1 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.8
note: Definition of accredited laboratory
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Subsection 23WA(1)

10 Paragraph 23WG(3)(c)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
note: Substitute senior police officer for senior constable.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 Paragraph 23WG(3)(c)

11 Paragraph 23WJ(3)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
note: Omit 'constable', substitute 'senior police officer'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
schema version: 2

12 Division 4 of Part ID (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
schema version: 2

13 Section 23WM (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
schema version: 2

14 Subsection 23WM(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
note: Omit 'senior constable', substitute 'senior police officer'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
schema version: 2

15 Section 23WN (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new schedule
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
schema version: 2

16 Section 23WN
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
note: Omit 'senior constable' and substitute 'senior police officer'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
schema version: 2

17 Section 23WO (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-17-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
schema version: 2

18 Section 23WO
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
note: Omit 'senior constable' and substitute 'senior police officer'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
schema version: 2

19 Section 23WP (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
schema version: 2

2 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of Commissioner)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.8
note: Definition of Commissioner
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of Commissioner)

20 Subsections 23WP(1) and (2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
note: Substitute senior police officer for senior constable.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 20 Subsections 23WP(1) and (2)

21 Paragraphs 23WR(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
note: Insert '(whether or not consent has been sought)' after 'procedure'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-21-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to insert text
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
premise text: Text to be inserted

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21 Paragraphs 23WR(a) and (b)

22 Paragraph 23XL(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
note: Substitute the least painful technique known and available to the person.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-22-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22 Paragraph 23XL(b)

23 Section 23XM (table item 2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
note: Insertion of '(other than by a finger prick)' after 'blood'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of '(other than by a finger prick)' after 'blood'
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

23WM Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
note: Permits non-intimate forensic procedure by senior police officer
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wm-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23wm
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wm-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WM Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by

23WN Circumstances in which senior police officer may order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
note: Senior police officer may order non-intimate forensic procedures under certain circumstances.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23wn
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ordering non-intimate forensic procedures is permitted under certain circumstances
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal conditions for ordering procedures
modality: AllenInterval
operator: under certain circumstances
premise text: Ordering non-intimate forensic procedures is permitted under certain circumstances

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Senior police officer has authority to order non-intimate forensic procedures
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Authority for ordering procedures
modality: Argumentation
operator: may order
premise text: Senior police officer may order non-intimate forensic procedures

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-intimate forensic procedures are within scope of ordering authority
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Scope of ordering procedures
modality: CogAI
operator: non-intimate forensic procedures
premise text: Ordering non-intimate forensic procedures is permitted under certain circumstances

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ordering non-intimate forensic procedures is permitted
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to order non-intimate forensic procedures
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Senior police officer has authority to order procedures

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Non-intimate forensic procedures are within scope of ordering authority
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Scope of ordering procedures
modality: Diffusion
operator: non-intimate forensic procedures
premise text: Ordering non-intimate forensic procedures is permitted under certain circumstances

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23WN Circumstances in which senior police officer may order

23WO Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
note: Matters to be considered by senior police officer before ordering forensic procedure
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wo-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23wo
schema version: 2

23WP Record of senior police officer’s order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wp-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23wp
schema version: 2

23XU Samples—sufficient material to share
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.11
curation status: Proposed
has part: 23XU(1) Samples—sufficient material to share
has part: 23XU(2) Samples—sufficient material to share
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23xu
schema version: 2

23XU(1) Samples—sufficient material to share
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.11
note: Sharing of sample material with suspect
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 23XU Samples—sufficient material to share

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The sample material overlaps with the analysis period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between request and analysis
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (c) there is sufficient material to be analysed both in the investigation of the offence and on behalf of the suspect.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The sample material has been recognized as sufficient.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of sample material as sufficient for sharing
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a sample is taken from a suspect under this Part; and (b) the suspect requests the investigating constable that the sample be shared;

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: There is sufficient material to be analysed both in the investigation of the offence and on behalf of the suspect.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to share sample material
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (a) a sample is taken from a suspect under this Part; and (b) the suspect requests the investigating constable that the sample be shared;

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The request has been spread to the investigating constable.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreading of sample material request
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (b) the suspect requests the investigating constable that the sample be shared;

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The analysis period has not ended yet.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal condition for sharing sample material
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (c) there is sufficient material to be analysed both in the investigation of the offence and on behalf of the suspect.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XU(1) Samples—sufficient material to share

23XU(2) Samples—sufficient material to share
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.11
note: Suspect must nominate an accredited laboratory for analysis.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 23XU Samples—sufficient material to share

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must nominate an accredited laboratory.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XU(2) Samples—sufficient material to share

23XW Results of analysis
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.13
note: Must provide DNA analysis results to suspect within 14 days of request or analysis.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xw-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xw-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-23xw
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to provide information
modality: Deontic
operator: >

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xw-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23XW Results of analysis

24 Section 23XM (table item 3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.11
note: Repeal a specific item.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
schema version: 2

25 Section 23XM (after table item 9)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.11
note: List of individuals authorized to take blood or saliva samples
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-25-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows specified individuals to perform medical procedures
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

26 Subsection 23XN(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.11
note: Omit specified words from a provision.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-26-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of specified words.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

27 Section 23XU
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.11
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
schema version: 2

28 Subsection 23XUA(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
note: Substitute phrase in request to investigating constable
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-28-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-28-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28 Subsection 23XUA(2)

29 After subsection 23XUA(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
note: Must inform suspect of instructions to leave premises if not complying with analysis.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-logic-cogai-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Event A (informing suspect) occurs after event B (analysis being conducted)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between events
modality: AllenInterval
operator: THEN
premise text: Investigating constable informs suspect after analysis is being conducted

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: AI is applied in the investigation process
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
modality: CogAI
operator: THEN
premise text: Investigating constable uses AI to analyze material and inform suspect

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Attendee must be informed of instructions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform suspect
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Investigating constable has authority to direct attendee

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information about instructions spreads from investigating constable to attendee
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of information
modality: Diffusion
operator: THEN
premise text: Investigating constable informs suspect and attendee is directed to leave premises

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29 After subsection 23XUA(2)

3 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of informed consent)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.8
note: Substitute sections for section 23WF
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace section with new sections
modality: Deontic
operator: substitution

30 Subsection 23XUA(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
note: Substitute 'attendee' for 'the person chosen'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-30-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 30 Subsection 23XUA(3)

31 Subsection 23XUA(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
note: Substitute 'analyst' for 'person responsible for analysing the material'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-31-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 31 Subsection 23XUA(3)

32 At the end of section 23XUA
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
curation status: Proposed
has part: 32(4) At the end of section 23XUA
has part: 32(5) At the end of section 23XUA
has part: 32(6) At the end of section 23XUA
has part: 32(7) At the end of section 23XUA
has part: 32(8) At the end of section 23XUA
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
schema version: 2

32(4) At the end of section 23XUA
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
note: The analyst may give instructions to the attendee.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 32 At the end of section 23XUA

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(4) At the end of section 23XUA

32(5) At the end of section 23XUA
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
note: Analyst may give direction to attendee to leave premises if attendee fails to comply.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-logic-diffusion-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 32 At the end of section 23XUA

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The instruction is a temporal subinterval of the analysis.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal subinterval of instruction
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalSubintervalOf
premise text: (5) The analyst may give a direction...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The attendee must leave the premises.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) The analyst may give a direction...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This prohibition diffuses to all attendees.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses prohibition to attendees
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (5) The analyst may give a direction...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(5) At the end of section 23XUA

32(6) At the end of section 23XUA
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
note: Failure to comply with direction is an offence against subsection (7).
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-diffusion-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 32 At the end of section 23XUA

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The direction contains an obligation to comply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Direction contains obligation to comply
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: (6) If the analyst gives such a direction, the analyst must inform...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: If the analyst gives a direction, then a failure to comply is an offence against subsection (7).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Failure to comply implies offence against subsection (7)
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
premise text: (6) If the analyst gives such a direction, the analyst must inform...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A failure to comply is an offence against subsection (7).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must comply with direction
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (6) If the analyst gives such a direction, the analyst must inform...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A failure to comply is an offence against subsection (7).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must not fail to comply with direction
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
premise text: (6) If the analyst gives such a direction, the analyst must inform...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation to comply spreads to the failure to comply.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Obligation spreads to failure to comply
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS TO
premise text: (6) If the analyst gives such a direction, the analyst must inform...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(6) At the end of section 23XUA

32(7) At the end of section 23XUA
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
note: Failure to comply with direction results in an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 32 At the end of section 23XUA

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with direction.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32(7) At the end of section 23XUA

32(8) At the end of section 23XUA
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
note: An offence against subsection (7) is an obligation.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 32 At the end of section 23XUA

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: An offence against subsection (7) is an obligation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: is

33 Section 23XW
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.13
note: Repeal section and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-33-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
schema version: 2

34 Subsection 23XWB(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.14
note: Repeal of subsection and substitution with new definition
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-34-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-34-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-34-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between Division and intimate forensic procedure
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal intervals mentioned in the provision

35 At the end of subsection 23XWB(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.14
note: Add taking of blood and saliva samples
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-35-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adds specified actions to existing list
modality: Deontic
operator: addition

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-35-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35 At the end of subsection 23XWB(2)

36 At the end of subsection 23XWC(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.14
note: Add by order of a judge or magistrate under section 23XWO.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The addition occurs during this time period.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Action during subsection 23XWC(1).
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Section 23XWC(1) defines the time period.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The addition is asserted.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Asserting the addition.
modality: CogAI
operator: assertion
premise text: The addition is a fact.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The addition is obligatory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Adding to the list of permitted actions.
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
premise text: Section 23XWO permits additions.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The addition ends at this point.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Action until subsection 23XWO.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: Section 23XWO defines the end condition.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The addition is valid.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: Validating the addition.
modality: SHACL
operator: validity
premise text: The addition conforms to the schema.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36 At the end of subsection 23XWC(1)

37 Subsection 23XWC(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.14
note: Insert 'judge or' after 'by order of a'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-37-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-37-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37 Subsection 23XWC(3)

38 Paragraph 23XWD(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.14
note: Insert 'judge or' after 'by order of a'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-38-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 38 Paragraph 23XWD(b)

39 Subsection 23XWE(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.14
note: Repeal subsection, substitute Division 6 for carrying out forensic procedures on offenders.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Forensic procedures may overlap with other laws.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: Sections 23XJ and 23XK apply to the carrying out of a forensic procedure under this Division.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Forensic procedures may imply other laws.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Division 6 applies in relation to the carrying out under this Division of a forensic procedure on an offender.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Forensic procedures recognize other laws.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
premise text: Division 6 applies in relation to the carrying out under this Division of a forensic procedure on an offender.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of offenders.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: None

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: None
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Forensic procedures diffuse to other laws.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
premise text: Sections 23XJ and 23XK apply to the carrying out of a forensic procedure under this Division.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 39 Subsection 23XWE(1)

4 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.8
note: Prohibit finger prick method in intimate forensic procedure definition
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of finger prick method
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

40 Paragraph 23XWL(c)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.15
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-40-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
schema version: 2

41 After section 23XWN
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.15
note: Judge or magistrate may order forensic procedure on offender under certain circumstances.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-41-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-41-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-41-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-41-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 23XWO is under section 23WE
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between sections
modality: AllenInterval
operator: under
premise text: Sections 23XWO and 23WE

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Judge or magistrate may order forensic procedure on offender
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to order forensic procedure
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: Section 23XWO

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-41-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The offender is subject to one of the following circumstances: (a) not in custody and has not consented, or (b) in custody and has not consented, or (c) cannot consent under section 23WE.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Multiple conditions for ordering forensic procedure
modality: LinearLogic
operator: or
premise text: Sections 23XWO and 23WE

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 41 After section 23XWN

42 Subsection 23XWO(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.15
note: Omit specific provision regarding consent for intimate forensic procedures.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-42-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits specific action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

43 Paragraph 23XWO(7)(c)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.15
note: Repeal a paragraph
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-43-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
schema version: 2

44 After section 23XWO
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.15
note: Insert Schedule 1 Forensic procedures
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-44-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
schema version: 2

45 Paragraph 23XWP(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.17
note: Omit specific phrase from a provision.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-45-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
schema version: 2

46 Subsection 23XWP(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.18
note: Omit certain language regarding forensic procedures for offenders not in detention.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-46-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
schema version: 2

47 Subsection 23XWP(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.18
note: Omit specific phrase from a judge's order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-47-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-47-logic-ltl-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-47-logic-diffusion-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-47-logic-argumentation-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-47-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the offender may be ordered to permit the carrying out of a forensic procedure if the judge or magistrate so orders
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Describes when one statement implies another
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: If a judge or magistrate orders the carrying out of a forensic procedure under this Division on an offender, the offender”,

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-47-logic-diffusion-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the offender may be ordered to permit the carrying out of a forensic procedure at some point in time
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Describes when one event occurs after another
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: If a judge or magistrate orders the carrying out of a forensic procedure under this Division on an offender, the offender”,

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-47-logic-ltl-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the offender may be ordered to permit the carrying out of a forensic procedure at some point in time
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes when one event occurs after another
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: If a judge or magistrate orders the carrying out of a forensic procedure under this Division on an offender, the offender”,

48 Subsection 23XWQ(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.18
note: Insertion of authorized person in a phrase
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-48-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
schema version: 2

49 After subparagraph 23XWQ(2)(b)(i)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.18
note: Informed consent of parent or guardian required for forensic procedure
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-49-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Obligation to inform
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Requires informed consent
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
premise text: Section 23XWR

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-49-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 49 After subparagraph 23XWQ(2)(b)(i)

5 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraph (c) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.8
note: Repeal paragraph of intimate forensic procedure definition.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
schema version: 2

50 Subparagraph 23XWQ(2)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.18
note: Omit 'after the person', substitute 'after the authorised person'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-50-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
schema version: 2

51 Paragraph 23XWR(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.18
note: Volunteer chooses storage of information
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-51-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-51-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 51 Paragraph 23XWR(2)(b)

52 Section 23YDAC
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.19
note: Insertion of '(1)' before 'In this'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-52-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
schema version: 2

53 Section 23YDAC (definition of Commonwealth DNA
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.19
note: Definition of Commonwealth DNA database system
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-53-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-53-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53 Section 23YDAC (definition of Commonwealth DNA

54 Section 23YDAC (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.19
note: Insertion of foreign law enforcement agency relation into Commonwealth DNA database system definition
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-54-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of foreign law enforcement agency relation in Commonwealth DNA database system definition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-54-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54 Section 23YDAC (paragraph (a) of the definition of

55 Section 23YDAC (after paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.19
note: Prohibition on committing an offence outside Australia
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-55-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence outside Australia
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

56 Section 23YDAC (at the end of the definition of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.19
note: Add Note: See also subsection (2).
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-56-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
schema version: 2

57 Section 23YDAC (definition of volunteers (limited
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.19
note: Definition of volunteers (limited purposes) index
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-57-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
schema version: 2

58 At the end of section 23YDAC
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.19
note: Add forensic procedures for participating jurisdictions to State/Territory DNA database system in Schedule 1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-58-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
schema version: 2

59 After paragraph 23YDAE(2)(d)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20
note: Inserts a new provision to assist foreign countries in deciding whether to make a request under the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 1987.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-59-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-59
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inserts a new provision
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59 After paragraph 23YDAE(2)(d)

6 Subsection 23WA(1) (after paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.8
note: Forensic procedures
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 Subsection 23WA(1) (after paragraph (a) of the definition of

60 Paragraph 23YDA(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20
note: Insert “, offender or volunteer” after ‘suspect’.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-60-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-60
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of text
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 60 Paragraph 23YDA(1)(b)

61 Paragraph 23YDA(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20
note: Requires consent for forensic procedures
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-61-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-61
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-61-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 61 Paragraph 23YDA(2)(a)

62 Paragraph 23YDA(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20
note: Insertion of new clause after Division 4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-62-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-62
schema version: 2

63 Paragraph 23YDA(2)(c)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20
note: Insertion of new clause for applying to judges and magistrates for forensic procedures
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-63-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-63
schema version: 2

64 Paragraphs 23YDA(2)(d), (e) and (f)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20
note: Insertion of words in a specific context
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-64-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-64-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 64 Paragraphs 23YDA(2)(d), (e) and (f)

65 Subsection 23YG(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20
curation status: Proposed
has part: 65(2) Subsection 23YG(2)
has part: 65(3) Subsection 23YG(2)
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-65
schema version: 2

65(2) Subsection 23YG(2)
type: Concept
description: True
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20
note: Material must be made available within 14 days after creation or upon request.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-65-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Subsection 23YG(2)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Material must be provided.
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 65(2) Subsection 23YG(2)

65(3) Subsection 23YG(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20
note: Exemptions from subsection (2)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-65-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 65 Subsection 23YG(2)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap with subsection 23XE(5)
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
premise text: (a) copies of records required to be made available under subsection 23XE(5); and (b) material required to be provided under section 23XU; and (c) copies of results of analysis and other information required to be provided under section 23XW.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Temporal overlap with subsection 23XE(5)
modality: CogAI
operator: and
premise text: (a) copies of records required to be made available under subsection 23XE(5); and (b) material required to be provided under section 23XU; and (c) copies of results of analysis and other information required to be provided under section 23XW.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Exemptions from subsection (2)
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Temporal overlap with subsection 23XE(5)
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
premise text: (a) copies of records required to be made available under subsection 23XE(5); and (b) material required to be provided under section 23XU; and (c) copies of results of analysis and other information required to be provided under section 23XW.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal overlap with subsection 23XE(5)
modality: LTL
operator: and
premise text: (a) copies of records required to be made available under subsection 23XE(5); and (b) material required to be provided under section 23XU; and (c) copies of results of analysis and other information required to be provided under section 23XW.

66 After paragraph 23YO(2)(d)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.21
note: Inserts a new purpose for assisting foreign countries in deciding to make a request under the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 1987.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-66-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-66
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inserts a new provision
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 66 After paragraph 23YO(2)(d)

67 After section 23YP
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.21
note: Analysis of forensic material must be carried out in an accredited laboratory.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-67-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-67
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The analysis must be carried out in an accredited laboratory.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Commonwealth.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

68 Subsection 23YQ(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.21
note: Substitute “AFP appointee” for “staff member”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-68-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 68 Subsection 23YQ(1)

69 Subsection 23YQ(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.21
note: Substitute “AFP appointee” for “staff member”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-69-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-69-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 69 Subsection 23YQ(2)

7 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of senior constable)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
note: Repeal definition of senior constable
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
schema version: 2

70 Subsection 23YUC(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.21
note: Substitute 'an intimate forensic procedure' for 'the forensic procedure'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-70-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
schema version: 2

71 Subsection 23YUC(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.21
note: Inserts 'under this Part' after 'an order'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-71-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
schema version: 2

72 After subsection 23YUC(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.22
note: Authorises carrying out of non-intimate forensic procedure in participating jurisdictions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-72-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to carry out procedure
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-72-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 72 After subsection 23YUC(1)

73 At the end of Division 11 of Part ID
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.22
note: Commissioner may enter into arrangement with prison head regarding forensic procedures.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-73-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
schema version: 2

74 Saving—orders by senior constable
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.22
note: Preserves validity of certain orders
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-74-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-74
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The order remains valid despite the amendment.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Preserves the validity of an order
modality: Deontic
operator: Preservation
premise text: The amendment made by item 16 does not affect the validity of an order that is in force under section 23WN of the Crimes Act 1914 immediately before the commencement of that item.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 74 Saving—orders by senior constable

75 Application provision
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.22
note: Amendments apply in relation to carrying out of forensic procedures starting on or after commencement.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-75
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Amendments apply in relation to carrying out of forensic procedures.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: (1) The amendments made by items 22 to 26, 34, 35, 39, 48, 49, 50, 67, 70 and 72 apply in relation to the carrying out of forensic procedures starting on or after the commencement of those items.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Amendments apply in relation to samples taken under Part ID of the Crimes Act 1914 on or after commencement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: (2) The amendments made by items 27 to 33 apply in relation to samples taken under Part ID of the Crimes Act 1914 on or after the commencement of those items.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Amendments apply in relation to orders made on or after commencement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: (3) The amendments made by items 21, 40, 41, 43 and 45 to 47 apply in relation to orders made on or after the commencement of those items.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Amendments apply in relation to applications made under section 23XWO of the Crimes Act 1914 on or after commencement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: (4) The amendments made by items 42 and 44 apply in relation to applications made under section 23XWO of the Crimes Act 1914 on or after the commencement of those items.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Amendment applies in relation to giving of informed consent on or after commencement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: (5) The amendment made by item 51 applies in relation to the giving of informed consent on or after the commencement of that item.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Amendments do not affect continuity of Commonwealth DNA database system.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: (6) The amendments made by items 53 to 55 do not affect the continuity of the Commonwealth DNA database system referred to in section 23YDAC of the Crimes Act 1914 or of the crime scene index referred to in that section.

76 Paragraphs 23WF(2)(b) and (c)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.24
note: Inform suspect of matters mentioned in section 23WJ
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-76-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-76
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Inform suspect
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-76-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76 Paragraphs 23WF(2)(b) and (c)

77 Paragraph 23WG(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.24
note: Informs suspect of matters mentioned in section 23WJ
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-77-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-77
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Informs suspect of matters mentioned in section 23WJ
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-77-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77 Paragraph 23WG(2)(b)

78 Paragraph 23XWG(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.24
note: Informs offender of matters mentioned in section 23XWJ
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-78-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-78
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-78-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78 Paragraph 23XWG(1)(b)

79 Subsection 23XWR(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.24
note: Insert comma and regulations after certain phrases.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-79-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-79
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-79-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 79 Subsection 23XWR(1)

8 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
note: Defines senior police officer rank
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 8 Subsection 23WA(1)

80 Application provision
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.24
note: Amendments apply in relation to informed consent on or after commencement.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-80-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-80
schema version: 2

9 Section 23WC (table item 2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
note: Omit 'senior constable', substitute 'senior police officer'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
schema version: 2

1 Section 59 (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.25
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Subsection 59(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
note: Omit 'the Chair' (second occurring) and substitute 'he or she'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
schema version: 2

11 Subsection 59(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
note: Insert “or the CEO” after “the Chair of the Board”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
schema version: 2

12 Paragraph 59(3)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
note: Insert CEO after Chair of the Board
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or the CEO
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation after
modality: AllenInterval
operator: after
premise text: the Chair of the Board

13 Subsection 59(5)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
note: Insert 'or the CEO' after 'The Chair of the Board'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-13-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or the CEO (as the case requires)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between 'The Chair of the Board' and 'CEO'
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation
premise text: The Chair of the Board (first occurring)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: or the CEO (as the case requires)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission to insert text
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
premise text: The Chair of the Board (first occurring)

14 Subsection 60(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
note: Insertion of CEO into Board heading
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-14-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
schema version: 2

15 Subsection 60(5)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
note: Substitute 'The Board and the CEO must' for 'The Board shall'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 15 Subsection 60(5)

16 Application of this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
note: Amendments apply to information in possession of ACC regardless of when it comes into possession.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply amendments
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 16 Application of this Part

17 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.27
note: Definition of ACC information
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-17-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ACC information means information that is in the ACC’s possession.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 17 Subsection 4(1)

18 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.27
note: List of permissible purposes
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-18-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-18-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-18-logic-alleninterval-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-18-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: List of permissible purposes
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-18-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass

19 Subsection 12(1) (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.28
note: Substitute 'Note 1' for 'Note'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-19-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
schema version: 2

2 Before subsection 59(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.25
note: Minister must be informed
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Before subsection 59(1)

20 Subsection 12(1) (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.28
note: Substitute sections 59AA and 59AB for section 59.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
schema version: 2

21 At the end of subsection 12(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.28
note: Relevant direction under subsection 25A(9) may be applied to this subsection.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-21-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: This subsection is subject to any relevant direction given under subsection 25A(9).
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Relevant direction under subsection 25A(9) may be applied to this subsection.
modality: Deontic
operator: may apply
premise text: Subsection 25A(9)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21 At the end of subsection 12(1)

22 At the end of subsection 12(1A)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.28
note: Relevant direction given under subsection 25A(9) is applicable.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-22-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Relevant direction given under subsection 25A(9) is applicable.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 22 At the end of subsection 12(1A)

23 After subsection 12(1A)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.28
note: Subject to direction on confidentiality
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-23-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-23
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subject to direction
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Direction applies to subsections
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJCT
premise text: Subsections (1) and (1A)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-23-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 23 After subsection 12(1A)

24 Subparagraph 47A(1)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.28
note: Omit specified phrase and substitute with new phrase.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-24-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-24
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure to specified entities.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

25 At the end of subsection 59(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.28
note: Subject to direction under subsection 25A(9)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-25
schema version: 2

26 Subsections 59(7) to (11)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.28
note: Inform one or more persons of ACC operations if in public interest.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-26-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-26-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-26
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Information duty
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-26-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: ACC information
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
premise text: Schedule 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 26 Subsections 59(7) to (11)

27 After section 59
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.29
note: Insert clause
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-27
schema version: 2

28 After paragraph 61(2)(d)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.34
note: CEO must disclose general nature and extent of information to a body corporate under section 59AB.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-28-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-28
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-28-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 28 After paragraph 61(2)(d)

29 Application of this Part
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.34
note: Amendments apply to ACC information regardless of when it comes into possession.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-29
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply amendments
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 29 Application of this Part

3 Subsection 59(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.25
note: Insert CEO after Chair of the Board
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CEO is inserted after The Chair of the Board.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relationship between insertion and CEO
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
premise text: The insertion of CEO occurs after The Chair of the Board.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CEO must be inserted after The Chair of the Board.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Justification for insertion
modality: Argumentation
operator: JUSTIFICATION
premise text: The insertion of CEO is justified by the need to include the CEO in the Board's structure.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CEO must be inserted after The Chair of the Board.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of insertion obligation
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNITION
premise text: The AI system recognizes the need to insert CEO after The Chair of the Board.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CEO must be inserted after The Chair of the Board.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS
premise text: The Chair of the Board must be inserted before CEO.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CEO must be inserted after The Chair of the Board in all parts of the Board's structure.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spread of insertion obligation
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
premise text: The insertion of CEO spreads to other parts of the Board's structure.

4 Subsection 59(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.25
note: Insert “or the CEO” after “requests the Chair”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
schema version: 2

5 Subsection 59(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.25
note: Insertion of CEO into functions clause
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
schema version: 2

59 Providing reports and information to members of Parliament
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.25
note: Providing reports and information to members of Parliament
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-59
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide reports and information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59 Providing reports and information to members of Parliament

59AA Disclosing information to government bodies
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.29
note: Disclosure of ACC information to certain entities
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59aa-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59aa-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-59aa
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure is permitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: CEO permits disclosure of ACC information
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: CEO considers it appropriate to disclose

59AB Disclosing information to private sector bodies
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.30
curation status: Proposed
has part: 59AB(1) Disclosing information to private sector bodies
has part: 59AB(2) Disclosing information to private sector bodies
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-59ab
schema version: 2

59AB(1) Disclosing information to private sector bodies
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.30
note: Disclosure of ACC information to private sector bodies is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 59AB Disclosing information to private sector bodies

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the disclosure must occur within a specified timeframe
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The disclosure of ACC information must occur within a specified timeframe.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
premise text: disclosing the ACC information would not prejudice the safety of a person, or prejudice the fair trial of a person who has been charged with an offence

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: disclosing the ACC information is permitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The CEO is permitted to disclose ACC information under certain conditions.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: the CEO considers it appropriate to do so

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the body corporate requires certain conditions to be met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The body corporate requires certain conditions to be met before disclosing ACC information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Requires
premise text: the CEO considers that disclosing the information to the body is necessary for a permissible purpose

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the CEO permits certain disclosure conditions
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The CEO is permitted to specify conditions under which ACC information can be disclosed.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: the CEO has undertaken, in writing, not to use or further disclose the information except as referred to in subsection (3)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the body corporate is a permissible recipient
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: The body corporate is classified as a permissible recipient of ACC information.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
premise text: the body has undertaken, in writing, not to use or further disclose the information except as referred to in subsection (3)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the disclosure must occur on a recurring basis
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The CEO is required to disclose ACC information on a recurring basis.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: the body has undertaken, in writing, not to use or further disclose the information except as referred to in subsection (3)

59AB(2) Disclosing information to private sector bodies
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.30
note: Disclosure of ACC information to private sector bodies under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 59AB Disclosing information to private sector bodies

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure conditions.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (i) preventing criminal offences or activities that might constitute criminal offences (including under a law of a foreign country);

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation for disclosure conditions.
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
premise text: (b) in any case—the information is not confidential commercial information relating to another body or person.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose ACC information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (2) The CEO may disclose ACC information to a body corporate under subsection (1) only if...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information diffusion for disclosure conditions.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Diffusion
premise text: (iii) facilitating the collection of criminal information and intelligence in relation to criminal offences or activities that might constitute criminal offences (including under a law of a foreign country);

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for disclosure conditions.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (ii) detecting criminal offences or activities that might constitute criminal offences (including under a law of a foreign country);

59AC Confidentiality in relation to examinations
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.34
note: Confidentiality in relation to examinations is subject to direction.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ac-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ac-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-59ac
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ac-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Direction applies to confidentiality in relation to examinations.
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJUNCTIVE MODO

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ac-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59AC Confidentiality in relation to examinations

59AD Publication of reports in relation to offences
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.34
note: Publication of reports in relation to offences must be based on admissible evidence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ad-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ad-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-59ad
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ad-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Must

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ad-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59AD Publication of reports in relation to offences

6 Before subsection 59(1A)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.25
note: Insert Information for Inter-Governmental Committee
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
schema version: 2

7 Subsection 59(1A)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.25
note: Insert 'or the CEO' after 'the Chair of the Board'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation after another interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: after

8 Subsection 59(1A)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
note: Insertion of CEO in Board title
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 Subsection 59(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
note: Insert 'or the CEO' after 'the Chair of the Board'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: CEO can be added
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits insertion of CEO
modality: Deontic
operator: permissive
premise text: Chair of the Board is specified

1 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.35
note: Defines Commonwealth officer
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines Commonwealth officer
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Has meaning given by subsection 3(1) of the Crimes Act 1914
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has meaning

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Subsection 4(1)

10 At the end of Division 1A of Part II
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
schema version: 2

11 Application of this Schedule
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.41
note: Amendments apply to any returnable item regardless of when seized or produced.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Application of this Schedule

2 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.35
note: Definition of returnable item
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Subsection 4(1)

24AA Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24AA(1) Use of and sharing returnable items
has part: 24AA(2) Use of and sharing returnable items
has part: 24AA(3) Use of and sharing returnable items
has part: 24AA(4) Use of and sharing returnable items
has part: 24AA(5) Use of and sharing returnable items
has part: 24AA(6) Use of and sharing returnable items
has part: 24AA(7) Use of and sharing returnable items
has part: 24AA(8) Use of and sharing returnable items
has part: 24AA(9) Use of and sharing returnable items
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa
schema version: 2

24AA(1) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
note: CEO may make returnable item available to constable or Commonwealth officer for specified purposes.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Returnable item may be used for specified purposes
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by CEO
modality: Deontic
operator: may
premise text: CEO has authority to make returnable item available

24AA(2) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
note: Use of returnable items by non-staff members is permitted.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to use returnable items
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AA(2) Use of and sharing returnable items

24AA(3) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
note: Allow head to share returnable item with staff member
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

24AA(4) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
note: Use of returnable items for State or Territory purposes is permitted.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to use returnable items for State or Territory purposes.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AA(4) Use of and sharing returnable items

24AA(5) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
note: CEO may make returnable item available to constable or Commonwealth officer.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted by CEO.
modality: Deontic
operator: may

24AA(6) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
note: Use of returnable items for other purposes authorized by law.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Use permitted.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows use of returnable items for other purposes.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Law authorizes use.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AA(6) Use of and sharing returnable items

24AA(7) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
note: Requires use of documents or other things for certain laws
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Expresses a requirement
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

24AA(8) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
note: Sharing of returnable items with certain agencies
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: CEO permits sharing
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (8) The CEO may make a returnable item available to...

24AA(9) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
note: Permits arrangement with a State or Territory law enforcement agency for returnable items.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-9-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AA(9) Use of and sharing returnable items

24AB When returnable items must be returned
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24AB(1) When returnable items must be returned
has part: 24AB(2) When returnable items must be returned
has part: 24AB(3) When returnable items must be returned
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ab
schema version: 2

24AB(1) When returnable items must be returned
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
note: Return a returnable item to the person from whom it was seized or produced if not required for judicial review proceedings.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 24AB When returnable items must be returned

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person from whom the item was seized or produced is entitled to possess it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty to return an item
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The CEO must take reasonable steps to return the item.

24AB(2) When returnable items must be returned
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
note: No obligation to take steps if certain conditions are met.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 24AB When returnable items must be returned

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the CEO does not have to take those steps if the conditions are met
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No obligation if conditions are met
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
premise text: if the returnable item may be retained because of an order under subsection 24AC(2), or any other order under that subsection has been made in relation to the item, then the CEO does not have to take those steps

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the CEO does not have to take those steps if the application is pending
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No obligation if application is pending
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
premise text: if the CEO has applied for such an order and the application has not been determined, then the CEO does not have to take those steps

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the CEO does not have to take those steps if the returnable item is subject to such a law or order
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No obligation under law or court order
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
premise text: if the returnable item may otherwise be retained, destroyed or disposed of under a law, or an order of a court or tribunal, of the Commonwealth or of a State or a Territory, then the CEO does not have to take those steps

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the CEO does not have to take those steps if there is a dispute over ownership
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No obligation due to dispute over ownership
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
premise text: if the returnable item is forfeited or forfeitable to the Commonwealth or is the subject of a dispute as to ownership, then the CEO does not have to take those steps

24AB(3) When returnable items must be returned
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
note: CEO must return document if ACC took possession.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 24AB When returnable items must be returned

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Return document if ACC took possession
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to return document
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: CEO is required to take reasonable steps

24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
curation status: Proposed
has part: 24AC(1) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
has part: 24AC(2) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
has part: 24AC(3) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
has part: 24AC(4) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
has part: 24AC(5) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
has part: 24AC(6) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
has part: 24AC(7) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
has part: 24AC(8) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac
schema version: 2

24AC(1) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
note: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Order under subsection (2)
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: CEO's application

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AC(1) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,

24AC(2) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
note: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AC(2) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,

24AC(3) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
note: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.

24AC(4) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
note: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AC(4) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,

24AC(5) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
note: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AC(5) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,

24AC(6) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
note: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AC(6) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,

24AC(7) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
note: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,

24AC(8) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
note: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Issuing officer has the same protection and immunity as a court member at the time of performing the function
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between issuing officer's function and court membership
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Issuing officer is a member of the court

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Returnable item may be retained
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: Issuing officer has the power to permit

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Issuing officer has the same protection and immunity as a court member
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting immunity to issuing officer
modality: Deontic
operator: Immunization
premise text: Issuing officer is protected from liability

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Issuing officer has the same protection and immunity as a court member
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting protection to issuing officer
modality: Deontic
operator: Protection
premise text: Issuing officer is protected from liability

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Issuing officer has the same protection and immunity as a court member
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Granting authority to issuing officer
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorization
premise text: Issuing officer is authorized to perform function

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-norm
type: Permission
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 24AC(8) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,

3 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (d) of the definition of serious
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.35
note: Omit 'within the meaning of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

4 Subsection 4(1) (subparagraph (da)(ii) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.35
note: Omit specified phrase from definition.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

5 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.35
note: Defines serious offence for ACC
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term with obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Subsection 4(1)

6 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
note: Defines State or Territory law enforcement agency
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State or Territory law enforcement agency has the meaning given by subsection 3ZQU(7) of the Crimes Act 1914.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation defined
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
premise text: Section 6 commences on a specified date

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State or Territory law enforcement agency has the meaning given by subsection 3ZQU(7) of the Crimes Act 1914.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Definition of term in context
modality: CogAI
operator: =
premise text: Term used in this section

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State or Territory law enforcement agency has the meaning given by subsection 3ZQU(7) of the Crimes Act 1914.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition of term
modality: Deontic
operator: =
premise text: Term defined

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State or Territory law enforcement agency has the meaning given by subsection 3ZQU(7) of the Crimes Act 1914.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Definition of term in context
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
premise text: Term used in this section

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: State or Territory law enforcement agency has the meaning given by subsection 3ZQU(7) of the Crimes Act 1914.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal relation defined
modality: LTL
operator: =
premise text: Section 6 commences on a specified date

7 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
note: Defines terrorism offence as in subsection 3(1) of the Crimes Act 1914.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines terrorism offence
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 Subsection 4(1)

8 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
note: Defines terrorist act
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: terrorist act has the same meaning as in subsection 100.1(1) of the Criminal Code.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines term
modality: Deontic
operator: =

9 Subsections 22(8) and (9)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
note: Repeal subsections
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal subsections
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal

1 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.42
note: Definition of constable
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Subsection 5(1)

10 After Subdivision A of Division 1 of Part 9
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
note: Prohibitions against disclosing information about notices
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-10
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure is prohibited during notices
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Prohibition during notices
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: Notices are events

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Disclosure is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: State forbids disclosure

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-10-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 10 After Subdivision A of Division 1 of Part 9

11 Section 78
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.50
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-11
schema version: 2

12 Paragraphs 79(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.50
note: Omit “to the Integrity Commissioner”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-12
schema version: 2

13 Subsection 79(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.50
note: Omit specific phrase from section 76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-13-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-13
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specific phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

14 Subsection 79(5)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.50
note: Legal professional privilege does not affect information or document given, produced, or referred to.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-shacl-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-14
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Legal professional privilege does not affect information or document given, produced, or referred to at any time.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap: Legal professional privilege does not affect information or document given, produced, or referred to at all times
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: None

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Legal professional privilege does not affect information or document given, produced, or referred to in cognitive AI systems.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive AI: Legal professional privilege does not affect information or document given, produced, or referred to in cognitive AI systems
modality: CogAI
operator: DoesNotAffect
premise text: None

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Information or document given, produced, or referred to is not subject to legal professional privilege.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal professional privilege obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: None

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Legal professional privilege does not diffuse to other entities.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Non-diffusive: Legal professional privilege does not diffuse to other entities
modality: Diffusion
operator: DoesNotDiffuse
premise text: None

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Legal professional privilege obligation is validated by SHACL.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
logic summary: SHACL validation: Legal professional privilege obligation is validated by SHACL
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates
premise text: None

15 Subsection 80(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.51
note: Omit specific phrase from section 75 or 76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-15
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits specific action
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

16 Subsection 80(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.51
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-16-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-16
schema version: 2

166 Application of Division
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-166-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-166
schema version: 2

17 Subsection 80(5)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.51
note: Omit specific phrase from section 75 or 76 notices.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-17-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-17
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits specific action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

18 Subsection 80(7)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.51
note: Omit “or 76”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-18-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-18
schema version: 2

19 Subsections 81(1) and (2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.51
note: Omit specific phrase from section 75 or 76 notices.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-19-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-19
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omitting phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

2 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.42
note: Defines Federal Court
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The Federal Court is defined as...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
premise text: Federal Court means the Federal Court of Australia.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Subsection 5(1)

20 Subsection 82(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.51
note: Substitute 'a corruption issue' for 'corruption issue'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-20-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-20
schema version: 2

21 Law enforcement agency head to pass on new information in
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.42
note: Law enforcement agency head must pass on new information in relation to corruption issue already notified
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-21-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21
schema version: 2

21 Subsection 83(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.51
note: Insert 'to do either or both of the following'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-21-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-21-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-21-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: insert

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-21-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 21 Subsection 83(1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Must pass on new information to relevant authorities
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide new information
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Law enforcement agency head has received new information

22 Paragraph 83(1)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.52
note: Omit “or”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-22-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-22
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of ‘or’.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

23 Paragraph 83(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.52
note: Produce documents or things specified in the summons if reasonable grounds exist to suspect relevance to an investigation.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-23-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-23
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Duty obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

24 Subsection 90(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.52
note: Omit specific phrase from direction.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-24-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-24
schema version: 2

25 Paragraph 92(2)(e)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.52
note: Substitute section number in paragraph.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-25-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-25
schema version: 2

26 Subsection 95(5)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.52
note: Maintains legal professional privilege despite disclosure.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-26-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-26
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Claim of legal professional privilege remains unaffected.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal professional privilege is maintained.
modality: Deontic
operator: Maintain
premise text: Disclosure does not affect legal professional privilege.

27 Subsection 96(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.52
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-27-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-27
schema version: 2

28 Paragraph 96(4)(c)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.52
note: Insertion of section numbers in Schedule 4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-28-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-28
schema version: 2

29 After Subdivision E of Division 2 of Part 9
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.53
note: Prohibition of contempt of ACLEI
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-29
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Forbids contempt of ACLEI
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

3 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.42
note: Definition of contempt of ACLEI
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Contempt of ACLEI has the meaning given by section 96A.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines key term
modality: Deontic
operator: defined

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Subsection 5(1)

30 Section 93 (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.58
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-30-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-30
schema version: 2

31 Section 94 (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.58
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-31-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-31
schema version: 2

32 Subsection 99(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.58
note: Authorized officer may apply for warrant to arrest person if they have not complied with order or are likely to leave Australia to avoid giving evidence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-32
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorized officer may apply for a warrant to arrest the person if they have not complied with the order or are likely to leave Australia to avoid giving evidence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with the time period during which the person is likely to leave Australia to avoid giving evidence.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: The authorized officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person is likely to leave Australia for the purpose of avoiding giving evidence at a hearing before the Integrity Commissioner.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorized officer may apply for a warrant to arrest the person.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the person from leaving Australia to avoid giving evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The person has been ordered to deliver their passport to the Integrity Commissioner.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorized officer may apply for a warrant to arrest the person if they have not complied with the order or are likely to leave Australia to avoid giving evidence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the person from attempting to evade service of summons.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The person is to be served with a summons under section 83.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorized officer may apply for a warrant to arrest the person if they have not complied with the order or are likely to leave Australia to avoid giving evidence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the person from leaving Australia to avoid giving evidence at a hearing before the Integrity Commissioner.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: The authorized officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person is likely to leave Australia for the purpose of avoiding giving evidence at a hearing before the Integrity Commissioner.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The authorized officer may apply for a warrant to arrest the person if they have not complied with the order or are likely to leave Australia to avoid giving evidence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of the person's attempts to evade service of summons.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
premise text: The authorized officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person is likely to abscond or is otherwise attempting, or likely to attempt, to evade service of the summons.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 32 Subsection 99(1)

33 Subsection 100(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.59
note: Omit all words after 'authorising' and substitute with 'the arrest of the person'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-33-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-33
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the specified action.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

34 After subsection 100(9)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.59
note: Authorized officer executing warrant does not need to be the one who applied for it.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-34-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-34
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission granted
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
premise text: Authorized officer executing warrant need not be the authorized officer who applied for the warrant.

35 Subsection 104(4)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.59
note: Substitute 'a hearing that has been held' for 'a hearing that been held'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-35-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-35-logic-alleninterval-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-35
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-35-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Held meets Heared
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between 'hearing' and 'held'
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEets
premise text: Heard happens after Held

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitution is obligatory
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to substitute
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: State must substitute

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-35-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 35 Subsection 104(4)

36 At the end of subparagraph 110(4)(b)(iv)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.59
note: Add “or”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-36-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-36
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 36 At the end of subparagraph 110(4)(b)(iv)

37 After subparagraph 110(4)(b)(iv)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.59
note: Insert eligible seizable item in any case
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-37-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-37
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to insert eligible seizable item
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST INSERT
premise text: After subparagraph 110(4)(b)(iv)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-37-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 37 After subparagraph 110(4)(b)(iv)

38 Paragraph 117(2)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.59
note: Insert “or a constable” after “authorised officer”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-38-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-38
schema version: 2

39 Paragraph 117(2)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.59
note: Insert “or a constable” after “not an authorised officer”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-39-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-39
schema version: 2

4 Subsection 20(1) (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.42
note: Substitute 'notified' for 'referred'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace word with new word
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

40 Subsection 117(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.59
note: Only an authorised officer or a constable may take part in searching a person.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-40-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-40
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits searching a person without authorization.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-40-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 40 Subsection 117(3)

41 At the end of section 142
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
note: See also subsection 96B(5)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-41-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-41
schema version: 2

42 Paragraph 147(1)(d)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
note: Omit “must”
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-42-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-42
schema version: 2

43 Paragraph 150(2)(a)
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
note: A person must provide information or produce a document or thing upon request.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-43-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-43
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information or produce a document or thing upon request.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 43 Paragraph 150(2)(a)

44 Subsection 150(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
note: Omit “request”, substitute “notice”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-44-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-44
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitute ‘notice’
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'request'
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omit ‘request’

45 Paragraph 156(5)(a)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
note: Substitute 'authorise' for 'authorises'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-45-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-45
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Replace 'authorises' with 'authorise'
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

46 Section 166 (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-46-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-46
schema version: 2

47 Section 166
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
note: Omit “Part”, substitute “Division”.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-47-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-47
schema version: 2

48 Subsection 167(5)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
note: Insertion of phrase after 'proposes to take action'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-48-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-48
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Insertion of phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 48 Subsection 167(5)

49 Subsection 167(5)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
note: Omit subsection 142(3) or (4)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-49-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-49
schema version: 2

5 Section 21 (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.42
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-5
schema version: 2

50 Paragraph 167(6)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
note: Replace 'Integrity Commissioner's' with 'special investigator's'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-50-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-50
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of using the term "Integrity Commissioner's"
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

51 Subsection 187(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.61
note: Omit 'Integrity Commissioner', substitute 'Assistant Integrity Commissioner'.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-51-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-51
schema version: 2

52 Subsection 18K(5) (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.61
note: Substitute sections 77A and 91 for section 91.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-52-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-52
schema version: 2

53 Subsection 6(1) (definition of federal law enforcement
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.61
note: Insertion of (aa) after paragraph (a)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-53-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-53
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-53-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 53 Subsection 6(1) (definition of federal law enforcement

54 Application—items 7 to 19
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.61
note: Amendments apply in relation to notices served on or after commencement.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-54-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-54
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Relates to amendments made by items 7-19 of this Schedule.
modality: Deontic
operator: relatesTo

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 54 Application—items 7 to 19

55 Application—section 96 of the Law Enforcement Integrity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.61
note: Commissioner Act 2006 applies to hearings under the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-55-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-55-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-55
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-55-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

56 Application—sections 96A to 96F of the Law Enforcement
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.61
note: Application of sections 96A to 96F of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-56-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-56
schema version: 2

57 Application—section 100 of the Law Enforcement Integrity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.61
note: Section 100 of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006 applies in relation to a warrant issued on or after this Schedule commences.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-57
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 100 of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Section applies to warrants issued on or after commencement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: Commissioner Act 2006

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 100 of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Section implies that warrants issued on or after commencement are subject to section 100.
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: Commissioner Act 2006

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 100 of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Section applies to warrants issued on or after commencement.
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicability
premise text: Commissioner Act 2006

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 100 of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to warrants issued on or after commencement.
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
premise text: Commissioner Act 2006

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Section 100 of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Section applies to warrants issued on or after commencement.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: Commissioner Act 2006

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 57 Application—section 100 of the Law Enforcement Integrity

58 Application—item 37
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.62
note: Amendment applies in relation to warrant issued on or after commencement.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-58-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-58
schema version: 2

59 Application—section 117 of the Law Enforcement Integrity
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.62
note: Section 117 of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006 applies in relation to a warrant executed on or after this Schedule commences.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-59-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-59
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to warrants executed on or after the commencement of this Schedule.
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 59 Application—section 117 of the Law Enforcement Integrity

6 Part 8 (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.42
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-6
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Repeal applied
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Repeal heading
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: Heading to be repealed

7 Subdivision A of Division 1 of Part 9 (heading)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-7
schema version: 2

75 Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43
curation status: Proposed
has part: 75(1) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
has part: 75(2) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
has part: 75(3) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
has part: 75(4) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
has part: 75(5) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
has part: 75(6) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-75
schema version: 2

75(1) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43
note: Require person to give information or produce document or thing upon request.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Notice to give information or to produce document or thing

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the person to provide information or produce document or thing.
modality: Deontic
operator: require

75(2) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43
note: Provide information in writing
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Notice to give information or to produce document or thing

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The information must be provided in writing.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Integrity Commissioner
modality: Deontic
operator: require

75(3) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43
note: Notice must be served on person, signed by Integrity Commissioner, and specify compliance period.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Notice to give information or to produce document or thing

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes duty on State
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75(3) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing

75(4) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
type: Concept
description: true
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43
note: Must provide information or produce document within 14 days after notice
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Notice to give information or to produce document or thing

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The period specified under paragraph (3)(c) must be greater than or equal to 14 days after the day the notice is served on the person
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: The period specified under paragraph (3)(c) must be greater than or equal to 14 days after the day the notice is served on the person
modality: CogAI
operator: mustBeGreaterThanOrEqualTo

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide information or produce document within 14 days after notice
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: The period specified under paragraph (3)(c) must be greater than or equal to 14 days after the day the notice is served on the person
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustBeGreaterThanOrEqualTo

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The period specified under paragraph (3)(c) must be greater than or equal to 14 days after the day the notice is served on the person
modality: LTL
operator: >=

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75(4) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing

75(5) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43
note: Record information or produce document/thing within 14 days
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Notice to give information or to produce document or thing

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to record information or produce document/thing
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

75(6) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43
note: Notice to give information or produce document or thing
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 75 Notice to give information or to produce document or thing

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the agent
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 75(6) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing

76 Compliance with notice
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.44
curation status: Proposed
has part: 76(1) Compliance with notice
has part: 76(2) Compliance with notice
has part: 76(3) Compliance with notice
has part: 76(4) Compliance with notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-76
schema version: 2

76(1) Compliance with notice
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.44
note: Compliance with notice within specified time period or allowed extension.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Compliance with notice

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Compliance within specified time period or extension.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: Section 75 notice

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(1) Compliance with notice

76(2) Compliance with notice
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.44
note: A person served with a notice may apply for further time to comply.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Compliance with notice

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(2) Compliance with notice

76(3) Compliance with notice
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.44
note: Allow further time to comply with notice
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Compliance with notice

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allow further time
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(3) Compliance with notice

76(4) Compliance with notice
type: Concept
description: acknowledgement
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.44
note: Integrity Commissioner must acknowledge receipt of information and documents.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 76 Compliance with notice

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Integrity Commissioner has an obligation to acknowledge receipt.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 76(4) Compliance with notice

77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
curation status: Proposed
has part: 77A(1) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
has part: 77A(2) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
has part: 77A(3) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
has part: 77A(4) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
has part: 77A(5) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
has part: 77A(6) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
has part: 77A(7) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
has part: 77A(8) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
has part: 77A(9) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a
schema version: 2

77A(1) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
note: Disclosure of notice information is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (Notation prohibiting disclosure of information about notice)
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of notice information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) This section applies in respect of a notice served on a person under section 75.

77A(2) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
note: Disclosure of notice information is prohibited except in specified circumstances.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (2) The Integrity Commissioner may include a notation...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77A(2) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited

77A(3) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
note: Failure to disclose notice may prejudice certain interests.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits failure to disclose notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) The Integrity Commissioner must include a notation in the notice...

77A(4) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
note: Disclosure of notice may be prohibited under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) The Integrity Commissioner may include a notation in the notice...

77A(5) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
note: Cannot include notation in notice
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

77A(6) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
description: yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
note: Must provide written statement with rights and obligations
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide written statement
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77A(6) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited

77A(7) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
note: Prohibition on disclosure of notice after investigation concludes and proceedings commence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The cancellation of a notation occurs during the commencement of an investigation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Discloses temporal relationship between notation cancellation and investigation commencement.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
premise text: (7) A notation included in the notice is cancelled by this subsection if: (a) the Integrity Commissioner concludes the investigation to which the notice relates; and (b) any criminal proceedings or civil penalty proceedings resulting from the investigation are commenced.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The cancellation of a notation results in the commencement of proceedings.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Discloses consequence of notation cancellation.
modality: CogAI
operator: then
premise text: (7) A notation included in the notice is cancelled by this subsection if: (a) the Integrity Commissioner concludes the investigation to which the notice relates; and (b) any criminal proceedings or civil penalty proceedings resulting from the investigation are commenced.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The disclosure of notice is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of notice after investigation concludes and proceedings commence.
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
premise text: (7) A notation included in the notice is cancelled by this subsection if: (a) the Integrity Commissioner concludes the investigation to which the notice relates; and (b) any criminal proceedings or civil penalty proceedings resulting from the investigation are commenced.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The cancellation of a notation occurs if an investigation is concluded and proceedings commence.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Discloses condition for notation cancellation.
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
premise text: (7) A notation included in the notice is cancelled by this subsection if: (a) the Integrity Commissioner concludes the investigation to which the notice relates; and (b) any criminal proceedings or civil penalty proceedings resulting from the investigation are commenced.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The cancellation of a notation occurs until the conclusion of an investigation.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Discloses temporal relationship between notation cancellation and investigation conclusion.
modality: LTL
operator: until
premise text: (7) A notation included in the notice is cancelled by this subsection if: (a) the Integrity Commissioner concludes the investigation to which the notice relates; and (b) any criminal proceedings or civil penalty proceedings resulting from the investigation are commenced.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77A(7) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited

77A(8) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
note: Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8
schema version: 2
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between cancellation and notification
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (8) If a notation is cancelled by subsection (7), the Integrity Commissioner must advise the person who was served with the notated notice, in writing, of the cancellation.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Knowledge representation of notification and cancellation
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
premise text: (8) If a notation is cancelled by subsection (7), the Integrity Commissioner must advise the person who was served with the notated notice, in writing, of the cancellation.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Information dissemination between notification and cancellation
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information dissemination
premise text: (8) If a notation is cancelled by subsection (7), the Integrity Commissioner must advise the person who was served with the notated notice, in writing, of the cancellation.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace between notification and cancellation
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (8) If a notation is cancelled by subsection (7), the Integrity Commissioner must advise the person who was served with the notated notice, in writing, of the cancellation.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77A(8) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited

77A(9) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
note: Prohibition on making a note about disclosure of information until notation is cancelled.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-9
schema version: 2
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (a) a notation has been included in the notice...

77B Offences of disclosure
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.47
curation status: Proposed
has part: 77B(1) Offences of disclosure
has part: 77B(2) Offences of disclosure
has part: 77B(3) Offences of disclosure
has part: 77B(4) Offences of disclosure
has part: 77B(5) Offences of disclosure
has part: 77B(6) Offences of disclosure
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77b
schema version: 2

77B(1) Offences of disclosure
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.47
note: Disclosing certain information is an offence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 77B Offences of disclosure

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Disclosing certain information is a subclass of the class of offences.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

77B(2) Offences of disclosure
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.47
note: Disclosure permitted under certain circumstances
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 77B Offences of disclosure

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits disclosure in specified situations
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

77B(3) Offences of disclosure
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.47
note: Disclosure of certain information is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 77B Offences of disclosure

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of disclosure as prohibited
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) a disclosure is made to a person about...

77B(4) Offences of disclosure
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.47
note: Disclosure of information is permitted under certain conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 77B Offences of disclosure

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permission to disclose information.
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (4) In proceedings for an offence against subsection (3), it is a defence...

77B(5) Offences of disclosure
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.47
note: Disclosure of certain information is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 77B Offences of disclosure

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (5) A person commits an offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of disclosure as prohibited
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) a disclosure is made to a person about...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: Agent
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 77B(5) Offences of disclosure

77B(6) Offences of disclosure
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.47
note: Disclosing information that could reasonably be expected to infer the existence of something is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-cogai-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 77B Offences of disclosure

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (6) A reference in this section to disclosing something's existence includes disclosing information from which a person could reasonably be expected to infer its existence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Cognitive AI application for prohibition
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
premise text: (6) A reference in this section to disclosing something's existence includes disclosing information from which a person could reasonably be expected to infer its existence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Disclosing information that could reasonably be expected to infer the existence of something.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classification of disclosure as prohibited
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: A reference in this section to disclosing something's existence includes disclosing information from which a person could reasonably be expected to infer its existence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
premise text: (6) A reference in this section to disclosing something's existence includes disclosing information from which a person could reasonably be expected to infer its existence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace for prohibition
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (6) A reference in this section to disclosing something's existence includes disclosing information from which a person could reasonably be expected to infer its existence.

78 Failure to comply with notice
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.50
curation status: Proposed
has part: 78(1) Failure to comply with notice
has part: 78(2) Failure to comply with notice
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-78
schema version: 2

78(1) Failure to comply with notice
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.50
note: Failure to comply with notice within specified time.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-78-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-78-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Failure to comply with notice

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to comply with notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-78-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(1) Failure to comply with notice

78(2) Failure to comply with notice
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.50
note: Defendant bears evidential burden to comply with notice.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-78-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 78 Failure to comply with notice

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defendant has an obligation to comply with the notice.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-78-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 78(2) Failure to comply with notice

8 Sections 75 and 76
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new provisions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 Subsection 77(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
note: Omit specific phrase from section 75 or 76 notice
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-9
schema version: 2

93 Offences—attendance at hearings etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.58
note: Offences—attendance at hearings etc.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-93-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-93
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-93-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 93 Offences—attendance at hearings etc.

94 Offences—disturbing or interrupting hearings
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.58
note: Offences—disturbing or interrupting hearings
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-94-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-94
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-94-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 94 Offences—disturbing or interrupting hearings

96A Contempt of ACLEI
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.53
curation status: Proposed
has part: 96A(1) Contempt of ACLEI
has part: 96A(2) Contempt of ACLEI
has part: 96A(3) Contempt of ACLEI
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96a
schema version: 2

96A(1) Contempt of ACLEI
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.53
note: Failure to comply with certain requirements at a hearing
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 96A Contempt of ACLEI

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of certain actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96A(1) Contempt of ACLEI

96A(2) Contempt of ACLEI
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.53
note: Refusal to answer question at a hearing does not violate contempt of ACLEI.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 96A Contempt of ACLEI

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal practitioner's privilege prevents answer disclosure.
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
premise text: (2) Subparagraph (1)(a)(iv)

96A(3) Contempt of ACLEI
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.53
note: Refusal to produce document on grounds of privileged communication
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 96A Contempt of ACLEI

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subparagraph (1)(a)(v) does not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal practitioner's obligation to produce document
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Legal practitioner has a duty to produce document

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subparagraph (1)(a)(v) does not apply
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Legal practitioner's permission to refuse production of document
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: Legal practitioner has a right to refuse production of document

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Subparagraph (1)(a)(v) does not apply
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Document can be produced at a later time
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalInterval
premise text: Legal practitioner has a duty to produce document

96B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.54
curation status: Proposed
has part: 96B(1) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
has part: 96B(2) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
has part: 96B(3) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
has part: 96B(4) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
has part: 96B(5) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
has part: 96B(6) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
has part: 96B(7) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96b
schema version: 2

96B(1) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.54
note: Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 96B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Integrity Commissioner may apply to either of the following courts...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for contempt application
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (1) If, in respect of a hearing...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Integrity Commissioner may apply to either of the following courts...
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes AI's role in contempt application
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (1) If, in respect of a hearing...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Integrity Commissioner may apply to either of the following courts...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with contempt in a hearing
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) If, in respect of a hearing...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Integrity Commissioner may apply to either of the following courts...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses responsibility for contempt application
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (1) If, in respect of a hearing...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the Integrity Commissioner may apply to either of the following courts...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace for contempt application
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
premise text: (1) If, in respect of a hearing...

96B(2) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.54
note: Integrity Commissioner must inform person before making application.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96b-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 96B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must inform
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96B(2) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt

96B(3) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
description: grounds and evidence
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.54
note: Certificate required for contempt application
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96b-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 96B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application must be accompanied by a certificate
modality: Deontic
operator: requires

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96B(3) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt

96B(4) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
description: Yes
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.54
note: Must provide a copy of the certificate to the person before or at the same time as the application is made.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96b-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 96B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the certificate to the person before or at the same time as the application is made.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96B(4) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt

96B(5) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.54
note: No obligation to provide evidence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96b-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 96B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Integrity Commissioner has an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

96B(6) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.54
note: Court may deal with person as if acts or omissions constituted contempt of court.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6
schema version: 2
part of: 96B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court to which the application was made finds that the person was in contempt of ACLEI, the court may deal with the person as if the acts or omissions involved constituted a contempt of that court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Overlaps with temporal intervals related to contempt proceedings.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (6) If, after considering the matters specified in the certificate; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of ACLEI; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of the person;

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court to which the application was made finds that the person was in contempt of ACLEI, the court may deal with the person as if the acts or omissions involved constituted a contempt of that court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognizes entities involved in contempt proceedings.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (6) If, after considering the matters specified in the certificate; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of ACLEI; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of the person;

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court to which the application was made finds that the person was in contempt of ACLEI, the court may deal with the person as if the acts or omissions involved constituted a contempt of that court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with person as if acts or omissions constituted contempt of court.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (6) If, after considering the matters specified in the certificate; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of ACLEI; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of the person;

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court to which the application was made finds that the person was in contempt of ACLEI, the court may deal with the person as if the acts or omissions involved constituted a contempt of that court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Spreads to related entities in contempt proceedings.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
premise text: (6) If, after considering the matters specified in the certificate; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of ACLEI; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of the person;

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the court to which the application was made finds that the person was in contempt of ACLEI, the court may deal with the person as if the acts or omissions involved constituted a contempt of that court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Repeats in temporal intervals related to contempt proceedings.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (6) If, after considering the matters specified in the certificate; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of ACLEI; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of the person;

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96B(6) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt

96B(7) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.54
note: Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96b-ss-7
schema version: 2
part of: 96B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with contempt
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

96C Conduct of contempt proceedings
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 96C(1) Conduct of contempt proceedings
has part: 96C(2) Conduct of contempt proceedings
has part: 96C(3) Conduct of contempt proceedings
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96c
schema version: 2

96C(1) Conduct of contempt proceedings
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
note: Application of section to Federal Court or Supreme Court proceedings
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96c-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 96C Conduct of contempt proceedings

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Section applies to specified courts
modality: Deontic
operator: applies

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96C(1) Conduct of contempt proceedings

96C(2) Conduct of contempt proceedings
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
note: Proceedings must be conducted in accordance with the laws that apply to punishing contempt of court.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 96C Conduct of contempt proceedings

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval for proceedings
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
premise text: (2) Proceedings in relation to the application are, subject to this Act, to be instituted, carried on, heard and determined in accordance with the laws (including any Rules of Court) that apply in relation to the punishment of a contempt of the court to which the application was made.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Inference for proceedings
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
premise text: (2) Proceedings in relation to the application are, subject to this Act, to be instituted, carried on, heard and determined in accordance with the laws (including any Rules of Court) that apply in relation to the punishment of a contempt of the court to which the application was made.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of proceedings
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (2) Proceedings in relation to the application are, subject to this Act, to be instituted, carried on, heard and determined in accordance with the laws (including any Rules of Court) that apply in relation to the punishment of a contempt of the court to which the application was made.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal trace for proceedings
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
premise text: (2) Proceedings in relation to the application are, subject to this Act, to be instituted, carried on, heard and determined in accordance with the laws (including any Rules of Court) that apply in relation to the punishment of a contempt of the court to which the application was made.

96C(3) Conduct of contempt proceedings
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
note: Certificate is prima facie evidence in contempt proceedings
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96c-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 96C Conduct of contempt proceedings

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Prima facie evidence
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Certificate is presented as evidence

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96C(3) Conduct of contempt proceedings

96D Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
curation status: Proposed
has part: 96D(1) Person in contempt may be detained
has part: 96D(2) Person in contempt may be detained
has part: 96D(3) Person in contempt may be detained
has part: 96D(4) Person in contempt may be detained
has part: 96D(5) Person in contempt may be detained
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96d
schema version: 2

96D(1) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
note: Detain person for bringing before court
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 96D Person in contempt may be detained

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Integrity Commissioner may, during the hearing concerned, direct a constable or an authorised officer to detain the person for the purpose of bringing the person before the relevant court for the hearing of the application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes temporal relationship between detention and court hearing
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: (1) If the Integrity Commissioner proposes to make an application under subsection 96B(1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Integrity Commissioner may, during the hearing concerned, direct a constable or an authorised officer to detain the person for the purpose of bringing the person before the relevant court for the hearing of the application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Provides justification for detention as part of court process
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
premise text: (1) If the Integrity Commissioner proposes to make an application under subsection 96B(1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Integrity Commissioner may, during the hearing concerned, direct a constable or an authorised officer to detain the person for the purpose of bringing the person before the relevant court for the hearing of the application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits detention without court hearing
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (1) If the Integrity Commissioner proposes to make an application under subsection 96B(1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Integrity Commissioner may, during the hearing concerned, direct a constable or an authorised officer to detain the person for the purpose of bringing the person before the relevant court for the hearing of the application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffuses responsibility between Integrity Commissioner and law enforcement
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (1) If the Integrity Commissioner proposes to make an application under subsection 96B(1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the Integrity Commissioner may, during the hearing concerned, direct a constable or an authorised officer to detain the person for the purpose of bringing the person before the relevant court for the hearing of the application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace between detention and court hearing
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: (1) If the Integrity Commissioner proposes to make an application under subsection 96B(1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96D(1) Person in contempt may be detained

96D(2) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
note: Person in contempt must be brought before the court as soon as practicable.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96d-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 96D Person in contempt may be detained

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to bring person before court
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96D(2) Person in contempt may be detained

96D(3) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
note: Court may direct person to appear before court in relation to application.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96d-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 96D Person in contempt may be detained

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court must direct person to appear before court.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96D(3) Person in contempt may be detained

96D(4) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
note: The court may impose conditions on the release of a person in contempt.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96d-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 96D Person in contempt may be detained

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must surrender their passport.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The court imposes conditions on the release.
modality: Deontic
operator: impose
premise text: The court may also impose any other condition...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96D(4) Person in contempt may be detained

96D(5) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
note: Court may vary or revoke a condition imposed under subsection (4)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96d-ss-5
schema version: 2
part of: 96D Person in contempt may be detained

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may vary or revoke a condition
modality: Deontic
operator: may

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96D(5) Person in contempt may be detained

96E Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.57
curation status: Proposed
has part: 96E(1) Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application
has part: 96E(2) Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96e
schema version: 2

96E(1) Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.57
note: Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application at any time.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96e-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 96E Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: May withdraw contempt application
modality: Deontic
operator: may

96E(2) Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.57
note: Person must be released from detention immediately if Integrity Commissioner withdraws contempt application and person is in detention under section 96D.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 96E Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must be released from detention immediately.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval during which person must be released from detention
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
premise text: (2) If: (a) the Integrity Commissioner does so; and (b) the person to whom the application relates is in detention under section 96D;

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must be released from detention immediately.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Classification of persons subject to contempt application withdrawal by Integrity Commissioner
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
premise text: (2) If: (a) the Integrity Commissioner does so; and (b) the person to whom the application relates is in detention under section 96D;

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must be released from detention immediately.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
premise text: (2) If the Integrity Commissioner does so; and (b) the person to whom the application relates is in detention under section 96D;

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must be released from detention immediately.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Conditional obligation based on Integrity Commissioner's action and person's detention status
modality: Diffusion
operator: If-then
premise text: (2) If: (a) the Integrity Commissioner does so; and (b) the person to whom the application relates is in detention under section 96D;

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person must be released from detention immediately.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Temporal interval until which person must not be detained
modality: LTL
operator: Until
premise text: (2) If: (a) the Integrity Commissioner does so; and (b) the person to whom the application relates is in detention under section 96D;

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96E(2) Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application

96F Double jeopardy
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.57
curation status: Proposed
has part: 96F(1) Double jeopardy
has part: 96F(2) Double jeopardy
has part: 96F(3) Double jeopardy
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96f
schema version: 2

96F(1) Double jeopardy
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.57
note: No double jeopardy for acts/offenses under this Act or a State law.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 96F Double jeopardy

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal overlap between offenses
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (1) If an act or omission by a person is an offence against this Act and is also an offence against a law of a State, the person may be prosecuted and convicted under this Act or under that law of that State in respect of the act or omission...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
logic summary: Implication of double jeopardy
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
premise text: (1) If an act or omission by a person is an offence against this Act and is also an offence against a law of a State, the person may be prosecuted and convicted under this Act or under that law of that State in respect of the act or omission...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No double jeopardy
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: (1) If an act or omission by a person is an offence against this Act and is also an offence against a law of a State, the person may be prosecuted and convicted under this Act or under that law of that State in respect of the act or omission...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: No double jeopardy obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: (1) If an act or omission by a person is an offence against this Act and is also an offence against a law of a State, the person may be prosecuted and convicted under this Act or under that law of that State in respect of the act or omission...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Repeating offenses
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (1) If an act or omission by a person is an offence against this Act and is also an offence against a law of a State, the person may be prosecuted and convicted under this Act or under that law of that State in respect of the act or omission...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96F(1) Double jeopardy

96F(2) Double jeopardy
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.57
note: No prosecution for an offence in respect of an act or omission if dealt with by the court under subsection 96B(1).
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 96F Double jeopardy

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is dealt with by the court under that section in respect of the act or omission
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: The provision overlaps with the application of subsection 96B(1).
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (a) an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 96B(1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence in respect of that act or omission
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If dealt with by the court, then no prosecution.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (a) an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 96B(1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence in respect of that act or omission
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: If dealt with by the court, then no prosecution.
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
premise text: (b) the person is dealt with by the court under that section in respect of the act or omission

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence in respect of that act or omission
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: The provision repeats the application of subsection 96B(1).
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
premise text: (b) the person is dealt with by the court under that section in respect of the act or omission

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96F(2) Double jeopardy

96F(3) Double jeopardy
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.57
note: No application can be made under subsection 96B(1) in respect of the act or omission.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-4-sec-96f-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 96F Double jeopardy

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 96F(3) Double jeopardy

0 Section 0
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-0-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-0
schema version: 2

0 Section 0
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-0-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-0-2
schema version: 2

0 Section 0
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-0-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-0-3
schema version: 2

0 Section 0
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-0-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-0-4
schema version: 2

0 Section 0
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-0-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-0-5
schema version: 2

0 Section 0
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
note: Section number
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-0-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-0-6
schema version: 2

0 Section 0
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-0-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-0-7
schema version: 2

1 Subsection 314.1(1) of the Criminal Code (after table item 1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
note: Prohibition on Benzylpiperazine (BZP)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-1-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-1-2
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
note: Section 1 obligation
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-1-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-1-3
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-1-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-1-4
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
note: Schedule for drugs, plants and precursors
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-1-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-1-5
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of Benzylpiperazine (BZP)
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

10 Subsection 314.4(1) of the Criminal Code (table item 99)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
note: Repeal item
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-10
schema version: 2

11 Subsection 314.4(1) of the Criminal Code (after table
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
note: Prohibition on 4-Methylmethcathinone (4-MMC)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-11
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the possession, sale, or importation of 4-MMC
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

12 Subsection 314.6(1) of the Criminal Code (table item 10)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
note: Repeal Phenylpropanolamine
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-12
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on Phenylpropanolamine
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

13 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.65
note: Defines 'border controlled precursor' for the purpose of the Criminal Code.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-13
schema version: 2

14 Subsection 183UA(1) (definition of special forfeited
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.65
note: Definition of special forfeited goods
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-14
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the term 'special forfeited goods'
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Substitutes a new definition for special forfeited goods
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 14 Subsection 183UA(1) (definition of special forfeited

15 Subsection 183UA(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.65
note: Omit 'or (n)', substitute ', (n) or (na)'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-15
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of omission
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Subsection 314.1(1) of the Criminal Code (after table item 7)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
note: Ketamine is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-2-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Ketamine is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: =

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-2-3
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-2-4
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-2-5
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-2-6
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-2-7
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-2-8
schema version: 2

250 Section 250
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-250-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-250
schema version: 2

250 Section 250
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-250-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-250-2
schema version: 2

250 Section 250
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-250-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-250-3
schema version: 2

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Subsection 314.1(1) of the Criminal Code (after table item 9)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
note: Methcathinone is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-3-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits methcathinone.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-3-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-3-3
schema version: 2

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
note: Section 3, page 64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-3-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-3-4
schema version: 2

4 Subsection 314.1(1) of the Criminal Code (after table
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
note: Prohibition of 4-Methylmethcathinone
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-4
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the production, possession, or use of 4-Methylmethcathinone
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

400 Section 400
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-400-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-400
schema version: 2

5 Subsection 314.3(1) of the Criminal Code (after table item 8)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
note: Phenylpropanolamine is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-5
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Phenylpropanolamine is prohibited.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: =

500 Section 500
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-500-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-500
schema version: 2

6 Subsection 314.4(1) of the Criminal Code (after table
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
note: Benzylpiperazine (BZP) is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-6
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of Benzylpiperazine (BZP)
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

7 Subsection 314.4(1) of the Criminal Code (after table
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
note: Ketamine is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-7
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits the use of ketamine.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

8 Subsection 314.4(1) of the Criminal Code (after table
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
note: Methamphetamine is prohibited.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-8
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits methamphetamine.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

9 Subsection 314.4(1) of the Criminal Code (table item 95)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
note: Repeal of methcathinone item in the Criminal Code
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-5-sec-9
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on methcathinone
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

1 Subsection 16A(1AB)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.66
note: Repeal subsection
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-1
schema version: 2

10 Section 338 (paragraph (a) of the definition of authorised
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.68
note: Authorise AFP member or employee to perform certain functions
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-10
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Grant permission
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit

11 Application—publication prohibitions relating to
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.70
note: Amendments apply in relation to applications made on or after commencement for restraining and freezing orders.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-11
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commencement before or after application.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal relation between commencement and application.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Amendments apply in relation to applications made on or after the commencement of those items.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Duty to comply with amended provisions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application of amendments to restrain conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Amendments apply in relation to applications made on or after commencement.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Duty to comply with amended provisions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application of amendments to freeze conduct.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: The amendment of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 made by item 7 of this Schedule applies in relation to an application made on or after the commencement of that item.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Application before or after amendment.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace between applications and amendments.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
premise text: Amendments apply in relation to applications made on or after commencement.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 11 Application—publication prohibitions relating to

15FA Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.67
curation status: Proposed
has part: 15FA(1) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
has part: 15FA(2) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
has part: 15FA(3) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
has part: 15FA(4) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15fa
schema version: 2

15FA(1) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.67
note: Prohibition on publication of evidence—proceedings for
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 15FA Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits publication of evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

15FA(2) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.67
note: Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-diffusion-6
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 15FA Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Restricts publication within a specific time frame
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Restriction
premise text: (2) If it appears to the magistrate to be necessary in order to prevent prejudice to the administration of justice,

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits publication of evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies matters to be restricted from publication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (a) if the application is made under section 15C (in person)—the matters referred to in that section that are contained in an affidavit made in support of the application;

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies matters to be restricted from publication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
premise text: (b) if the application is made under section 15D (by telephone or other electronic means)—the matters referred to in paragraph 15D(2)(a) that are contained, or that are to be contained, in an affidavit made in support of the application.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-diffusion-6
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Limits dissemination of information
modality: Diffusion
operator: Limit
premise text: (2) If it appears to the magistrate to be necessary in order to prevent prejudice to the administration of justice,

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Restricts publication of evidence
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Restrict
premise text: (2) If it appears to the magistrate to be necessary in order to prevent prejudice to the administration of justice,

15FA(3) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.67
note: Magistrate may make order at any time after application is made and before it is determined.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 15FA Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits publication of evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition

15FA(4) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.67
note: Prohibition on publication of evidence—proceedings for
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 15FA Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The power to publish evidence is prohibited.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits publication of evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) The power conferred by subsection (2) is in addition to, and is not taken to derogate from, any other power of the magistrate.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The power to publish evidence is prohibited in proceedings.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits publication of evidence—proceedings for
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) The power conferred by subsection (2) is in addition to, and is not taken to derogate from, any other power of the magistrate.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The power to publish evidence implies a prohibition in proceedings.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Implies prohibition on publication of evidence—proceedings for
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
premise text: (4) The power conferred by subsection (2) is in addition to, and is not taken to derogate from, any other power of the magistrate.

2 At the end of subsection 16A(1B)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.66
note: Court must make an order corresponding to a restraining order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A court must make an order corresponding to the order mentioned in this subsection within a certain time frame.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval between applying for a restraining order and making an order
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
premise text: The Director (or the Commissioner for the Australian Federal Police) applies for a restraining order.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The court recognizes the Director's application and makes an order corresponding to it.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Recognition of Director's application by the court
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNIZES
premise text: The Director (or the Commissioner for the Australian Federal Police) applies for a restraining order.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A court must make an order corresponding to the order mentioned in this subsection.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to make an order
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The Director (or the Commissioner for the Australian Federal Police) applies for a restraining order.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The obligation to make an order corresponding to the order mentioned in this subsection spreads to the court.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of obligations from Director to court
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
premise text: The Director (or the Commissioner for the Australian Federal Police) applies for a restraining order.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A court must make an order corresponding to the order mentioned in this subsection repeatedly.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Recurring trace of making orders under section 28A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
premise text: The Director (or the Commissioner for the Australian Federal Police) applies for a restraining order.

28A Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.68
curation status: Proposed
has part: 28A(1) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
has part: 28A(2) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
has part: 28A(3) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
has part: 28A(4) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-28a
schema version: 2

28A(1) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.68
note: Court may make order under subsection (2) if a proceeding of crime authority applies for restraining order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-28a-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 28A Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may prohibit publication of evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

28A(2) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.68
note: Court may prohibit or restrict publication of certain evidence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-28a-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 28A Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Publication is prohibited
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court prohibits publication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Court may make an order

28A(3) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.68
note: Court may make an order at any time after application is made and before it is determined.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 28A Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Excerpt describes a temporal interval of 'any time' after application is made.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
premise text: (3) The court may make an order under subsection (2) at any time after the application is made and before it is determined.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
logic summary: Excerpt describes a process of recognizing court orders.
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
premise text: (3) The court may make an order under subsection (2) at any time after the application is made and before it is determined.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (3) The court may make an order under subsection (2) at any time after the application is made and before it is determined.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Court may prohibit publication of evidence.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (3) The court may make an order under subsection (2) at any time after the application is made and before it is determined.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
logic summary: Excerpt describes a process of diffusion of information about court orders.
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
premise text: (3) The court may make an order under subsection (2) at any time after the application is made and before it is determined.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Excerpt describes a recurring trace of court orders.
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
premise text: (3) The court may make an order under subsection (2) at any time after the application is made and before it is determined.

28A(4) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.68
note: Prohibition on publication of evidence—proceedings for
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-28a-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 28A Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: (4) The power conferred by subsection (2) is not taken to derogate from any other power of the court.
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits publication of evidence
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: (4) The power conferred by subsection (2) is in addition to, and is not taken to derogate from, any other power of the court.

3 Subsection 16A(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.66
note: Omit ‘, (1AB)’ from the text.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-3
schema version: 2

4 Subsection 15B(1) (note 1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.66
note: Repeal note and substitute definition of authorised officer
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-deontic-5
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-4
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitution of new definition of authorised officer in section 338
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between repeal of note and substitution of new definition
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Repeal the note, substitute: Note 1:

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Note 1: Paragraphs (a), (aa), (b) and (c) of the definition of authorised officer in section 338
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibit certain persons from performing functions under the Act
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
premise text: Paragraphs (a), (aa), (b) and (c) of the definition of authorised officer in section 338

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: New definition of authorised officer in section 338
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes obligation on certain persons to comply with new definition of authorised officer
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
premise text: Note 1: Paragraphs (a), (aa), (b) and (c) of the definition of authorised officer in section 338

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Note 1: Paragraphs (a), (aa), (b) and (c) of the definition of authorised officer in section 338
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Permits repeal of note and substitution of new definition
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
premise text: Repeal the note, substitute:

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Substitution of new definition of authorised officer in section 338
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between repeal of note and substitution of new definition
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal relation
premise text: Repeal the note, substitute: Note 1:

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Subsection 15B(1) (note 1)

5 Section 15C (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.66
note: Repeal note and substitute definition of authorised officer
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-5
schema version: 2

6 Subsection 15D(1) (note)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.67
note: Repeal note and substitute definition of authorised officer
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-6
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 Subsection 15D(1) (note)

7 After section 15F
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.67
note: Insert clause
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-7
schema version: 2

8 At the end of subsection 15P(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.67
note: Adds certain persons performing functions under Schedule 6 to the definition of authorised officer
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 At the end of Division 2 of Part 2-1
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-6-sec-9
schema version: 2

1 Subsection 16(1) (definition of licence period)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.71
note: Defines licence period for a person released on licence for a federal sentence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-1
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the term 'licence period'
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Substitutes a new definition for 'licence period'
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 1 Subsection 16(1) (definition of licence period)

10 Paragraph 19AP(7)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.76
note: Omit specific phrase from subsection (6)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-10
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specific phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

11 Subsection 19AP(8)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.76
note: Prohibit varying or revoking a condition of the licence, imposing additional conditions on the licence, and changing the day on which the supervision period ends.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-11
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition of actions
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

12 Application of amendments
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.76
note: Amendments apply in relation to a licence granted under section 19AP of the amended law at or after commencement.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-logic-ltl-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-12
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The commencement is related to the application of amendments by an interval of [insert duration].
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the commencement and the application of amendments.
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text states that the amendments apply in relation to a licence granted under section 19AP of the amended law at or after commencement.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amendments apply in relation to a licence granted under section 19AP of the amended law at or after commencement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Classifies a provision as an Undertaking
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text describes the application of amendments in relation to a licence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The amendments apply in relation to a licence granted under section 19AP of the amended law at or after commencement.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Classifies a provision as an Undertaking
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text describes the application of amendments in relation to a licence.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The parole order is related to the release of a federal offender by an interval of [insert duration].
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the parole order and the release of a federal offender.
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
premise text: The text states that the Attorney-General will be required to reconsider making a parole order for the person within 12 months of the commencement.

19AL Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.72
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AL(1) Release on parole—making of parole order
has part: 19AL(2) Release on parole—making of parole order
has part: 19AL(3) Release on parole—making of parole order
has part: 19AL(4) Release on parole—making of parole order
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-19al
schema version: 2

19AL(1) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.72
note: The Attorney-General must make a parole order before the end of a non-parole period.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-19al-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: The Attorney-General must make a parole order.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AL(1) Release on parole—making of parole order

19AL(2) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
description: written notice with reasons for refusal
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.72
note: Notice to be given to person refused parole order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-19al-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: written notice with reasons for refusal
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Attorney-General must give notice
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Notice includes statement of reasons
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class

19AL(3) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.72
note: Parole order must be in writing and specify supervision conditions.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-19al-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Parole order must be in writing.
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AL(3) Release on parole—making of parole order

19AL(4) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.72
note: Exemption from parole order requirement for certain federal sentences
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4
schema version: 2
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Specifies temporal overlap between federal and State/ Territory sentences
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
premise text: (b) for a federal sentence, or federal sentences, that include a life sentence—until the release of the person from prison for the State or Territory offence (but a decision may be made under that subsection at any time during the 3 month period before the person’s expected release);

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows making of parole order despite requirement to refuse
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (4) Despite subsection (1)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows making of parole order despite requirement to refuse for life sentence cases
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (c) in any case—if the State or Territory sentence is a life sentence for which a non-parole period has not been fixed.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Allows decision-making under subsection (1) during specified time period
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
premise text: (but a decision may be made under that subsection at any time during the 3 month period before the person’s expected release);

19AM Release on parole—when is a person released
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.74
curation status: Proposed
has part: 19AM(1) Release on parole—when is a person released
has part: 19AM(2) Release on parole—when is a person released
has part: 19AM(3) Release on parole—when is a person released
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-19am
schema version: 2

19AM(1) Release on parole—when is a person released
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.74
note: A person must be released from prison on parole in accordance with a parole order. Parole period starts and ends according to subsections (2) and (3)
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1
schema version: 2
part of: 19AM Release on parole—when is a person released

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must be released on parole
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Parole period starts
modality: Deontic
operator: starts
premise text: (2)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Parole period ends
modality: Deontic
operator: ends
premise text: (3)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AM(1) Release on parole—when is a person released

19AM(2) Release on parole—when is a person released
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.74
note: A person must certify acceptance of parole conditions. A person must be released from prison on parole if they are eligible for release under subsection (1) but were imprisoned for a State or Territory offence on the day of eligibility.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2
schema version: 2
part of: 19AM Release on parole—when is a person released

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person must be released from prison on parole in accordance with the parole order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Release on parole occurs after imprisonment for a State or Territory offence
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
premise text: (2) However, if the person is imprisoned for a State or Territory offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The person must certify acceptance of parole conditions.
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide certification
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: The person certifies on the parole order (or a copy of the order) that he or she accepts the conditions to which the order is subject.

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person must be released from prison on parole in accordance with the parole order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Must provide release on parole
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
premise text: (2) However, if the person is imprisoned for a State or Territory offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: ...the person must be released from prison on parole in accordance with the parole order...
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::linear
logic summary: Release on parole implies compliance with parole order
modality: LinearLogic
operator: =>
premise text: (2) However, if the person is imprisoned for a State or Territory offence...

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AM(2) Release on parole—when is a person released

19AM(3) Release on parole—when is a person released
type: Concept
description: Certification of acceptance of conditions
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.74
note: A person must not be released from prison on parole unless they certify acceptance of the conditions. Release on parole—when is a person released
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-19am-ss-3
schema version: 2
part of: 19AM Release on parole—when is a person released

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 19AM(3) Release on parole—when is a person released

2 Subsection 16(1) (definition of parole order)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.71
note: Defines parole order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 2 Subsection 16(1) (definition of parole order)

3 Subsection 16(1) (definition of parole period)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.71
note: Defines parole period for a person with a parole order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines a term
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Subsection 16(1) (definition of parole period)

4 Subsection 16(1) (definition of released on parole)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.72
note: Substitute definition of parole order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-4
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Definition substitution
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution

5 Subsection 16(1) (definition of supervision period)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.72
note: Defines supervision period for a person released on parole or licence.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-5
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Defines the term 'supervision period'
modality: Deontic
operator: defines

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Substitutes a new definition for 'supervision period'
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 5 Subsection 16(1) (definition of supervision period)

6 Sections 19AL and 19AM
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.72
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new ones.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-6
schema version: 2

7 Paragraph 19AN(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.75
note: Omit specific phrase from parole order
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-7
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: The phrase must not be omitted
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
premise text: Omitting the phrase would be incorrect

8 Subsection 19AN(2)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.76
note: Prohibit modifying certain conditions of a parole order.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-8
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid

9 Paragraph 19AP(6)(b)
type: Concept
description: Supervision period end day
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.76
note: Specify supervision conditions for released persons.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-7-sec-9
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Specify conditions for released persons.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 9 Paragraph 19AP(6)(b)

1 Paragraph 15A(1)(b)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.78
note: Insertion of '(if any)' after 'the modifications'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-1
schema version: 2

2 Paragraphs 15A(1AB)(a), (b), (c) and (d)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.78
note: Repeal paragraphs
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-2
schema version: 2

3 Paragraph 15A(1AB)(g)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.78
note: Omit specified words.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified words.
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit

4 Before subsection 15A(1AD)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.78
note: Enforcement of penalty without court application
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-4
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposing obligation on state
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 4 Before subsection 15A(1AD)

5 Application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.78
note: Amendment applies in relation to orders made before, on or after commencement.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-5
schema version: 2

6 Pending applications to court
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.78
note: Application withdrawal on commencement
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-6
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Application withdrawal on commencement
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class hierarchy
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 6 Pending applications to court

7 Authority for past actions taken to enforce fines etc.
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.79
note: Authority for past actions taken to enforce fines etc.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-8-sec-7
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Person or authority had the power to take action
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
premise text: (2)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Definition of old law
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: isDefinedBy
premise text: (3)

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 7 Authority for past actions taken to enforce fines etc.

1 Short title
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
note: Citation of the Act
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-1-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-1
schema version: 2

1 Section 1
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement of the Act
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-1-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Commencement on day of Royal Assent
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Temporal commencement

1 Subsection 175(3)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.80
note: Substitute '7 years' for '5 years'
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-1-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-1-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

10 Section 10
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 6 items 1, 2 and 3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-10
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for commencement
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Conditional commencement

11 Section 11
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-11
schema version: 2

12 Section 12
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 6 item 9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-12-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-12
schema version: 2

13 Section 13
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-13-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-13
schema version: 2

14 Section 14
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-14-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-14
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-14-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during

15 Section 15
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
note: Commencement of Schedule 8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-15-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-15
schema version: 2

16 Section 16
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
note: Commencement of Schedule 9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-16
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Indicates commencement
modality: Deontic
operator: begins

2 Commencement
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement rules
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-2
schema version: 2

2 Section 2
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-2-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-2-2
schema version: 2

2 Application
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.80
note: Amendment applies to persons appointed or re-appointed as Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner before, on, or after commencement.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-2-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-2-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-2-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-2-3
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-2-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Obligation to apply amendment to specified persons.
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-2-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::dl
logic summary: Class inclusion: Amendment applies to persons appointed or re-appointed as Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner.
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion

22 Sept
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.84
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-22-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-22
schema version: 2

25 June 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
note: Commencement details
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-25-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-25-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-25
schema version: 2

25 June 2012 (s 2(1) item
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.84
note: Does not commence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-25-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-25-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative obligation
modality: Deontic
operator: not

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-25-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: Undertaking
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between commencement and Royal Assent
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: Commencement on day after end of period

3 Section 3
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
note: Schedule 1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-3
schema version: 2

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
note: Amendments to Acts specified in a Schedule
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-3-2
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to amend Acts in a Schedule
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-3-2-norm
type: Obligation
scope note: borne by: State
curation status: Proposed
modality: Deontic
borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
part of: 3 Schedule(s)

4 April 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-4
schema version: 2

4 October 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-4-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-4-2
schema version: 2

4 Section 4
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-4-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-4-3
schema version: 2

4 April 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-4-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-4-4
schema version: 2

4 October 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-4-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-4-5
schema version: 2

4 April 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
note: Note on table limitations
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-4-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-4-6
schema version: 2

4 Apr 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.84
note: List of schedules and items
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-4-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-4-7
schema version: 2

5 April 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-5
schema version: 2

5 April 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-10-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-10
schema version: 2

5 Apr 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.84
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-11-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-11
schema version: 2

5 April 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-2
schema version: 2

5 Section 5
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-3-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-3
schema version: 2

5 April 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-4-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-4
schema version: 2

5 April 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-5
schema version: 2

5 April 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-6-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-6
schema version: 2

5 April 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-7-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-7
schema version: 2

5 April 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
note: Provision does not commence if event mentioned in paragraph (b) does not occur.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-8-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-8
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable

5 April 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-9-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-9
schema version: 2

6 Section 6
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-6
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A specific point in time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.

7 Section 7
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-7
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
conclusion text: A specific point in time
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
logic summary: Defines temporal interval
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
premise text: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.

8 Section 8
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
note: Commencement of Schedule 5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-8-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-8
schema version: 2

9 Section 9
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
note: Does not commence
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sch-9-sec-9
schema version: 2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
logic summary: Negative assertion of commencement
modality: Deontic
operator: not

5 April 2012
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.1
note: Compilation of amendments
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sec-5-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5
schema version: 2

5 April 2012 (the compilation date).
type: Concept
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.2
note: Information about amending laws and amendment history.
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sec-5-2-norm
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
realized by: sec-5-2
schema version: 2

Crimes Legislation Amendment (Powers and Offences) Act 2012
type: Document
date: 5 April 2012
description: An Act to amend various Acts relating to the enforcement of the criminal law, and for other purposes
identifier: No. 24 of 2012
curation status: Proposed
proposed by: legis2cml
category: AU