Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 2021
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 13 of 2021
description: An Act to deal with consequential and transitional matters in connection with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021, and for related purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Short title of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Commencement rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-2-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines the scope of the Act
premise text: Scope definition
conclusion text: Definition of the Act's scope
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 March 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-3-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-2
note: Schedule 1, Parts 1 and 2 commence at the same time as the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-2-2-norm

1 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-4-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-3-norm

1 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-5
note: Applicable to September
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-5-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Indicates applicability
premise text: (paragraph (b))
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-4-norm

1 March 2023
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-6-norm

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Schedules 2 and 3 at the same time as the provisions covered by table item 2.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-5-norm

1 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-7-norm

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
note: Schedule 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-6-norm

1 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-8
note: Commencement details for Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-8-norm

7 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
note: Schedule 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-7-norm

1 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-9
note: Applicable duty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-9-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 September
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Duty applies
premise text: (a)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Section 8
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
note: Schedule 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-8-norm

9 Section 9
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9
note: Schedule 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-9-norm

28 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28
note: Conditional commencement of provisions after specific events occur.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-28-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sec-28-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between events.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Section 10
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
note: Schedule 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-10-norm

1 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-10
note: Applicable duty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-10-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 September
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Duty applies
premise text: (a)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11
note: Schedule 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-11-norm

1 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-11
note: Applicable provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-11-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 September
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Provision applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Section 12
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
note: Schedule 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-12-norm

1 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-12
note: Provisions do not commence if event in paragraph (b) does not occur.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.14
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-12-norm

13 Section 13
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
note: Schedule 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-13-norm

1 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-13
note: Applicable provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-13-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 September
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Provision applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Section 14
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
note: Schedule 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-14-norm

1 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-14
note: Applicable duty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-14-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 September
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Duty applies
premise text: (a)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Section 15
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
note: Schedule 5 provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-15-norm

1 September
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-15
note: Note on table limitations and amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.15
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-1-15-norm

3 Schedules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3-2
note: Legislation in schedules is amended or repealed according to its terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sec-3-2-norm

1 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Substitute applicable Rules of Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-1-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Repeal definitions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-2-norm

3 Subsection 4(1) (definition of applicable Rules of Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Definition of applicable Rules of Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-3-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Subsection 4(1) (definition of applicable Rules of Court)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Definition substitution
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Chief Executive Officer)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Substitute definition of Chief Executive Officer with Schedule 1 Amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-4-norm

5 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
note: Repeal certain definitions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-5-norm

6 Subsection 4(1) (at the end of the definition of court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
note: Add certain court acts to the definition of court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-6-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Subsection 4(1) (at the end of the definition of court)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adding elements to a set.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Deputy Chief Justice)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
note: Repeal definition of Deputy Chief Justice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-7-norm

8 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
note: Definition of Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-8-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-8-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
note: Repeal definitions of Federal Circuit Court and its CEO.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-9-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Repeal definitions
premise text: Definitions to be repealed
conclusion text: Repeal definitions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
note: Repeal certain definitions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-10-norm

11 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Registrar)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
note: Definition of Registrar
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-11-norm

12 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Registry Manager)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
note: Definition of Registry Manager
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-12-norm

13 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
note: Defines related Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-13-norm

14 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
note: Repeal definitions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-14-norm

15 Subsection 4(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
note: Reference to a Family Court of a State is a reference to a court to which section 41 applies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-15-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Subsection 4(1A)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Reference substitution
premise text: Section 41 applies to Family Courts of States
conclusion text: Reference to a Family Court of a State is a reference to a court to which section 41 applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Subsections 4(2) and (2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
note: Omit specific phrases from court rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-16-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Omit specific phrases from court rules
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Subsection 4(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
note: Jurisdiction under certain acts and rules is taken to be jurisdiction under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-17-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Subsection 4(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Jurisdiction is taken from other acts and rules.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Subsection 8(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
note: No proceedings by way of a matrimonial cause shall be instituted except under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.21
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits proceedings by way of a matrimonial cause
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Section 9
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
note: Repeal section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.21
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-19-norm

20 Paragraphs 10C(1)(c) and (d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
note: Authorise family counsellors under section 281 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.21
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-20-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Paragraphs 10C(1)(c) and (d)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Paragraphs 10G(1)(c) and (d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
note: Authorise family dispute resolution practitioners
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.21
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-21-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 Paragraphs 10G(1)(c) and (d)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Create obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Section 10P
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.21
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-22-norm

23 Section 11B (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
note: Omit reference to Division 1A of Part IVA and substitute with a new reference.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.21
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-23-norm

24 Subsection 11C(1) (note 1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
note: Substitute subsection 281(3) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-24-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a subsection with another
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Section 11D
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-25-norm

26 Subparagraphs 11E(1)(e)(i) and (ia)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
note: Substitute a family consultant nominated by the Chief Executive Officer for the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-26-norm

27 Subparagraph 11E(1)(e)(iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
note: Omit “, (ia)”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-27-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of ‘, (ia)’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Section 13G (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
note: Omit specified court names and substitute with new names.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-28-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting court names.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Paragraphs 13G(1)(a), (b) and (c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new courts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-29-norm

30 Subsection 13G(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-30-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to substitute
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Section 13J (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
note: Omit specified court names and substitute with new name.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-31-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting court names.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Paragraphs 13J(1)(a), (b) and (c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
note: Repeal and substitute paragraphs related to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.22
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32-norm

33 Subsection 13J(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-33-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Section 13K (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
note: Substitute court names
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-34-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-34-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 34 Section 13K (heading)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

35 Paragraphs 13K(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new court divisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-35-norm

36 Parts IV and IVA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
note: Repeal Parts IV and IVA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-36-norm

37 Paragraph 39(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-37-norm

38 Subsection 39(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-38-norm

39 Subsection 39(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-39-norm

40 Paragraph 39(5)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
note: Repeal paragraph 39(5)(b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.23
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-40-norm

41 Paragraph 39(5)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
note: Repeal paragraph 39(5)(d) and substitute with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-41-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits instituting proceedings under certain regulations.
premise text: Regulations made for the purposes of section 109, 110, 111, 111A or 111B; or paragraph 125(1)(f) or (g); or provisions of the applicable Rules of Court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Subsections 39(5AA) and (5A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
note: Repeal subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-42-norm

43 Paragraph 39(6)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-43-norm

44 Paragraph 39(6)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
note: Repeal paragraph 39(6)(d) and substitute with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-44-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits instituting proceedings under certain regulations or provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Paragraphs 39A(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
note: Repeal paragraphs, substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia or amend related amendments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-45-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Repeal paragraphs
premise text: Paragraphs 39A(1)(a) and (b)
conclusion text: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Paragraphs 39B(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-46-norm

47 Subsection 39B(1) (notes 1 and 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
note: Repeal notes and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Identify temporal intervals in the text
premise text: Text mentions 'notes'
conclusion text: Temporal interval not specified
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

48 Section 39G
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-48-norm

39G Jurisdiction in relation to transferred matters under other
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39g
note: Jurisdiction in relation to transferred matters under other laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-39g-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-39g-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39G Jurisdiction in relation to transferred matters under other
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

49 Section 40 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-49-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Subsection 40(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
note: Omit 'Family Court under this Act' and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) under this Act or the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-50-norm

51 Subsection 40(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
note: Omit all words after 'have been instituted in' and substitute with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-51-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting words after 'have been instituted in'
premise text: Omit all words after 'have been instituted in'
conclusion text: Substitute with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-51-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for omitting words after 'have been instituted in'
premise text: Omit all words after 'have been instituted in'
conclusion text: Substitute with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-51-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for omitting words after 'have been instituted in'
premise text: Omit all words after 'have been instituted in'
conclusion text: Substitute with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-51-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for omitting words after 'have been instituted in'
premise text: Omit all words after 'have been instituted in'
conclusion text: Substitute with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-51-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for omitting words after 'have been instituted in'
premise text: Omit all words after 'have been instituted in'
conclusion text: Substitute with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Subsection 40(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
note: Omit 'standard Rules of Court' and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-52-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of standard Rules of Court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53 Section 40A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
note: Repeal section 40A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-53-norm

54 Subsection 41(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
note: Substitute certain references in the Act with new ones.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-54-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the legislative body.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Subsection 41(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
note: Omit 'standard Rules of Court', substitute 'applicable Rules of Court'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-55-norm

56 Subsection 43(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
note: Omit specified text from court jurisdiction under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-56-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of specified text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 Subparagraph 44(1B)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-57-norm

58 Subparagraph 44(1B)(a)(iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-58-norm

59 Subsection 45(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-59
note: Substitute a phrase in subsection 45(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-59-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59 Subsection 45(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Implicates a duty to omit or amend
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Subsection 45(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-60
note: Omit specified phrase.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-60-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Paragraphs 45(2)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-61
note: Repeal and substitute court names
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-61-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: repeals
logic summary: Repeal paragraphs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Subsection 45(2) (notes 1 and 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-62
note: Repeal notes and substitute with new references to other sections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-62-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-62-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Identify temporal intervals in notes
premise text: Notes have dates
conclusion text: Temporal interval identified
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63 Subparagraphs 46(1)(a)(i) to (iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-63
note: Repeal and substitute certain courts with new ones.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-63-norm

64 Subparagraphs 46(1)(b)(i) to (iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
note: Repeal and substitute certain court divisions with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia or a State Family Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-64-norm

65 Paragraphs 46(1C)(a) to (c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-65
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new courts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-65-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Impose duty to repeal paragraphs
premise text: Repeal is a duty
conclusion text: Substitute with new courts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

66 Paragraphs 46(2A)(c) to (e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-66
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new courts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-66-norm

67 Subsection 46(3A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-67
note: Omit specified phrase.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-67-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Paragraphs 46(3A)(a) to (c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
note: Repeal and substitute court names
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-68-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Impose duty on repealing paragraphs
premise text: Repeal is a duty
conclusion text: Substitute court names accordingly
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 At the end of Part V
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
note: Add at the end of Part V
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-69-norm

47A Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47a
has part: 47A(1) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
has part: 47A(2) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
has part: 47A(3) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
has part: 47A(4) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
has part: 47A(5) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
has part: 47A(6) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.28

47A(1) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47a-ss-1
part of: 47A Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
note: Appeal from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.28

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Appeal is an obligation
premise text: (1) Subject to section 47B, an appeal lies from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction
conclusion text: An appeal is an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Appeal implies a right to review
premise text: (1) Subject to section 47B, an appeal lies from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction
conclusion text: An appeal implies a right to review
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Appeal is during the validity of the decree
premise text: (1) Subject to section 47B, an appeal lies from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction
conclusion text: An appeal is during the validity of the decree
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Appeal diffuses to other courts
premise text: (1) Subject to section 47B, an appeal lies from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction
conclusion text: An appeal diffuses to other courts
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Appeal is recognized by the court
premise text: (1) Subject to section 47B, an appeal lies from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction
conclusion text: An appeal is recognized by the court
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

47A(2) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47a-ss-2
part of: 47A Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
note: Subsection (1) does not apply to a decree of the Magistrates Court of Western Australia constituted by a Family Law Magistrate of Western Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.28

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47A(2) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes subsection (1) from applying to a specific type of court decree.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...a Family Law Magistrate of Western Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Indicates that subsection (1) and the specified court decree overlap in time.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...a decree of the Magistrates Court of Western Australia constituted by a Family Law Magistrate of Western Australia.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Traces
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between subsection (1) and the specified court decree.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...a decree of the Magistrates Court of Western Australia constituted by a Family Law Magistrate of Western Australia.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Spreads information about subsection (1) to include the specified court decree.
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...a decree of the Magistrates Court of Western Australia constituted by a Family Law Magistrate of Western Australia.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Identifies the specified court decree as relevant to subsection (1).
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...a decree of the Magistrates Court of Western Australia constituted by a Family Law Magistrate of Western Australia.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

47A(3) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47a-ss-3
part of: 47A Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
note: Appeal must be instituted within prescribed time
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.28

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47A(3) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide appeal within time
premise text: (3) An appeal under subsection (1) must be instituted...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47A(4) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47a-ss-4
part of: 47A Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
note: Supreme Court has federal jurisdiction over matters arising under the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.28

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47A(4) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Supreme Court has federal jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47A(5) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47a-ss-5
part of: 47A Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
note: Appeals to Supreme Court may not be instituted after a specified date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.28

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits appeals to Supreme Court after a specified date.
premise text: (5) The Governor-General may, by Proclamation...
conclusion text: ...and such a Proclamation may be expressed to apply only to proceedings of a specified class or specified classes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: The proclamation overlaps with the appeal period.
premise text: (5) The Governor-General may, by Proclamation...
conclusion text: ...fix a date as the date on or after which appeals to the Supreme Court of a specified State or Territory under this section may not be instituted...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The appeal period ends before the proclamation.
premise text: (5) The Governor-General may, by Proclamation...
conclusion text: ...fix a date as the date on or after which appeals to the Supreme Court of a specified State or Territory under this section may not be instituted...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: The proclamation diffuses the appeal period.
premise text: (5) The Governor-General may, by Proclamation...
conclusion text: ...fix a date as the date on or after which appeals to the Supreme Court of a specified State or Territory under this section may not be instituted...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: The proclamation recognizes the appeal period.
premise text: (5) The Governor-General may, by Proclamation...
conclusion text: ...fix a date as the date on or after which appeals to the Supreme Court of a specified State or Territory under this section may not be instituted...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47A(6) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47a-ss-6
part of: 47A Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
note: Court must proceed by way of a hearing de novo.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.28

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47A(6) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a hearing de novo
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47B Leave to appeal needed for child support matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47b
has part: 47B(1) Leave to appeal needed for child support matters
has part: 47B(2) Leave to appeal needed for child support matters
has part: 47B(3) Leave to appeal needed for child support matters
has part: 47B(4) Leave to appeal needed for child support matters
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.30

47B(1) Leave to appeal needed for child support matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47b-ss-1
part of: 47B Leave to appeal needed for child support matters
note: Leave of a single Judge is required to appeal from a decree in child support matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.30

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits appeal without leave
premise text: (1) Leave of a single Judge is required...
conclusion text: ...appeal from a decree in child support matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47b-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that appeal without leave is prohibited
premise text: (1) Leave of a single Judge is required...
conclusion text: ...appeal from a decree in child support matters.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47B(2) Leave to appeal needed for child support matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47b-ss-2
part of: 47B Leave to appeal needed for child support matters
note: Leave of the Supreme Court is required to appeal in child support matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.30

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits appealing without leave of the Supreme Court.
premise text: (2) Leave of the Supreme Court of a State or Territory is required to appeal...
conclusion text: ...appeal to the Court from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47b-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies leave of the Supreme Court as a requirement for appealing child support matters.
premise text: (2) Leave of the Supreme Court of a State or Territory is required to appeal...
conclusion text: ...appeal to the Court from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47b-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implicates that appealing without leave of the Supreme Court is not allowed.
premise text: (2) Leave of the Supreme Court of a State or Territory is required to appeal...
conclusion text: ...appeal to the Court from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47B(3) Leave to appeal needed for child support matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47b-ss-3
part of: 47B Leave to appeal needed for child support matters
note: Application for leave to appeal must be made within a specified time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.30

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47B(3) Leave to appeal needed for child support matters
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application for leave to appeal must be made within a specified time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47B(4) Leave to appeal needed for child support matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47b-ss-4
part of: 47B Leave to appeal needed for child support matters
note: Applicable Rules of Court may make provision for enabling applications without an oral hearing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.30

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47B(4) Leave to appeal needed for child support matters
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

47C Appeal may be dismissed if no reasonable prospect of success
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47c
has part: 47C(1) Appeal may be dismissed if no reasonable prospect of success
has part: 47C(2) Appeal may be dismissed if no reasonable prospect of success
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.31

47C(1) Appeal may be dismissed if no reasonable prospect of success
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47c-ss-1
part of: 47C Appeal may be dismissed if no reasonable prospect of success
note: Court may dismiss appeal if no reasonable prospect of success
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.31

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47c-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 47C(1) Appeal may be dismissed if no reasonable prospect of success
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (a) an appeal has been instituted in a court under this Division;
conclusion text: the court may, at any time, order that the proceedings on the appeal be dismissed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47C(2) Appeal may be dismissed if no reasonable prospect of success
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47c-ss-2
part of: 47C Appeal may be dismissed if no reasonable prospect of success
note: Court may dismiss appeal if no reasonable prospect of success
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.31

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47C(2) Appeal may be dismissed if no reasonable prospect of success
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May dismiss appeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

47D Appeals to High Court may not be brought
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47d
has part: 47D(1) Appeals to High Court may not be brought
has part: 47D(2) Appeals to High Court may not be brought
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.31

47D(1) Appeals to High Court may not be brought
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47d-ss-1
part of: 47D Appeals to High Court may not be brought
note: Appeals to High Court are not allowed from certain courts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.31

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Prohibition of appeals
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47D(2) Appeals to High Court may not be brought
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47d-ss-2
part of: 47D Appeals to High Court may not be brought
note: No appeals to High Court may be brought
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.31

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47d-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 47D(2) Appeals to High Court may not be brought
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits appeals to High Court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47E Regulations to be sole source of certain appellate jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47e
note: Court has appellate jurisdiction in relation to matters arising under regulations made for the purposes of section 111C.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.32
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47e-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47e-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47E Regulations to be sole source of certain appellate jurisdiction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47e-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasAppellateJurisdiction
logic summary: Court has appellate jurisdiction
premise text: Regulations made for the purposes of section 111C
conclusion text: Court has appellate jurisdiction in relation to matters arising under those regulations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47e-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Jurisdiction is during the effective period of the regulations
premise text: Regulations made for the purposes of section 111C
conclusion text: Jurisdiction is during the effective period of those regulations
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47e-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Jurisdiction is during the effective period of the regulations
premise text: Regulations made for the purposes of section 111C
conclusion text: Jurisdiction is during the effective period of those regulations
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47e-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Jurisdiction is during the effective period of the regulations
premise text: Regulations made for the purposes of section 111C
conclusion text: Jurisdiction is during the effective period of those regulations
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-47e-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Jurisdiction is during the effective period of the regulations
premise text: Regulations made for the purposes of section 111C
conclusion text: Jurisdiction is during the effective period of those regulations
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Subsection 55(5) (paragraphs (d) and (e) of the definition
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
note: Repeal of certain orders made by the Chief Executive Officer or a Senior Registrar/Registrar of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.32
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-70-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-70-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 70 Subsection 55(5) (paragraphs (d) and (e) of the definition
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition on making certain orders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71 Subsection 56(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
note: Specify the authority for issuing a divorce order certificate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.32
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-71-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-71-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71 Subsection 56(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasAuthority
logic summary: The state has the authority to issue a divorce order certificate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 At the end of Part VI
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
note: Add at the end of Part VI
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-72-norm

60 No appeal after divorce order takes effect
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-60-2
note: No appeal after divorce order takes effect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-60-2-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-60-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits appeals after divorce order takes effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 Subsection 60F(5) (definition of this Act)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
note: Repeal and substitute definition of this Act with applicable Rules of Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-73-norm

74 Section 60G (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74
note: Granting of leave
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-74-norm

75 Subsection 60G(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-75-norm

76 Subsection 60H(6) (definition of this Act)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76
note: Repeal and substitute definition of this Act with applicable Rules of Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-76-norm

77 Subsection 60HA(4) (definition of this Act)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77
note: Repeal and substitute definition of this Act with applicable Rules of Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-77-norm

78 Subsection 60HB(2) (definition of this Act)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78
note: Repeal definition, substitute with applicable Rules of Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-78-norm

79 Subsections 60I(2) to (5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79
note: Repeal subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-79-norm

80 Subsection 60I(6) (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80
note: Repeal heading, substitute text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.34
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-80-norm

81 Paragraph 60J(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-81
note: Modify subsection 60I(6)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.34
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-81-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Modification
logic summary: Change to subsection 60I(6)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Subsection 64B(9) (definition of this Act)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-82
note: Repeal and substitute definition of this Act with applicable Rules of Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.34
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-82-norm

83 Subsection 65D(3) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-83
note: Transfer of proceedings between Federal Circuit and Family Court divisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.34
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-83-norm

84 Subsection 67Z(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-84
note: Substitute approved form for prescribed form.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.34
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-84-norm

85 Subsection 67Z(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-85
note: Definition of approved form
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.34
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-85-norm

86 Subsection 67Z(4) (definition of prescribed form)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-86
note: Repeal definition of prescribed form
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.35
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-86-norm

87 Paragraph 67ZA(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-87
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new provisions for Chief Executive Officer, Senior Registrar, or Registrar of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.35
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-87-norm

88 Paragraph 67ZA(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-88
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.35
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-88-norm

89 Subsection 67ZBA(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-89
note: Substitute approved form for prescribed form.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.35
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-89-norm

90 Subsection 67ZBA(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-90
note: Definition of approved form
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.35
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-90-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-90-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: approved form means a form approved for the purposes of this section under the applicable Rules of Court.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91 Subsection 67ZBA(4) (definition of prescribed form)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-91
note: Repeal definition of prescribed form
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.35
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-91-norm

92 Section 69H (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-92
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.35
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-92-norm

69H Jurisdiction of Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69h
note: Jurisdiction of Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.35
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-69h-norm

93 Subsection 69H(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-93
note: Substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)' for 'Family Court'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.35
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-93-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-93-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term with another
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94 Subsection 69H(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-94
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.36
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-94-norm

95 Paragraphs 69N(2)(a) to (d) and (3)(a) to (d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-95
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new courts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.36
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-95-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-95-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 95 Paragraphs 69N(2)(a) to (d) and (3)(a) to (d)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-95-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace existing paragraphs with new ones.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96 Subparagraphs 69N(5)(b)(i) to (iv)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-96
note: Repeal and substitute certain court divisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.36
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-96-norm

97 Paragraphs 69N(6)(a) to (d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-97
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new courts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.36
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-97-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-97-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Impose new courts on existing laws
premise text: New courts replace old ones
conclusion text: Use Deontic to impose new courts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98 Section 69ZO
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-98
note: Repeal section and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.36
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-98-norm

69ZO This Division also applies to proceedings in Chambers
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69zo
note: Duties and powers of persons hearing child-related proceedings in Chambers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.36
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-69zo-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-69zo-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69ZO This Division also applies to proceedings in Chambers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-69zo-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Person has duties and powers
premise text: The following persons...
conclusion text: have all of the duties and powers that a court has under this Division:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99 Subsection 69ZR(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-99
note: Substitute “a person” for certain judicial titles.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.37
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-99-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-99-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 99 Subsection 69ZR(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

100 Section 70M (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-100
note: Substitute 'Registry Manager' for 'Registrar'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.37
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-100-norm

101 Paragraph 70NFD(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-101
note: Omit certain court names
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.37
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-101-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-101-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Omission of court names
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102 Paragraph 70NFD(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-102
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.37
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-102-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-102-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103 Subsection 79(9)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-103
note: Replace 'Family Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.37
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-103-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-103-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 103 Subsection 79(9)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

104 Paragraph 79(9)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-104
note: Attend a conference in relation to the matter before proceedings can continue.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.37
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-104-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-104-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104 Paragraph 79(9)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-104-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must attend a conference
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105 Paragraph 79H(3)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-105
note: Omit specified court name and substitute with new name.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.38
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-105-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-105-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of an outdated court name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106 Subsection 90SM(9)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-106
note: Replace 'Family Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.38
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-106-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term with another term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107 Paragraph 90SM(9)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-107
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with parties attending a conference with the Chief Executive Officer or a Senior Registrar/Registrar.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.38
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-107-norm

108 Paragraph 90SQ(3)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-108
note: Replace 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.38
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-108-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-108-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Replace
logic summary: Replace text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109 Part X
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-109
note: Repeal Part X
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.38
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-109-norm

110 Subsection 97(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-110
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.38
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-110-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-110-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110 Subsection 97(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-110-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Obligation to modify court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111 Subsection 97(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-111
note: Substitute judges for certain court officials
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.38
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-111-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-111-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits substitution of judges
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

112 Subsection 97(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-112
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-112-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

113 Subsection 98(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-113
note: Omit “(1)”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-113-norm

114 Subsection 98(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-114
note: Omit 'standard Rules of Court', substitute 'applicable Rules of Court'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-114-norm

115 Subsection 98(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-115
note: Repeal subsection (including note)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-115-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-115-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeal subsection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116 Sections 98AA and 98AB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-116
note: Repeal sections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-116-norm

117 Subsection 100B(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-117
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-117-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-117-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118 Subsection 102F(7) (definition of courtroom)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-118
note: Definition of courtroom modified
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-118-norm

119 Subsection 102G(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-119
note: Omit specified text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-119-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-119-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120 Subsection 102G(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-120
note: Repeal subsection 102G(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-120-norm

121 Section 102H
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-121
note: Repeal a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-121-norm

122 Subsection 102J(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-122
note: Omit “(1)”
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-122-norm

123 Subsection 102J(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-123
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-123-norm

124 Paragraph 102K(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-124
note: Omit specific phrase from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-124-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-124-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125 Paragraph 102K(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-125
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-125-norm

126 Division 3 of Part XI
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-126
note: Repeal Division 3 of Part XI
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-126-norm

127 Division 4 of Part XI (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-127
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-127-norm

128 Subsection 102Q(1) (paragraphs (a) and (b) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-128
note: Repeal and substitute paragraphs defining appropriate court officials.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-128-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-128-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 128 Subsection 102Q(1) (paragraphs (a) and (b) of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-128-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraphs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

129 Subsection 105(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-129
note: Repeal a note
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-129-norm

130 Subsection 109A(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-130
note: Omit specific phrase from judges' names.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-130-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-130-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specific phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131 Subsection 109A(5) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-131
note: Repeal a note
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.41
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-131-norm

132 After section 109A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-132
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.41
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-132-norm

109AA Rules of Court relating to enforcement—Federal Circuit and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-109aa
has part: 109AA(1) Rules of Court relating to enforcement—Federal Circuit and
has part: 109AA(2) Rules of Court relating to enforcement—Federal Circuit and
has part: 109AA(3) Rules of Court relating to enforcement—Federal Circuit and
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.41

109AA(1) Rules of Court relating to enforcement—Federal Circuit and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-109aa-ss-1
part of: 109AA Rules of Court relating to enforcement—Federal Circuit and
note: Applicability of section 109A to Rules of Court under Chapter 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.41

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-109aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Section 109A applies to Rules of Court under Chapter 3
premise text: Section 123 of this Act
conclusion text: Rules of Court under Chapter 3
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109AA(2) Rules of Court relating to enforcement—Federal Circuit and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-109aa-ss-2
part of: 109AA Rules of Court relating to enforcement—Federal Circuit and
note: References to courts and Registrars in subsection 109A(2) are clarified.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.41

109AA(3) Rules of Court relating to enforcement—Federal Circuit and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-109aa-ss-3
part of: 109AA Rules of Court relating to enforcement—Federal Circuit and
note: Section 109A has no effect in relation to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) except as provided by subsections (1) and (2) of this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.41

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-109aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
premise text: (3) Section 109A has no effect in relation to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
conclusion text: except as provided by subsections (1) and (2) of this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-109aa-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
premise text: (3) Section 109A has no effect in relation to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
conclusion text: except as provided by subsections (1) and (2) of this section.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-109aa-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines a recurring trace for the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
premise text: (3) Section 109A has no effect in relation to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
conclusion text: except as provided by subsections (1) and (2) of this section.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-109aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Grants permission to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
premise text: (3) Section 109A has no effect in relation to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
conclusion text: except as provided by subsections (1) and (2) of this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

133 Section 109B (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-133
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.41
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-133-norm

134 Subsection 109B(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-134
note: Replace section 81 with Chapter 4 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.41
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-134-norm

135 Paragraphs 109B(2)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-135
note: Omit specified text and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-135-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-135-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Omit specified text and substitute with new text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136 Paragraph 109B(2)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-136
note: Substitute title for Federal Circuit Court of Australia with Chief Executive Officer or a Registrar of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-136-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-136-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136 Paragraph 109B(2)(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-136-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace text with alternative
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137 Subsection 109B(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-137
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-137-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-137-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138 At the end of subsection 111C(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-138
note: Add “or the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-138-norm

139 Subsection 111C(7A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-139
note: Omit specific phrase from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-139-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-139-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the specified action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140 After subsection 111C(7A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-140
has part: 140(7B) After subsection 111C(7A)
has part: 140(7C) After subsection 111C(7A)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.42

140(7B) After subsection 111C(7A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-140-ss-7b
part of: 140 After subsection 111C(7A)
note: Extends power to make Rules of Court for adoption orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.42

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-140-ss-7b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extends power
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140(7C) After subsection 111C(7A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-140-ss-7c
part of: 140 After subsection 111C(7A)
note: Extends power to make Rules of Court for adoption orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.42

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-140-ss-7c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extension of power
premise text: (7C) The power...
conclusion text: ...to making adoption orders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

141 Paragraph 111CV(1A)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-141
note: Repeal and substitute paragraph, amend Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-141-norm

142 Paragraph 111CV(1A)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-142
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-142-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-142-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals a paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143 Section 112AA (definition of applicable Rules of Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-143
note: Repeal the definition of applicable Rules of Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-143-norm

144 Subsection 112AK(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-144
note: Allow for variation or discharge of an order under section 112AD
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-144-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-144-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allow for variation or discharge of an order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

145 Subsection 115(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-145
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-145-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-145-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Mandatory substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146 At the end of subsection 117(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-146
note: References other provisions about cost awards by Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-146-norm

147 Subsection 121(10) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-147
note: Omit specified sections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-147-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-147-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified sections.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148 After section 122
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-148
note: Amendments relating to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-148-norm

149 Subsection 122A(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-149
note: Omit specified phrases from court rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.44
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-149-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-149-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrases
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

150 Paragraphs 122A(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-150
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.44
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-150-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-150-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151 Paragraphs 122A(1)(c) and (d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-151
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.44
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-151-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-151-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152 Subsection 123(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-152
note: Omit specific phrase from text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.44
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-152-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-152-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Omit specific phrase from text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

153 Subsection 123(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-153
note: Omit specific language from court references
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.44
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-153-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-153-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified language
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

154 Subsection 123(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-154
note: Omit 'those courts', substitute 'the court'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.44
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-154-norm

155 Paragraph 123(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-155
note: Substitute 'a court' for 'the Family Court or another court'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.44
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-155-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-155-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 155 Paragraph 123(1)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-155-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to make the substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156 Paragraphs 123(1)(bb), (c) and (d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-156
note: Repeal specific paragraphs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-156-norm

157 Paragraph 123(1)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-157
note: Substitute 'a court' for 'the Family Court and in any other court'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-157-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-157-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 157 Paragraph 123(1)(f)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

158 Paragraph 123(1)(ma)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-158
note: Substitute Division 2 for Divisions 2 and 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-158-norm

159 Subparagraph 123(1)(sda)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-159
note: Substitute subsection 281(1) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-159-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-159-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a provision with another
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

160 Subparagraph 123(1)(sdb)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-160
note: Substitute subsection 281(2) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-160-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-160-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a provision with another
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161 Paragraph 123(1)(sea)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-161
note: Substitute subsection 281(1) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-161-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-161-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a provision with another
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162 Paragraph 123(1)(seb)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-162
note: Substitute subsection 281(2) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-162-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-162-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a provision with another
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

163 At the end of subsection 123(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-163
note: Amendment of power to make Rules of Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-163-norm

164 Subsection 123(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-164
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-164-norm

165 Subsection 123(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-165
note: Omit certain words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-165-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-165-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of certain words.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166 Paragraph 123(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-166
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-166-norm

167 Subsection 123(2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-167
note: Substitute Chief Justice of Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia for judges
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-167-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-167-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 167 Subsection 123(2A)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-167-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on judges to follow the new substitution rule
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168 Subsection 123(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-168
note: Repeal subsection (including note)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-168-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-168-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeal subsection
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

169 Subsection 124(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-169
note: Substitute court names
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-169-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-169-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 169 Subsection 124(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-169-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on the state to substitute court names
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

170 Subsection 124(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-170
note: Replace 'Family Court of Australia' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-170-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-170-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Replace
logic summary: Replace text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

171 Subsection 124(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-171
note: Substitute Chief Justice of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) for Judges in section 123.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-171-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-171-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 171 Subsection 124(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-171-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace judges with chief justice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172 Subsection 124(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-172
note: Substitute Chief Justice of the Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-172-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-172-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 172 Subsection 124(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-172-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on State
conclusion text: State must substitute Chief Justice of the Court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

173 Subsection 124(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-173
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.47
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-173-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-173-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 173 Subsection 124(6)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-173-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

174 Paragraph 125(1)(ba)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-174
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.47
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-174-norm

175 Paragraph 125(1)(baa)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-175
note: Substitute 'a court' for 'the Family Court and any other court'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.47
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-175-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-175-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 175 Paragraph 125(1)(baa)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-175-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176 Paragraph 125(1)(ca)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-176
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.47
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-176-norm

177 Paragraphs 125(1)(d) and (e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-177
note: Omit 'and fees prescribed under paragraph (ca)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.47
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-177-norm

178 Section 4 (definition of administrative affairs)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-178
note: Repeal and substitute definitions for administrative affairs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.47
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-178-norm

179 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-179
note: Definition of Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.47
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-179-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-179-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
conclusion text: means the Chief Executive Officer and Principal
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-179-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal relation
premise text: of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
conclusion text: of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180 Section 4 (definition of corporate services)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-180
note: Repeal and substitute definition of corporate services
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.48
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-180-norm

181 Section 4 (definition of Family Court Chief Executive
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-181
note: Repeal definition of Family Court Chief Executive Officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.48
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-181-norm

182 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-182
note: Defines family law or child support proceeding and Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.48
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-182-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-182-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a class hierarchy
premise text: family law or child support proceeding means a proceeding under...
conclusion text: ...or (b) the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-182-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a class hierarchy
premise text: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia means...
conclusion text: ...or (b) the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-182-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a duty
premise text: Insert: family law or child support proceeding means...
conclusion text: ...or (b) the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989; or...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-182-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines a duty
premise text: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia means...
conclusion text: ...or (b) the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-182-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval
premise text: other than a proceeding under section 72Q of that Act.
conclusion text: ...or (c) the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-182-logic-ltl-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: between
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval
premise text: other than a proceeding under section 72Q of that Act.
conclusion text: ...or (c) the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

183 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-183
note: Repeal definitions related to Federal Circuit Court and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.48
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-183-norm

184 Subsection 6(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-184
note: A person must meet certain qualifications to be appointed as a Judge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.49
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-184-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-184-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 184 Subsection 6(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-184-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory qualification for appointment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185 After section 13
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-185
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.49
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-185-norm

13A Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13a
has part: 13A(1) Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
has part: 13A(2) Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
has part: 13A(3) Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
has part: 13A(4) Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
has part: 13A(5) Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.49

13A(1) Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13a-ss-1
part of: 13A Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
note: Authorises a Judge to manage classes of proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.49

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-13a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13A(1) Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-13a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to authorise a Judge.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13A(2) Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13a-ss-2
part of: 13A Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
note: A Judge is subject to direction from the Chief Justice when managing classes of proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.49

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-13a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13A(2) Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-13a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJCT
logic summary: Subject to direction
premise text: Judge is managing a class of proceedings
conclusion text: Chief Justice may direct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13A(3) Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13a-ss-3
part of: 13A Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
note: Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.49

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-13a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to manage classes of proceedings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13A(4) Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13a-ss-4
part of: 13A Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
note: A Judge's rank, title, status and precedence are unaffected by authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.49

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-13a-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13A(4) Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-13a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continuity
logic summary: The authorisation does not affect the Judge's rank and precedence.
premise text: (4) The authorisation of a Judge...
conclusion text: ...the rank, title, status and precedence as a Judge...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-13a-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: The authorisation does not affect the Judge's temporal position.
premise text: (4) The authorisation of a Judge does not affect the rank, title, status and precedence as a Judge that the Judge had immediately before any such authorisation.
conclusion text: ...the rank, title, status and precedence as a Judge that the Judge had immediately before...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-13a-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: holds
logic summary: The authorisation does not affect the Judge's temporal position.
premise text: (4) The authorisation of a Judge does not affect the rank, title, status and precedence as a Judge that the Judge had immediately before any such authorisation.
conclusion text: ...the rank, title, status and precedence as a Judge that the Judge had immediately before...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-13a-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continuity
logic summary: The authorisation does not affect the Judge's duties.
premise text: (4) The authorisation of a Judge does not affect the rank, title, status and precedence as a Judge that the Judge had immediately before any such authorisation.
conclusion text: ...the rank, title, status and precedence as a Judge that the Judge had immediately before...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-13a-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: relevant
logic summary: The authorisation is relevant to the Judge's duties.
premise text: (4) The authorisation of a Judge does not affect the rank, title, status and precedence as a Judge that the Judge had immediately before any such authorisation.
conclusion text: ...the rank, title, status and precedence as a Judge that the Judge had immediately before...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13A(5) Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13a-ss-5
part of: 13A Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
note: Legislative instrument is not a direction under subsection (2) if given in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.49

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-13a-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13A(5) Authorised Judges may manage classes of proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-13a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Direction under subsection (2)
conclusion text: Legislative instrument
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186 Subsection 15(1AAA)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-186
note: Insertion of 'of the Court' after 'another Judge'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.50
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-186-norm

187 Section 15A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-187
note: Repeal a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.50
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-187-norm

188 After paragraph 18A(1B)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-188
note: Administrative matters related to judgments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.50
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-188-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-188-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 188 After paragraph 18A(1B)(e)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

189 After paragraph 18A(1B)(h)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-189
note: Insert court security
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.50
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-189-norm

190 After paragraph 18N(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-190
note: List of individuals for marshals and deputy marshals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.50
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-190-norm

191 Subsection 18N(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-191
note: Omit 'and the Marshals', substitute 'the Deputy Marshals of the Court and the Marshals for the purposes of the Admiralty Act 1988'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.50
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-191-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-191-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'and the Marshals'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

192 Subsection 18N(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-192
note: Omit 'and the Marshals', substitute 'the Deputy Marshals of the Court and the Marshals for the purposes of the Admiralty Act 1988'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.50
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-192-norm

193 At the end of Division 3 of Part IIA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-193
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.50
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-193-norm

18PA Marshal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18pa
has part: 18PA(1) Marshal
has part: 18PA(2) Marshal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.50

18PA(1) Marshal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18pa-ss-1
part of: 18PA Marshal
note: Marshal is responsible for security of the Court and personal security of Judges and officers and staff.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.50

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18pa-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18PA(1) Marshal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18pa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasResponsibility
logic summary: Marshal has responsibility for security of the Court and personal security of Judges and officers and staff.
premise text: (1) The Marshal of the Court is responsible for: (a) the security of the Court; and (b) the personal security of the Judges and officers and staff of the Court.
conclusion text: The Marshal has responsibility for security of the Court and personal security of Judges and officers and staff.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18pa-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Marshal's responsibility starts during the commencement of the Act.
premise text: (1) The Marshal of the Court is responsible for: (a) the security of the Court; and (b) the personal security of the Judges and officers and staff of the Court.
conclusion text: Marshal's responsibility starts during the commencement of the Act.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18pa-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Marshal's responsibility is limited to the duration of the Act.
premise text: (1) The Marshal of the Court is responsible for: (a) the security of the Court; and (b) the personal security of the Judges and officers and staff of the Court.
conclusion text: Marshal's responsibility is limited to the duration of the Act.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18pa-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasAuthorityTo
logic summary: Marshal has authority to perform duties related to security of the Court and personal security of Judges and officers and staff.
premise text: (1) The Marshal of the Court is responsible for: (a) the security of the Court; and (b) the personal security of the Judges and officers and staff of the Court.
conclusion text: Marshal has authority to perform duties related to security of the Court and personal security of Judges and officers and staff.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18PA(2) Marshal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18pa-ss-2
part of: 18PA Marshal
note: Responsibility of Marshal to take, receive and detain persons committed by the Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.50

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18pa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Marshal has an obligation to perform duties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18PB Deputy Marshals
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18pb
note: Deputy Marshals may exercise or perform Marshal's powers and functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.51
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18pb-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18pb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18PC Authorised persons to assist the Marshal or Deputy Marshals
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18pc
has part: 18PC(1) Authorised persons to assist the Marshal or Deputy Marshals
has part: 18PC(2) Authorised persons to assist the Marshal or Deputy Marshals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.51

18PC(1) Authorised persons to assist the Marshal or Deputy Marshals
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18pc-ss-1
part of: 18PC Authorised persons to assist the Marshal or Deputy Marshals
note: The Marshal may authorise persons to assist in exercising powers or performing functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.51

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18pc-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18PC(1) Authorised persons to assist the Marshal or Deputy Marshals
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18pc-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorisation
logic summary: Authorisation of persons to assist the Marshal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18PC(2) Authorised persons to assist the Marshal or Deputy Marshals
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18pc-ss-2
part of: 18PC Authorised persons to assist the Marshal or Deputy Marshals
note: Authorisation to assist Deputy Marshals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.51

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18pc-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Granting authority
premise text: (2) A Deputy Marshal of the Court may authorise persons...
conclusion text: to assist the Deputy Marshal in exercising powers or performing functions as the Deputy Marshal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18pc-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal relationship between authorisation and assistance
premise text: (2) A Deputy Marshal of the Court may authorise persons...
conclusion text: to assist the Deputy Marshal in exercising powers or performing functions as the Deputy Marshal.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18pc-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: justification
logic summary: Rationale for authorisation
premise text: (2) A Deputy Marshal of the Court may authorise persons...
conclusion text: to assist the Deputy Marshal in exercising powers or performing functions as the Deputy Marshal.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18pc-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuse
logic summary: Spread of authority to assistants
premise text: (2) A Deputy Marshal of the Court may authorise persons...
conclusion text: to assist the Deputy Marshal in exercising powers or performing functions as the Deputy Marshal.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18pc-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognise
logic summary: Recognition of authority to assistants
premise text: (2) A Deputy Marshal of the Court may authorise persons...
conclusion text: to assist the Deputy Marshal in exercising powers or performing functions as the Deputy Marshal.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194 Paragraphs 18Z(1)(b) and (c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-194
note: Substitute corporate services of Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.51
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-194-norm

195 Paragraphs 18Z(3)(b) to (e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-195
note: Repeal and substitute certain judicial positions with new ones.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.51
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-195-norm

196 Subsection 18Z(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-196
note: Consultation before imposing expenditure obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-196-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-196-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to consult
premise text: Chief Executive Officer must consult the person or persons mentioned in that item about the decision.
conclusion text: The Chief Executive Officer MUST consult the person or persons mentioned in that item about the decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-196-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to obtain consent from Attorney-General
premise text: Either the person or persons mentioned in that item MUST consent to the decision, OR the Attorney-General MUST consent to the decision.
conclusion text: The person or persons mentioned in that item MUST consent to the decision, OR the Attorney-General MUST consent to the decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-196-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation
premise text: Before the Chief Executive Officer makes a decision that has the effect of imposing an expenditure obligation relating to the administrative affairs of a court mentioned in an item of the following table.
conclusion text: The consultation must occur before the decision is made.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-196-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: Recurring duty to consult
premise text: When performing functions, or exercising powers, under this section, the Chief Executive Officer MUST consult the person or persons mentioned in that item about the decision.
conclusion text: The duty to consult is recurring and must be performed every time a decision is made.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-196-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to obtain consent from Attorney-General
premise text: Either the person or persons mentioned in that item MUST consent to the decision, OR the Attorney-General MUST consent to the decision.
conclusion text: The Attorney-General MUST consent to the decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

197 Subparagraphs 18ZB(a)(iv) to (ix)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-197
note: Repeal and substitute subparagraphs related to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-197-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-197-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval application
premise text: Subparagraphs 18ZB(a)(iv) to (ix)
conclusion text: Repeal and substitute subparagraphs
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

198 Subparagraphs 18ZB(e)(ii) and (iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-198
note: Repeal and substitute certain functions of the Chief Executive Officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-198-norm

199 Section 18ZC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-199
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-199-norm

18ZC Delegation of powers etc. under the finance law
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18zc
note: Delegation of powers under the finance law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18zc-norm

200 Subparagraphs 18ZD(1)(b)(ii) to (iv)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-200
note: Repeal and substitute certain administrative affairs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.54
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-200-norm

201 Subsections 18ZD(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-201
note: Consultation about spending before spending a part of the outcome amount for another outcome
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.54
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-201-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-201-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consult and obtain consent before spending
premise text: The Chief Executive Officer must spend the outcome amount.
conclusion text: The Chief Executive Officer MUST consult the person or persons mentioned in that item about the spending; and obtain the consent of: (i) the person or persons mentioned in that item to the spending; or (ii) the Attorney-General to the spending.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

202 Subparagraphs 18ZE(2)(b)(ii) and (iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-202
note: Repeal and substitute certain sections of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.55
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-202-norm

203 Sections 18ZF and 18ZG
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-203
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new ones.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.55
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-203-norm

18ZF Making arrangements relating to APS employees
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18zf
note: Must make APS employees available for assisting the Chief Executive Officer in performing functions under sections 84 and 278 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.55
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18zf-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18zf-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make APS employees available
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18ZG Delegation of powers etc. under the Public Service Act 1999
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18zg
note: Delegation of powers under the Public Service Act 1999
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.56
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18zg-norm

204 Paragraphs 18ZH(1)(b) and (c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-204
note: Repeal and substitute certain officers of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.56
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-204-norm

205 Subsections 18ZH(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-205
has part: 205(2) Subsections 18ZH(2) and (3)
has part: 205(3) Subsections 18ZH(2) and (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.57

205(2) Subsections 18ZH(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-205-ss-2
part of: 205 Subsections 18ZH(2) and (3)
note: Delegation of powers to the Chief Executive Officer's officers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.57

205(3) Subsections 18ZH(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-205-ss-3
part of: 205 Subsections 18ZH(2) and (3)
note: Appointment to multiple offices can be made in a single instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.57

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-205-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 205(3) Subsections 18ZH(2) and (3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-205-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Permission granted
premise text: (3) The appointment of a person to more than one office...
conclusion text: may be made in a single instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

206 Paragraphs 18ZI(1)(b) and (c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-206
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new court divisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.57
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-206-norm

207 Subsections 18ZI(4) and (5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-207
note: Substitute Chief Executive Officer's powers to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.57
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-207-norm

208 Section 18ZJ
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-208
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.57
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-208-norm

18ZJ Subdelegation of powers under this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18zj
note: Subdelegation of powers under this Division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.57
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18zj-norm

209 Section 18ZK
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-209
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.58
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-209-norm

18ZK Officers of the Court and the Federal Circuit and Family
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18zk
has part: 18ZK(1) Officers of the Court and the Federal Circuit and Family
has part: 18ZK(2) Officers of the Court and the Federal Circuit and Family
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.58

18ZK(1) Officers of the Court and the Federal Circuit and Family
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18zk-ss-1
part of: 18ZK Officers of the Court and the Federal Circuit and Family
note: May be an officer of one or more courts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.58

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18zk-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 18ZK(1) Officers of the Court and the Federal Circuit and Family
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18zk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to hold office
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18zk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap with court divisions
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18zk-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of office on agent
premise text: A person may be an officer of one or more courts:
conclusion text: The person is an officer of the court.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18zk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of office to related entities
premise text: (a) the Court;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18ZK(2) Officers of the Court and the Federal Circuit and Family
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18zk-ss-2
part of: 18ZK Officers of the Court and the Federal Circuit and Family
note: Subsection (1) has effect despite anything in this Act and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.58

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18zk-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18ZK(2) Officers of the Court and the Federal Circuit and Family
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18zk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continues effect despite other provisions
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: despite anything in this Act and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-18zk-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Section 18ZK(2) overlaps with other sections
premise text: (2) Subsection (1)
conclusion text: overlaps with other sections
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

210 Paragraphs 24(1)(d) and (e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-210
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.58
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-210-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-210-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

211 Subsection 25(1AA)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-211
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.58
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-211-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-211-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

212 Paragraph 29(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-212
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.59
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-212-norm

213 Section 32AA (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-213
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.59
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-213-norm

214 Paragraphs 32AA(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-214
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.59
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-214-norm

215 Paragraph 32AA(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-215
note: Substitute court name in paragraph 32AA(2)(b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.59
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-215-norm

216 Section 32AB (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-216
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.59
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-216-norm

217 Subsections 32AB(1), (3), (4), (5) and (6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-217
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.59
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-217-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-217-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

218 Subsection 32AB(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-218
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.59
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-218-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-218-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 218 Subsection 32AB(7)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

219 Subsection 32AB(8A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-219
note: Repeal subsection, substitute with new jurisdiction for Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.59
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-219-norm

220 After section 32AB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-220
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.60
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-220-norm

32AC Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32ac
has part: 32AC(1) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
has part: 32AC(2) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
has part: 32AC(3) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
has part: 32AC(4) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
has part: 32AC(5) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
has part: 32AC(6) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
has part: 32AC(7) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
has part: 32AC(8) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
has part: 32AC(9) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
has part: 32AC(10) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.60

32AC(1) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-1
part of: 32AC Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
note: Transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) to the Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.60

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (1) If...
conclusion text: ...the Court may, by order, transfer the proceeding...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between proceedings
premise text: (1) If: (a) a proceeding is pending in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2);
conclusion text: ...the Court may, by order, transfer the proceeding...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of proceedings
premise text: (1) If: (a) a proceeding is pending in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2);
conclusion text: ...the Court may, by order, transfer the proceeding...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to transfer proceedings
premise text: (1) If: (a) a proceeding is pending in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2);
conclusion text: ...the Court may, by order, transfer the proceeding...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Granting permission to transfer proceedings
premise text: (1) If: (a) a proceeding is pending in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2);
conclusion text: ...the Court may, by order, transfer the proceeding...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

32AC(2) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-2
part of: 32AC Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
note: Court may transfer proceeding on its own initiative or at party's request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.60

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to transfer proceeding
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32AC(3) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-3
part of: 32AC Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
note: Rules of Court may make provision in relation to transfers of proceedings from the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.60

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32AC(3) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

32AC(4) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-4
part of: 32AC Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
note: Court must consider factors when deciding to transfer proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.60

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32AC(4) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: The Court must consider factors.
conclusion text: Obligation to consider factors.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32AC(5) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-5
part of: 32AC Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
note: Consultation requirement before making Rules of Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.60

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult
premise text: Rules of Court are made for the purposes of subsection (3) or (4)
conclusion text: Court must consult Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation
premise text: Before Rules of Court are made
conclusion text: Consultation must occur before making Rules of Court
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32AC(6) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-6
part of: 32AC Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
note: Court must consider certain factors when deciding to transfer a proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.60

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court has an obligation to consider certain factors.
premise text: (6) In deciding whether to transfer a proceeding...
conclusion text: The Court must have regard to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Court's resources are sufficient to hear and determine the proceeding.
premise text: (6) In deciding whether to transfer a proceeding...
conclusion text: The Court must have regard to...whether the resources of the Court are sufficient to hear and determine the proceeding;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Court's capacity is sufficient for the proceeding.
premise text: (6) In deciding whether to transfer a proceeding...
conclusion text: The Court must have regard to...whether proceedings in respect of an associated matter are pending in the Court;
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court has an obligation to consider associated matters.
premise text: (6) In deciding whether to transfer a proceeding...
conclusion text: The Court must have regard to...whether proceedings in respect of an associated matter are pending in the Court;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-6-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court has an obligation to consider its resources.
premise text: (6) In deciding whether to transfer a proceeding...
conclusion text: The Court must have regard to...whether the resources of the Court are sufficient to hear and determine the proceeding;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32AC(7) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-7
part of: 32AC Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
note: No appeal from Court decision on transfer of proceeding under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.60

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 32AC(7) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No appeal from Court decision
premise text: (7) An appeal does not lie...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32AC(8) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-8
part of: 32AC Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
note: Court has jurisdiction in a matter that meets certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.60

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32AC(8) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Court has jurisdiction in a matter that meets certain conditions.
premise text: (a) is the subject of a proceeding transferred to the Court under this section; and (b) is a matter in which the Court does not have jurisdiction apart from this subsection.
conclusion text: The Court has jurisdiction in a matter that meets these conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: withinTemporalInterval
logic summary: The matter does not have jurisdiction apart from this subsection.
premise text: (b) is a matter in which the Court does not have jurisdiction apart from this subsection.
conclusion text: The matter does not have jurisdiction apart from this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: hasRecurringTrace
logic summary: The matter has a recurring trace.
premise text: (a) is the subject of a proceeding transferred to the Court under this section; and (b) is a matter in which the Court does not have jurisdiction apart from this subsection.
conclusion text: The matter has a recurring trace.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: isSubjectOf
logic summary: The proceeding transferred to the Court under this section is a matter in which the Court does not have jurisdiction apart from this subsection.
premise text: (a) is the subject of a proceeding transferred to the Court under this section; and (b) is a matter in which the Court does not have jurisdiction apart from this subsection.
conclusion text: The proceeding transferred to the Court under this section is a matter in which the Court does not have jurisdiction apart from this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32AC(9) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-9
part of: 32AC Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
note: Section does not apply to criminal proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.60

32AC(10) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-10
part of: 32AC Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
note: Section does not apply to proceedings of a kind specified in the regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.60

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ac-ss-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32AC(10) Discretionary transfer of civil proceedings from the Federal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

32AD Confirmation of civil proceedings transferred from the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32ad
has part: 32AD(1) Confirmation of civil proceedings transferred from the
has part: 32AD(2) Confirmation of civil proceedings transferred from the
has part: 32AD(3) Confirmation of civil proceedings transferred from the
has part: 32AD(4) Confirmation of civil proceedings transferred from the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.62

32AD(1) Confirmation of civil proceedings transferred from the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32ad-ss-1
part of: 32AD Confirmation of civil proceedings transferred from the
note: The Court may confirm the transfer of a proceeding to itself.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.62

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ad-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May confirm transfer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32AD(2) Confirmation of civil proceedings transferred from the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32ad-ss-2
part of: 32AD Confirmation of civil proceedings transferred from the
note: Court may receive further evidence to decide on making an order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.62

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ad-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to receive evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

32AD(3) Confirmation of civil proceedings transferred from the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32ad-ss-3
part of: 32AD Confirmation of civil proceedings transferred from the
note: Court has jurisdiction in a matter transferred from the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.62

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ad-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32AD(3) Confirmation of civil proceedings transferred from the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ad-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Court has jurisdiction in a matter.
premise text: (3) The Court has jurisdiction in a matter that:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ad-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: withinTemporalInterval
logic summary: Matter is within a temporal interval.
premise text: (b) is a matter in which the Court does not have jurisdiction apart from this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32AD(4) Confirmation of civil proceedings transferred from the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32ad-ss-4
part of: 32AD Confirmation of civil proceedings transferred from the
note: No appeal from a decision confirming the transfer of proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.62

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-32ad-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits appeal from a decision confirming transfer.
premise text: (4) An appeal does not lie...
conclusion text: ...from a decision of the Court...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

221 Subsections 34(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-221
note: Substitute 'The Minister must' for 'The Governor-General shall'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.62
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-221-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-221-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Minister.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

222 Subsection 34(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-222
note: Substitution of 'Minister' for 'Governor-General'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.62
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-222-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-222-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 222 Subsection 34(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

223 Subsection 49(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-223
has part: 223(2) Subsection 49(2)
has part: 223(2A) Subsection 49(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.62

223(2) Subsection 49(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-223-ss-2
part of: 223 Subsection 49(2)
note: Orders and reasons may be made public by another Judge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.62

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-223-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to make orders and reasons public.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

223(2A) Subsection 49(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-223-ss-2a
part of: 223 Subsection 49(2)
note: Judges may make public reasons prepared by another Judge on behalf of the original Judge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.62

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-223-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to make public reasons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

224 Subsection 49(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-224
note: Substitute 'this section' for 'subsection (2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.63
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-224-norm

225 After section 55
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-225
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.63
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-225-norm

55AA Actions by or against Marshal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-55aa
note: Marshal must direct writs and commands to a disinterested person appointed by the Court or Judge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.63
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-55aa-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-55aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Marshal must direct writs and commands.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

226 After subsection 59(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-226
note: May make Rules of Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.63
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-226-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-226-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to make Rules of Court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

227 After paragraph 59(2)(r)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-227
note: Transfer of proceedings from Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.64
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-227-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-227-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

228 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-228
note: Defines commencement day as the day the Schedule commences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.65
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-228-norm

229 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-229
note: Amendments apply to proceedings commenced before, on or after commencement day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.65
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-229-norm

230 Authorisation about handling complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-230
note: Continuation of written authorisation under Family Law Act 1975
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.65
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-230-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-230-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 230 Authorisation about handling complaints
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-230-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES
logic summary: Continuation of authorisation
premise text: Written authorisation under subsection 21B(3A) of the Family Law Act 1975
conclusion text: As if it had been made under subsection 48(2) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-230-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTINUATION
logic summary: Continuation of authorisation over time
premise text: Written authorisation under subsection 21B(3A) of the Family Law Act 1975
conclusion text: As if it had been made under subsection 48(2) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-230-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTINUATION
logic summary: Continuation of authorisation over time
premise text: Written authorisation under subsection 21B(3A) of the Family Law Act 1975
conclusion text: As if it had been made under subsection 48(2) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-230-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTINUATION
logic summary: Continuation of authorisation over time
premise text: Written authorisation under subsection 21B(3A) of the Family Law Act 1975
conclusion text: As if it had been made under subsection 48(2) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-230-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTINUATION
logic summary: Continuation of authorisation over time
premise text: Written authorisation under subsection 21B(3A) of the Family Law Act 1975
conclusion text: As if it had been made under subsection 48(2) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

231 Arrangements with other courts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-231
note: Continuation of arrangements with other courts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.65
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-231-norm

232 Arrangements with agencies or organisations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-232
note: Continuation of arrangements under Family Law Act 1975
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.66
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-232-norm

233 Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-233
note: Continuation of certain instruments under section 38W Family Law Act 1975
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.66
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-233-norm

234 Proclamation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-234
note: Continuation of a proclamation despite repeal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.66
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-234-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-234-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the repeal and continuation of the proclamation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

235 Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-235
note: Continuation of written authorisation under Family Law Act 1975
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.66
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-235-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-235-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 235 Oaths and affirmations
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-235-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTINUES
logic summary: Continuation of written authorisation
premise text: Written authorisation under subsection 98AA(2) of the Family Law Act 1975
conclusion text: as if it had been made under subsection 71(2) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-235-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTINUITY
logic summary: Continuity of written authorisation
premise text: Written authorisation under subsection 98AA(2) of the Family Law Act 1975
conclusion text: continues in force immediately before the commencement day.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-235-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTINUITY
logic summary: Continuity of written authorisation
premise text: Written authorisation under subsection 98AA(2) of the Family Law Act 1975
conclusion text: continues in force immediately before the commencement day.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-235-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTINUITY
logic summary: Continuity of written authorisation
premise text: Written authorisation under subsection 98AA(2) of the Family Law Act 1975
conclusion text: continues in force immediately before the commencement day.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-235-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTINUITY
logic summary: Continuity of written authorisation
premise text: Written authorisation under subsection 98AA(2) of the Family Law Act 1975
conclusion text: continues in force immediately before the commencement day.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

236 Seals and stamps
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-236
note: Affixing seal or stamp of Family Court until end of 12-month period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.66
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-236-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-236-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to affix seal or stamp
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

237 Continuity of Rules of Court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-237
note: Amendments do not affect continuity of certain Rules of Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.67
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-237-norm

238 Registries of the Federal Court of Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-238
note: Continuation of existing Registry on commencement day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.67
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-238-norm

1 January 2020
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1-2
note: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.69
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-1-2-norm

239 Paragraph 127(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-239
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute with conditions for age and education
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.69
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-239-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-239-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 239 Paragraph 127(1)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-239-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-239-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the obligation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

240 Application provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-240
note: Application provision for amendment of Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.69
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-240-norm

241 Section 700-1 (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-241
note: Omit 'the Chief Justice', substitute 'Judges'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.70
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-241-norm

242 Section 9 (paragraph (c) of the definition of Corporations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-242
note: Omit 'the Chief Justice', substitute 'Judges'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.70
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-242-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-242-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting 'the Chief Justice'
premise text: Omit 'the Chief Justice'
conclusion text: Substitute 'Judges'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

243 Subsection 109A(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-243
note: Substitute 'Judges' for 'the Chief Justice'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.70
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-243-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-243-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 243 Subsection 109A(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

244 Subsection 111C(7A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-244
note: Omit 'the Chief Justice', substitute 'Judges'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.70
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-244-norm

245 Subsection 111C(7B)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-245
note: Substitute 'Judges' for 'the Chief Justice'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.70
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-245-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-245-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 245 Subsection 111C(7B)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-245-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Substitution obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

246 Subsection 111C(7C)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-246
note: Substitute 'Judges' for 'the Chief Judge'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.70
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-246-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-246-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 246 Subsection 111C(7C)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-246-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Substitution obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

247 Subsection 123(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-247
note: Substitute judges for Chief Justice in Division 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.70
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-247-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-247-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation to substitute judges
premise text: Substitution required
conclusion text: Judges substituted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

248 Subsection 123(1) (note 1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-248
note: Omit 'Note 1', substitute 'Note'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.71
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-248-norm

249 Subsection 123(1) (note 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-249
note: Repeal a note
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.71
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-249-norm

250 Subsection 123(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-250
note: Substitute 'Judges' for 'the Chief Justice'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.71
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-250-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-250-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 250 Subsection 123(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

251 After paragraph 123(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-251
note: Reference to a rule-maker is treated as a reference to the Chief Justice acting on behalf of the Judges of that Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.71
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-251-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-251-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 251 After paragraph 123(2)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-251-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: treats-as
logic summary: Treats a reference to a rule-maker as a reference to the Chief Justice acting on behalf of the Judges.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-251-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes temporal interval of when the Chief Justice acts on behalf of the Judges.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

252 Subsection 123(2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-252
note: Substitute 'Judges' for 'the Chief Justice'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.71
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-252-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-252-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 252 Subsection 123(2A)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

253 Subsection 124(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-253
note: Substitute the function of the Rules Advisory Committee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.71
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-253-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-253-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 253 Subsection 124(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-253-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

254 Subsection 76(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-254
note: Substitute 'Judges, or a majority of them' for 'Chief Justice'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.71
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-254-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-254-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 254 Subsection 76(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-254-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to make the substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

255 Subsection 76(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-255
note: Repeal a note
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.71
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-255-norm

256 After subsection 76(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-256
note: Amendments relating to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.71
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-256-norm

257 Subsection 76(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-257
note: Substitute 'Judges' for 'the Chief Justice'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.72
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-257-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-257-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 257 Subsection 76(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-257-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Substitution obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

258 After paragraph 76(4)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-258
note: Reference to rule-maker is treated as reference to Chief Justice acting on behalf of Judges.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.72
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-258-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-258-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 258 After paragraph 76(4)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-258-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: treats-as
logic summary: Treats a reference to rule-maker as a reference to Chief Justice acting on behalf of Judges.
premise text: Rule-maker is treated as Chief Justice acting on behalf of Judges.
conclusion text: Reference to rule-maker is treated as reference to Chief Justice acting on behalf of Judges.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-258-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Indicates overlap between 'rule-maker' and 'Chief Justice acting on behalf of Judges'.
premise text: Rule-maker is a type of Chief Justice acting on behalf of Judges.
conclusion text: Reference to rule-maker is treated as reference to Chief Justice acting on behalf of Judges.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-258-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: holds-for-all
logic summary: Holds true for all cases where 'rule-maker' and 'Chief Justice acting on behalf of Judges' overlap.
premise text: Rule-maker is a type of Chief Justice acting on behalf of Judges.
conclusion text: Reference to rule-maker is treated as reference to Chief Justice acting on behalf of Judges.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-258-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffuses information about 'rule-maker' being treated as 'Chief Justice acting on behalf of Judges'.
premise text: Rule-maker is a type of Chief Justice acting on behalf of Judges.
conclusion text: Reference to rule-maker is treated as reference to Chief Justice acting on behalf of Judges.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-258-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: Recognizes 'rule-maker' being treated as 'Chief Justice acting on behalf of Judges'.
premise text: Rule-maker is a type of Chief Justice acting on behalf of Judges.
conclusion text: Reference to rule-maker is treated as reference to Chief Justice acting on behalf of Judges.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

259 Subsection 76(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-259
note: Substitution of 'Judges' for 'Chief Justice'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.72
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-259-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-259-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 259 Subsection 76(5)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

260 Section 77
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-260
note: Repeal section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.72
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-260-norm

261 Subsection 82(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-261
note: Repeal subsection, substitute with new appointment rules for the Chief Justice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.72
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-261-norm

262 Subsection 98(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-262
note: Substitution of judges in subsection 98(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.72
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-262-norm

263 Subsection 217(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-263
note: Substitution of 'Judges' with 'Judges, or a majority of them'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.72
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-263-norm

264 Subsection 217(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-264
note: Repeal note and amend Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.72
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-264-norm

265 After subsection 217(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-265
note: Proposed Rules of Court cannot be made if inconsistent with the aim mentioned in paragraph 216(a)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.73
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-265-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-265-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Proposed Rules of Court are to be made
conclusion text: Proposed Rules of Court cannot be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-265-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval requirement
premise text: Chief Judge considers Proposed Rules of Court during a specific time period
conclusion text: Proposed Rules of Court are not to be made if inconsistent with the aim mentioned in paragraph 216(a) during that time period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-265-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval requirement
premise text: Chief Judge considers Proposed Rules of Court during a specific time period
conclusion text: Proposed Rules of Court are not to be made if inconsistent with the aim mentioned in paragraph 216(a) during that time period
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-265-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional requirement
premise text: Chief Judge considers Proposed Rules of Court and the aim mentioned in paragraph 216(a)
conclusion text: Proposed Rules of Court are not to be made if inconsistent with the aim mentioned in paragraph 216(a)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-265-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: Conditional requirement
premise text: Chief Judge considers Proposed Rules of Court and the aim mentioned in paragraph 216(a)
conclusion text: Proposed Rules of Court are not to be made if inconsistent with the aim mentioned in paragraph 216(a)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

266 Subsection 217(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-266
note: Substitute 'Judges' for 'the Chief Judge'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.73
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-266-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-266-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 266 Subsection 217(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

267 After paragraph 217(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-267
note: Reference to a rule-maker is treated as a reference to the Chief Judge acting on behalf of the Judges of the Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.73
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-267-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-267-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 267 After paragraph 217(3)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-267-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: treats-as
logic summary: Treats a reference to a rule-maker as a reference to the Chief Judge acting on behalf of the Judges of the Court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

268 Subsection 217(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-268
note: Substitution of 'Judges' for 'Chief Judge' in subsection 217(4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.73
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-268-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-268-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 268 Subsection 217(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

269 Section 218
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-269
note: Repeal section 218
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.73
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-269-norm

270 Subsection 249(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-270
note: Repeal subsection, substitute with new appointment rules for the Chief Judge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.73
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-270-norm

271 Subsection 254(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-271
note: Substitute 'Judges, or a majority of them' for 'The Chief Judge'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.73
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-271-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-271-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on judges
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

272 Subsection 56A(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-272
note: Omit specified text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.74
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-272-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-272-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273 Application of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-273
note: Amendments apply in relation to rules of court made after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.74
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-273-norm

274 Continuity of rules of court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-274
note: Continuity of rules of court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.74
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-1-sec-274-norm

1 Paragraph 7(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Omit 'Family Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.75
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-1-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 43(5C)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.75
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-2-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 44(1) (note 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.75
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-3-norm

4 Section 44AAA (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.75
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-4-norm

5 Subsections 44AAA(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: Omit specified text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.75
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-5-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 44AAA(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
note: Omit specified text and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.75
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-6-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the specified text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Section 44AA (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.75
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-7-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsections 44AA(1), (2), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8) and (9)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.76
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-8-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsection 44AA(11) (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.76
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-9-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Subsections 44AA(11) and (12)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.76
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-10-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 44A(2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
note: Omit specified terms from court names
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.76
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-11-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Subsection 44A(2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
note: Omit specified court names and substitute with new names.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.76
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-12-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of old court names.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Paragraph 44A(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
note: Omit specified term and substitute with new term.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.76
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-13-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of a specific term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Section 46 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.76
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-14-norm

15 Subsections 46(1), (2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia' and substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.76
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-15-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using the old name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Subsection 3(1) (definition of Family Court Judge)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
note: Repeal the definition of Family Court Judge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.77
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-16-norm

17 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
note: Defines Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) Rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.77
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-17-norm

18 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
note: Repeal definitions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.77
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-18-norm

19 Subsection 3(10)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
note: Omit all words after 'before the Federal Court' and substitute with a transfer from the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.77
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-19-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of words after 'before the Federal Court'
premise text: Omit all words after 'before the Federal Court'
conclusion text: Substitute with a transfer from the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-19-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the transfer
premise text: Transfer by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) to the Federal Court under section 153 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 that has been confirmed...
conclusion text: under section 32AD of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-19-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Establishes a recurring trace for the transfer
premise text: Transfer by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) to the Federal Court under section 153 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 that has been confirmed...
conclusion text: by the Federal Court under section 32AC of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-19-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses the transfer to multiple parties
premise text: Transfer by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) to the Federal Court under section 153 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 that has been confirmed...
conclusion text: by the Federal Court under section 32AC of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-19-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Automate
logic summary: Automates the transfer process
premise text: Transfer by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) to the Federal Court under section 153 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 that has been confirmed...
conclusion text: by the Federal Court under section 32AC of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Subsection 3(11)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.77
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-20-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using 'Federal Circuit Court'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Subsection 3(12)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.77
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-21-norm

22 Subsections 5(1) and 6(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.78
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-22-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.78
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-23-norm

24 Section 8 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.78
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-24-norm

25 Subsection 8(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25
note: Jurisdiction of Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.78
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-25-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 Subsection 8(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Section 10
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.78
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-26-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Subsection 11(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.78
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-27-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Subparagraph 11(1)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28
note: Omit specified heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.78
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-28-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of an outdated heading.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Subsection 11(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29
note: Replace 'Federal Circuit Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.78
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-29-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Replace specified term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Paragraph 11(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30
note: Omit specified text and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.79
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-30-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of outdated terminology.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Subparagraph 11(3)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.79
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-31-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Subsections 11(4) and (7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.79
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-32-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Subsection 11(8A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-33
note: Substitute subsection (8A) with new provision regarding service on appropriate persons of documents lodged with a Registry.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.79
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-33-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: provides for
logic summary: Provides provision for service on appropriate persons of documents lodged with a Registry
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Subsection 11(9)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-34
note: Omit Federal Circuit Court Rules and substitute with new rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.79
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-34-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of old Federal Circuit Court Rules.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Subsection 12(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-35
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.79
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-35-norm

36 Section 13
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.79
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-36-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using 'Federal Circuit Court'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Subsections 13A(4) and 14(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-37
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.79
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-37-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Section 15A (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.80
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-38-norm

15A Stay of proceedings—Federal Circuit and Family Court of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15a
note: Stay of proceedings—Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.80
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-15a-norm

39 Subsection 15A(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39
note: Omit specified court name and substitute with new name.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.80
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-39-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of an outdated court name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Paragraphs 15A(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40
note: Omit specific language from existing provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.80
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-40-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of specified text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Subsection 15A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41
note: Omit specific court names
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.80
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-41-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Omit specific court names
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Subsection 15A(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-42
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.80
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-42-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Section 16 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.80
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-43-norm

44 Section 16
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.80
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-44-norm

45 Paragraph 17(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-45
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.80
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-45-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Subsection 18(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.80
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-46-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Section 18A (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-47
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.81
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-47-norm

48 Subsections 18A(1), (2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.81
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-48-norm

49 Paragraphs 18A(3)(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-49
note: Omit 'Family Court' and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.81
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-49-norm

50 Subparagraph 18A(3)(f)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.81
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-50-norm

51 Subparagraphs 18A(3)(f)(ii) and (iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-51
note: Omit 'Family Court Judge', substitute 'Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.81
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-51-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Subparagraph 18A(3)(f)(iv)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-52
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.81
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-52-norm

53 Subsections 18A(4) and (5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-53
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.81
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-53-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Subsection 19(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-54
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.81
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-54-norm

55 Paragraph (zd) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-55
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.81
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-55-norm

56 Paragraph (zf) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-56
note: Repeal and substitute certain decisions under the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.81
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-56-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-56-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56 Paragraph (zf) of Schedule 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 Subsection 3(1) (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-57
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.82
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-57-norm

58 Subsections 9(1) and 27(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-58
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.82
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-58-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Paragraph 28(1)(aa)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.82
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-59-norm

60 Subsection 28(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-60
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.82
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-60-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Subsection 41(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-61
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.83
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-61-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Paragraph 95C-1(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-62
note: Repeal and substitute with new court division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.83
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-62-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits repeal of the paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63 Schedule 1 (table item 26)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-63
note: Repeal and substitute certain acts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.83
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-63-norm

64 Subsection 102D(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-64
note: Omit specified text and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.83
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-64-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of outdated court name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65 Subsection 102N(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-65
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.83
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-65-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 Subparagraph 219UA(4)(c)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-66
note: Repeal a subparagraph and substitute with a new provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.83
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-66-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66 Subparagraph 219UA(4)(c)(i)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

67 Subparagraph 219UA(4)(e)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-67
note: Repeal and substitute a subparagraph with a new provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.83
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-67-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-67-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67 Subparagraph 219UA(4)(e)(ii)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: REPEAL
logic summary: Repeal the specified subparagraph.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Paragraph 219VA(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-68
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.84
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-68-norm

69 Subsection 219VB(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-69
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.84
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-69-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-70
note: Repeal paragraph (b) of definition of Court and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia or Archives Act 1983
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.84
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-70-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71 Subsections 53(6) and (7) and 55A(4) and (5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-71
note: Omit and substitute court names
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.84
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-71-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of certain court names
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Section 300-5 (definition of issuing officer)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-72
note: Replace 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.84
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-72-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term with another term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-73
note: Repeal definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.84
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-73-norm

74 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (aa) of the definition of issuing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-74
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.85
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-74-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75 Paragraph 25E(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-75
note: Omit 'Family Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.85
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-75-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Subsection 27(2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-76
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.85
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-76-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using 'Federal Circuit Court'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Paragraph 55A(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-77
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.85
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-77-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Subsection 55A(5B) (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-78
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.85
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-78-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-78-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 Subsections 55A(5B) and (5C)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-79
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.85
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-79-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-79-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using 'Federal Circuit Court'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Paragraphs 55A(8)(c) and (9)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-80
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.85
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-80-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

81 Subsection 55A(13)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-81
note: Definition of Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.85
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-81-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-81-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies a specific type of judge
premise text: Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
conclusion text: a Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) in a personal capacity and not as a court or a member of a court.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Subsection 55A(13) (definition of Judge of the Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-82
note: Repeal definition of Judge of the Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.86
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-82-norm

83 Subsection 55C(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-83
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.86
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-83-norm

84 Subsection 55C(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-84
note: Definition of Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.86
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-84-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-84-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term with a clear and specific meaning
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85 Subsection 55C(3) (definition of Judge of the Federal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-85
note: Repeal definition of Judge of the Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.86
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-85-norm

86 Section 57
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-86
note: Replace 'Federal Circuit Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.86
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-86-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87 Section 57
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-87
note: Replace court name with new name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.86
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-87-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-87-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Replace court name with new name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88 Subparagraph 61(2)(g)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-88
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.86
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-88-norm

89 Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-89
note: Omit specified laws and substitute with new provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.86
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-89-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-89-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 89 Schedule 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-89-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified laws
premise text: Omit specified laws
conclusion text: Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999, Part 6A
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-89-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Requires substitution with new provisions
premise text: Further consequential amendments Schedule 2
conclusion text: No. 13, 2021 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 2021
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-89-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Requires substitution with new provisions
premise text: Australian Energy Market Act 2004
conclusion text: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021, Part 7 of Chapter 4
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90 Subsection 11(1) (definition of magistrate)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-90
note: Definition of magistrate modified
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.87
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-90-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-90-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Modification
logic summary: Legislative definition changed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91 Subsection 11H(1) (definition of magistrate)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-91
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.87
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-91-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-91-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92 Subsection 3(1) (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-92
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.87
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-92-norm

93 Paragraph 46PH(1)(h)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-93
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.87
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-93-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-93-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94 Subsections 46PH(1C), (2A) and (4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-94
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.87
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-94-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-94-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95 Division 2 of Part IIB (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-95
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.87
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-95-norm

96 Subsection 46PO(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-96
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.87
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-96-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-96-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

97 Subsection 46PO(4) (note 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-97
note: Award costs in proceedings under this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.87
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-97-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-97-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Awarding costs is permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98 Subsection 46PP(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-98
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.88
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-98-norm

99 Section 46PR
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-99
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.88
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-99-norm

100 Subsection 46PS(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-100
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.88
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-100-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-100-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101 Section 46PSA (note 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101
note: Award costs in proceedings under section 46PO
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.88
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-101-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-101-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Grant permission to award costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102 Paragraphs 46PU(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.88
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-102-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-102-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103 Subsection 46PV(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-103
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.88
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-103-norm

104 Section 49B (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-104
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.88
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-104-norm

105 Section 49B
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-105
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.88
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-105-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-105-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106 Subsection 49C(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.89
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-106-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-106-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107 Section 5 (paragraph (b) of the definition of prescribed
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-107
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.89
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-107-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-107-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107 Section 5 (paragraph (b) of the definition of prescribed
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-107-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: REPEAL
logic summary: Repeal paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108 Subsection 6(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-108
note: Substitute name of court in Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.89
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-108-norm

109 Subsection 12BA(1) (definition of Family Court Judge)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-109
note: Repeal the definition of Family Court Judge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.89
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-109-norm

110 Section 12GL (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-110
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.89
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-110-norm

111 Subsection 12GL(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-111
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.89
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-111-norm

112 Subsection 12GL(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-112
note: Omit 'Family Court' and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.89
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-112-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-112-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

113 Paragraphs 12GL(3)(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-113
note: Omit 'Family Court' and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.90
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-113-norm

114 Subparagraph 12GL(3)(f)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-114
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.90
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-114-norm

115 Subparagraphs 12GL(3)(f)(ii) and (iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-115
note: Omit 'Family Court Judge', substitute 'Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.90
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-115-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-115-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated title
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

116 Subparagraph 12GL(3)(f)(iv)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-116
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.90
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-116-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-116-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117 Subsections 12GL(4) and (5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-117
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.90
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-117-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-117-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118 Section 34A (paragraph (c) of the definition of superior
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-118
note: Repeal paragraph (c) of the definition of superior court and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.90
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-118-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-118-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraph (c)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119 Section 34A (after paragraph (d) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-119
note: A State Family Court must be a court to which section 41 of the Family Law Act 1975 applies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.90
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-119-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-119-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 119 Section 34A (after paragraph (d) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-119-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be a court to which section 41 of the Family Law Act 1975 applies.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120 Paragraph 72(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-120
note: Repeal and substitute certain provisions with new ones.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.91
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-120-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-120-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 120 Paragraph 72(3)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-120-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace existing provisions with new ones.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

121 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-121
note: Repeal definitions of Family Court Judge and Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.91
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-121-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-121-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Repeal definitions
premise text: Definitions to be repealed
conclusion text: Repeal definitions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122 Subsection 5(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-122
note: Repeal and substitute a definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.91
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-122-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-122-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 122 Subsection 5(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

123 Subsection 5(1) (definition of the Family Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-123
note: Repeal the definition of the Family Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.91
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-123-norm

124 Subsection 27(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-124
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.91
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-124-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-124-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125 Paragraph 27(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-125
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.91
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-125-norm

126 Section 35 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-126
note: Substitute jurisdiction heading in Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.91
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-126-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-126-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 126 Section 35 (heading)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-126-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

127 Subsections 35(1) and (1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-127
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.92
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-127-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-127-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128 Subsection 35(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-128
note: Omit 'Family Court's jurisdiction' and substitute with 'jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.92
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-128-norm

129 Section 35A (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-129
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.92
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-129-norm

130 Subsection 35A(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-130
note: Transfer proceeding to Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) on application or motion.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.92
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-130-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-130-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to transfer proceeding
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

131 Subsection 35A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-131
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.92
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-131-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-131-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131 Subsection 35A(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-131-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132 Subsection 35A(2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-132
note: Transfer a proceeding to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) on application or initiative.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.92
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-132-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to transfer a proceeding
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133 Subsection 35A(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-133
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.92
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-133-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-133-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134 Paragraphs 35A(3)(a) to (e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-134
note: Replace 'Family Court' with 'the Court'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.92
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-134-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-134-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134 Paragraphs 35A(3)(a) to (e)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-134-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: omission
logic summary: Omission of 'Family Court'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135 Subparagraph 35A(3)(f)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-135
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.93
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-135-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-135-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136 Subparagraphs 35A(3)(f)(ii) and (iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-136
note: Omit 'Family Court Judge', substitute 'Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.93
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-136-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-136-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated title
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137 Subparagraph 35A(3)(f)(iv)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-137
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.93
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-137-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-137-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138 Subsection 35A(3) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-138
note: Repeal note and substitute with new rule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.93
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-138-norm

139 Subsection 35A(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-139
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.93
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-139-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-139-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140 Subsection 35A(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-140
note: Prohibition on appeal from certain decisions of Federal Courts and Family Courts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.93
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-140-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-140-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits appeal from certain decisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

141 Subsection 35B(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-141
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.93
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-141-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-141-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Substitution obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142 Paragraph 35B(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-142
note: Substitute a title in Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.93
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-142-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-142-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 142 Paragraph 35B(2)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-142-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143 Paragraph 35B(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-143
note: Omit 'Registrar of the Family Court', substitute 'Registrar of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.94
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-143-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-143-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated title
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144 Section 9 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-144
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.94
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-144-norm

145 Section 9 (paragraph (c) of the definition of issuing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-145
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.94
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-145-norm

146 Section 9 (paragraph (b) of the definition of relevant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-146
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.94
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-146-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-146-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace existing definition with new one
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

147 Section 486
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-147
note: Magistrates and judges cannot issue warrants for entry or possession without certain matters being satisfied.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.94
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-147-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-147-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of warrant issuance
premise text: Magistrates and judges may issue warrants.
conclusion text: They cannot issue warrants without certain matters being satisfied.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-147-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal interval between amendment and commencement
premise text: The amendments take effect on the commencement date.
conclusion text: The amendments apply between the commencement date and the end of the period specified in the Schedule.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-147-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval until amendment
premise text: The amendments take effect on the commencement date.
conclusion text: The amendments apply until the end of the period specified in the Schedule.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148 Subparagraph 41(7)(b)(ii) of Schedule 6
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-148
note: Repeal subparagraph, substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia or Broadcasting Services Act 1992
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.95
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-148-norm

149 Subsection 6(1) (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-149
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.95
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-149-norm

150 Paragraph 121FS(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-150
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.95
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-150-norm

151 Subparagraphs 205AD(b)(ii) and 205AF(5)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-151
note: Repeal subparagraphs and substitute with new entities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.95
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-151-norm

152 Subitem 33(2) of Schedule 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-152
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.95
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-152-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-152-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

153 Section 5 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-153
note: Repeal definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.95
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-153-norm

154 Section 5 (paragraph (b) of the definition of relevant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-154
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.96
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-154-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-154-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 154 Section 5 (paragraph (b) of the definition of relevant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-154-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

155 Paragraphs 114(1)(e), (f) and (g)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-155
note: Substitute court name in Federal Circuit Court Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.96
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-155-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-155-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 155 Paragraphs 114(1)(e), (f) and (g)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-155-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on the state to substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156 Section 3 (paragraph (b) of the definition of Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-156
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.96
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-156-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-156-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156 Section 3 (paragraph (b) of the definition of Court)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-156-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace definition with new text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

157 Paragraph 51(5)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-157
note: Repeal and substitute with new court division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.96
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-157-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-157-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace existing paragraph with new text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-158
note: Defines terms related to Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.96
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-158-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) Rules means the Rules of Court made under Chapter 3 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
conclusion text: Full Court of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) has the same meaning as Full Court in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-158-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
premise text: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) Rules means the Rules of Court made under Chapter 3 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
conclusion text: related Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) Rules has the same meaning as in the Family Law Act 1975.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

159 Subsection 5(1) (definition of related Federal Circuit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-159
note: Repeal definition of related Federal Circuit Court Rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.97
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-159-norm

160 Subsection 17(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-160
note: Replace 'Family Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.97
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-160-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-160-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 160 Subsection 17(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-160-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to replace 'Family Court'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161 Subsection 17(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-161
note: Make counselling facilities available to appropriate officers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.97
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-161-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-161-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 161 Subsection 17(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-161-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make counselling facilities available.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

162 Section 98X
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-162
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.97
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-162-norm

98X Simplified outline of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-98x
note: Jurisdiction under this Act is conferred on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) and certain State and Territory Courts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.97
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-98x-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-98x-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: isConferred
logic summary: Jurisdiction is conferred on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) and certain State and Territory Courts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

163 Subsection 99(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-163
note: Omit specified court names and substitute with new name.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.97
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-163-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-163-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of old court names.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164 At the end of section 99
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-164
note: Schedule 2: Further consequential amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.97
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-164-norm

165 Subsection 100(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-165
note: Omit certain court rules and substitute with others.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.98
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-165-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-165-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting certain court rules.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166 Sections 101 to 105
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-166
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new ones.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.98
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-166-norm

101 Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101-2
has part: 101(1) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
has part: 101(2) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.98

101(1) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1
part of: 101 Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
note: A Family Court of a State has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction of the State.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.98

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 101(1) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: The Family Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals.
premise text: (1) A Family Court of a State has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction of the State.
conclusion text: A Family Court of a State has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The jurisdiction applies during the appeals process.
premise text: (1) A Family Court of a State has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction of the State.
conclusion text: The jurisdiction applies during the appeals process.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: The jurisdiction is limited to the appeals process.
premise text: (1) A Family Court of a State has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction of the State.
conclusion text: The jurisdiction is limited to the appeals process.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasScope
logic summary: The jurisdiction applies to all courts within the State.
premise text: (1) A Family Court of a State has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction of the State.
conclusion text: The jurisdiction applies to all courts within the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasScope
logic summary: The jurisdiction applies to all appeals from decrees of summary courts.
premise text: (1) A Family Court of a State has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction of the State.
conclusion text: The jurisdiction applies to all appeals from decrees of summary courts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101(2) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-2
part of: 101 Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
note: Supreme Court of the Northern Territory has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.98

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 101(2) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-101-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Supreme Court has jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102 Appeals to High Court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102-2
has part: 102(1) Appeals to High Court
has part: 102(2) Appeals to High Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.98

102(1) Appeals to High Court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-1
part of: 102 Appeals to High Court
note: Appeals to High Court prohibited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.98

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(1) Appeals to High Court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: An appeal must not be brought...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102(2) Appeals to High Court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-2
part of: 102 Appeals to High Court
note: If subsection (1) is inconsistent with section 73 of the Constitution, add words to end of subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.98

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(2) Appeals to High Court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-102-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

167 Paragraphs 144(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-167
note: Decision becomes final after specified period without appeal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.99
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-167-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-167-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 167 Paragraphs 144(a) and (b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-167-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: Conditional obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-168
note: Repeal definitions of Family Court and Family Law Magistrate of Western Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.99
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-168-norm

169 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-169
note: Definition of Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.99
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-169-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-169-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy definition
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

170 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Full Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-170
note: Repeal definition of Full Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.99
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-170-norm

171 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-171
note: Defines Full Court of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.100
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-171-norm

172 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Judge)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-172
note: Repeal the definition of Judge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.100
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-172-norm

173 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-173
note: Defines related Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.100
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-173-norm

174 Subsection 4(1) (definition of related Federal Circuit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-174
note: Repeal definition of related Federal Circuit Court Rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.100
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-174-norm

175 Subsection 72Q(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-175
note: Omit specified court name and substitute with new name.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.100
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-175-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-175-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of an outdated court name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176 Section 103ZC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-176
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.100
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-176-norm

103ZC Simplified outline of this Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-103zc
note: Jurisdiction under this Act is conferred on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) and certain State and Territory Courts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.100
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-103zc-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-103zc-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: isConferred
logic summary: Jurisdiction is conferred on the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) and certain State and Territory Courts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

177 Subsection 104(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-177
note: Omit specified court names and substitute with new name.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.100
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-177-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-177-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of court names.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178 At the end of section 104
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-178
note: References other Acts for appeals
references: section 26 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021
references: section 47A of the Family Law Act 1975
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.101
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-178-norm

179 Subsection 105(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-179
note: Omit certain court rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.101
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-179-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-179-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 179 Subsection 105(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-179-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specific court rules
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180 Sections 106 to 110
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-180
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.101
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-180-norm

106 Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-2
has part: 106(1) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
has part: 106(2) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.101

106(1) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-2-ss-1
part of: 106 Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
note: A Family Court of a State has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction of the State.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.101

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-106-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106(1) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-106-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: The Family Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals.
premise text: (1) A Family Court of a State has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction of the State.
conclusion text: A Family Court of a State has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-106-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The Family Court has jurisdiction during the appeals process.
premise text: (1) A Family Court of a State has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction of the State.
conclusion text: The Family Court has jurisdiction during the appeals process.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-106-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: The Family Court has jurisdiction during the appeals process.
premise text: (1) A Family Court of a State has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction of the State.
conclusion text: The Family Court has jurisdiction during the appeals process.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-106-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustProvide
logic summary: A Family Court must provide jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals.
premise text: (1) A Family Court of a State has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction of the State.
conclusion text: A Family Court must provide jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-106-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: The Family Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals.
premise text: (1) A Family Court of a State has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction of the State.
conclusion text: The Family Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

106(2) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-2-ss-2
part of: 106 Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
note: Supreme Court of the Northern Territory has jurisdiction to hear and determine appeals from a decree of a court of summary jurisdiction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.101

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-106-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 106(2) Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-106-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Supreme Court has jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

107 Appeals to High Court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-107-2
has part: 107(1) Appeals to High Court
has part: 107(2) Appeals to High Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.101

107(1) Appeals to High Court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-1
part of: 107 Appeals to High Court
note: Appeals to High Court prohibited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.101

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 107(1) Appeals to High Court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

107(2) Appeals to High Court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-2
part of: 107 Appeals to High Court
note: Adds words to subsection (1) of section 73 of the Constitution for High Court appeals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.101

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-107-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: +
logic summary: Adds words to subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

181 Subsection 110W(2) (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-181
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.102
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-181-norm

182 Paragraph 110W(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-182
note: Repeal and substitute a decision with the Full Court of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.102
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-182-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-182-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 182 Paragraph 110W(2)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-182-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

183 Paragraphs 110W(3)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-183
note: Repeal paragraphs, substitute with new definitions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.102
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-183-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-183-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 183 Paragraphs 110W(3)(a) and (b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-183-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184 Section 5 (paragraph (b) of the definition of eligible
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-184
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.102
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-184-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-184-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 184 Section 5 (paragraph (b) of the definition of eligible
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-184-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185 Section 16
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-185
note: Insert '(1)' before 'Proceedings are also'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.102
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-185-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-185-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 185 Section 16
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-185-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of '(1)' before 'Proceedings are also'
premise text: Text supports insertion of '(1)',
conclusion text: Obligation to insert '(1)'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

186 At the end of section 16
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-186
note: Proceedings are excluded from the extent that they fall within the original or appellate jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.102
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-186-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-186-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 186 At the end of section 16
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

187 Section 18
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-187
note: Replace reference to Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 with Chapter 4 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.103
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-187-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-187-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to make the change.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188 Subsection 4(1) (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-188
note: Repeal definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.103
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-188-norm

189 Sections 39DA and 39DB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-189
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.103
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-189-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-189-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

190 Paragraph 49A(4)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-190
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new court division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.103
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-190-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-190-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 190 Paragraph 49A(4)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-190-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace existing paragraph with new text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

191 Section 52C (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-191
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.103
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-191-norm

192 Subsection 52C(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-192
note: Substitute court name in subsection 52C(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.103
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-192-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-192-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to make the substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

193 Paragraphs 52C(2)(e), (f) and (g)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-193
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.103
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-193-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-193-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194 Subsection 52C(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-194
note: Omit specified text and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.104
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-194-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-194-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits exercise of specified court division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

195 Paragraph 52C(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-195
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.104
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-195-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-195-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of 'Federal Circuit'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

196 Paragraph 52C(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-196
note: Omit section 15 of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 and substitute section 140 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.104
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-196-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-196-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

197 Paragraph 52C(3)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-197
note: Omit section and substitute with new section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.104
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-197-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-197-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

198 Paragraphs 52C(3)(d) and (e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-198
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.104
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-198-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-198-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

199 Section 52D
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-199
note: Replace 'Federal Circuit Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.104
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-199-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-199-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term with another term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

200 Paragraph 13A(4)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-200
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.104
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-200-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-200-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: REPEAL
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

201 Subsection 6(1) (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-201
note: Repeal definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.105
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-201-norm

202 Subsection 86(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-202
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.105
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-202-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-202-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

203 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-203
note: Repeal definitions of Federal Circuit Court and Family Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.105
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-203-norm

204 Paragraphs 56EU(4)(b), 56EW(3)(b) and 56EX(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-204
note: Repeal and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.105
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-204-norm

205 Paragraph 56EY(5)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-205
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new court division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.105
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-205-norm

206 Subsection 86(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-206
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.105
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-206-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-206-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

207 Paragraph 86(4)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-207
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.105
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-207-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-207-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

208 Section 86AA (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-208
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.105
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-208-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-208-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

209 Section 86AA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-209
note: Omit specified text from existing provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.106
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-209-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-209-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of specified text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

210 Section 86AA (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-210
note: Repeal note and substitute with new notes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.106
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-210-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-210-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Identify temporal intervals
premise text: Temporal interval present
conclusion text: Interval identified
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

211 Section 130 (definition of Family Court Judge)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-211
note: Repeal the definition of Family Court Judge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.106
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-211-norm

212 Paragraph 138(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-212
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.106
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-212-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-212-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 212 Paragraph 138(2)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

213 Section 138A (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-213
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.106
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-213-norm

214 Subsection 138A(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-214
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.106
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-214-norm

215 Subsection 138A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-215
note: Omit specified text from existing provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.106
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-215-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-215-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of text substitution.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

216 Subsection 138A(2) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-216
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.106
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-216-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-216-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

217 Section 138E (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-217
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.107
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-217-norm

138E Transfer of proceedings to the Federal Circuit and Family
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-138e
note: Transfer of proceedings to the Federal Circuit and Family
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.107
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-138e-norm

218 Subsection 138E(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-218
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.107
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-218-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-218-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

219 Subsection 138E(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-219
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.107
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-219-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-219-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Imposes obligation on courts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

220 Paragraphs 138E(2)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-220
note: Replace 'Family Court' with 'Court'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.107
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-220-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-220-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term
conclusion text: Obligation to replace
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

221 Paragraph 138E(2)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-221
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.107
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-221-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-221-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

222 Paragraph 138E(2)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-222
note: Replace 'Family Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.107
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-222-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-222-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term with another term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

223 Paragraph 138E(2)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-223
note: Replace 'the Family Court' with 'that Court'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.107
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-223-norm

224 Paragraph 138E(2)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-224
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.107
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-224-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-224-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

225 Subparagraph 138E(2)(f)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-225
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.107
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-225-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-225-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Remove 'Family Court'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

226 Subparagraphs 138E(2)(f)(ii) and (iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-226
note: Omit 'Family Court Judge', substitute 'Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.108
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-226-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-226-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated title
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

227 Subparagraph 138E(2)(f)(iv)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-227
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.108
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-227-norm

228 Subsections 138E(3) and (4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-228
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.108
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-228-norm

229 Paragraph 151AQA(4)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-229
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.108
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-229-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-229-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

230 Subsection 151AQA(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-230
note: Omit specified text from Copyright Act 1968
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.108
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-230-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-230-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

231 Section 131D (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-231
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.108
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-231-norm

232 Section 131D
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-232
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.108
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-232-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-232-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

233 Section 135AS (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-233
note: Replace 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.108
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-233-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-233-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Replace specified term with new one
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

234 Section 135AS
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-234
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.109
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-234-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-234-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

235 Subsection 195AZGH(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-235
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.109
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-235-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-235-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

236 Section 248MA (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-236
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.109
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-236-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-236-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

237 Section 248MA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-237
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.109
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-237-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-237-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

238 Section 586-10 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-238
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.109
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-238-norm

239 Subsection 586-10(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-239
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.109
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-239-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-239-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 239 Subsection 586-10(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-239-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

240 Paragraphs 586-15(1)(a), (2)(c) and (5)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-240
note: Omit 'Family Court' and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.109
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-240-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-240-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

241 Paragraphs 586-25(1)(b) and (2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-241
note: Repeal and substitute paragraphs with new court division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.109
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-241-norm

242 Paragraph 586-25(3)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-242
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.110
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-242-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-242-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace paragraph with new provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

243 Subsection 586-25(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-243
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.110
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-243-norm

244 Section 586-40 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-244
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.110
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-244-norm

245 Subparagraphs 586-40(1)(b)(i) and (3)(a)(i) and (b)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-245
note: Repeal and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.110
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-245-norm

246 Paragraph 586-65(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-246
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.110
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-246-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-246-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

247 Section 586-90 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-247
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.110
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-247-norm

248 Section 586-90
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-248
note: Omit specific rule and substitute with new rule.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.110
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-248-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-248-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specific rule.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

249 Paragraphs 586-90(a) and (c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-249
note: Substitute court name in Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.110
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-249-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-249-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 249 Paragraphs 586-90(a) and (c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-249-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Substitution obligation
premise text: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

250 Subsection 694-35(1) (paragraph (c) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-250
note: Repeal and substitute a paragraph with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.111
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-250-norm

251 Section 700-1 (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-251
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Chief Justice of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.111
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-251-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-251-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

252 Section 700-1 (definition of Family Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-252
note: Repeal the definition of Family Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.111
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-252-norm

253 Section 700-1 (definition of superior court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-253
note: Replace 'the Family Court' with 'the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)' in the Corporations Act 2001.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.111
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-253-norm

254 Section 9 (paragraph (c) of the definition of Corporations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-254
note: Substitute Chief Justice of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) for 'Family Court'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.111
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-254-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-254-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 254 Section 9 (paragraph (c) of the definition of Corporations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-254-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace Family Court with a new entity
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

255 Section 9 (definition of Family Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-255
note: Repeal the definition of Family Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.111
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-255-norm

256 Section 9 (definition of superior court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-256
note: Definition of superior court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.111
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-256-norm

257 Subsection 58AA(1) (paragraph (c) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-257
note: Repeal and substitute a paragraph with a new schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.111
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-257-norm

258 Paragraph 908CI(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-258
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new court division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.112
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-258-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-258-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 258 Paragraph 908CI(3)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-258-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace existing paragraph with new text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

259 Section 1337C (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-259
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.112
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-259-norm

260 Subsection 1337C(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-260
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.112
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-260-norm

261 Paragraphs 1337D(1)(a), (2)(c) and (5)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-261
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.112
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-261-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-261-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

262 Paragraphs 1337F(1)(b) and (2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-262
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 1.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.112
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-262-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-262-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Repeal paragraphs
premise text: Paragraphs 1337F(1)(b) and (2)(b)
conclusion text: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

263 Paragraph 1337F(3)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-263
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.112
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-263-norm

264 Subsection 1337F(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-264
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.112
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-264-norm

265 Section 1337J (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-265
note: Omit 'Family Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.112
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-265-norm

266 Subparagraphs 1337J(1)(b)(i) and (3)(a)(i) and (b)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-266
note: Repeal and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.113
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-266-norm

267 Subsection 1337P(3) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-267
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.113
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-267-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-267-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

268 Section 1337U (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-268
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.113
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-268-norm

269 Subsection 1337U(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-269
note: Omit specific court rules and substitute with new ones.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.113
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-269-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-269-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting court rules.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

270 Paragraphs 1337U(1)(a) and (c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-270
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.113
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-270-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-270-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

271 Section 5 (table item 3 in the definition of administrative
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-271
note: Repeal and substitute certain titles and offices in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.113
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-271-norm

272 Section 5 (table item 6 in the definition of administrative
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-272
note: Repeal item in administrative head
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.114
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-272-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-272-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 272 Section 5 (table item 6 in the definition of administrative
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-272-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

273 Section 5 (table item 7 in the definition of administrative
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-273
note: Omit specific words from a heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.114
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-273-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-273-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified words.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

274 Subsection 41(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-274
note: Omit specified court names and substitute with new names.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.114
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-274-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-274-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of specified court names.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

275 Subsection 41(1) (note 3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-275
note: Repeal note and substitute with new reference.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.114
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-275-norm

276 Section 45 (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-276
note: Repeal note and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.114
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-276-norm

277 Section 51 (table item 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-277
note: Repeal and substitute court names
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.114
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-277-norm

278 Section 51 (table item 5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-278
note: Repeal the item.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.115
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-278-norm

279 Section 51 (table item 6, column headed “Court”)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-279
note: Omit specific numbers from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.115
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-279-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-279-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified numbers.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

280 Subsection 3ZQO(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-280
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.115
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-280-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-280-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

281 Section 3ZQQ (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-281
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court Judges', substitute 'Judges of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.115
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-281-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-281-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

282 Section 3ZQQ
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-282
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.115
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-282-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-282-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclude
logic summary: Exclusion
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

283 Paragraph 3ZZNF(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-283
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.115
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-283-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-283-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

284 Paragraph 4AAA(1)(ab)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-284
note: Repeal a paragraph and substitute with a new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.115
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-284-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-284-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 284 Paragraph 4AAA(1)(ab)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-284-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

285 Subsections 4AAA(2) and (3A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-285
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.115
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-285-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-285-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

286 Subsection 100.1(1) of the Criminal Code (paragraph (c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-286
note: Repeal of paragraph (c) and substitution with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.116
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-286-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-286-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on continuing use of outdated court division
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

287 Paragraph 105.2(1)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-287
note: Omit specified court name and substitute with new name.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.116
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-287-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-287-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of an outdated court name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

288 Subsections 105.43(4), (5) and (7) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-288
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.116
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-288-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-288-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

289 Section 105.46 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-289
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court Judge', substitute 'Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.116
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-289-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-289-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated title
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

290 Section 105.46 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-290
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.116
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-290-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-290-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

291 Section 106.4 of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-291
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.116
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-291-norm

106 Section 106
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-3
has part: 106(1) Section 106
has part: 106(2) Section 106
has part: 106(3) Section 106
has part: 106(4) Section 106
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.116

106(1) Section 106
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-3-ss-1
part of: 106 Section 106
note: Appointment continuity
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.116

106(2) Section 106
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-3-ss-2
part of: 106 Section 106
note: Consent continues in force after commencement day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.116

106(3) Section 106
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-3-ss-3
part of: 106 Section 106
note: Continuation of preventative detention orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.116

106(4) Section 106
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-106-3-ss-4
part of: 106 Section 106
note: Defines commencement day as the day Schedule 2 to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 2021 commences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.116

292 Subparagraph 123.1(2)(b)(ii) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-292
note: Repeal and substitute a subparagraph with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.117
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-292-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-292-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a subparagraph with another provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

293 Paragraph 150.5(3)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-293
note: Repeal and substitute with new provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.117
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-293-norm

294 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-294
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.117
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-294-norm

295 Subsections 219RA(1) and 219ZL(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-295
note: Substitute court name in Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.117
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-295-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-295-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 295 Subsections 219RA(1) and 219ZL(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-295-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to make the substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

296 Subparagraph 117AE(3)(e)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-296
note: Repeal and substitute a subparagraph with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.118
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-296-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-296-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: REPEAL
logic summary: Repeal a provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

297 Section 3 (definition of Family Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-297
note: Repeal the definition of Family Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.118
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-297-norm

298 Paragraphs 18(1)(a) and 29(d) and (e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-298
note: Replace 'Family Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.118
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-298-norm

299 Paragraphs 76A(3)(b) and 77(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-299
note: Omit specified text from existing provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.118
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-299-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-299-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of outdated court name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

300 Subsection 77(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-300
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.118
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-300-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-300-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

301 Section 5 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-301
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.118
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-301-norm

302 Section 5 (paragraph (aa) of the definition of prescribed
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-302
note: Repeal and substitute a paragraph with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.118
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-302-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-302-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 302 Section 5 (paragraph (aa) of the definition of prescribed
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-302-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a paragraph with another
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

303 Subsections 28(5), 50(6), 52(7), 54(4), 67(4) and 68(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-303
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.119
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-303-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-303-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

304 Section 82
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-304
note: Jurisdiction of courts under the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.119
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-304-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-304-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 304 Section 82
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-304-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Court jurisdiction
premise text: The Federal Court and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) are given jurisdiction in relation to matters arising under the Act.
conclusion text: Other prescribed courts have jurisdiction if the Act so provides.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-304-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope
premise text: Under Part 2, the Federal Court and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) are given jurisdiction in relation to matters arising under the Act.
conclusion text: Other prescribed courts have jurisdiction if the Act so provides.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-304-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Universal scope
premise text: The Federal Court and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) are given jurisdiction in relation to matters arising under the Act.
conclusion text: Other prescribed courts have jurisdiction if the Act so provides.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-304-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if-and-only-if
logic summary: Conditional scope
premise text: Under Part 2, the Federal Court and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) are given jurisdiction in relation to matters arising under the Act.
conclusion text: Other prescribed courts have jurisdiction if the Act so provides.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-304-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: is-a
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: The Federal Court and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) are given jurisdiction in relation to matters arising under the Act.
conclusion text: Other prescribed courts have jurisdiction if the Act so provides.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

305 Paragraph 83(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-305
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.119
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-305-norm

306 Section 83A (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-306
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.119
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-306-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-306-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

307 Section 83A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-307
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.119
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-307-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-307-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

308 Subsection 84(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-308
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.119
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-308-norm

309 Subsection 86(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-309
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.119
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-309-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-309-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

310 Subsection 86(3) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-310
note: Repeal note and substitute with new notes for transfers of proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.120
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-310-norm

311 Subsection 87(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-311
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.120
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-311-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-311-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

312 Section 88 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-312
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.120
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-312-norm

313 Sections 88 and 89
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-313
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.120
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-313-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-313-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

314 Section 4 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-314
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.120
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-314-norm

315 Section 23
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-315
note: Omit proceedings for recovery of penalties in Federal Court or Federal Circuit Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.120
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-315-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-315-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of proceedings in Federal Court or Federal Circuit Court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

316 Subsection 24(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-316
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.121
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-316-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-316-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

317 Paragraphs 25(2)(a), (3)(b), (4)(b), (5)(b) and (6)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-317
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.121
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-317-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-317-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

318 Sections 26 and 28
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-318
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.121
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-318-norm

319 Paragraph 30(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-319
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.121
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-319-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-319-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 319 Paragraph 30(1)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-319-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

320 Subsection 30(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-320
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.121
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-320-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-320-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Substitution obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

321 Paragraph 31(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-321
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.121
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-321-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-321-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 321 Paragraph 31(1)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-321-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

322 Subsection 31(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-322
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.121
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-322-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-322-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 322 Subsection 31(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-322-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to update court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

323 Section 33
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-323
note: Granting injunctions in relation to contraventions of civil penalty provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.121
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-323-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-323-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

324 Sections 34, 35, 36 and 37
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-324
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.122
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-324-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-324-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

325 Section 38 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-325
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.122
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-325-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-325-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

326 Section 38
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-326
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.122
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-326-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-326-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 326 Section 38
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

327 Paragraph 44(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-327
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.122
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-327-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-327-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

328 Clause 1 of Schedule 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-328
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.122
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-328-norm

329 Paragraph 3(1)(d) of Schedule 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-329
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.122
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-329-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-329-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

330 Paragraph 7(c) of Schedule 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-330
note: Omit specific phrase from Federal Court's discretion
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.122
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-330-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-330-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

331 Subsection 110B(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-331
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.123
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-331-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-331-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

332 Subsections 46(3), 47(3) and 48(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-332
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.123
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-332-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-332-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

333 Subsection 4(5A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-333
note: Repeal subsection, substitute with new provision applying to certain appeals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.123
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-333-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-333-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 333 Subsection 4(5A)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-333-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace existing subsection with new one.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

334 Section 5 (definition of eligible Federal Circuit Court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-334
note: Repeal definition of eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.123
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-334-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-334-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 334 Section 5 (definition of eligible Federal Circuit Court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-334-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

335 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-335
note: Definition of eligible Judge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.123
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-335-norm

336 Subsection 11(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-336
note: Replace 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge' with 'eligible Judge'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.123
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-336-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-336-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 336 Subsection 11(6)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-336-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Replace 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge' with 'eligible Judge'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

337 Paragraph 12(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-337
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge', substitute 'eligible Judge'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.124
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-337-norm

338 Subsections 12(3) and 14(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-338
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge', substitute 'eligible Judge'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.124
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-338-norm

339 Sections 15 and 15A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-339
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge' and substitute 'eligible Judge'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.124
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-339-norm

340 Subsections 15B(1) and (4) and 16(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-340
note: Omit specified text from Federal Circuit Court Judge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.124
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-340-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-340-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of language
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

341 Subsections 16A(2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-341
note: Omit specified term from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.124
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-341-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-341-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

342 Section 17
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-342
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge' and substitute 'eligible Judge'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.124
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-342-norm

343 Subsections 18(1), (3) and (4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-343
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge', substitute 'eligible Judge'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.124
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-343-norm

344 Paragraph 19(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-344
note: Omit specific title
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.124
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-344-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-344-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of title
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

345 Subsection 19(9A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-345
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge' and substitute 'eligible Judge'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.124
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-345-norm

346 Subparagraphs 19A(1)(b)(ii) and 20(1)(a)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-346
note: Omit specified text from Federal Circuit Court Judge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.124
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-346-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-346-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of specific text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

347 Subsection 21(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-347
note: Replace 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge' with 'eligible Judge'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.124
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-347-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-347-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 347 Subsection 21(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-347-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

348 Subsection 22(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-348
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge', substitute 'eligible Judge'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.125
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-348-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-348-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of using an outdated term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

349 Paragraphs 22(5)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-349
note: Omit specific term from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.125
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-349-norm

350 Paragraph 26(1)(ca)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-350
note: Omit specified term from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.125
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-350-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-350-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

351 Subsection 26(2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-351
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge', substitute 'eligible Judge'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.125
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-351-norm

352 Paragraphs 28(a) and 29(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-352
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge', substitute 'eligible Judge'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.125
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-352-norm

353 Subsection 31(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-353
note: Omit specified term from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.125
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-353-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-353-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of a specific term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

354 Section 32
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-354
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge' and substitute 'eligible Judge'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.125
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-354-norm

355 Paragraphs 33(c) and 34(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-355
note: Omit specific title
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.125
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-355-norm

356 Subsections 35(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-356
note: Omit specified term from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.125
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-356-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-356-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

357 Subsections 43(1), (2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-357
note: Omit specified term from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.125
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-357-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-357-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of a specific term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

358 Paragraph 45(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-358
note: Replace 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge' with 'eligible Judge'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.125
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-358-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-358-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 358 Paragraph 45(1)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-358-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

359 Section 45A (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-359
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court Judges', substitute 'Judges of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.126
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-359-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-359-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

360 Subsections 45A(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-360
note: Omit specified text and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.126
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-360-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-360-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of outdated court name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

361 Subsection 45A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-361
note: Substitute 'eligible Judge' for 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.126
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-361-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-361-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 361 Subsection 45A(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-361-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

362 Section 45B (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-362
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court Judges', substitute 'Judges of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.126
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-362-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-362-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

363 Subsections 45B(1) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-363
note: Omit specified text from subsections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.126
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-363-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-363-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

364 Section 46A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-364
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge' and substitute 'eligible Judge'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.126
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-364-norm

365 Subparagraphs 48(1)(b)(iii) and (iv)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-365
note: Omit specified text from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.126
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-365-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-365-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of specific text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

366 Subsection 49(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-366
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge', substitute 'eligible Judge'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.126
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-366-norm

367 Section 49B
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-367
note: Substitute 'eligible Judge' for 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.126
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-367-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-367-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 367 Section 49B
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-367-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replaces a term with another
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

368 Paragraph 55(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-368
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judges' and substitute 'eligible Judges'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.126
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-368-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-368-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: -
logic summary: Exclusion
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

369 Section 12 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-369
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.127
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-369-norm

370 Subsections 417(3), 421(3) and 422(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-370
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.127
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-370-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-370-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

371 Section 537
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-371
note: Orders that can be made by courts in relation to a contravention of a civil remedy provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.127
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-371-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-371-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 371 Section 537
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-371-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the courts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

372 Subsection 539(2) (table)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-372
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.127
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-372-norm

373 Section 543
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-373
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.127
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-373-norm

374 Subsection 545(1) (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-374
note: Replace 'Federal Circuit Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.127
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-374-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-374-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 374 Subsection 545(1) (heading)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-374-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to replace 'Federal Circuit Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

375 Subsections 545(1) and (2) and 546(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-375
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.128
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-375-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-375-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using 'Federal Circuit Court'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

376 Paragraph 548(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-376
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.128
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-376-norm

377 Paragraph 558C(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-377
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.128
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-377-norm

378 Section 560
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-378
note: Repeal section and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.128
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-378-norm

560 Guide to this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-560
note: Jurisdiction of Federal Court and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.128
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-560-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-560-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 560 Guide to this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-560-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Court has jurisdiction over matters arising under the Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

379 Paragraphs 563(f), (g) and (h)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-379
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.128
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-379-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-379-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

380 Division 3 of Part 4-2 of Chapter 4 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-380
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.128
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-380-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-380-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

381 Section 566 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-381
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.129
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-381-norm

382 Section 566
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-382
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.129
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-382-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-382-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

383 Section 567 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-383
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.129
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-383-norm

384 Section 567
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-384
note: Omit specific substitution in Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.129
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-384-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-384-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

385 Paragraph 567(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-385
note: Omit “Federal Circuit”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.129
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-385-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-385-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of 'Federal Circuit'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

386 Paragraph 567(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-386
note: Replace section reference with new one.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.129
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-386-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-386-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 386 Paragraph 567(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-386-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

387 Paragraph 567(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-387
note: Replace section reference with new one.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.129
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-387-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-387-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

388 Paragraph 567(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-388
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.129
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-388-norm

389 Paragraph 567(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-389
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.129
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-389-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-389-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

390 Section 568
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-390
note: Repeal section and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.130
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-390-norm

568 No limitation on powers of the Federal Circuit and Family
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-568
note: No limitation on powers of the Federal Circuit and Family Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.130
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-568-norm

391 Paragraph 576(2)(ca)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-391
note: Prohibition on mediating proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.130
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-391-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-391-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 391 Paragraph 576(2)(ca)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-391-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits mediating proceedings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

392 Subsections 627(1A) and (2A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-392
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.130
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-392-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-392-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

393 Subsection 641B(2) (table item 4, column 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-393
note: Omit specified court names
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.130
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-393-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-393-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of court names
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

394 Section 653A (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-394
note: Substitute court name in section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.130
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-394-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-394-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the legislative body to make the substitution.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

395 Section 653A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-395
note: Substitute court name in section 653A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.130
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-395-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-395-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 395 Section 653A
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-395-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Court name substitution
premise text: Section 653A
conclusion text: Obligation to substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

396 Subsection 715(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-396
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.131
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-396-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-396-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

397 Paragraph 716(3)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-397
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.131
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-397-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-397-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

398 Subsection 717(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-398
note: Substitute court name in subsection 717(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.131
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-398-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-398-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 398 Subsection 717(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-398-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to make the substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

399 Paragraphs 789CD(3)(b) and 789CE(4)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-399
note: Repeal specified paragraphs and substitute with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.131
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-399-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-399-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

400 Section 6 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-400
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.131
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-400-norm

401 Subsections 337BB(1) and (6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-401
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.131
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-401-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-401-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

402 Section 353A (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-402
note: Substitute court name in section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.131
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-402-norm

403 Subsection 353A(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-403
note: Replace 'Federal Circuit Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.131
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-403-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-403-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 403 Subsection 353A(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-403-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to make the replacement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

404 Subitem 16(1) of Schedule 16 (table)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-404
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.132
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-404-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-404-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using 'Federal Circuit Court'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

405 Item 17 of Schedule 16
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-405
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.132
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-405-norm

406 Paragraphs 22(f), (g) and (h) of Schedule 17
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-406
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.132
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-406-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-406-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

407 Item 25 of Schedule 17 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-407
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.132
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-407-norm

408 Item 25 of Schedule 17
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-408
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.132
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-408-norm

409 Item 26 of Schedule 17 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-409
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.132
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-409-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-409-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

410 Item 26 of Schedule 17
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-410
note: Omit specified provision and substitute with new one.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.132
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-410-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-410-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits exercise of specified court division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

411 Paragraph 26(a) of Schedule 17
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-411
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.132
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-411-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-411-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Omit 'Federal Circuit'.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

412 Paragraph 26(b) of Schedule 17
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-412
note: Omit section 15 of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 and substitute section 140 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.133
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-412-norm

413 Paragraph 26(c) of Schedule 17
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-413
note: Omit section 16 of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 and substitute section 141 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.133
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-413-norm

414 Paragraph 26(d) of Schedule 17
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-414
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.133
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-414-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-414-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

415 Paragraph 26(e) of Schedule 17
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-415
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.133
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-415-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-415-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

416 Item 27 of Schedule 17
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-416
note: Repeal item, substitute
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.133
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-416-norm

27 No limitation on powers of the Federal Circuit and Family
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-2
note: No limitation on powers of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.133
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-27-2-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-27-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27 No limitation on powers of the Federal Circuit and Family
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

417 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-417
note: Substitute 'Family Court of Australia' for 'Family Court'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.133
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-417-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-417-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 417 Section 11
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-417-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to substitute 'Family Court of Australia' for 'Family Court'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

418 Subsection 12(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-418
note: Replace 'Family Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.133
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-418-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-418-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 418 Subsection 12(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

419 Subsection 3(1) (definition of Family Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-419
note: Repeal the definition of Family Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.134
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-419-norm

420 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (d) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-420
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.134
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-420-norm

421 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (fa) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-421
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.134
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-421-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-421-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

422 Subsection 3(1) (subparagraph (ga)(ii) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-422
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.134
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-422-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-422-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

423 Subsection 3(1) (paragraphs (j), (ja) and (k) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-423
note: Repeal paragraphs, substitute with appeals to specific courts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.134
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-423-norm

424 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-424
note: Definition of Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.134
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-424-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-424-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Identifies the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

425 Subsection 3(1) (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-425
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.135
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-425-norm

426 Subsection 10(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-426
note: Omit specified court names and substitute with new name.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.135
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-426-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-426-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting court names.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

427 Schedule (table item dealing with the Family Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-427
note: Repeal and substitute with new legislation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.135
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-427-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-427-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: REPEAL
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

428 Paragraph 99(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-428
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new court division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.135
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-428-norm

429 Subsection 132(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-429
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.135
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-429-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-429-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

430 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-430
note: Omit 'Family Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.135
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-430-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-430-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 430 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-430-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Omit specified text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

431 Division 2 of Part 2 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-431
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.136
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-431-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-431-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

432 Section 9A (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-432
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.136
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-432-norm

433 Subsection 9A(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-433
note: Allow exercise of power by Division 1 in certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.136
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-433-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-433-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to exercise power
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

434 Subsection 9A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-434
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.136
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-434-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-434-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

435 Paragraph 11(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-435
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.136
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-435-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-435-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 435 Paragraph 11(1)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-435-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to substitute court names
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

436 Subsection 11(2) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-436
note: Omit 'Family Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.136
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-436-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-436-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

437 Subsection 12(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-437
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.136
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-437-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-437-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

438 Paragraph 12(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-438
note: Omit specific court names from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.137
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-438-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-438-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of specific court names.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

439 Subsection 15(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-439
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.137
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-439-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-439-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

440 Subsection 5(1B) (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-440
note: Omit 'Family Court Judges', substitute 'Judges of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.137
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-440-norm

441 Paragraph 5(1B)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-441
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with exercising powers or performing functions under specific acts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.137
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-441-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-441-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 441 Paragraph 5(1B)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-441-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

442 Subsection 5(1C) (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-442
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.137
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-442-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-442-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

443 Paragraph 5(1C)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-443
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with exercising powers or performing functions under specific acts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.137
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-443-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-443-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 443 Paragraph 5(1C)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-443-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace paragraph with new obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

444 Subsections 64(7) and (8) and 67(4) and (5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-444
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia' and substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.137
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-444-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-444-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

445 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-445
note: Omit injunction and compensation orders for contravention of Commonwealth Procurement Rules.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.138
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-445-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-445-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

446 Section 4 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-446
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.138
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-446-norm

447 Section 8
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-447
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.138
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-447-norm

8 Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8-2
note: Grant injunction for contravention of Commonwealth Procurement Rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.139
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-8-2-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission to grant injunction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

448 Subsections 9(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-448
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.139
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-448-norm

449 Paragraph 10(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-449
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.139
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-449-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-449-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

450 Sections 11 and 14
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-450
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.139
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-450-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-450-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using 'Federal Circuit Court'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

451 Section 15
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-451
note: Repeal section and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.139
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-451-norm

15 Simplified outline of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15-2
note: Payment of compensation for contravention of Commonwealth Procurement Rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.139
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-15-2-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-15-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

452 Section 16
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-452
note: Substitute court name in Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.139
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-452-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-452-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 452 Section 16
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-452-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

453 Paragraph 10(2)(b) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-453
note: Repeal and substitute a paragraph with new court division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.140
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-453-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-453-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 453 Paragraph 10(2)(b) of Schedule 2
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-453-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to repeal and substitute a paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

454 Section 5 (paragraph (b) of the definition of issuing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-454
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.140
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-454-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-454-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 454 Section 5 (paragraph (b) of the definition of issuing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-454-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

455 Section 5 (paragraph (aa) of the definition of relevant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-455
note: Repeal and substitute a paragraph with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia or Healthcare Identifiers Act 2010.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.140
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-455-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-455-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 455 Section 5 (paragraph (aa) of the definition of relevant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-455-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal a paragraph.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

456 Paragraphs 31C(3)(b), 31D(3)(b) and 31E(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-456
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.140
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-456-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-456-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 456 Paragraphs 31C(3)(b), 31D(3)(b) and 31E(3)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-456-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to repeal paragraphs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

457 Subclause 1(1) of Schedule 1 (paragraph (b) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-457
note: Repeal and substitute paragraph (b) of the definition of applicable court with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.140
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-457-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-457-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 457 Subclause 1(1) of Schedule 1 (paragraph (b) of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-457-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraph (b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

458 Subclause 1(1) of Schedule 1 (paragraph (c) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-458
note: Repeal and substitute a paragraph in the definition of judicial officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.141
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-458-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-458-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 458 Subclause 1(1) of Schedule 1 (paragraph (c) of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

459 Paragraph 13(11)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-459
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new court division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.141
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-459-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-459-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 459 Paragraph 13(11)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-459-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace existing paragraph with new one.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

460 Subsection 19(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-460
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.141
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-460-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-460-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

461 Subitem 58(9) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-461
note: Omit specified text from Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.141
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-461-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-461-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

462 Paragraph 21(5)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-462
note: Omit specified court name and substitute with new name.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.141
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-462-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-462-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of an outdated court name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

463 Paragraph 21(9)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-463
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new court division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.141
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-463-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-463-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 463 Paragraph 21(9)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-463-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace existing paragraph with new text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

464 Paragraph 22(4)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-464
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.142
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-464-norm

465 Paragraphs 22(8)(b) and 23(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-465
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.142
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-465-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-465-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 465 Paragraphs 22(8)(b) and 23(3)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-465-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraphs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

466 Paragraphs 22(11)(b), 23(8)(b), 24(3)(b) and 26(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-466
note: Repeal and substitute certain paragraphs with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.142
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-466-norm

467 Subsection 126-15(2) (example)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-467
note: Omit 'The Family Court', substitute 'A court'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.142
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-467-norm

468 Section 4 (definition of Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-468
note: Definition of Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.142
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-468-norm

469 Subsection 12(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-469
note: Transfer of proceedings between courts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.142
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-469-norm

470 Section 15 (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-470
note: Substitute Part 5 of Chapter 4 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.143
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-470-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-470-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

471 Section 16 (note 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-471
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.143
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-471-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-471-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

472 Section 9 (paragraph (c) of the definition of issuing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-472
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.143
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-472-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-472-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

473 Section 9 (paragraph (b) of the definition of relevant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-473
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2 or Industrial Chemicals (Notification and Assessment) Act 1989
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.143
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-473-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-473-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 473 Section 9 (paragraph (b) of the definition of relevant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

474 Paragraphs 83(3)(b), 85(9)(b) and 86(8)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-474
note: Repeal certain paragraphs and substitute with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.143
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-474-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-474-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 474 Paragraphs 83(3)(b), 85(9)(b) and 86(8)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

475 Paragraph 33(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-475
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new court division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.143
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-475-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-475-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 475 Paragraph 33(3)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-475-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace existing paragraph with new text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

476 Subsection 11(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-476
note: Repeal and substitute a court definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.144
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-476-norm

477 Subitem 223(2) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-477
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.144
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-477-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-477-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

478 Subitem 237(2) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-478
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.144
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-478-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-478-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

479 Section 4 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-479
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.144
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-479-norm

480 Paragraphs 64B(3)(b) and 64D(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-480
note: Repeal and substitute with new court division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.144
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-480-norm

481 Title
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-481
note: Substitute court name in Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.144
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-481-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-481-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 481 Title
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-481-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to make the substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

482 Section 3 (paragraph (a) of the definition of Judge)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-482
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.145
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-482-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-482-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

483 After section 3A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-483
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.145
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-483-norm

3B Service in more than one judicial office
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3b
note: A person may satisfy the definition of Judge even if holding another office.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.145
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-3b-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-3b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3B Service in more than one judicial office
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

484 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-484
note: Modify definition of judicial salary
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.145
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-484-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-484-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 484 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

485 Subsection 4(1) (after paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-485
note: Judges' salaries
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.145
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-485-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-485-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 485 Subsection 4(1) (after paragraph (b) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-485-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to pay judges' salaries
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

486 Subsection 4(1) (after paragraph (d) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-486
note: Salary for Senior Judges and Judges of the Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.145
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-486-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-486-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 486 Subsection 4(1) (after paragraph (d) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-486-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay salary
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

487 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-487
note: Definition of Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.146
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-487-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-487-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines the Family Court of Australia
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

488 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of Judge)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-488
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.146
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-488-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-488-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

489 Subsection 4(1) (at the end of the end of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-489
note: Note for service in more than one judicial office
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.146
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-489-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-489-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 489 Subsection 4(1) (at the end of the end of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-489-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adds a note
conclusion text: Judge must add the note
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

490 At the end of section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-490
note: A person may satisfy the definition of Judge even if holding another office.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.146
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-490-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-490-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 490 At the end of section 5
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

491 Part 2 of the Schedule (cell at table item dealing with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-491
note: Repeal and substitute Chief Justice of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.147
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-491-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-491-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 491 Part 2 of the Schedule (cell at table item dealing with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-491-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

492 Part 2 of the Schedule (cell at table item dealing with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-492
note: Repeal of Deputy Chief Justice title and substitute with new title
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.147
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-492-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-492-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 492 Part 2 of the Schedule (cell at table item dealing with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-492-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

493 Part 2 of the Schedule (table item dealing with Judge
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-493
note: Repeal of a table item
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.147
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-493-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-493-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 493 Part 2 of the Schedule (table item dealing with Judge
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-493-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

494 Part 2 of the Schedule (cell at table item dealing with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-494
note: Repeal and substitute a title
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.147
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-494-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-494-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 494 Part 2 of the Schedule (cell at table item dealing with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-494-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

495 Part 2 of the Schedule (cell at table item dealing with Any
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-495
note: Repeal and substitute a judge with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.147
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-495-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-495-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 495 Part 2 of the Schedule (cell at table item dealing with Any
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-495-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

496 Part 2 of the Schedule (table item dealing with Judicial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-496
note: Repeal of item in Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.148
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-496-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-496-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 496 Part 2 of the Schedule (table item dealing with Judicial
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-496-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

497 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-497
note: Establishing a Commission to investigate an allegation of misbehaviour or incapacity of a Commonwealth judicial officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.148
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-497-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-497-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 497 Section 4
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-497-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Establish
logic summary: Establishing a Commission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

498 Paragraph 19(6)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-498
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.148
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-498-norm

499 Paragraph 19(6)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-499
note: Replace outdated court name with new one.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.148
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-499-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-499-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 499 Paragraph 19(6)(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-499-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

500 Paragraph 23(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-500
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.149
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-500-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-500-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 500 Paragraph 23(2)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

501 Paragraph 39B(1EA)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-501
note: Omit specified text from existing provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.149
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-501-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-501-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of text substitution.
premise text: Substitution of court names.
conclusion text: Omit specified text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

502 Paragraph 39B(1EA)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-502
note: Omit 'Family Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.149
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-502-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-502-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

503 Subparagraphs 39B(1EA)(d)(i) and (ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-503
note: Repeal and substitute subparagraphs with court references
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.149
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-503-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-503-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: repeal
logic summary: Repeal subparagraphs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

504 Subsection 39B(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-504
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.149
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-504-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-504-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Substitution obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

505 Subsection 39B(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-505
note: Defines Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.149
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-505-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-505-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 505 Subsection 39B(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-505-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-505-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 2021
conclusion text: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia means: ...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-505-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987
conclusion text: or the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2).
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

506 Paragraph (b) of the Preamble
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-506
note: Substitute court name in Preamble
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.150
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-506-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-506-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 506 Paragraph (b) of the Preamble
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

507 Subsection 3(1) (definition of Family Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-507
note: Repeal the definition of Family Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.150
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-507-norm

508 Paragraphs 4(1)(a) and (2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-508
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.150
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-508-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-508-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

509 Subsection 4(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-509
note: Omit 'the Family Court', substitute 'the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.150
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-509-norm

510 Subparagraph 5(1)(b)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-510
note: Omit 'Family Court' and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.150
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-510-norm

511 Subparagraphs 5(1)(b)(ii) and (iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-511
note: Omit 'Family Court' and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.150
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-511-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-511-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Remove 'Family Court'
conclusion text: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

512 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-512
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.150
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-512-norm

513 Paragraphs 5(4)(a) and (5)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-513
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.150
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-513-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-513-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

514 Paragraph 6(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-514
note: Replace 'Family Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.150
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-514-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-514-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 514 Paragraph 6(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-514-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

515 Subsection 6A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-515
note: Omit 'Family Court' and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.151
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-515-norm

516 Subsection 6A(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-516
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.151
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-516-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-516-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

517 Subsection 7(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-517
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.151
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-517-norm

518 Subsection 7(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-518
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.151
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-518-norm

519 Paragraph 7(5)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-519
note: Omit 'of the Family Court', substitute 'of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.151
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-519-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-519-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

520 Subsection 7(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-520
note: Omit 'of the Family Court' and substitute with 'of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.151
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-520-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-520-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'of the Family Court'
premise text: None
conclusion text: Omit 'of the Family Court' and substitute with 'of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-520-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Replacement
logic summary: Replaces a temporal interval with another one
premise text: None
conclusion text: Omit 'of the Family Court', substitute 'of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-520-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Replacement
logic summary: Replaces a temporal interval with another one
premise text: None
conclusion text: Omit 'of the Family Court', substitute 'of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-520-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal Replacement
logic summary: Replaces a temporal interval with another one
premise text: None
conclusion text: Omit 'of the Family Court', substitute 'of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-520-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Temporal Replacement
logic summary: Replaces a temporal interval with another one
premise text: None
conclusion text: Omit 'of the Family Court', substitute 'of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

521 Subparagraph 8(1)(b)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-521
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.151
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-521-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-521-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Court name modification requirement
premise text: Omit Family Court, substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

522 Subsection 9(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-522
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.151
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-522-norm

523 Paragraph 10(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-523
note: Substitute court name in Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.151
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-523-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-523-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 523 Paragraph 10(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-523-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to make the substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

524 Subsection 11(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-524
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.152
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-524-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-524-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Mandatory substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

525 Subsection 14(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-525
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.152
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-525-norm

526 Subsection 14(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-526
note: Omit 'Family Court' and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.152
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-526-norm

527 Subsection 16(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-527
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.152
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-527-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-527-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

528 Subsection 5(1) (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-528
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.152
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-528-norm

529 Subsection 5(1) (subparagraph (a)(ia) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-529
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.152
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-529-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-529-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

530 Paragraph 96AD(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-530
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.152
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-530-norm

531 Subsection 103(1) (note 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-531
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.152
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-531-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-531-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

532 Subsection 103(2) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-532
note: Substitute court name in Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.152
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-532-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-532-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 532 Subsection 103(2) (note)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-532-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute court name in Schedule 2
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

533 Paragraph 109(7)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-533
note: Repeal a paragraph and substitute with a new provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.153
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-533-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-533-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 533 Paragraph 109(7)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

534 Subparagraph 201(g)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-534
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.153
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-534-norm

535 Subsections 221(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-535
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.153
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-535-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-535-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

536 Section 9 (paragraph (b) of the definition of relevant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-536
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia or Marriage Act 1961
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.153
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-536-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-536-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 536 Section 9 (paragraph (b) of the definition of relevant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

537 Subsection 5(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of Judge)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-537
note: Authorise a Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia to perform a function.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.153
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-537-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-537-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 537 Subsection 5(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of Judge)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-537-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorisation
logic summary: Grant authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

538 Subsection 9A(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-538
note: Omit specified court names and substitute with new names.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.153
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-538-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-538-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of old court names.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

539 Subsection 92(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-539
note: Omit specified court names from legislation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.154
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-539-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-539-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 539 Subsection 92(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-539-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of specified court names.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

540 After subitem 6(6) of Schedule 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-540
note: Appeals may not be referred to the Full Court after a certain date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.154
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-540-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-540-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of appeals to the Full Court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

541 Paragraph 5(3)(ba)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-541
note: Repeal and substitute a specific judge with another
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.154
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-541-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-541-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 541 Paragraph 5(3)(ba)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-541-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

542 Subsection 5(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of eligible
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-542
note: Repeal paragraph (b) of definition and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.154
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-542-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-542-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on paragraph (b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

543 Subsection 5(1) (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-543
note: Repeal definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.154
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-543-norm

544 Subparagraph 42(2A)(e)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-544
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.155
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-544-norm

545 Section 91X (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-545
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.155
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-545-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-545-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

546 Subsections 91X(1), 114(1) and 153(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-546
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.155
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-546-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-546-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

547 Section 476 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-547
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.155
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-547-norm

548 Subsections 476(1), (2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-548
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.155
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-548-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-548-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

549 Paragraph 476A(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-549
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with transfer of proceedings to Federal Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.155
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-549-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-549-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

550 After subsection 476A(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-550
note: No original jurisdiction in relation to migration decisions under subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.155
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-550-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-550-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of original jurisdiction
premise text: Subsection (1)
conclusion text: Federal Court does not have original jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

551 Paragraph 476A(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-551
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.156
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-551-norm

552 Subsections 476B(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-552
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.156
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-552-norm

553 Section 477 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-553
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.156
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-553-norm

554 Subsections 477(1) and (2) and 480(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-554
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.156
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-554-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-554-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using 'Federal Circuit Court'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

555 Section 484 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-555
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.156
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-555-norm

556 Subsections 484(1) and (2) and 486B(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-556
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.156
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-556-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-556-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

557 Section 486C (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-557
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.156
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-557-norm

558 Subsection 486C(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-558
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.156
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-558-norm

559 Subsection 486C(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-559
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court's jurisdiction' and substitute with 'jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.156
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-559-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-559-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated jurisdiction terminology
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

560 Subsection 486C(3A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-560-2
has part: 560(3A) Subsection 486C(3A)
has part: 560(3B) Subsection 486C(3A)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.157

560(3A) Subsection 486C(3A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-560-2-ss-3a
part of: 560 Subsection 486C(3A)
note: Proceedings subject to this section's application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.157

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-560-2-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 560(3A) Subsection 486C(3A)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-560-2-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: appliesTo
logic summary: Section applies to specified proceedings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

560(3B) Subsection 486C(3A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-560-2-ss-3b
part of: 560 Subsection 486C(3A)
note: Section does not apply to proceedings transferred to the Federal Court under section 32AC of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.157

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-560-2-ss-3b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: Section implies that proceedings are not subject to this section if transferred to the Federal Court.
premise text: This section does not apply to proceedings that are transferred to the Federal Court under section 32AC of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976.
conclusion text: Proceedings are not subject to this section if transferred to the Federal Court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-560-2-ss-3b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Section overlaps with other sections regarding court transfers.
premise text: This section does not apply to proceedings that are transferred to the Federal Court under section 32AC of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976.
conclusion text: Section overlaps with other sections regarding court transfers.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-560-2-ss-3b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Contains
logic summary: Section contains information about court transfer implications.
premise text: This section does not apply to proceedings that are transferred to the Federal Court under section 32AC of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976.
conclusion text: Section contains information about court transfer implications.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

561 Subsection 486D(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-561
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.157
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-561-norm

562 Subsection 486D(5) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-562
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.157
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-562-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-562-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

563 Section 487A (paragraph (b) of the definition of issuing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-563
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute with a Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.157
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-563-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-563-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 563 Section 487A (paragraph (b) of the definition of issuing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-563-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

564 Paragraph 500(6)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-564
note: Replace 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.157
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-564-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-564-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty to replace the term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

565 Subsections 503A(4A) and (5A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-565
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.158
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-565-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-565-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using 'Federal Circuit Court'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

566 Section 503B (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-566
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.158
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-566-norm

567 Subsection 503B(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-567
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.158
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-567-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-567-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

568 Subsection 503B(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-568-2
note: Omit specific language from court orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.158
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-568-2-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-568-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified language.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

569 Paragraph 503B(2)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-569
note: Replace 'Federal Circuit Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.158
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-569-norm

570 Subsections 503B(4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (10) and (11)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-570
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.158
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-570-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-570-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using 'Federal Circuit Court'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

571 Subsection 503B(14) (table item 1, column headed “In the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-571
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court's jurisdiction' and substitute with 'jurisdiction of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.158
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-571-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-571-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated terminology
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

572 Section 503C (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-572
note: Substitute court name in section heading.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.158
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-572-norm

573 Subsection 503C(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-573
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.158
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-573-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-573-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

574 Subsection 503C(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-574
note: Permits the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) to make orders on application by the Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.159
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-574-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-574-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 574 Subsection 503C(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-574-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grants permission for the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) to make orders.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

575 Paragraph 503C(3)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-575
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.159
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-575-norm

576 Paragraph 503C(3)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-576
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.159
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-576-norm

577 Subsection 503C(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-577
note: Omit specific language from court orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.159
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-577-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-577-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified language.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

578 Paragraph 503C(4)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-578
note: Replace 'Federal Circuit Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.159
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-578-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-578-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Replace
logic summary: Replace a term with another term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

579 Subsections 503C(6) and (7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-579
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.159
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-579-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-579-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

580 Subsection 3(1) (definition of eligible Federal Circuit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-580
note: Repeal definition of eligible Court Judge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.160
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-580-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-580-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 580 Subsection 3(1) (definition of eligible Federal Circuit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-580-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

581 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-581
note: Definition of eligible Judge
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.160
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-581-norm

582 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-582
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge', substitute 'eligible Judge'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.160
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-582-norm

583 Paragraphs 13(2)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-583
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge' and substitute 'eligible Judge'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.160
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-583-norm

584 Subsections 13(2A), (2B), (2C), (2D) and (4) to (5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-584
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge' and substitute 'eligible Judge'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.160
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-584-norm

585 Subsection 13AA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-585
note: Omit specified term from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.160
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-585-norm

586 Subsection 13AA(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-586
note: Enforce order as if it were an order of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.160
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-586-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-586-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 586 Subsection 13AA(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-586-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to enforce the order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

587 Paragraphs 13AB(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-587
note: Omit specific title
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.161
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-587-norm

588 Section 15
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-588
note: Substitute 'eligible Judge' for 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.161
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-588-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-588-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 588 Section 15
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-588-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replaces a term with another
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

589 Subsections 25(2), 31(2), 38C(1) and (2) and 38D(1), (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-589
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge', substitute 'eligible Judge'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.161
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-589-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-589-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of term usage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

590 Section 38Z
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-590
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge' and substitute 'eligible Judge'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.161
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-590-norm

591 Paragraph 38ZB(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-591
note: Omit specified term from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.161
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-591-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-591-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

592 Subsection 38ZB(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-592
note: Omit specified term from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.161
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-592-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-592-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of a specific term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

593 Section 38ZC (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-593
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court Judges', substitute 'Judges of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.161
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-593-norm

594 Subsections 38ZC(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-594
note: Omit specified text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.161
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-594-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-594-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

595 Subsection 38ZC(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-595
note: Omit specified term from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.161
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-595-norm

596 Section 38ZD (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-596
note: Omit specified term from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.161
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-596-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-596-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of term.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

597 Subsections 38ZD(1) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-597
note: Substitute 'eligible Judge' for 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judge'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.161
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-597-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-597-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 597 Subsections 38ZD(1) and (3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-597-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to substitute 'eligible Judge'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

598 Paragraph 44(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-598
note: Omit 'eligible Federal Circuit Court Judges' and substitute 'eligible Judges'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.162
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-598-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-598-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of specific terminology
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

599 Paragraphs 45C(1)(b), 50C(1)(b), 79(3)(b), 80(3)(b) and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-599
note: Repeal certain paragraphs and substitute with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.162
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-599-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-599-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

600 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-600
note: Repeal and substitute a court with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia or National Cancer Screening Register Act 2016.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.162
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-600-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-600-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 600 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-600-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal a court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

601 Paragraph 24(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-601
note: Repeal and substitute with new court division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.162
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-601-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-601-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 601 Paragraph 24(3)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-601-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace existing paragraph with new text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

602 Subsection 5(1) (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-602
note: Repeal definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.162
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-602-norm

603 Subsection 5(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of lower
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-603
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with consequential amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.162
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-603-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-603-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 603 Subsection 5(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of lower
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-603-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: REPEAL
logic summary: Repeal paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

604 Subsection 5(1) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-604
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.163
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-604-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-604-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

605 Section 185
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-605
note: Confers jurisdiction on specified courts for civil proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.163
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-605-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-605-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: Establishes jurisdiction for civil proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

606 Subsection 187(1) (cell at table item 2, column headed
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-606
note: Repeal of court and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.163
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-606-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-606-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 606 Subsection 187(1) (cell at table item 2, column headed
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-606-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

607 Section 189 (table)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-607
note: Replace 'Federal Circuit Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.163
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-607-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-607-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: omission
logic summary: Omission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

608 Subsection 191(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-608
note: Substitute court name in subsection 191(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.164
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-608-norm

609 Subsection 191(2) (note 1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-609
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.164
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-609-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-609-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

610 Subsection 191(2) (note 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-610
note: Repeal note and substitute with new references.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.164
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-610-norm

611 Paragraph 199(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-611
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.164
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-611-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-611-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

612 Subparagraphs 73ZE(3)(e)(ii) and 73ZF(2)(e)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-612
note: Repeal and substitute subparagraphs with new court divisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.164
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-612-norm

613 Paragraph 73ZJ(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-613
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.164
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-613-norm

614 Paragraphs 73ZK(3)(b), 73ZP(3)(b) and 73ZQ(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-614
note: Repeal and substitute paragraphs with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.164
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-614-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-614-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Determine the deontic type of the provision
premise text: The text states 'Repeal the paragraphs...'
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

615 Section 7 (paragraph (b) of the definition of court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-615
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2 National Health Act 1953
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.165
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-615-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-615-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

616 Subparagraph 134D(2)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-616
note: Repeal and substitute a subparagraph with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.165
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-616-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-616-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal a subparagraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

617 Subsections 62(1) and 79A(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-617
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.165
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-617-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-617-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

618 Section 18LL
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-618
note: Omitting a specific conduct from being an offence under the law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.165
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-618-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-618-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 618 Section 18LL
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-618-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conduct
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

619 Subsections 18LN(1), 18LO(1) and 18QE(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-619
note: Omit specified text and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.166
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-619-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-619-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of outdated court name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

620 Section 19K (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-620
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.166
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-620-norm

621 Section 19K
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-621
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.166
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-621-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-621-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

622 Paragraph 190(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-622
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new court division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.166
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-622-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-622-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace existing paragraph with new text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

623 Section 3 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-623
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.166
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-623-norm

624 Section 3 (paragraph (b) of the definition of issuing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-624
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.166
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-624-norm

625 Section 91 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-625
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court Judges', substitute 'Judges of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.166
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-625-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-625-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated terminology
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

626 Subsections 91(1) and (2) and 92(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-626
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.167
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-626-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-626-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

627 Section 137 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-627
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.167
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-627-norm

628 Subsections 137(1), (2), (3) and (4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-628
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.167
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-628-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-628-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

629 Section 139
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-629
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.167
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-629-norm

630 Subsections 140(4) and 141(2) and (4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-630
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.167
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-630-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-630-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

631 Section 142
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-631
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.167
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-631-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-631-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 631 Section 142
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

632 Paragraph 147(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-632
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new court division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.167
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-632-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-632-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 632 Paragraph 147(1)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-632-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace existing paragraph with new text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

633 Sections 150, 151, 152 and 153
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-633
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.167
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-633-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-633-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using 'Federal Circuit Court'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

634 Section 154 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-634
note: Replace 'Federal Circuit Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.167
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-634-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-634-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 634 Section 154 (heading)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-634-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

635 Section 154
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-635
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.168
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-635-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-635-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 635 Section 154
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

636 Paragraph 232B(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-636
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute with new court division or Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.168
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-636-norm

637 Section 7 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-637
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.168
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-637-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-637-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

638 Subparagraphs 216(6)(b)(ii), 398(2)(b)(ii), 572D(3)(b)(ii),
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-638
note: Repeal certain subparagraphs and substitute with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.168
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-638-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-638-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 638 Subparagraphs 216(6)(b)(ii), 398(2)(b)(ii), 572D(3)(b)(ii),
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-638-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace existing subparagraphs with new ones
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

639 Subsection 602C(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-639
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.168
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-639-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-639-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

640 Paragraph 602C(8)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-640
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new court division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.168
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-640-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-640-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on the existing paragraph.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

641 Subsection 602D(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-641
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.168
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-641-norm

642 Paragraphs 602D(7)(b), 611B(3)(b) and 611J(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-642
note: Repeal and substitute paragraphs with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.168
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-642-norm

643 Paragraph 611N(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-643
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.169
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-643-norm

644 Paragraph 634(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-644
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.169
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-644-norm

645 Subparagraphs 685(3)(b)(ii), 686(5)(b)(ii), 687(7)(b)(ii),
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-645
note: Repeal specified subparagraphs and substitute with new court divisions or ombudsman act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.169
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-645-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-645-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

646 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-646
note: Defines chief executive officer in relation to courts and tribunals.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.169
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-646-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-646-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 646 Subsection 3(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-646-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines a term with a specific meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-646-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition
logic summary: Provides a formal definition for the term.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

647 Subsection 3(1) (definition of chief executive officer of a
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-647
note: Repeal definition of chief executive officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.170
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-647-norm

648 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (bb) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-648
note: Repeal and substitute a provision related to court or tribunal authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.170
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-648-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-648-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 648 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (bb) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-648-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal a provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

649 Subsection 3(1) (subparagraph (c)(i) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-649
note: Repeal of subparagraph (c)(i) and substitution with chief executive officer or staff member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.170
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-649-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-649-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 649 Subsection 3(1) (subparagraph (c)(i) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-649-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of subparagraph (c)(i)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

650 Paragraph 3(14)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-650
note: Repeal paragraph 3(14)(a)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.170
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-650-norm

651 Subsection 3(14)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-651
note: Substitute a phrase in a court or tribunal staff definition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.170
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-651-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-651-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 651 Subsection 3(14)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-651-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

652 Paragraph 3(16)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-652
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute chief executive officer in relation to court or tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.171
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-652-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-652-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 652 Paragraph 3(16)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-652-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

653 Paragraph 3(18)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-653
note: Reference to chief justice or chief judge in court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.171
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-653-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-653-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 653 Paragraph 3(18)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-653-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Reference to chief justice or chief judge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

654 Paragraph 3(18)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-654
note: Substitute a phrase in relation to a tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.171
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-654-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-654-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 654 Paragraph 3(18)(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

655 Paragraph 5(2)(ba)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-655
note: Omit certain references to court staff members.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.171
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-655-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-655-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 655 Paragraph 5(2)(ba)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-655-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting certain references.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

656 Subsection 16(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-656
note: Substitution of terminology in court or tribunal context
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.171
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-656-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-656-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 656 Subsection 16(5)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

657 Paragraph 16(5)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-657
note: Omit 'chief executive officer of a court', substitute 'chief executive officer, in relation to a court'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.171
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-657-norm

658 Paragraph 16(5)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-658
note: Omit specific term from definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.171
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-658-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-658-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Omit specific term from definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

659 Section 7 (paragraph (b) of the definition of designated
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-659
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.172
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-659-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-659-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 659 Section 7 (paragraph (b) of the definition of designated
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-659-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

660 Section 7 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-660
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.172
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-660-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-660-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

661 Section 6 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-661
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.172
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-661-norm

662 Paragraph 147(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-662
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new court division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.172
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-662-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-662-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 662 Paragraph 147(3)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-662-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace existing paragraph with new text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

663 Subsection 156(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-663
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.172
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-663-norm

664 Subsection 200D(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-664
note: Substitute court name in subsection 200D(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.172
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-664-norm

665 Subsection 200N(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-665
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.172
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-665-norm

666 Section 297
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-666
note: Jurisdiction on Federal Court and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.172
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-666-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-666-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 666 Section 297
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-666-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: confer
logic summary: Confers jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

667 Section 301 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-667
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.173
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-667-norm

668 Section 301
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-668
note: Substitute court name in legislation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.173
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-668-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-668-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 668 Section 301
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-668-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

669 Section 5 (paragraph (b) of the definition of relevant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-669
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2 or Personal Property Securities Act 2009
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.173
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-669-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-669-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 669 Section 5 (paragraph (b) of the definition of relevant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-669-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

670 Section 10
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-670
note: Repeal definitions of Family Court and Federal Circuit Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.173
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-670-norm

671 Section 205
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-671
note: Jurisdiction is conferred on specified courts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.173
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-671-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-671-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 671 Section 205
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-671-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: confers
logic summary: Jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

672 Paragraph 206(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-672
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.174
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-672-norm

673 Section 207 (after table item 1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-673
note: Inserts the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) with no specified limits.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.174
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-673-norm

674 Section 207 (cell at table item 2, column headed “Court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-674
note: Repeal of jurisdiction and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.174
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-674-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-674-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of jurisdiction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

675 Section 207 (table item 4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-675
note: Repeal a specific item.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.174
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-675-norm

676 Section 208 (table)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-676
note: Appeals with respect to PPS matters do not lie from certain courts.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.174
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-676-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-676-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits appeals with respect to PPS matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

677 Subsection 210(2) (table)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-677
note: Repeal of table and substitution with new transfers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.176
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-677-norm

678 Subsection 210(2) (note 1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-678
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.177
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-678-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-678-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

679 Subsection 210(2) (note 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-679
note: Transfers mentioned in the table are covered by other legislation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.177
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-679-norm

680 Subsection 211(3) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-680
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.177
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-680-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-680-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 680 Subsection 211(3) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-680-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace paragraph with new text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

681 Subsection 211(3) (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-681
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.177
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-681-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-681-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

682 Subsection 211(3) (after paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-682
note: Insertion of Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.177
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-682-norm

683 Subsection 211(3) (paragraph (c) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-683
note: Repeal paragraph (c) of the definition of superior court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.178
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-683-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-683-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits repeal of paragraph (c)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

684 Paragraphs 221(3)(b) and 222(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-684
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.178
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-684-norm

685 Subparagraphs 33(2)(f)(ii) and 35(2)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-685
note: Repeal and substitute certain subparagraphs with new legislation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.178
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-685-norm

686 Subsection 3(1) (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-686
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.178
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-686-norm

687 Paragraphs 39(5)(b) and 50(7)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-687
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.178
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-687-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-687-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

688 Subsections 54(1) and 55(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-688
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.178
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-688-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-688-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

689 Subsection 56(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-689
note: Transfers matters between courts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.178
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-689-norm

690 Paragraph 56(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-690
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.179
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-690-norm

691 Section 56A (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-691
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.179
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-691-norm

692 Subsections 56A(1), (3), (3A) and (4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-692
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.179
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-692-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-692-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using 'Federal Circuit Court'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

693 Subsection 56A(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-693
note: Repeal subsection, substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.179
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-693-norm

694 Subsections 57A(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-694
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.179
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-694-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-694-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

695 Section 57B
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-695
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.179
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-695-norm

696 Section 72
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-696
note: Substitute court name in Privacy Act 1988
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.179
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-696-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-696-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 696 Section 72
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-696-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to make the substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

697 Subsection 6(1) (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-697
note: Repeal definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.179
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-697-norm

698 Section 19
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-698
note: Division 7 orders must be made by the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.180
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-698-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-698-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 698 Section 19
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-698-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Division 7 orders must be made by the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-698-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Division 7 provides for compensation orders, and other orders, to be made by the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-698-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Division 7 provides for compensation orders, and other orders, to be made by the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-698-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Division 7 provides for compensation orders, and other orders, to be made by the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-698-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Division 7 provides for compensation orders, and other orders, to be made by the Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

699 Subsections 25(1) and 25A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-699
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.180
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-699-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-699-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

700 Section 55A (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-700
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.180
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-700-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-700-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

701 Subsections 55A(1) and 62(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-701
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.180
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-701-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-701-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

702 Paragraphs 63(2)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-702
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.180
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-702-norm

703 Paragraphs 80U(3)(b), 80V(3)(b) and 80W(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-703
note: Repeal and substitute paragraphs with new court names.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.180
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-703-norm

704 Subparagraphs 315B(2)(a)(v) and (b)(v)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-704
note: Substitute court name in Product Emissions Standards Act 2017
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.181
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-704-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-704-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 704 Subparagraphs 315B(2)(a)(v) and (b)(v)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-704-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to substitute court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

705 Subparagraphs 24(3)(f)(ii), 25(2)(f)(ii), 26(2)(b)(ii),
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-705
note: Repeal and substitute subparagraphs with new court divisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.181
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-705-norm

706 Paragraphs 35(2)(b) and 37(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-706
note: Repeal paragraphs and substitute with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.181
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-706-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-706-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 706 Paragraphs 35(2)(b) and 37(1)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-706-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to repeal paragraphs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

707 Section 6 (paragraph (b) of the definition of issuing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-707
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.181
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-707-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-707-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

708 Section 87 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-708
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court Judges', substitute 'Judges of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.181
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-708-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-708-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

709 Subsections 87(1) and (2) and 88(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-709
note: Omit specified text from existing legislation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.181
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-709-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-709-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of text substitution.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

710 Section 8 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-710
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.182
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-710-norm

711 Section 9
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-711
note: Federal Court or Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia may not make orders for civil remedies if a reprisal is taken against a person because of a public interest disclosure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.182
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-711-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-711-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on making orders for civil remedies if a reprisal is taken against a person because of a public interest disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

712 Sections 14, 15, 16 and 17
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-712
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.182
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-712-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-712-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

713 Subsection 22A(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-713
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.182
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-713-norm

714 Paragraphs 73(2)(b) to (ca)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-714
note: Repeal and substitute certain provisions related to the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Registrar of the Federal Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.182
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-714-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-714-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 714 Paragraphs 73(2)(b) to (ca)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-714-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal provisions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

715 Section 4 (paragraph (c) of the definition of judicial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-715
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute with a Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.183
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-715-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-715-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 715 Section 4 (paragraph (c) of the definition of judicial
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-715-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

716 Part 2 of Schedule 1 (cell at table item dealing with Chief
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-716
note: Repeal and substitute Chief Justice of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.183
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-716-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-716-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

717 Part 2 of Schedule 1 (cell at table item dealing with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-717
note: Repeal of a cell and substitution with a new title.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.183
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-717-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-717-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 717 Part 2 of Schedule 1 (cell at table item dealing with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-717-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of the cell
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

718 Part 2 of Schedule 1 (table item dealing with Judge
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-718
note: Repeal the item.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.183
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-718-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-718-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the item.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

719 Part 2 of Schedule 1 (cell at table item dealing with
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-719
note: Repeal and substitute a senior judge position
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.184
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-719-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-719-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 719 Part 2 of Schedule 1 (cell at table item dealing with
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-719-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

720 Part 2 of Schedule 1 (cell at table item dealing with Any
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-720
note: Repeal a specific judge and substitute another
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.184
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-720-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-720-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 720 Part 2 of Schedule 1 (cell at table item dealing with Any
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-720-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the specified action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

721 Part 4 of Schedule 1 (table item dealing with Judicial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-721
note: Repeal the item.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.184
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-721-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-721-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 721 Part 4 of Schedule 1 (table item dealing with Judicial
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-721-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

722 Subsection 5(1) (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-722
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.184
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-722-norm

723 Subsection 154A(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-723
note: Repeal a paragraph and substitute with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2 or Resale Royalty Right for Visual Artists Act 2009
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.184
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-723-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-723-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 723 Subsection 154A(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-723-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal a paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

724 Section 3 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-724
note: Repeal definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.184
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-724-norm

725 Subsection 39(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-725
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.185
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-725-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-725-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

726 Sections 43 and 44
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-726
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.185
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-726-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-726-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

727 Section 51 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-727
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.185
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-727-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-727-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

728 Section 51
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-728
note: Substitute court name in Road Vehicle Standards Act 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.185
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-728-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-728-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 728 Section 51
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-728-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to make the substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

729 Subsection 5(1) (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-729
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.185
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-729-norm

730 Subsection 5(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-730
note: Repeal a paragraph and substitute with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.185
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-730-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-730-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 730 Subsection 5(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-730-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace a paragraph with another provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

731 Subparagraphs 50(4)(c)(iii) and 52(3)(c)(iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-731
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.185
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-731-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-731-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

732 Paragraph 49(4)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-732
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.185
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-732-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-732-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of the repealed paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

733 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-733
note: Repeal a paragraph and substitute with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.186
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-733-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-733-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 733 Subsection 3(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-733-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a paragraph with another
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

734 Subsection 61BZD(1) (cell at table item 2, column headed
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-734
note: Repeal of civil jurisdiction court and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.186
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-734-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-734-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 734 Subsection 61BZD(1) (cell at table item 2, column headed
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-734-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

735 Paragraphs 553A(4)(d), 596(4)(d), 660XBE(4)(d),
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-735
note: Repeal and substitute paragraphs with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.186
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-735-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-735-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 735 Paragraphs 553A(4)(d), 596(4)(d), 660XBE(4)(d),
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-735-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraphs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

736 Subsection 1243(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-736
note: Omit specified court name and substitute with new name.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.186
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-736-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-736-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of an outdated court name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

737 Subsection 1252(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-737
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.186
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-737-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-737-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

738 Section 8 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-738
note: Repeal definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.186
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-738-norm

739 Subsection 59(8)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-739
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.187
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-739-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-739-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

740 Section 72 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-740
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.187
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-740-norm

741 Section 72
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-741
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.187
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-741-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-741-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 741 Section 72
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

742 Section 75F (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-742
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.187
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-742-norm

743 Section 75F
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-743
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.187
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-743-norm

744 Paragraph 81(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-744
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new court division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.187
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-744-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-744-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 744 Paragraph 81(3)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-744-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace existing paragraph with new text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

745 Subsection 107(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-745
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.187
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-745-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-745-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

746 Section 5 (paragraph (b) of the definition of relevant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-746
note: Repeal and substitute a paragraph with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.187
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-746-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-746-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 746 Section 5 (paragraph (b) of the definition of relevant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-746-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a paragraph with another
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

747 Subsection 103(1) (cell at table item 2, column headed
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-747
note: Repeal of civil jurisdiction court and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.188
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-747-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-747-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

748 Subsection 43K(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-748
note: Omit specified court name and substitute with new name.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.188
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-748-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-748-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of an outdated court name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

749 Subsection 43U(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-749
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.188
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-749-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-749-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

750 Section 14ZQ
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-750
note: Repeal definitions of Family Court and Family Court Judge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.188
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-750-norm

751 Section 14ZZS (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-751
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.188
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-751-norm

752 Subsection 14ZZS(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-752
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.188
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-752-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-752-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

753 Subsection 14ZZS(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-753
note: Replace 'Family Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.188
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-753-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-753-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 753 Subsection 14ZZS(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-753-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace a term with another
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

754 Paragraphs 14ZZS(2)(a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-754
note: Omit 'Family Court' and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.189
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-754-norm

755 Subparagraph 14ZZS(2)(f)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-755
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.189
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-755-norm

756 Subparagraphs 14ZZS(2)(f)(ii) and (iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-756
note: Omit 'Family Court Judge', substitute 'Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.189
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-756-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-756-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated title
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

757 Subparagraph 14ZZS(2)(f)(iv)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-757
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.189
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-757-norm

758 Subsections 14ZZS(3) and (4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-758
note: Omit 'Family Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.189
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-758-norm

759 Section 17A (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-759
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.189
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-759-norm

760 Subsection 17A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-760
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.189
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-760-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-760-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

761 Subsection 2(1) (table item 3, column 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-761
note: Omit Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2018, substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.189
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-761-norm

762 Part 2 of Schedule 1 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-762
note: Substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021 for the old act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.190
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-762-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-762-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 762 Part 2 of Schedule 1 (heading)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

763 Section 5 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-763
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.190
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-763-norm

764 Section 5 (paragraph (b) of the definition of issuing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-764
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.190
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-764-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-764-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of outdated terminology
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

765 Section 96 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-765
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court Judges', substitute 'Judges of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.190
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-765-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-765-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

766 Subsections 96(1) and (2) and 97(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-766
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.190
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-766-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-766-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

767 Paragraph 115(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-767
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.190
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-767-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-767-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 767 Paragraph 115(1)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-767-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace existing paragraph with new text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

768 Section 118
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-768
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.190
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-768-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-768-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 768 Section 118
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

769 Subsection 119(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-769
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.190
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-769-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-769-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

770 Section 121
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-770
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.191
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-770-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-770-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 770 Section 121
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

771 Subsections 126(1) and 127(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-771
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.191
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-771-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-771-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

772 Sections 128, 129, 130 and 131
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-772
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.191
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-772-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-772-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

773 Subsection 3(1) (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-773
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.191
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-773-norm

774 Section 42YM
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-774
note: Restraining a person from contravening the Act or regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.191
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-774-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-774-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 774 Section 42YM
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-774-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits a person from contravening the Act or regulations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

775 Sections 42YN, 42YO, 42YP, 42YQ and 42YR
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-775
note: Replace 'Federal Circuit Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.191
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-775-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-775-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exclude
logic summary: Exclusion
premise text: Omit ‘Federal Circuit Court’ (wherever occurring)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

776 Paragraphs 52(9)(b) and 85(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-776
note: Repeal paragraphs, substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.192
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-776-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-776-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace existing paragraphs with new ones.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

777 Subsection 6(1) (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-777
note: Repeal definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.192
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-777-norm

778 Sections 35, 56 and 67
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-778
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.192
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-778-norm

779 Subsections 83(2) and 83A(8)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-779
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.192
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-779-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-779-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

780 Sections 84D and 104
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-780
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.192
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-780-norm

781 Paragraph 190(aa)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-781
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.192
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-781-norm

782 Paragraph 191(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-782
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.192
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-782-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-782-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

783 Section 191A (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-783
note: Replace 'Federal Circuit Court' with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.192
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-783-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-783-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 783 Section 191A (heading)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-783-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: omission
logic summary: Omission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

784 Section 191A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-784
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.193
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-784-norm

785 Subsection 192(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-785
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.193
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-785-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-785-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

786 Subsection 194(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-786
note: Does not apply in relation to a transfer of proceedings between the Federal Court and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.193
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-786-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-786-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 786 Subsection 194(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-786-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Does not apply in relation to a transfer of proceedings between the Federal Court and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-786-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for transfer of proceedings
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

787 Subsection 195(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-787
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.193
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-787-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-787-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

788 Section 196
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-788
note: Substitute court name
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.193
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-788-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-788-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 788 Section 196
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

789 Section 197 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-789
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.193
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-789-norm

790 Section 197
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-790
note: Substitute court name in Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.193
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-790-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-790-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 790 Section 197
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-790-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Substitute court name in Schedule 2
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

791 Section 4 (paragraph (b) of the definition of superior
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-791
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.194
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-791-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-791-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 791 Section 4 (paragraph (b) of the definition of superior
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-791-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

792 Paragraphs 25(b) and 63(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-792
note: Repeal paragraphs, substitute with new court division
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.194
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-792-norm

793 Subsection 109(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-793
note: Omit specified court names and substitute with new name.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.194
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-793-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-793-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of outdated court names.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

794 At the end of section 109
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-794
note: Defines Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.194
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-794-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-794-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy
premise text: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) and Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
conclusion text: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

795 Subparagraphs 41(3)(f)(ii), 42(2)(f)(ii), 43(2)(b)(ii),
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-795
note: Repeal and substitute subparagraphs with new court divisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.194
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-795-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-795-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 795 Subparagraphs 41(3)(f)(ii), 42(2)(f)(ii), 43(2)(b)(ii),
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-795-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Repeal existing subparagraphs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

796 Section 6 (paragraph (c) of the definition of judicial
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-796
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute with a Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.195
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-796-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-796-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 796 Section 6 (paragraph (c) of the definition of judicial
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-796-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

797 Subparagraphs 82(3)(f)(ii), 83(2)(f)(ii), 84(2)(b)(ii),
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-797
note: Repeal certain subparagraphs and substitute with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.195
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-797-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-797-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

798 Section 138 (paragraph (b) of the definition of Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-798
note: Repeal paragraph (b) of the definition of Court and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.195
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-798-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-798-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal paragraph (b)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

799 Section 139 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-799
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.195
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-799-norm

800 Section 139
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-800
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.195
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-800-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-800-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

801 Section 7 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-801
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.195
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-801-norm

802 Section 7 (paragraph (b) of the definition of relevant
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-802
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute Schedule 2 Further consequential amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.195
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-802-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-802-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 802 Section 7 (paragraph (b) of the definition of relevant
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-802-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: REPEAL
logic summary: Repeal paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

803 Section 4 (paragraph (b) of the definition of court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-803
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.196
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-803-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-803-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 803 Section 4 (paragraph (b) of the definition of court)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-803-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace existing definition with new one
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

804 Paragraph 273A(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-804
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.196
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-804-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-804-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace existing paragraph with new text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

805 Paragraphs 273A(2)(e), (f) and (g)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-805
note: Omit specified text and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.196
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-805-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-805-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of outdated court name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

806 Subsection 273A(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-806
note: Omit specified text and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.196
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-806-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-806-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits exercise of specified court division.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

807 Paragraph 273A(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-807
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Court'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.196
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-807-norm

808 Paragraph 273A(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-808
note: Omit section 15 of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 and substitute section 140 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.196
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-808-norm

809 Paragraph 273A(3)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-809
note: Omit section 16 of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 and substitute section 141 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.196
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-809-norm

810 Paragraph 273A(3)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-810
note: Omit specified court name and substitute with new name.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.197
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-810-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-810-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of an outdated court name.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

811 Paragraph 273A(3)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-811
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.197
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-811-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-2-sec-811-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated court name
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 The whole of the Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
note: Repeal the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.198
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-1-norm

2 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
note: Defines commencement day as the day the Schedule commences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.199
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-2-norm

3 Instrument about Commonwealth tenancy disputes
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
note: Continuation of instrument under new name and application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.199
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-3-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Authorisation about handling complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
note: Continuation of written authorisation under specific conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.199
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-4-norm

5 Seals and stamps
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
note: Seal and stamp provisions for Federal Circuit Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.200
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-5-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Oaths and affirmations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
note: Continuation of written authorisation upon commencement day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.200
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-6-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Obligation continues
premise text: Written authorisation made under subsection 58(2) of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999
conclusion text: Continues in force as if it had been made under subsection 194(2) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation during commencement day
premise text: Written authorisation made under subsection 58(2) of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 and in force immediately before the commencement day
conclusion text: During the commencement day
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation during commencement day
premise text: Written authorisation made under subsection 58(2) of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 and in force immediately before the commencement day
conclusion text: During the commencement day
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: continues
logic summary: Continuation of written authorisation upon commencement day
premise text: Written authorisation made under subsection 58(2) of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 and in force immediately before the commencement day
conclusion text: Continues to be effective
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: continues
logic summary: Continuation of written authorisation upon commencement day
premise text: Written authorisation made under subsection 58(2) of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 and in force immediately before the commencement day
conclusion text: Continues to be effective
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Arrangements with other courts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
note: Continuation of arrangements with other courts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.200
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-7-norm

8 Arrangements with agencies or organisations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
note: Continuation of arrangements under Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.200
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-8-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
note: Continuation of instrument under section 117A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.201
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-9-norm

10 Determination of other terms and conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
note: Continuation of determination under clause 8 of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.201
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-10-norm

11 Certification of retired disabled Judges
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
note: Certification of retired disabled Judges
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.201
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-11-norm

12 Right of appeal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
note: Right of appeal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.201
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-12-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to appeal
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subparagraphs 92-1(4)(e)(ii) and 92-3(2)(e)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
note: Repeal certain subparagraphs and substitute with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.203
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-1-norm

2 Subparagraphs 74B(4)(e)(ii) and 74D(2)(e)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
note: Repeal and substitute subparagraphs with new court divisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.203
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-2-norm

3 Subparagraph 4(8)(b)(ii) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
note: Repeal and substitute a subparagraph with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.204
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-3-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Subparagraph 4(8)(b)(ii) of Schedule 2
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: Replace a subparagraph with another provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 539(2) (table item 11A, column 3, paragraph (b))
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
note: Repeal and substitute a paragraph with the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.205
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-4-norm

5 Subsections 35B(1), (2) and (3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-5
note: Omit 'Family Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.206
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-5-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Remove the specified text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsections 35B(9) and (12)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court' and substitute with 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.206
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-6-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Prohibition on using outdated term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Subsection 47A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-7
note: Repeal of subsection and substitution with exceptions for certain decrees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.206
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-7-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of subsection application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 After section 47B
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.206
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-8-norm

47BA Appeals relating to matters arising under Part VIIIC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47ba
has part: 47BA(1) Appeals relating to matters arising under Part VIIIC
has part: 47BA(2) Appeals relating to matters arising under Part VIIIC
has part: 47BA(3) Appeals relating to matters arising under Part VIIIC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.206

47BA(1) Appeals relating to matters arising under Part VIIIC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47ba-ss-1
part of: 47BA Appeals relating to matters arising under Part VIIIC
note: Appeal from interlocutory order or decree of Magistrates Court of Western Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.206

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-47ba-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47BA(1) Appeals relating to matters arising under Part VIIIC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-47ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Appeal is an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47BA(2) Appeals relating to matters arising under Part VIIIC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47ba-ss-2
part of: 47BA Appeals relating to matters arising under Part VIIIC
note: Appeal to the Court of Appeal from certain Family Court and Magistrates Court decisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.206

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-47ba-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47BA(2) Appeals relating to matters arising under Part VIIIC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-47ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Legal obligation to appeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47BA(3) Appeals relating to matters arising under Part VIIIC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47ba-ss-3
part of: 47BA Appeals relating to matters arising under Part VIIIC
note: Establishes federal jurisdiction for appeals under Part VIIIC.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.206

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-47ba-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 47BA(3) Appeals relating to matters arising under Part VIIIC
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-47ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Federal jurisdiction established
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Paragraph 90YZH(3)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9
note: Omit 'Federal Circuit Court of Australia', substitute 'Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.207
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-9-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Subsection 123(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10
note: Omit specific language from court references
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.207
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-10-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified language
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subparagraph 26(1)(d)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11
note: Insert '(other than Western Australia)' after 'a State'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.208
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-11-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Subparagraph 26(1)(d)(i)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of text
premise text: Text to be inserted
conclusion text: State must insert '(other than Western Australia)'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: insertion
logic summary: Temporal insertion
premise text: Insertion occurs at a specific point in time
conclusion text: State must insert '(other than Western Australia)' at a specific point in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-11-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: insertion
logic summary: Temporal insertion with LTL
premise text: Insertion occurs over an interval
conclusion text: State must insert '(other than Western Australia)' over an interval
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-11-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: insertion
logic summary: Diffusion of text
premise text: Text is diffused through the definition
conclusion text: State must diffuse '(other than Western Australia)' through its definition
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-11-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: insertion
logic summary: CogAI insertion
premise text: CogAI system inserts text
conclusion text: State must insert '(other than Western Australia)' using CogAI
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 After paragraph 26(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12
note: Insertion of judgments from specific courts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.208
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-12-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 After paragraph 26(1)(d)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS
logic summary: Inserts a judgment into the legislation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Subparagraph 26(1)(f)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13
note: Insertion of text after Family Law Act 1975
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.208
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-13-norm

14 Subsection 26(1) (before note 1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-14
note: Contingent amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.208
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-14-norm

15 Subparagraph 61PC(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15
note: Substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia for subparagraph 61PC(b)(ii)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.209
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-15-norm

16 Paragraph 48(5)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.210
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-16-norm

17 Subparagraph 582A(2)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17
note: Repeal subparagraph 582A(2)(b)(ii) and substitute with Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.211
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-17-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Subparagraphs 596A(6)(b)(ii) and (7)(g)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18
note: Repeal and substitute subparagraphs with new court divisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.211
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-18-norm

19 Paragraph 29D(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Division 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.212
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-19-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Repeal paragraph
premise text: Paragraph 29D(3)(b)
conclusion text: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Section 7 (definition of Federal Circuit Court)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20
note: Repeal the definition of Federal Circuit Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.213
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-20-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Subparagraphs 102E(b)(ii) and 102N(5)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21
note: Repeal and substitute certain subparagraphs with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.213
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-4-sec-21-norm

1 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-1
note: Defines terms related to the Family Court of Australia and its judges.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.214
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-1-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Definitions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Defines terms related to the Family Court of Australia and its judges.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies terms into categories
premise text: Family Court of a State means a court to which section 41 of the Family Law Act 1975, as amended by this Act, applies.
conclusion text: Family Court of Australia means the federal court known, immediately before the commencement day, as the Family Court of Australia.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies terms into categories
premise text: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia has the same meaning as in the new law.
conclusion text: Federal Circuit Court of Australia means the federal court known, immediately before the commencement day, as the Federal Circuit Court of Australia.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies terms into categories
premise text: Full Court, in relation to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1), means 2 or more Judges of the Court.
conclusion text: Federal Court means the Federal Court of Australia.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies terms into categories
premise text: new law means the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
conclusion text: Continuity of the Family Court of Australia, and Judges and personnel of the Court
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Change in title of judicial offices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2
note: Change in title of judicial offices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.215
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-2-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Change in title of judicial offices
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Same office under old and new law
premise text: old law means Part IV of the Family Law Act 1975, as in force immediately before the commencement day.
conclusion text: The office is the same under both laws.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Same class hierarchy for judicial offices
conclusion text: The titles of judicial offices are part of a hierarchical structure.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Appointments to judicial offices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-3
note: Continuation of Chief Justice office after commencement day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.215
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-3-norm

4 Chief Executive Officer of the Family Court of Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-4
note: Continuity of office for Chief Executive Officer and Principal Registrar
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.216
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-4-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Chief Executive Officer of the Family Court of Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Continuity of office obligation
premise text: (1)
conclusion text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Officers and staff of the Family Court of Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-5
note: Continuation of officers and staff after commencement day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.217
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-5-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Continues to serve in new role
premise text: Immediate predecessor was an officer/staff member
conclusion text: Current person continues as officer/staff member
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Includes staff members from old law
premise text: Staff members were part of old law registries
conclusion text: New role includes staff members from old law
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Application of subsection 25B(1) of the Acts Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-6
note: Application of subsection 25B(1) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 to the Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.217
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-6-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Application of subsection 25B(1) of the Acts Interpretation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Application of a rule or provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Things done by the Family Court of Australia or Judges of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-7
note: Amendments do not affect validity of actions taken before commencement day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.217
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-7-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Things done by the Family Court of Australia or Judges of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to maintain validity of actions
premise text: Actions taken before commencement day are valid.
conclusion text: Amendments do not affect validity of these actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Things done by, or in relation to, the Chief Executive
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-8
note: Things done by, or in relation to, the Chief Executive Officer of the Family Court of Australia are taken to have been done by, or in relation to, the Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.218
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-8-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 Things done by, or in relation to, the Chief Executive
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

9 Things done by, or in relation to, a Registrar or Deputy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-9
note: Things done by, or in relation to, a Registrar or Deputy are taken to have been done by, or in relation to, a Senior Registrar of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.218
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-9-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 Things done by, or in relation to, a Registrar or Deputy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: The provision takes things done by, or in relation to, a Registrar or Deputy and applies them to a Senior Registrar.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies its obligations to things done by, or in relation to, a Registrar or Deputy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-9-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: on and after the commencement day
logic summary: The provision specifies a temporal interval for its application.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may determine
logic summary: The Minister may determine that subitem (1) does not apply in relation to a specified thing done by, or in relation to, a Registrar of the Family Court of Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must be done by, or in relation to
logic summary: The provision requires things done by, or in relation to, a Registrar or Deputy to be done by, or in relation to, a Senior Registrar.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

10 Things done by, or in relation to, a Registry Manager
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-10
note: Things done by, or in relation to, a Registry Manager
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.219
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-10-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-10-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subitem
logic summary: Subitem (1) applies to things done by, or in relation to, the Registry Manager of a Registry of the Family Court of Australia
premise text: (1)
conclusion text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-10-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subitem
logic summary: Subitem (2) applies to things done by, or in relation to, the Registry Manager of a Registry of the Family Court of Australia
premise text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-10-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subitem
logic summary: Subitem (3) defines doing a thing as making an instrument
premise text: (3)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-10-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subitem
logic summary: Subitem (4) states that a determination under subitem (2) is not a legislative instrument
premise text: (4)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

11 Things done by, or in relation to, the Marshal or a Deputy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-11
note: Things done by, or in relation to, the Marshal or a Deputy are taken as having been done by, or in relation to, the Marshal or a Deputy of the specified court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.219
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-11-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Things done by, or in relation to, the Marshal or a Deputy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: equivalence
logic summary: Equates things done by, or in relation to, the Marshal or a Deputy with those done by, or in relation to, the Marshal or a Deputy of the specified court.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes temporal intervals for things done by, or in relation to, the Marshal or a Deputy.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Registries
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-12
note: Registry continues in existence after commencement day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.220
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-12-norm

13 Complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-13
note: Chief Justice must deal with complaint about Judge if complaint made on or after commencement day and circumstances gave rise to complaint occurred before commencement day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.220
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-13-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 Complaints
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Chief Justice must deal with complaint.
premise text: Complaint made on or after commencement day.
conclusion text: Chief Justice deals with complaint.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Complaint must be made on or after commencement day for Chief Justice to deal with complaint.
premise text: Complaint must occur before commencement day for Chief Justice not to deal with complaint.
conclusion text: Complaint made on or after commencement day implies Chief Justice deals with complaint.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-13-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: AND
logic summary: Chief Justice must deal with complaint if complaint made on or after commencement day and circumstances gave rise to complaint occurred before commencement day.
premise text: Complaint made on or after commencement day.
conclusion text: Chief Justice deals with complaint.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-13-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Chief Justice may deal with complaint if circumstances gave rise to complaint occurred before commencement day.
premise text: Complaint made on or after commencement day.
conclusion text: Chief Justice may deal with complaint.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Change in title of judicial offices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-14
note: Change in title of judicial offices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.221
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-14-norm

15 Appointments to judicial offices
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-15
note: Continuation of judges in office after commencement day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.221
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-15-norm

16 Officers and staff of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-16
note: Continuation of officers and staff after commencement day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.222
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-16-norm

17 Application of subsection 25B(1) of the Acts Interpretation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-17
note: Act applies as if Federal Circuit Court of Australia were a body and offices of Chief Judge and Judge were offices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.222
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-17-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Application of subsection 25B(1) of the Acts Interpretation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies as if
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the State to apply the provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Things done by, or in relation to, the Federal Circuit Court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-18
note: Validity of actions done before commencement day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.222
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-18-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Things done by, or in relation to, the Federal Circuit Court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Things done by, or in relation to, the Chief Executive
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-19
note: Things done by, or in relation to, the Chief Executive Officer are taken as having been done by, or in relation to, the new entity.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.223
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-19-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 Things done by, or in relation to, the Chief Executive
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: The provision takes things done by the old Chief Executive Officer and applies them to the new entity.
premise text: If a thing was done by, or in relation to, the Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia...
conclusion text: ...then, despite the repeal of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-19-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subitem
logic summary: Subitems (1) and (2) are part of a larger provision.
premise text: (1) If a thing was done by, or in relation to, the Chief Executive Officer...
conclusion text: ...then, despite the repeal of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-19-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: includes
logic summary: Doing a thing includes making an instrument.
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, doing a thing includes making an instrument.
conclusion text: ...doing a thing includes making an instrument.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-19-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determination
logic summary: The Minister may determine that subitem (1) does not apply to certain things.
premise text: (2) The Minister may, in writing, determine that subitem (1) does not apply...
conclusion text: ...in relation to a specified thing done by, or in relation to, the Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-19-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: A determination under subitem (2) is not a legislative instrument.
premise text: (4) A determination under subitem (2) is not a legislative instrument.
conclusion text: ...is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-19-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: The Minister may determine that subitem (1) does not apply to certain things.
premise text: (2) The Minister may, in writing, determine...
conclusion text: ...in relation to a specified thing done by, or in relation to, the Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Things done by, or in relation to, a Registrar
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-20
note: Prescribes how things done by a Registrar are treated for the purposes of laws on and after commencement day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.223
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-20-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Things done by, or in relation to, a Registrar
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Prescribes how things done by a Registrar are treated.
premise text: (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-20-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes making an instrument in doing a thing.
premise text: (3)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Things done by, or in relation to, the Sheriff or a Deputy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-21
note: Things done by, or in relation to, the Sheriff or a Deputy are taken as having been done by the new court authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.224
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-21-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 Things done by, or in relation to, the Sheriff or a Deputy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-21-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subitem
logic summary: Describes subitems of the provision
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Things done by, or in relation to, the Marshal or a Deputy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-22
note: Things done by, or in relation to, the Marshal or a Deputy are taken as having been done by, or in relation to, the Marshal or a Deputy of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.224
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-22-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Things done by, or in relation to, the Marshal or a Deputy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: The provision takes things done by, or in relation to, the Marshal or a Deputy and applies them to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-22-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: applies
logic summary: The provision applies things done by, or in relation to, the Marshal or a Deputy to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2).
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-22-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: The provision establishes an Allen interval between the things done by, or in relation to, the Marshal or a Deputy and the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-22-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: The provision excludes things done by, or in relation to, the Marshal or a Deputy from being taken as having been done by, or in relation to, the Federal Circuit Court of Australia.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-22-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: allows
logic summary: The provision allows the Minister to determine that subitem (1) does not apply in relation to a specified thing done by, or in relation to, the Marshal or a Deputy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-22-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibits
logic summary: The provision prohibits making an instrument from being taken as having been done by, or in relation to, the Marshal or a Deputy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Registries
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-23
note: Registry continuation after repeal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.225
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-23-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-23-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval application
premise text: commencement day
conclusion text: on and after that day
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-24
note: Chief Judge must deal with complaint about a Judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.225
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-24-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 Complaints
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Chief Judge must deal with complaint.
premise text: Complaint made about a Judge of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia.
conclusion text: Chief Judge deals with complaint.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-24-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Complaint must occur before commencement day for Chief Judge to deal with it.
premise text: Complaint made on or after commencement day.
conclusion text: Complaint occurred before commencement day.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-24-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Chief Judge's dealing with complaint implies a duty to address concerns about Judges.
premise text: Chief Judge deals with complaint.
conclusion text: Chief Judge addresses concerns about Judges.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-24-logic-dialectical-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Dialectical
operator: NOT-A
logic summary: Chief Judge's dealing with complaint does not imply a duty to address all concerns about Judges.
premise text: Chief Judge deals with complaint.
conclusion text: Chief Judge does not address all concerns about Judges.
execution surface: modalities::dialectical
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-24-logic-linearlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: AND
logic summary: Chief Judge's dealing with complaint and addressing concerns about Judges are related duties.
premise text: Chief Judge deals with complaint.
conclusion text: Chief Judge addresses concerns about Judges.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Appeals to the High Court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-25
note: Application for special leave to appeal can be made after commencement day if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.226
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-25-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 Appeals to the High Court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Application can be made
premise text: Application for special leave to appeal could be made under section 95 of the Family Law Act 1975.
conclusion text: Application may be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-25-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Time has passed since application could be made under section 95 of the Family Law Act 1975
premise text: on the day before the commencement day, an application for special leave to appeal could be made under section 95 of the Family Law Act 1975;
conclusion text: Application may be made
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-25-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: and
logic summary: Two conditions must be met
premise text: (a) on the day before the commencement day, an application for special leave to appeal could be made under section 95 of the Family Law Act 1975; and (b) despite the amendments to the Family Law Act 1975 made by this Act, on the commencement day the time for making the application has not ended;
conclusion text: Application may be made
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-25-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Application may be made
premise text: If: (a) on the day before the commencement day, an application for special leave to appeal could be made under section 95 of the Family Law Act 1975; and (b) despite the amendments to the Family Law Act 1975 made by this Act, on the commencement day the time for making the application has not ended;
conclusion text: Application may be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-25-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: on or after
logic summary: Application must be made on or after commencement day
premise text: then, on or after the commencement day, the application may be made to the High Court.
conclusion text: Application may be made
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Appeals to Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-26
note: Appeals can be made to Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia after commencement day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.226
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-26-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26 Appeals to Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Possibility of making appeal
premise text: (a) on the day before the commencement day, either...
conclusion text: ...the appeal or application may be made to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-26-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: according to
logic summary: Appeal is determined according to multiple laws
premise text: (3) To avoid doubt, the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) is to hear and determine...
conclusion text: ...according to: (a) the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021; and (b) the Family Law Act 1975, as amended by this Act; and (c) any other law of the Commonwealth, as relevant.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-26-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: on or after
logic summary: Appeal can be made within a specific time frame
premise text: (1) If: (a) on the day before the commencement day, either...
conclusion text: ...the appeal or application may be made to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia on or after the commencement day.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-26-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: recurring trace
logic summary: Appeal is a recurring event
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subitem (1), an appeal or application for leave to appeal must be made in accordance...
conclusion text: ...in accordance with the Rules of Court made under Chapter 3 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Act 2021.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-26-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: transitional provisions
logic summary: Appeal is part of transitional provisions
premise text: (Transitional provisions Schedule 5)
conclusion text: ...Transitional arrangements for appeals Part 4 No. 13, 2021 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Act 2021.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

27 Extensions of time to appeal or seek leave to appeal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-27
note: Allow person to apply for extension of time after commencement day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.227
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-27-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission to apply for extension of time.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Matters before a Judge or Full Court of the Family Court of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-28
note: Matters to be substantively heard by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.227
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-28-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-28-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28 Matters before a Judge or Full Court of the Family Court of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be substantively heard
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-29
note: Appeals before a single Judge of the Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.230
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-29-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29 Appeals from courts of summary jurisdiction
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Appeals must be heard by a single Judge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Matters before the Full Court of the Family Court of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-30
note: Full Court must conclude substantive hearing and deliver judgment on application, appeal or special case.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.232
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-30-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Full Court must conclude substantive hearing and deliver judgment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Matters before a Judge of the Family Court of Australia
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-31
note: Matters before a Judge of the Family Court of Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.233
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-31-norm

32 Constituting a Full Court of the Federal Circuit and Family
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-32
note: Allocation of another Judge to constitute a Full Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.234
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-32-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Chief Justice must allocate another Judge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Unavailability of a Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-33
note: Allocate another Judge if single Judge is unavailable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.235
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-33-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-33-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33 Unavailability of a Judge of the Federal Circuit and Family
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must allocate another Judge
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Other matters
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-34
note: Chief Justice may give direction to ensure application is heard and determined pending proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.236
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-34-norm

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Chief Justice may give direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

35 Application of case management provisions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-35
note: Division 4 of Part 5 of Chapter 3 applies to proceedings before the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.236
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-35-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-35-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35 Application of case management provisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Division 4 applies to proceedings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Prior judicial service
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-36
note: Prior judicial service includes Federal Magistrate appointments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.237
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-36-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36 Prior judicial service
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Prior judicial service includes Federal Magistrate appointments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-36-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: Commencement day
conclusion text: Effect of paragraph 123(3)(b)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-37
note: Applicable to proceedings commenced before, on or after the commencement day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.237
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-37-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-37-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37 Application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ApplicableTo
logic summary: Indicates applicability of a provision to proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Transitional rules
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-38
note: The Minister may make rules prescribing transitional matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.237
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-38-norm

39 Schedule does not limit certain provisions of the Acts
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-39
note: Schedule does not limit certain provisions of the Acts
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2021a00013rec01.pdf, p.238
asserts: c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-39-norm

c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-39-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39 Schedule does not limit certain provisions of the Acts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: excludes
logic summary: Excluded from Schedule's operation
premise text: Schedule does not limit certain provisions of the Acts
conclusion text: Section 7 and subsection 25B(1) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 are exempt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-39-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between Schedule and Section 7
premise text: Schedule does not limit certain provisions of the Acts
conclusion text: Section 7 overlaps with Schedule in terms of operation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-39-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Schedule implies exemption for Section 7 and subsection 25B(1)
premise text: Schedule does not limit certain provisions of the Acts
conclusion text: Section 7 and subsection 25B(1) are exempt due to Schedule's operation
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-39-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of exemption from Schedule to Section 7 and subsection 25B(1)
premise text: Schedule does not limit certain provisions of the Acts
conclusion text: Section 7 and subsection 25B(1) are exempt due to diffusion from Schedule
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

https://ns.webcivics.net/concept/c2021a00013rec01-sch-5-sec-39-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: recognizes
logic summary: CogAI recognizes exemption for Section 7 and subsection 25B(1)
premise text: Schedule does not limit certain provisions of the Acts
conclusion text: Section 7 and subsection 25B(1) are exempt due to CogAI's recognition
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed