Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Crimes Against Children and Community Protection Measures) Act 2020
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 70 of 2020
description: An Act to amend legislation relating to the criminal law, and for related purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Short title of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the Act as a legal document
conclusion text: The text is a short title.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Commencement rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-1-2-norm

22 June 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-22-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-2-2-norm

23 June 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-23-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-3-norm

20 July 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-20-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Schedule 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-4-norm

23 June 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-23-2-norm

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Schedule 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-5-norm

23 June 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-3
note: Applicable clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-23-3-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-23-3-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sec-23-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Clause applies
premise text: (a)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
note: Schedule 5 commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-6-norm

23 June 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-4
note: Commencement information for Act 2020
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-23-4-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-23-4-logic-alleninterval-1

c2020a00070-sec-23-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
note: Schedule 6, Parts 1 and 2: Commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-7-norm

23 June 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-23-5-norm

8 Section 8
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
note: Schedule 6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-8-norm

23 June 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-6
note: Applicable clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-23-6-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-23-6-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sec-23-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23 June 2020
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sec-23-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Clause applies to the specified paragraph (a)
premise text: (paragraph (a))
conclusion text: (paragraph (a) applies)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Section 9
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9
note: Schedule 6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-9-norm

23 June 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-7
note: Applicable clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-23-7-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-23-7-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sec-23-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23 June 2020
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sec-23-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Clause applies to the specified paragraph (a)
premise text: (paragraph (a))
conclusion text: (paragraph (a) applies)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Section 10
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
note: Schedule 7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-10-norm

23 June 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-23-8-norm

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11
note: Schedule 7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-11-norm

23 June 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-9
note: Commencement information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.9
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-23-9-norm

12 Section 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
note: Schedule 7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-12-norm

23 June 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-23-10-norm

13 Section 13
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-13-norm

20 July 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-20-2-norm

14 Section 14
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-14-norm

23 June 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-11
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-23-11-norm

15 Section 15
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 13
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-15-norm

20 July 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-20-3-norm

16 Section 16
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
note: Conditional commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-16-norm

23 June 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-12
note: Note on table limitations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-23-12-norm

3 Schedules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-2
note: Legislation in schedules is amended or repealed according to its terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2020a00070-sec-3-2-norm

1 After paragraph 19AU(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Revocation of parole order or licence without notice in certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.11
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 After paragraph 19AU(3)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of revocation without notice
premise text: Insert: (ba) in the opinion of the Attorney-General...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Application provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Application provision for Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.11
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-1-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-1-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-1-sec-2-logic-ltl-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-1-sec-2-logic-epistemic-4

c2020a00070-sch-1-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals.
premise text: The amendment applies in relation to a revocation made on or after the commencement of this Schedule
conclusion text: on or after the commencement of this Schedule
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-1-sec-2-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires an ordered or recurring trace.
premise text: The amendment applies in relation to a revocation made on or after the commencement of this Schedule
conclusion text: on or after the commencement of this Schedule
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-1-sec-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the amendment as applying in relation to a revocation.
premise text: The amendment made by this Schedule applies in relation to a revocation made on or after the commencement of this Schedule
conclusion text: in relation to a revocation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-1-sec-2-logic-epistemic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires knowledge about the commencement.
premise text: The amendment applies in relation to a revocation made on or after the commencement of this Schedule
conclusion text: on or after the commencement of this Schedule
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 15YM(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Admit video recording of interview as evidence in chief.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-2-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-2-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 15YM(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: admits
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state to admit video recording.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsections 15YM(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Repeal subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-2-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Subsections 15YM(2) and (3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Application and saving provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Application and saving provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-2-sec-3-norm

1 After paragraph 15YAB(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
note: Insertion of new section 15YHA about cross-examinations at committal proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-1-norm

2 At the end of subsection 15YF(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
note: Prohibition on cross-examining certain persons at committal proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-2-logic-argumentation-3

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 At the end of subsection 15YF(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: A person is not to cross-examine certain persons...
conclusion text: No cross-examination allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to subsection 15YF(1)
premise text: At the end of subsection 15YF(1)
conclusion text: The prohibition applies during the committal proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication from prohibition to restriction
premise text: A person is not to cross-examine certain persons...
conclusion text: Cross-examination of certain persons is restricted.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 At the end of subsection 15YG(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
note: Prohibition on cross-examining certain persons at committal proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-3-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 At the end of subsection 15YG(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: A person is not to cross-examine certain persons...
conclusion text: No cross-examination allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to committal proceedings
premise text: At the end of subsection 15YG(1)
conclusion text: The prohibition applies during committal proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 At the end of subsection 15YH(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
note: Prohibition on cross-examining certain persons at committal proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-4-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 At the end of subsection 15YH(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: A person is not to cross-examine certain persons...
conclusion text: No cross-examination allowed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation to committal proceedings
premise text: At the end of subsection 15YH(1)
conclusion text: The prohibition applies during committal proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 At the end of Division 3 of Part IAD
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
has part: 5(1) At the end of Division 3 of Part IAD
has part: 5(2) At the end of Division 3 of Part IAD
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.13

5(1) At the end of Division 3 of Part IAD
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5-ss-1
part of: 5 At the end of Division 3 of Part IAD
note: Prohibition on cross-examination of certain individuals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 5(1) At the end of Division 3 of Part IAD
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: A person is not to cross-examine...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5(2) At the end of Division 3 of Part IAD
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5-ss-2
part of: 5 At the end of Division 3 of Part IAD
note: List of persons subject to cross-examination at committal proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5(2) At the end of Division 3 of Part IAD
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: List of persons subject to cross-examination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Order under subsection 15YAB(3)
premise text: (c) for a special witness proceeding—a special witness for whom an order under subsection 15YAB(3) is in force for this section.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occursBefore
logic summary: Order under subsection 15YAB(3)
premise text: (c) for a special witness proceeding—a special witness for whom an order under subsection 15YAB(3) is in force for this section.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: inclusion
logic summary: Special witness for whom an order under subsection 15YAB(3) is in force
premise text: (c) for a special witness proceeding—a special witness for whom an order under subsection 15YAB(3) is in force for this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 15YM(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
note: Substitution of phrase in Division 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-6-norm

7 Subsection 15YM(4) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
note: Replace 'Note' with 'Note 1'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-7-norm

8 At the end of subsection 15YM(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
note: Prohibits cross-examination of certain persons at committal proceedings or similar kind.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-8-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-8-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 At the end of subsection 15YM(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Application provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
note: Amendments apply to proceedings begun on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-3-sec-9-norm

1 After paragraph 272.5(3)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
note: Inserts new section 272.15A to prohibit grooming a child outside Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-1-logic-alleninterval-2

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 After paragraph 272.5(3)(b) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits grooming a child outside Australia.
premise text: State
conclusion text: grooming a child outside Australia
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the prohibition.
premise text: State
conclusion text: [insert date]
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 272.9(1) of the Criminal Code (before the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
note: Defines 'engage in sexual activity'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Subsection 272.9(1) of the Criminal Code (before the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with legal meaning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes definition in the dictionary
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 272.10 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-3-norm

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-272
note: Prohibition on sexual intercourse or other sexual activity with a child outside Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 272 Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits the specified conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Paragraph 272.10(1)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
note: Repeal of paragraph and substitution with new conditions for child sex offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-4-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Paragraph 272.10(1)(b) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of child sex offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 272.13(1) of the Criminal Code (before the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-5
note: Defines 'engage in sexual activity'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-5-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Subsection 272.13(1) of the Criminal Code (before the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with legal meaning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes definition in the dictionary
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 After section 272.15 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-6-norm

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-272-2
has part: 272(1) Section 272
has part: 272(2) Section 272
has part: 272(3) Section 272
has part: 272(4) Section 272
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.16

272(1) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-1
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Engaging in conduct to make a child under 16 engage in sexual activity outside Australia is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 272(1) Section 272
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits engaging in conduct to make a child under 16 engage in sexual activity outside Australia.
premise text: (a) the defendant engages in conduct in relation to another person (the third party); and (b) the defendant does so with the intention of making it easier to procure a person (the child) to engage in sexual activity (whether or not with the defendant) outside Australia;
conclusion text: The defendant commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits engaging in conduct to make a child under 16 engage in sexual activity inside Australia.
premise text: (d) one or more of the following apply: (i) the conduct referred to in paragraph (a) occurs wholly or partly outside Australia;
conclusion text: The defendant commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits engaging in conduct to make a child under 16 engage in sexual activity with the third party inside Australia.
premise text: (iii) the conduct referred to in paragraph (a) occurs wholly in Australia and both the third party and the child are in Australia when that conduct occurs.
conclusion text: The defendant commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(2) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-2
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Absolute liability applies to certain provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Absolute liability is applied.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(3) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-3
part of: 272 Section 272
note: Prohibition of impossible sexual activity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition
premise text: (3) A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: A person cannot engage in the sexual activity referred to in subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies prohibition of impossible sexual activity
premise text: (3) A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1) even if it is impossible for the sexual activity referred to in that subsection to take place.
conclusion text: The person cannot engage in the sexual activity referred to in subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the section and the prohibited action
premise text: (3) A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1) even if it is impossible for the sexual activity referred to in that subsection to take place.
conclusion text: The section applies within the same time frame as the prohibited action
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies diffusion of prohibition through impossible sexual activity
premise text: (3) A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1) even if it is impossible for the sexual activity referred to in that subsection to take place.
conclusion text: The section implies that the prohibited action cannot occur
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the section as a prohibition using AI
premise text: (3) A person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1) even if it is impossible for the sexual activity referred to in that subsection to take place.
conclusion text: The section prohibits engaging in the sexual activity referred to in subsection (1)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272(4) Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-4
part of: 272 Section 272
note: It does not matter that the third party or the child is a fictitious person represented to the person as a real person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-272-2-ss-4-norm

7 Subsection 272.16(3) of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-7
note: Repeal of heading and substitution with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-7-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits belief that child is at least 16
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 272.16(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8
note: Omit 'or 272.15', substitute ', 272.15 or 272.15A'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-8-norm

9 After section 471.25 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9
note: Insert clause after section 471.25 of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-9-norm

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-471
note: Using postal or similar service to groom another person under 16 is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-471-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-471-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-471-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 471 Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-471-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Subsection 471.27(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10
note: Insertion of text after 'Subdivision'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-10-norm

11 After subsection 471.27(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11
note: Absolute liability applies for an offence against section 471.25A when the child is under 16.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-11-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 After subsection 471.27(1) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Absolute liability obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Subsection 471.27(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12
note: Omit specified text from Criminal Code subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-12-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Subsections 471.27(3) and (4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13
note: Proof of belief about age is evidence that the defendant believed the person to be under, of, at least or over a particular age.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-13-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 Subsections 471.27(3) and (4) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Subsection 471.28(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-14
note: Omit “or 471.25”, substitute ‘, 471.25 or 471.25A’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-14-norm

15 Subsection 471.28(2) of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-15-norm

16 After subsection 471.28(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16
note: Does not matter that the child is a fictitious person for an offence against section 471.25A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-16-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-16-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-16-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-16-logic-cogai-5

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Obligation to follow the rule
premise text: The child is a fictitious person
conclusion text: Does not matter for an offence against section 471.25A
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-16-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal interval of the rule does not overlap with the temporal interval of the exemption
premise text: The child is a fictitious person for an offence against section 471.25A
conclusion text: Does not matter that the child is a fictitious person for an offence against section 471.25A
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-16-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The rule repeats indefinitely
premise text: The child is a fictitious person for an offence against section 471.25A
conclusion text: Does not matter that the child is a fictitious person for an offence against section 471.25A
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-16-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The rule diffuses to all cases where the child is a fictitious person
premise text: The child is a fictitious person for an offence against section 471.25A
conclusion text: Does not matter that the child is a fictitious person for an offence against section 471.25A
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-16-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: The rule recognizes the child as a fictitious person
premise text: The child is a fictitious person represented to the sender as a real person
conclusion text: Does not matter that the child is a fictitious person for an offence against section 471.25A
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

17 Subsection 471.28(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17
note: Omit “or 471.25”, substitute ‘, 471.25 or 471.25A’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-17-norm

18 Subsection 471.29(1) of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18
note: Repeal and substitute a heading with a new belief condition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-18-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Subsection 471.29(1) of the Criminal Code (heading)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Remove an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Subsection 471.29(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19
note: Insertion of text after 'Subdivision'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-19-norm

20 After subsection 471.29(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20
note: Defence for prosecution under section 471.25A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-20-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-20-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 After subsection 471.29(1) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Subsection 471.29(2) of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21
note: Repeal of heading and substitution with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-21-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of procuring and grooming offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Subsection 471.29(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22
note: Omit specified text from Criminal Code subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-22-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Subsection 471.29(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23
note: Insertion of clause (1A) after section 471.29(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-23-norm

24 After section 474.23 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-24-norm

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-474
has part: 474(1) Section 474
has part: 474(2) Section 474
has part: 474(3) Section 474
has part: 474(4) Section 474
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.20

474(1) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-474-ss-1
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Creating, developing, altering or maintaining an electronic service is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of creating, developing, altering or maintaining an electronic service.
premise text: (a) the person engages in any of the following conduct:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Making available, advertising or promoting an electronic service is prohibited.
premise text: (iii) making available, advertising or promoting an electronic service;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Assisting in doing anything covered by a preceding subparagraph is prohibited.
premise text: (iv) assisting in doing anything covered by a preceding subparagraph;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474(2) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-474-ss-2
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Exemptions from guilt for impossible or unfeasible actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission to perform an action
premise text: The person may be found guilty of an offence against subsection (1)
conclusion text: Even if the action is impossible or unfeasible, the person can still be found guilty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describing the temporal relationship between actions
premise text: (i) at the time the person engages in the conduct mentioned in paragraph (1)(a); or (ii) at any other time.
conclusion text: The exemption applies if the action occurs at a different time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Describing the temporal relationship between actions
premise text: (i) at the time the person engages in the conduct mentioned in paragraph (1)(a); or (ii) at any other time.
conclusion text: The exemption applies until the action occurs.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Until
logic summary: Describing the temporal relationship between actions
premise text: (i) at the time the person engages in the conduct mentioned in paragraph (1)(a); or (ii) at any other time.
conclusion text: The exemption applies until the action occurs.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: KnowledgeGraph
logic summary: Describing the relationship between actions and knowledge
premise text: (a) committing the offence against section 474.22 or 474.23 is impossible; or (b) the electronic service is incapable of being used as mentioned in paragraph (1)(b):
conclusion text: The exemption applies if the action is impossible or unfeasible.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474(3) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-474-ss-3
part of: 474 Section 474
note: No attempt to commit an offence against subsection (1) is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-4

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Exclude attempts from offences
premise text: (3) It is not an offence to attempt to commit an offence against subsection (1).
conclusion text: (3) It is not an offence to attempt to commit an offence against subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Excluded
logic summary: Exclude attempts from offences
premise text: (3) It is not an offence to attempt to commit an offence against subsection (1).
conclusion text: (3) It is not an offence to attempt to commit an offence against subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Allow attempts without being an offence
premise text: (3) It is not an offence to attempt to commit an offence against subsection (1).
conclusion text: Attempt to commit an offence: Permissioned
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Included
logic summary: Include attempts in non-offence classification
premise text: (3) It is not an offence to attempt to commit an offence against subsection (1).
conclusion text: (3) It is not an offence to attempt to commit an offence against subsection (1).
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

474(4) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-474-ss-4
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Definition of electronic service
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines term
premise text: None
conclusion text: electronic service
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Applies to class hierarchy
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Subsection 474.25A(1) of the Criminal Code (before the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-25
note: Prohibits using a carriage service to see or hear a person under 16 engage in sexual activity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-25-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-25-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 Subsection 474.25A(1) of the Criminal Code (before the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Direct prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Subsection 474.25A(2) of the Criminal Code (before the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26
note: Prohibits causing a person under 16 to engage in sexual activity that is seen or heard by another person using a carriage service.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-26-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-26-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-26-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 26 Subsection 474.25A(2) of the Criminal Code (before the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Direct prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Section 474.25B of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-27-norm

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-474-2
note: Using a carriage service for sexual activity with a person under 16 years of age is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-2-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 474 Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Paragraph 474.25B(1)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-28
note: Insert '(the underlying offence)' after 'an offence'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-28-norm

29 Paragraph 474.25B(1)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-29
note: Repeal of paragraph 474.25B(1)(b) and substitution with new conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-29-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-29-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 29 Paragraph 474.25B(1)(b) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of child sex offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 After section 474.27 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30
note: Insert section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-30-norm

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-474-3
has part: 474(1) Section 474
has part: 474(2) Section 474
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.23

474(1) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-1
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Sending unsolicited sexual messages to minors is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(1) Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits sending unsolicited sexual messages to minors.
premise text: (a) the sender uses a carriage service to transmit a communication to another person (the recipient); and (b) the sender does this with the intention of making it easier to procure a person (the child) to engage in sexual activity with the sender; and (c) the child is someone who is, or who the sender believes to be, under 16 years of age;
conclusion text: (1) A person (the sender) commits an offence if:...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474(2) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-2
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Sending a communication with the intention of making it easier to procure a child to engage in sexual activity is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(2) Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the sender from committing the offence.
premise text: (2) A person (the sender) commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the sender does this with the intention of making it easier to procure a person (the child)...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the offence.
premise text: (2) A person (the sender) commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the sender does this with the intention of making it easier to procure a person (the child)...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines the recurring trace for the offence.
premise text: (2) A person (the sender) commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the sender does this with the intention of making it easier to procure a person (the child)...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the sender.
premise text: (2) A person (the sender) commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the sender does this with the intention of making it easier to procure a person (the child)...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-3-ss-2-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses the obligation to the recipient.
premise text: (2) A person (the sender) commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the sender does this with the intention of making it easier to procure a person (the child)...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Paragraph 474.28(1)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31
note: Inserts section 474.27AA after section 474.25A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-31-norm

32 Subsection 474.28(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-32
note: Omit specified text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-32-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-474-4
note: Reference to section 474(2) or (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-4-norm

33 Subsections 474.28(3) and (4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-33
note: Repeal subsections and substitute with new provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-33-norm

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-474-5
note: Belief of defendant's age is proof in absence of evidence to the contrary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-5-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-5-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474 Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Belief implies proof
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Subsection 474.28(8) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-34
note: Omit 'or 474.27', substitute '474.27 or 474.27AA'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-34-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-34-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Remove 'or 474.27'
conclusion text: Substitute '474.27 or 474.27AA'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Subsection 474.28(9) of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-35
note: Repeal a heading and substitute with 'Fictitious persons'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-35-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-35-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to repeal a heading
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Subsection 474.28(9) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-36
note: Insertion of new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-36-norm

37 After subsection 474.28(9) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-37
note: It does not matter that the child is a fictitious person represented to the sender as a real person for an offence against section 474.27AA.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-37-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-37-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-37-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37 After subsection 474.28(9) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Obligation to follow the rule
premise text: The law requires it.
conclusion text: It is obligatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Subsection 474.28(10) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-38
note: Omit 'or 474.27', substitute '474.27 or 474.27AA'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-38-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-38-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Remove 'or 474.27'
conclusion text: Substitute '474.27 or 474.27AA'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Subsection 474.29(4) of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-39
note: Repeal of heading and substitution with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-39-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-39-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-39-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 39 Subsection 474.29(4) of the Criminal Code (heading)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on procuring and grooming offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Subsection 474.29(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-40
note: Replace omitted text with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-40-norm

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-474-6
note: Reference to section 27AA(2) or (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-474-6-norm

41 Subsection 474.29(5) of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-41
note: Repeal and substitute heading
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-41-norm

42 After subsection 474.29(5) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-42
note: Defence for prosecution under section 474.27AA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-42-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-42-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42 After subsection 474.29(5) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defence obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-43
note: Defines electronic service for Schedule 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-43-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-43-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-43-logic-n3logic-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-43-logic-shacl-4
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-43-logic-cogai-5

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Dictionary in the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of electronic service
premise text: subsection 474.23A(4)
conclusion text: electronic service has the meaning given by subsection 474.23A(4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-43-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal relation between definitions
premise text: subsection 474.23A(4)
conclusion text: subsection 474.23A(4) is related to subsection 474.23A(4)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-43-logic-n3logic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of electronic service for Schedule 4
premise text: subsection 474.23A(4)
conclusion text: electronic service has the meaning given by subsection 474.23A(4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-43-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of electronic service for Schedule 4
premise text: subsection 474.23A(4)
conclusion text: electronic service has the meaning given by subsection 474.23A(4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-43-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of electronic service for Schedule 4
premise text: subsection 474.23A(4)
conclusion text: electronic service has the meaning given by subsection 474.23A(4)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

44 Paragraph 474.23A(1)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-44
note: Insertion of new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-44-norm

45 Paragraph 474.23A(2)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-45
note: Insertion of new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-45-norm

46 Subsections 474.24(1), (3) and (4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-46
note: Omit “or 474.23”, substitute ‘, 474.23 or 474.23A’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-46-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-4-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition of omission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 272.8(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-1
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 272.8(2) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 272.9(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-3
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-3-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 272.9(2) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-4
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-4-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 272.10(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-5
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-5-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition of penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 272.11(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-6
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-6-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Subsection 272.15(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-7
note: Repeal of penalty and substitution with imprisonment for 15 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-7-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of the penalty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 272.18(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-8
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.29
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-8-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsection 272.19(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-9
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.29
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-9-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Subsection 273.7(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-10
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.29
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-10-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 471.22(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-11
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.29
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-11-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Subsection 471.25(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-12
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.29
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-12-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Subsection 471.25(2) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-13
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.29
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-13-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Subsection 471.26(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-14
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.29
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-14-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Subsection 474.24A(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-15
note: Repeal of penalty and substitution with imprisonment for 30 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.29
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-15-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imprisonment for 30 years is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Subsection 474.25A(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-16
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-16-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Subsection 474.25A(2) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-17
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-17-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Subsection 474.25B(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-18
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-18-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Subsection 474.27(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-19
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-19-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-19-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Subsection 474.27(2) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-20
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-20-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-20-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Subsection 474.27A(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-21
note: Repeal of penalty and substitution with imprisonment for 10 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-21-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-5-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of the penalty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 At the end of subsection 16A(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-1
note: Minimum penalties apply for certain offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.31
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-1-norm

2 After section 16AA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-2
note: Minimum penalties for certain offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.31
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-2-logic-cogai-5

c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 After section 16AA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Imposes a sentence of imprisonment
premise text: If a person is convicted of an offence...
conclusion text: The court must impose a sentence of imprisonment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Specifies the minimum sentence for each offence
premise text: offence against subsection 272.8(1) of the Criminal Code 6 years...
conclusion text: The minimum sentence is at least 6 years
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Establishes a causal relationship between the offence and the penalty
premise text: If a person is convicted of an offence...
conclusion text: The court must impose a sentence of imprisonment based on the offence
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS-SPREAD-TO
logic summary: Applies to all persons convicted of the specified offences
premise text: Subject to section 16AAC...
conclusion text: The minimum penalty applies to all persons convicted of the offence
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Uses artificial intelligence to determine the minimum penalty
premise text: Minimum penalties for certain offences...
conclusion text: The system uses AI to determine the minimum penalty
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Application provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-3
note: Amendments apply in relation to conduct engaged on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.36
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-3-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Application provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 16(1) (definition of victim impact statement)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-4
note: Definition of victim impact statement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.37
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-4-norm

5 Section 16AAA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-5
note: Renumber section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.37
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-5-norm

6 Paragraph 16A(2)(h)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-6
note: Omit 'co-operated', substitute 'cooperated'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.37
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-6-norm

7 Saving provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-7
note: Saving provision for instruments in force before commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.37
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-7-norm

8 Subsection 16AAB(2) (after table item 10)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-8
note: Prohibition on certain offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.38
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-8-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids the specified offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsection 16AAB(2) (after table item 24)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-9
note: Presumption against bail for an offence against subsection 474.22A(1) of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.38
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-9-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-6-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes a prohibition on bail for specified offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 After subsection 15AA(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1
note: Court must state reasons and record them.
description: Reasons for granting bail
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state reasons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Application provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2
note: Application provision for bail decisions made after Division commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Application provision
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Holds true
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Before subsection 15AA(3AAA)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-3
note: Presumption against bail
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-3-norm

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Before subsection 15AA(3AAA)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

4 After section 15AA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-4
has part: 4(1) After section 15AA
has part: 4(2) After section 15AA
has part: 4(3) After section 15AA
has part: 4(4) After section 15AA
has part: 4(5) After section 15AA
has part: 4(6) After section 15AA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.40

4(1) After section 15AA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-4-ss-1
part of: 4 After section 15AA
note: Granting bail to certain individuals is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of granting bail.
premise text: (1) Despite any other law...
conclusion text: ...must not grant bail.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition.
premise text: (1) Despite any other law...
conclusion text: ...must not grant bail until...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(2) After section 15AA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-4-ss-2
part of: 4 After section 15AA
note: Presumption against bail for certain individuals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Grants prohibition on bail to the specified individuals
premise text: (2) In addition to any other matters, in determining whether the bail authority is satisfied that circumstances exist to grant bail to a person...
conclusion text: The bail authority must not grant bail to the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Grants prohibition on granting bail to individuals who would not comply with conditions
premise text: (f) if the person has pleaded guilty to the charge in respect of the offence or been convicted of the offence—whether the bail authority considers that the person would not be likely to undertake a rehabilitation program, or not be likely to comply with any bail conditions relating to rehabilitation or treatment, while released on bail.
conclusion text: The bail authority must not grant bail to the person if they would not comply with conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(3) After section 15AA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-4-ss-3
part of: 4 After section 15AA
note: Court must state reasons and record them.
description: Reasons for granting bail
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state reasons
conclusion text: Court must state reasons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(4) After section 15AA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-4-ss-4
part of: 4 After section 15AA
note: Appeal against a decision of a bail authority to grant or refuse bail.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 4(4) After section 15AA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (4) Despite any law of the Commonwealth...
conclusion text: The Director of Public Prosecutions or the person may appeal...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(5) After section 15AA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-4-ss-5
part of: 4 After section 15AA
note: Appeal under subsection (4) may be made to a court with jurisdiction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-5-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to appeal under subsection (4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(6) After section 15AA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-4-ss-6
part of: 4 After section 15AA
note: Presumption against bail if Director of Public Prosecutions appeals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-6-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents granting bail
premise text: (6) If a bail authority decides to grant bail...
conclusion text: ...Schedule 7 Presumption against bail
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between Director's appeal and bail decision
premise text: (6) If: (a) a bail authority decides to grant bail...
conclusion text: ...Schedule 7 Presumption against bail
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Recurring trace of Director's appeal and bail decision
premise text: (6) If: (a) a bail authority decides to grant bail...
conclusion text: ...Schedule 7 Presumption against bail
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Influence
logic summary: Director's appeal influences bail decision
premise text: (6) If: (a) a bail authority decides to grant bail...
conclusion text: ...Schedule 7 Presumption against bail
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-4-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Analyze
logic summary: Automated analysis of Director's appeal and bail decision
premise text: (6) If: (a) a bail authority decides to grant bail...
conclusion text: ...Schedule 7 Presumption against bail
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Application provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-5
note: Amendment applies to decisions made on or after commencement regarding bail for persons charged with or convicted of certain offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-5-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Application provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to apply the amendment to decisions made on or after commencement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Paragraph 16A(2)(g)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-1
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Paragraph 16A(2)(g)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace existing obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 After paragraph 16A(2)(m)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-2
note: Aggravating seriousness of criminal behaviour based on community standing used to aid in commission of offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-2-logic-cogai-5

c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 After paragraph 16A(2)(m)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Obligation to aggravate seriousness
premise text: Person's standing in the community was used by the person to aid in the commission of the offence.
conclusion text: Aggravating the seriousness of the criminal behaviour
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between community standing and commission of offence
premise text: The person's standing in the community was used by the person to aid in the commission of the offence.
conclusion text: Temporal interval for aggravation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Repeating pattern of community standing and commission of offence
premise text: The person's standing in the community was used by the person to aid in the commission of the offence.
conclusion text: Temporal interval for aggravation
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spreads
logic summary: Diffusion of community standing to commission of offence
premise text: The fact as a reason for aggravating the seriousness of the criminal behaviour to which the offence relates;
conclusion text: Community standing used to aid in commission of offence
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of community standing as a factor in aggravation
premise text: The person's standing in the community was used by the person to aid in the commission of the offence.
conclusion text: Community standing used to aid in commission of offence
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 After subsection 16A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-3
note: Court must consider rehabilitation when passing sentence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-3-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-3-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-3-logic-diffusion-5

c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 After subsection 16A(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to rehabilitate
premise text: Court must consider rehabilitation when passing sentence.
conclusion text: Rehabilitation is mandatory
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Sentence length should include time for rehabilitation program
premise text: In determining the length of any sentence or non-parole period—to include sufficient time for the person to undertake a rehabilitation program.
conclusion text: Rehabilitation program duration is necessary
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Sentence should be long enough for rehabilitation
premise text: In determining the length of any sentence or non-parole period—to include sufficient time for the person to undertake a rehabilitation program.
conclusion text: Rehabilitation is necessary for sentence duration
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-3-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Rehabilitation implies longer sentence length
premise text: In determining the length of any sentence or non-parole period—to include sufficient time for the person to undertake a rehabilitation program.
conclusion text: Longer sentence length is implied by rehabilitation
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-3-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Rehabilitation is a relevant factor in sentencing
premise text: The court must have regard to the objective of rehabilitating the person
conclusion text: Rehabilitation is necessary for sentence duration
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 16A(2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-4
note: Insert comma after certain phrases
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.44
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-4-norm

c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Subsection 16A(2A)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 16A(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-5
note: Omit specific subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.44
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-5-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified subsections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 272.30(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-6
note: Replace subsection 16A(2) with section 16A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.44
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-6-norm

7 Application provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-7
note: Application provision for amendments made by this Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.44
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-8-sec-7-norm

1 Subsection 272.30(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-1
note: Court must consider age and maturity of the person in relation to whom the offence was committed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 272.30(1) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: the court must take into account the following matters:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 After subsection 272.30(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-2
note: Court must consider only known matters in its decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 After subsection 272.30(1) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider only known matters.
premise text: Court must take into account a matter mentioned in subsection (1) so far as the matter is known to the court.
conclusion text: The court need only take into account a matter mentioned in subsection (1) so far as the matter is known to the court and, for a matter mentioned in paragraph (1)(a) or (c), relevant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 At the end of Subdivision C of Division 471 of the Criminal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-3
note: Add to the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-3-norm

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 At the end of Subdivision C of Division 471 of the Criminal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-471
has part: 471(1) Section 471
has part: 471(2) Section 471
has part: 471(3) Section 471
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.45

471(1) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-471-ss-1
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Court must consider certain factors when determining sentence for an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(1) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider certain factors.
premise text: (1) In determining the sentence to be passed, or the order to be made, respect of a person for an offence against this Subdivision,
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Factors considered by court are related to time.
premise text: (b) if that person was under 10 when the offence was committed—that fact as a reason for aggravating the Schedule 9
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider number of people involved in commission of offence.
premise text: (c) the number of people involved in the commission of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider seriousness of criminal behaviour.
premise text: seriousness of the criminal behaviour to which the offence relates;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(2) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-471-ss-2
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Court must consider only relevant information within its knowledge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(2) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider relevant information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: KNOWS
logic summary: Court's knowledge limits consideration
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471(3) Section 471
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-471-ss-3
part of: 471 Section 471
note: Court must consider additional matters beyond those mentioned in subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 471(3) Section 471
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-471-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider additional matters
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

4 At the end of Subdivision F of Division 474 of the Criminal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-4
note: Add to the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-4-norm

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 At the end of Subdivision F of Division 474 of the Criminal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-474
has part: 474(1) Section 474
has part: 474(2) Section 474
has part: 474(3) Section 474
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.46

474(1) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-474-ss-1
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Court must consider age and maturity of the person in relation to whom the offence was committed when determining sentence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(1) Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider age and maturity of the person in relation to whom the offence was committed.
premise text: (1) In determining the sentence to be passed, or the order to be made, respect of a person for an offence against this Subdivision, the court must take into account the following matters:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Age is a temporal interval relevant to determining sentence.
premise text: (a) the age and maturity of the person in relation to whom the offence was committed;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: Maturity is a relevant factor in determining sentence.
premise text: (b) if that person was under 10 when the offence was committed—that fact as a reason for aggravating the seriousness of the criminal behaviour to which the offence relates;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must consider number of people involved in commission of offence.
premise text: (c) the number of people involved in the commission of the offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474(2) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-474-ss-2
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Court must consider relevant information when making a decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(2) Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consider relevant information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: KNOWS
logic summary: Court has knowledge of relevant information
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Relevant information is contained within the court's knowledge
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474(3) Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-474-ss-3
part of: 474 Section 474
note: Court must consider additional matters when determining sentence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474(3) Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consider additional matters
premise text: Court must take into account...
conclusion text: ...additional sentencing factors for certain offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal relationship between consideration and additional factors
premise text: (3) The matters mentioned in subsection (1) are in addition to...
conclusion text: ...any other matters the court must take into account
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Relationship between consideration and additional factors
premise text: The matters mentioned in subsection (1) are in addition to...
conclusion text: ...any other matters the court must take into account
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Classification of additional factors as a separate consideration
premise text: The matters mentioned in subsection (1) are in addition to...
conclusion text: ...any other matters the court must take into account
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-474-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Classification of additional factors as a separate consideration using AI
premise text: The matters mentioned in subsection (1) are in addition to...
conclusion text: ...any other matters the court must take into account
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

5 Application provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-5
note: Amendments apply to sentence determination after commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.47
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-9-sec-5-norm

1 Before subsection 19(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-1
note: General requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.48
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-1-norm

2 At the end of section 19
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-2
has part: 2(5) At the end of section 19
has part: 2(6) At the end of section 19
has part: 2(7) At the end of section 19
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.48

2(5) At the end of section 19
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-2-ss-5
part of: 2 At the end of section 19
note: No cumulative or concurrent serving of imprisonment for Commonwealth child sex offences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.48
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-5-logic-argumentation-5

c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 2(5) At the end of section 19
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits cumulative or concurrent serving of imprisonment.
premise text: (5) An order must not have the effect that a term of imprisonment imposed on a person for a Commonwealth child sex offence be served partly cumulatively, or concurrently, with an uncompleted term of imprisonment...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the prohibition.
premise text: (5) An order must not have the effect that a term of imprisonment imposed on a person for a Commonwealth child sex offence be served partly cumulatively, or concurrently, with an uncompleted term of imprisonment...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Defines the temporal trace for the prohibition.
premise text: (5) An order must not have the effect that a term of imprisonment imposed on a person for a Commonwealth child sex offence be served partly cumulatively, or concurrently, with an uncompleted term of imprisonment...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses the prohibition to related concepts.
premise text: (5) An order must not have the effect that a term of imprisonment imposed on a person for a Commonwealth child sex offence be served partly cumulatively, or concurrently, with an uncompleted term of imprisonment...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-5-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justify
logic summary: Justifies the prohibition through logical reasoning.
premise text: (5) An order must not have the effect that a term of imprisonment imposed on a person for a Commonwealth child sex offence be served partly cumulatively, or concurrently, with an uncompleted term of imprisonment...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(6) At the end of section 19
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-2-ss-6
part of: 2 At the end of section 19
note: Court discretion to adjust sentence severity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.48
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-6-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2(6) At the end of section 19
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Court discretion
premise text: (5) does not apply if the court is satisfied that imposing the sentence in a different manner would still result in sentences that are of a severity appropriate in all the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval: Court discretion to adjust sentence severity
premise text: (6) Subsection (5) does not apply if the court is satisfied that imposing the sentence in a different manner would still result in sentences that are of a severity appropriate in all the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace: Court discretion to adjust sentence severity
premise text: (6) Subsection (5) does not apply if the court is satisfied that imposing the sentence in a different manner would still result in sentences that are of a severity appropriate in all the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion: Court discretion to adjust sentence severity
premise text: (6) Subsection (5) does not apply if the court is satisfied that imposing the sentence in a different manner would still result in sentences that are of a severity appropriate in all the circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: CogAI: Court discretion to adjust sentence severity
premise text: (6) Subsection (5) does not apply if the court is satisfied that imposing the sentence in a different manner would still result in sentences that are of a severity appropriate in all the circumstances.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(7) At the end of section 19
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-2-ss-7
part of: 2 At the end of section 19
note: Court must state reasons for imposing sentence
description: reasons for imposing sentence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.48
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-7-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-2-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must state reasons
conclusion text: state reasons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Application provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-10-sec-3
note: Applicability of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.48
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-10-sec-3-norm

1 Paragraph 20(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-1
note: Directs that a person be released upon giving security, with conditions depending on the nature of the offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.49
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-11-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-11-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-11-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Directs prohibition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 20(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-2
note: Omit ‘If’, substitute ‘Subject to subsection (1B), if’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.49
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-11-sec-2-norm

3 After subsection 20(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-3
note: Probation conditions for offenders convicted of Commonwealth child sex offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.49
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-11-sec-3-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-11-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-11-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-11-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-11-sec-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-11-sec-3-logic-deontic-5

c2020a00070-sch-11-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 After subsection 20(1A)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-11-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide conditions for probation supervision
premise text: The court must specify under paragraph (1)(b) the conditions that the person will, during the specified period...
conclusion text: The person must be subject to the supervision of a probation officer appointed in accordance with the order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-11-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Probation supervision is a temporal interval
premise text: The person must be subject to the supervision of a probation officer appointed in accordance with the order.
conclusion text: The supervision period is a temporal interval during which the person must comply with the conditions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-11-sec-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Probation supervision is an ordered trace
premise text: The person must be subject to the supervision of a probation officer appointed in accordance with the order.
conclusion text: The supervision period is an ordered trace during which the person must comply with the conditions.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-11-sec-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must obey all reasonable directions of the probation officer
premise text: The court must specify under paragraph (1)(b) the conditions that the person will, during the specified period...
conclusion text: The person must obey all reasonable directions of the probation officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-11-sec-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must not travel interstate or overseas without written permission of the probation officer
premise text: The court must specify under paragraph (1)(b) the conditions that the person will, during the specified period...
conclusion text: The person must not travel interstate or overseas without the written permission of the probation officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Application and saving provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-11-sec-4
note: Application and saving provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.50
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-11-sec-4-norm

1 After subparagraph 20AB(1AA)(a)(vii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-12-sec-1
note: Insert residential treatment order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.51
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-12-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-12-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-12-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 After subparagraph 20AB(1AA)(a)(vii)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-12-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERT
logic summary: Inserts a new provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 20BQ(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-12-sec-2
note: Insertion of a specific clause after subsection 20AB(1AA)(a)(viia)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.51
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-12-sec-2-norm

3 Application provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-12-sec-3
note: Application provision for amendments made by this Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.51
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-12-sec-3-norm

1 Subsection 19AA(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-1
note: Omit specified phrase.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 19AA(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-2
note: Prescribed authority must have regard to parole time when revoking parole order or licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Subsection 19AA(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Prescribed authority has an obligation to consider parole time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 19AG(5) (paragraph (ca) of the note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-3
note: Omit 'or 19AR(2)(e)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-3-norm

4 Subsection 19APB(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-4
note: Repeal subsection, substitute with new effect for parole order or licence revocation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-4-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Subsection 19APB(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Repeal subsection, substitute with new effect for parole order or licence revocation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The time the parole order or licence is taken to have been revoked under subsection 19AQ(1) or (2) is during the parole period or licence period
premise text: Subsection 19AQ(1) or (2)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Section 19AQ
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-5
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-5-norm

19AQ Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-19aq
has part: 19AQ(1) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
has part: 19AQ(2) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
has part: 19AQ(3) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
has part: 19AQ(4) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
has part: 19AQ(5) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.53

19AQ(1) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-1
part of: 19AQ Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
note: Revocation of parole order following further offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AQ(1) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits revocation of parole order
premise text: (1) If a person to whom a parole order relates is sentenced...
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with parole period
premise text: (1) If a person to whom a parole order relates is sentenced...
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Contains revocation time
premise text: (1) If a person to whom a parole order relates is sentenced...
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses revocation time across parole period
premise text: (1) If a person to whom a parole order relates is sentenced...
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes revocation time as relevant
premise text: (1) If a person to whom a parole order relates is sentenced...
conclusion text: ...the court that sentences the person for the new offence must determine...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

19AQ(2) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-2
part of: 19AQ Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
note: Court must determine revocation time for licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AQ(2) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Obligation to determine revocation time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AQ(3) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-3
part of: 19AQ Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
note: Determine revocation time for parole order or licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AQ(3) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
logic summary: Determines revocation time
premise text: (3) A revocation time determined under subsection (1) or (2)
conclusion text: must be one of the following times:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes temporal intervals for revocation time
premise text: (b) the time at which the court determines the new offence was most likely to have been committed;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: is an ordered trace of
logic summary: Defines order for revocation time intervals
premise text: (c) the time at which the court determines the new offence was most likely to have first begun to have been committed.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must be one of
logic summary: Must choose from three options for revocation time
premise text: one of the following times:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AQ(4) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-4
part of: 19AQ Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
note: Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AQ(4) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to revoke parole order or licence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AQ(5) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-5
part of: 19AQ Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
note: Does not apply to suspended sentences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-5-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AQ(5) Parole order or licence revoked following further offence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19aq-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excluded from application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Section 19AR (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-6
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.54
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-6-norm

19AR Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-19ar
note: Non-parole period may be revoked under section 19AQ
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.54
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19ar-norm

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19ar-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AR Fixing of non-parole period etc. where parole or licence taken
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

7 Subsections 19AR(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-7
note: Court must not make a recognizance release order for certain individuals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.54
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-7-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Subsections 19AR(1) and (2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court must not make a recognizance release order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 19AR(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-8
note: Court must not make a recognizance release order for certain individuals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.55
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-8-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-8-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 Subsection 19AR(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Court must not make a recognizance release order.
premise text: Court imposes new sentence or sentences.
conclusion text: Recognizance release order is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsection 19AR(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-9
note: A court may decline to fix a non-parole period if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.55
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-9-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-9-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-9-logic-deontic-4
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-9-logic-deontic-5

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 Subsection 19AR(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to decline fixing a non-parole period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: on the day after the end of the federal sentence, or the last to be served of the federal sentences
logic summary: Temporal relation between parole and sentencing
premise text: (b) the person is expected to be serving a State or Territory sentence on the specified date
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-9-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: as reduced by any remissions or reductions under section 19AA
logic summary: Temporal relation between parole and sentencing with reduction
premise text: (b) the person is expected to be serving a State or Territory sentence on the specified date, as reduced by any remissions or reductions under section 19AA
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-9-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Obligation to decline fixing a non-parole period if conditions are met
premise text: (a) the court is satisfied that doing so is appropriate, having regard to (i) the serious nature and circumstances of the offence or offences; (ii) the antecedents of the person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-9-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission for a court to decline fixing a non-parole period if conditions are met
premise text: (b) the person is expected to be serving a State or Territory sentence on the specified date, as reduced by any remissions or reductions under section 19AA
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Subsection 19AR(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-10
note: Omit specific words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.56
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-10-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of specific words.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 19AR(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-11
note: Omit specified phrase.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.56
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-11-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making recognizance release orders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Subsection 19AR(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-12
note: Omit “or the making of such orders”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.56
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-12-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making orders
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Subsection 19AR(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-13
note: Omit specified phrase from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.56
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-13-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Subsection 19AR(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-14
note: Omit “or the making of such orders”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.56
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-14-norm

15 Subsection 19AS(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-15
note: Court must issue warrant for detention if parole order is revoked and new sentence is imposed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.56
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-15-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Subsection 19AS(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must issue warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Subsection 19AS(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-16
note: Modify paragraph (1)(c) to paragraph (1)(d)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.57
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-16-norm

17 Paragraphs 19AT(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-17
note: A person serving a federal sentence must be released on parole or licence under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.57
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-17-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Paragraphs 19AT(1)(a) and (b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to release a person on parole or licence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Subsection 19AW(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-18
note: Omit 'may issue a warrant', substitute 'must issue a warrant'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.58
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-18-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits issuing a warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Paragraph 19AW(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-19
note: Omit 'nature', substitute 'serious nature'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.58
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-19-norm

20 Subsection 20(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-20
note: Substitute sections 19AC and 19AE
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.58
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-20-norm

21 Application provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-13-sec-21
note: Amendments apply in relation to revocation of parole orders or licences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.58
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-21-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 Application provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-13-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Amendments apply if revocation occurs on or after commencement.
premise text: (revocation occurs on or after commencement)
conclusion text: (amendments apply)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-14-sec-1
note: Defines child sexual abuse offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.59
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-14-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-14-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-14-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2020a00070-sch-14-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 3(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-14-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with legal effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-14-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: classifies
logic summary: Classifies the child sexual abuse offence into a specific category
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

474 Section 474
type: Concept
realized by: sch-14-sec-474
note: List of Commonwealth child sexual abuse offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.59
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-14-sec-474-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-14-sec-474-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-14-sec-474-logic-deontic-2

c2020a00070-sch-14-sec-474-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474 Section 474
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-14-sec-474-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Commonwealth child sex offence
conclusion text: Commonwealth child sexual abuse offence
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-14-sec-474-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: List of offences
premise text: 20 of the Criminal Code
conclusion text: Obligation to prosecute
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Section 272
type: Concept
realized by: sch-14-sec-272
note: State or Territory registrable child sex offence means an offence that a person becomes, or may at any time have become, a person whose name is entered on a child protection offender register.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.59
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-14-sec-272-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-14-sec-272-logic-descriptionlogic-1

c2020a00070-sch-14-sec-272-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the offence based on its relation to a child protection offender register.
premise text: The offence is committed by a person whose name is entered on a child protection offender register.
conclusion text: The offence is registrable if it meets this condition.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

1 Review of sentencing for Commonwealth child sex
type: Concept
realized by: sch-15-sec-1
note: Review of sentencing for Commonwealth child sex offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2020a00070.pdf, p.60
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-15-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-15-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-15-sec-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-15-sec-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2020a00070-sch-15-sec-1-logic-deontic-4

c2020a00070-sch-15-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory review of sentencing provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-15-sec-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal interval
logic summary: 3-year period for review
premise text: (3) The person or persons undertaking the review must give the Attorney-General a written report of the review within 12 months after the end of the 3-year period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-15-sec-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Reporting requirements for review
premise text: (4) The Attorney-General must cause a copy of the report of the review to be laid before each House of the Parliament within 15 sitting days of that House after its receipt by the Attorney-General.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2020a00070-sch-15-sec-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Attorney-General's discretion in selecting reviewers
premise text: (2) The review must be undertaken by one or more persons who, in the Attorney-General’s opinion, possess appropriate qualifications to undertake the review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed