Crimes (Internationally Protected Persons) Act 1976
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 8 of 1977
date: 10 March 2016
description: An Act relating to the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents 1 Short title This Act may be cited as the Crimes (Internationally Protected Persons) Act 1976.
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

10 March 2016
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
note: Includes amendments up to Act No. 4, 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-norm

26 May 2016
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26
note: Compilation information and notes about amendments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-26-norm

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Cites this Act as the Crimes (Internationally Protected Persons) Act 1976.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
has part: 2(1) Commencement
has part: 2(2) Commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.5

2(1) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-1
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between commencement and Royal Assent
premise text: Day of receipt of Royal Assent
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(2) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-2
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Conditional commencement of Section 11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
has part: 3(1) Interpretation
has part: 3(3) Interpretation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.5

3(1) Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-ss-1
part of: 3 Interpretation
note: Australia includes all Territories and Australian coastal sea.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Australia includes all Territories and Australian coastal sea.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for Australia
premise text: Australia includes all Territories and Australian coastal sea.
conclusion text: Australia is a country that includes all Territories and Australian coastal sea.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(3) Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-ss-3
part of: 3 Interpretation
note: Meaning of expressions from Convention to be applied in Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(3) Interpretation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Same meaning as in Convention
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: same meaning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3A Extended meaning of internationally protected person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3a
has part: 3A(1) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
has part: 3A(2) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
has part: 3A(3) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
has part: 3A(4) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.6

3A(1) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3a-ss-1
part of: 3A Extended meaning of internationally protected person
note: Definition of internationally protected person includes the Governor-General in relation to Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3A(1) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition is binding
premise text: (1) For the purposes of this Act...
conclusion text: The definition includes the Governor-General.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3A(2) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3a-ss-2
part of: 3A Extended meaning of internationally protected person
note: Prescribes representatives and officials of Australia, states, international organisations, and overseas missions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3A(2) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes persons in the definition of internationally protected person.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Act, the definition of internationally protected person...
conclusion text: ...the following persons:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Defines the scope of application for the definition of internationally protected person.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Act, the definition of internationally protected person...
conclusion text: ...in prescribed circumstances,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes persons in the definition of internationally protected person.
premise text: (b) a prescribed representative or official of a prescribed state other than Australia;
conclusion text: ...the following persons:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes persons in the definition of internationally protected person.
premise text: (d) a prescribed official of a prescribed designated overseas mission;
conclusion text: ...the following persons:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3A(3) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3a-ss-3
part of: 3A Extended meaning of internationally protected person
note: Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-3-norm

3A(4) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3a-ss-4
part of: 3A Extended meaning of internationally protected person
note: Defines official in relation to a designated overseas mission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3A(4) Extended meaning of internationally protected person
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines the term
premise text: (4)
conclusion text: official in relation to a designated overseas mission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has same meaning as
logic summary: Relates to the Overseas Missions (Privileges and Immunities) Act 1995
premise text: (4)
conclusion text: designated overseas mission
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Temporal interval includes the head of the mission or staff member
premise text: (a) or (b)
conclusion text: official in relation to a designated overseas mission
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Extension of Act to Territories
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: The Act extends to every Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-4-norm

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Extension of Act to Territories
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

5 Extraterritorial operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Act extends to acts, matters and things outside Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Extraterritorial operation of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extension of jurisdiction
premise text: Act extends to acts, matters and things outside Australia.
conclusion text: Obligation to exercise jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Effect of this Act on other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
has part: 6(1) Effect of this Act on other laws
has part: 6(2) Effect of this Act on other laws
has part: 6(3) Effect of this Act on other laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8

6(1) Effect of this Act on other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-1
part of: 6 Effect of this Act on other laws
note: This Act does not exclude or limit the operation of other laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(1) Effect of this Act on other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excluding other laws
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(2) Effect of this Act on other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-2
part of: 6 Effect of this Act on other laws
note: No liability for concurrent offenses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2) Effect of this Act on other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If A and B, then C
premise text: (A and B)
conclusion text: C
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(3) Effect of this Act on other laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-3
part of: 6 Effect of this Act on other laws
note: No liability for convictions under foreign laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(3) Effect of this Act on other laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Implies no conviction under this Act if convicted abroad
premise text: (3) Where a person has been convicted of an offence under the law of a country outside Australia in respect of any conduct, that person is not liable to be convicted of an offence against this Act in respect of that conduct.
conclusion text: If A, then not B
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between conviction abroad and under this Act
premise text: (3) Where a person has been convicted of an offence under the law of a country outside Australia in respect of any conduct, that person is not liable to be convicted of an offence against this Act in respect of that conduct.
conclusion text: T1 overlaps T2
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Repeating pattern of exemption from conviction under this Act for persons convicted abroad
premise text: (3) Where a person has been convicted of an offence under the law of a country outside Australia in respect of any conduct, that person is not liable to be convicted of an offence against this Act in respect of that conduct.
conclusion text: T1 repeats T2
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusing the scope of exemption from conviction under this Act for persons convicted abroad
premise text: (3) Where a person has been convicted of an offence under the law of a country outside Australia in respect of any conduct, that person is not liable to be convicted of an offence against this Act in respect of that conduct.
conclusion text: D1 diffuses D2
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognizing the exemption from conviction under this Act for persons convicted abroad
premise text: (3) Where a person has been convicted of an offence under the law of a country outside Australia in respect of any conduct, that person is not liable to be convicted of an offence against this Act in respect of that conduct.
conclusion text: C1 recognizes D2
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6A Application of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6a
note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6a-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6A Application of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Ratification of Convention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
note: Approval of Convention ratification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Australia has obligation to ratify Convention
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
has part: 8(1) Offences
has part: 8(2) Offences
has part: 8(3) Offences
has part: 8(3A) Offences
has part: 8(3B) Offences
has part: 8(3C) Offences
has part: 8(4) Offences
has part: 8(4A) Offences
has part: 8(5) Offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8

8(1) Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-1
part of: 8 Offences
note: Murdering or kidnapping an internationally protected person is punishable by imprisonment for life.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(1) Offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits murder and kidnapping of internationally protected persons.
premise text: (1) A person who murders or kidnaps an internationally protected person commits an offence against this Act and is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for life.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Prohibits
logic summary: Prohibits murder and kidnapping of internationally protected persons.
premise text: (1) A person who murders or kidnaps an internationally protected person commits an offence against this Act and is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for life.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty to punish murder and kidnapping of internationally protected persons.
premise text: (1) A person who murders or kidnaps an internationally protected person commits an offence against this Act and is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for life.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Murdering or kidnapping occurs during the punishment of murder and kidnapping.
premise text: (1) A person who murders or kidnaps an internationally protected person commits an offence against this Act and is punishable on conviction by imprisonment for life.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(2) Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-2
part of: 8 Offences
note: Offences against internationally protected persons are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits committing attacks on internationally protected persons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(3) Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-3
part of: 8 Offences
note: Destroying or damaging certain premises is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-cogai-6

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(3) Offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits destroying or damaging certain premises.
premise text: (3) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies actions as offences based on intent.
premise text: (3) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the offence.
premise text: (3) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for the offence.
premise text: (3) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses the prohibition to all relevant entities.
premise text: (3) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes the prohibition using AI.
premise text: (3) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(3A) Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-3a
part of: 8 Offences
note: Destroying or damaging internationally protected person's property is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-shacl-6

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(3A) Offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits destruction or damage to internationally protected person's property.
premise text: (3A) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies destruction or damage to internationally protected person's property as prohibited.
premise text: (3A) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for destruction or damage to internationally protected person's property.
premise text: (3A) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines recurring trace for destruction or damage to internationally protected person's property.
premise text: (3A) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Recognition
logic summary: Recognizes internationally protected person's property as entity.
premise text: (3A) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3a-logic-shacl-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: Validates schema for internationally protected person's property.
premise text: (3A) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...
conclusion text: ...commits an offence against this Act and is punishable...
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(3B) Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-3b
part of: 8 Offences
note: Destroying or damaging official premises, private accommodation, or means of transport of an internationally protected person is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-cogai-5
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-shacl-6

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(3B) Offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (3B) A person who intentionally destroys or damages...
conclusion text: An offence against this Act is committed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of premises as official or private
premise text: (a) any official premises, private accommodation or means of transport...
conclusion text: The premises are classified as official or private.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between destruction and internationally protected person presence
premise text: (b) any other premises or property in or upon which an internationally protected person is present...
conclusion text: The destruction overlaps with the internationally protected person's presence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of destruction and internationally protected person presence
premise text: (b) any other premises or property in or upon which an internationally protected person is present...
conclusion text: A recurring trace exists between destruction and internationally protected person presence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge graph construction
logic summary: Construction of knowledge graph for classification of premises
premise text: (a) any official premises, private accommodation or means of transport...
conclusion text: A knowledge graph is constructed for the classification of premises.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3b-logic-shacl-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
logic summary: Validation of premise classification against SHACL schema
premise text: (a) any official premises, private accommodation or means of transport...
conclusion text: The premise classification is validated against the SHACL schema.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(3C) Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-3c
part of: 8 Offences
note: Destroying or damaging internationally protected premises with intent to endanger life is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-argumentation-6

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(3C) Offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits destruction or damage with intent to endanger life.
premise text: (3C) A person who intentionally destroys or damages by means of fire or explosive: ...
conclusion text: An offence against this Act is committed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies destruction or damage as an offence.
premise text: (3C) A person who intentionally destroys or damages by means of fire or explosive: ...
conclusion text: An internationally protected premises is damaged.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Damages occur during the same time period as the offence.
premise text: (3C) A person who intentionally destroys or damages by means of fire or explosive: ...
conclusion text: The damage overlaps with the offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Damages repeat the same action as the offence.
premise text: (3C) A person who intentionally destroys or damages by means of fire or explosive: ...
conclusion text: The damage repeats the same action.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: Damages spread from the offence.
premise text: (3C) A person who intentionally destroys or damages by means of fire or explosive: ...
conclusion text: The damage spreads from the offence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-3c-logic-argumentation-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implicates
logic summary: Damages imply a threat to life.
premise text: (3C) A person who intentionally destroys or damages by means of fire or explosive: ...
conclusion text: The damage implies a threat.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(4) Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-4
part of: 8 Offences
note: Threatening to commit an offence is itself an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(4) Offences
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Threatening to commit an offence is itself an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(4A) Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-4a
part of: 8 Offences
note: Absolute liability applies for certain physical elements of circumstance in an offence against subsections (1), (2), (3), (3A), (3B), (3C) or (4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-6

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(4A) Offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Absolute liability obligation
premise text: (4A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1), (2), (3), (3A), (3B), (3C) or (4)
conclusion text: Absolute liability applies for certain physical elements of circumstance in an offence against subsections (1), (2), (3), (3A), (3B), (3C) or (4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class
logic summary: Classification of circumstances relevant to the offence
premise text: (a) that the person who is murdered or kidnapped, or whose person or liberty is otherwise attacked, is an internationally protected person;
conclusion text: The circumstance is classified as a physical element of circumstance relevant to the offence if it meets condition (a)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between the circumstances and the offence
premise text: (4A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1), (2), (3), (3A), (3B), (3C) or (4)
conclusion text: The circumstance is a temporal relation to the offence if it meets condition (d)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of circumstances relevant to the offence
premise text: (4A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1), (2), (3), (3A), (3B), (3C) or (4)
conclusion text: The circumstance is a recurring trace if it meets condition (b)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Absolute liability obligation
premise text: (4A) For the purposes of an offence against subsection (1), (2), (3), (3A), (3B), (3C) or (4)
conclusion text: The circumstance is an absolute liability obligation if it meets condition (c)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-4a-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class
logic summary: Classification of circumstances relevant to the offence
premise text: (a) that the person who is murdered or kidnapped, or whose person or liberty is otherwise attacked, is an internationally protected person;
conclusion text: The circumstance is classified as a physical element of circumstance relevant to the offence if it meets condition (d)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

8(5) Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-5
part of: 8 Offences
note: Creates an offence for purposes of this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-8-ss-5-norm

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11
has part: 11(3C) Section 11
has part: 11(6) Section 11
has part: 11(7) Section 11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.10

11(3C) Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-ss-3c
part of: 11 Section 11
note: Deemed offence against this Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-3c-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-3c-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(3C) Section 11
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-3c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (3C) or (4)
conclusion text: offence against this Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(6) Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-ss-6
part of: 11 Section 11
note: If evidence establishes a related offence, the person may be found guilty of that offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(6) Section 11
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: →
logic summary: If A, then B.
premise text: A
conclusion text: B
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(7) Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-ss-7
part of: 11 Section 11
note: Kidnapping, murder, and other violent acts are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits kidnapping, murder, and other violent acts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies actions as kidnapping or murder based on intent and circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Liability to prosecution
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-2
note: Liability to prosecution requires specific conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-4

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Liability to prosecution
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires liability to prosecution
premise text: The person is not liable unless...
conclusion text: Liability to prosecution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During: Offence committed after the Convention enters into force for Australia
premise text: (b) the offence is committed after the Convention enters into force for Australia and...
conclusion text: Offence committed after the Convention enters into force for Australia
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires jurisdiction over the offence
premise text: ...and the person is found in Australia or Australia is required by article 3 of the Convention to establish its jurisdiction...
conclusion text: Jurisdiction over the offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires establishment of jurisdiction over the offence
premise text: ...and the person is found in Australia or Australia is required by article 3 of the Convention to establish its jurisdiction over...
conclusion text: Establishment of jurisdiction over the offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-2
has part: 11(1) Taking offenders into custody
has part: 11(2) Taking offenders into custody
has part: 11(3) Taking offenders into custody
has part: 11(4) Taking offenders into custody
has part: 11(5) Taking offenders into custody
has part: 11(6) Taking offenders into custody
has part: 11(7) Taking offenders into custody
has part: 11(8) Taking offenders into custody
has part: 11(9) Taking offenders into custody
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12

11(1) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-1
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody
note: Definition of constable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(1) Taking offenders into custody
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: type
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: constable is a member or special member of the Australian Federal Police or a member of a police force of a State or Territory
conclusion text: constable is a subclass of member
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

11(2) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-2
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody
note: Constable may take person into custody for dealing with in accordance with section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(2) Taking offenders into custody
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Constable may take person into custody.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Constable shall cause person to be held in custody.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: and
logic summary: Two obligations: take into custody and bring before Magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: until
logic summary: Person must be held in custody until brought before a Magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(3) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-3
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody
note: Magistrate must make order to facilitate warrant execution.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(3) Taking offenders into custody
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate has a duty.
premise text: (3) Where...
conclusion text: The Magistrate shall make such order...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval of warrant issuance.
premise text: (6) In pursuance of a warrant issued under subsection (6);
conclusion text: the Magistrate shall make such order as is appropriate...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLICATION
logic summary: Implication of warrant production.
premise text: (b) there is produced to the Magistrate a warrant for the apprehension...
conclusion text: the Magistrate shall make such order as is appropriate...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Warrant execution spreads to other agents.
premise text: (3) Where...
conclusion text: The Magistrate shall make such order...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: EXECUTE
logic summary: CogAI executes warrant.
premise text: (6) In pursuance of a warrant issued under subsection (6);
conclusion text: the Magistrate shall make such order as is appropriate...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(4) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-4
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody
note: Magistrate must order release from custody if not satisfied warrant is needed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Magistrate must prohibit further detention.
premise text: (4) Where, in the circumstances referred to in paragraph (3)(a), a warrant referred to in paragraph (3)(b) is not produced to the Magistrate...
conclusion text: The Magistrate shall order release from custody.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Excerpt overlaps with other provisions on criminal proceedings.
premise text: (4) Where, in the circumstances referred to in paragraph (3)(a), a warrant referred to in paragraph (3)(b) is not produced to the Magistrate...
conclusion text: The excerpt relates to criminal proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Excerpt has recurring trace in handling unproduced warrants.
premise text: (4) Where, in the circumstances referred to in paragraph (3)(a), a warrant referred to in paragraph (3)(b) is not produced to the Magistrate...
conclusion text: The excerpt describes a procedure for handling unproduced warrants.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Apply
logic summary: Excerpt applies diffusion logic to warrant production.
premise text: (4) Where, in the circumstances referred to in paragraph (3)(a), a warrant referred to in paragraph (3)(b) is not produced to the Magistrate...
conclusion text: The excerpt describes a procedure for handling unproduced warrants.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Excerpt analyzes warrant production in criminal proceedings.
premise text: (4) Where, in the circumstances referred to in paragraph (3)(a), a warrant referred to in paragraph (3)(b) is not produced to the Magistrate...
conclusion text: The excerpt describes a procedure for handling unproduced warrants.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(5) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-5
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody
note: Must bring person before Magistrate after remand period expires
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to bring person before Magistrate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(6) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-6
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody
note: Failure to appear before a Magistrate may result in warrant for apprehension.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(6) Taking offenders into custody
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of failure to appear before a Magistrate.
premise text: (6) If a person who has been remanded on bail under subsection (4) does not appear before a Magistrate at the time and place mentioned in the recognizance entered into by the person on being granted bail...
conclusion text: ...a Magistrate may issue a warrant for the apprehension of the person and for bringing the person before a Magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between recognizance and failure to appear.
premise text: (6) If a person who has been remanded on bail under subsection (4) does not appear before a Magistrate at the time and place mentioned in the recognizance entered into by the person on being granted bail...
conclusion text: ...a Magistrate may issue a warrant for the apprehension of the person and for bringing the person before a Magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of failure to appear.
premise text: (6) If a person who has been remanded on bail under subsection (4) does not appear before a Magistrate at the time and place mentioned in the recognizance entered into by the person on being granted bail...
conclusion text: ...a Magistrate may issue a warrant for the apprehension of the person and for bringing the person before a Magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of recognizance to apprehend failure to appear.
premise text: (6) If a person who has been remanded on bail under subsection (4) does not appear before a Magistrate at the time and place mentioned in the recognizance entered into by the person on being granted bail...
conclusion text: ...a Magistrate may issue a warrant for the apprehension of the person and for bringing the person before a Magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-6-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implication of failure to appear on recognizance.
premise text: (6) If a person who has been remanded on bail under subsection (4) does not appear before a Magistrate at the time and place mentioned in the recognizance entered into by the person on being granted bail...
conclusion text: ...a Magistrate may issue a warrant for the apprehension of the person and for bringing the person before a Magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(7) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-7
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody
note: Entitlement to Convention rights for non-Australian citizens taken into custody
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-7-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(7) Taking offenders into custody
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Entitlement to Convention rights
premise text: Article 6 of the Convention
conclusion text: Person entitled to rights
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(8) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-8
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody
note: Applicability of laws in force to persons held in custody on remand
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-cogai-5

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(8) Taking offenders into custody
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Applicability of laws in force to persons held in custody on remand
premise text: (8) The laws in force in a State or Territory...
conclusion text: ...in relation to persons who are held in custody on remand...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Applicability of laws in force to persons held in custody on remand
premise text: (8) The laws in force in a State or Territory...
conclusion text: ...in relation to persons who are held in custody on remand...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Applicability of laws in force to persons held in custody on remand
premise text: (8) The laws in force in a State or Territory...
conclusion text: ...in relation to persons who are held in custody on remand...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Applicability of laws in force to persons held in custody on remand
premise text: (8) The laws in force in a State or Territory...
conclusion text: ...in relation to persons who are held in custody on remand...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inferential
logic summary: Applicability of laws in force to persons held in custody on remand
premise text: (8) The laws in force in a State or Territory...
conclusion text: ...in relation to persons who are held in custody on remand...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(9) Taking offenders into custody
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-2-ss-9
part of: 11 Taking offenders into custody
note: Permits arrest for an offence against this Act under other laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-2-ss-9-norm

12 Prosecutions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
has part: 12(1) Prosecutions
has part: 12(2) Prosecutions
has part: 12(3) Prosecutions
has part: 12(4) Prosecutions
has part: 12(5) Prosecutions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.14

12(1) Prosecutions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-1
part of: 12 Prosecutions
note: Prosecution must be on indictment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(1) Prosecutions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide prosecution on indictment.
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (2), a prosecution for an offence against this Act shall be on indictment.
conclusion text: Prosecution must be on indictment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(2) Prosecutions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-2
part of: 12 Prosecutions
note: A person charged in a State or Territory with an offence against this Act may be dealt with in accordance with that law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(2) Prosecutions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(3) Prosecutions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-3
part of: 12 Prosecutions
note: Attorney-General must provide consent for prosecution
description: Consent from Attorney-General or authorized person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(3) Prosecutions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Attorney-General must provide consent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(4) Prosecutions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-4
part of: 12 Prosecutions
note: No further step in proceedings shall be taken until consent is given.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(4) Prosecutions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to obtain consent before proceeding.
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: until such a consent has been given.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Proceedings overlap with the consent period.
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: until such a consent has been given.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(5) Prosecutions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-5
part of: 12 Prosecutions
note: Nothing in subsection (4) prevents the discharge of the accused if proceedings are not continued within a reasonable time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(5) Prosecutions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-12-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prevents
logic summary: Prohibits discharge of the accused if proceedings are not continued within a reasonable time.
premise text: (4)
conclusion text: (5)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Evidence of matters relating to Convention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
has part: 13(1) Evidence of matters relating to Convention
has part: 13(2) Evidence of matters relating to Convention
has part: 13(3) Evidence of matters relating to Convention
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.15

13(1) Evidence of matters relating to Convention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-ss-1
part of: 13 Evidence of matters relating to Convention
note: Foreign Affairs Minister must provide written certificate stating Convention entry/exit date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13(1) Evidence of matters relating to Convention
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written certificate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13(2) Evidence of matters relating to Convention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-ss-2
part of: 13 Evidence of matters relating to Convention
note: Australia may be named in a certificate under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to name Australia
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13(3) Evidence of matters relating to Convention
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-ss-3
part of: 13 Evidence of matters relating to Convention
note: Certificate admissible as prima facie evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Admissibility
logic summary: Certificate admissible in proceedings
premise text: (3) A certificate given under subsection (1)
conclusion text: is admissible as prima facie evidence of the matters stated in the certificate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-13-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalRelation
logic summary: Temporal relation between subsections
premise text: (1) and (3)
conclusion text: are temporally related as subsections of the same section.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

14 Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
has part: 14(1) Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister
has part: 14(2) Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.15

14(1) Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-1
part of: 14 Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister
note: Foreign Affairs Minister may issue written certificate stating relevant matters about an internationally protected person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-14-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-14-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(1) Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to issue certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(2) Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-2
part of: 14 Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister
note: Certificate admissibility in proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-14-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(2) Certificates by Foreign Affairs Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: admission
logic summary: Admissible as prima facie evidence
premise text: Certificate given under subsection (1)
conclusion text: Matters stated in the certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

15 Jurisdiction of courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
has part: 15(1) Jurisdiction of courts
has part: 15(2) Jurisdiction of courts
has part: 15(3) Jurisdiction of courts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.16

15(1) Jurisdiction of courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-ss-1
part of: 15 Jurisdiction of courts
note: Jurisdiction of courts with respect to offences against this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(1) Jurisdiction of courts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Invests jurisdiction in a court of a State.
premise text: (1) A provision of the Judiciary Act...
conclusion text: ...as if that jurisdiction were so invested without limitation as to locality other than the limitation imposed by section 80 of the Constitution.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Relates to a temporal interval during which jurisdiction is invested.
premise text: (1) A provision of the Judiciary Act...
conclusion text: ...as if that jurisdiction were so invested without limitation as to locality other than the limitation imposed by section 80 of the Constitution.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Relates to a temporal interval during which jurisdiction is invested.
premise text: (1) A provision of the Judiciary Act...
conclusion text: ...as if that jurisdiction were so invested without limitation as to locality other than the limitation imposed by section 80 of the Constitution.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Relates to a temporal interval during which jurisdiction is invested.
premise text: (1) A provision of the Judiciary Act...
conclusion text: ...as if that jurisdiction were so invested without limitation as to locality other than the limitation imposed by section 80 of the Constitution.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Relates to a temporal interval during which jurisdiction is invested.
premise text: (1) A provision of the Judiciary Act...
conclusion text: ...as if that jurisdiction were so invested without limitation as to locality other than the limitation imposed by section 80 of the Constitution.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(2) Jurisdiction of courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-ss-2
part of: 15 Jurisdiction of courts
note: Jurisdiction of courts outside Territory
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(2) Jurisdiction of courts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Jurisdiction
premise text: Section 80 of the Constitution
conclusion text: Court jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(3) Jurisdiction of courts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-ss-3
part of: 15 Jurisdiction of courts
note: Jurisdiction of courts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(3) Jurisdiction of courts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Court jurisdiction
premise text: (3) The trial of an offence against this Act not committed within a State may be held by a court of competent jurisdiction at any place where the court may sit.
conclusion text: The court has jurisdiction over trials outside the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap
premise text: (3) The trial of an offence against this Act not committed within a State may be held by a court of competent jurisdiction at any place where the court may sit.
conclusion text: The trial can occur at any time when the court is competent and can sit there.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: holdsForAll
logic summary: Temporal scope
premise text: (3) The trial of an offence against this Act not committed within a State may be held by a court of competent jurisdiction at any place where the court may sit.
conclusion text: The trial holds for all times when the court is competent and can sit there.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Information diffusion
premise text: (3) The trial of an offence against this Act not committed within a State may be held by a court of competent jurisdiction at any place where the court may sit.
conclusion text: The information about the trial diffuses to all places where the court can sit.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Artificial intelligence recognition
premise text: (3) The trial of an offence against this Act not committed within a State may be held by a court of competent jurisdiction at any place where the court may sit.
conclusion text: The artificial intelligence recognizes that the court has jurisdiction over trials outside the state.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Section 38 of Judiciary Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
note: A matter arising under this Act is deemed not a matter arising directly under a treaty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.16
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Not
logic summary: Denies direct applicability
premise text: Matter arising under this Act
conclusion text: Not a matter arising directly under a treaty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Entitles internationally protected persons special protection from attack on person, freedom or dignity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
logic summary: Entitlement to special protection
premise text: International law
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Classification of internationally protected persons
premise text: Constitutional provision
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
note: Definition of 'alleged offender'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Section 2
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-3
note: Prohibition of certain attacks on internationally protected persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the commission of certain attacks
premise text: International protection
conclusion text: State must prohibit
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies as a crime under internal law
premise text: Section classification
conclusion text: Classification as a crime
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-3
note: Each State Party shall make these crimes punishable by appropriate penalties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-2
note: States Parties must take measures to prevent attacks on internationally protected persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: States Parties must take measures.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-4
note: States must establish jurisdiction over crimes committed against internationally protected persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-4-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: States must establish jurisdiction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-4
note: Each State Party must take necessary measures to establish jurisdiction over crimes committed in its territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-4-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to take necessary measures
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-3
note: Cooperation in preventing crimes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-5
note: State must communicate pertinent facts about a crime committed to other States.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-5-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: State must communicate pertinent facts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-5
note: Transmit information about a crime against an internationally protected person to the relevant State Party.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-cogai-5

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to transmit information
premise text: State Party has information about the victim and circumstances of the crime
conclusion text: Transmit information promptly
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between State Party's actions and transmission deadline
premise text: State Party has information about the victim and circumstances of the crime before a certain date
conclusion text: Transmission must occur within a certain time frame
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal limit on State Party's actions
premise text: State Party has information about the victim and circumstances of the crime before a certain date
conclusion text: Transmission must occur within a certain time frame after that date
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Information diffusion from State Party to relevant State Party
premise text: State Party has information about the victim and circumstances of the crime
conclusion text: Relevant State Party receives information promptly
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Artificial intelligence inference for transmission deadline calculation
premise text: State Party has information about the victim and circumstances of the crime
conclusion text: Transmission must occur within a certain time frame based on AI calculations
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-6
note: Notify other states and international organizations of measures taken to ensure presence for prosecution or extradition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-6-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-6
note: Entitlement to communicate with State representative and be visited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-6-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-6-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Section 2
held by: State
scope note: held by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Has right to communication
premise text: State has duty to protect rights
conclusion text: Person has right to communicate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-7
note: States Parties undertake to include crimes as extraditable offences in future extradition treaties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-7-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: undertaking
logic summary: States Parties undertake to include crimes as extraditable offences in future extradition treaties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-7
note: A State Party may consider this Convention as the legal basis for extradition in respect of those crimes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-7-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-4
note: States Parties must recognize extraditable offences between themselves.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-4-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Section 3
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: States Parties must recognize extraditable offences.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4-2
note: Guarantee fair treatment for persons undergoing proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-4-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guaranteeing fair treatment is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-8
note: Assistance in criminal proceedings
description: Evidence necessary for the proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-8-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: States Parties have an obligation to provide assistance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-8
note: Communicate final outcome of proceedings to the Secretary-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-8-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-9
note: States Parties must submit disputes to arbitration or the International Court of Justice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-9-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: States Parties must submit disputes to arbitration or the International Court of Justice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-9
note: States Parties may declare not to be bound by paragraph 1 of article 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-9-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: States Parties may declare not to be bound.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-5
note: Withdrawal of reservations by States Parties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-5-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-3-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: State Party can withdraw reservation
premise text: Article 14
conclusion text: State Party may withdraw reservation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-10
note: Convention entry into force condition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-10-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-10-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-10-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-10
note: The Convention enters into force on the thirtieth day after deposit by a State of its instrument of ratification or accession.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-10-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-11
note: Any State Party may denounce this Convention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-11-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Denunciation obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-11
note: Denunciation takes effect six months after notification to the Secretary-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.23
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-11-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-11-logic-descriptionlogic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-2-11-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies descriptive clause as Undertaking.
premise text: The text describes a condition for denunciation to take effect.
conclusion text: Denunciation takes effect six months after notification.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28
note: Conditional commencement of Australian Federal Police (Consequential Amendments) Act 1979
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-28-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-28-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-28-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is specified as 20 July 1977
conclusion text: Temporal interval required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-28-2-norm

19 Oct 1979 (see s. 2 and
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19
note: See s. 2 and Gazette 1979, No. S206
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-19-norm

28 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-28-3-norm

28 May 1980
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-4
note: Crimes Legislation Amendment Act 1987
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-28-4-norm

16 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-2
note: References specific sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-16-2-norm

1 Mar 1989 (see Gazette
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-12
note: Mar 1989 (see Gazette, page 28)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-12-norm

15 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-15-2-norm

1 July 1988 (see Gazette
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-13
note: Gazette notice of Royal Assent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-1-13-norm

17 Jan 1990
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-17-norm

21 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-21-norm

10 Mar 1993 (see
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-3
note: Crimes and Other Legislation Amendment Act 1994
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-10-3-norm

19 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-2
note: Consequential Amendments Act 1995
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-19-2-norm

28 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-5
note: Conditional commencement of the Legislation Amendment (Application of Criminal Code) Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-28-5-norm

6 Apr 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2
note: Obligation on s. 4(1), (2) and Schedule 16(c)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-2-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-6-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-3
note: Schedule 10 (item 10)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-19-3-norm

20 Feb 2010
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-20-norm

22 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22
note: Schedule 5 (items 69,70)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-22-norm

22 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-2
note: Schedule 3 (item 2) of the Statute Law Revision Act (No. 1) 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-22-2-norm

11 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-3
has part: 11(3) Feb
has part: 11(4) Feb
has part: 11(1) Feb
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.30

11(3) Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-3-ss-3
part of: 11 Feb
note: Proclamation cannot fix a day earlier than the publication date without specific conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of fixing an earlier date without conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Date cannot be earlier than substantial minority sale day.
premise text: the substantial minority sale day
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(4) Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-3-ss-4
part of: 11 Feb
note: Commencement of amendments to various Acts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Amendments commence on a specific date
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(1) Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-3-ss-1
part of: 11 Feb
note: Commences at the later of two specified events
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-internationally-protected-persons-act-1976-sec-11-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed