Treasury Laws Amendment (Putting Consumers First—Establishment of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority) Act 2018
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 13 of 2018
date: 10 August 2022
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

10 August 2022
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
note: Includes amendments up to Act No. 35, 2022
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.1
asserts: c2022c00235-sec-10-norm

25 August 2022
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.1
asserts: c2022c00235-sec-25-norm

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
note: Establishment of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establishes
logic summary: Establishes the authority
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
note: Commencement rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-2
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: Temporal commencement
conclusion text: Commencement on day of Royal Assent
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 March 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-5-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2-2
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-2-2-norm

6 March 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
note: Commencement of Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-3-norm

6 March 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-2-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
note: Immediate commencement after provisions covered by table item 7.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-norm

6 March 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-3-norm

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5-2
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-5-2-norm

6 March 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-4-norm

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-5
note: Immediate commencement after provisions covered by table item 2.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-5-norm

6 March 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-6-norm

7 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
note: Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-7-norm

6 March 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-7
note: Commencement information for the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.7
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-7-norm

8 Section 8
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
note: Commencement provision for provisions not commenced within 4 years
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-8-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: if-then
logic summary: Conditional commencement provision
premise text: Provisions not commenced within 4 years
conclusion text: Commence on the day after the end of that period
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 March 2022
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5-3
note: Note on table limitations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-5-3-norm

3 Schedules
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3-2
note: Legislation in schedules is amended or repealed according to its terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-3-2-norm

4 Review of operation of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-2
has part: 4(1) Review of operation of amendments
has part: 4(2) Review of operation of amendments
has part: 4(3) Review of operation of amendments
has part: 4(4) Review of operation of amendments
has part: 4(5) Review of operation of amendments
has part: 4(6) Review of operation of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8

4(1) Review of operation of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-1
part of: 4 Review of operation of amendments
note: Independent review of amendments' operation after 18 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to review amendments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(2) Review of operation of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2
part of: 4 Review of operation of amendments
note: Complaints must be resolved in a way that is fair, efficient, timely and independent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4(2) Review of operation of amendments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide a fair resolution
premise text: Complaints against members of the scheme are resolved in a way that is fair, efficient, timely and independent.
conclusion text: The review must take into account feedback relating to whether their complaints were resolved in a way that was fair, efficient, timely and independent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Complaints must be resolved within a certain timeframe
premise text: The review must take into account feedback relating to whether their complaints were resolved in a way that was fair, efficient, timely and independent.
conclusion text: The review must consider the timeliness of complaint resolution
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Complaints must be resolved within a certain timeframe
premise text: The review must take into account feedback relating to whether their complaints were resolved in a way that was fair, efficient, timely and independent.
conclusion text: The review must consider the timeliness of complaint resolution
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(3) Review of operation of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-3
part of: 4 Review of operation of amendments
note: Review of operation of amendments regarding limits on claims and remedies under the AFCA scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4(3) Review of operation of amendments
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(4) Review of operation of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-4
part of: 4 Review of operation of amendments
note: The Minister must prepare a written report about the review.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty
conclusion text: The Minister must prepare a written report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(5) Review of operation of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-5
part of: 4 Review of operation of amendments
note: Report must be tabled in each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-5-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to table report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4(6) Review of operation of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-6
part of: 4 Review of operation of amendments
note: Review of operation of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.8
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-2-ss-6-norm

1 Section 761A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Definition of AFCA scheme and staff member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.10
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Section 761A
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Definition of AFCA scheme and staff member
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for definitions
premise text: AFCA scheme is defined as the external dispute resolution scheme for which an authorisation under Part 7.10A is in force.
conclusion text: AFCA scheme has a specific definition
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Class hierarchy for staff members
premise text: AFCA staff member is defined as a director, officer or employee of AFCA or a person engaged as a consultant to, or to perform services for, AFCA.
conclusion text: Staff members have specific definitions
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 After Part 7.10
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-2-norm

1050 Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1050
has part: 1050(1) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
has part: 1050(2) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
has part: 1050(3) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
has part: 1050(4) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
has part: 1050(5) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.12

1050(1) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1050-ss-1
part of: 1050 Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
note: Authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: authorise
logic summary: Grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1050(2) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2
part of: 1050 Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
note: Minister must consider general considerations and other relevant matters when authorizing an external dispute resolution scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-logic-ltl-4

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must consider general considerations and other relevant matters.
premise text: General considerations for an external dispute resolution scheme under section 1051A.
conclusion text: Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Minister may take into account other relevant matters.
premise text: Other matter the Minister considers relevant.
conclusion text: Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Minister's consideration period is between general considerations and other relevant matters.
premise text: General considerations for an external dispute resolution scheme under section 1051A.
conclusion text: Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: Minister's consideration is recursive with general considerations and other relevant matters.
premise text: General considerations for an external dispute resolution scheme under section 1051A.
conclusion text: Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

1050(3) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3
part of: 1050 Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
note: No authorisation of another external dispute resolution scheme can be in force while this one is.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 1050(3) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No authorisation can be in force while another one is.
premise text: (3) An authorisation of an external dispute resolution scheme must not come into force...
conclusion text: An authorisation of another external dispute resolution scheme cannot be in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: This provision overlaps with other provisions regulating external dispute resolution schemes.
premise text: (3) An authorisation of an external dispute resolution scheme must not come into force...
conclusion text: This provision overlaps with other provisions regulating external dispute resolution schemes.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: This provision overlaps with other provisions regulating external dispute resolution schemes.
premise text: (3) An authorisation of an external dispute resolution scheme must not come into force...
conclusion text: This provision overlaps with other provisions regulating external dispute resolution schemes.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: This provision is part of a diffusion of regulations regarding external dispute resolution schemes.
premise text: (3) An authorisation of an external dispute resolution scheme must not come into force...
conclusion text: This provision is part of the diffusion of regulations regarding external dispute resolution schemes.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: This provision overlaps with other provisions regulating artificial intelligence in external dispute resolution schemes.
premise text: (3) An authorisation of an external dispute resolution scheme must not come into force...
conclusion text: This provision overlaps with other provisions regulating artificial intelligence in external dispute resolution schemes.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1050(4) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1050-ss-4
part of: 1050 Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
note: Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-4-norm

1050(5) Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1050-ss-5
part of: 1050 Minister may authorise an external dispute resolution scheme
note: Specify day authorisation comes into force and conditions
description: (a) must specify the day the authorisation, variation or revocation comes into force; (b) may specify, vary or revoke conditions relating to the authorisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.12
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-5-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-5-logic-deontic-2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify day authorisation comes into force
premise text: (a) must specify the day the authorisation, variation or revocation comes into force;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1050-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Specify conditions relating to authorisation
premise text: (b) may specify, vary or revoke conditions relating to the authorisation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1051 Mandatory requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1051
has part: 1051(1) Mandatory requirements
has part: 1051(2) Mandatory requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.13

1051(1) Mandatory requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1
part of: 1051 Mandatory requirements
note: Organisational requirements for an external dispute resolution scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1051(1) Mandatory requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires organisational requirements
premise text: (a) the organisational requirements under subsection (2); and
conclusion text: (1) The mandatory requirements for an external dispute resolution scheme are:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Organisational requirements are part of mandatory requirements that apply during scheme operation
premise text: (1) The mandatory requirements for an external dispute resolution scheme are: (a) the organisational requirements under subsection (2); and
conclusion text: and (b) the operator requirements under subsection (3); and (c) the operational requirements under subsection (4); and (d) the compliance requirements under subsection (5).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Organisational requirements are part of mandatory requirements that apply during scheme operation
premise text: (1) The mandatory requirements for an external dispute resolution scheme are: (a) the organisational requirements under subsection (2); and
conclusion text: and (b) the operator requirements under subsection (3); and (c) the operational requirements under subsection (4); and (d) the compliance requirements under subsection (5).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires organisational requirements for scheme operation
premise text: (a) the organisational requirements under subsection (2); and
conclusion text: (1) The mandatory requirements for an external dispute resolution scheme are:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires operator requirements for scheme operation
premise text: (b) the operator requirements under subsection (3); and
conclusion text: (1) The mandatory requirements for an external dispute resolution scheme are:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1051(2) Mandatory requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2
part of: 1051 Mandatory requirements
note: Membership requirements for the scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.13
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1051(2) Mandatory requirements
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Membership requirement
premise text: The organisational requirements are that:
conclusion text: (a) the membership of the scheme is open to every entity that is required, under: Schedule 1 External dispute resolution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope
premise text: (2) The organisational requirements are that:
conclusion text: (a) the membership of the scheme is open to every entity that is required, under: Schedule 1 External dispute resolution
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Global applicability
premise text: (2) The organisational requirements are that:
conclusion text: (a) the membership of the scheme is open to every entity that is required, under: Schedule 1 External dispute resolution
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Global applicability
premise text: (2) The organisational requirements are that:
conclusion text: (a) the membership of the scheme is open to every entity that is required, under: Schedule 1 External dispute resolution
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: everywhere
logic summary: Global applicability
premise text: (2) The organisational requirements are that:
conclusion text: (a) the membership of the scheme is open to every entity that is required, under: Schedule 1 External dispute resolution
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

1051A General considerations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1051a
note: General considerations for an external dispute resolution scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051a-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051a-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1051A General considerations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1051a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: shall
logic summary: Mandatory consideration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052 Obligation to comply with mandatory requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052
note: Ensure compliance with mandatory requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052A ASIC may issue regulatory requirements
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052a
note: ASIC may issue regulatory requirements
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052a-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052a-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to issue regulatory requirements
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052B Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052b
has part: 1052B(1) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
has part: 1052B(2) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
has part: 1052B(3) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
has part: 1052B(4) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
has part: 1052B(5) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16

1052B(1) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-1
part of: 1052B Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
note: ASIC may give AFCA a written direction requiring the limit, or some or all of the limits, to be increased.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May give direction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052B(2) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-2
part of: 1052B Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
note: ASIC cannot give a direction under this section without prior written notice to AFCA.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of giving a direction without prior notice.
premise text: ASIC must not give a direction under this section.
conclusion text: AFCA has been notified at least 1 month in advance.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of applying the direction to complaints received before notice.
premise text: A direction under this section must not apply in relation to complaints AFCA received before ASIC gives the direction.
conclusion text: Complaints prior to notice are exempt from the direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052B(3) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-3
part of: 1052B Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
note: Must comply with direction made under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1052B(3) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052B(4) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-4
part of: 1052B Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
note: ASIC may apply to the Court for an order that AFCA comply with the direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: ASIC has an obligation to apply for a court order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052B(5) Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-5
part of: 1052B Directions to increase limits on the value of claims
note: A direction made under this section is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.16
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052b-ss-5-norm

1052BA Directions to ensure sufficient financing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052ba
has part: 1052BA(1) Directions to ensure sufficient financing
has part: 1052BA(2) Directions to ensure sufficient financing
has part: 1052BA(3) Directions to ensure sufficient financing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.17

1052BA(1) Directions to ensure sufficient financing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1
part of: 1052BA Directions to ensure sufficient financing
note: ASIC must give AFCA a written direction if it considers the scheme is not sufficiently financed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide direction
premise text: ASIC considers AFCA has not done all things reasonably practicable
conclusion text: AFCA must be given a written direction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to ensure sufficient financing
premise text: ASIC considers AFCA has not done all things reasonably practicable
conclusion text: AFCA must take steps to ensure sufficient financing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Direction is given within a specific timeframe
premise text: ASIC considers AFCA has not done all things reasonably practicable
conclusion text: AFCA must be given a written direction within a specific timeframe
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Direction implies sufficient financing
premise text: ASIC considers AFCA has not done all things reasonably practicable
conclusion text: Sufficient financing implies direction
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052BA(2) Directions to ensure sufficient financing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-2
part of: 1052BA Directions to ensure sufficient financing
note: Ensure sufficient financing for AFCA scheme operations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1052BA(2) Directions to ensure sufficient financing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Ensure sufficient financing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052BA(3) Directions to ensure sufficient financing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3
part of: 1052BA Directions to ensure sufficient financing
note: ASIC must give AFCA written notice before issuing a direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.17
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-4

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide notice
premise text: ASIC must not give a direction under this section unless...
conclusion text: ... ASIC has given AFCA written notice of at least 1 month of ASIC’s intention to issue the direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: KNOWS
logic summary: ASIC knows about the intention to issue a direction
premise text: ASIC has given AFCA written notice of at least 1 month of ASIC’s intention to issue the direction.
conclusion text: ... ASIC must not give a direction under this section unless...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Direction can only be issued after notice period
premise text: ASIC has given AFCA written notice of at least 1 month of ASIC’s intention to issue the direction.
conclusion text: ... ASIC must not give a direction under this section unless...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052ba-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: ASIC must provide notice before issuing a direction
premise text: ASIC has given AFCA written notice of at least 1 month of ASIC’s intention to issue the direction.
conclusion text: ... ASIC must not give a direction under this section unless...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052C General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c
has part: 1052C(1) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(2) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(3) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(4) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(5) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(6) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(7) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(8) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(9) General directions to AFCA
has part: 1052C(10) General directions to AFCA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18

1052C(1) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-1
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA
note: ASIC may give AFCA a specified direction if it considers non-compliance with mandatory requirements or regulatory conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to give direction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052C(2) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-2
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA
note: Notice must set out specific measures and reasons for direction.
description: (a) the specific measures that the direction will require AFCA to take to comply with the requirements or condition; (b) the reasons for ASIC’s intention to give the direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Requires notice to be given
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Requires temporal interval for notice
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052C(3) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-3
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA
note: ASIC may give AFCA direction with reasons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to direct AFCA.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052C(4) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-4
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA
note: The direction must deal with the time by which, or the period during which, it is to be complied with.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1052C(4) General directions to AFCA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must deal with time by which or period during which
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052C(5) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-5
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA
note: A direction made under this section is not a legislative instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-5-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1052C(5) General directions to AFCA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (5) A direction made under this section is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052C(6) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-6
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA
note: AFCA must comply with a direction made under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-6-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1052C(6) General directions to AFCA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
premise text: (6) AFCA must comply with a direction made under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052C(7) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-7
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA
note: ASIC may apply to the Court for an order that AFCA comply with the direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-7-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: ASIC has an obligation to apply to the Court for an order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052C(8) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-8
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA
note: ASIC may vary a direction made under this section by giving written notice to AFCA.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-8-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission granted
premise text: ASIC may vary a direction made under this section
conclusion text: AFCA must receive written notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052C(9) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-9
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA
note: ASIC can revoke the direction by giving written notice to AFCA.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-9-norm

1052C(10) General directions to AFCA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-10
part of: 1052C General directions to AFCA
note: ASIC may revoke a direction to AFCA with written notice if it is no longer necessary or appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.18
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-10-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-10-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052c-ss-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Revocation
logic summary: Revoke a direction to AFCA
premise text: ASIC considers that the direction is no longer necessary or appropriate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052D Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052d
has part: 1052D(1) Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
has part: 1052D(2) Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
has part: 1052D(3) Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.19

1052D(1) Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-1
part of: 1052D Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
note: ASIC must approve material changes to the AFCA scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052D(2) Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-2
part of: 1052D Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
note: Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by ASIC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052D(3) Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-3
part of: 1052D Approval of material changes to the AFCA scheme
note: Consideration of material changes to the AFCA scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.19
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052d-ss-3-norm

1052E Referring matters to appropriate authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052e
has part: 1052E(1) Referring matters to appropriate authorities
has part: 1052E(2) Referring matters to appropriate authorities
has part: 1052E(3) Referring matters to appropriate authorities
has part: 1052E(4) Referring matters to appropriate authorities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.20

1052E(1) Referring matters to appropriate authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-1
part of: 1052E Referring matters to appropriate authorities
note: Provide particulars of contravention, breach, refusal or failure to one or more authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide particulars.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052E(2) Referring matters to appropriate authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-2
part of: 1052E Referring matters to appropriate authorities
note: Must provide particulars of contravention, refusal or failure to the Minister administering the relevant Act.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide particulars.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052E(3) Referring matters to appropriate authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-3
part of: 1052E Referring matters to appropriate authorities
note: AFCA may refer systemic issues to APRA, ASIC or the Commissioner of Taxation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to refer systemic issues
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1052E(4) Referring matters to appropriate authorities
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-4
part of: 1052E Referring matters to appropriate authorities
note: Must provide particulars of systemic issue to one or more authorities.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.20
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1052e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide particulars of systemic issue.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1053 When complaints relating to superannuation can be made
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1053
note: A person may make a complaint relating to superannuation under the AFCA scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.21
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1053-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1053-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1053-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1053 When complaints relating to superannuation can be made
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1053-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1053A Persons taken to be members of regulated superannuation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1053a
note: Persons taken to be members of regulated superannuation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1053a-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1053a-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1053a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
logic summary: Persons taken to be members of regulated superannuation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1054 Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054
has part: 1054(1) Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint
has part: 1054(2) Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint
has part: 1054(3) Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.24

1054(1) Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054-ss-1
part of: 1054 Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint
note: AFCA may join certain persons as parties to a superannuation complaint.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: AFCA has the power to join parties.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1054(2) Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054-ss-2
part of: 1054 Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint
note: AFCA must give written notice to new and existing parties after deciding a person should be a party to the complaint.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1054(3) Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054-ss-3
part of: 1054 Power to join other parties to superannuation complaint
note: AFCA must give written notice of decision and reasons to a person who should not be a party to the complaint.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.24
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1054A Power to obtain information and documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054a
has part: 1054A(1) Power to obtain information and documents
has part: 1054A(2) Power to obtain information and documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.25

1054A(1) Power to obtain information and documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054a-ss-1
part of: 1054A Power to obtain information and documents
note: Require person to provide information or documents
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054a-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Mandatory provision of information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1054A(2) Power to obtain information and documents
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054a-ss-2
part of: 1054A Power to obtain information and documents
note: AFCA may take possession of documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.25
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054a-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to take possession
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1054B Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054b
has part: 1054B(1) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
has part: 1054B(2) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
has part: 1054B(3) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
has part: 1054B(4) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.26

1054B(1) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-1
part of: 1054B Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
note: Require attendance at conciliation conferences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Obligation to attend
premise text: AFCA thinks it desirable
conclusion text: Party or other person must attend
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Conferences held during a period
premise text: presence at conference would be conducive to settling complaint
conclusion text: Conference timing is relevant
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1054B(2) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-2
part of: 1054B Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
note: Must fix date, time and place for conference.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1054B(2) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to fix date, time and place.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1054B(3) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-3
part of: 1054B Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
note: AFCA may deal with the complaint as if it had been withdrawn by the complainant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1054B(3) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: AFCA may deal with the complaint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1054B(4) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-4
part of: 1054B Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
note: Failure to attend conciliation conference is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.26
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1054B(4) Power to require attendance at conciliation conferences
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to attend conciliation conference
premise text: Section 1054B(4)
conclusion text: Failure to comply is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1054BA Power to give directions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054ba
has part: 1054BA(1) Power to give directions
has part: 1054BA(2) Power to give directions
has part: 1054BA(3) Power to give directions
has part: 1054BA(4) Power to give directions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27

1054BA(1) Power to give directions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-1
part of: 1054BA Power to give directions
note: Directions to prohibit or restrict disclosure of documents or information relating to a complaint.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Directs prohibition of disclosure.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1054BA(2) Power to give directions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-2
part of: 1054BA Power to give directions
note: Must consider parties' wishes and privacy when giving directions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Must consider parties' wishes and privacy.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1054BA(3) Power to give directions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-3
part of: 1054BA Power to give directions
note: Directions may be made in writing or orally.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-3-norm

1054BA(4) Power to give directions
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-4
part of: 1054BA Power to give directions
note: Must comply with direction under section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1054BA(4) Power to give directions
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054ba-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1054C Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054c
has part: 1054C(1) Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
has part: 1054C(2) Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
has part: 1054C(3) Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27

1054C(1) Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-1
part of: 1054C Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
note: AFCA may refer a question of law to the Federal Court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to refer a question of law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1054C(2) Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2
part of: 1054C Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
note: Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1054C(2) Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasJurisdiction
logic summary: The Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law.
premise text: (2) The Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it under this section.
conclusion text: The Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The Federal Court has jurisdiction during the period specified in this section.
premise text: (2) The Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it under this section.
conclusion text: The Federal Court has jurisdiction during the period specified in this section.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: The Federal Court has jurisdiction during the period specified in this section.
premise text: (2) The Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it under this section.
conclusion text: The Federal Court has jurisdiction during the period specified in this section.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: The Federal Court's jurisdiction is diffused to the courts below during the period specified in this section.
premise text: (2) The Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it under this section.
conclusion text: The Federal Court's jurisdiction is diffused to the courts below during the period specified in this section.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasPartOf
logic summary: This provision is part of Section 1054C(2).
premise text: (2) The Federal Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine a question of law referred to it under this section.
conclusion text: This provision is part of Section 1054C(2).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1054C(3) Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-3
part of: 1054C Reference of questions of law to Federal Court
note: AFCA must not refer to the Federal Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.27
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1054c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: AFCA must not refer to the Federal Court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1055 Making a determination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055
has part: 1055(1) Making a determination
has part: 1055(2) Making a determination
has part: 1055(3) Making a determination
has part: 1055(4) Making a determination
has part: 1055(5) Making a determination
has part: 1055(6) Making a determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.28

1055(1) Making a determination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055-ss-1
part of: 1055 Making a determination
note: Powers, obligations and discretions of trustee, insurer, RSA provider or other person who made a decision or engaged in conduct related to the complaint.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: AFCA has powers, obligations and discretions.
premise text: (1) In making a determination of a superannuation complaint, AFCA has, subject to this section, all the powers, obligations and discretions that are conferred on the trustee, insurer, RSA provider or other person who:
conclusion text: AFCA has powers, obligations and discretions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: affirming
logic summary: AFCA can affirm decisions or conduct.
premise text: Affirming decisions or conduct
conclusion text: AFCA can affirm decisions or conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1055(2) Making a determination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2
part of: 1055 Making a determination
note: AFCA must affirm a decision or conduct if satisfied it is fair and reasonable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1055(2) Making a determination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: AFCA must affirm a decision or conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: AFCA's satisfaction with fairness and reasonableness is tied to a temporal interval.
premise text: (2) AFCA must affirm a decision or conduct (except a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit) if AFCA is satisfied that:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: AFCA's satisfaction with fairness and reasonableness forms a recurring trace.
premise text: (2) AFCA must affirm a decision or conduct (except a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit) if AFCA is satisfied that:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: AFCA's satisfaction with fairness and reasonableness diffuses through the system.
premise text: (2) AFCA must affirm a decision or conduct (except a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit) if AFCA is satisfied that:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: AFCA's satisfaction with fairness and reasonableness involves cognitive processes.
premise text: (2) AFCA must affirm a decision or conduct (except a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit) if AFCA is satisfied that:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1055(3) Making a determination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3
part of: 1055 Making a determination
note: AFCA must affirm a decision if it is fair and reasonable in all circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1055(3) Making a determination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: AFCA must affirm a decision.
premise text: (3) AFCA must affirm a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit if AFCA is satisfied that...
conclusion text: AFCA must affirm a decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Decision must be fair and reasonable in all circumstances.
premise text: (3) AFCA must affirm a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit if AFCA is satisfied that...
conclusion text: Decision must be fair and reasonable in all circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Decision must be made while the death benefit is being paid.
premise text: (3) AFCA must affirm a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit if AFCA is satisfied that...
conclusion text: Decision must be made while the death benefit is being paid.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Decision must be made until the death benefit is no longer payable.
premise text: (3) AFCA must affirm a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit if AFCA is satisfied that...
conclusion text: Decision must be made until the death benefit is no longer payable.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: AFCA must vary decisions or conduct if it is not fair and reasonable in all circumstances.
premise text: (3) AFCA must affirm a decision relating to the payment of a death benefit if AFCA is satisfied that...
conclusion text: AFCA must vary decisions or conduct if it is not fair and reasonable in all circumstances.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1055(4) Making a determination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055-ss-4
part of: 1055 Making a determination
note: AFCA may take actions to place a complainant in a position where unfairness or unreasonableness no longer exists.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to take actions
premise text: AFCA has the power to act
conclusion text: AFCA must take actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1055(5) Making a determination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055-ss-5
part of: 1055 Making a determination
note: AFCA may take actions to place complainant in a position where unfairness/unreasonableness no longer exists.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-5-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: AFCA has an obligation to take actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1055(6) Making a determination
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055-ss-6
part of: 1055 Making a determination
note: AFCA may vary or set aside a decision, and require repayment of money received under the life policy.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.28
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-6-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-6-logic-deontic-2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: AFCA may do something
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: AFCA requires repayment of money
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1055A AFCA to give reasons
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055a
note: AFCA must provide written reasons for its determination of a superannuation complaint.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055a-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055a-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: AFCA must provide written reasons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1055B Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055b
has part: 1055B(1) Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
has part: 1055B(2) Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
has part: 1055B(3) Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.30

1055B(1) Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1
part of: 1055B Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
note: Determination of superannuation complaint comes into operation immediately upon making.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1055B(1) Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Imposes obligation on the state.
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (2), a determination of a superannuation complaint by AFCA comes into operation immediately upon the making of the determination.
conclusion text: The state is obligated to implement the determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Occurs during the making of a determination.
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (2), a determination of a superannuation complaint by AFCA comes into operation immediately upon the making of the determination.
conclusion text: The determination occurs during the making of the determination.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Occurs during the making of a determination.
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (2), a determination of a superannuation complaint by AFCA comes into operation immediately upon the making of the determination.
conclusion text: The determination occurs during the making of the determination.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: Spreads through the implementation of the determination.
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (2), a determination of a superannuation complaint by AFCA comes into operation immediately upon the making of the determination.
conclusion text: The determination spreads through the implementation of the determination.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: through
logic summary: Spreads through the implementation of the determination.
premise text: (1) Subject to subsection (2), a determination of a superannuation complaint by AFCA comes into operation immediately upon the making of the determination.
conclusion text: The determination spreads through the implementation of the determination.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1055B(2) Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-2
part of: 1055B Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
note: Determination may come into operation on a later date specified in the determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-2-norm

1055B(3) Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3
part of: 1055B Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
note: Decision of another person is taken to be a decision of the other person for all purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.30
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1055B(3) Operation of determination of superannuation complaint
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takes
logic summary: Decision is taken to be a decision of another person.
premise text: (3) If, under subsection 1055(4) or (5), the determination varies a decision of another person...
conclusion text: ...is, for all purposes (other than the making of a complaint about the decision)...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: on
logic summary: Decision is taken to have effect on a specific date.
premise text: (3) If, under subsection 1055(4) or (5), the determination varies a decision of another person...
conclusion text: ...is, for all purposes (other than the making of a complaint about the decision)...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: on
logic summary: Decision is taken to have effect on a specific date.
premise text: (3) If, under subsection 1055(4) or (5), the determination varies a decision of another person...
conclusion text: ...is, for all purposes (other than the making of a complaint about the decision)...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: taken to be
logic summary: Decision is taken to be a decision of another person.
premise text: (3) If, under subsection 1055(4) or (5), the determination varies a decision of another person...
conclusion text: ...is, for all purposes (other than the making of a complaint about the decision)...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055b-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has effect
logic summary: Decision has effect on and from the day on which the original decision has or had effect.
premise text: ...unless AFCA otherwise orders, has effect...
conclusion text: ...on and from the day on which the original decision has or had effect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1055C Evidence of determination of superannuation complaint
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055c
has part: 1055C(1) Evidence of determination of superannuation complaint
has part: 1055C(2) Evidence of determination of superannuation complaint
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.31

1055C(1) Evidence of determination of superannuation complaint
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055c-ss-1
part of: 1055C Evidence of determination of superannuation complaint
note: Prima facie evidence of AFCA determination in proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.31
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055c-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1055C(1) Evidence of determination of superannuation complaint
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide prima facie evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1055C(2) Evidence of determination of superannuation complaint
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055c-ss-2
part of: 1055C Evidence of determination of superannuation complaint
note: Does not affect other methods for proof of determinations of AFCA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.31
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055c-ss-2-norm

1055D Compliance with determinations under the AFCA scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1055d
note: Must comply with any determination made in respect of the person by AFCA.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.31
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-logic-deontic-4

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1055D Compliance with determinations under the AFCA scheme
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with determination
premise text: AFCA joins the person under subsection 1054(1) as a party to the complaint.
conclusion text: The person must comply with any determination made in respect of the person by AFCA.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between complaint and determination
premise text: (a) a superannuation complaint has been made concerning a disability benefit (whether under a contract of insurance or otherwise);
conclusion text: The person must comply with any determination made in respect of the person by AFCA.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between complaint and commencement
premise text: (a) a superannuation complaint has been made concerning a disability benefit (whether under a contract of insurance or otherwise);
conclusion text: The person must comply with any determination made in respect of the person by AFCA.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1055d-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with determination
premise text: (c) AFCA joins the person under subsection 1054(1) as a party to the complaint;
conclusion text: The person must comply with any determination made in respect of the person by AFCA.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1056 When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1056
has part: 1056(1) When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
has part: 1056(2) When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
has part: 1056(3) When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.32

1056(1) When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1
part of: 1056 When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
note: Cannot make a superannuation complaint under AFCA scheme unless interest in death benefit exists.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.32
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 1056(1) When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making a superannuation complaint under AFCA scheme.
premise text: (1) A person cannot make a superannuation complaint...
conclusion text: A person cannot make a superannuation complaint...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts making a superannuation complaint under AFCA scheme to those with an interest in death benefit.
premise text: (1) A person cannot make a superannuation complaint...
conclusion text: The provision restricts the action to those with an interest in death benefit.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Restriction
logic summary: Restricts the time period for making a superannuation complaint.
premise text: (1) A person cannot make a superannuation complaint...
conclusion text: The provision restricts the action to those with an interest in death benefit within a certain time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Restriction
logic summary: Restricts the time period for making a superannuation complaint.
premise text: (1) A person cannot make a superannuation complaint...
conclusion text: The provision restricts the action to those with an interest in death benefit within a certain time frame.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Justification
logic summary: Justifies the prohibition by stating the condition for making a superannuation complaint.
premise text: (1) A person cannot make a superannuation complaint...
conclusion text: The provision justifies the action as prohibited by stating the condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

1056(2) When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1056-ss-2
part of: 1056 When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
note: Cannot make a superannuation complaint under AFCA scheme in certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.32
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making a complaint under AFCA scheme
premise text: (2) A person cannot make a superannuation complaint...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1056(3) When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3
part of: 1056 When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
note: Person cannot make a superannuation complaint unless AFCA is satisfied that person has an interest in the death benefit and it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.32
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-deontic-5

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1056(3) When superannuation complaint cannot be made in relation to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Person has an obligation to make a superannuation complaint.
premise text: AFCA is satisfied that person has an interest in the death benefit and it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
conclusion text: Person cannot make a superannuation complaint unless AFCA is satisfied that person has an interest in the death benefit and it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: within
logic summary: Notices must be given within a reasonable timeframe.
premise text: It was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
conclusion text: Person cannot make a superannuation complaint unless AFCA is satisfied that it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeGiven
logic summary: Decision-maker must give person notices within a reasonable timeframe.
premise text: It was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
conclusion text: Person cannot make a superannuation complaint unless AFCA is satisfied that it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannotMakeComplaint
logic summary: Person cannot make a superannuation complaint unless AFCA is satisfied that person has an interest in the death benefit and it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
premise text: AFCA is satisfied that person has an interest in the death benefit and it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
conclusion text: Person cannot make a superannuation complaint unless AFCA is satisfied that person has an interest in the death benefit and it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056-ss-3-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mustBeGivenNotices
logic summary: Decision-maker must give person notices within a reasonable timeframe.
premise text: It was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
conclusion text: Person cannot make a superannuation complaint unless AFCA is satisfied that it was unreasonable for person not to be given notices from decision-maker.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

1056A Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1056a
has part: 1056A(1) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
has part: 1056A(2) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
has part: 1056A(3) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.33

1056A(1) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-1
part of: 1056A Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
note: Notice to be given to persons with an interest in death benefit
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1056A(1) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
conclusion text: Notice must be given
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Timeframe for notice to be given
premise text: within 28 days after being so notified
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1056A(2) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-2
part of: 1056A Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
note: Notice must be given to a person under subsection (1) with specific details about the complaint.
description: Notice with complaint details and application period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1056A(2) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1056A(3) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-3
part of: 1056A Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
note: A person may be joined as a party to the complaint under section 1054.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1056A(3) Joining persons to complaints relating to death benefit
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1056a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May be joined as a party
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1057 Appeals to the Federal Court from determination of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1057
note: Party may appeal to Federal Court from AFCA's determination on a question of law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.33
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1057 Appeals to the Federal Court from determination of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to appeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1057A Operation and implementation of determination that is
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1057a
has part: 1057A(1) Operation and implementation of determination that is
has part: 1057A(2) Operation and implementation of determination that is
has part: 1057A(3) Operation and implementation of determination that is
has part: 1057A(4) Operation and implementation of determination that is
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.34

1057A(1) Operation and implementation of determination that is
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-1
part of: 1057A Operation and implementation of determination that is
note: Operation of determination unaffected by appeal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.34
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1057A(1) Operation and implementation of determination that is
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuation
logic summary: Determination operation continues despite appeal
premise text: (1) Subject to this section, the institution of an appeal...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1057A(2) Operation and implementation of determination that is
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-2
part of: 1057A Operation and implementation of determination that is
note: Court may make order staying or affecting operation of determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.34
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court prohibits certain actions
premise text: Court has authority to make orders
conclusion text: Order staying or affecting operation of determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Court's order overlaps with determination
premise text: Court makes order staying or affecting operation of determination
conclusion text: Order and determination overlap in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1057A(3) Operation and implementation of determination that is
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-3
part of: 1057A Operation and implementation of determination that is
note: May vary or revoke an existing order under subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.34
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permissive obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1057A(4) Operation and implementation of determination that is
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-4
part of: 1057A Operation and implementation of determination that is
note: Order subject to conditions and has effect until decision on appeal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.34
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Order is subject to conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1057B Sending of documents to, and disclosure of documents by, the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1057b
note: AFCA must send documents to the Federal Court and return them after a proceeding.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.35
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057b-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057b-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1057b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to send documents
premise text: AFCA must send documents
conclusion text: Federal Court must receive documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1058 Secrecy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1058
note: Disclose information to anyone
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.35
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1058-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1058-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-1058-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: Staff member has an obligation to keep information secret
conclusion text: Staff member must not disclose information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Schedule 3 (after table item 310)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Penalty units for each day or part of a day in respect of which the offence is committed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.37
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 At the end of subsection 38(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Add dispute resolution to Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.37
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 At the end of subsection 38(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adds a new provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 At the end of section 7A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
note: Delegate functions or powers to Tribunal members
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.37
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-5-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to delegate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 59(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
note: Omit 'subsection 62(2)', substitute 'section 62'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.38
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-6-norm

7 Section 61
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
note: Substitute section 62 for subsection 62(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.38
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-7-norm

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Section 61
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 62(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.38
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-8-norm

9 Subsection 62(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
note: Omit “(2)”
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.38
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-9-norm

10 Section 63
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
note: Replace 'subsection 62(2)' with 'section 62'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.38
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-10-norm

11 After paragraph (hb) of Schedule 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
note: Insertions into determinations under AFCA scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-11-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 After paragraph (hb) of Schedule 1
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS
logic summary: Inserts determinations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Subsection 57(2) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
note: A person affected by the outcome of reconsideration may make a complaint under specific schemes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-12-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Subsection 57(2) (note)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 After paragraph 56(5)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
note: Conditional commencement of AFCA scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.39
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-13-norm

14 Before subparagraph 127(4)(aa)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
note: Operator of AFCA scheme must be inserted
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-14-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 Before subparagraph 127(4)(aa)(ii)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to insert operator
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Section 292-330 (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
note: Complaint procedure under AFCA scheme and Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-15-norm

16 Subsection 95(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
note: ASIC may tell RSA provider that ASIC proposes to conduct an investigation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.40
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-ltl-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-cogai-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-shacl-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-n3logic-5

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of RSA provider's refusal or failure to give effect to determinations.
premise text: ASIC proposes to conduct an investigation.
conclusion text: RSA provider must not refuse or fail to give effect to determinations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of RSA providers' refusal or failure to give effect to determinations.
premise text: ASIC proposes to conduct an investigation.
conclusion text: RSA provider's refusal or failure to give effect to determinations is a recurring issue.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-cogai-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Classification
logic summary: Classification of RSA providers as entities that refuse or fail to give effect to determinations.
premise text: ASIC proposes to conduct an investigation.
conclusion text: RSA provider is classified as a non-compliant entity if they refuse or fail to give effect to determinations.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-shacl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: Validation of RSA providers' refusal or failure to give effect to determinations against schema.
premise text: ASIC proposes to conduct an investigation.
conclusion text: RSA provider's refusal or failure to give effect to determinations is invalid according to schema.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-16-logic-n3logic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: N3Logic
operator: Ontology Alignment
logic summary: Alignment of RSA providers' refusal or failure to give effect to determinations with ontology.
premise text: ASIC proposes to conduct an investigation.
conclusion text: RSA provider's refusal or failure to give effect to determinations is aligned with ontology.
execution surface: modalities::logic::n3_compiler
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Subsection 163(12) (paragraph (a) of the definition of do
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
note: Insertion of a term into the definition of 'Superannuation Complaints Tribunal'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.41
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-17-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Subsection 163(12) (paragraph (a) of the definition of do
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion into a definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Subsection 163(12) (at the end of paragraph (b) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
note: Add ‘, or a determination made under that scheme’ to the definition of do an act or thing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.41
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-18-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-18-logic-alleninterval-2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 Subsection 163(12) (at the end of paragraph (b) of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Addition
logic summary: Adding a condition to a definition.
premise text: Definition of do an act or thing.
conclusion text: Updated definition with added condition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-18-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Extension
logic summary: Extending the temporal interval of the definition.
premise text: Definition of do an act or thing.
conclusion text: Updated definition with added condition.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Subsection 24(3) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
note: Member may make a complaint under AFCA scheme or section 15CA of Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.41
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-19-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-19-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-19-logic-ltl-3

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-19-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19 Subsection 24(3) (note)
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Member has a right to make a complaint
premise text: None
conclusion text: Member may make a complaint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-19-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: must know
logic summary: Member must be aware of the complaint process
premise text: None
conclusion text: Member must know about the complaint process
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-19-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: can make a complaint
logic summary: Member can make a complaint under AFCA scheme or section 15CA of Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
premise text: None
conclusion text: Member can make a complaint
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Subsection 10(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
note: Defines AFCA scheme as same meaning as in Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act 2001.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-20-norm

21 After paragraph 58(2)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
note: Insert a direction given under the AFCA scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-21-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 After paragraph 58(2)(f)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 After subsection 58(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
has part: 22(2A) After subsection 58(2)
has part: 22(2B) After subsection 58(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.42

22(2A) After subsection 58(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a
part of: 22 After subsection 58(2)
note: Clarifies application of paragraph (2)(fa) to requirements under the AFCA scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22(2A) After subsection 58(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: apply
logic summary: Clarifies application of paragraph (2)(fa)
premise text: (2A) To avoid doubt, paragraph (2)(fa) applies in relation to any requirement imposed under the AFCA scheme.
conclusion text: paragraph (2)(fa) applies
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: apply
logic summary: Clarifies application of paragraph (2)(fa)
premise text: (2A) To avoid doubt, paragraph (2)(fa) applies in relation to any requirement imposed under the AFCA scheme.
conclusion text: paragraph (2)(fa) applies
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: apply
logic summary: Clarifies application of paragraph (2)(fa)
premise text: (2A) To avoid doubt, paragraph (2)(fa) applies in relation to any requirement imposed under the AFCA scheme.
conclusion text: paragraph (2)(fa) applies
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: apply
logic summary: Clarifies application of paragraph (2)(fa)
premise text: (2A) To avoid doubt, paragraph (2)(fa) applies in relation to any requirement imposed under the AFCA scheme.
conclusion text: paragraph (2)(fa) applies
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2a-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: apply
logic summary: Clarifies application of paragraph (2)(fa)
premise text: (2A) To avoid doubt, paragraph (2)(fa) applies in relation to any requirement imposed under the AFCA scheme.
conclusion text: paragraph (2)(fa) applies
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22(2B) After subsection 58(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22-ss-2b
part of: 22 After subsection 58(2)
note: Does not affect the meaning of certain paragraphs in subsection (2) other than paragraph (2)(fa)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2b-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-22-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: does not affect
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: (2A)
conclusion text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 After paragraph 263(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
note: Refusal to give effect to AFCA scheme determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-23-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of refusal
premise text: Determination made under AFCA scheme
conclusion text: Refusal to give effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Subsection 315(12) (paragraph (a) of the definition of do
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
note: Insertion of 'or made under the AFCA scheme' after Superannuation Complaints Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.42
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-24-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-24-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 24 Subsection 315(12) (paragraph (a) of the definition of do
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Insertion
logic summary: Obligation to insert text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Subsection 315(12) (at the end of paragraph (b) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
note: Add ‘, or a determination made under that scheme’ to the definition of do an act or thing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-25-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 Subsection 315(12) (at the end of paragraph (b) of the
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Addition
logic summary: Adding a clause to a definition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Subsection 133-120(2) in Schedule 1 (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
note: Dissatisfied person may make complaint under AFCA scheme or Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-logic-argumentation-4

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make complaint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Under
logic summary: Complaint under AFCA scheme or Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Within
logic summary: Timeframe for complaint under AFCA scheme
premise text: authorisation of the scheme comes into force
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-26-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: If-then
logic summary: Dissatisfied person may make complaint if certain conditions met
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Subsection 133-140(1) in Schedule 1 (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
note: Dissatisfied person may make complaint under AFCA scheme or Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-ltl-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-alleninterval-5

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make complaint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Under
logic summary: Complaint under AFCA scheme or Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Within
logic summary: Timeframe for complaint under AFCA scheme
premise text: AFCA scheme comes into force
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: But
logic summary: Complaint under AFCA scheme or Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993, but not before authorisation comes into force
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-27-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: On
logic summary: Day on which complaints cannot be made because of section 14AB of Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
premise text: Section 14AB of that Act
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Section 155-90 in Schedule 1 (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
note: Individual may make a complaint under AFCA scheme or Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.43
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-28-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-28-logic-epistemic-2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-28-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28 Section 155-90 in Schedule 1 (note)
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to make a complaint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-28-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: under
logic summary: Complaint under AFCA scheme or Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Subsection 355-65(3) in Schedule 1 (table item 3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
note: Repeal item, substitute with Superannuation Complaints Tribunal or AFCA operator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.44
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-29-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29 Subsection 355-65(3) in Schedule 1 (table item 3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Repeal item
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Subsection 390-5(1) in Schedule 1 (note 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
note: Dissatisfied person may make complaint under AFCA scheme or Superannuation (Resolution of Complaints) Act 1993.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.44
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-30-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-30-logic-epistemic-2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make complaint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-30-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Understandable
logic summary: Complaint process is understandable
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Application of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
note: Application of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.44
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-31-norm

32 At the end of subsection 912A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
note: Membership of the AFCA scheme added to subsection 912A(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-32-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32 At the end of subsection 912A(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adds membership of the AFCA scheme
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 At the end of subsection 1017G(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
note: Membership of the AFCA scheme is added to subsection 1017G(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-33-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-33-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 33 At the end of subsection 1017G(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adds membership of the AFCA scheme
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
note: Defines AFCA scheme as same meaning as in Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act 2001.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-34-norm

35 Paragraphs 47(1)(i), 64(5)(c) and 65(6)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
note: Insert 'and the AFCA scheme' after 'scheme'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-35-norm

36 Section 245 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-36-norm

245 Operator of approved external dispute resolution scheme or
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-245
note: ASIC may receive information from an AFCA scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-245-norm

37 Section 245
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
note: Insert 'or the AFCA scheme' after 'external dispute resolution scheme'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.45
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-37-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Subsection 204(1) of the National Credit Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
note: Defines AFCA scheme as equivalent to a specific term in the Corporations Act 2001.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-38-norm

39 Paragraph 12(1)(b) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
note: Insertion of AFCA scheme into external dispute resolution scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-39-norm

40 Subitem 16(1) of Schedule 2 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
note: Obligation to be a member of an approved external dispute resolution scheme and the AFCA scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-40-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-40-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40 Subitem 16(1) of Schedule 2 (heading)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Subitem 16(1) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
note: Insert 'and the AFCA scheme' after 'external dispute resolution scheme'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-41-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41 Subitem 16(1) of Schedule 2
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Before paragraph 47(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
note: Must be a member of the AFCA scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-42-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-42-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-42-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42 Before paragraph 47(1)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Before paragraph 101(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
note: Must be a member of the AFCA scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.46
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-43-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Before paragraph 101(1)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to be a member of the AFCA scheme
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Application of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
note: Conditional commencement of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.47
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-44-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-44-logic-alleninterval-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-44-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Subsection 57(2) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
note: Repeal note and substitute with new note allowing complaint under AFCA scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.48
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-45-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-45-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-45-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 45 Subsection 57(2) (note)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal note
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Section 292-330 (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
note: Complaint procedure under AFCA scheme for dissatisfied individuals
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.48
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-46-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-46-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46 Section 292-330 (note)
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make a complaint
premise text: Section 390-5 in Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953
conclusion text: AFCA scheme
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 Subparagraphs 113(2)(h)(ii), 126(2)(e)(ii), 127(2)(e)(ii),
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
note: Omit 'approved external dispute resolution scheme of which the licensee is a member' and substitute 'AFCA scheme'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.48
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-47-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-47-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-47-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of approved external dispute resolution schemes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Paragraph 158(2)(h)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
note: Omit specific term and substitute with another.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.48
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-48-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-48-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Omit specific term and substitute with another.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Subparagraph 160(3)(f)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
note: Omit 'approved external dispute resolution scheme of which the person is a member', substitute 'AFCA scheme'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.48
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-49-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the person to omit the specified scheme.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Subparagraphs 72(4)(b)(iii), 88(3)(g)(i) and 94(2)(b)(i) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
note: Omit specified external dispute resolution schemes and substitute with AFCA scheme.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.49
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-50-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Omit
logic summary: Removal of external dispute resolution schemes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Subparagraphs 177B(4)(b)(iii), 179D(2)(f)(i) and
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
note: Omit provision from National Credit Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.49
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-51-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-51-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-51-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Subsection 24(3) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
note: Member may make a complaint under AFCA scheme about superannuation provider's decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.49
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-52-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-52-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-52-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52 Subsection 24(3) (note)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-52-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53 After section 14AA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.49
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-53-norm

14AB When complaints can no longer be made
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14ab
has part: 14AB(1) When complaints can no longer be made
has part: 14AB(2) When complaints can no longer be made
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.49

14AB(1) When complaints can no longer be made
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14ab-ss-1
part of: 14AB When complaints can no longer be made
note: Complaints cannot be made after a certain date.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.49
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-14ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-14ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-14ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits making complaints
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14AB(2) When complaints can no longer be made
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14ab-ss-2
part of: 14AB When complaints can no longer be made
note: This section has effect despite any other provision of this Part.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.49
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-14ab-ss-2-norm

54 Subsection 133-120(2) in Schedule 1 (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
note: Allow complaint under AFCA scheme if dissatisfied with notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.50
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-54-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-54-logic-epistemic-2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-54-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 54 Subsection 133-120(2) in Schedule 1 (note)
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission to complain under AFCA scheme.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-54-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Believe
logic summary: Belief in right to complaint under AFCA scheme.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Subsection 133-140(1) in Schedule 1 (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
note: Allow complaint under AFCA scheme if dissatisfied with notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.50
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-55-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-55-logic-epistemic-2

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-55-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 55 Subsection 133-140(1) in Schedule 1 (note)
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission to complain under AFCA scheme.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-55-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Believe
logic summary: Dissatisfaction with notice implies belief in need for complaint.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Section 155-90 in Schedule 1 (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
note: Individual may make a complaint under AFCA scheme if dissatisfied with statement from superannuation provider.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.50
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-56-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-56-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-56-logic-ltl-3

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-56-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56 Section 155-90 in Schedule 1 (note)
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-56-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to make complaint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-56-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: dissatisfied with
logic summary: Knowledge of dissatisfaction
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-56-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: within
logic summary: Temporal constraint on complaint
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 Subsection 390-5(1) in Schedule 1 (note 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
note: Allow complaint under AFCA scheme if dissatisfied with statement given by superannuation provider.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.50
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-57-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-57-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-57-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 57 Subsection 390-5(1) in Schedule 1 (note 2)
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission to make complaint under AFCA scheme.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Application of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
note: Specifies the day on which amendments apply
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.50
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-58-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-58-logic-alleninterval-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-58-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <=
logic summary: Defines the start of the amendment application period
premise text: (3)
conclusion text: the day that is 12 months after the Part 3 application day
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Paragraph 912A(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-59
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-59-norm

60 Subsection 912A(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-60
note: Omit specific clause.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-60-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-60-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of clause.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Paragraph 1017G(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-61
note: Repeal paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-61-norm

62 Subsection 1017G(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-62
note: Omit specified phrase from National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-62-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-62-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-62-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase
premise text: Omit specified phrase
conclusion text: No omission allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63 Subsection 5(1) (definition of approved external dispute
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-63
note: Repeal definition of approved external dispute resolution scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-63-norm

64 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
note: Repeal a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-64-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-64-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-64-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals a section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65 Paragraphs 47(1)(i), 64(5)(c) and 65(6)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-65
note: Omit specified phrases from approved external dispute resolution schemes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-65-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-65-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-65-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 Section 245 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-66
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.52
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-66-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Repeal and substitute
premise text: Repeal heading
conclusion text: Substitute new text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

245 Operator of AFCA scheme may give information to ASIC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-245-2
note: May give information to ASIC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-245-2-norm

67 Section 245
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-67
note: Omit 'an approved external dispute resolution scheme or'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-67-norm

68 Subsection 204(1) of the National Credit Code (definition
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
note: Repeal definition of approved external dispute resolution scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-68-norm

69 Paragraph 12(1)(b) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
note: Omit specified text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-69-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-69-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of approved external dispute resolution scheme and
premise text: Approved external dispute resolution scheme
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Subitem 16(1) of Schedule 2 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
note: Repeal of heading and substitution with obligation to be a member of the AFCA scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-70-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-70-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-70-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70 Subitem 16(1) of Schedule 2 (heading)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-70-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on legal persons to be members of the AFCA scheme
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71 Subitem 16(1) of Schedule 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
note: Omit specified text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-71-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-71-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of an approved external dispute resolution scheme and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Application of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
note: Conditional commencement of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.53
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-1-sec-72-norm

1 After section 243B
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Insert section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.55
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-1-norm

243C ASIC may publish internal dispute resolution data
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-243c
has part: 243C(1) ASIC may publish internal dispute resolution data
has part: 243C(2) ASIC may publish internal dispute resolution data
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.55

243C(1) ASIC may publish internal dispute resolution data
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-243c-ss-1
part of: 243C ASIC may publish internal dispute resolution data
note: ASIC may publish internal dispute resolution data
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.55
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-243c-ss-1-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-243c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-243c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May publish
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

243C(2) ASIC may publish internal dispute resolution data
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-243c-ss-2
part of: 243C ASIC may publish internal dispute resolution data
note: Must publish internal dispute resolution data without personal information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.55
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-243c-ss-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-243c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-243c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to publish internal dispute resolution data
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Paragraph 912A(1)(g)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Provide a dispute resolution system complying with subsection (2) and give ASIC the information specified in any instrument under subsection (2A)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.55
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Paragraph 912A(1)(g)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a dispute resolution system
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 After subsection 912A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
has part: 3(2A) After subsection 912A(2)
has part: 3(2B) After subsection 912A(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.56

3(2A) After subsection 912A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-2a
part of: 3 After subsection 912A(2)
note: Specify internal dispute resolution procedures and operation details to ASIC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.56
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2a-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3(2B) After subsection 912A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b
part of: 3 After subsection 912A(2)
note: No personal information may be specified in an instrument under subsection (2A)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.56
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-cogai-4
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-shacl-5

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 3(2B) After subsection 912A(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits specifying personal information
premise text: (2B) An instrument under subsection (2A) must not specify any information that is personal information within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for prohibition
premise text: (2B) An instrument under subsection (2A) must not specify any information that is personal information within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses prohibition to all relevant parties
premise text: (2B) An instrument under subsection (2A) must not specify any information that is personal information within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: Infers prohibition from relevant data
premise text: (2B) An instrument under subsection (2A) must not specify any information that is personal information within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-3-ss-2b-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
logic summary: Validates compliance with prohibition
premise text: (2B) An instrument under subsection (2A) must not specify any information that is personal information within the meaning of the Privacy Act 1988.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 1017G(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Mandatory dispute resolution system for issuers and regulated persons
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.56
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Subsection 1017G(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 After paragraph 47(1)(h)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: Provide information to ASIC as a financial services licensee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.57
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Section 47 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.57
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-6-norm

47 Dispute resolution systems
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-47
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.57
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-47-norm

7 Subsections 47(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
note: Must have an internal dispute resolution procedure, give information to ASIC, and provide written reasons for decisions.
description: Internal dispute resolution procedure, information to ASIC, written reasons for decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.57
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-7-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Section 101 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.58
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-8-norm

101 Dispute resolution systems
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-101
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.58
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-101-norm

9 Subsections 101(1) and (1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
note: Trustees of regulated superannuation funds must have an internal dispute resolution procedure and provide certain information to ASIC.
description: Internal dispute resolution procedure, written reasons for decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.58
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 Subsections 101(1) and (1A)
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to have an internal dispute resolution procedure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Transitional provision for giving written reasons
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
note: Transitional provision for giving written reasons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.59
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-10-norm

11 Subsection 101(3) (definition of regulated superannuation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
note: Repeal definition of regulated superannuation fund and substitute with new definition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.59
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-11-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Subsection 101(3) (definition of regulated superannuation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal definition.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-2-sec-11-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Substitute
logic summary: New definition substitutes old one.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 The whole of the Act
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1-3
note: Repeal of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.60
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeal the Act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Paragraph 29(1)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2-3
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.61
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-2-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-2-3-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-2-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeal the specified paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Paragraph 12A(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3-3
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.61
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-3-3-norm

4 Subparagraph 127(4)(aa)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4-3
note: Omit “or”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.61
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-3-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-3-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-4-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of ‘or’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subparagraph 127(4)(aa)(iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5-4
note: Repeal a subparagraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.61
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-5-4-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-5-4-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-5-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the repeal of a subparagraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Section 129C
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6-8
note: Repeal section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.61
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-8-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-8-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-6-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeal the section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Division 3A of Part 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7-2
note: Repeal Division 3A of Part 7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.61
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-7-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-7-2-logic-alleninterval-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-7-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Identifies temporal interval for repeal
premise text: Repeal Division 3A of Part 7
conclusion text: Temporal interval for repeal
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subparagraph 3(1)(c)(iii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8-2
note: Repeal a subparagraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.61
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-8-2-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-8-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Obligation to repeal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Paragraph 3(2)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
note: Substitute section number in paragraph.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.62
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-9-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBST
logic summary: Replace text with new value.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Section 16 (definition of Superannuation Complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
note: Repeal definition of Superannuation Complaints Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.62
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-10-norm

11 Paragraph 38(2)(n)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.62
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-11-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals a paragraph
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Subsection 47(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-12
note: Omit specified text and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.62
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-12-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified text.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Subsection 95(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-13
note: ASIC may conduct an investigation if RSA provider refuses or fails to give effect to AFCA determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.62
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-13-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to conduct investigation
premise text: ASIC proposes to conduct an investigation
conclusion text: RSA provider refuses or fails to give effect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Subsection 163(12) (paragraph (a) of the definition of do
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-14
note: Omit 'made by the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal, or'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.62
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-14-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'made by the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal, or'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Subsection 163(12) (at the end of paragraph (b) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-15
note: Omit specified phrase from definition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.62
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-15-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Section 184
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-16
note: Repeal section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.62
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-16-norm

17 Subsection 155C(3) (paragraph (c) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-17
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute Division 3 of Part 7.10A of the Corporations Act 2001 or Superannuation Act 1990
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.63
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-17-norm

18 Subsection 49(3) (paragraph (c) of the definition of eligible
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-18
note: Repeal paragraph (c) of the definition of eligible regulatory law and substitute with Division 3 of Part 7.10A of the Corporations Act 2001 or Superannuation Act 2005.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.63
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-18-norm

19 Paragraph 46(1)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-19
note: Repeal a paragraph.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.63
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-19-norm

20 Subparagraph 6(1)(a)(iv)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-20
note: Omit sections 64A and 68A, substitute section 68A.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.63
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-20-norm

21 Subparagraph 6(1)(c)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-21
note: Substitute section 68A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.63
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-21-norm

22 Subsection 10(1) (definition of Superannuation
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-22
note: Repeal definition of Superannuation Complaints Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.63
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-22-norm

23 Paragraph 58(2)(f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-23
note: Repeal of Schedule 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.63
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-23-norm

24 Section 64A
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24
note: Repeal a section
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.64
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-24-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-24-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeals a section
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Subsection 101(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-25
note: Substitute words in a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.64
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-25-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-25-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 25 Subsection 101(1) (note)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Paragraph 263(1)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-26
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.64
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-26-norm

27 Subsection 315(12) (paragraph (a) of the definition of do
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-27
note: Omit 'made by the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal, or'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.64
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-27-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-27-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-27-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of 'made by the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal, or'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Subsection 315(12) (at the end of paragraph (b) of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-28
note: Omit 'directions of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal, or'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.64
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-28-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-28-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting certain words
premise text: Omit 'directions of the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal, or'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Paragraph 337A(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-29
note: Insertion of 'former' before Superannuation Complaints Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.64
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-29-norm

30 Section 8 (definition of Superannuation Complaints
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-30
note: Repeal definition of Superannuation Complaints Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.64
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-30-norm

31 Subsection 355-65(3) in Schedule 1 (table item 3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-31
note: Operator of AFCA scheme must provide information for performing functions or exercising powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.64
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-31-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-31-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 Subsection 355-65(3) in Schedule 1 (table item 3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Operator must provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Existing determinations unaffected
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-32
note: Existing determinations unaffected by repeal or amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.66
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-32-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-32-logic-deontic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-32-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32 Existing determinations unaffected
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Continuity
logic summary: Continues to apply despite changes
premise text: (1)
conclusion text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Transfer of records
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-33
note: Transfer of records from Superannuation Complaints Tribunal to Australian Securities and Investments Commission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.66
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-33-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-33-logic-alleninterval-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-33-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for transfer of records
premise text: (2) The records and documents are to be transferred to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission after that commencement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Remittal of matters by the Federal Court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-34
note: Remittal of matters by the Federal Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.67
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-34-norm

35 Transitional rules
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-35
note: The Minister may make rules prescribing matters of a transitional nature.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.67
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-35-norm
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-35-logic-descriptionlogic-1

c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-35-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect as Undertaking.
premise text: The text supports a transitional provision.
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Mar 2018
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5-5
note: Conditional commencement of Sch 3 on 5 Mar 2022
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.71
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-5-5-norm

9 Aug 2022
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9-2
note: Amendment history for Treasury Laws Amendment (Putting Consumers First—Establishment of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority) Act 2018
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: c2022c00235.pdf, p.71
asserts: c2022c00235-sch-3-sec-9-2-norm