Criminal Code Amendment (Hate Crimes) Act 2025
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 1 of 2025
description: An Act to amend the Criminal Code Act 1995, and for related purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1
note: Short title of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.5
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sec-2
note: Commencement rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.6
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sec-1-2
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.6
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 February 2025
type: Concept
realized by: sec-8
note: Note on table limitations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.6
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sec-8-norm

3 Schedules
type: Concept
realized by: sec-3
note: Legislation in schedules is amended or repealed according to its terms.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.6
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sec-3-norm

1A Section 16AAA (after table item 1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1a
note: Insertion of new offence against subsection 80.2BE(1) or (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.7
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-1a-norm

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-1a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 1A Section 16AAA (after table item 1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

1 Division 80 of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.7
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-1-norm

2 Section 80.1A of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Defines terms related to disability and close associates.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.7
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-2-norm

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Section 80.1A of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

2A Subdivision C of Division 80 of Part 5.1 of the Criminal
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2a
note: Omit 'Urging violence', substitute 'Urging or threatening violence, offences against groups or members of groups'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.8
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-2a-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-2a-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-2a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'Urging violence'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2B Section 80.2A of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2b
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.8
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-2b-norm

80 Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80
note: Advocating force or violence against groups prohibited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.8
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 80 Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits advocating force or violence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2C Paragraph 80.2A(1)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2c
note: Prohibit advocating use of force or violence against a group
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.8
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-2c-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-2c-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-2c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Paragraph 80.2A(1)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Omit “intending that”, substitute “reckless as to whether”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.8
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-3-norm

4 Paragraph 80.2A(1)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Insertion of specific terms into the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.8
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-4-norm

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Paragraph 80.2A(1)(c) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 80.2A(1) of the Criminal Code (at the end of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
note: Reference to section 5.4 for recklessness
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.8
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-5-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ref
logic summary: Reference to another provision
premise text: Section 5.4
conclusion text: Permission to see section 5.4
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5A Paragraph 80.2A(2)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5a
note: Prohibits advocating use of force or violence against a group
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.8
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-5a-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-5a-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-5a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 5A Paragraph 80.2A(2)(a) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-5a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Paragraph 80.2A(2)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
note: Omit “intending that”, substitute “reckless as to whether”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.8
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-6-norm

7 Paragraph 80.2A(2)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
note: Insertion of new terms in Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.8
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-7-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Paragraph 80.2A(2)(c) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of new terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 80.2A(2) of the Criminal Code (at the end of the
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
note: Reference to another section for recklessness
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.9
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-8-norm

9 After subsection 80.2A(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
note: Permits consideration of multiple attributes for purposes of paragraphs (1)(c) and (2)(c)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.9
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-9-norm

10 Subsection 80.2A(5) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
note: Repeal a note.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.9
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-10-norm

10A At the end of section 80.2A of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10a
note: Defines advocate as counsel, promote, encourage or urge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.9
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-10a-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-10a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-10a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-10a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10A At the end of section 80.2A of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-10a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines advocate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-10a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition
logic summary: Describes advocate
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10B Section 80.2B of the Criminal Code (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10b
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.9
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-10b-norm

80 Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-2
note: Advocating force or violence against members of groups or close associates is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.9
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-2-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-2-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 80 Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10C Paragraph 80.2B(1)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10c
note: Prohibit advocating use of force or violence against a person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.9
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-10c-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-10c-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-10c-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Paragraph 80.2B(1)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
note: Omit “intending that”, substitute “reckless as to whether”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.9
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-11-norm

11A Paragraph 80.2B(1)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11a
note: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new provision prohibiting hate crimes based on group membership or association.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.9
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-11a-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-11a-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-11a-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 11A Paragraph 80.2B(1)(c) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-11a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits hate crimes based on group membership or association.
premise text: Repeal paragraph and substitute with new provision.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Paragraph 80.2B(1)(d) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
note: Insertion of specific terms into the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.10
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-12-norm

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-12-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 12 Paragraph 80.2B(1)(d) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

13 Subsection 80.2B(1) of the Criminal Code (at the end of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
note: Reference to another section for recklessness
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.10
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-13-norm

13A Paragraph 80.2B(2)(a) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13a
note: Prohibit advocating use of force or violence against a person
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.10
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-13a-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-13a-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-13a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Paragraph 80.2B(2)(b) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
note: Omit “intending that”, substitute “reckless as to whether”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.10
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-14-norm

14A Paragraph 80.2B(2)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14a
note: Belief about targeted person's group membership or association
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.10
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-14a-norm

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-14a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14A Paragraph 80.2B(2)(c) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

15 Paragraph 80.2B(2)(d) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
note: Insertion of specific terms into the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.10
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-15-norm

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Paragraph 80.2B(2)(d) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

16 Subsection 80.2B(2) of the Criminal Code (at the end of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
note: Reference to section 5.4 for recklessness
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.10
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-16-norm

16A Subsection 80.2B(3) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16a
note: Repeal subsection, substitute clause regarding targeted group membership
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.11
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-16a-norm

17 After subsection 80.2B(4) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
note: Allows consideration of multiple attributes for purposes of paragraphs (1)(d) and (2)(d)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.11
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-17-norm

18 Subsection 80.2B(6) of the Criminal Code (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
note: Repeal a note.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.11
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-18-norm

18A At the end of section 80.2B of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18a
note: Defines advocate as counsel, promote, encourage or urge.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.11
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-18a-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-18a-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-18a-logic-descriptionlogic-2

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-18a-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 18A At the end of section 80.2B of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-18a-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines advocate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-18a-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has definition
logic summary: Describes advocate
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 After section 80.2B of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
note: Insert clause after section 80.2B of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.11
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-19-norm

80 Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-3
has part: 80(1) Section 80
has part: 80(2) Section 80
has part: 80(3) Section 80
has part: 80(4) Section 80
has part: 80(5) Section 80
has part: 80(6) Section 80
has part: 80(7) Section 80
has part: 80(8) Section 80
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.11

80(1) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-1
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Threatening a targeted group with force or violence is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.11
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-1-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Threatening a targeted group with force or violence is prohibited.
premise text: (a) the person threatens to use force or violence against a group (the targeted group); and
conclusion text: (1) A person commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The threat must occur within a certain timeframe.
premise text: (c) a reasonable member of the targeted group would fear that the threat will be carried out;
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: The person making the threat has an obligation to refrain from doing so.
premise text: (d) the threat, if carried out, would threaten the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: The targeted group has a right to protection from such threats.
premise text: (a) the person threatens to use force or violence against a group (the targeted group); and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Right
logic summary: The targeted group has a right to protection from such threats.
premise text: (b) the targeted group is distinguished by race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, intersex status, disability, nationality, national or ethnic origin or political opinion;
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(2) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-2
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Threatening a targeted group with force or violence is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.11
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-2-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(2) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits threatening a targeted group with force or violence.
premise text: (2) A person commits an offence if...
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines a temporal interval for the threat.
premise text: (c) a reasonable member of the targeted group would fear that the threat will be carried out.
conclusion text: A reasonable member of the targeted group would fear...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Requires a recurring trace of the threat.
premise text: (a) the person threatens to use force or violence against a group (the targeted group); and
conclusion text: The threat is repeated.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses the threat to others in the targeted group.
premise text: (b) the targeted group is distinguished by race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, intersex status, disability, nationality, national or ethnic origin or political opinion; and
conclusion text: The threat is diffused to others in the targeted group.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Represents knowledge about the targeted group.
premise text: (b) the targeted group is distinguished by race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, intersex status, disability, nationality, national or ethnic origin or political opinion; and
conclusion text: The targeted group has a specific characteristic.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(3) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-3
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Recklessness is the fault element for paragraphs (1)(b) and (2)(b)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.11
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-3-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(3) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Fault element
premise text: Section 80(3)
conclusion text: Recklessness
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(4) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-4
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Strict liability applies to paragraphs (1)(c) and (2)(c).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.11
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-4-norm

80(5) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-5
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Person may have in mind a combination of attributes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.11
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-5-norm

80(6) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-6
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Prosecution must consider alternative offence beyond reasonable doubt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.11
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-6-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(6) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to consider alternative offence
premise text: (6) Subsection (7) applies if...
conclusion text: ...the trier of fact is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of an offence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between prosecution and consideration of alternative offence
premise text: (6) Subsection (7) applies if...
conclusion text: ...the trier of fact is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of an offence...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace of prosecution and consideration of alternative offence
premise text: (6) Subsection (7) applies if...
conclusion text: ...the trier of fact is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of an offence...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prosecution and consideration of alternative offence
premise text: (6) Subsection (7) applies if...
conclusion text: ...the trier of fact is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of an offence...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classification
logic summary: Classification of offences using CogAI
premise text: (6) Subsection (7) applies if...
conclusion text: ...the trier of fact is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of an offence...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(7) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-7
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Triier of fact must accord procedural fairness in relation to finding of guilt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.11
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-7-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(7) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Triier must accord procedural fairness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(8) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-8
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Fear includes apprehension.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.11
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-8-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(8) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
premise text: Fear is a subset of apprehension.
conclusion text: Apprehension includes fear.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-3-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass relation
premise text: Fear is a concept.
conclusion text: Apprehension is related to fear.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-4
has part: 80(1) Section 80
has part: 80(2) Section 80
has part: 80(3) Section 80
has part: 80(4) Section 80
has part: 80(5) Section 80
has part: 80(6) Section 80
has part: 80(7) Section 80
has part: 80(8) Section 80
has part: 80(9) Section 80
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.13

80(1) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-1
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Threatening a person from a targeted group can lead to imprisonment for 7 years.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.13
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-1-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(1) Section 80
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits threatening a person from a targeted group.
premise text: (a) the first person threatens to use force or violence against a person (the targeted person); and
conclusion text: (e) the threat, if carried out, would threaten the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The threat must overlap with the targeted group.
premise text: (d) a reasonable member of the targeted group would fear that the threat will be carried out;
conclusion text: The threat, if carried out, would threaten the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Eventually
logic summary: The threat must eventually lead to a threat to the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth.
premise text: (e) the threat, if carried out, would threaten the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth;
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if: (a) the first person threatens to use force or violence against a person (the targeted person); and
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Obliges the person to not threaten a person from a targeted group.
premise text: (a) the first person threatens to use force or violence against a person (the targeted person); and
conclusion text: The first person commits an offence if: (a) the first person threatens to use force or violence against a person (the targeted person); and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits threatening a person from a targeted group.
premise text: (a) the first person threatens to use force or violence against a person (the targeted person); and
conclusion text: (e) the threat, if carried out, would threaten the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(2) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-2
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Threatening force or violence against a targeted person due to their group membership is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.13
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-2-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(2) Section 80
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Threatening force or violence
premise text: Targeted person is a member of a group
conclusion text: Offence committed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between threat and targeted group membership
premise text: Threat carried out within a reasonable timeframe
conclusion text: Fear of threat carried over
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(3) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-3
part of: 80 Section 80
note: It is immaterial whether the targeted person is a member or close associate of the targeted group.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.13
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-3-norm

80(4) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-4
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Recklessness is the fault element for certain paragraphs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.13
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-4-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(4) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Fault element
premise text: Section 80(4)
conclusion text: Recklessness
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(5) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-5
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Strict liability applies to paragraphs (1)(d) and (2)(d).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.13
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-5-norm

80(6) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-6
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Person may have in mind a combination of attributes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.13
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-6-norm

80(7) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-7
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Prosecution must consider alternative offence beyond reasonable doubt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.13
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-7-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(7) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to consider alternative offence
premise text: (7) Subsection (8) applies if...
conclusion text: ...the trier of fact is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of an alternative offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(8) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-8
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Triier of fact must accord procedural fairness in relation to finding of guilt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.13
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-8-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(8) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Triier must accord procedural fairness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(9) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-9
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Fear includes apprehension.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.13
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-9-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
premise text: Fear is a subset of apprehension.
conclusion text: Apprehension includes fear.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-4-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass relation
premise text: Fear is a concept.
conclusion text: Apprehension is a related concept.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-5
has part: 80(1) Section 80
has part: 80(2) Section 80
has part: 80(3) Section 80
has part: 80(4) Section 80
has part: 80(5) Section 80
has part: 80(6) Section 80
has part: 80(7) Section 80
has part: 80(8) Section 80
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.15

80(1) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-1
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Advocating hate speech that threatens public peace and order is a crime.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.15
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-1-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(1) Section 80
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits advocating hate speech.
premise text: The person advocates the causing of damage to, or the destruction of, real property or a motor vehicle.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they advocate hate speech.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reckless advocacy of hate speech.
premise text: The first person is reckless as to whether the damage or destruction will occur;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they are reckless in their advocacy of hate speech.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits advocating harm that threatens public peace and order.
premise text: the damage or destruction, if it were to occur, would threaten the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they advocate harm that threatens public peace and order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits advocating harm to protected groups.
premise text: the targeted group is distinguished by race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, intersex status, disability, nationality, national or ethnic origin or political opinion;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they advocate harm to protected groups.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits reckless advocacy of harm to protected groups.
premise text: The first person is reckless as to whether the damage or destruction will occur;
conclusion text: The person commits an offence if they are reckless in their advocacy of harm to protected groups.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(2) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-2
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Advocating damage to real property or a motor vehicle due to targeted group characteristics is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.15
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-2-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(2) Section 80
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits advocating damage to real property or a motor vehicle due to targeted group characteristics.
premise text: (2) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) the first person advocates the causing of damage to, or the destruction of, real property or a motor vehicle; and
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to avoid advocating damage to real property or a motor vehicle due to targeted group characteristics.
premise text: (2) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) the first person advocates the causing of damage to, or the destruction of, real property or a motor vehicle; and
conclusion text: Imprisonment for 5 years.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication between advocating damage and committing an offence.
premise text: (2) A person (the first person) commits an offence if: (a) the first person advocates the causing of damage to, or the destruction of, real property or a motor vehicle; and
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits reckless advocacy of damage to real property or a motor vehicle due to targeted group characteristics.
premise text: (c) the first person is reckless as to whether the damage or destruction will occur; and
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(3) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-3
part of: 80 Section 80
note: It is immaterial whether the real property or motor vehicle is owned/occupied by a member or close associate of the targeted group.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.15
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-3-norm

80(4) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-4
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Recklessness is the fault element for paragraphs (1)(d) and (2)(d)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.15
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-4-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Recklessness is a fault element
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(5) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-5
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Person may have in mind a combination of attributes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.15
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-5-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(5) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: mayHaveInMind
logic summary: Person may have in mind a combination of attributes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

80(6) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-6
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Prosecutor must provide evidence beyond reasonable doubt for the alternative offence.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.15
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-6-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-6-logic-epistemic-2
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-6-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-5

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(6) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Prosecutor must provide evidence beyond reasonable doubt.
premise text: Prosecutor has the duty to prove guilt.
conclusion text: Prosecutor must provide evidence beyond reasonable doubt for the alternative offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-6-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: >=
logic summary: Prosecutor must have sufficient evidence to convict.
premise text: Prosecutor has access to evidence.
conclusion text: Prosecutor must provide evidence beyond reasonable doubt for the alternative offence.
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: <=
logic summary: Prosecutor's burden of proof is not exceeded by the defendant's alibi.
premise text: Prosecutor has the duty to prove guilt.
conclusion text: Prosecutor must provide evidence beyond reasonable doubt for the alternative offence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-6-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: >=
logic summary: The prosecutor's argument is stronger than the defendant's alibi.
premise text: Prosecutor has access to evidence.
conclusion text: Prosecutor must provide evidence beyond reasonable doubt for the alternative offence.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: <=
logic summary: The prosecutor's burden of proof is not exceeded by the defendant's alibi within a certain time frame.
premise text: Prosecutor has the duty to prove guilt.
conclusion text: Prosecutor must provide evidence beyond reasonable doubt for the alternative offence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(7) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-7
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Triier of fact must accord procedural fairness in relation to finding of guilt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.15
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-7-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(7) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Triier of fact has an obligation to accord procedural fairness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(8) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-8
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Definition of advocate
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.15
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-8-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(8) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term with an obligation to use it correctly
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-5-ss-8-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: class hierarchy
logic summary: Applies to explicit class hierarchies
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-6
has part: 80(1) Section 80
has part: 80(2) Section 80
has part: 80(3) Section 80
has part: 80(4) Section 80
has part: 80(5) Section 80
has part: 80(6) Section 80
has part: 80(7) Section 80
has part: 80(8) Section 80
has part: 80(9) Section 80
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.17

80(1) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-1
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Threatening real property or a motor vehicle because of the targeted group's characteristics is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.17
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-1-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(1) Section 80
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits threatening real property or a motor vehicle because of the targeted group's characteristics.
premise text: (a) and (d)
conclusion text: An offence is committed if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation to not threaten real property or a motor vehicle because of the targeted group's characteristics.
premise text: (d)
conclusion text: A reasonable member of the targeted group would fear that...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Threatening real property or a motor vehicle must overlap with the targeted group's characteristics.
premise text: (a) and (d)
conclusion text: The threat will be carried out if...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-1-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Threatening real property or a motor vehicle implies a threat to the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth.
premise text: (e)
conclusion text: ...would threaten the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-1-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: The threat is diffused if it does not overlap with the targeted group's characteristics.
premise text: (a) and (d)
conclusion text: ...would fear that...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(2) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-2
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Threatening real property or a motor vehicle because of the targeted group's characteristics is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.17
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-2-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(2) Section 80
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Threatening real property or a motor vehicle is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(3) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-3
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Exemptions from liability for targeted group members and associates
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.17
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-3-norm

80(4) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-4
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Recklessness is the fault element for certain paragraphs.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.17
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-4-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(4) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Fault element
premise text: Section 80(4)
conclusion text: Recklessness
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(5) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-5
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Strict liability applies to paragraphs (1)(d) and (2)(d)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.17
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-5-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Strict liability obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(6) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-6
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Person may have in mind a combination of attributes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.17
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-6-norm

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(6) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

80(7) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-7
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Prosecution must provide evidence beyond reasonable doubt for the alternative offence.
description: Evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.17
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-7-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-7-logic-epistemic-2

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(7) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >=
logic summary: Beyond reasonable doubt
premise text: Trier of fact is satisfied
conclusion text: Prosecution must provide evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-7-logic-epistemic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Epistemic
operator: >
logic summary: Reasonable doubt
premise text: Trier of fact is not satisfied
conclusion text: Prosecution must provide evidence beyond reasonable doubt
execution surface: modalities::epistemic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(8) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-8
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Triier of fact must accord procedural fairness in relation to finding of guilt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.17
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-8-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(8) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Triier must accord procedural fairness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(9) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-9
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Fear includes apprehension.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.17
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-9-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Inclusion relation
premise text: Fear is a subset of apprehension.
conclusion text: Apprehension includes fear.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-6-ss-9-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Subclass relation
premise text: Fear is a concept.
conclusion text: Apprehension is related to fear.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80 Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-7
has part: 80(1) Section 80
has part: 80(2) Section 80
has part: 80(3) Section 80
has part: 80(4) Section 80
has part: 80(5) Section 80
has part: 80(6) Section 80
has part: 80(7) Section 80
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.20

80(1) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-1
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Advocating for violence against a targeted group is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.20
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-1-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-5

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(1) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
premise text: (a) the first person intentionally advocates for another person, or a group, to use force or violence against a group (the targeted group); and
conclusion text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
premise text: (b) the first person does so by causing damage to property; and
conclusion text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
premise text: (c) the first person does so reckless as to whether the force or violence will occur; and
conclusion text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
premise text: (d) the targeted group is distinguished by race, religion or ethnic origin; and
conclusion text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the action.
premise text: (e) the use of force or violence would threaten the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: (1) A person (the first person) commits an offence if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

80(2) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-2
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Advocating for violence against a targeted group is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.20
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-2-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(2) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits advocating for violence against a targeted group.
premise text: Advocating for violence
conclusion text: Offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(3) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-3
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Recklessness is the fault element for paragraphs (1)(d) and (2)(d)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.20
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-3-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(3) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Fault element
conclusion text: recklessness
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(4) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-4
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Person may have in mind a combination of attributes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.20
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-4-norm

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(4) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

80(5) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-5
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Prosecution must consider alternative offence beyond reasonable doubt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.20
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-5-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(5) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to consider alternative offence
premise text: (5) Subsection (6) applies if...
conclusion text: ...the trier of fact is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of an alternative offence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(6) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-6
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Triier of fact must accord procedural fairness to defendant in relation to finding of guilt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.20
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-6-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(6) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Triier has an obligation to accord procedural fairness.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

80(7) Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-7
part of: 80 Section 80
note: Defines damage for the purposes of section 80(7)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.20
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-7-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-7-logic-ltl-4
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-7-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-7-logic-cogai-6

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 80(7) Section 80
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: includes
logic summary: Defines a term with an obligation
premise text: The term is defined as damage for the purposes of this section.
conclusion text: Damage includes minor damage.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: subClassOf
logic summary: Describes a subclass of 'damage'
premise text: Minor damage is a subclass of damage.
conclusion text: Minor damage is damage for the purposes of this section.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Defines an interval that overlaps with 'damage'
premise text: The interval starts at minor damage and ends at no upper bound.
conclusion text: Minor damage is within the interval of damage for this section.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-7-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: occursBefore
logic summary: Defines an event that occurs before 'damage'
premise text: The event starts at minor damage and ends at no upper bound.
conclusion text: Minor damage is within the interval of damage for this section.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-7-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: diffusesInto
logic summary: Defines a concept that diffuses into 'damage'
premise text: The concept starts at minor damage and ends at no upper bound.
conclusion text: Minor damage is within the diffusion of damage for this section.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-7-ss-7-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: isSubClassOf
logic summary: Describes a subclass of 'damage' using AI
premise text: Minor damage is a subclass of damage according to AI.
conclusion text: Minor damage is damage for the purposes of this section according to AI.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Paragraphs 80.2H(7)(b), 80.2HA(7)(b) and 80.2K(6)(b) of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
note: Insertion of terms into Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.22
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-20-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-20-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-20-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of terms
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

21 Subsection 80.3(1) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
note: Insertion of clause after 'and C'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.22
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-21-norm

80 Section 80
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80-8
note: References sections 2BB, 80.2BC and 80.2BD and 80.2BE.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.22
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-80-8-norm

22 After paragraph 80.4(2)(c) of the Criminal Code
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
note: Mandatory minimum sentences and maximum penalties
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.22
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-22-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 After paragraph 80.4(2)(c) of the Criminal Code
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-1-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires mandatory minimum sentences and maximum penalties
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Paragraph 15AAA(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Insertion of exception clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.23
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-1-norm

2 Section 16AAA (before table item 1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Offences against certain provisions of the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.23
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits specific offences
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Paragraph 16AAC(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: The court must take into account cooperation with law enforcement in certain investigations.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.23
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Paragraph 16AAC(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The court must take into account cooperation with law enforcement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Paragraph 16AAC(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Repeal paragraph, substitute with new provision
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.24
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-4-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits cooperation with law enforcement agencies
premise text: Paragraph 16A(2)(h)
conclusion text: No cooperation allowed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 80.2H(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.24
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-5-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 80.2HA(1) of the Criminal Code (penalty)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
note: Repeal of penalty
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.24
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-6-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Prohibition on penalty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Application provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
note: Commencement provision for application of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.24
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-7-norm

8 Review of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
note: Review of amendments made by this Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025.pdf, p.25
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-8-norm
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-2

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to review and report
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

criminal-code-amendment-hate-crimes-act-2025-sch-2-sec-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BEFORE
logic summary: Temporal interval for review commencement
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed