1 Definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.18
note: Defines terms used in the scheme
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Terms must be defined in accordance with the scheme
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to define terms
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The scheme requires definitions of key terms

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Definitions are classified under this scheme
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: Definitions are organized into a class hierarchy

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Definitions

11 Interpretation
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.28
note: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 applies to this scheme.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
schema version: 2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Interpretation

12 Regulations
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 12(1) Regulations
has part: 12(2) Regulations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
schema version: 2

12(1) Regulations
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.28
note: Governor-General may make regulations.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Regulations

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(1) Regulations

12(2) Regulations
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.28
note: Regulations affecting inner adjacent areas require agreement from participating State Minister.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 12 Regulations

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulation prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12(2) Regulations

13 Definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.29
note: Defines baseline of Australia's territorial sea
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-13-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-13-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
schema version: 2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-13-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: baseline of Australia's territorial sea
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition

14 Adjacent areas
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.29
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14(1) Adjacent areas
has part: 14(2) Adjacent areas
has part: 14(3) Adjacent areas
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
schema version: 2

14(1) Adjacent areas
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.29
note: Defines adjacent area for New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia or Tasmania
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Adjacent areas

14(2) Adjacent areas
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.29
note: Defines adjacent area for Queensland
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Adjacent areas

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Coral Sea area
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship with continental shelf
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: Outer limits of the continental shelf

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines adjacent area for Queensland
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

14(3) Adjacent areas
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.29
note: Definition of adjacent area for Western Australia
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 14 Adjacent areas

15 Baselines
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.30
note: Defines baseline for a State's territorial sea
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
schema version: 2

16 Indicative map
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 16(1) Indicative map
has part: 16(2) Indicative map
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
schema version: 2

16(1) Indicative map
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.30
note: Map showing relevant areas appears in Appendix 1.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Indicative map

16(2) Indicative map
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.30
note: Provisions of this scheme prevail over the map if there is any inconsistency.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-16-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 16 Indicative map

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provisions of this scheme prevail.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Provisions of this scheme prevail over the map.
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails-over
premise text: There is an inconsistency.

2 Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.21
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2(1) Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
has part: 2(2) Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
has part: 2(3) Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
schema version: 2

2(1) Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.21
note: Applicable State criminal law in adjacent area
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Application of State criminal law in adjacent area

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State criminal law applies to inner adjacent area
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (1) The substantive criminal law of a State...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2(1) Application of State criminal law in adjacent area

2(2) Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.21
note: Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Application of State criminal law in adjacent area

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State criminal law applies to outer adjacent area
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (2) The provisions of the substantive criminal law of a State...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2(2) Application of State criminal law in adjacent area

2(3) Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.21
note: Does not apply to a substantive criminal law that is incapable of applying in an adjacent area or is limited by its express terms.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Application of State criminal law in adjacent area

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: !
premise text: None

3 Application of laws of criminal investigation, procedure and
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.21
note: Application of laws of criminal investigation, procedure and evidence
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
schema version: 2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to include
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inclusion in the act
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
premise text: act includes an omission

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Definition of area
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Area of administrative responsibility
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is equal to
premise text: area of administrative responsibility for a particular State is the area of the State

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Application of laws of criminal investigation, procedure and

4 Evidentiary presumption about the locus of an offence
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.24
note: Evidentiary presumption about the locus of an offence
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
schema version: 2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Evidentiary presumption about the locus of an offence

5 Intergovernmental agreement
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.25
curation status: Proposed
has part: 5(1) Intergovernmental agreement
has part: 5(2) Intergovernmental agreement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
schema version: 2

5(1) Intergovernmental agreement
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.25
note: Intergovernmental agreement for maritime offences administration and enforcement
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-5-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 5 Intergovernmental agreement

5(2) Intergovernmental agreement
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.25
note: Concurrent responsibility in specified parts of the adjacent area.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-5-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 5 Intergovernmental agreement

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-5-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5(2) Intergovernmental agreement

6 Effect of the agreement
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.25
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6(1) Effect of the agreement
has part: 6(2) Effect of the agreement
has part: 6(3) Effect of the agreement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
schema version: 2

6(1) Effect of the agreement
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.25
note: No court can bring a charge of a maritime offence contrary to the intergovernmental agreement.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Effect of the agreement

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between international agreements and court proceedings
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (1) A charge of a maritime offence must not be brought in a court contrary to the intergovernmental agreement.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of international agreements on court proceedings
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) A charge of a maritime offence must not be brought in a court contrary to the intergovernmental agreement.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of international agreements and court proceedings
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
premise text: (1) A charge of a maritime offence must not be brought in a court contrary to the intergovernmental agreement.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of bringing charges in court
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: (1) A charge of a maritime offence must not be brought in a court contrary to the intergovernmental agreement.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Propagation of international agreements through court proceedings
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
premise text: (1) A charge of a maritime offence must not be brought in a court contrary to the intergovernmental agreement.

6(2) Effect of the agreement
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.25
note: Court must permanently stay proceedings if charge of maritime offence is brought in contravention of subclause (1)
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Effect of the agreement

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court must, on application by the Commonwealth Attorney-General or a participating State Minister, permanently stay the proceedings in that court.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excerpt overlaps with subclause (1)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (2) If a charge of a maritime offence is brought in a court in contravention of subclause (1), the court...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court must, on application by the Commonwealth Attorney-General or a participating State Minister, permanently stay the proceedings in that court.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Excerpt requires analysis of 'charge of a maritime offence'
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
premise text: (2) If a charge of a maritime offence is brought in a court in contravention of subclause (1), the court...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court must, on application by the Commonwealth Attorney-General or a participating State Minister, permanently stay the proceedings in that court.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must prohibit bringing charge in contravention of subclause (1)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) If a charge of a maritime offence is brought in a court in contravention of subclause (1), the court...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court must, on application by the Commonwealth Attorney-General or a participating State Minister, permanently stay the proceedings in that court.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Excerpt diffuses to other provisions
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) If a charge of a maritime offence is brought in a court in contravention of subclause (1), the court...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the court must, on application by the Commonwealth Attorney-General or a participating State Minister, permanently stay the proceedings in that court.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Excerpt is part of a recurring provision
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: (2) If a charge of a maritime offence is brought in a court in contravention of subclause (1), the court...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(2) Effect of the agreement

6(3) Effect of the agreement
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.25
note: Court's jurisdiction not affected by contravention of subclause (1)
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Effect of the agreement

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(3) Effect of the agreement

7 Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.26
curation status: Proposed
has part: 7(1) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
has part: 7(2) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
has part: 7(3) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
has part: 7(4) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
has part: 7(5) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
schema version: 2

7(1) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.26
note: Commonwealth Attorney-general's consent required for certain maritime offences.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...and (b) the ship is registered under the law of a country other than Australia;
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The offence is alleged to have been committed between two temporal intervals.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
premise text: (b) the ship is registered under the law of a country other than Australia...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...to a preliminary examination in committal proceedings...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires Commonwealth Attorney-General's written consent.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (1) The Commonwealth Attorney-general’s written consent is required...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...before a charge of a maritime offence can proceed to hearing or determination...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Commonwealth Attorney-general's written consent is required for certain maritime offences.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (1) The Commonwealth Attorney-general’s written consent is required...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(1) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain

7(2) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.26
note: Commonwealth Attorney-General must consider views of country of registration before granting consent.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The grant of consent CONTAINS the consideration of views of country of registration before taking action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between consideration and grant of consent.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) Before granting such a consent, the Commonwealth Attorney-general must take into account any views expressed by the government of the country of registration.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The grant of consent CONTAINS the consideration of views of country of registration before taking action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes a relationship between consideration and grant of consent.
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) Before granting such a consent, the Commonwealth Attorney-general must take into account any views expressed by the government of the country of registration.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Commonwealth Attorney-General MUST consider the views of the country of registration before granting consent.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider views of country of registration.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) Before granting such a consent, the Commonwealth Attorney-general must take into account any views expressed by the government of the country of registration.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The grant of consent CONTAINS the consideration of views of country of registration before taking action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes a relationship between consideration and grant of consent.
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) Before granting such a consent, the Commonwealth Attorney-general must take into account any views expressed by the government of the country of registration.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The grant of consent CONTAINS the consideration of views of country of registration before taking action.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between consideration and grant of consent.
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (2) Before granting such a consent, the Commonwealth Attorney-general must take into account any views expressed by the government of the country of registration.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(2) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain

7(3) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.26
note: Commonwealth Attorney-general's consent required for certain actions.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The absence of consent is not to prevent or delay: (a), (b), (c), or (d) during these actions
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: During arrest, proceedings related to arrest, laying of charge, extradition, and remanding.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (3) Even though the Commonwealth Attorney-general has not granted such a consent...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The absence of consent is not to prevent or delay: (a), (b), (c), or (d)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justifies arrest, proceedings related to arrest, laying of charge, extradition, and remanding.
modality: Argumentation
operator: justifies
premise text: (3) Even though the Commonwealth Attorney-general has not granted such a consent...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The absence of consent is not to prevent or delay...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires Commonwealth Attorney-General's consent.
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (3) Even though the Commonwealth Attorney-general has not granted such a consent...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The absence of consent is not to prevent or delay: (a), (b), (c), or (d)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows arrest, proceedings related to arrest, laying of charge, extradition, and remanding.
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
premise text: (3) Even though the Commonwealth Attorney-general has not granted such a consent...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The absence of consent is not to prevent or delay: (a), (b), (c), or (d) during these actions
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: During arrest, proceedings related to arrest, laying of charge, extradition, and remanding.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (3) Even though the Commonwealth Attorney-general has not granted such a consent...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(3) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain

7(4) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.26
note: Court must permanently stay proceedings if Commonwealth Attorney-General declines consent.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court in which the suspected offender has been charged with the offence must permanently stay the proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for when Commonwealth Attorney-general's consent is required.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (4) If the Commonwealth Attorney-General declines to grant consent,

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court in which the suspected offender has been charged with the offence must permanently stay the proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Describes how CogAI is applied to determine Commonwealth Attorney-general's consent.
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
premise text: (4) If the Commonwealth Attorney-General declines to grant consent,

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court in which the suspected offender has been charged with the offence must permanently stay the proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on court action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) If the Commonwealth Attorney-General declines to grant consent,

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court in which the suspected offender has been charged with the offence must permanently stay the proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes how information about Commonwealth Attorney-general's consent is disseminated.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (4) If the Commonwealth Attorney-General declines to grant consent,

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court in which the suspected offender has been charged with the offence must permanently stay the proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for when Commonwealth Attorney-general's consent is required.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (4) If the Commonwealth Attorney-General declines to grant consent,

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7(4) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain

7(5) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.26
note: Commonwealth Attorney-general's consent required for certain documents
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 7 Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires Commonwealth Attorney-General's consent
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

8 Non-exclusion of consistent extraterritorial legislative schemes
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.27
note: State law can operate extraterritorially consistently with the scheme.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
schema version: 2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: State law can operate extraterritorially.
modality: Deontic
operator: can

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8 Non-exclusion of consistent extraterritorial legislative schemes

9 Exclusion of certain laws from ambit of this scheme
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.27
note: Exclusion of certain laws from ambit of this scheme
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
schema version: 2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This scheme does not apply to these laws.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exclusion
modality: Deontic
operator: excludedBy
premise text: State and Commonwealth laws excluded by regulation from the ambit of the scheme.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The cooperative scheme
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Scope
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
premise text: This scheme applies to State and Commonwealth laws not excluded by regulation from the ambit of the scheme.

1 Short title
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.6
note: Cites this Act as the Crimes at Sea Act 2000.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Cites this Act.
modality: Deontic
operator: citation

11 Application of amendments
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.32
note: Amendments apply to acts and omissions after commencement.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
schema version: 2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply amendments.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class inclusion for amendment application.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.6
curation status: Proposed
has part: 2(1) Commencement
has part: 2(2) Commencement
has part: 2(3) Commencement
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Apr 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
note: Schedule 1 (items 1–52, 54–75, 78–82): 20 May Remainder: Royal Assent — Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003 41, 2003
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2(1) Commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.6
note: Commences on a specific day after Royal Assent.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines when the Act comes into effect.
modality: Deontic
operator: commencement

2(2) Commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement provision
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between commencement and other provisions
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Commencement day to be fixed by Proclamation

2(3) Commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 2 Commencement

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

21 Nov
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
schema version: 2

22 Nov 2008
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
schema version: 2

27 June
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 3 items 10 and 11
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-27
schema version: 2

27 May
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
note: Commencement of commencement provisions
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-27-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-27-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-2
schema version: 2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-27-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Starts on specified date
modality: Deontic
operator: begins

29 Mar
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
note: Commences on 1 July 2008
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-29
schema version: 2

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.6
note: Amendment and repeal of Acts specified in Schedule 2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Apr 2000
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
note: Consequential amendments to the Petroleum (Timor Sea Treaty) Act 2003
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-2
schema version: 2

3 June 2003
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
note: Repeals and consequential amendments to the Offshore Petroleum (Repeals and Consequential Amendments) Act 2006
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-3-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-3-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-3
schema version: 2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking

31 Mar
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
note: Conditional commencement of the Timor Gap Treaty (Transitional Arrangements) Act 2000
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-31-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-31-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-31
schema version: 2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-31-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement

4 Definitions
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.6
note: Definitions for the Act
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-6
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-7
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
schema version: 2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definitions for the Act
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: substantive criminal law has the same meaning as in clause 1 of Schedule 1.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: cooperative scheme means the legislative and administrative scheme for applying and enforcing criminal law in the areas adjacent to the coast of Australia set out in Schedule 1.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Australian ship means: ...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition of Australian ship
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: (a) a ship registered in Australia; or (b) a ship that operates, or is controlled, from a base in Australia and is not registered under the law of another country; or (c) a ship that belongs to an arm of the Defence Force.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: cooperative scheme means the legislative and administrative scheme for applying and enforcing criminal law in the areas adjacent to the coast of Australia set out in Schedule 1.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition of cooperative scheme
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: cooperative scheme means the legislative and administrative scheme for applying and enforcing criminal law in the areas adjacent to the coast of Australia set out in Schedule 1.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: foreign ship means a ship other than an Australian ship.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition of foreign ship
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: foreign ship means a ship other than an Australian ship.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: intergovernmental agreement means the intergovernmental agreement entered into under clause 5 of the cooperative scheme.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition of intergovernmental agreement
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: intergovernmental agreement means the intergovernmental agreement entered into under clause 5 of the cooperative scheme.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-7
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: law of criminal investigation, procedure and evidence has the same meaning as in clause 1 of Schedule 1.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition of law of criminal investigation, procedure and evidence
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: law of criminal investigation, procedure and evidence has the same meaning as in clause 1 of Schedule 1.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Definitions

5 Ratification of cooperative scheme
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.8
note: The Commonwealth has the force of law to give the cooperative scheme.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
schema version: 2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: to give the cooperative scheme.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Force of law
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: The Commonwealth has the force of law.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Ratification of cooperative scheme

6 Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.9
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6(1) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
has part: 6(2) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
has part: 6(3) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
schema version: 2

6(1) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.9
note: Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation applies
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
premise text: (1) The substantive criminal law of the Jervis Bay Territory...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(1) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area

6(2) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.9
note: Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation applies to State
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(2) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area

6(3) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.9
note: Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6 Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation to criminal act at sea
modality: AllenInterval
operator: at sea
premise text: outside the adjacent area to a criminal act:

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Applying substantive criminal law
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
premise text: (3) The substantive criminal law of the Jervis Bay Territory...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Assuming application of substantive law
modality: Deontic
operator: taken to have applied
premise text: The substantive criminal law of the Jervis Bay Territory...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Tracing criminal act through ship's first country
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
premise text: if the first country at which the ship calls...

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6(3) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area

6A Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.12
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6A(1) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
has part: 6A(2) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
has part: 6A(3) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
has part: 6A(4) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6a
schema version: 2

6A(1) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.12
note: Applicability of Northern Territory substantive criminal law to petroleum activities in the Greater Sunrise special regime area.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6A Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application of a rule to a specific context.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6A(1) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime

6A(2) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.12
note: Exemptions from relevant substantive criminal law for certain acts and individuals.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6A Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the application of relevant substantive criminal law.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2)

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6A(2) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime

6A(3) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.12
note: No proceedings for an offence against a substantive criminal law may be instituted against a person under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6A Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No proceedings for an offence against a substantive criminal law may be instituted.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

6A(4) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.12
note: Prosecution requires Attorney-General's written consent.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 6A Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conditional commencement of prosecution.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (4) A prosecution for an offence against a law applied by subsection (1) may only be heard and determined if the Attorney-General consents in writing to the prosecution.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of prosecution as conditional on consent.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (4) A prosecution for an offence against a law applied by subsection (1) may only be heard and determined if the Attorney-General consents in writing to the prosecution.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of prosecution without consent.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) A prosecution for an offence against a law applied by subsection (1) may only be heard and determined if the Attorney-General consents in writing to the prosecution.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Enforcement of criminal law requires cooperation between Australia and Timor-Leste.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: Cooperation between Australia and Timor-Leste in the enforcement of criminal law

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation of cooperation between Australia and Timor-Leste.
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
premise text: Cooperation between Australia and Timor-Leste in the enforcement of criminal law

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6A(4) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime

6B Transit of persons accused of offences against the laws of
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.13
note: Permits transportation of accused persons through Australia
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6b-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6b
schema version: 2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

6C Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.15
curation status: Proposed
has part: 6C(1) Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
has part: 6C(2) Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
has part: 6C(3) Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6c
schema version: 2

6C(1) Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.15
note: Australia and Timor-Leste may agree on enforcement of criminal laws.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 6C Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the

6C(2) Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.15
note: Regulations may provide for the production of documents, summoning of witnesses, and taking of evidence by authorities of Timor-Leste.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 6C Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Regulations may provide for...
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6C(2) Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the

6C(3) Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.15
note: Detention authorization limited to surrender to Australia or Timor-Leste.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 6C Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: No temporal interval relation specified
modality: AllenInterval
operator: None
premise text: (3) A provision for detention of a person under this section may only authorize detention until the time it first becomes practicable to surrender the person to an appropriate authority of Australia or Timor-Leste.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: No cognitive agent specified
modality: CogAI
operator: None
premise text: (3) A provision for detention of a person under this section may only authorize detention until the time it first becomes practicable to surrender the person to an appropriate authority of Australia or Timor-Leste.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Limited authorization
modality: Deontic
operator: only
premise text: (3) A provision for detention of a person under this section may only authorize detention until the time it first becomes practicable to surrender the person to an appropriate authority of Australia or Timor-Leste.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: No diffusion specified
modality: Diffusion
operator: None
premise text: (3) A provision for detention of a person under this section may only authorize detention until the time it first becomes practicable to surrender the person to an appropriate authority of Australia or Timor-Leste.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: No ordered trace specified
modality: LTL
operator: None
premise text: (3) A provision for detention of a person under this section may only authorize detention until the time it first becomes practicable to surrender the person to an appropriate authority of Australia or Timor-Leste.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6C(3) Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the

7 Publication of intergovernmental agreement
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.17
note: Publication of intergovernmental agreement in the Gazette.
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
schema version: 2

7 Aug 2019
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.37
note: Prohibition of certain conduct
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-7-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-7-2
schema version: 2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

8 No effect on Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.17
note: No effect on Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
schema version: 2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap with Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: This Act and the cooperative scheme do not apply to an act to which section 15 of the Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991 applies.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Influence from Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
modality: CogAI
operator: Influences
premise text: This Act and the cooperative scheme do not apply to an act to which section 15 of the Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991 applies.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No effect on Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Implies no effect on Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: This Act and the cooperative scheme do not apply to an act to which section 15 of the Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991 applies.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion from Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: This Act and the cooperative scheme do not apply to an act to which section 15 of the Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991 applies.

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal containment with Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
premise text: This Act and the cooperative scheme do not apply to an act to which section 15 of the Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991 applies.

9 Regulations
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.17
curation status: Proposed
has part: 9(1) Regulations
has part: 9(2) Regulations
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
schema version: 2

9(1) Regulations
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.17
note: Governor-General may make regulations
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-9-ss-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Regulations

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-9-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9(1) Regulations

9(2) Regulations
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.17
note: No regulations for cooperative scheme purposes
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 9 Regulations

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

2 September 2019
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation notes and disclaimers
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-2
schema version: 2

30 August 2019
type: Concept
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.1
note: Includes amendments up to Act No. 57, 2019
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sec-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-30
schema version: 2

Crimes at Sea Act 2000
type: Document
date: 30 August 2019
description: An Act to give effect to a cooperative scheme for dealing with crimes at sea, and for other purposes
identifier: No. 13 of 2000
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU