1 Paragraph 4.3(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
note: Substitutes a broader duty to perform
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: New text
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replaces 'by law' with a broader phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: substitution
premise text: Original text

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Paragraph 4.3(b) of the Criminal Code

10 Paragraph 270.3(2)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.9
note: Omit 'or slave trading;’ and substitute ‘, slave trading or the reduction of a person to slavery;’.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.14
note: Marriage to a person without full consent is prohibited.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-2
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the coercion, threat or deception is used against the victim or another person.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with coercion, threat or deception in marriage.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) applies whether the coercion, threat or deception is used against the victim or another person.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a party to the marriage is married (within the meaning of this subsection)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits marriage to a person without full consent.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (i) a party to the marriage has not freely or fully consented...

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a party to the marriage is married (within the meaning of this subsection)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits marriage to a person married to more than one person.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (ii) a party to the marriage is married (within the meaning of this subsection) to more than one person.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the coercion, threat or deception is used against the victim or another person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits coercion, threat or deception in marriage.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) applies whether the coercion, threat or deception is used against the victim or another person.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits slave trading.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

11 Subsection 270.3(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.9
note: Inserts prohibition on commercial transactions involving slavery.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-11-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits commercial transactions involving slavery.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies as prohibition on commercial transactions involving slavery.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

12 Sections 270.4 to 270.9 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.9
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new subdivision C
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
schema version: 2

12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.16
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
has part: 12(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2
schema version: 2

12(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.16
note: Requires consideration of economic relationship, contract terms, and personal circumstances in determining slavery-like conditions.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: requires relation
premise text: (2) The following matters are covered by this subsection:

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applies to artificial agents.
modality: CogAI
operator: applies to
premise text: his or her ability to speak, write and understand English or another language;

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires consideration of economic relationship, contract terms, and personal circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (2) The following matters are covered by this subsection:

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Applies to ordered or recurring traces.
modality: LTL
operator: applies to
premise text: the personal circumstances of the alleged victim, including but not limited to:

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Applies to data schema.
modality: SHACL
operator: applies to
premise text: the extent of his or her social and physical dependence on the alleged offender.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

12(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.16
note: Exemptions from subsection (1)
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Other evidence can be led at any time before or after subsection (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between subsection (1) and other evidence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: Subsection (1) does not prevent the leading of other evidence in proceedings

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Other evidence can process information through subsection (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence processing through other evidence
modality: CogAI
operator: through
premise text: Subsection (1) does not limit the manner in which evidence may be given or its admissibility

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Other evidence is admissible
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from the general prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: Subsection (1) does not prevent other evidence from being led

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Other evidence can diffuse information through subsection (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of information through other evidence
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: Subsection (1) does not prevent the leading of other evidence in proceedings

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Other evidence can be led at any time before or after subsection (1)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval between subsection (1) and other evidence
modality: LTL
operator: between
premise text: Subsection (1) does not limit the manner in which evidence may be given or its admissibility

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

13 Section 270.12 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.16
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
schema version: 2

14 Section 270.12 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.16
note: Insertion of section number in Criminal Code
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
schema version: 2

14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.18
note: Deception has a corresponding meaning
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-14-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2
schema version: 2

15 At the end of section 270.12 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15(2) At the end of section 270.12 of the Criminal Code
has part: 15(3) At the end of section 270.12 of the Criminal Code
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
schema version: 2

15(2) At the end of section 270.12 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17
note: No provision of this Division excludes or limits the concurrent operation of other laws.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15 At the end of section 270.12 of the Criminal Code

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No provision of this Division excludes or limits the concurrent operation of other laws.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to exclude or limit concurrent operation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)

15(3) At the end of section 270.12 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17
note: Applicability of subsection (2) despite other laws
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-15-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15 At the end of section 270.12 of the Criminal Code

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability of subsection (2)
modality: Deontic
operator: applicable
premise text: Other laws do not supersede this subsection

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-15-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(3) At the end of section 270.12 of the Criminal Code

16 Section 270.13 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
schema version: 2

16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.20
note: Procedural fairness is required for guilt in certain cases.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-16-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires procedural fairness
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Guilty only if procedurally fair
modality: Epistemic
operator: if-then

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-16-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

17 Section 270.14 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17
note: Repeal section 270.14 of the Criminal Code
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Section 271.1 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17
note: Defines coercion as in Division 270
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
schema version: 2

18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.22
curation status: Proposed
has part: 18(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
has part: 18(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2
schema version: 2

18(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.22
note: Court discretion to find defendant not guilty of aggravated offence but guilty of related offence.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court has discretion to permit alternative outcome.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

18(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.22
note: Procedural fairness is required for guilt finding in certain cases.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (2) only applies if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between finding guilt and subsection application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: Section 271.7B provides for offences of organ trafficking.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (2) only applies if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires procedural fairness
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Section 271.7B provides for offences of organ trafficking.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (2) only applies if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval between finding guilt and subsection application
modality: LTL
operator: between
premise text: Section 271.7B provides for offences of organ trafficking.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18 Section 271.1 of the Criminal Code

19 Section 271.1 of the Criminal Code (at the end of the
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17
note: Definition of deceive
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19 Section 271.1 of the Criminal Code (at the end of the

2 Section 73.2 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
schema version: 2

20 Section 271.1 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.18
note: Defines exploitation with a reference to section 271.1A.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
schema version: 2

20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 20(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
has part: 20(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
has part: 20(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2
schema version: 2

20(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24
note: Recklessness applies in relation to paragraph (1)(b).
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

20(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24
note: Absolute liability applies in relation to paragraph (1)(c).
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

20(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24
note: A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1) even if the third person has not been prosecuted for, or has not been found guilty, of any other offence.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

2013 No. 6, 2013 5
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.9
note: Threats to cause deportation or removal from Australia are prohibited, unless there are reasonable grounds.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-ltl-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013
schema version: 2

2013 No. 6, 2013 23
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.27
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2013(2) No. 6, 2013 23
has part: 2013(3) No. 6, 2013 23
has part: 2013(4) No. 6, 2013 23
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-10
schema version: 2

2013(2) No. 6, 2013 23
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.27
note: List of matters covered by this subsection
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 23

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2013(2) No. 6, 2013 23

2013(3) No. 6, 2013 23
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.27
note: Reference to alleged victim includes guardian in organ removal context.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 23

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusive relation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2013(3) No. 6, 2013 23

2013(4) No. 6, 2013 23
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.27
note: No leading of other evidence in proceedings is prevented.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 23

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (b) limit the manner in which evidence may be given or the admissibility of evidence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition negation
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: (a) prevent the leading of any other evidence in the relevant proceedings;

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2013(4) No. 6, 2013 23

2013 No. 6, 2013 25
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.29
note: Forced labour has the same meaning as in Division 270.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-11
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 25

2013 No. 6, 2013 7
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.11
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2013(3) No. 6, 2013 7
has part: 2013(4) No. 6, 2013 7
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-2
schema version: 2

2013(3) No. 6, 2013 7
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.11
note: Prosecution for a servitude offence cannot proceed if the defendant is guilty of a forced labour offence.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 7

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on prosecution for servitude offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

2013(4) No. 6, 2013 7
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.11
note: Affording procedural fairness in relation to finding of guilt.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 7

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to afford procedural fairness.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2013(4) No. 6, 2013 7

2013 No. 6, 2013 9
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.13
note: Restricts certain employment practices.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-3
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Other cases have different penalties.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with other provisions regarding employment practices and penalties.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (b) in any other case—

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No exploitation or confiscation allowed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits exploitation and confiscation of travel or identity documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (ii) the extent to which the victim will be free to cease providing the labour or services;

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No unprotected sex required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits provision of sexual services requiring unprotected sex.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (vi) if the engagement is to involve the provision of sexual services—that fact, or the nature of sexual services to be provided (for example, whether those services will require the victim to have unprotected sex).

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Penalty depends on offense severity.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies imprisonment for specific terms based on offense severity.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (a) in the case of an aggravated offence (see section 270.8)—

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 9

2013 No. 6, 2013 11
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.15
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to reasonable excuse.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-4
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The defendant must provide evidence of a reasonable excuse.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Subsection (2) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The defendant must provide evidence of a reasonable excuse.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to subsection (4).
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (4).

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The defendant must provide evidence of a reasonable excuse.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Defendant believes they have a reasonable excuse.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
premise text: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (4).

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The defendant must provide evidence of a reasonable excuse during this interval.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Subsection (2) does not apply if the person has an interval of reasonable excuses.
modality: LTL
operator: Interval
premise text: Subsection (2) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 11

2013 No. 6, 2013 13
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-5
schema version: 2

2013 No. 6, 2013 15
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-6
schema version: 2

2013 No. 6, 2013 17
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.21
note: Organ trafficking is prohibited.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-7-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-7
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits organ trafficking.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

2013 No. 6, 2013 19
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.23
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2013(2) No. 6, 2013 19
has part: 2013(3) No. 6, 2013 19
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-8
schema version: 2

2013(2) No. 6, 2013 19
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.23
note: If the court is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence, but is satisfied that they are guilty of an offence against section 271.7D, it may find the defendant not guilty of the aggravated offence.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 19

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May find the defendant not guilty of the aggravated offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2013(2) No. 6, 2013 19

2013(3) No. 6, 2013 19
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.23
note: Afford procedural fairness in relation to finding of guilt for offence against section 271.7D.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 19

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (2) only applies if...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Afford procedural fairness
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 271.7D provides for offences of domestic organ trafficking.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection (2) does not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No procedural fairness if no guilt finding
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Subsection (2) only applies if...

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2013(3) No. 6, 2013 19

2013 No. 6, 2013 21
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-9
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Threats are defined as temporal intervals.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for threats.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (b) a threat to cause a person’s deportation or removal from Australia; or (c) a threat of any other detrimental action...

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Threats are classified as AI-related actions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies threats as AI-related actions.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (b) a threat to cause a person’s deportation or removal from Australia; or (c) a threat of any other detrimental action...

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Threats to cause deportation or removal are prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits threats to cause deportation or removal.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) a threat to cause a person’s deportation or removal from Australia; or (c) a threat of any other detrimental action...

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Threats are classified as detrimental actions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies threats as detrimental actions.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (b) a threat to cause a person’s deportation or removal from Australia; or (c) a threat of any other detrimental action...

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Threats are defined as diffused.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Defines diffusion for threats.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (b) a threat to cause a person’s deportation or removal from Australia; or (c) a threat of any other detrimental action...

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Threats are defined as recurring traces.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for threats.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (b) a threat to cause a person’s deportation or removal from Australia; or (c) a threat of any other detrimental action...

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 5

21 Section 271.1 of the Criminal Code (definition of threat)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.18
note: Repeal and redefine threat
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
schema version: 2

22 After section 271.1 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.18
note: Insert clause after section 271.1 of the Criminal Code
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
schema version: 2

22 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
note: Repeal of heading and substitution
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-22-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2
schema version: 2

23 Paragraphs 271.2(1)(b) and (c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.18
note: Omit specific words from a provision.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-23-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the specified action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

24 Paragraphs 271.2(1A)(b) and (c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.18
note: Omit specific words from the Criminal Code
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-24-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
schema version: 2

24 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-24-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

25 Paragraphs 271.2(2)(b) and (2A)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.18
note: Omit “or debt bondage”.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-25-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Omit “or debt bondage”.
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

26 Section 271.3 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
schema version: 2

26 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-26-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2
schema version: 2

27 Subparagraph 271.3(1)(a)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
note: Omit ‘; and’ from ‘; or’.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-27-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of ‘; and’.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

270 Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.8
note: Defines coercion, conducting a business, and related terms.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270
schema version: 2

270 Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.15
curation status: Proposed
has part: 270(1) Section 270
has part: 270(2) Section 270
has part: 270(3) Section 270
has part: 270(4) Section 270
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-10
schema version: 2

270(1) Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.15
note: Slavery-like offence committed against a person under 18 is an aggravated offence.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Section 270

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits slavery-like offences against persons under 18.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

270(2) Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.15
note: Prosecution must allege aggravated offence if intending to prove it.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Section 270

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270(2) Section 270

270(3) Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.15
note: If the trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence, but is otherwise satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the corresponding slavery-like offence.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Section 270

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ∃t (t ∈ A ∧ t ∈ B)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: If A overlaps with B, then there is a temporal interval where both A and B occur.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: A ∩ B ≠ ∅

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A ∃B
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: If A recognizes B, then A is aware of B.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (A R B)

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ~A | ~B
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If A implies B, then if not A, then not B.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (A -> B)

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ∀x (Ax → Bx)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: If A diffuses into B, then all instances of A are also instances of B.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: A ⊆ B

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: C
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: If A and B, then C.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Conjunction
premise text: (A ∧ B)

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270(3) Section 270

270(4) Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.15
note: Afford procedural fairness in relation to finding of guilt for corresponding slavery-like offence.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Section 270

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (guilt finding is valid)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Afford procedural fairness
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (defendant has been afforded procedural fairness)

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270(4) Section 270

270 Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.15
note: Jurisdictional requirement for slavery-like offences
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-11-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-11
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires jurisdiction for slavery-like offences
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

270 Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.15
note: Relevant evidence for slavery-like offences
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-12
schema version: 2

270 Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.16
note: No defence of victim consent or acquiescence in a proceeding for an offence against Division 270.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-13-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-13
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits defence of victim consent or acquiescence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

270 Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.16
note: Offences against Division 270—other laws not excluded
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-14
schema version: 2

270 Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17
note: Offences against Division 270—double jeopardy
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-15
schema version: 2

270 Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.9
note: Definition of servitude
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-2
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270 Section 270

270 Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.10
curation status: Proposed
has part: 270(1) Section 270
has part: 270(2) Section 270
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-3
schema version: 2

270(1) Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.10
note: Engaging in conduct that causes another person to enter into or remain in servitude is prohibited.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Section 270

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Direct prohibition of conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270(1) Section 270

270(2) Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.10
note: Conducting business involving servitude of another person is an offence.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Section 270

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the person conducts any business; and the business involves the servitude of another person (or persons).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Involves temporal interval of conduct
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if:

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the person conducts any business; and the business involves the servitude of another person (or persons).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Involves knowledge representation of conduct
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if:

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the person conducts any business; and the business involves the servitude of another person (or persons).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if:

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the person conducts any business; and the business involves the servitude of another person (or persons).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if:

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: if the person conducts any business; and the business involves the servitude of another person (or persons).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Involves recurring trace of conduct
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if:

270 Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.11
curation status: Proposed
has part: 270(1) Section 270
has part: 270(2) Section 270
has part: 270(3) Section 270
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-4
schema version: 2

270(1) Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.11
note: Forced labour is prohibited.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Section 270

270(2) Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.11
note: Subsection (1) applies regardless of the victim or another person affected by coercion, threat, or deception.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Section 270

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The obligation applies regardless of the context.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: (1) applies whether the coercion, threat or deception is used against the victim or another person.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The obligation applies to all persons affected by coercion, threat, or deception.
modality: Deontic
operator: Scope
premise text: (1) applies whether the coercion, threat or deception is used against the victim or another person.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The obligation applies regardless of the context.
modality: Deontic
operator: Scope
premise text: (2)

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270(2) Section 270

270(3) Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.11
note: The victim may be in a condition of forced labour regardless of their ability to escape.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Section 270

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The victim's condition is a necessary condition for forced labour.
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
premise text: (3) The victim may be in a condition of forced labour whether or not:

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270(3) Section 270

270 Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.12
curation status: Proposed
has part: 270(1) Section 270
has part: 270(2) Section 270
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-5
schema version: 2

270(1) Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.12
note: Forced labour is prohibited.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Section 270

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct overlaps with the temporal interval of forced labour.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with temporal intervals of forced labour.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the conduct causes another person to enter into or remain in forced labour.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct is recognized as forcing labour.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes conduct as forcing labour.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the conduct causes another person to enter into or remain in forced labour.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct causing forced labour.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the conduct causes another person to enter into or remain in forced labour.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information is diffused about forced labour.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses information about forced labour.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the conduct causes another person to enter into or remain in forced labour.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The conduct is a recurring trace of forced labour.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of conduct causing forced labour.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the conduct causes another person to enter into or remain in forced labour.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270(1) Section 270

270(2) Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.12
note: Forced labour of another person is prohibited.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Section 270

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The business involving forced labour overlaps with other offences.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with other offences.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person conducts any business; and (b) the business involves the forced labour of another person (or persons).

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The system recognizes this as a servitude offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes as a servitude offence.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person conducts any business; and (b) the business involves the forced labour of another person (or persons).

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The business involving forced labour is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits forced labour.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person conducts any business; and (b) the business involves the forced labour of another person (or persons).

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The diffusion of forced labour extends to other offences.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses to other offences.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person conducts any business; and (b) the business involves the forced labour of another person (or persons).

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace of forced labour.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of forced labour.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person conducts any business; and (b) the business involves the forced labour of another person (or persons).

270 Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.12
note: Section 270 obligation
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-6
schema version: 2

270 Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.12
note: Deceptive recruiting for labour or services is prohibited.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-7-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-7
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the provision as a prohibition.
modality: Deontic
operator: =

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270 Section 270

270 Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.13
curation status: Proposed
has part: 270(1) Section 270
has part: 270(2) Section 270
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-8
schema version: 2

270(1) Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.13
note: Marriage is a forced marriage if one party entered without freely and fully consenting.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Section 270

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of forced marriage
modality: Deontic
operator: is-forced-marriage
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Division, a marriage is a forced marriage...

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270(1) Section 270

270(2) Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.13
note: Defines marriage for the purposes of subsection (1)
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Section 270

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for any reason, including the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the scope of subsection (1)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), marriage includes...

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes specific types of relationships in the definition of marriage
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), marriage includes...

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...within the meaning of section 2E of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclasses registered relationship within the meaning of section 2E of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
premise text: (a) a registered relationship...

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...under a law of a foreign country;
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclasses marriage recognised under a law of a foreign country
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
premise text: (b) a marriage recognised...

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...under a law of a foreign country, if the relationship is of the same, or a similar, type as any registered relationship within...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclasses relationship registered (however that process is described) under a law of a foreign country
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
premise text: (c) a relationship registered...

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for any reason, including the following:
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclasses void, invalid, or not recognised by law marriage
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
premise text: (d) a marriage (including...

270 Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.14
curation status: Proposed
has part: 270(1) Section 270
has part: 270(2) Section 270
has part: 270(3) Section 270
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-9
schema version: 2

270(1) Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.14
note: Forced marriage as a crime
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Section 270

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...imprisonment for 4 years.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits forced marriages
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270(1) Section 270

270(2) Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.14
note: Marriage is a forced marriage if the person is not a victim.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Section 270

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state must punish those who commit an aggravated offence in a forced marriage.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: >

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270(2) Section 270

270(3) Section 270
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.14
note: Strict liability applies to paragraph (2)(c)
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 270 Section 270

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: List of coercion types
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definitions for Division 270
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 270 Section 270

271 Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.18
note: Definition of exploitation
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271
schema version: 2

271 Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 271(1) Section 271
has part: 271(2) Section 271
has part: 271(3) Section 271
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-10
schema version: 2

271(1) Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24
note: Harbouring a victim under 18 is an aggravated offence.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 271 Section 271

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state must prohibit harbouring victims under 18.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 271(1) Section 271

271(2) Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24
note: If the trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence, but is satisfied that the defendant is guilty of an offence against section 271.7F, it may find the defendant not guilty of the aggravated offence, but guilty of an offence against that section.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 271 Section 271

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 271(2) Section 271

271(3) Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24
note: Afford procedural fairness in relation to finding of guilt for offence against section 271.7F.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 271 Section 271

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Afford procedural fairness
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 271(3) Section 271

271 Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25
curation status: Proposed
has part: 271(1) Section 271
has part: 271(2) Section 271
has part: 271(3) Section 271
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-11
schema version: 2

271(1) Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25
note: Aggravated debt bondage: prohibition on committing offence with cruel treatment or danger of death.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 271 Section 271

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 7 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on committing offence with cruel treatment or danger of death.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) the victim is under 18;

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 7 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on committing offence with cruel treatment or danger of death.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) the offender, in committing the offence, subjects the victim to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment;

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 7 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on committing offence with cruel treatment or danger of death.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c)(i) engages in conduct that gives rise to a danger of death or serious harm to the victim or another person;

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 7 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on committing offence with cruel treatment or danger of death.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c)(ii) is reckless as to that danger;

271(2) Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25
note: If the trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence, but is satisfied that the defendant is guilty of an offence against section 271.8, it may find the defendant not guilty of the aggravated offence, but guilty of an offence against that section.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 271 Section 271

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 271(2) Section 271

271(3) Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25
note: Procedural fairness is required for the finding of guilt.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 271 Section 271

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires procedural fairness.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Procedural fairness is a condition for the application of subsection (2).
modality: Epistemic
operator: if

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 271(3) Section 271

271 Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
note: Jurisdictional requirements for offences other than domestic trafficking in persons or organs
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-12
schema version: 2

271 Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
note: Prohibition on certain conduct
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-13-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-13
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: =

271 Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
note: Jurisdictional requirements for domestic trafficking offenses
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-14-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-14
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes jurisdictional requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-14-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 271 Section 271

271 Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
note: Triers of fact may consider coercion, threat, or deception in determining whether a person has been coerced, threatened, or deceived.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-logic-ltl-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-15
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in determining whether a person has been coerced, threatened, or deceived
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consideration of coercion, threat, or deception
modality: Deontic
operator: may consider
premise text: Triers of fact may have regard to any of the matters covered by subsection (2)

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in determining whether a person has been coerced, threatened, or deceived
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consideration of coercion, threat, or deception in proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: may consider
premise text: For the purposes of proceedings for an offence against this Division

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in determining whether a person has been coerced, threatened, or deceived
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ordered trace between triers of fact and coercion, threat, or deception
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
premise text: the trier of fact may have regard to any of the matters covered by subsection (2)

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in determining whether a person has been coerced, threatened, or deceived
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ordered trace between proceedings and coercion, threat, or deception
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
premise text: For the purposes of proceedings for an offence against this Division

271 Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.27
note: No defence of victim consent or acquiescence for offences against Division 271
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-16-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-16
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits defence of victim consent or acquiescence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: No defence of victim consent or acquiescence for offences against Division 271

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-16-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 271 Section 271

271 Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.28
note: Offences against Division 271—other laws not excluded
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-17
schema version: 2

271 Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
note: Trafficking in persons is an aggravated offence.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-2
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits trafficking in persons.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

271 Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
note: Domestic trafficking in persons is an aggravated offence.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-3
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Domestic trafficking in persons is an aggravated offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the subject of the obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: is

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 271 Section 271

271 Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.20
note: Removal of organs without consent is prohibited.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-4
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Removal of organs may be performed during a medical procedure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Removal of organs may overlap with medical or therapeutic needs.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: Removal of organs is carried out in the same location as a medical procedure.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Removal of organs is a complex task requiring cognitive abilities.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies removal of organs as a cognitive task.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: Removal of organs requires decision-making and problem-solving.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Removal of organs without consent is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits removal of organs without consent.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Removal of organs without consent is contrary to the law.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Removal of organs may be performed at multiple locations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Removal of organs may diffuse to other locations.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlap
premise text: Removal of organs is carried out in the same location as a medical procedure.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Removal of organs may be performed during a series of medical procedures.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Removal of organs may overlap with medical or therapeutic needs over time.
modality: LTL
operator: Overlap
premise text: Removal of organs is carried out in the same location as a medical procedure over time.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 271 Section 271

271 Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.20
note: Offence of organ trafficking
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-5-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-5
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offence of organ trafficking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits organ trafficking
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Engaging in conduct consisting of the organisation or facilitation of entry into Australia

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 271 Section 271

271 Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.21
note: Aggravated offence of organ trafficking if victim is under 18 or subjected to cruel treatment.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-6
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Aggravated offence of organ trafficking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits organ trafficking with aggravating factors.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Victim under 18 or subjected to cruel treatment.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Aggravated offence of organ trafficking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct giving rise to danger of death or serious harm.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Offender is reckless as to that danger.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Aggravated offence of organ trafficking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits organ removal without consent.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Offender commits the offence intending that an organ will be removed.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Aggravated offence of organ trafficking.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies aggravated offence if victim is under 18 or subjected to cruel treatment.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: Section 271(1)(a) or (c) applies.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 271 Section 271

271 Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.22
note: Offence of domestic organ trafficking
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-7-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-7
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 12 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits domestic organ trafficking
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Section 271

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 271 Section 271

271 Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.22
note: Aggravated offence of domestic organ trafficking
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-8-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-8
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits domestic organ trafficking
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-8-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 271 Section 271

271 Section 271
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.23
note: Harbouring a victim is an offence.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-9-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-9
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Harbouring a victim is an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision states a fact about harbouring a victim.
modality: Deontic
operator: is

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 271 Section 271

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes conditions of exploitation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 271 Section 271

28 Subparagraph 271.3(1)(c)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
note: Insertion of 'or another person' after 'victim'
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-28-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28 Subparagraph 271.3(1)(c)(i) of the Criminal Code

29 At the end of section 271.3 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
note: Procedural fairness is required for the application of subsection (2) of section 271.3.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application of subsection (2) after finding guilt
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between finding guilt and application of subsection (2)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: Finding guilt for the offence against section 271.2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Procedural fairness is required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires procedural fairness for subsection (2) application
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Subsection (2)

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Procedural fairness is required only if defendant has been afforded it
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Only applies if defendant has been afforded procedural fairness
modality: Deontic
operator: only if
premise text: Subsection (2)

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Procedural fairness is required for the application of subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: For the application of subsection (2) to be valid, procedural fairness must be provided
modality: Deontic
operator: for
premise text: Subsection (2)

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application of subsection (2) ordered by procedural fairness
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Ordered trace of procedural fairness and application of subsection (2)
modality: LTL
operator: ordered by
premise text: Procedural fairness in relation to the finding of guilt for the offence against section 271.2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29 At the end of section 271.3 of the Criminal Code

3 Subsection 73.2(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
note: Omit specific phrase from Criminal Code subsection
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specific phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

30 Subsection 271.4(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
note: Repeal subsection 271.4(3) of the Criminal Code.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-30-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals subsection 271.4(3)
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

31 Paragraphs 271.5(1)(b) and (c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
note: Omit 'force or threats', substitute 'coercion, threat or deception'
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-31-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits coercion, threat or deception
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

32 Paragraph 271.5(2A)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
note: Omit “or debt bondage”.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-32-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits debt bondage
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

33 Section 271.6 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-33-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
schema version: 2

34 Subparagraph 271.6(1)(c)(i)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
note: Insert 'or another person' after 'victim'
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-34-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34 Subparagraph 271.6(1)(c)(i)

35 At the end of section 271.6 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
note: Amendments to Criminal Code
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-35-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
schema version: 2

36 Section 271.7 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.20
note: Substitute 'A person' for 'A person (1)' in section 271.7 of the Criminal Code.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-36-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘A person’.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replaces a placeholder with a specific term.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
premise text: Omit ‘(1) A person’.

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36 Section 271.7 of the Criminal Code

37 Subsection 271.7(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.20
note: Repeal subsection 271.7(2) of the Criminal Code
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-37-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
schema version: 2

38 After section 271.7
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.20
note: Insert subdivision BA—Organ trafficking
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-38-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
schema version: 2

39 Subsection 271.8(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24
note: Omit “(1)” from subsection 271.8(1) of the Criminal Code.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-39-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
schema version: 2

4 Paragraph 73.2(1)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
schema version: 2

4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-4-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2
schema version: 2

40 Subsection 271.8(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25
note: Repeal of penalty
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-40-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

41 Subsections 271.8(2) and (3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25
note: Repeal subsections
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-41-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
schema version: 2

42 Section 271.9 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-42-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
schema version: 2

43 Subdivision D of Division 271 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25
note: Schedule 1 Criminal Code amendments
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-43-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
schema version: 2

44 Section 271.10 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-44-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
schema version: 2

45 Section 271.10 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
note: Substitute specific sections of the Criminal Code
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-45-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
schema version: 2

46 Section 271.11 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-46-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
schema version: 2

47 Section 271.11 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
note: Omit certain sections of the Criminal Code
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-47-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
schema version: 2

48 After section 271.11 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
note: Insert clause after section 271.11 of the Criminal Code
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-48-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
schema version: 2

49 Section 271.12 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.27
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new title.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-49-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Repeal and substitute.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classify deontic type.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Text indicates a change to the heading.

5 Subsection 73.2(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
note: Repeal subsection 73.2(3) of the Criminal Code.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
schema version: 2

50 Section 271.12 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.28
note: Insertion of '(1)' before 'This Division'
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-50-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
schema version: 2

51 At the end of section 271.12 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 51(2) At the end of section 271.12 of the Criminal Code
has part: 51(3) At the end of section 271.12 of the Criminal Code
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
schema version: 2

51(2) At the end of section 271.12 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.28
note: No provision of this Division excludes or limits concurrent operation of other laws.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-51-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-51-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 51 At the end of section 271.12 of the Criminal Code

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to limit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limitation clause
modality: Deontic
operator: limits
premise text: No explicit limitation

51(3) At the end of section 271.12 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.28
note: Applicability of subsection (2) despite other laws
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-51-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-51-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 51 At the end of section 271.12 of the Criminal Code

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability of subsection (2)
modality: Deontic
operator: applicable
premise text: Other laws do not supersede this subsection

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-51-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51(3) At the end of section 271.12 of the Criminal Code

52 Dictionary in the Criminal Code (definition of exploitation)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.28
note: Repeal and redefine exploitation
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-52-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
schema version: 2

53 Dictionary in the Criminal Code (definition of forced
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.28
note: Definition of forced labour
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-53-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
schema version: 2

54 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.29
note: Defines enforced marriage as a term in the Criminal Code.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-54-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a key term.
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

55 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.29
note: Defines servitude as having the same meaning as in Division 270.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-55-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
schema version: 2

56 Dictionary in the Criminal Code (definition of sexual
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.29
note: Definition of sexual service
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-56-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
schema version: 2

57 Dictionary in the Criminal Code (definition of sexual
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.29
note: Repeal definition of sexual servitude
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-57-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
schema version: 2

58 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.29
note: Defines slavery-like offence
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-58-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
schema version: 2

6 Subsections 268.15(3), 268.60(3) and 268.83(3) of the
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
note: Repeal definitions of sexual service in Criminal Code
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
schema version: 2

6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.10
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
has part: 6(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2
schema version: 2

6(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.10
note: Subsection (1) applies regardless of the victim or another person affected by coercion, threat, or deception.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The obligation applies regardless of the victim or another person affected.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (1)

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

6(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.10
note: The victim may be in a condition of servitude regardless of escape possibilities.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

7 Division 270 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
schema version: 2

73 Section 73
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
note: Aggravated offence of people smuggling (danger of death or serious harm etc.)
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-73-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
schema version: 2

8 Before section 270.1 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
note: Insert Schedule 1 Criminal Code amendments
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-8-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
schema version: 2

8 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-8-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-2
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the type of obligation or prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: This provision classifies a legal effect

9 Before paragraph 270.3(1)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.9
note: Reduces a person to slavery
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-9-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reducing a person to slavery
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

1 Paragraph 15Y(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Paragraph 245AA(2)(c)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.31
note: Substitute text in paragraph 245AA(2)(c)
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-10-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Text substitution
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

11 Paragraph 245AA(2)(d)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.31
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
schema version: 2

12 At the end of paragraph 245AG(2)(d)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.31
note: Add “within the meaning of the Criminal Code”.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
schema version: 2

13 Sections 245AH and 245AI
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.31
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new ones.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
schema version: 2

14 Section 338 (subparagraph (b)(ii) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.31
note: Omit 'exploitation, or' from the definition of serious offence
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-14-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Omit 'exploitation, or'
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits exploitation, or
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Definition of serious offence

15 Subparagraphs 5D(3A)(a)(ii) and (iii)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.31
note: Repeal specific sections related to slavery and human trafficking.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-15-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

2 Paragraph 21B(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
note: Omit specific phrase from offence definition
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The phrase must be included
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of a phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omitting the phrase is an action

2013 No. 6, 2013 27
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.31
note: Repeal a definition.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-2013-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2013
schema version: 2

2013 No. 6, 2013 29
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-2013-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2013-2
schema version: 2

233B Aggravated offence of people smuggling (danger of death or
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
note: Aggravated offence of people smuggling (danger of death or serious harm etc.)
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-233b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-233b
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-233b-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 233B Aggravated offence of people smuggling (danger of death or

245AH Meaning of exploited
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.31
note: A person is exploited if they are subjected to exploitation within the meaning of the Criminal Code.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-245ah-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-245ah
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-245ah-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 245AH Meaning of exploited

28 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.32
note: Prohibition on debt bondage
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-28-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-28
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids debt bondage
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (vi) section 271.8 or 271.9 (debt bondage)

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-28-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People

3 Section 233B (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

4 Subsection 233B(1)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
note: Substitute phrase in subsection 233B(1)
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
schema version: 2

5 Paragraph 233B(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
schema version: 2

6 Subsection 233B(4) (definition of exploit)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
note: Repeal definition of exploit
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
schema version: 2

7 Subsection 233B(4) (definition of forced labour)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
note: Repeal the definition of forced labour.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
schema version: 2

8 Subsection 233B(4) (definition of sexual servitude)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
note: Repeal definition of sexual servitude
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 Subsection 233B(4) (definition of slavery)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
note: Definition of slavery
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: slavery
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the term slavery
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as

1 Application of amendments made by this Act
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.33
note: Amendments apply to offences committed on or after the Act's commencement.
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-3-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
schema version: 2

c2013a00006-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2013a00006-sch-3-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Application of amendments made by this Act

1 Short title
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.6
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: c2013a00006-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

2 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.6
asserts: c2013a00006-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.6
note: Commences on day after receiving Royal Assent.
asserts: c2013a00006-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2013 No. 6, 2013 3
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2013a00006-sec-2013-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2013
schema version: 2

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.6
note: Schedules governing amendments and repeals of Acts
asserts: c2013a00006-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People Trafficking) Act 2013
type: Document
description: An Act to amend the law relating to slavery, slavery-like conditions and people trafficking, and for other purposes
identifier: No. 6 of 2013
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU