1 Short title
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.5
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Punishment
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.12
curation status: Proposed
has part: 10(1) Punishment
has part: 10(2) Punishment
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10
schema version: 2

10(1) Punishment
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.12
note: Imprisonment for life or lesser term for wilful killing of a person
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Punishment

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits wilful killing of a person
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

10(2) Punishment
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.12
note: Prohibition on punishment exceeding 25 years for other offences against the Act
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 10 Punishment

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The punishment for any other offence against this Act shall not exceed 25 years.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits punishment exceeding 25 years
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) The punishment for any other offence against this Act is imprisonment for not more than 25 years.

11 Only Australian citizens or residents to be prosecuted
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.13
note: Only Australian citizens or residents can be prosecuted under this Act.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-11-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11
schema version: 2

11 Oct
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-11-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-2
schema version: 2

11 Oct 1945 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
note: War Crimes Amendment Act 1988
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-11-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-11-3
schema version: 2

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person shall not be charged with an offence against this Act unless...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits prosecution of non-citizens or residents.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: None

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-11-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Only Australian citizens or residents to be prosecuted

12 Who may prosecute
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.13
note: Only prosecution in name of Attorney-General or Director of Public Prosecutions.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-12-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-12
schema version: 2

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts prosecution to specified entities.
modality: Deontic
operator: only

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 Who may prosecute

13 Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.13
curation status: Proposed
has part: 13(1) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
has part: 13(2) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
has part: 13(3) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13
schema version: 2

13(1) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.13
note: Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law obligation
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 13 Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 68 applies in relation to an offence against this Act
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation applies
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (1) Section 68 of the Judiciary Act 1903

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13(1) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law

13(2) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.13
note: Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 13 Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Has effect
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13(2) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law

13(3) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.13
note: Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law obligation
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-13-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 13 Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to follow jurisdiction rules
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: (3) Where:

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 13(3) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law

14 Objection to venue
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.15
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14(1) Objection to venue
has part: 14(2) Objection to venue
has part: 14(3) Objection to venue
has part: 14(4) Objection to venue
has part: 14(5) Objection to venue
has part: 14(6) Objection to venue
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14
schema version: 2

14(1) Objection to venue
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.15
note: This section applies where a proceeding for an offence against this Act is being held in a State or internal Territory.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Objection to venue

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The section applies during the proceeding.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the section and the proceeding.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Containment
premise text: (1) This section applies where a proceeding for an offence against this Act is being held in a State or internal Territory.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The section applies if the proceeding is held in a State or internal Territory.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability of the section to a proceeding in a State or internal Territory.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: (1) This section applies where a proceeding for an offence against this Act is being held in a State or internal Territory.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The section applies if the proceeding is held in a State or internal Territory.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability of the section to a proceeding in a State or internal Territory.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: (1) This section applies where a proceeding for an offence against this Act is being held in a State or internal Territory.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The section applies during the proceeding.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the section and the proceeding.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Containment
premise text: (1) This section applies where a proceeding for an offence against this Act is being held in a State or internal Territory.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(1) Objection to venue

14(2) Objection to venue
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.15
note: Defendant may apply for change of venue.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Objection to venue

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) The defendant may apply...

14(3) Objection to venue
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.15
note: Application can be made at a later time if allowed by the magistrate or judge.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Objection to venue

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between application and charging
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (a) as soon as reasonably practicable after the defendant is charged with the offence;

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (3) An application may only be made:

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(3) Objection to venue

14(4) Objection to venue
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.15
note: Proceedings for the offence must be held in another State or Territory.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Objection to venue

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...order that all proceedings for the offence be held in that other State or Territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the commencement of proceedings.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (4) If an application is made...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...order that all proceedings for the offence be held in that other State or Territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applies reasoning to determine the venue of proceedings.
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
premise text: (4) If an application is made...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...order that all proceedings for the offence be held in that other State or Territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits proceedings in the defendant's State or Territory.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) If an application is made...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...order that all proceedings for the offence be held in that other State or Territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the venue of proceedings to another State or Territory.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (4) If an application is made...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...order that all proceedings for the offence be held in that other State or Territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a temporal trace for the commencement of proceedings.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (4) If an application is made...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(4) Objection to venue

14(5) Objection to venue
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.15
note: Appeal or review of orders and decisions is allowed.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-5-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Objection to venue

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows appeal or review.
modality: Deontic
operator: Allowance

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(5) Objection to venue

14(6) Objection to venue
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.15
note: Constitutes a single Territory for the purposes of this section.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-6-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-14-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Objection to venue

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Constitutes a single Territory for the purposes of this section.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14(6) Objection to venue

15 Effect of order for change of venue
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.15
note: Prohibition on holding proceedings in a different State or internal Territory
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-15-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-15
schema version: 2

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a proceeding for an offence against this Act is being held in a State or internal Territory; and (b) the magistrate or judge orders under section 14 that all proceedings for the offence be held in another State or internal Territory.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-15-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15 Effect of order for change of venue

16 No defence of superior orders
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.16
note: No defence of superior orders
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-16-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-16
schema version: 2

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 No defence of superior orders

17 Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.16
curation status: Proposed
has part: 17(1) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
has part: 17(2) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
has part: 17(3) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
has part: 17(4) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
has part: 17(5) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17
schema version: 2

17(1) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.16
note: This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section has effect during the proceedings for an offence against this Act.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Implies temporal relationship
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implies argumentative relationship
modality: Argumentation
operator: hasEffect
premise text: (1) This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
premise text: (1) This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Implies diffusion relationship
modality: Diffusion
operator: hasEffect
premise text: (1) This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies causal relationship
modality: LinearLogic
operator: hasEffect
premise text: (1) This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(1) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war

17(2) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.16
note: Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permitted by laws, customs and usages of war
modality: Deontic
operator: Permitted
premise text: (a) was permitted by the laws, customs and usages of war

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Not under international law a crime against humanity
modality: Deontic
operator: Not a crime against humanity
premise text: (b) was not under international law a crime against humanity

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(2) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war

17(3) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.16
note: Justification by laws, customs and usages of war
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between justification and act
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, the doing of the act by the defendant was permitted by the laws, customs and usages of war if it was reasonably justified by the exigencies and necessities of the conduct of war.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal relationship between justification and act
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, the doing of the act by the defendant was permitted by the laws, customs and usages of war if it was reasonably justified by the exigencies and necessities of the conduct of war.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Justification by laws, customs and usages of war
modality: Deontic
operator: justifiedBy
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, the doing of the act by the defendant was permitted by the laws, customs and usages of war if it was reasonably justified by the exigencies and necessities of the conduct of war.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal relationship between justification and act
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, the doing of the act by the defendant was permitted by the laws, customs and usages of war if it was reasonably justified by the exigencies and necessities of the conduct of war.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between justification and act
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, the doing of the act by the defendant was permitted by the laws, customs and usages of war if it was reasonably justified by the exigencies and necessities of the conduct of war.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(3) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war

17(4) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
type: Concept
description: Evidence of defence facts
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.16
note: Defendant must provide evidence of defence facts
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-4-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Evidence of defence facts
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant must provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(4) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war

17(5) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.16
note: Prosecution bears onus of establishing facts beyond reasonable doubt.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-5-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-17-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 17 Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prosecution bears onus.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishing obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Reasonable doubt
modality: Epistemic
operator: Doubt

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17(5) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war

18 Alternative verdicts
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.17
curation status: Proposed
has part: 18(1) Alternative verdicts
has part: 18(2) Alternative verdicts
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18
schema version: 2

18(1) Alternative verdicts
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.17
note: Alternative verdicts for certain offences
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Alternative verdicts

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an offence of another kind, being an offence referred to in a paragraph of subsection 6(1);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between the time of the act and the time of the law in force
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (b) on the accused’s trial for the offence charged, the jury:...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the accused is guilty of an alternative offence against this Act;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to follow alternative verdicts for certain offences
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) This section has effect where...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an offence of another kind, being an offence referred to in a paragraph of subsection 6(1);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace between the time of the act and the time of the law in force
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (b) on the accused’s trial for the offence charged, the jury:...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(1) Alternative verdicts

18(2) Alternative verdicts
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.17
note: Jury may find accused not guilty of offence charged but guilty of alternative offence.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-18-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 18 Alternative verdicts

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Jury may find accused not guilty.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Accused must be found guilty of alternative offence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18(2) Alternative verdicts

19 Legal assistance
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.18
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19(1) Legal assistance
has part: 19(2) Legal assistance
has part: 19(3) Legal assistance
has part: 19(4) Legal assistance
has part: 19(5) Legal assistance
has part: 19(6) Legal assistance
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19
schema version: 2

19 Feb
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (International Crime Cooperation and Other Measures) Act 2018
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-2
schema version: 2

19(1) Legal assistance
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.18
note: A person who has been charged with an offence may apply for assistance.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-argumentation-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Legal assistance

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person who has been charged may apply for assistance at any time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between the charge and the application.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: The provision states that the application must be made before or after the charge.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-argumentation-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person who has been charged may apply for assistance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Claims that the Attorney-General has a duty to assist.
modality: Argumentation
operator: claim
premise text: The provision states that the Attorney-General must provide assistance.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person who has been charged may apply for assistance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inferentially establishes the obligation to assist.
modality: CogAI
operator: inference
premise text: The provision states that the Attorney-General must provide assistance.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person who has been charged may apply for assistance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide assistance.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: The Attorney-General is required to assist.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: All persons who have been charged may apply for assistance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the obligation to assist throughout the relevant population.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuse
premise text: The provision applies to all persons who have been charged.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(1) Legal assistance

19(2) Legal assistance
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.18
note: Attorney-General may authorise Commonwealth to provide legal or financial assistance in a proceeding.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Legal assistance

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by Attorney-General.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(2) Legal assistance

19(3) Legal assistance
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.18
note: Conditions for authorisation under subsection (2)
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Legal assistance

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conditions as determined by the Attorney-General
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission with conditions
modality: Deontic
operator: may be subject to
premise text: Authorisation under subsection (2)

19(4) Legal assistance
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.18
note: Attorney-General must consider hardship to applicant in refusal decision.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Legal assistance

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Hardship must be considered in refusal decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Refusal without considering hardship is within the interval of 'hardship consideration'.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
premise text: Attorney-General has a duty to consider hardship.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Hardship must be considered in refusal decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Refusal without considering hardship is within the cognitive AI framework of 'hardship consideration'.
modality: CogAI
operator: ⊆
premise text: Attorney-General has a duty to consider hardship.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Hardship must be considered in refusal decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General has a duty to consider hardship.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Attorney-General is required to make decisions.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Hardship must be considered in refusal decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Refusal without considering hardship is within the diffusion of 'hardship consideration'.
modality: Diffusion
operator: ⊆
premise text: Attorney-General has a duty to consider hardship.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Hardship must be considered in refusal decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Refusal without considering hardship leads to a contradiction.
modality: LinearLogic
operator: →
premise text: Attorney-General has a duty to consider hardship.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(4) Legal assistance

19(5) Legal assistance
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.18
note: Request for consent on notice to Parliament
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-5-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Legal assistance

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Request for consent
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide consent
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
premise text: Decision to refuse application

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(5) Legal assistance

19(6) Legal assistance
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.18
note: The Attorney-General must lay a copy of the notice before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-6-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-19-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 19 Legal assistance

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Within 15 sitting days of that House after the Attorney-General receives the consent.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The action must occur within a specified time frame.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Attorney-General shall cause a copy of the notice to be laid before each House of the Parliament.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General must perform the action.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(6) Legal assistance

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

20 Certain provisions enacted to avoid doubt
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.19
note: Provisions enacted to avoid doubt
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-20
schema version: 2

21 Reporting
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.19
curation status: Proposed
has part: 21(1) Reporting
has part: 21(2) Reporting
has part: 21(3) Reporting
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21
schema version: 2

21(1) Reporting
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.19
note: The Attorney-General must prepare a report about the operation of this Act during the year after the end of the financial year.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Reporting

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to prepare a report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(1) Reporting

21(2) Reporting
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.19
note: Reporting requirements for suspected offences against this Act.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Reporting

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Reporting requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(2) Reporting

21(3) Reporting
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.19
note: The Attorney-General must report to each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-21-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 21 Reporting

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General must report to each House of Parliament.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Reporting is a subclass of obligations.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS_OF

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21(3) Reporting

22 Dec
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22
schema version: 2

22 Dec 1999 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
note: Conditional commencement of the Act
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-22-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-22-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-2
schema version: 2

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-22-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Relation between temporal intervals required
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal interval required for commencement

22 May
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
note: Preamble obligation
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-22-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-22-3
schema version: 2

23 May 2018
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.1
note: Includes amendments up to Act No. 34, 2018
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23
schema version: 2

25 Jan 1989
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25
schema version: 2

25 Jan 1989 (s 2)
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
note: War Crimes Amendment Act 1999
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-25-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25-2
schema version: 2

3 Application
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.6
note: The Act extends to all external Territories.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3
schema version: 2

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Extension of jurisdiction
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
premise text: The Act extends to all external Territories.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Application

30 May 2018
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30
schema version: 2

3A Application of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.6
note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-3a-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-3a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-3a
schema version: 2

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-3a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3A Application of the Criminal Code

4 Effect of this Part
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.7
note: Provisions of this Part have effect for the purposes of this Act, except where otherwise stated.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-4-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-4
schema version: 2

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: except where otherwise stated.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion clause
modality: Deontic
operator: except
premise text: Provisions of this Part have effect for the purposes of this Act.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Effect of this Part

5 Interpretation
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.7
note: Definitions for act, occupation, person, and proceeding.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-5-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5
schema version: 2

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definitions for act, occupation, person, and proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...an occupation of territory...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: occupation means...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...a person means a natural person...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: person means a natural person...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Interpretation

6 Serious crimes
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.8
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6(1) Serious crimes
has part: 6(2) Serious crimes
has part: 6(3) Serious crimes
has part: 6(4) Serious crimes
has part: 6(5) Serious crimes
has part: 6(6) Serious crimes
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6
schema version: 2

6 Apr 2001
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act 2010
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-2
schema version: 2

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

6(1) Serious crimes
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.8
note: An act is a serious crime if it was done in a part of Australia and was, under the law then in force in that part, an offence.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Serious crimes

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Being, by act or omission, in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, or party to, the commission of.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: directly or indirectly
premise text: (iii) being, by act or omission, in any way, directly or indirectly...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The act is a serious crime.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (1) An act is a serious crime if...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: An offence referred to in any of paragraphs (a) to (j), inclusive.
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (i) an offence whose elements are substantially the same as...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(1) Serious crimes

6(2) Serious crimes
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.8
note: Consider defence under law in force at a particular time when determining if an act is an offence.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Serious crimes

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in a part of Australia, an offence of a particular kind...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Consider the time when the defence was applicable.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: at
premise text: (2) In determining for the purposes of subsection (1)

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: whether or not an act was, under the law in force at a particular time...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consider the defence under law in force.
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
premise text: (2) In determining for the purposes of subsection (1)

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...that could have been established in a proceeding...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consider the defence under that law.
modality: Deontic
operator: regard
premise text: (2) In determining for the purposes of subsection (1)

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...whether or not an act was, under the law in force at a particular time...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Consider the defence under law in force.
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
premise text: (2) In determining for the purposes of subsection (1)

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...in a part of Australia, an offence of a particular kind...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Consider the time when the defence was applicable.
modality: LTL
operator: when
premise text: (2) In determining for the purposes of subsection (1)

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(2) Serious crimes

6(3) Serious crimes
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.8
note: Serious crimes definition
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Serious crimes

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...be a serious crime by virtue of subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between law and act
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) An act is a serious crime if...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...be a serious crime by virtue of subsection (1).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application to serious crimes
modality: CogAI
operator: is-a
premise text: (3) An act is a serious crime if...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...be a serious crime by virtue of subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of serious crime
modality: Deontic
operator: is
premise text: (3) An act is a serious crime if...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...be a serious crime by virtue of subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional relation between law and act
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: (3) An act is a serious crime if...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...be a serious crime by virtue of subsection (1).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation between law and act
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (3) An act is a serious crime if...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(3) Serious crimes

6(4) Serious crimes
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.8
note: Deportation or internment in certain conditions is a serious crime.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Serious crimes

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a serious crime.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Indicates overlap between deportation/internment and certain conditions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (4) The deportation of a person to, or the internment of a person in, a death camp, a slave labour camp, or a place where persons are subjected to treatment similar to that undergone in a death camp or slave labour camp...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a serious crime.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Indicates recognition of deportation/internment as serious crimes.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (4) The deportation of a person to, or the internment of a person in, a death camp, a slave labour camp, or a place where persons are subjected to treatment similar to that undergone in a death camp or slave labour camp...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a serious crime.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits deportation or internment in certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) The deportation of a person to, or the internment of a person in, a death camp, a slave labour camp, or a place where persons are subjected to treatment similar to that undergone in a death camp or slave labour camp...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a serious crime.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Indicates spread of deportation/internment to certain conditions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
premise text: (4) The deportation of a person to, or the internment of a person in, a death camp, a slave labour camp, or a place where persons are subjected to treatment similar to that undergone in a death camp or slave labour camp...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is a serious crime.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Indicates repetition of deportation/internment in certain conditions.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (4) The deportation of a person to, or the internment of a person in, a death camp, a slave labour camp, or a place where persons are subjected to treatment similar to that undergone in a death camp or slave labour camp...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(4) Serious crimes

6(5) Serious crimes
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.8
note: Deportation or internment of a person as mentioned in subsection (4) is prohibited.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Serious crimes

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes temporal relations between actions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (5) Each of the following is a serious crime:

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits deportation or internment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) Each of the following is a serious crime:

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring deportation or internment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (b) aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring the deportation or internment of a person as so mentioned;

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits being knowingly concerned in, or party to, deportation or internment.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (c) being, by act or omission, in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, or party to, the deportation or internment of a person as so mentioned.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(5) Serious crimes

6(6) Serious crimes
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.8
note: Disregard of legal requirements for acts done in the past
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-6-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Serious crimes

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the fact that the doing of an act was required or permitted by the law in force when and where the act was done shall be disregarded.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Ignoring past legal requirements
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Ignore
premise text: (6) For the purposes of subsections (3), (4) and (5)

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the fact that the doing of an act was required or permitted by the law in force when and where the act was done shall be disregarded.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Ignoring past legal requirements
modality: CogAI
operator: Ignore
premise text: (6) For the purposes of subsections (3), (4) and (5)

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the fact that the doing of an act was required or permitted by the law in force when and where the act was done shall be disregarded.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ignoring past legal requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: Ignore
premise text: (6) For the purposes of subsections (3), (4) and (5)

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the fact that the doing of an act was required or permitted by the law in force when and where the act was done shall be disregarded.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Ignoring past legal requirements
modality: Diffusion
operator: Ignore
premise text: (6) For the purposes of subsections (3), (4) and (5)

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the fact that the doing of an act was required or permitted by the law in force when and where the act was done shall be disregarded.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Ignoring past legal requirements
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Ignore
premise text: (6) For the purposes of subsections (3), (4) and (5)

7 War crimes
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.9
note: Serious crime is a war crime if committed under specified conditions
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-7
schema version: 2

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 War crimes

8 Effect of sections 6 and 7
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.10
curation status: Proposed
has part: 8(1) Effect of sections 6 and 7
has part: 8(2) Effect of sections 6 and 7
has part: 8(3) Effect of sections 6 and 7
has part: 8(4) Effect of sections 6 and 7
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8
schema version: 2

8(1) Effect of sections 6 and 7
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.10
note: Nothing in section 6 or 7 limits the generality of anything else in that section.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Effect of sections 6 and 7

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(1) Effect of sections 6 and 7

8(2) Effect of sections 6 and 7
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.10
note: An act may be a serious crime by virtue of certain subsections.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Effect of sections 6 and 7

8(3) Effect of sections 6 and 7
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.10
note: A serious crime may be a war crime under certain conditions.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Effect of sections 6 and 7

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Serious crimes and war crimes overlap in time if the serious crime meets the conditions in subsections 7(1) and (3).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The excerpt specifies temporal overlap between serious crimes and war crimes.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) A serious crime may be a war crime by virtue of either or both of subsections 7(1) and (3), but not otherwise.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The excerpt recognizes that serious crimes can be war crimes under certain conditions.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The excerpt recognizes serious crimes as potentially war crimes.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (3) A serious crime may be a war crime by virtue of either or both of subsections 7(1) and (3), but not otherwise.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) A serious crime is a war crime if it meets the conditions in subsections 7(1) and (3).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If A is a serious crime, then it may be a war crime.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (3) A serious crime may be a war crime by virtue of either or both of subsections 7(1) and (3), but not otherwise.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Serious crimes diffuse to war crimes if they meet the conditions in subsections 7(1) and (3).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The excerpt specifies diffusion of serious crimes to war crimes.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
premise text: (3) A serious crime may be a war crime by virtue of either or both of subsections 7(1) and (3), but not otherwise.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Serious crimes repeat as war crimes if they meet the conditions in subsections 7(1) and (3).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The excerpt specifies repeated occurrence of serious crimes as war crimes.
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (3) A serious crime may be a war crime by virtue of either or both of subsections 7(1) and (3), but not otherwise.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8(3) Effect of sections 6 and 7

8(4) Effect of sections 6 and 7
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.10
note: Prohibits combining serious crimes to constitute a war crime
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-8-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 8 Effect of sections 6 and 7

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for serious crimes that can be combined to constitute a war crime
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (4) Two or more serious crimes may together constitute a war crime by virtue of subsection 7(4), but not otherwise.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classifies the serious crimes that can be combined to constitute a war crime using AI
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
premise text: (4) Two or more serious crimes may together constitute a war crime by virtue of subsection 7(4), but not otherwise.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits combining serious crimes to constitute a war crime
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) Two or more serious crimes may together constitute a war crime by virtue of subsection 7(4), but not otherwise.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the prohibition on combining serious crimes to constitute a war crime
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (4) Two or more serious crimes may together constitute a war crime by virtue of subsection 7(4), but not otherwise.

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines the temporal trace for serious crimes that can be combined to constitute a war crime
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (4) Two or more serious crimes may together constitute a war crime by virtue of subsection 7(4), but not otherwise.

9 War crime to be indictable offence
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.12
curation status: Proposed
has part: 9(1) War crime to be indictable offence
has part: 9(2) War crime to be indictable offence
has part: 9(3) War crime to be indictable offence
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9
schema version: 2

9(1) War crime to be indictable offence
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.12
note: Guilty of an indictable offence for committing a war crime.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 9 War crime to be indictable offence

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Guilty of an indictable offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) A person who...

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(1) War crime to be indictable offence

9(2) War crime to be indictable offence
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.12
note: Exempts sections of Criminal Code from applying to offences against this Act.
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 9 War crime to be indictable offence

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exempts sections of Criminal Code from applying to offences against this Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

9(3) War crime to be indictable offence
type: Concept
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.12
note: Absolute liability for war crimes
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-9-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 9 War crime to be indictable offence

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on the state
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(3) War crime to be indictable offence

War Crimes Act 1945
type: Document
date: 23 May 2018
identifier: No. 48 of 1945
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU