Crimes Legislation Amendment (Economic Disruption) Act 2021
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 3 of 2021
description: An Act to amend the Crimes Act 1914, the Criminal Code Act 1995 and the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, and for other purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Short title of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the Act as a short title
conclusion text: The Act is the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Economic Disruption) Act 2021.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Commencement rules for provisions in the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Commences on the day this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal intervals not applicable
premise text: No temporal references
conclusion text: No interval logic applies
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 February
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-16-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
note: Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-2-2-norm

17 February
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-17-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-3-norm

17 February
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-2
note: Applicable duty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-17-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-17-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-17-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 February
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-17-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Duty applies
premise text: (a)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Conditional commencement of Schedules 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-4-norm

17 February
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-17-3-norm

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Schedule 7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-5-norm

17 February
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-17-4-norm

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
note: Reference to Schedule 7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-6-norm

3 Schedules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-2
note: Legislation in schedules is amended or repealed according to its terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sec-3-2-norm

1 Subsection 400.1(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Definition of director in relation to a company.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 400.1(1) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines the term 'director'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has a class hierarchy
logic summary: Classifies director into a specific category
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 400.1(1) of the Criminal Code (definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Repeal definition of proceeds of crime
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-2-norm

3 Subsection 400.1(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Defines 'proceeds of general crime' and 'proceeds of indictable crime'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Subsection 400.1(1) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a class hierarchy for crimes
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Describes the scope of the obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Paragraph 400.1(3)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
note: Substitute “(1) For the purposes of this Division, a person”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-5-norm

6 At the end of section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
has part: 6(2) At the end of section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
has part: 6(3) At the end of section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
has part: 6(4) At the end of section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
has part: 6(5) At the end of section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.10

6(2) At the end of section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-ss-2
part of: 6 At the end of section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
note: Dealing with money or property is attributed to the first person if they are reckless about its consequences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(2) At the end of section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Recklessness implies attribution of dealing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(3) At the end of section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-ss-3
part of: 6 At the end of section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
note: It is immaterial whether the identity of the other person can be established.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Established obligation
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(4) At the end of section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-ss-4
part of: 6 At the end of section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
note: Conduct substantially contributes to another person dealing with money or property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6(4) At the end of section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: causes
logic summary: Conduct causes obligation
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (2),
conclusion text: the conduct substantially contributes to another person dealing with money or property.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Conduct within temporal interval
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (2),
conclusion text: the conduct substantially contributes to another person dealing with money or property.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: within
logic summary: Conduct within temporal interval
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (2),
conclusion text: the conduct substantially contributes to another person dealing with money or property.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: within
logic summary: Conduct within temporal interval
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (2),
conclusion text: the conduct substantially contributes to another person dealing with money or property.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: within
logic summary: Conduct within temporal interval
premise text: (4) For the purposes of subsection (2),
conclusion text: the conduct substantially contributes to another person dealing with money or property.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(5) At the end of section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6-ss-5
part of: 6 At the end of section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
note: It is immaterial whether the identity of the other person can be established for the purposes of subsection (4).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Established obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 After section 400.2 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
note: Inserts Schedule 1 and general amendments to the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-7-norm

400 Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-400
has part: 400(1) Section 400
has part: 400(2) Section 400
has part: 400(3) Section 400
has part: 400(4) Section 400
has part: 400(5) Section 400
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.11

400(1) Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-400-ss-1
part of: 400 Section 400
note: Person may have effective control of money or property without a legal or equitable estate or interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (a) a legal or equitable estate or interest in the money or property; or (b) a right, power or privilege in connection with the money or property.
conclusion text: Person may have effective control of money or property without a legal or equitable estate or interest.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between 'effective control' and 'legal or equitable estate or interest'
premise text: (a) a legal or equitable estate or interest in the money or property.
conclusion text: Person may have effective control of money or property without a legal or equitable estate or interest.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: holdsForAll
logic summary: Universal quantification over 'person' and 'effective control'
premise text: (a) a legal or equitable estate or interest in the money or property; or (b) a right, power or privilege in connection with the money or property.
conclusion text: Person may have effective control of money or property without a legal or equitable estate or interest.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusing 'effective control' to 'person'
premise text: (a) a legal or equitable estate or interest in the money or property; or (b) a right, power or privilege in connection with the money or property.
conclusion text: Person may have effective control of money or property without a legal or equitable estate or interest.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasCapability
logic summary: Granting capability to 'person' for 'effective control'
premise text: (a) a legal or equitable estate or interest in the money or property; or (b) a right, power or privilege in connection with the money or property.
conclusion text: Person may have effective control of money or property without a legal or equitable estate or interest.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

400(2) Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-400-ss-2
part of: 400 Section 400
note: Person with effective control of money or property for ultimate benefit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 400(2) Section 400
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffectiveControl
logic summary: Person has effective control of money or property
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Division, if money or other property is held on trust for the ultimate benefit of a person
conclusion text: The person is taken to have effective control of the money or property.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Control occurs during trust period
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Division, if money or other property is held on trust for the ultimate benefit of a person
conclusion text: The control occurs during the trust period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Control is traceable to trust period
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Division, if money or other property is held on trust for the ultimate benefit of a person
conclusion text: The control is traceable to the trust period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Control spreads during trust period
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Division, if money or other property is held on trust for the ultimate benefit of a person
conclusion text: The control spreads during the trust period.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasEffectiveControl
logic summary: Person has effective control of money or property
premise text: (2) For the purposes of this Division, if money or other property is held on trust for the ultimate benefit of a person
conclusion text: The person is taken to have effective control of the money or property.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

400(3) Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-400-ss-3
part of: 400 Section 400
note: Regard may be had to shareholdings, debentures, directorships, trusts, family relationships, domestic relationships, and business relationships when determining effective control of money or property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-3-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 400(3) Section 400
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

400(4) Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-400-ss-4
part of: 400 Section 400
note: Defines family relationships for the purpose of this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-4-norm

400(5) Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-400-ss-5
part of: 400 Section 400
note: More than one person may have effective control of money or other property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-ss-5-norm

8 Subsection 400.2A(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
note: Insertion of new section number in Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-8-norm

9 After section 400.2A of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
note: Insert clause after section 400.2A of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-9-norm

400 Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-400-2
has part: 400(1) Section 400
has part: 400(2) Section 400
has part: 400(3) Section 400
has part: 400(4) Section 400
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.12

400(1) Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-1
part of: 400 Section 400
note: Dealing with money or property valued at $10,000,000 or more is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 400(1) Section 400
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: The provision imposes a prohibition on dealing with money or property valued at $10,000,000 or more.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

400(2) Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-2
part of: 400 Section 400
note: Money laundering is prohibited if conduct conceals or disguises certain information about money or property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of money laundering
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: Imprisonment for life.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

400(3) Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-3
part of: 400 Section 400
note: Engaging in conduct with proceeds of general crime on multiple occasions exceeds $10,000,000 value threshold.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 400(3) Section 400
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct with proceeds of general crime.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) on 2 or more occasions, the person engages in conduct in relation to money or other property; and
conclusion text: Imprisonment for life.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation to not engage in conduct with proceeds of general crime.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) on 2 or more occasions, the person engages in conduct in relation to money or other property; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-3-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implies imprisonment for life if conduct exceeds $10,000,000 value threshold.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) on 2 or more occasions, the person engages in conduct in relation to money or other property; and
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits imprisonment for life.
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence if: (a) on 2 or more occasions, the person engages in conduct in relation to money or other property; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

400(4) Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-4
part of: 400 Section 400
note: Dealing with money or property that are proceeds of indictable crime is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 400(4) Section 400
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with money or property that are proceeds of indictable crime.
premise text: (a) the person deals with money or other property; and (b) either: (i) the money or property is proceeds of indictable crime;
conclusion text: the person commits an offence if
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Requires recklessness about the fact that money or property are proceeds of indictable crime.
premise text: (c) the person is reckless as to the fact that the money or property is proceeds of indictable crime;
conclusion text: the person commits an offence if
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval during which the offence occurs.
premise text: (4) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person deals with money or other property; and (b) either: (i) the money or property is proceeds of indictable crime;
conclusion text: the person commits an offence
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace of persons who commit an offence.
premise text: (4) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person deals with money or other property; and (b) either: (i) the money or property is proceeds of indictable crime;
conclusion text: the person commits an offence
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-2-ss-4-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Defines a diffusion of persons who commit an offence.
premise text: (4) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person deals with money or other property; and (b) either: (i) the money or property is proceeds of indictable crime;
conclusion text: the person commits an offence
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Section 400.3 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
note: Substitute heading in section 400.3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Section 400.3 (heading)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace text with new heading
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Before subsection 400.3(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
note: Insert Tier 1 offences before subsection 400.3(1) of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Before subsection 400.3(1) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Subparagraph 400.3(1)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 After subsection 400.3(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
note: Engaging in conduct with proceeds of general crime is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-13-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-13-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 After subsection 400.3(1) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct with proceeds of general crime.
premise text: The Criminal Code defines an offence as engaging in conduct with proceeds of general crime.
conclusion text: Engaging in such conduct is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Before subsection 400.3(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
note: Insert Tier 2 offences before subsection 400.3(2) of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS
logic summary: Insertion of text
premise text: Text to be inserted
conclusion text: Tier 2 offences inserted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Subparagraph 400.3(2)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Paragraph 400.3(2)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 After subsection 400.3(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
note: Money laundering is prohibited if conduct conceals or disguises proceeds of general crime.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-17-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-17-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 After subsection 400.3(2) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Before subsection 400.3(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
note: Insert Tier 3 offences before subsection 400.3(3) of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-18-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Imposes a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Subparagraph 400.3(3)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-19-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Paragraph 400.3(3)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
note: Omit ‘proceeds of crime’, substitute ‘proceeds of indictable crime’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-20-norm

21 After subsection 400.3(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
has part: 21(3A) After subsection 400.3(3) of the Criminal Code
has part: 21(3B) After subsection 400.3(3) of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.21

21(3A) After subsection 400.3(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21-ss-3a
part of: 21 After subsection 400.3(3) of the Criminal Code
note: Engaging in conduct with proceeds of general crime is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3a-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3a-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct with proceeds of general crime.
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct in relation to money or other property; and (b) the money or property is proceeds of general crime;
conclusion text: The conduct is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Requires person to be negligent about nature of money or property.
premise text: (c) the person is negligent as to the fact that the money or property is proceeds of general crime;
conclusion text: The person has a duty to disclose the nature of the money or property.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for conduct with proceeds of general crime.
premise text: (e) when the conduct occurs, the value of the money and other property is $1,000,000 or more.
conclusion text: The conduct occurs within a specific temporal interval.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Allows person to engage in conduct with proceeds of general crime if value exceeds $1,000,000.
premise text: (e) when the conduct occurs, the value of the money and other property is $1,000,000 or more.
conclusion text: The person has permission to engage in conduct with proceeds of general crime if the value exceeds $1,000,000.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3a-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Requires person to disclose nature of money or property.
premise text: (d) the conduct concealed or disguised any or all of the following: (i) the nature of the money or property;
conclusion text: The person has a duty to disclose the nature of the money or property.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(3B) After subsection 400.3(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21-ss-3b
part of: 21 After subsection 400.3(3) of the Criminal Code
note: Engaging in conduct with proceeds of general crime on multiple occasions is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3b-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3b-logic-deontic-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(3B) After subsection 400.3(3) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to not engage in conduct with proceeds of general crime.
premise text: (a) on 2 or more occasions, the person engages in conduct in relation to money or other property;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to be aware of the nature of proceeds of general crime.
premise text: (c) for each occasion, the person is negligent as to the fact that the money or property is proceeds of general crime;
conclusion text: The conduct concealed or disguised any or all of...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-21-ss-3b-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to not conceal or disguise the source of proceeds of general crime.
premise text: (d) for each occasion, the conduct concealed or disguised any or all of...
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Before subsection 400.3(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
note: Absolute liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-22-norm

23 Subsection 400.3(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
note: Omit specific subsections from the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-23-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Section 400.4 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
note: Substitute heading in section 400.4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-24-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace heading
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Before subsection 400.4(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
note: Insert Tier 1 offences before subsection 400.4(1) of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-25-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS
logic summary: Inserts a provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Subparagraph 400.4(1)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-26-norm

27 After subsection 400.4(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
has part: 27(1A) After subsection 400.4(1) of the Criminal Code
has part: 27(1B) After subsection 400.4(1) of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.22

27(1A) After subsection 400.4(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27-ss-1a
part of: 27 After subsection 400.4(1) of the Criminal Code
note: Money laundering offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits money laundering conduct
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct in relation to money or other property; and (b) the money or property is, and the person believes it to be, proceeds of general crime;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Requires conduct to occur within a specific time frame
premise text: (d) when the conduct occurs, the value of the money and other property is $100,000 or more.
conclusion text: The conduct must occur within 6 months of the value exceeding $100,000.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Requires recurring conduct
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct in relation to money or other property; and (b) the money or property is, and the person believes it to be, proceeds of general crime;
conclusion text: The person must engage in recurring conduct to commit an offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses responsibility for money laundering conduct
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct in relation to money or other property; and (b) the money or property is, and the person believes it to be, proceeds of general crime;
conclusion text: The diffusion of responsibility for money laundering conduct is unclear.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implicates
logic summary: Implicates a moral or ethical argument about money laundering conduct
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct in relation to money or other property; and (b) the money or property is, and the person believes it to be, proceeds of general crime;
conclusion text: The conduct implies a moral or ethical argument about the nature of money laundering.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

27(1B) After subsection 400.4(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27-ss-1b
part of: 27 After subsection 400.4(1) of the Criminal Code
note: Engaging in conduct to conceal or disguise proceeds of general crime on multiple occasions is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1b-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1b-logic-shacl-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
premise text: (a) on 2 or more occasions, the person engages in conduct...
conclusion text: The person commits an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relation between occasions of conduct
premise text: (a) on 2 or more occasions, the person engages in conduct...
conclusion text: The conduct occurs on multiple occasions.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace of conduct
premise text: (a) on 2 or more occasions, the person engages in conduct...
conclusion text: The conduct is repeated.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1b-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Represents knowledge about conduct and its classification
premise text: (a) on 2 or more occasions, the person engages in conduct...
conclusion text: The conduct is represented as an offence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-27-ss-1b-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema validation
logic summary: Validates schema for classification of conduct
premise text: (a) on 2 or more occasions, the person engages in conduct...
conclusion text: The conduct conforms to the schema.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Before subsection 400.4(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
note: Insert Tier 2 offences before subsection 400.4(2) of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-28-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Imposes a duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Subparagraph 400.4(2)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Paragraph 400.4(2)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-30-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 After subsection 400.4(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
has part: 31(2A) After subsection 400.4(2) of the Criminal Code
has part: 31(2B) After subsection 400.4(2) of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.24

31(2A) After subsection 400.4(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-31-ss-2a
part of: 31 After subsection 400.4(2) of the Criminal Code
note: Money laundering is prohibited if conduct conceals or disguises proceeds of general crime.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-31-ss-2a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-31-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-31-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31(2B) After subsection 400.4(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-31-ss-2b
part of: 31 After subsection 400.4(2) of the Criminal Code
note: Engaging in conduct with proceeds of general crime on multiple occasions is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-31-ss-2b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-31-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-31-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct with proceeds of general crime.
premise text: (2B) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: The conduct is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Before subsection 400.4(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
note: Insert Schedule 1 Money laundering
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-32-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERT
logic summary: Insertion of schedule
premise text: Schedule 1 inserted
conclusion text: Money laundering prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Subparagraph 400.4(3)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-33-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Paragraph 400.4(3)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-34-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-34-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 After subsection 400.4(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
has part: 35(3A) After subsection 400.4(3) of the Criminal Code
has part: 35(3B) After subsection 400.4(3) of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.26

35(3A) After subsection 400.4(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35-ss-3a
part of: 35 After subsection 400.4(3) of the Criminal Code
note: Engaging in conduct with proceeds of general crime is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3a-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3a-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3a-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct with proceeds of general crime.
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct in relation to money or other property; and (b) the money or property is proceeds of general crime;
conclusion text: The conduct is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty to not engage in conduct with proceeds of general crime.
premise text: (e) when the conduct occurs, the value of the money and other property is $100,000 or more.
conclusion text: The person must not engage in conduct with proceeds of general crime.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3a-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implies that engaging in conduct with proceeds of general crime leads to an offence.
premise text: (a) the person engages in conduct in relation to money or other property; and (b) the money or property is proceeds of general crime;
conclusion text: The conduct is an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3a-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits engaging in conduct with proceeds of general crime if the value is $100,000 or more.
premise text: (e) when the conduct occurs, the value of the money and other property is $100,000 or more.
conclusion text: The person must not engage in conduct with proceeds of general crime if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35(3B) After subsection 400.4(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35-ss-3b
part of: 35 After subsection 400.4(3) of the Criminal Code
note: Money laundering offence requires concealment of property values and sources.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3b-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3b-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
premise text: (3B) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: The conduct is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between conduct and property values
premise text: (e) the sum of the values of the money and other property...
conclusion text: The conduct occurs before the property values are known.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Requires recurring trace of conduct
premise text: (a) on 2 or more occasions, the person engages in conduct...
conclusion text: The conduct recurs on multiple occasions.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-35-ss-3b-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation to conceal property values and sources
premise text: (c) for each occasion, the person is negligent as to the fact that...
conclusion text: The person has an obligation to conceal the property values and sources.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Before subsection 400.4(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
note: Absolute liability inserted before subsection 400.4(4) of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-36-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of absolute liability provision
premise text: Provision inserted before subsection 400.4(4)
conclusion text: Absolute liability obligation created
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Subsection 400.4(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
note: Omit specific subsections from the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-37-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits specific actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Section 400.5 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
note: Substitute heading in section 400.5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-38-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38 Section 400.5 (heading)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

39 Subparagraph 400.5(1)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-39-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-39-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Subparagraph 400.5(2)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-40-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Paragraph 400.5(2)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-41-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Subparagraph 400.5(3)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-42-norm

43 Paragraph 400.5(3)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-43-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Section 400.6 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
note: Substitute heading in section 400.6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-44-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-44-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace heading
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Subparagraph 400.6(1)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-45-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-45-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Subparagraph 400.6(2)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-46-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Paragraph 400.6(2)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-47-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-47-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Subparagraph 400.6(3)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-48-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-48-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Paragraph 400.6(3)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-49-norm

50 Section 400.7 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
note: Substitute 'Proceeds of crime' for 'Dealing in proceeds of crime'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-50-norm

51 Subparagraph 400.7(1)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-51-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-51-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Subparagraph 400.7(2)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-52-norm

53 Paragraph 400.7(2)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-53-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-53-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Subparagraph 400.7(3)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-54-norm

55 Paragraph 400.7(3)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-55-norm

56 Section 400.8 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
note: Substitute heading text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-56-norm

57 Subparagraph 400.8(1)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-57-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-57-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Subparagraph 400.8(2)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-58-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-58-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Paragraph 400.8(2)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-59
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-59-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-59-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Subparagraph 400.8(3)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-60
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-60-norm

61 Paragraph 400.8(3)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-61
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-61-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Before subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-62
note: Dealing with proceeds of indictable crime over $10,000,000 is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-62-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-62-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-62-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62 Before subsection 400.9(1) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Offence implies imprisonment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63 Paragraph 400.9(1)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-63
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-63-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-63-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-63-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Paragraph 400.9(1A)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-64-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-64-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65 Subsection 400.9(2) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-65
note: Modify definition of 'proceeds of indictable crime'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-65-norm

66 Paragraph 400.9(2)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-66
note: Omit specified phrase from Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-66-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67 Subsection 400.9(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-67
note: Insertion of new subsections in the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-67-norm

68 Subsection 400.10(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
note: Insertion of new subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-68-norm

69 Subsection 400.10(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
note: Insertion of a clause after section 400.9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-69-norm

70 After paragraph 400.10(1)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
note: Belief requirement for money laundering
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-70-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-70-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-70-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70 After paragraph 400.10(1)(a) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires belief throughout period
premise text: Person had that belief
conclusion text: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71 Subsection 400.10(1) of the Criminal Code (example)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime' and substitute with 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-71-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Remove the term 'proceeds of crime'
conclusion text: Substitute with 'proceeds of indictable crime'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 After subsection 400.10(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
note: A person is not criminally responsible for an offence against a proceeds of general crime offence provision if they had a mistaken but reasonable belief about the value of money or property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-72-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-72-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-72-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-72-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72 After subsection 400.10(1) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to not be criminally responsible
premise text: The person had a mistaken but reasonable belief about the value of money or property.
conclusion text: The person is not criminally responsible for an offence against a proceeds of general crime offence provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-72-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The belief must have occurred during the period of conduct
premise text: The person had that belief throughout that period
conclusion text: The belief must have occurred during the period of conduct
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-72-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The person's conduct would have constituted another offence if the value was what they believed it to be
premise text: Had the value been what the person believed it to be, the person’s conduct would have constituted another offence against this Division
conclusion text: The person's conduct would have constituted another offence if the value was what they believed it to be
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (1A)
premise text: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (1A) (see subsection 13.3(3))
conclusion text: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in subsection (1A)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The provision is part of the Criminal Code
premise text: After subsection 400.10(1) of the Criminal Code
conclusion text: The provision is part of the Criminal Code
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 At the end of section 400.11 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
note: Add: whether an offence is a foreign offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-73-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-73-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 73 At the end of section 400.11 of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

74 Subsection 400.12(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74
note: Insertion of clause after 'this Division'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-74-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-74-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of clause
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75 Subsection 400.13(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75
note: Repeal subsection and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.31
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-75-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal subsection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 After section 400.14 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76
note: Insert clause after section 400.14 of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-76-norm

400 Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-400-3
note: Recklessness is a fault element in relation to certain provisions of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.32
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Recklessness is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Paragraph 400.15(1)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77
note: Insertion of exception for proceeds of general crime offence provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.33
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-77-norm

78 Subparagraph 400.15(1)(b)(i) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78
note: Omit 'proceeds of crime', substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.33
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-78-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-78-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 After paragraph 400.15(1)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79
note: Prohibition on committing an offence against a proceeds of general crime offence provision outside Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.33
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-79-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-79-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Conduct outside Australia
conclusion text: Offence against proceeds of general crime offence provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Application of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80
note: Application of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-80-norm

81 Section 400.10A of the Criminal Code (at the end of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-81
note: Add 'proceeds of indictable crime'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-81-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-81-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-81-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 81 Section 400.10A of the Criminal Code (at the end of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: add
logic summary: Adds a new obligation
conclusion text: proceeds of indictable crime
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Subsection 400.10A(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-82
note: Insertion of section reference
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-82-norm

83 Subsection 400.10A(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-83
note: Insertion of a clause after section 400.8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-83-norm

84 Subsection 400.10A(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-84
note: Substitute 'proceeds of indictable crime' for 'proceeds of crime'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-84-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-84-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replaces a term with another
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85 After section 400.10A of the Criminal Code)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-85
note: Insert clause after section 400.10A of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-85-norm

400 Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-400-4
note: Prove that money or property is proceeds of general crime if part of a controlled operation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-4-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-400-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 400 Section 400
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

86 Application of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-86
note: Commencement of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-1-sec-86-norm

1 Subsection 23B(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Definition of designated official
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 23B(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 23B(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Exclusion of certain members from covert investigations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Subsection 23B(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclude
logic summary: Excluding individuals from covert investigations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 23B(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Prohibits a member of the police force from engaging in covert investigations under the orders of a superior.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Subsection 23B(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits an action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 23B(1) (at the end of paragraph (c) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Addition to definition of investigating official
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Subsection 23B(1) (at the end of paragraph (c) of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adding a condition to an existing definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Paragraph 23B(4)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: Replace 'investigating official' with 'designated official'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.37
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-5-norm

6 Subsection 23V(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.38
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: REPEAL
logic summary: Repeal subsection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 57
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-1-norm

57 Court may make orders relating to buying back forfeited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-57
note: Court must make orders relating to buying back forfeited property under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57-logic-dialectical-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57 Court may make orders relating to buying back forfeited
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must make orders relating to buying back forfeited property.
premise text: The court is satisfied that the person had the interest immediately before the forfeiture order was made.
conclusion text: The court MUST make orders relating to buying back forfeited property.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
logic summary: Court must make orders relating to buying back forfeited property if the person had the interest immediately before the forfeiture order was made.
premise text: The court is satisfied that the person had the interest immediately before the forfeiture order was made.
conclusion text: The court ⇒ making orders relating to buying back forfeited property.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Court must make orders relating to buying back forfeited property between certain dates.
premise text: The person had the interest immediately before the forfeiture order was made.
conclusion text: The court BETWEEN making orders relating to buying back forfeited property and the date of the forfeiture order.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57-logic-dialectical-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Dialectical
operator: ~
logic summary: Court must make orders relating to buying back forfeited property if the person had the interest immediately before the forfeiture order was made.
premise text: The court is satisfied that the person had the interest immediately before the forfeiture order was made.
conclusion text: The court ~ making orders relating to buying back forfeited property.
execution surface: modalities::dialectical
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Court may make orders relating to buying back forfeited property under certain conditions.
premise text: The person had the interest immediately before the forfeiture order was made.
conclusion text: The court MAY make orders relating to buying back forfeited property.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57A Applying for an order under section 57
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-57a
has part: 57A(1) Applying for an order under section 57
has part: 57A(2) Applying for an order under section 57
has part: 57A(3) Applying for an order under section 57
has part: 57A(4) Applying for an order under section 57
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.41

57A(1) Applying for an order under section 57
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-57a-ss-1
part of: 57A Applying for an order under section 57
note: Application for order under section 57
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57a-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 57A(1) Applying for an order under section 57
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to apply for an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57A(2) Applying for an order under section 57
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-57a-ss-2
part of: 57A Applying for an order under section 57
note: A person may apply to the court for an order under section 57 after the forfeiture order is made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57A(2) Applying for an order under section 57
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57A(3) Applying for an order under section 57
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-57a-ss-3
part of: 57A Applying for an order under section 57
note: Cannot apply under subsection (2) if notified of application for forfeiture order but did not make an application before forfeiture order was made.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57a-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 57A(3) Applying for an order under section 57
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on applying under subsection (2)
premise text: Notified of application for forfeiture order but did not make an application before forfeiture order was made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57A(4) Applying for an order under section 57
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-57a-ss-4
part of: 57A Applying for an order under section 57
note: Court may give leave to apply under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57a-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-57a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 103
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-2-norm

103 Court may make orders relating to buying back forfeited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-103
note: Court may make orders relating to buying back forfeited property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-103-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-103-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-103-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 103 Court may make orders relating to buying back forfeited
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-103-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Court has an obligation to make orders relating to buying back forfeited property.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 104 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
note: Substitute order under section 102
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Section 104 (heading)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace 'orders' with 'an order'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 104(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
note: Omit “or 103”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-4-norm

5 After section 104
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
note: Insert clause after section 104
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-5-norm

104A Applying for an order under section 103
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-104a
has part: 104A(1) Applying for an order under section 103
has part: 104A(2) Applying for an order under section 103
has part: 104A(3) Applying for an order under section 103
has part: 104A(4) Applying for an order under section 103
has part: 104A(5) Applying for an order under section 103
has part: 104A(6) Applying for an order under section 103
has part: 104A(7) Applying for an order under section 103
has part: 104A(8) Applying for an order under section 103
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.44

104A(1) Applying for an order under section 103
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-104a-ss-1
part of: 104A Applying for an order under section 103
note: A person may apply to the court for an order under section 103.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104A(1) Applying for an order under section 103
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses a permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104A(2) Applying for an order under section 103
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-104a-ss-2
part of: 104A Applying for an order under section 103
note: Cannot apply under subsection (1) of section 104A unless court gives leave.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-2-norm

104A(3) Applying for an order under section 103
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-104a-ss-3
part of: 104A Applying for an order under section 103
note: Court may grant leave to apply for order under section 103
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 104A(3) Applying for an order under section 103
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104A(4) Applying for an order under section 103
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-104a-ss-4
part of: 104A Applying for an order under section 103
note: Court cannot hear application under subsection (1) if Official Trustee has taken action in relation to property under section 100.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-4-logic-ltl-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 104A(4) Applying for an order under section 103
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Court cannot hear application
premise text: Official Trustee has taken action in relation to property under section 100
conclusion text: Court must not hear application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Court cannot make an order in relation to interest under section 103
premise text: It would not be practicable for the court to make an order in relation to the interest under section 103
conclusion text: Court must not hear application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps with
logic summary: Application and Official Trustee's action overlap in time
premise text: Official Trustee has taken action in relation to property under section 100
conclusion text: Application and Official Trustee's action overlap in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps with
logic summary: Application and Official Trustee's action have a common temporal interval
premise text: Official Trustee has taken action in relation to property under section 100
conclusion text: Application and Official Trustee's action have a common temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

104A(5) Applying for an order under section 103
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-104a-ss-5
part of: 104A Applying for an order under section 103
note: Written notice to responsible authority is required for application and grounds.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104A(5) Applying for an order under section 103
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Written notice is a requirement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104A(6) Applying for an order under section 103
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-104a-ss-6
part of: 104A Applying for an order under section 103
note: Responsible authority may appear and adduce evidence at the hearing of the application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104A(6) Applying for an order under section 103
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May appear and adduce evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104A(7) Applying for an order under section 103
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-104a-ss-7
part of: 104A Applying for an order under section 103
note: Authority may represent Commonwealth in proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104A(7) Applying for an order under section 103
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Representing the Commonwealth
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104A(8) Applying for an order under section 103
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-104a-ss-8
part of: 104A Applying for an order under section 103
note: Notice of grounds for contesting application
description: grounds on which it proposes to contest the application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104A(8) Applying for an order under section 103
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-104a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide notice
conclusion text: The responsible authority must give the applicant notice...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 After section 181
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-6-norm

181A Examination orders relating to applications under section 57A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-181a
has part: 181A(1) Examination orders relating to applications under section 57A
has part: 181A(2) Examination orders relating to applications under section 57A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.46

181A(1) Examination orders relating to applications under section 57A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-181a-ss-1
part of: 181A Examination orders relating to applications under section 57A
note: Court may make examination order for person related to forfeiture order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-181a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-181a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 181A(1) Examination orders relating to applications under section 57A
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-181a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Court may make examination order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181A(2) Examination orders relating to applications under section 57A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-181a-ss-2
part of: 181A Examination orders relating to applications under section 57A
note: Ceases to have effect under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-181a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-181a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-181a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cease
logic summary: Ceases to have effect
premise text: (2) The *examination order ceases to have effect when...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181B Examination orders relating to applications under
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-181b
has part: 181B(1) Examination orders relating to applications under
has part: 181B(2) Examination orders relating to applications under
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.46

181B(1) Examination orders relating to applications under
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-181b-ss-1
part of: 181B Examination orders relating to applications under
note: Court may make examination order for person related to application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-181b-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-181b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-181b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 181B(1) Examination orders relating to applications under
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-181b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May make examination order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181B(2) Examination orders relating to applications under
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-181b-ss-2
part of: 181B Examination orders relating to applications under
note: Ceases to have effect under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.46
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-181b-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-181b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-181b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cease
logic summary: Ceases to have effect
premise text: (2) The *examination order ceases to have effect when...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 At the end of subsection 187(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
note: Additions to examination conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-7-norm

8 Paragraph 187(5)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified words.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 After paragraph 202(5)(eb)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
note: Person must be able to repay loan and meet expenses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 After paragraph 202(5)(eb)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be able to repay loan
premise text: Person has made an application under section 57A for an order under section 57 in relation to an interest in property
conclusion text: The person will be able to repay the loan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must meet expenses
premise text: Person has made an application under section 57A for an order under section 57 in relation to an interest in property
conclusion text: The person will be able to meet the person's eligible living expenses
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must meet debts
premise text: Person has made an application under section 57A for an order under section 57 in relation to an interest in property
conclusion text: The person will be able to meet any eligible debts of the person
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Loan repayment must occur after application
premise text: Person has made an application under section 57A for an order under section 57 in relation to an interest in property
conclusion text: The loan repayment must occur after the application
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

10 Paragraph 202(5)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
note: Omit specific phrase from text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 At the end of section 202
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
has part: 11(7) At the end of section 202
has part: 11(8) At the end of section 202
has part: 11(9) At the end of section 202
has part: 11(10) At the end of section 202
has part: 11(11) At the end of section 202
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.48

11(7) At the end of section 202
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11-ss-7
part of: 11 At the end of section 202
note: It is immaterial whether the loan was made before or after the application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-11-ss-7-norm

11(8) At the end of section 202
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11-ss-8
part of: 11 At the end of section 202
note: It is immaterial whether the loan was made before or after the application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-11-ss-8-norm

11(9) At the end of section 202
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11-ss-9
part of: 11 At the end of section 202
note: Defines loan and borrow for purposes of section 202
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-11-ss-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-11-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-11-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-11-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes equivalent concepts as loan
premise text: (9) For the purposes of this section, loan includes anything that may reasonably be regarded as equivalent to a loan
conclusion text: loan includes anything that may reasonably be regarded as equivalent to a loan
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-11-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has a corresponding meaning
logic summary: Borrow has a corresponding meaning
premise text: (9) For the purposes of this section, loan includes anything that may reasonably be regarded as equivalent to a loan, and borrow has a corresponding meaning
conclusion text: borrow has a corresponding meaning
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(10) At the end of section 202
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11-ss-10
part of: 11 At the end of section 202
note: Eligible living expenses of a person and their dependants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-11-ss-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-11-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-11-ss-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(10) At the end of section 202
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-11-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Definition of eligible living expenses
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11(11) At the end of section 202
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11-ss-11
part of: 11 At the end of section 202
note: Debt incurred in good faith is considered eligible.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.48
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-11-ss-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-11-ss-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-11-ss-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11(11) At the end of section 202
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-11-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has-obligation
logic summary: Obligation to consider good faith
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Section 338 (definition of examination order)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
note: Substitute specific examination orders in a definition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.49
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-12-norm

13 Section 338 (before paragraph (h) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
note: Offences against certain sections related to examination orders under sections 181A and 181B are prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.49
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-13-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of specific offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Transitional—section 57 of the Proceeds of Crime Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-14
note: Continuation of Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 despite amendment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 Transitional—section 57 of the Proceeds of Crime Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES
logic summary: Continues to apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Transitional—sections 103 and 104 of the Proceeds of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15
note: Continues to apply certain provisions of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 despite amendments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Transitional—sections 103 and 104 of the Proceeds of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continues
logic summary: Obligation to apply certain provisions
premise text: Amendments made by items 2 to 5
conclusion text: Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 continues to apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 338
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
note: Definition of financial advantage includes financial advantage.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-4-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-4-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-4-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-4-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 338
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-4-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
premise text: advantage includes financial advantage.
conclusion text: financial advantage is included in the definition of advantage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-4-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition
logic summary: Definition relation
premise text: See also the definition of financial advantage.
conclusion text: The definition of financial advantage is related to the concept of financial advantage.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 338 (at the end of the definition of benefit)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
note: Add note about advantage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-4-sec-2-norm

3 Section 338
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
note: Defines financial advantage as avoiding, deferring or reducing a debt, loss or liability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-4-sec-3-norm

4 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
note: Applicability of amendments made by this Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-4-sec-4-norm

1 Section 53
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-1
note: Repeal section 53
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-1-norm

2 After section 68
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-2-norm

68A Third exception—property located outside Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-68a
has part: 68A(1) Third exception—property located outside Australia
has part: 68A(2) Third exception—property located outside Australia
has part: 68A(3) Third exception—property located outside Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.53

68A(1) Third exception—property located outside Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-68a-ss-1
part of: 68A Third exception—property located outside Australia
note: Commonwealth's equitable interest in property located outside Australia vests in equity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-68a-ss-1-norm

68A(2) Third exception—property located outside Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-68a-ss-2
part of: 68A Third exception—property located outside Australia
note: No dealing for the purposes of subsection 69(1) if action by responsible authority under paragraph (1)(c)(i)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-68a-ss-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-68a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68A(2) Third exception—property located outside Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

68A(3) Third exception—property located outside Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-68a-ss-3
part of: 68A Third exception—property located outside Australia
note: Despite section 66 and subsection (1) of this section, if property specified in a *forfeiture order is property located outside *Australia;
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-68a-ss-3-norm

3 After section 98
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-3
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-3-norm

98A Third exception—property located outside Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-98a
has part: 98A(1) Third exception—property located outside Australia
has part: 98A(2) Third exception—property located outside Australia
has part: 98A(3) Third exception—property located outside Australia
has part: 98A(4) Third exception—property located outside Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.54

98A(1) Third exception—property located outside Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-98a-ss-1
part of: 98A Third exception—property located outside Australia
note: Commonwealth's equitable interest in property located outside Australia must be protected and enforced.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-98a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-98a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-98a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98A(1) Third exception—property located outside Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-98a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Commonwealth has an obligation to protect its equitable interest in property.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98A(2) Third exception—property located outside Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-98a-ss-2
part of: 98A Third exception—property located outside Australia
note: No action by the responsible authority is a dealing for subsection 99(1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-98a-ss-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-98a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98A(2) Third exception—property located outside Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

98A(3) Third exception—property located outside Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-98a-ss-3
part of: 98A Third exception—property located outside Australia
note: Property vests in a person under the law of the place where it is located.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-98a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-98a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-98a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-98a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Property vests in a person under the law of the place where it is located.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-98a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation between property location and vesting
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98A(4) Third exception—property located outside Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-98a-ss-4
part of: 98A Third exception—property located outside Australia
note: Equitable interest vested in the Commonwealth is unaffected by subsection (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-98a-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-98a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-98a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Vested interest remains unaffected
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: (4)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 314(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-4
note: Substitution of phrase in section 53
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.55
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-4-norm

5 At the end of section 314
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-5
note: Jurisdiction of courts not excluded by location outside Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.55
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 At the end of section 314
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to respect jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-6
note: Application of amendments made by this Schedule to property acquired before, at or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-5-sec-6-norm

1 Section 195 (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-1
note: Omit specific text from section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-1-norm

2 Subsection 196(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-2
note: Omit specific penalty duration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-2-norm

3 Section 197A (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-3
note: Omit specific text from section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 At the end of section 198
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-4
note: Add: or (f) in proceedings for an offence against this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-4-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 At the end of section 198
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 211(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-5
note: Omit '100', substitute '120'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-5-norm

6 Subsection 218(1) (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-6
note: Omit '100', substitute '120'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-6-norm

7 Subparagraph 266A(1)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-7
note: Insertion of 'or someone else' after specific phrase.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-7-norm

8 At the end of paragraph 266A(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-8
note: Exercise of a power or performance of a function under Division 2 of Part 4-1 is added to paragraph 266A(1)(a)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-8-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 At the end of paragraph 266A(1)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsection 266A(2) (after table item 2C)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-9
note: Insert Schedule 6 Information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-9-norm

10 Subsection 266A(2) (at the end of the table)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-10
note: Enabling or assisting the International Criminal Court to perform its functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 At the end of subsection 266A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-11
note: Add Schedule 6 Information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-11-norm

12 After subsection 266A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-12
note: No duty to disclose information, but allows disclosure for certain purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows disclosure under specified conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

13 After paragraph 266A(4)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-13
note: Insert proceedings for an offence against Part 3-1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-13-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 After paragraph 266A(4)(e)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

14 After subsection 266A(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-14
note: No application of subsection (5) in proceedings for an offence against
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-14-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 After subsection 266A(6)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15 Paragraph 271(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15
note: Omit “or”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-15-norm

16 Paragraph 271(2)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-16
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-16-norm

17 Subsection 271(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-17
note: Omit proceedings under certain sections of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-17-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-17-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Subsection 271(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits proceedings under certain sections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Section 338
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-18
note: Definitions for International Criminal Court, Mutual Assistance Department, and International War Crimes Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-18-norm

19 Section 338 (after paragraph (g) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-19
note: Offence against section 195, 196 or 197A related to examination of person under section 180
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-19-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-19-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits specific offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Application—section 266A of the Proceeds of Crime Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-20
note: Amendments of section 266A apply in relation to information obtained before or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-6-sec-20-norm

1 Subsection 5(2) (after note 5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1
note: Transfer of assets from Confiscated Assets Account to COAG Reform Fund
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-1-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Transfer of assets from Confiscated Assets Account to COAG Reform Fund
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between accounts
premise text: Confiscated Assets Account
conclusion text: COAG Reform Fund
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 At the end of subsection 7(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2
note: Grant is not covered by section 298F of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 At the end of subsection 7(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

3 At the end of subsection 7(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-3
note: Note on channelling grants payments through the COAG Reform Fund
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-3-norm

4 Paragraph 9(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-4
note: Omit certain words related to property subject to restraining orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-4-norm

5 At the end of section 69
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-5
note: No effect on Official Trustee's powers and duties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Official Trustee exempt from Division 3 of Part 4-1
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 After paragraph 70(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-6
note: Apply GST liability to associated entity's payment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.65
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 After paragraph 70(1)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 After Division 4 of Part 2-2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.65
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-7-norm

71A Official Trustee may take custody and control of forfeited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-71a
note: Official Trustee may take custody and control of forfeited property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.65
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-71a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-71a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-71a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 88(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-8
note: Replace 'Minister' with '*Official Trustee'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Paragraph 88(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-9
note: Omit 'Minister', substitute 'Official Trustee'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-9-norm

10 Subsection 88(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-10
note: Replace 'Minister' with '*Official Trustee'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 88(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-11
note: Omit 'Minister' (second occurring) and substitute 'Official Trustee'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-11-norm

12 Paragraph 89(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-12
note: Omit 'Minister', substitute '*Official Trustee'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-12-norm

13 Section 90
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-13
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-13-norm

90 Buying out other interests in forfeited property
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-90
has part: 90(1) Buying out other interests in forfeited property
has part: 90(2) Buying out other interests in forfeited property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.66

90(1) Buying out other interests in forfeited property
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-90-ss-1
part of: 90 Buying out other interests in forfeited property
note: The relevant person must pay to the Commonwealth an amount equal to the value of that other interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-90-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The relevant person has an obligation to pay to the Commonwealth an amount equal to the value of that other interest.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90(2) Buying out other interests in forfeited property
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-90-ss-2
part of: 90 Buying out other interests in forfeited property
note: Direct Official Trustee to transfer other interest if objection lodged within period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-90-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to the Minister or senior officer.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 At the end of section 99
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-14
note: Exercise of powers or performance of duties by Official Trustee not prevented or limited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.67
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Exercise of powers or performance of duties not prevented or limited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Subsection 100(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-15
note: Substitution of authorization in subsection 99(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-15-logic-deontic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows substitution
premise text: Omit ‘If subsection 99(1) no longer prevents’
conclusion text: substitute ‘If subsection 99(1) authorises’
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-15-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows substitution
premise text: Substitute ‘If subsection 99(1) authorises’
conclusion text: Omit ‘If subsection 99(1) no longer prevents’
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

16 After paragraph 100(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-16
note: Apply GST entity's liability to pay GST in connection with disposal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 After paragraph 100(1)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state to pay GST in connection with disposal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 After Division 2 of Part 2-3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-17
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-17-norm

101A Official Trustee may take custody and control of forfeited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-101a
note: Official Trustee may take custody and control of forfeited property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-101a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-101a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-101a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 101A Official Trustee may take custody and control of forfeited
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-101a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Subsection 105(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-18
note: Replace 'Minister' with '*Official Trustee'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-18-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Section 106
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-19
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-19-norm

106 Buying out other interests in forfeited property
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-106
note: Buyer must give written notice to other persons with interests in the property before purchasing their interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.69
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-106-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-106-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-106-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-106-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Buyer must give notice to other persons with interests in the property
premise text: Property is forfeited to the Commonwealth under section 92
conclusion text: Buyer may purchase interest from the Commonwealth
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-106-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Relevant Person gives written notice within 21 days after forfeiture
premise text: Interest in the property is required to be transferred to a person under section 105 or a direction under subparagraph 102(d)(i)
conclusion text: Buyer must give notice to other persons with interests in the property
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-106-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Buyer must lodge written objection within 21 days after receiving notice
premise text: Relevant Person gives written notice to other persons with interests in the property
conclusion text: Buyer may not purchase interest from the Commonwealth without objection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-106-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Buyer must give written notice to other persons with interests in the property before purchasing their interest
premise text: Property is forfeited to the Commonwealth under section 92
conclusion text: Buyer may purchase interest from the Commonwealth
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

20 Subsection 114(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-20
note: Replace 'Minister' with '*Official Trustee'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-20-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-20-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Paragraph 114(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-21
note: Omit 'Minister', substitute 'Official Trustee'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-21-norm

22 Subsection 114(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-22
note: Replace 'Minister' with '*Official Trustee'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-22-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Subsection 114(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-23
note: Replace 'Minister' with 'Official Trustee'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-23-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-23-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-23-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23 Subsection 114(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 After section 267
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-24
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-24-norm

267AA Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-267aa
has part: 267AA(1) Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
has part: 267AA(2) Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.70

267AA(1) Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-267aa-ss-1
part of: 267AA Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
note: Exercise powers in relation to specified property types
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on Official Trustee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267AA(2) Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-267aa-ss-2
part of: 267AA Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
note: Defines controlled property for Division 2 purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267aa-ss-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267aa-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267AA(2) Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

267AB Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-267ab
has part: 267AB(1) Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
has part: 267AB(2) Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
has part: 267AB(3) Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
has part: 267AB(4) Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.71

267AB(1) Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-1
part of: 267AB Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
note: Official Trustee's powers and duties in relation to forfeited property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267AB(1) Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on the Official Trustee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Describes temporal relation to forfeited property
premise text: (a) property that is the subject of a *forfeiture order; or (b) property forfeited under section 92; or (c) property that is subject to a direction under section 282 or 282A.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Describes recurring relation to forfeited property
premise text: (a) property that is the subject of a *forfeiture order; or (b) property forfeited under section 92; or (c) property that is subject to a direction under section 282 or 282A.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Describes diffusion of Official Trustee's powers and duties
premise text: (a) property that is the subject of a *forfeiture order; or (b) property forfeited under section 92; or (c) property that is subject to a direction under section 282 or 282A.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: AppliesTo
logic summary: Describes application of Official Trustee's powers and duties
premise text: (a) property that is the subject of a *forfeiture order; or (b) property forfeited under section 92; or (c) property that is subject to a direction under section 282 or 282A.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267AB(2) Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-2
part of: 267AB Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
note: Official Trustee's powers and duties in relation to forfeited property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267AB(2) Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exercised
logic summary: Exercise of powers
premise text: (2) If property is the subject of a *forfeiture order...
conclusion text: ...the powers conferred on the *Official Trustee under Division 3 may be exercised...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: performed
logic summary: Performance of duties
premise text: (2) If property is the subject of a *forfeiture order...
conclusion text: ...the duties imposed on the Official Trustee under Division 3 are to be performed...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for exercising powers and performing duties
premise text: (a) during the period: (i) beginning when the forfeiture order was made...
conclusion text: ...ending at the later of the times set out in subsection 69(1); or (b) during the period mentioned in section 86.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for exercising powers and performing duties (LTL)
premise text: (a) during the period: (i) beginning when the forfeiture order was made...
conclusion text: ...ending at the later of the times set out in subsection 69(1); or (b) during the period mentioned in section 86.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposed
logic summary: Imposition of duties
premise text: (2) If property is the subject of a *forfeiture order...
conclusion text: ...the duties imposed on the Official Trustee under Division 3 are to be performed...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267AB(3) Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-3
part of: 267AB Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
note: Official Trustee's powers and duties may be exercised in relation to forfeited property.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267AB(3) Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Official Trustee's powers and duties may be exercised.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

267AB(4) Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-4
part of: 267AB Additional property to which the Official Trustee’s powers
note: Exercise powers and perform duties in relation to property during appeal period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-267ab-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Exercise powers and perform duties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Subsection 270(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-25
note: Insertion of additional actions after 'require the person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-25-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 Subsection 270(1)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Paragraphs 270(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-26
note: Provide information and evidence to the Official Trustee within a specified period.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-26-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-26-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26 Paragraphs 270(1)(a) and (b)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information and evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Subsection 270(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-27
has part: 27(2) Subsection 270(2)
has part: 27(3) Subsection 270(2)
has part: 27(4) Subsection 270(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.73

27(2) Subsection 270(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-27-ss-2
part of: 27 Subsection 270(2)
note: May require evidence to be given on oath or affirmation
description: Evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.73
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-27-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-27-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Require
logic summary: Mandatory requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(3) Subsection 270(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-27-ss-3
part of: 27 Subsection 270(2)
note: An oath or affirmation may be administered in a specific way when giving evidence by video link.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.73
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-27-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-27-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-27-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-27-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Oath or affirmation must be administered in a specific way.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-27-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Excerpt describes a class of procedures for administering oaths and affirmations.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(4) Subsection 270(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-27-ss-4
part of: 27 Subsection 270(2)
note: An oath or affirmation may be administered by the Official Trustee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.73
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-27-ss-4-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-27-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(4) Subsection 270(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

28 Section 275
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-28
note: Insertion of '(1)' before 'A person'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.74
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-28-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-28-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-28-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28 Section 275
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion requirement
premise text: (1) before A person
conclusion text: Obligation to insert '(1)'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Subparagraph 275(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-29
note: Omit specific phrase from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.74
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-29-norm

30 Subparagraph 275(b)(iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-30
note: Repeal a subparagraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.74
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-30-norm

31 At the end of section 275
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-31
has part: 31(2) At the end of section 275
has part: 31(3) At the end of section 275
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.74

31(2) At the end of section 275
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-31-ss-2
part of: 31 At the end of section 275
note: Refusal to provide evidence under notice may result in imprisonment or penalty units.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.74
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-31-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-31-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 31(2) At the end of section 275
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-31-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits refusal to provide evidence under notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31(3) At the end of section 275
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-31-ss-3
part of: 31 At the end of section 275
note: Refusal to provide evidence under notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.74
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-31-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-31-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-31-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-31-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 31(3) At the end of section 275
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal to provide evidence
premise text: Notice under paragraph 270(1)(d)
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 6 months or 30 penalty units, or both.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-31-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RecurringTrace
logic summary: Recurring refusal to provide evidence under notice
premise text: Notice under paragraph 270(1)(d)
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 6 months or 30 penalty units, or both.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence under notice
premise text: Notice under paragraph 270(1)(d)
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 6 months or 30 penalty units, or both.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-31-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between notice and refusal to provide evidence
premise text: Notice under paragraph 270(1)(d)
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 6 months or 30 penalty units, or both.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-31-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permission to refuse evidence under certain circumstances
premise text: Notice under paragraph 270(1)(d)
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 6 months or 30 penalty units, or both.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

32 At the end of Division 2 of Part 4-1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-32
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-32-norm

275A Failure to produce a book
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-275a
note: Refusal to produce a book upon notice
description: Book
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-275a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-275a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-275a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 275A Failure to produce a book
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-275a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of refusing to produce a book upon notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Paragraph 278(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-33
note: Insertion of 'written' before 'agreement'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-33-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-33-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33 Paragraph 278(2)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Obligation to insert
premise text: Insertion of 'written'
conclusion text: Obligation to insert 'written' before 'agreement'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

34 Section 279 (at the end of the heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-34
note: Add “etc.”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-34-norm

35 Paragraphs 279(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-35
note: Specify persons who may have an interest in forfeited property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-35-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-35-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Specify persons who may have an interest in forfeited property
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-35-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <-
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: forfeiture order
conclusion text: immediately before the forfeiture order was made
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 At the end of section 279
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-36
has part: 36(5) At the end of section 279
has part: 36(6) At the end of section 279
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.76

36(5) At the end of section 279
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-36-ss-5
part of: 36 At the end of section 279
note: No written notice required for disposal of controlled property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-36-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-36-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-36-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Exemption from written notice requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(6) At the end of section 279
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-36-ss-6
part of: 36 At the end of section 279
note: Official Trustee must give person written notice of disposal of property after agreed disposal.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-36-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-36-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-36-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Section 281
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-37
note: Insertion of '(1)' before 'Amounts'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-37-norm

38 Paragraphs 281(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-38
note: Property covered by a restraining order or forfeiture order is taken to be so.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-38-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-38-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Property covered by a restraining order or forfeiture order is taken to be so.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 At the end of section 281
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-39
note: Proceeds of an offence or instrument of that offence continue to be proceeds of that offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.77
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-39-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-39-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-39-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39 At the end of section 281
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continues the obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 At the end of Division 3 of Part 4-1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-40
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.77
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-40-norm

281A Official Trustee does not acquire any additional proprietary
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-281a
note: Official Trustee does not acquire additional proprietary interests in controlled property when exercising powers or performing duties.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.77
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-281a-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-281a-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-281a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not acquire
logic summary: No acquisition of proprietary interests
premise text: Official Trustee's powers and duties
conclusion text: No additional interests acquired
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 At the end of section 285
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-41
note: Controlled property
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.77
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-41-norm

42 Paragraph 288(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-42
note: Omit 'or under', substitute ', under'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.77
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-42-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-42-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'or under' and substituting ', under'.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Paragraph 288(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-43
note: Insertion of section references after Mutual Assistance Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-43-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Paragraph 288(1)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of section references
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 At the end of subsection 289(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-44
note: See also section 267AB for extension of controlled property meaning.
references: section 267AB
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-44-norm

45 Subsection 289(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-45
note: Omit specific text from subsection 289(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-45-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-45-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits specific text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 At the end of subsection 290(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-46
note: See also section 267AB for extension of controlled property meaning.
references: section 267AB
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-46-norm

47 After paragraph 296(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-47
note: Input tax credits entitlement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-47-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-47-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: entitled
logic summary: Entitlement to input tax credits
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Paragraph 296(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-48
note: Substitute section 90(1)(f) for section 90(f)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-48-norm

49 Paragraph 296(3)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-49
note: Substitute provision in section 106(1)(f)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-49-norm

50 After paragraph 297(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-50
note: Transferring amounts to COAG Reform Fund for grants to States and Territories
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-50-norm

51 Paragraph 297(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-51
note: Omit specific phrase from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.79
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-51-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-51-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase.
premise text: Omit ‘but that the Official Trustee has been unable to recover’
conclusion text: or (b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 After paragraph 297(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-52
note: Paying Official Trustee amounts under regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.79
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-52-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-52-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52 After paragraph 297(e)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

53 After paragraph 297(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-53
note: Making payments in discharge of an associated GST entity's liability to pay GST is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.79
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-53-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-53-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of making payments in discharge of an associated GST entity's liability to pay GST.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Before paragraph 296(1)(h)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-54
note: Prohibition on paying money under foreign deferred prosecution agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.79
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-54-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-54-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids payment of money under foreign deferred prosecution agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 At the end of Part 4-3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-55
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.80
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-55-norm

298A Grants to the States and Territories for crime prevention etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298a
has part: 298A(1) Grants to the States and Territories for crime prevention etc.
has part: 298A(2) Grants to the States and Territories for crime prevention etc.
has part: 298A(3) Grants to the States and Territories for crime prevention etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.80

298A(1) Grants to the States and Territories for crime prevention etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298a-ss-1
part of: 298A Grants to the States and Territories for crime prevention etc.
note: Grant of financial assistance to States and Territories for specified purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.80
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298a-ss-1-norm

298A(2) Grants to the States and Territories for crime prevention etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298a-ss-2
part of: 298A Grants to the States and Territories for crime prevention etc.
note: Grant of reimbursement or partial reimbursement of costs or expenses
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.80
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298a-ss-2-norm

298A(3) Grants to the States and Territories for crime prevention etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298a-ss-3
part of: 298A Grants to the States and Territories for crime prevention etc.
note: Does not limit subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.80
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not imply
logic summary: Limits the scope of subsection (2)
premise text: (2) does not limit (1)
conclusion text: (3) does not limit (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

298B Terms and conditions of grants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298b
has part: 298B(1) Terms and conditions of grants
has part: 298B(2) Terms and conditions of grants
has part: 298B(3) Terms and conditions of grants
has part: 298B(4) Terms and conditions of grants
has part: 298B(5) Terms and conditions of grants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.80

298B(1) Terms and conditions of grants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298b-ss-1
part of: 298B Terms and conditions of grants
note: Terms and conditions of grants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.80
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 298B(1) Terms and conditions of grants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies to a grant of financial assistance
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

298B(2) Terms and conditions of grants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298b-ss-2
part of: 298B Terms and conditions of grants
note: Written agreement required for financial assistance grants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.80
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 298B(2) Terms and conditions of grants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

298B(3) Terms and conditions of grants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298b-ss-3
part of: 298B Terms and conditions of grants
note: Comply with terms and conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.80
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

298B(4) Terms and conditions of grants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298b-ss-4
part of: 298B Terms and conditions of grants
note: Grant recipient must repay amounts to the Commonwealth under specified circumstances.
description: repayment amounts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.80
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 298B(4) Terms and conditions of grants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to repay
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

298B(5) Terms and conditions of grants
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298b-ss-5
part of: 298B Terms and conditions of grants
note: Minister must enter into agreement on behalf of Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.80
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 298B(5) Terms and conditions of grants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

298C Minister has powers etc. of the Commonwealth
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298c
has part: 298C(1) Minister has powers etc. of the Commonwealth
has part: 298C(2) Minister has powers etc. of the Commonwealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.81

298C(1) Minister has powers etc. of the Commonwealth
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298c-ss-1
part of: 298C Minister has powers etc. of the Commonwealth
note: The Minister has all the rights, responsibilities, duties and powers of the Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.81
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298c-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 298C(1) Minister has powers etc. of the Commonwealth
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: The Minister has rights, responsibilities, duties and powers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

298C(2) Minister has powers etc. of the Commonwealth
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298c-ss-2
part of: 298C Minister has powers etc. of the Commonwealth
note: The Minister has powers to pay and institute actions on behalf of the Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.81
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298c-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298c-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298c-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298c-ss-2-logic-ltl-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: The Minister has a power to act on behalf of the Commonwealth.
premise text: Minister is an agent.
conclusion text: Minister has a power to act on behalf of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298c-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustPay
logic summary: The Minister must pay a section 298A grant on behalf of the Commonwealth.
premise text: Section 298A grant is payable by the Minister.
conclusion text: The Minister must pay a section 298A grant on behalf of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298c-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustInstituteAction
logic summary: The Minister must institute an action or proceeding on behalf of the Commonwealth.
premise text: Minister has power to institute actions.
conclusion text: The Minister must institute an action or proceeding on behalf of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The Minister may institute an action during the period of the section 298A grant.
premise text: Section 298A grant has a duration.
conclusion text: The Minister may institute an action during the period of the section 298A grant.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298c-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Instituting an action is a recurring trace.
premise text: Minister has power to institute actions.
conclusion text: Instituting an action is a recurring trace.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

298D Conferral of powers on the Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298d
note: The Minister may exercise a power conferred on the Minister by an agreement under section 298B.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.81
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298d-norm

298E Channelling State/Territory grants through the COAG
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298e
has part: 298E(1) Channelling State/Territory grants through the COAG
has part: 298E(2) Channelling State/Territory grants through the COAG
has part: 298E(3) Channelling State/Territory grants through the COAG
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.81

298E(1) Channelling State/Territory grants through the COAG
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298e-ss-1
part of: 298E Channelling State/Territory grants through the COAG
note: Minister must direct grant of financial assistance to be debited from Confiscated Assets Account and credited to COAG Reform Fund.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.81
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298e-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298e-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 298E(1) Channelling State/Territory grants through the COAG
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has a duty to direct grant of financial assistance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

298E(2) Channelling State/Territory grants through the COAG
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298e-ss-2
part of: 298E Channelling State/Territory grants through the COAG
note: Grant direction must be expressed to enable debiting from COAG Reform Fund.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.81
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298e-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 298E(2) Channelling State/Territory grants through the COAG
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST Express
logic summary: Expressed direction is necessary for grant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

298E(3) Channelling State/Territory grants through the COAG
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298e-ss-3
part of: 298E Channelling State/Territory grants through the COAG
note: Two or more directions under subsection (1) may be set out in the same document.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.81
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298e-ss-3-norm

298F Debits from the COAG Reform Fund
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-298f
note: Ensure COAG Reform Fund is debited for grant purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.82
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298f-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298f-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298f-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 298F Debits from the COAG Reform Fund
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-298f-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to debit COAG Reform Fund
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Section 338
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-56
note: Definitions for associated GST entity and COAG Reform Fund.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.82
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-56-norm

57 Section 338 (note to the definition of controlled property)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-57
note: Substitute 'Note 1' for 'Note'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.82
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-57-norm

58 Section 338 (at the end of the definition of controlled
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-58
note: Note 2 and Note 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.82
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-58-norm

59 Section 338
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-59
note: Definition of foreign deferred prosecution agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.82
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-59-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59 Section 338
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

60 Application—sections 270 and 275 of the Proceeds of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-60
note: Amendments apply after commencement of item
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.83
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-60-norm

61 Application—section 278 of the Proceeds of Crime Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-61
note: Amendment of section 278 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 applies to agreements made or given after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.83
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-61-norm

62 Application—section 279 of the Proceeds of Crime Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-62
note: Amendment of subsection 279(1) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 applies in relation to a notice given after commencement and an agreement made or given by a person after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.83
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-62-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-62-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-62-logic-ltl-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-62-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-62-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-62-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the amendment and agreement.
premise text: (1) The amendment of subsection 279(1) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 made by this Part applies in relation to a notice given after the commencement of this item.
conclusion text: The amendment applies after the commencement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-62-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the agreement.
premise text: (2) Subsections 279(5) and (6) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (as amended by this Part) apply in relation to an agreement made or given by a person after the commencement of this item.
conclusion text: The agreement applies after the commencement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-62-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the amendment as an undertaking.
premise text: (1) The amendment of subsection 279(1) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 made by this Part applies in relation to a notice given after the commencement of this item.
conclusion text: The amendment is an undertaking.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-62-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the agreement as subject to the amended subsection 279(1) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
premise text: (2) Subsections 279(5) and (6) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (as amended by this Part) apply in relation to an agreement made or given by a person after the commencement of this item.
conclusion text: The agreement is subject to the amended subsection 279(1).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

63 Application—section 281 of the Proceeds of Crime Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-63
note: Amendments apply after commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.84
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-63-norm

64 Application—paragraph 296(1)(aa) of the Proceeds of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-64
note: Application of paragraph 296(1)(aa) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.84
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-64-norm

65 Application—paragraph 297(e) of the Proceeds of Crime
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-65
note: Amendment of paragraph 297(e) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 applies to costs, charges and expenses incurred after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.84
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-65-norm

66 Application—paragraph 297(ea) of the Proceeds of Crime
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-66
note: Application of paragraph 297(ea) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to costs, charges and expenses incurred after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.84
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-66-norm

67 After paragraph 296(1)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-67
note: Payment of money under a Commonwealth deferred prosecution agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.85
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-67-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-67-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-67-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67 After paragraph 296(1)(f)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the Commonwealth to accept payment under a deferred prosecution agreement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Section 338
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-68
note: Definition of Commonwealth deferred prosecution agreement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021.pdf, p.85
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-economic-disruption-act-2021-sch-7-sec-68-norm