Gene Technology Act 2000
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 169 of 2000
date: 14 October 2024
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

14 October 2024
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14
note: Compilation information and notes on amendments.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-5
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-6

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies the text of the law as amended.
premise text: The compilation shows the text of the law as amended and in force on 14 October 2024.
conclusion text: The compilation is a representation of the law as it stands.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Provides information about amending laws and amendment history.
premise text: The notes at the end of this compilation include information about amending laws and the amendment history of provisions of the compiled law.
conclusion text: The notes provide context for understanding changes to the law.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the effect of uncommenced amendments.
premise text: The effect of uncommenced amendments is not shown in the text of the compiled law.
conclusion text: Uncommenced amendments do not affect the current text of the law.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Provides information about applications, saving, and transitional provisions.
premise text: If the operation of a provision or amendment of the compiled law is affected by an application, saving or transitional provision that is not included in this compilation, details are included in the endnotes.
conclusion text: The compilation does not include all relevant information about applications, saving, and transitional provisions.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes modifications to the compiled law.
premise text: If the compiled law is modified by another law, the compiled law operates as modified but the modification does not amend the text of the law.
conclusion text: The compilation does not show the text of the compiled law as modified.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes self-repealing provisions.
premise text: If a provision of the compiled law has been repealed in accordance with a provision of the law, details are included in the endnotes.
conclusion text: The compilation notes any repealed provisions.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.13
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
has part: 2(1) Commencement
has part: 2(2) Commencement
has part: 2(3) Commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.13

2(1) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-1
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Commences on a specific day after Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.13
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: commence
logic summary: Establishes commencement rule
premise text: (1) Sections 1 and 2 of this Act commence on the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: Sections 1 and 2 of this Act commence on the specified day.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: before
logic summary: Establishes temporal relationship with Act's commencement
premise text: (1) Sections 1 and 2 of this Act commence on the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: The commencement date is before the Act's effective date.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: before
logic summary: Establishes temporal relationship with Act's commencement
premise text: (1) Sections 1 and 2 of this Act commence on the day on which this Act receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: The commencement date is before the Act's effective date.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

2(2) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-2
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Commencement of other provisions subject to subsection (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.13
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-2-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-2-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Fixed day or days to be fixed by Proclamation
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2(3) Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2-ss-3
part of: 2 Commencement
note: Conditional commencement provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.13
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-2-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-2-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Specifies the temporal interval for commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Object of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Protect health and safety of people and environment by regulating GMOs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.13
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Object of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Protect health and safety of people and environment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Regulatory framework to achieve object
type: Concept
realized by: sec-4
note: Regulatory framework must prevent environmental degradation despite lack of full scientific certainty.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.13
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Regulatory framework to achieve object
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Regulatory framework is obligatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Nationally consistent scheme
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Intention of Parliament regarding national scheme
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.14
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-5-norm

6 Act to bind the Crown
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6
has part: 6(1) Act to bind the Crown
has part: 6(2) Act to bind the Crown
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.14

6(1) Act to bind the Crown
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-1
part of: 6 Act to bind the Crown
note: The Crown is bound by this Act in all its capacities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.14
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-6-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The Crown is obligated to comply with this Act.
premise text: (1) This Act binds the Crown in each of its capacities.
conclusion text: The Crown must comply with this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: This Act imposes an obligation on the Crown.
premise text: (1) This Act binds the Crown in each of its capacities.
conclusion text: The Crown is obligated to comply with this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-6-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: This Act implies an obligation on the Crown.
premise text: (1) This Act binds the Crown in each of its capacities.
conclusion text: The Crown must comply with this Act if it is bound by this Act.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6(2) Act to bind the Crown
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-ss-2
part of: 6 Act to bind the Crown
note: Crown not liable for prosecution
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.14
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits Crown liability
premise text: (2) Nothing in this Act
conclusion text: Crown not liable for prosecution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 External Territories
type: Concept
realized by: sec-7
note: This Act extends to every external Territory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.14
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-7-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 External Territories
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extension of jurisdiction
premise text: The Act applies to external Territories.
conclusion text: The Act extends to every external Territory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
has part: 8(1) Offences
has part: 8(2) Offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.14

8(1) Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-1
part of: 8 Offences
note: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.14
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-8-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-8-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8(1) Offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-8-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code applies to all offences against this Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8(2) Offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8-ss-2
part of: 8 Offences
note: Offence punishable by penalty not exceeding specified amount
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.14
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-8-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-8-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-8-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-8-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-8-ss-2-logic-shacl-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-8-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence
premise text: (2) If a maximum penalty is specified:
conclusion text: a person who contravenes the section or subsection commits an offence punishable, on conviction, by a penalty not exceeding the specified penalty;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-8-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for the provision
premise text: (2) If a maximum penalty is specified:
conclusion text: then: Preliminary Part 1 Section 8 Gene Technology Act 2000
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-8-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Defines the recurring trace for the provision
premise text: (2) If a maximum penalty is specified:
conclusion text: then: Preliminary Part 1 Section 8 Gene Technology Act 2000
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-8-ss-2-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Entity Recognition
logic summary: Recognizes the entity (person) involved in the provision
premise text: (2) If a maximum penalty is specified:
conclusion text: a person who contravenes the section or subsection commits an offence punishable, on conviction, by a penalty not exceeding the specified penalty;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-8-ss-2-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Schema Validation
logic summary: Validates the schema of the provision
premise text: (2) If a maximum penalty is specified:
conclusion text: then: Preliminary Part 1 Section 8 Gene Technology Act 2000
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-9
note: Part outline
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.16
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-9-norm

10 Definitions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10
note: Definitions for the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.17
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Class hierarchy definitions
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Meaning of intentional release of a GMO into the environment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11
note: Intentional release of GMO into environment is a dealing with a GMO.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.22
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-11-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Meaning of intentional release of a GMO into the environment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Dealing involves intentional release.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Meaning of corresponding State law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12
has part: 12(1) Meaning of corresponding State law
has part: 12(2) Meaning of corresponding State law
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.23

12(1) Meaning of corresponding State law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-1
part of: 12 Meaning of corresponding State law
note: The Minister declares State law to correspond to this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.23
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-12-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-12-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-12-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(1) Meaning of corresponding State law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-12-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Declaration
logic summary: Minister's declaration of State law correspondence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-12-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Corresponding State law is a subclass of declared laws.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12(2) Meaning of corresponding State law
type: Concept
realized by: sec-12-ss-2
part of: 12 Meaning of corresponding State law
note: Minister may revoke Gazette notice under subsection (1) in relation to a State law under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.23
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-12-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-12-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-12-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12(2) Meaning of corresponding State law
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-12-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-12-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: relation to a State law
logic summary: Applies to a specific domain.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13
has part: 13(1) Operation of Act
has part: 13(2) Operation of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.24

13(1) Operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-ss-1
part of: 13 Operation of Act
note: Applicability of Act to various entities and activities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.24
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-13-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-13-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-13-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13(1) Operation of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-13-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Applicability of Act to various entities and activities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-13-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13(2) Operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-ss-2
part of: 13 Operation of Act
note: Defines constitutional corporation and trade or commerce.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.24
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-13-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-13-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-13-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 13(2) Operation of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-13-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Identifies a type of entity.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-13-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: typeOf
logic summary: Classifies entities by type.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Wind-back of reach of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-2
has part: 14(1) Wind-back of reach of Act
has part: 14(2) Wind-back of reach of Act
has part: 14(3) Wind-back of reach of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.24

14(1) Wind-back of reach of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-2-ss-1
part of: 14 Wind-back of reach of Act
note: Wind-back notice in relation to a State is in force at that time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.24
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-2-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-2-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(1) Wind-back of reach of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-2-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State.
premise text: (a) a corresponding State law is in force in the notifying State at that time;
conclusion text: The wind-back notice must be in force.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-2-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Specifies the temporal relationship between the wind-back notice and the corresponding State law.
premise text: (a) a corresponding State law is in force in the notifying State at that time;
conclusion text: The wind-back notice must overlap with the corresponding State law.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-2-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the wind-back notice and its effect.
premise text: (b) a wind-back notice in relation to that State is in force at that time;
conclusion text: The wind-back notice must be until the corresponding State law is no longer in force.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-2-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Describes how the obligation is propagated.
premise text: (a) a corresponding State law is in force in the notifying State at that time;
conclusion text: The wind-back notice must diffuse to other States.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-2-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: Describes how the obligation can be inferred.
premise text: (b) a wind-back notice in relation to that State is in force at that time;
conclusion text: The wind-back notice must infer the corresponding State law.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14(2) Wind-back of reach of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-2-ss-2
part of: 14 Wind-back of reach of Act
note: Exemptions from application of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.24
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-2-ss-2-norm

14(3) Wind-back of reach of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-14-2-ss-3
part of: 14 Wind-back of reach of Act
note: Notice of application to wind-back the reach of the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.24
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-2-ss-3-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-14-2-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14(3) Wind-back of reach of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15 Relationship to other Commonwealth laws
type: Concept
realized by: sec-15
note: Provisions of this Act do not substitute for other Commonwealth laws.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.25
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-15-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Relationship to other Commonwealth laws
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Provisions of this Act do not substitute for other Commonwealth laws.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 State laws may operate concurrently
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16
has part: 16(1) State laws may operate concurrently
has part: 16(2) State laws may operate concurrently
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.26

16(1) State laws may operate concurrently
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-ss-1
part of: 16 State laws may operate concurrently
note: State laws may operate concurrently with this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-16-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-16-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(1) State laws may operate concurrently
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-16-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: concurrently
logic summary: Concurrent operation of State laws and the Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16(2) State laws may operate concurrently
type: Concept
realized by: sec-16-ss-2
part of: 16 State laws may operate concurrently
note: State laws may operate concurrently with federal laws under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-16-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-16-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16(2) State laws may operate concurrently
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-16-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permits concurrent operation of state and federal laws.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

17 Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17
has part: 17(1) Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
has part: 17(2) Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
has part: 17(3) Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
has part: 17(4) Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
has part: 17(5) Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
has part: 17(6) Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.26

17(1) Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-1
part of: 17 Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
note: Confer functions, powers and duties on Commonwealth officers and bodies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(1) Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: confer
logic summary: Granting functions, powers and duties
premise text: (1) A corresponding State law may confer...
conclusion text: ...functions, powers and duties on the following:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between functions, powers and duties
premise text: (1) A corresponding State law may confer...
conclusion text: ...functions, powers and duties on the following:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of functions, powers and duties
premise text: (1) A corresponding State law may confer...
conclusion text: ...functions, powers and duties on the following:
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuse
logic summary: Diffusing functions, powers and duties to Commonwealth officers and bodies
premise text: (1) A corresponding State law may confer...
conclusion text: ...functions, powers and duties on the following:
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: classify
logic summary: Classification of Commonwealth officers and bodies using AI
premise text: (a) the Regulator or another officer of...
conclusion text: ...the following:
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

17(2) Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-2
part of: 17 Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
note: Permits Commonwealth officers and bodies to perform functions or exercise powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(3) Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-3
part of: 17 Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
note: Regulator may include dealings on GMO Register if corresponding State law confers power.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-3-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(3) Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Regulator has permission to include dealings on GMO Register.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(4) Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-4
part of: 17 Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
note: Regulator may vary GMO Register in accordance with corresponding State law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-4-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(4) Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

17(5) Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-5
part of: 17 Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
note: Regulator may enter information on Record in accordance with corresponding State law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-5-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 17(5) Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Regulator may enter information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17(6) Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-17-ss-6
part of: 17 Conferral of functions on Commonwealth officers and bodies
note: Regulator may make notations in GMO Register and Record of GMO Dealings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.26
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-6-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-17-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Regulator has permission to make notations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 No doubling-up of liabilities
type: Concept
realized by: sec-18
note: No punishment for offence under this Act if already punished under corresponding State law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.27
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-18-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-18-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-18-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18 No doubling-up of liabilities
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If A implies B, and A is true, then B is true.
premise text: (A -> B)
conclusion text: B
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Review of certain decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19
has part: 19(1) Review of certain decisions
has part: 19(2) Review of certain decisions
has part: 19(3) Review of certain decisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.28

19(1) Review of certain decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-1
part of: 19 Review of certain decisions
note: Application for review of a reviewable State decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.28
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-1-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(1) Review of certain decisions
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

19(2) Review of certain decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-2
part of: 19 Review of certain decisions
note: Decision made by Regulator is reviewable if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.28
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(2) Review of certain decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Regulator has an obligation to review decisions.
premise text: (2) A decision made by the Regulator...
conclusion text: is a reviewable State decision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Decision overlaps with other reviewable decisions.
premise text: (b) the decision is declared by the regulations...
conclusion text: is a reviewable State decision for the purposes of this section.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Regulator's obligation implies a duty to review decisions.
premise text: (2) A decision made by the Regulator...
conclusion text: is a reviewable State decision.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Regulator's obligation diffuses to other entities.
premise text: (2) A decision made by the Regulator...
conclusion text: is a reviewable State decision.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19(3) Review of certain decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-ss-3
part of: 19 Review of certain decisions
note: Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 has effect as if a corresponding State law were an Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.28
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19(3) Review of certain decisions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasEffectAsIf
logic summary: Imposes obligation on State to have effect as if a corresponding law were an Act.
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 has effect as if a corresponding State law were an Act.
conclusion text: The Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 has effect as if a corresponding State law were an Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the section and the commencement of the Act.
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 has effect as if a corresponding State law were an Act.
conclusion text: The section applies during the commencement of the Act.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the section and the commencement of the Act.
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 has effect as if a corresponding State law were an Act.
conclusion text: The section applies during the commencement of the Act.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the section and the commencement of the Act.
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 has effect as if a corresponding State law were an Act.
conclusion text: The section diffuses during the commencement of the Act.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasEffectAsIf
logic summary: Describes the cognitive relationship between the section and the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024.
premise text: (3) For the purposes of this section, the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 has effect as if a corresponding State law were an Act.
conclusion text: The section has a cognitive effect on the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Things done for multiple purposes
type: Concept
realized by: sec-20
note: Validity of licenses/certificates not affected by concurrent purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.28
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-20-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-20-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Things done for multiple purposes
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with the Act despite concurrent purposes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Ministerial Council may issue policy principles
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21
has part: 21(1) Ministerial Council may issue policy principles
has part: 21(2) Ministerial Council may issue policy principles
has part: 21(3) Ministerial Council may issue policy principles
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.28

21(1) Ministerial Council may issue policy principles
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-ss-1
part of: 21 Ministerial Council may issue policy principles
note: Ministerial Council may issue policy principles.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.28
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-21-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-21-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21(1) Ministerial Council may issue policy principles
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-21-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May issue policy principles.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(2) Ministerial Council may issue policy principles
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-ss-2
part of: 21 Ministerial Council may issue policy principles
note: Must be satisfied that policy principle was developed in accordance with section 22 before issuing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.28
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-21-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-21-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be satisfied
premise text: Policy principle was developed in accordance with section 22
conclusion text: Ministerial Council must issue policy principle
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21(3) Ministerial Council may issue policy principles
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-ss-3
part of: 21 Ministerial Council may issue policy principles
note: Regulations must not derogate from health and safety of people or environment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.28
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-21-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-21-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Regulations must not derogate from health and safety of people or environment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Consultation on policy principles
type: Concept
realized by: sec-22
note: Consultation on policy principles required
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.29
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-22-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires consultation
premise text: (1) Policy principles are to be developed in consultation with...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Ministerial Council may issue policy guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23
note: Ministerial Council may issue policy guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.30
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-23-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-23-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May issue policy guidelines.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Ministerial Council may issue codes of practice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24
has part: 24(1) Ministerial Council may issue codes of practice
has part: 24(2) Ministerial Council may issue codes of practice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.30

24(1) Ministerial Council may issue codes of practice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-ss-1
part of: 24 Ministerial Council may issue codes of practice
note: Ministerial Council may issue codes of practice in relation to gene technology.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.30
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-24-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-24-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24(2) Ministerial Council may issue codes of practice
type: Concept
realized by: sec-24-ss-2
part of: 24 Ministerial Council may issue codes of practice
note: Must consult with certain groups before issuing a code of practice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.30
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-24-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-24-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must consult with certain groups
premise text: (2) The Ministerial Council must not issue a code of practice unless...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-25
note: Establishes the office of the Gene Technology Regulator and specifies its functions and powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.31
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-25-norm

26 The Gene Technology Regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-26
note: Establishment of Gene Technology Regulator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.31
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-26-norm

27 Functions of the Regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27
note: Functions of the Regulator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.31
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-27-norm

28 Powers of the Regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28
note: The Regulator has power to do all things necessary or convenient for the performance of its functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.32
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-28-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-28-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Power
logic summary: The Regulator has power to do all things necessary or convenient.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29
has part: 29(1) Delegation
has part: 29(2) Delegation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.32

29(1) Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-ss-1
part of: 29 Delegation
note: Delegation of powers or functions to employees, departments, or state agencies.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.32
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-29-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-29-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-29-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-29-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: canDelegate
logic summary: Power delegation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-29-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29(2) Delegation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-29-ss-2
part of: 29 Delegation
note: Delegate must comply with Regulator's directions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.32
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-29-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-29-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply
premise text: Regulator's directions
conclusion text: Delegate's actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Independence of the Regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30
note: Regulator's discretion in GMO licence issuance and conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.33
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-30-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-30-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-30-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Discretion
logic summary: Regulator's freedom to act
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31
note: Dealing with GMOs unless authorized or exempt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.34
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-31-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-31-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-31-logic-ltl-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-31-logic-deontic-3

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-31-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 Simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-31-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <>
logic summary: Defines permitted dealing types
premise text: (a) the person undertaking the dealing is authorised to do so by a GMO licence;
conclusion text: Dealing with GMOs unless authorized or exempt.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-31-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <>
logic summary: Defines notifiable low risk dealings
premise text: (b) the dealing is a notifiable low risk dealing (see Division 2 of Part 6);
conclusion text: Dealing with GMOs unless authorized or exempt.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-31-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies dealings with GMOs as prohibited
premise text: This Part prohibits dealings with GMOs unless...
conclusion text: Dealing with GMOs is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32
has part: 32(1) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence
has part: 32(2) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence
has part: 32(3) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence
has part: 32(4) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.35

32(1) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32-ss-1
part of: 32 Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence
note: Dealing with a GMO without a licence is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.35
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(1) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with GMOs without a licence.
premise text: (a) the person deals with a GMO, knowing that it is a GMO;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with GMOs without a licence.
premise text: (b) the dealing with the GMO by the person is not authorised by a GMO licence, and the person knows or is reckless as to that fact;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with GMOs without a licence.
premise text: (c) the dealing with the GMO is not specified in an emergency dealing determination, and the person knows or is reckless as to that fact;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with GMOs without a licence.
premise text: (d) the dealing is not a notifiable low risk dealing, and the person knows or is reckless as to that fact;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with GMOs without a licence.
premise text: (e) the dealing is not an exempt dealing, and the person knows or is reckless as to that fact;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(2) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32-ss-2
part of: 32 Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence
note: Dealing with a GMO without a licence is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.35
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(2) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Expresses the negative aspect of the prohibition.
premise text: Not deal with a GMO without a licence
conclusion text: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(3) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32-ss-3
part of: 32 Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence
note: Dealing with a GMO without a licence is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.35
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(3) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of dealing with GMO without a licence.
premise text: (3) In this section: exempt dealing means a dealing specified by the regulations to be an exempt dealing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of dealings as exempt or non-exempt.
premise text: (3) In this section: exempt dealing means a dealing specified by the regulations to be an exempt dealing.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for exempt dealings.
premise text: (3) In this section: exempt dealing means a dealing specified by the regulations to be an exempt dealing.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(4) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-32-ss-4
part of: 32 Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence
note: Exemptions from regulations under subsection (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.35
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-4-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-32-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(4) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

33 Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence—strict liability
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33
has part: 33(1) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence—strict liability
has part: 33(2) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence—strict liability
has part: 33(3) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence—strict liability
has part: 33(4) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence—strict liability
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.36

33(1) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence—strict liability
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-1
part of: 33 Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence—strict liability
note: Dealing with a GMO without a licence is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-1-logic-argumentation-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(1) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence—strict liability
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with GMOs without a licence.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: Dealing with a GMO without a licence is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-1-logic-argumentation-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies that dealing with GMOs without a licence is an offence.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: Dealing with a GMO without a licence implies an offence.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Deals with GMOs within the scope of the licence.
premise text: (a) the person deals with a GMO...
conclusion text: Dealing with GMOs is within the scope of the licence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads the prohibition to dealing with GMOs without a licence.
premise text: (b) the dealing with the GMO by the person...
conclusion text: Dealing with GMOs without a licence spreads the prohibition.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognise
logic summary: Recognises the licence as a condition for dealing with GMOs.
premise text: (b) the dealing with the GMO by the person is not authorised...
conclusion text: The licence recognises the condition for dealing with GMOs.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33(2) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence—strict liability
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-2
part of: 33 Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence—strict liability
note: Dealing with a GMO without a licence is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(2) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence—strict liability
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: !
logic summary: Expresses the negative aspect of the prohibition.
premise text: Dealing with a GMO without a licence
conclusion text: Prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: ∧
logic summary: Combines the prohibition with the subject.
premise text: NaturalPerson
conclusion text: Dealing with a GMO without a licence is prohibited NaturalPerson
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: ⊆
logic summary: Defines the temporal scope of the prohibition.
premise text: GMO
conclusion text: Dealing with a GMO without a licence is prohibited during its existence
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33(3) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence—strict liability
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-3
part of: 33 Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence—strict liability
note: Strict liability for dealing with GMO without a licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(3) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence—strict liability
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with GMO without a licence
premise text: (3) An offence under this section is punishable...
conclusion text: ...50 penalty units.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33(4) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence—strict liability
type: Concept
realized by: sec-33-ss-4
part of: 33 Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence—strict liability
note: Dealing with GMOs without a licence is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.36
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 33(4) Person not to deal with a GMO without a licence—strict liability
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-33-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of dealing with GMOs without a licence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34
has part: 34(1) Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence
has part: 34(2) Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence
has part: 34(3) Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence
has part: 34(4) Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.37

34(1) Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34-ss-1
part of: 34 Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence
note: Breach of GMO licence conditions is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.37
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-34-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-34-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(1) Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-34-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits action
conclusion text: Breach of licence conditions is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(2) Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34-ss-2
part of: 34 Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence
note: Breach of GMO licence conditions is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.37
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-34-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-34-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(2) Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-34-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits breach of GMO licence conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(3) Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34-ss-3
part of: 34 Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence
note: Breach of GMO licence conditions is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.37
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-34-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-34-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(3) Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-34-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits breach of GMO licence conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34(4) Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-34-ss-4
part of: 34 Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence
note: Breach of GMO licence conditions is an offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.37
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-34-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-34-ss-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 34(4) Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-34-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits breach of GMO licence conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence—strict
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35
note: Breach of GMO licence conditions is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.37
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35-logic-argumentation-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 35 Person must not breach conditions of a GMO licence—strict
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: The holder of a GMO licence commits an offence if the holder:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35-logic-argumentation-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of breaching GMO licence conditions on committing an offence
premise text: The holder of a GMO licence commits an offence if the holder:
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35A Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35a
has part: 35A(1) Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
has part: 35A(2) Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.38

35A(1) Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35a-ss-1
part of: 35A Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
note: Breach of emergency dealing conditions is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.38
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35a-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-epistemic-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 35A(1) Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits breach of emergency dealing conditions.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the action or omission contravenes such a condition, and the person knows or is reckless as to that fact.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on individuals to comply with emergency dealing conditions.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: ...the action or omission contravenes such a condition, and the person knows or is reckless as to that fact.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-epistemic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Knowledge
logic summary: Requires individuals to have knowledge of emergency dealing conditions.
premise text: (b) the person has knowledge of the conditions to which an emergency dealing determination is subject;
conclusion text: ...and the person knows or is reckless as to that fact.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implicates a causal relationship between breach of emergency dealing conditions and committing an offence.
premise text: (a) the person intentionally takes an action or omits to take an action;
conclusion text: ...and the action or omission contravenes such a condition, and the person knows or is reckless as to that fact.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35a-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits intentional breach of emergency dealing conditions.
premise text: (a) the person intentionally takes an action or omits to take an action;
conclusion text: ...and the person knows or is reckless as to that fact.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35A(2) Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35a-ss-2
part of: 35A Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
note: Breach of GMO dealing conditions is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.38
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35a-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 35A(2) Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (2) An offence under this section is punishable...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35B Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35b
has part: 35B(1) Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
has part: 35B(2) Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
has part: 35B(3) Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.39

35B(1) Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35b-ss-1
part of: 35B Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
note: Breach of emergency dealing conditions is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.39
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35b-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35b-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 35B(1) Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: Breach of emergency dealing conditions is an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35B(2) Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35b-ss-2
part of: 35B Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
note: Breach of emergency dealing conditions is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.39
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35b-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35b-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 35B(2) Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits breach of emergency dealing conditions.
premise text: (2) Strict liability applies to paragraphs (1)(a) and (c).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35B(3) Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-35b-ss-3
part of: 35B Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
note: Breach of emergency dealing conditions is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.39
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35b-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35b-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 35B(3) Person must not breach conditions of emergency dealing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-35b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits breach of emergency dealing conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 Person must not breach conditions on GMO Register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-36
note: Dealing with GMOs on the register is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.39
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-36-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-36-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-36-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 36 Person must not breach conditions on GMO Register
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with GMOs on the register
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

37 Offence relating to notifiable low risk dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-37
note: Dealing with GMO without proper regulation is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.40
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-37-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-37-logic-deontic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-37-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-37-logic-ltl-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-37-logic-diffusion-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-37-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 37 Offence relating to notifiable low risk dealings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with GMO without regulation.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the dealing by the person was not undertaken in accordance with the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-37-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty to comply with regulation.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the dealing by the person was not undertaken in accordance with the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-37-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Dealing with GMO without regulation overlaps with obligation to comply.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the dealing by the person was not undertaken in accordance with the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-37-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalRecurring
logic summary: Dealing with GMO without regulation is a recurring obligation.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the dealing by the person was not undertaken in accordance with the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-37-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: InformationSpread
logic summary: Dealing with GMO without regulation spreads information about non-compliance.
premise text: (1) A person commits an offence...
conclusion text: ...the dealing by the person was not undertaken in accordance with the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

38 Aggravated offences—significant damage to health or safety of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38
has part: 38(1) Aggravated offences—significant damage to health or safety of
has part: 38(2) Aggravated offences—significant damage to health or safety of
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.40

38(1) Aggravated offences—significant damage to health or safety of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38-ss-1
part of: 38 Aggravated offences—significant damage to health or safety of
note: Significant damage to health or safety of people or environment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.40
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38(1) Aggravated offences—significant damage to health or safety of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: implies
logic summary: If an offence causes significant damage, it is an aggravated offence
premise text: (offence) -> (significant damage)
conclusion text: (offence) -> (aggravated offence)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The commission of the offence occurs during significant damage
premise text: (commission of offence) -> (significant damage)
conclusion text: (commission of offence) -> (during significant damage)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: The commission of the offence continues until significant damage is caused
premise text: (commission of offence) -> (significant damage)
conclusion text: (commission of offence) -> (until significant damage)
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: through
logic summary: The commission of the offence spreads through people or environment
premise text: (commission of offence) -> (people or environment)
conclusion text: (commission of offence) -> (through people or environment)
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: by
logic summary: The commission of the offence is caused by a cognitive agent
premise text: (commission of offence) -> (cognitive agent)
conclusion text: (commission of offence) -> (by cognitive agent)
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38(2) Aggravated offences—significant damage to health or safety of
type: Concept
realized by: sec-38-ss-2
part of: 38 Aggravated offences—significant damage to health or safety of
note: Intentional or reckless conduct causing significant damage to health or safety
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.40
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38(2) Aggravated offences—significant damage to health or safety of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Intentional conduct creates an obligation to prevent harm
premise text: (a) intended his or her conduct...
conclusion text: The person committed the offence with intent...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Reckless conduct creates an obligation to prevent harm
premise text: (b) was reckless as to whether...
conclusion text: The person committed the offence with reckless disregard...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Conduct causing significant damage overlaps with a temporal interval of harm
premise text: (a) intended his or her conduct to cause...
conclusion text: The person's conduct overlaps with the temporal interval of harm
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-2-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Conduct causing significant damage repeats over time
premise text: (b) was reckless as to whether...
conclusion text: The person's conduct repeats over the temporal interval of harm
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-38-ss-2-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Reckless disregard for harm is not a permission to cause harm
premise text: (b) was reckless as to whether...
conclusion text: The person's conduct does not create a permission to cause harm
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-39
note: Licensing system for dealings with GMOs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.41
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-39-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-39-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-39-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-39-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-39-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-39-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 39 Simplified outline
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasLicense
logic summary: Licence holder must inform others of conditions
premise text: The licence holder is required to inform such persons of any conditions of the licence that apply to them.
conclusion text: A person other than the licence holder must be informed of conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-39-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implies
logic summary: Application for a licence implies compliance with conditions
premise text: A person applies for a licence to deal with GMOs.
conclusion text: The application implies compliance with conditions
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-39-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Conditions apply during the licence period
premise text: The licence holder is required to inform such persons of any conditions of the licence that apply to them.
conclusion text: Conditions apply during the licence period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-39-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustInform
logic summary: Licence holder must inform others of conditions
premise text: The licence holder is required to inform such persons of any conditions of the licence that apply to them.
conclusion text: Others must be informed by the licence holder
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-39-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: hasLicense
logic summary: Licence holder has a licence
premise text: The licence holder is required to inform such persons of any conditions of the licence that apply to them.
conclusion text: The licence holder has a licence
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

40 Person may apply for a licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40
has part: 40(1) Person may apply for a licence
has part: 40(2) Person may apply for a licence
has part: 40(3) Person may apply for a licence
has part: 40(4) Person may apply for a licence
has part: 40(5) Person may apply for a licence
has part: 40(6) Person may apply for a licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.42

40(1) Person may apply for a licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-1
part of: 40 Person may apply for a licence
note: A person may apply for a licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.42
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-1-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(1) Person may apply for a licence
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

40(2) Person may apply for a licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-2
part of: 40 Person may apply for a licence
note: Application must be in writing and contain specified information.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.42
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(2) Person may apply for a licence
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(3) Person may apply for a licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-3
part of: 40 Person may apply for a licence
note: Application must specify intentional release of GMO into environment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.42
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(3) Person may apply for a licence
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must specify
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(4) Person may apply for a licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-4
part of: 40 Person may apply for a licence
note: Permits dealings with GMOs or specified classes of GMOs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.42
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(4) Person may apply for a licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERMITS
logic summary: Permits dealings with GMOs or specified classes of GMOs.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: CLASSIFICATION
logic summary: Classifies dealings as permitted or not.
premise text: (4) The dealings in respect of which a person may apply for a licence
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(5) Person may apply for a licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-5
part of: 40 Person may apply for a licence
note: Applicant may apply for a licence authorising dealings by specified person or persons, class of person, or all persons.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.42
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-5-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to deal with specified persons or classes of persons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class
logic summary: Applicant may apply for a licence authorising dealings by specified person or persons, class of person, or all persons.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-5-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: All
logic summary: Permission to deal with all persons.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Apply
logic summary: Applicant may apply for a licence authorising dealings by specified person or persons, class of person, or all persons.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Request
logic summary: Applicant requests permission to deal with specified person or persons, class of person, or all persons.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40(6) Person may apply for a licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40-ss-6
part of: 40 Person may apply for a licence
note: Must pay application fee
description: application fee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.42
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-6-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 40(6) Person may apply for a licence
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide application fee
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40A Licences relating to inadvertent dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40a
has part: 40A(1) Licences relating to inadvertent dealings
has part: 40A(2) Licences relating to inadvertent dealings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.43

40A(1) Licences relating to inadvertent dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40a-ss-1
part of: 40A Licences relating to inadvertent dealings
note: Regulator may treat person as having made an inadvertent dealings application with agreement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.43
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40a-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to treat person as having made an inadvertent dealings application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40A(2) Licences relating to inadvertent dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-40a-ss-2
part of: 40A Licences relating to inadvertent dealings
note: Allowing application under section 40 for GMOs inadvertently possessed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.43
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40a-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-40a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 Application may be withdrawn
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41
has part: 41(1) Application may be withdrawn
has part: 41(2) Application may be withdrawn
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.43

41(1) Application may be withdrawn
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41-ss-1
part of: 41 Application may be withdrawn
note: Application may be withdrawn at any time before licence is issued.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.43
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-41-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-41-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(1) Application may be withdrawn
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-41-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to withdraw application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41(2) Application may be withdrawn
type: Concept
realized by: sec-41-ss-2
part of: 41 Application may be withdrawn
note: Application fee not refundable if withdrawn
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.43
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-41-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-41-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 41(2) Application may be withdrawn
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-41-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits refund of application fee upon withdrawal
premise text: (2) The application fee is not refundable if the applicant withdraws the application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Regulator may require applicant to give further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42
has part: 42(1) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
has part: 42(2) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
has part: 42(3) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.43

42(1) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-1
part of: 42 Regulator may require applicant to give further information
note: Regulator may require applicant to give further information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.43
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-42-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-42-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(1) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-42-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulator may require applicant to give further information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(2) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-2
part of: 42 Regulator may require applicant to give further information
note: Regulator may require applicant to give further information within a specified period.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.43
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-42-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-42-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 42(2) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-42-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Regulator may require applicant to give further information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42(3) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-42-ss-3
part of: 42 Regulator may require applicant to give further information
note: Regulator may require applicant to give further information at any time before the Regulator decides the application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.43
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-42-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-42-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Regulator may require information to be given under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Regulator must consider applications except in certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43
has part: 43(1) Regulator must consider applications except in certain
has part: 43(2) Regulator must consider applications except in certain
has part: 43(3) Regulator must consider applications except in certain
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.44

43(1) Regulator must consider applications except in certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43-ss-1
part of: 43 Regulator must consider applications except in certain
note: Must consider applications for a licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.44
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-43-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-43-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-43-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must consider application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43(2) Regulator must consider applications except in certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43-ss-2
part of: 43 Regulator must consider applications except in certain
note: Regulator must not consider application under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.44
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-43-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-43-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-43-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-43-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-43-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-43-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-43-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Regulator is prohibited from considering the application.
premise text: (2) However, the Regulator is not required to consider the application...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-43-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Regulator must consider application within a certain timeframe.
premise text: (d) the applicant did not provide further information required by the Regulator by notice under section 42 within the period specified in the notice...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-43-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Regulator must consider application repeatedly.
premise text: (e) the Regulator is satisfied that to issue the licence would be inconsistent with a policy principle in force under section 21...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-43-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Regulator must diffuse information about application.
premise text: (f) the Regulator is satisfied (having regard to the matters specified in section 58) that the applicant is not a suitable person to hold a licence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-43-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Infer
logic summary: Regulator must infer suitability of applicant.
premise text: (f) the Regulator is satisfied (having regard to the matters specified in section 58) that the applicant is not a suitable person to hold a licence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43(3) Regulator must consider applications except in certain
type: Concept
realized by: sec-43-ss-3
part of: 43 Regulator must consider applications except in certain
note: Regulator must issue licence within prescribed period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.44
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-43-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-43-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-43-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulatory duty
conclusion text: issue licence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Regulator may consult with applicant
type: Concept
realized by: sec-44
note: Consultation with applicant or another agency before considering an application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.44
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-44-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-44-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Regulator's obligation to consult with applicant.
premise text: Regulator must consider application before consulting applicant.
conclusion text: Regulator may consult applicant or another agency.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Regulator must not use certain information in considering licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-45
note: Regulator must not use confidential commercial information without consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.44
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-45-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-45-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of using confidential information
premise text: Regulator must not use the information.
conclusion text: unless the first person has given written consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Applications to which this Division applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46
note: Application for GMO licence must not involve intentional release into environment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.46
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-46-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-46-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-46-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No intentional release of GMO into environment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46A Division does not apply to an application relating to inadvertent
type: Concept
realized by: sec-46a
note: Regulator's satisfaction required for GMO licence application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.46
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-46a-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-46a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-46a-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-46a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 46A Division does not apply to an application relating to inadvertent
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-46a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Regulator has an obligation to satisfy the conditions for a GMO licence application
premise text: The Regulator must be satisfied that...
conclusion text: ...the dealings proposed are limited to certain purposes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-46a-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalOverlap
logic summary: Regulator's satisfaction is conditional on the GMO being inadvertently obtained
premise text: The applicant came into possession of the GMO...
conclusion text: ...inadvertently
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47 What the Regulator must do in relation to application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47
has part: 47(1) What the Regulator must do in relation to application
has part: 47(2) What the Regulator must do in relation to application
has part: 47(3) What the Regulator must do in relation to application
has part: 47(4) What the Regulator must do in relation to application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.46

47(1) What the Regulator must do in relation to application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-1
part of: 47 What the Regulator must do in relation to application
note: Regulator must prepare risk assessment and plan before issuing licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.46
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-47-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-47-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must perform action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(2) What the Regulator must do in relation to application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-2
part of: 47 What the Regulator must do in relation to application
note: Regulator must consider health and safety risks in risk assessment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.46
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-47-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-47-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator has a duty to consider health and safety risks.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(3) What the Regulator must do in relation to application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-3
part of: 47 What the Regulator must do in relation to application
note: Regulator must protect health and safety of people and environment in risk management plan.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.46
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-47-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-47-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-47-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must protect health and safety of people and environment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-47-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Risk management plan is a type of plan that protects health and safety of people and environment.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

47(4) What the Regulator must do in relation to application
type: Concept
realized by: sec-47-ss-4
part of: 47 What the Regulator must do in relation to application
note: Regulator may consult relevant parties for application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.46
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-47-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-47-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to consult parties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

48 Applications to which this Division applies
type: Concept
realized by: sec-48
note: Application for GMO licence must involve intentional release into environment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.48
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-48-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-48-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48 Applications to which this Division applies
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be satisfied that at least one dealing would involve intentional release into environment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Division does not apply to an application relating to inadvertent
type: Concept
realized by: sec-49
note: Regulator's satisfaction required for GMO licence application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.48
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-49-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-49-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-49-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-49-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-49-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Regulator's satisfaction is a requirement
premise text: Regulator must be satisfied
conclusion text: GMO licence application is allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-49-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Dealing types are restricted to specific time periods
premise text: Dealing types include experiments, propagation, growth, transportation, and other dealings
conclusion text: GMO licence application is not affected by Division 48 during these times
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-49-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Dealing types are restricted to specific time periods
premise text: Dealing types include experiments, propagation, growth, transportation, and other dealings
conclusion text: GMO licence application is not affected by Division 48 during these times
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-49-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Regulator's satisfaction is a prerequisite for GMO licence application
premise text: Regulator must be satisfied
conclusion text: GMO licence application is allowed if Regulator is satisfied
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-49-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: Regulator's satisfaction is a prerequisite for GMO licence application
premise text: Regulator must be satisfied
conclusion text: GMO licence application is allowed if Regulator is satisfied
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Regulator must prepare risk assessment and risk management
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50
has part: 50(1) Regulator must prepare risk assessment and risk management
has part: 50(3) Regulator must prepare risk assessment and risk management
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.48

50(1) Regulator must prepare risk assessment and risk management
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-1
part of: 50 Regulator must prepare risk assessment and risk management
note: Regulator must prepare risk assessment and risk management plan before issuing licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.48
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must prepare risk assessment and risk management plan.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50(3) Regulator must prepare risk assessment and risk management
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50-ss-3
part of: 50 Regulator must prepare risk assessment and risk management
note: Regulator must seek advice from various entities on preparation of risk assessment and risk management plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.48
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50-ss-3-logic-shacl-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must seek advice
premise text: Regulator is required to prepare risk assessment and risk management plan
conclusion text: Regulator seeks advice from relevant entities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Regulator must seek advice within a certain timeframe
premise text: The Regulator has a deadline to prepare the risk assessment and risk management plan
conclusion text: Regulator seeks advice before the deadline
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Regulator's obligations are bounded by time
premise text: The Regulator has a limited timeframe to prepare the risk assessment and risk management plan
conclusion text: Regulator seeks advice within the timeframe
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50-ss-3-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Regulator's actions are guided by AI
premise text: The Regulator uses AI to inform its decision-making
conclusion text: Regulator seeks advice from AI-powered systems
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50-ss-3-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Regulator's obligations are defined by schema
premise text: The Regulator is subject to schema-based regulations
conclusion text: Regulator seeks advice from schema-based systems
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50A Limited and controlled release applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50a
has part: 50A(1) Limited and controlled release applications
has part: 50A(2) Limited and controlled release applications
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.49

50A(1) Limited and controlled release applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50a-ss-1
part of: 50A Limited and controlled release applications
note: Regulator must be satisfied with application conditions before issuing a licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.49
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50a-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50A(1) Limited and controlled release applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must be satisfied with application conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50A(2) Limited and controlled release applications
type: Concept
realized by: sec-50a-ss-2
part of: 50A Limited and controlled release applications
note: Methods for restricting GMO dissemination or persistence in the environment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.49
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50a-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 50A(2) Limited and controlled release applications
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-50a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Classifies controls as part of GMO regulations.
premise text: (a) and (b)
conclusion text: controls include...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Matters Regulator must take into account in preparing risk
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51
has part: 51(1) Matters Regulator must take into account in preparing risk
has part: 51(2) Matters Regulator must take into account in preparing risk
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.51

51(1) Matters Regulator must take into account in preparing risk
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51-ss-1
part of: 51 Matters Regulator must take into account in preparing risk
note: Regulator must consider specific factors when preparing risk assessment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.51
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-51-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-51-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator has a duty to consider specific factors.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51(2) Matters Regulator must take into account in preparing risk
type: Concept
realized by: sec-51-ss-2
part of: 51 Matters Regulator must take into account in preparing risk
note: Regulator must consider health and safety of people, environment, advice from State or local council, and Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.51
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-51-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-51-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-51-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must consider...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-51-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Consider health and safety of people, environment...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52 Public notification of risk assessment and risk management plan
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52
has part: 52(1) Public notification of risk assessment and risk management plan
has part: 52(2) Public notification of risk assessment and risk management plan
has part: 52(3) Public notification of risk assessment and risk management plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.52

52(1) Public notification of risk assessment and risk management plan
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52-ss-1
part of: 52 Public notification of risk assessment and risk management plan
note: Public notification of risk assessment and risk management plan is required.
description: Notice in Gazette, newspapers, and website
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.52
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-52-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-52-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 52(1) Public notification of risk assessment and risk management plan
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-52-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Public notification is required
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(2) Public notification of risk assessment and risk management plan
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52-ss-2
part of: 52 Public notification of risk assessment and risk management plan
note: Public notification of risk assessment and risk management plan
description: Risk assessment and risk management plan, written submissions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.52
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-52-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-52-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide public notification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

52(3) Public notification of risk assessment and risk management plan
type: Concept
realized by: sec-52-ss-3
part of: 52 Public notification of risk assessment and risk management plan
note: Seek advice from various entities on risk assessment and management plan
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.52
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-52-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-52-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ought
logic summary: Regulator has an obligation to seek advice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53 Regulator may take other actions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53
has part: 53(1) Regulator may take other actions
has part: 53(2) Regulator may take other actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.53

53(1) Regulator may take other actions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-1
part of: 53 Regulator may take other actions
note: Regulator may take additional actions in deciding an application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.53
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-53-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-53-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Regulator has the power to take additional actions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

53(2) Regulator may take other actions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-53-ss-2
part of: 53 Regulator may take other actions
note: Regulator may direct part of public hearing to be held in private.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.53
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-53-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-53-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by Regulator.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54 Person may request copies of certain documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54
has part: 54(1) Person may request copies of certain documents
has part: 54(2) Person may request copies of certain documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.54

54(1) Person may request copies of certain documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54-ss-1
part of: 54 Person may request copies of certain documents
note: Request for copies of documents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.54
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-54-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-54-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to request documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

54(2) Person may request copies of certain documents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-54-ss-2
part of: 54 Person may request copies of certain documents
note: Regulator must provide a copy of documents, except for confidential commercial information and relevant convictions.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.54
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-54-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-3

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Regulator must provide documents
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: IS NOT A
logic summary: Regulator is not required to provide confidential commercial information or relevant convictions
premise text: (2) If a person makes a request under subsection (1), the Regulator must provide to the person a copy of the documents, other than:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-54-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: IS A
logic summary: Regulator has an obligation to provide documents
premise text: (2) If a person makes a request under subsection (1), the Regulator must provide to the person a copy of the documents, other than:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

55 Regulator must make a decision on licence and licence conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-55
note: Regulator must decide on licence and conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.55
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-55-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-55-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must make a decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Regulator must not issue the licence unless satisfied as to risk
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56
has part: 56(1) Regulator must not issue the licence unless satisfied as to risk
has part: 56(2) Regulator must not issue the licence unless satisfied as to risk
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.55

56(1) Regulator must not issue the licence unless satisfied as to risk
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56-ss-1
part of: 56 Regulator must not issue the licence unless satisfied as to risk
note: Regulator must ensure risks can be managed to protect health and safety and the environment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.55
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56(1) Regulator must not issue the licence unless satisfied as to risk
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Regulator must ensure risks can be managed.
premise text: Regulator has the power to issue licences.
conclusion text: Risk management is required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Between
logic summary: Regulator must consider risks posed by dealings proposed to be authorised.
premise text: Dealing proposals are subject to risk assessment.
conclusion text: Risk management is required for dealing proposals.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Regulator's decision implies consideration of risks.
premise text: Regulator has the power to issue licences.
conclusion text: Regulator's decision is based on consideration of risks.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Regulator's decision spreads to licence issuance.
premise text: Regulator has the power to issue licences.
conclusion text: Licence issuance is affected by regulator's decision.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Regulator uses knowledge to make a decision.
premise text: Regulator has access to information about risks.
conclusion text: Regulator makes an informed decision.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56(2) Regulator must not issue the licence unless satisfied as to risk
type: Concept
realized by: sec-56-ss-2
part of: 56 Regulator must not issue the licence unless satisfied as to risk
note: Regulator must have regard to certain factors when issuing a licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.55
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 56(2) Regulator must not issue the licence unless satisfied as to risk
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must have regard to certain factors.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-56-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Regulator's consideration of submissions and policy guidelines.
premise text: (c) any submissions received under section 52 in relation to the licence;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57 Other circumstances in which Regulator must not issue the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57
has part: 57(1) Other circumstances in which Regulator must not issue the
has part: 57(2) Other circumstances in which Regulator must not issue the
has part: 57(3) Other circumstances in which Regulator must not issue the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.56

57(1) Other circumstances in which Regulator must not issue the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57-ss-1
part of: 57 Other circumstances in which Regulator must not issue the
note: Regulator must not issue licence if inconsistent with policy principle
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.56
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-57-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-57-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Regulator must not issue licence
premise text: Policy principle in force under section 21
conclusion text: Regulator must not issue licence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

57(2) Other circumstances in which Regulator must not issue the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57-ss-2
part of: 57 Other circumstances in which Regulator must not issue the
note: Regulator must not issue licence unless suitable person is found.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.56
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-57-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-57-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-57-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-57-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-57-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-57-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNotIssueLicenceUnless
logic summary: Regulator must not issue licence unless suitable person is found.
premise text: (2) The Regulator must not issue the licence unless the Regulator is satisfied that the applicant is a suitable person to hold the licence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-57-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalInterval
logic summary: Regulator's satisfaction is a temporal interval.
premise text: (2) The Regulator must not issue the licence unless the Regulator is satisfied that the applicant is a suitable person to hold the licence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-57-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalTrace
logic summary: Regulator's satisfaction forms a temporal trace.
premise text: (2) The Regulator must not issue the licence unless the Regulator is satisfied that the applicant is a suitable person to hold the licence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-57-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: InformationDiffusion
logic summary: Regulator's satisfaction diffuses to applicants.
premise text: (2) The Regulator must not issue the licence unless the Regulator is satisfied that the applicant is a suitable person to hold the licence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-57-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: KnowledgeRepresentation
logic summary: Regulator's satisfaction represents knowledge.
premise text: (2) The Regulator must not issue the licence unless the Regulator is satisfied that the applicant is a suitable person to hold the licence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

57(3) Other circumstances in which Regulator must not issue the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-57-ss-3
part of: 57 Other circumstances in which Regulator must not issue the
note: Regulator must not issue the Regulator must not issue the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.56
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-57-ss-3-norm

58 Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a person is
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58
has part: 58(1) Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a person is
has part: 58(2) Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a person is
has part: 58(3) Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a person is
has part: 58(4) Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a person is
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.56

58(1) Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a person is
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-1
part of: 58 Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a person is
note: Regulator must consider certain factors when deciding whether a person is suitable to hold a licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.56
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(1) Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a person is
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must consider certain factors.
premise text: (1) Without limiting the matters to which the Regulator may have regard...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Regulator considers past convictions and licence revocations.
premise text: (b) any revocation or suspension of a licence...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(2) Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a person is
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-2
part of: 58 Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a person is
note: Regulator must consider certain factors when deciding whether a body corporate is suitable to hold a licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.56
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(2) Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a person is
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must consider certain factors.
premise text: (2) Without limiting the matters to which the Regulator may have regard...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(3) Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a person is
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-3
part of: 58 Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a person is
note: Definition of relevant conviction for licence application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.56
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(3) Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a person is
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Classification of convictions
premise text: (a) the offence was committed within the period of 10 years immediately before the making of the application for the licence;
conclusion text: relevant conviction means a conviction for an offence against a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a foreign country, being a law relating to the health and safety of people or the environment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: isA
logic summary: Definition hierarchy
premise text: (3) In this section:
conclusion text: relevant conviction means...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58(4) Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a person is
type: Concept
realized by: sec-58-ss-4
part of: 58 Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a person is
note: Nothing in this section affects the operation of Part VIIC of the Crimes Act 1914.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.56
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 58(4) Matters to be taken into account in deciding whether a person is
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exclusion
logic summary: Excludes Part VIIC of the Crimes Act 1914 from being affected.
premise text: (4) Nothing in this section affects the operation of Part VIIC of the Crimes Act 1914 (which includes provisions that, in certain circumstances, relieve persons from the requirement to disclose spent convictions and require persons aware of such convictions to disregard them).
conclusion text: (4) Nothing in this section affects the operation of Part VIIC of the Crimes Act 1914.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-58-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Includes provisions that, in certain circumstances, relieve persons from the requirement to disclose spent convictions and require persons aware of such convictions to disregard them.
premise text: (4) Nothing in this section affects the operation of Part VIIC of the Crimes Act 1914 (which includes provisions that, in certain circumstances, relieve persons from the requirement to disclose spent convictions and require persons aware of such convictions to disregard them).
conclusion text: (4) Nothing in this section affects the operation of Part VIIC of the Crimes Act 1914 (which includes provisions that, in certain circumstances, relieve persons from the requirement to disclose spent convictions and require persons aware of such convictions to disregard them).
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59 Notification of licence decision
type: Concept
realized by: sec-59
note: Regulator must notify applicant of decision in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.58
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-59-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-59-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator has a duty to notify applicant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Period of licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60
has part: 60(1) Period of licence
has part: 60(2) Period of licence
has part: 60(3) Period of licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.58

60(1) Period of licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60-ss-1
part of: 60 Period of licence
note: A licence continues in force until it is cancelled or surrendered.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.58
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60(1) Period of licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: continues
logic summary: Obligation to maintain licence
premise text: (1) A licence continues in force:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: until the end of that period
logic summary: Temporal interval for licence duration
premise text: (b) otherwise—until it is cancelled or surrendered.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60(2) Period of licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60-ss-2
part of: 60 Period of licence
note: Licence not in force during period of suspension
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.58
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion
premise text: (2) A licence is not in force throughout any period of suspension.
conclusion text: A licence is not in force during the period of suspension.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: disjoint
logic summary: Temporal disjointness
premise text: (2) A licence is not in force throughout any period of suspension.
conclusion text: The period of suspension and the licence's effective period are disjoint temporal intervals.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: ¬∃t (P(t) ∧ Q(t))
logic summary: Temporal negation
premise text: (2) A licence is not in force throughout any period of suspension.
conclusion text: There does not exist a time t such that the licence is in force at t and the period of suspension is also in force at t.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: ¬∃t (P(t) ∧ Q(t))
logic summary: Temporal negation
premise text: (2) A licence is not in force throughout any period of suspension.
conclusion text: There does not exist a time t such that the licence is in force at t and the period of suspension is also in force at t.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: ¬∃t (P(t) ∧ Q(t))
logic summary: Temporal negation
premise text: (2) A licence is not in force throughout any period of suspension.
conclusion text: There does not exist a time t such that the licence is in force at t and the period of suspension is also in force at t.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60(3) Period of licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-60-ss-3
part of: 60 Period of licence
note: Licence period cannot exceed 12 months
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.58
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 60(3) Period of licence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-60-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits licence period exceeding 12 months
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Licence is subject to conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-61
note: GMO licence is subject to conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.59
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-61-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-61-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-61-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61 Licence is subject to conditions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJECT
logic summary: Licence is subject to conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Conditions that may be prescribed or imposed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62
has part: 62(1) Conditions that may be prescribed or imposed
has part: 62(2) Conditions that may be prescribed or imposed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.59

62(1) Conditions that may be prescribed or imposed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62-ss-1
part of: 62 Conditions that may be prescribed or imposed
note: Conditions that impose obligations in relation to GM products derived from a GMO.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.59
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-62-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-62-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-62-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-62-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62(1) Conditions that may be prescribed or imposed
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-62-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Obligation imposition
premise text: (1) Licence conditions may include conditions that impose obligations...
conclusion text: ...in relation to GM products that are derived from a GMO in respect of which particular dealings are licensed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-62-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Class inclusion
premise text: (1) Licence conditions may include conditions that impose obligations...
conclusion text: ...in relation to GM products that are derived from a GMO in respect of which particular dealings are licensed.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-62-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: derived from
logic summary: Temporal derivation
premise text: (1) Licence conditions may include conditions that impose obligations...
conclusion text: ...in relation to GM products that are derived from a GMO in respect of which particular dealings are licensed.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62(2) Conditions that may be prescribed or imposed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-62-ss-2
part of: 62 Conditions that may be prescribed or imposed
note: Conditions that may be prescribed or imposed on a licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.59
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-62-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-62-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-62-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 62(2) Conditions that may be prescribed or imposed
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-62-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires documentation and record-keeping
premise text: (2) Licence conditions may relate to, but are not limited to...
conclusion text: Documentation and record-keeping requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-62-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: During the licence period
premise text: (2) Licence conditions may relate to, but are not limited to...
conclusion text: Documentation and record-keeping requirements.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63 Condition about informing people of obligations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63
has part: 63(1) Condition about informing people of obligations
has part: 63(2) Condition about informing people of obligations
has part: 63(3) Condition about informing people of obligations
has part: 63(4) Condition about informing people of obligations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.60

63(1) Condition about informing people of obligations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-1
part of: 63 Condition about informing people of obligations
note: Licence holder must inform certain individuals of licence conditions and changes.
description: information about licence conditions and changes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.60
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-63-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-63-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Licence holder has a moral obligation to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

63(2) Condition about informing people of obligations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-2
part of: 63 Condition about informing people of obligations
note: Requirements for informing people of obligations may be prescribed by regulations or specified by the Regulator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.60
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-63-ss-2-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-63-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(2) Condition about informing people of obligations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

63(3) Condition about informing people of obligations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-3
part of: 63 Condition about informing people of obligations
note: Measures may include labelling, packaging, training and information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.60
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-63-ss-3-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-63-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 63(3) Condition about informing people of obligations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

63(4) Condition about informing people of obligations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-63-ss-4
part of: 63 Condition about informing people of obligations
note: Comply with requirements if prescribed or specified
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.60
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-63-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-63-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-63-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
premise text: (4) If such requirements are prescribed or specified...
conclusion text: it is a condition of a licence that the licence holder comply with the requirements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

64 Condition about monitoring and audits
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64
has part: 64(1) Condition about monitoring and audits
has part: 64(2) Condition about monitoring and audits
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.61

64(1) Condition about monitoring and audits
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64-ss-1
part of: 64 Condition about monitoring and audits
note: Allow Regulator or authorized person to audit or monitor dealing with GMO.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.61
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64(1) Condition about monitoring and audits
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must allow entry for auditing or monitoring.
premise text: (a) a person is authorised by the licence to deal with a GMO;
conclusion text: the person must allow the Regulator, or a person authorised by the Regulator, to enter premises...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for auditing or monitoring.
premise text: (1) It is a condition of a licence that if:
conclusion text: the person must allow the Regulator, or a person authorised by the Regulator, to enter premises...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for auditing or monitoring.
premise text: (1) It is a condition of a licence that if:
conclusion text: the person must allow the Regulator, or a person authorised by the Regulator, to enter premises...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for auditing or monitoring.
premise text: (1) It is a condition of a licence that if:
conclusion text: the person must allow the Regulator, or a person authorised by the Regulator, to enter premises...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for auditing or monitoring.
premise text: (1) It is a condition of a licence that if:
conclusion text: the person must allow the Regulator, or a person authorised by the Regulator, to enter premises...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

64(2) Condition about monitoring and audits
type: Concept
realized by: sec-64-ss-2
part of: 64 Condition about monitoring and audits
note: Conditions that may be imposed by the Regulator or prescribed by regulations are not limited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.61
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may impose
logic summary: Regulator may impose conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Conditions are imposed during the Regulator's power
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not limit the conditions that may be imposed by the Regulator or prescribed by the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: Conditions are imposed during the Regulator's power
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not limit the conditions that may be imposed by the Regulator or prescribed by regulations.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: during
logic summary: Conditions are imposed during the Regulator's power
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not limit the conditions that may be imposed by the Regulator or prescribed by regulations.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-64-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: during
logic summary: Conditions are imposed during the Regulator's power
premise text: (2) Subsection (1) does not limit the conditions that may be imposed by the Regulator or prescribed by regulations.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

65 Condition about additional information to be given to the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65
has part: 65(1) Condition about additional information to be given to the
has part: 65(2) Condition about additional information to be given to the
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.61

65(1) Condition about additional information to be given to the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-1
part of: 65 Condition about additional information to be given to the
note: Inform Regulator of certain risks, contraventions, and unintended effects.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.61
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-65-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-65-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform Regulator
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65(2) Condition about additional information to be given to the
type: Concept
realized by: sec-65-ss-2
part of: 65 Condition about additional information to be given to the
note: Reckless disregard implies awareness of additional information or contraventions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.61
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-65-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-65-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-65-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-65-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(2) Condition about additional information to be given to the
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: recklessness
logic summary: Reckless disregard implies awareness.
premise text: (a) the licence holder is taken to have become aware...
conclusion text: (b) the licence holder is taken to have become aware...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-65-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: recklessness
logic summary: Reckless disregard implies knowledge.
premise text: (a) the licence holder is taken to have become aware...
conclusion text: (b) the licence holder is taken to have become aware...
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-65-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: recklessness
logic summary: Reckless disregard implies a trace.
premise text: (a) the licence holder is taken to have become aware...
conclusion text: (b) the licence holder is taken to have become aware...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 Person may give information to Regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-66
note: A person covered by a licence may inform the Regulator about certain risks and contraventions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.62
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-66-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-66-logic-epistemic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66 Person may give information to Regulator
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to inform the Regulator
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-66-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: OUGHT_TO_KNOW
logic summary: Knowledge of risks and contraventions
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67 Protection of persons who give information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-67
note: No civil liability for providing information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.62
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-67-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-67-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-67-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 67 Protection of persons who give information
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: No civil liability implies obligation to provide information
premise text: No civil liability
conclusion text: Obligation to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Suspension and cancellation of licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-68
note: Suspension or cancellation of GMO licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.63
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-68-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-68-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-68-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-68-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-68-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-68-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Regulator may prohibit GMO licence suspension or cancellation
premise text: Regulator has authority to regulate GMO licences
conclusion text: GMO licence holder must comply with regulations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-68-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Regulator may suspend or cancel licence during overlapping time periods
premise text: Regulator has authority to regulate GMO licences
conclusion text: Licence holder must comply with regulations during overlapping time periods
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-68-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Regulator's decision is based on reasonable grounds
premise text: Regulator has authority to regulate GMO licences
conclusion text: Licence holder must comply with regulations if regulator believes licence conditions have been breached
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-68-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Inference
logic summary: Regulator's decision is based on available information
premise text: Regulator has authority to regulate GMO licences
conclusion text: Licence holder must comply with regulations if regulator believes licence conditions have been breached
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-68-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Regulator's decision is based on available information
premise text: Regulator has authority to regulate GMO licences
conclusion text: Licence holder must comply with regulations if regulator believes licence conditions have been breached
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

69 Surrender of licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-69
note: Licence holder may surrender licence with Regulator's consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.63
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-69-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-69-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-69-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to surrender licence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70 Transfer of licences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70
has part: 70(1) Transfer of licences
has part: 70(2) Transfer of licences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.63

70(1) Transfer of licences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-1
part of: 70 Transfer of licences
note: Joint application for licence transfer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.63
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-70-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-70-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to apply for licence transfer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

70(2) Transfer of licences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-70-ss-2
part of: 70 Transfer of licences
note: Application must be in writing and contain certain information.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.63
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-70-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-70-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 70(2) Transfer of licences
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-70-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71 Variation of licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71
has part: 71(1) Variation of licence
has part: 71(1A) Variation of licence
has part: 71(2) Variation of licence
has part: 71(2A) Variation of licence
has part: 71(2B) Variation of licence
has part: 71(3) Variation of licence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.64

71(1) Variation of licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-1
part of: 71 Variation of licence
note: Regulator may vary licence on its own initiative or at licence holder's request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.64
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Regulator has permission to vary licence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-1-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Initiative
logic summary: Regulator's initiative triggers licence variation.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: At
logic summary: Variation may occur at any time or on licence holder's request.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(1A) Variation of licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-1a
part of: 71 Variation of licence
note: Application for variation must be in writing and contain specified information.
description: specified information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.64
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-1a-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 71(1A) Variation of licence
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be in writing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(2) Variation of licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-2
part of: 71 Variation of licence
note: Cannot vary a licence for intentional release of GMO into environment if application was originally considered under Division 3.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.64
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on varying licence for intentional release of GMO.
premise text: Application was originally considered under Division 3.
conclusion text: Regulator must not vary licence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(2A) Variation of licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-2a
part of: 71 Variation of licence
note: The Regulator must not vary a licence under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.64
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2a-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2a-logic-deontic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Regulator cannot vary the license.
premise text: Section 50A applies to an application that proposes controls and limits on the dissemination, persistence and release of the GMO concerned
conclusion text: The Regulator must not vary a licence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2a-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Regulator's power to vary the license is restricted.
premise text: The application for variation proposes, in relation to any GMO...
conclusion text: ...unless...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(2B) Variation of licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-2b
part of: 71 Variation of licence
note: Regulator must not vary licence unless certain conditions met
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.64
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2b-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2b-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2b-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2b-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Regulator's obligation to not vary licence
premise text: (2B) If an application has been made for variation of a licence, the Regulator must not vary the licence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2b-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Regulator's decision to vary licence is conditional on risk assessment and management plan
premise text: (2B) If an application has been made for variation of a licence, the Regulator must not vary the licence...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2b-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Regulator's decision to vary licence is conditional on risk assessment and management plan
premise text: (2B) If an application has been made for variation of a licence, the Regulator must not vary the licence...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2b-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Risk Assessment
logic summary: Regulator's decision to vary licence is conditional on risk assessment and management plan
premise text: (2B) If an application has been made for variation of a licence, the Regulator must not vary the licence...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-2b-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Base
logic summary: Regulator's decision to vary licence is conditional on risk assessment and management plan
premise text: (2B) If an application has been made for variation of a licence, the Regulator must not vary the licence...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

71(3) Variation of licence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-71-ss-3
part of: 71 Variation of licence
note: The Regulator may perform certain actions without limiting subsection (1)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.64
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-71-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72
has part: 72(1) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
has part: 72(2) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
has part: 72(3) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
has part: 72(4) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
has part: 72(5) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
has part: 72(6) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
has part: 72(7) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.66

72(1) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72-ss-1
part of: 72 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Regulator must notify licence holder of proposed suspension, cancellation or variation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.66
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72(1) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must notify licence holder.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(2) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72-ss-2
part of: 72 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Regulator must notify licence holder of proposed suspension, cancellation or variation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.66
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must notify licence holder.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Regulator must notify before suspension/cancellation.
premise text: (2) The notice: (a) must state that the Regulator proposes to suspend, cancel or vary the licence; and
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: may
logic summary: Regulator may invite written submission.
premise text: (2) The notice: (a) must state that the Regulator proposes to suspend, cancel or vary the licence; and
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: must
logic summary: Regulator must provide information.
premise text: (2) The notice: (a) may require the licence holder to give to the Regulator any information of a kind specified in the notice that is relevant to the proposed suspension, cancellation or variation; and
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: must
logic summary: Regulator must provide information.
premise text: (2) The notice: (a) may require the licence holder to give to the Regulator any information of a kind specified in the notice that is relevant to the proposed suspension, cancellation or variation; and
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(3) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72-ss-3
part of: 72 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Must provide information within a specified period after receiving notice.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.66
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information within a specified period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(4) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72-ss-4
part of: 72 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Regulator must consider submissions when suspending, cancelling or varying a licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.66
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must consider submissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(5) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72-ss-5
part of: 72 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Exemption from section 72(5) for licence holder requests
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.66
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-5-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72(5) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Licence holder exemption
premise text: Section does not apply to...
conclusion text: ...licence holder requests
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(6) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72-ss-6
part of: 72 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Regulator must notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or variation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.66
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-6-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must notify.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72(7) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72-ss-7
part of: 72 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Regulator must notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or variation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.66
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-7-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72(7) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must notify.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72A Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72a
note: Simplified outline of Part 5A
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.68
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72a-norm

72B Minister may make emergency dealing determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72b
has part: 72B(1) Minister may make emergency dealing determination
has part: 72B(2) Minister may make emergency dealing determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.69

72B(1) Minister may make emergency dealing determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72b-ss-1
part of: 72B Minister may make emergency dealing determination
note: Minister may make emergency dealing determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.69
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72b-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to make emergency dealing determination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Emergency dealing duration
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument (an emergency dealing determination), specify dealings with a GMO for the purposes of this Part.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72b-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Minister's authority to make emergency dealing determination
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument (an emergency dealing determination), specify dealings with a GMO for the purposes of this Part.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Emergency dealing determination propagation
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument (an emergency dealing determination), specify dealings with a GMO for the purposes of this Part.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Minister's authority inference
premise text: (1) The Minister may, by legislative instrument (an emergency dealing determination), specify dealings with a GMO for the purposes of this Part.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

72B(2) Minister may make emergency dealing determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72b-ss-2
part of: 72B Minister may make emergency dealing determination
note: Minister must make emergency dealing determination under specified conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.69
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72b-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister has an obligation to make emergency dealing determination.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72C Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72c
has part: 72C(1) Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
has part: 72C(2) Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
has part: 72C(3) Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
has part: 72C(4) Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
has part: 72C(5) Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
has part: 72C(6) Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
has part: 72C(7) Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.70

72C(1) Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72c-ss-1
part of: 72C Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
note: Defines the period of effect for an emergency dealing determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.70
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72c-ss-1-norm

72C(2) Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72c-ss-2
part of: 72C Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
note: Emergency dealing determination ceases to have effect after 6 months or when revoked.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.70
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72c-ss-2-norm

72C(3) Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72c-ss-3
part of: 72C Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
note: Extend period of effect of emergency dealing determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.70
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72c-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72C(4) Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72c-ss-4
part of: 72C Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
note: Extension of emergency dealing determination period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.70
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72c-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72c-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to extend
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72C(5) Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72c-ss-5
part of: 72C Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
note: The Minister may extend the period of effect of an emergency dealing determination under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.70
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72c-ss-5-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72c-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72c-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: The Minister can extend the period of effect under certain conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72c-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The extension occurs during the same time period as the original determination.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72C(6) Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72c-ss-6
part of: 72C Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
note: Defines the period of effect for an emergency dealing determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.70
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72c-ss-6-norm

72C(7) Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72c-ss-7
part of: 72C Period of effect of emergency dealing determination
note: Defines period of effect for emergency dealing determination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.70
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72c-ss-7-norm

72D Emergency dealing determination authorises dealings, subject
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72d
has part: 72D(1) Emergency dealing determination authorises dealings, subject
has part: 72D(2) Emergency dealing determination authorises dealings, subject
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.73

72D(1) Emergency dealing determination authorises dealings, subject
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72d-ss-1
part of: 72D Emergency dealing determination authorises dealings, subject
note: Authorises dealings with GMO subject to conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.73
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72d-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72d-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 72D(1) Emergency dealing determination authorises dealings, subject
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorize
logic summary: Authorises dealings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72D(2) Emergency dealing determination authorises dealings, subject
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72d-ss-2
part of: 72D Emergency dealing determination authorises dealings, subject
note: Conditions for emergency dealing determination
description: (a) to (i)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.73
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72d-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72D(2) Emergency dealing determination authorises dealings, subject
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Mandatory conditions
premise text: (a) to (i)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72E Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72e
has part: 72E(1) Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
has part: 72E(2) Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
has part: 72E(3) Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
has part: 72E(4) Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
has part: 72E(5) Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.76

72E(1) Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72e-ss-1
part of: 72E Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
note: Variation of emergency dealing determination conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.76
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72E(2) Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72e-ss-2
part of: 72E Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
note: Minister may revoke emergency dealing determination under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.76
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 72E(2) Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Minister may revoke emergency dealing determination.
premise text: Risk to health and safety or environment associated with continuation of dealings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Risk to health and safety or environment associated with continuation of dealings overlaps with threat to which emergency dealing determination relates.
premise text: The Minister becomes aware of risks to the health and safety of people, or to the environment, associated with the continuation of the dealings authorised by the emergency dealing determination.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
logic summary: Risk to health and safety or environment associated with continuation of dealings will eventually cease to exist.
premise text: The Minister is satisfied that adequate measures to address those risks are not able to be implemented.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Risk to health and safety or environment associated with continuation of dealings will diffuse over time.
premise text: The Minister is satisfied that the threat to which the emergency dealing determination relates: (i) no longer exists; or (ii) is no longer sufficiently actual or imminent as to require the determination to be in force to address that threat.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Minister recognizes risk to health and safety or environment associated with continuation of dealings.
premise text: The Minister becomes aware of risks to the health and safety of people, or to the environment, associated with the continuation of the dealings authorised by the emergency dealing determination.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72E(3) Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72e-ss-3
part of: 72E Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
note: Minister cannot vary, suspend or revoke emergency dealing determination without consulting States.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.76
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of varying, suspending or revoking emergency dealing determination.
premise text: States have not been consulted.
conclusion text: Minister must consult States.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

72E(4) Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72e-ss-4
part of: 72E Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
note: Variation, suspension or revocation of emergency dealing determination takes effect on specified day.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.76
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72E(4) Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: takesEffect
logic summary: Obligation takes effect
premise text: (4) A variation, suspension or revocation of an emergency dealing determination
conclusion text: on the day specified by the Minister in the variation, suspension or revocation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

72E(5) Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-72e-ss-5
part of: 72E Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
note: Minimum waiting period after variation, suspension or revocation of emergency dealing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.76
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-5-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-5-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 72E(5) Variation, suspension and revocation of emergency dealing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must not be earlier than a specified day
premise text: (5) The day specified as mentioned in paragraph (4)(b)
conclusion text: must not be earlier than 30 days after the day on which the variation, suspension or revocation is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship
premise text: (5) The day specified as mentioned in paragraph (4)(b)
conclusion text: 30 days after the day on which the variation, suspension or revocation is made.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship
premise text: (5) The day specified as mentioned in paragraph (4)(b)
conclusion text: 30 days after the day on which the variation, suspension or revocation is made.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship
premise text: (5) The day specified as mentioned in paragraph (4)(b)
conclusion text: 30 days after the day on which the variation, suspension or revocation is made.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-72e-ss-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval relationship
premise text: (5) The day specified as mentioned in paragraph (4)(b)
conclusion text: 30 days after the day on which the variation, suspension or revocation is made.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-73
note: Establishes mechanism for regulating notifiable low risk dealings and dealings on the GMO Register.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.78
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-73-norm

74 Notifiable low risk dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74
has part: 74(1) Notifiable low risk dealings
has part: 74(2) Notifiable low risk dealings
has part: 74(3) Notifiable low risk dealings
has part: 74(4) Notifiable low risk dealings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.79

74(1) Notifiable low risk dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-1
part of: 74 Notifiable low risk dealings
note: Declare dealing with GMO as notifiable low risk dealing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.79
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74(1) Notifiable low risk dealings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: declare
logic summary: Declare a type of action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(2) Notifiable low risk dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-2
part of: 74 Notifiable low risk dealings
note: The Regulator must be satisfied that a GMO dealing would not involve intentional release into the environment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.79
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: The Regulator must satisfy a condition.
premise text: (2) Before the Governor-General makes regulations declaring a dealing with a GMO to be a notifiable low risk dealing, the Regulator must be satisfied that the dealing would not involve the intentional release of a GMO into the environment.
conclusion text: The Regulator must be satisfied that the dealing would not involve the intentional release of a GMO into the environment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: The Regulator's satisfaction must be within a specific time frame.
premise text: (2) Before the Governor-General makes regulations declaring a dealing with a GMO to be a notifiable low risk dealing, the Regulator must be satisfied that the dealing would not involve the intentional release of a GMO into the environment.
conclusion text: The satisfaction must be within a specific time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: The Regulator's satisfaction is valid until a certain condition is met.
premise text: (2) Before the Governor-General makes regulations declaring a dealing with a GMO to be a notifiable low risk dealing, the Regulator must be satisfied that the dealing would not involve the intentional release of a GMO into the environment.
conclusion text: The satisfaction is valid until a certain condition is met.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Prevents
logic summary: The Regulator's satisfaction prevents the intentional release of a GMO into the environment.
premise text: (2) Before the Governor-General makes regulations declaring a dealing with a GMO to be a notifiable low risk dealing, the Regulator must be satisfied that the dealing would not involve the intentional release of a GMO into the environment.
conclusion text: The satisfaction prevents the intentional release of a GMO into the environment.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Validates
logic summary: The Regulator's satisfaction validates the classification of a dealing with a GMO.
premise text: (2) Before the Governor-General makes regulations declaring a dealing with a GMO to be a notifiable low risk dealing, the Regulator must be satisfied that the dealing would not involve the intentional release of a GMO into the environment.
conclusion text: The satisfaction validates the classification of a dealing with a GMO.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(3) Notifiable low risk dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-3
part of: 74 Notifiable low risk dealings
note: Consideration of risk before declaring a GMO dealing notifiable low risk.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.79
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must consider certain factors before declaring a GMO dealing notifiable low risk.
premise text: (3) Before the Governor-General makes regulations...
conclusion text: The Regulator must consider...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Regulator must consider factors within a certain timeframe before declaring a GMO dealing notifiable low risk.
premise text: (3) Before the Governor-General makes regulations...
conclusion text: The Regulator's consideration is bounded by time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Regulator must consider factors within a certain timeframe before declaring a GMO dealing notifiable low risk.
premise text: (3) Before the Governor-General makes regulations...
conclusion text: The Regulator's consideration is bounded by time.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Regulator must consider factors within a certain timeframe before declaring a GMO dealing notifiable low risk.
premise text: (3) Before the Governor-General makes regulations...
conclusion text: The Regulator's consideration is bounded by time.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Regulator must consider factors within a certain timeframe before declaring a GMO dealing notifiable low risk.
premise text: (3) Before the Governor-General makes regulations...
conclusion text: The Regulator's consideration is bounded by time.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

74(4) Notifiable low risk dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-74-ss-4
part of: 74 Notifiable low risk dealings
note: Exemptions for GMO dealings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.79
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-74-ss-4-norm

75 Regulation of notifiable low risk dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-75
note: May regulate dealings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.79
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-75-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-75-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75 Regulation of notifiable low risk dealings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

76 GMO Register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76
has part: 76(1) GMO Register
has part: 76(2) GMO Register
has part: 76(3) GMO Register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.81

76(1) GMO Register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76-ss-1
part of: 76 GMO Register
note: Establishment of a GMO Register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.81
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-76-ss-1-norm

76(2) GMO Register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76-ss-2
part of: 76 GMO Register
note: The Regulator must maintain the GMO Register.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.81
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-76-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-76-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulatory duty
conclusion text: The Regulator must maintain the GMO Register.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(3) GMO Register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-76-ss-3
part of: 76 GMO Register
note: Allowance for computerized form of GMO Register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.81
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-76-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-76-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-76-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-3

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-76-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Indicates the time period for keeping the register
premise text: (3) The GMO Register may be kept in a computerised form.
conclusion text: The GMO Register is kept during [start date] to [end date]
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-76-ss-3-logic-ltl-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Specifies the duration of keeping the register
premise text: (3) The GMO Register may be kept in a computerised form.
conclusion text: The GMO Register is kept until [end date]
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Indicates the allowed action
premise text: (3) The GMO Register may be kept in a computerised form.
conclusion text: It is permissible to keep the GMO Register in a computerized form
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Contents of Register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-77
note: Specify description and conditions of dealing with GMO in Register
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.81
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-77-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-77-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Specify description and conditions of dealing with GMO in Register
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Regulator may include dealings with GMOs on GMO Register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78
has part: 78(1) Regulator may include dealings with GMOs on GMO Register
has part: 78(2) Regulator may include dealings with GMOs on GMO Register
has part: 78(3) Regulator may include dealings with GMOs on GMO Register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.81

78(1) Regulator may include dealings with GMOs on GMO Register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78-ss-1
part of: 78 Regulator may include dealings with GMOs on GMO Register
note: Regulator may include dealings with GMOs on GMO Register if authorised by GMO licence or meets specific conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.81
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(1) Regulator may include dealings with GMOs on GMO Register
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Regulator may include dealings with GMOs on GMO Register.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Dealing with a GMO is to be included on the GMO Register if it meets specific conditions.
premise text: (a) the dealing is, or has been, authorised by a GMO licence; or (b) the GMO concerned...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Dealing with a GMO is to be included on the GMO Register if it meets specific conditions.
premise text: (a) the dealing is, or has been, authorised by a GMO licence; or (b) the GMO concerned...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Dealing with a GMO is to be included on the GMO Register if it meets specific conditions.
premise text: (a) the dealing is, or has been, authorised by a GMO licence; or (b) the GMO concerned...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Dealing with a GMO is to be included on the GMO Register if it meets specific conditions.
premise text: (a) the dealing is, or has been, authorised by a GMO licence; or (b) the GMO concerned...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78(2) Regulator may include dealings with GMOs on GMO Register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78-ss-2
part of: 78 Regulator may include dealings with GMOs on GMO Register
note: Regulator may include dealings with GMOs on GMO Register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.81
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to deal with GMOs
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78(3) Regulator may include dealings with GMOs on GMO Register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-78-ss-3
part of: 78 Regulator may include dealings with GMOs on GMO Register
note: Regulator may include dealings with GMOs on GMO Register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.81
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-78-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals
premise text: Day specified in the determination
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79 Regulator not to make determination unless risks can be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79
has part: 79(1) Regulator not to make determination unless risks can be
has part: 79(2) Regulator not to make determination unless risks can be
has part: 79(3) Regulator not to make determination unless risks can be
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.82

79(1) Regulator not to make determination unless risks can be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79-ss-1
part of: 79 Regulator not to make determination unless risks can be
note: Regulator must not make determination unless risks can be assessed as minimal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.82
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-79-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-79-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(1) Regulator not to make determination unless risks can be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-79-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Regulator must not make determination unless risks can be assessed as minimal.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

79(2) Regulator not to make determination unless risks can be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79-ss-2
part of: 79 Regulator not to make determination unless risks can be
note: Regulator must consider certain information when making a determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.82
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-79-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-79-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-79-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(2) Regulator not to make determination unless risks can be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-79-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator has an obligation to consider certain information.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the Regulator must have regard...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-79-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Regulator's consideration is a temporal interval.
premise text: (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the Regulator must have regard...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

79(3) Regulator not to make determination unless risks can be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-79-ss-3
part of: 79 Regulator not to make determination unless risks can be
note: Regulator must consider relevant matters when making a determination.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.82
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-79-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-79-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79(3) Regulator not to make determination unless risks can be
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-79-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator has an obligation to consider relevant matters.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Variation of GMO Register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80
has part: 80(1) Variation of GMO Register
has part: 80(2) Variation of GMO Register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.82

80(1) Variation of GMO Register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80-ss-1
part of: 80 Variation of GMO Register
note: The Regulator may vary the GMO Register.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.82
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-80-ss-1-norm

80(2) Variation of GMO Register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-80-ss-2
part of: 80 Variation of GMO Register
note: Variation of GMO Register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.82
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-80-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-80-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-80-ss-2-logic-ltl-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-80-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(2) Variation of GMO Register
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: remove
logic summary: Removal from the GMO Register
premise text: (2) A variation may remove a dealing from the GMO Register;
conclusion text: A dealing may be removed from the GMO Register.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: revocation
logic summary: Revocation of conditions on the GMO Register
premise text: (2) A variation may revoke or vary conditions to which a dealing on the GMO Register is subject;
conclusion text: Conditions on the GMO Register may be revoked or varied.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-80-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposition
logic summary: Imposition of additional conditions on the GMO Register
premise text: (2) A variation may impose additional conditions to which a dealing on the GMO Register is subject;
conclusion text: Additional conditions may be imposed on the GMO Register.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-80-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for variation
premise text: (2) A variation may remove a dealing from the GMO Register;
conclusion text: The removal of a dealing from the GMO Register occurs during the variation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-80-ss-2-logic-ltl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Temporal interval for variation
premise text: (2) A variation may revoke or vary conditions to which a dealing on the GMO Register is subject;
conclusion text: The revocation or variation of conditions occurs until the end of the variation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

81 Inspection of Register
type: Concept
realized by: sec-81
note: Permit inspection of GMO Register
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.83
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-81-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-81-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-81-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

82 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-82
note: Establishes a system for certifying facilities to specified containment levels.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.84
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-82-norm

83 Application for certification
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83
has part: 83(1) Application for certification
has part: 83(2) Application for certification
has part: 83(3) Application for certification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.85

83(1) Application for certification
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83-ss-1
part of: 83 Application for certification
note: Application for certification of a facility to a particular containment level under this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.85
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-83-ss-1-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-83-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(1) Application for certification
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

83(2) Application for certification
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83-ss-2
part of: 83 Application for certification
note: Application must be in writing and contain required information.
description: Information as the Regulator requires
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.85
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-83-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-83-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be in writing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

83(3) Application for certification
type: Concept
realized by: sec-83-ss-3
part of: 83 Application for certification
note: Application fee must be provided with application.
description: application fee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.85
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-83-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-83-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 83(3) Application for certification
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-83-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Application fee must be provided.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

84 When the Regulator may certify the facility
type: Concept
realized by: sec-84
note: Regulator may certify facility to specified containment level
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.85
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-84-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-84-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-84-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted by Regulator
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

85 Regulator may require applicant to give further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85
has part: 85(1) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
has part: 85(2) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.85

85(1) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85-ss-1
part of: 85 Regulator may require applicant to give further information
note: Regulator may require applicant to provide further information.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.85
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-85-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-85-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(1) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-85-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulator's obligation to request additional information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

85(2) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-85-ss-2
part of: 85 Regulator may require applicant to give further information
note: Regulator may require applicant to give further information within a specified period.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.85
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-85-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-85-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 85(2) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-85-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Regulator may require applicant to give further information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

86 Conditions of certification
type: Concept
realized by: sec-86
note: Conditions for facility certification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.85
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-86-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-86-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-86-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 86 Conditions of certification
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-86-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: imposes
logic summary: Regulator imposes conditions on certification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87 Variation of certification
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87
has part: 87(1) Variation of certification
has part: 87(2) Variation of certification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.86

87(1) Variation of certification
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-1
part of: 87 Variation of certification
note: The Regulator may vary the certification at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.86
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-87-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-87-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to vary certification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

87(2) Variation of certification
type: Concept
realized by: sec-87-ss-2
part of: 87 Variation of certification
note: Regulator may impose additional conditions or remove/vary existing ones.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.86
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-87-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-87-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Regulator has permission to impose conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

88 Suspension or cancellation of certification
type: Concept
realized by: sec-88
note: Suspension or cancellation of certification upon reasonable grounds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.86
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-88-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-88-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-88-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Regulator may suspend or cancel certification
premise text: Reasonable grounds exist
conclusion text: Certification suspension or cancellation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89
has part: 89(1) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
has part: 89(2) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
has part: 89(3) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
has part: 89(4) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
has part: 89(5) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
has part: 89(6) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
has part: 89(7) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.86

89(1) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-1
part of: 89 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Regulator must notify holder before suspending, cancelling or varying a certification.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.86
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must notify holder.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(2) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-2
part of: 89 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Notice requirements for suspension, cancellation or variation of certification
description: information relevant to the proposed suspension, cancellation or variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.86
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(3) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-3
part of: 89 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Regulator must notify holder of certification within a specified period.
description: Information and submission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.86
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(3) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must notify holder of certification
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(4) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-4
part of: 89 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Regulator must consider submissions when suspending, cancelling or varying a certification.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.86
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator has an obligation to consider submissions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(5) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-5
part of: 89 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Exemption from section 89(5) for certification holders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.86
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-5-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(5) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Certification holder exemption
premise text: Holder of certification
conclusion text: Not subject to section 89(5)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(6) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-6
part of: 89 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Regulator must notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or variation.
description: Notification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.86
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-6-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must notify.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89(7) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89-ss-7
part of: 89 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Regulator must notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or variation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.86
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-7-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89(7) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must notify.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89A Transfer of certification
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89a
has part: 89A(1) Transfer of certification
has part: 89A(2) Transfer of certification
has part: 89A(3) Transfer of certification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.87

89A(1) Transfer of certification
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89a-ss-1
part of: 89A Transfer of certification
note: Joint application for transfer of certification
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.87
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89a-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows joint application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89A(2) Transfer of certification
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89a-ss-2
part of: 89A Transfer of certification
note: Application must be in writing and contain specified information.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.87
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89a-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 89A(2) Transfer of certification
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

89A(3) Transfer of certification
type: Concept
realized by: sec-89a-ss-3
part of: 89A Transfer of certification
note: Regulator must ensure conditions continue to be met if certification is transferred.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.87
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89a-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-89a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Regulator has a duty to ensure conditions continue to be met.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90 Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90
has part: 90(1) Guidelines
has part: 90(2) Guidelines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.88

90(1) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90-ss-1
part of: 90 Guidelines
note: The Regulator may issue technical or procedural guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.88
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-90-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-90-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

90(2) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-90-ss-2
part of: 90 Guidelines
note: Regulator may vary or revoke guidelines by written instrument.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.88
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-90-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-90-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 90(2) Guidelines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-90-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulator's power to vary or revoke guidelines.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91 Application for accreditation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91
has part: 91(1) Application for accreditation
has part: 91(2) Application for accreditation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.89

91(1) Application for accreditation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91-ss-1
part of: 91 Application for accreditation
note: Application for accreditation of an organisation as an accredited organisation under this Division.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.89
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-91-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-91-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 91(1) Application for accreditation
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-91-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Permission to apply for accreditation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

91(2) Application for accreditation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-91-ss-2
part of: 91 Application for accreditation
note: Application must be in writing and contain required information.
description: Information as the Regulator requires
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.89
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-91-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-91-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-91-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-91-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 91(2) Application for accreditation
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-91-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application must be in writing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-91-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTAIN
logic summary: Information as the Regulator requires
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92 Regulator may accredit organisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92
has part: 92(1) Regulator may accredit organisations
has part: 92(2) Regulator may accredit organisations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.89

92(1) Regulator may accredit organisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92-ss-1
part of: 92 Regulator may accredit organisations
note: Regulator may accredit organisations as an accredited organisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.89
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-92-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-92-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92(1) Regulator may accredit organisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-92-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

92(2) Regulator may accredit organisations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-92-ss-2
part of: 92 Regulator may accredit organisations
note: Regulator must have regard to certain conditions when accrediting an organisation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.89
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-92-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-92-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-92-ss-2-logic-ltl-3

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-92-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 92(2) Regulator may accredit organisations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-92-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST HAVE REGARD TO
logic summary: Regulator must consider certain conditions.
premise text: (2) In deciding whether to accredit an organisation, the Regulator...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-92-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Organisation must be able to maintain the Institutional Biosafety Committee.
premise text: (b) if the organisation has established an Institutional Biosafety Committee—whether the organisation will be able to maintain...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-92-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Organisation must have indemnity arrangements for its Institutional Biosafety Committee members.
premise text: (c) if the organisation has established an Institutional Biosafety Committee—whether the organisation has appropriate indemnity arrangements...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93 Regulator may require applicant to give further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93
has part: 93(1) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
has part: 93(2) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.90

93(1) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93-ss-1
part of: 93 Regulator may require applicant to give further information
note: Regulator may require applicant to give further information
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.90
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-93-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-93-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93(1) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-93-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulator may require applicant to give further information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

93(2) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
type: Concept
realized by: sec-93-ss-2
part of: 93 Regulator may require applicant to give further information
note: Regulator may require applicant to give further information
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.90
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-93-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-93-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-93-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-93-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 93(2) Regulator may require applicant to give further information
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-93-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: Regulator may require applicant to give further information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-93-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Within a specified period
premise text: (2) The notice may specify the period within which the information is to be provided.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

94 Conditions of accreditation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-94
note: Conditions for accreditation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.90
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-94-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-94-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-94-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Regulator imposes obligations on accredited organisations
premise text: Regulator has authority to impose conditions
conclusion text: Accredited organisation must comply with conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95 Variation of accreditation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95
has part: 95(1) Variation of accreditation
has part: 95(2) Variation of accreditation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.90

95(1) Variation of accreditation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95-ss-1
part of: 95 Variation of accreditation
note: The Regulator may vary an accredited organisation's accreditation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.90
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-95-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-95-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-95-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

95(2) Variation of accreditation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-95-ss-2
part of: 95 Variation of accreditation
note: Regulator may impose additional conditions or remove/vary existing conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.90
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-95-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-95-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-95-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Regulator may impose additional conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96 Suspension or cancellation of accreditation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-96
note: Suspension or cancellation of accreditation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.91
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-96-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-96-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-96-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-96-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits suspension or cancellation of accreditation
premise text: The Regulator may, by notice in writing...
conclusion text: The accreditation of an organisation shall not be suspended or cancelled.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-96-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with accreditation duration
premise text: The Regulator may, by notice in writing...
conclusion text: Suspension or cancellation of accreditation occurs during the accreditation period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

97 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-97
has part: 97(1) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
has part: 97(2) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
has part: 97(3) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
has part: 97(4) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.91

97(1) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-97-ss-1
part of: 97 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Regulator must notify holder before suspending, cancelling or varying accreditation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.91
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must notify holder.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

97(2) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-97-ss-2
part of: 97 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Regulator must notify holder of proposed suspension, cancellation or variation.
description: information relevant to the proposed suspension, cancellation or variation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.91
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must notify holder
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Regulator must notify holder before suspension/cancellation/variation
premise text: (2) The notice:...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

97(3) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-97-ss-3
part of: 97 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Regulator must notify holder of accreditation within a specified period.
description: Information and submission
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.91
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 97(3) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must notify holder of accreditation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

97(4) Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
type: Concept
realized by: sec-97-ss-4
part of: 97 Regulator to notify of proposed suspension, cancellation or
note: Regulator must consider submissions when deciding to suspend, cancel or vary accreditation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.91
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must consider submissions.
premise text: Submission made under paragraph (2)(c) is relevant.
conclusion text: Regulator's decision should take into account submission.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Regulator's decision must be made after considering submissions.
premise text: Decision to suspend, cancel or vary accreditation should occur after submission has been considered.
conclusion text: Submission is a prerequisite for the Regulator's decision.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Regulator must consider submissions before making a decision.
premise text: Decision to suspend, cancel or vary accreditation should occur after submission has been considered.
conclusion text: Submission is necessary for the Regulator's decision.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Regulator must consider submissions from all relevant parties.
premise text: Paragraph (2)(c) defines what constitutes a submission.
conclusion text: Submission is an essential consideration for the Regulator.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-97-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Regulator must consider submissions in a systematic and methodical way.
premise text: Decision to suspend, cancel or vary accreditation should occur after submission has been considered.
conclusion text: Submission is necessary for the Regulator's decision.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98 Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-98
has part: 98(1) Guidelines
has part: 98(2) Guidelines
has part: 98(3) Guidelines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.92

98(1) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-98-ss-1
part of: 98 Guidelines
note: Regulator may issue guidelines for accreditation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.92
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-98-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-98-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-98-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulator obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

98(2) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-98-ss-2
part of: 98 Guidelines
note: Establishment and maintenance of Institutional Biosafety Committees guidelines
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.92
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-98-ss-2-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-98-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98(2) Guidelines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

98(3) Guidelines
type: Concept
realized by: sec-98-ss-3
part of: 98 Guidelines
note: The Regulator may vary or revoke the guidelines.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.92
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-98-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-98-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-98-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 98(3) Guidelines
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-98-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Implies obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

99 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-99
note: Establishment of Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee and Gene Technology Ethics and Community Consultative Committee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.93
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-99-norm

100 The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100
has part: 100(1) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
has part: 100(2) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
has part: 100(3) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
has part: 100(4) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
has part: 100(5) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
has part: 100(6) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
has part: 100(7) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
has part: 100(7A) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
has part: 100(8) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.94

100(1) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100-ss-1
part of: 100 The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
note: Establishes a committee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.94
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(1) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establish
logic summary: Creates an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(2) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100-ss-2
part of: 100 The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
note: Minister must appoint chair of Committee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.94
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(2) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: Minister is to appoint...
conclusion text: Chair must be appointed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(3) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100-ss-3
part of: 100 The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
note: Members must hold office on a part-time basis.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.94
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(3) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to hold office on a part-time basis.
premise text: (3) The members hold office on a part-time basis.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(4) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100-ss-4
part of: 100 The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
note: Consultation requirements for appointing a Committee member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.94
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
premise text: (4) Before appointing a member of the Committee, the Minister must...
conclusion text: The Minister MUST consult...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation
premise text: (4) Before appointing a member of the Committee, the Minister must...
conclusion text: The consultation period CONTAINS: States, Regulator, scientific, consumer, health, environmental and industry groups
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Inference from consultation requirements
premise text: (a) the States;
conclusion text: If the Minister MUST consult the States, then the States are relevant to the appointment process
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Spread of consultation requirements
premise text: (c) such scientific, consumer, health, environmental and industry groups as the Minister considers appropriate;
conclusion text: The consultation requirements SPREADS: scientific, consumer, health, environmental and industry groups
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: REQUIRES
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application for consultation
premise text: (d) such other Ministers as the Minister considers appropriate;
conclusion text: The consultation requirements REQUIRES: artificial intelligence application for other Ministers
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(5) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100-ss-5
part of: 100 The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
note: The Minister must have skills or experience in one or more of the specified areas before appointing a person as a member of the Committee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.94
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-5-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-5-logic-deontic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(5) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must have skills or experience in one or more of the specified areas.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
logic summary: The Minister must not appoint a person as a member of the Committee unless the Minister is satisfied that the person has skills or experience in one or more of the specified areas.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(6) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100-ss-6
part of: 100 The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
note: The Minister must appoint a layperson to the Committee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.94
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-6-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(7) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100-ss-7
part of: 100 The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
note: Ensure broad range of skills and experience in the areas mentioned
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.94
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-7-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 100(7) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ensure
logic summary: Ensure a broad range of skills and experience
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(7A) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100-ss-7a
part of: 100 The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
note: The Minister must ensure that the Committee includes at least one person who is a member of the Ethics and Community Committee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.94
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-7a-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-7a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-7a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-7a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to include a member of the Ethics and Community Committee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-7a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasMember
logic summary: The Committee has at least one member who is a member of the Ethics and Community Committee.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

100(8) The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-100-ss-8
part of: 100 The Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee
note: Cannot appoint a member to chair the Committee without majority agreement from jurisdictions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.94
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-8-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-100-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of appointment
premise text: No majority agreement from jurisdictions
conclusion text: Cannot appoint
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

101 Function of the Gene Technology Technical Advisory
type: Concept
realized by: sec-101
note: Provide scientific and technical advice on request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.95
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-101-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-101-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-101-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 101 Function of the Gene Technology Technical Advisory
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-101-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide advice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

102 Expert advisers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-102
has part: 102(1) Expert advisers
has part: 102(2) Expert advisers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.96

102(1) Expert advisers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-102-ss-1
part of: 102 Expert advisers
note: Minister may appoint expert advisers to assist the Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.96
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-102-ss-1-norm

102(2) Expert advisers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-102-ss-2
part of: 102 Expert advisers
note: Expert advisers are not Committee members.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.96
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-102-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-102-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 102(2) Expert advisers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-102-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: Expert advisers are not Committee members.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103 Remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103
has part: 103(1) Remuneration
has part: 103(2) Remuneration
has part: 103(3) Remuneration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.96

103(1) Remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103-ss-1
part of: 103 Remuneration
note: A person must be paid remuneration determined by the Remuneration Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.96
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-103-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-103-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-103-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 103(1) Remuneration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-103-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be paid remuneration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103(2) Remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103-ss-2
part of: 103 Remuneration
note: A person must be paid allowances prescribed by regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.96
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-103-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-103-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-103-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-103-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 103(2) Remuneration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-103-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide payment
premise text: Person is a member of the Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee or an expert adviser
conclusion text: Must be paid allowances prescribed by regulations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-103-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: IS
logic summary: Is a person paid allowances prescribed by regulations?
premise text: A person is a member of the Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee or an expert adviser
conclusion text: True
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

103(3) Remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-103-ss-3
part of: 103 Remuneration
note: Subject to the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.96
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-103-ss-3-norm

104 Members and procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-104
has part: 104(1) Members and procedures
has part: 104(2) Members and procedures
has part: 104(3) Members and procedures
has part: 104(4) Members and procedures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.97

104(1) Members and procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-104-ss-1
part of: 104 Members and procedures
note: Regulations for Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee members and expert advisers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.97
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(1) Members and procedures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prescribes
logic summary: Regulations prescribe rules for committee members
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104(2) Members and procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-104-ss-2
part of: 104 Members and procedures
note: Regulations may prescribe matters relating to the operation of the Gene Technology Technical Advisory Committee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.97
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-2-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(2) Members and procedures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

104(3) Members and procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-104-ss-3
part of: 104 Members and procedures
note: Committee must operate in writing if no regulations are in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.97
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(3) Members and procedures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Committee must operate in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

104(4) Members and procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-104-ss-4
part of: 104 Members and procedures
note: Committee may operate if no regulations are in force and no determination is in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.97
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 104(4) Members and procedures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Committee can operate under certain conditions.
premise text: No regulations are in force and no determination is in force.
conclusion text: The Committee may operate.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: The provision applies during a specific time period.
premise text: No regulations are in force and no determination is in force.
conclusion text: The provision applies during the specified time period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: during
logic summary: The provision has a temporal interval that specifies when it applies.
premise text: No regulations are in force and no determination is in force.
conclusion text: The provision applies during the specified time period.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: The provision has a condition that must be met for it to apply.
premise text: No regulations are in force and no determination is in force.
conclusion text: The provision applies if the specified conditions are met.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-104-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: if
logic summary: The provision has a condition that must be met for it to apply.
premise text: No regulations are in force and no determination is in force.
conclusion text: The provision applies if the specified conditions are met.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105 Subcommittees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105
has part: 105(1) Subcommittees
has part: 105(2) Subcommittees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.97

105(1) Subcommittees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105-ss-1
part of: 105 Subcommittees
note: Establish subcommittees with Regulator's consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.97
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-105-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-105-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-105-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to establish subcommittees
premise text: Regulator's consent required
conclusion text: Establish subcommittees
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

105(2) Subcommittees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-105-ss-2
part of: 105 Subcommittees
note: The regulations may prescribe matters relating to the constitution and operation of subcommittees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.97
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-105-ss-2-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-105-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 105(2) Subcommittees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

106 The Gene Technology Ethics and Community Consultative
type: Concept
realized by: sec-106
note: Establishment of the Gene Technology Ethics and Community Consultative Committee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.98
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-106-norm

107 Function of Ethics and Community Committee
type: Concept
realized by: sec-107
note: Provide advice on various matters related to gene technology
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.98
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-107-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-107-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-107-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 107 Function of Ethics and Community Committee
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-107-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide advice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108 Membership
type: Concept
realized by: sec-108
has part: 108(1) Membership
has part: 108(2) Membership
has part: 108(3) Membership
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.99

108(1) Membership
type: Concept
realized by: sec-108-ss-1
part of: 108 Membership
note: Minister must appoint members to Ethics and Community Committee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.99
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-108-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-108-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-108-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 108(1) Membership
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-108-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide appointment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108(2) Membership
type: Concept
realized by: sec-108-ss-2
part of: 108 Membership
note: Consultation requirements for appointing a member of the Ethics and Community Committee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.99
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-108-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-108-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-108-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-108-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to consult
premise text: (2) Before appointing a member of the Ethics and Community Committee, the Minister must...
conclusion text: ...the Minister must consult...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-108-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Temporal interval for consultation requirements
premise text: (2) Before appointing a member of the Ethics and Community Committee, the Minister must...
conclusion text: ...the Minister must consult...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

108(3) Membership
type: Concept
realized by: sec-108-ss-3
part of: 108 Membership
note: The Minister must appoint a person with relevant skills or experience to the Ethics and Community Committee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.99
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-108-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-108-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-108-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Minister must appoint a person with relevant skills or experience.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109 Remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109
has part: 109(1) Remuneration
has part: 109(2) Remuneration
has part: 109(3) Remuneration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.100

109(1) Remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109-ss-1
part of: 109 Remuneration
note: A person must be paid remuneration determined by the Remuneration Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.100
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-109-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-109-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-109-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 109(1) Remuneration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-109-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be paid remuneration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109(2) Remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109-ss-2
part of: 109 Remuneration
note: A person must be paid allowances prescribed by regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.100
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-109-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-109-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-109-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 109(2) Remuneration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-109-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to pay allowances
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

109(3) Remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-109-ss-3
part of: 109 Remuneration
note: Remuneration subject to the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.100
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-109-ss-3-norm

110 Membership and Procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110
has part: 110(1) Membership and Procedures
has part: 110(2) Membership and Procedures
has part: 110(3) Membership and Procedures
has part: 110(4) Membership and Procedures
has part: 110(5) Membership and Procedures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.100

110(1) Membership and Procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-1
part of: 110 Membership and Procedures
note: Regulations may prescribe matters relating to the members of the Ethics and Community Committee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.100
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-110-ss-1-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-110-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(1) Membership and Procedures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

110(2) Membership and Procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-2
part of: 110 Membership and Procedures
note: Regulations may prescribe matters relating to the operation of the Ethics and Community Committee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.100
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-110-ss-2-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-110-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(2) Membership and Procedures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

110(3) Membership and Procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-3
part of: 110 Membership and Procedures
note: Ethics and Community Committee must operate in writing by the Regulator if no regulations are in force.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.100
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-110-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-110-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-110-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 110(3) Membership and Procedures
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-110-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to operate in writing by the Regulator.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

110(4) Membership and Procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-4
part of: 110 Membership and Procedures
note: Ethics and Community Committee may operate in writing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.100
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-110-ss-4-norm

110(5) Membership and Procedures
type: Concept
realized by: sec-110-ss-5
part of: 110 Membership and Procedures
note: Legislative instrument determination is not valid.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.100
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-110-ss-5-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-110-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-110-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
premise text: (5) A determination made under subsection (3) or (4)
conclusion text: is not a legislative instrument.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111 Subcommittees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111
has part: 111(1) Subcommittees
has part: 111(2) Subcommittees
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.101

111(1) Subcommittees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111-ss-1
part of: 111 Subcommittees
note: Establishment of subcommittees with Regulator's consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.101
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-111-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-111-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-111-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to establish subcommittees
premise text: The Ethics and Community Committee may...
conclusion text: ...establish subcommittees.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

111(2) Subcommittees
type: Concept
realized by: sec-111-ss-2
part of: 111 Subcommittees
note: The regulations may prescribe matters relating to the constitution and operation of subcommittees.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.101
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-111-ss-2-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-111-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 111(2) Subcommittees
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

112 Expert advisers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-112
has part: 112(1) Expert advisers
has part: 112(2) Expert advisers
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.102

112(1) Expert advisers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-112-ss-1
part of: 112 Expert advisers
note: Minister may appoint expert advisers to assist Ethics and Community Committee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.102
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-112-ss-1-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-112-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 112(1) Expert advisers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

112(2) Expert advisers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-112-ss-2
part of: 112 Expert advisers
note: Expert advisers are not members of the Ethics and Community Committee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.102
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-112-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-112-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-112-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 112(2) Expert advisers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-112-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
conclusion text: Expert advisers are not members of the Ethics and Community Committee.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

117 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-117
note: Simplified outline of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.103
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-117-norm

118 Appointment of the Regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-118
has part: 118(1) Appointment of the Regulator
has part: 118(2) Appointment of the Regulator
has part: 118(3) Appointment of the Regulator
has part: 118(4) Appointment of the Regulator
has part: 118(5) Appointment of the Regulator
has part: 118(6) Appointment of the Regulator
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.104

118(1) Appointment of the Regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-118-ss-1
part of: 118 Appointment of the Regulator
note: The Regulator must be appointed by the Governor-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.104
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator appointment is mandatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(2) Appointment of the Regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-118-ss-2
part of: 118 Appointment of the Regulator
note: Regulator must hold office for a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.104
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 118(2) Appointment of the Regulator
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Regulator holds office
premise text: (2) The Regulator holds office for the period specified in the instrument of appointment.
conclusion text: The Regulator must hold office for a specified period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Regulator's term overlaps with the instrument of appointment
premise text: (2) The period specified must not be less than 3 years or more than 5 years.
conclusion text: The Regulator's term overlaps with the instrument of appointment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: mustBe
logic summary: Regulator's term is valid if it meets the conditions
premise text: (2) The period specified must not be less than 3 years or more than 5 years.
conclusion text: The Regulator's term is valid if it meets the conditions.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustBe
logic summary: Regulator's term spreads to other parts of the instrument
premise text: (2) The period specified must not be less than 3 years or more than 5 years.
conclusion text: The Regulator's term spreads to other parts of the instrument.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: mustBe
logic summary: Regulator's term is recognized by AI systems
premise text: (2) The period specified must not be less than 3 years or more than 5 years.
conclusion text: The Regulator's term is recognized by AI systems.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(3) Appointment of the Regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-118-ss-3
part of: 118 Appointment of the Regulator
note: The Regulator must hold office on a full-time basis.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.104
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: holds
logic summary: Regulator holds office
conclusion text: obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(4) Appointment of the Regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-118-ss-4
part of: 118 Appointment of the Regulator
note: Majority of jurisdictions must agree to the appointment.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.104
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Governor-General must appoint Regulator with majority agreement.
premise text: (4) The Governor-General...
conclusion text: The Governor-General must not appoint...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(5) Appointment of the Regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-118-ss-5
part of: 118 Appointment of the Regulator
note: Cannot appoint Regulator if employed by a body corporate related to gene technologies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.104
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-5-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

118(6) Appointment of the Regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-118-ss-6
part of: 118 Appointment of the Regulator
note: Governor-General cannot appoint Regulator with pecuniary interest in gene technology body corporate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.104
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-6-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-6-logic-deontic-4

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition on appointment
premise text: Governor-General has authority to appoint Regulator
conclusion text: Regulator cannot be appointed with pecuniary interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during development and implementation of gene technologies
logic summary: Temporal interval condition
premise text: Regulator's appointment is subject to temporal interval
conclusion text: Development and implementation of gene technologies during Regulator's appointment
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-6-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must not
logic summary: Negative obligation on Governor-General
premise text: Governor-General has authority to appoint Regulator
conclusion text: Governor-General must not appoint Regulator with pecuniary interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-118-ss-6-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must not appoint
logic summary: Negative obligation on Governor-General
premise text: Governor-General has authority to appoint Regulator
conclusion text: Governor-General must not appoint Regulator with pecuniary interest
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119 Termination of appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119
has part: 119(1) Termination of appointment
has part: 119(2) Termination of appointment
has part: 119(3) Termination of appointment
has part: 119(4) Termination of appointment
has part: 119(5) Termination of appointment
has part: 119(6) Termination of appointment
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.104

119(1) Termination of appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119-ss-1
part of: 119 Termination of appointment
note: Governor-General may terminate appointment of Regulator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.104
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 119(1) Termination of appointment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to terminate appointment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119(2) Termination of appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119-ss-2
part of: 119 Termination of appointment
note: Termination of appointment under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.104
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 119(2) Termination of appointment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Regulator's actions are prohibited.
premise text: (a) becomes bankrupt, applies to take the benefit of any law for the relief of bankrupt or insolvent debtors, compounds with his or her creditors or makes an assignment of his or her remuneration for their benefit;
conclusion text: the Governor-General must terminate his or her appointment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Regulator's actions are prohibited.
premise text: (b) fails to comply with his or her obligations under section 120;
conclusion text: the Governor-General must terminate his or her appointment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Regulator's actions are prohibited.
premise text: (c) without the consent of the Minister, engages in any paid employment outside the duties of his or her office;
conclusion text: the Governor-General must terminate his or her appointment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Regulator's actions are prohibited.
premise text: (d) is absent from duty, except on leave of absence, for 14 consecutive days or for 28 days in any 12 months;
conclusion text: the Governor-General must terminate his or her appointment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119(3) Termination of appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119-ss-3
part of: 119 Termination of appointment
note: Governor-General must obtain majority agreement from jurisdictions before terminating the appointment of the Regulator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.104
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 119(3) Termination of appointment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to obtain majority agreement
premise text: Governor-General must not terminate the appointment of the Regulator unless a majority of jurisdictions agree.
conclusion text: The Governor-General MUST obtain majority agreement from jurisdictions before terminating the appointment of the Regulator.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for terminating the appointment contains jurisdictional agreement
premise text: The Governor-General must not terminate the appointment of the Regulator unless a majority of jurisdictions agree to the termination of the appointment.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for terminating the appointment contains jurisdictional agreement.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for terminating the appointment is contained in jurisdictional agreement
premise text: The Governor-General must not terminate the appointment of the Regulator unless a majority of jurisdictions agree to the termination of the appointment.
conclusion text: The temporal interval for terminating the appointment is contained in jurisdictional agreement.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Jurisdictional agreement diffuses to Regulator's appointment
premise text: The Governor-General must not terminate the appointment of the Regulator unless a majority of jurisdictions agree to the termination of the appointment.
conclusion text: Jurisdictional agreement diffuses to Regulator's appointment.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Regulator's appointment is contained in jurisdictional agreement
premise text: The Governor-General must not terminate the appointment of the Regulator unless a majority of jurisdictions agree to the termination of the appointment.
conclusion text: Regulator's appointment is contained in jurisdictional agreement.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119(4) Termination of appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119-ss-4
part of: 119 Termination of appointment
note: Retirement of Regulator on grounds of physical or mental incapacity with Regulator's consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.104
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to retire Regulator
premise text: Regulator is eligible employee or member of superannuation scheme
conclusion text: Governor-General may retire Regulator
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: Temporal interval for retirement
premise text: Regulator is eligible employee or member of superannuation scheme within a certain time frame
conclusion text: Governor-General may retire Regulator during this time frame
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-4-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Justification for retirement
premise text: Regulator is eligible employee or member of superannuation scheme and Governor-General consents
conclusion text: Retirement of Regulator is justified
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Propagation
logic summary: Propagated effect of retirement
premise text: Governor-General retires Regulator
conclusion text: Regulator's position is vacated
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119(5) Termination of appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119-ss-5
part of: 119 Termination of appointment
note: Regulator must be retired on grounds of invalidity if removed or retired due to incapacity and CSC gives a certificate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.104
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-5-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-5-logic-ltl-3

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 119(5) Termination of appointment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must be retired on grounds of invalidity.
premise text: (5) For the purposes of the Superannuation Act 1976, the Regulator is taken to have been retired from office on the grounds of invalidity...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Regulator's retirement must occur after removal or retirement due to incapacity.
premise text: (5) For the purposes of the Superannuation Act 1976, the Regulator is taken to have been retired from office on the grounds of invalidity...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-5-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: Regulator's retirement must occur after removal or retirement due to incapacity.
premise text: (5) For the purposes of the Superannuation Act 1976, the Regulator is taken to have been retired from office on the grounds of invalidity...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

119(6) Termination of appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-119-ss-6
part of: 119 Termination of appointment
note: Regulator must be retired on grounds of invalidity if removed or retired due to incapacity and CSC gives a certificate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.104
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-6-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 119(6) Termination of appointment
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-119-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must be retired on grounds of invalidity.
premise text: (a) the Regulator is removed or retired from office on the grounds of physical or mental incapacity; and (b) CSC gives a certificate under section 13 of that Act.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

120 Disclosure of interests
type: Concept
realized by: sec-120
note: The Regulator must disclose its interests to the Minister.
description: written notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.106
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-120-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-120-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-120-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator has an obligation to disclose interests.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

121 Acting appointment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-121
note: The Minister may appoint a person to act as the Regulator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.106
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-121-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-121-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-121-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by the Minister
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

122 Terms and conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-122
note: Terms and conditions for the Regulator's office determined by the Governor-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.106
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-122-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-122-logic-alleninterval-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-122-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal relation
premise text: None
conclusion text: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

123 Outside employment
type: Concept
realized by: sec-123
note: Regulator cannot engage in paid employment outside office without Minister's approval.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.106
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-123-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-123-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-123-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-123-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-123-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-123-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-123-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: cannot
logic summary: Prohibition of Regulator's outside employment.
premise text: Regulator must not engage in paid employment outside the duties of the Regulator’s office.
conclusion text: Minister's approval required.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-123-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval for Regulator's employment restrictions.
premise text: Regulator must not engage in paid employment outside the duties of the Regulator’s office without the approval of the Minister.
conclusion text: Minister's approval required during Regulator's employment.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-123-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication from Regulator's outside employment prohibition.
premise text: Regulator must not engage in paid employment outside the duties of the Regulator’s office without the approval of the Minister.
conclusion text: Minister's approval required for Regulator's outside employment.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-123-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of Regulator's employment restrictions to other agents.
premise text: Regulator must not engage in paid employment outside the duties of the Regulator’s office without the approval of the Minister.
conclusion text: Minister's approval required for Regulator's outside employment.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-123-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: asserts
logic summary: CogAI asserts Regulator's employment restrictions.
premise text: Regulator must not engage in paid employment outside the duties of the Regulator’s office without the approval of the Minister.
conclusion text: Minister's approval required for Regulator's outside employment.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124 Remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-124
has part: 124(1) Remuneration
has part: 124(2) Remuneration
has part: 124(3) Remuneration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.107

124(1) Remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-124-ss-1
part of: 124 Remuneration
note: Regulator must be paid remuneration determined by the Remuneration Tribunal or prescribed by regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.107
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-124-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-124-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-124-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 124(1) Remuneration
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-124-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must be paid remuneration.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(2) Remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-124-ss-2
part of: 124 Remuneration
note: Regulator must be paid allowances prescribed by regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.107
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-124-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-124-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-124-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to pay allowances
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

124(3) Remuneration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-124-ss-3
part of: 124 Remuneration
note: Subject to the Remuneration Tribunal Act 1973.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.107
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-124-ss-3-norm

125 Leave of absence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125
has part: 125(1) Leave of absence
has part: 125(2) Leave of absence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.107

125(1) Leave of absence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125-ss-1
part of: 125 Leave of absence
note: Regulator has recreation leave entitlements determined by the Remuneration Tribunal.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.107
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-125-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-125-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-125-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 125(1) Leave of absence
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-125-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Regulator has a duty to provide recreation leave entitlements.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

125(2) Leave of absence
type: Concept
realized by: sec-125-ss-2
part of: 125 Leave of absence
note: Grant leave of absence on terms and conditions determined by the Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.107
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-125-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-125-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-125-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: grant
logic summary: Permission to grant leave of absence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

126 Resignation
type: Concept
realized by: sec-126
note: Regulator may resign by giving written notice to Governor-General.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.107
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-126-norm

127 Regulator may charge for services
type: Concept
realized by: sec-127
note: Regulator may charge for services provided by or on behalf of the Regulator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.108
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-127-norm

128 Notional payments by the Commonwealth
type: Concept
realized by: sec-128
has part: 128(1) Notional payments by the Commonwealth
has part: 128(2) Notional payments by the Commonwealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.108

128(1) Notional payments by the Commonwealth
type: Concept
realized by: sec-128-ss-1
part of: 128 Notional payments by the Commonwealth
note: Notional payments by the Commonwealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.108
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-128-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-128-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-128-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-128-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-128-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-128-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-128-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to pay notionally
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-128-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between Commonwealth and fees/charges
premise text: (1) The purpose of this section is to ensure that fees and charges under this Act and the regulations, and charges under the Gene Technology (Licence Charges) Act 2000, are notionally payable by the Commonwealth (or parts of the Commonwealth).
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-128-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrently
logic summary: Recurring notionally payable fees and charges
premise text: (1) The purpose of this section is to ensure that fees and charges under this Act and the regulations, and charges under the Gene Technology (Licence Charges) Act 2000, are notionally payable by the Commonwealth (or parts of the Commonwealth).
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-128-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of notionally payable fees and charges to parts of the Commonwealth
premise text: (1) The purpose of this section is to ensure that fees and charges under this Act and the regulations, and charges under the Gene Technology (Licence Charges) Act 2000, are notionally payable by the Commonwealth (or parts of the Commonwealth).
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-128-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Recognition of notionally payable fees and charges by CogAI
premise text: (1) The purpose of this section is to ensure that fees and charges under this Act and the regulations, and charges under the Gene Technology (Licence Charges) Act 2000, are notionally payable by the Commonwealth (or parts of the Commonwealth).
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

128(2) Notional payments by the Commonwealth
type: Concept
realized by: sec-128-ss-2
part of: 128 Notional payments by the Commonwealth
note: The Minister may give written directions for the purpose of this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.108
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-128-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-128-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-128-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: The Minister may give written directions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

129 Gene Technology Account
type: Concept
realized by: sec-129
has part: 129(1) Gene Technology Account
has part: 129(2) Gene Technology Account
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.108

129(1) Gene Technology Account
type: Concept
realized by: sec-129-ss-1
part of: 129 Gene Technology Account
note: Establishes a Gene Technology Account
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.108
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-129-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-129-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-129-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 129(1) Gene Technology Account
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-129-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: establish
logic summary: Creates an obligation to establish the account
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

129(2) Gene Technology Account
type: Concept
realized by: sec-129-ss-2
part of: 129 Gene Technology Account
note: The Account is a special account for the purposes of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.108
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-129-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-129-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-129-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 129(2) Gene Technology Account
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-129-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Account is a special account
premise text: The Account is a special account for the purposes of...
conclusion text: It is an obligation to maintain this account.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

130 Credits to Account
type: Concept
realized by: sec-130
has part: 130(1) Credits to Account
has part: 130(2) Credits to Account
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.108

130(1) Credits to Account
type: Concept
realized by: sec-130-ss-1
part of: 130 Credits to Account
note: Credit amounts received by the Commonwealth under various laws and regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.108
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-130-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-130-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-130-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-130-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-130-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-130-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-130-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 130(1) Credits to Account
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-130-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be credited to the Account.
premise text: (1) There must be credited...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-130-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Amounts received within a specific timeframe.
premise text: (e) amounts equal to interest received by the Commonwealth from the investment of amounts standing to the credit of the Account;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-130-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: Recurring credits under various laws and regulations.
premise text: (c) amounts equal to fees received by the Commonwealth under subsections 40(6) and 83(3);
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-130-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be credited to the Account.
premise text: (f) amounts equal to money received by the Commonwealth in relation to property paid for with amounts standing to the credit of the Account;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-130-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be credited to the Account.
premise text: (g) amounts equal to amounts recovered by the Commonwealth under subsection 146(5) or 158(4), to the extent that they are referable to amounts debited from the Account;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

130(2) Credits to Account
type: Concept
realized by: sec-130-ss-2
part of: 130 Credits to Account
note: Duty to make payments in connection with the performance of the Regulator’s functions under this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.108
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-130-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-130-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-130-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 130(2) Credits to Account
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-130-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State to make payments.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

131 Recovery of amounts
type: Concept
realized by: sec-131
note: Recovery of amounts payable to the Commonwealth
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.109
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-131-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-131-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-131-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 131 Recovery of amounts
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-131-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Recovery of debts due to the Commonwealth
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

132 Purposes of Account
type: Concept
realized by: sec-132
note: Expenditure of Account amounts for costs, expenses, and obligations incurred by the Regulator or inspectors.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.110
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-132-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-132-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-132-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 132 Purposes of Account
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-132-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to expend Account amounts.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

133 Staff assisting the Regulator
type: Concept
realized by: sec-133
note: Staff assisting the Regulator must be persons engaged under the Public Service Act 1999.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.111
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-133-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-133-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-133-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 133 Staff assisting the Regulator
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-133-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Staff assisting the Regulator must be persons engaged under the Public Service Act 1999.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

134 Consultants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-134
has part: 134(1) Consultants
has part: 134(2) Consultants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.111

134(1) Consultants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-134-ss-1
part of: 134 Consultants
note: The Regulator may engage persons with suitable qualifications and experience as consultants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.111
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-134-ss-1-norm

134(2) Consultants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-134-ss-2
part of: 134 Consultants
note: Regulator determines terms and conditions of engagement for consultants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.111
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-134-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-134-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-134-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 134(2) Consultants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-134-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: determines
logic summary: Regulator's obligation to determine terms and conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

135 Seconded officers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-135
note: The Regulator may be assisted by certain persons and authorities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.111
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-135-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-135-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 135 Seconded officers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

136 Annual Report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136
has part: 136(1) Annual Report
has part: 136(1A) Annual Report
has part: 136(2) Annual Report
has part: 136(3) Annual Report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.112

136(1) Annual Report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136-ss-1
part of: 136 Annual Report
note: The Regulator must prepare and give a report to the Minister.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.112
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-136-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-136-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-136-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-136-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Regulator must perform an action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-136-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: AT
logic summary: Temporal relation between the end of a financial year and the preparation of a report.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(1A) Annual Report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136-ss-1a
part of: 136 Annual Report
note: Annual report must include GMO licence information and breaches of conditions.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.112
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-136-ss-1a-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-136-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-136-ss-1a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(1A) Annual Report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-136-ss-1a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide annual report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(2) Annual Report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136-ss-2
part of: 136 Annual Report
note: Minister must provide annual report to each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.112
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-136-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-136-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-136-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(2) Annual Report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-136-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

136(3) Annual Report
type: Concept
realized by: sec-136-ss-3
part of: 136 Annual Report
note: Regulator must give a copy of the report to each State.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.112
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-136-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-136-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-136-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 136(3) Annual Report
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-136-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must give a copy of the report to each State.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137 Reports to Parliament
type: Concept
realized by: sec-137
has part: 137(1) Reports to Parliament
has part: 137(2) Reports to Parliament
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.112

137(1) Reports to Parliament
type: Concept
realized by: sec-137-ss-1
part of: 137 Reports to Parliament
note: The Regulator must report to Parliament on matters relating to its functions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.112
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-137-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-137-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-137-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

137(2) Reports to Parliament
type: Concept
realized by: sec-137-ss-2
part of: 137 Reports to Parliament
note: Regulator must give a copy of the report to each State.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.112
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-137-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-137-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-137-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 137(2) Reports to Parliament
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-137-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must give a copy of the report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138 Record of GMO Dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-138
has part: 138(1) Record of GMO Dealings
has part: 138(2) Record of GMO Dealings
has part: 138(3) Record of GMO Dealings
has part: 138(3A) Record of GMO Dealings
has part: 138(4) Record of GMO Dealings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.113

138(1) Record of GMO Dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-138-ss-1
part of: 138 Record of GMO Dealings
note: Maintain a Record of GMO Dealings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.113
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to maintain a Record
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138(2) Record of GMO Dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-138-ss-2
part of: 138 Record of GMO Dealings
note: Maintain a comprehensive record of all dealings in Australia that involve GMOs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.113
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138(2) Record of GMO Dealings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to maintain a record
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138(3) Record of GMO Dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-138-ss-3
part of: 138 Record of GMO Dealings
note: Record of GMO Dealings must contain specific information
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.113
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138(3) Record of GMO Dealings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide record
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138(3A) Record of GMO Dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-138-ss-3a
part of: 138 Record of GMO Dealings
note: Record of GMO Dealings must contain specific information
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.113
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-3a-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-3a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138(3A) Record of GMO Dealings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-3a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide record
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

138(4) Record of GMO Dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-138-ss-4
part of: 138 Record of GMO Dealings
note: Must contain specific information about GMO dealings
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.113
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 138(4) Record of GMO Dealings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-138-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Expresses a duty to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

139 Inspection of Record
type: Concept
realized by: sec-139
note: Permit inspection of Record
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.114
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-139-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-139-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-139-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permit
logic summary: Granting permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140 Regulator may review notifiable low risk dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-140
has part: 140(1) Regulator may review notifiable low risk dealings
has part: 140(2) Regulator may review notifiable low risk dealings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.115

140(1) Regulator may review notifiable low risk dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-140-ss-1
part of: 140 Regulator may review notifiable low risk dealings
note: Regulator may review notifiable low risk dealings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.115
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-140-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-140-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-140-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-140-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 140(1) Regulator may review notifiable low risk dealings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-140-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulator has the power to review notifiable low risk dealings
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-140-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: at any time
logic summary: The Regulator may review notifiable low risk dealings at any time
premise text: (1) The Regulator may, at any time,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

140(2) Regulator may review notifiable low risk dealings
type: Concept
realized by: sec-140-ss-2
part of: 140 Regulator may review notifiable low risk dealings
note: Regulator must consider specific matters when reviewing dealings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.115
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-140-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-140-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-140-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 140(2) Regulator may review notifiable low risk dealings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-140-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator's consideration is mandatory.
premise text: (2) The basis of the Regulator’s consideration...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

141 Regulator may review exemptions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-141
note: Regulator may review exemptions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.115
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-141-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-141-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-141-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulator has the power to review exemptions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

142 Regulator may give notice of consideration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-142
note: Regulator must publish notice inviting written submissions on specified matters.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.115
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-142-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-142-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-142-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must publish notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143 What Regulator may do after consideration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143
has part: 143(1) What Regulator may do after consideration
has part: 143(2) What Regulator may do after consideration
has part: 143(3) What Regulator may do after consideration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.116

143(1) What Regulator may do after consideration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143-ss-1
part of: 143 What Regulator may do after consideration
note: Regulator may recommend declaration of notifiable low risk dealing.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.116
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-143-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-143-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-143-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to declare
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143(2) What Regulator may do after consideration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143-ss-2
part of: 143 What Regulator may do after consideration
note: Regulator may recommend amendments to regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.116
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-143-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-143-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-143-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by Regulator
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

143(3) What Regulator may do after consideration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-143-ss-3
part of: 143 What Regulator may do after consideration
note: Regulator may recommend amendments to regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.116
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-143-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-143-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-143-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by Regulator
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

144 Regulator not required to review matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-144
note: No obligation to review matters under sections 140 or 141.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.117
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-144-norm

145 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-145
note: Regulator can give directions to comply with Act or regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.118
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-145-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-145-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-145-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Regulator has the power to give directions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146 Regulator may give directions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-146
has part: 146(1) Regulator may give directions
has part: 146(2) Regulator may give directions
has part: 146(2A) Regulator may give directions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.118

146(1) Regulator may give directions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-146-ss-1
part of: 146 Regulator may give directions
note: Regulator may give directions to licence holder for compliance with Act or regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.118
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-146-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-146-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-146-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 146(1) Regulator may give directions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-146-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulator may give directions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146(2) Regulator may give directions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-146-ss-2
part of: 146 Regulator may give directions
note: Regulator may give directions to a person not complying with the Act or regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.118
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-146-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-146-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-146-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Regulator may give directions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

146(2A) Regulator may give directions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-146-ss-2a
part of: 146 Regulator may give directions
note: Regulator may give directions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.118
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-146-ss-2a-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-146-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-146-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MAY
logic summary: May give directions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

147 Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-147
has part: 147(1) Injunctions
has part: 147(2) Injunctions
has part: 147(3) Injunctions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.121

147(1) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-147-ss-1
part of: 147 Injunctions
note: Granting injunctions to prevent conduct that is or would be an offence against the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.121
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 147(1) Injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits conduct that is or would be an offence against the Act.
premise text: (1) If a person has engaged, is engaging, or is about to engage in any conduct...
conclusion text: The Court may grant an injunction restraining the person from engaging in the conduct.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Restriction
logic summary: Restricts injunctions to conduct that has engaged, is engaging, or will engage.
premise text: (1) If a person has engaged, is engaging, or is about to engage in any conduct...
conclusion text: The Court may grant an injunction restraining the person from engaging in the conduct.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Requires recurring trace of conduct that has engaged, is engaging, or will engage.
premise text: (1) If a person has engaged, is engaging, or is about to engage in any conduct...
conclusion text: The Court may grant an injunction restraining the person from engaging in the conduct.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses injunctions to prevent conduct that is or would be an offence against the Act.
premise text: (1) If a person has engaged, is engaging, or is about to engage in any conduct...
conclusion text: The Court may grant an injunction restraining the person from engaging in the conduct.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Reasoning
logic summary: Requires reasoning to determine whether conduct is an offence against the Act.
premise text: (1) If a person has engaged, is engaging, or is about to engage in any conduct...
conclusion text: The Court may grant an injunction restraining the person from engaging in the conduct.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

147(2) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-147-ss-2
part of: 147 Injunctions
note: Granting injunctions for refusal or failure to comply with the Act or regulations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.121
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 147(2) Injunctions
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with the Act or regulations.
premise text: (2) If a person has refused or failed, is refusing or failing, or is about to refuse or fail...
conclusion text: The Court may grant an injunction requiring the person to do the thing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: implication
logic summary: Implication of refusal or failure on granting an injunction.
premise text: (2) If a person has refused or failed, is refusing or failing, or is about to refuse or fail...
conclusion text: The Court may grant an injunction requiring the person to do the thing.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: between
logic summary: Temporal relationship between refusal/failure and granting an injunction.
premise text: (2) If a person has refused or failed, is refusing or failing, or is about to refuse or fail...
conclusion text: The Court may grant an injunction requiring the person to do the thing.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffuse
logic summary: Diffusing the obligation to comply with the Act or regulations.
premise text: (2) If a person has refused or failed, is refusing or failing, or is about to refuse or fail...
conclusion text: The Court may grant an injunction requiring the person to do the thing.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: infer
logic summary: Inferencing the obligation to comply with the Act or regulations.
premise text: (2) If a person has refused or failed, is refusing or failing, or is about to refuse or fail...
conclusion text: The Court may grant an injunction requiring the person to do the thing.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

147(3) Injunctions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-147-ss-3
part of: 147 Injunctions
note: Court may grant injunction regardless of intent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.121
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-147-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to grant injunction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148 Forfeiture
type: Concept
realized by: sec-148
has part: 148(1) Forfeiture
has part: 148(2) Forfeiture
has part: 148(3) Forfeiture
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.122

148(1) Forfeiture
type: Concept
realized by: sec-148-ss-1
part of: 148 Forfeiture
note: Forfeiture of property used in commission of offence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.122
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-148-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-148-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-148-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-148-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 148(1) Forfeiture
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-148-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits forfeiture
premise text: (1) If a court convicts...
conclusion text: ...the court may order forfeiture
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-148-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between conviction and forfeiture
premise text: (1) If a court convicts...
conclusion text: ...the court may order forfeiture to the Commonwealth
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(2) Forfeiture
type: Concept
realized by: sec-148-ss-2
part of: 148 Forfeiture
note: A thing ordered by a court to be forfeited under this section becomes the property of the Commonwealth.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.122
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-148-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-148-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits forfeiting a thing under this section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

148(3) Forfeiture
type: Concept
realized by: sec-148-ss-3
part of: 148 Forfeiture
note: Must keep thing in custody as directed by Regulator.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.122
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-148-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-148-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-148-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to keep thing in custody.
premise text: Regulator directs
conclusion text: Thing must be kept in custody.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

149 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-149
note: Simplified outline of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.123
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-149-norm

150 Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-150
has part: 150(1) Appointment of inspectors
has part: 150(2) Appointment of inspectors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.124

150(1) Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-150-ss-1
part of: 150 Appointment of inspectors
note: Appoint inspectors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.124
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-150-ss-1-norm

150(2) Appointment of inspectors
type: Concept
realized by: sec-150-ss-2
part of: 150 Appointment of inspectors
note: Inspector must comply with Regulator's directions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.124
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-150-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-150-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-150-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151 Identity card
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151
has part: 151(1) Identity card
has part: 151(2) Identity card
has part: 151(3) Identity card
has part: 151(4) Identity card
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.124

151(1) Identity card
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151-ss-1
part of: 151 Identity card
note: Regulator must issue an identity card to an inspector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.124
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide
premise text: Regulator must issue an identity card to an inspector.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151(2) Identity card
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151-ss-2
part of: 151 Identity card
note: Identity card must be in prescribed form and contain recent photograph.
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.124
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151(2) Identity card
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide identity card in prescribed form.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Identity card must contain recent photograph.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151(3) Identity card
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151-ss-3
part of: 151 Identity card
note: Return identity card upon ceasing to be an inspector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.124
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151(3) Identity card
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: OBLIG
logic summary: Duty to return identity card
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

151(4) Identity card
type: Concept
realized by: sec-151-ss-4
part of: 151 Identity card
note: Must carry identity card at all times while exercising powers or performing functions as an inspector.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.124
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-4-logic-deontic-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 151(4) Identity card
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must carry identity card
premise text: An inspector must carry his or her identity card at all times
conclusion text: at all times while exercising powers or performing functions as an inspector.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carry identity card at all times
premise text: An inspector must carry his or her identity card
conclusion text: at all times while exercising powers or performing functions as an inspector.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval of carrying identity card
premise text: An inspector must carry his or her identity card at all times while exercising powers or performing functions as an inspector.
conclusion text: The temporal interval of carrying the identity card is contained within the temporal interval of exercising powers or performing functions as an inspector.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal trace of carrying identity card
premise text: An inspector must carry his or her identity card at all times while exercising powers or performing functions as an inspector.
conclusion text: The temporal trace of carrying the identity card is contained within the temporal trace of exercising powers or performing functions as an inspector.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-151-ss-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Carry identity card at all times while exercising powers or performing functions as an inspector
premise text: An inspector must carry his or her identity card at all times while exercising powers or performing functions as an inspector.
conclusion text: at all times while exercising powers or performing functions as an inspector.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152 Powers available to inspectors for monitoring compliance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-152
has part: 152(1) Powers available to inspectors for monitoring compliance
has part: 152(2) Powers available to inspectors for monitoring compliance
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.125

152(1) Powers available to inspectors for monitoring compliance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-152-ss-1
part of: 152 Powers available to inspectors for monitoring compliance
note: Inspector may enter premises and exercise monitoring powers.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.125
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-152-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-152-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-152-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 152(1) Powers available to inspectors for monitoring compliance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-152-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Inspector can enter premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

152(2) Powers available to inspectors for monitoring compliance
type: Concept
realized by: sec-152-ss-2
part of: 152 Powers available to inspectors for monitoring compliance
note: Inspector entry permission under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.125
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-152-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-152-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-152-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 152(2) Powers available to inspectors for monitoring compliance
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-152-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to enter premises
premise text: Occupier consent required
conclusion text: Inspector entry permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

153 Monitoring powers
type: Concept
realized by: sec-153
note: Inspector's powers to search and inspect premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.125
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-153-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-153-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-153-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 153 Monitoring powers
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-153-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Inspector has power to search
premise text: Inspector is authorized
conclusion text: Search is permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

154 Searches and seizures related to offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-154
has part: 154(1) Searches and seizures related to offences
has part: 154(2) Searches and seizures related to offences
has part: 154(3) Searches and seizures related to offences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.128

154(1) Searches and seizures related to offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-154-ss-1
part of: 154 Searches and seizures related to offences
note: Inspector must have reasonable grounds to search premises.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.128
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-154-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-154-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-154-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-154-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 154(1) Searches and seizures related to offences
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-154-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
premise text: Inspector has reasonable grounds
conclusion text: Search premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-154-ss-1-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: REASONABLE GROUNDS
logic summary: Evidential material suspicion
premise text: Inspector suspects evidential material
conclusion text: Search premises
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

154(2) Searches and seizures related to offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-154-ss-2
part of: 154 Searches and seizures related to offences
note: Inspector's powers during searches and seizures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.128
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-154-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-154-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-154-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-154-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Inspector has power to enter premises
premise text: Inspector is authorized to enter premises
conclusion text: Inspector may enter premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-154-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Inspector's powers are during the search and seizure
premise text: Search and seizure is taking place
conclusion text: Inspector's powers are during the search and seizure
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

154(3) Searches and seizures related to offences
type: Concept
realized by: sec-154-ss-3
part of: 154 Searches and seizures related to offences
note: Seizure of additional items during search and seizure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.128
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-154-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-154-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-154-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits seizing additional items without warrant
premise text: (3) If...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

155 Offence-related powers of inspectors in relation to premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-155
note: Inspector's powers of search, inspection, and sampling
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.128
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-155-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-155-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-155-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 155 Offence-related powers of inspectors in relation to premises
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-155-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Inspector has power to search premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156 Use of equipment at premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156
has part: 156(1) Use of equipment at premises
has part: 156(2) Use of equipment at premises
has part: 156(3) Use of equipment at premises
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.129

156(1) Use of equipment at premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156-ss-1
part of: 156 Use of equipment at premises
note: Inspector may operate equipment to access evidential material.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.129
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 156(1) Use of equipment at premises
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission granted
premise text: Inspector believes on reasonable grounds...
conclusion text: Equipment operation is permitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Equipment operation occurs during inspection
premise text: Inspector operates equipment during inspection
conclusion text: Inspection occurs during equipment operation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156(2) Use of equipment at premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156-ss-2
part of: 156 Use of equipment at premises
note: Seize equipment and associated devices if evidential material is accessible.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.129
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits seizing equipment and associated devices.
premise text: (2) If the inspector, after operating the equipment...
conclusion text: The inspector may not seize the equipment and any disk, tape or other associated device.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Describes temporal relation between equipment operation and seizure.
premise text: (2) If the inspector, after operating the equipment...
conclusion text: The seizure occurs after the equipment is operated.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Describes recurring trace of equipment operation and seizure.
premise text: (2) If the inspector, after operating the equipment...
conclusion text: The seizure occurs repeatedly if the equipment is operated repeatedly.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Describes diffusion of evidential material from premises.
premise text: (2) If the material can be transferred to a disk, tape or other storage device...
conclusion text: The evidential material diffuses from the premises if it is transferred to a storage device.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Describes recognition of evidential material by inspector.
premise text: (2) If the inspector, after operating the equipment...
conclusion text: The inspector recognizes the evidential material if it is accessible.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

156(3) Use of equipment at premises
type: Concept
realized by: sec-156-ss-3
part of: 156 Use of equipment at premises
note: Seizure of equipment under certain conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.129
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 156(3) Use of equipment at premises
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-156-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits seizure without practicable documentary form or copying
premise text: (3) An inspector may seize equipment under paragraph (2)(a) only if: (a) it is not practicable to put the material in documentary form as mentioned in paragraph (2)(b) or to copy the material as mentioned in paragraph (2)(c); or (b) possession by the occupier of the equipment could constitute an offence.
conclusion text: (3) An inspector may seize equipment under paragraph (2)(a) only if: (a) it is not practicable to put the material in documentary form as mentioned in paragraph (2)(b) or to copy the material as mentioned in paragraph (2)(c); or (b) possession by the occupier of the equipment could constitute an offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

157 Expert assistance to operate a thing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-157
has part: 157(1) Expert assistance to operate a thing
has part: 157(2) Expert assistance to operate a thing
has part: 157(3) Expert assistance to operate a thing
has part: 157(4) Expert assistance to operate a thing
has part: 157(5) Expert assistance to operate a thing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.131

157(1) Expert assistance to operate a thing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-157-ss-1
part of: 157 Expert assistance to operate a thing
note: Inspector must secure thing if necessary to prevent information/material from being destroyed/alterated.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.131
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 157(1) Expert assistance to operate a thing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to secure thing
premise text: Inspector believes information/material may be accessible by operating thing.
conclusion text: Inspector must do whatever is necessary to secure thing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Timeframe for inspector's action must be before information/material is destroyed/alterated
premise text: Inspector does not take action under subsection.
conclusion text: Timeframe for inspector's action must be before information/material is destroyed/alterated.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Inspector's action can occur at any time after thing is secured
premise text: Inspector secures thing.
conclusion text: Inspector's action can occur at any time after thing is secured.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: IF
logic summary: Inspector's action must be taken if expert assistance is required
premise text: Expert assistance is required to operate thing.
conclusion text: Inspector's action must be taken if expert assistance is required.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: IS_A
logic summary: Thing is a security risk if not secured by AI system
premise text: Expert assistance is required to operate thing.
conclusion text: Thing is a security risk if expert assistance is not provided by AI system.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

157(2) Expert assistance to operate a thing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-157-ss-2
part of: 157 Expert assistance to operate a thing
note: Inspector must give notice to occupier before securing thing.
description: Notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.131
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 157(2) Expert assistance to operate a thing
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

157(3) Expert assistance to operate a thing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-157-ss-3
part of: 157 Expert assistance to operate a thing
note: The thing may be secured for a period not exceeding 24 hours or until it has been operated by the expert, whichever happens first.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.131
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 157(3) Expert assistance to operate a thing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state to secure the thing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

157(4) Expert assistance to operate a thing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-157-ss-4
part of: 157 Expert assistance to operate a thing
note: Inspector may apply for extension of expert assistance period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.131
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 157(4) Expert assistance to operate a thing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Inspection has a duty to apply for extension
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

157(5) Expert assistance to operate a thing
type: Concept
realized by: sec-157-ss-5
part of: 157 Expert assistance to operate a thing
note: Inspector must give notice to occupier before applying for extension.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.131
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-5-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 157(5) Expert assistance to operate a thing
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-157-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Inspector must give notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158 Powers available to inspectors for dealing with dangerous
type: Concept
realized by: sec-158
has part: 158(1) Powers available to inspectors for dealing with dangerous
has part: 158(2) Powers available to inspectors for dealing with dangerous
has part: 158(3) Powers available to inspectors for dealing with dangerous
has part: 158(4) Powers available to inspectors for dealing with dangerous
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.132

158(1) Powers available to inspectors for dealing with dangerous
type: Concept
realized by: sec-158-ss-1
part of: 158 Powers available to inspectors for dealing with dangerous
note: Inspector has reasonable grounds to suspect non-compliance and considers it necessary to exercise powers to avoid imminent risk.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.132
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 158(1) Powers available to inspectors for dealing with dangerous
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: has
logic summary: Inspector has reasonable grounds
premise text: (a) an inspector has reasonable grounds for suspecting that there may be on any premises a particular thing in respect of which this Act or the regulations have not been complied with;
conclusion text: the inspector has reasonable grounds
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Inspector must consider it necessary to exercise powers
premise text: (b) the inspector considers that it is necessary to exercise powers under this section in order to avoid an imminent risk of death, serious illness, serious injury, or to protect the environment;
conclusion text: the inspector must consider it necessary
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: on
logic summary: Inspector is looking at a temporal interval on premises
premise text: (a) an inspector has reasonable grounds for suspecting that there may be on any premises a particular thing in respect of which this Act or the regulations have not been complied with;
conclusion text: the inspector is looking at a temporal interval on premises
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: on
logic summary: Inspector is tracing an ordered sequence on premises
premise text: (a) an inspector has reasonable grounds for suspecting that there may be on any premises a particular thing in respect of which this Act or the regulations have not been complied with;
conclusion text: the inspector is tracing an ordered sequence on premises
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Inspector must protect the environment
premise text: (b) the inspector considers that it is necessary to exercise powers under this section in order to avoid an imminent risk of death, serious illness, serious injury, or to protect the environment;
conclusion text: the inspector must consider it necessary to protect the environment
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158(2) Powers available to inspectors for dealing with dangerous
type: Concept
realized by: sec-158-ss-2
part of: 158 Powers available to inspectors for dealing with dangerous
note: Inspector's powers to deal with dangerous things
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.132
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 158(2) Powers available to inspectors for dealing with dangerous
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: can
logic summary: Inspector can enter premises
conclusion text: Inspector may enter the premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Inspector must secure thing if found on premises
conclusion text: Inspector must secure the thing, if the inspector finds it on the premises
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Inspector may require person to take steps
conclusion text: Inspector may require the person to take such steps as the inspector considers necessary for the person to comply with this Act or the regulations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: must
logic summary: Inspector must take steps in relation to thing
conclusion text: Inspector must take such steps, or arrange for such steps to be taken, in relation to the thing as the inspector considers appropriate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158(3) Powers available to inspectors for dealing with dangerous
type: Concept
realized by: sec-158-ss-3
part of: 158 Powers available to inspectors for dealing with dangerous
note: Exercise powers only when necessary to avoid imminent risk of death or serious harm.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.132
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: only if
logic summary: Conditional obligation
premise text: Risk of death or serious harm exists
conclusion text: Exercise powers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

158(4) Powers available to inspectors for dealing with dangerous
type: Concept
realized by: sec-158-ss-4
part of: 158 Powers available to inspectors for dealing with dangerous
note: Person liable for costs incurred by Commonwealth due to inspector's actions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.132
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 158(4) Powers available to inspectors for dealing with dangerous
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-158-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Liability for costs incurred by Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

159 Inspector must produce identity card on request
type: Concept
realized by: sec-159
note: Inspector must produce identity card on request
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.133
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-159-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-159-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-159-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Inspection is prohibited if occupier requests identity card
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

160 Consent
type: Concept
realized by: sec-160
has part: 160(1) Consent
has part: 160(2) Consent
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.133

160(1) Consent
type: Concept
realized by: sec-160-ss-1
part of: 160 Consent
note: Inspector must inform person of right to refuse consent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.133
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-160-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-160-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 160(1) Consent
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-160-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to inform
conclusion text: Inspector must inform person of right to refuse consent.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

160(2) Consent
type: Concept
realized by: sec-160-ss-2
part of: 160 Consent
note: Voluntary consent required for lawful entry by inspector
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.133
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-160-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-160-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-160-ss-2-logic-deontic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-160-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 160(2) Consent
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-160-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Consent is necessary for lawful entry
premise text: Inspector must have consent to enter
conclusion text: No entry without consent is lawful
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-160-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Inspection without consent is not permissible
premise text: Consent is necessary for inspection
conclusion text: No inspection without consent is permissible
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161 Details of warrant to be given to occupier etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-161
has part: 161(1) Details of warrant to be given to occupier etc.
has part: 161(2) Details of warrant to be given to occupier etc.
has part: 161(3) Details of warrant to be given to occupier etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.133

161(1) Details of warrant to be given to occupier etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-161-ss-1
part of: 161 Details of warrant to be given to occupier etc.
note: Inspector must provide a copy of the warrant to the occupier or apparent representative.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.133
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-161-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-161-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-161-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 161(1) Details of warrant to be given to occupier etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-161-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161(2) Details of warrant to be given to occupier etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-161-ss-2
part of: 161 Details of warrant to be given to occupier etc.
note: Inspector must identify themselves to the occupier.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.133
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-161-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-161-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-161-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 161(2) Details of warrant to be given to occupier etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-161-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide identification
conclusion text: The inspector must identify themselves.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

161(3) Details of warrant to be given to occupier etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-161-ss-3
part of: 161 Details of warrant to be given to occupier etc.
note: No signature of magistrate is required on warrant copy.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.133
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-161-ss-3-norm

162 Announcement before entry
type: Concept
realized by: sec-162
note: Inspector must announce before entering premises under a warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.133
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-162-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-162-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-162-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 162 Announcement before entry
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-162-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide announcement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

163 Compensation for damage
type: Concept
realized by: sec-163
has part: 163(1) Compensation for damage
has part: 163(2) Compensation for damage
has part: 163(3) Compensation for damage
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.134

163(1) Compensation for damage
type: Concept
realized by: sec-163-ss-1
part of: 163 Compensation for damage
note: Owner entitled to compensation for damage caused by insufficient care
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.134
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 163(1) Compensation for damage
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Owner has an obligation to provide compensation
premise text: The owner of a thing is entitled to compensation for damage...
conclusion text: The owner must provide compensation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPermission
logic summary: State permits operation without sufficient care
premise text: (a) the damage was caused to the thing as a result of it being operated...
conclusion text: The state permits operation without sufficient care
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Owner has a right to compensation for damage
premise text: (b) the damage was caused as a result of...
conclusion text: The owner has a right to compensation for damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasUndertaking
logic summary: State undertakes to provide compensation for damage
premise text: (1) The owner of a thing is entitled to...
conclusion text: The state undertakes to provide compensation for damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligationToProvide
logic summary: Owner has an obligation to provide compensation for damage
premise text: (a) the damage was caused to the thing as a result of it being operated...
conclusion text: The owner must provide compensation for damage
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

163(2) Compensation for damage
type: Concept
realized by: sec-163-ss-2
part of: 163 Compensation for damage
note: Compensation is payable out of money appropriated by the Parliament.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.134
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 163(2) Compensation for damage
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasObligation
logic summary: Has an obligation to pay compensation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

163(3) Compensation for damage
type: Concept
realized by: sec-163-ss-3
part of: 163 Compensation for damage
note: Regard must be had to whether the occupier and their employees/agents provided warning or guidance.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.134
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 163(3) Compensation for damage
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-163-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Regard must be had to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164 Power to search goods, baggage etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-164
has part: 164(1) Power to search goods, baggage etc.
has part: 164(2) Power to search goods, baggage etc.
has part: 164(3) Power to search goods, baggage etc.
has part: 164(4) Power to search goods, baggage etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.135

164(1) Power to search goods, baggage etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-164-ss-1
part of: 164 Power to search goods, baggage etc.
note: Authority to search goods, baggage etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.135
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 164(1) Power to search goods, baggage etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPowerToSearch
logic summary: Authority to search
premise text: (1) This section applies...
conclusion text: ...to any goods that are...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal scope
premise text: (a) a place outside Australia and a place in Australia;
conclusion text: ...or (b) a place outside an external territory and a place in that territory.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: implies
logic summary: Implication of authority
premise text: (1) This section applies...
conclusion text: ...to any goods that are...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164(2) Power to search goods, baggage etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-164-ss-2
part of: 164 Power to search goods, baggage etc.
note: Inspectors may examine or search goods under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.135
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to inspect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

164(3) Power to search goods, baggage etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-164-ss-3
part of: 164 Power to search goods, baggage etc.
note: Inspector may ask questions about goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.135
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-3-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 164(3) Power to search goods, baggage etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

164(4) Power to search goods, baggage etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-164-ss-4
part of: 164 Power to search goods, baggage etc.
note: Must answer questions truthfully
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.135
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 164(4) Power to search goods, baggage etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide truthful answers
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-164-ss-4-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: KANS
logic summary: Knows the answer
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

165 Seizure of goods
type: Concept
realized by: sec-165
note: Seizure of goods under reasonable grounds
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.135
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-165-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-165-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-165-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-165-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-165-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-165-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-165-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits seizure without reasonable grounds
premise text: Inspector has reasonable grounds to suspect goods are evidential material
conclusion text: Seizure of goods is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-165-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Seizure occurs during overlap of inspector's suspicion and goods being evidential material
premise text: Inspector has reasonable grounds to suspect goods are evidential material
conclusion text: Seizure occurs during overlap of inspector's suspicion and goods being evidential material
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-165-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Seizure is recurring if inspector has reasonable grounds to suspect goods are evidential material
premise text: Inspector has reasonable grounds to suspect goods are evidential material
conclusion text: Seizure is recurring if inspector has reasonable grounds to suspect goods are evidential material
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-165-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of seizure occurs when inspector has reasonable grounds to suspect goods are evidential material
premise text: Inspector has reasonable grounds to suspect goods are evidential material
conclusion text: Diffusion of seizure occurs when inspector has reasonable grounds to suspect goods are evidential material
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-165-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: CogAI recognizes goods as evidential material based on inspector's suspicion
premise text: Inspector has reasonable grounds to suspect goods are evidential material
conclusion text: CogAI recognizes goods as evidential material based on inspector's suspicion
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166 Copies of seized things to be provided
type: Concept
realized by: sec-166
has part: 166(1) Copies of seized things to be provided
has part: 166(2) Copies of seized things to be provided
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.136

166(1) Copies of seized things to be provided
type: Concept
realized by: sec-166-ss-1
part of: 166 Copies of seized things to be provided
note: Inspector must provide a copy of seized documents or information to the occupier upon request.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.136
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-166-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-166-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-166-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 166(1) Copies of seized things to be provided
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-166-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

166(2) Copies of seized things to be provided
type: Concept
realized by: sec-166-ss-2
part of: 166 Copies of seized things to be provided
note: Exemption from subsection (1) for certain seizures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.136
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-166-ss-2-norm

167 Occupier entitled to be present during search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-167
has part: 167(1) Occupier entitled to be present during search
has part: 167(2) Occupier entitled to be present during search
has part: 167(3) Occupier entitled to be present during search
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.136

167(1) Occupier entitled to be present during search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-167-ss-1
part of: 167 Occupier entitled to be present during search
note: Occupier entitled to be present during search
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.136
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-167-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-167-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Occupier has right
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

167(2) Occupier entitled to be present during search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-167-ss-2
part of: 167 Occupier entitled to be present during search
note: Right to observe search ceases if person impedes search.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.136
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-167-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-167-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-167-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Cease
logic summary: Right to observe ceases
premise text: Person impedes search
conclusion text: Right to observe ceases
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

167(3) Occupier entitled to be present during search
type: Concept
realized by: sec-167-ss-3
part of: 167 Occupier entitled to be present during search
note: Right to be present during search
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.136
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-167-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-167-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-167-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasRight
logic summary: Occupier has a right
conclusion text: Occupier is entitled to be present during search
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168 Receipts for things seized
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168
has part: 168(1) Receipts for things seized
has part: 168(2) Receipts for things seized
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.137

168(1) Receipts for things seized
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168-ss-1
part of: 168 Receipts for things seized
note: Inspector must provide a receipt for seized things.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.137
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-168-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-168-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-168-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 168(1) Receipts for things seized
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-168-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide a receipt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

168(2) Receipts for things seized
type: Concept
realized by: sec-168-ss-2
part of: 168 Receipts for things seized
note: Allowance for multiple items in one receipt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.137
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-168-ss-2-norm

169 Retention of seized things
type: Concept
realized by: sec-169
has part: 169(1) Retention of seized things
has part: 169(2) Retention of seized things
has part: 169(3) Retention of seized things
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.137

169(1) Retention of seized things
type: Concept
realized by: sec-169-ss-1
part of: 169 Retention of seized things
note: Return seized things after 60 days or if reason for seizure no longer exists.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.137
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-169-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-169-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-169-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-169-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Inspector must return seized things.
premise text: Inspector seizes a thing under this Part.
conclusion text: Inspector must return the thing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-169-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: 60-day period implies return.
premise text: The period of 60 days after its seizure ends.
conclusion text: Return the thing within 60 days.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

169(2) Retention of seized things
type: Concept
realized by: sec-169-ss-2
part of: 169 Retention of seized things
note: Return seized thing within 60 days unless certain conditions apply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.137
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-169-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-169-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-169-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Duty to return seized thing within 60 days
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

169(3) Retention of seized things
type: Concept
realized by: sec-169-ss-3
part of: 169 Retention of seized things
note: Terms and conditions for returning seized things
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.137
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-169-ss-3-norm

170 Magistrate may permit a thing to be retained
type: Concept
realized by: sec-170
has part: 170(1) Magistrate may permit a thing to be retained
has part: 170(2) Magistrate may permit a thing to be retained
has part: 170(3) Magistrate may permit a thing to be retained
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.138

170(1) Magistrate may permit a thing to be retained
type: Concept
realized by: sec-170-ss-1
part of: 170 Magistrate may permit a thing to be retained
note: Magistrate may permit an inspector to retain a thing for a further period under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.138
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 170(1) Magistrate may permit a thing to be retained
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to retain a thing.
premise text: Magistrate may permit an inspector to retain a thing for a further period.
conclusion text: Inspector is allowed to retain the thing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between the seizure and the further retention period.
premise text: Seizure occurs before the end of 60 days after the seizure.
conclusion text: Further retention period overlaps with the seizure period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of further retention periods.
premise text: Inspector applies for an order to retain the thing for a further period.
conclusion text: Further retention periods are recurring traces.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of the inspector's request to retain the thing.
premise text: Inspector requests to retain the thing for a further period.
conclusion text: Request is diffused to the magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognition of the inspector's authority to retain the thing.
premise text: Inspector has applied for an order to retain the thing.
conclusion text: Inspector is recognized as having authority to retain the thing.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

170(2) Magistrate may permit a thing to be retained
type: Concept
realized by: sec-170-ss-2
part of: 170 Magistrate may permit a thing to be retained
note: Magistrate may permit inspector to retain thing for a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.138
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by magistrate.
premise text: Magistrate has discretion to permit inspector to retain thing.
conclusion text: Inspector may retain thing for a specified period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: for a period (not being a period exceeding 3 years)
logic summary: Temporal interval specified in order
premise text: Magistrate specifies duration of inspector's retention.
conclusion text: Inspector retains thing for a specified duration.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: the magistrate may order that an inspector may retain the thing
logic summary: Order from magistrate permits inspector to retain thing.
premise text: Magistrate has authority to issue orders.
conclusion text: Inspector retains thing due to magistrate's order.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: the magistrate is satisfied that it is necessary for an inspector to continue to retain the thing
logic summary: Necessity condition
premise text: Magistrate considers necessity of inspector retaining thing.
conclusion text: Inspector retains thing due to necessity.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: the magistrate may order that an inspector may retain the thing for a period (not being a period exceeding 3 years) spec
logic summary: AI-assisted decision-making
premise text: Magistrate uses AI to inform retention decision.
conclusion text: Inspector retains thing due to AI-assisted magistrate's order.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

170(3) Magistrate may permit a thing to be retained
type: Concept
realized by: sec-170-ss-3
part of: 170 Magistrate may permit a thing to be retained
note: Inspector may permit retention of thing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.138
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-170-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

171 Disposal of goods if there is no owner or owner cannot be
type: Concept
realized by: sec-171
note: The Regulator may dispose of a thing in such manner as the Regulator thinks appropriate.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.138
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-171-norm

172 Monitoring warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-172
has part: 172(1) Monitoring warrants
has part: 172(2) Monitoring warrants
has part: 172(3) Monitoring warrants
has part: 172(4) Monitoring warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.140

172(1) Monitoring warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-172-ss-1
part of: 172 Monitoring warrants
note: Inspector may apply for a warrant under this section.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.140
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 172(1) Monitoring warrants
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Inspector has the power to apply for a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172(2) Monitoring warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-172-ss-2
part of: 172 Monitoring warrants
note: Magistrate must issue warrant if satisfied that inspectors need access for compliance purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.140
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 172(2) Monitoring warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must issue warrant.
premise text: Inspector access necessary for compliance.
conclusion text: Warrant issued.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172(3) Monitoring warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-172-ss-3
part of: 172 Monitoring warrants
note: Inspector must provide information to magistrate before issuing warrant.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.140
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 172(3) Monitoring warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Magistrate must receive information from inspector.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-3-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: Requires
logic summary: Inspector must provide required information to magistrate.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Inspector's information is sought repeatedly.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

172(4) Monitoring warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-172-ss-4
part of: 172 Monitoring warrants
note: Warrant must authorise entry and exercise powers
description: (a) authorise one or more inspectors, (b) state purpose for which warrant is issued
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.140
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits entry without authorisation
premise text: (4) The warrant must: (a) authorise one or more inspectors (whether or not named in the warrant), with such assistance and by such force as is necessary and reasonable:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Requires authorisation for entry
premise text: (i) to enter the premises; and (ii) to exercise the powers set out in section 153 in relation to the premises:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Requires authorisation for exercise of powers
premise text: (ii) to exercise the powers set out in section 153 in relation to the premises:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-172-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Requires authorisation for specified hours of entry
premise text: (b) state whether the entry is authorised to be made at any time of the day or night or during specified hours of the day or night:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

173 Offence-related warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-173
has part: 173(1) Offence-related warrants
has part: 173(2) Offence-related warrants
has part: 173(3) Offence-related warrants
has part: 173(4) Offence-related warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.140

173(1) Offence-related warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-173-ss-1
part of: 173 Offence-related warrants
note: An inspector may apply for a warrant under this section in relation to premises.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.140
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: An inspector may apply for a warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

173(2) Offence-related warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-173-ss-2
part of: 173 Offence-related warrants
note: Magistrate must issue warrant if satisfied with reasonable grounds for suspecting evidential material exists or may exist within 72 hours.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.140
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 173(2) Offence-related warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Magistrate must issue warrant
premise text: Reasonable grounds for suspecting evidential material exists or may exist within 72 hours.
conclusion text: Warrant must be issued
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-2-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: REASONABLE GROUNDS
logic summary: Magistrate has reasonable grounds to believe warrant is justified
premise text: There are reasonable grounds for suspecting evidential material exists or may exist within 72 hours.
conclusion text: Warrant is justified
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: WITHIN 72 HOURS
logic summary: Evidential material must exist or may exist within 72 hours for warrant to be issued
premise text: There are reasonable grounds for suspecting evidential material exists or may exist within 72 hours.
conclusion text: Warrant is only justified if evidential material exists or may exist within 72 hours
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-2-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IS SATISFIED BY INFORMATION ON OATH
logic summary: Magistrate must be satisfied with information on oath for warrant to be issued
premise text: There are reasonable grounds for suspecting evidential material exists or may exist within 72 hours.
conclusion text: Warrant is only justified if magistrate is satisfied with information on oath
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: WITHIN NEXT 72 HOURS
logic summary: Evidential material must exist or may exist within next 72 hours for warrant to be issued
premise text: There are reasonable grounds for suspecting evidential material exists or may exist within 72 hours.
conclusion text: Warrant is only justified if evidential material exists or may exist within next 72 hours
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

173(3) Offence-related warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-173-ss-3
part of: 173 Offence-related warrants
note: Magistrate must provide further information before issuing warrant.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.140
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 173(3) Offence-related warrants
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Magistrate has a duty to provide further information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

173(4) Offence-related warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-173-ss-4
part of: 173 Offence-related warrants
note: Warrant requirements for inspectors
description: (a) name one or more inspectors; (b) authorise the inspectors so named, with such assistance and by such force as is necessary and reasonable: (i) to enter the premises; (ii) to exercise the powers set out in subsection 154(3) and section 155; (iii) to seize the evidential material;
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.140
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-173-ss-4-norm

174 Offence-related warrants by telephone, telex, fax etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-174
has part: 174(1) Offence-related warrants by telephone, telex, fax etc.
has part: 174(2) Offence-related warrants by telephone, telex, fax etc.
has part: 174(3) Offence-related warrants by telephone, telex, fax etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.141

174(1) Offence-related warrants by telephone, telex, fax etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-174-ss-1
part of: 174 Offence-related warrants by telephone, telex, fax etc.
note: Inspector may apply for warrant by telephone, telex, fax or other electronic means.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.141
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-174-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-174-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-174-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-174-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-174-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Permission to apply for warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-174-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of inspector's action as permission
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-174-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessity
logic summary: Inspector considers it necessary to apply for warrant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

174(2) Offence-related warrants by telephone, telex, fax etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-174-ss-2
part of: 174 Offence-related warrants by telephone, telex, fax etc.
note: Magistrate may require voice communication for warrants.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.141
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-174-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-174-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-174-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 174(2) Offence-related warrants by telephone, telex, fax etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-174-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Requires magistrate to request voice communication.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

174(3) Offence-related warrants by telephone, telex, fax etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sec-174-ss-3
part of: 174 Offence-related warrants by telephone, telex, fax etc.
note: Inspector must prepare information before applying for warrant.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.141
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-174-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-174-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-174-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 174(3) Offence-related warrants by telephone, telex, fax etc.
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-174-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to prepare information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

175 Offences relating to warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-175
has part: 175(1) Offences relating to warrants
has part: 175(2) Offences relating to warrants
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.143

175(1) Offences relating to warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-175-ss-1
part of: 175 Offences relating to warrants
note: Inspection must not make false or misleading statements in warrant applications.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.143
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-175-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-175-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-175-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Inspection must not make false or misleading statements.
premise text: Inspector
conclusion text: Warrant application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

175(2) Offences relating to warrants
type: Concept
realized by: sec-175-ss-2
part of: 175 Offences relating to warrants
note: Inspector must not perform certain actions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.143
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-175-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-175-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-175-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 175(2) Offences relating to warrants
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-175-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must Not
logic summary: Prohibition of inspector action
premise text: (2) An inspector must not:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

176 Part not to abrogate privilege against self-incrimination
type: Concept
realized by: sec-176
note: Right to refuse self-incrimination
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.145
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-176-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-176-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-176-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 176 Part not to abrogate privilege against self-incrimination
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-176-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Right to refuse self-incrimination
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

177 Part does not limit power to impose conditions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-177
note: Regulator and Minister have power to impose conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.145
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-177-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-177-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-177-logic-deontic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-177-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Regulator has power.
conclusion text: Regulator has power to impose conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-177-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Minister has power.
conclusion text: Minister has power to impose conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

178 Simplified outline
type: Concept
realized by: sec-178
note: Simplified outline of this Part
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.146
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-178-norm

179 Meaning of terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-179
note: List of reviewable decisions and eligible persons
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.147
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-179-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-179-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-179-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-179-logic-ltl-3

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-179-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 179 Meaning of terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-179-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: List of reviewable decisions and eligible persons
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-179-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >
logic summary: Temporal intervals
premise text: Decision made under paragraph 43(2)(f)
conclusion text: To refuse to consider an application on the basis that the applicant is not a suitable person to hold a licence
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-179-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >
logic summary: Recurring trace
premise text: Section 55
conclusion text: To issue a licence
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180 Notification of decisions and review rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180
has part: 180(1) Notification of decisions and review rights
has part: 180(2) Notification of decisions and review rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.148

180(1) Notification of decisions and review rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180-ss-1
part of: 180 Notification of decisions and review rights
note: Regulator must notify eligible persons of reviewable decisions.
description: notice in writing containing terms, reasons, and review rights
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.148
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-180-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-180-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-180-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Regulator must perform action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

180(2) Notification of decisions and review rights
type: Concept
realized by: sec-180-ss-2
part of: 180 Notification of decisions and review rights
note: No effect on decision validity if requirements not met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.148
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-180-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-180-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-180-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 180(2) Notification of decisions and review rights
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-180-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: State obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181 Internal review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-181
has part: 181(1) Internal review
has part: 181(2) Internal review
has part: 181(3) Internal review
has part: 181(4) Internal review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.149

181(1) Internal review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-181-ss-1
part of: 181 Internal review
note: Eligible person may apply for internal review of a decision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.149
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 181(1) Internal review
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Expresses permission or obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181(2) Internal review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-181-ss-2
part of: 181 Internal review
note: Application for internal review must be made within a specified period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.149
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Application for internal review must be made within a specified period.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Application for internal review must be made within a specified period.
premise text: (2) An application for internal review must be made within 30 days...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: OBLIGATION
logic summary: Application for internal review is an obligation for the Regulator.
premise text: (2) An application for internal review must be made within 30 days...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: OBLIGATION
logic summary: Application for internal review is an obligation that must be fulfilled by the Regulator.
premise text: (2) An application for internal review must be made within 30 days...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: OBLIGATION
logic summary: Application for internal review is an obligation that must be fulfilled by the Regulator.
premise text: (2) An application for internal review must be made within 30 days...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181(3) Internal review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-181-ss-3
part of: 181 Internal review
note: The Regulator must review a decision personally upon receiving an application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.149
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Regulator must review a decision personally.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

181(4) Internal review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-181-ss-4
part of: 181 Internal review
note: Regulator's decision on reviewable decision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.149
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-4-logic-deontic-3

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: affirming
logic summary: Affirms a decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: varying
logic summary: Varies a decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-181-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: revoking
logic summary: Revokes a decision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

182 Deadlines for making reviewable decisions
type: Concept
realized by: sec-182
note: Regulator must notify applicant within specified period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.149
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-182-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-182-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-182-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Regulator has a duty to notify applicant
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

183 Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-183
has part: 183(1) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
has part: 183(2) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.150

183(1) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-183-ss-1
part of: 183 Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
note: Eligible person may apply for review of Regulator's decisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.150
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 183(1) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: May
logic summary: Eligible person has a right to apply for review.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

183(2) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
type: Concept
realized by: sec-183-ss-2
part of: 183 Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
note: Definition of decision for review purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.150
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183-ss-2-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 183(2) Review of decisions by Administrative Review Tribunal
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

183A Extended standing for judicial review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-183a
has part: 183A(1) Extended standing for judicial review
has part: 183A(2) Extended standing for judicial review
has part: 183A(3) Extended standing for judicial review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.150

183A(1) Extended standing for judicial review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-183a-ss-1
part of: 183A Extended standing for judicial review
note: Extended standing for judicial review
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.150
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 183A(1) Extended standing for judicial review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: extends
logic summary: Extends the meaning of a term
premise text: (1) This section extends (and does not limit) the meaning...
conclusion text: ...the meaning of the term person aggrieved in the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation to
logic summary: Relation to decisions and conduct
premise text: (a) a decision made under this Act or the regulations;
conclusion text: ...in relation to... (c) conduct engaged in for the purpose of making a decision...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-1-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: for
logic summary: For the purposes of the application
premise text: (1) This section extends (and does not limit)...
conclusion text: ...the meaning of the term person aggrieved in the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 for...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: for
logic summary: For the purposes of the application
premise text: (1) This section extends (and does not limit)...
conclusion text: ...the meaning of the term person aggrieved in the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 for...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: for
logic summary: For the purposes of the application
premise text: (1) This section extends (and does not limit)...
conclusion text: ...the meaning of the term person aggrieved in the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 for...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

183A(2) Extended standing for judicial review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-183a-ss-2
part of: 183A Extended standing for judicial review
note: A State is taken to be a person aggrieved by the decision, failure or conduct.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.150
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 183A(2) Extended standing for judicial review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Assertion of a property
conclusion text: State is taken to be a person aggrieved
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

183A(3) Extended standing for judicial review
type: Concept
realized by: sec-183a-ss-3
part of: 183A Extended standing for judicial review
note: A term used in this section and the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 has the same meaning.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.150
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 183A(3) Extended standing for judicial review
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-183a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Same meaning as in the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977.
premise text: (3) A term used in this section and in the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 has the same meaning in this section as it has in that Act.
conclusion text: The term has the same meaning.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

184 Application for protection of confidential commercial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-184
has part: 184(1) Application for protection of confidential commercial
has part: 184(2) Application for protection of confidential commercial
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.151

184(1) Application for protection of confidential commercial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-184-ss-1
part of: 184 Application for protection of confidential commercial
note: Declaration of confidential commercial information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.151
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-184-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-184-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-184-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 184(1) Application for protection of confidential commercial
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-184-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to apply for declaration
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

184(2) Application for protection of confidential commercial
type: Concept
realized by: sec-184-ss-2
part of: 184 Application for protection of confidential commercial
note: Application must be in writing
description: Regulator approval form
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.151
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-184-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-184-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-184-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 184(2) Application for protection of confidential commercial
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-184-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide application in writing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185 Regulator may declare that information is confidential
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185
has part: 185(1) Regulator may declare that information is confidential
has part: 185(2) Regulator may declare that information is confidential
has part: 185(2A) Regulator may declare that information is confidential
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.151

185(1) Regulator may declare that information is confidential
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185-ss-1
part of: 185 Regulator may declare that information is confidential
note: Regulator must declare confidential information if it has commercial value.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.151
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-185-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-185-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-185-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 185(1) Regulator may declare that information is confidential
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-185-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Regulator must declare confidential information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185(2) Regulator may declare that information is confidential
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185-ss-2
part of: 185 Regulator may declare that information is confidential
note: Regulator must declare information confidential if public interest in disclosure outweighs prejudice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.151
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-185-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-185-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-185-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Regulator has an obligation to declare information confidential.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

185(2A) Regulator may declare that information is confidential
type: Concept
realized by: sec-185-ss-2a
part of: 185 Regulator may declare that information is confidential
note: Must declare non-confidentiality of GMO field trial locations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.151
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-185-ss-2a-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-185-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-185-ss-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to declare non-confidentiality
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186 Revocation of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186
has part: 186(1) Revocation of declaration
has part: 186(2) Revocation of declaration
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.153

186(1) Revocation of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186-ss-1
part of: 186 Revocation of declaration
note: Revocation of declaration under section 185
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.153
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-186-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-186-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-186-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: revocation
logic summary: Declaration revocation
premise text: Regulator's satisfaction
conclusion text: Declaration revoked
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

186(2) Revocation of declaration
type: Concept
realized by: sec-186-ss-2
part of: 186 Revocation of declaration
note: Review rights must be exhausted before revocation takes effect.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.153
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-186-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-186-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-186-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to exhaust review rights before revocation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

187 Confidential commercial information must not be disclosed
type: Concept
realized by: sec-187
note: Disclosing confidential commercial information is prohibited for certain individuals and entities.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.153
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-187-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-187-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-187-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-187-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-187-logic-cogai-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-187-logic-shacl-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-187-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 187 Confidential commercial information must not be disclosed
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-187-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of confidential commercial information.
premise text: (1) A person who...
conclusion text: must not disclose the information except...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-187-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines the temporal interval for which confidentiality is required.
premise text: (c) knows that the information is confidential commercial information;
conclusion text: and (d) to any of the following in the course of carrying out duties or functions under this Act or under a corresponding State law:
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-187-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses the requirement that confidential commercial information must not be disclosed.
premise text: (i) the Commonwealth or a Commonwealth authority;
conclusion text: or (ii) a State agency;
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-187-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes the artificial intelligence system that can process confidential commercial information.
premise text: (iii) an artificial intelligence system;
conclusion text: or (iv) a natural person or legal person;
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-187-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validate
logic summary: Validates the shape of the data that contains confidential commercial information.
premise text: (v) a data set containing confidential commercial information;
conclusion text: or (vi) a natural person or legal person;
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188 Conduct by directors, employees and agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-188
has part: 188(1) Conduct by directors, employees and agents
has part: 188(2) Conduct by directors, employees and agents
has part: 188(3) Conduct by directors, employees and agents
has part: 188(4) Conduct by directors, employees and agents
has part: 188(5) Conduct by directors, employees and agents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.156

188(1) Conduct by directors, employees and agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-188-ss-1
part of: 188 Conduct by directors, employees and agents
note: Establishing state of mind of a body corporate in relation to conduct
description: Director, employee or agent's actual or apparent authority and state of mind
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.156
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-1-logic-deontic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 188(1) Conduct by directors, employees and agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasAuthority
logic summary: Establishing authority
premise text: Actual or apparent authority
conclusion text: State of mind
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasMentalState
logic summary: Establishing mental state
premise text: State of mind
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188(2) Conduct by directors, employees and agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-188-ss-2
part of: 188 Conduct by directors, employees and agents
note: Body corporate liable for conduct of directors, employees, and agents within scope of their authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.156
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 188(2) Conduct by directors, employees and agents
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Liability
logic summary: Body corporate liable for conduct.
premise text: Conduct within scope of authority.
conclusion text: Obligation to take precautions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188(3) Conduct by directors, employees and agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-188-ss-3
part of: 188 Conduct by directors, employees and agents
note: Establishing state of mind for employees or agents
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.156
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 188(3) Conduct by directors, employees and agents
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasAuthority
logic summary: Authority relation
premise text: Employee or agent had actual or apparent authority
conclusion text: State of mind established
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188(4) Conduct by directors, employees and agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-188-ss-4
part of: 188 Conduct by directors, employees and agents
note: Establishes liability for conduct by employees or agents within the scope of their actual or apparent authority.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.156
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 188(4) Conduct by directors, employees and agents
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Establishes a duty to prevent harm.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

188(5) Conduct by directors, employees and agents
type: Concept
realized by: sec-188-ss-5
part of: 188 Conduct by directors, employees and agents
note: No imprisonment for certain offenses if convicted by a non-corporate person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.156
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-5-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 188(5) Conduct by directors, employees and agents
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If A, then B
premise text: (a) a person other than a body corporate is convicted of an offence
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be punished by imprisonment for that offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Necessitates
logic summary: If A, then B
premise text: (b) the person would not have been convicted of the offence if subsections (3) and (4) had not been enacted
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be punished by imprisonment for that offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between conviction and offense
premise text: (a) a person other than a body corporate is convicted of an offence
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be punished by imprisonment for that offence
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-5-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal relationship between conviction and offense
premise text: (a) a person other than a body corporate is convicted of an offence
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be punished by imprisonment for that offence
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-188-ss-5-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Diffusion of information about offense conviction
premise text: (a) a person other than a body corporate is convicted of an offence
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be punished by imprisonment for that offence
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

189 Meaning of terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-189
has part: 189(1) Meaning of terms
has part: 189(2) Meaning of terms
has part: 189(3) Meaning of terms
has part: 189(4) Meaning of terms
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.157

189(1) Meaning of terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-189-ss-1
part of: 189 Meaning of terms
note: Defines state of mind for a person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.157
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 189(1) Meaning of terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes references to knowledge, intention, opinion, belief or purpose
premise text: (1) A reference in subsection 188(1) or (3) to the state of mind of a person includes a reference to:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: includes
logic summary: Includes references to knowledge, intention, opinion, belief or purpose
premise text: (1) A reference in subsection 188(1) or (3) to the state of mind of a person includes a reference to:
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

189(2) Meaning of terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-189-ss-2
part of: 189 Meaning of terms
note: Definition of director for a body corporate incorporated for a public purpose
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.157
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-2-norm

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 189(2) Meaning of terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

189(3) Meaning of terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-189-ss-3
part of: 189 Meaning of terms
note: Reference to failing or refusing to engage in conduct is included.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.157
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 189(3) Meaning of terms
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion of failing/refusing to engage in conduct.
premise text: (3) A reference...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass relationship between 'conduct' and 'failing/refusing to engage in conduct'.
premise text: (3) A reference...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

189(4) Meaning of terms
type: Concept
realized by: sec-189-ss-4
part of: 189 Meaning of terms
note: Defines ancillary offence relating to Act or regulations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.157
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 189(4) Meaning of terms
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of ancillary offence
premise text: (4) A reference in section 188 to an ancillary offence relating to this Act or the regulations is a reference to an offence...
conclusion text: ...that relates to this Act or the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal relation between sections
premise text: (4) A reference in section 188 to an ancillary offence relating to this Act or the regulations is a reference to an offence...
conclusion text: ...that relates to this Act or the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal relation between sections
premise text: (4) A reference in section 188 to an ancillary offence relating to this Act or the regulations is a reference to an offence...
conclusion text: ...that relates to this Act or the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of ancillary offence using diffusion logic
premise text: (4) A reference in section 188 to an ancillary offence relating to this Act or the regulations is a reference to an offence...
conclusion text: ...that relates to this Act or the regulations.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-189-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of ancillary offence using CogAI logic
premise text: (4) A reference in section 188 to an ancillary offence relating to this Act or the regulations is a reference to an offence...
conclusion text: ...that relates to this Act or the regulations.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

190 Transitional provision—dealings covered by Genetic
type: Concept
realized by: sec-190
has part: 190(1) Transitional provision—dealings covered by Genetic
has part: 190(2) Transitional provision—dealings covered by Genetic
has part: 190(3) Transitional provision—dealings covered by Genetic
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.158

190(1) Transitional provision—dealings covered by Genetic
type: Concept
realized by: sec-190-ss-1
part of: 190 Transitional provision—dealings covered by Genetic
note: Dealing with GMO during transition period must comply with advice to proceed.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.158
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-190-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-190-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-190-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-190-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 190(1) Transitional provision—dealings covered by Genetic
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-190-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Forbid
logic summary: Dealing with GMO during transition period must comply with advice to proceed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-190-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: Dealing time is before commencement of Part 4
conclusion text: Dealing time is during transition period
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

190(2) Transitional provision—dealings covered by Genetic
type: Concept
realized by: sec-190-ss-2
part of: 190 Transitional provision—dealings covered by Genetic
note: Transitional provision for dealings covered by Genetic Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.158
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-190-ss-2-norm

190(3) Transitional provision—dealings covered by Genetic
type: Concept
realized by: sec-190-ss-3
part of: 190 Transitional provision—dealings covered by Genetic
note: Definition of transitional period
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.158
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-190-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-190-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-190-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: defined_by
logic summary: Defines the term 'transition period'
conclusion text: The transitional period is defined as the period of 2 years beginning at the commencement of Part 4 of this Act.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

191 Regulations may relate to transitional matters
type: Concept
realized by: sec-191
note: Regulations may be made in relation to transitional matters arising from the enactment of this Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.159
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-191-norm

192 False or misleading information or document
type: Concept
realized by: sec-192
note: Prohibition on providing false or misleading information
description: Correct information when requested
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.160
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 192 False or misleading information or document
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition on providing false or misleading information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

192A Interference with dealings with GMOs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-192a
has part: 192A(1) Interference with dealings with GMOs
has part: 192A(2) Interference with dealings with GMOs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.160

192A(1) Interference with dealings with GMOs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-192a-ss-1
part of: 192A Interference with dealings with GMOs
note: Interfering with dealings with GMOs without consent is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.160
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192a-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 192A(1) Interference with dealings with GMOs
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of interfering with dealings with GMOs.
premise text: The person intends to prevent or hinder authorised GMO dealings.
conclusion text: The conduct is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192a-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of damaging, destroying, or interfering with premises at which dealings with GMOs are being undertaken.
premise text: The conduct involves damaging, destroying, or interfering with premises at which dealings with GMOs are being undertaken.
conclusion text: The conduct is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192a-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of removing a thing from premises at which dealings with GMOs are being undertaken.
premise text: The conduct involves removing a thing from premises at which dealings with GMOs are being undertaken.
conclusion text: The conduct is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192a-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of interfering with things at or removing them from premises at which dealings with GMOs are being undertaken.
premise text: The conduct involves damaging, destroying, or interfering with a thing at, or removing a thing from, premises.
conclusion text: The conduct is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

192A(2) Interference with dealings with GMOs
type: Concept
realized by: sec-192a-ss-2
part of: 192A Interference with dealings with GMOs
note: Authorised GMO dealings must be undertaken at premises or facility
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.160
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192a-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192a-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 192A(2) Interference with dealings with GMOs
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide authorised GMO dealings
premise text: (2) In this section:
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-192a-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: IS-A
logic summary: Authorised GMO dealings are a type of dealings with GMOs
premise text: authorised GMO dealings, in relation to premises or a facility,
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

193 Regulations
type: Concept
realized by: sec-193
note: Governor-General may make regulations for carrying out or giving effect to the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.161
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-193-norm

194 Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-194
has part: 194(1) Review of operation of Act
has part: 194(2) Review of operation of Act
has part: 194(3) Review of operation of Act
has part: 194(4) Review of operation of Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.162

194(1) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-194-ss-1
part of: 194 Review of operation of Act
note: Independent review of Act's operation to be undertaken after fourth anniversary.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.162
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-1-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to undertake review
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194(2) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-194-ss-2
part of: 194 Review of operation of Act
note: A person undertaking a review must give the Ministerial Council a written report.
description: written report
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.162
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to provide a written report
conclusion text: A person who undertakes such a review must give the Ministerial Council a written report.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal interval for reporting
premise text: (2) A person who undertakes such a review must give the Ministerial Council a written report of the review.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-2-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Implication of reporting on review operation
premise text: (2) A person who undertakes such a review must give the Ministerial Council a written report.
conclusion text: The Ministerial Council will receive a written report.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Spread of reporting requirement
premise text: (2) A person who undertakes such a review must give the Ministerial Council a written report.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194(3) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-194-ss-3
part of: 194 Review of operation of Act
note: Minister must cause report to be tabled in Parliament within 12 months.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.162
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 194(3) Review of operation of Act
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Minister must cause report to be tabled.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

194(4) Review of operation of Act
type: Concept
realized by: sec-194-ss-4
part of: 194 Review of operation of Act
note: Defines independent review under the Act.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.162
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-194-ss-4-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: =
logic summary: Classifies the legal effect of the provision.
premise text: The provision defines independent review under the Act.
conclusion text: The provision is an undertaking to undertake a review by persons with appropriate qualifications.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

21 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-21-2
note: Amendment of certain sections of the Australia New Zealand Food Authority Act 1998
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.166
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-21-2-norm

10 July
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-2
note: Prohibition of Human Cloning Act 2002
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.166
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-2-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids human cloning
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Dec
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-2
note: Conditional commencement of Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Act (No. 1) 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.166
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-2-norm

6 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sec-6-2
note: Conditional commencement of Gene Technology Amendment Act 2007
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.166
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-6-2-norm

28 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-2
note: Schedule 1 and Schedule 2 commencement dates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.166
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-28-2-norm

23 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.166
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-23-2-norm

23 June 2008 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-3
note: Legislation history for Gene Technology Act 2000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.166
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-23-3-norm

19 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sec-19-3
note: Conditional commencement of Acts Interpretation Amendment Act 2011
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.167
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-19-3-norm

27 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.167
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-27-2-norm

27 Dec 2011
type: Concept
realized by: sec-27-3
note: Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.167
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-27-3-norm

28 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-28-3
note: Commencement of Gene Technology Act 2000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.167
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-28-3-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-28-3-logic-alleninterval-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-28-3-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: 1 July 2011
conclusion text: (s 2(1) item 2)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 June
type: Concept
realized by: sec-30-2
note: Amendment of Schedule 14
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.168
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-30-2-norm

13 Apr
type: Concept
realized by: sec-13-2
note: Amendment of Schedule 7 and Schedule 2 by the Framework Reform (Consequential Provisions) Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.168
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-13-2-norm

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-3
note: Consequential Provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.168
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-3-norm

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-4
note: Conditional commencement of Act 2015 on September 5, 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.168
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-4-logic-alleninterval-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires a relation between identifiable temporal intervals for conditional commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement on September 5, 2016
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-2
note: Gene Technology Amendment Act 2015
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.168
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-5-2-norm

10 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sec-10-5
note: Commencement of Statute Law Revision Act 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.168
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-5-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-5-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-5-logic-deontic-2
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-5-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-5-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-5-logic-cogai-5

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-5-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: Sch 1: 10 Mar 2016 (s 2(1) item 2)
conclusion text: 4, 2016
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-5-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Obligation
premise text: Sch 1: 10 Mar 2016 (s 2(1) item 2)
conclusion text: Statute Law Revision Act 2016
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-5-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Claim
premise text: Sch 1: 10 Mar 2016 (s 2(1) item 2)
conclusion text: Statute Law Revision Act 2016
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-5-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Propagation
premise text: Sch 1: 10 Mar 2016 (s 2(1) item 2)
conclusion text: Statute Law Revision Act 2016
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-10-5-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Knowledge representation
premise text: Sch 1: 10 Mar 2016 (s 2(1) item 2)
conclusion text: Statute Law Revision Act 2016
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Feb
type: Concept
realized by: sec-11-2
note: Territories Legislation Amendment Act 2016
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.168
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-11-2-norm

23 Mar
type: Concept
realized by: sec-23-4
note: Commencement of Gene Technology Act 2000
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.168
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-23-4-norm
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-23-4-logic-alleninterval-1

gene-technology-act-2000-sec-23-4-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

31 May
type: Concept
realized by: sec-31-2
note: Conditional commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: gene-technology-act-2000.pdf, p.169
asserts: gene-technology-act-2000-sec-31-2-norm