1 Short title
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.5
note: Cites this Act as the Crimes (Internationally Protected Persons) Act 1976.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.23
note: Convention entry into force condition
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-10-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-10-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-10
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-10-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.23
note: Any State Party may denounce this Convention.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-11-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-11
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Denunciation obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

1 Mar 1989 (see Gazette
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.28
note: Mar 1989 (see Gazette, page 28)
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-12
schema version: 2

1 July 1988 (see Gazette
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
note: Gazette notice of Royal Assent
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-13
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.17
note: Entitles internationally protected persons special protection from attack on person, freedom or dignity.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-2
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entitlement to special protection
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
premise text: International law

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of internationally protected persons
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
premise text: Constitutional provision

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.18
note: Prohibition of certain attacks on internationally protected persons
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-3
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State must prohibit
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the commission of certain attacks
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: International protection

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Classification as a crime
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies as a crime under internal law
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: Section classification

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Section 1

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.18
note: States must establish jurisdiction over crimes committed against internationally protected persons.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-4-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-4
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States must establish jurisdiction.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Section 1

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.19
note: State must communicate pertinent facts about a crime committed to other States.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-5-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-5
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State must communicate pertinent facts.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.20
note: Notify other states and international organizations of measures taken to ensure presence for prosecution or extradition.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-6-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-6
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.20
note: States Parties undertake to include crimes as extraditable offences in future extradition treaties.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-7-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-7
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States Parties undertake to include crimes as extraditable offences in future extradition treaties.
modality: Deontic
operator: undertaking

1 Section 1
type: Concept
description: Evidence necessary for the proceedings
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.21
note: Assistance in criminal proceedings
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-8-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-8
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States Parties have an obligation to provide assistance
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.22
note: States Parties must submit disputes to arbitration or the International Court of Justice.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-9-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1-9
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States Parties must submit disputes to arbitration or the International Court of Justice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Section 1

10 March 2016
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.1
note: Includes amendments up to Act No. 4, 2016
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10
schema version: 2

10 Liability to prosecution
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
note: Liability to prosecution requires specific conditions
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-2
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Offence committed after the Convention enters into force for Australia
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During: Offence committed after the Convention enters into force for Australia
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (b) the offence is committed after the Convention enters into force for Australia and...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Liability to prosecution
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires liability to prosecution
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: The person is not liable unless...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Jurisdiction over the offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires jurisdiction over the offence
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: ...and the person is found in Australia or Australia is required by article 3 of the Convention to establish its jurisdiction...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Establishment of jurisdiction over the offence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires establishment of jurisdiction over the offence
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: ...and the person is found in Australia or Australia is required by article 3 of the Convention to establish its jurisdiction over...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Liability to prosecution

10 Mar 1993 (see
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
note: Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment Act 1994
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-3
schema version: 2

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.10
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11(3C) Section 11
has part: 11(6) Section 11
has part: 11(7) Section 11
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11
schema version: 2

11 Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11(1) Taking offenders into custody
has part: 11(2) Taking offenders into custody
has part: 11(3) Taking offenders into custody
has part: 11(4) Taking offenders into custody
has part: 11(5) Taking offenders into custody
has part: 11(6) Taking offenders into custody
has part: 11(7) Taking offenders into custody
has part: 11(8) Taking offenders into custody
has part: 11(9) Taking offenders into custody
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-2
schema version: 2

11(1) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
note: Definition of constable
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: constable is a subclass of member
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: type
premise text: constable is a member or special member of the Australian Federal Police or a member of a police force of a State or Territory

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(1) Taking offenders into custody

11(2) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
note: Constable may take person into custody for dealing with in accordance with section.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Person must be held in custody until brought before a Magistrate.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: until

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Constable may take person into custody.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Constable shall cause person to be held in custody.
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Two obligations: take into custody and bring before Magistrate.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(2) Taking offenders into custody

11(3) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
note: Magistrate must make order to facilitate warrant execution.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Magistrate shall make such order as is appropriate...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval of warrant issuance.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (6) In pursuance of a warrant issued under subsection (6);

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Magistrate shall make such order as is appropriate...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of warrant production.
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLICATION
premise text: (b) there is produced to the Magistrate a warrant for the apprehension...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Magistrate shall make such order as is appropriate...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: CogAI executes warrant.
modality: CogAI
operator: EXECUTE
premise text: (6) In pursuance of a warrant issued under subsection (6);

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Magistrate shall make such order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate has a duty.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) Where...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Magistrate shall make such order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Warrant execution spreads to other agents.
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
premise text: (3) Where...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(3) Taking offenders into custody

11(4) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
note: Magistrate must order release from custody if not satisfied warrant is needed.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The excerpt relates to criminal proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excerpt overlaps with other provisions on criminal proceedings.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (4) Where, in the circumstances referred to in paragraph (3)(a), a warrant referred to in paragraph (3)(b) is not produced to the Magistrate...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The excerpt describes a procedure for handling unproduced warrants.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Excerpt analyzes warrant production in criminal proceedings.
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
premise text: (4) Where, in the circumstances referred to in paragraph (3)(a), a warrant referred to in paragraph (3)(b) is not produced to the Magistrate...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Magistrate shall order release from custody.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Magistrate must prohibit further detention.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) Where, in the circumstances referred to in paragraph (3)(a), a warrant referred to in paragraph (3)(b) is not produced to the Magistrate...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The excerpt describes a procedure for handling unproduced warrants.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Excerpt applies diffusion logic to warrant production.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Apply
premise text: (4) Where, in the circumstances referred to in paragraph (3)(a), a warrant referred to in paragraph (3)(b) is not produced to the Magistrate...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The excerpt describes a procedure for handling unproduced warrants.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Excerpt has recurring trace in handling unproduced warrants.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (4) Where, in the circumstances referred to in paragraph (3)(a), a warrant referred to in paragraph (3)(b) is not produced to the Magistrate...

11(5) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
note: Must bring person before Magistrate after remand period expires
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to bring person before Magistrate
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

11(6) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
note: Failure to appear before a Magistrate may result in warrant for apprehension.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a Magistrate may issue a warrant for the apprehension of the person and for bringing the person before a Magistrate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between recognizance and failure to appear.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (6) If a person who has been remanded on bail under subsection (4) does not appear before a Magistrate at the time and place mentioned in the recognizance entered into by the person on being granted bail...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a Magistrate may issue a warrant for the apprehension of the person and for bringing the person before a Magistrate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of failure to appear on recognizance.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
premise text: (6) If a person who has been remanded on bail under subsection (4) does not appear before a Magistrate at the time and place mentioned in the recognizance entered into by the person on being granted bail...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a Magistrate may issue a warrant for the apprehension of the person and for bringing the person before a Magistrate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of failure to appear before a Magistrate.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (6) If a person who has been remanded on bail under subsection (4) does not appear before a Magistrate at the time and place mentioned in the recognizance entered into by the person on being granted bail...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a Magistrate may issue a warrant for the apprehension of the person and for bringing the person before a Magistrate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of recognizance to apprehend failure to appear.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (6) If a person who has been remanded on bail under subsection (4) does not appear before a Magistrate at the time and place mentioned in the recognizance entered into by the person on being granted bail...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a Magistrate may issue a warrant for the apprehension of the person and for bringing the person before a Magistrate.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of failure to appear.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (6) If a person who has been remanded on bail under subsection (4) does not appear before a Magistrate at the time and place mentioned in the recognizance entered into by the person on being granted bail...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(6) Taking offenders into custody

11(7) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
note: Entitlement to Convention rights for non-Australian citizens taken into custody
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person entitled to rights
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Entitlement to Convention rights
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: Article 6 of the Convention

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-7-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: NaturalPerson
part of: 11(7) Taking offenders into custody

11(8) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
note: Applicability of laws in force to persons held in custody on remand
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to persons who are held in custody on remand...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Applicability of laws in force to persons held in custody on remand
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (8) The laws in force in a State or Territory...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to persons who are held in custody on remand...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applicability of laws in force to persons held in custody on remand
modality: CogAI
operator: Inferential
premise text: (8) The laws in force in a State or Territory...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to persons who are held in custody on remand...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability of laws in force to persons held in custody on remand
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: (8) The laws in force in a State or Territory...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to persons who are held in custody on remand...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Applicability of laws in force to persons held in custody on remand
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (8) The laws in force in a State or Territory...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in relation to persons who are held in custody on remand...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Applicability of laws in force to persons held in custody on remand
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (8) The laws in force in a State or Territory...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(8) Taking offenders into custody

11(9) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
note: Permits arrest for an offence against this Act under other laws.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody

11 Feb
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11(3) Feb
has part: 11(4) Feb
has part: 11(1) Feb
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-3
schema version: 2

11(1) Feb
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.30
note: Commences at the later of two specified events
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-3-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Feb

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

11(3) Feb
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.30
note: Proclamation cannot fix a day earlier than the publication date without specific conditions.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-3-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Feb

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Date cannot be earlier than substantial minority sale day.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: the substantial minority sale day

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of fixing an earlier date without conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

11(4) Feb
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.30
note: Commencement of amendments to various Acts
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-3-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Feb

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Amendments commence on a specific date
modality: Deontic
operator: begins

11(3C) Section 11
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.10
note: Deemed offence against this Act
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-3c-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-ss-3c
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Section 11

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: offence against this Act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (3C) or (4)

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-3c-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(3C) Section 11

11(6) Section 11
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.10
note: If evidence establishes a related offence, the person may be found guilty of that offence.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Section 11

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: B
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If A, then B.
modality: Deontic
operator: →
premise text: A

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(6) Section 11

11(7) Section 11
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.10
note: Kidnapping, murder, and other violent acts are prohibited.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Section 11

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits kidnapping, murder, and other violent acts.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies actions as kidnapping or murder based on intent and circumstances.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

12 Prosecutions
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.14
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12(1) Prosecutions
has part: 12(2) Prosecutions
has part: 12(3) Prosecutions
has part: 12(4) Prosecutions
has part: 12(5) Prosecutions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12
schema version: 2

12(1) Prosecutions
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.14
note: Prosecution must be on indictment.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Prosecutions

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prosecution must be on indictment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide prosecution on indictment.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (2), a prosecution for an offence against this Act shall be on indictment.

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(1) Prosecutions

12(2) Prosecutions
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.14
note: A person charged in a State or Territory with an offence against this Act may be dealt with in accordance with that law.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Prosecutions

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(2) Prosecutions

12(3) Prosecutions
type: Concept
description: Consent from Attorney-General or authorized person
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.14
note: Attorney-General must provide consent for prosecution
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Prosecutions

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General must provide consent
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(3) Prosecutions

12(4) Prosecutions
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.14
note: No further step in proceedings shall be taken until consent is given.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Prosecutions

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: until such a consent has been given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Proceedings overlap with the consent period.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3)

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: until such a consent has been given.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to obtain consent before proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (3)

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(4) Prosecutions

12(5) Prosecutions
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.14
note: Nothing in subsection (4) prevents the discharge of the accused if proceedings are not continued within a reasonable time.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Prosecutions

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (5)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits discharge of the accused if proceedings are not continued within a reasonable time.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prevents
premise text: (4)

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(5) Prosecutions

13 Evidence of matters relating to Convention
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.15
curation status: Proposed
has part: 13(1) Evidence of matters relating to Convention
has part: 13(2) Evidence of matters relating to Convention
has part: 13(3) Evidence of matters relating to Convention
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13
schema version: 2

13(1) Evidence of matters relating to Convention
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.15
note: Foreign Affairs Minister must provide written certificate stating Convention entry/exit date.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 13 Evidence of matters relating to Convention

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written certificate.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13(1) Evidence of matters relating to Convention

13(2) Evidence of matters relating to Convention
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.15
note: Australia may be named in a certificate under subsection (1)
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 13 Evidence of matters relating to Convention

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to name Australia
modality: Deontic
operator: May

13(3) Evidence of matters relating to Convention
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.15
note: Certificate admissible as prima facie evidence
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 13 Evidence of matters relating to Convention

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: are temporally related as subsections of the same section.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between subsections
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalRelation
premise text: (1) and (3)

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is admissible as prima facie evidence of the matters stated in the certificate.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Certificate admissible in proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: Admissibility
premise text: (3) A certificate given under subsection (1)

14 Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.15
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14(1) Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister
has part: 14(2) Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14
schema version: 2

14(1) Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.15
note: Foreign Affairs Minister may issue written certificate stating relevant matters about an internationally protected person.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-14-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to issue certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-14-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(1) Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister

14(2) Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.15
note: Certificate admissibility in proceedings
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Matters stated in the certificate
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Admissible as prima facie evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: admission
premise text: Certificate given under subsection (1)

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-14-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(2) Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister

15 Jurisdiction of courts
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.16
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15(1) Jurisdiction of courts
has part: 15(2) Jurisdiction of courts
has part: 15(3) Jurisdiction of courts
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15
schema version: 2

15 June
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-2
schema version: 2

15(1) Jurisdiction of courts
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.16
note: Jurisdiction of courts with respect to offences against this Act.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Jurisdiction of courts

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if that jurisdiction were so invested without limitation as to locality other than the limitation imposed by section 80 of the Constitution.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Relates to a temporal interval during which jurisdiction is invested.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) A provision of the Judiciary Act...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if that jurisdiction were so invested without limitation as to locality other than the limitation imposed by section 80 of the Constitution.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Relates to a temporal interval during which jurisdiction is invested.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (1) A provision of the Judiciary Act...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if that jurisdiction were so invested without limitation as to locality other than the limitation imposed by section 80 of the Constitution.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Invests jurisdiction in a court of a State.
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (1) A provision of the Judiciary Act...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if that jurisdiction were so invested without limitation as to locality other than the limitation imposed by section 80 of the Constitution.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Relates to a temporal interval during which jurisdiction is invested.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (1) A provision of the Judiciary Act...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...as if that jurisdiction were so invested without limitation as to locality other than the limitation imposed by section 80 of the Constitution.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Relates to a temporal interval during which jurisdiction is invested.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) A provision of the Judiciary Act...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(1) Jurisdiction of courts

15(2) Jurisdiction of courts
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.16
note: Jurisdiction of courts outside Territory
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Jurisdiction of courts

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Court jurisdiction
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: Section 80 of the Constitution

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(2) Jurisdiction of courts

15(3) Jurisdiction of courts
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.16
note: Jurisdiction of courts
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15 Jurisdiction of courts

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The trial can occur at any time when the court is competent and can sit there.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (3) The trial of an offence against this Act not committed within a State may be held by a court of competent jurisdiction at any place where the court may sit.

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The artificial intelligence recognizes that the court has jurisdiction over trials outside the state.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence recognition
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
premise text: (3) The trial of an offence against this Act not committed within a State may be held by a court of competent jurisdiction at any place where the court may sit.

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court has jurisdiction over trials outside the state.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: (3) The trial of an offence against this Act not committed within a State may be held by a court of competent jurisdiction at any place where the court may sit.

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information about the trial diffuses to all places where the court can sit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information diffusion
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (3) The trial of an offence against this Act not committed within a State may be held by a court of competent jurisdiction at any place where the court may sit.

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The trial holds for all times when the court is competent and can sit there.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal scope
modality: LTL
operator: holdsForAll
premise text: (3) The trial of an offence against this Act not committed within a State may be held by a court of competent jurisdiction at any place where the court may sit.

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15(3) Jurisdiction of courts

16 Section 38 of Judiciary Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.16
note: A matter arising under this Act is deemed not a matter arising directly under a treaty.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16
schema version: 2

16 Dec
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.28
note: References specific sections
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-16-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16-2
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Not a matter arising directly under a treaty
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Denies direct applicability
modality: Deontic
operator: Not
premise text: Matter arising under this Act

17 Jan 1990
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17
schema version: 2

19 Oct 1979 (see s. 2 and
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.28
note: See s. 2 and Gazette 1979, No. S206
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19
schema version: 2

19 Dec
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
note: Consequential Amendments Act 1995
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-19-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-2
schema version: 2

19 Feb
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
note: Schedule 10 (item 10)
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-19-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-3
schema version: 2

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.5
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2(1) Commencement
has part: 2(2) Commencement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.23
note: The Convention enters into force on the thirtieth day after deposit by a State of its instrument of ratification or accession.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-10
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.23
note: Denunciation takes effect six months after notification to the Secretary-General.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-11-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-11-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-11
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-11-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Denunciation takes effect six months after notification.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies descriptive clause as Undertaking.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text describes a condition for denunciation to take effect.

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.18
note: Definition of 'alleged offender'
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-2
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Section 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.18
note: Each State Party shall make these crimes punishable by appropriate penalties.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-3
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.19
note: Each State Party must take necessary measures to establish jurisdiction over crimes committed in its territory.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-4-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-4
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take necessary measures
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.19
note: Transmit information about a crime against an internationally protected person to the relevant State Party.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-5
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Transmission must occur within a certain time frame
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between State Party's actions and transmission deadline
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: State Party has information about the victim and circumstances of the crime before a certain date

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Transmission must occur within a certain time frame based on AI calculations
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence inference for transmission deadline calculation
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: State Party has information about the victim and circumstances of the crime

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Transmit information promptly
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to transmit information
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: State Party has information about the victim and circumstances of the crime

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Relevant State Party receives information promptly
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information diffusion from State Party to relevant State Party
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: State Party has information about the victim and circumstances of the crime

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Transmission must occur within a certain time frame after that date
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal limit on State Party's actions
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: State Party has information about the victim and circumstances of the crime before a certain date

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.20
note: Entitlement to communicate with State representative and be visited.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-6-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-6
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person has right to communicate
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has right to communication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
premise text: State has duty to protect rights

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-6-norm
type: Right
scope note: held by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
held by: State
part of: 2 Section 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.21
note: A State Party may consider this Convention as the legal basis for extradition in respect of those crimes.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-7-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-7
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.21
note: Communicate final outcome of proceedings to the Secretary-General.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-8-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-8
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.22
note: States Parties may declare not to be bound by paragraph 1 of article 1.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-9-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-9
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States Parties may declare not to be bound.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

2(1) Commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between commencement and Royal Assent
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Day of receipt of Royal Assent

2(2) Commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.5
note: Conditional commencement of Section 11
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

20 Feb 2010
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20
schema version: 2

21 Dec
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21
schema version: 2

22 Mar
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.30
note: Schedule 5 (items 69,70)
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22
schema version: 2

22 Sept
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.30
note: Schedule 3 (item 2) of the Statute Law Revision Act (No. 1) 2016
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-22-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-2
schema version: 2

26 May 2016
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation information and notes about amendments.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-26
schema version: 2

28 Feb
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.28
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Federal Police (Consequential Amendments) Act 1979
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-28-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-28-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28
schema version: 2

28 Nov
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-28-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-2
schema version: 2

28 May
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-28-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-3
schema version: 2

28 May 1980
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.28
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment Act 1987
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-28-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-4
schema version: 2

28 June
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
note: Conditional commencement of the Legislation Amendment (Application of Criminal Code) Act 2001
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-28-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-28-5
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-28-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified as 20 July 1977

3 Interpretation
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.5
curation status: Proposed
has part: 3(1) Interpretation
has part: 3(3) Interpretation
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.18
note: States Parties must take measures to prevent attacks on internationally protected persons.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-2
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States Parties must take measures.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.19
note: Cooperation in preventing crimes
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-3
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.21
note: States Parties must recognize extraditable offences between themselves.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-4-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-4
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: States Parties must recognize extraditable offences.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Section 3

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.22
note: Withdrawal of reservations by States Parties
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-5-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-5
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State Party may withdraw reservation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State Party can withdraw reservation
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: Article 14

3(1) Interpretation
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.5
note: Australia includes all Territories and Australian coastal sea.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 3 Interpretation

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Australia includes all Territories and Australian coastal sea.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Australia is a country that includes all Territories and Australian coastal sea.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for Australia
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Australia includes all Territories and Australian coastal sea.

3(3) Interpretation
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.5
note: Meaning of expressions from Convention to be applied in Act
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 3 Interpretation

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: same meaning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Same meaning as in Convention
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (3)

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3(3) Interpretation

3A Extended meaning of internationally protected person
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.6
curation status: Proposed
has part: 3A(1) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
has part: 3A(2) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
has part: 3A(3) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
has part: 3A(4) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3a
schema version: 2

3A(1) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.6
note: Definition of internationally protected person includes the Governor-General in relation to Australia.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 3A Extended meaning of internationally protected person

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The definition includes the Governor-General.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition is binding
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3A(1) Extended meaning of internationally protected person

3A(2) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.6
note: Prescribes representatives and officials of Australia, states, international organisations, and overseas missions.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 3A Extended meaning of internationally protected person

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in prescribed circumstances,
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the scope of application for the definition of internationally protected person.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Act, the definition of internationally protected person...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following persons:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes persons in the definition of internationally protected person.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Act, the definition of internationally protected person...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following persons:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes persons in the definition of internationally protected person.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (b) a prescribed representative or official of a prescribed state other than Australia;

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the following persons:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Includes persons in the definition of internationally protected person.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: (d) a prescribed official of a prescribed designated overseas mission;

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3A(2) Extended meaning of internationally protected person

3A(3) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.6
note: Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of this section.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 3A Extended meaning of internationally protected person

3A(4) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.6
note: Defines official in relation to a designated overseas mission.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 3A Extended meaning of internationally protected person

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: official in relation to a designated overseas mission
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval includes the head of the mission or staff member
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
premise text: (a) or (b)

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: official in relation to a designated overseas mission
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the term
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
premise text: (4)

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: designated overseas mission
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Relates to the Overseas Missions (Privileges and Immunities) Act 1995
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has same meaning as
premise text: (4)

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3A(4) Extended meaning of internationally protected person

4 Extension of Act to Territories
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.7
note: The Act extends to every Territory.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

4 Section 4
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.21
note: Guarantee fair treatment for persons undergoing proceedings.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-4-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4-2
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Guaranteeing fair treatment is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Extension of Act to Territories

5 Extraterritorial operation of Act
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.7
note: Act extends to acts, matters and things outside Australia.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to exercise jurisdiction
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extension of jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
premise text: Act extends to acts, matters and things outside Australia.

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Extraterritorial operation of Act

6 Effect of this Act on other laws
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6(1) Effect of this Act on other laws
has part: 6(2) Effect of this Act on other laws
has part: 6(3) Effect of this Act on other laws
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6
schema version: 2

6 Apr 2001
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
note: Obligation on s. 4(1), (2) and Schedule 16(c)
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

6(1) Effect of this Act on other laws
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
note: This Act does not exclude or limit the operation of other laws.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Effect of this Act on other laws

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Excluding other laws
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(1) Effect of this Act on other laws

6(2) Effect of this Act on other laws
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
note: No liability for concurrent offenses
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Effect of this Act on other laws

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: C
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If A and B, then C
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (A and B)

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(2) Effect of this Act on other laws

6(3) Effect of this Act on other laws
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
note: No liability for convictions under foreign laws
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Effect of this Act on other laws

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: T1 overlaps T2
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between conviction abroad and under this Act
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) Where a person has been convicted of an offence under the law of a country outside Australia in respect of any conduct, that person is not liable to be convicted of an offence against this Act in respect of that conduct.

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: C1 recognizes D2
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizing the exemption from conviction under this Act for persons convicted abroad
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (3) Where a person has been convicted of an offence under the law of a country outside Australia in respect of any conduct, that person is not liable to be convicted of an offence against this Act in respect of that conduct.

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If A, then not B
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies no conviction under this Act if convicted abroad
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (3) Where a person has been convicted of an offence under the law of a country outside Australia in respect of any conduct, that person is not liable to be convicted of an offence against this Act in respect of that conduct.

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: D1 diffuses D2
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusing the scope of exemption from conviction under this Act for persons convicted abroad
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (3) Where a person has been convicted of an offence under the law of a country outside Australia in respect of any conduct, that person is not liable to be convicted of an offence against this Act in respect of that conduct.

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: T1 repeats T2
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Repeating pattern of exemption from conviction under this Act for persons convicted abroad
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (3) Where a person has been convicted of an offence under the law of a country outside Australia in respect of any conduct, that person is not liable to be convicted of an offence against this Act in respect of that conduct.

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(3) Effect of this Act on other laws

6A Application of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6a-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6a
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6A Application of the Criminal Code

7 Ratification of Convention
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
note: Approval of Convention ratification
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7
schema version: 2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Australia has obligation to ratify Convention
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation

8 Offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8(1) Offences
has part: 8(2) Offences
has part: 8(3) Offences
has part: 8(3A) Offences
has part: 8(3B) Offences
has part: 8(3C) Offences
has part: 8(4) Offences
has part: 8(4A) Offences
has part: 8(5) Offences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8
schema version: 2

8(1) Offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
note: Murdering or kidnapping an internationally protected person is punishable by imprisonment for life.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Offences

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Murdering or kidnapping occurs during the punishment of murder and kidnapping.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (1) A person who murders or kidnaps an internationally protected person commits an offence against this Act and is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for life.

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits murder and kidnapping of internationally protected persons.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person who murders or kidnaps an internationally protected person commits an offence against this Act and is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for life.

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty to punish murder and kidnapping of internationally protected persons.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) A person who murders or kidnaps an internationally protected person commits an offence against this Act and is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for life.

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Prohibits murder and kidnapping of internationally protected persons.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibits
premise text: (1) A person who murders or kidnaps an internationally protected person commits an offence against this Act and is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for life.

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(1) Offences

8(2) Offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
note: Offences against internationally protected persons are prohibited.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Offences

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits committing attacks on internationally protected persons.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

8(3) Offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
note: Destroying or damaging certain premises is an offence.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Offences

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (3) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes the prohibition using AI.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (3) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits destroying or damaging certain premises.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies actions as offences based on intent.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (3) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the prohibition to all relevant entities.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (3) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for the offence.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (3) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(3) Offences

8(3A) Offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
note: Destroying or damaging internationally protected person's property is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-shacl-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-3a
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Offences

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for destruction or damage to internationally protected person's property.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (3A) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes internationally protected person's property as entity.
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Recognition
premise text: (3A) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits destruction or damage to internationally protected person's property.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3A) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies destruction or damage to internationally protected person's property as prohibited.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (3A) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for destruction or damage to internationally protected person's property.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (3A) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-shacl-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates schema for internationally protected person's property.
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
premise text: (3A) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(3A) Offences

8(3B) Offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
note: Destroying or damaging official premises, private accommodation, or means of transport of an internationally protected person is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-cogai-5
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-shacl-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-3b
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Offences

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The destruction overlaps with the internationally protected person's presence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between destruction and internationally protected person presence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
premise text: (b) any other premises or property in or upon which an internationally protected person is present...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A knowledge graph is constructed for the classification of premises.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Construction of knowledge graph for classification of premises
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph construction
premise text: (a) any official premises, private accommodation or means of transport...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An offence against this Act is committed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3B) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The premises are classified as official or private.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of premises as official or private
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) any official premises, private accommodation or means of transport...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A recurring trace exists between destruction and internationally protected person presence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of destruction and internationally protected person presence
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (b) any other premises or property in or upon which an internationally protected person is present...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-shacl-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The premise classification is validated against the SHACL schema.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation of premise classification against SHACL schema
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
premise text: (a) any official premises, private accommodation or means of transport...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(3B) Offences

8(3C) Offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
note: Destroying or damaging internationally protected premises with intent to endanger life is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-argumentation-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-3c
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Offences

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The damage overlaps with the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Damages occur during the same time period as the offence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3C) A person who intentionally destroys or damages by means of fire or explosive: ...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The damage implies a threat.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Damages imply a threat to life.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implicates
premise text: (3C) A person who intentionally destroys or damages by means of fire or explosive: ...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An offence against this Act is committed.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits destruction or damage with intent to endanger life.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3C) A person who intentionally destroys or damages by means of fire or explosive: ...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An internationally protected premises is damaged.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies destruction or damage as an offence.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (3C) A person who intentionally destroys or damages by means of fire or explosive: ...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The damage spreads from the offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Damages spread from the offence.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
premise text: (3C) A person who intentionally destroys or damages by means of fire or explosive: ...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The damage repeats the same action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Damages repeat the same action as the offence.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (3C) A person who intentionally destroys or damages by means of fire or explosive: ...

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(3C) Offences

8(4) Offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
note: Threatening to commit an offence is itself an offence.
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Offences

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Threatening to commit an offence is itself an offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(4) Offences

8(4A) Offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
note: Absolute liability applies for certain physical elements of circumstance in an offence against subsections (1), (2), (3), (3A), (3B), (3C) or (4)
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-4a
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Offences

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The circumstance is a temporal relation to the offence if it meets condition (d)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between the circumstances and the offence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (4A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1), (2), (3), (3A), (3B), (3C) or (4)

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Absolute liability applies for certain physical elements of circumstance in an offence against subsections (1), (2), (3), (3A), (3B), (3C) or (4)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (4A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1), (2), (3), (3A), (3B), (3C) or (4)

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The circumstance is an absolute liability obligation if it meets condition (c)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Absolute liability obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (4A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1), (2), (3), (3A), (3B), (3C) or (4)

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The circumstance is classified as a physical element of circumstance relevant to the offence if it meets condition (a)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of circumstances relevant to the offence
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class
premise text: (a) that the person who is murdered or kidnapped, or whose person or liberty is otherwise attacked, is an internationally protected person;

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The circumstance is classified as a physical element of circumstance relevant to the offence if it meets condition (d)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of circumstances relevant to the offence
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class
premise text: (a) that the person who is murdered or kidnapped, or whose person or liberty is otherwise attacked, is an internationally protected person;

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The circumstance is a recurring trace if it meets condition (b)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of circumstances relevant to the offence
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (4A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1), (2), (3), (3A), (3B), (3C) or (4)

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(4A) Offences

8(5) Offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
note: Creates an offence for purposes of this Act
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Offences

Crimes (Internationally Protected Persons) Act 1976
type: Document
date: 10 March 2016
description: An Act relating to the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents 1 Short title This Act may be cited as the Crimes (Internationally Protected Persons) Act 1976.
identifier: No. 8 of 1977
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU