1 After Part 5-1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.8
note: Insert provision
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Decisions made before commencement of Part 5-1A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.59
note: Clarifies power to make decisions under Telecommunications Act
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
schema version: 2

11 Keeping information or documents before commencement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.60
note: Service provider may keep information before commencement.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
schema version: 2

12 First reporting period after commencement of Part 5-1A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.60
note: Defines reporting period for annual report under Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
schema version: 2

180G The Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.38
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180G(1) The Organisation
has part: 180G(2) The Organisation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180g
schema version: 2

180G(1) The Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.38
note: Cannot make an authorisation for disclosure of information about a journalist or their employer.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180G The Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Authorisation cannot be made for a period overlapping with a journalist information warrant
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: a purpose of making the authorisation would be to identify another person whom the eligible person knows or reasonably believes to be a source

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: authorisation for disclosure of information about a journalist or their employer

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure of information about an employer of a journalist
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: particular person is working in a professional capacity as a journalist; or particular person is an employer of such a person

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure of information about a source
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: particular person to be: a person who is working in a professional capacity as a journalist; or particular person is an employer of such a person

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on making an authorisation for disclosure of information about another person
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: particular person whom the eligible person knows or reasonably believes to be a source

180G(2) The Organisation
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.38
note: Nothing in this section affects the kind of person in relation to whom a warrant may be issued under this Act.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180G The Organisation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the kind of person...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Describes a class of persons affected by the provision.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: (2) Nothing in this section affects...

180H Enforcement agencies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.39
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180H(1) Enforcement agencies
has part: 180H(2) Enforcement agencies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180h
schema version: 2

180H(1) Enforcement agencies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.39
note: Authorized officer must not disclose information or documents of a particular person if they are a journalist or their employer.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180H Enforcement agencies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if they are a journalist or their employer.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) An authorised officer of an enforcement agency must not make an authorisation...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: of a particular person if they are a journalist or their employer.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: Authorized officer must not disclose information or documents.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: unless a journalist information warrant is in force, in relation to that particular person, under which authorised officers of the agency may make authorisations under that section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure for source identification
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: a purpose of making the authorisation would be to identify another person whom the authorised officer knows or reasonably believes to be a source;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if they are a journalist or their employer.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition for authorized officers
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (1) An authorised officer of an enforcement agency must not make an authorisation...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless a journalist information warrant is in force, in relation to that particular person, under which authorised officers of the agency may make authorisations under that section.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition for disclosure without warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (1) An authorised officer of an enforcement agency must not make an authorisation...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180H(1) Enforcement agencies

180H(2) Enforcement agencies
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.39
note: No disclosure of information or documents relating to a particular person
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180H Enforcement agencies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...must not make an authorisation...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
premise text: (2) An authorised officer...

180J Requesting a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180J(1) Requesting a journalist information warrant
has part: 180J(2) Requesting a journalist information warrant
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180j
schema version: 2

180J(1) Requesting a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40
note: Request for a journalist information warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180j-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180J Requesting a journalist information warrant

180J(2) Requesting a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40
note: Request for journalist information warrant must specify facts and grounds.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180j-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180J Requesting a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Warrant must be issued.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Request must specify facts and grounds.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180J(2) Requesting a journalist information warrant

180K Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180K(1) Further information
has part: 180K(2) Further information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180k
schema version: 2

180K(1) Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40
note: The Minister may require the Director-General to provide further information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180K Further information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Expresses a request for information.
modality: Epistemic
operator: require

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Specifies a temporal interval.
modality: LTL
operator: within

180K(2) Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40
note: Refuse to consider or take action on a request if the Director-General breaches the requirement.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180K Further information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refuse to consider or take action on a request.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires overlap between Director-General's breach and Minister's consideration/action.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (2) If the Director-General breaches the requirement, the Minister may:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refuse to consider or take action on a request.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits Minister from considering or taking action on a request.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) If the Director-General breaches the requirement, the Minister may:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refuse to take any further action on a request.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits Minister from taking further action on a request.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) If the Director-General breaches the requirement, the Minister may:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refuse to consider or take action on a request.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires recurring trace of Director-General's breach for Minister's consideration/action.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (2) If the Director-General breaches the requirement, the Minister may:

180L Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180L(1) Issuing a journalist information warrant
has part: 180L(2) Issuing a journalist information warrant
has part: 180L(3) Issuing a journalist information warrant
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180l
schema version: 2

180L(1) Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40
note: Issue a journalist information warrant or refuse to issue one
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180L Issuing a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

180L(2) Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40
note: Minister must satisfy conditions before issuing a journalist information warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180L Issuing a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The public interest in issuing the warrant outweighs the public interest in protecting the confidentiality of the identity of the source in connection with whom authorisations would be made under the authority of the warrant, having regard to...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Minister must satisfy conditions before issuing a journalist information warrant during a specific time period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The Minister must not issue a journalist information warrant unless...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must satisfy the conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a duty to satisfy conditions before issuing a journalist information warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (2) The Minister must not issue a journalist information warrant unless...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must consider any submissions made by a Public Interest Advocate under section 180X, and any other matters the Minister considers relevant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a duty to consider all relevant matters before issuing a journalist information warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: must
premise text: (2) The Minister must not issue a journalist information warrant unless...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Organisation’s functions would extend to the making of authorisations under Division 3 in relation to the particular person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Minister has a function that extends to making authorisations under Division 3.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has-a
premise text: (2) The Minister must not issue a journalist information warrant unless...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Organisation’s functions would extend to the making of authorisations under Division 3 in relation to the particular person, having regard to...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Minister has a function that extends to making authorisations under Division 3.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has-a
premise text: (2) The Minister must not issue a journalist information warrant unless...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The public interest in protecting the confidentiality of the identity of the source in connection with whom authorisations would be made under the authority of the warrant outweighs the public interest in issuing the warrant, having regard to...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Minister must satisfy conditions before issuing a journalist information warrant until a certain time period.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (2) The Minister must not issue a journalist information warrant unless...

180L(3) Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40
note: Conditions or restrictions for making authorisations under the warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 180L Issuing a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation permits
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: (3) A journalist information warrant issued under this section may specify conditions or restrictions relating to making authorisations under the authority of the warrant.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation restriction
modality: Deontic
operator: Restricts
premise text: (3) A journalist information warrant issued under this section may specify conditions or restrictions relating to making authorisations under the authority of the warrant.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation allowance
modality: Deontic
operator: Allows
premise text: (3) A journalist information warrant issued under this section may specify conditions or restrictions relating to making authorisations under the authority of the warrant.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation regulation
modality: Deontic
operator: Regulates
premise text: (3) A journalist information warrant issued under this section may specify conditions or restrictions relating to making authorisations under the authority of the warrant.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Authorisation limitation
modality: Deontic
operator: Limits
premise text: (3) A journalist information warrant issued under this section may specify conditions or restrictions relating to making authorisations under the authority of the warrant.

180M Issuing a journalist information warrant in an emergency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.41
note: Issuing a journalist information warrant in an emergency
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180m-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180m-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180m
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180m-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directs the Director-General of Security to issue a warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: issue

180N Duration of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.44
note: The Minister must revoke a journalist information warrant before its specified period ends.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180n-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180n-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180n
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Minister must revoke the warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

180P Discontinuance of authorisations before expiry of a journalist
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.44
note: Ensure discontinuation of authorisations before expiry of a journalist information warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180p-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180p-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180p
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform the Minister and take steps to ensure discontinuation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180Q(1) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
has part: 180Q(2) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
has part: 180Q(3) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
has part: 180Q(4) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
has part: 180Q(5) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180q
schema version: 2

180Q(1) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.44
note: Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180q-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply for a journalist information warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180Q(1) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information

180Q(2) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.44
note: Agency must apply for journalist information on behalf of the agency or its officer.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180q-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must apply for journalist information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180Q(2) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information

180Q(3) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.44
note: Agency chief officer may nominate an office for agency management
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180q-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information

180Q(4) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.44
note: Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180q-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May apply
modality: Deontic
operator: may

180Q(5) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.44
note: Application for journalist information may be made in writing or any other form.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180q-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180Q(5) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information

180R Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180R(1) Further information
has part: 180R(2) Further information
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180r
schema version: 2

180R(1) Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.45
note: Agency must provide further information to Part 4-1 issuing authority
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180r-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180r-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180R Further information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

180R(2) Further information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.45
note: Requirement to not breach the requirement
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180r-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180r-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180R Further information

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180R(2) Further information

180S Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180S(1) Oaths and affirmations
has part: 180S(2) Oaths and affirmations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180s
schema version: 2

180S(1) Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.45
note: Information must be verified on oath or affirmation when applying for Part 4-1 issuing authority.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180s-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180S Oaths and affirmations

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to verify information on oath or affirmation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180S(1) Oaths and affirmations

180S(2) Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.45
note: Authority to administer oath or affirmation
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180s-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180S Oaths and affirmations

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for oath or affirmation administration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the Part 4-1 issuing authority may:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting authority
modality: Deontic
operator: authorize
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the Part 4-1 issuing authority may:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180S(2) Oaths and affirmations

180T Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.46
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180T(1) Issuing a journalist information warrant
has part: 180T(2) Issuing a journalist information warrant
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180t
schema version: 2

180T(1) Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.46
note: Authority to issue a journalist information warrant upon application.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180t-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180T Issuing a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Warrant issued within a reasonable timeframe.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between issuing authority's decision and warrant issuance.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Section 180Q application consideration.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Issue a journalist information warrant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Issuing authority has an obligation to issue a warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Application under section 180Q.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180T(1) Issuing a journalist information warrant

180T(2) Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.46
note: Must issue a journalist information warrant only under specified conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180t-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180T Issuing a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to issue a warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the issuing authority as responsible for issuing warrants
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.47
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180U(1) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
has part: 180U(2) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
has part: 180U(3) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
has part: 180U(4) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
has part: 180U(5) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180u
schema version: 2

180U(1) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.47
note: Journalist information warrant must be in prescribed form and signed by issuing authority.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for issuing authority's signature.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
premise text: (1) A journalist information warrant issued under this Subdivision must be in accordance with the prescribed form...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Authority's signature implies compliance with prescribed form.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (1) A journalist information warrant issued under this Subdivision must be in accordance with the prescribed form...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Authority's signature is a cognitive event.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS
premise text: (1) A journalist information warrant issued under this Subdivision must be in accordance with the prescribed form...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with prescribed form and signature.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) A journalist information warrant issued under this Subdivision must be in accordance with the prescribed form...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information about issuing authority's signature is disseminated.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS
premise text: (1) A journalist information warrant issued under this Subdivision must be in accordance with the prescribed form...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180U(1) Form and content of a journalist information warrant

180U(2) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.47
note: Conditions or restrictions for making authorisations under the warrant.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180u-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specifies conditions or restrictions.
modality: Deontic
operator: specifies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180U(2) Form and content of a journalist information warrant

180U(3) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.47
note: Journalist information warrant must specify a period of up to 90 days.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180u-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must specify a period of up to 90 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST_SPECIFY

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180U(3) Form and content of a journalist information warrant

180U(4) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.47
note: No variation of a journalist information warrant is allowed by the issuing authority.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the period for which it is to be in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The warrant's duration cannot overlap with a new one.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4) A Part 4-1 issuing authority must not...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the period for which it is to be in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The warrant's duration will not be modified.
modality: CogAI
operator: NotModified
premise text: (4) A Part 4-1 issuing authority must not...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...by extending the period for which it is to be in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No variation of a journalist information warrant is allowed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (4) A Part 4-1 issuing authority must not vary...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the period for which it is to be in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The change will not diffuse to other warrants.
modality: Diffusion
operator: NotDiffused
premise text: (4) A Part 4-1 issuing authority must not...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the period for which it is to be in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The warrant's duration will not change.
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
premise text: (4) A Part 4-1 issuing authority must not...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180U(4) Form and content of a journalist information warrant

180U(5) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.47
note: Allows for multiple warrants to be issued under the same Act.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180u-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits further warrants under the same Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow

180V Entry into force of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.47
note: Entry into force of a journalist information warrant
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180v-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180v-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180v
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180v-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Comes into force when issued

180W Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180W(1) Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief
has part: 180W(2) Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180w
schema version: 2

180W(1) Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48
note: Must revoke journalist information warrant if grounds cease to exist
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180w-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180w-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180W Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180w-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180W(1) Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief

180W(2) Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48
note: Delegation of power to a certifying officer
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180w-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180w-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180W Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief

180X Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48
curation status: Proposed
has part: 180X(1) Public Interest Advocates
has part: 180X(2) Public Interest Advocates
has part: 180X(3) Public Interest Advocates
has part: 180X(4) Public Interest Advocates
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180x
schema version: 2

180X(1) Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48
note: The Prime Minister must declare Public Interest Advocates.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180x-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 180X Public Interest Advocates

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180X(1) Public Interest Advocates

180X(2) Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48
note: Submit to Minister or issuing authority about specific matters.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180x-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 180X Public Interest Advocates

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to submit
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

180X(3) Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48
note: Regulations may prescribe matters relating to the performance of a Public Interest Advocate.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180x-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 180X Public Interest Advocates

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: mayPrescribe

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 180X(3) Public Interest Advocates

180X(4) Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48
note: A declaration under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-180x-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 180X Public Interest Advocates

182A Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.51
curation status: Proposed
has part: 182A(1) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
has part: 182A(2) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-182a
schema version: 2

182A(1) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.51
note: Disclosing or using journalist information warrants is an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-182a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 182A Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure or use of journalist information warrants.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implicates imprisonment for 2 years upon committing the offence.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 182A(1) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants

182A(2) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.51
note: Disclosing or using a journalist information warrant without permission is an offence.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 182A Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants by CogAI.
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing or using a journalist information warrant.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 182A(2) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants

182B Permitted disclosure or use: journalist information warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.52
note: Disclosure or use of information is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-182b
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permitted disclosure or use
modality: Deontic
operator: !

185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.53
curation status: Proposed
has part: 185D(1) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
has part: 185D(2) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
has part: 185D(3) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
has part: 185D(4) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-185d
schema version: 2

185D(1) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.53
note: Notification of issuing a journalist information warrant to the Inspector-General and Parliamentary Joint Committee.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-185d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must notify the Inspector-General and Parliamentary Joint Committee.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

185D(2) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.53
note: Must provide copy of authorisation to Inspector-General after warrant expiry
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-185d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Copy provided to Inspector-General
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide copy of authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
premise text: Authorisation made under warrant

185D(3) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.53
note: Must provide report to Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security upon request from Inspector-General.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-185d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty to provide report.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

185D(4) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.53
note: Request for briefing from Inspector-General
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-185d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media

185E Reports on access to retained data
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.55
curation status: Proposed
has part: 185E(1) Reports on access to retained data
has part: 185E(2) Reports on access to retained data
has part: 185E(3) Reports on access to retained data
has part: 185E(4) Reports on access to retained data
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-185e
schema version: 2

185E(1) Reports on access to retained data
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.55
note: Minister must provide report to committee upon receipt of Inspector-General's report
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-185e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 185E Reports on access to retained data

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Report subject to committee
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 185E(1) Reports on access to retained data

185E(2) Reports on access to retained data
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.55
note: Request for briefing from Inspector-General on authorisation or authorisations
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-185e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 185E Reports on access to retained data

185E(3) Reports on access to retained data
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.55
note: Minister must provide report to Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security upon receipt of Ombudsman's report.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-185e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 185E Reports on access to retained data

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Report is part of the Minister's duties
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPartOf

185E(4) Reports on access to retained data
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.55
note: Request for briefing from Ombudsman
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-185e-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 185E Reports on access to retained data

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide briefing
modality: Deontic
operator: request

187A Service providers must keep certain information and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.8
curation status: Proposed
has part: 187A(1) Service providers must keep certain information and
has part: 187A(3) Service providers must keep certain information and
has part: 187A(3A) Service providers must keep certain information and
has part: 187A(3B) Service providers must keep certain information and
has part: 187A(3C) Service providers must keep certain information and
has part: 187A(4) Service providers must keep certain information and
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187a
schema version: 2

187A(1) Service providers must keep certain information and
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.8
note: Service providers must keep certain information and documents.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 187A Service providers must keep certain information and

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Service providers must keep information of a kind specified in or under section 187AA
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies services
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Section 187AA

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187A(1) Service providers must keep certain information and

187A(3) Service providers must keep certain information and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.8
note: Service providers must keep certain information and
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 187A Service providers must keep certain information and

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187A(3) Service providers must keep certain information and

187A(3A) Service providers must keep certain information and
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.8
note: Minister may declare service to be subject to this Part.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 187A Service providers must keep certain information and

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187A(3A) Service providers must keep certain information and

187A(3B) Service providers must keep certain information and
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.8
note: Service providers must keep certain information for a specified period.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3b
schema version: 2
part of: 187A Service providers must keep certain information and

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to keep information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187A(3B) Service providers must keep certain information and

187A(3C) Service providers must keep certain information and
type: Concept
description: Review report within 15 sitting days of a House of the Parliament
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.8
note: Must refer amendment to Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security for review.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3c
schema version: 2
part of: 187A Service providers must keep certain information and

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to refer amendment for review
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition of Minister's obligation
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A

187A(4) Service providers must keep certain information and
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.8
note: Service providers must keep certain information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 187A Service providers must keep certain information and

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to keep information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187A(4) Service providers must keep certain information and

187AA Information to be kept
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.11
note: Service provider must keep certain information about subscribers and services.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187aa-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187aa-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187aa
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Service provider must keep certain information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187aa-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187AA Information to be kept

187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14
curation status: Proposed
has part: 187B(1) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
has part: 187B(2) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
has part: 187B(2A) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
has part: 187B(3) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
has part: 187B(4) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
has part: 187B(5) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
has part: 187B(6) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
has part: 187B(7) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b
schema version: 2

187B(1) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14
note: Service providers not covered by this Part
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part

187B(2) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14
note: The Communications Access Co-ordinator may declare that subsection 187A(1) applies in relation to a relevant service.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: declare

187B(2A) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14
note: Consultation with Privacy Commissioner before making declaration
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Declaration cannot be made without consultation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consult
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Consultation with Privacy Commissioner is required

187B(3) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14
note: Consider interests of law enforcement and national security, Telecommunications Act 1997, Privacy Act 1988, and submissions from the Privacy Commissioner.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part

187B(4) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14
note: Declaration must be in writing.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written declaration.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187B(4) Certain service providers not covered by this Part

187B(5) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14
note: A declaration made under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaring something as not a legislative instrument.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

187B(6) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14
note: Communications Access Co-ordinator must give written notice to Minister after declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: As soon as practicable after making a declaration under subsection (2),

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Communications Access Co-ordinator must give written notice to Minister.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

187B(7) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
description: Written notice
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14
note: Minister must notify Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security after receiving notice.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to notify
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

187BA Ensuring the confidentiality of information
type: Concept
description: Protection measures (encryption, protection from unauthorized access)
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.15
note: Must protect confidentiality of information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ba-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ba-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187ba
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ba-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to protect confidentiality
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

187C Period for keeping information and documents
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.15
curation status: Proposed
has part: 187C(1) Period for keeping information and documents
has part: 187C(2) Period for keeping information and documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187c
schema version: 2

187C(1) Period for keeping information and documents
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.15
note: Service provider must keep information or documents for 2 years after closure of account.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 187C Period for keeping information and documents

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Information or documents must be kept for at least 2 years after closure of account.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (i) starting when the information or document came into existence; and (ii) ending 2 years after the closure of the account to which the information or document relates;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Information or documents are related to a service provider.
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
premise text: (1) The period for which a service provider must keep, or cause to be kept, information or a document under section 187A is:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Service provider must keep information or documents.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) The period for which a service provider must keep, or cause to be kept, information or a document under section 187A is:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information or documents are related to a closure of account.
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
premise text: (i) starting when the information or document came into existence; and (ii) ending 2 years after the closure of the account to which the information or document relates;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Information or documents must be kept for at least 2 years.
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: (i) starting when the information or document came into existence; and (ii) ending 2 years after it came into existence;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187C(1) Period for keeping information and documents

187C(2) Period for keeping information and documents
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.15
note: Prescribes a period for keeping information and documents in relation to specified matters.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 187C Period for keeping information and documents

187D Effect of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.16
note: Comply with data retention implementation plan for communications carried by a service.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187d-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187d
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with data retention implementation plan.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187d-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Subclass of obligations related to data retention implementation plans.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187D Effect of data retention implementation plans

187E Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.16
curation status: Proposed
has part: 187E(1) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
has part: 187E(2) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
has part: 187E(3) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
has part: 187E(4) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187e
schema version: 2

187E(1) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.16
note: Service provider must apply for approval of data retention implementation plan.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 187E Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Service provider must apply for approval.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187E(1) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans

187E(2) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.16
note: Service provider must specify practices for keeping confidential information and documents, interim arrangements, and compliance day.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 187E Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Service provider must comply with obligations.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187E(2) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans

187E(3) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.16
note: Plan must cease to be in force by specified day if approved
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 187E Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not be later than the day on which the plan would, if approved, cease to be in force under section 187H in relation to the service.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: (3) The day specified under paragraph (2)(c)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not be later than the day on which the plan would, if approved, cease to be in force under section 187H in relation to the service.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Plan must cease to be in force by specified day if approved
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (3) The day specified under paragraph (2)(c)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: must not be later than the day on which the plan would, if approved, cease to be in force under section 187H in relation to the service.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (3) The day specified under paragraph (2)(c)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187E(3) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans

187E(4) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.16
note: Plan must specify contact details of service provider officers/employees
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187e-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 187E Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Plan must specify contact details
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187E(4) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans

187F Approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.17
curation status: Proposed
has part: 187F(1) Approval of data retention implementation plans
has part: 187F(2) Approval of data retention implementation plans
has part: 187F(3) Approval of data retention implementation plans
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187f
schema version: 2

187F(1) Approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
description: Approval of data retention implementation plan
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.17
note: Service provider must obtain approval for data retention implementation plan.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 187F Approval of data retention implementation plans

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Service provider must obtain approval
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

187F(2) Approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.17
note: Consider desirability of achieving substantial compliance with section 187A and reduce regulatory burden.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 187F Approval of data retention implementation plans

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consider temporal interval for desirability of achieving substantial compliance.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) the desirability of achieving substantial compliance with section 187A (and sections 187BA and 187C) as soon as practicable;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider desirability of achieving substantial compliance with section 187A.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (2) Before making a decision under subsection (1), the Communications Access Co-ordinator must take into account:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider extent of plan reduction of regulatory burden.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (b) the extent to which the plan would reduce the regulatory burden imposed on the service provider by this Part;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Consider temporal interval for desirability of achieving substantial compliance.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (a) the desirability of achieving substantial compliance with section 187A (and sections 187BA and 187C) as soon as practicable;

187F(3) Approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.17
note: Conditional approval process for data retention implementation plans
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 187F Approval of data retention implementation plans

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: after receiving the application
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for decision-making
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
premise text: Decision must be made within 60 days

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: within 60 days
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a decision within 60 days
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The Co-ordinator must make a decision

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: within 60 days
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on not making a decision within 60 days
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: The Co-ordinator must not fail to make a decision

187G Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.18
curation status: Proposed
has part: 187G(1) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
has part: 187G(2) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
has part: 187G(3) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
has part: 187G(4) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
has part: 187G(5) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
has part: 187G(6) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187g
schema version: 2

187G(1) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
type: Concept
description: plan
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.18
note: Must provide copy of plan to enforcement agencies and security authorities, invite comments.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 187G Consultation with agencies and the ACMA

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide plan
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

187G(2) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
type: Concept
description: Amendment to original plan
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.18
note: Must request amendment within 30 days after receiving comment or summary.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 187G Consultation with agencies and the ACMA

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to request amendment within 30 days.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

187G(3) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
type: Concept
description: Amended plan and reasons for non-acceptance
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.18
note: Respond to a request for an amendment of the original plan.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187g-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 187G Consultation with agencies and the ACMA

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to respond
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

187G(4) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.18
note: Must refer request and response to ACMA, and request ACMA's determination on amendment.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187g-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 187G Consultation with agencies and the ACMA

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to refer request and response to ACMA.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

187G(5) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
type: Concept
description: Copy of determination
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.18
note: Determine in writing that the original plan should be amended in a specified manner and give a copy of the determination to the service provider.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187g-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 187G Consultation with agencies and the ACMA

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA has an obligation to determine in writing that the original plan should be amended.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

187G(6) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.18
note: Approve amended plan and notify service provider of approval
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187g-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 187G Consultation with agencies and the ACMA

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to approve amended plan
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

187H When data retention implementation plans are in force
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 187H(1) When data retention implementation plans are in force
has part: 187H(2) When data retention implementation plans are in force
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187h
schema version: 2

187H(1) When data retention implementation plans are in force
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.20
note: Data retention implementation plan comes into force upon approval and ceases after a specified period or when the service is no longer operated.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-epistemic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-paraconsistent-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 187H When data retention implementation plans are in force

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the end of the implementation phase for this Part; or ..., at the end of the period of 18 months starting on the day the service provider started to operate the service after that commencement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for data retention plan implementation phase
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (a) comes into force when the Communications Access Co-ordinator notifies the service provider of the approval of the plan; (b) ceases to be in force in relation to that service: ...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the end of the implementation phase for this Part; or ..., at the end of the period of 18 months starting on the day the service provider started to operate the service after that commencement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Service provider's obligation to implement data retention plan upon approval
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
premise text: (a) comes into force when the Communications Access Co-ordinator notifies the service provider of the approval of the plan; (b) ceases to be in force in relation to that service: ...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-epistemic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the end of the implementation phase for this Part; or ..., at the end of the period of 18 months starting on the day the service provider started to operate the service after that commencement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Service provider's knowledge of data retention plan implementation phase
modality: Epistemic
operator: knows
premise text: (a) comes into force when the Communications Access Co-ordinator notifies the service provider of the approval of the plan; (b) ceases to be in force in relation to that service: ...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the end of the implementation phase for this Part; or ..., at the end of the period of 18 months starting on the day the service provider started to operate the service after that commencement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval for data retention plan implementation phase
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (a) comes into force when the Communications Access Co-ordinator notifies the service provider of the approval of the plan; (b) ceases to be in force in relation to that service: ...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-paraconsistent-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the end of the implementation phase for this Part; or ..., at the end of the period of 18 months starting on the day the service provider started to operate the service after that commencement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::paraconsistent
logic summary: Alternative conditions for data retention plan implementation phase
modality: Paraconsistent
operator: or
premise text: (a) comes into force when the Communications Access Co-ordinator notifies the service provider of the approval of the plan; (b) ceases to be in force in relation to that service: ...

187H(2) When data retention implementation plans are in force
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.20
note: Commencement of implementation phase
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187h-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 187H When data retention implementation plans are in force

187J Amending data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 187J(1) Amending data retention implementation plans
has part: 187J(2) Amending data retention implementation plans
has part: 187J(3) Amending data retention implementation plans
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187j
schema version: 2

187J(1) Amending data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.20
note: Amendment of data retention implementation plans requires approval from the Communications Access Co-ordinator.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 187J Amending data retention implementation plans

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits amendment of data retention implementation plans.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187J(1) Amending data retention implementation plans

187J(2) Amending data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.20
note: Approval of data retention implementation plan must be approved by the State.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 187J Amending data retention implementation plans

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Approval is mandatory.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187J(2) Amending data retention implementation plans

187J(3) Amending data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.20
note: Amendment of data retention implementation plan comes into force under specific conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187j-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 187J Amending data retention implementation plans

187K The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.21
curation status: Proposed
has part: 187K(1) The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant
has part: 187K(2) The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant
has part: 187K(3) The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187k
schema version: 2

187K(1) The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.21
note: Granting exemptions or variations to service providers
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187k-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 187K The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: grant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies service providers
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies

187K(2) The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.21
note: Decision must be in writing.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187k-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 187K The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written decision
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

187K(3) The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.21
note: Granting decision for Communications Access Co-ordinator
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187k-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 187K The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant

187KA Review of exemption or variation decisions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.23
curation status: Proposed
has part: 187KA(1) Review of exemption or variation decisions
has part: 187KA(2) Review of exemption or variation decisions
has part: 187KA(3) Review of exemption or variation decisions
has part: 187KA(4) Review of exemption or variation decisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187ka
schema version: 2

187KA(1) Review of exemption or variation decisions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.23
note: Service provider may apply for review of exemption or variation decisions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 187KA Review of exemption or variation decisions

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187KA(1) Review of exemption or variation decisions

187KA(2) Review of exemption or variation decisions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.23
note: Confirm or substitute a decision made under subsection 187K(1)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 187KA Review of exemption or variation decisions

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to confirm or substitute a decision
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

187KA(3) Review of exemption or variation decisions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.23
note: Must provide a copy of the application to specified agencies and authorities.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 187KA Review of exemption or variation decisions

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the application.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

187KA(4) Review of exemption or variation decisions
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.23
note: Consider interests of law enforcement and national security when making decisions about service providers.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 187KA Review of exemption or variation decisions

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider interests of law enforcement and national security.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (4) Before making a decision...

187KB Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 187KB(1) Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
has part: 187KB(2) Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
has part: 187KB(3) Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187kb
schema version: 2

187KB(1) Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.24
note: The Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to a service provider.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 187KB Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

187KB(2) Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.24
note: Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to service providers.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 187KB Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to

187KB(3) Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.24
note: The Minister may enter into an agreement on behalf of the Commonwealth.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 187KB Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187KB(3) Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to

187L Confidentiality of applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 187L(1) Confidentiality of applications
has part: 187L(1A) Confidentiality of applications
has part: 187L(2) Confidentiality of applications
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187l
schema version: 2

187L(1) Confidentiality of applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.24
note: Must treat application as confidential and ensure it is not disclosed without permission.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 187L Confidentiality of applications

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must treat application as confidential.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

187L(1A) Confidentiality of applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.24
note: ACMA must treat application as confidential and ensure it is not disclosed without written permission.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 187L Confidentiality of applications

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must treat application as confidential.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ACMA must not disclose application without written permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT

187L(2) Confidentiality of applications
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.24
note: Must treat copy of application as confidential and ensure it is not disclosed without permission.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187l-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 187L Confidentiality of applications

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must treat copy of application as confidential.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must not disclose copy of application without permission.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT

187LA Application of the Privacy Act 1988
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.25
curation status: Proposed
has part: 187LA(1) Application of the Privacy Act 1988
has part: 187LA(2) Application of the Privacy Act 1988
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187la
schema version: 2

187LA(1) Application of the Privacy Act 1988
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.25
note: The Privacy Act 1988 applies to service providers in relation to retained data.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187la-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 187LA Application of the Privacy Act 1988

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Privacy Act applies to service providers.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187LA(1) Application of the Privacy Act 1988

187LA(2) Application of the Privacy Act 1988
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.25
note: Information is personal if it relates to an individual or a communication involving the individual.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-paraconsistent-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 187LA Application of the Privacy Act 1988

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It is personal information about an individual if it relates to the individual or a communication involving the individual.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relatesTo
premise text: The information relates to:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information is personal if it relates to an individual or a communication involving the individual.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
premise text: The Privacy Act 1988 requires:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information is personal if it relates to an individual or a communication involving the individual.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Knowledge claim
modality: Epistemic
operator: implies
premise text: The Privacy Act 1988 states:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: It is personal information about an individual if it relates to the individual or a communication involving the individual.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal property
modality: LTL
operator: holdsForAll
premise text: The information is kept under this Part.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-paraconsistent-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information is personal if it relates to an individual or a communication involving the individual.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::paraconsistent
logic summary: Alternative
modality: Paraconsistent
operator: or
premise text: The information relates to:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187LA(2) Application of the Privacy Act 1988

187M Pecuniary penalties and infringement notices
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.25
note: Pecuniary penalties and infringement notices for contraventions of civil penalty provisions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187m-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187m-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187m
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187m-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits pecuniary penalties and infringement notices.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187m-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187M Pecuniary penalties and infringement notices

187N Review of operation of Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.26
curation status: Proposed
has part: 187N(1) Review of operation of Part
has part: 187N(1A) Review of operation of Part
has part: 187N(2) Review of operation of Part
has part: 187N(3) Review of operation of Part
has part: 187N(4) Review of operation of Part
has part: 187N(5) Review of operation of Part
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187n
schema version: 2

187N(1) Review of operation of Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.26
note: Must review the operation of this Part.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187n-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 187N Review of operation of Part

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to review
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

187N(1A) Review of operation of Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.26
note: Review of operation of Part must start and conclude within two years after implementation phase end.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187n-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 187N Review of operation of Part

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to review operation of Part
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

187N(2) Review of operation of Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.26
note: Committee must give Minister a written report of review.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187n-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 187N Review of operation of Part

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Committee must give the Minister a written report of the review.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Committee obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187N(2) Review of operation of Part

187N(3) Review of operation of Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.26
note: Agency must keep documents and information for a specified period.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187n-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 187N Review of operation of Part

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to keep documents and information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

187N(4) Review of operation of Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.26
note: Must keep authorisations and information related to a report.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187n-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 187N Review of operation of Part

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to keep authorisations and information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

187N(5) Review of operation of Part
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.26
note: No obligation to keep information under this Act or another law is limited by subsections (3) and (4).
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187n-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 187N Review of operation of Part

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187N(5) Review of operation of Part

187P Annual reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.27
curation status: Proposed
has part: 187P(1) Annual reports
has part: 187P(1A) Annual reports
has part: 187P(2) Annual reports
has part: 187P(3) Annual reports
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187p
schema version: 2

187P(1) Annual reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.27
note: Annual report must be prepared by the Minister after each June 30th.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 187P Annual reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prepare annual report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

187P(1A) Annual reports
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.27
note: Must include information about costs and data retention plans.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 187P Annual reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory requirement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187P(1A) Annual reports

187P(2) Annual reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.27
note: Annual report must be included in the report prepared under subsection 186(2)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 187P Annual reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The annual report contains information about the year ending on that 30 June
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) A report under subsection (1) must be included in the report prepared under subsection 186(2) relating to the year ending on that 30 June.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: If a report is prepared under subsection (1), then it must include an annual report in the report prepared under subsection 186(2)
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (2) A report under subsection (1) must be included in the report prepared under subsection 186(2) relating to the year ending on that 30 June.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to include annual report in the report prepared under subsection 186(2)
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) A report under subsection (1) must be included in the report prepared under subsection 186(2) relating to the year ending on that 30 June.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The annual report contains information about the year ending on that 30 June
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) A report under subsection (1) must be included in the report prepared under subsection 186(2) relating to the year ending on that 30 June.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The annual report contains information about the year ending on that 30 June
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) A report under subsection (1) must be included in the report prepared under subsection 186(2) relating to the year ending on that 30 June.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187P(2) Annual reports

187P(3) Annual reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.27
note: Report cannot be made in a manner that enables identification of a person.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-187p-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 187P Annual reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Report must not be made in a manner that enables identification of a person.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 187P(3) Annual reports

1A Section 4
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.28
note: Defines retained data as having the same meaning as in the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1a
schema version: 2

1B Paragraphs 94(2A)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.28
note: Substitute 'period' for 'year'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1b
schema version: 2

1C At the end of subsection 94(2A)
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.28
note: Requires reporting of certain data retention information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1c
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1C At the end of subsection 94(2A)

1D After subsection 94(2A)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.29
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1D(2B) After subsection 94(2A)
has part: 1D(2C) After subsection 94(2A)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1d
schema version: 2

1D(2B) After subsection 94(2A)
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.29
note: Report must specify authorizations for information or documents held for certain lengths of time.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 1D After subsection 94(2A)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1D(2B) After subsection 94(2A)

1D(2C) After subsection 94(2A)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.29
note: The Minister may declare kinds of information to be set out in a report.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c
schema version: 2
part of: 1D After subsection 94(2A)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: No temporal interval specified.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal interval
premise text: (2C) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, declare kinds of information that are to be set out in a report under subsection (1).

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: No artificial intelligence application specified.
modality: CogAI
operator: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: (2C) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, declare kinds of information that are to be set out in a report under subsection (1).

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to declare kinds of information.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: No information dissemination specified.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information dissemination
premise text: (2C) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, declare kinds of information that are to be set out in a report under subsection (1).

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: No recurring trace specified.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (2C) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, declare kinds of information that are to be set out in a report under subsection (1).

1E Section 3
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.29
note: Definition of retained data activity
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1e-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1e
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1E Section 3

1F After paragraph 29(1)(bb)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.29
note: Review of retained data activities and reports under specific Acts
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1f
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to review certain matters
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1F After paragraph 29(1)(bb)

1G At the end of section 29
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1G(4) At the end of section 29
has part: 1G(5) At the end of section 29
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1g
schema version: 2

1G(4) At the end of section 29
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.30
note: Exempts certain actions from paragraphs (3)(c) and (k)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1g-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 1G At the end of section 29

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Paragraphs (3)(c) and (k) do not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts actions from certain paragraphs
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
premise text: (4) Subject to subsection (5)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1G(4) At the end of section 29

1G(5) At the end of section 29
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.30
note: Service providers cannot review retained data activities.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1g-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 1G At the end of section 29

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...are to be performed for the sole purpose of assessing, and making recommendations on...
confidence: 0.6000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (5) The Committee’s functions under paragraphs (1)(bd) and (be):...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...do not permit reviewing the retained data activities of service providers;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits reviewing retained data activities.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) The Committee’s functions under paragraphs (1)(bd) and (be):...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1G(5) At the end of section 29

1H Subsection 6(1) (at the end of the definition of personal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.30
note: Extends meaning of personal information to cover information kept under Part 5-1A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-n3logic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1h
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval during which information is covered
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During the period specified in Part 5-1A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Section 187LA of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to extend meaning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extends the meaning of personal information
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
premise text: Section 187LA of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information covered by the extended definition
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Covers information kept under Part 5-1A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act
modality: Diffusion
operator: covers
premise text: Personal information definition

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-n3logic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Personal information definition subsumes Part 5-1A
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Subsumes Part 5-1A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act under personal information definition
modality: N3Logic
operator: subsumes
premise text: Section 187LA of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information validation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates that information kept under Part 5-1A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act is covered by personal information definition
modality: SHACL
operator: validates
premise text: Section 187LA of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1H Subsection 6(1) (at the end of the definition of personal

1J Subsection 6C(1) (note)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.30
note: Service providers are treated as organisations for the purposes of this Act.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1j-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1j-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1j-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1j-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1j
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1j-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Organisation for purposes of this Act
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Treated as organisation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: treated as
premise text: Section 187LA of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Organisation for purposes of this Act
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Treated as organisation
modality: Deontic
operator: treated as
premise text: Section 187LA of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1j-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Organisation for purposes of this Act
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Treated as organisation
modality: LTL
operator: treated as
premise text: Section 187LA of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1j-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1J Subsection 6C(1) (note)

2 Section 7 (at the end of the definition of civil penalty
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.31
note: Add a provision of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 declared to be a civil penalty provision.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adding a provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Add

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Section 7 (at the end of the definition of civil penalty

3 Subsection 105(5A)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.31
note: Monitor and report on compliance costs
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to monitor and report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

3A After subsection 280(1A)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.31
note: Disclosure of information or document not prohibited in certain circumstances
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure and civil proceeding
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: in connection with a civil proceeding

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information or document
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Subsection (1)(b) does not apply

3B Section 281
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.32
note: Insertion of '(1)' before 'Division 2'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3b
schema version: 2

3C At the end of section 281
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 3C(2) At the end of section 281
has part: 3C(3) At the end of section 281
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3c
schema version: 2

3C(2) At the end of section 281
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.32
note: Disclosure of information or document by a person as a witness in a civil proceeding is permitted for specific purposes.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 3C At the end of section 281

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information or document.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

3C(3) At the end of section 281
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.32
note: Exemptions from subsection (2)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3c-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 3C At the end of section 281

4 Subsection 314(8)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.33
note: Omit specified section of Act
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

5 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.33
note: Defines Defence Minister's meaning
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: same meaning as in the Intelligence Services Act 2001
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Same meaning as Intelligence Services Act 2001
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Defence Minister

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Subsection 5(1)

6 At the end of subsection 6R(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.35
note: Add “and all the enforcement agencies”.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 At the end of subsection 6R(3)

64 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s or Inspector-General’s
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.36
note: Dealing in connection with Organisation’s or Inspector-General’s functions is prohibited.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-64-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition on dealing with Organisation’s or Inspector-General’s functions.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-64-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s or Inspector-General’s

6A After section 6DB
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.35
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6a
schema version: 2

6B Section 64 (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.36
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6b-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6b
schema version: 2

6C Subsection 64(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.36
note: Insertion of additional functions into the Inspector-General's duties
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6c
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of a new obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

6D Subsection 64(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.36
note: Allow communication with foreign intelligence information
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6d-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6d
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission to communicate
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.35
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6DC(1) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
has part: 6DC(2) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
has part: 6DC(3) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
has part: 6DC(4) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6dc
schema version: 2

6DC(1) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.35
note: Minister may appoint issuing authority
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between Minister's appointment and issuing authority's role
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to appoint
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6DC(1) Part 4-1 issuing authorities

6DC(2) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.35
note: Consent to be appointed by the Minister
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to consent
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6DC(2) Part 4-1 issuing authorities

6DC(3) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.35
note: Appointment ceases if the person ceases to be appointable or is revoked by writing.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ceases to have effect
modality: Deontic
operator: CEASES
premise text: (3) A person’s appointment ceases...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Revoked by writing
modality: Deontic
operator: REVOKE
premise text: (b) the Minister, by writing, revokes the appointment.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6DC(3) Part 4-1 issuing authorities

6DC(4) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.35
note: Part 4-1 issuing authority has a duty to perform or exercise its function or power.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: has

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6DC(4) Part 4-1 issuing authorities

6E Paragraph 176(5)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.36
note: Conditional commencement of authorization period
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6e-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6e
schema version: 2

6F Subsection 176(6)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.37
note: Must revoke authorisation under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6f
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: must

6G Paragraph 180(6)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.37
note: Specifies the time period for an authorization to remain in force.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6g-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6g
schema version: 2

6H Subsection 180(7)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.37
note: Must revoke authorisation if disclosure is no longer required
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6h-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6h-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6h
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Revocation must be cancelled
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of revoking authorisation without disclosure being required
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Disclosure is no longer required

6J Section 180F
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.38
note: Interference with privacy must be proportionate and justifiable.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6j-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6j-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6j
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6j-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6J Section 180F

6K Before paragraph 180F(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.38
note: Requires consideration of conduct gravity, including seriousness of offence and pecuniary penalty.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6k-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6k-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6k
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires consideration of conduct gravity.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6k-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6K Before paragraph 180F(a)

6L After Division 4B of Part 4-1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6l-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6l
schema version: 2

6M After subparagraph 181A(3)(b)(i)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48
note: Enable compliance with obligations under section 185D or 185E
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6m-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6m
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6m-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6M After subparagraph 181A(3)(b)(i)

6N After paragraph 181A(3)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.49
note: Disclosure to IGIS official for exercising powers or performing functions under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6n
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure overlaps with IGIS official's powers and functions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Disclosure overlaps with IGIS official's powers and functions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: IGIS official has power to exercise powers or perform functions under the Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure overlaps with IGIS official's knowledge
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Disclosure overlaps with IGIS official's knowledge
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
premise text: IGIS official has power to exercise powers or perform functions under the Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure must be made to IGIS official
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information to IGIS official
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: IGIS official has power to exercise powers or perform functions under the Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure diffuses to IGIS official's powers and functions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Disclosure diffuses to IGIS official's powers and functions
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
premise text: IGIS official has power to exercise powers or perform functions under the Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure overlaps with IGIS official's powers and functions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Disclosure overlaps with IGIS official's powers and functions
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: IGIS official has power to exercise powers or perform functions under the Act

6P After subparagraph 181A(6)(b)(i)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.49
note: Enabling a person to comply with obligations under section 185D or 185E
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6p-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6p-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6p
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enabling a duty to be fulfilled
modality: Deontic
operator: enables

6Q After paragraph 181A(6)(b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.49
note: Insertion of IGIS official's use in connection with exercising powers or performing functions under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6q-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6q
schema version: 2

6R After subparagraph 181B(3)(b)(i)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.49
note: Enabling a person to comply with obligations under section 185D or 185E
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6r-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6r-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6r
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6r-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enabling a duty to be fulfilled
modality: Deontic
operator: enables

6S Before subparagraph 181B(6)(b)(i)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.49
note: Enabling a person to comply with obligations under section 185D or 185E
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6s-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6s-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6s
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Enabling a person to comply with obligations
modality: Deontic
operator: enabling

6T Subsection 182(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.50
note: Disclosure of non-missing person information is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6t-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6t-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6t
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose non-missing person information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

6U Subsection 182(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.50
note: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (3) (see subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code).
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6u-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6u-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6u
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6u-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6u-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6U Subsection 182(3)

6V At the end of Division 6 of Part 4-1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.51
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6v-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6v
schema version: 2

6W At the end of section 185
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.52
note: Section does not limit subsection 187N(3)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6w-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6w-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6w
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6w-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection 187N(3) is not limited
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limits subsection 187N(3)
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: Section 6W

6X After section 185C
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.52
note: Amendment of Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 2015
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6x-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6x
schema version: 2

6Y At the end of subsection 186(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.55
note: Schedule 1 Data retention added
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6y-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6y
schema version: 2

6Z After subsection 186(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6Z(1A) After subsection 186(1)
has part: 6Z(1B) After subsection 186(1)
has part: 6Z(1C) After subsection 186(1)
has part: 6Z(1D) After subsection 186(1)
has part: 6Z(1E) After subsection 186(1)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6z
schema version: 2

6Z(1A) After subsection 186(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.56
note: Defines categories for report under subsection (1B)
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1a-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1a
schema version: 2
part of: 6Z After subsection 186(1)

6Z(1B) After subsection 186(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.56
note: Minister may declare categories of offences and other matters.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1b
schema version: 2
part of: 6Z After subsection 186(1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to declare categories
modality: Deontic
operator: May

6Z(1C) After subsection 186(1)
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.56
note: Report must specify authorizations and documents held for certain lengths of time.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1c
schema version: 2
part of: 6Z After subsection 186(1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide report with specified information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1c-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6Z(1C) After subsection 186(1)

6Z(1D) After subsection 186(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.56
note: Disregard certain authorisations under subsection 180(2) for the purposes of paragraph (1)(f).
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d
schema version: 2
part of: 6Z After subsection 186(1)

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: disregard any authorisations under subsection 180(2), except to the extent that they include authorisations under subsection 180(3).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excluding certain authorisations over time.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal exclusion
premise text: (1D) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f),

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: disregard any authorisations under subsection 180(2), except to the extent that they include authorisations under subsection 180(3).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Excluding certain knowledge.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge exclusion
premise text: (1D) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f),

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: disregard any authorisations under subsection 180(2), except to the extent that they include authorisations under subsection 180(3).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excluding certain authorisations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclude
premise text: (1D) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f),

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: disregard any authorisations under subsection 180(2), except to the extent that they include authorisations under subsection 180(3).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Excluding certain information.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information exclusion
premise text: (1D) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f),

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: disregard any authorisations under subsection 180(2), except to the extent that they include authorisations under subsection 180(3).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Excluding certain authorisations over time.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal exclusion
premise text: (1D) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f),

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6Z(1D) After subsection 186(1)

6Z(1E) After subsection 186(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.56
note: The Minister may declare kinds of information to be set out in the report.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1e-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1e
schema version: 2
part of: 6Z After subsection 186(1)

7 Existing information and documents
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.58
note: Applicable amendments for existing information and documents
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
schema version: 2

8 Reducing the period for keeping information or documents
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.58
note: Service provider must not reduce period for keeping information or documents before specified commencement.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-8-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8 Reducing the period for keeping information or documents

9 Applications made before commencement of Part 5-1A
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.58
note: Service provider may apply for approval of data retention implementation plan or amendment.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: After the commencement of Part 5-1A of that Act as so amended.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Service provider may apply.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-9-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9 Applications made before commencement of Part 5-1A

1 Subparagraphs 107J(1)(a)(i) and (ii)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.61
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Section 107G
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
note: Omit certain terms from a provision.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Omit certain terms from a provision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

11 Subsection 107J(1) (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
note: Repeal of heading and substitution with new text
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-11-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of notices given by criminal law-enforcement agencies
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

110 Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
note: Prohibition on applying for stored communications warrants
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-110-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-110
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits application of stored communications warrants
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

110A Meaning of criminal law-enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.61
note: List of criminal law-enforcement agencies
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-110a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-110a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-110a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-110a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the Australian Federal Police;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies a criminal law-enforcement agency
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (1) Each of the following is a criminal law-enforcement agency:

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-110a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 110A Meaning of criminal law-enforcement agency

12 Paragraphs 107L(2)(a), 107M(1)(a), (2)(a) and (3)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-12-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

13 Part 3-3 (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
schema version: 2

130 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
note: Law enforcement agencies must provide evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-130-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-130-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-130
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-130-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-130-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 130 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal

138 Employee of carrier may communicate information to criminal
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
note: Employee may communicate information to criminal law-enforcement agency
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-138-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-138
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-138-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 138 Employee of carrier may communicate information to criminal

14 Section 110 (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
schema version: 2

15 Subsections 111(3) and 116(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-15-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

16 Subparagraph 120(1)(a)(i)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-16-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'enforcement agency'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

17 Subsection 120(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency's', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency's'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-17-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency's'
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency's'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: None

176A Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64
curation status: Proposed
has part: 176A(1) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(2) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(3) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(3A) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(3B) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(4) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(4A) Meaning of enforcement agency
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-176a
schema version: 2

176A(1) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64
note: Defines enforcement agency
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-176a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is an enforcement agency
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Agency is an enforcement agency
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) Each of the following...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 176A(1) Meaning of enforcement agency

176A(2) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64
note: Request for Minister to declare authority or body as enforcement agency.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...at a specific time to declare...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Timing of request for declaration
modality: AllenInterval
operator: request timing
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request the Minister...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to justify the declaration.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justification for declaration as enforcement agency
modality: Argumentation
operator: justification
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request the Minister...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the authority or body to be an enforcement agency.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requesting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: request
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request the Minister to declare...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and declare the authority or body as an enforcement agency.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Declaration process
modality: Diffusion
operator: declare
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request the Minister...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 176A(2) Meaning of enforcement agency

176A(3) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64
note: Declaration of enforcement agency authority and officers
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency

176A(3A) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64
note: Minister has permission to make declaration without head of authority's request
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (3A) The Minister may make the declaration...

176A(3B) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64
note: Minister must be satisfied on reasonable grounds before making declaration.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b
schema version: 2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Minister is satisfied on reasonable grounds that...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Minister's satisfaction on reasonable grounds must occur during declaration-making process.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (3B) The Minister must not make the declaration unless...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Minister is satisfied on reasonable grounds that...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister has a duty to make declaration only if satisfied on reasonable grounds.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (3B) The Minister must not make the declaration unless...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Minister is not satisfied on reasonable grounds that...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister cannot make declaration without being satisfied on reasonable grounds.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (3B) The Minister must not make the declaration unless...

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the functions of the authority or body no longer include: (a) enforcement of the criminal law; or...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Minister's declaration only applies until functions of authority or body change.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (3B) The Minister must not make the declaration unless...

176A(4) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64
note: Consideration of factors before making declaration
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-176a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency

176A(4A) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64
note: Restrict access to stored communications and telecommunications data
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-176a-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restrict access
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 176A(4A) Meaning of enforcement agency

18 Subparagraph 120(2)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
schema version: 2

19 Paragraph 120(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
note: Omit 'enforcement agency's', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency's'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
schema version: 2

2 Subsection 110(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.61
note: Omit 'An enforcement agency', substitute 'A criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

20 Paragraph 120(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
schema version: 2

21 Subsection 120(4)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
schema version: 2

22 Subsection 122(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-22-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

23 Paragraph 122(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Subsection 122(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-24
schema version: 2

25 Subsection 122(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
note: Omit “other enforcement agency”, substitute ‘other criminal law-enforcement agency’.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-25
schema version: 2

26 Subsection 122(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-26-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-26
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

27 Subsection 123(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-27-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-27
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

28 Subsection 123(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
note: Omit 'other enforcement agency', substitute 'other criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-28
schema version: 2

29 Subsection 123(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-29
schema version: 2

3 After section 110
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.61
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

30 Subsection 127(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency' and substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-30
schema version: 2

31 Paragraphs 127(2)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-31-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-31
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'enforcement agency'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

32 Subsections 127(3) and 128(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-32-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-32
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

33 Subsection 128(3)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency' and substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-33-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-33
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

34 Section 130 (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-34-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-34
schema version: 2

35 Subsections 130(1) and (2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-35-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-35
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-35-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35 Subsections 130(1) and (2)

36 Section 131
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-36-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-36
schema version: 2

37 Subsection 135(1) (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
note: Repeal of heading and substitution with new text
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-37-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-37
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on communicating information to criminal law-enforcement agencies
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

38 Paragraph 135(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-38-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-38
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'enforcement agency'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

39 Subsection 135(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-39-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-39
schema version: 2

4 Before section 177
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64
note: Insert clause
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
schema version: 2

40 Section 138 (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-40-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-40
schema version: 2

41 Subsection 138(2)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-41-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-41
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'enforcement agency'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

42 Subsection 139(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-42-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-42
schema version: 2

43 Paragraph 139(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
note: Substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency' for 'enforcement agency'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-43-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-43
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to use correct terminology
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

44 Paragraph 150(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.73
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency's', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency's'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-44-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-44
schema version: 2

45 Subsections 159(1) and 160(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.73
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-45-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-45
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

46 Subsections 161A(1) and (2) and 162(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.73
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-46-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-46
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'enforcement agency'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

47 Section 163
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.73
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-47-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-47
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'enforcement agency'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

48 Existing domestic preservation notices
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.74
note: Continuation of existing domestic preservation notices after commencement.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-48-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-48
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48 Existing domestic preservation notices

49 Existing stored communications warrants
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.74
note: Existing stored communications warrants continue in force after commencement.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-49-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-49
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Warrant continues in force
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to maintain warrant
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
premise text: Warrant issued before commencement

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-49-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49 Existing stored communications warrants

5 Subsection 5(1) (definition of Crime and Misconduct
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.68
note: Omit 'Misconduct', substitute 'Corruption'
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Corruption
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits Misconduct
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: None

50 Existing authorisations
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.74
note: Continuation of existing authorisation after commencement
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-50-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-50
schema version: 2

51 Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.75
note: Certificates issued under certain sections of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 continue in force after commencement.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-51
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the certificate continues in force until the end of the period.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Certificates issued under certain sections of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 are in force during the period after commencement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) on that commencement, the authority or body is not a criminal law-enforcement agency (whether or not it is an enforcement agency);

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the certificate continues in force as if the authority or body were a criminal law-enforcement agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to maintain certificates
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
premise text: (a) an authority or body issued a certificate under section 107U or 130 of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 before the commencement of this Schedule;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the certificate continues in force as if the authority or body were a criminal law-enforcement agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to maintain certificates
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
premise text: (b) on that commencement, the authority or body is not a criminal law-enforcement agency (whether or not it is an enforcement agency);

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the certificate continues in force as if the authority or body were an enforcement agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to maintain certificates
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
premise text: (a) an authority or body issued a certificate under section 185C of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 before the commencement of this Schedule;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the certificate continues in force as if the authority or body were an enforcement agency.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to maintain certificates
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
premise text: (b) on that commencement, the authority or body is not an enforcement agency;

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51 Evidentiary certificates

6 Subsection 5(1) (definition of criminal law-enforcement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.68
note: Repeal and redefine criminal law-enforcement agency definition.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 Subsection 5(1) (definition of criminal law-enforcement

7 Subsection 5(1) (definition of enforcement agency)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.68
note: Repeal definition, substitute with new meaning.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
schema version: 2

8 Subsection 5(1) (at the end of the definition of officer)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.68
note: Specify persons as officers for criminal law-enforcement agencies or enforcement agencies.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify persons as officers.
modality: Deontic
operator: specify

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8 Subsection 5(1) (at the end of the definition of officer)

9 Section 107G
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.68
note: Omit certain phrases from a law.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of certain phrases.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

1 Subsection 5C(1)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.77
note: Substitute Chapter 4A for certain references.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Subsection 5C(1)

10 Obligation to keep records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.89
note: Exempts pre-commencement actions from certain sections of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts actions from certain sections.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: (1) Sections 151 and 186A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 as amended by this Act do not apply in relation to anything done before the commencement of this Schedule.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts actions from certain sections.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: (2) Despite the repeal of sections 150A and 151 of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 by this Act, those sections continue to apply in relation to things done before the commencement of this Schedule as if those sections had not been repealed.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to exempt pre-commencement actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) Sections 151 and 186A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 as amended by this Act do not apply in relation to anything done before the commencement of this Schedule.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Includes actions done before the commencement of the schedule.
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalInclusion
premise text: (1) Sections 151 and 186A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 as amended by this Act do not apply in relation to anything done before the commencement of this Schedule.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Obligation to keep records

151 Obligation to keep records
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.78
note: Agency must keep records for specified period.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-151-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-151-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-151
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-151-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-151-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 151 Obligation to keep records

186A Obligation to keep records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.79
note: Chief officer must keep records for specified period.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186a
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Records must be kept.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide records
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Chief officer must cause records to be kept.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186A Obligation to keep records

186B Inspection of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.82
curation status: Proposed
has part: 186B(1) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(2) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(3) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(4) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(5) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(6) Inspection of records
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186b
schema version: 2

186B(1) Inspection of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.82
note: The Ombudsman must inspect records of an enforcement agency to determine compliance.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 186B Inspection of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186B(1) Inspection of records

186B(2) Inspection of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.82
note: Ombudsman may enter premises, access records, and require staff information.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 186B Inspection of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ombudsman has permission to enter premises.
modality: Deontic
operator: Can

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ombudsman may require staff information.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

186B(3) Inspection of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.82
note: Ombudsman must give reasonable notice to chief officer before inspection.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 186B Inspection of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Before inspection, the Ombudsman must give reasonable notice.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Ombudsman must give reasonable notice.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The chief officer must receive notice before inspection.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The chief officer must receive notice.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186B(3) Inspection of records

186B(4) Inspection of records
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.82
note: Must provide assistance to the Ombudsman
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 186B Inspection of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Starts with inspection of records
modality: AllenInterval
operator: STARTS WITH
premise text: (4) The chief officer must ensure that members of staff of the agency give the Ombudsman any assistance the Ombudsman reasonably requires to enable the Ombudsman to perform functions under this section.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Reasonable requirement for assistance
modality: Argumentation
operator: REASONABLE REQUIREMENT
premise text: (4) The chief officer must ensure that members of staff of the agency give the Ombudsman any assistance the Ombudsman reasonably requires to enable the Ombudsman to perform functions under this section.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Information dissemination
modality: CogAI
operator: INFORMATION DISSEMINATION
premise text: (4) The chief officer must ensure that members of staff of the agency give the Ombudsman any assistance the Ombudsman reasonably requires to enable the Ombudsman to perform functions under this section.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide assistance to the Ombudsman
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Dissemination of information
modality: Diffusion
operator: DISSEMINATION
premise text: (4) The chief officer must ensure that members of staff of the agency give the Ombudsman any assistance the Ombudsman reasonably requires to enable the Ombudsman to perform functions under this section.

186B(5) Inspection of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.82
note: No obligation to inspect all relevant records.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 186B Inspection of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No obligation to inspect all relevant records.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186B(5) Inspection of records

186B(6) Inspection of records
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.82
note: Ombudsman may refrain from inspecting records under certain conditions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186b-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 186B Inspection of records

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to refrain from inspection
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186B(6) Inspection of records

186C Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.83
note: Ombudsman may obtain relevant information from an officer of a particular enforcement agency.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186c
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to obtain information
modality: Deontic
operator: May

186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.84
curation status: Proposed
has part: 186D(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 186D(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 186D(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 186D(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186d
schema version: 2

186D(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.84
note: Must provide information despite other laws or interests.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186D(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

186D(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.84
note: Information obtained as a consequence of giving access to a document cannot be used in evidence against the person except in specific cases.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits use of information as evidence in certain cases.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: None

186D(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.84
note: An officer of an enforcement agency must provide information and access to an inspecting officer.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information and access.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186D(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

186D(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.84
note: Enforcement agency must provide information to a person.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186D(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other

186E Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.85
curation status: Proposed
has part: 186E(1) Application of Ombudsman Act
has part: 186E(2) Application of Ombudsman Act
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186e
schema version: 2

186E(1) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.85
note: Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Chapter.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 186E Application of Ombudsman Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: in relation to the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Chapter.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excludes application of Section 11A
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: (1) Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply

186E(2) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.85
note: Excluding references to inspecting officer actions under Chapter 19 of the Ombudsman Act 1976.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186e-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 186E Application of Ombudsman Act

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Omit reference to inspecting officer actions under Chapter 19.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclude references to inspecting officer actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
premise text: Section 19 of the Ombudsman Act 1976

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186E(2) Application of Ombudsman Act

186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.86
curation status: Proposed
has part: 186F(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
has part: 186F(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
has part: 186F(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186f
schema version: 2

186F(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.86
note: Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to share information
modality: Deontic
operator: may

186F(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.86
note: Ombudsman must provide information to State if necessary for inspecting authority's functions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186F(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State

186F(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.86
note: Ombudsman may receive information from inspecting authority.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186F(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State

186G Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.86
curation status: Proposed
has part: 186G(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
has part: 186G(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186g
schema version: 2

186G(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.86
note: The Ombudsman may delegate certain powers to APS employees or persons with similar oversight functions.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186g-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186g-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 186G Delegation by Ombudsman

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to delegate powers
modality: Deontic
operator: may

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186G(1) Delegation by Ombudsman

186G(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.86
note: Delegate must provide instrument of delegation upon request.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186g-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186g-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 186G Delegation by Ombudsman

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Delegate must provide instrument of delegation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186G(2) Delegation by Ombudsman

186H Ombudsman not to be sued
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.87
note: Ombudsman not liable to action for acts done in good faith
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186h-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186h-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186h-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186h-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186h
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186h-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman is not liable to action for acts done in good faith.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Obligation implies non-liability for actions taken in good faith
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: The Ombudsman is an inspecting officer.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman is not liable to action for acts done in good faith.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation implies non-liability
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: The Ombudsman is an inspecting officer.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186h-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman is not liable to action for acts done in good faith.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Obligation implies non-liability for actions taken in good faith
modality: LinearLogic
operator: All
premise text: The Ombudsman is an inspecting officer.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186h-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186H Ombudsman not to be sued

186J Reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.87
curation status: Proposed
has part: 186J(1) Reports
has part: 186J(2) Reports
has part: 186J(3) Reports
has part: 186J(4) Reports
has part: 186J(5) Reports
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186j
schema version: 2

186J(1) Reports
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.87
note: The Ombudsman must report to the Minister.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186j-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 186J Reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Ombudsman must report to the Minister.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186J(1) Reports

186J(2) Reports
type: Concept
description: true
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.87
note: Must provide report to Minister after financial year end.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 186J Reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the timing of providing a report.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The report under subsection (1) must be given to the Minister as soon as practicable after the end of the financial year.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Describes the implication of providing a report.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: (2) The report under subsection (1) must be given to the Minister as soon as practicable after the end of the financial year.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes the action of providing a report.
modality: CogAI
operator: mustBeProvided
premise text: (2) The report under subsection (1) must be given to the Minister as soon as practicable after the end of the financial year.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes the action of providing a report.
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustBeGiven
premise text: (2) The report under subsection (1) must be given to the Minister as soon as practicable after the end of the financial year.

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186J(2) Reports

186J(3) Reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.87
note: Report must be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186j-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 186J Reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

186J(4) Reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.87
note: The Ombudsman must report to the Minister in writing about the results of an inspection.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186j-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 186J Reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186J(4) Reports

186J(5) Reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.87
note: Ombudsman may include report on contravention in inspection report.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-186j-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 186J Reports

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Report on contravention
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide report on contravention
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Inspection under this Chapter

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 186J(5) Reports

2 At the end of section 87
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.77
note: Must not refuse attending, giving information, or answering questions when required.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of refusing to attend, give information, or answer questions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 At the end of section 87

3 Section 134
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.77
note: Insert 'or Chapter 4A' after certain phrases.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
schema version: 2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Section 134

4 Part 3-5 (heading)
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.77
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
schema version: 2

5 Divisions 1 and 2 of Part 3-5
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.77
note: Repeal of Divisions and substitution with a new Schedule
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
schema version: 2

6 At the end of Part 4-2
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.79
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
schema version: 2

7 Before Chapter 5
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.82
note: Insert Chapter 4A—Oversight by the Commonwealth Ombudsman
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
schema version: 2

8 Existing inspections by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.89
note: Continuation of inspection under amended Act
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 Reports
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.89
note: Conditional commencement of section 186J of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
schema version: 2

1 Short title
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
note: Table of sections
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-1-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

13 April 2015
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13
schema version: 2

13 October 2015
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-13-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-2
schema version: 2

13 April 2015
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-13-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-3
schema version: 2

13 October 2015
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
note: Note on table limitations
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-13-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-4
schema version: 2

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement rules for provisions in the Act.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule 1 items 1 to 7, effective after the end of a 6-month period from Act receipt.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2
schema version: 2

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Schedules
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
note: Legislation in schedules is amended or repealed according to its terms.
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-3-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-2
schema version: 2

4 Section 4
type: Concept
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule commencement
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Act 2015
type: Document
description: An Act to amend the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979, and for related purposes
identifier: No. 39 of 2015
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU