from Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-103-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-103-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-103-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the ACMA stating a certain phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104 Subclause 34(4) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-104
note: Omit ACMA and substitute ACCC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of ACMA
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105 After subclause 34(4) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-105
note: Consult ACMA before issuing a certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-105-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult ACMA
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106 Subclause 34(5) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-106
note: Omit ACMA and substitute ACCC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-106-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-106-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of ACMA
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107 At the end of clause 34 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-107
note: Exemption from obligation under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.107
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts Telstra from obligations under specific conditions
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...
conclusion text: ...(a) depriving any person of a right under a contract that was in force at the time the request was made;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for exemptions
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...
conclusion text: ...if a final migration plan is in force—requiring Telstra to engage in conduct in connection with matters covered by the final migration plan.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for exemptions
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...
conclusion text: ...if a final migration plan is in force—requiring Telstra to engage in conduct in connection with matters covered by the final migration plan.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for exemptions
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...
conclusion text: ...if a final migration plan is in force—requiring Telstra to engage in conduct in connection with matters covered by the final migration plan.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-107-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for exemptions
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...
conclusion text: ...if a final migration plan is in force—requiring Telstra to engage in conduct in connection with matters covered by the final migration plan.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-104-2
has part: 104(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 104(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.108

104(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7
part of: 104 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Right to request contract provision to come into force if condition precedent is satisfied.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Right to request contract provision to come into force if condition precedent is satisfied.
premise text: (7) If, at the time the request was made:...
conclusion text: ...the person would have a right under the contingent provisions;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between request and condition precedent.
premise text: (7) If, at the time the request was made:...
conclusion text: ...the possibility that the condition precedent could become satisfied;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between request and condition precedent.
premise text: (7) If, at the time the request was made:...
conclusion text: ...the contingent provisions would come into force;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Request to modify contract provision is permitted.
premise text: (7) If, at the time the request was made:...
conclusion text: ...the person had the right under the contingent provisions;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Request to modify contract provision implies right to do so.
premise text: (7) If, at the time the request was made:...
conclusion text: ...the person would have a right under the contingent provisions;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8
part of: 104 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: NBN corporation is prohibited from being the occupier or controller of the site.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits NBN corporation from occupying or controlling the site.
premise text: NBN corporation has a right to use the site.
conclusion text: NBN corporation is prohibited from occupying or controlling the site.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: NBN corporation's access to the site overlaps with Telstra's right to use the site.
premise text: Telstra has a right to use the site.
conclusion text: NBN corporation's access to the site overlaps with Telstra's right to use the site.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: NBN corporation's access to the site is recurring and overlaps with Telstra's right to use the site.
premise text: Telstra has a right to use the site.
conclusion text: NBN corporation's access to the site is recurring and overlaps with Telstra's right to use the site.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses NBN corporation's access to the site through Telstra's right to use the site.
premise text: Telstra has a right to use the site.
conclusion text: NBN corporation's access to the site is diffused through Telstra's right to use the site.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-104-2-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Classifies NBN corporation's access to the site as prohibited by CogAI.
premise text: Telstra has a right to use the site.
conclusion text: NBN corporation's access to the site is classified as prohibited by CogAI.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108 Subclause 35(3) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-108
note: Omit specific phrase from ACMA statement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.108
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-108-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-108-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specific phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109 Subclause 35(4) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-109
note: Substitute ACCC for ACMA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.109
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-109-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-109-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-109-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to substitute ACCC for ACMA
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110 After subclause 35(4) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-110
note: Consult ACMA before issuing a certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.109
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult ACMA
premise text: ACCC must issue a certificate
conclusion text: ACMA must be consulted before issuing a certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: Consultation is a prerequisite for issuing a certificate
premise text: Issuing a certificate requires consultation with ACMA
conclusion text: ACMA must be consulted before issuing a certificate
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: MUST
logic summary: Consultation is a necessary condition for issuing a certificate
premise text: Issuing a certificate requires consultation with ACMA
conclusion text: ACMA must be consulted before issuing a certificate
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: MUST
logic summary: Consultation is a necessary condition for issuing a certificate
premise text: Issuing a certificate requires consultation with ACMA
conclusion text: ACMA must be consulted before issuing a certificate
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: MUST
logic summary: Consultation is a necessary condition for issuing a certificate
premise text: Issuing a certificate requires consultation with ACMA
conclusion text: ACMA must be consulted before issuing a certificate
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111 Subclause 35(5) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-111
note: Omit ACMA and substitute ACCC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.109
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-111-norm

112 At the end of clause 35 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-112
has part: 112(6) At the end of clause 35 of Schedule 1
has part: 112(7) At the end of clause 35 of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.109

112(6) At the end of clause 35 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-112-ss-6
part of: 112 At the end of clause 35 of Schedule 1
note: Exemption from obligation under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.109
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Obligation exemption
premise text: (6) Subclause (1) does not impose an obligation to the extent...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112(7) At the end of clause 35 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-112-ss-7
part of: 112 At the end of clause 35 of Schedule 1
note: Right to claim contingent provisions if condition precedent is satisfied
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.109
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: right
logic summary: Right to claim contingent provisions
premise text: Assuming the condition precedent had been satisfied
conclusion text: The person would have a right under the contingent provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Condition precedent must be satisfied before contingent provisions take effect
premise text: If the condition precedent had been satisfied
conclusion text: The person would have a right under the contingent provisions
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Condition precedent must be met for contingent provisions to take effect
premise text: Assuming that the condition precedent had been satisfied
conclusion text: The person would have a right under the contingent provisions
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: iff
logic summary: Condition precedent is necessary and sufficient for contingent provisions to take effect
premise text: If the condition precedent had been satisfied
conclusion text: The person would have a right under the contingent provisions
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
logic summary: Condition precedent implies contingent provisions taking effect
premise text: Assuming that the condition precedent had been satisfied
conclusion text: The person would have a right under the contingent provisions
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-106-2
note: The NBN corporation is taken to not be the operator of an eligible underground facility under certain agreements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.110
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-106-2-norm

113 At the end of clause 36 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-113
has part: 113(7) At the end of clause 36 of Schedule 1
has part: 113(8) At the end of clause 36 of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.110

113(7) At the end of clause 36 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-113-ss-7
part of: 113 At the end of clause 36 of Schedule 1
note: Prevent arbitrators from making determinations that would prevent Telstra from complying with certain undertakings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.110
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition of making determinations that would prevent Telstra from complying with undertakings.
premise text: (7) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Identifies the temporal interval during which arbitrators must not make determinations that would prevent Telstra from complying with undertakings.
premise text: (7) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Identifies the temporal interval during which arbitrators must not make determinations that would prevent Telstra from complying with undertakings.
premise text: (7) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Identifies the temporal interval during which arbitrators must not make determinations that would prevent Telstra from complying with undertakings.
premise text: (7) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-7-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: not
logic summary: Identifies the argument that prohibits making determinations that would prevent Telstra from complying with undertakings.
premise text: (7) An arbitrator must not make a determination under this clause if...
conclusion text: ...would have the effect of: preventing Telstra from complying with an undertaking in force under section 577A, 577C or 577E;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

113(8) At the end of clause 36 of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-113-ss-8
part of: 113 At the end of clause 36 of Schedule 1
note: No effect on agreement in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.110
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-113-ss-8-norm

114 Section 152AA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-114
note: Carrier must not prevent or hinder standard access obligation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.110
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 114 Section 152AA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Preventing or hindering a standard access obligation is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: The Commission may conduct an arbitration of a dispute about access to declared services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The provision overlaps with the Allen interval of 'If agreement cannot be reached, but no access undertaking is in operation'.
premise text: Section 152AA
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: A carrier must not prevent or hinder the fulfilment of a standard access obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-108-2
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-108-2-norm

115 Section 152AC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-115
note: Definition of access agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-115-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-115-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-115-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: access agreement has the meaning given by section 152BE.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116 Section 152AC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-116
note: Definition of access determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-116-norm

117 Section 152AC (definition of access undertaking)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117
note: Omit “an ordinary access undertaking or”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117-norm

118 Section 152AC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-118
note: Defines binding rules of conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 118 Section 152AC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defined
logic summary: Defines a concept
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subclassOf
logic summary: Establishes a subclass relationship
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119 Section 152AC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-119
note: Defines final access determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-119-norm

120 Section 152AC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-120
note: Defines fixed principles provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-norm

121 Section 152AC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-121
note: Defines term for fixed principles
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-121-norm

122 Section 152AC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-122
note: Definition of interim access determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.112
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-norm

123 Section 152AC (definition of ordinary access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-123
note: Repeal definition of ordinary access
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-123-norm

124 Section 152AC (definition of telecommunications access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-124
note: Repeal definition of telecommunications access code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-norm

125 Section 152AC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-125
note: Definition of variation agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125-norm

126 At the end of section 152AF
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-126
note: Anything done by a carrier or provider in fulfillment of the requirement is taken to be an aspect of access to a declared service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 126 At the end of section 152AF
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

127 After section 152AH
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-127
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-127-norm

152AI When public inquiry commences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152ai
note: Public inquiry commences when notice is published.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ai-norm

128 Subsection 152ALA(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-128
note: Repeal subsection, substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.113
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-norm

110 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-110-2
note: The Commission must consider a relevant matter when determining the expiry date of a declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-110-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commission must consider a relevant matter.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

129 After subsection 152ALA(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-129
note: Fresh declaration replaces expired declaration if it comes into force immediately after expiry.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-129-norm

130 Paragraph 152ALA(7)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-130
note: Substitute 18-month for 12-month in subsection heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131 After subparagraph 152ALA(7)(a)(v)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-131
note: Duty to extend or expire declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-131-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-131-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-131-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131 After subparagraph 152ALA(7)(a)(v)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-131-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132 Subsection 152AM(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-132
note: Commission does not have a duty to consider public inquiry upon request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132 Subsection 152AM(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133 Subsection 152AQ(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-133
note: Substitution of words in a law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.114
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-133-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-133-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133 Subsection 152AQ(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

134 Subsections 152AQ(4), (5) and (6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-134
has part: 134(4) Subsections 152AQ(4), (5) and (6)
has part: 134(5) Subsections 152AQ(4), (5) and (6)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115

134(4) Subsections 152AQ(4), (5) and (6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-134-ss-4
part of: 134 Subsections 152AQ(4), (5) and (6)
note: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134(4) Subsections 152AQ(4), (5) and (6)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
conclusion text: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134(5) Subsections 152AQ(4), (5) and (6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-134-ss-5
part of: 134 Subsections 152AQ(4), (5) and (6)
note: The Register is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: The Register is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135 Sections 152AQA and 152AQB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-135
note: Repeal sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-135-norm

136 Subsection 152AR(12) (definition of pre-request right)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-136
note: Omit specified phrase.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Omit specified phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137 Section 152AS
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-137
note: Repeal a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-137-norm

138 After subsection 152ASA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-138
note: Service or proposed service cannot be specified in a determination if it is declared.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 138 After subsection 152ASA(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of service specification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

139 After subsection 152ASA(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-139
has part: 139(2A) After subsection 152ASA(2)
has part: 139(2B) After subsection 152ASA(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115

139(2A) After subsection 152ASA(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-139-ss-2a
part of: 139 After subsection 152ASA(2)
note: Determination must not be varied except in specified circumstances.
description: Variation of determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 139(2A) After subsection 152ASA(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

139(2B) After subsection 152ASA(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b
part of: 139 After subsection 152ASA(2)
note: Determination must not be revoked under certain circumstances.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.115
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-logic-ltl-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 139(2B) After subsection 152ASA(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotRevocable
logic summary: Determination must not be revoked.
premise text: (2B) A determination under this section may provide that the determination must not be revoked;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustBeRevocable
logic summary: Determination can be revoked under certain circumstances.
premise text: (2B) A determination under this section may provide that the determination must be revoked except in such circumstances as are specified in the determination;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for revocation of a determination.
premise text: (2B) A determination under this section may provide that the determination must not be revoked;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-139-ss-2b-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Defines temporal trace for revocation of a determination.
premise text: (2B) A determination under this section may provide that the determination must not be revoked;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-112-2
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-112-2-norm

140 Subsection 152ASA(8)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-140
note: Omit all words from and including 'Commission'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making a fresh determination under this section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

141 After subsection 152ASA(11)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-141
has part: 141(11A) After subsection 152ASA(11)
has part: 141(11B) After subsection 152ASA(11)
has part: 141(11C) After subsection 152ASA(11)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116

141(11A) After subsection 152ASA(11)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-141-ss-11a
part of: 141 After subsection 152ASA(11)
note: Applicability of Acts Interpretation Act 1901 to Commission's power
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11a-norm

141(11B) After subsection 152ASA(11)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b
part of: 141 After subsection 152ASA(11)
note: Cannot be varied or removed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of variation or removal
premise text: (11B) A provision referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b)
conclusion text: cannot be varied or removed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between provisions
premise text: (11B) A provision referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b)
conclusion text: between the provisions referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval until variation or removal
premise text: (11B) A provision referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b)
conclusion text: until the provisions referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b) are varied or removed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition
premise text: (11B) A provision referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b)
conclusion text: diffuses the prohibition on variation or removal
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
logic summary: Assertion of prohibition
premise text: (11B) A provision referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b)
conclusion text: asserts the prohibition on variation or removal
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

141(11C) After subsection 152ASA(11)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-141-ss-11c
part of: 141 After subsection 152ASA(11)
note: No variation or revocation of a determination is allowed unless consistent with certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11c-logic-linearlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 141(11C) After subsection 152ASA(11)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: No variation or revocation is allowed.
premise text: (11C) A determination under this section must not be varied or revoked in a manner that is inconsistent with a provision referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-141-ss-11c-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: No variation or revocation is allowed.
premise text: (11C) A determination under this section must not be varied or revoked in a manner that is inconsistent with a provision referred to in paragraph (2A)(a) or (b) or (2B)(a) or (b).
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142 Subsection 152ASA(12)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-142
note: Repeal of a legislative instrument determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of legislative instrument determinations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143 Subsection 152ASA(13) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-143
note: Repeal a note
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-143-norm

144 Section 152AT
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-144
note: Repeal section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-norm

145 After subsection 152ATA(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-145
note: Service or proposed service cannot be specified in an order if it is a declared service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.116
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-145-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-145-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-145-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 145 After subsection 152ATA(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-145-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Service or proposed service is a declared service.
conclusion text: Cannot be specified in an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146 After subsection 152ATA(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-146
has part: 146(4A) After subsection 152ATA(4)
has part: 146(4B) After subsection 152ATA(4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.117

146(4A) After subsection 152ATA(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a
part of: 146 After subsection 152ATA(4)
note: Order must not be varied except in specified circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.117
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits variation of order
premise text: (4A) An order under paragraph (3)(a)
conclusion text: may: (a) provide that the order must not be varied; or (b) provide that the order must not be varied except in such circumstances as are specified in the order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes temporal overlap of variation prohibition
premise text: (4A) An order under paragraph (3)(a)
conclusion text: may: (a) provide that the order must not be varied; or (b) provide that the order must not be varied except in such circumstances as are specified in the order.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship of variation prohibition
premise text: (4A) An order under paragraph (3)(a)
conclusion text: may: (a) provide that the order must not be varied; or (b) provide that the order must not be varied except in such circumstances as are specified in the order.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Describes diffusion of variation prohibition
premise text: (4A) An order under paragraph (3)(a)
conclusion text: may: (a) provide that the order must not be varied; or (b) provide that the order must not be varied except in such circumstances as are specified in the order.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Describes recognition of variation prohibition
premise text: (4A) An order under paragraph (3)(a)
conclusion text: may: (a) provide that the order must not be varied; or (b) provide that the order must not be varied except in such circumstances as are specified in the order.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146(4B) After subsection 152ATA(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b
part of: 146 After subsection 152ATA(4)
note: Order must not be revoked except in specified circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.117
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-logic-dialectical-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of order
premise text: (4B) An order under paragraph (3)(a)
conclusion text: must not be revoked except in such circumstances as are specified in the order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between revocation and order
premise text: (4B) An order under paragraph (3)(a)
conclusion text: except in such circumstances as are specified in the order
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship between revocation and order
premise text: (4B) An order under paragraph (3)(a)
conclusion text: must not be revoked except in such circumstances as are specified in the order.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-ss-4b-logic-dialectical-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Dialectical
operator: Negation
logic summary: Describes negation of revocation
premise text: (4B) An order under paragraph (3)(a)
conclusion text: must not be revoked
execution surface: modalities::dialectical
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

147 After subsection 152ATA(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-147
note: Commission may refuse to consider subsequent application if grounds are materially similar.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.117
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-147-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-147-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-147-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Commission may refuse to consider subsequent application if grounds are materially similar.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148 Subsection 152ATA(10)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-148
note: Omit all words from and including 'Commission'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.117
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making a fresh order under paragraph (3)(a)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

114 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-114-2
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114-2-norm

149 After subsection 152ATA(16)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-149
has part: 149(16A) After subsection 152ATA(16)
has part: 149(16B) After subsection 152ATA(16)
has part: 149(16C) After subsection 152ATA(16)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118

149(16A) After subsection 152ATA(16)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-149-ss-16a
part of: 149 After subsection 152ATA(16)
note: Applying Acts Interpretation Act 1901 to Commission's power
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16a-norm

149(16B) After subsection 152ATA(16)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-149-ss-16b
part of: 149 After subsection 152ATA(16)
note: Cannot be varied or removed after certain subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16b-logic-linearlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 149(16B) After subsection 152ATA(16)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on variation or removal
premise text: (16B) A provision referred to in paragraph (4A)(a) or (b) or (4B)(a) or (b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16b-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of subsections on provisions
premise text: (16B) A provision referred to in paragraph (4A)(a) or (b) or (4B)(a) or (b)
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149(16C) After subsection 152ATA(16)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-149-ss-16c
part of: 149 After subsection 152ATA(16)
note: Order variation or revocation must be consistent with certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16c-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16c-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 149(16C) After subsection 152ATA(16)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of order variation or revocation.
premise text: (16C) An order under paragraph (3)(a)
conclusion text: must not be varied or revoked in a manner that is inconsistent with...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-149-ss-16c-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of order variation or revocation.
premise text: (16C) An order under paragraph (3)(a)
conclusion text: ...must not be varied or revoked in a manner that is inconsistent with...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150 Subsection 152ATA(18) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-150
note: Repeal a note.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-norm

151 Subsection 152AU(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-151
note: Omit “152AT(1) or”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-151-norm

152 Sections 152AV to 152AX
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152
note: Repeal sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-norm

153 Subsection 152AXA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-153
note: Omit ‘(1)’ from section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-153-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-153-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-153-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

154 Paragraph 152AXA(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-154
note: Omit “152AT or”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-154-norm

155 Subsection 152AXA(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-155
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-155-norm

156 Section 152AY
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-156
note: Repeal section and substitute with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.118
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-156-norm

152AY Compliance with standard access obligations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152ay
has part: 152AY(1) Compliance with standard access obligations
has part: 152AY(2) Compliance with standard access obligations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.119

152AY(1) Compliance with standard access obligations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-1
part of: 152AY Compliance with standard access obligations
note: Carrier or carriage service provider must comply with standard access obligations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.119
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 152AY(1) Compliance with standard access obligations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier or carriage service provider must comply with standard access obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152AY(2) Compliance with standard access obligations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-2
part of: 152AY Compliance with standard access obligations
note: Carrier or carriage service provider must comply with obligations regarding access agreements, undertakings, and binding rules of conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.119
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 152AY(2) Compliance with standard access obligations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152ay-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier or carriage service provider must comply with obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-116-2
note: Commission may make binding rules of conduct if urgent need exists.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-116-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-116-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-116-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 116 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-116-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Commission considers urgent need
conclusion text: Binding rules of conduct may be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

157 Paragraph 152BBAA(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-157
note: Omit “152AS or”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-157-norm

158 Paragraph 152BBAA(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-158
note: Omit “152AT or”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-158-norm

159 Subsection 152BBC(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-159
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-159-norm

160 Division 4 of Part XIC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-160
note: Repeal Division and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-160-norm

152BC Access determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bc
has part: 152BC(1) Access determinations
has part: 152BC(2) Access determinations
has part: 152BC(3) Access determinations
has part: 152BC(4) Access determinations
has part: 152BC(5) Access determinations
has part: 152BC(6) Access determinations
has part: 152BC(7) Access determinations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120

152BC(1) Access determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-1
part of: 152BC Access determinations
note: Commission may make a written determination relating to access to a declared service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 152BC(1) Access determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

152BC(2) Access determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-2
part of: 152BC Access determinations
note: A determination under subsection (1) must be known as an access determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 152BC(2) Access determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a name for the access determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152BC(3) Access determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3
part of: 152BC Access determinations
note: Specify terms and conditions for carrier or provider compliance with standard access obligations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-6

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 152BC(3) Access determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires a carrier or provider to comply with specified terms and conditions.
premise text: (3) An access determination may:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: specifies
logic summary: Specifies terms and conditions for carrier or provider compliance.
premise text: (3) An access determination may: (a) specify any or all of the terms and conditions on which a carrier or carriage service provider is to comply with any or all of the standard access obligations applicable to the carrier or provider;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Requires a carrier or provider to extend or enhance capability within a specified timeframe.
premise text: (d) require a carrier or carriage service provider to extend or enhance the capability of a facility by means of which the declared service is supplied;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Applies to all carriers and providers.
premise text: (3) An access determination may: (a) specify any or all of the terms and conditions on which a carrier or carriage service provider is to comply with any or all of the standard access obligations applicable to the carrier or provider;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires a carrier or provider to pay for access to the declared service.
premise text: (g) require access seekers to accept, and pay for, access to the declared service;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-3-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires a carrier or provider to comply with specified obligations.
premise text: (i) unconditionally; or (ii) subject to such conditions or limitations as are specified in the determination;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152BC(4) Access determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-4
part of: 152BC Access determinations
note: Subsection (3) does not limit subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Subsection (3) implies no limit on subsection (1)
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

152BC(5) Access determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-5
part of: 152BC Access determinations
note: May make different provision with respect to carriers or carriage service providers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 152BC(5) Access determinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152BC(6) Access determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-6
part of: 152BC Access determinations
note: Does not limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: DoesNotImply
logic summary: Negative implication
premise text: (5)
conclusion text: (3A)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152BC(7) Access determinations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-7
part of: 152BC Access determinations
note: Commission may perform functions and exercise powers under an access determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.120
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bc-ss-7-norm

118 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-2
has part: 118(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 118(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 118(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 118(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 118(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 118(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 118(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.122

118(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-8
part of: 118 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Terms and conditions must include price or method of ascertaining price
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 118(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to include price or method of ascertaining price
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-9
part of: 118 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Matters that the Commission must take into account when making access determinations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 118(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Commission's obligations
premise text: The Commission must take into account...
conclusion text: ...when making access determinations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1
part of: 118 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission must consider various factors when making an access determination. Prevents Commission from making access determinations with certain effects.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 118(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Commission has a duty to consider various factors.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents Commission from making access determinations with certain effects.
premise text: (1) The Commission must not make an access determination that...
conclusion text: ...would have any of the following effects:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for access seeker's request.
premise text: (1) The Commission must not make an access determination that...
conclusion text: ...would have any of the following effects:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for carrier's or provider's requirements.
premise text: (b) preventing a carrier or carriage service provider from...
conclusion text: ...obtaining a sufficient amount of the service to be able to meet the carrier’s or provider’s reasonably anticipated requirements,
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses access seeker's request for access.
premise text: (a) preventing a service provider who already has access to...
conclusion text: ...obtaining a sufficient amount of the service to be able to meet the service provider’s reasonably anticipated requirements,
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes Commission's authority.
premise text: (1) The Commission must not make an access determination that...
conclusion text: ...would have any of the following effects:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-2
part of: 118 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may take into account characteristics, costs, revenues, and demand of other eligible services when making access determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 118(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commission may take into account...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-3
part of: 118 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may consider other relevant matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 118(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

118(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-4
part of: 118 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Section does not apply to interim access determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-5
part of: 118 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Restrictions on access determinations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.122
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-118-2-ss-5-norm

120 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-2
has part: 120(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 120(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 120(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 120(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 120(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 120(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 120(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.124

120(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2
part of: 120 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Determination must provide a nominal termination date for fixed principles provision. Grounds for believing access seeker is not creditworthy or has repeated failures to comply with terms and conditions.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 120(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a nominal termination date.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits grounds for believing access seeker is not creditworthy or has repeated failures to comply with terms and conditions.
premise text: (2) Examples of grounds for believing as mentioned in subparagraph (1)(g)(i)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with repeated failures by the access seeker to comply with terms and conditions.
premise text: (2) Examples of grounds for believing as mentioned in subparagraph (1)(g)(i)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with repeated failures by the access seeker to comply with terms and conditions.
premise text: (2) Examples of grounds for believing as mentioned in subparagraph (1)(g)(i)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

120(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-3
part of: 120 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Must not make an access determination inconsistent with standard access obligations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits making an access determination inconsistent with standard access obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-3a
part of: 120 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission cannot make access determination that would require Telstra to engage in conduct covered by final migration plan.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of Commission's action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-4
part of: 120 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Compensation for deprivation of pre-determination right
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 120(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Compensation obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-5
part of: 120 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: An access determination is of no effect to the extent it contravenes subsections (1), (3), or (3A).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-5-norm

120(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-6
part of: 120 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Definition of pre-determination right and protected contractual right.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 120(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Definition of pre-determination right implies a duty to comply with access determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-1
part of: 120 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: An access determination may include a provision that is specified to be a fixed principles provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.124
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion of a provision in an access determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-122-2
has part: 122(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 122(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 122(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 122(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 122(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.126

122(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-3
part of: 122 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Replacement access determination must include fixed principles provision with same terms as previous access determination.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.126
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide fixed principles provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-4
part of: 122 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Fixed principles provision ceases to be in force when access determination ceases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.126
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-4-norm

122(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-5
part of: 122 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Access determination must not be varied to alter or remove fixed principles provision.
description: fixed principles provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.126
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Cannot be varied
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-1
part of: 122 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Access determination comes into force on specified day and ceases to be in force on expiry date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.126
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: comes-into-force
logic summary: Implies a future event
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ceases-to-be-in-force
logic summary: Implies a past event
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-2
part of: 122 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Conditional commencement of determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.126
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122-2-ss-2-norm

124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2
has part: 124(2A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(4A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 124(9A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128

124(2A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-2a
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Condition for commencement of section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Must not be earlier than the day on which the declaration came into force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 124(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Cannot be earlier than the day the service became a declared service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 124(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Cannot be earlier than the specified day
premise text: (3A) If the declared service is covered by subsection 152AL(7), the specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the service became a declared service under that subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
logic summary: Specified day before the day the service became a declared service
premise text: (3A) If the declared service is covered by subsection 152AL(7), the specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the service became a declared service under that subsection.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: before
logic summary: Specified day before the day the service became a declared service
premise text: (3A) If the declared service is covered by subsection 152AL(7), the specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the service became a declared service under that subsection.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: none
logic summary: No diffusion logic applied
premise text: (3A) If the declared service is covered by subsection 152AL(7), the specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the service became a declared service under that subsection.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: none
logic summary: No CogAI logic applied
premise text: (3A) If the declared service is covered by subsection 152AL(7), the specified day must not be earlier than the day on which the service became a declared service under that subsection.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-4
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: If a previous access determination expires, the specified day must be the first day after its expiry.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 124(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with the condition
premise text: The specified day must be the first day after the expiry of the previous access determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(4A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-4a
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Conditional commencement of access determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-4a-norm

124(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-5
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Expiry date for access determination must be specified.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify expiry date
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-6
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The Commission must have regard to certain matters when specifying an expiry date for an access determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commission must have regard to certain matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-7
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission can make a fresh access determination under section 152BC in the same terms as the expired access determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-7-norm

124(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Access determination revoked upon declaration cessation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
logic summary: Prohibition of access determination
premise text: (8) If...
conclusion text: ...the access determination is taken to be revoked...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Revocation occurs at declaration cessation time
premise text: (b) the declared service is covered by a declaration under section 152AL,
conclusion text: ...and the Commission does not make a fresh declaration...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Commission inaction implies revocation
premise text: (c) the Commission does not make a fresh declaration under section 152AL that replaces the declaration referred to in paragraph (b) of this subsection;
conclusion text: ...the access determination is taken to be revoked...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Revocation spreads through declaration cessation
premise text: (a) an access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force;
conclusion text: ...and the declaration ceases to be in force;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Revocation inference from declaration cessation
premise text: (b) the declared service is covered by a declaration under section 152AL,
conclusion text: ...and the Commission does not make a fresh declaration...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Access determination revoked upon declaration revocation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits access determination revocation upon declaration revocation
premise text: (9) If an access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and the declared service is covered by a declaration under section 152AL, and the declaration is revoked; and the Commission does not make a fresh declaration under section 152AL that replaces the declaration referred to in paragraph (b) of this subsection;
conclusion text: the access determination is taken to be revoked at the time of the revocation of the declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between declarations and access determinations
premise text: (9) If an access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and the declared service is covered by a declaration under section 152AL, and the declaration is revoked;
conclusion text: the access determination is taken to be revoked at the time of the revocation of the declaration
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between declarations and access determinations
premise text: (9) If an access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and the declared service is covered by a declaration under section 152AL, and the declaration is revoked;
conclusion text: the access determination is taken to be revoked at the time of the revocation of the declaration
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Describes a relationship between declarations and access determinations
premise text: (9) If an access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and the declared service is covered by a declaration under section 152AL, and the declaration is revoked;
conclusion text: the access determination is taken to be revoked at the time of the revocation of the declaration
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Asserts
logic summary: Describes a relationship between declarations and access determinations
premise text: (9) If an access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and the declared service is covered by a declaration under section 152AL, and the declaration is revoked;
conclusion text: the access determination is taken to be revoked at the time of the revocation of the declaration
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(9A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a
part of: 124 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Prohibition on access to declared service while interim access determination is in force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.128
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits access to declared service
premise text: (9A) If: an interim access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval for prohibition
premise text: (9A) If: an interim access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval for prohibition using LTL
premise text: (9A) If: an interim access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval for prohibition using diffusion
premise text: (9A) If: an interim access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-124-2-ss-9a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval for prohibition using CogAI
premise text: (9A) If: an interim access determination relating to access to a declared service is in force; and
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2
has part: 126(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(12) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(13) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(14) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(15) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(16) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 126(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130

126(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-10
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may declare new expiry date for original access determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to modify expiry date.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-11
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Publish a declaration on the Commission's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-11-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish a declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126(12) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-12
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may extend expiry date for access determination by same period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-12-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-12-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to extend expiry date
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126(13) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-13
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission must publish instrument on website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-13-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-13-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 126(13) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish
conclusion text: The Commission must publish an instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126(14) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-14
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: No procedural fairness requirements for Commission decisions under subsections (10) or (12)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-14-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-14-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits procedural fairness requirements for Commission decisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126(15) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-15
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: A declaration under subsection (10) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-15-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-15-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Declaring something as not an instrument is a prohibition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126(16) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-16
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: An instrument under subsection (12) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-16-norm

126(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission must make interim access determination if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 126(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make interim access determination.
premise text: Commission makes a declaration under section 152AL after the commencement of this section.
conclusion text: Commission must make an interim access determination in relation to access to the service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Commission has commenced to hold a public inquiry under Part 25 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 about a proposal to make an access determination in relation to access to the declared service.
premise text: The Commission has commenced to hold a public inquiry under Part 25 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 about a proposal to make an access determination in relation to access to the declared service;
conclusion text: The public inquiry has started before the declaration was made.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Commission considers there is an urgent need to make an access determination in relation to access to the service before the completion of the public inquiry;
premise text: (d) either: (i) the Commission considers that it is unlikely that a final access determination in relation to access to the service will be made within 6 months after the commencement of the public inquiry; or (ii) the Commission considers that there is an urgent need to make an access determination in relation to access to the service before the completion of the public inquiry;
conclusion text: The public inquiry must end before the interim access determination can be made.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Commission considers it is unlikely that a final access determination in relation to access to the service will be made within 6 months after the commencement of the public inquiry.
premise text: (d) either: (i) the Commission considers that it is unlikely that a final access determination in relation to access to the service will be made within 6 months after the commencement of the public inquiry; or (ii) the Commission considers that there is an urgent need to make an access determination in relation to access to the service before the completion of the public inquiry;
conclusion text: The interim access determination must be made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-2
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may make interim access determination if declaration is in force and no previous access determination has been made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-3
part of: 126 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Conditional commencement of interim access determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.130
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-126-2-ss-3-norm

128 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-128-2
has part: 128(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 128(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 128(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 128(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 128(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.132

128(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-4
part of: 128 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission not required to observe procedural fairness in making interim access determination Conditional effect of subsection (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of procedural fairness requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-5
part of: 128 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: If a declaration is in force under section 152AL and an access determination has previously been made, the entity must comply with the access determination. Commission must not make an interim access determination without following this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Entity must comply
premise text: Declaration is in force under section 152AL
conclusion text: Access determination has previously been made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of making interim access determinations without following this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1
part of: 128 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission must not make access determination without public inquiry and report Commission must hold a public inquiry within 30 days after declaration. Exempts Commission decisions from certain judicial review provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-7

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of making access determination
premise text: (a) the Commission has held a public inquiry...
conclusion text: ...the Commission must not make an access determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Report must be published within 180 days of determination
premise text: (c) the report was published during the 180-day period...
conclusion text: ...the Commission must not make an access determination
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Commission can only make access determination if conditions are met
premise text: (a) the Commission has held a public inquiry...
conclusion text: ...the Commission must not make an access determination
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Commission's action is conditional on meeting requirements
premise text: (a) the Commission has held a public inquiry...
conclusion text: ...the Commission must not make an access determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Commission's action is conditional on meeting requirements
premise text: (b) the Commission has prepared a report...
conclusion text: ...the Commission must not make an access determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to hold a public inquiry
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits application of certain provisions to Commission decisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2
part of: 128 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Exempts interim access determination from subsection (1) Commission must hold a public inquiry about access to declared service. Court must not make orders staying or otherwise affecting the operation or implementation of the decision pending finalisation of the application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Court cannot make orders staying or otherwise affecting the operation or implementation of the decision.
premise text: Subsection 39B(1) of the Judiciary Act 1903
conclusion text: No orders can be made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The provision overlaps with other provisions related to access determinations and public inquiries
premise text: Subsection 39B(1) of the Judiciary Act 1903
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The provision repeats a similar provision in another part of the legislation
premise text: Subsection 39B(1) of the Judiciary Act 1903
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The provision diffuses information about access determinations and public inquiries
premise text: Subsection 39B(1) of the Judiciary Act 1903
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The provision recognizes the importance of access determinations and public inquiries in the legislation
premise text: Subsection 39B(1) of the Judiciary Act 1903
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

128(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-3
part of: 128 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Conditional commencement Commission must hold a public inquiry about access to declared service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.132
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-128-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

130 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-130-2
has part: 130(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 130(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 130(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 130(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 130(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.134

130(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-6
part of: 130 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may defer public inquiry about access determination until declaration expiry date is extended or further extended.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

130(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7
part of: 130 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission not required to hold public inquiry about access determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 130(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Commission obligation
premise text: (7) If...
conclusion text: the Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between declarations and inquiries
premise text: (7) If a declaration is in force under section 152AL;
conclusion text: ...the Commission decides to allow the declaration to expire...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Inquiry implication
premise text: (7) If a declaration is in force under section 152AL;
conclusion text: ...the Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Declaration propagation
premise text: (7) If a declaration is in force under section 152AL;
conclusion text: ...the Commission decides to allow the declaration to expire...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

130(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-8
part of: 130 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission must hold a public inquiry within 30 days after making binding rules of conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 130(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to hold a public inquiry
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

130(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-1
part of: 130 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may decide to combine public inquiries.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-1-norm

130(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-2
part of: 130 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission must ensure reports for combined inquiries.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.134
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 130(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide reports
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-130-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for report preparation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2
has part: 132(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 132(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 132(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 132(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 132(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 132(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 132(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 132(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 132(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136

132(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-1
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Applying a modified version of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 to a power conferred on the Commission by section 152BC. Commission must hold a public inquiry under Part 25 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 about a proposal to make an access determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must hold a public inquiry
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission must make final access determination within 6 months after commencement. Commission not required to hold public inquiry under Part 25 if proposal is of minor nature and affected parties consent in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-6

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make final access determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Commission exempt from holding public inquiry under Part 25.
premise text: (2) The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry...
conclusion text: ...if the variation is of a minor nature and affected parties consent in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Minor variation defined as one that occurs between the time of proposal and the time of consent.
premise text: (2) The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry...
conclusion text: ...if the variation is of a minor nature; or (b) each carrier or carriage service provider and access seeker whose interests are likely to be affected by the variation has consented in writing to the variation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: recurring
logic summary: Minor variation defined as one that recurs over time.
premise text: (2) The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry...
conclusion text: ...if the variation is of a minor nature; or (b) each carrier or carriage service provider and access seeker whose interests are likely to be affected by the variation has consented in writing to the variation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Commission permitted to vary access determination without holding public inquiry.
premise text: (2) The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry...
conclusion text: ...if the variation is of a minor nature; or (b) each carrier or carriage service provider and access seeker whose interests are likely to be affected by the variation has consented in writing to the variation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-2-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: Commission's decision to hold public inquiry implies that minor variation is not acceptable.
premise text: (2) The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry...
conclusion text: ...if the variation is of a minor nature; or (b) each carrier or carriage service provider and access seeker whose interests are likely to be affected by the variation has consented in writing to the variation.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may extend 6-month period for making final access determination Consent required for revocation of access determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-7

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to extend period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: HasPart
logic summary: Extension of time frame
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State must obtain consent before revoking access determination
premise text: (a) carrier or service provider; and (b) access seeker; whose interests are likely to be affected by the revocation has consented in writing to the revocation.
conclusion text: The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry under Part 25 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 about a proposal to revoke an access determination if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for which consent is required
premise text: (a) carrier or service provider; and (b) access seeker; whose interests are likely to be affected by the revocation has consented in writing to the revocation.
conclusion text: The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry under Part 25 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 about a proposal to revoke an access determination if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for which consent is required
premise text: (a) carrier or service provider; and (b) access seeker; whose interests are likely to be affected by the revocation has consented in writing to the revocation.
conclusion text: The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry under Part 25 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 about a proposal to revoke an access determination if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Consent diffusion through revocation of access determination
premise text: (a) carrier or service provider; and (b) access seeker; whose interests are likely to be affected by the revocation has consented in writing to the revocation.
conclusion text: The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry under Part 25 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 about a proposal to revoke an access determination if...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inference from consent requirement
premise text: (a) carrier or service provider; and (b) access seeker; whose interests are likely to be affected by the revocation has consented in writing to the revocation.
conclusion text: The Commission is not required to hold a public inquiry under Part 25 of the Telecommunications Act 1997 about a proposal to revoke an access determination if...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-4
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Prohibition on varying certain provisions in access determinations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 132(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits variation of certain provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-5
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission does not have a duty to consider exercising power.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-6
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may alter proposed variation if public inquiry has commenced
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-7
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Notice of alteration must be published in a certain way.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 132(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish notice of alteration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-8
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Consent required for alteration of minor nature
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-8-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 132(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: Alteration of minor nature with consent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-9
part of: 132 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Prohibition on making binding rules of conduct that relate to access to a declared service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.136
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-132-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on making binding rules of conduct
premise text: (9) Despite anything else in this section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-134-2
has part: 134(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 134(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 134(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 134(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.138

134(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-1
part of: 134 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Prohibition on engaging in conduct that constitutes a contravention of an access determination. Service provider rule for the purposes of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-2
part of: 134 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Remedy for contravention of access determination Carriage service provider must comply with access determinations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide remedy for contravention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-3
part of: 134 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Court may make other orders against involved persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4
part of: 134 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Defines who is considered involved in a contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.138
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: involvement
logic summary: Involvement in a contravention is an obligation.
premise text: A person who has aided, abetted, counselled or procured the contravention is involved.
conclusion text: The person is obligated to prevent further involvement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: involvement
logic summary: Involvement in a contravention is an obligation.
premise text: A person who has induced the contravention, whether through threats or promises or otherwise, is involved.
conclusion text: The person is obligated to prevent further involvement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: involvement
logic summary: Involvement in a contravention is an obligation.
premise text: A person who has been in any way (directly or indirectly) knowingly concerned in or a party to the contravention is involved.
conclusion text: The person is obligated to prevent further involvement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-134-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: involvement
logic summary: Involvement in a contravention is an obligation.
premise text: A person who has conspired with others to effect the contravention is involved.
conclusion text: The person is obligated to prevent further involvement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-2
has part: 136(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 136(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 136(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 136(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 136(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 136(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.140

136(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-1
part of: 136 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The Commission must maintain a register of access determinations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to maintain a register
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classification of access determinations
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-2
part of: 136 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The Register is to be maintained by electronic means.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-2-norm

136(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-3
part of: 136 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make available
conclusion text: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-4
part of: 136 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The Register is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits the Register from being a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5
part of: 136 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may remove a provision from the Register if it prejudices substantially the commercial interests of a person and outweighs the public interest in publication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits publication of a provision if it prejudices substantially the commercial interests of a person.
premise text: (a) publication of a particular provision of an access determination could reasonably be expected to prejudice substantially the commercial interests of a person;
conclusion text: the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the access determination that is included in the Register.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for removal of a provision.
premise text: (b) the prejudice outweighs the public interest in the publication of the provision;
conclusion text: the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the access determination that is included in the Register.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Defines a temporal trace for removal of a provision.
premise text: (b) the prejudice outweighs the public interest in the publication of the provision;
conclusion text: the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the access determination that is included in the Register.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Spread
logic summary: Describes how information spreads about removal of a provision.
premise text: (b) the prejudice outweighs the public interest in the publication of the provision;
conclusion text: the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the access determination that is included in the Register.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Artificial Intelligence Application
logic summary: Describes how artificial intelligence is applied to removal of a provision.
premise text: (b) the prejudice outweighs the public interest in the publication of the provision;
conclusion text: the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the access determination that is included in the Register.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-6
part of: 136 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission must include annotation in Register if required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.140
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-136-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to include annotation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152BD Binding rules of conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bd
has part: 152BD(1) Binding rules of conduct
has part: 152BD(2) Binding rules of conduct
has part: 152BD(3) Binding rules of conduct
has part: 152BD(4) Binding rules of conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.141

152BD(1) Binding rules of conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-1
part of: 152BD Binding rules of conduct
note: Commission may make written rules specifying terms and conditions for carriers or carriage service providers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.141
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 152BD(1) Binding rules of conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Commission may make rules
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152BD(2) Binding rules of conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-2
part of: 152BD Binding rules of conduct
note: Rules under subsection (1) are to be known as binding rules of conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.141
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 152BD(2) Binding rules of conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

152BD(3) Binding rules of conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-3
part of: 152BD Binding rules of conduct
note: Rules of conduct may be of general application or limited as provided in the rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.141
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 152BD(3) Binding rules of conduct
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: binding obligation
logic summary: Rules of conduct are binding.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152BD(4) Binding rules of conduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-4
part of: 152BD Binding rules of conduct
note: Limitation on binding rules of conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.141
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: NOT
logic summary: Negative limitation
premise text: (4)
conclusion text: binding rules of conduct may be limited to
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152bd-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: SUBSETOF
logic summary: Temporal limitation
premise text: (b) particular classes of carriers or carriage service providers
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2
has part: 138(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 138(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 138(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 138(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 138(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 138(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 138(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 138(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 138(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142

138(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission is not required to obtain information if it is not reasonably practicable. Exempts subsection (4) from limitation by subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-6

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Commission's obligation to obtain information
premise text: Commission is not required...
conclusion text: ...if it is not reasonably practicable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap: Commission's obligation and urgent need
premise text: Commission is not required to obtain information if it is not reasonably practicable.
conclusion text: ...if it is not reasonably practicable.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal until: Commission's obligation and urgent need
premise text: Commission is not required to obtain information if it is not reasonably practicable.
conclusion text: ...if it is not reasonably practicable.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion: Commission's obligation and urgent need
premise text: Commission is not required to obtain information if it is not reasonably practicable.
conclusion text: ...if it is not reasonably practicable.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: CogAI inference: Commission's obligation and urgent need
premise text: Commission is not required to obtain information if it is not reasonably practicable.
conclusion text: ...if it is not reasonably practicable.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exempts
logic summary: Implies obligation
premise text: Subsection (4) does not limit subsection 33(3A)
conclusion text: Obligation to exempt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

138(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-6
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Restrictions on binding rules of conduct Commission not required to observe procedural fairness in making binding rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restriction
logic summary: Restricts binding rules of conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of procedural fairness requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-7
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission does not have a duty to consider making binding rules of conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Commission has a duty to consider making binding rules of conduct.
conclusion text: Commission does not have a duty to consider making binding rules of conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-8
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may exercise powers under rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-8-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

138(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-9
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Instrument under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
conclusion text: (9) An instrument under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

138(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Prevents the Commission from making rules that would prevent a service provider from obtaining sufficient access to a declared service. Commission must consider various factors when making binding rules of conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents the Commission from making rules that would prevent a service provider from obtaining sufficient access to a declared service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consider certain factors.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Consideration of specific factors is a necessary condition for making binding rules.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-2
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may take into account characteristics, costs, revenues, and demand of other eligible services when making binding rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may take into account
logic summary: Commission's obligation to consider characteristics, costs, revenues, and demand of other eligible services.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Commission's consideration of costs and revenues is between the supply of declared service and the demand for other eligible services.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-3
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may consider other relevant matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

138(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4
part of: 138 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission not required to take a matter into account if it is not reasonably practicable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.142
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Commission exempt from taking a matter into account if it is not reasonably practicable.
premise text: Subsection (1) or (2)
conclusion text: Not required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: interval relation
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between Commission's decision-making and its obligations.
premise text: Urgent need to make binding rules of conduct
conclusion text: Not required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: trace relation
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between Commission's decision-making and its obligations.
premise text: Urgent need to make binding rules of conduct
conclusion text: Not required
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-138-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusion relation
logic summary: Describes the spread of information about Commission's decision-making.
premise text: Urgent need to make binding rules of conduct
conclusion text: Not required
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-140-2
has part: 140(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 140(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 140(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 140(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 140(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 140(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.144

140(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2
part of: 140 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Grounds for denying access based on creditworthiness or repeated non-compliance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 140(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits access based on creditworthiness or repeated non-compliance
premise text: (2) Examples of grounds for believing as mentioned in subparagraph (1)(g)(i)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Access denied for recurring non-compliance
premise text: (b) repeated failures by the access seeker to comply with the terms and conditions on which the same or similar access has been provided
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Access denied for recurring non-compliance within a specific time frame
premise text: (b) repeated failures by the access seeker to comply with the terms and conditions on which the same or similar access has been provided
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-3
part of: 140 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission cannot make binding rules of conduct inconsistent with standard access obligations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on making rules of conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140(3A) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-3a
part of: 140 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission cannot make binding rules that would require Telstra to engage in conduct covered by the final migration plan.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of Commission's action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-4
part of: 140 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Compensation for deprivation of access right
description: Fair compensation and reimbursement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 140(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Compensation obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-5
part of: 140 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Exemptions from binding rules of conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from binding rules of conduct
premise text: (5) Binding rules of conduct are of no effect to the extent to which they contravene subsection (1), (3) or (3A).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6
part of: 140 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Access agreements prevail over inconsistent binding rules of conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.144
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-6

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 140(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
logic summary: Binding rules have no effect to the extent they are inconsistent with an access agreement.
premise text: (binding rules of conduct are applicable to those parties) and (access agreement is applicable to those parties)
conclusion text: (binding rules of conduct have no effect to the extent they are inconsistent with an access agreement)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is applicable to
logic summary: Binding rules apply to carriers or carriage service providers and access seekers.
premise text: (binding rules of conduct) are applicable to (a carrier or carriage service provider) and (an access seeker)
conclusion text: (binding rules of conduct are applicable to those parties)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Binding rules came into force before the binding rules of conduct came into force.
premise text: (binding rules of conduct) came into force after (binding rules of conduct came into force)
conclusion text: (binding rules of conduct came into force before the binding rules of conduct came into force)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: for all
logic summary: Binding rules apply to carriers or carriage service providers and access seekers.
premise text: (binding rules of conduct) are applicable to (a carrier or carriage service provider) and (an access seeker)
conclusion text: (binding rules of conduct are applicable to those parties for all time)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
logic summary: Access agreements prevail over binding rules of conduct.
premise text: (access agreement) is applicable to (those parties) and (binding rules of conduct) are applicable to (those parties)
conclusion text: (access agreement prevails over binding rules of conduct)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-140-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
logic summary: Binding rules have no effect to the extent they are inconsistent with an access agreement.
premise text: (binding rules of conduct) are applicable to (those parties) and (access agreement) is applicable to (those parties)
conclusion text: (binding rules of conduct have no effect to the extent they are inconsistent with an access agreement)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-142-2
has part: 142(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 142(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 142(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 142(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.146

142(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1
part of: 142 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commencement of binding rules of conduct Prohibition on conduct that constitutes a contravention of binding rules of conduct Service provider rule for the purposes of the Telecommunications Act 1997 Exempts Commission decisions from certain judicial review provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-8

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 142(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: on
logic summary: Binding rules come into force on specified day
premise text: (1) Binding rules of conduct come into force on the day specified in the rules as the day on which the rules are to come into force.
conclusion text: (1) Binding rules of conduct come into force on the day specified in the rules as the day on which the rules are to come into force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Rules take effect during specified period
premise text: (1) Binding rules of conduct come into force on the day specified in the rules as the day on which the rules are to come into force.
conclusion text: The rules take effect during a specified period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
logic summary: Rules imply commencement date
premise text: (1) Binding rules of conduct come into force on the day specified in the rules as the day on which the rules are to come into force.
conclusion text: The rules imply a commencement date.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Rules imply commencement date through argumentation
premise text: (1) Binding rules of conduct come into force on the day specified in the rules as the day on which the rules are to come into force.
conclusion text: The rules imply a commencement date through argumentation.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
logic summary: Rules diffuse through commencement date
premise text: (1) Binding rules of conduct come into force on the day specified in the rules as the day on which the rules are to come into force.
conclusion text: The rules diffuse through a commencement date.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-8
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits application of certain judicial review provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-2
part of: 142 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Carriage service provider must comply with binding rules of conduct. Rules of conduct must specify an expiry date. Court must comply with binding rules of conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 142(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-3
part of: 142 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Expiry date must occur within 12 months of rules making
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-4
part of: 142 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Binding rules of conduct cease to be in force on expiry date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.146
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-142-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Binding rules of conduct cease to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-144-2
has part: 144(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 144(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 144(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 144(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.148

144(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-2
part of: 144 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Remedy for contravention of rules despite revocation or expiry The Register is to be maintained by electronic means.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 144(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide remedy for contravention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-3
part of: 144 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Court may make orders against other persons involved in contravention. The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 144(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
conclusion text: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-4
part of: 144 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: A person involved in the contravention is a reference to a person who has aided, abetted, counselled or procured the contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 144(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: refers to
logic summary: The text refers to a person involved in the contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-1
part of: 144 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The Commission must maintain a register of binding rules of conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.148
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 144(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commission must maintain a register.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-144-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS A
logic summary: The register is a list of binding rules.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-146-2
has part: 146(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 146(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 146(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.150

146(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-4
part of: 146 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: The Register is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-4-norm

146(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5
part of: 146 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may remove provision from rules if it prejudices substantially the commercial interests of a person and outweighs public interest in publication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Regulation of rules by Commission.
premise text: (5) If the Commission is satisfied...
conclusion text: ...the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the rules that is included in the Register.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for removal of provisions.
premise text: (5) If the Commission is satisfied...
conclusion text: ...the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the rules that is included in the Register.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for removal of provisions.
premise text: (5) If the Commission is satisfied...
conclusion text: ...the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the rules that is included in the Register.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information about removal of provisions.
premise text: (5) If the Commission is satisfied...
conclusion text: ...the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the rules that is included in the Register.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification of provisions based on commercial interests and public interest.
premise text: (5) If the Commission is satisfied...
conclusion text: ...the Commission may remove the provision from the version of the rules that is included in the Register.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-6
part of: 146 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission must include annotation in Register if required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-146-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide annotation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152BE Access agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152be
has part: 152BE(1) Access agreements
has part: 152BE(1A) Access agreements
has part: 152BE(2) Access agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.150

152BE(1) Access agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1
part of: 152BE Access agreements
note: Access agreement definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 152BE(1) Access agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Access agreement definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: An access seeker and a carrier or carriage service provider are parties to the agreement.
conclusion text: The agreement is an access agreement.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: The agreement relates to access to a declared service.
conclusion text: The declaration of the service is prior to the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

152BE(1A) Access agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1a
part of: 152BE Access agreements
note: Exempts agreement from paragraph (1)(b) to the extent it is covered by subparagraph (1)(e)(ix) or (x)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-1a-norm

152BE(2) Access agreements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2
part of: 152BE Access agreements
note: Agreement to access eligible service must be declared after its declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.150
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 152BE(2) Access agreements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to declare eligible service after its declaration.
premise text: (2) If an agreement relates to access to an eligible service (within the meaning of section 152AL); and...
conclusion text: ...the eligible service becomes a declared service; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Eligible service declaration time overlaps with agreement entry time.
premise text: (2) If an agreement relates to access to an eligible service (within the meaning of section 152AL); and...
conclusion text: ...the eligible service becomes a declared service; and
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Eligible service declaration is recurrently related to agreement entry.
premise text: (2) If an agreement relates to access to an eligible service (within the meaning of section 152AL); and...
conclusion text: ...the eligible service becomes a declared service; and
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Eligible service declaration diffuses to agreement entry.
premise text: (2) If an agreement relates to access to an eligible service (within the meaning of section 152AL); and...
conclusion text: ...the eligible service becomes a declared service; and
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152be-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inferential
logic summary: Eligible service declaration is inferentially related to agreement entry.
premise text: (2) If an agreement relates to access to an eligible service (within the meaning of section 152AL); and...
conclusion text: ...the eligible service becomes a declared service; and
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2
has part: 148(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 148(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152

148(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-3
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Carrier must provide variation agreement and written statement within 28 days. Reference to access agreement is updated upon variation agreement.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide variation agreement and written statement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: update
logic summary: Update reference to access agreement
premise text: Variation agreement is legally enforceable
conclusion text: Reference to access agreement is updated
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-4
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may specify information by writing. Commencement of section is unaffected by timing of access agreements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-5
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Access agreements are not legislative instruments. Commission may specify information for paragraph (2)(d) purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
conclusion text: An access agreement is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-6
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may specify information for paragraph (3)(b) purposes Variation agreements are not legislative instruments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
conclusion text: (6) A variation agreement is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-1
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Carrier must provide access agreement and written statement to Commission within 28 days.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must provide access agreement and written statement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-2
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Carrier must provide agreement and statement within 28 days
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-7
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may require information to be verified by statutory declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-8
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission must publish instrument on website
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must publish instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-9
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission may extend deadline for certain actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-9-norm

148(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-10
part of: 148 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Legislative instruments under certain subsections are not legislative instruments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.152
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-148-2-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of a property
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-150-2
has part: 150(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 150(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 150(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.154

150(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-11
part of: 150 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Notification of termination of access agreement is required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-11-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1
part of: 150 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Service provider rule for the purposes of the Telecommunications Act 1997. Duty to notify Commission of terminated access agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 150(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Service provider rule
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIGES
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to notify the Commission of terminated access agreements
premise text: (a) a copy of an access agreement has been given to the Commission under section 152BEA
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a copy of an access agreement has been given to the Commission under section 152BEA;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Specifies a temporal interval for which this section applies
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a copy of an access agreement has been given to the Commission under section 152BEA;
conclusion text: and (b) the agreement is terminated, rescinded or cancelled before the expiry of the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: Specifies a recursive relation for which this section applies
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a copy of an access agreement has been given to the Commission under section 152BEA;
conclusion text: and (b) the agreement is terminated, rescinded or cancelled before the expiry of the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: IMPOSES
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to notify the Commission of terminated access agreements
premise text: (a) a copy of an access agreement has been given to the Commission under section 152BEA;
conclusion text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a copy of an access agreement has been given to the Commission under section 152BEA;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-1-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Specifies the conditions under which this section applies
premise text: (a) a copy of an access agreement has been given to the Commission under section 152BEA;
conclusion text: and (b) the agreement is terminated, rescinded or cancelled before the expiry of the agreement.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-2
part of: 150 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Notify the Commission of termination, rescission, or cancellation within 28 days. Carriage service provider must comply with sections 152BEA and 152BEB.
description: Notification in writing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 150(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-150-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161 Subdivision A of Division 5 of Part XIC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-161
note: Repeal Subdivision A of Division 5 of Part XIC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-161-norm

162 Subsection 152CBA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-162
note: Substitute 'a' for 'an active'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-norm

163 Before subsection 152CBA(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-163
note: States conduct in relation to access to a service and terms and conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.154
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-163-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-163-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-163-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the undertaking as a deontic provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164 Subsection 152CBA(10)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-164
note: Permits giving a fresh special access undertaking if the previous one expires.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.155
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-164-norm

165 Before subsection 152CBA(11)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-165
note: Commission may perform functions or exercise powers in relation to the undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.155
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-165-norm

166 After section 152CBA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-166
has part: 166(1) After section 152CBA
has part: 166(2) After section 152CBA
has part: 166(3) After section 152CBA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.155

166(1) After section 152CBA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-166-ss-1
part of: 166 After section 152CBA
note: Defines a fixed principles term or condition with a notional period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.155
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-166-ss-1-norm

166(2) After section 152CBA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-166-ss-2
part of: 166 After section 152CBA
note: Qualifying circumstances for fixed principles term or condition
description: one or more specified circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.155
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-166-ss-2-norm

166(3) After section 152CBA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-166-ss-3
part of: 166 After section 152CBA
note: Defines notional fixed period for a fixed principles term or condition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.155
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-166-ss-3-norm

152 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152-2
has part: 152(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 152(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.156

152(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-4
part of: 152 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Fixed principles term or condition ceases to be in operation when the undertaking ceases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Fixed principles term or condition is specified in a special access undertaking.
premise text: (a) a fixed principles term or condition is specified in a special access undertaking;
conclusion text: the fixed principles term or condition is specified in a special access undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Undertaking ceases to be in operation when the fixed principles term or condition ceases.
premise text: (b) the undertaking ceases to be in operation before the end of the notional fixed period for the fixed principles term or condition;
conclusion text: the undertaking ceases to be in operation when the fixed principles term or condition ceases.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Fixed principles term or condition can be included in a fresh undertaking.
premise text: (a) a fixed principles term or condition is specified in a special access undertaking;
conclusion text: a fresh undertaking can include an identical fixed principles term or condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5
part of: 152 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission must not reject other undertaking for specified reasons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.156
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotReject
logic summary: Commission obligation
premise text: Original undertaking accepted by Commission
conclusion text: Commission must not reject other undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Notional fixed periods overlap
premise text: Original and corresponding fixed principles terms have notional fixed periods that end at or before the same time
conclusion text: Notional fixed periods for original and corresponding fixed principles terms overlap
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustConsider
logic summary: Commission must consider submissions related to specified circumstances
premise text: Other undertaking contains qualifying circumstances
conclusion text: Commission must consider submissions related to corresponding fixed principles term or condition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-152-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotApply
logic summary: Paragraphs do not apply to specified conditions
premise text: Corresponding fixed principles term or condition is the only term or condition contained in other undertaking
conclusion text: Paragraphs 152CBD(2)(d) and (ii) do not apply to corresponding fixed principles term or condition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

154 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-154-2
note: Commission must not reject variation of undertaking under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-154-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-154-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-154-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 154 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-154-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must not reject variation
premise text: Qualifying circumstances exist
conclusion text: Commission must not reject
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

167 Before paragraph 152CBC(6)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-167
note: Compliance with notice under section 152CBDA is required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.158
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-167-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-167-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-167-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 167 Before paragraph 152CBC(6)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-167-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168 Paragraph 152CBC(6)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-168
note: Insertion of phrase after 'if'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.159
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-168-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-168-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-168-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of phrase
premise text: Paragraph (ac) does not apply
conclusion text: and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

169 After section 152CBC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-169
note: Amendments to Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.159
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-169-norm

156 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-156-2
note: Commission may refuse to consider another special access undertaking if it is materially similar to a previous one.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-156-2-norm

170 After paragraph 152CBD(2)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-170
note: Commission must be satisfied that conduct promotes long-term interests of end-users and terms and conditions are reasonable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 170 After paragraph 152CBD(2)(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to satisfy Commission's conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Classifies conduct as promoting long-term interests of end-users.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

171 At the end of section 152CBD
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-171
has part: 171(3) At the end of section 152CBD
has part: 171(4) At the end of section 152CBD
has part: 171(5) At the end of section 152CBD
has part: 171(6) At the end of section 152CBD
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.160

171(3) At the end of section 152CBD
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-171-ss-3
part of: 171 At the end of section 152CBD
note: Subsection (2) has effect subject to subsection 152CBAA(5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-3-norm

171(4) At the end of section 152CBD
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-171-ss-4
part of: 171 At the end of section 152CBD
note: Commission must refuse to accept undertaking if certain conditions not met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Commission prohibits acceptance of undertaking if conditions not met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

171(5) At the end of section 152CBD
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-171-ss-5
part of: 171 At the end of section 152CBD
note: Subsection (4) has effect subject to subsection 152CBAA(5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-5-norm

171(6) At the end of section 152CBD
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-171-ss-6
part of: 171 At the end of section 152CBD
note: Commission must publish special access undertaking under certain conditions.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.160
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 171(6) At the end of section 152CBD
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-171-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172 After section 152CBD
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-172
has part: 172(1) After section 152CBD
has part: 172(2) After section 152CBD
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.161

172(1) After section 152CBD
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-172-ss-1
part of: 172 After section 152CBD
note: Special access undertaking to the Commission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.161
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide a special access undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172(2) After section 152CBD
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-172-ss-2
part of: 172 After section 152CBD
note: Commission may give written notice stating variations to original undertaking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.161
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 172(2) After section 152CBD
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Commission has an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-158-2
has part: 158(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 158(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.162

158(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-3
part of: 158 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission must consider varied undertaking under section 152CBC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.162
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consider varied undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-4
part of: 158 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commission does not have a duty to consider giving a notice under subsection (2).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.162
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 158(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-158-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

173 After subsection 152CBG(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-173
note: Subsection (4) has effect subject to subsection 152CBAA(6)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.162
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-173-norm

174 After section 152CBI
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-174
note: Special access undertakings prevail over inconsistent access determinations and binding rules of conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.162
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-174-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-174-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-174-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-174-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
logic summary: Special access undertakings take precedence over inconsistent determinations and rules.
premise text: Access determination
conclusion text: Inconsistent with special access undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-174-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
logic summary: Special access undertakings override inconsistent binding rules of conduct.
premise text: Binding rules of conduct
conclusion text: Inconsistent with special access undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

175 Subsection 152CC(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-175
note: Omit “may”, substitute “is to”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-175-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-175-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-175-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits using 'may'
premise text: Omit ‘may’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘is to’
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176 Subsections 152CC(3), (4) and (5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-176
has part: 176(3) Subsections 152CC(3), (4) and (5)
has part: 176(4) Subsections 152CC(3), (4) and (5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163

176(3) Subsections 152CC(3), (4) and (5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-176-ss-3
part of: 176 Subsections 152CC(3), (4) and (5)
note: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 176(3) Subsections 152CC(3), (4) and (5)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
conclusion text: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176(4) Subsections 152CC(3), (4) and (5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-176-ss-4
part of: 176 Subsections 152CC(3), (4) and (5)
note: The Register is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-ss-4-norm

177 Sections 152CE, 152CF, 152CG and 152CGA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-177
note: Repeal sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-177-norm

178 Section 152CGB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-178
note: Repeal a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-178-norm

179 Subsection 152CH(1) (notes 1A, 1B, 2 and 3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179
note: Repeal notes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-179-norm

180 Subsection 152CH(1) (note 5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180
note: Repeal note and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-norm

181 Subsection 152CH(1) (note 6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-181
note: Repeal a note
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-181-norm

182 Subsection 152CI(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-182
note: Repeal subsection, substitute with provision having no effect to the extent of inconsistency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.163
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits provision with inconsistent Ministerial pricing determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

160 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-160-2
note: Inconsistent provision has no effect to the extent of inconsistency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-160-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-160-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-160-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of inconsistent provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

183 Subsection 152CJ(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-183
note: Omit “may”, substitute “is to”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-183-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-183-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-183-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits using 'may'
premise text: Omit ‘may’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘is to’
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184 Subsections 152CJ(3), (4) and (5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-184
has part: 184(3) Subsections 152CJ(3), (4) and (5)
has part: 184(4) Subsections 152CJ(3), (4) and (5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164

184(3) Subsections 152CJ(3), (4) and (5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-184-ss-3
part of: 184 Subsections 152CJ(3), (4) and (5)
note: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 184(3) Subsections 152CJ(3), (4) and (5)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
conclusion text: The Register must be made available for inspection on the Commission's website.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184(4) Subsections 152CJ(3), (4) and (5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-184-ss-4
part of: 184 Subsections 152CJ(3), (4) and (5)
note: The Register is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: The Register is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185 Division 8 of Part XIC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-185
note: Repeal Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-185-norm

186 Division 9 of Part XIC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-186
note: Repeal Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-186-norm

187 Paragraph 152EF(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-187-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-187-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-187-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the specified paragraph.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188 Subparagraph 152ELA(3)(a)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-188
note: Omit '152AT(1) or'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-188-norm

189 Subparagraph 152ELA(3)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-189
note: Omit “or” (last occurring)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-189-norm

190 Subparagraph 152ELA(3)(a)(iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-190
note: Repeal a subparagraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-190-norm

191 Paragraph 152ELA(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-191
note: Repeal paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.164
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-191-norm

192 Paragraph 152ELA(3)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-192
note: Omit “this Part;”, substitute “this Part.”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-192-norm

193 Paragraph 152ELA(3)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-193
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-193-norm

194 Subsections 152ELA(6) and (7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-194
note: Repeal subsections and substitute with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-194-norm

195 Before section 152EM
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-195
has part: 195(1) Before section 152EM
has part: 195(2) Before section 152EM
has part: 195(3) Before section 152EM
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.165

195(1) Before section 152EM
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-195-ss-1
part of: 195 Before section 152EM
note: Compensation for acquisition of property on just terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

195(2) Before section 152EM
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-195-ss-2
part of: 195 Before section 152EM
note: Person may institute proceedings for recovery of compensation if Commonwealth and person do not agree on amount.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 195(2) Before section 152EM
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

195(3) Before section 152EM
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-195-ss-3
part of: 195 Before section 152EM
note: Definitions and scope of Part 2 of Schedule 1 to the Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195-ss-3-norm

195A After section 152EO
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-195a
note: Amendments to Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.165
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-195a-norm

162 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-162-2
has part: 162(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 162(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 162(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 162(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.166

162(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1
part of: 162 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister must conduct a review of the operation of certain provisions before June 30, 2014.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 162(1) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the time period for the review
premise text: (1) Before 30 June 2014, the Minister must cause to be conducted a review of the operation of: (a) this Part; and (b) the remaining provisions of this Act so far as they relate to this Part.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the time period for the review
premise text: (1) Before 30 June 2014, the Minister must cause to be conducted a review of the operation of: (a) this Part; and (b) the remaining provisions of this Act so far as they relate to this Part.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty
premise text: (1) Before 30 June 2014, the Minister must cause to be conducted a review of the operation of: (a) this Part; and (b) the remaining provisions of this Act so far as they relate to this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-2
part of: 162 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Public consultation must be made during a review under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 162(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide public consultation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-3
part of: 162 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister must prepare report after review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 162(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to prepare report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-4
part of: 162 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister must table report in each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 162(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-162-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to table report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

196 Subsection 155AAA(21) (subparagraph (c)(i) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-196
note: Omit specific references from definition of protected information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-196-norm

197 Subsection 171B(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-197
note: Omit certain words from section headings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-197-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-197-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-197-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting words.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

198 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-198
note: Definitions for access agreement, access determination, and binding rules of conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.166
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-198-norm

199 Transitional—certificates under subclause 33(3) of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-199
note: Certificate effect after commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.167
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-199-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-199-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 199 Transitional—certificates under subclause 33(3) of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

200 Transitional—certificates under subclause 34(3) of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-200
note: Certificate effect after commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.167
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-200-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-200-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 200 Transitional—certificates under subclause 34(3) of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

201 Transitional—certificates under subclause 35(3) of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-201
note: Certificate effect after commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.167
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-201-norm

164 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-164-2
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-164-2-norm

202 Transitional—ordinary class exemptions from standard
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-202
note: Continues application of section 152AS despite repeal and amendment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-norm

203 Transitional—ordinary individual exemptions from
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-203
note: Continues application of section 152AT despite repeal and amendment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.168
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-203-norm

204 Transitional—ordinary access undertakings given to the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-204
note: Transitional provisions for ordinary access undertakings given to the Commission before 15 September 2009.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.169
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-logic-alleninterval-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: The undertaking must be in operation immediately before the commencement of this item.
premise text: This subitem has effect subject to the following subitems.
conclusion text: The undertaking cannot be varied so as to extend its duration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: The undertaking must adopt a set of model terms and conditions set out in the telecommunications access code.
premise text: (4)
conclusion text: If the undertaking adopts a set of model terms and conditions set out in the telecommunications access code, then, despite the repeal of sections 152BJ and 152BK of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010,
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: The undertaking must not be inconsistent with an access agreement.
premise text: (5)
conclusion text: If the undertaking is inconsistent with an access agreement, the undertaking has no effect to the extent of the inconsistency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The undertaking was in operation immediately before the commencement of this item.
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-166-2
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-166-2-norm

205 Transitional—ordinary access undertakings given to the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-205
note: Ordinary access undertaking given to Commission on or after 15 September 2009
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-205-norm

15 September 2009; and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15-6
note: The undertaking continues to apply despite repeals and amendments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.170
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 September 2009; and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continues
logic summary: The undertaking persists in spite of changes.
premise text: Repeals and amendments do not affect the undertaking.
conclusion text: The undertaking continues to apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal interval
logic summary: The undertaking ceases to have effect when the first access determination comes into force.
premise text: There is a temporal relationship between the undertaking and the access determination.
conclusion text: The undertaking's duration is tied to the access determination.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: If the undertaking adopts model terms and conditions, those sections continue to apply despite repeals.
premise text: There is a recurring relationship between the undertaking and the model terms.
conclusion text: The undertaking's effect is sustained by the model terms.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: The undertaking cannot be varied to extend its duration.
premise text: There is a prohibition on modifying the undertaking.
conclusion text: The undertaking's duration is fixed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

206 Transitional—continuity of special access undertakings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-206
note: Continuity of special access undertakings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.171
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the effect on the undertaking
premise text: The amendment does not affect the undertaking
conclusion text: The undertaking continues to exist
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

207 Transitional—arbitration of access disputes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-207
note: Continuation of Division, definition, and sections despite repeals and amendments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.171
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-207-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-207-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-207-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 207 Transitional—arbitration of access disputes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-207-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-168-2
note: No access dispute notification allowed under section 152CM of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.172
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-168-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-168-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-168-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 168 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-168-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: No access dispute notification allowed.
premise text: Section 152CM of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

170 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-170-2
note: Determination has no effect if inconsistent with binding rules of conduct or access agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.174
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-170-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits inconsistent determinations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

208 Transitional—compliance with standard access
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-208
note: Carrier or carriage service provider must comply with standard access obligations under specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.174
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-208-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-208-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-208-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 208 Transitional—compliance with standard access
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-208-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carrier or carriage service provider must comply with standard access obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-172-2
note: Terms and conditions about a particular matter must comply with the access determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 172 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-172-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

209 Transitional—hindering the fulfilment of an obligation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-209
note: Hindering the fulfilment of an obligation imposed by arbitration determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-209-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-209-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 209 Transitional—hindering the fulfilment of an obligation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

210 Transitional—regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-210
note: Governor-General may make regulations in relation to transitional matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.176
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-210-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-210-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-210-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Implies permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

211 At the end of section 151AF (before the note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-211
note: Add content services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.177
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-211-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-211-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-211-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: add
logic summary: Adds content services
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

212 Subsections 151AKA(9) and (10)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-212
note: Commission is not required to observe procedural fairness in relation to Part A competition notices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.177
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-212-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-212-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-212-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 212 Subsections 151AKA(9) and (10)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-212-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of procedural fairness observation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

213 Application—competition notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-213
note: Amendment of section 151AKA applies to Part A competition notices issued after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.177
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-213-norm

174 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-174-2
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.178
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-174-2-norm

214 Subsection 5(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-214
note: Definition of payphone carriage service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.178
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-cogai-6

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: payphone carriage service is a type of carriage service
conclusion text: carriage service is a subclass of payphone carriage service
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: payphone carriage service is supplied by means of a payphone during its operation
conclusion text: payphone operation is a temporal interval during which payphone carriage service is supplied
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Duty
premise text: payphone carriage service must be supplied by means of a payphone
conclusion text: means of a payphone must supply payphone carriage service
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Inference
premise text: payphone carriage service is supplied by means of a payphone
conclusion text: means of a payphone are sufficient to supply payphone carriage service
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: implies
logic summary: Propagation
premise text: payphone carriage service is supplied by means of a payphone
conclusion text: means of a payphone are sufficient to supply payphone carriage service
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-214-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: implies
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: payphone carriage service is supplied by means of a payphone
conclusion text: means of a payphone are sufficient to supply payphone carriage service
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

215 Subsection 5(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-215
note: Defines price-related terms and conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.178
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-215-norm

216 Subsection 5(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-216
note: Defines VOIP service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.178
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216-norm

216A Subparagraph 6(1)(b)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-216a
note: Omit specific term from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.178
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of a specific term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216B Subparagraph 6(1)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-216b
note: Omit 'teletypewriter' and substitute with a device that enables text-based communication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.178
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'teletypewriter'
premise text: Omit 'teletypewriter'
conclusion text: Substitute with a device that enables text-based communication.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Replacement
logic summary: Replaces 'teletypewriter' at the specified point in time.
premise text: Omit 'teletypewriter'
conclusion text: Substitute with a device that enables text-based communication.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Replacement
logic summary: Replaces 'teletypewriter' at the specified point in time.
premise text: Omit 'teletypewriter'
conclusion text: Substitute with a device that enables text-based communication.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal Replacement
logic summary: Replaces 'teletypewriter' at the specified point in time.
premise text: Omit 'teletypewriter'
conclusion text: Substitute with a device that enables text-based communication.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-216b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Temporal Replacement
logic summary: Replaces 'teletypewriter' at the specified point in time.
premise text: Omit 'teletypewriter'
conclusion text: Substitute with a device that enables text-based communication.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

217 After section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-217
note: Insert: ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 Amendments Schedule 1 Universal service regime Part 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.178
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-217-norm

6A When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6a
has part: 6A(1) When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
has part: 6A(2) When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
has part: 6A(3) When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.179

6A(1) When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1
part of: 6A When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
note: Service not taken to be supplied in fulfilment of universal service obligation unless notice given
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.179
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: NOT
logic summary: Service not taken to be supplied in fulfilment of universal service obligation unless notice given
premise text: (a) a standard telephone service is supplied, or proposed to be supplied, to a customer by a primary universal service provider; and (b) the service is: ...
conclusion text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, if: ...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Service not taken to be supplied in fulfilment of universal service obligation unless notice given
premise text: (a) a standard telephone service is supplied, or proposed to be supplied, to a customer by a primary universal service provider; and (b) the service is: ...
conclusion text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, if: ...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Service not taken to be supplied in fulfilment of universal service obligation unless notice given
premise text: (a) a standard telephone service is supplied, or proposed to be supplied, to a customer by a primary universal service provider; and (b) the service is: ...
conclusion text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, if: ...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Service not taken to be supplied in fulfilment of universal service obligation unless notice given
premise text: (a) a standard telephone service is supplied, or proposed to be supplied, to a customer by a primary universal service provider; and (b) the service is: ...
conclusion text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, if: ...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IF-THEN
logic summary: Service not taken to be supplied in fulfilment of universal service obligation unless notice given
premise text: (a) a standard telephone service is supplied, or proposed to be supplied, to a customer by a primary universal service provider; and (b) the service is: ...
conclusion text: (1) For the purposes of this Act, if: ...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6A(2) When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6a-ss-2
part of: 6A When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
note: Determine requirements for standard telephone service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.179
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to determine requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6A(3) When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3
part of: 6A When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
note: Customer must be given option to choose another standard telephone service before entering agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.179
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6A(3) When a standard telephone service is supplied in fulfilment of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide option to customer
premise text: Customer was given the option of being supplied with another standard telephone service.
conclusion text: The relevant service is taken not to be supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Customer must enter agreement before option expires
premise text: if, before the customer entered into an agreement with the primary universal service provider for the supply of the relevant service:
conclusion text: ...the customer was given the option of being supplied with another standard telephone service by the provider...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Option must be provided before agreement is entered
premise text: if, before the customer entered into an agreement with the primary universal service provider for the supply of the relevant service:
conclusion text: ...the customer was given the option of being supplied with another standard telephone service by the provider...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Provider must give option to customer
premise text: The primary universal service provider must supply another standard telephone service if the customer was given the option.
conclusion text: ...the relevant service is taken not to be supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Customer must choose another standard telephone service
premise text: If the customer was given the option, they must choose another standard telephone service.
conclusion text: ...the relevant service is taken not to be supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-176-2
note: Customer acknowledges that the relevant service is not supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 176 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: acknowledges
logic summary: Acknowledgement of non-supply
premise text: Customer acknowledges that the relevant service is not supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation.
conclusion text: Obligation fulfilled
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between notice and supply
premise text: The customer has, by written notice given to the provider, acknowledged that the relevant service is not supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation; and
conclusion text: Notice and supply occur within a temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered
logic summary: Ordered trace of notice and supply
premise text: The customer has, by written notice given to the provider, acknowledged that the relevant service is not supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation; and
conclusion text: Notice and supply occur in an ordered temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of notice to provider
premise text: The customer has, by written notice given to the provider, acknowledged that the relevant service is not supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation; and
conclusion text: Notice diffuses to provider
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-176-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognises
logic summary: Provider recognises notice from customer
premise text: The customer has, by written notice given to the provider, acknowledged that the relevant service is not supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation; and
conclusion text: Provider recognises notice from customer
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

218 After section 8B
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-218
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-218-norm

8BA Special meaning of standard telephone service
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8ba
has part: 8BA(1) Special meaning of standard telephone service
has part: 8BA(2) Special meaning of standard telephone service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180

8BA(1) Special meaning of standard telephone service
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8ba-ss-1
part of: 8BA Special meaning of standard telephone service
note: Defines standard telephone service as a reference to a specific service with specified characteristics.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8ba-ss-1-norm

8BA(2) Special meaning of standard telephone service
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8ba-ss-2
part of: 8BA Special meaning of standard telephone service
note: Minister may determine characteristics for standard telephone service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-8ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to determine characteristics
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219 Subsections 9(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-219
has part: 219(2) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
has part: 219(2A) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
has part: 219(2B) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
has part: 219(2C) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
has part: 219(2D) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
has part: 219(2E) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
has part: 219(3) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180

219(2) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-219-ss-2
part of: 219 Subsections 9(2) and (3)
note: Obligation to supply standard telephone services on request.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 219(2) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to supply standard telephone services on request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: Subclass of obligation to provide standard telephone services.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219(2A) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-219-ss-2a
part of: 219 Subsections 9(2) and (3)
note: Obligation to supply, install and maintain payphones in Australia.
description: payphones
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 219(2A) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to supply, install and maintain payphones in Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies payphones as a required service.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219(2B) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-219-ss-2b
part of: 219 Subsections 9(2) and (3)
note: Obligation to supply prescribed carriage services on request.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2b-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 219(2B) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to supply prescribed carriage services on request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: Subclass of obligation to supply prescribed carriage services.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219(2C) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c
part of: 219 Subsections 9(2) and (3)
note: Request for standard telephone service must comply with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 219(2C) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements.
premise text: Request for standard telephone service.
conclusion text: Compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During the supply of a standard telephone service, compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements is required.
premise text: Supply of a standard telephone service.
conclusion text: Compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: During the supply of a standard telephone service, compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements is required.
premise text: Supply of a standard telephone service.
conclusion text: Compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: During the supply of a standard telephone service, compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements is required.
premise text: Supply of a standard telephone service.
conclusion text: Compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: During the supply of a standard telephone service, compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements is required.
premise text: Supply of a standard telephone service.
conclusion text: Compliance with ComLaw Authoritative Act C2012C00891 requirements.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219(2D) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-219-ss-2d
part of: 219 Subsections 9(2) and (3)
note: Minister may determine requirements by legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to determine requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219(2E) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-219-ss-2e
part of: 219 Subsections 9(2) and (3)
note: No obligation arises for standard telephone service supply under specified circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2e-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2e-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 219(2E) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-2e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negation of obligation
premise text: (2E) An obligation does not arise...
conclusion text: No obligation arises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219(3) Subsections 9(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-219-ss-3
part of: 219 Subsections 9(2) and (3)
note: Minister may determine circumstances for subsection (2E) purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.180
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-219-ss-3-norm

220 Subsection 9(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-220
note: Substitute clause in subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-220-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-220-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 220 Subsection 9(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

221 Subsection 9(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-221
note: Substitute subsection (2B) for (1)(c)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-221-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-221-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 221 Subsection 9(5)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

222 Subsection 9(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-222
note: Substitute clause in subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-222-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-222-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 222 Subsection 9(6)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

223 Section 9A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-223
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-223-norm

9A Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9a
has part: 9A(1) Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services
has part: 9A(2) Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181

9A(1) Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9a-ss-1
part of: 9A Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services
note: Minister must determine what is necessary to ensure prescribed carriage services are reasonably accessible.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9A(1) Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Determine
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to determine what is necessary.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9A(2) Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9a-ss-2
part of: 9A Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services
note: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9A(2) Reasonable accessibility of prescribed carriage services
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-9a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of a legislative instrument
premise text: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: It is a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

224 Subsection 12C(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-224
note: Omit 'take all reasonable steps to'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-224-norm

225 After Subdivision B of Division 5 of Part 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-225
note: Amendments to Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.181
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-225-norm

178 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-178-2
note: Standard telephone service requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-178-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-178-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-178-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 178 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-178-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide standard telephone service
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EB Performance standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eb
has part: 12EB(1) Performance standards
has part: 12EB(2) Performance standards
has part: 12EB(3) Performance standards
has part: 12EB(4) Performance standards
has part: 12EB(5) Performance standards
has part: 12EB(6) Performance standards
has part: 12EB(7) Performance standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182

12EB(1) Performance standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-1
part of: 12EB Performance standards
note: The Minister may make a written determination setting out standards to be complied with by a primary universal service provider.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EB(1) Performance standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Minister may make a written determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EB(2) Performance standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-2
part of: 12EB Performance standards
note: A determination may be of general application or limited as provided.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EB(2) Performance standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

12EB(3) Performance standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3
part of: 12EB Performance standards
note: Compliance with subsection (2) does not limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EB(3) Performance standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Implication of compliance with subsection (2)
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not, by implication, limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
conclusion text: Compliance with subsection (2) does not limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Excludes
logic summary: Exclusion of compliance from other obligations
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not, by implication, limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
conclusion text: Compliance with subsection (2) is excluded from other obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of compliance with subsection (2)
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not, by implication, limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
conclusion text: Compliance with subsection (2) implies that subsection 33(3A) is not limited
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Overlap between compliance and subsection 33(3A)
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not, by implication, limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
conclusion text: Compliance with subsection (2) overlaps with subsection 33(3A)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Includes
logic summary: Inclusion of compliance in obligations
premise text: (3) Subsection (2) does not, by implication, limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
conclusion text: Compliance with subsection (2) is included in obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

12EB(4) Performance standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-4
part of: 12EB Performance standards
note: Primary universal service provider must comply with a standard in force under subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EB(4) Performance standards
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Primary universal service provider must comply with a standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EB(5) Performance standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-5
part of: 12EB Performance standards
note: Service supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EB(5) Performance standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Universal service obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EB(6) Performance standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6
part of: 12EB Performance standards
note: Exempts standard telephone service from this section if supplied in fulfilment of universal service obligation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EB(6) Performance standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts from the obligation.
premise text: The service is supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation.
conclusion text: This section does not apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The exemption overlaps with the standard telephone service provision.
premise text: The service is supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation.
conclusion text: This section does not apply to such services.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The exemption repeats with each standard telephone service provision.
premise text: The service is supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation.
conclusion text: This section does not apply to such services.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The exemption diffuses to other standard telephone services.
premise text: The service is supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation.
conclusion text: This section does not apply to such services.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The exemption recognizes standard telephone services supplied in fulfilment of universal service obligation.
premise text: The service is supplied in fulfilment of the universal service obligation.
conclusion text: This section applies to such services.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EB(7) Performance standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-7
part of: 12EB Performance standards
note: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.182
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of a legislative instrument
premise text: (7) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eb-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship of a legislative instrument
premise text: (7) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

12EC Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ec
note: Minister may make written determination setting standards for primary universal service providers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.183
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ec-norm

180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2
has part: 180(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 180(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184

180(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-2
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Determination may be of general application or limited as provided in the instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-2-norm

180(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-3
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Determination prevails over inconsistent instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: Determination
conclusion text: over inconsistent instruments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-4
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Instruments inconsistent with a determination have no effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits instruments inconsistent with a determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Performance benchmarks are a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Legislative instrument
premise text: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: Performance benchmarks are a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to performance benchmarks
premise text: (5) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument. Performance benchmarks
conclusion text: Performance benchmarks occur during the determination of a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to performance benchmarks
premise text: (5) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument. Performance benchmarks
conclusion text: Performance benchmarks occur during the determination of a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: is-a
logic summary: Definition of performance benchmark
premise text: (5) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument. Performance benchmarks
conclusion text: Performance benchmarks are defined as a type of determination.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is-a
logic summary: Definition of performance benchmark
premise text: (5) A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument. Performance benchmarks
conclusion text: Performance benchmarks are defined as a type of AI output.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

180(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-6
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Minister may set minimum benchmarks for compliance with a standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-7
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Instrument may be of general application or limited as provided in the instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-7-norm

180(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-8
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Must meet or exceed minimum benchmarks
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to meet minimum benchmarks
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-9
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Primary universal service provider must meet or exceed a minimum benchmark set by an instrument under subsection (6).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Primary universal service provider must meet or exceed a minimum benchmark.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-10
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Clause 1 of Schedule 1 to the Telecommunications Act 1997 does not apply to a contravention of a standard in force under subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-10-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-10-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 180(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

180(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-11
part of: 180 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Clause 1 of Schedule 2 to the Telecommunications Act 1997 does not apply to a contravention of a standard in force under subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.184
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-11-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-180-2-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12ED Performance standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ed
note: Minister may make written determination setting standards for payphone carriage service providers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.185
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ed-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ed-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ed-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12ED Performance standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ed-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Minister may make determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-182-2
has part: 182(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 182(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 182(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 182(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 182(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186

182(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-2
part of: 182 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: A determination under subsection (1) may be of general application or may be limited as provided in the determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 182(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

182(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3
part of: 182 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Compliance with subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 is not limited by subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 182(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Implication of limitation on subsection 33(3A)
premise text: Subsection (2) does not limit subsection 33(3A)
conclusion text: Compliance is not limited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between subsections
premise text: Subsection (2) and subsection 33(3A) have overlapping temporal scopes
conclusion text: No implication on compliance
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Repeating pattern of subsections
premise text: Subsection (2) and subsection 33(3A) have repeating patterns
conclusion text: No implication on compliance
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of implications
premise text: Implication of limitation on subsection 33(3A) is diffused to subsection (2)
conclusion text: Compliance is not limited
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of compliance as a concept
premise text: Compliance is recognized as a concept in the legislation
conclusion text: Compliance is not limited
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

182(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-4
part of: 182 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Primary universal service provider must comply with a determination under subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 182(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5
part of: 182 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Instruments inconsistent with a determination have no effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 182(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits instruments inconsistent with a determination.
premise text: (5) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent to which the instrument is inconsistent with a determination in force under subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Determination is a legislative instrument.
premise text: (5) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Determination is a legislative instrument.
premise text: (5) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Determination is a legislative instrument.
premise text: (5) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Implication
logic summary: Instruments inconsistent with a determination have no effect.
premise text: (5) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-6
part of: 182 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 182(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-182-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of legislative instrument
premise text: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: It is an obligation on the State to make such a determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

12EE Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ee
has part: 12EE(1) Performance benchmarks
has part: 12EE(2) Performance benchmarks
has part: 12EE(3) Performance benchmarks
has part: 12EE(4) Performance benchmarks
has part: 12EE(5) Performance benchmarks
has part: 12EE(6) Performance benchmarks
has part: 12EE(7) Performance benchmarks
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186

12EE(1) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-1
part of: 12EE Performance benchmarks
note: The Minister must set standards for primary universal service providers.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EE(1) Performance benchmarks
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must set standards.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EE(2) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-2
part of: 12EE Performance benchmarks
note: A determination may be of general application or limited as provided.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-2-norm

12EE(3) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-3
part of: 12EE Performance benchmarks
note: Determination prevails over inconsistent instruments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EE(3) Performance benchmarks
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EE(4) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4
part of: 12EE Performance benchmarks
note: Instruments inconsistent with a determination have no effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EE(4) Performance benchmarks
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Instrument inconsistency is prohibited.
premise text: (4) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent to which the instrument is inconsistent with a determination in force under subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Instrument inconsistency has no temporal impact.
premise text: (4) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent to which the instrument is inconsistent with a determination in force under subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Instrument inconsistency is not permitted.
premise text: (4) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent to which the instrument is inconsistent with a determination in force under subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Instrument inconsistency has no temporal relation.
premise text: (4) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent to which the instrument is inconsistent with a determination in force under subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Instrument inconsistency has no diffusion impact.
premise text: (4) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent to which the instrument is inconsistent with a determination in force under subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

12EE(5) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-5
part of: 12EE Performance benchmarks
note: Performance benchmarks must be determined
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EE(5) Performance benchmarks
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide performance benchmarks
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EE(6) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-6
part of: 12EE Performance benchmarks
note: Minister may set minimum benchmarks for compliance with a standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to set benchmarks
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EE(7) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-7
part of: 12EE Performance benchmarks
note: Instrument may be of general application or limited as provided in the instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.186
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ee-ss-7-norm

184 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-184-2
has part: 184(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 184(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 184(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 184(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188

184(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-8
part of: 184 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Must meet or exceed minimum benchmarks
description: minimum benchmarks
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to meet or exceed minimum benchmarks
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-9
part of: 184 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Primary universal service provider must meet or exceed a minimum benchmark.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 184(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to meet or exceed a minimum benchmark.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-10
part of: 184 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Clause 1 of Schedule 1 to the Telecommunications Act 1997 does not apply to a contravention of a standard in force under subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-10-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-10-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 184(10) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

184(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-11
part of: 184 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Clause 1 of Schedule 2 to the Telecommunications Act 1997 does not apply to a contravention of a standard in force under subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-11-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-184-2-ss-11-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 184(11) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

12EF Rules about the location of payphones
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ef
has part: 12EF(1) Rules about the location of payphones
has part: 12EF(2) Rules about the location of payphones
has part: 12EF(3) Rules about the location of payphones
has part: 12EF(4) Rules about the location of payphones
has part: 12EF(5) Rules about the location of payphones
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188

12EF(1) Rules about the location of payphones
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-1
part of: 12EF Rules about the location of payphones
note: Minister must make rules for payphone locations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EF(1) Rules about the location of payphones
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with rules.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EF(2) Rules about the location of payphones
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-2
part of: 12EF Rules about the location of payphones
note: Primary universal service provider must comply with a determination under subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EF(2) Rules about the location of payphones
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Primary universal service provider must comply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EF(3) Rules about the location of payphones
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3
part of: 12EF Rules about the location of payphones
note: Compliance with determination implies compliance with obligation to locate payphones.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EF(3) Rules about the location of payphones
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Obligation implies compliance.
premise text: (3) If a primary universal service provider complies with a determination under subsection (1), the provider is taken to have complied with an obligation under paragraph 9(1)(b) or subsection 9(2A),
conclusion text: the provider is taken to have complied with an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Compliance during determination implies obligation.
premise text: (3) If a primary universal service provider complies with a determination under subsection (1), the provider is taken to have complied with an obligation under paragraph 9(1)(b) or subsection 9(2A),
conclusion text: the provider is taken to have complied with an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Compliance during determination implies obligation.
premise text: (3) If a primary universal service provider complies with a determination under subsection (1), the provider is taken to have complied with an obligation under paragraph 9(1)(b) or subsection 9(2A),
conclusion text: the provider is taken to have complied with an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EF(4) Rules about the location of payphones
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-4
part of: 12EF Rules about the location of payphones
note: Instruments inconsistent with a determination have no effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EF(4) Rules about the location of payphones
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inconsistentWith
logic summary: Obligation violation
premise text: (4)
conclusion text: (a) or (b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EF(5) Rules about the location of payphones
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-5
part of: 12EF Rules about the location of payphones
note: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.188
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-5-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ef-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EF(5) Rules about the location of payphones
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

12EG Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eg
has part: 12EG(1) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
has part: 12EG(2) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
has part: 12EG(3) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
has part: 12EG(4) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.189

12EG(1) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-1
part of: 12EG Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
note: Minister must make rules for public consultation on payphone location
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.189
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EG(1) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must make rules
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EG(2) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-2
part of: 12EG Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
note: Minister must ensure public consultation on payphone removal
description: Notification of process outcome
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.189
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EG(2) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to ensure public consultation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EG(3) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-3
part of: 12EG Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
note: Primary universal service provider must comply with a determination under subsection (1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.189
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EG(3) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Primary universal service provider must comply with a determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EG(4) Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-4
part of: 12EG Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
note: Rules about the process for public consultation on the location
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.189
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eg-ss-4-norm

186 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-186-2
note: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.190
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-186-2-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-186-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

12EH Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eh
has part: 12EH(1) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
has part: 12EH(2) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
has part: 12EH(3) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
has part: 12EH(4) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.190

12EH(1) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-1
part of: 12EH Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
note: Minister may make rules for resolution of complaints about payphones.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.190
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EH(1) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EH(2) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-2
part of: 12EH Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
note: Primary universal service provider must comply with a determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.190
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EH(2) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EH(3) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3
part of: 12EH Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
note: Instruments inconsistent with a determination have no effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.190
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits instruments inconsistent with a determination.
premise text: (3) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;
conclusion text: has no effect to the extent to which the instrument is inconsistent with a determination in force under subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Instruments may overlap with determinations.
premise text: (3) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Instruments may contain determinations.
premise text: (3) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Instruments diffuse to determinations.
premise text: (3) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: Instruments infer determinations.
premise text: (3) Each of the following instruments: (a) an approved policy statement for a primary universal service provider; (b) an approved standard marketing plan for a primary universal service provider;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EH(4) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-4
part of: 12EH Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
note: A determination under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.190
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-4-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12eh-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EH(4) Rules about the process for resolution of complaints about the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

12EI Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ei
has part: 12EI(1) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
has part: 12EI(2) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
has part: 12EI(3) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
has part: 12EI(4) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
has part: 12EI(5) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
has part: 12EI(6) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
has part: 12EI(7) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.191

12EI(1) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-1
part of: 12EI Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
note: ACMA must direct removal of payphone if objections are notified and breach determination is found.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.191
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EI(1) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA must direct removal of payphone.
premise text: Notification of objections and breach determination found.
conclusion text: Direction given.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Removal of payphone must be after breach determination found.
premise text: Breach determination found.
conclusion text: Removal of payphone must occur after breach determination found.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EI(2) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-2
part of: 12EI Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
note: ACMA may direct provider not to remove payphone from location.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.191
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Directive obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EI(3) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-3
part of: 12EI Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
note: ACMA may direct provider to supply and install payphone within specified period.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.191
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EI(3) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Directive obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EI(4) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4
part of: 12EI Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
note: Minimum notice period for removal of payphones
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.191
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EI(4) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition on short notice periods
premise text: (4) A period specified under paragraph (3)(b) must not be shorter than 30 days after the notice is given.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between notice periods and removal of payphones
premise text: (4) A period specified under paragraph (3)(b) must not be shorter than 30 days after the notice is given.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between notice periods and removal of payphones
premise text: (4) A period specified under paragraph (3)(b) must not be shorter than 30 days after the notice is given.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between notice periods and removal of payphones
premise text: (4) A period specified under paragraph (3)(b) must not be shorter than 30 days after the notice is given.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between notice periods and removal of payphones
premise text: (4) A period specified under paragraph (3)(b) must not be shorter than 30 days after the notice is given.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EI(5) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-5
part of: 12EI Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
note: Must comply with a determination under subsection 12EF(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.191
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must not
logic summary: Prohibition on inconsistent directions
premise text: (2) or (3)
conclusion text: 12EF(1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

12EI(6) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-6
part of: 12EI Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
note: Primary universal service providers must comply with ACMA directions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.191
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12EI(6) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12EI(7) Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-7
part of: 12EI Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones
note: Directions by the ACMA about the removal of payphones are not legislative instruments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.191
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-12ei-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of directions by the ACMA
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-188-2
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-188-2-norm

226 Subsection 150(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-226
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.192
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-226-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-226-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-226-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: REPEAL
logic summary: Repeal subsection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

227 Before section 113
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-227
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.193
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-227-norm

228 Section 113
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-228
note: Minister may make performance standards and set minimum benchmarks.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.193
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-228-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-228-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-228-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 228 Section 113
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-228-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

229 After section 114
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-229
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.193
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-229-norm

114A Wholesale carriage service and wholesale customer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-114a
note: Carriage service provider must supply carriage service to another provider
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.193
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 114A Wholesale carriage service and wholesale customer
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-114a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

190 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-190-2
note: Second provider must be a wholesale customer of the first provider.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-190-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-190-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-190-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 190 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-190-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

230 After subsection 115(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-230
note: No standard applies to wholesale carriage services.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-230-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-230-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-230-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Prohibition on standard application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

231 Subsections 115(5) and (6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-231
note: Repeal subsections and substitute with new definitions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-231-norm

232 After section 117A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-232
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-232-norm

117B Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117b
has part: 117B(1) Performance benchmarks
has part: 117B(2) Performance benchmarks
has part: 117B(3) Performance benchmarks
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.194

117B(1) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117b-ss-1
part of: 117B Performance benchmarks
note: The Minister may set minimum benchmarks for carriage service providers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to set benchmarks
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117B(2) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117b-ss-2
part of: 117B Performance benchmarks
note: Instrument may be of general application or limited as provided in the instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117b-ss-2-norm

117B(3) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117b-ss-3
part of: 117B Performance benchmarks
note: Does not limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 by implication.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.194
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: DoesNotImply
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Subsection (2)
conclusion text: Subsection (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117C Compliance with performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117c
has part: 117C(1) Compliance with performance benchmarks
has part: 117C(2) Compliance with performance benchmarks
has part: 117C(3) Compliance with performance benchmarks
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.195

117C(1) Compliance with performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117c-ss-1
part of: 117C Compliance with performance benchmarks
note: Must meet or exceed minimum benchmark
description: Performance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.195
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to meet performance benchmarks
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117C(2) Compliance with performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117c-ss-2
part of: 117C Compliance with performance benchmarks
note: Must meet or exceed a minimum benchmark set by the instrument.
description: Performance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.195
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 117C(2) Compliance with performance benchmarks
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must meet or exceed a minimum benchmark.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117C(3) Compliance with performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3
part of: 117C Compliance with performance benchmarks
note: Exempts first provider from contravening a standard if another carriage service provider is responsible for the contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.195
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 117C(3) Compliance with performance benchmarks
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts first provider from obligation to comply with standard.
premise text: (3) For the purposes of determining whether the first provider has met or exceeded a minimum benchmark set by the instrument...
conclusion text: The first provider is taken not to have contravened the standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Indicates overlap between two temporal intervals: the benchmark period and the standard enforcement period.
premise text: (3) For the purposes of determining whether the first provider has met or exceeded a minimum benchmark set by the instrument...
conclusion text: The benchmark period overlaps with the standard enforcement period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Indicates recurring trace between two events: the contravention and the exemption.
premise text: (3) For the purposes of determining whether the first provider has met or exceeded a minimum benchmark set by the instrument...
conclusion text: The contravention and exemption are part of a recurring pattern.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Indicates diffusion of responsibility from one provider to another.
premise text: (b) the contravention is wholly or partly attributable to one or more acts or omissions of another carriage service provider;
conclusion text: The first provider's responsibility is diffused to another provider.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Indicates inference from the definition of 'standard' to the meaning of 'contravention'
premise text: (a) the first provider has contravened a standard in force under section 115;
conclusion text: The first provider's act is a contravention if it meets the definition of 'standard'
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117D Performance standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117d
has part: 117D(1) Performance standards
has part: 117D(2) Performance standards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.195

117D(1) Performance standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117d-ss-1
part of: 117D Performance standards
note: Minister may make standards for wholesale carriage services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.195
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 117D(1) Performance standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to comply with standards
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117D(2) Performance standards
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117d-ss-2
part of: 117D Performance standards
note: A standard under this section may be of general application or may be limited as provided in the standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.195
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 117D(2) Performance standards
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

192 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-192-2
note: Does not limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-192-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-192-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-192-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: DoesNotImply
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Subsection (2)
conclusion text: Subsection (3A)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117E Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117e
has part: 117E(1) Performance benchmarks
has part: 117E(2) Performance benchmarks
has part: 117E(3) Performance benchmarks
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196

117E(1) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117e-ss-1
part of: 117E Performance benchmarks
note: Minister may set minimum benchmarks for carriage service providers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to set benchmarks
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117E(2) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117e-ss-2
part of: 117E Performance benchmarks
note: Instrument may be of general application or limited as provided in the instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117e-ss-2-norm

117E(3) Performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117e-ss-3
part of: 117E Performance benchmarks
note: Does not limit subsection 33(3A) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117e-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: DoesNotImply
logic summary: Negative implication
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: (3A)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117F Compliance with performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117f
has part: 117F(1) Compliance with performance benchmarks
has part: 117F(2) Compliance with performance benchmarks
has part: 117F(3) Compliance with performance benchmarks
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196

117F(1) Compliance with performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117f-ss-1
part of: 117F Compliance with performance benchmarks
note: Provider must meet or exceed minimum benchmark
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 117F(1) Compliance with performance benchmarks
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117F(2) Compliance with performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117f-ss-2
part of: 117F Compliance with performance benchmarks
note: Must meet or exceed a minimum benchmark set by the instrument.
description: Performance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 117F(2) Compliance with performance benchmarks
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must meet or exceed a minimum benchmark.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117F(3) Compliance with performance benchmarks
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117f-ss-3
part of: 117F Compliance with performance benchmarks
note: Exempts first provider from contravening standard if another provider is partly responsible.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 117F(3) Compliance with performance benchmarks
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-117f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts first provider from contravening standard.
premise text: First provider has contravened a standard.
conclusion text: First provider is not considered to have contravened the standard.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

233 At the end of subsection 118(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-233
note: Add “or 117D”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.196
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-233-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-233-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-233-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 233 At the end of subsection 118(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-233-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adding to a list.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

234 At the end of paragraph 118(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-234
note: Add 'or 117D'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-234-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-234-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-234-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adding to a list
premise text: The list must be updated.
conclusion text: Add 'or 117D'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

235 Subsection 120(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-235
has part: 235(4) Subsection 120(4)
has part: 235(5) Subsection 120(4)
has part: 235(6) Subsection 120(4)
has part: 235(7) Subsection 120(4)
has part: 235(8) Subsection 120(4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197

235(4) Subsection 120(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-235-ss-4
part of: 235 Subsection 120(4)
note: Waiver must be in the specified form.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to specify waiver form.
premise text: (4) A waiver must be in the form specified in the instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

235(5) Subsection 120(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-235-ss-5
part of: 235 Subsection 120(4)
note: The form must include a statement that summarises the consequences of the waiver.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 235(5) Subsection 120(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a statement
conclusion text: The form must include a statement that summarises the consequences of the waiver.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

235(6) Subsection 120(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-235-ss-6
part of: 235 Subsection 120(4)
note: Waiver cannot be set out in a standard form of agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on waiver
premise text: (6) A waiver must not be set out in a standard form of agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

235(7) Subsection 120(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-235-ss-7
part of: 235 Subsection 120(4)
note: Customer cannot waive protection and rights under Part in relation to a particular standard telephone service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 235(7) Subsection 120(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on waiving protection and rights
premise text: Universal service obligation
conclusion text: Customer's protection and rights under Part
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

235(8) Subsection 120(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-235-ss-8
part of: 235 Subsection 120(4)
note: An instrument under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 235(8) Subsection 120(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-235-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of a legislative instrument
premise text: (8) An instrument under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: An instrument under subsection (1) is a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

236 After section 120
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-236
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-236-norm

120A Carriage service may be supplied on condition that the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-120a
note: Customer waives protection and rights under this Part in relation to the carriage service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-120a-norm

237 Section 122
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-237
note: Insert 'or 117D' after '115'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.197
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-237-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-237-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-237-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-194-2
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.198
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-194-2-norm

238 After section 122
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-238
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.198
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-238-norm

122A Failure to meet or exceed a minimum benchmark is not an
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-122a
note: Failure to meet or exceed a minimum benchmark is not an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.198
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-122a-norm

239 At the end of section 123 (before the note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-239
note: Add 'or 117D'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.198
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-239-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-239-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-239-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adding to a list
premise text: The list contains 'or 117C'
conclusion text: The list now contains 'or 117D'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

240 Application—waiver
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-240
note: Amendments apply in relation to a waiver given after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.198
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-240-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-240-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-240-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 240 Application—waiver
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-240-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

241 After subsection 529(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-241
has part: 241(2A) After subsection 529(2)
has part: 241(2B) After subsection 529(2)
has part: 241(2C) After subsection 529(2)
has part: 241(2D) After subsection 529(2)
has part: 241(2E) After subsection 529(2)
has part: 241(2F) After subsection 529(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.199

241(2A) After subsection 529(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-241-ss-2a
part of: 241 After subsection 529(2)
note: Carriers or carriage service providers must prepare reports.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 241(2A) After subsection 529(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide reports
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

241(2B) After subsection 529(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-241-ss-2b
part of: 241 After subsection 529(2)
note: Carriers or carriage service providers must give reports to ACMA.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 241(2B) After subsection 529(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

241(2C) After subsection 529(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-241-ss-2c
part of: 241 After subsection 529(2)
note: Rules for report preparation manner and form
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 241(2C) After subsection 529(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to specify rules for report preparation
premise text: (2C) The rules may specify the manner and form in which reports are to be prepared.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

241(2D) After subsection 529(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-241-ss-2d
part of: 241 After subsection 529(2)
note: Rules may require preparation of reports as and when required by ACMA or at specified intervals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2d-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 241(2D) After subsection 529(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Obligation to prepare reports
premise text: Rules may provide for...
conclusion text: ...the preparation of reports as and when required by the ACMA;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2d-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: REGULAR
logic summary: Reports must be prepared at regular intervals
premise text: or at specified intervals.
conclusion text: ...at regular intervals as are specified in the rules.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

241(2E) After subsection 529(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-241-ss-2e
part of: 241 After subsection 529(2)
note: Report prepared in accordance with rules may be given to ACMA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2e-norm

241(2F) After subsection 529(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-241-ss-2f
part of: 241 After subsection 529(2)
note: No limitation on subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-241-ss-2f-norm

242 Paragraphs 529(4)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-242
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with ACMA's telecommunications functions or powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.199
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-242-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-242-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-242-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 242 Paragraphs 529(4)(a) and (b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-242-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace existing paragraphs with new obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

196 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-196-2
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.200
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-196-2-norm

243 At the end of section 529
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-243
note: Section 529 does not limit ACMA's general information-gathering powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.200
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-243-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-243-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 243 At the end of section 529
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

244 Transitional—record-keeping rules
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-244
note: Amendments do not affect record-keeping rules continuity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.200
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-244-norm

245 At the end of Schedule 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-245
note: Add at the end of Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.201
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-245-norm

16 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-7
note: Must inform prospective customer of non-priority assistance and alternative providers.
description: Information about priority assistance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.201
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-16-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of non-compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

198 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-198-2
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.202
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-198-2-norm

17 Priority assistance industry code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17-2
note: Defines priority assistance industry code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.202
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-17-2-norm

18 Compliance with the priority assistance industry code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-3
note: Compliance with priority assistance industry code is mandatory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.202
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-3-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Compliance with the priority assistance industry code
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory compliance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-18-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal applicability
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

19 Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19-2
has part: 19(1) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
has part: 19(2) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
has part: 19(3) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.202

19(1) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-1
part of: 19 Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
note: Carriage service provider must offer priority assistance if requested by prospective residential customer.
description: Priority assistance in connection with standard telephone service supply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.202
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(1) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide priority assistance
premise text: Request for priority assistance
conclusion text: Obligation to provide priority assistance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(2) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-2
part of: 19 Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
note: Provider must inform prospective residential customer of priority assistance options.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.202
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(2) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Provider must inform prospective residential customer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(3) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-3
part of: 19 Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
note: Priority assistance has the same meaning as in the priority assistance industry code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.202
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(3) Information for prospective residential customers of a carriage
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-19-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of priority assistance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Requirements for Telstra
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-3
note: No requirement imposed on Telstra if clause 19 of Carrier Licence Conditions Declaration 1997 is in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.203
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from requirement
premise text: Clause 19 of Carrier Licence Conditions Declaration 1997 is in force.
conclusion text: No requirement imposed on Telstra.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between clause 19 and the Part
premise text: Clause 19 of Carrier Licence Conditions Declaration 1997 is during the force of the Part.
conclusion text: The Part does not impose a requirement on Telstra if clause 19 is in force.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Permission to exempt from requirement
premise text: The Part permits exemption from the requirement if clause 19 of Carrier Licence Conditions Declaration 1997 is in force.
conclusion text: No requirement imposed on Telstra if clause 19 is in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-20-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemption from requirement
premise text: The Part does not impose a requirement on Telstra if clause 19 of Carrier Licence Conditions Declaration 1997 is in force.
conclusion text: No requirement imposed on Telstra.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

200 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-200-2
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.204
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-200-2-norm

246 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-246
note: Definition of authorised infringement notice officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.204
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-246-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-246-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-246-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-246-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-246-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

247 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-247
note: Definition of infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.204
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-247-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-247-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-247-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-247-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a key term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-247-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

248 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-248
note: Definition of penalty unit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.204
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-248-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-248-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-248-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 248 Section 7
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-248-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines term
conclusion text: penalty unit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

249 After Part 31A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-249
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.204
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-249-norm

572D Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572d
note: Infringement notices for contraventions of civil penalty provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.204
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572d-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 572D Simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Establishes an obligation to issue infringement notices.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572E When an infringement notice can be given
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572e
has part: 572E(1) When an infringement notice can be given
has part: 572E(2) When an infringement notice can be given
has part: 572E(3) When an infringement notice can be given
has part: 572E(4) When an infringement notice can be given
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.205

572E(1) When an infringement notice can be given
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1
part of: 572E When an infringement notice can be given
note: Authorized infringement notice officer may give an infringement notice to a person who has contravened a civil penalty provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.205
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 572E(1) When an infringement notice can be given
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: May give an infringement notice
premise text: Authorized infringement notice officer has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened a civil penalty provision.
conclusion text: The authorized infringement notice officer may give an infringement notice to the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Must give an infringement notice if reasonable grounds exist
premise text: If an authorized infringement notice officer has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened a civil penalty provision, the authorized infringement notice officer may give to the person an infringement notice.
conclusion text: The authorized infringement notice officer must give an infringement notice to the person if he or she has reasonable grounds to believe that a person has contravened a civil penalty provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: can
logic summary: Can issue an infringement notice based on reasonable grounds
premise text: The authorized infringement notice officer may give to the person an infringement notice relating to the contravention if he or she has reasonable grounds.
conclusion text: The authorized infringement notice officer can issue an infringement notice to the person based on his or her reasonable grounds.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: must
logic summary: Must give an infringement notice within a time limit
premise text: If an authorized infringement notice officer has reasonable grounds to believe that a person has contravened a civil penalty provision, the authorized infringement notice officer may give to the person an infringement notice relating to the contravention.
conclusion text: The authorized infringement notice officer must give an infringement notice to the person within a time limit if he or she has reasonable grounds to believe that a person has contravened a civil penalty provision.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Authorized infringement notice officer can give an infringement notice
premise text: If an authorized infringement notice officer has reasonable grounds to believe that a person has contravened a civil penalty provision, the authorized infringement notice officer may give to the person an infringement notice.
conclusion text: The authorized infringement notice officer can give an infringement notice to the person if he or she has reasonable grounds to believe that a person has contravened a civil penalty provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572E(2) When an infringement notice can be given
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572e-ss-2
part of: 572E When an infringement notice can be given
note: Infringement notice must be given within 12 months after the day on which the contravention is alleged to have taken place.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.205
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 572E(2) When an infringement notice can be given
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572E(3) When an infringement notice can be given
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572e-ss-3
part of: 572E When an infringement notice can be given
note: No infringement notice can be given for contravention of section 68 or 101.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.205
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 572E(3) When an infringement notice can be given
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: No infringement notice can be given
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572E(4) When an infringement notice can be given
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572e-ss-4
part of: 572E When an infringement notice can be given
note: Infringement notice can be given for certain contraventions of carrier licence conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.205
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 572E(4) When an infringement notice can be given
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits certain conduct.
premise text: (4) If...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572e-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between infringement notice and contraventions.
premise text: (4) If...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

202 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-202-2
has part: 202(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 202(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 202(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.206

202(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-5
part of: 202 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: No infringement notice can be given if the provision is a listed infringement notice provision and has been so for at least 3 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.206
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 202(5) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: No infringement notice can be given.
premise text: The provision is a listed infringement notice provision and has been so for at least 3 months.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

202(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-6
part of: 202 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: No infringement notice can be given unless the other provision has been a listed infringement notice provision for at least 3 months before the contravention is alleged to have taken place.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.206
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 202(6) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No infringement notice can be given.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

202(7) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7
part of: 202 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Declaration of listed infringement notice provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.206
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permits
logic summary: Declares a provision as permitted
premise text: (7) The ACMA may, by legislative instrument...
conclusion text: a specified provision of this Act; or ... is a listed infringement notice provision for the purposes of this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Declares a temporal interval during which a provision applies
premise text: (7) The ACMA may, by legislative instrument...
conclusion text: a specified provision of this Act; or ... is a listed infringement notice provision for the purposes of this section.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Declares a temporal interval during which a provision applies
premise text: (7) The ACMA may, by legislative instrument...
conclusion text: a specified provision of this Act; or ... is a listed infringement notice provision for the purposes of this section.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Declares a provision that can be applied through a declaration
premise text: (7) The ACMA may, by legislative instrument...
conclusion text: a specified provision of this Act; or ... is a listed infringement notice provision for the purposes of this section.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-202-2-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: through
logic summary: Declares a provision that can be applied through a determination
premise text: (7) The ACMA may, by legislative instrument...
conclusion text: a specified provision of this Act; or ... is a listed infringement notice provision for the purposes of this section.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

204 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-204-2
has part: 204(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 204(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.208

204(8) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-8
part of: 204 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Publish notice and consider submissions before making or varying a declaration.
description: Submissions to the ACMA within 14 days after publication of the notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.208
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish and consider submissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

204(9) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-9
part of: 204 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Includes specified Acts and regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.208
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Includes specified Acts and regulations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-204-2-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: specified Acts and regulations
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572F Matters to be included in an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572f
has part: 572F(1) Matters to be included in an infringement notice
has part: 572F(2) Matters to be included in an infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.208

572F(1) Matters to be included in an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572f-ss-1
part of: 572F Matters to be included in an infringement notice
note: Infringement notice must contain specific details and information.
description: (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.208
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide specific information.
premise text: (a) set out the name of the person to whom the notice is given;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide explanation for payment.
premise text: (e) give an explanation of how payment of the penalty is to be made;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND
logic summary: Multiple obligations in a single provision.
premise text: (a), (b), (c), (d), (e)
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572F(2) Matters to be included in an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2
part of: 572F Matters to be included in an infringement notice
note: Must provide specific information in an infringement notice
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.208
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 572F(2) Matters to be included in an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide specific information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Contains temporal interval
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(c), the brief details must include...
conclusion text: ...the date of the alleged contravention;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Contains trace
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(c), the brief details must include...
conclusion text: ...the civil penalty provision that was allegedly contravened.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572f-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Contains information about infringement notice
premise text: (2) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(c), the brief details must include...
conclusion text: ...the following information in relation to the alleged contravention:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

572G Amount of penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572g
has part: 572G(1) Amount of penalty
has part: 572G(2) Amount of penalty
has part: 572G(3) Amount of penalty
has part: 572G(4) Amount of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.209

572G(1) Amount of penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572g-ss-1
part of: 572G Amount of penalty
note: Specify pecuniary penalty for infringement notice
description: Number of penalty units
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.209
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 572G(1) Amount of penalty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Specify pecuniary penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class
logic summary: Relation to determination
premise text: Determination under subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572G(2) Amount of penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572g-ss-2
part of: 572G Amount of penalty
note: Determination of contraventions and penalty units
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.209
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: sets out
logic summary: Defining contraventions
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572G(3) Amount of penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572g-ss-3
part of: 572G Amount of penalty
note: Maximum penalty units per contravention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.209
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 572G(3) Amount of penalty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Penalty units must not exceed
premise text: Determination for a particular kind of contravention
conclusion text: 18,000 penalty units
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Specifics the maximum penalty units
premise text: Section 3 of subsection 572G
conclusion text: 18,000
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572G(4) Amount of penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572g-ss-4
part of: 572G Amount of penalty
note: Penalty amount must be a pecuniary penalty equal to 12 penalty units.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.209
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 572G(4) Amount of penalty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Equality of penalty amount
premise text: (4) The penalty to be specified in an infringement notice given to a person other than a body corporate must be a pecuniary penalty equal to 12 penalty units.
conclusion text: (4) The penalty to be specified in an infringement notice given to a person other than a body corporate must be a pecuniary penalty equal to 12 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572g-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Equality of penalty amount
premise text: (4) The penalty to be specified in an infringement notice given to a person other than a body corporate must be a pecuniary penalty equal to 12 penalty units.
conclusion text: (4) The penalty to be specified in an infringement notice given to a person other than a body corporate must be a pecuniary penalty equal to 12 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572H Withdrawal of an infringement notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572h
note: Scope of withdrawal of an infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.209
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572h-norm

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572h-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 572H Withdrawal of an infringement notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

206 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-206-2
has part: 206(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 206(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
has part: 206(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210

206(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-2
part of: 206 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Withdrawal of infringement notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 206(2) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Authorized officer can withdraw notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

206(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-3
part of: 206 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Withdrawal notice must be given within 28 days after infringement notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 206(3) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide withdrawal notice within 28 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

206(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4
part of: 206 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
note: Commonwealth liable to refund penalty if infringement notice withdrawn after payment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 206(4) Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on Commonwealth to refund penalty.
premise text: (4) If the penalty specified in the infringement notice is paid; and (b) the infringement notice is withdrawn after the penalty is paid;
conclusion text: the Commonwealth is liable to refund the penalty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for liability.
premise text: (4) If: (a) the penalty specified in the infringement notice is paid; and (b) the infringement notice is withdrawn after the penalty is paid;
conclusion text: the Commonwealth is liable to refund the penalty.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Defines recurring liability for refund.
premise text: (4) If: (a) the penalty specified in the infringement notice is paid; and (b) the infringement notice is withdrawn after the penalty is paid;
conclusion text: the Commonwealth is liable to refund the penalty.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Defines diffusion of liability.
premise text: (4) If: (a) the penalty specified in the infringement notice is paid; and (b) the infringement notice is withdrawn after the penalty is paid;
conclusion text: the Commonwealth is liable to refund the penalty.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-206-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inferential
logic summary: Defines inferential relationship between Commonwealth and refund.
premise text: (4) If: (a) the penalty specified in the infringement notice is paid; and (b) the infringement notice is withdrawn after the penalty is paid;
conclusion text: the Commonwealth is liable to refund the penalty.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572J What happens if the penalty is paid
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572j
has part: 572J(1) What happens if the penalty is paid
has part: 572J(2) What happens if the penalty is paid
has part: 572J(3) What happens if the penalty is paid
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210

572J(1) What happens if the penalty is paid
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572j-ss-1
part of: 572J What happens if the penalty is paid
note: Payment of penalty triggers obligation to comply with infringement notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 572J(1) What happens if the penalty is paid
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation triggered by payment of penalty.
premise text: (1) This section applies if:...
conclusion text: ...the infringement notice is not withdrawn.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Payment of penalty occurs during infringement notice period.
premise text: (1) This section applies if:...
conclusion text: ...and (c) the infringement notice is not withdrawn.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572J(2) What happens if the penalty is paid
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572j-ss-2
part of: 572J What happens if the penalty is paid
note: Liability is discharged upon payment of the penalty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: discharge
logic summary: Obligation discharge
premise text: (2) Any liability of the person for the alleged contravention is discharged.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572J(3) What happens if the penalty is paid
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3
part of: 572J What happens if the penalty is paid
note: Prevents bringing proceedings under Part 31 against the person for alleged contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prevents bringing proceedings
premise text: (3) Proceedings under Part 31 may not be brought against the person for the alleged contravention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval during which proceedings are prohibited
premise text: (3) Proceedings under Part 31 may not be brought against the person for the alleged contravention.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Defines a recurring prohibition on bringing proceedings
premise text: (3) Proceedings under Part 31 may not be brought against the person for the alleged contravention.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Spreads the prohibition to all persons within a certain scope
premise text: (3) Proceedings under Part 31 may not be brought against the person for the alleged contravention.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572j-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Identifies the prohibition as a rule of conduct
premise text: (3) Proceedings under Part 31 may not be brought against the person for the alleged contravention.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572K Effect of this Part on civil proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572k
note: Does not require an infringement notice to be given in relation to an alleged contravention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.210
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572k-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572k-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572k-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 572K Effect of this Part on civil proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negation of a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572L Appointment of authorised infringement notice officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572l
has part: 572L(1) Appointment of authorised infringement notice officer
has part: 572L(2) Appointment of authorised infringement notice officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.211

572L(1) Appointment of authorised infringement notice officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572l-ss-1
part of: 572L Appointment of authorised infringement notice officer
note: Appointment of authorised infringement notice officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.211
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572l-ss-1-norm

572L(2) Appointment of authorised infringement notice officer
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572l-ss-2
part of: 572L Appointment of authorised infringement notice officer
note: ACMA must not appoint a person under subsection (1) unless the person meets certain qualifications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.211
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572l-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of appointment without qualifications.
premise text: ACMA must appoint a person under subsection (1)
conclusion text: The ACMA may not appoint a person unless the person meets certain qualifications.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

572M Guidelines relating to infringement notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572m
has part: 572M(1) Guidelines relating to infringement notices
has part: 572M(2) Guidelines relating to infringement notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.211

572M(1) Guidelines relating to infringement notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572m-ss-1
part of: 572M Guidelines relating to infringement notices
note: Must regard relevant guidelines in exercising power.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.211
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572m-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572m-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 572M(1) Guidelines relating to infringement notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572m-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider guidelines
premise text: Exercising power
conclusion text: Regard relevant guidelines
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572M(2) Guidelines relating to infringement notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572m-ss-2
part of: 572M Guidelines relating to infringement notices
note: ACMA may formulate guidelines for infringement notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.211
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572m-ss-2-norm

208 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-208-2
note: No infringement notice can be given without guidelines in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.212
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-208-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-208-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-208-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 208 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-208-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of issuing infringement notices without guidelines.
premise text: Guidelines must be in force under subsection (2).
conclusion text: No infringement notice can be given.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572N Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-572n
note: Regulations may make further provision in relation to infringement notices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.212
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-572n-norm

250 Application—infringement notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-250
note: Section applies in relation to alleged contravention of civil penalty provision after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.212
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-250-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-250-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-250-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 250 Application—infringement notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-250-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies to alleged contravention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

251 Section 7 (definition of civil penalty provision)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-251
note: Defines civil penalty provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.213
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-251-norm

210 Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-210-2
note: Consumer Safeguards
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-210-2-norm

252 Subsection 112(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-252
note: Insertion of section 125AA after sections 124 and 125.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-252-norm

253 After section 125
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-253
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-253-norm

125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-125aa
has part: 125AA(1) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
has part: 125AA(2) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
has part: 125AA(3) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
has part: 125AA(4) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
has part: 125AA(5) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214

125AA(1) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-1
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
note: ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125AA(2) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-2
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
note: Industry standard must be known by a specific name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a standard with a specific name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125AA(3) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-3
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
note: ACMA must consult a body or association before determining an industry standard.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125AA(4) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
note: The Minister may direct ACMA to determine a standard under subsection (1) that applies to participants in a specified section of the telecommunications industry.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 125AA(4) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or authorization.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relating to
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between the standard and the telecommunications activities.
premise text: (b) deals with one or more specified matters relating to the telecommunications activities of those participants;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: must consider
logic summary: Requires consideration of specific matters when determining the standard.
premise text: (b) deals with one or more specified matters relating to the telecommunications activities of those participants;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must inform
logic summary: Requires informing participants about the specific matters when determining the standard.
premise text: (b) deals with one or more specified matters relating to the telecommunications activities of those participants;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must utilize
logic summary: Requires utilizing specific knowledge when determining the standard.
premise text: (b) deals with one or more specified matters relating to the telecommunications activities of those participants;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125AA(5) ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-5
part of: 125AA ACMA must determine an industry standard if directed by
note: ACMA must not determine a standard under subsection (1) unless it does so in accordance with a direction under subsection (4).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.214
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-125aa-ss-5-norm

15 Dec 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15-7
note: See s. 2(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.217
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-15-7-norm

22 Sept 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-3
note: Royal Assent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010.pdf, p.217
asserts: telecommunications-legislation-amendment-competition-and-consumer-safeguards-act-2010-sch-1-sec-22-3-norm