Crimes Legislation Amendment (Powers and Offences) Act 2012
type: Document
category: AU
identifier: No. 24 of 2012
date: 5 April 2012
description: An Act to amend various Acts relating to the enforcement of the criminal law, and for other purposes
proposed by: legis2cml
curation status: Proposed

5 April 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5
note: Compilation of amendments
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sec-5-norm

5 April 2012 (the compilation date).
type: Concept
realized by: sec-5-2
note: Information about amending laws and amendment history.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sec-5-2-norm

1 Short title
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-1
note: Citation of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-1-norm

2 Commencement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-2
note: Commencement rules
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-2-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-1-2
note: Commencement of the Act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-1-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-1-2-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval
premise text: Temporal commencement
conclusion text: Commencement on day of Royal Assent
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 April 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-4-norm

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-2-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-2-2-norm

5 April 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-norm

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-3
note: Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-3-norm

4 October 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-4-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-4-2-norm

4 Section 4
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-4-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-4-3-norm

5 April 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-2-norm

5 Section 5
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-3-norm

25 June 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-25
note: Commencement details
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-25-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-25-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-25-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between commencement and Royal Assent
premise text: Commencement on day after end of period
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Section 6
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-6
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal interval
premise text: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: A specific point in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 April 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-4-norm

7 Section 7
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-7
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Defines temporal interval
premise text: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
conclusion text: A specific point in time
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 April 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-5-norm

8 Section 8
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-8
note: Commencement of Schedule 5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-8-norm

4 April 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-4-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-4-4-norm

9 Section 9
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-9
note: Does not commence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative assertion of commencement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Section 10
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-10
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 6 items 1, 2 and 3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires relation between identifiable temporal intervals for commencement
premise text: Conditional commencement
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 April 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-6-norm

11 Section 11
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-11
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-11-norm

5 April 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-7-norm

12 Section 12
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-12
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 6 item 9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-12-norm

5 April 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-8
note: Provision does not commence if event mentioned in paragraph (b) does not occur.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.6
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-8-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-8-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Section 13
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-13
note: The day after this Act receives the Royal Assent.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-13-norm

5 April 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-9-norm

14 Section 14
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-14
note: Conditional commencement of provisions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-14-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-14-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 October 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-4-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-4-5-norm

15 Section 15
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-15
note: Commencement of Schedule 8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-15-norm

5 April 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-10-norm

16 Section 16
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-16
note: Commencement of Schedule 9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: begins
logic summary: Indicates commencement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 April 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-4-6
note: Note on table limitations
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-4-6-norm

3 Schedule(s)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-3-2
note: Amendments to Acts specified in a Schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.7
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-3-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Schedule(s)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the State to amend Acts in a Schedule
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-1
note: Definition of accredited laboratory
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 23WA(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of Commissioner)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-2
note: Definition of Commissioner
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of Commissioner)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of informed consent)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-3
note: Substitute sections for section 23WF
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: substitution
logic summary: Replace section with new sections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-4
note: Prohibit finger prick method in intimate forensic procedure definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of finger prick method
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 23WA(1) (paragraph (c) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-5
note: Repeal paragraph of intimate forensic procedure definition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-5-norm

6 Subsection 23WA(1) (after paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-6
note: Forensic procedures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.8
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-6-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Subsection 23WA(1) (after paragraph (a) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

7 Subsection 23WA(1) (definition of senior constable)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-7
note: Repeal definition of senior constable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-7-norm

8 Subsection 23WA(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-8
note: Defines senior police officer rank
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-8-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-8-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 8 Subsection 23WA(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

9 Section 23WC (table item 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-9
note: Omit 'senior constable', substitute 'senior police officer'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-9-norm

10 Paragraph 23WG(3)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-10
note: Substitute senior police officer for senior constable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-10-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 Paragraph 23WG(3)(c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Paragraph 23WJ(3)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-11
note: Omit 'constable', substitute 'senior police officer'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-11-norm

12 Division 4 of Part ID (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-12
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-12-norm

13 Section 23WM (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-13
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-13-norm

23WM Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23wm
note: Permits non-intimate forensic procedure by senior police officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wm-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wm-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WM Non-intimate forensic procedure may be carried out by
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

14 Subsection 23WM(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-14
note: Omit 'senior constable', substitute 'senior police officer'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-14-norm

15 Section 23WN (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-15
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new schedule
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.9
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-15-norm

23WN Circumstances in which senior police officer may order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23wn
note: Senior police officer may order non-intimate forensic procedures under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23WN Circumstances in which senior police officer may order
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission to order non-intimate forensic procedures
premise text: Senior police officer has authority to order procedures
conclusion text: Ordering non-intimate forensic procedures is permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: under certain circumstances
logic summary: Temporal conditions for ordering procedures
premise text: Ordering non-intimate forensic procedures is permitted under certain circumstances
conclusion text: Ordering non-intimate forensic procedures is permitted under certain circumstances
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: may order
logic summary: Authority for ordering procedures
premise text: Senior police officer may order non-intimate forensic procedures
conclusion text: Senior police officer has authority to order non-intimate forensic procedures
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: non-intimate forensic procedures
logic summary: Scope of ordering procedures
premise text: Ordering non-intimate forensic procedures is permitted under certain circumstances
conclusion text: Non-intimate forensic procedures are within scope of ordering authority
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wn-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: non-intimate forensic procedures
logic summary: Scope of ordering procedures
premise text: Ordering non-intimate forensic procedures is permitted under certain circumstances
conclusion text: Non-intimate forensic procedures are within scope of ordering authority
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

16 Section 23WN
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-16
note: Omit 'senior constable' and substitute 'senior police officer'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-16-norm

17 Section 23WO (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-17
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-17-norm

23WO Matters to be considered by senior police officer before
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23wo
note: Matters to be considered by senior police officer before ordering forensic procedure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wo-norm

18 Section 23WO
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-18
note: Omit 'senior constable' and substitute 'senior police officer'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-18-norm

19 Section 23WP (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-19
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-19-norm

23WP Record of senior police officer’s order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23wp
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23wp-norm

20 Subsections 23WP(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-20
note: Substitute senior police officer for senior constable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-20-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-20-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 20 Subsections 23WP(1) and (2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

21 Paragraphs 23WR(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-21
note: Insert '(whether or not consent has been sought)' after 'procedure'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-21-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 Paragraphs 23WR(a) and (b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of text
premise text: Text to be inserted
conclusion text: Obligation to insert text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Paragraph 23XL(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-22
note: Substitute the least painful technique known and available to the person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-22-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 Paragraph 23XL(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Section 23XM (table item 2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23
note: Insertion of '(other than by a finger prick)' after 'blood'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.10
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion of '(other than by a finger prick)' after 'blood'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Section 23XM (table item 3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-24
note: Repeal a specific item.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-24-norm

25 Section 23XM (after table item 9)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-25
note: List of individuals authorized to take blood or saliva samples
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-25-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-25-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows specified individuals to perform medical procedures
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

26 Subsection 23XN(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-26
note: Omit specified words from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-26-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-26-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of specified words.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Section 23XU
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-27
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-27-norm

23XU Samples—sufficient material to share
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23xu
has part: 23XU(1) Samples—sufficient material to share
has part: 23XU(2) Samples—sufficient material to share
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.11

23XU(1) Samples—sufficient material to share
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1
part of: 23XU Samples—sufficient material to share
note: Sharing of sample material with suspect
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XU(1) Samples—sufficient material to share
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission to share sample material
premise text: (a) a sample is taken from a suspect under this Part; and (b) the suspect requests the investigating constable that the sample be shared;
conclusion text: There is sufficient material to be analysed both in the investigation of the offence and on behalf of the suspect.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Temporal overlap between request and analysis
premise text: (c) there is sufficient material to be analysed both in the investigation of the offence and on behalf of the suspect.
conclusion text: The sample material overlaps with the analysis period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal condition for sharing sample material
premise text: (c) there is sufficient material to be analysed both in the investigation of the offence and on behalf of the suspect.
conclusion text: The analysis period has not ended yet.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreading of sample material request
premise text: (b) the suspect requests the investigating constable that the sample be shared;
conclusion text: The request has been spread to the investigating constable.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognition of sample material as sufficient for sharing
premise text: (1) This section applies if: (a) a sample is taken from a suspect under this Part; and (b) the suspect requests the investigating constable that the sample be shared;
conclusion text: The sample material has been recognized as sufficient.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

23XU(2) Samples—sufficient material to share
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-2
part of: 23XU Samples—sufficient material to share
note: Suspect must nominate an accredited laboratory for analysis.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.11
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XU(2) Samples—sufficient material to share
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xu-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must nominate an accredited laboratory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 Subsection 23XUA(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-28
note: Substitute phrase in request to investigating constable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-28-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-28-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28 Subsection 23XUA(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes duty on State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 After subsection 23XUA(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-29
note: Must inform suspect of instructions to leave premises if not complying with analysis.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-logic-cogai-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29 After subsection 23XUA(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform suspect
premise text: Investigating constable has authority to direct attendee
conclusion text: Attendee must be informed of instructions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: THEN
logic summary: Temporal relation between events
premise text: Investigating constable informs suspect after analysis is being conducted
conclusion text: Event A (informing suspect) occurs after event B (analysis being conducted)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: THEN
logic summary: Spread of information
premise text: Investigating constable informs suspect and attendee is directed to leave premises
conclusion text: Information about instructions spreads from investigating constable to attendee
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-29-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: THEN
logic summary: Artificial intelligence application
premise text: Investigating constable uses AI to analyze material and inform suspect
conclusion text: AI is applied in the investigation process
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

30 Subsection 23XUA(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-30
note: Substitute 'attendee' for 'the person chosen'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-30-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-30-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 30 Subsection 23XUA(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

31 Subsection 23XUA(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-31
note: Substitute 'analyst' for 'person responsible for analysing the material'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-31-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-31-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 31 Subsection 23XUA(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-31-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32 At the end of section 23XUA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32
has part: 32(4) At the end of section 23XUA
has part: 32(5) At the end of section 23XUA
has part: 32(6) At the end of section 23XUA
has part: 32(7) At the end of section 23XUA
has part: 32(8) At the end of section 23XUA
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12

32(4) At the end of section 23XUA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-4
part of: 32 At the end of section 23XUA
note: The analyst may give instructions to the attendee.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-4-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(4) At the end of section 23XUA
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

32(5) At the end of section 23XUA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-5
part of: 32 At the end of section 23XUA
note: Analyst may give direction to attendee to leave premises if attendee fails to comply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-logic-diffusion-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(5) At the end of section 23XUA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits action
premise text: (5) The analyst may give a direction...
conclusion text: The attendee must leave the premises.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: TemporalSubintervalOf
logic summary: Defines temporal subinterval of instruction
premise text: (5) The analyst may give a direction...
conclusion text: The instruction is a temporal subinterval of the analysis.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-5-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses prohibition to attendees
premise text: (5) The analyst may give a direction...
conclusion text: This prohibition diffuses to all attendees.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(6) At the end of section 23XUA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-6
part of: 32 At the end of section 23XUA
note: Failure to comply with direction is an offence against subsection (7).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-argumentation-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-diffusion-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(6) At the end of section 23XUA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must comply with direction
premise text: (6) If the analyst gives such a direction, the analyst must inform...
conclusion text: A failure to comply is an offence against subsection (7).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST NOT
logic summary: Must not fail to comply with direction
premise text: (6) If the analyst gives such a direction, the analyst must inform...
conclusion text: A failure to comply is an offence against subsection (7).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Direction contains obligation to comply
premise text: (6) If the analyst gives such a direction, the analyst must inform...
conclusion text: The direction contains an obligation to comply.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-argumentation-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: IMPLIES
logic summary: Failure to comply implies offence against subsection (7)
premise text: (6) If the analyst gives such a direction, the analyst must inform...
conclusion text: If the analyst gives a direction, then a failure to comply is an offence against subsection (7).
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-6-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS TO
logic summary: Obligation spreads to failure to comply
premise text: (6) If the analyst gives such a direction, the analyst must inform...
conclusion text: The obligation to comply spreads to the failure to comply.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(7) At the end of section 23XUA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-7
part of: 32 At the end of section 23XUA
note: Failure to comply with direction results in an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 32(7) At the end of section 23XUA
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with direction.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

32(8) At the end of section 23XUA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-32-ss-8
part of: 32 At the end of section 23XUA
note: An offence against subsection (7) is an obligation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.12
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-32-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is
logic summary: Obligation
conclusion text: An offence against subsection (7) is an obligation.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Section 23XW
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-33
note: Repeal section and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-33-norm

23XW Results of analysis
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-23xw
note: Must provide DNA analysis results to suspect within 14 days of request or analysis.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.13
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xw-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xw-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xw-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23XW Results of analysis
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-23xw-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: >
logic summary: Duty to provide information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 Subsection 23XWB(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-34
note: Repeal of subsection and substitution with new definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-34-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-34-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-34-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Requires temporal relation between Division and intimate forensic procedure
premise text: Temporal intervals mentioned in the provision
conclusion text: Undertaking
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 At the end of subsection 23XWB(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-35
note: Add taking of blood and saliva samples
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-35-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-35-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-35-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35 At the end of subsection 23XWB(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adds specified actions to existing list
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 At the end of subsection 23XWC(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-36
note: Add by order of a judge or magistrate under section 23XWO.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-shacl-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36 At the end of subsection 23XWC(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: addition
logic summary: Adding to the list of permitted actions.
premise text: Section 23XWO permits additions.
conclusion text: The addition is obligatory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Action during subsection 23XWC(1).
premise text: Section 23XWC(1) defines the time period.
conclusion text: The addition occurs during this time period.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Action until subsection 23XWO.
premise text: Section 23XWO defines the end condition.
conclusion text: The addition ends at this point.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: assertion
logic summary: Asserting the addition.
premise text: The addition is a fact.
conclusion text: The addition is asserted.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-36-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: validity
logic summary: Validating the addition.
premise text: The addition conforms to the schema.
conclusion text: The addition is valid.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

37 Subsection 23XWC(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-37
note: Insert 'judge or' after 'by order of a'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-37-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-37-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37 Subsection 23XWC(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Paragraph 23XWD(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-38
note: Insert 'judge or' after 'by order of a'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-38-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-38-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-38-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 38 Paragraph 23XWD(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-38-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

39 Subsection 23XWE(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-39
note: Repeal subsection, substitute Division 6 for carrying out forensic procedures on offenders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.14
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 39 Subsection 23XWE(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of offenders.
premise text: None
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Forensic procedures may overlap with other laws.
premise text: Sections 23XJ and 23XK apply to the carrying out of a forensic procedure under this Division.
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Forensic procedures may imply other laws.
premise text: Division 6 applies in relation to the carrying out under this Division of a forensic procedure on an offender.
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuses
logic summary: Forensic procedures diffuse to other laws.
premise text: Sections 23XJ and 23XK apply to the carrying out of a forensic procedure under this Division.
conclusion text: None
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-39-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognizes
logic summary: Forensic procedures recognize other laws.
premise text: Division 6 applies in relation to the carrying out under this Division of a forensic procedure on an offender.
conclusion text: None
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

40 Paragraph 23XWL(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-40
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-40-norm

41 After section 23XWN
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-41
note: Judge or magistrate may order forensic procedure on offender under certain circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-41-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-41-logic-linearlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-41-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-41-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 41 After section 23XWN
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-41-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Obligation to order forensic procedure
premise text: Section 23XWO
conclusion text: Judge or magistrate may order forensic procedure on offender
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-41-logic-linearlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: or
logic summary: Multiple conditions for ordering forensic procedure
premise text: Sections 23XWO and 23WE
conclusion text: The offender is subject to one of the following circumstances: (a) not in custody and has not consented, or (b) in custody and has not consented, or (c) cannot consent under section 23WE.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-41-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: under
logic summary: Temporal relationship between sections
premise text: Sections 23XWO and 23WE
conclusion text: Section 23XWO is under section 23WE
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

42 Subsection 23XWO(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-42
note: Omit specific provision regarding consent for intimate forensic procedures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-42-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-42-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-42-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits specific action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

43 Paragraph 23XWO(7)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-43
note: Repeal a paragraph
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-43-norm

44 After section 23XWO
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-44
note: Insert Schedule 1 Forensic procedures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.15
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-44-norm

45 Paragraph 23XWP(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-45
note: Omit specific phrase from a provision.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.17
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-45-norm

46 Subsection 23XWP(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-46
note: Omit certain language regarding forensic procedures for offenders not in detention.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-46-norm

47 Subsection 23XWP(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-47
note: Omit specific phrase from a judge's order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-47-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-47-logic-ltl-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-47-logic-diffusion-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-47-logic-argumentation-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-47-logic-ltl-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Describes when one event occurs after another
premise text: If a judge or magistrate orders the carrying out of a forensic procedure under this Division on an offender, the offender”,
conclusion text: the offender may be ordered to permit the carrying out of a forensic procedure at some point in time
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-47-logic-diffusion-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Describes when one event occurs after another
premise text: If a judge or magistrate orders the carrying out of a forensic procedure under this Division on an offender, the offender”,
conclusion text: the offender may be ordered to permit the carrying out of a forensic procedure at some point in time
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-47-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Describes when one statement implies another
premise text: If a judge or magistrate orders the carrying out of a forensic procedure under this Division on an offender, the offender”,
conclusion text: the offender may be ordered to permit the carrying out of a forensic procedure if the judge or magistrate so orders
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

48 Subsection 23XWQ(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-48
note: Insertion of authorized person in a phrase
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-48-norm

49 After subparagraph 23XWQ(2)(b)(i)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-49
note: Informed consent of parent or guardian required for forensic procedure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-49-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-49-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 49 After subparagraph 23XWQ(2)(b)(i)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-49-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Requires informed consent
premise text: Section 23XWR
conclusion text: Obligation to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

50 Subparagraph 23XWQ(2)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-50
note: Omit 'after the person', substitute 'after the authorised person'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-50-norm

51 Paragraph 23XWR(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-51
note: Volunteer chooses storage of information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.18
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-51-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-51-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 51 Paragraph 23XWR(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

52 Section 23YDAC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-52
note: Insertion of '(1)' before 'In this'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-52-norm

53 Section 23YDAC (definition of Commonwealth DNA
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-53
note: Definition of Commonwealth DNA database system
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-53-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-53-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53 Section 23YDAC (definition of Commonwealth DNA
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

54 Section 23YDAC (paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-54
note: Insertion of foreign law enforcement agency relation into Commonwealth DNA database system definition
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-54-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-54-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 54 Section 23YDAC (paragraph (a) of the definition of
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of foreign law enforcement agency relation in Commonwealth DNA database system definition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Section 23YDAC (after paragraph (a) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-55
note: Prohibition on committing an offence outside Australia
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-55-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-55-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-55-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits committing an offence outside Australia
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Section 23YDAC (at the end of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-56
note: Add Note: See also subsection (2).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-56-norm

57 Section 23YDAC (definition of volunteers (limited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-57
note: Definition of volunteers (limited purposes) index
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-57-norm

58 At the end of section 23YDAC
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-58
note: Add forensic procedures for participating jurisdictions to State/Territory DNA database system in Schedule 1
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.19
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-58-norm

59 After paragraph 23YDAE(2)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-59
note: Inserts a new provision to assist foreign countries in deciding whether to make a request under the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 1987.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-59-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-59-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59 After paragraph 23YDAE(2)(d)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS
logic summary: Inserts a new provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

60 Paragraph 23YDA(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-60
note: Insert “, offender or volunteer” after ‘suspect’.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-60-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-60-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-60-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 60 Paragraph 23YDA(1)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-60-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of text
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

61 Paragraph 23YDA(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-61
note: Requires consent for forensic procedures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-61-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-61-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 61 Paragraph 23YDA(2)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-61-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Expresses a requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

62 Paragraph 23YDA(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-62
note: Insertion of new clause after Division 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-62-norm

63 Paragraph 23YDA(2)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-63
note: Insertion of new clause for applying to judges and magistrates for forensic procedures
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-63-norm

64 Paragraphs 23YDA(2)(d), (e) and (f)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-64
note: Insertion of words in a specific context
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-64-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-64-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 64 Paragraphs 23YDA(2)(d), (e) and (f)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

65 Subsection 23YG(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-65
has part: 65(2) Subsection 23YG(2)
has part: 65(3) Subsection 23YG(2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20

65(2) Subsection 23YG(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-65-ss-2
part of: 65 Subsection 23YG(2)
note: Material must be made available within 14 days after creation or upon request.
description: True
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 65(2) Subsection 23YG(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Material must be provided.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

65(3) Subsection 23YG(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-65-ss-3
part of: 65 Subsection 23YG(2)
note: Exemptions from subsection (2)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.20
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: exemption
logic summary: Exemptions from subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap with subsection 23XE(5)
premise text: (a) copies of records required to be made available under subsection 23XE(5); and (b) material required to be provided under section 23XU; and (c) copies of results of analysis and other information required to be provided under section 23XW.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: and
logic summary: Temporal overlap with subsection 23XE(5)
premise text: (a) copies of records required to be made available under subsection 23XE(5); and (b) material required to be provided under section 23XU; and (c) copies of results of analysis and other information required to be provided under section 23XW.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: and
logic summary: Temporal overlap with subsection 23XE(5)
premise text: (a) copies of records required to be made available under subsection 23XE(5); and (b) material required to be provided under section 23XU; and (c) copies of results of analysis and other information required to be provided under section 23XW.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-65-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: and
logic summary: Temporal overlap with subsection 23XE(5)
premise text: (a) copies of records required to be made available under subsection 23XE(5); and (b) material required to be provided under section 23XU; and (c) copies of results of analysis and other information required to be provided under section 23XW.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

66 After paragraph 23YO(2)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-66
note: Inserts a new purpose for assisting foreign countries in deciding to make a request under the Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Act 1987.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-66-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-66-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 66 After paragraph 23YO(2)(d)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-66-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS
logic summary: Inserts a new provision
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

67 After section 23YP
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-67
note: Analysis of forensic material must be carried out in an accredited laboratory.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-67-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-67-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Commonwealth.
conclusion text: The analysis must be carried out in an accredited laboratory.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

68 Subsection 23YQ(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-68
note: Substitute “AFP appointee” for “staff member”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-68-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-68-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 68 Subsection 23YQ(1)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

69 Subsection 23YQ(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-69
note: Substitute “AFP appointee” for “staff member”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-69-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-69-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 69 Subsection 23YQ(2)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

70 Subsection 23YUC(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-70
note: Substitute 'an intimate forensic procedure' for 'the forensic procedure'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-70-norm

71 Subsection 23YUC(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-71
note: Inserts 'under this Part' after 'an order'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.21
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-71-norm

72 After subsection 23YUC(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-72
note: Authorises carrying out of non-intimate forensic procedure in participating jurisdictions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-72-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-72-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 72 After subsection 23YUC(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-72-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to carry out procedure
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

73 At the end of Division 11 of Part ID
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-73
note: Commissioner may enter into arrangement with prison head regarding forensic procedures.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-73-norm

74 Saving—orders by senior constable
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-74
note: Preserves validity of certain orders
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-74-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-74-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-74-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 74 Saving—orders by senior constable
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-74-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Preservation
logic summary: Preserves the validity of an order
premise text: The amendment made by item 16 does not affect the validity of an order that is in force under section 23WN of the Crimes Act 1914 immediately before the commencement of that item.
conclusion text: The order remains valid despite the amendment.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

75 Application provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-75
note: Amendments apply in relation to carrying out of forensic procedures starting on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.22
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-6

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Amendments apply in relation to carrying out of forensic procedures.
premise text: (1) The amendments made by items 22 to 26, 34, 35, 39, 48, 49, 50, 67, 70 and 72 apply in relation to the carrying out of forensic procedures starting on or after the commencement of those items.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Amendments apply in relation to samples taken under Part ID of the Crimes Act 1914 on or after commencement.
premise text: (2) The amendments made by items 27 to 33 apply in relation to samples taken under Part ID of the Crimes Act 1914 on or after the commencement of those items.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Amendments apply in relation to orders made on or after commencement.
premise text: (3) The amendments made by items 21, 40, 41, 43 and 45 to 47 apply in relation to orders made on or after the commencement of those items.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Amendments apply in relation to applications made under section 23XWO of the Crimes Act 1914 on or after commencement.
premise text: (4) The amendments made by items 42 and 44 apply in relation to applications made under section 23XWO of the Crimes Act 1914 on or after the commencement of those items.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Amendment applies in relation to giving of informed consent on or after commencement.
premise text: (5) The amendment made by item 51 applies in relation to the giving of informed consent on or after the commencement of that item.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-75-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Amendments do not affect continuity of Commonwealth DNA database system.
premise text: (6) The amendments made by items 53 to 55 do not affect the continuity of the Commonwealth DNA database system referred to in section 23YDAC of the Crimes Act 1914 or of the crime scene index referred to in that section.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Paragraphs 23WF(2)(b) and (c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-76
note: Inform suspect of matters mentioned in section 23WJ
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-76-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-76-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-76-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76 Paragraphs 23WF(2)(b) and (c)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-76-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Inform suspect
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77 Paragraph 23WG(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-77
note: Informs suspect of matters mentioned in section 23WJ
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-77-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-77-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-77-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77 Paragraph 23WG(2)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-77-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Informs suspect of matters mentioned in section 23WJ
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78 Paragraph 23XWG(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-78
note: Informs offender of matters mentioned in section 23XWJ
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-78-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-78-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78 Paragraph 23XWG(1)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

79 Subsection 23XWR(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-79
note: Insert comma and regulations after certain phrases.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-79-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-79-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 79 Subsection 23XWR(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

80 Application provision
type: Concept
realized by: sch-1-sec-80
note: Amendments apply in relation to informed consent on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.24
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-1-sec-80-norm

1 Section 59 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-1
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-1-norm

59 Providing reports and information to members of Parliament
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59
note: Providing reports and information to members of Parliament
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59 Providing reports and information to members of Parliament
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide reports and information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Before subsection 59(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-2
note: Minister must be informed
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Before subsection 59(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 59(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-3
note: Insert CEO after Chair of the Board
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: INSERTS
logic summary: Insertion obligation
premise text: The Chair of the Board must be inserted before CEO.
conclusion text: CEO must be inserted after The Chair of the Board.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: CONTAINS
logic summary: Temporal relationship between insertion and CEO
premise text: The insertion of CEO occurs after The Chair of the Board.
conclusion text: CEO is inserted after The Chair of the Board.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: JUSTIFICATION
logic summary: Justification for insertion
premise text: The insertion of CEO is justified by the need to include the CEO in the Board's structure.
conclusion text: CEO must be inserted after The Chair of the Board.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS
logic summary: Spread of insertion obligation
premise text: The insertion of CEO spreads to other parts of the Board's structure.
conclusion text: CEO must be inserted after The Chair of the Board in all parts of the Board's structure.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNITION
logic summary: Recognition of insertion obligation
premise text: The AI system recognizes the need to insert CEO after The Chair of the Board.
conclusion text: CEO must be inserted after The Chair of the Board.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 59(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-4
note: Insert “or the CEO” after “requests the Chair”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-4-norm

5 Subsection 59(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-5
note: Insertion of CEO into functions clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-5-norm

6 Before subsection 59(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-6
note: Insert Information for Inter-Governmental Committee
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-6-norm

7 Subsection 59(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-7
note: Insert 'or the CEO' after 'the Chair of the Board'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.25
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-7-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: after
logic summary: Temporal relation after another interval
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 59(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-8
note: Insertion of CEO in Board title
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-8-norm

9 Subsection 59(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-9
note: Insert 'or the CEO' after 'the Chair of the Board'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permissive
logic summary: Permits insertion of CEO
premise text: Chair of the Board is specified
conclusion text: CEO can be added
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 Subsection 59(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-10
note: Omit 'the Chair' (second occurring) and substitute 'he or she'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-10-norm

11 Subsection 59(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-11
note: Insert “or the CEO” after “the Chair of the Board”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-11-norm

12 Paragraph 59(3)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-12
note: Insert CEO after Chair of the Board
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: after
logic summary: Temporal relation after
premise text: the Chair of the Board
conclusion text: or the CEO
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

13 Subsection 59(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-13
note: Insert 'or the CEO' after 'The Chair of the Board'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-13-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-13-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between 'The Chair of the Board' and 'CEO'
premise text: The Chair of the Board (first occurring)
conclusion text: or the CEO (as the case requires)
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-13-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: permission
logic summary: Granting permission to insert text
premise text: The Chair of the Board (first occurring)
conclusion text: or the CEO (as the case requires)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Subsection 60(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-14
note: Insertion of CEO into Board heading
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-14-norm

15 Subsection 60(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-15
note: Substitute 'The Board and the CEO must' for 'The Board shall'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-15-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 15 Subsection 60(5)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Application of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-16
note: Amendments apply to information in possession of ACC regardless of when it comes into possession.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.26
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-16-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-16-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 16 Application of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-16-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to apply amendments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

17 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-17
note: Definition of ACC information
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-17-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-17-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 17 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-17-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: definition
logic summary: Defines a term
conclusion text: ACC information means information that is in the ACC’s possession.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-18
note: List of permissible purposes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.27
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-18-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-18-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-18-logic-alleninterval-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-18-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: List of permissible purposes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-18-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasClass
logic summary: Explicit class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-18-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal interval relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19 Subsection 12(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-19
note: Substitute 'Note 1' for 'Note'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-19-norm

20 Subsection 12(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-20
note: Substitute sections 59AA and 59AB for section 59.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-20-norm

21 At the end of subsection 12(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-21
note: Relevant direction under subsection 25A(9) may be applied to this subsection.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-21-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-21-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 At the end of subsection 12(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may apply
logic summary: Relevant direction under subsection 25A(9) may be applied to this subsection.
premise text: Subsection 25A(9)
conclusion text: This subsection is subject to any relevant direction given under subsection 25A(9).
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 At the end of subsection 12(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-22
note: Relevant direction given under subsection 25A(9) is applicable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-22-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-22-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 22 At the end of subsection 12(1A)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Relevant direction given under subsection 25A(9) is applicable.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 After subsection 12(1A)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-23
note: Subject to direction on confidentiality
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-23-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-23-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-23-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 23 After subsection 12(1A)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJCT
logic summary: Direction applies to subsections
premise text: Subsections (1) and (1A)
conclusion text: Subject to direction
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Subparagraph 47A(1)(b)(ii)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-24
note: Omit specified phrase and substitute with new phrase.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-24-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-24-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-24-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure to specified entities.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

25 At the end of subsection 59(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-25
note: Subject to direction under subsection 25A(9)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-25-norm

26 Subsections 59(7) to (11)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-26
note: Inform one or more persons of ACC operations if in public interest.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.28
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-26-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-26-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-26-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 26 Subsections 59(7) to (11)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Information duty
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-26-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: ACC information
premise text: Schedule 2
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 After section 59
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-27
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-27-norm

59AA Disclosing information to government bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59aa
note: Disclosure of ACC information to certain entities
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.29
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59aa-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59aa-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59aa-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: CEO permits disclosure of ACC information
premise text: CEO considers it appropriate to disclose
conclusion text: Disclosure is permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59AB Disclosing information to private sector bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59ab
has part: 59AB(1) Disclosing information to private sector bodies
has part: 59AB(2) Disclosing information to private sector bodies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.30

59AB(1) Disclosing information to private sector bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1
part of: 59AB Disclosing information to private sector bodies
note: Disclosure of ACC information to private sector bodies is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-6

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: The CEO is permitted to disclose ACC information under certain conditions.
premise text: the CEO considers it appropriate to do so
conclusion text: disclosing the ACC information is permitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classifies
logic summary: The body corporate is classified as a permissible recipient of ACC information.
premise text: the body has undertaken, in writing, not to use or further disclose the information except as referred to in subsection (3)
conclusion text: the body corporate is a permissible recipient
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Within
logic summary: The disclosure of ACC information must occur within a specified timeframe.
premise text: disclosing the ACC information would not prejudice the safety of a person, or prejudice the fair trial of a person who has been charged with an offence
conclusion text: the disclosure must occur within a specified timeframe
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: The CEO is required to disclose ACC information on a recurring basis.
premise text: the body has undertaken, in writing, not to use or further disclose the information except as referred to in subsection (3)
conclusion text: the disclosure must occur on a recurring basis
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Requires
logic summary: The body corporate requires certain conditions to be met before disclosing ACC information.
premise text: the CEO considers that disclosing the information to the body is necessary for a permissible purpose
conclusion text: the body corporate requires certain conditions to be met
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: The CEO is permitted to specify conditions under which ACC information can be disclosed.
premise text: the CEO has undertaken, in writing, not to use or further disclose the information except as referred to in subsection (3)
conclusion text: the CEO permits certain disclosure conditions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

59AB(2) Disclosing information to private sector bodies
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2
part of: 59AB Disclosing information to private sector bodies
note: Disclosure of ACC information to private sector bodies under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.30
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose ACC information.
premise text: (2) The CEO may disclose ACC information to a body corporate under subsection (1) only if...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for disclosure conditions.
premise text: (i) preventing criminal offences or activities that might constitute criminal offences (including under a law of a foreign country);
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for disclosure conditions.
premise text: (ii) detecting criminal offences or activities that might constitute criminal offences (including under a law of a foreign country);
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information Diffusion
logic summary: Information diffusion for disclosure conditions.
premise text: (iii) facilitating the collection of criminal information and intelligence in relation to criminal offences or activities that might constitute criminal offences (including under a law of a foreign country);
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ab-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge Representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation for disclosure conditions.
premise text: (b) in any case—the information is not confidential commercial information relating to another body or person.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

59AC Confidentiality in relation to examinations
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59ac
note: Confidentiality in relation to examinations is subject to direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ac-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ac-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ac-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59AC Confidentiality in relation to examinations
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ac-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: SUBJUNCTIVE MODO
logic summary: Direction applies to confidentiality in relation to examinations.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

59AD Publication of reports in relation to offences
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-59ad
note: Publication of reports in relation to offences must be based on admissible evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ad-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ad-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ad-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59AD Publication of reports in relation to offences
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-59ad-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28 After paragraph 61(2)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-28
note: CEO must disclose general nature and extent of information to a body corporate under section 59AB.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-28-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-28-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 28 After paragraph 61(2)(d)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-28-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to disclose information
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

29 Application of this Part
type: Concept
realized by: sch-2-sec-29
note: Amendments apply to ACC information regardless of when it comes into possession.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.34
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-29-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 29 Application of this Part
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-2-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to apply amendments
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-1
note: Defines Commonwealth officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines Commonwealth officer
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: has meaning
logic summary: Has meaning given by subsection 3(1) of the Crimes Act 1914
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-2
note: Definition of returnable item
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 4(1) (paragraph (d) of the definition of serious
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-3
note: Omit 'within the meaning of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 4(1) (subparagraph (da)(ii) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-4
note: Omit specified phrase from definition.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of phrase.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-5
note: Defines serious offence for ACC
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.35
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term with obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-6
note: Defines State or Territory law enforcement agency
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of term
premise text: Term defined
conclusion text: State or Territory law enforcement agency has the meaning given by subsection 3ZQU(7) of the Crimes Act 1914.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal relation defined
premise text: Section 6 commences on a specified date
conclusion text: State or Territory law enforcement agency has the meaning given by subsection 3ZQU(7) of the Crimes Act 1914.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: =
logic summary: Temporal relation defined
premise text: Section 6 commences on a specified date
conclusion text: State or Territory law enforcement agency has the meaning given by subsection 3ZQU(7) of the Crimes Act 1914.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of term in context
premise text: Term used in this section
conclusion text: State or Territory law enforcement agency has the meaning given by subsection 3ZQU(7) of the Crimes Act 1914.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: =
logic summary: Definition of term in context
premise text: Term used in this section
conclusion text: State or Territory law enforcement agency has the meaning given by subsection 3ZQU(7) of the Crimes Act 1914.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-7
note: Defines terrorism offence as in subsection 3(1) of the Crimes Act 1914.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Subsection 4(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines terrorism offence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-8
note: Defines terrorist act
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Defines term
conclusion text: terrorist act has the same meaning as in subsection 100.1(1) of the Criminal Code.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsections 22(8) and (9)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-9
note: Repeal subsections
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Repeal
logic summary: Repeal subsections
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

10 At the end of Division 1A of Part II
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-10
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-10-norm

24AA Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa
has part: 24AA(1) Use of and sharing returnable items
has part: 24AA(2) Use of and sharing returnable items
has part: 24AA(3) Use of and sharing returnable items
has part: 24AA(4) Use of and sharing returnable items
has part: 24AA(5) Use of and sharing returnable items
has part: 24AA(6) Use of and sharing returnable items
has part: 24AA(7) Use of and sharing returnable items
has part: 24AA(8) Use of and sharing returnable items
has part: 24AA(9) Use of and sharing returnable items
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36

24AA(1) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-1
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items
note: CEO may make returnable item available to constable or Commonwealth officer for specified purposes.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by CEO
premise text: CEO has authority to make returnable item available
conclusion text: Returnable item may be used for specified purposes
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AA(2) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-2
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items
note: Use of returnable items by non-staff members is permitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AA(2) Use of and sharing returnable items
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to use returnable items
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AA(3) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-3
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items
note: Allow head to share returnable item with staff member
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AA(4) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-4
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items
note: Use of returnable items for State or Territory purposes is permitted.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AA(4) Use of and sharing returnable items
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to use returnable items for State or Territory purposes.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AA(5) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-5
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items
note: CEO may make returnable item available to constable or Commonwealth officer.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Permission granted by CEO.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AA(6) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-6
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items
note: Use of returnable items for other purposes authorized by law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AA(6) Use of and sharing returnable items
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows use of returnable items for other purposes.
premise text: Law authorizes use.
conclusion text: Use permitted.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AA(7) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-7
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items
note: Requires use of documents or other things for certain laws
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Expresses a requirement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AA(8) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-8
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items
note: Sharing of returnable items with certain agencies
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: CEO permits sharing
premise text: (8) The CEO may make a returnable item available to...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AA(9) Use of and sharing returnable items
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-9
part of: 24AA Use of and sharing returnable items
note: Permits arrangement with a State or Territory law enforcement agency for returnable items.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.36
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-9-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AA(9) Use of and sharing returnable items
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24aa-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: PERM
logic summary: Permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AB When returnable items must be returned
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ab
has part: 24AB(1) When returnable items must be returned
has part: 24AB(2) When returnable items must be returned
has part: 24AB(3) When returnable items must be returned
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39

24AB(1) When returnable items must be returned
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-1
part of: 24AB When returnable items must be returned
note: Return a returnable item to the person from whom it was seized or produced if not required for judicial review proceedings.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty to return an item
premise text: The CEO must take reasonable steps to return the item.
conclusion text: The person from whom the item was seized or produced is entitled to possess it.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AB(2) When returnable items must be returned
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2
part of: 24AB When returnable items must be returned
note: No obligation to take steps if certain conditions are met.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
logic summary: No obligation if conditions are met
premise text: if the returnable item may be retained because of an order under subsection 24AC(2), or any other order under that subsection has been made in relation to the item, then the CEO does not have to take those steps
conclusion text: the CEO does not have to take those steps if the conditions are met
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
logic summary: No obligation if application is pending
premise text: if the CEO has applied for such an order and the application has not been determined, then the CEO does not have to take those steps
conclusion text: the CEO does not have to take those steps if the application is pending
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
logic summary: No obligation under law or court order
premise text: if the returnable item may otherwise be retained, destroyed or disposed of under a law, or an order of a court or tribunal, of the Commonwealth or of a State or a Territory, then the CEO does not have to take those steps
conclusion text: the CEO does not have to take those steps if the returnable item is subject to such a law or order
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: EXCEPT
logic summary: No obligation due to dispute over ownership
premise text: if the returnable item is forfeited or forfeitable to the Commonwealth or is the subject of a dispute as to ownership, then the CEO does not have to take those steps
conclusion text: the CEO does not have to take those steps if there is a dispute over ownership
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AB(3) When returnable items must be returned
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-3
part of: 24AB When returnable items must be returned
note: CEO must return document if ACC took possession.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ab-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to return document
premise text: CEO is required to take reasonable steps
conclusion text: Return document if ACC took possession
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac
has part: 24AC(1) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
has part: 24AC(2) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
has part: 24AC(3) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
has part: 24AC(4) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
has part: 24AC(5) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
has part: 24AC(6) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
has part: 24AC(7) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
has part: 24AC(8) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39

24AC(1) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-1
part of: 24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
note: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-1-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AC(1) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: CEO's application
conclusion text: Order under subsection (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AC(2) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-2
part of: 24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
note: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-2-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AC(2) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

24AC(3) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-3
part of: 24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
note: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AC(4) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-4
part of: 24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
note: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-4-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-4-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AC(4) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

24AC(5) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-5
part of: 24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
note: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-5-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-5-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AC(5) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

24AC(6) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-6
part of: 24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
note: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-6-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AC(6) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Temporal relation
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24AC(7) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-7
part of: 24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
note: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-7-norm

24AC(8) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8
part of: 24AC Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
note: Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.39
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-norm
type: Permission
modality: Deontic
part of: 24AC(8) Issuing officer may permit a returnable item to be retained,
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Granting permission
premise text: Issuing officer has the power to permit
conclusion text: Returnable item may be retained
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between issuing officer's function and court membership
premise text: Issuing officer is a member of the court
conclusion text: Issuing officer has the same protection and immunity as a court member at the time of performing the function
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Immunization
logic summary: Granting immunity to issuing officer
premise text: Issuing officer is protected from liability
conclusion text: Issuing officer has the same protection and immunity as a court member
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Protection
logic summary: Granting protection to issuing officer
premise text: Issuing officer is protected from liability
conclusion text: Issuing officer has the same protection and immunity as a court member
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-24ac-ss-8-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Authorization
logic summary: Granting authority to issuing officer
premise text: Issuing officer is authorized to perform function
conclusion text: Issuing officer has the same protection and immunity as a court member
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Application of this Schedule
type: Concept
realized by: sch-3-sec-11
note: Amendments apply to any returnable item regardless of when seized or produced.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.41
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Application of this Schedule
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-3-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-1
note: Definition of constable
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-1-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 5(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-2
note: Defines Federal Court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Subsection 5(1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: is defined as
logic summary: Defines a term
premise text: Federal Court means the Federal Court of Australia.
conclusion text: The Federal Court is defined as...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 5(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-3
note: Definition of contempt of ACLEI
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Subsection 5(1)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defined
logic summary: Defines key term
conclusion text: Contempt of ACLEI has the meaning given by section 96A.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 20(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-4
note: Substitute 'notified' for 'referred'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace word with new word
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Section 21 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-5
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-5-norm

21 Law enforcement agency head to pass on new information in
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21
note: Law enforcement agency head must pass on new information in relation to corruption issue already notified
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-21-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-21-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-21-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide new information
premise text: Law enforcement agency head has received new information
conclusion text: Must pass on new information to relevant authorities
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Part 8 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-6
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.42
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Repeal heading
premise text: Heading to be repealed
conclusion text: Repeal applied
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Subdivision A of Division 1 of Part 9 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-7
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-7-norm

8 Sections 75 and 76
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-8
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new provisions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-8-norm

75 Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-75
has part: 75(1) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
has part: 75(2) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
has part: 75(3) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
has part: 75(4) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
has part: 75(5) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
has part: 75(6) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43

75(1) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-1
part of: 75 Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
note: Require person to give information or produce document or thing upon request.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the person to provide information or produce document or thing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75(2) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-2
part of: 75 Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
note: Provide information in writing
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: require
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the Integrity Commissioner
conclusion text: The information must be provided in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75(3) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-3
part of: 75 Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
note: Notice must be served on person, signed by Integrity Commissioner, and specify compliance period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75(3) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Imposes duty on State
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75(4) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-4
part of: 75 Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
note: Must provide information or produce document within 14 days after notice
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75(4) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide information or produce document within 14 days after notice
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: The period specified under paragraph (3)(c) must be greater than or equal to 14 days after the day the notice is served on the person
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: >=
logic summary: The period specified under paragraph (3)(c) must be greater than or equal to 14 days after the day the notice is served on the person
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: mustBeGreaterThanOrEqualTo
logic summary: The period specified under paragraph (3)(c) must be greater than or equal to 14 days after the day the notice is served on the person
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-4-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: mustBeGreaterThanOrEqualTo
logic summary: The period specified under paragraph (3)(c) must be greater than or equal to 14 days after the day the notice is served on the person
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75(5) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-5
part of: 75 Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
note: Record information or produce document/thing within 14 days
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to record information or produce document/thing
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

75(6) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-75-ss-6
part of: 75 Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
note: Notice to give information or produce document or thing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.43
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 75(6) Notice to give information or to produce document or thing
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-75-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the agent
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76 Compliance with notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-76
has part: 76(1) Compliance with notice
has part: 76(2) Compliance with notice
has part: 76(3) Compliance with notice
has part: 76(4) Compliance with notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.44

76(1) Compliance with notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-1
part of: 76 Compliance with notice
note: Compliance with notice within specified time period or allowed extension.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(1) Compliance with notice
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to comply with notice.
premise text: Section 75 notice
conclusion text: Compliance within specified time period or extension.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(2) Compliance with notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-2
part of: 76 Compliance with notice
note: A person served with a notice may apply for further time to comply.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(2) Compliance with notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

76(3) Compliance with notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-3
part of: 76 Compliance with notice
note: Allow further time to comply with notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(3) Compliance with notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Allow further time
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

76(4) Compliance with notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-76-ss-4
part of: 76 Compliance with notice
note: Integrity Commissioner must acknowledge receipt of information and documents.
description: acknowledgement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.44
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 76(4) Compliance with notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-76-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Integrity Commissioner has an obligation to acknowledge receipt.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Subsection 77(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-9
note: Omit specific phrase from section 75 or 76 notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-9-norm

10 After Subdivision A of Division 1 of Part 9
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-10
note: Prohibitions against disclosing information about notices
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-10-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 10 After Subdivision A of Division 1 of Part 9
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: State forbids disclosure
conclusion text: Disclosure is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-10-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Prohibition during notices
premise text: Notices are events
conclusion text: Disclosure is prohibited during notices
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a
has part: 77A(1) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
has part: 77A(2) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
has part: 77A(3) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
has part: 77A(4) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
has part: 77A(5) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
has part: 77A(6) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
has part: 77A(7) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
has part: 77A(8) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
has part: 77A(9) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45

77A(1) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-1
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
note: Disclosure of notice information is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of notice information.
premise text: (1) This section applies in respect of a notice served on a person under section 75.
conclusion text: (Notation prohibiting disclosure of information about notice)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

77A(2) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-2
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
note: Disclosure of notice information is prohibited except in specified circumstances.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-2-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 77A(2) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of disclosure
premise text: (2) The Integrity Commissioner may include a notation...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77A(3) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-3
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
note: Failure to disclose notice may prejudice certain interests.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits failure to disclose notice.
premise text: (3) The Integrity Commissioner must include a notation in the notice...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77A(4) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-4
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
note: Disclosure of notice may be prohibited under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of notice
premise text: (4) The Integrity Commissioner may include a notation in the notice...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77A(5) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-5
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
note: Cannot include notation in notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77A(6) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-6
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
note: Must provide written statement with rights and obligations
description: yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 77A(6) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to provide written statement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77A(7) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
note: Prohibition on disclosure of notice after investigation concludes and proceedings commence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 77A(7) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of notice after investigation concludes and proceedings commence.
premise text: (7) A notation included in the notice is cancelled by this subsection if: (a) the Integrity Commissioner concludes the investigation to which the notice relates; and (b) any criminal proceedings or civil penalty proceedings resulting from the investigation are commenced.
conclusion text: The disclosure of notice is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: during
logic summary: Discloses temporal relationship between notation cancellation and investigation commencement.
premise text: (7) A notation included in the notice is cancelled by this subsection if: (a) the Integrity Commissioner concludes the investigation to which the notice relates; and (b) any criminal proceedings or civil penalty proceedings resulting from the investigation are commenced.
conclusion text: The cancellation of a notation occurs during the commencement of an investigation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: until
logic summary: Discloses temporal relationship between notation cancellation and investigation conclusion.
premise text: (7) A notation included in the notice is cancelled by this subsection if: (a) the Integrity Commissioner concludes the investigation to which the notice relates; and (b) any criminal proceedings or civil penalty proceedings resulting from the investigation are commenced.
conclusion text: The cancellation of a notation occurs until the conclusion of an investigation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: if
logic summary: Discloses condition for notation cancellation.
premise text: (7) A notation included in the notice is cancelled by this subsection if: (a) the Integrity Commissioner concludes the investigation to which the notice relates; and (b) any criminal proceedings or civil penalty proceedings resulting from the investigation are commenced.
conclusion text: The cancellation of a notation occurs if an investigation is concluded and proceedings commence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-7-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: then
logic summary: Discloses consequence of notation cancellation.
premise text: (7) A notation included in the notice is cancelled by this subsection if: (a) the Integrity Commissioner concludes the investigation to which the notice relates; and (b) any criminal proceedings or civil penalty proceedings resulting from the investigation are commenced.
conclusion text: The cancellation of a notation results in the commencement of proceedings.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77A(8) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
note: Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 77A(8) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between cancellation and notification
premise text: (8) If a notation is cancelled by subsection (7), the Integrity Commissioner must advise the person who was served with the notated notice, in writing, of the cancellation.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace between notification and cancellation
premise text: (8) If a notation is cancelled by subsection (7), the Integrity Commissioner must advise the person who was served with the notated notice, in writing, of the cancellation.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Information dissemination
logic summary: Information dissemination between notification and cancellation
premise text: (8) If a notation is cancelled by subsection (7), the Integrity Commissioner must advise the person who was served with the notated notice, in writing, of the cancellation.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-8-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Knowledge representation
logic summary: Knowledge representation of notification and cancellation
premise text: (8) If a notation is cancelled by subsection (7), the Integrity Commissioner must advise the person who was served with the notated notice, in writing, of the cancellation.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77A(9) Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77a-ss-9
part of: 77A Disclosure of notice may be prohibited
note: Prohibition on making a note about disclosure of information until notation is cancelled.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.45
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77a-ss-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (a) a notation has been included in the notice...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77B Offences of disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77b
has part: 77B(1) Offences of disclosure
has part: 77B(2) Offences of disclosure
has part: 77B(3) Offences of disclosure
has part: 77B(4) Offences of disclosure
has part: 77B(5) Offences of disclosure
has part: 77B(6) Offences of disclosure
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.47

77B(1) Offences of disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77b-ss-1
part of: 77B Offences of disclosure
note: Disclosing certain information is an offence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits disclosure of certain information.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Disclosing certain information is a subclass of the class of offences.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77B(2) Offences of disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77b-ss-2
part of: 77B Offences of disclosure
note: Disclosure permitted under certain circumstances
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permits disclosure in specified situations
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77B(3) Offences of disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77b-ss-3
part of: 77B Offences of disclosure
note: Disclosure of certain information is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (3) A person commits an offence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of disclosure as prohibited
premise text: (a) a disclosure is made to a person about...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77B(4) Offences of disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77b-ss-4
part of: 77B Offences of disclosure
note: Disclosure of information is permitted under certain conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Permission to disclose information.
premise text: (4) In proceedings for an offence against subsection (3), it is a defence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77B(5) Offences of disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77b-ss-5
part of: 77B Offences of disclosure
note: Disclosure of certain information is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-5-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 77B(5) Offences of disclosure
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: (5) A person commits an offence...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of disclosure as prohibited
premise text: (a) a disclosure is made to a person about...
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

77B(6) Offences of disclosure
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6
part of: 77B Offences of disclosure
note: Disclosing information that could reasonably be expected to infer the existence of something is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.47
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-diffusion-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-cogai-6

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
premise text: Disclosing information that could reasonably be expected to infer the existence of something.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classification of disclosure as prohibited
premise text: A reference in this section to disclosing something's existence includes disclosing information from which a person could reasonably be expected to infer its existence.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for prohibition
premise text: (6) A reference in this section to disclosing something's existence includes disclosing information from which a person could reasonably be expected to infer its existence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Recurring trace for prohibition
premise text: (6) A reference in this section to disclosing something's existence includes disclosing information from which a person could reasonably be expected to infer its existence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-diffusion-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffusion
logic summary: Diffusion of prohibition
premise text: (6) A reference in this section to disclosing something's existence includes disclosing information from which a person could reasonably be expected to infer its existence.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-77b-ss-6-logic-cogai-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: CogAI
logic summary: Cognitive AI application for prohibition
premise text: (6) A reference in this section to disclosing something's existence includes disclosing information from which a person could reasonably be expected to infer its existence.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Section 78
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-11
note: Repeal section and substitute with new content.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-11-norm

78 Failure to comply with notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-78
has part: 78(1) Failure to comply with notice
has part: 78(2) Failure to comply with notice
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.50

78(1) Failure to comply with notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-78-ss-1
part of: 78 Failure to comply with notice
note: Failure to comply with notice within specified time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-78-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-78-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(1) Failure to comply with notice
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-78-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: obligation
logic summary: Obligation to comply with notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

78(2) Failure to comply with notice
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-78-ss-2
part of: 78 Failure to comply with notice
note: Defendant bears evidential burden to comply with notice.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-78-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-78-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 78(2) Failure to comply with notice
borne by: NaturalPerson
scope note: borne by: NaturalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-78-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Defendant has an obligation to comply with the notice.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Paragraphs 79(1)(a) and (b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-12
note: Omit “to the Integrity Commissioner”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-12-norm

13 Subsection 79(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-13
note: Omit specific phrase from section 76
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-13-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-13-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specific phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

14 Subsection 79(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-14
note: Legal professional privilege does not affect information or document given, produced, or referred to.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.50
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-diffusion-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-cogai-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-shacl-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Legal professional privilege obligation
premise text: None
conclusion text: Information or document given, produced, or referred to is not subject to legal professional privilege.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap: Legal professional privilege does not affect information or document given, produced, or referred to at all times
premise text: None
conclusion text: Legal professional privilege does not affect information or document given, produced, or referred to at any time.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-diffusion-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: DoesNotDiffuse
logic summary: Non-diffusive: Legal professional privilege does not diffuse to other entities
premise text: None
conclusion text: Legal professional privilege does not diffuse to other entities.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-cogai-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: DoesNotAffect
logic summary: Cognitive AI: Legal professional privilege does not affect information or document given, produced, or referred to in cognitive AI systems
premise text: None
conclusion text: Legal professional privilege does not affect information or document given, produced, or referred to in cognitive AI systems.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-14-logic-shacl-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: SHACL
operator: Validates
logic summary: SHACL validation: Legal professional privilege obligation is validated by SHACL
premise text: None
conclusion text: Legal professional privilege obligation is validated by SHACL.
execution surface: modalities::logic::shacl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Subsection 80(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-15
note: Omit specific phrase from section 75 or 76
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits specific action
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

16 Subsection 80(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-16
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-16-norm

17 Subsection 80(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-17
note: Omit specific phrase from section 75 or 76 notices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-17-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-17-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-17-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits specific action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

18 Subsection 80(7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-18
note: Omit “or 76”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-18-norm

19 Subsections 81(1) and (2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-19
note: Omit specific phrase from section 75 or 76 notices.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-19-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-19-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-19-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omitting phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

20 Subsection 82(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-20
note: Substitute 'a corruption issue' for 'corruption issue'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-20-norm

21 Subsection 83(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-21-2
note: Insert 'to do either or both of the following'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.51
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-21-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-21-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-21-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 21 Subsection 83(1)
borne by: LegalPerson
scope note: borne by: LegalPerson
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-21-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insert
logic summary: Insertion obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Paragraph 83(1)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-22
note: Omit “or”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-22-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-22-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-22-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of ‘or’.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

23 Paragraph 83(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-23
note: Produce documents or things specified in the summons if reasonable grounds exist to suspect relevance to an investigation.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-23-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-23-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-23-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Duty obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

24 Subsection 90(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-24
note: Omit specific phrase from direction.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-24-norm

25 Paragraph 92(2)(e)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-25
note: Substitute section number in paragraph.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-25-norm

26 Subsection 95(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-26
note: Maintains legal professional privilege despite disclosure.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-26-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-26-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-26-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Maintain
logic summary: Legal professional privilege is maintained.
premise text: Disclosure does not affect legal professional privilege.
conclusion text: Claim of legal professional privilege remains unaffected.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

27 Subsection 96(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-27
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-27-norm

28 Paragraph 96(4)(c)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-28
note: Insertion of section numbers in Schedule 4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.52
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-28-norm

29 After Subdivision E of Division 2 of Part 9
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-29
note: Prohibition of contempt of ACLEI
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-29-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-29-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-29-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Forbids contempt of ACLEI
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96A Contempt of ACLEI
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96a
has part: 96A(1) Contempt of ACLEI
has part: 96A(2) Contempt of ACLEI
has part: 96A(3) Contempt of ACLEI
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.53

96A(1) Contempt of ACLEI
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96a-ss-1
part of: 96A Contempt of ACLEI
note: Failure to comply with certain requirements at a hearing
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 96A(1) Contempt of ACLEI
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of certain actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96A(2) Contempt of ACLEI
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96a-ss-2
part of: 96A Contempt of ACLEI
note: Refusal to answer question at a hearing does not violate contempt of ACLEI.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Exemption
logic summary: Legal practitioner's privilege prevents answer disclosure.
premise text: (2) Subparagraph (1)(a)(iv)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96A(3) Contempt of ACLEI
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96a-ss-3
part of: 96A Contempt of ACLEI
note: Refusal to produce document on grounds of privileged communication
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.53
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Legal practitioner's obligation to produce document
premise text: Legal practitioner has a duty to produce document
conclusion text: Subparagraph (1)(a)(v) does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-3-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Legal practitioner's permission to refuse production of document
premise text: Legal practitioner has a right to refuse production of document
conclusion text: Subparagraph (1)(a)(v) does not apply
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: TemporalInterval
logic summary: Document can be produced at a later time
premise text: Legal practitioner has a duty to produce document
conclusion text: Subparagraph (1)(a)(v) does not apply
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

96B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96b
has part: 96B(1) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
has part: 96B(2) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
has part: 96B(3) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
has part: 96B(4) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
has part: 96B(5) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
has part: 96B(6) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
has part: 96B(7) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.54

96B(1) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1
part of: 96B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
note: Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with contempt in a hearing
premise text: (1) If, in respect of a hearing...
conclusion text: ...the Integrity Commissioner may apply to either of the following courts...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Defines temporal interval for contempt application
premise text: (1) If, in respect of a hearing...
conclusion text: ...the Integrity Commissioner may apply to either of the following courts...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring Trace
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace for contempt application
premise text: (1) If, in respect of a hearing...
conclusion text: ...the Integrity Commissioner may apply to either of the following courts...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses responsibility for contempt application
premise text: (1) If, in respect of a hearing...
conclusion text: ...the Integrity Commissioner may apply to either of the following courts...
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-1-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes AI's role in contempt application
premise text: (1) If, in respect of a hearing...
conclusion text: ...the Integrity Commissioner may apply to either of the following courts...
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

96B(2) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96b-ss-2
part of: 96B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
note: Integrity Commissioner must inform person before making application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96B(2) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must inform
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96B(3) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96b-ss-3
part of: 96B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
note: Certificate required for contempt application
description: grounds and evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96B(3) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: requires
logic summary: Application must be accompanied by a certificate
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96B(4) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96b-ss-4
part of: 96B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
note: Must provide a copy of the certificate to the person before or at the same time as the application is made.
description: Yes
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96B(4) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide a copy of the certificate to the person before or at the same time as the application is made.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96B(5) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96b-ss-5
part of: 96B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
note: No obligation to provide evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Integrity Commissioner has an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96B(6) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6
part of: 96B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
note: Court may deal with person as if acts or omissions constituted contempt of court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 96B(6) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with person as if acts or omissions constituted contempt of court.
premise text: (6) If, after considering the matters specified in the certificate; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of ACLEI; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of the person;
conclusion text: the court to which the application was made finds that the person was in contempt of ACLEI, the court may deal with the person as if the acts or omissions involved constituted a contempt of that court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with temporal intervals related to contempt proceedings.
premise text: (6) If, after considering the matters specified in the certificate; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of ACLEI; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of the person;
conclusion text: the court to which the application was made finds that the person was in contempt of ACLEI, the court may deal with the person as if the acts or omissions involved constituted a contempt of that court.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Repeats in temporal intervals related to contempt proceedings.
premise text: (6) If, after considering the matters specified in the certificate; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of ACLEI; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of the person;
conclusion text: the court to which the application was made finds that the person was in contempt of ACLEI, the court may deal with the person as if the acts or omissions involved constituted a contempt of that court.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Spread
logic summary: Spreads to related entities in contempt proceedings.
premise text: (6) If, after considering the matters specified in the certificate; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of ACLEI; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of the person;
conclusion text: the court to which the application was made finds that the person was in contempt of ACLEI, the court may deal with the person as if the acts or omissions involved constituted a contempt of that court.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-6-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Recognizes entities involved in contempt proceedings.
premise text: (6) If, after considering the matters specified in the certificate; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of ACLEI; and hearing or receiving any evidence or statements by or in support of the person;
conclusion text: the court to which the application was made finds that the person was in contempt of ACLEI, the court may deal with the person as if the acts or omissions involved constituted a contempt of that court.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96B(7) Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96b-ss-7
part of: 96B Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
note: Federal Court or Supreme Court to deal with contempt
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.54
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96b-ss-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits dealing with contempt
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96C Conduct of contempt proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96c
has part: 96C(1) Conduct of contempt proceedings
has part: 96C(2) Conduct of contempt proceedings
has part: 96C(3) Conduct of contempt proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56

96C(1) Conduct of contempt proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96c-ss-1
part of: 96C Conduct of contempt proceedings
note: Application of section to Federal Court or Supreme Court proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96C(1) Conduct of contempt proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies to specified courts
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96C(2) Conduct of contempt proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2
part of: 96C Conduct of contempt proceedings
note: Proceedings must be conducted in accordance with the laws that apply to punishing contempt of court.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Temporal interval for proceedings
premise text: (2) Proceedings in relation to the application are, subject to this Act, to be instituted, carried on, heard and determined in accordance with the laws (including any Rules of Court) that apply in relation to the punishment of a contempt of the court to which the application was made.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal Trace
logic summary: Temporal trace for proceedings
premise text: (2) Proceedings in relation to the application are, subject to this Act, to be instituted, carried on, heard and determined in accordance with the laws (including any Rules of Court) that apply in relation to the punishment of a contempt of the court to which the application was made.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffusion of proceedings
premise text: (2) Proceedings in relation to the application are, subject to this Act, to be instituted, carried on, heard and determined in accordance with the laws (including any Rules of Court) that apply in relation to the punishment of a contempt of the court to which the application was made.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Inference
logic summary: Inference for proceedings
premise text: (2) Proceedings in relation to the application are, subject to this Act, to be instituted, carried on, heard and determined in accordance with the laws (including any Rules of Court) that apply in relation to the punishment of a contempt of the court to which the application was made.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96C(3) Conduct of contempt proceedings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96c-ss-3
part of: 96C Conduct of contempt proceedings
note: Certificate is prima facie evidence in contempt proceedings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96C(3) Conduct of contempt proceedings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96c-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to provide evidence
premise text: Certificate is presented as evidence
conclusion text: Prima facie evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96D Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96d
has part: 96D(1) Person in contempt may be detained
has part: 96D(2) Person in contempt may be detained
has part: 96D(3) Person in contempt may be detained
has part: 96D(4) Person in contempt may be detained
has part: 96D(5) Person in contempt may be detained
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56

96D(1) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1
part of: 96D Person in contempt may be detained
note: Detain person for bringing before court
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 96D(1) Person in contempt may be detained
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits detention without court hearing
premise text: (1) If the Integrity Commissioner proposes to make an application under subsection 96B(1)
conclusion text: the Integrity Commissioner may, during the hearing concerned, direct a constable or an authorised officer to detain the person for the purpose of bringing the person before the relevant court for the hearing of the application.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes temporal relationship between detention and court hearing
premise text: (1) If the Integrity Commissioner proposes to make an application under subsection 96B(1)
conclusion text: the Integrity Commissioner may, during the hearing concerned, direct a constable or an authorised officer to detain the person for the purpose of bringing the person before the relevant court for the hearing of the application.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Establishes recurring trace between detention and court hearing
premise text: (1) If the Integrity Commissioner proposes to make an application under subsection 96B(1)
conclusion text: the Integrity Commissioner may, during the hearing concerned, direct a constable or an authorised officer to detain the person for the purpose of bringing the person before the relevant court for the hearing of the application.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Diffuses responsibility between Integrity Commissioner and law enforcement
premise text: (1) If the Integrity Commissioner proposes to make an application under subsection 96B(1)
conclusion text: the Integrity Commissioner may, during the hearing concerned, direct a constable or an authorised officer to detain the person for the purpose of bringing the person before the relevant court for the hearing of the application.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Justification
logic summary: Provides justification for detention as part of court process
premise text: (1) If the Integrity Commissioner proposes to make an application under subsection 96B(1)
conclusion text: the Integrity Commissioner may, during the hearing concerned, direct a constable or an authorised officer to detain the person for the purpose of bringing the person before the relevant court for the hearing of the application.
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96D(2) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96d-ss-2
part of: 96D Person in contempt may be detained
note: Person in contempt must be brought before the court as soon as practicable.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96D(2) Person in contempt may be detained
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to bring person before court
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96D(3) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96d-ss-3
part of: 96D Person in contempt may be detained
note: Court may direct person to appear before court in relation to application.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96D(3) Person in contempt may be detained
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Court must direct person to appear before court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96D(4) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96d-ss-4
part of: 96D Person in contempt may be detained
note: The court may impose conditions on the release of a person in contempt.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96D(4) Person in contempt may be detained
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: impose
logic summary: The court imposes conditions on the release.
premise text: The court may also impose any other condition...
conclusion text: The person must surrender their passport.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96D(5) Person in contempt may be detained
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96d-ss-5
part of: 96D Person in contempt may be detained
note: Court may vary or revoke a condition imposed under subsection (4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.56
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96D(5) Person in contempt may be detained
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96d-ss-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: Court may vary or revoke a condition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96E Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96e
has part: 96E(1) Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application
has part: 96E(2) Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.57

96E(1) Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96e-ss-1
part of: 96E Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application
note: Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application at any time.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: may
logic summary: May withdraw contempt application
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96E(2) Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2
part of: 96E Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application
note: Person must be released from detention immediately if Integrity Commissioner withdraws contempt application and person is in detention under section 96D.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96E(2) Integrity Commissioner may withdraw contempt application
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Must
logic summary: Mandatory obligation
premise text: (2) If the Integrity Commissioner does so; and (b) the person to whom the application relates is in detention under section 96D;
conclusion text: the person must be released from detention immediately.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: During
logic summary: Temporal interval during which person must be released from detention
premise text: (2) If: (a) the Integrity Commissioner does so; and (b) the person to whom the application relates is in detention under section 96D;
conclusion text: the person must be released from detention immediately.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Until
logic summary: Temporal interval until which person must not be detained
premise text: (2) If: (a) the Integrity Commissioner does so; and (b) the person to whom the application relates is in detention under section 96D;
conclusion text: the person must be released from detention immediately.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: If-then
logic summary: Conditional obligation based on Integrity Commissioner's action and person's detention status
premise text: (2) If: (a) the Integrity Commissioner does so; and (b) the person to whom the application relates is in detention under section 96D;
conclusion text: the person must be released from detention immediately.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96e-ss-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Classifies
logic summary: Classification of persons subject to contempt application withdrawal by Integrity Commissioner
premise text: (2) If: (a) the Integrity Commissioner does so; and (b) the person to whom the application relates is in detention under section 96D;
conclusion text: the person must be released from detention immediately.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96F Double jeopardy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96f
has part: 96F(1) Double jeopardy
has part: 96F(2) Double jeopardy
has part: 96F(3) Double jeopardy
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.57

96F(1) Double jeopardy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1
part of: 96F Double jeopardy
note: No double jeopardy for acts/offenses under this Act or a State law.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 96F(1) Double jeopardy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: No double jeopardy
premise text: (1) If an act or omission by a person is an offence against this Act and is also an offence against a law of a State, the person may be prosecuted and convicted under this Act or under that law of that State in respect of the act or omission...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Temporal overlap between offenses
premise text: (1) If an act or omission by a person is an offence against this Act and is also an offence against a law of a State, the person may be prosecuted and convicted under this Act or under that law of that State in respect of the act or omission...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: Repeating offenses
premise text: (1) If an act or omission by a person is an offence against this Act and is also an offence against a law of a State, the person may be prosecuted and convicted under this Act or under that law of that State in respect of the act or omission...
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: No double jeopardy obligation
premise text: (1) If an act or omission by a person is an offence against this Act and is also an offence against a law of a State, the person may be prosecuted and convicted under this Act or under that law of that State in respect of the act or omission...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-1-logic-argumentation-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Implication of double jeopardy
premise text: (1) If an act or omission by a person is an offence against this Act and is also an offence against a law of a State, the person may be prosecuted and convicted under this Act or under that law of that State in respect of the act or omission...
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

96F(2) Double jeopardy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2
part of: 96F Double jeopardy
note: No prosecution for an offence in respect of an act or omission if dealt with by the court under subsection 96B(1).
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 96F(2) Double jeopardy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If dealt with by the court, then no prosecution.
premise text: (a) an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 96B(1)
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence in respect of that act or omission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: The provision overlaps with the application of subsection 96B(1).
premise text: (a) an application is made to the Federal Court or a Supreme Court under subsection 96B(1)
conclusion text: the person is dealt with by the court under that section in respect of the act or omission
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Repeats
logic summary: The provision repeats the application of subsection 96B(1).
premise text: (b) the person is dealt with by the court under that section in respect of the act or omission
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence in respect of that act or omission
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-2-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Implies
logic summary: If dealt with by the court, then no prosecution.
premise text: (b) the person is dealt with by the court under that section in respect of the act or omission
conclusion text: the person is not liable to be prosecuted for an offence in respect of that act or omission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

96F(3) Double jeopardy
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-96f-ss-3
part of: 96F Double jeopardy
note: No application can be made under subsection 96B(1) in respect of the act or omission.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.57
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-3-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-96f-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 96F(3) Double jeopardy
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

30 Section 93 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-30
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-30-norm

93 Offences—attendance at hearings etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-93
note: Offences—attendance at hearings etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-93-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-93-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 93 Offences—attendance at hearings etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

31 Section 94 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-31
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-31-norm

94 Offences—disturbing or interrupting hearings
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-94
note: Offences—disturbing or interrupting hearings
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-94-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-94-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 94 Offences—disturbing or interrupting hearings
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

32 Subsection 99(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-32
note: Authorized officer may apply for warrant to arrest person if they have not complied with order or are likely to leave Australia to avoid giving evidence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.58
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 32 Subsection 99(1)
borne by: Agent
scope note: borne by: Agent
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the person from leaving Australia to avoid giving evidence.
premise text: The person has been ordered to deliver their passport to the Integrity Commissioner.
conclusion text: The authorized officer may apply for a warrant to arrest the person.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the person from attempting to evade service of summons.
premise text: The person is to be served with a summons under section 83.
conclusion text: The authorized officer may apply for a warrant to arrest the person if they have not complied with the order or are likely to leave Australia to avoid giving evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Overlaps with the time period during which the person is likely to leave Australia to avoid giving evidence.
premise text: The authorized officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person is likely to leave Australia for the purpose of avoiding giving evidence at a hearing before the Integrity Commissioner.
conclusion text: The authorized officer may apply for a warrant to arrest the person if they have not complied with the order or are likely to leave Australia to avoid giving evidence.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring
logic summary: Recurring trace of the person's attempts to evade service of summons.
premise text: The authorized officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person is likely to abscond or is otherwise attempting, or likely to attempt, to evade service of the summons.
conclusion text: The authorized officer may apply for a warrant to arrest the person if they have not complied with the order or are likely to leave Australia to avoid giving evidence.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-32-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the person from leaving Australia to avoid giving evidence at a hearing before the Integrity Commissioner.
premise text: The authorized officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person is likely to leave Australia for the purpose of avoiding giving evidence at a hearing before the Integrity Commissioner.
conclusion text: The authorized officer may apply for a warrant to arrest the person if they have not complied with the order or are likely to leave Australia to avoid giving evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

33 Subsection 100(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-33
note: Omit all words after 'authorising' and substitute with 'the arrest of the person'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-33-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-33-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the specified action.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

34 After subsection 100(9)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-34
note: Authorized officer executing warrant does not need to be the one who applied for it.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-34-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-34-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-34-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permits
logic summary: Permission granted
premise text: Authorized officer executing warrant need not be the authorized officer who applied for the warrant.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

35 Subsection 104(4)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-35
note: Substitute 'a hearing that has been held' for 'a hearing that been held'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-35-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-35-logic-alleninterval-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-35-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 35 Subsection 104(4)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-35-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes a duty on the state to substitute
premise text: State must substitute
conclusion text: Substitution is obligatory
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-35-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: MEets
logic summary: Establishes a temporal relationship between 'hearing' and 'held'
premise text: Heard happens after Held
conclusion text: Held meets Heared
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

36 At the end of subparagraph 110(4)(b)(iv)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-36
note: Add “or”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-36-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-36-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 36 At the end of subparagraph 110(4)(b)(iv)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

37 After subparagraph 110(4)(b)(iv)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-37
note: Insert eligible seizable item in any case
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-37-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-37-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-37-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 37 After subparagraph 110(4)(b)(iv)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-37-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST INSERT
logic summary: Obligation to insert eligible seizable item
premise text: After subparagraph 110(4)(b)(iv)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

38 Paragraph 117(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-38
note: Insert “or a constable” after “authorised officer”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-38-norm

39 Paragraph 117(2)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-39
note: Insert “or a constable” after “not an authorised officer”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-39-norm

40 Subsection 117(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-40
note: Only an authorised officer or a constable may take part in searching a person.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.59
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-40-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-40-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-40-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 40 Subsection 117(3)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-40-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits searching a person without authorization.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

41 At the end of section 142
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-41
note: See also subsection 96B(5)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-41-norm

42 Paragraph 147(1)(d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-42
note: Omit “must”
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-42-norm

43 Paragraph 150(2)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-43
note: A person must provide information or produce a document or thing upon request.
description: true
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-43-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-43-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-43-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 43 Paragraph 150(2)(a)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-43-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST PROVIDE
logic summary: Must provide information or produce a document or thing upon request.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

44 Subsection 150(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-44
note: Omit “request”, substitute “notice”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-44-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-44-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-44-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of 'request'
premise text: Omit ‘request’
conclusion text: Substitute ‘notice’
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

45 Paragraph 156(5)(a)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-45
note: Substitute 'authorise' for 'authorises'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-45-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-45-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-45-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Replace 'authorises' with 'authorise'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

46 Section 166 (heading)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-46
note: Repeal heading and substitute with new text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-46-norm

166 Application of Division
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-166
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-166-norm

47 Section 166
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-47
note: Omit “Part”, substitute “Division”.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-47-norm

48 Subsection 167(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-48
note: Insertion of phrase after 'proposes to take action'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-48-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-48-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-48-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 48 Subsection 167(5)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-48-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: insertion
logic summary: Insertion of phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

49 Subsection 167(5)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-49
note: Omit subsection 142(3) or (4)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-49-norm

50 Paragraph 167(6)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-50
note: Replace 'Integrity Commissioner's' with 'special investigator's'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.60
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-50-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-50-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-50-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of using the term "Integrity Commissioner's"
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

51 Subsection 187(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-51
note: Omit 'Integrity Commissioner', substitute 'Assistant Integrity Commissioner'.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-51-norm

52 Subsection 18K(5) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-52
note: Substitute sections 77A and 91 for section 91.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-52-norm

53 Subsection 6(1) (definition of federal law enforcement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-53
note: Insertion of (aa) after paragraph (a)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-53-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-53-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 53 Subsection 6(1) (definition of federal law enforcement
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

54 Application—items 7 to 19
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-54
note: Amendments apply in relation to notices served on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-54-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-54-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-54-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 54 Application—items 7 to 19
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-54-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: relatesTo
logic summary: Relates to amendments made by items 7-19 of this Schedule.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

55 Application—section 96 of the Law Enforcement Integrity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-55
note: Commissioner Act 2006 applies to hearings under the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-55-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-55-logic-alleninterval-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-55-logic-alleninterval-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Temporal interval application
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

56 Application—sections 96A to 96F of the Law Enforcement
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-56
note: Application of sections 96A to 96F of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-56-norm

57 Application—section 100 of the Law Enforcement Integrity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-57
note: Section 100 of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006 applies in relation to a warrant issued on or after this Schedule commences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.61
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-argumentation-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 57 Application—section 100 of the Law Enforcement Integrity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Section applies to warrants issued on or after commencement.
premise text: Commissioner Act 2006
conclusion text: Section 100 of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Section applies to warrants issued on or after commencement.
premise text: Commissioner Act 2006
conclusion text: Section 100 of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-argumentation-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Argumentation
operator: Implication
logic summary: Section implies that warrants issued on or after commencement are subject to section 100.
premise text: Commissioner Act 2006
conclusion text: Section 100 of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006
execution surface: modalities::argumentation
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Temporal Interval
logic summary: Section applies to warrants issued on or after commencement.
premise text: Commissioner Act 2006
conclusion text: Section 100 of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-57-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Applicability
logic summary: Section applies to warrants issued on or after commencement.
premise text: Commissioner Act 2006
conclusion text: Section 100 of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

58 Application—item 37
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-58
note: Amendment applies in relation to warrant issued on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-58-norm

59 Application—section 117 of the Law Enforcement Integrity
type: Concept
realized by: sch-4-sec-59
note: Section 117 of the Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner Act 2006 applies in relation to a warrant executed on or after this Schedule commences.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.62
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-59-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-59-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-59-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 59 Application—section 117 of the Law Enforcement Integrity
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-4-sec-59-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: applies
logic summary: Section applies to warrants executed on or after the commencement of this Schedule.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 314.1(1) of the Criminal Code (after table item 1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-1
note: Prohibition on Benzylpiperazine (BZP)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits the use of Benzylpiperazine (BZP)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-norm

250 Section 250
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-250
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-250-norm

0 Section 0
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-0
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-0-norm

2 Subsection 314.1(1) of the Criminal Code (after table item 7)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2-2
note: Ketamine is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Prohibition
conclusion text: Ketamine is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-3-norm

500 Section 500
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-500
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-500-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-1-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-1-2-norm

3 Subsection 314.1(1) of the Criminal Code (after table item 9)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-3-2
note: Methcathinone is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-3-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-3-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits methcathinone.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-3-norm

250 Section 250
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-250-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-250-2-norm

0 Section 0
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-0-2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-0-2-norm

4 Subsection 314.1(1) of the Criminal Code (after table
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-4
note: Prohibition of 4-Methylmethcathinone
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits the production, possession, or use of 4-Methylmethcathinone
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-4-norm

250 Section 250
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-250-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-250-3-norm

0 Section 0
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-0-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-0-3-norm

5 Subsection 314.3(1) of the Criminal Code (after table item 8)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-5
note: Phenylpropanolamine is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-5-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: =
logic summary: Prohibition
conclusion text: Phenylpropanolamine is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

400 Section 400
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-400
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-400-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-1-3
note: Section 1 obligation
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-1-3-norm

6 Subsection 314.4(1) of the Criminal Code (after table
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-6
note: Benzylpiperazine (BZP) is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.63
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-6-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of Benzylpiperazine (BZP)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-5-norm

0 Section 0
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-0-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-0-4-norm

7 Subsection 314.4(1) of the Criminal Code (after table
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-7
note: Ketamine is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits the use of ketamine.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-3-3
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-3-3-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-1-4
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-1-4-norm

8 Subsection 314.4(1) of the Criminal Code (after table
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-8
note: Methamphetamine is prohibited.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits methamphetamine.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2-6
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-6-norm

0 Section 0
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-0-5
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-0-5-norm

9 Subsection 314.4(1) of the Criminal Code (table item 95)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-9
note: Repeal of methcathinone item in the Criminal Code
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on methcathinone
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-7-norm

0 Section 0
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-0-6
note: Section number
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-0-6-norm

10 Subsection 314.4(1) of the Criminal Code (table item 99)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-10
note: Repeal item
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-10-norm

11 Subsection 314.4(1) of the Criminal Code (after table
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-11
note: Prohibition on 4-Methylmethcathinone (4-MMC)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibits the possession, sale, or importation of 4-MMC
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Section 2
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-2-8
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-2-8-norm

0 Section 0
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-0-7
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-0-7-norm

12 Subsection 314.6(1) of the Criminal Code (table item 10)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-12
note: Repeal Phenylpropanolamine
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-12-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-12-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Imposes prohibition on Phenylpropanolamine
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Section 3
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-3-4
note: Section 3, page 64
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-3-4-norm

1 Section 1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-1-5
note: Schedule for drugs, plants and precursors
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.64
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-1-5-norm

13 Subsection 4(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-13
note: Defines 'border controlled precursor' for the purpose of the Criminal Code.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.65
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-13-norm

14 Subsection 183UA(1) (definition of special forfeited
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-14
note: Definition of special forfeited goods
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.65
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-14-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-14-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 14 Subsection 183UA(1) (definition of special forfeited
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-14-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines the term 'special forfeited goods'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-14-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes
logic summary: Substitutes a new definition for special forfeited goods
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15 Subsection 183UA(1) (paragraph (b) of the definition of
type: Concept
realized by: sch-5-sec-15
note: Omit 'or (n)', substitute ', (n) or (na)'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.65
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-15-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-15-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-5-sec-15-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: prohibition
logic summary: Prohibition of omission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 16A(1AB)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-1
note: Repeal subsection
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-1-norm

2 At the end of subsection 16A(1B)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-2
note: Court must make an order corresponding to a restraining order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Obligation to make an order
premise text: The Director (or the Commissioner for the Australian Federal Police) applies for a restraining order.
conclusion text: A court must make an order corresponding to the order mentioned in this subsection.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: BETWEEN
logic summary: Temporal interval between applying for a restraining order and making an order
premise text: The Director (or the Commissioner for the Australian Federal Police) applies for a restraining order.
conclusion text: A court must make an order corresponding to the order mentioned in this subsection within a certain time frame.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: RECURSIVE
logic summary: Recurring trace of making orders under section 28A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
premise text: The Director (or the Commissioner for the Australian Federal Police) applies for a restraining order.
conclusion text: A court must make an order corresponding to the order mentioned in this subsection repeatedly.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: SPREADS_TO
logic summary: Diffusion of obligations from Director to court
premise text: The Director (or the Commissioner for the Australian Federal Police) applies for a restraining order.
conclusion text: The obligation to make an order corresponding to the order mentioned in this subsection spreads to the court.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-2-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: RECOGNIZES
logic summary: Recognition of Director's application by the court
premise text: The Director (or the Commissioner for the Australian Federal Police) applies for a restraining order.
conclusion text: The court recognizes the Director's application and makes an order corresponding to it.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 16A(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-3
note: Omit ‘, (1AB)’ from the text.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-3-norm

4 Subsection 15B(1) (note 1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-4
note: Repeal note and substitute definition of authorised officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-ltl-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-deontic-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Subsection 15B(1) (note 1)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibit certain persons from performing functions under the Act
premise text: Paragraphs (a), (aa), (b) and (c) of the definition of authorised officer in section 338
conclusion text: Note 1: Paragraphs (a), (aa), (b) and (c) of the definition of authorised officer in section 338
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes obligation on certain persons to comply with new definition of authorised officer
premise text: Note 1: Paragraphs (a), (aa), (b) and (c) of the definition of authorised officer in section 338
conclusion text: New definition of authorised officer in section 338
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between repeal of note and substitution of new definition
premise text: Repeal the note, substitute: Note 1:
conclusion text: Substitution of new definition of authorised officer in section 338
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Establishes temporal relation between repeal of note and substitution of new definition
premise text: Repeal the note, substitute: Note 1:
conclusion text: Substitution of new definition of authorised officer in section 338
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-4-logic-deontic-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permission
logic summary: Permits repeal of note and substitution of new definition
premise text: Repeal the note, substitute:
conclusion text: Note 1: Paragraphs (a), (aa), (b) and (c) of the definition of authorised officer in section 338
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

5 Section 15C (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-5
note: Repeal note and substitute definition of authorised officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.66
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-5-norm

6 Subsection 15D(1) (note)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-6
note: Repeal note and substitute definition of authorised officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.67
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-6-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Subsection 15D(1) (note)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

7 After section 15F
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-7
note: Insert clause
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.67
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-7-norm

15FA Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15fa
has part: 15FA(1) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
has part: 15FA(2) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
has part: 15FA(3) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
has part: 15FA(4) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.67

15FA(1) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-1
part of: 15FA Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
note: Prohibition on publication of evidence—proceedings for
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.67
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits publication of evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15FA(2) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2
part of: 15FA Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
note: Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.67
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-diffusion-6

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits publication of evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies matters to be restricted from publication
premise text: (a) if the application is made under section 15C (in person)—the matters referred to in that section that are contained in an affidavit made in support of the application;
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Classify
logic summary: Classifies matters to be restricted from publication
premise text: (b) if the application is made under section 15D (by telephone or other electronic means)—the matters referred to in paragraph 15D(2)(a) that are contained, or that are to be contained, in an affidavit made in support of the application.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Restrict
logic summary: Restricts publication of evidence
premise text: (2) If it appears to the magistrate to be necessary in order to prevent prejudice to the administration of justice,
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal Restriction
logic summary: Restricts publication within a specific time frame
premise text: (2) If it appears to the magistrate to be necessary in order to prevent prejudice to the administration of justice,
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-2-logic-diffusion-6
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Limit
logic summary: Limits dissemination of information
premise text: (2) If it appears to the magistrate to be necessary in order to prevent prejudice to the administration of justice,
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15FA(3) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-3
part of: 15FA Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
note: Magistrate may make order at any time after application is made and before it is determined.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.67
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibition
logic summary: Prohibits publication of evidence
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

15FA(4) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-4
part of: 15FA Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
note: Prohibition on publication of evidence—proceedings for
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.67
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits publication of evidence
premise text: (4) The power conferred by subsection (2) is in addition to, and is not taken to derogate from, any other power of the magistrate.
conclusion text: The power to publish evidence is prohibited.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-4-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits publication of evidence—proceedings for
premise text: (4) The power conferred by subsection (2) is in addition to, and is not taken to derogate from, any other power of the magistrate.
conclusion text: The power to publish evidence is prohibited in proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-15fa-ss-4-logic-linearlogic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: Imply
logic summary: Implies prohibition on publication of evidence—proceedings for
premise text: (4) The power conferred by subsection (2) is in addition to, and is not taken to derogate from, any other power of the magistrate.
conclusion text: The power to publish evidence implies a prohibition in proceedings.
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

8 At the end of subsection 15P(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-8
note: Adds certain persons performing functions under Schedule 6 to the definition of authorised officer
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.67
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-8-norm

9 At the end of Division 2 of Part 2-1
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-9
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-9-norm

28A Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-28a
has part: 28A(1) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
has part: 28A(2) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
has part: 28A(3) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
has part: 28A(4) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.68

28A(1) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-28a-ss-1
part of: 28A Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
note: Court may make order under subsection (2) if a proceeding of crime authority applies for restraining order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court may prohibit publication of evidence.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28A(2) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-28a-ss-2
part of: 28A Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
note: Court may prohibit or restrict publication of certain evidence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court prohibits publication
premise text: Court may make an order
conclusion text: Publication is prohibited
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

28A(3) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3
part of: 28A Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
note: Court may make an order at any time after application is made and before it is determined.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Court may prohibit publication of evidence.
premise text: (3) The court may make an order under subsection (2) at any time after the application is made and before it is determined.
conclusion text: (3) The court may make an order under subsection (2) at any time after the application is made and before it is determined.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlap
logic summary: Excerpt describes a temporal interval of 'any time' after application is made.
premise text: (3) The court may make an order under subsection (2) at any time after the application is made and before it is determined.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurrent
logic summary: Excerpt describes a recurring trace of court orders.
premise text: (3) The court may make an order under subsection (2) at any time after the application is made and before it is determined.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-diffusion-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Diffusion
operator: Diffuse
logic summary: Excerpt describes a process of diffusion of information about court orders.
premise text: (3) The court may make an order under subsection (2) at any time after the application is made and before it is determined.
execution surface: modalities::diffusion
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-3-logic-cogai-5
type: LogicApplication
modality: CogAI
operator: Recognize
logic summary: Excerpt describes a process of recognizing court orders.
premise text: (3) The court may make an order under subsection (2) at any time after the application is made and before it is determined.
execution surface: sparql_library::parsers::chk_parser
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

28A(4) Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-28a-ss-4
part of: 28A Prohibition of publication of evidence—proceedings for
note: Prohibition on publication of evidence—proceedings for
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-28a-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits publication of evidence
premise text: (4) The power conferred by subsection (2) is in addition to, and is not taken to derogate from, any other power of the court.
conclusion text: (4) The power conferred by subsection (2) is not taken to derogate from any other power of the court.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

10 Section 338 (paragraph (a) of the definition of authorised
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-10
note: Authorise AFP member or employee to perform certain functions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.68
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Grant permission
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Application—publication prohibitions relating to
type: Concept
realized by: sch-6-sec-11
note: Amendments apply in relation to applications made on or after commencement for restraining and freezing orders.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.70
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-logic-ltl-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 11 Application—publication prohibitions relating to
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Application of amendments to restrain conduct.
premise text: Amendments apply in relation to applications made on or after commencement.
conclusion text: Duty to comply with amended provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Temporal relation
logic summary: Temporal relation between commencement and application.
premise text: Amendments apply in relation to applications made on or after the commencement of those items.
conclusion text: Commencement before or after application.
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-logic-ltl-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Recurring trace
logic summary: Recurring trace between applications and amendments.
premise text: Amendments apply in relation to applications made on or after commencement.
conclusion text: Application before or after amendment.
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-6-sec-11-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Application of amendments to freeze conduct.
premise text: The amendment of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 made by item 7 of this Schedule applies in relation to an application made on or after the commencement of that item.
conclusion text: Duty to comply with amended provisions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 16(1) (definition of licence period)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-1
note: Defines licence period for a person released on licence for a federal sentence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 1 Subsection 16(1) (definition of licence period)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines the term 'licence period'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-1-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes
logic summary: Substitutes a new definition for 'licence period'
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Subsection 16(1) (definition of parole order)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-2
note: Defines parole order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-2-norm

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 2 Subsection 16(1) (definition of parole order)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

3 Subsection 16(1) (definition of parole period)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-3
note: Defines parole period for a person with a parole order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.71
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 3 Subsection 16(1) (definition of parole period)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines a term
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Subsection 16(1) (definition of released on parole)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-4
note: Substitute definition of parole order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Substitution
logic summary: Definition substitution
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Subsection 16(1) (definition of supervision period)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-5
note: Defines supervision period for a person released on parole or licence.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-5-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-5-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 5 Subsection 16(1) (definition of supervision period)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-5-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: defines
logic summary: Defines the term 'supervision period'
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-5-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: substitutes
logic summary: Substitutes a new definition for 'supervision period'
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

6 Sections 19AL and 19AM
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-6
note: Repeal sections and substitute with new ones.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-6-norm

19AL Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-19al
has part: 19AL(1) Release on parole—making of parole order
has part: 19AL(2) Release on parole—making of parole order
has part: 19AL(3) Release on parole—making of parole order
has part: 19AL(4) Release on parole—making of parole order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.72

19AL(1) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-19al-ss-1
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order
note: The Attorney-General must make a parole order before the end of a non-parole period.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AL(1) Release on parole—making of parole order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: The Attorney-General must make a parole order.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AL(2) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-19al-ss-2
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order
note: Notice to be given to person refused parole order
description: written notice with reasons for refusal
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Attorney-General must give notice
conclusion text: written notice with reasons for refusal
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-2-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Class
logic summary: Notice includes statement of reasons
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AL(3) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-19al-ss-3
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order
note: Parole order must be in writing and specify supervision conditions.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-3-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AL(3) Release on parole—making of parole order
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Parole order must be in writing.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AL(4) Release on parole—making of parole order
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4
part of: 19AL Release on parole—making of parole order
note: Exemption from parole order requirement for certain federal sentences
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.72
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-logic-deontic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows making of parole order despite requirement to refuse
premise text: (4) Despite subsection (1)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-logic-alleninterval-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Overlaps
logic summary: Specifies temporal overlap between federal and State/ Territory sentences
premise text: (b) for a federal sentence, or federal sentences, that include a life sentence—until the release of the person from prison for the State or Territory offence (but a decision may be made under that subsection at any time during the 3 month period before the person’s expected release);
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows making of parole order despite requirement to refuse for life sentence cases
premise text: (c) in any case—if the State or Territory sentence is a life sentence for which a non-parole period has not been fixed.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19al-ss-4-logic-deontic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Permit
logic summary: Allows decision-making under subsection (1) during specified time period
premise text: (but a decision may be made under that subsection at any time during the 3 month period before the person’s expected release);
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AM Release on parole—when is a person released
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-19am
has part: 19AM(1) Release on parole—when is a person released
has part: 19AM(2) Release on parole—when is a person released
has part: 19AM(3) Release on parole—when is a person released
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.74

19AM(1) Release on parole—when is a person released
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1
part of: 19AM Release on parole—when is a person released
note: A person must be released from prison on parole in accordance with a parole order. Parole period starts and ends according to subsections (2) and (3)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.74
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-3

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AM(1) Release on parole—when is a person released
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must be released on parole
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: starts
logic summary: Parole period starts
premise text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-1-logic-deontic-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: ends
logic summary: Parole period ends
premise text: (3)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AM(2) Release on parole—when is a person released
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2
part of: 19AM Release on parole—when is a person released
note: A person must certify acceptance of parole conditions. A person must be released from prison on parole if they are eligible for release under subsection (1) but were imprisoned for a State or Territory offence on the day of eligibility.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.74
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AM(2) Release on parole—when is a person released
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide certification
premise text: The person certifies on the parole order (or a copy of the order) that he or she accepts the conditions to which the order is subject.
conclusion text: The person must certify acceptance of parole conditions.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MUST
logic summary: Must provide release on parole
premise text: (2) However, if the person is imprisoned for a State or Territory offence...
conclusion text: ...the person must be released from prison on parole in accordance with the parole order...
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: >=
logic summary: Release on parole occurs after imprisonment for a State or Territory offence
premise text: (2) However, if the person is imprisoned for a State or Territory offence...
conclusion text: ...the person must be released from prison on parole in accordance with the parole order...
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-2-logic-linearlogic-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LinearLogic
operator: =>
logic summary: Release on parole implies compliance with parole order
premise text: (2) However, if the person is imprisoned for a State or Territory offence...
conclusion text: ...the person must be released from prison on parole in accordance with the parole order...
execution surface: modalities::linear
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

19AM(3) Release on parole—when is a person released
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-19am-ss-3
part of: 19AM Release on parole—when is a person released
note: A person must not be released from prison on parole unless they certify acceptance of the conditions. Release on parole—when is a person released
description: Certification of acceptance of conditions
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.74
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-3-norm
type: Prohibition
modality: Deontic
part of: 19AM(3) Release on parole—when is a person released
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-19am-ss-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: MustNot
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Paragraph 19AN(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-7
note: Omit specific phrase from parole order
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.75
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-7-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified phrase
premise text: Omitting the phrase would be incorrect
conclusion text: The phrase must not be omitted
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

8 Subsection 19AN(2)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-8
note: Prohibit modifying certain conditions of a parole order.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-8-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-8-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-8-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: forbid
logic summary: Prohibition
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

9 Paragraph 19AP(6)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-9
note: Specify supervision conditions for released persons.
description: Supervision period end day
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-9-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-9-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-9-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 9 Paragraph 19AP(6)(b)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-9-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Specify conditions for released persons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 0.5000
curation status: Proposed

10 Paragraph 19AP(7)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-10
note: Omit specific phrase from subsection (6)
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-10-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-10-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-10-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specific phrase
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

11 Subsection 19AP(8)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-11
note: Prohibit varying or revoking a condition of the licence, imposing additional conditions on the licence, and changing the day on which the supervision period ends.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-11-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-11-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-11-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibition of actions
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

12 Application of amendments
type: Concept
realized by: sch-7-sec-12
note: Amendments apply in relation to a licence granted under section 19AP of the amended law at or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.76
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-logic-descriptionlogic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-2
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-3
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-logic-ltl-4

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-logic-descriptionlogic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies a provision as an Undertaking
premise text: The text describes the application of amendments in relation to a licence.
conclusion text: The amendments apply in relation to a licence granted under section 19AP of the amended law at or after commencement.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-logic-deontic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Classifies a provision as an Undertaking
premise text: The text describes the application of amendments in relation to a licence.
conclusion text: The amendments apply in relation to a licence granted under section 19AP of the amended law at or after commencement.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-logic-alleninterval-3
type: LogicApplication
modality: AllenInterval
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the commencement and the application of amendments.
premise text: The text states that the amendments apply in relation to a licence granted under section 19AP of the amended law at or after commencement.
conclusion text: The commencement is related to the application of amendments by an interval of [insert duration].
execution surface: modalities::interval_reasoning
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-7-sec-12-logic-ltl-4
type: LogicApplication
modality: LTL
operator: Applicable
logic summary: Describes the temporal relationship between the parole order and the release of a federal offender.
premise text: The text states that the Attorney-General will be required to reconsider making a parole order for the person within 12 months of the commencement.
conclusion text: The parole order is related to the release of a federal offender by an interval of [insert duration].
execution surface: modalities::temporal_ltl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Paragraph 15A(1)(b)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-1
note: Insertion of '(if any)' after 'the modifications'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-1-norm

2 Paragraphs 15A(1AB)(a), (b), (c) and (d)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-2
note: Repeal paragraphs
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-2-norm

3 Paragraph 15A(1AB)(g)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-3
note: Omit specified words.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Prohibit
logic summary: Prohibits omission of specified words.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Before subsection 15A(1AD)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-4
note: Enforcement of penalty without court application
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-4-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-4-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-4-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 4 Before subsection 15A(1AD)
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-4-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposing obligation on state
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

5 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-5
note: Amendment applies in relation to orders made before, on or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-5-norm

6 Pending applications to court
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-6
note: Application withdrawal on commencement
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.78
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-6-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-6-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 6 Pending applications to court
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-6-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligate
logic summary: Application withdrawal on commencement
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-6-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: hasPart
logic summary: Class hierarchy
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

7 Authority for past actions taken to enforce fines etc.
type: Concept
realized by: sch-8-sec-7
note: Authority for past actions taken to enforce fines etc.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.79
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-7-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-7-norm
type: Obligation
modality: Deontic
part of: 7 Authority for past actions taken to enforce fines etc.
borne by: State
scope note: borne by: State
deontic status: HeuristicDerived
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-7-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: hasPower
logic summary: Person or authority had the power to take action
premise text: (2)
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-8-sec-7-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: isDefinedBy
logic summary: Definition of old law
premise text: (3)
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

1 Subsection 175(3)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-1-3
note: Substitute '7 years' for '5 years'
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.80
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-1-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-1-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Imposes an obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

2 Application
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-2-3
note: Amendment applies to persons appointed or re-appointed as Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner before, on, or after commencement.
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.80
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-2-3-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-2-3-logic-deontic-1
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-2-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-2-3-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: Obligation
logic summary: Obligation to apply amendment to specified persons.
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-2-3-logic-descriptionlogic-2
type: LogicApplication
modality: DescriptionLogic
operator: ClassInclusion
logic summary: Class inclusion: Amendment applies to persons appointed or re-appointed as Law Enforcement Integrity Commissioner.
execution surface: modalities::dl
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

4 Apr 2012
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-4-7
note: List of schedules and items
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.84
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-4-7-norm

25 June 2012 (s 2(1) item
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-25-2
note: Does not commence
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.84
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-25-2-norm
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1

crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-25-2-logic-deontic-1
type: LogicApplication
modality: Deontic
operator: not
logic summary: Negative obligation
execution surface: modalities::logic::deontic
confidence: 1.0000
curation status: Proposed

22 Sept
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-22
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.84
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-22-norm

5 Apr 2012 (s 2(1)
type: Concept
realized by: sch-9-sec-5-11
note: Conditional commencement of Schedule 2
curation status: Proposed
schema version: 2
proposed by: legis2cml
source: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012.pdf, p.84
asserts: crimes-legislation-amendment-powers-and-offences-act-2012-sch-9-sec-5-11-norm