1 After paragraph 121(3)(d)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.7
note: Disclosure for integrity commissioner's functions
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 After paragraph 121(3)(d)

2 Before paragraph 127(4)(a)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.7
note: Insert paragraph 121(3)(da)
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of a new paragraph
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERT

3 Application of amendments
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.7
note: Amendments apply to corruption issues before or after commencement.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amendments overlap with corrupt conduct at different times.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with corrupt conduct before and after commencement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: The amendments apply in relation to corruption issues, whether the related corrupt conduct was or may have been engaged in before the commencement or will or may be engaged in after that commencement.

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amendments apply to all related corrupt conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Applies to all related corrupt conduct.
modality: CogAI
operator: appliesTo
premise text: Corrupt conduct within the meaning of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006.

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amendments apply to corruption issues.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Holds true for all related corrupt conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
premise text: Corrupt conduct within the meaning of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006.

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amendments diffuse to all related corrupt conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses to all related corrupt conduct.
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: Corrupt conduct within the meaning of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006.

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amendments hold for all related corrupt conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Holds for all related corrupt conduct.
modality: LTL
operator: holdsForAll
premise text: Corrupt conduct within the meaning of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006.

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Application of amendments

4 Subsection 89(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.7
note: Omit 'if the evidence', substitute 'if giving the evidence'.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘if giving the evidence’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'if the evidence'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘if the evidence’

5 Subparagraph 89(1)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.8
note: Omit 'provision.' and substitute 'provision; or'.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
schema version: 2

6 After paragraph 89(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.8
note: Disclosing AUSTRAC information is prohibited.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-6-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of AUSTRAC information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-6-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 After paragraph 89(1)(b)

7 Subsection 199(1) (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.8
note: Repeal heading and substitute with 'Police personnel'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-7-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to repeal heading
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 Subsection 199(1) (heading)

8 Subsection 199(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.8
note: Insert “or employees” after “members”.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-8-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insert “or employees” after “members”.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8 Subsection 199(1)

1 Part IAD (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.9
note: Repeal and substitute heading with new one
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Paragraph 15Y(1)(e)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10
note: Omit specific phrase from subsections.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-10-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

11 Subsection 15Y(2)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10
curation status: Proposed
has part: 11(2) Subsection 15Y(2)
has part: 11(3) Subsection 15Y(2)
has part: 11(4) Subsection 15Y(2)
has part: 11(5) Subsection 15Y(2)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
schema version: 2

11(2) Subsection 15Y(2)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10
note: Prohibits proceedings involving special witnesses for certain offences.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Subsection 15Y(2)

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Proceedings involving special witnesses are prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (2) This Part contains special rules for adult complainants involved in proceedings to which this subsection applies.

11(3) Subsection 15Y(2)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10
note: Supporting victims and witnesses in criminal proceedings
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Subsection 15Y(2)

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to support victims and witnesses
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(3) Subsection 15Y(2)

11(4) Subsection 15Y(2)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10
note: Each of subsections (1), (2) and (3) also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding referred to in that subsection.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Subsection 15Y(2)

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding referred to in that subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Extension of temporal scope to connected proceedings.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Extension
premise text: (4) Each of subsections (1), (2) and (3)

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding referred to in that subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Extension of temporal scope to connected proceedings.
modality: CogAI
operator: Temporal Extension
premise text: (4) Each of subsections (1), (2) and (3)

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding referred to in that subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability of subsections to connected proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: (4) Each of subsections (1), (2) and (3) also applies...

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding referred to in that subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Extension of temporal scope to connected proceedings.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal Extension
premise text: (4) Each of subsections (1), (2) and (3)

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding referred to in that subsection.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Extension of temporal scope to connected proceedings.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Extension
premise text: (4) Each of subsections (1), (2) and (3)

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(4) Subsection 15Y(2)

11(5) Subsection 15Y(2)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10
note: Obligation to apply special witnesses in Commonwealth offences
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 11 Subsection 15Y(2)

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The application of special witnesses occurs during the duration of Commonwealth offences
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Special witnesses apply during Commonwealth offences
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (5) Similarly, subsection 15YAB(1) (about special witnesses) also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding for a Commonwealth offence.

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state must apply special witnesses in Commonwealth offences
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Special witnesses are applied in Commonwealth offences
modality: CogAI
operator: apply
premise text: (5) Similarly, subsection 15YAB(1) (about special witnesses) also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding for a Commonwealth offence.

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state must apply special witnesses in Commonwealth offences
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applying special witnesses is an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
premise text: (5) Similarly, subsection 15YAB(1) (about special witnesses) also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding for a Commonwealth offence.

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The application of special witnesses diffuses during the duration of Commonwealth offences
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Special witnesses diffuse during Commonwealth offences
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (5) Similarly, subsection 15YAB(1) (about special witnesses) also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding for a Commonwealth offence.

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The application of special witnesses occurs during the duration of Commonwealth offences
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Special witnesses apply during Commonwealth offences
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (5) Similarly, subsection 15YAB(1) (about special witnesses) also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding for a Commonwealth offence.

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11(5) Subsection 15Y(2)

12 Section 15YA
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.11
note: Definition of adult
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-12-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: adult means a person who is 18 or over.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

13 Section 15YA (definition of child complainant)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.11
note: Substitute 'child proceeding' for 'a proceeding'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-13-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

14 Section 15YA
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.11
note: Defines child proceeding
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
schema version: 2

15 Section 15YA (definition of child witness)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.11
note: Substitute 'child proceeding' for 'a proceeding'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
schema version: 2

15YP Excluding people from the courtroom
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
note: Excluding people from the courtroom
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-15yp-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-15yp-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15yp
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-15yp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits excluding people from the courtroom
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-15yp-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15YP Excluding people from the courtroom

15YT Other video link evidence provisions are unaffected
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.24
note: Nothing in this Part affects the operation of Division 279 of the Criminal Code (about video link evidence in offences against humanity).
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-15yt-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15yt
schema version: 2

16 Section 15YA
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.11
note: Defines who is considered a party to a proceeding.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Identifies the parties involved in a proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a subclass of entities that are considered parties to a proceeding.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Section 15YA

16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16AB(1) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(2) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(3) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(4) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(5) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(6) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(7) Matters relating to victim impact statements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16ab
schema version: 2

16AB(1) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30
note: This section applies in relation to victim impact statements.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16AB(1) Matters relating to victim impact statements

16AB(2) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30
note: Only one victim impact statement may be made for each victim of an offence, unless the court gives leave.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16AB(2) Matters relating to victim impact statements

16AB(3) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30
note: No implication is to be drawn from the absence of a victim impact statement for a victim.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No implication is drawn from...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No implication is drawn from the absence of a statement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (3) No implication is to be drawn...

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16AB(3) Matters relating to victim impact statements

16AB(4) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30
note: Victim impact statement may be read to court by or on behalf of the victim.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16AB(4) Matters relating to victim impact statements

16AB(5) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30
note: Excluding certain types of statements from consideration in court proceedings.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-ltl-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excluding certain statements due to temporal constraints.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exclusion
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account,

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prevents reading or considering the statement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account,

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts consideration of certain statements.
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account,

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagating exclusion of certain statements.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account,

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Tracing exclusion of certain statements.
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account,

16AB(6) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30
note: Person convicted of offence may only test facts in victim impact statement.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-6-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May only
modality: Deontic
operator: may_only

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16AB(6) Matters relating to victim impact statements

16AB(7) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
description: True
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30
note: Parties to criminal proceedings must provide a reading or cross-examination under specific subsections.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-7-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a reading or cross-examination.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Parties to criminal proceedings must provide a reading or cross-examination under specific subsections.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16AB(7) Matters relating to victim impact statements

17 Section 15YA (definition of proceeding)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.11
note: Defines 'proceeding' in criminal proceedings
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-17-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear meaning
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Substitutes a new definition for an existing one
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes

18 Section 15YA
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.12
note: Definitions for special witness, vulnerable adult complainant, and vulnerable adult proceeding.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
schema version: 2

19 After section 15YA
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.12
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19(1) After section 15YA
has part: 19(2) After section 15YA
has part: 19(3) After section 15YA
has part: 19(4) After section 15YA
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
schema version: 2

19(1) After section 15YA
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.12
note: Court may declare a person to be a special witness in relation to the proceeding if satisfied that the person is unlikely to be able to satisfactorily give evidence in the ordinary manner. Definition of vulnerable adult complainant
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-diffusion-6
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-argumentation-7
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19 After section 15YA

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Declaration made due to specific factors.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: because of
premise text: ...due to (a) a disability; or...

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: (1) A vulnerable adult complainant, in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding, is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-argumentation-7
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Rational argument
modality: Argumentation
operator: =
premise text: (1) A vulnerable adult complainant, in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding, is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration of special witness is an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: (1) A vulnerable adult complainant, in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding, is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-diffusion-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information flow
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: (1) A vulnerable adult complainant, in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding, is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: (1) A vulnerable adult complainant, in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding, is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(1) After section 15YA

19(2) After section 15YA
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.12
note: A declaration under subsection (1) may be made on the court’s own initiative or on application by or on behalf of a party to the proceeding. Adult can opt out of being treated as vulnerable adult complainant.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19 After section 15YA

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Declaration may be made on initiative or application
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adult can opt out of being treated as vulnerable adult complainant.
modality: Deontic
operator: OptOut

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(2) After section 15YA

19(3) After section 15YA
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.12
note: Vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the vulnerable adult proceeding. Court may order application of certain sections to a special witness
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19 After section 15YA

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state can proceed without involving the complainant during the proceeding.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between involve and proceed
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) A vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the vulnerable adult proceeding.

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The artificial agent cognizes that the state need not involve the complainant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial agent's understanding of obligation
modality: CogAI
operator: cognizes
premise text: (3) A vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the vulnerable adult proceeding.

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state need not involve the complainant.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to involve complainant
modality: Deontic
operator: needNot
premise text: (3) A vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the vulnerable adult proceeding.

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state's obligation to involve the complainant diffuses to other persons or entities.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of obligation to involve
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: (3) A vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the vulnerable adult proceeding.

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state can proceed until involving the complainant is required.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relationship between involve and proceed
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (3) A vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the vulnerable adult proceeding.

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(3) After section 15YA

19(4) After section 15YA
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.12
note: Application for order may be made by or on behalf of special witness.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 19 After section 15YA

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order may be made
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Application may be made

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19(4) After section 15YA

2 Before subsection 15Y(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.9
note: Insert proceedings involving children
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to insert proceedings
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Before subsection 15Y(1)

20 Subsections 15YB(1) and 15YC(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.13
note: Omit 'a proceeding', substitute 'a child proceeding'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
schema version: 2

21 Subsection 15YE(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.13
note: Court must disallow inappropriate or aggressive questions in cross-examination.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-21-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disallow question
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must disallow
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: Question is inappropriate or aggressively worded

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21 Subsection 15YE(1)

22 Subsection 15YE(2)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.14
note: Replace 'child witness' with 'person's'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
schema version: 2

23 At the end of section 15YE
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.14
note: Applicability of subsection to specific persons
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-23-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23 At the end of section 15YE

24 Subsection 15YF(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.14
note: Substitute 'child proceeding' for 'proceeding'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-24
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24 Subsection 15YF(1)

25 Section 15YG (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.14
note: Replace 'child witnesses' with 'vulnerable persons'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-25
schema version: 2

26 Subsection 15YG(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.14
note: Replace 'child witness' with 'person to whom subsection (1A) applies'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-26
schema version: 2

27 After subsection 15YG(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.14
note: Specifies persons subject to this subsection
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-27
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-27-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27 After subsection 15YG(1)

279 Section 279
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.25
note: Proceedings for certain offences against specific Divisions of the Chapter apply to this Division.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-279
schema version: 2

279 Section 279
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.25
note: Court may direct witness give evidence by video link under certain conditions.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-2
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court permits witness to give evidence by video link.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

279 Section 279
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.26
curation status: Proposed
has part: 279(1) Section 279
has part: 279(2) Section 279
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-3
schema version: 2

279(1) Section 279
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.26
note: Witness must give evidence under direction in specific conditions.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 279 Section 279

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...if the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting (the Australian location); and...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to give evidence under direction
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (1) A witness can give evidence under a direction only...

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 279(1) Section 279

279(2) Section 279
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.26
note: Court considers appropriate persons for a specific purpose.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 279 Section 279

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Appropriate persons
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determines appropriateness
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
premise text: Court decision

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Appropriate persons
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies persons
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
premise text: Subsection (1)

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 279(2) Section 279

279 Section 279
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.26
note: A person who gives evidence under a direction must give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-4
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The direction is given during the time the person gives evidence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The direction is given at a specific time or place.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: A person who gives evidence under a direction is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The direction is given during the time the person gives evidence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The direction is given at a specific time or place.
modality: CogAI
operator: during
premise text: A person who gives evidence under a direction is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person who gives evidence under a direction must give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide evidence at a specific location
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The court is sitting in Australia.

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The direction is given during the time the person gives evidence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The direction is given at a specific time or place.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: A person who gives evidence under a direction is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The direction is given during the time the person gives evidence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The direction is given at a specific time or place.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: A person who gives evidence under a direction is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 279 Section 279

279 Section 279
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.26
note: Administration of oaths and affirmations for witnesses giving evidence under direction.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-5-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-5
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Witnesses must provide oaths or affirmations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Supporting victims and witnesses in criminal proceedings is a class of things that can be administered by video link.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: Schedule 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 279 Section 279

279 Section 279
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.27
note: Court may order payment of expenses incurred in connection with giving evidence.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-6-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-6
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 279 Section 279

279 Section 279
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.27
note: No effect on other laws about foreign evidence
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-7
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The provision applies to certain proceedings.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 279 Section 279

28 Subsection 15YG(2)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.14
note: Omit specific phrase from vulnerable witness protections
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-28-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-28
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Omitting phrase is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specific phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Substitution of phrase

29 Before paragraph 15YG(4)(a)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.15
note: Permits making of complaint by or on behalf of vulnerable adult complainant
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-29-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-29
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make complaint
modality: Deontic
operator: may

3 Subsection 15Y(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.9
note: This subsection applies to proceedings for any of the following offences:
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: This subsection applies to proceedings for any of the following offences:
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Subsection 15Y(1)

30 Subsection 15YG(5)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.15
note: Replace 'child' with 'vulnerable person'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-30-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-30
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute 'vulnerable person'
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace a term
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
premise text: Omit 'child'

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-30-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30 Subsection 15YG(5)

31 Section 15YH (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.15
note: Substitute 'vulnerable persons' for 'child witnesses and child complainants'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-31
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31 Section 15YH (heading)

32 Section 15YH
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.15
note: Insertion of '(1)' before 'A'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-32-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-32
schema version: 2

33 Section 15YH
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.15
note: Omit 'a child witness or a child complainant except through counsel'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-33-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-33
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting a child witness or complainant without counsel
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

34 At the end of section 15YH
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.15
note: Applicable persons for certain types of proceedings
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-34-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-34
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines applicable persons
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 34 At the end of section 15YH

35 Division 4 of Part IAD (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.15
note: Replace 'child witnesses' with 'vulnerable persons'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-35-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-35
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace text
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

36 Subsection 15YI(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.16
note: Replace 'A child witness' with 'Evidence from a person to whom subsection (1A) applies'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-36-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-36
schema version: 2

37 Paragraphs 15YI(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.16
note: Substitute 'vulnerable person' for 'child'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-37-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-37
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to substitute 'vulnerable person' for 'child'
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-37-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37 Paragraphs 15YI(1)(a) and (b)

38 Subsection 15YI(1) (note)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.16
note: Replace 'child witness' with 'vulnerable person'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-38-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-38
schema version: 2

39 After subsection 15YI(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.16
note: List of persons subject to this subsection
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-39-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-39
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-39-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39 After subsection 15YI(1)

4 Paragraph 15Y(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.9
note: Omit specified text from paragraph.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of text.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

40 Subsection 15YI(2)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.16
note: Replace 'child witness' with 'vulnerable person's'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-40-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-40
schema version: 2

41 Subsection 15YJ(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.16
note: Omit 'child witness' evidence, substitute 'vulnerable person's evidence'.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-41-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-41
schema version: 2

42 Paragraph 15YJ(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.16
note: Replace 'child' with 'vulnerable person'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-42-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-42
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to replace
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace a term
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
premise text: Replace 'child' with 'vulnerable person'

43 Subsection 15YJ(2)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.16
note: Replace '15YM' with '15YO (about accompanying adults)' in Schedule 2, section 43.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-43-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-43
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace '15YM' with '15YO'
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

44 Section 15YK
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.17
note: Omit 'the child witness' evidence, substitute 'the vulnerable person's evidence'.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-44-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-44
schema version: 2

45 Section 15YK
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.17
note: Substitute 'vulnerable person' for 'child'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-45-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-45
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-45-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45 Section 15YK

46 Subsection 15YL(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.17
note: Omit evidence from a child witness in a proceeding.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-46-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-46
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting evidence from a child witness in a proceeding.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

47 Paragraphs 15YL(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.17
note: Substitute ‘person’ for ‘child’.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-47-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-47
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-47-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 47 Paragraphs 15YL(1)(a) and (b)

48 Subparagraph 15YL(2)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.17
note: Omit 'child's', substitute 'person's'.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-48-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-48
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Omitting 'child's' is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'child's'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Substituting 'person's' is allowed.

49 Subsection 15YL(3)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.17
note: This subsection applies to specific persons under certain conditions.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-49-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-49
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Indicates that this subsection imposes an obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: implies

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-49-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49 Subsection 15YL(3)

5 Paragraph 15Y(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.9
note: Omit specific phrase from text.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (slavery and slavery-like conditions);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Replaces omitted phrase with new one at same point.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal replacement
premise text: Omit ‘(Slavery and slavery-like conditions); or’

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (slavery and slavery-like conditions);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Replaces omitted phrase with new one at same point.
modality: CogAI
operator: Temporal replacement
premise text: Omit ‘(Slavery and slavery-like conditions); or’

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (slavery and slavery-like conditions);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘(Slavery and slavery-like conditions); or’

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (slavery and slavery-like conditions);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Replaces omitted phrase with new one at same point.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal replacement
premise text: Omit ‘(Slavery and slavery-like conditions); or’

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (slavery and slavery-like conditions);
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Replaces omitted phrase with new one at same point.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal replacement
premise text: Omit ‘(Slavery and slavery-like conditions); or’

50 Subsection 15YM(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.17
note: Replace 'child witness' with 'person to whom subsection (1A) applies'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-50-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-50
schema version: 2

51 After subsection 15YM(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.18
note: List of persons subject to this subsection
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-51-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-51
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-51-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51 After subsection 15YM(1)

52 Subsection 15YM(2)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.18
note: Omit specific phrase from subsection (1)
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-52-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-52
schema version: 2

53 Subsection 15YM(4)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.18
note: Substitute “person” for “child witness”.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-53-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-53
schema version: 2

54 Subsection 15YN(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.18
note: Substitute “person” for “child witness”.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-54-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-54
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54 Subsection 15YN(1)

55 Paragraph 15YN(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.18
note: Omit specific phrase from text
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-55-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-55
schema version: 2

56 After Division 5 of Part IAD
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.18
note: Insert clause after Division 5 of Part IAD
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-56-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-56
schema version: 2

57 Section 15YO (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.21
note: Substitute 'vulnerable persons' for 'child witnesses'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-57-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-57
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57 Section 15YO (heading)

58 Subsection 15YO(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.21
note: Replace 'child witness' with 'person to whom subsection (1A) applies'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-58-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-58
schema version: 2

59 Subsection 15YO(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.21
note: Substitute “person” for “child” in certain contexts.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-59-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-59
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59 Subsection 15YO(1)

6 Paragraph 15Y(1)(caa)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.9
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-6-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the specified action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

60 After subsection 15YO(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.21
note: Defines persons subject to subsection 15YO(1)
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-60-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-60
schema version: 2

61 Subsection 15YO(2)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.21
note: Substitution of chosen under subsection (1) in Schedule 2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-61-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-61
schema version: 2

62 Subsections 15YO(2) and (3)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
note: Replace 'child' with 'person'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-62-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-62
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 62 Subsections 15YO(2) and (3)

63 Subsection 15YO(4)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
note: Substitute “person” for “child”.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-63-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-63
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-63-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 63 Subsection 15YO(4)

64 Paragraph 15YO(4)(a)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
note: Omit specific words from a provision.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-64-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-64
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the specified action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

65 Paragraph 15YO(4)(b)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
note: Omit 'child', substitute 'person'.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-65-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-65
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'child'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit 'child', substitute 'person'.

66 Subsection 15YO(5)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
note: Omit 'child', substitute 'person'.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-66-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-66
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'child'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit 'child', substitute 'person'.

67 Section 15YP
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
note: Repeal section and substitute with new text.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-67-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-67
schema version: 2

68 Section 15YQ (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
note: Substitute 'vulnerable persons' for 'children's'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-68-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-68
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to substitute 'vulnerable persons' for 'children's'
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68 Section 15YQ (heading)

69 Section 15YQ
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
note: Insert '(1)' before 'If' in section 15YQ.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-69-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-69
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-69-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69 Section 15YQ

7 Paragraphs 15Y(1)(cab), (cac), (ca) and (cba)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10
note: Omit specific phrases from a provision.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-7-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision must not omit those phrases.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of specific phrases.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omitting the specified phrases is prohibited.

70 Section 15YQ
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.23
note: Substitute 'person to whom subsection (2) applies' for 'child witness'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-70-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-70
schema version: 2

71 Paragraph 15YQ(a)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.23
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with prohibition on classifying persons as unreliable witnesses.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-71-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-71-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-71
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition on classifying persons as unreliable witnesses.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-71-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Replaces the original paragraph with new text.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Substitute

72 Paragraph 15YQ(d)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.23
note: Omit 'child', substitute 'person'.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-72-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-72
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'child'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit 'child', substitute 'person'.

73 At the end of section 15YQ
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.23
note: Applicable persons for certain types of proceedings
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-73-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-73
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applies to specific persons
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-73-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 73 At the end of section 15YQ

74 Section 15YR (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.23
note: Substitute 'vulnerable adult complainants' for 'child complainants'.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-74-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-74
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74 Section 15YR (heading)

75 Paragraph 15YR(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.23
note: Identify vulnerable persons in proceedings
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-75-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-75
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-75-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75 Paragraph 15YR(1)(c)

76 After subsection 15YR(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.24
note: Applicability of subsection to child witnesses and vulnerable adult complainants
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-76-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-76-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-76
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-76-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal applicability
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: This subsection applies to the following persons:

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applicability of the subsection
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
premise text: This subsection applies to the following persons:

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-76-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76 After subsection 15YR(1)

77 Paragraphs 15YR(4)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.24
note: Replace 'child witness or child complainant' with 'vulnerable person'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-77-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-77
schema version: 2

78 Section 15YT
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.24
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-78-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-78
schema version: 2

79 At the end of subsection 270.12(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.24
note: Add Note
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-79-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-79
schema version: 2

8 Paragraph 15Y(1)(cb)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10
note: Omit '1958.' and substitute with '1958;'.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
schema version: 2

80 At the end of subsection 271.12(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.24
note: Add Note
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-80-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-80
schema version: 2

81 At the end of section 272.7 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-81-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-81
schema version: 2

82 Subdivision D of Division 272 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.25
note: Repeal Subdivision D of Division 272 of the Criminal Code
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-82-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-82
schema version: 2

83 At the end of section 273.4 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-83-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-83
schema version: 2

84 Subdivision D of Division 273 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.25
note: Repeal Subdivision D of Division 273 of the Criminal Code
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-84-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-84
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals Subdivision D of Division 273 of the Criminal Code
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

85 At the end of Chapter 8 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-85-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-85
schema version: 2

86 Subsection 16(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.28
note: Definition of 'family' affected by subsection 16A(4)
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-86
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsections 16(1) and 16A(4) are related by temporal interval
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between subsections
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relatedTo
premise text: Subsection 16(1) and subsection 16A(4)

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Definition of 'family' implies obligation to define
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Definition of 'family' implies obligation to define
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
premise text: Subsection 16(1)

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Definition of 'family' influenced by artificial intelligence
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Definition of 'family' influenced by artificial intelligence
modality: CogAI
operator: influences
premise text: Subsection 16A(4)

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to define 'family'
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of 'family'
modality: Deontic
operator: affectedBy
premise text: Subsection 16(1)

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Definition of 'family' diffuses through subsections
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Obligation to define 'family' diffuses through subsections
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
premise text: Subsection 16(1)

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 86 Subsection 16(1)

87 Subsection 16(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.28
note: Defines harm as physical, psychological and emotional suffering, economic and other loss, and damage.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-87-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-87-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-87
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines harm
modality: Deontic
operator: includes

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-87-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Describes harm as a subclass of harm
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-87-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 87 Subsection 16(1)

88 Subsection 16(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.28
note: Definition of victim impact statement
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-88-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-88
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning
modality: Deontic
operator: definition

89 At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 89(1) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
has part: 89(2) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
has part: 89(3) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
has part: 89(4) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-89
schema version: 2

89(1) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
type: Concept
description: Details of the harm suffered by the victim as a result of the offence
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.28
note: A victim impact statement must be made by the individual, their family member, or a person appointed by the court.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-89-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 89 At the end of Division 1 of Part IB

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The statement must be made
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(1) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB

89(2) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.28
note: Court may exempt oral statements from a requirement.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-89-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 89 At the end of Division 1 of Part IB

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemption from obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 89(2) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB

89(3) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.28
note: Minister may prescribe a form for victim impact statements.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-89-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 89 At the end of Division 1 of Part IB

89(4) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.28
note: Delegation of power to Secretary or SES employee
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-89-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 89 At the end of Division 1 of Part IB

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Power delegation
modality: Deontic
operator: canDelegate

9 Paragraph 15Y(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10
note: Omit specific phrase from regulations.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of a specific phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

90 After paragraph 16A(2)(e)
type: Concept
description: True
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.29
note: Any victim impact statement for the victim must be provided.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-90-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-90
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a victim impact statement.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-90-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 90 After paragraph 16A(2)(e)

91 Subsection 16A(4)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.29
note: Omit “this section”, substitute ‘this Part’.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-91-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-91
schema version: 2

92 After section 16AA
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30
note: Insert clause
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-92-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-92
schema version: 2

93 Application of amendments
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.31
note: Amendments apply in relation to offences committed on or after the commencement of this Schedule.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-93-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-93
schema version: 2

1 Subsection 3ZQA(1) (definition of age determination
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.32
note: Substitute information in age determination definition
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace specific information with a broader term
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

10 Application and transitional provisions
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.38
note: Amendments apply in relation to authorisations made at or after commencement, but not continuous exercise of powers begun before commencement.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-10-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

2 Subsection 3ZQA(2)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.32
note: Omit specific phrase from Migration Act 1958
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits taking of X-ray of a part of a person's body
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

236A No discharge without conviction for certain offences
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.32
note: Court may only make order for certain offence under specific conditions.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236a-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-236a
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts court action to specific circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: only

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 236A No discharge without conviction for certain offences

236C Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 236C(1) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
has part: 236C(2) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
has part: 236C(3) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-236c
schema version: 2

236C(1) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.33
note: Court must consider time in immigration detention when imposing sentence.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-236c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 236C Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider time in immigration detention.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 236C(1) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.

236C(2) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.33
note: Court must consider time spent in immigration detention during sentencing period.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-236c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 236C Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to consider time spent in immigration detention.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 236C(2) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.

236C(3) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.33
note: Neither section 236B nor this section prevents section 16E of the Crimes Act 1914 from applying to the imposition of the sentence or the setting of the non-parole period.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-236c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 236C Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 16E
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section 236B and this section prevent section 16E from applying.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prevents
premise text: Section 236B

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 236C(3) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.

236D Burden and standard of proof in relation to age
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.33
note: Prosecution bears burden of proving defendant's age at time of alleged offence.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236d-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236d-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236d-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-236d
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prosecution bears obligation to prove defendant's age.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236d-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Prosecution must provide evidence on balance of probabilities.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Probability

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236d-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defendant's age is a temporal interval to be proven by prosecution.
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalInterval

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 236D Burden and standard of proof in relation to age

236E Evidentiary certificates in proceedings for offences
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.33
note: Who may issue a certificate
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236e-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236e-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-236e
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: by the specified individuals
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Issuance of certificates
modality: Deontic
operator: issuance
premise text: A written certificate may be issued under this subsection

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236e-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 236E Evidentiary certificates in proceedings for offences

236F Evidentiary certificates—procedural matters
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.35
curation status: Proposed
has part: 236F(1) Evidentiary certificates—procedural matters
has part: 236F(2) Evidentiary certificates—procedural matters
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-236f
schema version: 2

236F(1) Evidentiary certificates—procedural matters
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.35
note: Certificate cannot be admitted in evidence without prior notice and copy.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 236F Evidentiary certificates—procedural matters

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...has, at least 28 days before the certificate is sought to be so admitted...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Certificate must have been given at least 28 days before admission.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: At Least
premise text: The person charged with the offence; or a lawyer who has appeared for the person in those proceedings;

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must not be admitted in evidence unless...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition on admitting certificate in evidence without prior notice and copy.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: Certificate issued under subsection 236E(1)

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...has, at least 28 days before the certificate is sought to be so admitted...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Certificate must be given to person or lawyer before admission.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: The person charged with the offence; or a lawyer who has appeared for the person in those proceedings;

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...unless...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Certificate cannot be admitted in evidence without prior notice and copy.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: The person charged with the offence; or a lawyer who has appeared for the person in those proceedings;

236F(2) Evidentiary certificates—procedural matters
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.35
note: Person charged with offence may require certificate signer to be called as a witness.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-236f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 236F Evidentiary certificates—procedural matters

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: require

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 236F(2) Evidentiary certificates—procedural matters

3 Section 236A
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.32
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
schema version: 2

4 At the end of Subdivision A of Division 12 of Part 2
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.32
note: Add Deterring people smuggling
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
schema version: 2

5 Application of amendments
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.36
note: Application of amendments
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amendment applies in relation to offences committed at or after the commencement of this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (1) The amendment made by item 3 applies in relation to offences committed (or alleged to have been committed) at or after the commencement of this Part.

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The section applies in relation to sentences imposed at or after the commencement of this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2) Section 236C (about time in immigration detention) of the Migration Act 1958 (as inserted by this Part) applies in relation to sentences imposed, or non-parole periods set, at or after the commencement of this Part.

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amendment applies in relation to offences committed at or after the commencement of this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: (1) The amendment made by item 3 applies in relation to offences committed (or alleged to have been committed) at or after the commencement of this Part.

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amendment applies in relation to offences committed at or after the commencement of this Part.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: (1) The amendment made by item 3 applies in relation to offences committed (or alleged to have been committed) at or after the commencement of this Part.

6 Subsection 236E(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.37
note: Issuing a certificate under this subsection if an authorisation authorises the exercise of maritime powers.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
schema version: 2

7 Paragraphs 236E(3)(a) to (i)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.37
note: Repeal certain paragraphs and substitute with new provisions regarding maritime powers.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-7-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal certain paragraphs.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 Paragraphs 236E(3)(a) to (i)

8 Subsection 236E(4)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.38
note: Omit 'ship', substitute 'vessel'.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 Subsection 236E(6)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.38
note: Repeal subsection and substitute definitions.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-9-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subsection 236E(6)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Definitions

1 Section 5 (definition of AAT reviewable decision)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.39
note: Repeal the definition of AAT reviewable decision.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 At the end of subsection 75G(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
note: A decision to cancel a registration is reviewable.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 At the end of subsection 75G(1)

11 Subsection 75G(2)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
note: Substitute subsection 233C(1) for subsection 75R(1)
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11
schema version: 2

12 Division 4 of Part 6 (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
note: Repeal the heading.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-12-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Repeal the heading.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: No temporal relation specified
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Division 4 of Part 6 (heading)

13 Subsection 75Q(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
note: Substitute reviewable decision under section 75C, 75E or 75G in relation to one or more persons
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-13-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace text with new text
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute

14 Subsection 75Q(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
note: Substitute 'each of the persons' for 'the person'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-14
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 Subsection 75Q(1)

15 At the end of subsection 75Q(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
note: Registering a person as a remittance network provider is obligatory if they applied under subsection 75B(2) for that person to be so registered.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-15-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15 At the end of subsection 75Q(1)

16 Sections 75R and 75S
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.41
note: Repeal sections
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-16-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals sections
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

17 After subsection 123(7)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.41
note: Must not disclose information unless certain conditions are met.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-17-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prohibited disclosure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
premise text: Disclosure made without conditions.

18 After subsection 123(7A)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.41
note: Must not disclose information to another person.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-18-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot

19 Paragraph 123(11)(a)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.41
note: Insertion of section references
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19
schema version: 2

2 Section 5 (after paragraph (h) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.39
note: Designated agency must be one of the Clean Energy Regulator or another designated agency.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Clean Energy Regulator or another designated agency
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Membership in a set
modality: Deontic
operator: in
premise text: designated agency

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Section 5 (after paragraph (h) of the definition of

20 Paragraph 130(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.41
note: Disclosure is for purposes of official duties in connection with investigation or proposed investigation.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-20-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure for purposes of official duties
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on entrusted agency official
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Given written undertaking

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 Paragraph 130(3)(a)

21 After subsection 130(3)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.42
note: Recipient and officials must comply with Information Privacy Principles.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-21-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21 After subsection 130(3)

22 Paragraph 136(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.42
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new provision.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-22-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace existing provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22 Paragraph 136(1)(c)

23 Paragraph 137(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.42
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new provision.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-23-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits production under certain provisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

233A Simplified outline
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.44
note: Review of AUSTRAC CEO decisions by Administrative Appeals Tribunal
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233a-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-233a
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Administrative Appeals Tribunal review
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Review obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may be reviewed
premise text: AUSTRAC CEO decision

233B Reviewable decisions
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.44
note: Refusal to register a person as a remittance network provider, independent remittance dealer, or remittance affiliate.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233b-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-233b
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of registration
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233b-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 233B Reviewable decisions

233C Giving notice of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 233C(1) Giving notice of reviewable decisions
has part: 233C(2) Giving notice of reviewable decisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-233c
schema version: 2

233C(1) Giving notice of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
description: terms of the decision, reasons for the decision, and particulars of the persons' right to have the decision reviewed
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.45
note: Give written notice to persons after reviewable decision made in relation to one or more persons.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233c-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-233c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 233C Giving notice of reviewable decisions

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

233C(2) Giving notice of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.45
note: Exempts reviewable decisions from subsection (1)
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233c-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-233c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 233C Giving notice of reviewable decisions

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 233C(2) Giving notice of reviewable decisions

233D Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 233D(1) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
has part: 233D(2) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
has part: 233D(3) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-233d
schema version: 2

233D(1) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.45
note: Reviewable decisions made by a delegate of the AUSTRAC CEO are subject to reconsideration.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 233D Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies the temporal scope of the obligation.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) This section applies to a reviewable decision if the decision is made by a delegate of the AUSTRAC CEO.

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Identifies the cognitive process involved in the obligation.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: (1) This section applies to a reviewable decision if the decision is made by a delegate of the AUSTRAC CEO.

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the delegate to reconsider decisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads the obligation to other entities.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: (1) This section applies to a reviewable decision if the decision is made by a delegate of the AUSTRAC CEO.

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Indicates the temporal duration of the obligation.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (1) This section applies to a reviewable decision if the decision is made by a delegate of the AUSTRAC CEO.

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 233D(1) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by

233D(2) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.45
note: Application for reconsideration of decision
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-233d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 233D Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person affected by a reviewable decision who is dissatisfied with the decision may apply to the AUSTRAC CEO for the decision to be reconsidered.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to apply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 233D(2) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by

233D(3) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
type: Concept
description: Information required by the AML/CTF Rules
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.45
note: Application requirements for reconsideration of decisions made by the authority.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-233d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 233D Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be made within Schedule 4
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 233D(3) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by

233E Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.46
curation status: Proposed
has part: 233E(1) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
has part: 233E(2) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
has part: 233E(3) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
has part: 233E(4) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
has part: 233E(5) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-233e
schema version: 2

233E(1) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.46
note: The AUSTRAC CEO must reconsider a reviewable decision upon receiving an application.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-233e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 233E Reconsideration of reviewable decisions

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The AUSTRAC CEO must reconsider a reviewable decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 233E(1) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions

233E(2) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.46
note: Affirm, vary or revoke reviewable decisions
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-233e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 233E Reconsideration of reviewable decisions

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory action
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

233E(3) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.46
note: Reconsideration of reviewable decisions must be done by AUSTRAC CEO or delegated person under certain conditions.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-233e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 233E Reconsideration of reviewable decisions

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to reconsider reviewable decisions
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (3) The AUSTRAC CEO’s reconsideration...

233E(4) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
description: yes
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.46
note: Provide written notice to applicant after decision made under subsection (2)
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-233e-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 233E Reconsideration of reviewable decisions

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4) The AUSTRAC CEO must...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

233E(5) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.46
note: Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-233e-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 233E Reconsideration of reviewable decisions

233F Review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.47
note: Application for review of AUSTRAC CEO decisions
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233f-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233f-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-233f
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: reviewable decision
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application is made
modality: Deontic
operator: has

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233f-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 233F Review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal

233G Failure to comply does not affect validity
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.47
note: Failure to provide notice does not affect decision validity
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233g-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233g-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-233g
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233g-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 233G Failure to comply does not affect validity

24 After subsection 139(2)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.42
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to matters in subsection (3)(3) of the Criminal Code.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-24-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-24-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-24-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Defendant must provide evidence
modality: Epistemic
operator: Evidential Burden

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24 After subsection 139(2)

25 Subsection 145(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.42
note: Appoints AUSTRAC staff as authorised officers.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-25
schema version: 2

26 At the end of subsection 161(2)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.43
note: Reviewable decisions of AUSTRAC CEO under subsection 161(2)
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26 At the end of subsection 161(2)

27 Section 164A
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.43
note: Repeal section 164A
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27
schema version: 2

28 At the end of subsection 191(2)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.43
note: A decision to give a direction is reviewable.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-28
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-28-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28 At the end of subsection 191(2)

29 Section 191A
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.43
note: Repeal section 191A
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-29
schema version: 2

3 Section 5 (after paragraph (u) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.39
note: Designated agency includes the Integrity Commission of Tasmania.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Integrity Commission of Tasmania
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion relation
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: designated agency

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Section 5 (after paragraph (u) of the definition of

30 At the end of paragraph 225(3)(f)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.43
note: Add “or”.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-30-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The list of permitted elements is updated.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adds to the list of permitted elements
modality: Deontic
operator: add

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-30-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30 At the end of paragraph 225(3)(f)

31 After paragraph 225(3)(f)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.43
note: Permission to insert provision for persons with suitable qualifications and experience
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-31-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

32 After Part 17
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.43
note: Insert Schedule 4 Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing amendments
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-32-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-32
schema version: 2

33 Application and transitional provisions
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.47
note: Old law continues to apply in relation to certain decisions made before the commencement day.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-33-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-33
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals and amendments do not affect old law
modality: Deontic
operator: !

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-33-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33 Application and transitional provisions

34 Subsection 130(3AA)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.49
note: Replace outdated privacy principles with Australian Privacy Principles.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-34-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-34
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty to replace outdated privacy principles.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

4 Section 5 (definition of reviewable decision)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.39
note: Repeals definition, substitutes with new meaning.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
schema version: 2

5 Section 73
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.39
note: Omit Division 4 review of decisions.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-5-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-5
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits review of decisions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

6 At the end of subsection 75B(6)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.39
note: Amendments to Schedule 4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6
schema version: 2

7 At the end of subsection 75C(2)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
note: Decision not to register person is reviewable.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-7
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 At the end of subsection 75C(2)

8 Subsection 75C(5) (note)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
note: Repeal a note
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 At the end of subsection 75E(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
note: Decision to impose a condition is reviewable.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-9
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9 At the end of subsection 75E(1)

1 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Former Yugoslavia Tribunal)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.50
note: Repeal and substitute definition of Former Yugoslavia Tribunal
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-1
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Definition of Former Yugoslavia Tribunal is repealed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
premise text: Definition needs to be repealed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Former Yugoslavia Tribunal definition is substituted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition substitution
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Substitute
premise text: New definition needs to be substituted

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Former Yugoslavia Tribunal)

10 Section 4 (definition of Statute of the Tribunal)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.53
note: Defines Statute of the Tribunal
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-10-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-10-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-10
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Statute of the Tribunal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-10-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Statute of the Tribunal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Substitutes a definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Section 4 (definition of Statute of the Tribunal)

11 Section 4 (at the end of the definition of Tribunal)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.54
note: Add International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals to the definition of Tribunal.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-11-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-11
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adding entities to a set.
modality: Deontic
operator: addition

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Section 4 (at the end of the definition of Tribunal)

12 Section 4 (at the end of the definition of Tribunal offence)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.54
note: Add an offence for which the International Residual Mechanism has power to prosecute under Article 1 of the Statute of the Tribunal.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-12
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 Section 4 (at the end of the definition of Tribunal offence)

13 At the end of subsection 42(3)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.54
note: Add Article 13 of the Statute of the Tribunal
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-13
schema version: 2

14 Schedules 1 to 4
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.54
note: Repeal Schedules
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-14
schema version: 2

15 Application of amendments
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.54
note: Applicable amendments and definitions
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-15-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-15
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application of amendments
modality: Deontic
operator: apply

1966 S/RES/1966 (2010).
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.51
note: Compilation and registration of the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Law Enforcement Integrity, Vulnerable Witness Protection and Other Measures) Act 2013.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-1966-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-1966
schema version: 2

1966 S/RES/1966 (2010).
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.54
note: Note on accessibility of UN documents
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-1966-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-1966-2
schema version: 2

2 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.50
note: Defines International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-2
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: established by United Nations Security Council Resolution 1966 S/RES/1966 (2010)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the Mechanism
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: organs referred to in Article 4 of the Statute of the Tribunal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Includes organs referred to in Article 4 of the Statute of the Tribunal
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Article 4 of the Statute of the Tribunal

3 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Rwanda Tribunal)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.51
note: Repeal and substitute definition of Rwanda Tribunal
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-3
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace existing definition with new one
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Update definition of Rwanda Tribunal
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Definition Replacement

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Rwanda Tribunal)

31 December 1994, established by United Nations Security
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.51
note: Establishes Council Resolution 955 S/RES/955 (1994) and includes organs referred to in Article 10 of the Statute of the Tribunal.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-31
schema version: 2

31 December 1994, established by United Nations Security
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.53
note: Establishment of United Nations Security Council Resolution 955 S/RES/955 (1994)
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-31-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-31-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-31-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-31-2
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-31-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as an undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: None

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-31-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as a descriptive clause
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: None

4 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Statute of the Tribunal)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.51
note: Definition of Statute of the Tribunal
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-4
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the term Statute of the Tribunal
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Substitutes a new definition for Statute of the Tribunal
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes

5 Subsection 4(1) (at the end of the definition of Tribunal)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.52
note: Add International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals to the definition of Tribunal.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-5-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-5
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adding entities to a set.
modality: Deontic
operator: addition

6 Subsection 4(1) (at the end of the definition of Tribunal
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.52
note: List of offences under International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-6-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-6
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: List of offences
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 Subsection 4(1) (at the end of the definition of Tribunal

7 Section 4 (definition of Former Yugoslavia Tribunal)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.52
note: Repeal and substitute definition of Former Yugoslavia Tribunal
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-7-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-7
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Definition of Former Yugoslavia Tribunal is repealed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
premise text: Definition needs to be repealed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Former Yugoslavia Tribunal definition is substituted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition substitution
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Substitute
premise text: New definition needed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 Section 4 (definition of Former Yugoslavia Tribunal)

8 Section 4
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.52
note: Definition of International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-8-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-8-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-8
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-8-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the Mechanism
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Mechanism established by United Nations Security Council Resolution 1966 S/RES/1966 (2010)

827 S/RES/827 (1993); and
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.51
note: References annexed documents and resolutions
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-827-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-827
schema version: 2

827 S/RES/827 (1993); and
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.53
note: Annexed documents for the Rwanda Tribunal and International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-827-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-827-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-827-2
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-827-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal relation between documents
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between documents
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal relation between documents

9 Section 4 (definition of Rwanda Tribunal)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.53
note: Repeal and substitute definition of Rwanda Tribunal
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-9-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-9
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace existing definition
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Define Rwanda Tribunal
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9 Section 4 (definition of Rwanda Tribunal)

1 Short title
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-1-2
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commencement on day of Royal Assent
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal commencement

1 Subsection 8(1C)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1(1C) Subsection 8(1C)
has part: 1(1D) Subsection 8(1C)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-1-3
schema version: 2

1(1C) Subsection 8(1C)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.56
note: Permits entry into arrangements for provision of police and regulatory services
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1c-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1c-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1c
schema version: 2
part of: 1 Subsection 8(1C)

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...for that Territory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between entry into arrangements and provision of services
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
premise text: (1C) The Minister and the following person...

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...may enter into arrangements...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to enter into arrangements
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
premise text: (1C) The Minister and the following person...

1(1D) Subsection 8(1C)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.56
note: Police services and regulatory services must comply with arrangements in force under subsection (1C) for the Territory.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1d-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1d
schema version: 2
part of: 1 Subsection 8(1C)

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1(1D) Subsection 8(1C)

12 March 2014.
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.6
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-12
schema version: 2

12 March 2014
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.6
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-12-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-12-2
schema version: 2

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement rules for provisions in the Act.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2 Transitional—preserving existing arrangements
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.56
note: Preserving existing arrangements under subsection 8(1C) of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-2-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-2-3
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-2-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Transitional—preserving existing arrangements

22 May
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.61
note: May
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-22
schema version: 2

23 May 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.61
note: Amendment history for Crimes Legislation Amendment (Law Enforcement Integrity, Vulnerable Witness Protection and Other Measures) Act 2013
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-23-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-23
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for amendment history
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Compilation date and registered date are specified

27 March 2014
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
note: Applicable to paragraph (b)
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-27-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-27
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Deontic logic applies
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (paragraph (b))

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-27-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 27 March 2014

28 June 2013
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-28
schema version: 2

28 June
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.61
note: Schedule 1, 2, Sch 3 (items 1–5), Sch 4 (items 1–33), Sch 5 and 6: 29 June 2013 (s 2(1) items 2, 3, 5, 7)
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-28-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-28-2
schema version: 2

29 June 2013
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-29
schema version: 2

29 June 2013
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-29-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-29-2
schema version: 2

29 June 2013
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement information for Crimes Legislation Amendment (Law Enforcement Integrity, Vulnerable Witness Protection and Other Measures) Act 2013
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-29-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-29-3
schema version: 2

29 June 2013
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.6
note: Note on table limitations
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-29-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-29-4
schema version: 2

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
note: Schedule 3 section
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.6
note: Schedules amendment and repeal rules
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-3-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-3-2
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-3-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal intervals
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

3 Subsection 69C(3)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.56
note: Omit 'the Deputy Commissioner', substitute 'a Deputy Commissioner'.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-3-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-3-3
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'the Deputy Commissioner'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

4 Section 4
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
note: Schedule 3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-4
schema version: 2

4 At the end of section 69C (after the note)
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.57
note: Commissioner is taken to have delegated powers, functions or duties to an AFP employee if the Commissioner has delegated them under subsection (3) and the AFP employee is acting in or performing the duties of the senior executive AFP employee.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-4-2
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner is taken to have delegated the powers, functions or duties mentioned in paragraph (a) to the AFP employee mentioned in paragraph (b).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Delegation of powers, functions or duties by Commissioner and AFP employee.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal overlap
premise text: The Commissioner has delegated one or more powers, functions or duties under subsection (3) and the AFP employee is acting in or performing the duties of the senior executive AFP employee.

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Therefore, the Commissioner is taken to have delegated the powers, functions or duties mentioned in paragraph (a) to the AFP employee mentioned in paragraph (b).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Delegation of powers, functions or duties by Commissioner and AFP employee.
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
premise text: The Commissioner has delegated one or more powers, functions or duties under subsection (3) and the AFP employee is acting in or performing the duties of the senior executive AFP employee.

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner is taken to have delegated the powers, functions or duties mentioned in paragraph (a) to the AFP employee mentioned in paragraph (b).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Commissioner's delegation of powers, functions or duties to an AFP employee.
modality: Deontic
operator: delegation
premise text: The Commissioner has delegated one or more powers, functions or duties under subsection (3).

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commissioner is taken to have delegated the powers, functions or duties mentioned in paragraph (a) to the AFP employee mentioned in paragraph (b).
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Delegation of powers, functions or duties by Commissioner and AFP employee.
modality: LTL
operator: traceability
premise text: The Commissioner has delegated one or more powers, functions or duties under subsection (3) and the AFP employee is acting in or performing the duties of the senior executive AFP employee.

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 At the end of section 69C (after the note)

5 Section 5
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
note: Schedule 4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-5
schema version: 2

5 Subsection 5(1) (definition of Inspector of the Victorian
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.57
note: Repeal and substitute the definition of Inspector of the Victorian Inspectorate.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-5-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-5-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-5-2
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-5-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace a term with another.
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-5-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Subsection 5(1) (definition of Inspector of the Victorian

6 Section 6
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.6
note: Schedule 4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-6
schema version: 2

6 Subsection 5(1) (subparagraph (f)(i) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.57
note: Omit 'section 3A of'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-6-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-6-2
schema version: 2

7 Section 7
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.6
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-7-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-7
schema version: 2

7 Subsection 5(1) (subparagraph (f)(ii) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.57
note: Omit 'section 3B of'
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-7-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-7-2
schema version: 2

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grants permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A specific point in time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.

8 Subsection 5(1) (subparagraph (fa)(i) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.57
note: Omit “Part 3 of”.
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-8
schema version: 2

23 May 2018
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.1
note: Includes amendments up to Act No. 34, 2018
asserts: c2018c00199-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-23
schema version: 2

30 May 2018
type: Concept
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
asserts: c2018c00199-sec-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30
schema version: 2

Crimes Legislation Amendment (Law Enforcement Integrity, Vulnerable Witness Protection and Other Measures) Act 2013
type: Document
date: 23 May 2018
description: An Act to amend various Acts relating to criminal law and law enforcement, and for other purposes
identifier: No. 74 of 2013
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU