Crimes at Sea Act 2000
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 13 of 2000
date: 30 August 2019
description: An Act to give effect to a cooperative scheme for dealing with crimes at sea, and for other purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

30 August 2019
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30
note: Includes amendments up to Act No. 57, 2019
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sec-30-norm

2 September 2019
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Compilation notes and disclaimers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sec-2-norm

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Cites this Act as the Crimes at Sea Act 2000.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: citation
logic summary: Cites this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
has part: 2(1) Commencement
has part: 2(2) Commencement
has part: 2(3) Commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.6

2(1) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-ss-1
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Commences on a specific day after Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: commencement
logic summary: Defines when the Act comes into effect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(2) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-ss-2
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Commencement provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between commencement and other provisions
premise text: Commencement day to be fixed by Proclamation
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(3) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-ss-3
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Amendment and repeal of Acts specified in Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-norm

4 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Definitions for the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-6
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-7

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definitions for the Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: cooperative scheme means the legislative and administrative scheme for applying and enforcing criminal law in the areas adjacent to the coast of Australia set out in Schedule 1.
conclusion text: substantive criminal law has the same meaning as in clause 1 of Schedule 1.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of Australian ship
premise text: (a) a ship registered in Australia; or (b) a ship that operates, or is controlled, from a base in Australia and is not registered under the law of another country; or (c) a ship that belongs to an arm of the Defence Force.
conclusion text: Australian ship means: ...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of cooperative scheme
premise text: cooperative scheme means the legislative and administrative scheme for applying and enforcing criminal law in the areas adjacent to the coast of Australia set out in Schedule 1.
conclusion text: cooperative scheme means the legislative and administrative scheme for applying and enforcing criminal law in the areas adjacent to the coast of Australia set out in Schedule 1.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of foreign ship
premise text: foreign ship means a ship other than an Australian ship.
conclusion text: foreign ship means a ship other than an Australian ship.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of intergovernmental agreement
premise text: intergovernmental agreement means the intergovernmental agreement entered into under clause 5 of the cooperative scheme.
conclusion text: intergovernmental agreement means the intergovernmental agreement entered into under clause 5 of the cooperative scheme.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-4-logic-descriptionlogic-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of law of criminal investigation, procedure and evidence
premise text: law of criminal investigation, procedure and evidence has the same meaning as in clause 1 of Schedule 1.
conclusion text: law of criminal investigation, procedure and evidence has the same meaning as in clause 1 of Schedule 1.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Ratification of cooperative scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: The Commonwealth has the force of law to give the cooperative scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Ratification of cooperative scheme
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Force of law
premise text: The Commonwealth has the force of law.
conclusion text: to give the cooperative scheme.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
has part: 6(1) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
has part: 6(2) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
has part: 6(3) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.9

6(1) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-ss-1
part of: 6 Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
note: Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(1) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Obligation applies
premise text: (1) The substantive criminal law of the Jervis Bay Territory...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(2) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-ss-2
part of: 6 Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
note: Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Obligation applies to State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(3) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6-ss-3
part of: 6 Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
note: Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(3) Application of Australian criminal law outside the adjacent area
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Applying substantive criminal law
premise text: (3) The substantive criminal law of the Jervis Bay Territory...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: at sea
logic summary: Temporal relation to criminal act at sea
premise text: outside the adjacent area to a criminal act:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ordered trace
logic summary: Tracing criminal act through ship's first country
premise text: if the first country at which the ship calls...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: taken to have applied
logic summary: Assuming application of substantive law
premise text: The substantive criminal law of the Jervis Bay Territory...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6A Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6a
has part: 6A(1) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
has part: 6A(2) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
has part: 6A(3) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
has part: 6A(4) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.12

6A(1) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6a-ss-1
part of: 6A Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
note: Applicability of Northern Territory substantive criminal law to petroleum activities in the Greater Sunrise special regime area.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6A(1) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Application of a rule to a specific context.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6A(2) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6a-ss-2
part of: 6A Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
note: Exemptions from relevant substantive criminal law for certain acts and individuals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 6A(2) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the application of relevant substantive criminal law.
premise text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6A(3) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6a-ss-3
part of: 6A Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
note: No proceedings for an offence against a substantive criminal law may be instituted against a person under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No proceedings for an offence against a substantive criminal law may be instituted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6A(4) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4
part of: 6A Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
note: Prosecution requires Attorney-General's written consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-shacl-5

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 6A(4) Criminal laws applicable in the Greater Sunrise special regime
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of prosecution without consent.
premise text: (4) A prosecution for an offence against a law applied by subsection (1) may only be heard and determined if the Attorney-General consents in writing to the prosecution.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Conditional commencement of prosecution.
premise text: (4) A prosecution for an offence against a law applied by subsection (1) may only be heard and determined if the Attorney-General consents in writing to the prosecution.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Enforcement of criminal law requires cooperation between Australia and Timor-Leste.
premise text: Cooperation between Australia and Timor-Leste in the enforcement of criminal law
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Classification of prosecution as conditional on consent.
premise text: (4) A prosecution for an offence against a law applied by subsection (1) may only be heard and determined if the Attorney-General consents in writing to the prosecution.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6a-ss-4-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validation
logic summary: Validation of cooperation between Australia and Timor-Leste.
premise text: Cooperation between Australia and Timor-Leste in the enforcement of criminal law
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6B Transit of persons accused of offences against the laws of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6b
note: Permits transportation of accused persons through Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6b-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6b-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6C Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6c
has part: 6C(1) Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
has part: 6C(2) Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
has part: 6C(3) Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.15

6C(1) Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6c-ss-1
part of: 6C Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
note: Australia and Timor-Leste may agree on enforcement of criminal laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-1-norm

6C(2) Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6c-ss-2
part of: 6C Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
note: Regulations may provide for the production of documents, summoning of witnesses, and taking of evidence by authorities of Timor-Leste.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6C(2) Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Regulations may provide for...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6C(3) Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3
part of: 6C Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
note: Detention authorization limited to surrender to Australia or Timor-Leste.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6C(3) Agreements relating to enforcement of criminal laws in the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: only
logic summary: Limited authorization
premise text: (3) A provision for detention of a person under this section may only authorize detention until the time it first becomes practicable to surrender the person to an appropriate authority of Australia or Timor-Leste.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: None
logic summary: No temporal interval relation specified
premise text: (3) A provision for detention of a person under this section may only authorize detention until the time it first becomes practicable to surrender the person to an appropriate authority of Australia or Timor-Leste.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: None
logic summary: No ordered trace specified
premise text: (3) A provision for detention of a person under this section may only authorize detention until the time it first becomes practicable to surrender the person to an appropriate authority of Australia or Timor-Leste.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: None
logic summary: No diffusion specified
premise text: (3) A provision for detention of a person under this section may only authorize detention until the time it first becomes practicable to surrender the person to an appropriate authority of Australia or Timor-Leste.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-6c-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: None
logic summary: No cognitive agent specified
premise text: (3) A provision for detention of a person under this section may only authorize detention until the time it first becomes practicable to surrender the person to an appropriate authority of Australia or Timor-Leste.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Publication of intergovernmental agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
note: Publication of intergovernmental agreement in the Gazette.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 No effect on Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
note: No effect on Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-cogai-5

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Implies no effect on Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
premise text: This Act and the cooperative scheme do not apply to an act to which section 15 of the Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991 applies.
conclusion text: No effect on Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap with Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
premise text: This Act and the cooperative scheme do not apply to an act to which section 15 of the Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991 applies.
conclusion text: Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Temporal containment with Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
premise text: This Act and the cooperative scheme do not apply to an act to which section 15 of the Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991 applies.
conclusion text: Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion from Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
premise text: This Act and the cooperative scheme do not apply to an act to which section 15 of the Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991 applies.
conclusion text: Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Influences
logic summary: Influence from Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
premise text: This Act and the cooperative scheme do not apply to an act to which section 15 of the Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991 applies.
conclusion text: Crimes (Aviation) Act 1991
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

9 Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
has part: 9(1) Regulations
has part: 9(2) Regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.17

9(1) Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-ss-1
part of: 9 Regulations
note: Governor-General may make regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-9-ss-1-norm

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-9-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9(1) Regulations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

9(2) Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9-ss-2
part of: 9 Regulations
note: No regulations for cooperative scheme purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-9-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-9-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Defines terms used in the scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
premise text: Definitions are organized into a class hierarchy
conclusion text: Definitions are classified under this scheme
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation to define terms
premise text: The scheme requires definitions of key terms
conclusion text: Terms must be defined in accordance with the scheme
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
has part: 2(1) Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
has part: 2(2) Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
has part: 2(3) Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.21

2(1) Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-1
part of: 2 Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
note: Applicable State criminal law in adjacent area
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2(1) Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: State criminal law applies to inner adjacent area
premise text: (1) The substantive criminal law of a State...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(2) Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-2
part of: 2 Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
note: Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2(2) Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: State criminal law applies to outer adjacent area
premise text: (2) The provisions of the substantive criminal law of a State...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(3) Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2-ss-3
part of: 2 Application of State criminal law in adjacent area
note: Does not apply to a substantive criminal law that is incapable of applying in an adjacent area or is limited by its express terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Application of laws of criminal investigation, procedure and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Application of laws of criminal investigation, procedure and evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Application of laws of criminal investigation, procedure and
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion in the act
premise text: act includes an omission
conclusion text: Obligation to include
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: is equal to
logic summary: Area of administrative responsibility
premise text: area of administrative responsibility for a particular State is the area of the State
conclusion text: Definition of area
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Evidentiary presumption about the locus of an offence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Evidentiary presumption about the locus of an offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-4-norm

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Evidentiary presumption about the locus of an offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

5 Intergovernmental agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
has part: 5(1) Intergovernmental agreement
has part: 5(2) Intergovernmental agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.25

5(1) Intergovernmental agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5-ss-1
part of: 5 Intergovernmental agreement
note: Intergovernmental agreement for maritime offences administration and enforcement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-5-ss-1-norm

5(2) Intergovernmental agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5-ss-2
part of: 5 Intergovernmental agreement
note: Concurrent responsibility in specified parts of the adjacent area.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-5-ss-2-norm

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-5-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5(2) Intergovernmental agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

6 Effect of the agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
has part: 6(1) Effect of the agreement
has part: 6(2) Effect of the agreement
has part: 6(3) Effect of the agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.25

6(1) Effect of the agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-ss-1
part of: 6 Effect of the agreement
note: No court can bring a charge of a maritime offence contrary to the intergovernmental agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of bringing charges in court
premise text: (1) A charge of a maritime offence must not be brought in a court contrary to the intergovernmental agreement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between international agreements and court proceedings
premise text: (1) A charge of a maritime offence must not be brought in a court contrary to the intergovernmental agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of international agreements on court proceedings
premise text: (1) A charge of a maritime offence must not be brought in a court contrary to the intergovernmental agreement.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagation of international agreements through court proceedings
premise text: (1) A charge of a maritime offence must not be brought in a court contrary to the intergovernmental agreement.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of international agreements and court proceedings
premise text: (1) A charge of a maritime offence must not be brought in a court contrary to the intergovernmental agreement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6(2) Effect of the agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-ss-2
part of: 6 Effect of the agreement
note: Court must permanently stay proceedings if charge of maritime offence is brought in contravention of subclause (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2) Effect of the agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court must prohibit bringing charge in contravention of subclause (1)
premise text: (2) If a charge of a maritime offence is brought in a court in contravention of subclause (1), the court...
conclusion text: ...the court must, on application by the Commonwealth Attorney-General or a participating State Minister, permanently stay the proceedings in that court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Excerpt overlaps with subclause (1)
premise text: (2) If a charge of a maritime offence is brought in a court in contravention of subclause (1), the court...
conclusion text: ...the court must, on application by the Commonwealth Attorney-General or a participating State Minister, permanently stay the proceedings in that court.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Excerpt is part of a recurring provision
premise text: (2) If a charge of a maritime offence is brought in a court in contravention of subclause (1), the court...
conclusion text: ...the court must, on application by the Commonwealth Attorney-General or a participating State Minister, permanently stay the proceedings in that court.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Excerpt diffuses to other provisions
premise text: (2) If a charge of a maritime offence is brought in a court in contravention of subclause (1), the court...
conclusion text: ...the court must, on application by the Commonwealth Attorney-General or a participating State Minister, permanently stay the proceedings in that court.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Excerpt requires analysis of 'charge of a maritime offence'
premise text: (2) If a charge of a maritime offence is brought in a court in contravention of subclause (1), the court...
conclusion text: ...the court must, on application by the Commonwealth Attorney-General or a participating State Minister, permanently stay the proceedings in that court.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

6(3) Effect of the agreement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-ss-3
part of: 6 Effect of the agreement
note: Court's jurisdiction not affected by contravention of subclause (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-3-norm

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-6-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(3) Effect of the agreement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

7 Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
has part: 7(1) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
has part: 7(2) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
has part: 7(3) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
has part: 7(4) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
has part: 7(5) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.26

7(1) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7-ss-1
part of: 7 Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
note: Commonwealth Attorney-general's consent required for certain maritime offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(1) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires Commonwealth Attorney-General's written consent.
premise text: (1) The Commonwealth Attorney-general’s written consent is required...
conclusion text: ...to a preliminary examination in committal proceedings...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: The offence is alleged to have been committed between two temporal intervals.
premise text: (b) the ship is registered under the law of a country other than Australia...
conclusion text: ...and (b) the ship is registered under the law of a country other than Australia;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: The Commonwealth Attorney-general's written consent is required for certain maritime offences.
premise text: (1) The Commonwealth Attorney-general’s written consent is required...
conclusion text: ...before a charge of a maritime offence can proceed to hearing or determination...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(2) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7-ss-2
part of: 7 Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
note: Commonwealth Attorney-General must consider views of country of registration before granting consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(2) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consider views of country of registration.
premise text: (2) Before granting such a consent, the Commonwealth Attorney-general must take into account any views expressed by the government of the country of registration.
conclusion text: The Commonwealth Attorney-General MUST consider the views of the country of registration before granting consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between consideration and grant of consent.
premise text: (2) Before granting such a consent, the Commonwealth Attorney-general must take into account any views expressed by the government of the country of registration.
conclusion text: The grant of consent CONTAINS the consideration of views of country of registration before taking action.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Describes a temporal relationship between consideration and grant of consent.
premise text: (2) Before granting such a consent, the Commonwealth Attorney-general must take into account any views expressed by the government of the country of registration.
conclusion text: The grant of consent CONTAINS the consideration of views of country of registration before taking action.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Describes a relationship between consideration and grant of consent.
premise text: (2) Before granting such a consent, the Commonwealth Attorney-general must take into account any views expressed by the government of the country of registration.
conclusion text: The grant of consent CONTAINS the consideration of views of country of registration before taking action.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Describes a relationship between consideration and grant of consent.
premise text: (2) Before granting such a consent, the Commonwealth Attorney-general must take into account any views expressed by the government of the country of registration.
conclusion text: The grant of consent CONTAINS the consideration of views of country of registration before taking action.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(3) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7-ss-3
part of: 7 Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
note: Commonwealth Attorney-general's consent required for certain actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(3) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires Commonwealth Attorney-General's consent.
premise text: (3) Even though the Commonwealth Attorney-general has not granted such a consent...
conclusion text: The absence of consent is not to prevent or delay...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During arrest, proceedings related to arrest, laying of charge, extradition, and remanding.
premise text: (3) Even though the Commonwealth Attorney-general has not granted such a consent...
conclusion text: The absence of consent is not to prevent or delay: (a), (b), (c), or (d) during these actions
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: During arrest, proceedings related to arrest, laying of charge, extradition, and remanding.
premise text: (3) Even though the Commonwealth Attorney-general has not granted such a consent...
conclusion text: The absence of consent is not to prevent or delay: (a), (b), (c), or (d) during these actions
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
logic summary: Allows arrest, proceedings related to arrest, laying of charge, extradition, and remanding.
premise text: (3) Even though the Commonwealth Attorney-general has not granted such a consent...
conclusion text: The absence of consent is not to prevent or delay: (a), (b), (c), or (d)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-3-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: justifies
logic summary: Justifies arrest, proceedings related to arrest, laying of charge, extradition, and remanding.
premise text: (3) Even though the Commonwealth Attorney-general has not granted such a consent...
conclusion text: The absence of consent is not to prevent or delay: (a), (b), (c), or (d)
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

7(4) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7-ss-4
part of: 7 Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
note: Court must permanently stay proceedings if Commonwealth Attorney-General declines consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 7(4) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on court action.
premise text: (4) If the Commonwealth Attorney-General declines to grant consent,
conclusion text: the court in which the suspected offender has been charged with the offence must permanently stay the proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for when Commonwealth Attorney-general's consent is required.
premise text: (4) If the Commonwealth Attorney-General declines to grant consent,
conclusion text: the court in which the suspected offender has been charged with the offence must permanently stay the proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for when Commonwealth Attorney-general's consent is required.
premise text: (4) If the Commonwealth Attorney-General declines to grant consent,
conclusion text: the court in which the suspected offender has been charged with the offence must permanently stay the proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Describes how information about Commonwealth Attorney-general's consent is disseminated.
premise text: (4) If the Commonwealth Attorney-General declines to grant consent,
conclusion text: the court in which the suspected offender has been charged with the offence must permanently stay the proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
logic summary: Describes how CogAI is applied to determine Commonwealth Attorney-general's consent.
premise text: (4) If the Commonwealth Attorney-General declines to grant consent,
conclusion text: the court in which the suspected offender has been charged with the offence must permanently stay the proceedings.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7(5) Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7-ss-5
part of: 7 Commonwealth Attorney-General’s consent required for certain
note: Commonwealth Attorney-general's consent required for certain documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-7-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires Commonwealth Attorney-General's consent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Non-exclusion of consistent extraterritorial legislative schemes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
note: State law can operate extraterritorially consistently with the scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 Non-exclusion of consistent extraterritorial legislative schemes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: State law can operate extraterritorially.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Exclusion of certain laws from ambit of this scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
note: Exclusion of certain laws from ambit of this scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludedBy
logic summary: Exclusion
premise text: State and Commonwealth laws excluded by regulation from the ambit of the scheme.
conclusion text: This scheme does not apply to these laws.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Scope
premise text: This scheme applies to State and Commonwealth laws not excluded by regulation from the ambit of the scheme.
conclusion text: The cooperative scheme
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

11 Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
note: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 applies to this scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-11-norm

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Interpretation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

12 Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
has part: 12(1) Regulations
has part: 12(2) Regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.28

12(1) Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-ss-1
part of: 12 Regulations
note: Governor-General may make regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(1) Regulations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(2) Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12-ss-2
part of: 12 Regulations
note: Regulations affecting inner adjacent areas require agreement from participating State Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(2) Regulations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Regulation prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
note: Defines baseline of Australia's territorial sea
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-13-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-13-logic-descriptionlogic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-13-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: baseline of Australia's territorial sea
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Adjacent areas
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
has part: 14(1) Adjacent areas
has part: 14(2) Adjacent areas
has part: 14(3) Adjacent areas
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.29

14(1) Adjacent areas
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-ss-1
part of: 14 Adjacent areas
note: Defines adjacent area for New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia or Tasmania
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-ss-1-norm

14(2) Adjacent areas
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-ss-2
part of: 14 Adjacent areas
note: Defines adjacent area for Queensland
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines adjacent area for Queensland
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Describes temporal relationship with continental shelf
premise text: Outer limits of the continental shelf
conclusion text: Coral Sea area
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(3) Adjacent areas
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14-ss-3
part of: 14 Adjacent areas
note: Definition of adjacent area for Western Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-14-ss-3-norm

15 Baselines
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
note: Defines baseline for a State's territorial sea
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-15-norm

16 Indicative map
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
has part: 16(1) Indicative map
has part: 16(2) Indicative map
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.30

16(1) Indicative map
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-ss-1
part of: 16 Indicative map
note: Map showing relevant areas appears in Appendix 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-16-ss-1-norm

16(2) Indicative map
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16-ss-2
part of: 16 Indicative map
note: Provisions of this scheme prevail over the map if there is any inconsistency.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-16-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-1-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prevails-over
logic summary: Provisions of this scheme prevail over the map.
premise text: There is an inconsistency.
conclusion text: The provisions of this scheme prevail.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Application of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
note: Amendments apply to acts and omissions after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to apply amendments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Class inclusion for amendment application.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31
note: Conditional commencement of the Timor Gap Treaty (Transitional Arrangements) Act 2000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-31-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-31-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-31-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Apr 2000
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-2
note: Consequential amendments to the Petroleum (Timor Sea Treaty) Act 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-2-norm

2 Apr 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2-2
note: Schedule 1 (items 1–52, 54–75, 78–82): 20 May Remainder: Royal Assent — Crimes Legislation Enhancement Act 2003 41, 2003
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-2-2-norm

3 June 2003
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-3
note: Repeals and consequential amendments to the Offshore Petroleum (Repeals and Consequential Amendments) Act 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-3-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-3-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-3-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal intervals for commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement is Undertaking
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29
note: Commences on 1 July 2008
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-29-norm

21 Nov
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-21-norm

22 Nov 2008
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-22-norm

27 June
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 3 items 10 and 11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-27-norm

27 May
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-2
note: Commencement of commencement provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-27-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-27-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-27-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Starts on specified date
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Aug 2019
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7-2
note: Prohibition of certain conduct
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-at-sea-act-2000.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-7-2-norm
asserts: crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-at-sea-act-2000-sch-2-sec-7-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed