Human Rights Legislation Amendment Act 2017
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 32 of 2017
date: 1 September 2021
description: An Act to amend legislation relating to human rights, and for other purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 September 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Includes amendments up to Act No. 13, 2021
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sec-1-norm

3 November 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sec-3-norm

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
note: Short title of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.5
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-1-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies the Act as a specific legislation
conclusion text: The Act is the Human Rights Legislation Amendment Act 2017.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
note: Commencement rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.5
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-2
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.5
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-2

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-1-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Starts on a specific day
conclusion text: The Act begins on the day after it receives Royal Assent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relationship between the Act and its commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 April 2017
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
note: Note on table limitations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.5
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-13-norm

3 Schedules
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
note: Legislation in schedules is amended or repealed according to its terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.5
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-3-norm

1 Subsection 3(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Defines 'acts, omissions or practices' in relation to a complaint.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.6
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-1-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 3(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Establishes a class hierarchy for complaints
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 3(1) (definition of alleged unlawful
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Repeal definition of alleged unlawful discrimination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.6
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-2-norm

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Subsection 3(1) (definition of alleged unlawful
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 8(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
has part: 3(2) Subsection 8(2)
has part: 3(3) Subsection 8(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.6

3(2) Subsection 8(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-2
part of: 3 Subsection 8(2)
note: Members must co-operate with each other to achieve common objectives.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.6
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(3) Subsection 8(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-3
part of: 3 Subsection 8(2)
note: Does not affect the operation of section 44
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.6
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(3) Subsection 8(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not affect
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: (2)
conclusion text: (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 After subsection 8(6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Powers of Commission must be exercised by President
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.6
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST EXERCISE
logic summary: Must exercise powers
premise text: Commission's powers must be exercised by President
conclusion text: President must exercise Commission's powers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 At the end of section 8A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: The President has power to do all things necessary or convenient for the performance of his or her functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.6
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Power
logic summary: Granting power to perform actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Paragraph 11(1)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
note: Commission to endeavour by conciliation to effect a settlement of matters that gave rise to inquiry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.7
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-6-norm

7 After subsection 19(2B)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
note: Prohibition on delegating certain powers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.7
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-7-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-7-logic-cogai-5

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits delegation of power
premise text: Subsection (2) does not allow the President to delegate a power that can be exercised by the President because of subsection 8(6A)
conclusion text: The President cannot delegate this power.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with the power that can be exercised by the President
premise text: Subsection (2) does not allow the President to delegate a power that can be exercised by the President because of subsection 8(6A)
conclusion text: The two powers overlap.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring prohibition on delegation
premise text: Subsection (2) does not allow the President to delegate a power that can be exercised by the President because of subsection 8(6A)
conclusion text: The prohibition is recurring.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses the power to other agents
premise text: Subsection (2) does not allow the President to delegate a power that can be exercised by the President because of subsection 8(6A)
conclusion text: The power is diffused to other agents.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies the power as one that requires human oversight
premise text: Subsection (2) does not allow the President to delegate a power that can be exercised by the President because of subsection 8(6A)
conclusion text: The power is classified as one that requires human oversight.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 After paragraph 20(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
note: Commission must be satisfied that inquiry is not warranted
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.7
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-8-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 After paragraph 20(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to satisfy Commission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 After subparagraph 20(2)(c)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
note: No reasonable prospect of settlement by conciliation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.7
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: No reasonable prospect of settlement by conciliation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 At the end of section 20
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
has part: 10(9) At the end of section 20
has part: 10(10) At the end of section 20
has part: 10(11) At the end of section 20
has part: 10(12) At the end of section 20
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.7

10(9) At the end of section 20
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-ss-9
part of: 10 At the end of section 20
note: Act fairly in the performance of functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.7
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-10-ss-9-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-10-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-10-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to act fairly
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(10) At the end of section 20
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-ss-10
part of: 10 At the end of section 20
note: Act expeditiously in dealing with a complaint and finish within 12 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.7
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-10-ss-10-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-10-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-10-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to act expeditiously
premise text: The Commission must act.
conclusion text: within 12 months
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(11) At the end of section 20
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-ss-11
part of: 10 At the end of section 20
note: No duty imposed on Commission by subsections (9) and (10)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.7
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-10-ss-11-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-10-ss-11-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-10-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: No duty imposed
premise text: (9) and (10)
conclusion text: No duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10(12) At the end of section 20
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10-ss-12
part of: 10 At the end of section 20
note: Legally enforceable obligation to observe rules of natural justice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.7
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-10-ss-12-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-10-ss-12-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-10-ss-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10(12) At the end of section 20
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-10-ss-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to observe rules of natural justice
premise text: (12) Subsection (11)
conclusion text: Subsection (11) does not affect a legally enforceable obligation to observe the rules of natural justice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 After section 20
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.8
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-11-norm

20A Reports to the Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20a
note: Commission may report to Minister on inquiry into human rights issue.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.8
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20a-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20a-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20A Reports to the Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Paragraph 31(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
note: Commission to endeavour by conciliation to effect a settlement of matters that gave rise to inquiry
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.8
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-12-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to endeavour by conciliation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 After paragraph 32(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
note: Commission must be satisfied that inquiry is not warranted
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.8
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-13-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-13-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13 After paragraph 32(3)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Mandatory duty on the Commission
premise text: The Commission must be satisfied...
conclusion text: An inquiry is not warranted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 After subparagraph 32(3)(c)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
note: No reasonable prospect of settlement by conciliation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.9
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-14-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conciliation
premise text: Commission's satisfaction
conclusion text: No settlement by conciliation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 At the end of section 32
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
has part: 15(4) At the end of section 32
has part: 15(5) At the end of section 32
has part: 15(6) At the end of section 32
has part: 15(7) At the end of section 32
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.9

15(4) At the end of section 32
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15-ss-4
part of: 15 At the end of section 32
note: The Commission must act fairly in the performance of its functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.9
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-15-ss-4-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-15-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-15-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to act fairly
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(5) At the end of section 32
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15-ss-5
part of: 15 At the end of section 32
note: Act expeditiously and complete complaint within 12 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.9
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-15-ss-5-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-15-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-15-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to act expeditiously
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(6) At the end of section 32
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15-ss-6
part of: 15 At the end of section 32
note: No duty imposed on Commission by subsections (4) and (5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.9
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-15-ss-6-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-15-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-15-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ¬
logic summary: No duty imposed
premise text: (4) and (5)
conclusion text: No duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15(7) At the end of section 32
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15-ss-7
part of: 15 At the end of section 32
note: Legally enforceable obligation to observe rules of natural justice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.9
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-15-ss-7-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-15-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-15-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15(7) At the end of section 32
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-15-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to observe rules of natural justice
premise text: (7) Subsection (6) does not affect a legally enforceable obligation to observe the rules of natural justice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 After section 32
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.9
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-16-norm

32A Reports to the Minister
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32a
note: Commission may report to Minister on inquiry into discrimination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.9
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-32a-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-32a-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-32a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32A Reports to the Minister
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-32a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Section 46
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
note: Omit specific phrase from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.10
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-17-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Section 46C (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.10
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-18-norm

46C Functions of the Commission that are to be performed by the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46c
note: Functions of the Commission that are to be performed by the Commissioner etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.10
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46c-norm

19 Paragraph 46C(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.10
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-19-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-19-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals the specified paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 After subsection 46C(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
has part: 20(2A) After subsection 46C(2)
has part: 20(2B) After subsection 46C(2)
has part: 20(2C) After subsection 46C(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.10

20(2A) After subsection 46C(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-ss-2a
part of: 20 After subsection 46C(2)
note: Commissioner must submit reports to Minister on human rights enjoyment and exercise.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.10
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2a-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(2A) After subsection 46C(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to submit reports
premise text: Commissioner has a duty to report
conclusion text: Reports must be submitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(2B) After subsection 46C(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-ss-2b
part of: 20 After subsection 46C(2)
note: Reports to be submitted by the Commissioner regarding Native Title Act 1993 and its impact on human rights.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.10
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2b-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2b-logic-ltl-3

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(2B) After subsection 46C(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to submit reports
premise text: The Commissioner is required to submit reports
conclusion text: Reports must be submitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Reports must be submitted after subsection 46C(2)
premise text: Subsection 46C(2) has occurred
conclusion text: Reports must be submitted after the subsection has occurred
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Reports are submitted at least once
premise text: The Commissioner submits reports regularly
conclusion text: Reports are submitted at least once
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20(2C) After subsection 46C(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20-ss-2c
part of: 20 After subsection 46C(2)
note: Recommendations for action to ensure human rights enjoyment and exercise.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.10
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2c-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2c-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2c-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20(2C) After subsection 46C(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
premise text: (2C) A report under subsection (2A) or (2B)
conclusion text: Recommendations for action to ensure human rights enjoyment and exercise.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2c-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the report.
premise text: (2C) A report under subsection (2A) or (2B)
conclusion text: After subsection 46C(2)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2c-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implies that the State must take action.
premise text: (2C) A report under subsection (2A) or (2B)
conclusion text: Recommendations for action to ensure human rights enjoyment and exercise.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2c-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagates the obligation to take action.
premise text: (2C) A report under subsection (2A) or (2B)
conclusion text: Recommendations for action to ensure human rights enjoyment and exercise.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-20-ss-2c-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Infers the obligation from the report.
premise text: (2C) A report under subsection (2A) or (2B)
conclusion text: Recommendations for action to ensure human rights enjoyment and exercise.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Subsections 46C(3) and (4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
note: Insertion of phrase after 'functions'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.10
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-21-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 Subsections 46C(3) and (4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Obligation to insert phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Section 46M
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
note: Omit specified paragraph and substitute with new subsections.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.10
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-22-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified paragraph.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Section 46MB
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23
note: Repeal of heading and substitution with new title
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.10
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-23-norm

46MB Functions of Commission that are to be performed by the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46mb
note: Functions of Commission that are to be performed by the National Children’s Commissioner etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.11
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46mb-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46mb-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46mb-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the National Children’s Commissioner etc.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Paragraph 46MB(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.11
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-24-norm

25 Subsection 46MB(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25
has part: 25(3) Subsection 46MB(3)
has part: 25(3A) Subsection 46MB(3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.11

25(3) Subsection 46MB(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-ss-3
part of: 25 Subsection 46MB(3)
note: Submit reports to the Minister on human rights matters related to children in Australia.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.11
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-25-ss-3-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-25-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-25-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to submit reports
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25(3A) Subsection 46MB(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25-ss-3a
part of: 25 Subsection 46MB(3)
note: Recommendations for action to ensure human rights enjoyment by children in Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.11
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-25-ss-3a-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-25-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-25-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the National Children’s Commissioner
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Subsections 46MB(4), (5) and (6)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26
note: Insertion of phrase after 'functions'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.11
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-26-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-26-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26 Subsections 46MB(4), (5) and (6)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Obligation to insert phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Subsection 46P(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27
has part: 27(1) Subsection 46P(1)
has part: 27(1A) Subsection 46P(1)
has part: 27(1B) Subsection 46P(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.11

27(1) Subsection 46P(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-ss-1
part of: 27 Subsection 46P(1)
note: Written complaint alleging unlawful discrimination may be lodged with the Commission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.11
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(1) Subsection 46P(1)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to lodge complaint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(1A) Subsection 46P(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-ss-1a
part of: 27 Subsection 46P(1)
note: Must be reasonably arguable that the alleged acts, omissions or practices are unlawful discrimination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.11
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1a-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(1A) Subsection 46P(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with the requirement.
premise text: The alleged acts, omissions or practices must be reasonably arguable that they are unlawful discrimination.
conclusion text: It is obligatory to argue that the alleged acts, omissions or practices are unlawful discrimination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ⇒
logic summary: If the alleged acts, omissions or practices are reasonably arguable to be unlawful discrimination, then it must be reasonably arguable that they are unlawful discrimination.
premise text: The alleged acts, omissions or practices are reasonably arguable that they are unlawful discrimination.
conclusion text: It is reasonably arguable that the alleged acts, omissions or practices are unlawful discrimination.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: The requirement must be within a reasonable time frame of being unlawful discrimination.
premise text: The alleged acts, omissions or practices are reasonably arguable that they are unlawful discrimination.
conclusion text: There is a reasonable time frame between the alleged acts, omissions or practices and them being unlawful discrimination.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: ⇒
logic summary: If the alleged acts, omissions or practices are reasonably arguable to be unlawful discrimination, then they must be reasonably arguable to be unlawful discrimination in a wider context.
premise text: The alleged acts, omissions or practices are reasonably arguable that they are unlawful discrimination.
conclusion text: There is a reasonable argument for the alleged acts, omissions or practices being unlawful discrimination in a wider context.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: The requirement is a subclass of a more general concept of unlawful discrimination.
premise text: The alleged acts, omissions or practices are reasonably arguable that they are unlawful discrimination.
conclusion text: The requirement is a subclass of a more general concept of unlawful discrimination.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27(1B) Subsection 46P(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27-ss-1b
part of: 27 Subsection 46P(1)
note: Must provide details of alleged acts, omissions or practices.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.11
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1b-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1b-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 27(1B) Subsection 46P(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-27-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide details
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Paragraphs 46P(2)(a), (b) and (c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28
note: Omit 'unlawful discrimination' and substitute 'acts, omissions or practices'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.12
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-28-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits discrimination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Subsection 46PC(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29
note: Insert paragraph 46PF(1)(b) or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.12
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-29-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29 Subsection 46PC(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS
logic summary: Inserts text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Subsection 46PE(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-30
note: Insertion of subsection 46PE(3)(2A)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.12
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-30-norm

31 Subsection 46PF(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31
has part: 31(1) Subsection 46PF(1)
has part: 31(1A) Subsection 46PF(1)
has part: 31(1B) Subsection 46PF(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.12

31(1) Subsection 46PF(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31-ss-1
part of: 31 Subsection 46PF(1)
note: The President must consider a complaint and attempt to conciliate it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.12
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-31-ss-1-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-31-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The President must consider a complaint.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31(1A) Subsection 46PF(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31-ss-1a
part of: 31 Subsection 46PF(1)
note: The President may inform themselves of necessary facts and circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.12
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-31-ss-1a-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-31-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-31-ss-1a-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-31-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-31-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-31-ss-1a-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge
logic summary: President has knowledge of necessary facts and circumstances
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-31-ss-1a-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Possibility
logic summary: President may inform themselves with possibility of forming opinion
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31(1B) Subsection 46PF(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-31-ss-1b
part of: 31 Subsection 46PF(1)
note: Notification requirements must be complied with after terminating a complaint.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.12
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-31-ss-1b-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-31-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-31-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Subsection 46PF(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-32
note: Omit 'alleged unlawful discrimination', substitute 'alleged acts, omissions or practices'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.12
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-32-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-32-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits alleged unlawful discrimination
premise text: Omit 'alleged unlawful discrimination'
conclusion text: Substitute 'alleged acts, omissions or practices'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Subsection 46PF(3) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-33
note: Omit 'unlawful discrimination', substitute 'acts or omissions'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.12
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-33-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits discrimination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Subsection 46PF(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-34
note: Insertion of phrase after 'under'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.13
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-34-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-34-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Paragraph 46PF(5)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-35
note: Omit 'unlawful discrimination', substitute 'acts, omissions or practices'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.13
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-35-norm

36 At the end of section 46PF
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36
has part: 36(6) At the end of section 46PF
has part: 36(7) At the end of section 46PF
has part: 36(8) At the end of section 46PF
has part: 36(9) At the end of section 46PF
has part: 36(10) At the end of section 46PF
has part: 36(11) At the end of section 46PF
has part: 36(12) At the end of section 46PF
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.13

36(6) At the end of section 46PF
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-ss-6
part of: 36 At the end of section 46PF
note: Act fairly to complainant and respondent in dealing with complaint.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.13
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-6-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to act fairly
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(7) At the end of section 46PF
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-ss-7
part of: 36 At the end of section 46PF
note: Must notify certain persons of a complaint
description: Notification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.13
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-7-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(8) At the end of section 46PF
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-ss-8
part of: 36 At the end of section 46PF
note: Notify respondent or other person upon specified events
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.13
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-8-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to notify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(9) At the end of section 46PF
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-ss-9
part of: 36 At the end of section 46PF
note: Definition of adverse allegation for purposes of subsections (7) and (8)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.13
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-9-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(9) At the end of section 46PF
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines key term for legal purposes
premise text: None
conclusion text: Adverse allegation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Applies to explicit class/type/subclass hierarchies
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(10) At the end of section 46PF
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-ss-10
part of: 36 At the end of section 46PF
note: The President must act expeditiously in dealing with a complaint and use best endeavours to finish within 12 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.13
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-10-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: The President must act expeditiously.
conclusion text: The President has an obligation to act expeditiously.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(11) At the end of section 46PF
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-ss-11
part of: 36 At the end of section 46PF
note: No enforceable duty on the President imposed by subsections (6) and (10)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.13
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-11-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-11-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from duties
premise text: (11) Subsections (6) and (10)
conclusion text: No duty imposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36(12) At the end of section 46PF
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-36-ss-12
part of: 36 At the end of section 46PF
note: Legally enforceable obligation to observe rules of natural justice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.13
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-12-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-12-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36(12) At the end of section 46PF
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-36-ss-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to observe rules of natural justice
premise text: (12) Subsection (11) does not affect a legally enforceable obligation to observe the rules of natural justice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Before subsection 46PH(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-37
note: Discretionary termination of complaint
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.14
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-37-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-37-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-37-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37 Before subsection 46PH(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to terminate complaints discretionally
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Paragraph 46PH(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-38
note: Omit 'unlawful discrimination is', substitute 'acts, omissions or practices are'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.15
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-38-norm

39 Paragraph 46PH(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-39
note: Omit '12 months', substitute '6 months'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.15
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-39-norm

40 Paragraph 46PH(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-40
note: Omit 'unlawful discrimination', substitute 'acts, omissions or practices'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.15
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-40-norm

41 Paragraph 46PH(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41
note: The President must be satisfied that an inquiry is not warranted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.15
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-41-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-41-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41 Paragraph 46PH(1)(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The President must be satisfied.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41A Paragraph 46PH(1)(h)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41a
note: Omit “Court;”, substitute ‘Court.’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.15
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-41a-norm

41B Paragraph 46PH(1)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-41b
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.15
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-41b-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-41b-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-41b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals a paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 At the end of subsection 46PH(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-42
note: Consideration of exemption applies to determination of non-unlawful discrimination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.15
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-42-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-42-logic-deontic-2

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42 At the end of subsection 46PH(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Exemption consideration is a duty
premise text: An exemption applies
conclusion text: Consideration of exemption applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-42-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Exemption consideration is a duty
premise text: An act, omission or practice may not be unlawful discrimination
conclusion text: Consideration of exemption applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 After subsection 46PH(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43
has part: 43(1A) After subsection 46PH(1)
has part: 43(1B) After subsection 46PH(1)
has part: 43(1C) After subsection 46PH(1)
has part: 43(1D) After subsection 46PH(1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.15

43(1A) After subsection 46PH(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43-ss-1a
part of: 43 After subsection 46PH(1)
note: Mandatory termination of complaint
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.15
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-43-ss-1a-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-43-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-43-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to terminate complaint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43(1B) After subsection 46PH(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43-ss-1b
part of: 43 After subsection 46PH(1)
note: Must terminate complaint if trivial, vexatious, misconceived or lacking in substance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.15
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-43-ss-1b-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-43-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-43-ss-1b-logic-deontic-2
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-43-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-3

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-43-ss-1b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to terminate complaint
premise text: (1B) The President must...
conclusion text: terminate the complaint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-43-ss-1b-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to terminate complaint if no reasonable prospect of settlement by conciliation
premise text: (b) there is no reasonable prospect...
conclusion text: terminate the complaint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-43-ss-1b-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval for termination
premise text: if the President is satisfied that...
conclusion text: (a) or (b)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43(1C) After subsection 46PH(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43-ss-1c
part of: 43 After subsection 46PH(1)
note: Must terminate complaint if no reasonable prospect of Federal Court/Federal Circuit Court satisfaction
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.15
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-43-ss-1c-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-43-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-43-ss-1c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43(1D) After subsection 46PH(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-43-ss-1d
part of: 43 After subsection 46PH(1)
note: Complaint may be terminated at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.15
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-43-ss-1d-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-43-ss-1d-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-43-ss-1d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: (1D) A complaint may be terminated...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Before subsection 46PH(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-44
note: Notification obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.16
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-44-norm

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-44-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 44 Before subsection 46PH(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

45 Subsection 46PH(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-45
note: Omit specific phrase from subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.16
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-45-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-45-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits termination of complaint
premise text: Omit ‘decides to terminate a complaint’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘terminates a complaint’
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Subsection 46PH(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46
note: Omit specific phrase from text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.16
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase.
premise text: Omit ‘that decision’ (wherever occurring)
conclusion text: Substitute ‘the termination’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Before subsection 46PH(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-47
note: Must include a statement about cost awards in proceedings under section 46PO.
description: Notice under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.16
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-47-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-47-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to include a statement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Before subsection 46PH(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-48
note: Revocation of amendment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.16
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-48-norm

49 Sections 46PJ and 46PK
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-49
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new ones.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.17
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-49-norm

46PJ President may hold conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46pj
has part: 46PJ(1) President may hold conferences
has part: 46PJ(2) President may hold conferences
has part: 46PJ(3) President may hold conferences
has part: 46PJ(4) President may hold conferences
has part: 46PJ(5) President may hold conferences
has part: 46PJ(6) President may hold conferences
has part: 46PJ(7) President may hold conferences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.17

46PJ(1) President may hold conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-1
part of: 46PJ President may hold conferences
note: The President may hold a conference to conciliate a complaint.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.17
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-1-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to hold a conference
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46PJ(2) President may hold conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-2
part of: 46PJ President may hold conferences
note: The President may invite people to attend a conference.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.17
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-2-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to invite
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46PJ(3) President may hold conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-3
part of: 46PJ President may hold conferences
note: The President must require a person to attend a conference.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.17
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-3-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46PJ(3) President may hold conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46PJ(4) President may hold conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-4
part of: 46PJ President may hold conferences
note: President must provide notice with conference details and effect of subsection (5)
description: Notice under subsection (3) must specify place, time, and effect of subsection (5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.17
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-4-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46PJ(4) President may hold conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: President has a duty to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46PJ(5) President may hold conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-5
part of: 46PJ President may hold conferences
note: Refusal to attend a conference after notice is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.17
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-5-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-5-logic-argumentation-5

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 46PJ(5) President may hold conferences
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of refusing to attend a conference after notice.
premise text: (5) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person has been given a notice under subsection (3) requiring the person to attend a conference; and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the requirement.
conclusion text: Penalty: 10 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Notice overlaps with refusal to attend conference.
premise text: (5) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person has been given a notice under subsection (3) requiring the person to attend a conference; and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the requirement.
conclusion text: The notice and refusal overlap in time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Refusal occurs after notice expires.
premise text: (5) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person has been given a notice under subsection (3) requiring the person to attend a conference; and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the requirement.
conclusion text: The refusal occurs after the notice expires.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-5-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: There is an obligation to attend a conference after notice.
premise text: (5) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person has been given a notice under subsection (3) requiring the person to attend a conference; and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the requirement.
conclusion text: The person must attend the conference.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-5-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Refusal implies an offence.
premise text: (5) A person commits an offence if: (a) the person has been given a notice under subsection (3) requiring the person to attend a conference; and (b) the person refuses or fails to comply with the requirement.
conclusion text: If the person refuses, they commit an offence.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46PJ(6) President may hold conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-6
part of: 46PJ President may hold conferences
note: Subsection (5) is an offence of strict liability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.17
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-6-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits subsection (5)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46PJ(7) President may hold conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-7
part of: 46PJ President may hold conferences
note: The Commonwealth must pay a reasonable sum for the person's expenses of attendance.
description: expenses of attendance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.17
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-7-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46PJ(7) President may hold conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pj-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Commonwealth has an obligation to pay the person's expenses.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46PK Proceedings at conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46pk
has part: 46PK(1) Proceedings at conferences
has part: 46PK(2) Proceedings at conferences
has part: 46PK(3) Proceedings at conferences
has part: 46PK(4) Proceedings at conferences
has part: 46PK(5) Proceedings at conferences
has part: 46PK(6) Proceedings at conferences
has part: 46PK(7) Proceedings at conferences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.18

46PK(1) Proceedings at conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1
part of: 46PK Proceedings at conferences
note: Prevents admissibility of evidence from reconciliation proceedings in other cases. Conference proceedings must be conducted in an appropriate manner.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.18
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-7
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-ltl-8
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-9
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-cogai-10

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46PK(1) Proceedings at conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prevents admissibility
premise text: (1) Evidence of anything said or done by a person in the course of the conciliation of a complaint in accordance with section 46PF is not admissible in any proceedings relating to the alleged acts, omissions or practices.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Prohibition
logic summary: Prevents admissibility within a specific time frame
premise text: (1) Evidence of anything said or done by a person in the course of the conciliation of a complaint in accordance with section 46PF is not admissible in any proceedings relating to the alleged acts, omissions or practices.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Prohibition
logic summary: Prevents admissibility within a specific time frame
premise text: (1) Evidence of anything said or done by a person in the course of the conciliation of a complaint in accordance with section 46PF is not admissible in any proceedings relating to the alleged acts, omissions or practices.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads prohibition to related cases
premise text: (1) Evidence of anything said or done by a person in the course of the conciliation of a complaint in accordance with section 46PF is not admissible in any proceedings relating to the alleged acts, omissions or practices.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Rebuttal
logic summary: Rebuts admissibility of evidence from reconciliation proceedings
premise text: (1) Evidence of anything said or done by a person in the course of the conciliation of a complaint in accordance with section 46PF is not admissible in any proceedings relating to the alleged acts, omissions or practices.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to conduct proceedings appropriately.
premise text: (1) Subject to this section, a conference mentioned in subsection 46PJ(1) is to be conducted in such manner as the person presiding at the conference considers appropriate.
conclusion text: The person presiding must conduct the proceedings in an appropriate manner.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-7
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEETS
logic summary: Conference proceedings must occur within a specific timeframe.
premise text: (1) Subject to this section, a conference mentioned in subsection 46PJ(1) is to be conducted in such manner as the person presiding at the conference considers appropriate.
conclusion text: The conference occurs within a specific timeframe.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-ltl-8
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: NEXT
logic summary: Conference proceedings must occur after a specific event.
premise text: (1) Subject to this section, a conference mentioned in subsection 46PJ(1) is to be conducted in such manner as the person presiding at the conference considers appropriate.
conclusion text: The conference occurs after a specific event.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-diffusion-9
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Conference proceedings must spread to other entities.
premise text: (1) Subject to this section, a conference mentioned in subsection 46PJ(1) is to be conducted in such manner as the person presiding at the conference considers appropriate.
conclusion text: The conference spreads to other entities.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-1-logic-cogai-10
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNIZES
logic summary: Conference proceedings must recognize specific entities.
premise text: (1) Subject to this section, a conference mentioned in subsection 46PJ(1) is to be conducted in such manner as the person presiding at the conference considers appropriate.
conclusion text: The conference recognizes specific entities.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

46PK(2) Proceedings at conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-2
part of: 46PK Proceedings at conferences
note: Conference proceedings must be conducted in private. Exemption from subsection (1) for section 46PSA.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.18
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-2-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of public conference proceedings.
premise text: (2) The conference is to be conducted in private.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46PK(3) Proceedings at conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-3
part of: 46PK Proceedings at conferences
note: Ensure fair conduct at conferences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.18
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-3-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46PK(3) Proceedings at conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to ensure fairness.
premise text: (3) The person presiding at the conference...
conclusion text: The person presiding must take all reasonable steps...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46PK(4) Proceedings at conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-4
part of: 46PK Proceedings at conferences
note: No representation allowed at conferences without consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.18
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-4-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 46PK(4) Proceedings at conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of representation
premise text: (4) Unless the person presiding at the conference consents:
conclusion text: an individual is not entitled to be represented at the conference by another person;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal restriction
premise text: (4) Unless the person presiding at the conference consents:
conclusion text: an individual is not entitled to be represented at the conference by another person;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal restriction
premise text: (4) Unless the person presiding at the conference consents:
conclusion text: a body (whether or not incorporated) is not entitled to be represented at the conference otherwise than by a person who is an officer or employee of the body.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of representation
premise text: (4) Unless the person presiding at the conference consents:
conclusion text: a body (whether or not incorporated) is not entitled to be represented at the conference otherwise than by a person who is an officer or employee of the body.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-4-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implication
logic summary: Implication of consent for representation
premise text: (4) Unless the person presiding at the conference consents:
conclusion text: an individual is not entitled to be represented at the conference by another person;
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46PK(5) Proceedings at conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-5
part of: 46PK Proceedings at conferences
note: Entitlement to nominate another person to attend on behalf of an individual with a disability.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.18
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-5-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Entitlement to nominate another person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46PK(6) Proceedings at conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-6
part of: 46PK Proceedings at conferences
note: Individuals with disabilities can nominate another person to assist at conferences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.18
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-6-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-6-norm
type: Right
modality: Deontic
part of: 46PK(6) Proceedings at conferences
held by: NaturalPerson
scope note: held by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Individuals with disabilities have a right.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Assistance occurs during the conference.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46PK(7) Proceedings at conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-7
part of: 46PK Proceedings at conferences
note: Definition of disability for purposes of this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.18
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-7-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-7-logic-deontic-2
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-7-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-4

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46PK(7) Proceedings at conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation to define disability
premise text: For the purposes of this section, disability has the same meaning as...
conclusion text: Disability is defined for purposes of this section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-7-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Obligation to prohibit admitting things said in conciliation
premise text: ...Things said in conciliation are not admissible in evidence in certain proceedings
conclusion text: Certain proceedings have a prohibition on admitting things said in conciliation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-7-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Conditional prohibition
premise text: ...Things said in conciliation are not admissible in evidence in certain proceedings
conclusion text: Certain proceedings have a conditional prohibition on admitting things said in conciliation
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-46pk-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
premise text: ...Things said in conciliation are not admissible in evidence in certain proceedings
conclusion text: Certain proceedings have a prohibition on admitting things said in conciliation within a temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Section 46PL
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-50
note: Repeal a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.19
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-50-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-50-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals a section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Subsection 46PM(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-51
note: Omit specified phrases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.19
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-51-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the omission of certain phrases.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Paragraph 46PO(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-52
note: Substitute paragraph 46PF(1)(b) or section with ‘or’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.19
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-52-norm

53 After subsection 46PO(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-53
note: Application must not be made unless court grants leave or complaint is terminated under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.19
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-53-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-53-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-53-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 53 After subsection 46PO(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-53-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of making an application without court leave or termination of complaint.
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 At the end of subsection 46PO(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-54
note: Award costs in proceedings under this section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.20
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-54-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-54-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to award costs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Subsection 46PP(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-55
note: Omit specific text from existing provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.20
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-55-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-55-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting specified text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Subsection 46PS(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-56
note: Insertion of paragraph 46PF(1)(b) after 'terminated under'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.20
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-56-norm

57 After section 46PS
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-57
note: Court may have regard to an offer to settle when deciding whether to award costs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.20
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-57-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-57-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-57-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-57-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-57-logic-cogai-5

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57 After section 46PS
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May have regard to an offer
premise text: Offer was or is rejected
conclusion text: Award costs in proceedings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-57-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Offer was or is rejected during the proceedings
premise text: Proceedings have been instituted under section 46PO against a respondent to a terminated complaint
conclusion text: Award costs in proceedings
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-57-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: may
logic summary: Court may consider the offer when deciding whether to award costs
premise text: Offer was or is rejected
conclusion text: Award costs in proceedings
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-57-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: may
logic summary: Court may diffuse the offer to settle into consideration of costs
premise text: Proceedings have been instituted under section 46PO against a respondent to a terminated complaint
conclusion text: Award costs in proceedings
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-57-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: may
logic summary: Court may use artificial intelligence to consider the offer when deciding whether to award costs
premise text: Offer was or is rejected
conclusion text: Award costs in proceedings
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Application of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-58
note: Amendments apply in relation to inquiries made after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.20
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-58-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-58-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-58-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58 Application of amendments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-58-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation on the State to apply amendments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Transitional—tabling of reports
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59
note: Continues to apply previous section despite amendment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.22
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-59-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-59-logic-deontic-1

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59 Transitional—tabling of reports
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-2-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Continues obligation
premise text: Previous section still applies.
conclusion text: New amendment does not affect previous section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Section 209
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-3
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.23
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-1-3-norm

209 Reports by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-209
note: Commissioner must report to the Commonwealth Minister about the operation of this Act or its effect on human rights.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.23
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-209-norm
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-209-logic-deontic-1
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-209-logic-descriptionlogic-2

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-209-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Commissioner must report.
premise text: This Act requires the Commissioner to report.
conclusion text: The Commissioner reports.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-209-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS_A
logic summary: The Commissioner is responsible for reporting.
premise text: The Commissioner has a responsibility to report.
conclusion text: The Commissioner's responsibility includes reporting.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.27
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-12-norm

13 Apr 2017 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-13-2
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.27
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-13-2-norm

1 Mar 2021
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-4
note: Amendment history for Human Rights Legislation Amendment Act 2017
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017.pdf, p.27
asserts: human-rights-legislation-amendment-act-2017-sch-3-sec-1-4-norm