War Crimes Act 1945
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 48 of 1945
date: 23 May 2018
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

23 May 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23
note: Includes amendments up to Act No. 34, 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-23-norm

30 May 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-30-norm

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.5
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.5
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-2-norm

3 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: The Act extends to all external Territories.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.6
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extension of jurisdiction
premise text: The Act extends to all external Territories.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3A Application of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3a
note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.6
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-3a-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-3a-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3A Application of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Effect of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Provisions of this Part have effect for the purposes of this Act, except where otherwise stated.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.7
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-4-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Effect of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: except
logic summary: Exclusion clause
premise text: Provisions of this Part have effect for the purposes of this Act.
conclusion text: except where otherwise stated.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Definitions for act, occupation, person, and proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.7
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-5-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-3

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Interpretation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definitions for act, occupation, person, and proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: occupation means...
conclusion text: ...an occupation of territory...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: person means a natural person...
conclusion text: ...a person means a natural person...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Serious crimes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
has part: 6(1) Serious crimes
has part: 6(2) Serious crimes
has part: 6(3) Serious crimes
has part: 6(4) Serious crimes
has part: 6(5) Serious crimes
has part: 6(6) Serious crimes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.8

6(1) Serious crimes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-1
part of: 6 Serious crimes
note: An act is a serious crime if it was done in a part of Australia and was, under the law then in force in that part, an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.8
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(1) Serious crimes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: The act is a serious crime.
premise text: (1) An act is a serious crime if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: directly or indirectly
logic summary: Being, by act or omission, in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, or party to, the commission of.
premise text: (iii) being, by act or omission, in any way, directly or indirectly...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: An offence referred to in any of paragraphs (a) to (j), inclusive.
premise text: (i) an offence whose elements are substantially the same as...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(2) Serious crimes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-2
part of: 6 Serious crimes
note: Consider defence under law in force at a particular time when determining if an act is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.8
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2) Serious crimes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider the defence under law in force.
premise text: (2) In determining for the purposes of subsection (1)
conclusion text: whether or not an act was, under the law in force at a particular time...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: at
logic summary: Consider the time when the defence was applicable.
premise text: (2) In determining for the purposes of subsection (1)
conclusion text: ...in a part of Australia, an offence of a particular kind...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: when
logic summary: Consider the time when the defence was applicable.
premise text: (2) In determining for the purposes of subsection (1)
conclusion text: ...in a part of Australia, an offence of a particular kind...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: regard
logic summary: Consider the defence under that law.
premise text: (2) In determining for the purposes of subsection (1)
conclusion text: ...that could have been established in a proceeding...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Consider the defence under law in force.
premise text: (2) In determining for the purposes of subsection (1)
conclusion text: ...whether or not an act was, under the law in force at a particular time...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(3) Serious crimes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-3
part of: 6 Serious crimes
note: Serious crimes definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.8
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(3) Serious crimes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Definition of serious crime
premise text: (3) An act is a serious crime if...
conclusion text: ...be a serious crime by virtue of subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between law and act
premise text: (3) An act is a serious crime if...
conclusion text: ...be a serious crime by virtue of subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relation between law and act
premise text: (3) An act is a serious crime if...
conclusion text: ...be a serious crime by virtue of subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional relation between law and act
premise text: (3) An act is a serious crime if...
conclusion text: ...be a serious crime by virtue of subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is-a
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application to serious crimes
premise text: (3) An act is a serious crime if...
conclusion text: ...be a serious crime by virtue of subsection (1).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6(4) Serious crimes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-4
part of: 6 Serious crimes
note: Deportation or internment in certain conditions is a serious crime.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.8
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(4) Serious crimes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits deportation or internment in certain conditions.
premise text: (4) The deportation of a person to, or the internment of a person in, a death camp, a slave labour camp, or a place where persons are subjected to treatment similar to that undergone in a death camp or slave labour camp...
conclusion text: is a serious crime.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Indicates overlap between deportation/internment and certain conditions.
premise text: (4) The deportation of a person to, or the internment of a person in, a death camp, a slave labour camp, or a place where persons are subjected to treatment similar to that undergone in a death camp or slave labour camp...
conclusion text: is a serious crime.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Indicates repetition of deportation/internment in certain conditions.
premise text: (4) The deportation of a person to, or the internment of a person in, a death camp, a slave labour camp, or a place where persons are subjected to treatment similar to that undergone in a death camp or slave labour camp...
conclusion text: is a serious crime.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: Indicates spread of deportation/internment to certain conditions.
premise text: (4) The deportation of a person to, or the internment of a person in, a death camp, a slave labour camp, or a place where persons are subjected to treatment similar to that undergone in a death camp or slave labour camp...
conclusion text: is a serious crime.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Indicates recognition of deportation/internment as serious crimes.
premise text: (4) The deportation of a person to, or the internment of a person in, a death camp, a slave labour camp, or a place where persons are subjected to treatment similar to that undergone in a death camp or slave labour camp...
conclusion text: is a serious crime.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(5) Serious crimes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-5
part of: 6 Serious crimes
note: Deportation or internment of a person as mentioned in subsection (4) is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.8
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-4

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(5) Serious crimes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits deportation or internment.
premise text: (5) Each of the following is a serious crime:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring deportation or internment.
premise text: (b) aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring the deportation or internment of a person as so mentioned;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits being knowingly concerned in, or party to, deportation or internment.
premise text: (c) being, by act or omission, in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, or party to, the deportation or internment of a person as so mentioned.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes temporal relations between actions.
premise text: (5) Each of the following is a serious crime:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(6) Serious crimes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-6
part of: 6 Serious crimes
note: Disregard of legal requirements for acts done in the past
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.8
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Ignore
logic summary: Ignoring past legal requirements
premise text: (6) For the purposes of subsections (3), (4) and (5)
conclusion text: the fact that the doing of an act was required or permitted by the law in force when and where the act was done shall be disregarded.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Ignore
logic summary: Ignoring past legal requirements
premise text: (6) For the purposes of subsections (3), (4) and (5)
conclusion text: the fact that the doing of an act was required or permitted by the law in force when and where the act was done shall be disregarded.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Ignore
logic summary: Ignoring past legal requirements
premise text: (6) For the purposes of subsections (3), (4) and (5)
conclusion text: the fact that the doing of an act was required or permitted by the law in force when and where the act was done shall be disregarded.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Ignore
logic summary: Ignoring past legal requirements
premise text: (6) For the purposes of subsections (3), (4) and (5)
conclusion text: the fact that the doing of an act was required or permitted by the law in force when and where the act was done shall be disregarded.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Ignore
logic summary: Ignoring past legal requirements
premise text: (6) For the purposes of subsections (3), (4) and (5)
conclusion text: the fact that the doing of an act was required or permitted by the law in force when and where the act was done shall be disregarded.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 War crimes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
note: Serious crime is a war crime if committed under specified conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.9
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-7-norm

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 War crimes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

8 Effect of sections 6 and 7
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
has part: 8(1) Effect of sections 6 and 7
has part: 8(2) Effect of sections 6 and 7
has part: 8(3) Effect of sections 6 and 7
has part: 8(4) Effect of sections 6 and 7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.10

8(1) Effect of sections 6 and 7
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-1
part of: 8 Effect of sections 6 and 7
note: Nothing in section 6 or 7 limits the generality of anything else in that section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.10
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(1) Effect of sections 6 and 7
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(2) Effect of sections 6 and 7
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-2
part of: 8 Effect of sections 6 and 7
note: An act may be a serious crime by virtue of certain subsections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.10
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-2-norm

8(3) Effect of sections 6 and 7
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-3
part of: 8 Effect of sections 6 and 7
note: A serious crime may be a war crime under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.10
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(3) Effect of sections 6 and 7
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If A is a serious crime, then it may be a war crime.
premise text: (3) A serious crime may be a war crime by virtue of either or both of subsections 7(1) and (3), but not otherwise.
conclusion text: (3) A serious crime is a war crime if it meets the conditions in subsections 7(1) and (3).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The excerpt specifies temporal overlap between serious crimes and war crimes.
premise text: (3) A serious crime may be a war crime by virtue of either or both of subsections 7(1) and (3), but not otherwise.
conclusion text: Serious crimes and war crimes overlap in time if the serious crime meets the conditions in subsections 7(1) and (3).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The excerpt specifies repeated occurrence of serious crimes as war crimes.
premise text: (3) A serious crime may be a war crime by virtue of either or both of subsections 7(1) and (3), but not otherwise.
conclusion text: Serious crimes repeat as war crimes if they meet the conditions in subsections 7(1) and (3).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: The excerpt specifies diffusion of serious crimes to war crimes.
premise text: (3) A serious crime may be a war crime by virtue of either or both of subsections 7(1) and (3), but not otherwise.
conclusion text: Serious crimes diffuse to war crimes if they meet the conditions in subsections 7(1) and (3).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The excerpt recognizes serious crimes as potentially war crimes.
premise text: (3) A serious crime may be a war crime by virtue of either or both of subsections 7(1) and (3), but not otherwise.
conclusion text: The excerpt recognizes that serious crimes can be war crimes under certain conditions.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

8(4) Effect of sections 6 and 7
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-4
part of: 8 Effect of sections 6 and 7
note: Prohibits combining serious crimes to constitute a war crime
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.10
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits combining serious crimes to constitute a war crime
premise text: (4) Two or more serious crimes may together constitute a war crime by virtue of subsection 7(4), but not otherwise.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for serious crimes that can be combined to constitute a war crime
premise text: (4) Two or more serious crimes may together constitute a war crime by virtue of subsection 7(4), but not otherwise.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Defines the temporal trace for serious crimes that can be combined to constitute a war crime
premise text: (4) Two or more serious crimes may together constitute a war crime by virtue of subsection 7(4), but not otherwise.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses the prohibition on combining serious crimes to constitute a war crime
premise text: (4) Two or more serious crimes may together constitute a war crime by virtue of subsection 7(4), but not otherwise.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-8-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the serious crimes that can be combined to constitute a war crime using AI
premise text: (4) Two or more serious crimes may together constitute a war crime by virtue of subsection 7(4), but not otherwise.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 War crime to be indictable offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9
has part: 9(1) War crime to be indictable offence
has part: 9(2) War crime to be indictable offence
has part: 9(3) War crime to be indictable offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.12

9(1) War crime to be indictable offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-1
part of: 9 War crime to be indictable offence
note: Guilty of an indictable offence for committing a war crime.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.12
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(1) War crime to be indictable offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Guilty of an indictable offence
premise text: (1) A person who...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(2) War crime to be indictable offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-2
part of: 9 War crime to be indictable offence
note: Exempts sections of Criminal Code from applying to offences against this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.12
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exempts sections of Criminal Code from applying to offences against this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9(3) War crime to be indictable offence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9-ss-3
part of: 9 War crime to be indictable offence
note: Absolute liability for war crimes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.12
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(3) War crime to be indictable offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-9-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Punishment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
has part: 10(1) Punishment
has part: 10(2) Punishment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.12

10(1) Punishment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-ss-1
part of: 10 Punishment
note: Imprisonment for life or lesser term for wilful killing of a person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.12
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-10-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-10-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits wilful killing of a person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(2) Punishment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-ss-2
part of: 10 Punishment
note: Prohibition on punishment exceeding 25 years for other offences against the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.12
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-10-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-10-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits punishment exceeding 25 years
premise text: (2) The punishment for any other offence against this Act is imprisonment for not more than 25 years.
conclusion text: The punishment for any other offence against this Act shall not exceed 25 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Only Australian citizens or residents to be prosecuted
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11
note: Only Australian citizens or residents can be prosecuted under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.13
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-11-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-11-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Only Australian citizens or residents to be prosecuted
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits prosecution of non-citizens or residents.
premise text: None
conclusion text: A person shall not be charged with an offence against this Act unless...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Who may prosecute
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
note: Only prosecution in name of Attorney-General or Director of Public Prosecutions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.13
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-12-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Who may prosecute
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: only
logic summary: Restricts prosecution to specified entities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
has part: 13(1) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
has part: 13(2) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
has part: 13(3) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.13

13(1) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-ss-1
part of: 13 Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
note: Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.13
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13(1) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Obligation applies
premise text: (1) Section 68 of the Judiciary Act 1903
conclusion text: Section 68 applies in relation to an offence against this Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13(2) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-ss-2
part of: 13 Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
note: Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.13
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13(2) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Has effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13(3) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-ss-3
part of: 13 Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
note: Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.13
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13(3) Jurisdiction of courts and choice of law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-13-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to follow jurisdiction rules
premise text: (3) Where:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Objection to venue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
has part: 14(1) Objection to venue
has part: 14(2) Objection to venue
has part: 14(3) Objection to venue
has part: 14(4) Objection to venue
has part: 14(5) Objection to venue
has part: 14(6) Objection to venue
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.15

14(1) Objection to venue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-1
part of: 14 Objection to venue
note: This section applies where a proceeding for an offence against this Act is being held in a State or internal Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.15
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(1) Objection to venue
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Applicability of the section to a proceeding in a State or internal Territory.
premise text: (1) This section applies where a proceeding for an offence against this Act is being held in a State or internal Territory.
conclusion text: The section applies if the proceeding is held in a State or internal Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Containment
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the section and the proceeding.
premise text: (1) This section applies where a proceeding for an offence against this Act is being held in a State or internal Territory.
conclusion text: The section applies during the proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Containment
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the section and the proceeding.
premise text: (1) This section applies where a proceeding for an offence against this Act is being held in a State or internal Territory.
conclusion text: The section applies during the proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Applicability of the section to a proceeding in a State or internal Territory.
premise text: (1) This section applies where a proceeding for an offence against this Act is being held in a State or internal Territory.
conclusion text: The section applies if the proceeding is held in a State or internal Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

14(2) Objection to venue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-2
part of: 14 Objection to venue
note: Defendant may apply for change of venue.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.15
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (2) The defendant may apply...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

14(3) Objection to venue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-3
part of: 14 Objection to venue
note: Application can be made at a later time if allowed by the magistrate or judge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.15
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(3) Objection to venue
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted
premise text: (3) An application may only be made:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between application and charging
premise text: (a) as soon as reasonably practicable after the defendant is charged with the offence;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(4) Objection to venue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-4
part of: 14 Objection to venue
note: Proceedings for the offence must be held in another State or Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.15
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(4) Objection to venue
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits proceedings in the defendant's State or Territory.
premise text: (4) If an application is made...
conclusion text: ...order that all proceedings for the offence be held in that other State or Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the commencement of proceedings.
premise text: (4) If an application is made...
conclusion text: ...order that all proceedings for the offence be held in that other State or Territory.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Establishes a temporal trace for the commencement of proceedings.
premise text: (4) If an application is made...
conclusion text: ...order that all proceedings for the offence be held in that other State or Territory.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses the venue of proceedings to another State or Territory.
premise text: (4) If an application is made...
conclusion text: ...order that all proceedings for the offence be held in that other State or Territory.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
logic summary: Applies reasoning to determine the venue of proceedings.
premise text: (4) If an application is made...
conclusion text: ...order that all proceedings for the offence be held in that other State or Territory.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(5) Objection to venue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-5
part of: 14 Objection to venue
note: Appeal or review of orders and decisions is allowed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.15
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-5-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(5) Objection to venue
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Allowance
logic summary: Allows appeal or review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(6) Objection to venue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-ss-6
part of: 14 Objection to venue
note: Constitutes a single Territory for the purposes of this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.15
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-6-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(6) Objection to venue
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-14-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Constitutes a single Territory for the purposes of this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Effect of order for change of venue
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
note: Prohibition on holding proceedings in a different State or internal Territory
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.15
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-15-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-15-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Effect of order for change of venue
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (a) a proceeding for an offence against this Act is being held in a State or internal Territory; and (b) the magistrate or judge orders under section 14 that all proceedings for the offence be held in another State or internal Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 No defence of superior orders
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
note: No defence of superior orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.16
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-16-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 No defence of superior orders
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17
has part: 17(1) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
has part: 17(2) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
has part: 17(3) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
has part: 17(4) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
has part: 17(5) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.16

17(1) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-1
part of: 17 Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
note: This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.16
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(1) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Implies obligation
premise text: (1) This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.
conclusion text: This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Implies causal relationship
premise text: (1) This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.
conclusion text: This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Implies argumentative relationship
premise text: (1) This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.
conclusion text: This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Implies temporal relationship
premise text: (1) This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.
conclusion text: This section has effect during the proceedings for an offence against this Act.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: hasEffect
logic summary: Implies diffusion relationship
premise text: (1) This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.
conclusion text: This section has effect for the purposes of a proceeding for an offence against this Act.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

17(2) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-2
part of: 17 Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
note: Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.16
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(2) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permitted
logic summary: Permitted by laws, customs and usages of war
premise text: (a) was permitted by the laws, customs and usages of war
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Not a crime against humanity
logic summary: Not under international law a crime against humanity
premise text: (b) was not under international law a crime against humanity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

17(3) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-3
part of: 17 Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
note: Justification by laws, customs and usages of war
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.16
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(3) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: justifiedBy
logic summary: Justification by laws, customs and usages of war
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, the doing of the act by the defendant was permitted by the laws, customs and usages of war if it was reasonably justified by the exigencies and necessities of the conduct of war.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between justification and act
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, the doing of the act by the defendant was permitted by the laws, customs and usages of war if it was reasonably justified by the exigencies and necessities of the conduct of war.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between justification and act
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, the doing of the act by the defendant was permitted by the laws, customs and usages of war if it was reasonably justified by the exigencies and necessities of the conduct of war.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between justification and act
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, the doing of the act by the defendant was permitted by the laws, customs and usages of war if it was reasonably justified by the exigencies and necessities of the conduct of war.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between justification and act
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, the doing of the act by the defendant was permitted by the laws, customs and usages of war if it was reasonably justified by the exigencies and necessities of the conduct of war.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(4) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-4
part of: 17 Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
note: Defendant must provide evidence of defence facts
description: Evidence of defence facts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.16
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-4-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(4) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Defendant must provide evidence
conclusion text: Evidence of defence facts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(5) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-5
part of: 17 Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
note: Prosecution bears onus of establishing facts beyond reasonable doubt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.16
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-5-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(5) Defence based on laws, customs and usages of war
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Establishing obligation
conclusion text: Prosecution bears onus.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-17-ss-5-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Doubt
logic summary: Reasonable doubt
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

18 Alternative verdicts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18
has part: 18(1) Alternative verdicts
has part: 18(2) Alternative verdicts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.17

18(1) Alternative verdicts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-1
part of: 18 Alternative verdicts
note: Alternative verdicts for certain offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.17
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(1) Alternative verdicts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to follow alternative verdicts for certain offences
premise text: (1) This section has effect where...
conclusion text: ...the accused is guilty of an alternative offence against this Act;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between the time of the act and the time of the law in force
premise text: (b) on the accused’s trial for the offence charged, the jury:...
conclusion text: ...an offence of another kind, being an offence referred to in a paragraph of subsection 6(1);
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace between the time of the act and the time of the law in force
premise text: (b) on the accused’s trial for the offence charged, the jury:...
conclusion text: ...an offence of another kind, being an offence referred to in a paragraph of subsection 6(1);
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18(2) Alternative verdicts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18-ss-2
part of: 18 Alternative verdicts
note: Jury may find accused not guilty of offence charged but guilty of alternative offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.17
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18(2) Alternative verdicts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Jury may find accused not guilty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-18-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Accused must be found guilty of alternative offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Legal assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19
has part: 19(1) Legal assistance
has part: 19(2) Legal assistance
has part: 19(3) Legal assistance
has part: 19(4) Legal assistance
has part: 19(5) Legal assistance
has part: 19(6) Legal assistance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.18

19(1) Legal assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-1
part of: 19 Legal assistance
note: A person who has been charged with an offence may apply for assistance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.18
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-argumentation-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(1) Legal assistance
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide assistance.
premise text: The Attorney-General is required to assist.
conclusion text: A person who has been charged may apply for assistance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-argumentation-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: claim
logic summary: Claims that the Attorney-General has a duty to assist.
premise text: The provision states that the Attorney-General must provide assistance.
conclusion text: A person who has been charged may apply for assistance.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between the charge and the application.
premise text: The provision states that the application must be made before or after the charge.
conclusion text: A person who has been charged may apply for assistance at any time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses the obligation to assist throughout the relevant population.
premise text: The provision applies to all persons who have been charged.
conclusion text: All persons who have been charged may apply for assistance.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: inference
logic summary: Inferentially establishes the obligation to assist.
premise text: The provision states that the Attorney-General must provide assistance.
conclusion text: A person who has been charged may apply for assistance.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(2) Legal assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-2
part of: 19 Legal assistance
note: Attorney-General may authorise Commonwealth to provide legal or financial assistance in a proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.18
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(2) Legal assistance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by Attorney-General.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(3) Legal assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-3
part of: 19 Legal assistance
note: Conditions for authorisation under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.18
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may be subject to
logic summary: Permission with conditions
premise text: Authorisation under subsection (2)
conclusion text: Conditions as determined by the Attorney-General
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(4) Legal assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-4
part of: 19 Legal assistance
note: Attorney-General must consider hardship to applicant in refusal decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.18
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(4) Legal assistance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Attorney-General has a duty to consider hardship.
premise text: The Attorney-General is required to make decisions.
conclusion text: Hardship must be considered in refusal decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: →
logic summary: Refusal without considering hardship leads to a contradiction.
premise text: Attorney-General has a duty to consider hardship.
conclusion text: Hardship must be considered in refusal decision.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Refusal without considering hardship is within the interval of 'hardship consideration'.
premise text: Attorney-General has a duty to consider hardship.
conclusion text: Hardship must be considered in refusal decision.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Refusal without considering hardship is within the diffusion of 'hardship consideration'.
premise text: Attorney-General has a duty to consider hardship.
conclusion text: Hardship must be considered in refusal decision.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Refusal without considering hardship is within the cognitive AI framework of 'hardship consideration'.
premise text: Attorney-General has a duty to consider hardship.
conclusion text: Hardship must be considered in refusal decision.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(5) Legal assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-5
part of: 19 Legal assistance
note: Request for consent on notice to Parliament
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.18
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-5-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(5) Legal assistance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide consent
premise text: Decision to refuse application
conclusion text: Request for consent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

19(6) Legal assistance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-6
part of: 19 Legal assistance
note: The Attorney-General must lay a copy of the notice before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.18
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-6-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(6) Legal assistance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Attorney-General must perform the action.
conclusion text: The Attorney-General shall cause a copy of the notice to be laid before each House of the Parliament.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN
logic summary: The action must occur within a specified time frame.
conclusion text: Within 15 sitting days of that House after the Attorney-General receives the consent.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Certain provisions enacted to avoid doubt
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20
note: Provisions enacted to avoid doubt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.19
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-20-norm

21 Reporting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21
has part: 21(1) Reporting
has part: 21(2) Reporting
has part: 21(3) Reporting
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.19

21(1) Reporting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-ss-1
part of: 21 Reporting
note: The Attorney-General must prepare a report about the operation of this Act during the year after the end of the financial year.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.19
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(1) Reporting
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to prepare a report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(2) Reporting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-ss-2
part of: 21 Reporting
note: Reporting requirements for suspected offences against this Act.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.19
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(2) Reporting
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Reporting requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(3) Reporting
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-ss-3
part of: 21 Reporting
note: The Attorney-General must report to each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.19
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-3-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(3) Reporting
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Attorney-General must report to each House of Parliament.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-21-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS_OF
logic summary: Reporting is a subclass of obligations.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Oct
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-11-2-norm

11 Oct 1945 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-3
note: War Crimes Amendment Act 1988
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-11-3-norm

25 Jan 1989
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-25-norm

25 Jan 1989 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25-2
note: War Crimes Amendment Act 1999
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-25-2-norm

22 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-22-norm

22 Dec 1999 (s 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-2
note: Conditional commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-22-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-22-2-logic-alleninterval-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-22-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Temporal interval required for commencement
conclusion text: Relation between temporal intervals required
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Apr 2001
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (Serious and Organised Crime) Act 2010
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-2-norm
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-2-logic-alleninterval-1

war-crimes-act-1945-sec-6-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-2
note: Conditional commencement of Crimes Legislation Amendment (International Crime Cooperation and Other Measures) Act 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-19-2-norm

22 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22-3
note: Preamble obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: war-crimes-act-1945.pdf, p.23
asserts: war-crimes-act-1945-sec-22-3-norm