Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People Trafficking) Act 2013
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 6 of 2013
description: An Act to amend the law relating to slavery, slavery-like conditions and people trafficking, and for other purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

2 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.6
asserts: c2013a00006-sec-2-norm

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.6
asserts: c2013a00006-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
note: Commences on day after receiving Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.6
asserts: c2013a00006-sec-2-2-norm

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Schedules governing amendments and repeals of Acts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.6
asserts: c2013a00006-sec-3-norm

2013 No. 6, 2013 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2013
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2013a00006-sec-2013-norm

1 Paragraph 4.3(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Substitutes a broader duty to perform
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Paragraph 4.3(b) of the Criminal Code
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: substitution
logic summary: Replaces 'by law' with a broader phrase
premise text: Original text
conclusion text: New text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 73.2 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2-norm

73 Section 73
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
note: Aggravated offence of people smuggling (danger of death or serious harm etc.)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-73-norm

3 Subsection 73.2(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Omit specific phrase from Criminal Code subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specific phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Paragraph 73.2(1)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-4-norm

5 Subsection 73.2(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
note: Repeal subsection 73.2(3) of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-5-norm

6 Subsections 268.15(3), 268.60(3) and 268.83(3) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
note: Repeal definitions of sexual service in Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-norm

7 Division 270 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-7-norm

8 Before section 270.1 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
note: Insert Schedule 1 Criminal Code amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-8-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the type of obligation or prohibition
premise text: This provision classifies a legal effect
conclusion text: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

4 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-4-2-norm

270 Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270
note: Defines coercion, conducting a business, and related terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 270 Section 270
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: List of coercion types
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Definitions for Division 270
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2013 No. 6, 2013 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013
note: Threats to cause deportation or removal from Australia are prohibited, unless there are reasonable grounds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-ltl-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-cogai-6

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 5
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits threats to cause deportation or removal.
premise text: (b) a threat to cause a person’s deportation or removal from Australia; or (c) a threat of any other detrimental action...
conclusion text: Threats to cause deportation or removal are prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies threats as detrimental actions.
premise text: (b) a threat to cause a person’s deportation or removal from Australia; or (c) a threat of any other detrimental action...
conclusion text: Threats are classified as detrimental actions.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for threats.
premise text: (b) a threat to cause a person’s deportation or removal from Australia; or (c) a threat of any other detrimental action...
conclusion text: Threats are defined as temporal intervals.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for threats.
premise text: (b) a threat to cause a person’s deportation or removal from Australia; or (c) a threat of any other detrimental action...
conclusion text: Threats are defined as recurring traces.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Defines diffusion for threats.
premise text: (b) a threat to cause a person’s deportation or removal from Australia; or (c) a threat of any other detrimental action...
conclusion text: Threats are defined as diffused.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies threats as AI-related actions.
premise text: (b) a threat to cause a person’s deportation or removal from Australia; or (c) a threat of any other detrimental action...
conclusion text: Threats are classified as AI-related actions.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Before paragraph 270.3(1)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
note: Reduces a person to slavery
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-9-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reducing a person to slavery
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Paragraph 270.3(2)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
note: Omit 'or slave trading;’ and substitute ‘, slave trading or the reduction of a person to slavery;’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits slave trading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 270.3(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
note: Inserts prohibition on commercial transactions involving slavery.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-11-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits commercial transactions involving slavery.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies as prohibition on commercial transactions involving slavery.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Sections 270.4 to 270.9 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new subdivision C
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-norm

270 Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-2
note: Definition of servitude
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-2-norm

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 270 Section 270
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2
has part: 6(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
has part: 6(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.10

6(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2
part of: 6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
note: Subsection (1) applies regardless of the victim or another person affected by coercion, threat, or deception.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The obligation applies regardless of the victim or another person affected.
premise text: (1)
conclusion text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3
part of: 6 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
note: The victim may be in a condition of servitude regardless of escape possibilities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-6-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270 Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-3
has part: 270(1) Section 270
has part: 270(2) Section 270
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.10

270(1) Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-1
part of: 270 Section 270
note: Engaging in conduct that causes another person to enter into or remain in servitude is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 270(1) Section 270
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Direct prohibition of conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270(2) Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2
part of: 270 Section 270
note: Conducting business involving servitude of another person is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if:
conclusion text: if the person conducts any business; and the business involves the servitude of another person (or persons).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Involves recurring trace of conduct
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if:
conclusion text: if the person conducts any business; and the business involves the servitude of another person (or persons).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on conduct
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if:
conclusion text: if the person conducts any business; and the business involves the servitude of another person (or persons).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Involves temporal interval of conduct
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if:
conclusion text: if the person conducts any business; and the business involves the servitude of another person (or persons).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Involves knowledge representation of conduct
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if:
conclusion text: if the person conducts any business; and the business involves the servitude of another person (or persons).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2013 No. 6, 2013 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-2
has part: 2013(3) No. 6, 2013 7
has part: 2013(4) No. 6, 2013 7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.11

2013(3) No. 6, 2013 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-3
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 7
note: Prosecution for a servitude offence cannot proceed if the defendant is guilty of a forced labour offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.11
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on prosecution for servitude offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2013(4) No. 6, 2013 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-4
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 7
note: Affording procedural fairness in relation to finding of guilt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.11
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2013(4) No. 6, 2013 7
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to afford procedural fairness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270 Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-4
has part: 270(1) Section 270
has part: 270(2) Section 270
has part: 270(3) Section 270
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.11

270(1) Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-1
part of: 270 Section 270
note: Forced labour is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.11
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-1-norm

270(2) Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2
part of: 270 Section 270
note: Subsection (1) applies regardless of the victim or another person affected by coercion, threat, or deception.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.11
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 270(2) Section 270
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: The obligation applies regardless of the context.
premise text: (1) applies whether the coercion, threat or deception is used against the victim or another person.
conclusion text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Scope
logic summary: The obligation applies to all persons affected by coercion, threat, or deception.
premise text: (1) applies whether the coercion, threat or deception is used against the victim or another person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Scope
logic summary: The obligation applies regardless of the context.
premise text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

270(3) Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-3
part of: 270 Section 270
note: The victim may be in a condition of forced labour regardless of their ability to escape.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.11
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 270(3) Section 270
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: The victim's condition is a necessary condition for forced labour.
premise text: (3) The victim may be in a condition of forced labour whether or not:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-8-2-norm

270 Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-5
has part: 270(1) Section 270
has part: 270(2) Section 270
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.12

270(1) Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1
part of: 270 Section 270
note: Forced labour is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 270(1) Section 270
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conduct causing forced labour.
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the conduct causes another person to enter into or remain in forced labour.
conclusion text: The conduct is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with temporal intervals of forced labour.
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the conduct causes another person to enter into or remain in forced labour.
conclusion text: The conduct overlaps with the temporal interval of forced labour.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of conduct causing forced labour.
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the conduct causes another person to enter into or remain in forced labour.
conclusion text: The conduct is a recurring trace of forced labour.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses information about forced labour.
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the conduct causes another person to enter into or remain in forced labour.
conclusion text: The information is diffused about forced labour.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes conduct as forcing labour.
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) the conduct causes another person to enter into or remain in forced labour.
conclusion text: The conduct is recognized as forcing labour.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270(2) Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2
part of: 270 Section 270
note: Forced labour of another person is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits forced labour.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person conducts any business; and (b) the business involves the forced labour of another person (or persons).
conclusion text: The business involving forced labour is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with other offences.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person conducts any business; and (b) the business involves the forced labour of another person (or persons).
conclusion text: The business involving forced labour overlaps with other offences.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of forced labour.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person conducts any business; and (b) the business involves the forced labour of another person (or persons).
conclusion text: There is a recurring trace of forced labour.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses to other offences.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person conducts any business; and (b) the business involves the forced labour of another person (or persons).
conclusion text: The diffusion of forced labour extends to other offences.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-5-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes as a servitude offence.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person conducts any business; and (b) the business involves the forced labour of another person (or persons).
conclusion text: The system recognizes this as a servitude offence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270 Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-6
note: Section 270 obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-6-norm

270 Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-7
note: Deceptive recruiting for labour or services is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-7-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-7-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 270 Section 270
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the provision as a prohibition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2013 No. 6, 2013 9
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-3
note: Restricts certain employment practices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-logic-alleninterval-4

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 9
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits exploitation and confiscation of travel or identity documents.
premise text: (ii) the extent to which the victim will be free to cease providing the labour or services;
conclusion text: No exploitation or confiscation allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits provision of sexual services requiring unprotected sex.
premise text: (vi) if the engagement is to involve the provision of sexual services—that fact, or the nature of sexual services to be provided (for example, whether those services will require the victim to have unprotected sex).
conclusion text: No unprotected sex required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies imprisonment for specific terms based on offense severity.
premise text: (a) in the case of an aggravated offence (see section 270.8)—
conclusion text: Penalty depends on offense severity.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with other provisions regarding employment practices and penalties.
premise text: (b) in any other case—
conclusion text: Other cases have different penalties.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270 Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-8
has part: 270(1) Section 270
has part: 270(2) Section 270
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.13

270(1) Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-1
part of: 270 Section 270
note: Marriage is a forced marriage if one party entered without freely and fully consenting.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 270(1) Section 270
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is-forced-marriage
logic summary: Definition of forced marriage
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Division, a marriage is a forced marriage...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270(2) Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2
part of: 270 Section 270
note: Defines marriage for the purposes of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-6

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes specific types of relationships in the definition of marriage
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), marriage includes...
conclusion text: ...the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclasses registered relationship within the meaning of section 2E of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901
premise text: (a) a registered relationship...
conclusion text: ...within the meaning of section 2E of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclasses marriage recognised under a law of a foreign country
premise text: (b) a marriage recognised...
conclusion text: ...under a law of a foreign country;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclasses relationship registered (however that process is described) under a law of a foreign country
premise text: (c) a relationship registered...
conclusion text: ...under a law of a foreign country, if the relationship is of the same, or a similar, type as any registered relationship within...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclasses void, invalid, or not recognised by law marriage
premise text: (d) a marriage (including...
conclusion text: ...for any reason, including the following:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-8-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Defines the scope of subsection (1)
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), marriage includes...
conclusion text: ...for any reason, including the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10-2
note: Marriage to a person without full consent is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-alleninterval-4

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits marriage to a person without full consent.
premise text: (i) a party to the marriage has not freely or fully consented...
conclusion text: ...a party to the marriage is married (within the meaning of this subsection)...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits marriage to a person married to more than one person.
premise text: (ii) a party to the marriage is married (within the meaning of this subsection) to more than one person.
conclusion text: ...a party to the marriage is married (within the meaning of this subsection)...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits coercion, threat or deception in marriage.
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) applies whether the coercion, threat or deception is used against the victim or another person.
conclusion text: ...the coercion, threat or deception is used against the victim or another person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-10-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with coercion, threat or deception in marriage.
premise text: (3) Subsection (1) applies whether the coercion, threat or deception is used against the victim or another person.
conclusion text: ...the coercion, threat or deception is used against the victim or another person.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

270 Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-9
has part: 270(1) Section 270
has part: 270(2) Section 270
has part: 270(3) Section 270
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.14

270(1) Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-1
part of: 270 Section 270
note: Forced marriage as a crime
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 270(1) Section 270
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits forced marriages
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...imprisonment for 4 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

270(2) Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-2
part of: 270 Section 270
note: Marriage is a forced marriage if the person is not a victim.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 270(2) Section 270
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
conclusion text: The state must punish those who commit an aggravated offence in a forced marriage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270(3) Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-3
part of: 270 Section 270
note: Strict liability applies to paragraph (2)(c)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2013 No. 6, 2013 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-4
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to reasonable excuse.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-logic-ltl-4

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 11
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden.
premise text: Subsection (2) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: The defendant must provide evidence of a reasonable excuse.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to subsection (4).
premise text: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (4).
conclusion text: The defendant must provide evidence of a reasonable excuse.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Belief
logic summary: Defendant believes they have a reasonable excuse.
premise text: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (4).
conclusion text: The defendant must provide evidence of a reasonable excuse.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Interval
logic summary: Subsection (2) does not apply if the person has an interval of reasonable excuses.
premise text: Subsection (2) does not apply if the person has a reasonable excuse.
conclusion text: The defendant must provide evidence of a reasonable excuse during this interval.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270 Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-10
has part: 270(1) Section 270
has part: 270(2) Section 270
has part: 270(3) Section 270
has part: 270(4) Section 270
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.15

270(1) Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-1
part of: 270 Section 270
note: Slavery-like offence committed against a person under 18 is an aggravated offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits slavery-like offences against persons under 18.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270(2) Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-2
part of: 270 Section 270
note: Prosecution must allege aggravated offence if intending to prove it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 270(2) Section 270
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270(3) Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3
part of: 270 Section 270
note: If the trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence, but is otherwise satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the corresponding slavery-like offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 270(3) Section 270
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If A implies B, then if not A, then not B.
premise text: (A -> B)
conclusion text: ~A | ~B
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Conjunction
logic summary: If A and B, then C.
premise text: (A ∧ B)
conclusion text: C
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: If A overlaps with B, then there is a temporal interval where both A and B occur.
premise text: A ∩ B ≠ ∅
conclusion text: ∃t (t ∈ A ∧ t ∈ B)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: If A diffuses into B, then all instances of A are also instances of B.
premise text: A ⊆ B
conclusion text: ∀x (Ax → Bx)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: If A recognizes B, then A is aware of B.
premise text: (A R B)
conclusion text: A ∃B
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

270(4) Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-4
part of: 270 Section 270
note: Afford procedural fairness in relation to finding of guilt for corresponding slavery-like offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 270(4) Section 270
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Afford procedural fairness
premise text: (defendant has been afforded procedural fairness)
conclusion text: (guilt finding is valid)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270 Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-11
note: Jurisdictional requirement for slavery-like offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-11-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-11-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires jurisdiction for slavery-like offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270 Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-12
note: Relevant evidence for slavery-like offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-12-norm

12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2
has part: 12(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
has part: 12(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.16

12(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
note: Requires consideration of economic relationship, contract terms, and personal circumstances in determining slavery-like conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires consideration of economic relationship, contract terms, and personal circumstances.
premise text: (2) The following matters are covered by this subsection:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: requires relation
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals.
premise text: (2) The following matters are covered by this subsection:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to ordered or recurring traces.
premise text: the personal circumstances of the alleged victim, including but not limited to:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to artificial agents.
premise text: his or her ability to speak, write and understand English or another language;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: applies to
logic summary: Applies to data schema.
premise text: the extent of his or her social and physical dependence on the alleged offender.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3
part of: 12 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
note: Exemptions from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from the general prohibition
premise text: Subsection (1) does not prevent other evidence from being led
conclusion text: Other evidence is admissible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between subsection (1) and other evidence
premise text: Subsection (1) does not prevent the leading of other evidence in proceedings
conclusion text: Other evidence can be led at any time before or after subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between subsection (1) and other evidence
premise text: Subsection (1) does not limit the manner in which evidence may be given or its admissibility
conclusion text: Other evidence can be led at any time before or after subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Diffusion of information through other evidence
premise text: Subsection (1) does not prevent the leading of other evidence in proceedings
conclusion text: Other evidence can diffuse information through subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-12-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: through
logic summary: Artificial intelligence processing through other evidence
premise text: Subsection (1) does not limit the manner in which evidence may be given or its admissibility
conclusion text: Other evidence can process information through subsection (1)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

270 Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-13
note: No defence of victim consent or acquiescence in a proceeding for an offence against Division 270.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-13-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-13-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits defence of victim consent or acquiescence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Section 270.12 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-13-norm

270 Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-14
note: Offences against Division 270—other laws not excluded
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-14-norm

14 Section 270.12 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
note: Insertion of section number in Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-14-norm

2013 No. 6, 2013 13
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-5-norm

15 At the end of section 270.12 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
has part: 15(2) At the end of section 270.12 of the Criminal Code
has part: 15(3) At the end of section 270.12 of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17

15(2) At the end of section 270.12 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15-ss-2
part of: 15 At the end of section 270.12 of the Criminal Code
note: No provision of this Division excludes or limits the concurrent operation of other laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to exclude or limit concurrent operation
premise text: (2) Without limiting subsection (1)
conclusion text: No provision of this Division excludes or limits the concurrent operation of other laws.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(3) At the end of section 270.12 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15-ss-3
part of: 15 At the end of section 270.12 of the Criminal Code
note: Applicability of subsection (2) despite other laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-15-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-15-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(3) At the end of section 270.12 of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applicable
logic summary: Applicability of subsection (2)
premise text: Other laws do not supersede this subsection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Section 270.13 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-16-norm

270 Section 270
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270-15
note: Offences against Division 270—double jeopardy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-270-15-norm

17 Section 270.14 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
note: Repeal section 270.14 of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-17-norm

18 Section 271.1 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
note: Defines coercion as in Division 270
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Section 271.1 of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Section 271.1 of the Criminal Code (at the end of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
note: Definition of deceive
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-19-norm

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 Section 271.1 of the Criminal Code (at the end of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

14 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-2
note: Deception has a corresponding meaning
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-14-2-norm

20 Section 271.1 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
note: Defines exploitation with a reference to section 271.1A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-20-norm

21 Section 271.1 of the Criminal Code (definition of threat)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
note: Repeal and redefine threat
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-21-norm

22 After section 271.1 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
note: Insert clause after section 271.1 of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-22-norm

271 Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271
note: Definition of exploitation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271 Section 271
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes conditions of exploitation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Paragraphs 271.2(1)(b) and (c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
note: Omit specific words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-23-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the specified action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Paragraphs 271.2(1A)(b) and (c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
note: Omit specific words from the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-24-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Paragraphs 271.2(2)(b) and (2A)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
note: Omit “or debt bondage”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-25-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Omit “or debt bondage”.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2013 No. 6, 2013 15
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-6-norm

26 Section 271.3 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-26-norm

271 Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-2
note: Trafficking in persons is an aggravated offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-2-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits trafficking in persons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Subparagraph 271.3(1)(a)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
note: Omit ‘; and’ from ‘; or’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-27-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of ‘; and’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Subparagraph 271.3(1)(c)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
note: Insertion of 'or another person' after 'victim'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-28-norm

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-28-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28 Subparagraph 271.3(1)(c)(i) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

29 At the end of section 271.3 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
note: Procedural fairness is required for the application of subsection (2) of section 271.3.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-5

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29 At the end of section 271.3 of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires procedural fairness for subsection (2) application
premise text: Subsection (2)
conclusion text: Procedural fairness is required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between finding guilt and application of subsection (2)
premise text: Finding guilt for the offence against section 271.2
conclusion text: Application of subsection (2) after finding guilt
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered by
logic summary: Ordered trace of procedural fairness and application of subsection (2)
premise text: Procedural fairness in relation to the finding of guilt for the offence against section 271.2
conclusion text: Application of subsection (2) ordered by procedural fairness
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: only if
logic summary: Only applies if defendant has been afforded procedural fairness
premise text: Subsection (2)
conclusion text: Procedural fairness is required only if defendant has been afforded it
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: for
logic summary: For the application of subsection (2) to be valid, procedural fairness must be provided
premise text: Subsection (2)
conclusion text: Procedural fairness is required for the application of subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Subsection 271.4(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
note: Repeal subsection 271.4(3) of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-30-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals subsection 271.4(3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Paragraphs 271.5(1)(b) and (c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
note: Omit 'force or threats', substitute 'coercion, threat or deception'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-31-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits coercion, threat or deception
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Paragraph 271.5(2A)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
note: Omit “or debt bondage”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-32-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits debt bondage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Section 271.6 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-33-norm

271 Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-3
note: Domestic trafficking in persons is an aggravated offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-3-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271 Section 271
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Defines the subject of the obligation.
conclusion text: Domestic trafficking in persons is an aggravated offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Subparagraph 271.6(1)(c)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
note: Insert 'or another person' after 'victim'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-34-norm

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34 Subparagraph 271.6(1)(c)(i)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

35 At the end of section 271.6 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
note: Amendments to Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-35-norm

16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-2
note: Procedural fairness is required for guilt in certain cases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-16-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-epistemic-2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-16-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires procedural fairness
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-16-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Guilty only if procedurally fair
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Section 271.7 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
note: Substitute 'A person' for 'A person (1)' in section 271.7 of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-36-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36 Section 271.7 of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replaces a placeholder with a specific term.
premise text: Omit ‘(1) A person’.
conclusion text: Substitute ‘A person’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

37 Subsection 271.7(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
note: Repeal subsection 271.7(2) of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-37-norm

38 After section 271.7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
note: Insert subdivision BA—Organ trafficking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-38-norm

271 Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-4
note: Removal of organs without consent is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-cogai-5

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 271 Section 271
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits removal of organs without consent.
premise text: Removal of organs without consent is contrary to the law.
conclusion text: Removal of organs without consent is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Removal of organs may overlap with medical or therapeutic needs.
premise text: Removal of organs is carried out in the same location as a medical procedure.
conclusion text: Removal of organs may be performed during a medical procedure.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Removal of organs may overlap with medical or therapeutic needs over time.
premise text: Removal of organs is carried out in the same location as a medical procedure over time.
conclusion text: Removal of organs may be performed during a series of medical procedures.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Removal of organs may diffuse to other locations.
premise text: Removal of organs is carried out in the same location as a medical procedure.
conclusion text: Removal of organs may be performed at multiple locations.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies removal of organs as a cognitive task.
premise text: Removal of organs requires decision-making and problem-solving.
conclusion text: Removal of organs is a complex task requiring cognitive abilities.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271 Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-5
note: Offence of organ trafficking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-5-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-5-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 271 Section 271
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits organ trafficking
premise text: Engaging in conduct consisting of the organisation or facilitation of entry into Australia
conclusion text: Offence of organ trafficking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2013 No. 6, 2013 17
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-7
note: Organ trafficking is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.21
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-7-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-7-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits organ trafficking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271 Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-6
note: Aggravated offence of organ trafficking if victim is under 18 or subjected to cruel treatment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.21
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-logic-deontic-4

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 271 Section 271
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits organ trafficking with aggravating factors.
premise text: Victim under 18 or subjected to cruel treatment.
conclusion text: Aggravated offence of organ trafficking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conduct giving rise to danger of death or serious harm.
premise text: Offender is reckless as to that danger.
conclusion text: Aggravated offence of organ trafficking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies aggravated offence if victim is under 18 or subjected to cruel treatment.
premise text: Section 271(1)(a) or (c) applies.
conclusion text: Aggravated offence of organ trafficking.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits organ removal without consent.
premise text: Offender commits the offence intending that an organ will be removed.
conclusion text: Aggravated offence of organ trafficking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2
has part: 18(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
has part: 18(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.22

18(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-2
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
note: Court discretion to find defendant not guilty of aggravated offence but guilty of related offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Court has discretion to permit alternative outcome.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3
part of: 18 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
note: Procedural fairness is required for guilt finding in certain cases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires procedural fairness
premise text: Section 271.7B provides for offences of organ trafficking.
conclusion text: Subsection (2) only applies if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between finding guilt and subsection application
premise text: Section 271.7B provides for offences of organ trafficking.
conclusion text: Subsection (2) only applies if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-18-2-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between finding guilt and subsection application
premise text: Section 271.7B provides for offences of organ trafficking.
conclusion text: Subsection (2) only applies if...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271 Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-7
note: Offence of domestic organ trafficking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-7-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-7-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 271 Section 271
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits domestic organ trafficking
premise text: Section 271
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 12 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271 Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-8
note: Aggravated offence of domestic organ trafficking
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-8-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-8-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-8-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 271 Section 271
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits domestic organ trafficking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2013 No. 6, 2013 19
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-8
has part: 2013(2) No. 6, 2013 19
has part: 2013(3) No. 6, 2013 19
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.23

2013(2) No. 6, 2013 19
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-2
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 19
note: If the court is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence, but is satisfied that they are guilty of an offence against section 271.7D, it may find the defendant not guilty of the aggravated offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2013(2) No. 6, 2013 19
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May find the defendant not guilty of the aggravated offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2013(3) No. 6, 2013 19
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-3
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 19
note: Afford procedural fairness in relation to finding of guilt for offence against section 271.7D.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2013(3) No. 6, 2013 19
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Afford procedural fairness
premise text: Section 271.7D provides for offences of domestic organ trafficking.
conclusion text: Subsection (2) only applies if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No procedural fairness if no guilt finding
premise text: Subsection (2) only applies if...
conclusion text: Subsection (2) does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271 Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-9
note: Harbouring a victim is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-9-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-9-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271 Section 271
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: The provision states a fact about harbouring a victim.
conclusion text: Harbouring a victim is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2
has part: 20(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
has part: 20(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
has part: 20(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24

20(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
note: Recklessness applies in relation to paragraph (1)(b).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2-norm

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(2) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

20(3) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-3
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
note: Absolute liability applies in relation to paragraph (1)(c).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-3-norm

20(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-4
part of: 20 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
note: A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1) even if the third person has not been prosecuted for, or has not been found guilty, of any other offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-4-norm

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-20-2-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(4) Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

271 Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-10
has part: 271(1) Section 271
has part: 271(2) Section 271
has part: 271(3) Section 271
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24

271(1) Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-1
part of: 271 Section 271
note: Harbouring a victim under 18 is an aggravated offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271(1) Section 271
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
conclusion text: The state must prohibit harbouring victims under 18.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271(2) Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-2
part of: 271 Section 271
note: If the trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence, but is satisfied that the defendant is guilty of an offence against section 271.7F, it may find the defendant not guilty of the aggravated offence, but guilty of an offence against that section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-2-norm

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271(2) Section 271
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

271(3) Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-3
part of: 271 Section 271
note: Afford procedural fairness in relation to finding of guilt for offence against section 271.7F.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271(3) Section 271
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Afford procedural fairness
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Subsection 271.8(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
note: Omit “(1)” from subsection 271.8(1) of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-39-norm

2013 No. 6, 2013 21
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-9-norm

40 Subsection 271.8(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-40-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Subsections 271.8(2) and (3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
note: Repeal subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-41-norm

42 Section 271.9 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-42-norm

271 Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-11
has part: 271(1) Section 271
has part: 271(2) Section 271
has part: 271(3) Section 271
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25

271(1) Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1
part of: 271 Section 271
note: Aggravated debt bondage: prohibition on committing offence with cruel treatment or danger of death.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on committing offence with cruel treatment or danger of death.
premise text: (a) the victim is under 18;
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 7 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on committing offence with cruel treatment or danger of death.
premise text: (b) the offender, in committing the offence, subjects the victim to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment;
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 7 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on committing offence with cruel treatment or danger of death.
premise text: (c)(i) engages in conduct that gives rise to a danger of death or serious harm to the victim or another person;
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 7 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on committing offence with cruel treatment or danger of death.
premise text: (c)(ii) is reckless as to that danger;
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 7 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271(2) Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-2
part of: 271 Section 271
note: If the trier of fact is not satisfied that the defendant is guilty of the aggravated offence, but is satisfied that the defendant is guilty of an offence against section 271.8, it may find the defendant not guilty of the aggravated offence, but guilty of an offence against that section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-2-norm

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271(2) Section 271
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

271(3) Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-3
part of: 271 Section 271
note: Procedural fairness is required for the finding of guilt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271(3) Section 271
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires procedural fairness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-11-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: if
logic summary: Procedural fairness is a condition for the application of subsection (2).
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Subdivision D of Division 271 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
note: Schedule 1 Criminal Code amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-43-norm

22 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-2
note: Repeal of heading and substitution
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-22-2-norm

44 Section 271.10 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-44-norm

271 Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-12
note: Jurisdictional requirements for offences other than domestic trafficking in persons or organs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-12-norm

45 Section 271.10 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
note: Substitute specific sections of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-45-norm

271 Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-13
note: Prohibition on certain conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-13-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-13-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Imposes prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Section 271.11 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-46-norm

271 Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-14
note: Jurisdictional requirements for domestic trafficking offenses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-14-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-14-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 271 Section 271
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Establishes jurisdictional requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Section 271.11 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
note: Omit certain sections of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-47-norm

48 After section 271.11 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
note: Insert clause after section 271.11 of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-48-norm

271 Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-15
note: Triers of fact may consider coercion, threat, or deception in determining whether a person has been coerced, threatened, or deceived.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-logic-ltl-2
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-logic-ltl-4

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may consider
logic summary: Consideration of coercion, threat, or deception
premise text: Triers of fact may have regard to any of the matters covered by subsection (2)
conclusion text: in determining whether a person has been coerced, threatened, or deceived
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
logic summary: Ordered trace between triers of fact and coercion, threat, or deception
premise text: the trier of fact may have regard to any of the matters covered by subsection (2)
conclusion text: in determining whether a person has been coerced, threatened, or deceived
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may consider
logic summary: Consideration of coercion, threat, or deception in proceedings
premise text: For the purposes of proceedings for an offence against this Division
conclusion text: in determining whether a person has been coerced, threatened, or deceived
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-15-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
logic summary: Ordered trace between proceedings and coercion, threat, or deception
premise text: For the purposes of proceedings for an offence against this Division
conclusion text: in determining whether a person has been coerced, threatened, or deceived
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

2013 No. 6, 2013 23
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-10
has part: 2013(2) No. 6, 2013 23
has part: 2013(3) No. 6, 2013 23
has part: 2013(4) No. 6, 2013 23
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.27

2013(2) No. 6, 2013 23
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-2
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 23
note: List of matters covered by this subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-2-norm

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2013(2) No. 6, 2013 23
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

2013(3) No. 6, 2013 23
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-3
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 23
note: Reference to alleged victim includes guardian in organ removal context.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2013(3) No. 6, 2013 23
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusive relation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2013(4) No. 6, 2013 23
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-4
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 23
note: No leading of other evidence in proceedings is prevented.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2013(4) No. 6, 2013 23
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-10-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Prohibition negation
premise text: (a) prevent the leading of any other evidence in the relevant proceedings;
conclusion text: (b) limit the manner in which evidence may be given or the admissibility of evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271 Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-16
note: No defence of victim consent or acquiescence for offences against Division 271
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-16-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-16-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-16-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 271 Section 271
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits defence of victim consent or acquiescence
premise text: No defence of victim consent or acquiescence for offences against Division 271
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Section 271.12 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new title.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-49-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classify deontic type.
premise text: Text indicates a change to the heading.
conclusion text: Repeal and substitute.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-24-2-norm

271 Section 271
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271-17
note: Offences against Division 271—other laws not excluded
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-271-17-norm

50 Section 271.12 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
note: Insertion of '(1)' before 'This Division'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-50-norm

51 At the end of section 271.12 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
has part: 51(2) At the end of section 271.12 of the Criminal Code
has part: 51(3) At the end of section 271.12 of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.28

51(2) At the end of section 271.12 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-51-ss-2
part of: 51 At the end of section 271.12 of the Criminal Code
note: No provision of this Division excludes or limits concurrent operation of other laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-51-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: limits
logic summary: Limitation clause
premise text: No explicit limitation
conclusion text: Obligation to limit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51(3) At the end of section 271.12 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-51-ss-3
part of: 51 At the end of section 271.12 of the Criminal Code
note: Applicability of subsection (2) despite other laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-51-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-51-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51(3) At the end of section 271.12 of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-51-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applicable
logic summary: Applicability of subsection (2)
premise text: Other laws do not supersede this subsection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Dictionary in the Criminal Code (definition of exploitation)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
note: Repeal and redefine exploitation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-52-norm

53 Dictionary in the Criminal Code (definition of forced
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
note: Definition of forced labour
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-53-norm

2013 No. 6, 2013 25
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2013-11
note: Forced labour has the same meaning as in Division 270.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.29
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-11-norm

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-2013-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2013 No. 6, 2013 25
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

54 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
note: Defines enforced marriage as a term in the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.29
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-54-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a key term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
note: Defines servitude as having the same meaning as in Division 270.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.29
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-55-norm

56 Dictionary in the Criminal Code (definition of sexual
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
note: Definition of sexual service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.29
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-56-norm

57 Dictionary in the Criminal Code (definition of sexual
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
note: Repeal definition of sexual servitude
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.29
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-57-norm

58 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
note: Defines slavery-like offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.29
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-58-norm

26 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-1-sec-26-2-norm

1 Paragraph 15Y(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-1-norm

2 Paragraph 21B(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Omit specific phrase from offence definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of a phrase
premise text: Omitting the phrase is an action
conclusion text: The phrase must be included
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 233B (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-3-norm

233B Aggravated offence of people smuggling (danger of death or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-233b
note: Aggravated offence of people smuggling (danger of death or serious harm etc.)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-233b-norm

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-233b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 233B Aggravated offence of people smuggling (danger of death or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 233B(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Substitute phrase in subsection 233B(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-4-norm

5 Paragraph 233B(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-5-norm

6 Subsection 233B(4) (definition of exploit)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
note: Repeal definition of exploit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-6-norm

7 Subsection 233B(4) (definition of forced labour)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
note: Repeal the definition of forced labour.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-7-norm

8 Subsection 233B(4) (definition of sexual servitude)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
note: Repeal definition of sexual servitude
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-8-norm

9 Subsection 233B(4) (definition of slavery)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
note: Definition of slavery
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines the term slavery
conclusion text: slavery
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2013 No. 6, 2013 27
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2013
note: Repeal a definition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.31
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-2013-norm

10 Paragraph 245AA(2)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
note: Substitute text in paragraph 245AA(2)(c)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.31
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-10-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Text substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Paragraph 245AA(2)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.31
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-11-norm

12 At the end of paragraph 245AG(2)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
note: Add “within the meaning of the Criminal Code”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.31
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-12-norm

13 Sections 245AH and 245AI
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new ones.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.31
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-13-norm

245AH Meaning of exploited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-245ah
note: A person is exploited if they are subjected to exploitation within the meaning of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.31
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-245ah-norm

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-245ah-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 245AH Meaning of exploited
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

14 Section 338 (subparagraph (b)(ii) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
note: Omit 'exploitation, or' from the definition of serious offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.31
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-14-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits exploitation, or
premise text: Definition of serious offence
conclusion text: Omit 'exploitation, or'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Subparagraphs 5D(3A)(a)(ii) and (iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
note: Repeal specific sections related to slavery and human trafficking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.31
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-15-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28
note: Prohibition on debt bondage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.32
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-28-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-28-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 28 Crimes Legislation Amendment (Slavery, Slavery-like Conditions and People
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids debt bondage
premise text: (vi) section 271.8 or 271.9 (debt bondage)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2013 No. 6, 2013 29
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2013-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-2-sec-2013-2-norm

1 Application of amendments made by this Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
note: Amendments apply to offences committed on or after the Act's commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2013a00006.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-3-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2013a00006-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

c2013a00006-sch-3-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Application of amendments made by this Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2013a00006-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed