1 Section 761A
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.10
note: Definition of AFCA scheme and staff member
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of AFCA scheme and staff member
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AFCA scheme has a specific definition
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: AFCA scheme is defined as the external dispute resolution scheme for which an authorisation under Part 7.10A is in force.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Staff members have specific definitions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy for staff members
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
premise text: AFCA staff member is defined as a director, officer or employee of AFCA or a person engaged as a consultant to, or to perform services for, AFCA.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Section 761A

10 Section 63
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.38
note: Replace 'subsection 62(2)' with 'section 62'
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
schema version: 2

1050 Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.12
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1050(1) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
has part: 1050(2) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
has part: 1050(3) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
has part: 1050(4) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
has part: 1050(5) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1050
schema version: 2

1050(1) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.12
note: Authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1050-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1050 Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise

1050(2) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.12
note: Minister must consider general considerations and other relevant matters when authorizing an external dispute resolution scheme.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1050 Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Minister's consideration period is between general considerations and other relevant matters.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: General considerations for an external dispute resolution scheme under section 1051A.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister must consider general considerations and other relevant matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: General considerations for an external dispute resolution scheme under section 1051A.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Minister may take into account other relevant matters.
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: Other matter the Minister considers relevant.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Minister's consideration is recursive with general considerations and other relevant matters.
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
premise text: General considerations for an external dispute resolution scheme under section 1051A.

1050(3) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.12
note: No authorisation of another external dispute resolution scheme can be in force while this one is.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 1050 Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This provision overlaps with other provisions regulating external dispute resolution schemes.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: This provision overlaps with other provisions regulating external dispute resolution schemes.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) An authorisation of an external dispute resolution scheme must not come into force...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This provision overlaps with other provisions regulating artificial intelligence in external dispute resolution schemes.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: This provision overlaps with other provisions regulating artificial intelligence in external dispute resolution schemes.
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) An authorisation of an external dispute resolution scheme must not come into force...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An authorisation of another external dispute resolution scheme cannot be in force.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No authorisation can be in force while another one is.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (3) An authorisation of an external dispute resolution scheme must not come into force...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This provision is part of the diffusion of regulations regarding external dispute resolution schemes.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: This provision is part of a diffusion of regulations regarding external dispute resolution schemes.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) An authorisation of an external dispute resolution scheme must not come into force...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This provision overlaps with other provisions regulating external dispute resolution schemes.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: This provision overlaps with other provisions regulating external dispute resolution schemes.
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (3) An authorisation of an external dispute resolution scheme must not come into force...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1050(3) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme

1050(4) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.12
note: Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1050-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 1050 Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme

1050(5) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
type: Concept
description: (a) must specify the day the authorisation, variation or revocation comes into force; (b) may specify, vary or revoke conditions relating to the authorisation.
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.12
note: Specify day authorisation comes into force and conditions
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-5-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1050-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 1050 Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify day authorisation comes into force
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (a) must specify the day the authorisation, variation or revocation comes into force;

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify conditions relating to authorisation
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
premise text: (b) may specify, vary or revoke conditions relating to the authorisation.

1051 Mandatory requirements
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.13
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1051(1) Mandatory requirements
has part: 1051(2) Mandatory requirements
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1051
schema version: 2

1051(1) Mandatory requirements
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.13
note: Organisational requirements for an external dispute resolution scheme
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1051 Mandatory requirements

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and (b) the operator requirements under subsection (3); and (c) the operational requirements under subsection (4); and (d) the compliance requirements under subsection (5).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Organisational requirements are part of mandatory requirements that apply during scheme operation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) The mandatory requirements for an external dispute resolution scheme are: (a) the organisational requirements under subsection (2); and

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) The mandatory requirements for an external dispute resolution scheme are:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires organisational requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (a) the organisational requirements under subsection (2); and

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) The mandatory requirements for an external dispute resolution scheme are:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires organisational requirements for scheme operation
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (a) the organisational requirements under subsection (2); and

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (1) The mandatory requirements for an external dispute resolution scheme are:
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires operator requirements for scheme operation
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: (b) the operator requirements under subsection (3); and

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: and (b) the operator requirements under subsection (3); and (c) the operational requirements under subsection (4); and (d) the compliance requirements under subsection (5).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Organisational requirements are part of mandatory requirements that apply during scheme operation
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) The mandatory requirements for an external dispute resolution scheme are: (a) the organisational requirements under subsection (2); and

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1051(1) Mandatory requirements

1051(2) Mandatory requirements
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.13
note: Membership requirements for the scheme
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1051 Mandatory requirements

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the membership of the scheme is open to every entity that is required, under: Schedule 1 External dispute resolution
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal scope
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The organisational requirements are that:

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the membership of the scheme is open to every entity that is required, under: Schedule 1 External dispute resolution
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Global applicability
modality: CogAI
operator: everywhere
premise text: (2) The organisational requirements are that:

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the membership of the scheme is open to every entity that is required, under: Schedule 1 External dispute resolution
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Membership requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: The organisational requirements are that:

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the membership of the scheme is open to every entity that is required, under: Schedule 1 External dispute resolution
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Global applicability
modality: Diffusion
operator: everywhere
premise text: (2) The organisational requirements are that:

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (a) the membership of the scheme is open to every entity that is required, under: Schedule 1 External dispute resolution
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Global applicability
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
premise text: (2) The organisational requirements are that:

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1051(2) Mandatory requirements

1051A General considerations
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16
note: General considerations for an external dispute resolution scheme
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051a-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1051a
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory consideration
modality: Deontic
operator: shall

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1051A General considerations

1052 Obligation to comply with mandatory requirements
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16
note: Ensure compliance with mandatory requirements
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

1052A ASIC may issue regulatory requirements
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16
note: ASIC may issue regulatory requirements
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052a-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052a
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to issue regulatory requirements
modality: Deontic
operator: may

1052B Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1052B(1) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
has part: 1052B(2) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
has part: 1052B(3) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
has part: 1052B(4) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
has part: 1052B(5) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052b
schema version: 2

1052B(1) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16
note: ASIC may give AFCA a written direction requiring the limit, or some or all of the limits, to be increased.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1052B Directions to increase limits on the value of claims

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May give direction
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

1052B(2) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16
note: ASIC cannot give a direction under this section without prior written notice to AFCA.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1052B Directions to increase limits on the value of claims

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AFCA has been notified at least 1 month in advance.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of giving a direction without prior notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: ASIC must not give a direction under this section.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Complaints prior to notice are exempt from the direction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of applying the direction to complaints received before notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
premise text: A direction under this section must not apply in relation to complaints AFCA received before ASIC gives the direction.

1052B(3) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16
note: Must comply with direction made under this section.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 1052B Directions to increase limits on the value of claims

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1052B(3) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims

1052B(4) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16
note: ASIC may apply to the Court for an order that AFCA comply with the direction.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 1052B Directions to increase limits on the value of claims

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ASIC has an obligation to apply for a court order.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

1052B(5) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16
note: A direction made under this section is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 1052B Directions to increase limits on the value of claims

1052BA Directions to ensure sufficient financing
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.17
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1052BA(1) Directions to ensure sufficient financing
has part: 1052BA(2) Directions to ensure sufficient financing
has part: 1052BA(3) Directions to ensure sufficient financing
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052ba
schema version: 2

1052BA(1) Directions to ensure sufficient financing
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.17
note: ASIC must give AFCA a written direction if it considers the scheme is not sufficiently financed.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1052BA Directions to ensure sufficient financing

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AFCA must be given a written direction within a specific timeframe
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Direction is given within a specific timeframe
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: ASIC considers AFCA has not done all things reasonably practicable

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Sufficient financing implies direction
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Direction implies sufficient financing
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: ASIC considers AFCA has not done all things reasonably practicable

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AFCA must be given a written direction
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide direction
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ASIC considers AFCA has not done all things reasonably practicable

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AFCA must take steps to ensure sufficient financing
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to ensure sufficient financing
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ASIC considers AFCA has not done all things reasonably practicable

1052BA(2) Directions to ensure sufficient financing
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.17
note: Ensure sufficient financing for AFCA scheme operations
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1052BA Directions to ensure sufficient financing

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Ensure sufficient financing
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1052BA(2) Directions to ensure sufficient financing

1052BA(3) Directions to ensure sufficient financing
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.17
note: ASIC must give AFCA written notice before issuing a direction.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 1052BA Directions to ensure sufficient financing

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... ASIC has given AFCA written notice of at least 1 month of ASIC’s intention to issue the direction.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ASIC must not give a direction under this section unless...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... ASIC must not give a direction under this section unless...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ASIC must provide notice before issuing a direction
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: ASIC has given AFCA written notice of at least 1 month of ASIC’s intention to issue the direction.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... ASIC must not give a direction under this section unless...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: ASIC knows about the intention to issue a direction
modality: Epistemic
operator: KNOWS
premise text: ASIC has given AFCA written notice of at least 1 month of ASIC’s intention to issue the direction.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ... ASIC must not give a direction under this section unless...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Direction can only be issued after notice period
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: ASIC has given AFCA written notice of at least 1 month of ASIC’s intention to issue the direction.

1052C General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1052C(1) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(2) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(3) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(4) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(5) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(6) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(7) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(8) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(9) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(10) General directions to AFCA
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c
schema version: 2

1052C(1) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
note: ASIC may give AFCA a specified direction if it considers non-compliance with mandatory requirements or regulatory conditions.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to give direction
modality: Deontic
operator: may

1052C(10) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
note: ASIC may revoke a direction to AFCA with written notice if it is no longer necessary or appropriate.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-10-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-10
schema version: 2
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Revoke a direction to AFCA
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
premise text: ASIC considers that the direction is no longer necessary or appropriate.

1052C(2) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
description: (a) the specific measures that the direction will require AFCA to take to comply with the requirements or condition; (b) the reasons for ASIC’s intention to give the direction.
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
note: Notice must set out specific measures and reasons for direction.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal interval for notice
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires notice to be given
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

1052C(3) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
note: ASIC may give AFCA direction with reasons.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to direct AFCA.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

1052C(4) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
note: The direction must deal with the time by which, or the period during which, it is to be complied with.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must deal with time by which or period during which
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1052C(4) General directions to AFCA

1052C(5) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
note: A direction made under this section is not a legislative instrument.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-5-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: (5) A direction made under this section is not a legislative instrument.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1052C(5) General directions to AFCA

1052C(6) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
note: AFCA must comply with a direction made under this section.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-6-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (6) AFCA must comply with a direction made under this section.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1052C(6) General directions to AFCA

1052C(7) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
note: ASIC may apply to the Court for an order that AFCA comply with the direction.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-7-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: ASIC has an obligation to apply to the Court for an order.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

1052C(8) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
note: ASIC may vary a direction made under this section by giving written notice to AFCA.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-8-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AFCA must receive written notice
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: ASIC may vary a direction made under this section

1052C(9) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
note: ASIC can revoke the direction by giving written notice to AFCA.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA

1052D Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.19
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1052D(1) Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
has part: 1052D(2) Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
has part: 1052D(3) Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052d
schema version: 2

1052D(1) Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.19
note: ASIC must approve material changes to the AFCA scheme.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1052D Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

1052D(2) Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.19
note: Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1052D Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by ASIC
modality: Deontic
operator: May

1052D(3) Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.19
note: Consideration of material changes to the AFCA scheme
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 1052D Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme

1052E Referring matters to appropriate authorities
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1052E(1) Referring matters to appropriate authorities
has part: 1052E(2) Referring matters to appropriate authorities
has part: 1052E(3) Referring matters to appropriate authorities
has part: 1052E(4) Referring matters to appropriate authorities
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052e
schema version: 2

1052E(1) Referring matters to appropriate authorities
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.20
note: Provide particulars of contravention, breach, refusal or failure to one or more authorities.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1052E Referring matters to appropriate authorities

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide particulars.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

1052E(2) Referring matters to appropriate authorities
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.20
note: Must provide particulars of contravention, refusal or failure to the Minister administering the relevant Act.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1052E Referring matters to appropriate authorities

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide particulars.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

1052E(3) Referring matters to appropriate authorities
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.20
note: AFCA may refer systemic issues to APRA, ASIC or the Commissioner of Taxation.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 1052E Referring matters to appropriate authorities

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to refer systemic issues
modality: Deontic
operator: may

1052E(4) Referring matters to appropriate authorities
type: Concept
description: true
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.20
note: Must provide particulars of systemic issue to one or more authorities.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 1052E Referring matters to appropriate authorities

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide particulars of systemic issue.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

1053 When complaints relating to superannuation can be made
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.21
note: A person may make a complaint relating to superannuation under the AFCA scheme.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1053-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1053-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1053
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1053-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1053-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1053 When complaints relating to superannuation can be made

1053A Persons taken to be members of regulated superannuation
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.24
note: Persons taken to be members of regulated superannuation
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1053a-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1053a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1053a
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1053a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Persons taken to be members of regulated superannuation
modality: Deontic
operator: Right

1054 Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.24
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1054(1) Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint
has part: 1054(2) Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint
has part: 1054(3) Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054
schema version: 2

1054(1) Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.24
note: AFCA may join certain persons as parties to a superannuation complaint.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1054 Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: AFCA has the power to join parties.
modality: Deontic
operator: May

1054(2) Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.24
note: AFCA must give written notice to new and existing parties after deciding a person should be a party to the complaint.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1054 Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

1054(3) Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.24
note: AFCA must give written notice of decision and reasons to a person who should not be a party to the complaint.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 1054 Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

1054A Power to obtain information and documents
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.25
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1054A(1) Power to obtain information and documents
has part: 1054A(2) Power to obtain information and documents
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054a
schema version: 2

1054A(1) Power to obtain information and documents
type: Concept
description: true
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.25
note: Require person to provide information or documents
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054a-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1054A Power to obtain information and documents

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory provision of information
modality: Deontic
operator: require

1054A(2) Power to obtain information and documents
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.25
note: AFCA may take possession of documents
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054a-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1054A Power to obtain information and documents

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to take possession
modality: Deontic
operator: may

1054B Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.26
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1054B(1) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
has part: 1054B(2) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
has part: 1054B(3) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
has part: 1054B(4) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054b
schema version: 2

1054B(1) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.26
note: Require attendance at conciliation conferences
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1054B Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Conference timing is relevant
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Conferences held during a period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: presence at conference would be conducive to settling complaint

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Party or other person must attend
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to attend
modality: Deontic
operator: require
premise text: AFCA thinks it desirable

1054B(2) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.26
note: Must fix date, time and place for conference.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1054B Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to fix date, time and place.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1054B(2) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences

1054B(3) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.26
note: AFCA may deal with the complaint as if it had been withdrawn by the complainant.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 1054B Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: AFCA may deal with the complaint
modality: Deontic
operator: may

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1054B(3) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences

1054B(4) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.26
note: Failure to attend conciliation conference is an offence.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 1054B Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Failure to comply is an offence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to attend conciliation conference
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Section 1054B(4)

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1054B(4) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences

1054BA Power to give directions
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1054BA(1) Power to give directions
has part: 1054BA(2) Power to give directions
has part: 1054BA(3) Power to give directions
has part: 1054BA(4) Power to give directions
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054ba
schema version: 2

1054BA(1) Power to give directions
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27
note: Directions to prohibit or restrict disclosure of documents or information relating to a complaint.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1054BA Power to give directions

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Directs prohibition of disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

1054BA(2) Power to give directions
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27
note: Must consider parties' wishes and privacy when giving directions.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1054BA Power to give directions

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must consider parties' wishes and privacy.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

1054BA(3) Power to give directions
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27
note: Directions may be made in writing or orally.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 1054BA Power to give directions

1054BA(4) Power to give directions
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27
note: Must comply with direction under section.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 1054BA Power to give directions

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1054BA(4) Power to give directions

1054C Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1054C(1) Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
has part: 1054C(2) Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
has part: 1054C(3) Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054c
schema version: 2

1054C(1) Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27
note: AFCA may refer a question of law to the Federal Court.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1054C Reference of questions of law to Federal Court

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to refer a question of law.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

1054C(2) Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27
note: Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it under this section.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1054C Reference of questions of law to Federal Court

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court has jurisdiction during the period specified in this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The Federal Court has jurisdiction during the period specified in this section.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (2) The Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it under this section.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This provision is part of Section 1054C(2).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: This provision is part of Section 1054C(2).
modality: CogAI
operator: hasPartOf
premise text: (2) The Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it under this section.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law.
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
premise text: (2) The Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it under this section.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court's jurisdiction is diffused to the courts below during the period specified in this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The Federal Court's jurisdiction is diffused to the courts below during the period specified in this section.
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
premise text: (2) The Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it under this section.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court has jurisdiction during the period specified in this section.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The Federal Court has jurisdiction during the period specified in this section.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (2) The Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it under this section.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1054C(2) Reference of questions of law to Federal Court

1054C(3) Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27
note: AFCA must not refer to the Federal Court
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 1054C Reference of questions of law to Federal Court

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AFCA must not refer to the Federal Court
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

1055 Making a determination
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.28
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1055(1) Making a determination
has part: 1055(2) Making a determination
has part: 1055(3) Making a determination
has part: 1055(4) Making a determination
has part: 1055(5) Making a determination
has part: 1055(6) Making a determination
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055
schema version: 2

1055(1) Making a determination
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.28
note: Powers, obligations and discretions of trustee, insurer, RSA provider or other person who made a decision or engaged in conduct related to the complaint.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1055 Making a determination

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AFCA has powers, obligations and discretions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: AFCA has powers, obligations and discretions.
modality: Deontic
operator: has
premise text: (1) In making a determination of a superannuation complaint, AFCA has, subject to this section, all the powers, obligations and discretions that are conferred on the trustee, insurer, RSA provider or other person who:

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AFCA can affirm decisions or conduct.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: AFCA can affirm decisions or conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: affirming
premise text: Affirming decisions or conduct

1055(2) Making a determination
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.28
note: AFCA must affirm a decision or conduct if satisfied it is fair and reasonable.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1055 Making a determination

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: AFCA's satisfaction with fairness and reasonableness is tied to a temporal interval.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) AFCA must affirm a decision or conduct (except a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit) if AFCA is satisfied that:

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: AFCA's satisfaction with fairness and reasonableness involves cognitive processes.
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
premise text: (2) AFCA must affirm a decision or conduct (except a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit) if AFCA is satisfied that:

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: AFCA must affirm a decision or conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: AFCA's satisfaction with fairness and reasonableness diffuses through the system.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (2) AFCA must affirm a decision or conduct (except a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit) if AFCA is satisfied that:

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: AFCA's satisfaction with fairness and reasonableness forms a recurring trace.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (2) AFCA must affirm a decision or conduct (except a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit) if AFCA is satisfied that:

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1055(2) Making a determination

1055(3) Making a determination
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.28
note: AFCA must affirm a decision if it is fair and reasonable in all circumstances.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 1055 Making a determination

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision must be made while the death benefit is being paid.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Decision must be made while the death benefit is being paid.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (3) AFCA must affirm a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit if AFCA is satisfied that...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AFCA must affirm a decision.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: AFCA must affirm a decision.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (3) AFCA must affirm a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit if AFCA is satisfied that...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision must be fair and reasonable in all circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Decision must be fair and reasonable in all circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (3) AFCA must affirm a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit if AFCA is satisfied that...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AFCA must vary decisions or conduct if it is not fair and reasonable in all circumstances.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: AFCA must vary decisions or conduct if it is not fair and reasonable in all circumstances.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (3) AFCA must affirm a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit if AFCA is satisfied that...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Decision must be made until the death benefit is no longer payable.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Decision must be made until the death benefit is no longer payable.
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (3) AFCA must affirm a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit if AFCA is satisfied that...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1055(3) Making a determination

1055(4) Making a determination
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.28
note: AFCA may take actions to place a complainant in a position where unfairness or unreasonableness no longer exists.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 1055 Making a determination

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AFCA must take actions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to take actions
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: AFCA has the power to act

1055(5) Making a determination
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.28
note: AFCA may take actions to place complainant in a position where unfairness/unreasonableness no longer exists.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-5-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 1055 Making a determination

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: AFCA has an obligation to take actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

1055(6) Making a determination
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.28
note: AFCA may vary or set aside a decision, and require repayment of money received under the life policy.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-6-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 1055 Making a determination

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: AFCA may do something
modality: Deontic
operator: may

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: AFCA requires repayment of money
modality: Deontic
operator: require

1055A AFCA to give reasons
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.30
note: AFCA must provide written reasons for its determination of a superannuation complaint.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055a-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055a
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: AFCA must provide written reasons
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

1055B Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1055B(1) Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
has part: 1055B(2) Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
has part: 1055B(3) Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055b
schema version: 2

1055B(1) Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.30
note: Determination of superannuation complaint comes into operation immediately upon making.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1055B Operation of determination of superannuation complaint

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The determination occurs during the making of the determination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Occurs during the making of a determination.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (2), a determination of a superannuation complaint by AFCA comes into operation immediately upon the making of the determination.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The determination spreads through the implementation of the determination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Spreads through the implementation of the determination.
modality: CogAI
operator: through
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (2), a determination of a superannuation complaint by AFCA comes into operation immediately upon the making of the determination.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The state is obligated to implement the determination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (2), a determination of a superannuation complaint by AFCA comes into operation immediately upon the making of the determination.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The determination spreads through the implementation of the determination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads through the implementation of the determination.
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (2), a determination of a superannuation complaint by AFCA comes into operation immediately upon the making of the determination.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The determination occurs during the making of the determination.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Occurs during the making of a determination.
modality: LTL
operator: during
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (2), a determination of a superannuation complaint by AFCA comes into operation immediately upon the making of the determination.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1055B(1) Operation of determination of superannuation complaint

1055B(2) Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.30
note: Determination may come into operation on a later date specified in the determination.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1055B Operation of determination of superannuation complaint

1055B(3) Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.30
note: Decision of another person is taken to be a decision of the other person for all purposes.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 1055B Operation of determination of superannuation complaint

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is, for all purposes (other than the making of a complaint about the decision)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Decision is taken to have effect on a specific date.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: on
premise text: (3) If, under subsection 1055(4) or (5), the determination varies a decision of another person...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is, for all purposes (other than the making of a complaint about the decision)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Decision is taken to be a decision of another person.
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
premise text: (3) If, under subsection 1055(4) or (5), the determination varies a decision of another person...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is, for all purposes (other than the making of a complaint about the decision)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Decision is taken to be a decision of another person.
modality: Deontic
operator: taken to be
premise text: (3) If, under subsection 1055(4) or (5), the determination varies a decision of another person...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...on and from the day on which the original decision has or had effect.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Decision has effect on and from the day on which the original decision has or had effect.
modality: Deontic
operator: has effect
premise text: ...unless AFCA otherwise orders, has effect...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...is, for all purposes (other than the making of a complaint about the decision)...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Decision is taken to have effect on a specific date.
modality: LTL
operator: on
premise text: (3) If, under subsection 1055(4) or (5), the determination varies a decision of another person...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1055B(3) Operation of determination of superannuation complaint

1055C Evidence of determination of superannuation complaint
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.31
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1055C(1) Evidence of determination of superannuation complaint
has part: 1055C(2) Evidence of determination of superannuation complaint
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055c
schema version: 2

1055C(1) Evidence of determination of superannuation complaint
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.31
note: Prima facie evidence of AFCA determination in proceedings
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055c-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1055C Evidence of determination of superannuation complaint

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide prima facie evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1055C(1) Evidence of determination of superannuation complaint

1055C(2) Evidence of determination of superannuation complaint
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.31
note: Does not affect other methods for proof of determinations of AFCA
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055c-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1055C Evidence of determination of superannuation complaint

1055D Compliance with determinations under the AFCA scheme
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.31
note: Must comply with any determination made in respect of the person by AFCA.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055d
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must comply with any determination made in respect of the person by AFCA.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between complaint and determination
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (a) a superannuation complaint has been made concerning a disability benefit (whether under a contract of insurance or otherwise);

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must comply with any determination made in respect of the person by AFCA.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: AFCA joins the person under subsection 1054(1) as a party to the complaint.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must comply with any determination made in respect of the person by AFCA.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with determination
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (c) AFCA joins the person under subsection 1054(1) as a party to the complaint;

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must comply with any determination made in respect of the person by AFCA.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval between complaint and commencement
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: (a) a superannuation complaint has been made concerning a disability benefit (whether under a contract of insurance or otherwise);

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1055D Compliance with determinations under the AFCA scheme

1056 When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.32
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1056(1) When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
has part: 1056(2) When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
has part: 1056(3) When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1056
schema version: 2

1056(1) When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.32
note: Cannot make a superannuation complaint under AFCA scheme unless interest in death benefit exists.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1056 When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision restricts the action to those with an interest in death benefit within a certain time frame.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Restricts the time period for making a superannuation complaint.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Restriction
premise text: (1) A person cannot make a superannuation complaint...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A person cannot make a superannuation complaint...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making a superannuation complaint under AFCA scheme.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) A person cannot make a superannuation complaint...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision restricts the action to those with an interest in death benefit.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Restricts making a superannuation complaint under AFCA scheme to those with an interest in death benefit.
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
premise text: (1) A person cannot make a superannuation complaint...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision justifies the action as prohibited by stating the condition.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Justifies the prohibition by stating the condition for making a superannuation complaint.
modality: Deontic
operator: Justification
premise text: (1) A person cannot make a superannuation complaint...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The provision restricts the action to those with an interest in death benefit within a certain time frame.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Restricts the time period for making a superannuation complaint.
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Restriction
premise text: (1) A person cannot make a superannuation complaint...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1056(1) When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to

1056(2) When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.32
note: Cannot make a superannuation complaint under AFCA scheme in certain circumstances.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1056-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1056 When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making a complaint under AFCA scheme
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) A person cannot make a superannuation complaint...

1056(3) When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.32
note: Person cannot make a superannuation complaint unless AFCA is satisfied that person has an interest in the death benefit and it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 1056 When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person cannot make a superannuation complaint unless AFCA is satisfied that it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Notices must be given within a reasonable timeframe.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
premise text: It was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person cannot make a superannuation complaint unless AFCA is satisfied that person has an interest in the death benefit and it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Person has an obligation to make a superannuation complaint.
modality: Deontic
operator: can
premise text: AFCA is satisfied that person has an interest in the death benefit and it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person cannot make a superannuation complaint unless AFCA is satisfied that it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Decision-maker must give person notices within a reasonable timeframe.
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeGiven
premise text: It was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person cannot make a superannuation complaint unless AFCA is satisfied that person has an interest in the death benefit and it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Person cannot make a superannuation complaint unless AFCA is satisfied that person has an interest in the death benefit and it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
modality: Deontic
operator: cannotMakeComplaint
premise text: AFCA is satisfied that person has an interest in the death benefit and it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Person cannot make a superannuation complaint unless AFCA is satisfied that it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Decision-maker must give person notices within a reasonable timeframe.
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeGivenNotices
premise text: It was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1056(3) When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to

1056A Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.33
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1056A(1) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
has part: 1056A(2) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
has part: 1056A(3) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1056a
schema version: 2

1056A(1) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
type: Concept
description: Notice
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.33
note: Notice to be given to persons with an interest in death benefit
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1056A Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Timeframe for notice to be given
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: within 28 days after being so notified

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Notice must be given
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1056A(1) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit

1056A(2) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
type: Concept
description: Notice with complaint details and application period
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.33
note: Notice must be given to a person under subsection (1) with specific details about the complaint.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1056A Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1056A(2) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit

1056A(3) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.33
note: A person may be joined as a party to the complaint under section 1054.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 1056A Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May be joined as a party
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1056A(3) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit

1057 Appeals to the Federal Court from determination of
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.33
note: Party may appeal to Federal Court from AFCA's determination on a question of law.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1057
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: may

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1057 Appeals to the Federal Court from determination of

1057A Operation and implementation of determination that is
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.34
curation status: Proposed
has part: 1057A(1) Operation and implementation of determination that is
has part: 1057A(2) Operation and implementation of determination that is
has part: 1057A(3) Operation and implementation of determination that is
has part: 1057A(4) Operation and implementation of determination that is
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1057a
schema version: 2

1057A(1) Operation and implementation of determination that is
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.34
note: Operation of determination unaffected by appeal
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 1057A Operation and implementation of determination that is

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Determination operation continues despite appeal
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
premise text: (1) Subject to this section, the institution of an appeal...

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1057A(1) Operation and implementation of determination that is

1057A(2) Operation and implementation of determination that is
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.34
note: Court may make order staying or affecting operation of determination
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 1057A Operation and implementation of determination that is

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order and determination overlap in time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Court's order overlaps with determination
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: Court makes order staying or affecting operation of determination

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order staying or affecting operation of determination
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court prohibits certain actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Court has authority to make orders

1057A(3) Operation and implementation of determination that is
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.34
note: May vary or revoke an existing order under subsection (2)
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 1057A Operation and implementation of determination that is

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permissive obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

1057A(4) Operation and implementation of determination that is
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.34
note: Order subject to conditions and has effect until decision on appeal.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 1057A Operation and implementation of determination that is

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Order is subject to conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

1057B Sending of documents to, and disclosure of documents by, the
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.35
note: AFCA must send documents to the Federal Court and return them after a proceeding.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057b-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1057b
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Federal Court must receive documents
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to send documents
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: AFCA must send documents

1058 Secrecy
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.35
note: Disclose information to anyone
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1058-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1058-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1058
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1058-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Staff member must not disclose information
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not
premise text: Staff member has an obligation to keep information secret

11 After paragraph (hb) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.39
note: Insertions into determinations under AFCA scheme
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-11-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inserts determinations
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 After paragraph (hb) of Schedule 1

12 Subsection 57(2) (note)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.39
note: A person affected by the outcome of reconsideration may make a complaint under specific schemes.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-12-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 12 Subsection 57(2) (note)

13 After paragraph 56(5)(a)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.39
note: Conditional commencement of AFCA scheme
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
schema version: 2

14 Before subparagraph 127(4)(aa)(ii)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.40
note: Operator of AFCA scheme must be inserted
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-14-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to insert operator
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 Before subparagraph 127(4)(aa)(ii)

14AB When complaints can no longer be made
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.49
curation status: Proposed
has part: 14AB(1) When complaints can no longer be made
has part: 14AB(2) When complaints can no longer be made
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14ab
schema version: 2

14AB(1) When complaints can no longer be made
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.49
note: Complaints cannot be made after a certain date.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-14ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-14ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 14AB When complaints can no longer be made

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-14ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits making complaints
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

14AB(2) When complaints can no longer be made
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.49
note: This section has effect despite any other provision of this Part.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-14ab-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 14AB When complaints can no longer be made

15 Section 292-330 (note)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.40
note: Complaint procedure under AFCA scheme and Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
schema version: 2

16 Subsection 95(1A)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.40
note: ASIC may tell RSA provider that ASIC proposes to conduct an investigation.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-ltl-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-cogai-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-shacl-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-n3logic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-cogai-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: RSA provider is classified as a non-compliant entity if they refuse or fail to give effect to determinations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of RSA providers as entities that refuse or fail to give effect to determinations.
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Classification
premise text: ASIC proposes to conduct an investigation.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: RSA provider must not refuse or fail to give effect to determinations.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of RSA provider's refusal or failure to give effect to determinations.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: ASIC proposes to conduct an investigation.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: RSA provider's refusal or failure to give effect to determinations is a recurring issue.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of RSA providers' refusal or failure to give effect to determinations.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: ASIC proposes to conduct an investigation.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: RSA provider's refusal or failure to give effect to determinations is aligned with ontology.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
logic summary: Alignment of RSA providers' refusal or failure to give effect to determinations with ontology.
modality: N3Logic
operator: Ontology Alignment
premise text: ASIC proposes to conduct an investigation.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: RSA provider's refusal or failure to give effect to determinations is invalid according to schema.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validation of RSA providers' refusal or failure to give effect to determinations against schema.
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
premise text: ASIC proposes to conduct an investigation.

17 Subsection 163(12) (paragraph (a) of the definition of do
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.41
note: Insertion of a term into the definition of 'Superannuation Complaints Tribunal'
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-17-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion into a definition
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17 Subsection 163(12) (paragraph (a) of the definition of do

18 Subsection 163(12) (at the end of paragraph (b) of the
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.41
note: Add ‘, or a determination made under that scheme’ to the definition of do an act or thing.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-18-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-18-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-18-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Updated definition with added condition.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Extending the temporal interval of the definition.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Extension
premise text: Definition of do an act or thing.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Updated definition with added condition.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adding a condition to a definition.
modality: Deontic
operator: Addition
premise text: Definition of do an act or thing.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 18 Subsection 163(12) (at the end of paragraph (b) of the

19 Subsection 24(3) (note)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.41
note: Member may make a complaint under AFCA scheme or section 15CA of Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-19-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-19-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-19-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Member may make a complaint
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Member has a right to make a complaint
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: None

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-19-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Member must know about the complaint process
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Member must be aware of the complaint process
modality: Epistemic
operator: must know
premise text: None

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-19-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Member can make a complaint
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Member can make a complaint under AFCA scheme or section 15CA of Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
modality: LTL
operator: can make a complaint
premise text: None

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19 Subsection 24(3) (note)

2 After Part 7.10
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.12
note: Insert clause
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
schema version: 2

20 Subsection 10(1)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.42
note: Defines AFCA scheme as same meaning as in Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act 2001.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
schema version: 2

21 After paragraph 58(2)(f)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.42
note: Insert a direction given under the AFCA scheme.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-21-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21 After paragraph 58(2)(f)

22 After subsection 58(2)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.42
curation status: Proposed
has part: 22(2A) After subsection 58(2)
has part: 22(2B) After subsection 58(2)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
schema version: 2

22(2A) After subsection 58(2)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.42
note: Clarifies application of paragraph (2)(fa) to requirements under the AFCA scheme.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 22 After subsection 58(2)

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: paragraph (2)(fa) applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Clarifies application of paragraph (2)(fa)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: apply
premise text: (2A) To avoid doubt, paragraph (2)(fa) applies in relation to any requirement imposed under the AFCA scheme.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: paragraph (2)(fa) applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Clarifies application of paragraph (2)(fa)
modality: CogAI
operator: apply
premise text: (2A) To avoid doubt, paragraph (2)(fa) applies in relation to any requirement imposed under the AFCA scheme.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: paragraph (2)(fa) applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Clarifies application of paragraph (2)(fa)
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
premise text: (2A) To avoid doubt, paragraph (2)(fa) applies in relation to any requirement imposed under the AFCA scheme.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: paragraph (2)(fa) applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Clarifies application of paragraph (2)(fa)
modality: Diffusion
operator: apply
premise text: (2A) To avoid doubt, paragraph (2)(fa) applies in relation to any requirement imposed under the AFCA scheme.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: paragraph (2)(fa) applies
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Clarifies application of paragraph (2)(fa)
modality: LinearLogic
operator: apply
premise text: (2A) To avoid doubt, paragraph (2)(fa) applies in relation to any requirement imposed under the AFCA scheme.

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22(2A) After subsection 58(2)

22(2B) After subsection 58(2)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.42
note: Does not affect the meaning of certain paragraphs in subsection (2) other than paragraph (2)(fa)
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2b-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 22 After subsection 58(2)

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: does not affect
premise text: (2A)

23 After paragraph 263(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.42
note: Refusal to give effect to AFCA scheme determination
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-23-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Refusal to give effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Determination made under AFCA scheme

24 Subsection 315(12) (paragraph (a) of the definition of do
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.42
note: Insertion of 'or made under the AFCA scheme' after Superannuation Complaints Tribunal
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-24-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to insert text
modality: Deontic
operator: Insertion

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24 Subsection 315(12) (paragraph (a) of the definition of do

245 Operator of approved external dispute resolution scheme or
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.45
note: ASIC may receive information from an AFCA scheme
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-245-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-245
schema version: 2

245 Operator of AFCA scheme may give information to ASIC
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.53
note: May give information to ASIC
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-245-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-245-2
schema version: 2

25 Subsection 315(12) (at the end of paragraph (b) of the
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.43
note: Add ‘, or a determination made under that scheme’ to the definition of do an act or thing.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-25-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adding a clause to a definition.
modality: Deontic
operator: Addition

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25 Subsection 315(12) (at the end of paragraph (b) of the

26 Subsection 133-120(2) in Schedule 1 (note)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.43
note: Dissatisfied person may make complaint under AFCA scheme or Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-logic-argumentation-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Dissatisfied person may make complaint if certain conditions met
modality: Argumentation
operator: If-then

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make complaint
modality: Deontic
operator: May

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Complaint under AFCA scheme or Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
modality: Epistemic
operator: Under

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Timeframe for complaint under AFCA scheme
modality: LTL
operator: Within
premise text: authorisation of the scheme comes into force

27 Subsection 133-140(1) in Schedule 1 (note)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.43
note: Dissatisfied person may make complaint under AFCA scheme or Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-alleninterval-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Day on which complaints cannot be made because of section 14AB of Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
modality: AllenInterval
operator: On
premise text: Section 14AB of that Act

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Complaint under AFCA scheme or Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993, but not before authorisation comes into force
modality: Argumentation
operator: But

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make complaint
modality: Deontic
operator: May

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Complaint under AFCA scheme or Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
modality: Epistemic
operator: Under

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Timeframe for complaint under AFCA scheme
modality: LTL
operator: Within
premise text: AFCA scheme comes into force

28 Section 155-90 in Schedule 1 (note)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.43
note: Individual may make a complaint under AFCA scheme or Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-28-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-28-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a complaint
modality: Deontic
operator: may

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-28-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Complaint under AFCA scheme or Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
modality: Epistemic
operator: under

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-28-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28 Section 155-90 in Schedule 1 (note)

29 Subsection 355-65(3) in Schedule 1 (table item 3)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.44
note: Repeal item, substitute with Superannuation Complaints Tribunal or AFCA operator
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-29-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal item
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29 Subsection 355-65(3) in Schedule 1 (table item 3)

3 Schedule 3 (after table item 310)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.37
note: Penalty units for each day or part of a day in respect of which the offence is committed
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

30 Subsection 390-5(1) in Schedule 1 (note 2)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.44
note: Dissatisfied person may make complaint under AFCA scheme or Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-30-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-30-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to make complaint
modality: Deontic
operator: May

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-30-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Complaint process is understandable
modality: Epistemic
operator: Understandable

31 Application of amendments
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.44
note: Application of amendments
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
schema version: 2

32 At the end of subsection 912A(2)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.45
note: Membership of the AFCA scheme added to subsection 912A(2)
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-32-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adds membership of the AFCA scheme
modality: Deontic
operator: addition

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32 At the end of subsection 912A(2)

33 At the end of subsection 1017G(2)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.45
note: Membership of the AFCA scheme is added to subsection 1017G(2)
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-33-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adds membership of the AFCA scheme
modality: Deontic
operator: addition

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-33-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 33 At the end of subsection 1017G(2)

34 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.45
note: Defines AFCA scheme as same meaning as in Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act 2001.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-34-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
schema version: 2

35 Paragraphs 47(1)(i), 64(5)(c) and 65(6)(c)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.45
note: Insert 'and the AFCA scheme' after 'scheme'
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-35-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
schema version: 2

36 Section 245 (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.45
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-36-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
schema version: 2

37 Section 245
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.45
note: Insert 'or the AFCA scheme' after 'external dispute resolution scheme'
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-37-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

38 Subsection 204(1) of the National Credit Code
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.46
note: Defines AFCA scheme as equivalent to a specific term in the Corporations Act 2001.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-38-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
schema version: 2

39 Paragraph 12(1)(b) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.46
note: Insertion of AFCA scheme into external dispute resolution scheme
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-39-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
schema version: 2

4 At the end of subsection 38(2)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.37
note: Add dispute resolution to Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adds a new provision
modality: Deontic
operator: addition

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 At the end of subsection 38(2)

40 Subitem 16(1) of Schedule 2 (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.46
note: Obligation to be a member of an approved external dispute resolution scheme and the AFCA scheme
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-40-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-40-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40 Subitem 16(1) of Schedule 2 (heading)

41 Subitem 16(1) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.46
note: Insert 'and the AFCA scheme' after 'external dispute resolution scheme'
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-41-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41 Subitem 16(1) of Schedule 2

42 Before paragraph 47(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.46
note: Must be a member of the AFCA scheme
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-42-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 42 Before paragraph 47(1)(b)

43 Before paragraph 101(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.46
note: Must be a member of the AFCA scheme
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-43-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to be a member of the AFCA scheme
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43 Before paragraph 101(1)(b)

44 Application of amendments
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.47
note: Conditional commencement of amendments
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-44-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-44-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-44-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

45 Subsection 57(2) (note)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.48
note: Repeal note and substitute with new note allowing complaint under AFCA scheme.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-45-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to repeal note
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-45-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 45 Subsection 57(2) (note)

46 Section 292-330 (note)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.48
note: Complaint procedure under AFCA scheme for dissatisfied individuals
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-46-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AFCA scheme
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make a complaint
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 390-5 in Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-46-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 46 Section 292-330 (note)

47 Subparagraphs 113(2)(h)(ii), 126(2)(e)(ii), 127(2)(e)(ii),
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.48
note: Omit 'approved external dispute resolution scheme of which the licensee is a member' and substitute 'AFCA scheme'.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-47-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of approved external dispute resolution schemes.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

48 Paragraph 158(2)(h)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.48
note: Omit specific term and substitute with another.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-48-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Omit specific term and substitute with another.
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid

49 Subparagraph 160(3)(f)(ii)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.48
note: Omit 'approved external dispute resolution scheme of which the person is a member', substitute 'AFCA scheme'.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-49-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the person to omit the specified scheme.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

5 At the end of section 7A
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.37
note: Delegate functions or powers to Tribunal members
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-5-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to delegate
modality: Deontic
operator: may

50 Subparagraphs 72(4)(b)(iii), 88(3)(g)(i) and 94(2)(b)(i) of the
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.49
note: Omit specified external dispute resolution schemes and substitute with AFCA scheme.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-50-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Removal of external dispute resolution schemes
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit

51 Subparagraphs 177B(4)(b)(iii), 179D(2)(f)(i) and
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.49
note: Omit provision from National Credit Code
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-51-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting provision
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

52 Subsection 24(3) (note)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.49
note: Member may make a complaint under AFCA scheme about superannuation provider's decision.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-52-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: may

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-52-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 52 Subsection 24(3) (note)

53 After section 14AA
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.49
note: Insert clause
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-53-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
schema version: 2

54 Subsection 133-120(2) in Schedule 1 (note)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.50
note: Allow complaint under AFCA scheme if dissatisfied with notice.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-54-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-54-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission to complain under AFCA scheme.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-54-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Belief in right to complaint under AFCA scheme.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Believe

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-54-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54 Subsection 133-120(2) in Schedule 1 (note)

55 Subsection 133-140(1) in Schedule 1 (note)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.50
note: Allow complaint under AFCA scheme if dissatisfied with notice.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-55-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-55-logic-epistemic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission to complain under AFCA scheme.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-55-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Dissatisfaction with notice implies belief in need for complaint.
modality: Epistemic
operator: Believe

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-55-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 55 Subsection 133-140(1) in Schedule 1 (note)

56 Section 155-90 in Schedule 1 (note)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.50
note: Individual may make a complaint under AFCA scheme if dissatisfied with statement from superannuation provider.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-56-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-56-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-56-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make complaint
modality: Deontic
operator: may

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-56-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
logic summary: Knowledge of dissatisfaction
modality: Epistemic
operator: dissatisfied with

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-56-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal constraint on complaint
modality: LTL
operator: within

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-56-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 56 Section 155-90 in Schedule 1 (note)

57 Subsection 390-5(1) in Schedule 1 (note 2)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.50
note: Allow complaint under AFCA scheme if dissatisfied with statement given by superannuation provider.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-57-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission to make complaint under AFCA scheme.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-57-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57 Subsection 390-5(1) in Schedule 1 (note 2)

58 Application of amendments
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.50
note: Specifies the day on which amendments apply
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-58-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-58-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-58-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the day that is 12 months after the Part 3 application day
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines the start of the amendment application period
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <=
premise text: (3)

59 Paragraph 912A(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.52
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-59-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-59
schema version: 2

6 Subsection 59(1)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.38
note: Omit 'subsection 62(2)', substitute 'section 62'.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
schema version: 2

60 Subsection 912A(3)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.52
note: Omit specific clause.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-60-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-60
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of clause.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

61 Paragraph 1017G(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.52
note: Repeal paragraph
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-61-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-61
schema version: 2

62 Subsection 1017G(3)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.52
note: Omit specified phrase from National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-62-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-62
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: No omission allowed
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit specified phrase

63 Subsection 5(1) (definition of approved external dispute
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.52
note: Repeal definition of approved external dispute resolution scheme
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-63-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-63
schema version: 2

64 Section 11
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.52
note: Repeal a section
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-64-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals a section
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

65 Paragraphs 47(1)(i), 64(5)(c) and 65(6)(c)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.52
note: Omit specified phrases from approved external dispute resolution schemes.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-65-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-65
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

66 Section 245 (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.52
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-66-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-66
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute new text
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal and substitute
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Repeal heading

67 Section 245
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.53
note: Omit 'an approved external dispute resolution scheme or'
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-67-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-67
schema version: 2

68 Subsection 204(1) of the National Credit Code (definition
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.53
note: Repeal definition of approved external dispute resolution scheme
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-68-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
schema version: 2

69 Paragraph 12(1)(b) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.53
note: Omit specified text
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-69-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of approved external dispute resolution scheme and
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Approved external dispute resolution scheme

7 Section 61
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.38
note: Substitute section 62 for subsection 62(2)
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 Section 61

70 Subitem 16(1) of Schedule 2 (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.53
note: Repeal of heading and substitution with obligation to be a member of the AFCA scheme
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-70-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on legal persons to be members of the AFCA scheme
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-70-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 70 Subitem 16(1) of Schedule 2 (heading)

71 Subitem 16(1) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.53
note: Omit specified text.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-71-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of an approved external dispute resolution scheme and
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

72 Application of amendments
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.53
note: Conditional commencement of amendments
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-72-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
schema version: 2

8 Subsection 62(1)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.38
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 Subsection 62(2)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.38
note: Omit “(2)”
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
schema version: 2

1 After section 243B
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.55
note: Insert section
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Transitional provision for giving written reasons
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.59
note: Transitional provision for giving written reasons
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
schema version: 2

101 Dispute resolution systems
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.58
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-101-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-101
schema version: 2

11 Subsection 101(3) (definition of regulated superannuation
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.59
note: Repeal definition of regulated superannuation fund and substitute with new definition.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-11-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition.
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: New definition substitutes old one.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Substitute

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Subsection 101(3) (definition of regulated superannuation

2 Paragraph 912A(1)(g)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.55
note: Provide a dispute resolution system complying with subsection (2) and give ASIC the information specified in any instrument under subsection (2A)
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide a dispute resolution system
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Paragraph 912A(1)(g)

243C ASIC may publish internal dispute resolution data
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.55
curation status: Proposed
has part: 243C(1) ASIC may publish internal dispute resolution data
has part: 243C(2) ASIC may publish internal dispute resolution data
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-243c
schema version: 2

243C(1) ASIC may publish internal dispute resolution data
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.55
note: ASIC may publish internal dispute resolution data
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-243c-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-243c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-243c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 243C ASIC may publish internal dispute resolution data

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-243c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May publish
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY

243C(2) ASIC may publish internal dispute resolution data
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.55
note: Must publish internal dispute resolution data without personal information
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-243c-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-243c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-243c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 243C ASIC may publish internal dispute resolution data

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-243c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to publish internal dispute resolution data
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

3 After subsection 912A(2)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 3(2A) After subsection 912A(2)
has part: 3(2B) After subsection 912A(2)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

3(2A) After subsection 912A(2)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.56
note: Specify internal dispute resolution procedures and operation details to ASIC
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2a-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-2a
schema version: 2
part of: 3 After subsection 912A(2)

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

3(2B) After subsection 912A(2)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.56
note: No personal information may be specified in an instrument under subsection (2A)
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-cogai-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b
schema version: 2
part of: 3 After subsection 912A(2)

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2B) An instrument under subsection (2A) must not specify any information that is personal information within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988.

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Infers prohibition from relevant data
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
premise text: (2B) An instrument under subsection (2A) must not specify any information that is personal information within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988.

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits specifying personal information
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2B) An instrument under subsection (2A) must not specify any information that is personal information within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988.

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses prohibition to all relevant parties
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2B) An instrument under subsection (2A) must not specify any information that is personal information within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988.

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validates compliance with prohibition
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
premise text: (2B) An instrument under subsection (2A) must not specify any information that is personal information within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988.

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3(2B) After subsection 912A(2)

4 Subsection 1017G(1)
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.56
note: Mandatory dispute resolution system for issuers and regulated persons
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Subsection 1017G(1)

47 Dispute resolution systems
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.57
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-47-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-47
schema version: 2

5 After paragraph 47(1)(h)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.57
note: Provide information to ASIC as a financial services licensee
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

6 Section 47 (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.57
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
schema version: 2

7 Subsections 47(1) and (2)
type: Concept
description: Internal dispute resolution procedure, information to ASIC, written reasons for decisions
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.57
note: Must have an internal dispute resolution procedure, give information to ASIC, and provide written reasons for decisions.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-7-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

8 Section 101 (heading)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.58
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 Subsections 101(1) and (1A)
type: Concept
description: Internal dispute resolution procedure, written reasons for decisions
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.58
note: Trustees of regulated superannuation funds must have an internal dispute resolution procedure and provide certain information to ASIC.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to have an internal dispute resolution procedure
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9 Subsections 101(1) and (1A)

1 Short title
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
note: Establishment of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-2
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commencement on day of Royal Assent
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal commencement

1 The whole of the Act
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.60
note: Repeal of the Act
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-3
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal the Act
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Establishes the authority
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes

10 Section 16 (definition of Superannuation Complaints
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.62
note: Repeal definition of Superannuation Complaints Tribunal
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
schema version: 2

11 Paragraph 38(2)(n)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.62
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-11-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals a paragraph
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

12 Subsection 47(1) (note)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.62
note: Omit specified text and substitute with new text.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-12-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified text.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

13 Subsection 95(1A)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.62
note: ASIC may conduct an investigation if RSA provider refuses or fails to give effect to AFCA determination.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-13-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: RSA provider refuses or fails to give effect
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to conduct investigation
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: ASIC proposes to conduct an investigation

14 Subsection 163(12) (paragraph (a) of the definition of do
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.62
note: Omit 'made by the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal, or'
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-14-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-14
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'made by the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal, or'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

15 Subsection 163(12) (at the end of paragraph (b) of the
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.62
note: Omit specified phrase from definition.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-15-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-15
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

16 Section 184
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.62
note: Repeal section
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-16
schema version: 2

17 Subsection 155C(3) (paragraph (c) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.63
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute Division 3 of Part 7.10A of the Corporations Act 2001 or Superannuation Act 1990
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Subsection 49(3) (paragraph (c) of the definition of eligible
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.63
note: Repeal paragraph (c) of the definition of eligible regulatory law and substitute with Division 3 of Part 7.10A of the Corporations Act 2001 or Superannuation Act 2005.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-18
schema version: 2

19 Paragraph 46(1)(f)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.63
note: Repeal a paragraph.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-19
schema version: 2

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
note: Commencement rules
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2 Paragraph 29(1)(f)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-2-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-2-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-2-3
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-2-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal the specified paragraph
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

20 Subparagraph 6(1)(a)(iv)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.63
note: Omit sections 64A and 68A, substitute section 68A.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-20
schema version: 2

21 Subparagraph 6(1)(c)(i)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.63
note: Substitute section 68A
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-21-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-21
schema version: 2

22 Subsection 10(1) (definition of Superannuation
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.63
note: Repeal definition of Superannuation Complaints Tribunal
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-22
schema version: 2

23 Paragraph 58(2)(f)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.63
note: Repeal of Schedule 3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-23-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-23
schema version: 2

24 Section 64A
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.64
note: Repeal a section
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-24-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeals a section
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

25 Subsection 101(1) (note)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.64
note: Substitute words in a provision.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-25-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-25
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 25 Subsection 101(1) (note)

26 Paragraph 263(1)(c)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.64
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-26-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-26
schema version: 2

27 Subsection 315(12) (paragraph (a) of the definition of do
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.64
note: Omit 'made by the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal, or'
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-27-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-27
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'made by the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal, or'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

28 Subsection 315(12) (at the end of paragraph (b) of the
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.64
note: Omit 'directions of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal, or'
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-28-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-28
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting certain words
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit 'directions of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal, or'

29 Paragraph 337A(a)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.64
note: Insertion of 'former' before Superannuation Complaints Tribunal
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-29-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-29
schema version: 2

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
note: Commencement of Schedule 1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Schedules
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
note: Legislation in schedules is amended or repealed according to its terms.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-3-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-3-2
schema version: 2

3 Paragraph 12A(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-3-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-3-3
schema version: 2

30 Section 8 (definition of Superannuation Complaints
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.64
note: Repeal definition of Superannuation Complaints Tribunal
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-30
schema version: 2

31 Subsection 355-65(3) in Schedule 1 (table item 3)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.64
note: Operator of AFCA scheme must provide information for performing functions or exercising powers.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-31-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-31
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Operator must provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31 Subsection 355-65(3) in Schedule 1 (table item 3)

32 Existing determinations unaffected
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.66
note: Existing determinations unaffected by repeal or amendments
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-32-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-32
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Continues to apply despite changes
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
premise text: (1)

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32 Existing determinations unaffected

33 Transfer of records
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.66
note: Transfer of records from Superannuation Complaints Tribunal to Australian Securities and Investments Commission
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-33-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-33-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-33
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-33-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for transfer of records
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: (2) The records and documents are to be transferred to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission after that commencement.

34 Remittal of matters by the Federal Court
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.67
note: Remittal of matters by the Federal Court
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-34-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-34
schema version: 2

35 Transitional rules
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.67
note: The Minister may make rules prescribing matters of a transitional nature.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-35-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-35-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-35
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-35-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text supports a transitional provision.

4 Section 4
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
note: Immediate commencement after provisions covered by table item 7.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
schema version: 2

4 Review of operation of amendments
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
curation status: Proposed
has part: 4(1) Review of operation of amendments
has part: 4(2) Review of operation of amendments
has part: 4(3) Review of operation of amendments
has part: 4(4) Review of operation of amendments
has part: 4(5) Review of operation of amendments
has part: 4(6) Review of operation of amendments
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-2
schema version: 2

4(1) Review of operation of amendments
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
note: Independent review of amendments' operation after 18 months.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Review of operation of amendments

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to review amendments
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

4(2) Review of operation of amendments
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
note: Complaints must be resolved in a way that is fair, efficient, timely and independent.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Review of operation of amendments

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The review must consider the timeliness of complaint resolution
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Complaints must be resolved within a certain timeframe
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: The review must take into account feedback relating to whether their complaints were resolved in a way that was fair, efficient, timely and independent.

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The review must take into account feedback relating to whether their complaints were resolved in a way that was fair, efficient, timely and independent.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a fair resolution
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Complaints against members of the scheme are resolved in a way that is fair, efficient, timely and independent.

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The review must consider the timeliness of complaint resolution
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Complaints must be resolved within a certain timeframe
modality: LTL
operator: >=
premise text: The review must take into account feedback relating to whether their complaints were resolved in a way that was fair, efficient, timely and independent.

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4(2) Review of operation of amendments

4(3) Review of operation of amendments
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
note: Review of operation of amendments regarding limits on claims and remedies under the AFCA scheme.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Review of operation of amendments

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4(3) Review of operation of amendments

4(4) Review of operation of amendments
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
note: The Minister must prepare a written report about the review.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Review of operation of amendments

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Minister must prepare a written report.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a duty
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

4(5) Review of operation of amendments
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
note: Report must be tabled in each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Review of operation of amendments

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to table report
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

4(6) Review of operation of amendments
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
note: Review of operation of amendments
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 4 Review of operation of amendments

4 Subparagraph 127(4)(aa)(ii)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.61
note: Omit “or”.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-3
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of ‘or’.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

5 March 2018
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
schema version: 2

5 Section 5
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-5-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5-2
schema version: 2

5 March 2022
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
note: Note on table limitations
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-5-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5-3
schema version: 2

5 Subparagraph 127(4)(aa)(iii)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal a subparagraph
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-5-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-5-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5-4
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-5-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the repeal of a subparagraph
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

5 Mar 2018
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.71
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 3 on 5 Mar 2022
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-5-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5-5
schema version: 2

6 March 2018
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
schema version: 2

6 March 2018
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-2
schema version: 2

6 March 2018
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-3
schema version: 2

6 March 2018
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-4
schema version: 2

6 Section 6
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
note: Immediate commencement after provisions covered by table item 2.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-5
schema version: 2

6 March 2018
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-6
schema version: 2

6 March 2018
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
note: Commencement information for the Act
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-7
schema version: 2

6 Section 129C
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal section
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-8-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-8
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal the section
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

7 Section 7
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
note: Schedule 2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
schema version: 2

7 Division 3A of Part 7
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal Division 3A of Part 7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-7-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-7-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7-2
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-7-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Temporal interval for repeal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Identifies temporal interval for repeal
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Repeal Division 3A of Part 7

8 Section 8
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
note: Commencement provision for provisions not commenced within 4 years
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-8-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
schema version: 2

8 Subparagraph 3(1)(c)(iii)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.61
note: Repeal a subparagraph
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-8-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8-2
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commence on the day after the end of that period
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Conditional commencement provision
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
premise text: Provisions not commenced within 4 years

9 Paragraph 3(2)(d)
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.62
note: Substitute section number in paragraph.
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-9-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
schema version: 2

9 Aug 2022
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.71
note: Amendment history for Treasury Laws Amendment (Putting Consumers First—Establishment of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority) Act 2018
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-9-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9-2
schema version: 2

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace text with new value.
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBST

10 August 2022
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.1
note: Includes amendments up to Act No. 35, 2022
asserts: c2022c00235-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-10
schema version: 2

25 August 2022
type: Concept
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
asserts: c2022c00235-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-25
schema version: 2

Treasury Laws Amendment (Putting Consumers First—Establishment of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority) Act 2018
type: Document
date: 10 August 2022
identifier: No. 13 of 2018
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU