Crimes (Hostages) Act 1989
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 26 of 1989
date: 10 March 2016
description: An Act to give effect to the International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages, and for related purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

10 March 2016
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
note: Includes amendments up to Act No. 4, 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.1
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-10-norm

25 May 2016
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25
note: Compilation information and endnotes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.1
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-25-norm

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Commences on a day fixed by proclamation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-2-norm

3 Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Definition of Australian aircraft and coastal sea
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of Australian aircraft and coastal sea
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for Australian aircraft and coastal sea
premise text: (Australian aircraft) = (an aircraft registered under regulations made under the Civil Aviation Act 1988) or (an aircraft that is owned by, or is in the possession or control of, the Commonwealth or an authority of the Commonwealth) or (an aircraft of any part of the Defence Force)
conclusion text: (Australian coastal sea) = (the territorial sea of Australia) and (the sea on the landward side of the territorial sea of Australia)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 December 1979, a copy of the English text of which is set out in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18
has part: 18(2) December 1979, a copy of the English text of which is set out in
has part: 18(3) December 1979, a copy of the English text of which is set out in
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.6

18(2) December 1979, a copy of the English text of which is set out in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-2
part of: 18 December 1979, a copy of the English text of which is set out in
note: Same meaning as in Convention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(2) December 1979, a copy of the English text of which is set out in
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Same meaning
premise text: (2) Except so far as the contrary intention appears, an expression that is used both in this Act and in the Convention...
conclusion text: has, in this Act, the same meaning as it has in the Convention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(3) December 1979, a copy of the English text of which is set out in
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-3
part of: 18 December 1979, a copy of the English text of which is set out in
note: Exempts certain offences from Commonwealth law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-18-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-18-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-18-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts certain offences
premise text: Section 6 of the Crimes Act 1914 and section 11.4 of the Criminal Code
conclusion text: Not an offence against a law of the Commonwealth
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Act extends to external Territories
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Act extends to external Territories
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Act extends to external Territories
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extension of jurisdiction
premise text: Act applies to external Territories
conclusion text: State has jurisdiction over external Territories
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Extends to acts, matters and things outside Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extends to acts, matters and things outside Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Effect of this Act on other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
has part: 6(1) Effect of this Act on other laws
has part: 6(2) Effect of this Act on other laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.7

6(1) Effect of this Act on other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-1
part of: 6 Effect of this Act on other laws
note: This Act does not exclude or limit the operation of other laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(1) Effect of this Act on other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Exclusion of other laws
premise text: This Act is not intended to exclude or limit the operation of any other law.
conclusion text: Other laws are not excluded by this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: limits
logic summary: Limitation of other laws
premise text: This Act is not intended to exclude or limit the operation of any other law.
conclusion text: Other laws are limited by this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion of other laws
premise text: This Act is not intended to exclude or limit the operation of any other law.
conclusion text: Other laws are included in this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(2) Effect of this Act on other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-2
part of: 6 Effect of this Act on other laws
note: Immunity from prosecution for convictions in foreign countries
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2) Effect of this Act on other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Immunity implies no liability
premise text: (Person has been convicted in a country outside Australia of an offence against the law of that country) Implies (Person is not liable to be convicted of an offence against this Act)
conclusion text: (Person is not liable to be convicted of an offence against this Act)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6A Application of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6a
note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6a-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6A Application of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Meaning of hostage-taking
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
note: Seizing or detaining another person and threatening to kill, injure, or continue to detain them is hostage-taking.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits taking a person hostage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 When hostage-taking an offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
has part: 8(1) When hostage-taking an offence
has part: 8(2) When hostage-taking an offence
has part: 8(3) When hostage-taking an offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.8

8(1) When hostage-taking an offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-1
part of: 8 When hostage-taking an offence
note: A person who commits an act of hostage-taking after the Convention enters into force for Australia commits an offence against this subsection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(1) When hostage-taking an offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to commit an act of hostage-taking
premise text: (1) A person who, at any time after the Convention enters into force for Australia, commits an act of hostage-taking.
conclusion text: A person who commits an act of hostage-taking after the Convention enters into force for Australia commits an offence against this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
logic summary: The act of hostage-taking must occur before the Convention enters into force for Australia
premise text: (1) A person who, at any time after the Convention enters into force for Australia, commits an act of hostage-taking.
conclusion text: A person who commits an act of hostage-taking after the Convention enters into force for Australia commits an offence against this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: before
logic summary: The act of hostage-taking must occur before the Convention enters into force for Australia
premise text: (1) A person who, at any time after the Convention enters into force for Australia, commits an act of hostage-taking.
conclusion text: A person who commits an act of hostage-taking after the Convention enters into force for Australia commits an offence against this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(2) When hostage-taking an offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-2
part of: 8 When hostage-taking an offence
note: Hostage-taking is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits hostage-taking
premise text: (2) The punishment for an offence against subsection (1) is imprisonment for life or for any lesser term.
conclusion text: Hostage-taking is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implies that hostage-taking is an offence if it is punishable by imprisonment for life or for any lesser term
premise text: (2) The punishment for an offence against subsection (1) is imprisonment for life or for any lesser term.
conclusion text: If the punishment for an offence against subsection (1) includes imprisonment for life or for any lesser term, then hostage-taking is an offence
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Hostage-taking overlaps with offences punishable by imprisonment for life or for any lesser term
premise text: (2) The punishment for an offence against subsection (1) is imprisonment for life or for any lesser term.
conclusion text: The temporal interval of hostage-taking overlaps with the temporal intervals of offences punishable by imprisonment for life or for any lesser term
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classifies hostage-taking as an offence based on its punishment
premise text: (2) The punishment for an offence against subsection (1) is imprisonment for life or for any lesser term.
conclusion text: Hostage-taking is classified as an offence based on its punishment
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-2-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: RDF
logic summary: Represents hostage-taking as a subclass of offences
premise text: (2) The punishment for an offence against subsection (1) is imprisonment for life or for any lesser term.
conclusion text: Hostage-taking is a subclass of offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(3) When hostage-taking an offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-3
part of: 8 When hostage-taking an offence
note: Subject to section 9, a person shall not be charged with an offence against this Act unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-3-logic-ltl-5

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(3) When hostage-taking an offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the act was committed outside Australia, then the person must be an Australian citizen.
premise text: (ii) The person is not an Australian citizen.
conclusion text: (i) The person is an Australian citizen.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the act was committed outside Australia, then the person must be present in Australia.
premise text: (ii) The person is not present in Australia.
conclusion text: (i) The person is present in Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If the act was committed outside Australia, then the act must be committed to compel a legislative, executive or judicial institution in Australia.
premise text: (iii) The person is not committing the act to compel an institution.
conclusion text: (i) The act is committed to compel an institution.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The conditions overlap with each other.
premise text: (i) The person is an Australian citizen.
conclusion text: (ii) The person is present in Australia.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-8-ss-3-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The conditions repeat over time.
conclusion text: The conditions repeat over time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Person not to be charged in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9
has part: 9(1) Person not to be charged in certain circumstances
has part: 9(2) Person not to be charged in certain circumstances
has part: 9(3) Person not to be charged in certain circumstances
has part: 9(4) Person not to be charged in certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.8

9(1) Person not to be charged in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-1
part of: 9 Person not to be charged in certain circumstances
note: No charge for acts not covered by the Convention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(1) Person not to be charged in certain circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If Convention applies, charge is possible.
premise text: Convention applies
conclusion text: Charge is possible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Excerpt defines a temporal interval where Convention does not apply.
premise text: Article 12 of the Convention
conclusion text: Convention would not apply in relation to that act
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Excerpt defines a temporal interval where Convention does not apply.
premise text: Article 12 of the Convention
conclusion text: Convention would not apply in relation to that act
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Excerpt defines a diffusion of Convention applicability.
premise text: Article 12 of the Convention
conclusion text: Convention would not apply in relation to that act
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(2) Person not to be charged in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-2
part of: 9 Person not to be charged in certain circumstances
note: No charge for certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-2-norm

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(2) Person not to be charged in certain circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

9(3) Person not to be charged in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-3
part of: 9 Person not to be charged in certain circumstances
note: Exemption from extradition for persons extradited to the State where the act was committed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Exemption from extradition
premise text: Person extradited to the State where the act was committed
conclusion text: Not charged in certain circumstances
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(4) Person not to be charged in certain circumstances
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-4
part of: 9 Person not to be charged in certain circumstances
note: Definition of State for certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(4) Person not to be charged in certain circumstances
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-9-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines the scope of 'State'
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Prosecutions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-2
has part: 10(1) Prosecutions
has part: 10(2) Prosecutions
has part: 10(3) Prosecutions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.9

10(1) Prosecutions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-2-ss-1
part of: 10 Prosecutions
note: Attorney-General's consent required for prosecution
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-10-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-10-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-10-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10(1) Prosecutions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-10-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires Attorney-General's consent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(2) Prosecutions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-2-ss-2
part of: 10 Prosecutions
note: No further step in proceedings can be taken until consent is given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-10-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-10-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-10-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No further step in proceedings can be taken until consent is given.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(3) Prosecutions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-2-ss-3
part of: 10 Prosecutions
note: Nothing in subsection (2) prevents the discharge of the accused if proceedings are not continued within a reasonable time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-10-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-10-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-10-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prevents
logic summary: Prevents discharge of the accused if proceedings are not continued within a reasonable time.
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Venue where offence committed on aircraft
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11
note: Presumption that act did not take place in another part of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Change of venue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
has part: 12(1) Change of venue
has part: 12(2) Change of venue
has part: 12(3) Change of venue
has part: 12(4) Change of venue
has part: 12(5) Change of venue
has part: 12(6) Change of venue
has part: 12(7) Change of venue
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.10

12(1) Change of venue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-1
part of: 12 Change of venue
note: Proceedings on indictment must be discontinued if offence committed in another part of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(1) Change of venue
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (a) the defendant objects to the trial...
conclusion text: the court shall forthwith order that the proceedings on the indictment be discontinued
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Discharge jury if offence committed in another part of Australia
premise text: (b) the court is satisfied that...
conclusion text: that the jury be discharged
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Order defendant to appear before another court of first-mentioned State or Territory
premise text: that the defendant appear before that court...
conclusion text: at a specified time, not later than 28 days after the day on which the order is made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(2) Change of venue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-2
part of: 12 Change of venue
note: Court may admit defendant to bail on recognizances it thinks fit.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(2) Change of venue
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court may admit defendant to bail.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(3) Change of venue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-3
part of: 12 Change of venue
note: Defendant's obligation to appear before court discharged if indictment not filed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(3) Change of venue
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: release
logic summary: Release from custody or discharge of recognizances.
premise text: (3) If, before the time at which the defendant is to appear before a court...
conclusion text: ...he or she be released; or...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: discharge
logic summary: Discharge of obligation to appear.
premise text: (3) If, before the time at which the defendant is to appear before a court...
conclusion text: ...the defendant from the obligation to appear before that court at that time;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Notification period during which the defendant's obligation to appear is discharged.
premise text: (3) If, before the time at which the defendant is to appear before a court...
conclusion text: ...the Attorney-General or the Director of Public Prosecutions notifies that court that he or she does not intend to file an indictment against the defendant in a court of another part of Australia,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Notification period until which the defendant's obligation to appear is discharged.
premise text: (3) If, before the time at which the defendant is to appear before a court...
conclusion text: ...the first-mentioned court shall, as soon as practicable after being so notified, make an order:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: release
logic summary: Release from custody.
premise text: (3) If, before the time at which the defendant is to appear before a court...
conclusion text: ...he or she be released;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(4) Change of venue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-4
part of: 12 Change of venue
note: Court must not allow defendant to appear before court if indictment filed in another part of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court must not allow defendant to appear before court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(5) Change of venue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-5
part of: 12 Change of venue
note: Defendant must be released if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(5) Change of venue
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: →
logic summary: If A, then B.
premise text: A
conclusion text: B
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(6) Change of venue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-6
part of: 12 Change of venue
note: No prejudice to other indictments or information against the defendant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(6) Change of venue
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(7) Change of venue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-7
part of: 12 Change of venue
note: Court jurisdiction may be exercised by a single judge or Magistrate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(7) Change of venue
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-12-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Exercise of jurisdiction may be permitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Evidence of certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
has part: 13(1) Evidence of certain matters
has part: 13(2) Evidence of certain matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.12

13(1) Evidence of certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-ss-1
part of: 13 Evidence of certain matters
note: Minister must provide written certificate stating Convention entered into force and remains in force.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to provide written certificate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13(2) Evidence of certain matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-ss-2
part of: 13 Evidence of certain matters
note: Certificate admissible as prima facie evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: admission
logic summary: Admission of certificate as evidence
premise text: Certificate given under subsection (1)
conclusion text: Prima facie evidence of matters stated in the certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

14 Section 38 of Judiciary Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
note: Matter under this Act does not include treaty interpretation matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Exclude treaty interpretation from matters under this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Assistance under article 6 of Convention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
note: States shall report findings and intentions regarding jurisdiction. A person in custody is entitled to assistance under article 6 of the Convention. Any State Party may withdraw its reservation by notification to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-15-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-15-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-15-logic-descriptionlogic-4

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Assistance under article 6 of Convention
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: States are obligated to report findings and intentions.
premise text: Article 6(2)
conclusion text: State shall report its findings to the States or organization referred to in paragraph 2 of this article and indicate whether it intends to exercise jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-15-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The person has a right to assistance.
premise text: Article 6 of the Convention
conclusion text: Assistance is owed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-15-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: State Party can withdraw reservation
premise text: State has made a reservation
conclusion text: State may withdraw reservation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-15-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Reservation is withdrawn when State notifies Secretary-General
premise text: State has notified Secretary-General
conclusion text: Reservation is withdrawn
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-15-2-norm

20 June 1990 (gaz 1990,
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20
note: No S145
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-20-norm

21 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment Act 1994
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-21-norm

19 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19
note: Statute Law Revision Act 1996
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-19-norm

25 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-2
note: Conditional commencement of the Law and Justice Legislation Amendment (Application of Criminal Code) Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-25-2-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-25-2-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-25-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for commencement
premise text: The text specifies a specific date and time for commencement
conclusion text: Commencement occurs on 20 June 1990
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6 Apr 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2
note: References s 4(1), (2) and Sch 15.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6-2-norm

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-6-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Apr 2001
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

24 May 2001 (s 2(1)(a))
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24
note: Conditional commencement of Statute Law Revision Act 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-24-norm

22 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-22-norm

19 Apr 2011 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-2
note: Statute Law Revision Act 2012, sections 136 and 2012
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-19-2-norm
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-19-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-19-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the Act's purpose
premise text: The Act revises and amends statutes
conclusion text: Purpose stated
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-2
note: Conditional commencement of Statute Law Revision Act (No. 1) 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-22-2-norm

11 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-2
note: Amendments to Crimes (Hostages) Act 1989
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-hostages-act-1989.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-hostages-act-1989-sec-11-2-norm