Crimes Legislation Amendment (Law Enforcement Integrity, Vulnerable Witness Protection and Other Measures) Act 2013
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 74 of 2013
date: 23 May 2018
description: An Act to amend various Acts relating to criminal law and law enforcement, and for other purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

23 May 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23
note: Includes amendments up to Act No. 34, 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.1
asserts: c2018c00199-sec-23-norm

30 May 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.1
asserts: c2018c00199-sec-30-norm

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-2
note: Commencement rules for provisions in the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-1-2
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: Temporal commencement
conclusion text: Commencement on day of Royal Assent
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

28 June 2013
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-28
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-28-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-2-2
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-2-2-norm

29 June 2013
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-29
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-29-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-3
note: Schedule 3 section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-3-norm

29 June 2013
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-29-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-29-2-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-4
note: Schedule 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-norm

27 March 2014
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-27
note: Applicable to paragraph (b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-27-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-27-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27 March 2014
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Deontic logic applies
premise text: (paragraph (b))
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-5
note: Schedule 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-5-norm

29 June 2013
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-29-3
note: Commencement information for Crimes Legislation Amendment (Law Enforcement Integrity, Vulnerable Witness Protection and Other Measures) Act 2013
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-29-3-norm

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-6
note: Schedule 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.6
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-6-norm

12 March 2014.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.6
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-12-norm

12 March 2014
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-12-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.6
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-12-2-norm

7 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-7
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.6
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-7-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal interval
premise text: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: A specific point in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 June 2013
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-29-4
note: Note on table limitations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.6
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-29-4-norm

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-3-2
note: Schedules amendment and repeal rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.6
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-3-2-logic-alleninterval-1

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-3-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal intervals
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 After paragraph 121(3)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Disclosure for integrity commissioner's functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-1-norm

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 After paragraph 121(3)(d)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

2 Before paragraph 127(4)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Insert paragraph 121(3)(da)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERT
logic summary: Insertion of a new paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Application of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Amendments apply to corruption issues before or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-cogai-5

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Application of amendments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true for all related corrupt conduct.
premise text: Corrupt conduct within the meaning of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006.
conclusion text: The amendments apply to corruption issues.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Overlaps with corrupt conduct before and after commencement.
premise text: The amendments apply in relation to corruption issues, whether the related corrupt conduct was or may have been engaged in before the commencement or will or may be engaged in after that commencement.
conclusion text: The amendments overlap with corrupt conduct at different times.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: holdsForAll
logic summary: Holds for all related corrupt conduct.
premise text: Corrupt conduct within the meaning of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006.
conclusion text: The amendments hold for all related corrupt conduct.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses to all related corrupt conduct.
premise text: Corrupt conduct within the meaning of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006.
conclusion text: The amendments diffuse to all related corrupt conduct.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Applies to all related corrupt conduct.
premise text: Corrupt conduct within the meaning of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006.
conclusion text: The amendments apply to all related corrupt conduct.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 89(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Omit 'if the evidence', substitute 'if giving the evidence'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'if the evidence'
premise text: Omit ‘if the evidence’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘if giving the evidence’
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subparagraph 89(1)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
note: Omit 'provision.' and substitute 'provision; or'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-5-norm

6 After paragraph 89(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
note: Disclosing AUSTRAC information is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-6-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-6-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 After paragraph 89(1)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of AUSTRAC information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Subsection 199(1) (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
note: Repeal heading and substitute with 'Police personnel'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-7-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Subsection 199(1) (heading)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal heading
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 199(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
note: Insert “or employees” after “members”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-8-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 Subsection 199(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Insert “or employees” after “members”.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Part IAD (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Repeal and substitute heading with new one
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-1-norm

2 Before subsection 15Y(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Insert proceedings involving children
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Before subsection 15Y(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to insert proceedings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 15Y(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: This subsection applies to proceedings for any of the following offences:
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Subsection 15Y(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: This subsection applies to proceedings for any of the following offences:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Paragraph 15Y(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Omit specified text from paragraph.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Paragraph 15Y(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: Omit specific phrase from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-cogai-5

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified phrase.
premise text: Omit ‘(Slavery and slavery-like conditions); or’
conclusion text: (slavery and slavery-like conditions);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal replacement
logic summary: Replaces omitted phrase with new one at same point.
premise text: Omit ‘(Slavery and slavery-like conditions); or’
conclusion text: (slavery and slavery-like conditions);
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal replacement
logic summary: Replaces omitted phrase with new one at same point.
premise text: Omit ‘(Slavery and slavery-like conditions); or’
conclusion text: (slavery and slavery-like conditions);
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal replacement
logic summary: Replaces omitted phrase with new one at same point.
premise text: Omit ‘(Slavery and slavery-like conditions); or’
conclusion text: (slavery and slavery-like conditions);
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Temporal replacement
logic summary: Replaces omitted phrase with new one at same point.
premise text: Omit ‘(Slavery and slavery-like conditions); or’
conclusion text: (slavery and slavery-like conditions);
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Paragraph 15Y(1)(caa)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-6-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the specified action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Paragraphs 15Y(1)(cab), (cac), (ca) and (cba)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
note: Omit specific phrases from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-7-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of specific phrases.
premise text: Omitting the specified phrases is prohibited.
conclusion text: The provision must not omit those phrases.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Paragraph 15Y(1)(cb)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
note: Omit '1958.' and substitute with '1958;'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-8-norm

9 Paragraph 15Y(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
note: Omit specific phrase from regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of a specific phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Paragraph 15Y(1)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
note: Omit specific phrase from subsections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-10-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 15Y(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
has part: 11(2) Subsection 15Y(2)
has part: 11(3) Subsection 15Y(2)
has part: 11(4) Subsection 15Y(2)
has part: 11(5) Subsection 15Y(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10

11(2) Subsection 15Y(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-ss-2
part of: 11 Subsection 15Y(2)
note: Prohibits proceedings involving special witnesses for certain offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of proceedings
premise text: (2) This Part contains special rules for adult complainants involved in proceedings to which this subsection applies.
conclusion text: Proceedings involving special witnesses are prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(3) Subsection 15Y(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-ss-3
part of: 11 Subsection 15Y(2)
note: Supporting victims and witnesses in criminal proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(3) Subsection 15Y(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to support victims and witnesses
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(4) Subsection 15Y(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-ss-4
part of: 11 Subsection 15Y(2)
note: Each of subsections (1), (2) and (3) also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding referred to in that subsection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(4) Subsection 15Y(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Applicability of subsections to connected proceedings.
premise text: (4) Each of subsections (1), (2) and (3) also applies...
conclusion text: ...also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding referred to in that subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Extension
logic summary: Extension of temporal scope to connected proceedings.
premise text: (4) Each of subsections (1), (2) and (3)
conclusion text: ...also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding referred to in that subsection.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Extension
logic summary: Extension of temporal scope to connected proceedings.
premise text: (4) Each of subsections (1), (2) and (3)
conclusion text: ...also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding referred to in that subsection.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal Extension
logic summary: Extension of temporal scope to connected proceedings.
premise text: (4) Each of subsections (1), (2) and (3)
conclusion text: ...also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding referred to in that subsection.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Temporal Extension
logic summary: Extension of temporal scope to connected proceedings.
premise text: (4) Each of subsections (1), (2) and (3)
conclusion text: ...also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding referred to in that subsection.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

11(5) Subsection 15Y(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11-ss-5
part of: 11 Subsection 15Y(2)
note: Obligation to apply special witnesses in Commonwealth offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(5) Subsection 15Y(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Applying special witnesses is an obligation
premise text: (5) Similarly, subsection 15YAB(1) (about special witnesses) also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding for a Commonwealth offence.
conclusion text: The state must apply special witnesses in Commonwealth offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Special witnesses apply during Commonwealth offences
premise text: (5) Similarly, subsection 15YAB(1) (about special witnesses) also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding for a Commonwealth offence.
conclusion text: The application of special witnesses occurs during the duration of Commonwealth offences
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Special witnesses apply during Commonwealth offences
premise text: (5) Similarly, subsection 15YAB(1) (about special witnesses) also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding for a Commonwealth offence.
conclusion text: The application of special witnesses occurs during the duration of Commonwealth offences
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Special witnesses diffuse during Commonwealth offences
premise text: (5) Similarly, subsection 15YAB(1) (about special witnesses) also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding for a Commonwealth offence.
conclusion text: The application of special witnesses diffuses during the duration of Commonwealth offences
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-11-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: apply
logic summary: Special witnesses are applied in Commonwealth offences
premise text: (5) Similarly, subsection 15YAB(1) (about special witnesses) also applies to any proceedings connected with a proceeding for a Commonwealth offence.
conclusion text: The state must apply special witnesses in Commonwealth offences
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

12 Section 15YA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
note: Definition of adult
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.11
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-12-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: adult means a person who is 18 or over.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Section 15YA (definition of child complainant)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
note: Substitute 'child proceeding' for 'a proceeding'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.11
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-13-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Section 15YA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
note: Defines child proceeding
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.11
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-14-norm

15 Section 15YA (definition of child witness)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
note: Substitute 'child proceeding' for 'a proceeding'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.11
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-15-norm

16 Section 15YA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
note: Defines who is considered a party to a proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.11
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Section 15YA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Identifies the parties involved in a proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Defines a subclass of entities that are considered parties to a proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Section 15YA (definition of proceeding)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
note: Defines 'proceeding' in criminal proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.11
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-17-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear meaning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes
logic summary: Substitutes a new definition for an existing one
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Section 15YA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
note: Definitions for special witness, vulnerable adult complainant, and vulnerable adult proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-18-norm

19 After section 15YA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
has part: 19(1) After section 15YA
has part: 19(2) After section 15YA
has part: 19(3) After section 15YA
has part: 19(4) After section 15YA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.12

19(1) After section 15YA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-1
part of: 19 After section 15YA
note: Court may declare a person to be a special witness in relation to the proceeding if satisfied that the person is unlikely to be able to satisfactorily give evidence in the ordinary manner. Definition of vulnerable adult complainant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-diffusion-6
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-argumentation-7

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(1) After section 15YA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Declaration of special witness is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: because of
logic summary: Declaration made due to specific factors.
premise text: ...due to (a) a disability; or...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition
premise text: (1) A vulnerable adult complainant, in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding, is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
conclusion text: is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: (1) A vulnerable adult complainant, in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding, is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
conclusion text: is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Recurring trace
premise text: (1) A vulnerable adult complainant, in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding, is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
conclusion text: is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-diffusion-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Information flow
premise text: (1) A vulnerable adult complainant, in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding, is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
conclusion text: is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-1-logic-argumentation-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: =
logic summary: Rational argument
premise text: (1) A vulnerable adult complainant, in relation to a vulnerable adult proceeding, is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
conclusion text: is an adult who is, or is alleged to be, a victim of an offence...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(2) After section 15YA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-2
part of: 19 After section 15YA
note: A declaration under subsection (1) may be made on the court’s own initiative or on application by or on behalf of a party to the proceeding. Adult can opt out of being treated as vulnerable adult complainant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(2) After section 15YA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Declaration may be made on initiative or application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OptOut
logic summary: Adult can opt out of being treated as vulnerable adult complainant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(3) After section 15YA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-3
part of: 19 After section 15YA
note: Vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the vulnerable adult proceeding. Court may order application of certain sections to a special witness
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-6

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(3) After section 15YA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: needNot
logic summary: Obligation to involve complainant
premise text: (3) A vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the vulnerable adult proceeding.
conclusion text: The state need not involve the complainant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between involve and proceed
premise text: (3) A vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the vulnerable adult proceeding.
conclusion text: The state can proceed without involving the complainant during the proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between involve and proceed
premise text: (3) A vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the vulnerable adult proceeding.
conclusion text: The state can proceed until involving the complainant is required.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Spread of obligation to involve
premise text: (3) A vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the vulnerable adult proceeding.
conclusion text: The state's obligation to involve the complainant diffuses to other persons or entities.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: cognizes
logic summary: Artificial agent's understanding of obligation
premise text: (3) A vulnerable adult complainant need not be involved in the vulnerable adult proceeding.
conclusion text: The artificial agent cognizes that the state need not involve the complainant.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(4) After section 15YA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19-ss-4
part of: 19 After section 15YA
note: Application for order may be made by or on behalf of special witness.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(4) After section 15YA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-19-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: Application may be made
conclusion text: Order may be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Subsections 15YB(1) and 15YC(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
note: Omit 'a proceeding', substitute 'a child proceeding'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-20-norm

21 Subsection 15YE(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
note: Court must disallow inappropriate or aggressive questions in cross-examination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-21-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 Subsection 15YE(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Court must disallow
premise text: Question is inappropriate or aggressively worded
conclusion text: Disallow question
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Subsection 15YE(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
note: Replace 'child witness' with 'person's'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-22-norm

23 At the end of section 15YE
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23
note: Applicability of subsection to specific persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-23-norm

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-23-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23 At the end of section 15YE
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

24 Subsection 15YF(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24
note: Substitute 'child proceeding' for 'proceeding'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-24-norm

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 Subsection 15YF(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

25 Section 15YG (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25
note: Replace 'child witnesses' with 'vulnerable persons'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-25-norm

26 Subsection 15YG(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26
note: Replace 'child witness' with 'person to whom subsection (1A) applies'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-26-norm

27 After subsection 15YG(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27
note: Specifies persons subject to this subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-27-norm

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-27-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27 After subsection 15YG(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

28 Subsection 15YG(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28
note: Omit specific phrase from vulnerable witness protections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-28-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specific phrase
premise text: Substitution of phrase
conclusion text: Omitting phrase is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Before paragraph 15YG(4)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29
note: Permits making of complaint by or on behalf of vulnerable adult complainant
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-29-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to make complaint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Subsection 15YG(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30
note: Replace 'child' with 'vulnerable person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-30-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-30-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 Subsection 15YG(5)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term
premise text: Omit 'child'
conclusion text: Substitute 'vulnerable person'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Section 15YH (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31
note: Substitute 'vulnerable persons' for 'child witnesses and child complainants'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-31-norm

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 Section 15YH (heading)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

32 Section 15YH
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32
note: Insertion of '(1)' before 'A'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-32-norm

33 Section 15YH
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-33
note: Omit 'a child witness or a child complainant except through counsel'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-33-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting a child witness or complainant without counsel
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 At the end of section 15YH
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-34
note: Applicable persons for certain types of proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-34-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-34-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34 At the end of section 15YH
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Defines applicable persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Division 4 of Part IAD (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-35
note: Replace 'child witnesses' with 'vulnerable persons'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-35-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-35-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Subsection 15YI(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36
note: Replace 'A child witness' with 'Evidence from a person to whom subsection (1A) applies'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-36-norm

37 Paragraphs 15YI(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-37
note: Substitute 'vulnerable person' for 'child'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-37-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-37-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-37-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37 Paragraphs 15YI(1)(a) and (b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to substitute 'vulnerable person' for 'child'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Subsection 15YI(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38
note: Replace 'child witness' with 'vulnerable person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-38-norm

39 After subsection 15YI(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39
note: List of persons subject to this subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-39-norm

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-39-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39 After subsection 15YI(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40 Subsection 15YI(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40
note: Replace 'child witness' with 'vulnerable person's'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-40-norm

41 Subsection 15YJ(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41
note: Omit 'child witness' evidence, substitute 'vulnerable person's evidence'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-41-norm

42 Paragraph 15YJ(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-42
note: Replace 'child' with 'vulnerable person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-42-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-42-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term
premise text: Replace 'child' with 'vulnerable person'
conclusion text: Obligation to replace
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Subsection 15YJ(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43
note: Replace '15YM' with '15YO (about accompanying adults)' in Schedule 2, section 43.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-43-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace '15YM' with '15YO'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Section 15YK
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44
note: Omit 'the child witness' evidence, substitute 'the vulnerable person's evidence'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-44-norm

45 Section 15YK
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-45
note: Substitute 'vulnerable person' for 'child'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-45-norm

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-45-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45 Section 15YK
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

46 Subsection 15YL(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46
note: Omit evidence from a child witness in a proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-46-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting evidence from a child witness in a proceeding.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Paragraphs 15YL(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-47
note: Substitute ‘person’ for ‘child’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-47-norm

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-47-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47 Paragraphs 15YL(1)(a) and (b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

48 Subparagraph 15YL(2)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48
note: Omit 'child's', substitute 'person's'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-48-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-48-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'child's'
premise text: Substituting 'person's' is allowed.
conclusion text: Omitting 'child's' is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Subsection 15YL(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-49
note: This subsection applies to specific persons under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-49-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-49-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-49-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49 Subsection 15YL(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Indicates that this subsection imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

50 Subsection 15YM(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50
note: Replace 'child witness' with 'person to whom subsection (1A) applies'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-50-norm

51 After subsection 15YM(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-51
note: List of persons subject to this subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-51-norm

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-51-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51 After subsection 15YM(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

52 Subsection 15YM(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-52
note: Omit specific phrase from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-52-norm

53 Subsection 15YM(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-53
note: Substitute “person” for “child witness”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-53-norm

54 Subsection 15YN(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-54
note: Substitute “person” for “child witness”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-54-norm

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54 Subsection 15YN(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

55 Paragraph 15YN(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-55
note: Omit specific phrase from text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-55-norm

56 After Division 5 of Part IAD
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-56
note: Insert clause after Division 5 of Part IAD
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-56-norm

57 Section 15YO (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-57
note: Substitute 'vulnerable persons' for 'child witnesses'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.21
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-57-norm

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57 Section 15YO (heading)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

58 Subsection 15YO(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-58
note: Replace 'child witness' with 'person to whom subsection (1A) applies'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.21
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-58-norm

59 Subsection 15YO(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59
note: Substitute “person” for “child” in certain contexts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.21
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-59-norm

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59 Subsection 15YO(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

60 After subsection 15YO(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-60
note: Defines persons subject to subsection 15YO(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.21
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-60-norm

61 Subsection 15YO(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-61
note: Substitution of chosen under subsection (1) in Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.21
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-61-norm

62 Subsections 15YO(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-62
note: Replace 'child' with 'person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-62-norm

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62 Subsections 15YO(2) and (3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

63 Subsection 15YO(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-63
note: Substitute “person” for “child”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-63-norm

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-63-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63 Subsection 15YO(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

64 Paragraph 15YO(4)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64
note: Omit specific words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-64-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-64-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the specified action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65 Paragraph 15YO(4)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-65
note: Omit 'child', substitute 'person'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-65-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-65-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'child'
premise text: Omit 'child', substitute 'person'.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 Subsection 15YO(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66
note: Omit 'child', substitute 'person'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-66-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-66-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'child'
premise text: Omit 'child', substitute 'person'.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67 Section 15YP
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-67
note: Repeal section and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-67-norm

15YP Excluding people from the courtroom
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15yp
note: Excluding people from the courtroom
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-15yp-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-15yp-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-15yp-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 15YP Excluding people from the courtroom
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-15yp-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits excluding people from the courtroom
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Section 15YQ (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-68
note: Substitute 'vulnerable persons' for 'children's'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-68-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-68-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68 Section 15YQ (heading)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to substitute 'vulnerable persons' for 'children's'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 Section 15YQ
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-69
note: Insert '(1)' before 'If' in section 15YQ.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-69-norm

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-69-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69 Section 15YQ
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

70 Section 15YQ
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70
note: Substitute 'person to whom subsection (2) applies' for 'child witness'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-70-norm

71 Paragraph 15YQ(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-71
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with prohibition on classifying persons as unreliable witnesses.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-71-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-71-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition on classifying persons as unreliable witnesses.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-71-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replaces the original paragraph with new text.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Paragraph 15YQ(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-72
note: Omit 'child', substitute 'person'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-72-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-72-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'child'
premise text: Omit 'child', substitute 'person'.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 At the end of section 15YQ
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-73
note: Applicable persons for certain types of proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-73-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-73-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-73-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73 At the end of section 15YQ
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-73-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Applies to specific persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74 Section 15YR (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-74
note: Substitute 'vulnerable adult complainants' for 'child complainants'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-74-norm

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74 Section 15YR (heading)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

75 Paragraph 15YR(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-75
note: Identify vulnerable persons in proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-75-norm

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-75-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75 Paragraph 15YR(1)(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

76 After subsection 15YR(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-76
note: Applicability of subsection to child witnesses and vulnerable adult complainants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-76-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-76-logic-alleninterval-2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-76-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76 After subsection 15YR(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Applicability of the subsection
premise text: This subsection applies to the following persons:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-76-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal applicability
premise text: This subsection applies to the following persons:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Paragraphs 15YR(4)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-77
note: Replace 'child witness or child complainant' with 'vulnerable person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-77-norm

78 Section 15YT
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-78
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-78-norm

15YT Other video link evidence provisions are unaffected
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15yt
note: Nothing in this Part affects the operation of Division 279 of the Criminal Code (about video link evidence in offences against humanity).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-15yt-norm

79 At the end of subsection 270.12(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-79
note: Add Note
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-79-norm

80 At the end of subsection 271.12(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-80
note: Add Note
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-80-norm

81 At the end of section 272.7 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-81
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-81-norm

82 Subdivision D of Division 272 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-82
note: Repeal Subdivision D of Division 272 of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-82-norm

83 At the end of section 273.4 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-83
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-83-norm

84 Subdivision D of Division 273 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-84
note: Repeal Subdivision D of Division 273 of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-84-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-84-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals Subdivision D of Division 273 of the Criminal Code
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85 At the end of Chapter 8 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-85
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-85-norm

279 Section 279
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279
note: Proceedings for certain offences against specific Divisions of the Chapter apply to this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 279 Section 279
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies to certain proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279 Section 279
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-2
note: Court may direct witness give evidence by video link under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-2-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Court permits witness to give evidence by video link.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279 Section 279
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-3
has part: 279(1) Section 279
has part: 279(2) Section 279
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.26

279(1) Section 279
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-1
part of: 279 Section 279
note: Witness must give evidence under direction in specific conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 279(1) Section 279
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to give evidence under direction
premise text: (1) A witness can give evidence under a direction only...
conclusion text: ...if the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting (the Australian location); and...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279(2) Section 279
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-2
part of: 279 Section 279
note: Court considers appropriate persons for a specific purpose.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 279(2) Section 279
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: consider
logic summary: Determines appropriateness
premise text: Court decision
conclusion text: Appropriate persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-3-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is-a
logic summary: Classifies persons
premise text: Subsection (1)
conclusion text: Appropriate persons
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279 Section 279
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-4
note: A person who gives evidence under a direction must give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-cogai-5

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 279 Section 279
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide evidence at a specific location
premise text: The court is sitting in Australia.
conclusion text: A person who gives evidence under a direction must give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The direction is given at a specific time or place.
premise text: A person who gives evidence under a direction is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.
conclusion text: The direction is given during the time the person gives evidence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: The direction is given at a specific time or place.
premise text: A person who gives evidence under a direction is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.
conclusion text: The direction is given during the time the person gives evidence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: The direction is given at a specific time or place.
premise text: A person who gives evidence under a direction is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.
conclusion text: The direction is given during the time the person gives evidence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: The direction is given at a specific time or place.
premise text: A person who gives evidence under a direction is taken to give it at the courtroom or other place in Australia where the court is sitting.
conclusion text: The direction is given during the time the person gives evidence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279 Section 279
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-5
note: Administration of oaths and affirmations for witnesses giving evidence under direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-5-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 279 Section 279
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Witnesses must provide oaths or affirmations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Supporting victims and witnesses in criminal proceedings is a class of things that can be administered by video link.
premise text: Schedule 2
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279 Section 279
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-6
note: Court may order payment of expenses incurred in connection with giving evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-6-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-6-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 279 Section 279
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

279 Section 279
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279-7
note: No effect on other laws about foreign evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-279-7-norm

86 Subsection 16(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-86
note: Definition of 'family' affected by subsection 16A(4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-cogai-5

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86 Subsection 16(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: affectedBy
logic summary: Definition of 'family'
premise text: Subsection 16(1)
conclusion text: Obligation to define 'family'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relatedTo
logic summary: Temporal relation between subsections
premise text: Subsection 16(1) and subsection 16A(4)
conclusion text: Subsections 16(1) and 16A(4) are related by temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Definition of 'family' implies obligation to define
premise text: Subsection 16(1)
conclusion text: Definition of 'family' implies obligation to define
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Obligation to define 'family' diffuses through subsections
premise text: Subsection 16(1)
conclusion text: Definition of 'family' diffuses through subsections
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-86-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: influences
logic summary: Definition of 'family' influenced by artificial intelligence
premise text: Subsection 16A(4)
conclusion text: Definition of 'family' influenced by artificial intelligence
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

87 Subsection 16(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-87
note: Defines harm as physical, psychological and emotional suffering, economic and other loss, and damage.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-87-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-87-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-87-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 87 Subsection 16(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Defines harm
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-87-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Describes harm as a subclass of harm
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88 Subsection 16(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-88
note: Definition of victim impact statement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-88-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-88-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89 At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-89
has part: 89(1) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
has part: 89(2) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
has part: 89(3) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
has part: 89(4) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.28

89(1) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-89-ss-1
part of: 89 At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
note: A victim impact statement must be made by the individual, their family member, or a person appointed by the court.
description: Details of the harm suffered by the victim as a result of the offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(1) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The statement must be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(2) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-89-ss-2
part of: 89 At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
note: Court may exempt oral statements from a requirement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(2) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Exemption from obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(3) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-89-ss-3
part of: 89 At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
note: Minister may prescribe a form for victim impact statements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-3-norm

89(4) At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-89-ss-4
part of: 89 At the end of Division 1 of Part IB
note: Delegation of power to Secretary or SES employee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: canDelegate
logic summary: Power delegation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-89-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90 After paragraph 16A(2)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-90
note: Any victim impact statement for the victim must be provided.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.29
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-90-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-90-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-90-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90 After paragraph 16A(2)(e)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a victim impact statement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91 Subsection 16A(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-91
note: Omit “this section”, substitute ‘this Part’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.29
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-91-norm

92 After section 16AA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-92
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-92-norm

16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16ab
has part: 16AB(1) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(2) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(3) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(4) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(5) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(6) Matters relating to victim impact statements
has part: 16AB(7) Matters relating to victim impact statements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30

16AB(1) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-1
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
note: This section applies in relation to victim impact statements.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16AB(1) Matters relating to victim impact statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16AB(2) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-2
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
note: Only one victim impact statement may be made for each victim of an offence, unless the court gives leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-2-norm

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16AB(2) Matters relating to victim impact statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

16AB(3) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-3
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
note: No implication is to be drawn from the absence of a victim impact statement for a victim.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16AB(3) Matters relating to victim impact statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: No implication is drawn from the absence of a statement.
premise text: (3) No implication is to be drawn...
conclusion text: No implication is drawn from...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

16AB(4) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-4
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
note: Victim impact statement may be read to court by or on behalf of the victim.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16AB(4) Matters relating to victim impact statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16AB(5) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
note: Excluding certain types of statements from consideration in court proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-ltl-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents reading or considering the statement.
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account,
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Trace
logic summary: Tracing exclusion of certain statements.
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account,
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts consideration of certain statements.
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account,
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Exclusion
logic summary: Excluding certain statements due to temporal constraints.
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagating exclusion of certain statements.
premise text: (5) A victim impact statement is not to be read to the court, or otherwise taken into account,
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16AB(6) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-6
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
note: Person convicted of offence may only test facts in victim impact statement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-6-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16AB(6) Matters relating to victim impact statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may_only
logic summary: May only
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16AB(7) Matters relating to victim impact statements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-7
part of: 16AB Matters relating to victim impact statements
note: Parties to criminal proceedings must provide a reading or cross-examination under specific subsections.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-7-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16AB(7) Matters relating to victim impact statements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a reading or cross-examination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-16ab-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: SUBCLASS OF
logic summary: Parties to criminal proceedings must provide a reading or cross-examination under specific subsections.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93 Application of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-93
note: Amendments apply in relation to offences committed on or after the commencement of this Schedule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.31
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-2-sec-93-norm

1 Subsection 3ZQA(1) (definition of age determination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
note: Substitute information in age determination definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.32
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace specific information with a broader term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 3ZQA(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
note: Omit specific phrase from Migration Act 1958
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.32
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits taking of X-ray of a part of a person's body
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 236A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.32
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-3-norm

236A No discharge without conviction for certain offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-236a
note: Court may only make order for certain offence under specific conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.32
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236a-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236a-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 236A No discharge without conviction for certain offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: only
logic summary: Restricts court action to specific circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

4 At the end of Subdivision A of Division 12 of Part 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
note: Add Deterring people smuggling
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.32
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-4-norm

236C Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-236c
has part: 236C(1) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
has part: 236C(2) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
has part: 236C(3) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.33

236C(1) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-236c-ss-1
part of: 236C Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
note: Court must consider time in immigration detention when imposing sentence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 236C(1) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider time in immigration detention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

236C(2) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-236c-ss-2
part of: 236C Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
note: Court must consider time spent in immigration detention during sentencing period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 236C(2) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider time spent in immigration detention.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

236C(3) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-236c-ss-3
part of: 236C Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
note: Neither section 236B nor this section prevents section 16E of the Crimes Act 1914 from applying to the imposition of the sentence or the setting of the non-parole period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 236C(3) Time in immigration detention counts for sentencing etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prevents
logic summary: Section 236B and this section prevent section 16E from applying.
premise text: Section 236B
conclusion text: Section 16E
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

236D Burden and standard of proof in relation to age
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-236d
note: Prosecution bears burden of proving defendant's age at time of alleged offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236d-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236d-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236d-logic-ltl-3

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 236D Burden and standard of proof in relation to age
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Prosecution bears obligation to prove defendant's age.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236d-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Probability
logic summary: Prosecution must provide evidence on balance of probabilities.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236d-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalInterval
logic summary: Defendant's age is a temporal interval to be proven by prosecution.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

236E Evidentiary certificates in proceedings for offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-236e
note: Who may issue a certificate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236e-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236e-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 236E Evidentiary certificates in proceedings for offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: issuance
logic summary: Issuance of certificates
premise text: A written certificate may be issued under this subsection
conclusion text: by the specified individuals
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

236F Evidentiary certificates—procedural matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-236f
has part: 236F(1) Evidentiary certificates—procedural matters
has part: 236F(2) Evidentiary certificates—procedural matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.35

236F(1) Evidentiary certificates—procedural matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1
part of: 236F Evidentiary certificates—procedural matters
note: Certificate cannot be admitted in evidence without prior notice and copy.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.35
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on admitting certificate in evidence without prior notice and copy.
premise text: Certificate issued under subsection 236E(1)
conclusion text: Must not be admitted in evidence unless...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: At Least
logic summary: Certificate must have been given at least 28 days before admission.
premise text: The person charged with the offence; or a lawyer who has appeared for the person in those proceedings;
conclusion text: ...has, at least 28 days before the certificate is sought to be so admitted...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Certificate must be given to person or lawyer before admission.
premise text: The person charged with the offence; or a lawyer who has appeared for the person in those proceedings;
conclusion text: ...has, at least 28 days before the certificate is sought to be so admitted...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Certificate cannot be admitted in evidence without prior notice and copy.
premise text: The person charged with the offence; or a lawyer who has appeared for the person in those proceedings;
conclusion text: ...unless...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

236F(2) Evidentiary certificates—procedural matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-236f-ss-2
part of: 236F Evidentiary certificates—procedural matters
note: Person charged with offence may require certificate signer to be called as a witness.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.35
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 236F(2) Evidentiary certificates—procedural matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-236f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Application of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
note: Application of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.36
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-4

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: (1) The amendment made by item 3 applies in relation to offences committed (or alleged to have been committed) at or after the commencement of this Part.
conclusion text: The amendment applies in relation to offences committed at or after the commencement of this Part.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking
premise text: (1) The amendment made by item 3 applies in relation to offences committed (or alleged to have been committed) at or after the commencement of this Part.
conclusion text: The amendment applies in relation to offences committed at or after the commencement of this Part.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace
premise text: (1) The amendment made by item 3 applies in relation to offences committed (or alleged to have been committed) at or after the commencement of this Part.
conclusion text: The amendment applies in relation to offences committed at or after the commencement of this Part.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: (2) Section 236C (about time in immigration detention) of the Migration Act 1958 (as inserted by this Part) applies in relation to sentences imposed, or non-parole periods set, at or after the commencement of this Part.
conclusion text: The section applies in relation to sentences imposed at or after the commencement of this Part.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 236E(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
note: Issuing a certificate under this subsection if an authorisation authorises the exercise of maritime powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.37
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-6-norm

7 Paragraphs 236E(3)(a) to (i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
note: Repeal certain paragraphs and substitute with new provisions regarding maritime powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.37
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-7-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Paragraphs 236E(3)(a) to (i)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Repeal certain paragraphs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 236E(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
note: Omit 'ship', substitute 'vessel'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.38
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-8-norm

9 Subsection 236E(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
note: Repeal subsection and substitute definitions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.38
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-9-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
premise text: Definitions
conclusion text: Subsection 236E(6)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Application and transitional provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
note: Amendments apply in relation to authorisations made at or after commencement, but not continuous exercise of powers begun before commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.38
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-10-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-1

c2018c00199-sch-3-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 5 (definition of AAT reviewable decision)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
note: Repeal the definition of AAT reviewable decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-1-norm

2 Section 5 (after paragraph (h) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
note: Designated agency must be one of the Clean Energy Regulator or another designated agency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Section 5 (after paragraph (h) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: in
logic summary: Membership in a set
premise text: designated agency
conclusion text: Clean Energy Regulator or another designated agency
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 5 (after paragraph (u) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
note: Designated agency includes the Integrity Commission of Tasmania.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Section 5 (after paragraph (u) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
premise text: designated agency
conclusion text: Integrity Commission of Tasmania
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Section 5 (definition of reviewable decision)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
note: Repeals definition, substitutes with new meaning.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-4-norm

5 Section 73
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-5
note: Omit Division 4 review of decisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-5-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits review of decisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 At the end of subsection 75B(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6
note: Amendments to Schedule 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-6-norm

7 At the end of subsection 75C(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-7
note: Decision not to register person is reviewable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-7-norm

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 At the end of subsection 75C(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 75C(5) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8
note: Repeal a note
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-8-norm

9 At the end of subsection 75E(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9
note: Decision to impose a condition is reviewable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-9-norm

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 At the end of subsection 75E(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

10 At the end of subsection 75G(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10
note: A decision to cancel a registration is reviewable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-10-norm

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 At the end of subsection 75G(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 75G(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11
note: Substitute subsection 233C(1) for subsection 75R(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-11-norm

12 Division 4 of Part 6 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12
note: Repeal the heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-12-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: No temporal relation specified
premise text: Division 4 of Part 6 (heading)
conclusion text: Repeal the heading.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Subsection 75Q(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13
note: Substitute reviewable decision under section 75C, 75E or 75G in relation to one or more persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-13-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace text with new text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Subsection 75Q(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-14
note: Substitute 'each of the persons' for 'the person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-14-norm

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 Subsection 75Q(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15 At the end of subsection 75Q(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15
note: Registering a person as a remittance network provider is obligatory if they applied under subsection 75B(2) for that person to be so registered.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-15-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 At the end of subsection 75Q(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Sections 75R and 75S
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16
note: Repeal sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.41
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-16-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals sections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 After subsection 123(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17
note: Must not disclose information unless certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.41
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-17-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Disclosure made without conditions.
conclusion text: Prohibited disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 After subsection 123(7A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18
note: Must not disclose information to another person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.41
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-18-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustNot
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Paragraph 123(11)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19
note: Insertion of section references
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.41
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-19-norm

20 Paragraph 130(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20
note: Disclosure is for purposes of official duties in connection with investigation or proposed investigation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.41
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-20-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-20-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Paragraph 130(3)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on entrusted agency official
premise text: Given written undertaking
conclusion text: Disclosure for purposes of official duties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 After subsection 130(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21
note: Recipient and officials must comply with Information Privacy Principles.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-21-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 After subsection 130(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Paragraph 136(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-22-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Paragraph 136(1)(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace existing provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Paragraph 137(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-23-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-23-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits production under certain provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 After subsection 139(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24
note: Defendant bears evidential burden in relation to matters in subsection (3)(3) of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-24-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-24-logic-epistemic-2

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 After subsection 139(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant bears evidential burden
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-24-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Evidential Burden
logic summary: Defendant must provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Subsection 145(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-25
note: Appoints AUSTRAC staff as authorised officers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-25-norm

26 At the end of subsection 161(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26
note: Reviewable decisions of AUSTRAC CEO under subsection 161(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-26-norm

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26 At the end of subsection 161(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

27 Section 164A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27
note: Repeal section 164A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-27-norm

28 At the end of subsection 191(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-28
note: A decision to give a direction is reviewable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-28-norm

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-28-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28 At the end of subsection 191(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

29 Section 191A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-29
note: Repeal section 191A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-29-norm

30 At the end of paragraph 225(3)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30
note: Add “or”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-30-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-30-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 At the end of paragraph 225(3)(f)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: add
logic summary: Adds to the list of permitted elements
conclusion text: The list of permitted elements is updated.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 After paragraph 225(3)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31
note: Permission to insert provision for persons with suitable qualifications and experience
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-31-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-31-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 After Part 17
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-32
note: Insert Schedule 4 Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-32-norm

233A Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-233a
note: Review of AUSTRAC CEO decisions by Administrative Appeals Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.44
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233a-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233a-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may be reviewed
logic summary: Review obligation
premise text: AUSTRAC CEO decision
conclusion text: Administrative Appeals Tribunal review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

233B Reviewable decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-233b
note: Refusal to register a person as a remittance network provider, independent remittance dealer, or remittance affiliate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.44
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233b-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233b-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 233B Reviewable decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of registration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

233C Giving notice of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-233c
has part: 233C(1) Giving notice of reviewable decisions
has part: 233C(2) Giving notice of reviewable decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.45

233C(1) Giving notice of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-233c-ss-1
part of: 233C Giving notice of reviewable decisions
note: Give written notice to persons after reviewable decision made in relation to one or more persons.
description: terms of the decision, reasons for the decision, and particulars of the persons' right to have the decision reviewed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233c-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

233C(2) Giving notice of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-233c-ss-2
part of: 233C Giving notice of reviewable decisions
note: Exempts reviewable decisions from subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233c-ss-2-norm

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 233C(2) Giving notice of reviewable decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

233D Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-233d
has part: 233D(1) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
has part: 233D(2) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
has part: 233D(3) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.45

233D(1) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1
part of: 233D Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
note: Reviewable decisions made by a delegate of the AUSTRAC CEO are subject to reconsideration.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 233D(1) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the delegate to reconsider decisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Specifies the temporal scope of the obligation.
premise text: (1) This section applies to a reviewable decision if the decision is made by a delegate of the AUSTRAC CEO.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Indicates the temporal duration of the obligation.
premise text: (1) This section applies to a reviewable decision if the decision is made by a delegate of the AUSTRAC CEO.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Spreads the obligation to other entities.
premise text: (1) This section applies to a reviewable decision if the decision is made by a delegate of the AUSTRAC CEO.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Identifies the cognitive process involved in the obligation.
premise text: (1) This section applies to a reviewable decision if the decision is made by a delegate of the AUSTRAC CEO.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

233D(2) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-233d-ss-2
part of: 233D Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
note: Application for reconsideration of decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 233D(2) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to apply
conclusion text: A person affected by a reviewable decision who is dissatisfied with the decision may apply to the AUSTRAC CEO for the decision to be reconsidered.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

233D(3) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-233d-ss-3
part of: 233D Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
note: Application requirements for reconsideration of decisions made by the authority.
description: Information required by the AML/CTF Rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 233D(3) Applications for reconsideration of decisions made by
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be made within Schedule 4
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

233E Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-233e
has part: 233E(1) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
has part: 233E(2) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
has part: 233E(3) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
has part: 233E(4) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
has part: 233E(5) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.46

233E(1) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-233e-ss-1
part of: 233E Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
note: The AUSTRAC CEO must reconsider a reviewable decision upon receiving an application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 233E(1) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The AUSTRAC CEO must reconsider a reviewable decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

233E(2) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-233e-ss-2
part of: 233E Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
note: Affirm, vary or revoke reviewable decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

233E(3) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-233e-ss-3
part of: 233E Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
note: Reconsideration of reviewable decisions must be done by AUSTRAC CEO or delegated person under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to reconsider reviewable decisions
premise text: (3) The AUSTRAC CEO’s reconsideration...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

233E(4) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-233e-ss-4
part of: 233E Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
note: Provide written notice to applicant after decision made under subsection (2)
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written notice
conclusion text: (4) The AUSTRAC CEO must...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

233E(5) Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-233e-ss-5
part of: 233E Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
note: Reconsideration of reviewable decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233e-ss-5-norm

233F Review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-233f
note: Application for review of AUSTRAC CEO decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.47
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233f-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233f-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 233F Review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Application is made
conclusion text: reviewable decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

233G Failure to comply does not affect validity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-233g
note: Failure to provide notice does not affect decision validity
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.47
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233g-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233g-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233g-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 233G Failure to comply does not affect validity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-233g-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Application and transitional provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-33
note: Old law continues to apply in relation to certain decisions made before the commencement day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.47
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-33-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-33-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33 Application and transitional provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Repeals and amendments do not affect old law
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Subsection 130(3AA)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-34
note: Replace outdated privacy principles with Australian Privacy Principles.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.49
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-34-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-34-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-4-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty to replace outdated privacy principles.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Former Yugoslavia Tribunal)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-1
note: Repeal and substitute definition of Former Yugoslavia Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.50
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Former Yugoslavia Tribunal)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition
premise text: Definition needs to be repealed
conclusion text: Definition of Former Yugoslavia Tribunal is repealed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Definition substitution
premise text: New definition needs to be substituted
conclusion text: Former Yugoslavia Tribunal definition is substituted
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2
note: Defines International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.50
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the Mechanism
premise text: International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals
conclusion text: established by United Nations Security Council Resolution 1966 S/RES/1966 (2010)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Includes organs referred to in Article 4 of the Statute of the Tribunal
premise text: Article 4 of the Statute of the Tribunal
conclusion text: organs referred to in Article 4 of the Statute of the Tribunal
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Rwanda Tribunal)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-3
note: Repeal and substitute definition of Rwanda Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.51
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Rwanda Tribunal)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace existing definition with new one
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Definition Replacement
logic summary: Update definition of Rwanda Tribunal
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 December 1994, established by United Nations Security
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-31
note: Establishes Council Resolution 955 S/RES/955 (1994) and includes organs referred to in Article 10 of the Statute of the Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.51
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-31-norm

4 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Statute of the Tribunal)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-4
note: Definition of Statute of the Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.51
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-4-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines the term Statute of the Tribunal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes
logic summary: Substitutes a new definition for Statute of the Tribunal
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

827 S/RES/827 (1993); and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-827
note: References annexed documents and resolutions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.51
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-827-norm

1966 S/RES/1966 (2010).
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-1966
note: Compilation and registration of the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Law Enforcement Integrity, Vulnerable Witness Protection and Other Measures) Act 2013.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.51
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-1966-norm

5 Subsection 4(1) (at the end of the definition of Tribunal)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-5
note: Add International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals to the definition of Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-5-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adding entities to a set.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 4(1) (at the end of the definition of Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-6
note: List of offences under International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-6-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Subsection 4(1) (at the end of the definition of Tribunal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: List of offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Section 4 (definition of Former Yugoslavia Tribunal)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-7
note: Repeal and substitute definition of Former Yugoslavia Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-7-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Section 4 (definition of Former Yugoslavia Tribunal)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition
premise text: Definition needs to be repealed
conclusion text: Definition of Former Yugoslavia Tribunal is repealed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Definition substitution
premise text: New definition needed
conclusion text: Former Yugoslavia Tribunal definition is substituted
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-8
note: Definition of International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-8-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-8-logic-descriptionlogic-1

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-8-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the Mechanism
premise text: Mechanism established by United Nations Security Council Resolution 1966 S/RES/1966 (2010)
conclusion text: International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Section 4 (definition of Rwanda Tribunal)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-9
note: Repeal and substitute definition of Rwanda Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-9-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 Section 4 (definition of Rwanda Tribunal)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace existing definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Define Rwanda Tribunal
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 December 1994, established by United Nations Security
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-31-2
note: Establishment of United Nations Security Council Resolution 955 S/RES/955 (1994)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-31-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-31-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-31-2-logic-deontic-2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-31-2-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as a descriptive clause
premise text: None
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-31-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as an undertaking
premise text: None
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Section 4 (definition of Statute of the Tribunal)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-10
note: Defines Statute of the Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-10-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-10-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Section 4 (definition of Statute of the Tribunal)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: Statute of the Tribunal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-10-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes
logic summary: Substitutes a definition
conclusion text: Statute of the Tribunal
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

827 S/RES/827 (1993); and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-827-2
note: Annexed documents for the Rwanda Tribunal and International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-827-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-827-2-logic-alleninterval-1

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-827-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal relation between documents
premise text: Temporal relation between documents
conclusion text: Temporal relation between documents
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1966 S/RES/1966 (2010).
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-1966-2
note: Note on accessibility of UN documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.54
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-1966-2-norm

11 Section 4 (at the end of the definition of Tribunal)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-11
note: Add International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals to the definition of Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.54
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-11-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Section 4 (at the end of the definition of Tribunal)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adding entities to a set.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Section 4 (at the end of the definition of Tribunal offence)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-12
note: Add an offence for which the International Residual Mechanism has power to prosecute under Article 1 of the Statute of the Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.54
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-12-norm

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Section 4 (at the end of the definition of Tribunal offence)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

13 At the end of subsection 42(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-13
note: Add Article 13 of the Statute of the Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.54
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-13-norm

14 Schedules 1 to 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-14
note: Repeal Schedules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.54
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-14-norm

15 Application of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-15
note: Applicable amendments and definitions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.54
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-15-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-5-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Application of amendments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 8(1C)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-1-3
has part: 1(1C) Subsection 8(1C)
has part: 1(1D) Subsection 8(1C)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.56

1(1C) Subsection 8(1C)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1c
part of: 1 Subsection 8(1C)
note: Permits entry into arrangements for provision of police and regulatory services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.56
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1c-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1c-logic-alleninterval-2

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission to enter into arrangements
premise text: (1C) The Minister and the following person...
conclusion text: ...may enter into arrangements...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Temporal relation between entry into arrangements and provision of services
premise text: (1C) The Minister and the following person...
conclusion text: ...for that Territory.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1(1D) Subsection 8(1C)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1d
part of: 1 Subsection 8(1C)
note: Police services and regulatory services must comply with arrangements in force under subsection (1C) for the Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.56
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1d-norm

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-1-3-ss-1d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1(1D) Subsection 8(1C)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

2 Transitional—preserving existing arrangements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-2-3
note: Preserving existing arrangements under subsection 8(1C) of the Australian Federal Police Act 1979.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.56
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-2-3-norm

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-2-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Transitional—preserving existing arrangements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 69C(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-3-3
note: Omit 'the Deputy Commissioner', substitute 'a Deputy Commissioner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.56
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-3-3-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-3-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'the Deputy Commissioner'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 At the end of section 69C (after the note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-4-2
note: Commissioner is taken to have delegated powers, functions or duties to an AFP employee if the Commissioner has delegated them under subsection (3) and the AFP employee is acting in or performing the duties of the senior executive AFP employee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.57
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-logic-argumentation-4

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 At the end of section 69C (after the note)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: delegation
logic summary: Commissioner's delegation of powers, functions or duties to an AFP employee.
premise text: The Commissioner has delegated one or more powers, functions or duties under subsection (3).
conclusion text: The Commissioner is taken to have delegated the powers, functions or duties mentioned in paragraph (a) to the AFP employee mentioned in paragraph (b).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: temporal overlap
logic summary: Delegation of powers, functions or duties by Commissioner and AFP employee.
premise text: The Commissioner has delegated one or more powers, functions or duties under subsection (3) and the AFP employee is acting in or performing the duties of the senior executive AFP employee.
conclusion text: The Commissioner is taken to have delegated the powers, functions or duties mentioned in paragraph (a) to the AFP employee mentioned in paragraph (b).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: traceability
logic summary: Delegation of powers, functions or duties by Commissioner and AFP employee.
premise text: The Commissioner has delegated one or more powers, functions or duties under subsection (3) and the AFP employee is acting in or performing the duties of the senior executive AFP employee.
conclusion text: The Commissioner is taken to have delegated the powers, functions or duties mentioned in paragraph (a) to the AFP employee mentioned in paragraph (b).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-4-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: Delegation of powers, functions or duties by Commissioner and AFP employee.
premise text: The Commissioner has delegated one or more powers, functions or duties under subsection (3) and the AFP employee is acting in or performing the duties of the senior executive AFP employee.
conclusion text: Therefore, the Commissioner is taken to have delegated the powers, functions or duties mentioned in paragraph (a) to the AFP employee mentioned in paragraph (b).
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 5(1) (definition of Inspector of the Victorian
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-5-2
note: Repeal and substitute the definition of Inspector of the Victorian Inspectorate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.57
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-5-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-5-2-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-5-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Subsection 5(1) (definition of Inspector of the Victorian
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-5-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term with another.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 5(1) (subparagraph (f)(i) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-6-2
note: Omit 'section 3A of'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.57
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-6-2-norm

7 Subsection 5(1) (subparagraph (f)(ii) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-7-2
note: Omit 'section 3B of'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.57
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-7-2-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Grants permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 5(1) (subparagraph (fa)(i) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-8
note: Omit “Part 3 of”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.57
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-8-norm

28 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-28-2
note: Schedule 1, 2, Sch 3 (items 1–5), Sch 4 (items 1–33), Sch 5 and 6: 29 June 2013 (s 2(1) items 2, 3, 5, 7)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.61
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-28-2-norm

22 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-22
note: May
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.61
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-22-norm

23 May 2018 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-23
note: Amendment history for Crimes Legislation Amendment (Law Enforcement Integrity, Vulnerable Witness Protection and Other Measures) Act 2013
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2018c00199.pdf, p.61
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-23-norm
asserts: c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-1

c2018c00199-sch-6-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for amendment history
premise text: Compilation date and registered date are specified
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed