Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Act 2015
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 39 of 2015
description: An Act to amend the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979, and for related purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Commencement rules for provisions in the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Table of sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-1-2-norm

13 April 2015
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-13-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
note: Schedule 1 items 1 to 7, effective after the end of a 6-month period from Act receipt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-2-2-norm

13 October 2015
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-13-2-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-3-norm

13 April 2015
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-13-3-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Schedule commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-4-norm

13 October 2015
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-4
note: Note on table limitations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-13-4-norm

3 Schedules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-2
note: Legislation in schedules is amended or repealed according to its terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.6
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sec-3-2-norm

1 After Part 5-1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Insert provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.8
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1-norm

187A Service providers must keep certain information and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187a
has part: 187A(1) Service providers must keep certain information and
has part: 187A(3) Service providers must keep certain information and
has part: 187A(3A) Service providers must keep certain information and
has part: 187A(3B) Service providers must keep certain information and
has part: 187A(3C) Service providers must keep certain information and
has part: 187A(4) Service providers must keep certain information and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.8

187A(1) Service providers must keep certain information and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187a-ss-1
part of: 187A Service providers must keep certain information and
note: Service providers must keep certain information and documents.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.8
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187A(1) Service providers must keep certain information and
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies services
premise text: Section 187AA
conclusion text: Service providers must keep information of a kind specified in or under section 187AA
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187A(3) Service providers must keep certain information and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3
part of: 187A Service providers must keep certain information and
note: Service providers must keep certain information and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.8
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187A(3) Service providers must keep certain information and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

187A(3A) Service providers must keep certain information and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3a
part of: 187A Service providers must keep certain information and
note: Minister may declare service to be subject to this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.8
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3a-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187A(3A) Service providers must keep certain information and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

187A(3B) Service providers must keep certain information and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3b
part of: 187A Service providers must keep certain information and
note: Service providers must keep certain information for a specified period.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.8
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187A(3B) Service providers must keep certain information and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to keep information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187A(3C) Service providers must keep certain information and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3c
part of: 187A Service providers must keep certain information and
note: Must refer amendment to Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security for review.
description: Review report within 15 sitting days of a House of the Parliament
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.8
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3c-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to refer amendment for review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-3c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Definition of Minister's obligation
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187A(4) Service providers must keep certain information and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187a-ss-4
part of: 187A Service providers must keep certain information and
note: Service providers must keep certain information
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.8
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187A(4) Service providers must keep certain information and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to keep information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187AA Information to be kept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187aa
note: Service provider must keep certain information about subscribers and services.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.11
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187aa-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187aa-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187aa-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187AA Information to be kept
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Service provider must keep certain information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b
has part: 187B(1) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
has part: 187B(2) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
has part: 187B(2A) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
has part: 187B(3) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
has part: 187B(4) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
has part: 187B(5) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
has part: 187B(6) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
has part: 187B(7) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14

187B(1) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b-ss-1
part of: 187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part
note: Service providers not covered by this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-1-norm

187B(2) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b-ss-2
part of: 187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part
note: The Communications Access Co-ordinator may declare that subsection 187A(1) applies in relation to a relevant service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: declare
logic summary: Declaration of obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187B(2A) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b-ss-2a
part of: 187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part
note: Consultation with Privacy Commissioner before making declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-2a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult
premise text: Consultation with Privacy Commissioner is required
conclusion text: Declaration cannot be made without consultation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187B(3) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b-ss-3
part of: 187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part
note: Consider interests of law enforcement and national security, Telecommunications Act 1997, Privacy Act 1988, and submissions from the Privacy Commissioner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-3-norm

187B(4) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b-ss-4
part of: 187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part
note: Declaration must be in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187B(4) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written declaration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187B(5) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b-ss-5
part of: 187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part
note: A declaration made under subsection (2) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Declaring something as not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187B(6) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b-ss-6
part of: 187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part
note: Communications Access Co-ordinator must give written notice to Minister after declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: Communications Access Co-ordinator must give written notice to Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: As soon as practicable after making a declaration under subsection (2),
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

187B(7) Certain service providers not covered by this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187b-ss-7
part of: 187B Certain service providers not covered by this Part
note: Minister must notify Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security after receiving notice.
description: Written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.14
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-7-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187BA Ensuring the confidentiality of information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187ba
note: Must protect confidentiality of information
description: Protection measures (encryption, protection from unauthorized access)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.15
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ba-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ba-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ba-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to protect confidentiality
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187C Period for keeping information and documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187c
has part: 187C(1) Period for keeping information and documents
has part: 187C(2) Period for keeping information and documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.15

187C(1) Period for keeping information and documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1
part of: 187C Period for keeping information and documents
note: Service provider must keep information or documents for 2 years after closure of account.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.15
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187C(1) Period for keeping information and documents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Service provider must keep information or documents.
premise text: (1) The period for which a service provider must keep, or cause to be kept, information or a document under section 187A is:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Information or documents must be kept for at least 2 years after closure of account.
premise text: (i) starting when the information or document came into existence; and (ii) ending 2 years after the closure of the account to which the information or document relates;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Information or documents must be kept for at least 2 years.
premise text: (i) starting when the information or document came into existence; and (ii) ending 2 years after it came into existence;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Information or documents are related to a closure of account.
premise text: (i) starting when the information or document came into existence; and (ii) ending 2 years after the closure of the account to which the information or document relates;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Information or documents are related to a service provider.
premise text: (1) The period for which a service provider must keep, or cause to be kept, information or a document under section 187A is:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187C(2) Period for keeping information and documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187c-ss-2
part of: 187C Period for keeping information and documents
note: Prescribes a period for keeping information and documents in relation to specified matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.15
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187c-ss-2-norm

187D Effect of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187d
note: Comply with data retention implementation plan for communications carried by a service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187d-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187D Effect of data retention implementation plans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with data retention implementation plan.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187d-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: Subclass of obligations related to data retention implementation plans.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187E Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187e
has part: 187E(1) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
has part: 187E(2) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
has part: 187E(3) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
has part: 187E(4) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.16

187E(1) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187e-ss-1
part of: 187E Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
note: Service provider must apply for approval of data retention implementation plan.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187E(1) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Service provider must apply for approval.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187E(2) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187e-ss-2
part of: 187E Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
note: Service provider must specify practices for keeping confidential information and documents, interim arrangements, and compliance day.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187E(2) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Service provider must comply with obligations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187E(3) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3
part of: 187E Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
note: Plan must cease to be in force by specified day if approved
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187E(3) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Plan must cease to be in force by specified day if approved
premise text: (3) The day specified under paragraph (2)(c)
conclusion text: must not be later than the day on which the plan would, if approved, cease to be in force under section 187H in relation to the service.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship
premise text: (3) The day specified under paragraph (2)(c)
conclusion text: must not be later than the day on which the plan would, if approved, cease to be in force under section 187H in relation to the service.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship
premise text: (3) The day specified under paragraph (2)(c)
conclusion text: must not be later than the day on which the plan would, if approved, cease to be in force under section 187H in relation to the service.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187E(4) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187e-ss-4
part of: 187E Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
note: Plan must specify contact details of service provider officers/employees
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.16
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187E(4) Applying for approval of data retention implementation plans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Plan must specify contact details
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187F Approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187f
has part: 187F(1) Approval of data retention implementation plans
has part: 187F(2) Approval of data retention implementation plans
has part: 187F(3) Approval of data retention implementation plans
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.17

187F(1) Approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187f-ss-1
part of: 187F Approval of data retention implementation plans
note: Service provider must obtain approval for data retention implementation plan.
description: Approval of data retention implementation plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Service provider must obtain approval
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187F(2) Approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2
part of: 187F Approval of data retention implementation plans
note: Consider desirability of achieving substantial compliance with section 187A and reduce regulatory burden.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to consider desirability of achieving substantial compliance with section 187A.
premise text: (2) Before making a decision under subsection (1), the Communications Access Co-ordinator must take into account:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Consider temporal interval for desirability of achieving substantial compliance.
premise text: (a) the desirability of achieving substantial compliance with section 187A (and sections 187BA and 187C) as soon as practicable;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Consider temporal interval for desirability of achieving substantial compliance.
premise text: (a) the desirability of achieving substantial compliance with section 187A (and sections 187BA and 187C) as soon as practicable;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to consider extent of plan reduction of regulatory burden.
premise text: (b) the extent to which the plan would reduce the regulatory burden imposed on the service provider by this Part;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187F(3) Approval of data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187f-ss-3
part of: 187F Approval of data retention implementation plans
note: Conditional approval process for data retention implementation plans
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.17
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to make a decision within 60 days
premise text: The Co-ordinator must make a decision
conclusion text: within 60 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on not making a decision within 60 days
premise text: The Co-ordinator must not fail to make a decision
conclusion text: within 60 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187f-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Temporal interval for decision-making
premise text: Decision must be made within 60 days
conclusion text: after receiving the application
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

187G Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187g
has part: 187G(1) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
has part: 187G(2) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
has part: 187G(3) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
has part: 187G(4) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
has part: 187G(5) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
has part: 187G(6) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.18

187G(1) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187g-ss-1
part of: 187G Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
note: Must provide copy of plan to enforcement agencies and security authorities, invite comments.
description: plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187G(2) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187g-ss-2
part of: 187G Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
note: Must request amendment within 30 days after receiving comment or summary.
description: Amendment to original plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to request amendment within 30 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187G(3) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187g-ss-3
part of: 187G Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
note: Respond to a request for an amendment of the original plan.
description: Amended plan and reasons for non-acceptance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to respond
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187G(4) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187g-ss-4
part of: 187G Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
note: Must refer request and response to ACMA, and request ACMA's determination on amendment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to refer request and response to ACMA.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187G(5) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187g-ss-5
part of: 187G Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
note: Determine in writing that the original plan should be amended in a specified manner and give a copy of the determination to the service provider.
description: Copy of determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: ACMA has an obligation to determine in writing that the original plan should be amended.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187G(6) Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187g-ss-6
part of: 187G Consultation with agencies and the ACMA
note: Approve amended plan and notify service provider of approval
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.18
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187g-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to approve amended plan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187H When data retention implementation plans are in force
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187h
has part: 187H(1) When data retention implementation plans are in force
has part: 187H(2) When data retention implementation plans are in force
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.20

187H(1) When data retention implementation plans are in force
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1
part of: 187H When data retention implementation plans are in force
note: Data retention implementation plan comes into force upon approval and ceases after a specified period or when the service is no longer operated.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-epistemic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-paraconsistent-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for data retention plan implementation phase
premise text: (a) comes into force when the Communications Access Co-ordinator notifies the service provider of the approval of the plan; (b) ceases to be in force in relation to that service: ...
conclusion text: ...the end of the implementation phase for this Part; or ..., at the end of the period of 18 months starting on the day the service provider started to operate the service after that commencement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval for data retention plan implementation phase
premise text: (a) comes into force when the Communications Access Co-ordinator notifies the service provider of the approval of the plan; (b) ceases to be in force in relation to that service: ...
conclusion text: ...the end of the implementation phase for this Part; or ..., at the end of the period of 18 months starting on the day the service provider started to operate the service after that commencement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obliges
logic summary: Service provider's obligation to implement data retention plan upon approval
premise text: (a) comes into force when the Communications Access Co-ordinator notifies the service provider of the approval of the plan; (b) ceases to be in force in relation to that service: ...
conclusion text: ...the end of the implementation phase for this Part; or ..., at the end of the period of 18 months starting on the day the service provider started to operate the service after that commencement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-epistemic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: knows
logic summary: Service provider's knowledge of data retention plan implementation phase
premise text: (a) comes into force when the Communications Access Co-ordinator notifies the service provider of the approval of the plan; (b) ceases to be in force in relation to that service: ...
conclusion text: ...the end of the implementation phase for this Part; or ..., at the end of the period of 18 months starting on the day the service provider started to operate the service after that commencement.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-1-logic-paraconsistent-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Paraconsistent
operator: or
logic summary: Alternative conditions for data retention plan implementation phase
premise text: (a) comes into force when the Communications Access Co-ordinator notifies the service provider of the approval of the plan; (b) ceases to be in force in relation to that service: ...
conclusion text: ...the end of the implementation phase for this Part; or ..., at the end of the period of 18 months starting on the day the service provider started to operate the service after that commencement.
execution surface: modalities::paraconsistent
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187H(2) When data retention implementation plans are in force
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187h-ss-2
part of: 187H When data retention implementation plans are in force
note: Commencement of implementation phase
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187h-ss-2-norm

187J Amending data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187j
has part: 187J(1) Amending data retention implementation plans
has part: 187J(2) Amending data retention implementation plans
has part: 187J(3) Amending data retention implementation plans
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.20

187J(1) Amending data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187j-ss-1
part of: 187J Amending data retention implementation plans
note: Amendment of data retention implementation plans requires approval from the Communications Access Co-ordinator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 187J(1) Amending data retention implementation plans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits amendment of data retention implementation plans.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187J(2) Amending data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187j-ss-2
part of: 187J Amending data retention implementation plans
note: Approval of data retention implementation plan must be approved by the State.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187J(2) Amending data retention implementation plans
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Approval is mandatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187J(3) Amending data retention implementation plans
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187j-ss-3
part of: 187J Amending data retention implementation plans
note: Amendment of data retention implementation plan comes into force under specific conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.20
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187j-ss-3-norm

187K The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187k
has part: 187K(1) The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant
has part: 187K(2) The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant
has part: 187K(3) The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.21

187K(1) The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187k-ss-1
part of: 187K The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant
note: Granting exemptions or variations to service providers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.21
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
logic summary: Permission granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Classifies service providers
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187K(2) The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187k-ss-2
part of: 187K The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant
note: Decision must be in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.21
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187K(3) The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187k-ss-3
part of: 187K The Communications Access Co-ordinator may grant
note: Granting decision for Communications Access Co-ordinator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.21
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187k-ss-3-norm

187KA Review of exemption or variation decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187ka
has part: 187KA(1) Review of exemption or variation decisions
has part: 187KA(2) Review of exemption or variation decisions
has part: 187KA(3) Review of exemption or variation decisions
has part: 187KA(4) Review of exemption or variation decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.23

187KA(1) Review of exemption or variation decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-1
part of: 187KA Review of exemption or variation decisions
note: Service provider may apply for review of exemption or variation decisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.23
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-1-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187KA(1) Review of exemption or variation decisions
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

187KA(2) Review of exemption or variation decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-2
part of: 187KA Review of exemption or variation decisions
note: Confirm or substitute a decision made under subsection 187K(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.23
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to confirm or substitute a decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187KA(3) Review of exemption or variation decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-3
part of: 187KA Review of exemption or variation decisions
note: Must provide a copy of the application to specified agencies and authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.23
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187KA(4) Review of exemption or variation decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-4
part of: 187KA Review of exemption or variation decisions
note: Consider interests of law enforcement and national security when making decisions about service providers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.23
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187ka-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to consider interests of law enforcement and national security.
premise text: (4) Before making a decision...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187KB Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187kb
has part: 187KB(1) Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
has part: 187KB(2) Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
has part: 187KB(3) Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.24

187KB(1) Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-1
part of: 187KB Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
note: The Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to a service provider.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187KB(2) Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-2
part of: 187KB Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
note: Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to service providers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-2-norm

187KB(3) Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-3
part of: 187KB Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
note: The Minister may enter into an agreement on behalf of the Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187KB(3) Commonwealth may make a grant of financial assistance to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187kb-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187L Confidentiality of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187l
has part: 187L(1) Confidentiality of applications
has part: 187L(1A) Confidentiality of applications
has part: 187L(2) Confidentiality of applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.24

187L(1) Confidentiality of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1
part of: 187L Confidentiality of applications
note: Must treat application as confidential and ensure it is not disclosed without permission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must treat application as confidential.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187L(1A) Confidentiality of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1a
part of: 187L Confidentiality of applications
note: ACMA must treat application as confidential and ensure it is not disclosed without written permission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ACMA must treat application as confidential.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-1a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
logic summary: ACMA must not disclose application without written permission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187L(2) Confidentiality of applications
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187l-ss-2
part of: 187L Confidentiality of applications
note: Must treat copy of application as confidential and ensure it is not disclosed without permission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.24
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must treat copy of application as confidential.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187l-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
logic summary: Must not disclose copy of application without permission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187LA Application of the Privacy Act 1988
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187la
has part: 187LA(1) Application of the Privacy Act 1988
has part: 187LA(2) Application of the Privacy Act 1988
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.25

187LA(1) Application of the Privacy Act 1988
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187la-ss-1
part of: 187LA Application of the Privacy Act 1988
note: The Privacy Act 1988 applies to service providers in relation to retained data.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.25
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187LA(1) Application of the Privacy Act 1988
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The Privacy Act applies to service providers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187LA(2) Application of the Privacy Act 1988
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2
part of: 187LA Application of the Privacy Act 1988
note: Information is personal if it relates to an individual or a communication involving the individual.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.25
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-paraconsistent-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187LA(2) Application of the Privacy Act 1988
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relatesTo
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: The information relates to:
conclusion text: It is personal information about an individual if it relates to the individual or a communication involving the individual.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Duty
premise text: The Privacy Act 1988 requires:
conclusion text: Information is personal if it relates to an individual or a communication involving the individual.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: implies
logic summary: Knowledge claim
premise text: The Privacy Act 1988 states:
conclusion text: Information is personal if it relates to an individual or a communication involving the individual.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: holdsForAll
logic summary: Temporal property
premise text: The information is kept under this Part.
conclusion text: It is personal information about an individual if it relates to the individual or a communication involving the individual.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187la-ss-2-logic-paraconsistent-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Paraconsistent
operator: or
logic summary: Alternative
premise text: The information relates to:
conclusion text: Information is personal if it relates to an individual or a communication involving the individual.
execution surface: modalities::paraconsistent
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187M Pecuniary penalties and infringement notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187m
note: Pecuniary penalties and infringement notices for contraventions of civil penalty provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.25
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187m-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187m-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187m-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 187M Pecuniary penalties and infringement notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187m-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits pecuniary penalties and infringement notices.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187N Review of operation of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187n
has part: 187N(1) Review of operation of Part
has part: 187N(1A) Review of operation of Part
has part: 187N(2) Review of operation of Part
has part: 187N(3) Review of operation of Part
has part: 187N(4) Review of operation of Part
has part: 187N(5) Review of operation of Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.26

187N(1) Review of operation of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187n-ss-1
part of: 187N Review of operation of Part
note: Must review the operation of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187N(1A) Review of operation of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187n-ss-1a
part of: 187N Review of operation of Part
note: Review of operation of Part must start and conclude within two years after implementation phase end.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to review operation of Part
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187N(2) Review of operation of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187n-ss-2
part of: 187N Review of operation of Part
note: Committee must give Minister a written report of review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187N(2) Review of operation of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Committee obligation
conclusion text: The Committee must give the Minister a written report of the review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187N(3) Review of operation of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187n-ss-3
part of: 187N Review of operation of Part
note: Agency must keep documents and information for a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Agency has an obligation to keep documents and information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187N(4) Review of operation of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187n-ss-4
part of: 187N Review of operation of Part
note: Must keep authorisations and information related to a report.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to keep authorisations and information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187N(5) Review of operation of Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187n-ss-5
part of: 187N Review of operation of Part
note: No obligation to keep information under this Act or another law is limited by subsections (3) and (4).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.26
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-5-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187n-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187N(5) Review of operation of Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

187P Annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187p
has part: 187P(1) Annual reports
has part: 187P(1A) Annual reports
has part: 187P(2) Annual reports
has part: 187P(3) Annual reports
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.27

187P(1) Annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1
part of: 187P Annual reports
note: Annual report must be prepared by the Minister after each June 30th.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.27
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to prepare annual report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187P(1A) Annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1a
part of: 187P Annual reports
note: Must include information about costs and data retention plans.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.27
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187P(1A) Annual reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187P(2) Annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2
part of: 187P Annual reports
note: Annual report must be included in the report prepared under subsection 186(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.27
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 187P(2) Annual reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to include annual report in the report prepared under subsection 186(2)
premise text: (2) A report under subsection (1) must be included in the report prepared under subsection 186(2) relating to the year ending on that 30 June.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: The annual report contains information about the year ending on that 30 June
premise text: (2) A report under subsection (1) must be included in the report prepared under subsection 186(2) relating to the year ending on that 30 June.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: The annual report contains information about the year ending on that 30 June
premise text: (2) A report under subsection (1) must be included in the report prepared under subsection 186(2) relating to the year ending on that 30 June.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: The annual report contains information about the year ending on that 30 June
premise text: (2) A report under subsection (1) must be included in the report prepared under subsection 186(2) relating to the year ending on that 30 June.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-2-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: If a report is prepared under subsection (1), then it must include an annual report in the report prepared under subsection 186(2)
premise text: (2) A report under subsection (1) must be included in the report prepared under subsection 186(2) relating to the year ending on that 30 June.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187P(3) Annual reports
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187p-ss-3
part of: 187P Annual reports
note: Report cannot be made in a manner that enables identification of a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.27
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 187P(3) Annual reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-187p-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Report must not be made in a manner that enables identification of a person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1A Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1a
note: Defines retained data as having the same meaning as in the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1a-norm

1B Paragraphs 94(2A)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1b
note: Substitute 'period' for 'year'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1b-norm

1C At the end of subsection 94(2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1c
note: Requires reporting of certain data retention information
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.28
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1C At the end of subsection 94(2A)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1D After subsection 94(2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1d
has part: 1D(2B) After subsection 94(2A)
has part: 1D(2C) After subsection 94(2A)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.29

1D(2B) After subsection 94(2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2b
part of: 1D After subsection 94(2A)
note: Report must specify authorizations for information or documents held for certain lengths of time.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.29
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1D(2B) After subsection 94(2A)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1D(2C) After subsection 94(2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c
part of: 1D After subsection 94(2A)
note: The Minister may declare kinds of information to be set out in a report.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.29
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to declare kinds of information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal interval
logic summary: No temporal interval specified.
premise text: (2C) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, declare kinds of information that are to be set out in a report under subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: No recurring trace specified.
premise text: (2C) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, declare kinds of information that are to be set out in a report under subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information dissemination
logic summary: No information dissemination specified.
premise text: (2C) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, declare kinds of information that are to be set out in a report under subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1d-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Artificial intelligence application
logic summary: No artificial intelligence application specified.
premise text: (2C) The Minister may, by legislative instrument, declare kinds of information that are to be set out in a report under subsection (1).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

1E Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1e
note: Definition of retained data activity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.29
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1e-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1E Section 3
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

1F After paragraph 29(1)(bb)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1f
note: Review of retained data activities and reports under specific Acts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.29
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1f-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1F After paragraph 29(1)(bb)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to review certain matters
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1G At the end of section 29
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1g
has part: 1G(4) At the end of section 29
has part: 1G(5) At the end of section 29
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.30

1G(4) At the end of section 29
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1g-ss-4
part of: 1G At the end of section 29
note: Exempts certain actions from paragraphs (3)(c) and (k)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1G(4) At the end of section 29
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts actions from certain paragraphs
premise text: (4) Subject to subsection (5)
conclusion text: Paragraphs (3)(c) and (k) do not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1G(5) At the end of section 29
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1g-ss-5
part of: 1G At the end of section 29
note: Service providers cannot review retained data activities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 1G(5) At the end of section 29
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reviewing retained data activities.
premise text: (5) The Committee’s functions under paragraphs (1)(bd) and (be):...
conclusion text: ...do not permit reviewing the retained data activities of service providers;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1g-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval.
premise text: (5) The Committee’s functions under paragraphs (1)(bd) and (be):...
conclusion text: ...are to be performed for the sole purpose of assessing, and making recommendations on...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.6000
curation status: Proposed

1H Subsection 6(1) (at the end of the definition of personal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1h
note: Extends meaning of personal information to cover information kept under Part 5-1A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-n3logic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-shacl-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1H Subsection 6(1) (at the end of the definition of personal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extends the meaning of personal information
premise text: Section 187LA of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act
conclusion text: Obligation to extend meaning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During the period specified in Part 5-1A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act
premise text: Section 187LA of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act
conclusion text: Temporal interval during which information is covered
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: covers
logic summary: Covers information kept under Part 5-1A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act
premise text: Personal information definition
conclusion text: Information covered by the extended definition
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-n3logic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: subsumes
logic summary: Subsumes Part 5-1A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act under personal information definition
premise text: Section 187LA of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act
conclusion text: Personal information definition subsumes Part 5-1A
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1h-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: validates
logic summary: Validates that information kept under Part 5-1A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act is covered by personal information definition
premise text: Section 187LA of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act
conclusion text: Information validation
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

1J Subsection 6C(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1j
note: Service providers are treated as organisations for the purposes of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.30
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1j-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1j-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1j-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1j-logic-ltl-3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1j-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1J Subsection 6C(1) (note)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: treated as
logic summary: Treated as organisation
premise text: Section 187LA of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979
conclusion text: Organisation for purposes of this Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1j-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: treated as
logic summary: Treated as organisation
premise text: Section 187LA of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979
conclusion text: Organisation for purposes of this Act
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-1j-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: treated as
logic summary: Treated as organisation
premise text: Section 187LA of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979
conclusion text: Organisation for purposes of this Act
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 7 (at the end of the definition of civil penalty
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Add a provision of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 declared to be a civil penalty provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.31
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Section 7 (at the end of the definition of civil penalty
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Add
logic summary: Adding a provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 105(5A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Monitor and report on compliance costs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.31
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to monitor and report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3A After subsection 280(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3a
note: Disclosure of information or document not prohibited in certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.31
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3a-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information or document
premise text: Subsection (1)(b) does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between disclosure and civil proceeding
premise text: in connection with a civil proceeding
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3B Section 281
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3b
note: Insertion of '(1)' before 'Division 2'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3b-norm

3C At the end of section 281
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3c
has part: 3C(2) At the end of section 281
has part: 3C(3) At the end of section 281
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.32

3C(2) At the end of section 281
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3c-ss-2
part of: 3C At the end of section 281
note: Disclosure of information or document by a person as a witness in a civil proceeding is permitted for specific purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3c-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information or document.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3C(3) At the end of section 281
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3c-ss-3
part of: 3C At the end of section 281
note: Exemptions from subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.32
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-3c-ss-3-norm

4 Subsection 314(8)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Omit specified section of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.33
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
note: Defines Defence Minister's meaning
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.33
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Subsection 5(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Same meaning as Intelligence Services Act 2001
premise text: Defence Minister
conclusion text: same meaning as in the Intelligence Services Act 2001
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6 At the end of subsection 6R(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
note: Add “and all the enforcement agencies”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.35
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 At the end of subsection 6R(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6A After section 6DB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6a
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.35
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6a-norm

6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6dc
has part: 6DC(1) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
has part: 6DC(2) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
has part: 6DC(3) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
has part: 6DC(4) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.35

6DC(1) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-1
part of: 6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities
note: Minister may appoint issuing authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.35
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 6DC(1) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to appoint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between Minister's appointment and issuing authority's role
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6DC(2) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-2
part of: 6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities
note: Consent to be appointed by the Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.35
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 6DC(2) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to consent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6DC(3) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-3
part of: 6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities
note: Appointment ceases if the person ceases to be appointable or is revoked by writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.35
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 6DC(3) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CEASES
logic summary: Ceases to have effect
premise text: (3) A person’s appointment ceases...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: REVOKE
logic summary: Revoked by writing
premise text: (b) the Minister, by writing, revokes the appointment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6DC(4) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-4
part of: 6DC Part 4-1 issuing authorities
note: Part 4-1 issuing authority has a duty to perform or exercise its function or power.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.35
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6DC(4) Part 4-1 issuing authorities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6dc-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Expresses a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6B Section 64 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6b
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6b-norm

64 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s or Inspector-General’s
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
note: Dealing in connection with Organisation’s or Inspector-General’s functions is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-64-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-64-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-64-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 64 Dealing in connection with Organisation’s or Inspector-General’s
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition on dealing with Organisation’s or Inspector-General’s functions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6C Subsection 64(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6c
note: Insertion of additional functions into the Inspector-General's duties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of a new obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6D Subsection 64(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6d
note: Allow communication with foreign intelligence information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6d-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission to communicate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6E Paragraph 176(5)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6e
note: Conditional commencement of authorization period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.36
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6e-norm

6F Subsection 176(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6f
note: Must revoke authorisation under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.37
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6f-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6f-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6G Paragraph 180(6)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6g
note: Specifies the time period for an authorization to remain in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.37
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6g-norm

6H Subsection 180(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6h
note: Must revoke authorisation if disclosure is no longer required
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.37
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6h-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6h-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of revoking authorisation without disclosure being required
premise text: Disclosure is no longer required
conclusion text: Revocation must be cancelled
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6J Section 180F
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6j
note: Interference with privacy must be proportionate and justifiable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6j-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6j-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6j-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6J Section 180F
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6j-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6K Before paragraph 180F(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6k
note: Requires consideration of conduct gravity, including seriousness of offence and pecuniary penalty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6k-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6k-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6k-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6K Before paragraph 180F(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6k-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires consideration of conduct gravity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6L After Division 4B of Part 4-1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6l
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6l-norm

180G The Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180g
has part: 180G(1) The Organisation
has part: 180G(2) The Organisation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.38

180G(1) The Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1
part of: 180G The Organisation
note: Cannot make an authorisation for disclosure of information about a journalist or their employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: authorisation for disclosure of information about a journalist or their employer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Authorisation cannot be made for a period overlapping with a journalist information warrant
premise text: a purpose of making the authorisation would be to identify another person whom the eligible person knows or reasonably believes to be a source
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure of information about an employer of a journalist
premise text: particular person is working in a professional capacity as a journalist; or particular person is an employer of such a person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on disclosure of information about a source
premise text: particular person to be: a person who is working in a professional capacity as a journalist; or particular person is an employer of such a person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on making an authorisation for disclosure of information about another person
premise text: particular person whom the eligible person knows or reasonably believes to be a source
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180G(2) The Organisation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180g-ss-2
part of: 180G The Organisation
note: Nothing in this section affects the kind of person in relation to whom a warrant may be issued under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.38
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180g-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Describes a class of persons affected by the provision.
premise text: (2) Nothing in this section affects...
conclusion text: ...the kind of person...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

180H Enforcement agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180h
has part: 180H(1) Enforcement agencies
has part: 180H(2) Enforcement agencies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.39

180H(1) Enforcement agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1
part of: 180H Enforcement agencies
note: Authorized officer must not disclose information or documents of a particular person if they are a journalist or their employer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.39
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 180H(1) Enforcement agencies
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: Authorized officer must not disclose information or documents.
conclusion text: of a particular person if they are a journalist or their employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure for source identification
premise text: a purpose of making the authorisation would be to identify another person whom the authorised officer knows or reasonably believes to be a source;
conclusion text: unless a journalist information warrant is in force, in relation to that particular person, under which authorised officers of the agency may make authorisations under that section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure prohibition
premise text: (1) An authorised officer of an enforcement agency must not make an authorisation...
conclusion text: ...if they are a journalist or their employer.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition for authorized officers
premise text: (1) An authorised officer of an enforcement agency must not make an authorisation...
conclusion text: ...if they are a journalist or their employer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition for disclosure without warrant
premise text: (1) An authorised officer of an enforcement agency must not make an authorisation...
conclusion text: ...unless a journalist information warrant is in force, in relation to that particular person, under which authorised officers of the agency may make authorisations under that section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

180H(2) Enforcement agencies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180h-ss-2
part of: 180H Enforcement agencies
note: No disclosure of information or documents relating to a particular person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.39
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180h-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: (2) An authorised officer...
conclusion text: ...must not make an authorisation...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180J Requesting a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180j
has part: 180J(1) Requesting a journalist information warrant
has part: 180J(2) Requesting a journalist information warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40

180J(1) Requesting a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180j-ss-1
part of: 180J Requesting a journalist information warrant
note: Request for a journalist information warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180j-ss-1-norm

180J(2) Requesting a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180j-ss-2
part of: 180J Requesting a journalist information warrant
note: Request for journalist information warrant must specify facts and grounds.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180j-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180J(2) Requesting a journalist information warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information warrant
premise text: Request must specify facts and grounds.
conclusion text: Warrant must be issued.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180K Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180k
has part: 180K(1) Further information
has part: 180K(2) Further information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40

180K(1) Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180k-ss-1
part of: 180K Further information
note: The Minister may require the Director-General to provide further information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: require
logic summary: Expresses a request for information.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: within
logic summary: Specifies a temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180K(2) Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2
part of: 180K Further information
note: Refuse to consider or take action on a request if the Director-General breaches the requirement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits Minister from considering or taking action on a request.
premise text: (2) If the Director-General breaches the requirement, the Minister may:
conclusion text: Refuse to consider or take action on a request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits Minister from taking further action on a request.
premise text: (2) If the Director-General breaches the requirement, the Minister may:
conclusion text: Refuse to take any further action on a request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Requires overlap between Director-General's breach and Minister's consideration/action.
premise text: (2) If the Director-General breaches the requirement, the Minister may:
conclusion text: Refuse to consider or take action on a request.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180k-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Requires recurring trace of Director-General's breach for Minister's consideration/action.
premise text: (2) If the Director-General breaches the requirement, the Minister may:
conclusion text: Refuse to consider or take action on a request.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180L Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180l
has part: 180L(1) Issuing a journalist information warrant
has part: 180L(2) Issuing a journalist information warrant
has part: 180L(3) Issuing a journalist information warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40

180L(1) Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180l-ss-1
part of: 180L Issuing a journalist information warrant
note: Issue a journalist information warrant or refuse to issue one
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180L(2) Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2
part of: 180L Issuing a journalist information warrant
note: Minister must satisfy conditions before issuing a journalist information warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Minister has a duty to satisfy conditions before issuing a journalist information warrant.
premise text: (2) The Minister must not issue a journalist information warrant unless...
conclusion text: The Minister must satisfy the conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has-a
logic summary: Minister has a function that extends to making authorisations under Division 3.
premise text: (2) The Minister must not issue a journalist information warrant unless...
conclusion text: The Organisation’s functions would extend to the making of authorisations under Division 3 in relation to the particular person.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Minister must satisfy conditions before issuing a journalist information warrant during a specific time period.
premise text: (2) The Minister must not issue a journalist information warrant unless...
conclusion text: The public interest in issuing the warrant outweighs the public interest in protecting the confidentiality of the identity of the source in connection with whom authorisations would be made under the authority of the warrant, having regard to...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Minister must satisfy conditions before issuing a journalist information warrant until a certain time period.
premise text: (2) The Minister must not issue a journalist information warrant unless...
conclusion text: The public interest in protecting the confidentiality of the identity of the source in connection with whom authorisations would be made under the authority of the warrant outweighs the public interest in issuing the warrant, having regard to...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Minister has a duty to consider all relevant matters before issuing a journalist information warrant.
premise text: (2) The Minister must not issue a journalist information warrant unless...
conclusion text: The Minister must consider any submissions made by a Public Interest Advocate under section 180X, and any other matters the Minister considers relevant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has-a
logic summary: Minister has a function that extends to making authorisations under Division 3.
premise text: (2) The Minister must not issue a journalist information warrant unless...
conclusion text: The Organisation’s functions would extend to the making of authorisations under Division 3 in relation to the particular person, having regard to...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180L(3) Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3
part of: 180L Issuing a journalist information warrant
note: Conditions or restrictions for making authorisations under the warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.40
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Authorisation permits
premise text: (3) A journalist information warrant issued under this section may specify conditions or restrictions relating to making authorisations under the authority of the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restricts
logic summary: Authorisation restriction
premise text: (3) A journalist information warrant issued under this section may specify conditions or restrictions relating to making authorisations under the authority of the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allows
logic summary: Authorisation allowance
premise text: (3) A journalist information warrant issued under this section may specify conditions or restrictions relating to making authorisations under the authority of the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Regulates
logic summary: Authorisation regulation
premise text: (3) A journalist information warrant issued under this section may specify conditions or restrictions relating to making authorisations under the authority of the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180l-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Limits
logic summary: Authorisation limitation
premise text: (3) A journalist information warrant issued under this section may specify conditions or restrictions relating to making authorisations under the authority of the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

180M Issuing a journalist information warrant in an emergency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180m
note: Issuing a journalist information warrant in an emergency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.41
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180m-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180m-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180m-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: issue
logic summary: Directs the Director-General of Security to issue a warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180N Duration of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180n
note: The Minister must revoke a journalist information warrant before its specified period ends.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180n-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180n-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: The Minister must revoke the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180P Discontinuance of authorisations before expiry of a journalist
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180p
note: Ensure discontinuation of authorisations before expiry of a journalist information warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180p-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180p-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform the Minister and take steps to ensure discontinuation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180q
has part: 180Q(1) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
has part: 180Q(2) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
has part: 180Q(3) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
has part: 180Q(4) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
has part: 180Q(5) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.44

180Q(1) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180q-ss-1
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
note: Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180Q(1) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to apply for a journalist information warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180Q(2) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180q-ss-2
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
note: Agency must apply for journalist information on behalf of the agency or its officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180Q(2) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must apply for journalist information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180Q(3) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180q-ss-3
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
note: Agency chief officer may nominate an office for agency management
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-3-norm

180Q(4) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180q-ss-4
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
note: Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180Q(5) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180q-ss-5
part of: 180Q Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
note: Application for journalist information may be made in writing or any other form.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.44
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-5-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180q-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 180Q(5) Enforcement agency may apply for a journalist information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

180R Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180r
has part: 180R(1) Further information
has part: 180R(2) Further information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.45

180R(1) Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180r-ss-1
part of: 180R Further information
note: Agency must provide further information to Part 4-1 issuing authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.45
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180r-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180r-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Agency must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180R(2) Further information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180r-ss-2
part of: 180R Further information
note: Requirement to not breach the requirement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.45
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180r-ss-2-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180r-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180R(2) Further information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

180S Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180s
has part: 180S(1) Oaths and affirmations
has part: 180S(2) Oaths and affirmations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.45

180S(1) Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180s-ss-1
part of: 180S Oaths and affirmations
note: Information must be verified on oath or affirmation when applying for Part 4-1 issuing authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.45
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180S(1) Oaths and affirmations
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to verify information on oath or affirmation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180S(2) Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180s-ss-2
part of: 180S Oaths and affirmations
note: Authority to administer oath or affirmation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.45
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 180S(2) Oaths and affirmations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorize
logic summary: Granting authority
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the Part 4-1 issuing authority may:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180s-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval for oath or affirmation administration
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this section, the Part 4-1 issuing authority may:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180T Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180t
has part: 180T(1) Issuing a journalist information warrant
has part: 180T(2) Issuing a journalist information warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.46

180T(1) Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180t-ss-1
part of: 180T Issuing a journalist information warrant
note: Authority to issue a journalist information warrant upon application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180T(1) Issuing a journalist information warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Issuing authority has an obligation to issue a warrant.
premise text: Application under section 180Q.
conclusion text: Issue a journalist information warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between issuing authority's decision and warrant issuance.
premise text: Section 180Q application consideration.
conclusion text: Warrant issued within a reasonable timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180T(2) Issuing a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180t-ss-2
part of: 180T Issuing a journalist information warrant
note: Must issue a journalist information warrant only under specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.46
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to issue a warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180t-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Classifies the issuing authority as responsible for issuing warrants
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180u
has part: 180U(1) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
has part: 180U(2) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
has part: 180U(3) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
has part: 180U(4) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
has part: 180U(5) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.47

180U(1) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant
note: Journalist information warrant must be in prescribed form and signed by issuing authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180U(1) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with prescribed form and signature.
premise text: (1) A journalist information warrant issued under this Subdivision must be in accordance with the prescribed form...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEGINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for issuing authority's signature.
premise text: (1) A journalist information warrant issued under this Subdivision must be in accordance with the prescribed form...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Authority's signature implies compliance with prescribed form.
premise text: (1) A journalist information warrant issued under this Subdivision must be in accordance with the prescribed form...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS
logic summary: Information about issuing authority's signature is disseminated.
premise text: (1) A journalist information warrant issued under this Subdivision must be in accordance with the prescribed form...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS
logic summary: Authority's signature is a cognitive event.
premise text: (1) A journalist information warrant issued under this Subdivision must be in accordance with the prescribed form...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

180U(2) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180u-ss-2
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant
note: Conditions or restrictions for making authorisations under the warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180U(2) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: specifies
logic summary: Specifies conditions or restrictions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180U(3) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180u-ss-3
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant
note: Journalist information warrant must specify a period of up to 90 days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180U(3) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST_SPECIFY
logic summary: Must specify a period of up to 90 days.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180U(4) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant
note: No variation of a journalist information warrant is allowed by the issuing authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 180U(4) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: No variation of a journalist information warrant is allowed.
premise text: (4) A Part 4-1 issuing authority must not vary...
conclusion text: ...by extending the period for which it is to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The warrant's duration cannot overlap with a new one.
premise text: (4) A Part 4-1 issuing authority must not...
conclusion text: ...the period for which it is to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
logic summary: The warrant's duration will not change.
premise text: (4) A Part 4-1 issuing authority must not...
conclusion text: ...the period for which it is to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: NotDiffused
logic summary: The change will not diffuse to other warrants.
premise text: (4) A Part 4-1 issuing authority must not...
conclusion text: ...the period for which it is to be in force.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: NotModified
logic summary: The warrant's duration will not be modified.
premise text: (4) A Part 4-1 issuing authority must not...
conclusion text: ...the period for which it is to be in force.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180U(5) Form and content of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180u-ss-5
part of: 180U Form and content of a journalist information warrant
note: Allows for multiple warrants to be issued under the same Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180u-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allow
logic summary: Permits further warrants under the same Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180V Entry into force of a journalist information warrant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180v
note: Entry into force of a journalist information warrant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.47
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180v-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180v-logic-alleninterval-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180v-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for commencement
premise text: Comes into force when issued
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180W Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180w
has part: 180W(1) Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief
has part: 180W(2) Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48

180W(1) Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180w-ss-1
part of: 180W Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief
note: Must revoke journalist information warrant if grounds cease to exist
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180w-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180w-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180W(1) Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180w-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180W(2) Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180w-ss-2
part of: 180W Revocation of a journalist information warrant by chief
note: Delegation of power to a certifying officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180w-ss-2-norm

180X Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180x
has part: 180X(1) Public Interest Advocates
has part: 180X(2) Public Interest Advocates
has part: 180X(3) Public Interest Advocates
has part: 180X(4) Public Interest Advocates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48

180X(1) Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180x-ss-1
part of: 180X Public Interest Advocates
note: The Prime Minister must declare Public Interest Advocates.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180X(1) Public Interest Advocates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a mandatory duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180X(2) Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180x-ss-2
part of: 180X Public Interest Advocates
note: Submit to Minister or issuing authority about specific matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to submit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180X(3) Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180x-ss-3
part of: 180X Public Interest Advocates
note: Regulations may prescribe matters relating to the performance of a Public Interest Advocate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180X(3) Public Interest Advocates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mayPrescribe
logic summary: Regulations may prescribe matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180X(4) Public Interest Advocates
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180x-ss-4
part of: 180X Public Interest Advocates
note: A declaration under subsection (1) is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-180x-ss-4-norm

6M After subparagraph 181A(3)(b)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6m
note: Enable compliance with obligations under section 185D or 185E
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.48
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6m-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6m-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6M After subparagraph 181A(3)(b)(i)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6N After paragraph 181A(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6n
note: Disclosure to IGIS official for exercising powers or performing functions under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.49
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information to IGIS official
premise text: IGIS official has power to exercise powers or perform functions under the Act
conclusion text: Disclosure must be made to IGIS official
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Disclosure overlaps with IGIS official's powers and functions
premise text: IGIS official has power to exercise powers or perform functions under the Act
conclusion text: Disclosure overlaps with IGIS official's powers and functions
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Disclosure overlaps with IGIS official's powers and functions
premise text: IGIS official has power to exercise powers or perform functions under the Act
conclusion text: Disclosure overlaps with IGIS official's powers and functions
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Disclosure diffuses to IGIS official's powers and functions
premise text: IGIS official has power to exercise powers or perform functions under the Act
conclusion text: Disclosure diffuses to IGIS official's powers and functions
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6n-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Disclosure overlaps with IGIS official's knowledge
premise text: IGIS official has power to exercise powers or perform functions under the Act
conclusion text: Disclosure overlaps with IGIS official's knowledge
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6P After subparagraph 181A(6)(b)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6p
note: Enabling a person to comply with obligations under section 185D or 185E
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.49
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6p-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6p-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6p-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: enables
logic summary: Enabling a duty to be fulfilled
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6Q After paragraph 181A(6)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6q
note: Insertion of IGIS official's use in connection with exercising powers or performing functions under the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Act 1986.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.49
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6q-norm

6R After subparagraph 181B(3)(b)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6r
note: Enabling a person to comply with obligations under section 185D or 185E
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.49
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6r-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6r-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6r-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: enables
logic summary: Enabling a duty to be fulfilled
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6S Before subparagraph 181B(6)(b)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6s
note: Enabling a person to comply with obligations under section 185D or 185E
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.49
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6s-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6s-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6s-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: enabling
logic summary: Enabling a person to comply with obligations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6T Subsection 182(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6t
note: Disclosure of non-missing person information is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6t-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6t-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6t-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose non-missing person information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6U Subsection 182(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6u
note: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (3) (see subsection 13.3(3) of the Criminal Code).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.50
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6u-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6u-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6u-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6U Subsection 182(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6u-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6V At the end of Division 6 of Part 4-1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6v
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.51
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6v-norm

182A Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-182a
has part: 182A(1) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
has part: 182A(2) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.51

182A(1) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-182a-ss-1
part of: 182A Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
note: Disclosing or using journalist information warrants is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.51
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 182A(1) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure or use of journalist information warrants.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implicates imprisonment for 2 years upon committing the offence.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182A(2) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2
part of: 182A Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
note: Disclosing or using a journalist information warrant without permission is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.51
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 182A(2) Disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosing or using a journalist information warrant.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval of disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification of disclosure/use offences: journalist information warrants by CogAI.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...Imprisonment for 2 years.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182B Permitted disclosure or use: journalist information warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-182b
note: Disclosure or use of information is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-182b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Permitted disclosure or use
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6W At the end of section 185
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6w
note: Section does not limit subsection 187N(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6w-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6w-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6w-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Limits subsection 187N(3)
premise text: Section 6W
conclusion text: Subsection 187N(3) is not limited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6X After section 185C
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6x
note: Amendment of Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.52
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6x-norm

185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-185d
has part: 185D(1) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
has part: 185D(2) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
has part: 185D(3) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
has part: 185D(4) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.53

185D(1) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-185d-ss-1
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
note: Notification of issuing a journalist information warrant to the Inspector-General and Parliamentary Joint Committee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.53
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Minister must notify the Inspector-General and Parliamentary Joint Committee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185D(2) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-185d-ss-2
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
note: Must provide copy of authorisation to Inspector-General after warrant expiry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.53
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide copy of authorisation
premise text: Authorisation made under warrant
conclusion text: Copy provided to Inspector-General
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185D(3) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-185d-ss-3
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
note: Must provide report to Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security upon request from Inspector-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.53
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty to provide report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185D(4) Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-185d-ss-4
part of: 185D Notification etc. of authorisations intended to identify media
note: Request for briefing from Inspector-General
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.53
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185d-ss-4-norm

185E Reports on access to retained data
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-185e
has part: 185E(1) Reports on access to retained data
has part: 185E(2) Reports on access to retained data
has part: 185E(3) Reports on access to retained data
has part: 185E(4) Reports on access to retained data
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.55

185E(1) Reports on access to retained data
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-185e-ss-1
part of: 185E Reports on access to retained data
note: Minister must provide report to committee upon receipt of Inspector-General's report
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.55
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 185E(1) Reports on access to retained data
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Report subject to committee
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185E(2) Reports on access to retained data
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-185e-ss-2
part of: 185E Reports on access to retained data
note: Request for briefing from Inspector-General on authorisation or authorisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.55
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-2-norm

185E(3) Reports on access to retained data
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-185e-ss-3
part of: 185E Reports on access to retained data
note: Minister must provide report to Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security upon receipt of Ombudsman's report.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.55
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPartOf
logic summary: Report is part of the Minister's duties
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185E(4) Reports on access to retained data
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-185e-ss-4
part of: 185E Reports on access to retained data
note: Request for briefing from Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.55
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-185e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: request
logic summary: Obligation to provide briefing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6Y At the end of subsection 186(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6y
note: Schedule 1 Data retention added
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.55
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6y-norm

6Z After subsection 186(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6z
has part: 6Z(1A) After subsection 186(1)
has part: 6Z(1B) After subsection 186(1)
has part: 6Z(1C) After subsection 186(1)
has part: 6Z(1D) After subsection 186(1)
has part: 6Z(1E) After subsection 186(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.56

6Z(1A) After subsection 186(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1a
part of: 6Z After subsection 186(1)
note: Defines categories for report under subsection (1B)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1a-norm

6Z(1B) After subsection 186(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1b
part of: 6Z After subsection 186(1)
note: Minister may declare categories of offences and other matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to declare categories
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6Z(1C) After subsection 186(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1c
part of: 6Z After subsection 186(1)
note: Report must specify authorizations and documents held for certain lengths of time.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6Z(1C) After subsection 186(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide report with specified information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6Z(1D) After subsection 186(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d
part of: 6Z After subsection 186(1)
note: Disregard certain authorisations under subsection 180(2) for the purposes of paragraph (1)(f).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-ltl-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6Z(1D) After subsection 186(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclude
logic summary: Excluding certain authorisations.
premise text: (1D) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f),
conclusion text: disregard any authorisations under subsection 180(2), except to the extent that they include authorisations under subsection 180(3).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal exclusion
logic summary: Excluding certain authorisations over time.
premise text: (1D) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f),
conclusion text: disregard any authorisations under subsection 180(2), except to the extent that they include authorisations under subsection 180(3).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal exclusion
logic summary: Excluding certain authorisations over time.
premise text: (1D) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f),
conclusion text: disregard any authorisations under subsection 180(2), except to the extent that they include authorisations under subsection 180(3).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information exclusion
logic summary: Excluding certain information.
premise text: (1D) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f),
conclusion text: disregard any authorisations under subsection 180(2), except to the extent that they include authorisations under subsection 180(3).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1d-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge exclusion
logic summary: Excluding certain knowledge.
premise text: (1D) For the purposes of paragraph (1)(f),
conclusion text: disregard any authorisations under subsection 180(2), except to the extent that they include authorisations under subsection 180(3).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6Z(1E) After subsection 186(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1e
part of: 6Z After subsection 186(1)
note: The Minister may declare kinds of information to be set out in the report.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.56
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-6z-ss-1e-norm

7 Existing information and documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
note: Applicable amendments for existing information and documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.58
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-7-norm

8 Reducing the period for keeping information or documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
note: Service provider must not reduce period for keeping information or documents before specified commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.58
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-8-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 Reducing the period for keeping information or documents
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Applications made before commencement of Part 5-1A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
note: Service provider may apply for approval of data retention implementation plan or amendment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.58
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-9-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 Applications made before commencement of Part 5-1A
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Service provider may apply.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: After the commencement of Part 5-1A of that Act as so amended.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Decisions made before commencement of Part 5-1A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
note: Clarifies power to make decisions under Telecommunications Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.59
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-10-norm

11 Keeping information or documents before commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
note: Service provider may keep information before commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.60
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-11-norm

12 First reporting period after commencement of Part 5-1A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
note: Defines reporting period for annual report under Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.60
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-1-sec-12-norm

1 Subparagraphs 107J(1)(a)(i) and (ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.61
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-1-norm

2 Subsection 110(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Omit 'An enforcement agency', substitute 'A criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.61
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-2-norm

3 After section 110
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.61
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-3-norm

110A Meaning of criminal law-enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-110a
note: List of criminal law-enforcement agencies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.61
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-110a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-110a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-110a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110A Meaning of criminal law-enforcement agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-110a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies a criminal law-enforcement agency
premise text: (1) Each of the following is a criminal law-enforcement agency:
conclusion text: (a) the Australian Federal Police;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Before section 177
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-4-norm

176A Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176a
has part: 176A(1) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(2) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(3) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(3A) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(3B) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(4) Meaning of enforcement agency
has part: 176A(4A) Meaning of enforcement agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64

176A(1) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176a-ss-1
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency
note: Defines enforcement agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 176A(1) Meaning of enforcement agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Agency is an enforcement agency
premise text: (1) Each of the following...
conclusion text: is an enforcement agency
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

176A(2) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency
note: Request for Minister to declare authority or body as enforcement agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 176A(2) Meaning of enforcement agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: request
logic summary: Requesting permission
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request the Minister to declare...
conclusion text: ...the authority or body to be an enforcement agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: request timing
logic summary: Timing of request for declaration
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request the Minister...
conclusion text: ...at a specific time to declare...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: justification
logic summary: Justification for declaration as enforcement agency
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request the Minister...
conclusion text: ...to justify the declaration.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: declare
logic summary: Declaration process
premise text: (2) The head of an authority or body may request the Minister...
conclusion text: ...and declare the authority or body as an enforcement agency.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

176A(3) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency
note: Declaration of enforcement agency authority and officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3-norm

176A(3A) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3a
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency
note: Minister has permission to make declaration without head of authority's request
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (3A) The Minister may make the declaration...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176A(3B) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency
note: Minister must be satisfied on reasonable grounds before making declaration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-ltl-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Minister has a duty to make declaration only if satisfied on reasonable grounds.
premise text: (3B) The Minister must not make the declaration unless...
conclusion text: ...the Minister is satisfied on reasonable grounds that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Minister cannot make declaration without being satisfied on reasonable grounds.
premise text: (3B) The Minister must not make the declaration unless...
conclusion text: ...the Minister is not satisfied on reasonable grounds that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Minister's satisfaction on reasonable grounds must occur during declaration-making process.
premise text: (3B) The Minister must not make the declaration unless...
conclusion text: ...the Minister is satisfied on reasonable grounds that...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-3b-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Minister's declaration only applies until functions of authority or body change.
premise text: (3B) The Minister must not make the declaration unless...
conclusion text: ...the functions of the authority or body no longer include: (a) enforcement of the criminal law; or...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176A(4) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176a-ss-4
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency
note: Consideration of factors before making declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-4-norm

176A(4A) Meaning of enforcement agency
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176a-ss-4a
part of: 176A Meaning of enforcement agency
note: Restrict access to stored communications and telecommunications data
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.64
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-4a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 176A(4A) Meaning of enforcement agency
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-176a-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restrict access
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 5(1) (definition of Crime and Misconduct
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: Omit 'Misconduct', substitute 'Corruption'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.68
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits Misconduct
premise text: None
conclusion text: Corruption
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 5(1) (definition of criminal law-enforcement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
note: Repeal and redefine criminal law-enforcement agency definition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.68
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-6-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Subsection 5(1) (definition of criminal law-enforcement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

7 Subsection 5(1) (definition of enforcement agency)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
note: Repeal definition, substitute with new meaning.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.68
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-7-norm

8 Subsection 5(1) (at the end of the definition of officer)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
note: Specify persons as officers for criminal law-enforcement agencies or enforcement agencies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.68
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-8-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 Subsection 5(1) (at the end of the definition of officer)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: specify
logic summary: Specify persons as officers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Section 107G
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
note: Omit certain phrases from a law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.68
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of certain phrases.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Section 107G
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
note: Omit certain terms from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Omit certain terms from a provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 107J(1) (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
note: Repeal of heading and substitution with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-11-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of notices given by criminal law-enforcement agencies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Paragraphs 107L(2)(a), 107M(1)(a), (2)(a) and (3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-12-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Part 3-3 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-13-norm

14 Section 110 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-14-norm

110 Criminal law-enforcement agencies may apply for stored
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-110
note: Prohibition on applying for stored communications warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-110-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-110-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits application of stored communications warrants
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Subsections 111(3) and 116(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-15-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Subparagraph 120(1)(a)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-16-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'enforcement agency'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Subsection 120(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency's', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency's'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.69
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-17-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency's'
premise text: None
conclusion text: Substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency's'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Subparagraph 120(2)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-18-norm

19 Paragraph 120(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
note: Omit 'enforcement agency's', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency's'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-19-norm

20 Paragraph 120(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-20-norm

21 Subsection 120(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-21-norm

22 Subsection 122(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-22-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Paragraph 122(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-23-norm

24 Subsection 122(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-24-norm

25 Subsection 122(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25
note: Omit “other enforcement agency”, substitute ‘other criminal law-enforcement agency’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-25-norm

26 Subsection 122(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.70
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-26-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-26-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Subsection 123(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-27-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Subsection 123(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28
note: Omit 'other enforcement agency', substitute 'other criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-28-norm

29 Subsection 123(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-29-norm

30 Subsection 127(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency' and substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-30-norm

31 Paragraphs 127(2)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-31-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-31-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'enforcement agency'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Subsections 127(3) and 128(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-32-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-32-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Subsection 128(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-33
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency' and substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-33-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Section 130 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-34
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-34-norm

130 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-130
note: Law enforcement agencies must provide evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-130-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-130-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-130-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 130 Evidentiary certificates relating to actions by criminal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-130-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Subsections 130(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-35
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.71
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-35-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-35-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-35-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 35 Subsections 130(1) and (2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Section 131
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-36-norm

37 Subsection 135(1) (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-37
note: Repeal of heading and substitution with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-37-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-37-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on communicating information to criminal law-enforcement agencies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Paragraph 135(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-38-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-38-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'enforcement agency'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Subsection 135(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-39-norm

40 Section 138 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-40-norm

138 Employee of carrier may communicate information to criminal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-138
note: Employee may communicate information to criminal law-enforcement agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-138-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-138-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 138 Employee of carrier may communicate information to criminal
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

41 Subsection 138(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-41-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-41-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'enforcement agency'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Subsection 139(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-42
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-42-norm

43 Paragraph 139(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43
note: Substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency' for 'enforcement agency'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.72
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-43-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to use correct terminology
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Paragraph 150(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency's', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency's'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.73
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-44-norm

45 Subsections 159(1) and 160(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-45
note: Omit 'an enforcement agency', substitute 'a criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.73
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-45-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-45-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'an enforcement agency'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Subsections 161A(1) and (2) and 162(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.73
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-46-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'enforcement agency'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Section 163
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-47
note: Omit 'enforcement agency', substitute 'criminal law-enforcement agency'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.73
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-47-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-47-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'enforcement agency'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Existing domestic preservation notices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48
note: Continuation of existing domestic preservation notices after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-48-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-48-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48 Existing domestic preservation notices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Conditional obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Existing stored communications warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-49
note: Existing stored communications warrants continue in force after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-49-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-49-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-49-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49 Existing stored communications warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Obligation to maintain warrant
premise text: Warrant issued before commencement
conclusion text: Warrant continues in force
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Existing authorisations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50
note: Continuation of existing authorisation after commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.74
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-50-norm

51 Evidentiary certificates
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-51
note: Certificates issued under certain sections of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 continue in force after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.75
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-alleninterval-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51 Evidentiary certificates
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Obligation to maintain certificates
premise text: (a) an authority or body issued a certificate under section 107U or 130 of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 before the commencement of this Schedule;
conclusion text: the certificate continues in force as if the authority or body were a criminal law-enforcement agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Obligation to maintain certificates
premise text: (b) on that commencement, the authority or body is not a criminal law-enforcement agency (whether or not it is an enforcement agency);
conclusion text: the certificate continues in force as if the authority or body were a criminal law-enforcement agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Obligation to maintain certificates
premise text: (a) an authority or body issued a certificate under section 185C of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 before the commencement of this Schedule;
conclusion text: the certificate continues in force as if the authority or body were an enforcement agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Obligation to maintain certificates
premise text: (b) on that commencement, the authority or body is not an enforcement agency;
conclusion text: the certificate continues in force as if the authority or body were an enforcement agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-2-sec-51-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Certificates issued under certain sections of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 are in force during the period after commencement.
premise text: (b) on that commencement, the authority or body is not a criminal law-enforcement agency (whether or not it is an enforcement agency);
conclusion text: the certificate continues in force until the end of the period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 5C(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
note: Substitute Chapter 4A for certain references.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-1-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 5C(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

2 At the end of section 87
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
note: Must not refuse attending, giving information, or answering questions when required.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 At the end of section 87
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of refusing to attend, give information, or answer questions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 134
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
note: Insert 'or Chapter 4A' after certain phrases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-3-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Section 134
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

4 Part 3-5 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-4-norm

5 Divisions 1 and 2 of Part 3-5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
note: Repeal of Divisions and substitution with a new Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.77
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-5-norm

151 Obligation to keep records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-151
note: Agency must keep records for specified period.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.78
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-151-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-151-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-151-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151 Obligation to keep records
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-151-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide records
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 At the end of Part 4-2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.79
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-6-norm

186A Obligation to keep records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186a
note: Chief officer must keep records for specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.79
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186a-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186a-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186A Obligation to keep records
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide records
premise text: Chief officer must cause records to be kept.
conclusion text: Records must be kept.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Before Chapter 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
note: Insert Chapter 4A—Oversight by the Commonwealth Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-7-norm

186B Inspection of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186b
has part: 186B(1) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(2) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(3) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(4) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(5) Inspection of records
has part: 186B(6) Inspection of records
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.82

186B(1) Inspection of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186b-ss-1
part of: 186B Inspection of records
note: The Ombudsman must inspect records of an enforcement agency to determine compliance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186B(1) Inspection of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186B(2) Inspection of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186b-ss-2
part of: 186B Inspection of records
note: Ombudsman may enter premises, access records, and require staff information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Can
logic summary: Ombudsman has permission to enter premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Ombudsman may require staff information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186B(3) Inspection of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186b-ss-3
part of: 186B Inspection of records
note: Ombudsman must give reasonable notice to chief officer before inspection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186B(3) Inspection of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: The Ombudsman must give reasonable notice.
conclusion text: Before inspection, the Ombudsman must give reasonable notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: The chief officer must receive notice.
conclusion text: The chief officer must receive notice before inspection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186B(4) Inspection of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4
part of: 186B Inspection of records
note: Must provide assistance to the Ombudsman
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide assistance to the Ombudsman
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: STARTS WITH
logic summary: Starts with inspection of records
premise text: (4) The chief officer must ensure that members of staff of the agency give the Ombudsman any assistance the Ombudsman reasonably requires to enable the Ombudsman to perform functions under this section.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: REASONABLE REQUIREMENT
logic summary: Reasonable requirement for assistance
premise text: (4) The chief officer must ensure that members of staff of the agency give the Ombudsman any assistance the Ombudsman reasonably requires to enable the Ombudsman to perform functions under this section.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: DISSEMINATION
logic summary: Dissemination of information
premise text: (4) The chief officer must ensure that members of staff of the agency give the Ombudsman any assistance the Ombudsman reasonably requires to enable the Ombudsman to perform functions under this section.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: INFORMATION DISSEMINATION
logic summary: Information dissemination
premise text: (4) The chief officer must ensure that members of staff of the agency give the Ombudsman any assistance the Ombudsman reasonably requires to enable the Ombudsman to perform functions under this section.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186B(5) Inspection of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186b-ss-5
part of: 186B Inspection of records
note: No obligation to inspect all relevant records.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186B(5) Inspection of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: No obligation to inspect all relevant records.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186B(6) Inspection of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186b-ss-6
part of: 186B Inspection of records
note: Ombudsman may refrain from inspecting records under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.82
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-6-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186B(6) Inspection of records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to refrain from inspection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186C Power to obtain relevant information
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186c
note: Ombudsman may obtain relevant information from an officer of a particular enforcement agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.83
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186c-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186c-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to obtain information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186d
has part: 186D(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 186D(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 186D(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
has part: 186D(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.84

186D(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186d-ss-1
part of: 186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
note: Must provide information despite other laws or interests.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.84
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186D(1) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186D(2) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186d-ss-2
part of: 186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
note: Information obtained as a consequence of giving access to a document cannot be used in evidence against the person except in specific cases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.84
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits use of information as evidence in certain cases.
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186D(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186d-ss-3
part of: 186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
note: An officer of an enforcement agency must provide information and access to an inspecting officer.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.84
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186D(3) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information and access.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186D(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186d-ss-4
part of: 186D Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
note: Enforcement agency must provide information to a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.84
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186D(4) Ombudsman to be given information and access despite other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186E Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186e
has part: 186E(1) Application of Ombudsman Act
has part: 186E(2) Application of Ombudsman Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.85

186E(1) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186e-ss-1
part of: 186E Application of Ombudsman Act
note: Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply in relation to the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Chapter.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.85
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186e-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes application of Section 11A
premise text: (1) Section 11A of the Ombudsman Act 1976 does not apply
conclusion text: in relation to the exercise or proposed exercise of a power, or the performance or the proposed performance of a function, of the Ombudsman under this Chapter.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

186E(2) Application of Ombudsman Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186e-ss-2
part of: 186E Application of Ombudsman Act
note: Excluding references to inspecting officer actions under Chapter 19 of the Ombudsman Act 1976.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.85
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186e-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186E(2) Application of Ombudsman Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Exclude references to inspecting officer actions.
premise text: Section 19 of the Ombudsman Act 1976
conclusion text: Omit reference to inspecting officer actions under Chapter 19.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186f
has part: 186F(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
has part: 186F(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
has part: 186F(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.86

186F(1) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186f-ss-1
part of: 186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
note: Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to share information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186F(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186f-ss-2
part of: 186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
note: Ombudsman must provide information to State if necessary for inspecting authority's functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186F(2) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186F(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186f-ss-3
part of: 186F Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
note: Ombudsman may receive information from inspecting authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-3-norm

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186f-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186F(3) Exchange of information between Ombudsman and State
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

186G Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186g
has part: 186G(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
has part: 186G(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.86

186G(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186g-ss-1
part of: 186G Delegation by Ombudsman
note: The Ombudsman may delegate certain powers to APS employees or persons with similar oversight functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186g-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186g-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186G(1) Delegation by Ombudsman
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186g-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to delegate powers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186G(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186g-ss-2
part of: 186G Delegation by Ombudsman
note: Delegate must provide instrument of delegation upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.86
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186g-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186g-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186G(2) Delegation by Ombudsman
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186g-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Delegate must provide instrument of delegation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186H Ombudsman not to be sued
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186h
note: Ombudsman not liable to action for acts done in good faith
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.87
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186h-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186h-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186h-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186h-logic-alleninterval-3

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186h-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186H Ombudsman not to be sued
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186h-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Obligation implies non-liability
premise text: The Ombudsman is an inspecting officer.
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman is not liable to action for acts done in good faith.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186h-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: All
logic summary: Obligation implies non-liability for actions taken in good faith
premise text: The Ombudsman is an inspecting officer.
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman is not liable to action for acts done in good faith.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186h-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Obligation implies non-liability for actions taken in good faith
premise text: The Ombudsman is an inspecting officer.
conclusion text: Therefore, the Ombudsman is not liable to action for acts done in good faith.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186J Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186j
has part: 186J(1) Reports
has part: 186J(2) Reports
has part: 186J(3) Reports
has part: 186J(4) Reports
has part: 186J(5) Reports
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.87

186J(1) Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186j-ss-1
part of: 186J Reports
note: The Ombudsman must report to the Minister.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.87
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-1-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186J(1) Reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: The Ombudsman must report to the Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186J(2) Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2
part of: 186J Reports
note: Must provide report to Minister after financial year end.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.87
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186J(2) Reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the timing of providing a report.
premise text: (2) The report under subsection (1) must be given to the Minister as soon as practicable after the end of the financial year.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Describes the implication of providing a report.
premise text: (2) The report under subsection (1) must be given to the Minister as soon as practicable after the end of the financial year.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustBeGiven
logic summary: Describes the action of providing a report.
premise text: (2) The report under subsection (1) must be given to the Minister as soon as practicable after the end of the financial year.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: mustBeProvided
logic summary: Describes the action of providing a report.
premise text: (2) The report under subsection (1) must be given to the Minister as soon as practicable after the end of the financial year.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186J(3) Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186j-ss-3
part of: 186J Reports
note: Report must be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.87
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-3-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186J(4) Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186j-ss-4
part of: 186J Reports
note: The Ombudsman must report to the Minister in writing about the results of an inspection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.87
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-4-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186J(4) Reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186J(5) Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-186j-ss-5
part of: 186J Reports
note: Ombudsman may include report on contravention in inspection report.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.87
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-5-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186J(5) Reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-186j-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to provide report on contravention
premise text: Inspection under this Chapter
conclusion text: Report on contravention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Existing inspections by the Ombudsman
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
note: Continuation of inspection under amended Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.89
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-8-norm

9 Reports
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
note: Conditional commencement of section 186J of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.89
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-9-norm

10 Obligation to keep records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
note: Exempts pre-commencement actions from certain sections of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015.pdf, p.89
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-norm
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-logic-ltl-2
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-3
asserts: telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-4

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Obligation to keep records
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts actions from certain sections.
premise text: (1) Sections 151 and 186A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 as amended by this Act do not apply in relation to anything done before the commencement of this Schedule.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalInclusion
logic summary: Includes actions done before the commencement of the schedule.
premise text: (1) Sections 151 and 186A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 as amended by this Act do not apply in relation to anything done before the commencement of this Schedule.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exempts actions from certain sections.
premise text: (2) Despite the repeal of sections 150A and 151 of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 by this Act, those sections continue to apply in relation to things done before the commencement of this Schedule as if those sections had not been repealed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

telecommunications-interception-and-access-amendment-data-retention-act-2015-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to exempt pre-commencement actions.
premise text: (1) Sections 151 and 186A of the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979 as amended by this Act do not apply in relation to anything done before the commencement of this Schedule.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed